M/s. Ashok International rep., by its Managing Director.
State of A.P. and others.
involved. Hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment.
construction of godowns and for creation of other facilities around the Port.
interfering with their possession over the property.
the defendants. referring the matters to arbitration.
arbitration and thereby, indirectly terminating the suits.
that the trial Court has taken the correct view of the matter.
and their relationship is governed by the lease deeds executed in the year 1996.
commencement of the tenancy by the Lessee with the Lessor.
plaintiffs to file the suits.
the agreement cannot be maintained and it stands barred by Section 8 of the Act.
agreement, that the matter shall be referred to arbitration.
evident from paragraph 4 of the counter affidavit filed before this Court.
arising out of their action can be treated as the one referable to lease deed.
the prayer in the suits.
subject however to payment of rents.
situation obtains in this case.
framing a preliminary issue as to the maintainability of the suits.
aside. As a result, the applications filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C.
amount shall be subject to the outcome of the suits.
stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.