Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Michigan Senator Gary Peters is known for doing nothing, where he has skipped 84% of small business hearings and 89% of hearings on China.

Q1: In 2019, how many votes did Sen Peters miss in the house
A1: He missed none of them

Q2: Out of 85 Senators, how many other senators had the same record as Gary Peters
A2: Only 15 senators had the same record

Q3: In the 2017-2018 yeat, what was Senator Gary Peter's ranking
A3: He ranked as the 4th most effective

Q4: How many small business committee meetings and China panel meetings did Sen Gary Peters miss
A4: No answer could be found.
user
justification: Its clear from the Q&As that the senator has a good track record and is not known for doing nothing. Its not confirmed about the % of hearings missed, but it seems from his ranking this would not be true

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant