Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Russian Energy Narrative Targets Poland, Ukraine and the Baltic States

Q1: Why is Ukraine adverse to Russian energy
A1: The Nord Stream 2 infrastructure would enable Gazprom to cut Ukraine out of gas transit traffic, which could cost the country about $2 billion in transit fees (the equivalent of nearly 6 percent of its projected budget for 2018). Revenues aside, as Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki recently stated in Berlin, the real danger lies in the fact that Russia can launch a massive land offensive against Ukraine without fear of damaging Ukraine’s pipeline infrastructure and interrupting Gazprom’s exports to Western countries.

Q2: why is Poland adverse to Russian energy
A2: The General Court next examines Poland’s argument that the 2016 decision breaches the principle 
of energy solidarity 8
in that it enables Gazprom and undertakings in the Gazprom group to redirect
additional volumes of gas onto the EU market by fully exploiting the capacities of the North Stream 
1 pipeline. Taking into account the lack of significant growth in demand for natural gas in central 
Europe, according to Poland, that would, as its only possible consequence, influence the 
conditions of supply and use of transmission services on the pipelines competing with OPAL. The 
General Court observes, in that regard, that that principle imposes not only obligations of mutual 
assistance where, for example following natural disasters or acts of terrorism, a Member State is in 
a critical or emergency situation as regards its gas supply, but also requires the European Union 
and the Member States to endeavour, in the exercise of their powers in the field of energy policy,
to avoid adopting measures likely to affect the interests of the EU and other Member States as 
regards security of supply, its economic and political viability, the diversification of supply or of 
sources of supply, and to do so in order to take account of their interdependence and de facto 
solidarity.
user
justification: From the Q&As you can see that Ukraine, Poland and the Ukraine are adverse to Russian Energy. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant