Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi approved $4.8 million in impeachment-related consulting fees to the Clinton Foundation.

Q1: Where was this claim posted?
A1: At the daily world update, a clearly labelled satire news site. The Daily World Update site is part of the "America's Last Line of Defense" network of satire websites. Self-professed liberal troll Christopher Blair runs those sites. The Maine resident works alongside a loose confederation of friends and allies. Blair has been in a feud with fact-checking website Snopes, and he has also criticized other fact-checkers who labeled his work "fake news" instead of satire. In reaction, he has recently rebranded all his active websites and Facebook pages, so they carry prominent disclaimers everywhere.

Q2: Did Pelosi approve 4.8 million in impeachment fees?
A2: The story is not true and is clearly labeled as satire. Pelosi did not approve these fees, and as a non-profit organization, the Clinton Foundation would not have the expertise to provide consultations on the impeachment hearings. President Trump was impeached by the House on December 18, 2019. Pelosi, as Speaker, has control over when the process is handed over to the Senate - a chamber she fears is not willing to hold a "fair" trial on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
user
justification: from the 2nd question and answer pair it seems that the claim is refuted

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant