Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: U.S. aid dollars sent to Ukraine under Biden’s supervision went toward Burisma, where Biden’s son Hunter was a board member.

Q1: Did the USA send aid to Ukraine whilst Joe Biden was vice president.
A1: The United States disbursed about $1.28 billion to Ukraine between 2014 and 2016

Q2: Was Hunter Biden a board member of Ukrainian energy company 'Burisma'
A2: Hunter Biden was appointed to the board of Burisma.

Q3: Did hunter Biden use his position to secure US government funds for energy company burisma?
A3: Ukraine’s top prosecutor said his office is reviewing several cases related to the owner of a gas company where the son of former Vice President Joe Biden sat on the board, but he added that he wasn’t aware of any evidence of wrongdoing by either Joe or Hunter Biden.

Q4: Is there proof that U.S. aid money went to Burisma?
A4: No answer could be found.

Q5: Did Burisma receive U.S. funds?
A5: No answer could be found.

Q6: Is there a Burisma legal case regarding Hunter Biden?
A6: No, because Ukrainian officials say the inquiry into alleged improprieties at Burisma has never been completely closed.

“The Burisma case is still there; it’s up and down,” a senior Ukrainian official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. “But the Burisma case and a Hunter Biden case are totally different things, and the latter simply does not exist.”
user
justification: There is nothing to prove that the aid went through Burisma 

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant