Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Russia violated South Korean airspace

Q1: Did any neutral countries have an opinion on what happened?
A1: Japan meanwhile has protested against both Russia and South Korea.

Because it claims sovereignty over the islands, Japan's government said that Russia had violated its airspace. It also said that South Korea's response was extremely regrettable.

Q2: What are the defence zones of South Korea ?
A2: South Korea claims Russia went beyond its ADIZ (air defence identification zone ) and into the territorial airspace surrounding the islands.

But other nations do not recognise South Korea's claim of sovereignty.
user
justification: Q1 is too vague and "opinions" aren't facts. I'm not sure that Japan could be considered a "neutral country".
Q2 A question about  air defence identification zones would have been better but even then the question doesn't specifically address the claim.

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant