Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Prime Minister Narendra Modi has “inducted” 22-year-old Prathap NM from Karnataka, who builds drones from e-wastes, into the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).

Q1: Who did PM Narendra Modi induct into the Defence Research and Development Service
A1: No answer could be found.

Q2: Can PM Modi induct someone into the DRDO
A2: Every year RAC recruits Scientists in DRDS mostly at entry level (Scientist 'B'). However, depending on the requirements in specialized areas of research & development, limited number of scientists are also recruited in higher grades (Scientist 'C' to Scientist 'H').
user
justification: There is no evidence shown below to support or refute the claim about the specific person Prathap NM being inducted into the DRDO therefore I can not make a decision.

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant