Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: AN 11-YEAR-OLD GIRL KILL TWO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS DURING AN ATTEMPTED HOME INVASION

Q1: Where does the story of an 11 year old girl shooting dead 2 illegal immigrants who burgled her home likely originate from ?
A1: The bogus story has been circulating for the past year on Internet blogs and Web sites concerning a girl shooting two men who broke into her Butte home in November 2006.

Q2: Has any official declared that the story of an 11 year old girl shooting dead 2 illegal immigrant burglars is fake?
A2: When asked about the authenticity of the events described in this story, Butte-Silver Bow Sheriff John Walsh told The Montana Standard in an earlier interview that his office never investigated such an incident.

“This never happened,” Walsh said.

Q3: Is the story about an 11-year-old Montana girl who killed two illegal immigrants during an attempted home invasion?
A3: No, because There was no Ralphel Resindez, there was no Enrico Garza, and despite her elevation to heroine status with some gun rights groups, there was no little girl name Patricia who bravely defended her home with her father's shotgun.

"This never happened," Butte-Silver Bow County Sheriff John Walsh told the Montana Standard, a few years back.

"It's amazing how these things get around," he said.
user
justification: this story has been refuted by local law enforcement,

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant