Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: In the Republican tax bill, 83% of the benefits went to the top 1%.

Q1: In the Republican tax bill, did the 83% of the benefits went to the top 1%?
A1: There’s no question that the top 5 percent do the best by far under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. But in the early years, about half of the tax breaks go to the bottom 90 percent of taxpayers. It’s only later that the picture skews as hard toward the wealthiest, as Sanders said.

Q2: Who benefits most from tax break benefits?
A2: the benefits of the law would be heavily concentrated among the upper-middle and upper-class Americans, with nearly two-thirds of the benefit going to the richest fifth of Americans in 2018.

Q3: Who were the most tax cuts aimed at?
A3: corporate rate cuts mostly

Q4: Do lower earners benefit much from corporate tax cuts?
A4: corporate rate cuts mostly help Americans rich enough to own stock, that means that in 2027, poor and middle-class Americans would see a very mild tax increase on average:
user
justification: there seems to be conflicting evidence here, about half of the tax breaks to the bottom 90% but two-thirds of the benefit going to the richest fifth of Americans in 2018. So this is difficult to confirm 

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant