Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Donald Trump claimed that Biden's mandate for net zero carbon emissions for home, offices and new buildings would mean no windows.

Q1: What is Joe Biden's net zero carbon emissions plan by 2030?
A1: The Biden administration has committed to reduce those emissions 50% by 2030 below 2005 levels. That’s a critical first step of a global energy transition that must achieve net-zero emissions by midcentury to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 F) and thereby avert the worst impacts of climate change.

Q2: What is the specific buildings plan?
A2: A net-zero emissions building portfolio by 2045, including a 50 percent emissions reduction by 2032.

Q3: Does net-zero mean having no windows in buildings?
A3: Net-zero really has nothing to say about whether you can have windows or not. As can be seen in the photo above, this important net-zero building has lots of windows.
user
justification: This claim is refuted. According to the QA pairs, there is quite literally nothing in Biden's mandate that means "no windows" to combat carbon emissions. The mandate explains that emissions need to be reduced by 50% to pre-2005 levels. There was not a single mention of "no windows" anywhere as the claim states. Therefore, this claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant