Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: US senators being consulted about circuit court judicial nominees in their home states was a long standing requirement.

Q1: Are US senators involved in the circuit court judicial nominees process
A1: . After a President selects a nominee for a U.S. circuit or district court 
judgeship, the chairman sends a blue-colored form to the Senators representing the home state of 
the nominee. The form seeks the home state Senators’ assessment of the nominee. If a home state 
Senator has no objection to a nominee, the blue slip is returned to the chairman with a positive 
response. If, however, a home state Senator objects to a nominee, the blue slip is either withheld 
or returned with a negative response

Q2: how is a negative blue slip interpreted
A2: If a negative blue slip is received, the chairman may take the following actions
on the nominee: (1) stop all committee proceedings; (2) move forward but give added
weight to the unfavorable review; or (3) proceed without notice of the negative
review. Since the late 1970s, the committee has generally used the latter two actions
when dealing with a negative blue slip

Q3: how long has the blue slip been in use
A3: From
research conducted at the National Archives, evidence suggests that the blue-slip
procedure began sometime in the mid- to late 1910s under the chairmanship of
Senator Charles A. Culberson of Texas.1

Q4: why is the blue slip important
A4: This tradition comes from the practice of reserving circuit court positions for each
state to ensure proportional or equal state representation for each circuit.10 The
President is often effectively required by this tradition to select a circuit court
nominee from the state of the retiring judge
user
justification: Confirmed as a requirement since the 1910s in QA pair.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant