Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Condoleezza Rice summed up the Democratic Party in 75 words.

Q1: What were the 75 words?
A1: f you are taught bitterness and anger, then you will believe you are a victim. You will feel aggrieved and the twin brother of aggrievement is entitlement. So now you think you are owed something and you don’t have to work for it and now you’re on a really bad road to nowhere because there are people who will play to that sense of victimhood, aggrievement and entitlement, and you still won’t have a job.”

Q2: Did Condoleezza Rice  say these words?
A2: No, because Similar words were said, "My fellow Americans, ours has never been a narrative of grievance and entitlement. We have never believed that I am doing poorly because you are doing well. We have never been jealous of one another and never envious of each other’s successes. No, no, ours has been a belief of opportunity. And it has been a constant struggle, long and hard, up and down, to try to extend the benefits of the American dream to all."

Q3: were those words aimed at democratic party
A3: No, because it is clear that she was advocating for Republican candidates in both speeches.
user
justification: Condoleezza Rice was advocating for Republican candidates in her speeches. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant