Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: When the Coalition came to power, it inherited a 755 million tonne emissions deficit needed to reach Australia's second Kyoto target because Labor hadn't done the hard work.

Q1: Has the greenhouse gas emmission turned around by 1.1 billion tonnes under Angus Taylor ?
A1: Mr Taylor's claim is misleading. It found that actual emissions under Labor in 2013 were significantly lower than had been anticipated a year earlier.Meanwhile, emissions under the Coalition have risen for four of the past five years, and are higher today than they were in 2013.

According to the department's latest predictions, they will be higher still in 2020, under current policy assumptions
user
justification: The answer and source show that they did not inherit that deficit so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant