Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: U.S., Germany and France have no educational requirement for the office of President.

Q1: What are the requirements of becoming a president according to the US constitution?
A1: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Q2: What are the requirements of becoming a president according to the German constitution?
A2: The Federal President shall be elected by the Federal Convention without debate. Any German who is entitled to vote in Bundestag elections and has attained the age of forty may be elected.

Q3: What are the requirements of becoming a president according to the French constitution?
A3: the French constitution states that a candidate for a presidential election is required to:

be a French citizen;
have attained the age of 18 years;
be qualified to vote;
not be ineligible by reasons of criminal conviction or judicial decision;
and have a bank account.
user
justification: The question-answer pairs establish the requirements for becoming President in the countries in the claim, and there is no mention of educational requirement in the answers.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant