Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: It's against the law for Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices.

Q1: Can Medicare negotiate for drug prices
A1: Medicare, which insures more than 60 million beneficiaries, doesn't have that power, mostly because Congress stopped it from getting the best drug prices years ago

Q2: What law stops Medicare from negotiating prices and as such use middlemen in their drug purchase
A2: Medicare Modernization Act. Among other things, it put corporate Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) in charge of acquiring drugs through Medicare's "Part D" plan.
user
justification: The second answer and source show info about the law that stops medicare negotiating prices so the claim is supported.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant