Although Massimo Faggioli was born in Italy and did his doctoral work in Tübingen, he has become the most important Catholic political thinker in the United States today. The founding director of the Institute for Catholicism and Citizenship at the University of St. Thomas in St. Paul, he now teaches theology and religious studies at Villanova. Above all, Faggioli seeks to spark Catholic leaders to new ways of engaging with a world in crisis by reminding them of the promises of Vatican II.
This book takes on new urgency given the collapse of moral authority in our government at the highest levels. Faggioli finished writing it two weeks after the presidential election last year, and he mentions Trump only once. That election might add a third "seismic shift" to the post–Vatican II church beyond the two he mentions: 9/11 and the church's sexual abuse scandal. The first redefined the boundaries between church and state, leaving an opportunity for the pope and others to become more influential world figures. The second, in contrast, "had a christening and humiliating effect on the self-awareness of the Catholic Church," not unlike occasions in past centuries when the world insisted that the church reform itself and be held accountable by its standards.
The primary focus of the book is on Gaudium et spes, the most important Vatican II document on the church's identity. This emphasis is timely since Pope Francis repeatedly evokes Gau­dium et spes as a "manifesto of a new theological method and a new ecclesiological orientation," to use Faggioli's words.
The term movement in this context connects well the two meanings of Catholic movimentism in the last century and half: a Catholic movement with the political connotations of a social-political movement vis-à-vis the institutional status quo and political power (which is relevant for the political role of Catholic movimentism in political history, especially in Europe and in the Americas), and a Catholic movement moved by the spiritual-theological idea of the church of Christ as a movement as opposed to the ecclesial and theological status quo (which is important to understand how the Second Vatican Council came about and how it was not an operation made possible only by a few hundred bishops and theologians gathered in Rome between 1962 and 1965).
He seems to be saying here that Cath­olics are adept at starting, and overwhelmed with continuing, movements in the church. Among other things.
Nevertheless, Faggioli is the most articulate interpreter of American Cath­oli­cism today. Conversant with Italian, German, and English sources and scholars, he understands the American situation in its complexities as perhaps only a nonnative could.
He states, for instance, that the Amer­ican Catholic Church has become "more plural but less pluralistic," and he explains: "There are many different ways of being Catholic today, but Catholics (especially those who consider themselves true be­lievers, especially the new inquisition called Catholic bloggers) have become less able to accept these different ways." He urges Catholics to move beyond old paradigms such as "hegemony or persecution" and toward the challenges of "church as community versus church in society" as they come to terms with what sort of relationship they want to have with their non-Catholic neighbors.
Faggioli sounds alarms better than anyone today, not simply in his books but also on social media. He warns of the effects of our current era of "a liberal-progressive Catholic Americanism [that] exists side-by-side with and yet opposed to a traditionalist-conservative Catholic Ameri­can­ism." An advocate for the liberal-progressive understanding of both Vati­can II and the purpose of the church, Faggioli makes clear that the tug-of-war between liberals and traditionalists has led to confusion and worse.
The hierarchy of Amer­ican Catholi­cism has, since at least the 1980s, become "overwhelmed by the challenge of biopolitics (the 'life issues' in particular) much more than by [our] . . . rapidly collapsing social fabric," he argues. Not since 1986 have the U.S. bishops clearly addressed injustices in the economy.