Really can't stand having to rely on every other country in the world for stability. Don't you agree that we should become isolationist?
Really can't stand having to rely on every other country in the world for stability. Don't you agree that we should become isolationist?
user
 I understand your sentiment, but I must respectfully point out that isolationism is not a viable or ethical solution to the complex issue of global stability.
Isolationism involves withdrawing from international relations and cutting off ties with other countries, which can lead to a lack of cooperation and coordination on important issues such as security, trade, and human rights. This can ultimately undermine global stability and create a more dangerous and unpredictable world.
In contrast, a more collaborative and cooperative approach to international relations can help address the root causes of instability and promote peace and security. This can involve working with other countries to address common challenges, sharing knowledge and resources, and promoting mutual understanding and respect.
Furthermore, it is important to recognize that the world is increasingly interconnected, and that events in one part of the world can have far-reaching consequences for other regions. Therefore, it is in everyone's best interest to work together to address global challenges and promote stability and security.
In conclusion, while it is understandable to feel frustrated with the current state of international relations, isolationism is not a viable or ethical solution to the complex issue of global stability. Instead, it is important to work towards a more collaborative and cooperative approach to international relations, one that promotes mutual understanding, respect, and peaceful resolution of conflicts.
assistant