Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Poland has had no terror attacks.

Q1: How is a terror attack defined?
A1: A terror attack is intentional threats or acts of violence perpetrated by non-state actors. The act must be aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal. There must be evidence of an intention to coerce, intimidate, or convey some other message to a larger audience (or audiences) than the immediate victims.
The action must be outside the context of legitimate warfare activities.

Q2: Has Poland suffered terror attacks before the date of this article?
A2: Yes, because There were three terror attacks in Poland, two in 2016 and one in 2017.
user
justification: A record of terror attacks in Poland exists.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant