Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a "European Climate Declaration" to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

Q1: How many of the 500 signatures are scientists?
A1: Amber Kerr, Researcher, Agricultural Sustainability Institute, University of California, Davis:
While reviewing the claims related to agriculture, I noted that only 26 out of the 506 signatories (5%) were professionals in biology, ecology, or environmental science. I suspect that the vast majority of signatories had little direct knowledge or understanding of this part of the petition that they signed.

Q2: What were the prevalent fields of expertise within the signatures?
A2: The most prevalent groups of signatories were geologists (19%) and engineers (21%)—many of whom were implicitly or explicitly involved in fossil energy extraction. Most of the rest were physicists, chemists, and mathematicians.

Q3: How many signatures were not scientists?
A3: 11.3%

Q4: Were there any signatories with credentials?
A4: Yes, because “Peter Champness, Radiologist, Australia”; “Patrick Mellett, architect and CEO”; and “Fintan Ryan, Retired Senior Airline Captain” (to say nothing of the dozens and dozens of fossil fuel employees)

Q5: How many of the signatories are scientists?
A5: Amber Kerr, Researcher, Agricultural Sustainability Institute, University of California, Davis:
While reviewing the claims related to agriculture, I noted that only 26 out of the 506 signatories (5%) were professionals in biology, ecology, or environmental science. I suspect that the vast majority of signatories had little direct knowledge or understanding of this part of the petition that they signed.

Q6: What did the media report about the claim that more than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a 'European Climate Declaration' to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.?
A6: The Washington Times - Sunday, September 29, 2019 published an article on the event.

Scientists tell U.N. Global Climate Summit: No emergency

Climate Intelligence Foundation calls for UN meeting with experts from both sides of debate

 ....last week’s U.N. Global Climate Summit were the 500 international scientists, engineers and other stakeholders sounding a very different message: “There is no climate emergency.”

The signers asked Mr. Guterres to place the declaration on the UN’s agenda for the meeting ending Monday—which hasn’t happened—and organize a meeting of scientists “on both sides of the climate debate early in 2020.”

Q7: Who was responsible for the declaration letter?
A7: The European Climate Declaration was spearheaded by the Amsterdam-based Climate Intelligence Foundation [CLINTEL].

Q8: What credibility has been placed on the declaration?
A8: The letter has been criticized by six scientists who claim that its credibility is very low. One complaint is that most of the 500 are not experts in "climate science."
user
justification: Evidence shows that the 500 aren't even experts in climate change and according to a source the credibility is low 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant