Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A phishing attack, that CERT-in issued a warning about, was sponsored by the Chinese army.

Q1: What was the CERT-In warning about?
A1: The Twitter post said that possible phishing attack is sponsored by the Chinese Army.

Q2: Who is sponsoring the potential phishing attacks?
A2: No answer could be found.

Q3: Was there a warning about an attack from Chinese cyberwarriors
A3: Yes, a twitter post shows a warning

Q4: Who is sponsoring this attack
A4: No answer could be found.
user
justification: There is not enough evidence in the Q&As to support or refute the claim. Questions would need to be asked whether the army had done this before or if there was an official statement from the army refuting the claim.

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant