Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: In 2008 the US Congress gave Wall Street trillions of dollars of zero interest loans.

Q1: What happened in the US in 2007/8?
A1: The Great Recession.
Bank loans were going sour. Bank stock prices were in free fall. Big-name firms were outright failing or on the brink.

As the housing bubble popped and the most severe financial crisis since the Great Depression tightened its grip on the US economy, the situation swiftly became an all-hands-on-deck state of affairs for the Federal Reserve, which supervises bank holding companies and state member banks to ensure they're safe and sound.

Q2: What is this claim based on?
A2: Federal Reserve's 'astounding' report: We loaned banks trillions
The Federal Reserve offers details on the loans it gave to banks and others at the height of the financial crisis. One program alone doled out nearly $9 trillion.

Q3: What did the Federal Bank do to combat the Great Recession?
A3: The emergency liquidity programs that the Federal Reserve set up provided secured and mostly short-term loans.
The Federal Reserve also provided credit to several systemically important financial institutions. These actions were taken to avoid the disorderly failure of these institutions and the potential catastrophic consequences for the U.S. financial system and economy. All extensions of credit were fully secured and are in the process of being fully repaid.
Finally, the Federal Reserve provided economic stimulus by lowering interest rates. Over the course of the crisis, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) reduced its target for the federal funds rate to a range of 0 to 1/4 percent.

Q4: Were the interest rates zero?
A4: No, because Interest rates were very low, but not at zero.
user
justification: Intreset rate were low but not St zero 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant