Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Marriott International effectively denied employees unemployment and health benefits by saying the company had not laid them off, instead putting them on a zero-hour schedule?

Q1: Has hotel giant Marriott International effectively denied employees unemployment and health benefits by saying the company had not laid them off, instead putting them on a zero-hour schedule?
A1: No, The Health benefits remained and the workers were furloughed, HOWEVER many workers who were furloughed were not paid and some were laid off.

Q2: Did the Marriot pay health benefits to the laid off workers
A2: They won't be paid their salaries during their time away from the company, but they will receive health care benefits.
user
justification: It seems that some were aid off from the QA, however there is nothing on zero-hour contracts, therefore the claim is refuted

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant