Oh rafa could definitely get to it and even surpass it. But the h2h is biased with many losses coming on clay, but it's a debate done to death. The poster stated that novak and rafa will be known as greater once they are retired. Simply wrong.
I've literally just explained how it could. If they chase down his 20 and have superior h2h they could well be considered greater when it's all done.
Stop going to the net, Medvedev. Damn..
It was always going to be unfair to someone. The linesman shat the bed. It wasnt even close, nor was it "needed".
I have never been a linesman, never will be. So this is very much as an "expert" talking absolute crap. But surely if there was any doubt there, any at all, you stay silent. I get it, you call it how you see it, and i am talking crap but Kei was going to win the point so why yell out.
It's a hard job to do, highly prone to error.
Brilliant point. Was gone for all money.
Djokovic has the break in the third.
If djokovic wins 7 grand slam titles post the age of 31, that would be the most ever won by a player after that age. Sure, it's technically possible. List of things are possible. Doesn't mean it will happen.
Once again the poster stated that at the end of their careers, Novak and rafa will be known as much greater than Federer. I stand by the statement that that is an atrocious call.
Medvedev sitting there wondering wtf just happened.
Medvedev is a baseline grinder and that's it, is horrible up at net and showing any sort of variety but because his style is slightly unusual it's thrown Novak off a bit. Just needs to up the ante in the rallies does Novak and he should get this done even if it's a little bit tougher than he expected.
I'd say if the game score gets to 10-10 or something in the 5th, then go to a super. Rarely do games get that far anyway.
And he said they will be known as the best. It could happen, almost certainly should for Rafa.
They can claim to be much greater if they get to 21 slams?
Go back and show us where he said much greater.
"Nadal and Novak will well and truly be known as the best when they are done"
Fed fanbois last 10 years "Grand Slam titles is everything h2h doesnt matter he's the greatest."
Now moving on to "H2H and Grand Slams irrelevant, its weeks at number one that count."
Rodger has been an absolute bloody legend for a very long time. It's not blasphemy to suggest players could end up being regarded better than him though.
He gets to 20 and with a superior h2h you'll still think Fed is the better player?