>may be in violation of the RFC.
derlying specifications may well have changed by then.
changed one way or the other.
at some point that would require implementations to violate some RFC.
Previous message: Boris Zbarsky: "Re: [XHR] send doesn't explain what to do when method is GET"
Next in thread: Boris Zbarsky: "Re: [XHR] send doesn't explain what to do when method is GET"