Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Russia has a lower prison population than America because of the presence of telephone justice in Russia

Q1: What was the USA Prison population in 2019?
A1: 1,430,800 at year-end 2019
(page 1 of source)

Q2: What was the Russian prison population in 2019?
A2: 455,514 people were serving their sentences in correctional colonies in Russia

Q3: What is telephone justice?
A3: telephone justice – the practice of powerful individuals calling judges to instruct them on what verdicts to deliver

Q4: What affect has telephone justice had on Russian incarcerations?
A4: No answer could be found.

Q5: Why does Russia have a low number of people in prison?
A5: No answer could be found.

Q6: Does the United States have a high rate of people in prison?
A6: Year after year, the United States beats out much larger countries – India, China – and more totalitarian ones –Russia and the Philippines – for the distinction of having the highest incarceration rate in the world.

According to a 2018 report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), nearly 2.2 million adults were held in America’s prisons and jails at the end of 2016. That means for every 100,000 people residing in the United States, approximately 655 of them were behind bars.

Q7: Why does the United States have more people in prison?
A7: - Most inmates are held in state prisons and local jails – not federal prisons.

-In many cities and states, money often decides who stays in jail and who gets out.

- Once you’re in the criminal justice system, it’s often difficult to get out.

Q8: Is the presence of telephone justice in Russia problematic?
A8: In the Russian Federation, judges remain prone to undue influence. A 2010 ICJ mission learned that the phenomenon of “telephone justice” remained widespread: reportedly, judges are often – as a matter of routine – directly instructed by the court president how to resolve a specific case. The ICJ’s interlocutors also stressed the fact that as judges are aware of the expectations of a particular outcome in a case over which they preside regardless of the evidence, there is often no need to give direct instructions. Furthermore when such expectations are not met, a judicial decision may be overturned or not implemented and the judge may face discipline as a result of having issued an “erroneous” decision. Two types of cases, in which “telephone justice” is particularly prevalent, were singled out: criminal cases for conduct considered to be terrorism-related and cases related to the exercise of the rights to freedom of expression or peaceful assembly.[15]
user
justification: The claim is correct about the US having a larger prison population than Russia, However there is no link to the reason for it being down solely to telephone justice in Russia 

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant