Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A proposed $4.6 billion US emergency aid bill wasn’t humanitarian.

Q1: What was the $4.6 billion US emergency aid bill intended for?
A1: The $4.6 billion bipartisan humanitarian aid bill was intended to provide shelter and care for unaccompanied children, and providing care in licensed shelters and expanding the supplies of shelters.

Q2: Is some of the bill providing non-humanitarian funding?
A2: Yes, because It included money for the military and department of justice too.

Q3: Is the bill humanitarian?
A3: Yes, because As the largest portion of the funding is for Health and Human services, which is humanitarian.
user
justification: Some of the aid in the bill the claim refers too was for military, but as mostly humanitarian aid so as the claim is absolutist then it is wholly wrong

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant