Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Bombardier to open rail car assembly plant in the USA due to Trump’s reduced corporate tax rate.

Q1: Is Bombardier opening a new plant in California
A1: Bombardier is set to open a rail car assembly site in Pittsburg, California, to support its ongoing rail projects in the US.

The official announcement was made by Bombardier Transportation Americas Division president Elliot G (Lee) Sander.

Q2: Why is Bombardier opening a plant in California
A2: In addition to creating and retaining local jobs in Pittsburg, California, the move will enable the New York site to prepare for the upcoming East Coast orders
user
justification: Seems the plant was opened for assembly not due to reduced ta  rate. Therefore the claim is refuted

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant