Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A spray known as Miracle Mineral Solution can offer protection against coronavirus

Q1: What is Miracle Mineral Solution (MMS)?
A1: MMS consists of chlorine dioxide, a powerful bleach that is used both on textiles and in the industrial treatment of water.

Q2: Is Miracle Mineral Solution (MMS) an approved medical treatment?
A2: MMS has been banned in several countries around the world for use as a medical treatment.
In the US, the chemical cannot be sold for human consumption. In 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) put out a public warning after it was notified of many injuries to consumers from drinking the fluid, with symptoms that included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, severe dehydration and one person who had a life-threatening reaction.

Q3: Have authorities taken any action to stop Miracle Mineral Solution being promoted as a cure for COVID-19?
A3: Miracle Mineral Solution is perhaps the most prominent but not the only product targeted by the FDA in what it has dubbed Operation Quack Hack.  Since March, the FDA has issued 42 warning letters demanding that firms stop making false claims about preventing or treating Covid-19. 

“We are actively monitoring for any firms marketing products with fraudulent COVID-19 prevention and treatment claims,” the agency said, noting that it has discovered “hundreds of such products including fraudulent drugs, testing kits and personal protective equipment (PPE) sold online with unproven claims.”
user
justification: The third source shows that the solution can not protect against coronavirus so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant