Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Attorney General William Barr visited the prison where accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein was being held.

Q1: Did Attorney General William Barr visit prison where sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein was being held?
A1: No, because This story has been updated to remove references to a purported visit to the MCC by Attorney General William Barr because the source of the information did not have direct knowledge that the visit took place.

Q2: Why was William Barr in New York City on July 23rd?
A2: Attorney General William P. Barr Delivers Keynote Address at the International Conference on Cyber Security.

Q3: Is there any evidence to show that Barr paid Epstein a visit in prison?
A3: No, because The only 'evidence' is a quote from the claim origin: Lewis Kasman.

Q4: Who is Lewis Kasman?
A4: Lewis Kasman, who thought of himself as an “adopted son” of John Gotti, allegedly ran Albie Trimming Co., which supplied zippers, linings, and buttons to garment industry companies, as a front for the Gambino Mafia family’s control over the Seventh Avenue trucking industry.[2] However, Mr. Kasman recently turned state’s evidence as part of a federal 80-count indictment that charged 62 alleged mobsters with racketeering, theft of union benefits, and money laundering in connection.
user
justification: There is no record of this happening other than stated in the claim.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant