Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The state of California admitted in a court settlement that a million people voted improperly in the US elections in 2019.

Q1: What happens to an inactive voter?
A1: a State may remove a registrant who "(i) has failed to
respond to a notice" and "(ii) has not voted or appeared to vote ...
during the period beginning on the date of the notice and ending on
the day after the date of the second general election for Federal office
that occurs after the date of the notice" (about four years). 52 U. S. C.
§20507(d)(l)(B). Not only are States allowed to remove registrants
who satisfy these requirements, but federal law makes this removal
mandatory.

Q2: What is the US Federal law regarding inactive voters?
A2: The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) is a federal law requiring the removal of inactive registrations from the voter rolls after two general federal elections (encompassing from 2 to 4 years).

Q3: What are the main reasons that voters become inactive?
A3: Inactive voter registrations belong, for the most part, to voters who have moved to another county or state or have passed away.

Q4: What was the situation regarding registered voters in the County of Los Angeles  in January 2019?
A4: Los Angeles County had the highest number of inactive registrations of any single county in the US, with more voter registrations on its voter rolls than it had citizens old enough to register. This means that more than one out of every five LA County registrations likely belongs to a voter who has moved or is deceased.

Q5: What was the federal lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch against California in the 2019 US elections about?
A5: In its lawsuit, Judicial Watch alleged:

Los Angeles County has more voter registrations on its voter rolls than it has citizens who are old enough to register.  Specifically, according to data provided to and published by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Los Angeles County has a registration rate of 112 percent of its adult citizen population.

The entire State of California has a registration rate of about 101 percent of its age-eligible citizenry.

Eleven of California’s 58 counties have registration rates exceeding 100 percent of the age-eligible citizenry.

Q6: What did the federal lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch against California in the 2019 US elections confirm?
A6: The lawsuit confirmed that Los Angeles County has on its rolls more than 1.5 million potentially ineligible voters. This means that more than one out of every five LA County registrations likely belongs to a voter who has moved or is deceased. Judicial Watch notes that “Los Angeles County has the highest number of inactive registrations of any single county in the country.”

The Judicial Watch lawsuit also uncovered that neither the State of California nor Los Angeles County had been removing inactive voters from the voter registration rolls for the past 20 years. The Supreme Court affirmed last year in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Inst., 138 S. Ct. 1833 (2018) that the NVRA “makes this removal mandatory.”

Q7: Do inactive voter registrations count as a vote?
A7: No, because These voters do not automatically receive a mail ballot in each election. They are still eligible to vote by visiting a Voter Service and Polling Center during election time, or they can contact the Elections Division to find out more information about how to reactivate their record.
user
justification: The Q&As show that although California had a lot of inactive voters, there is no evidence to show that they voted improperly in the US elections, so the claim is refuted. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant