Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Jamia Millia Islamia University students, Aysha Renna and Ladeeda Farzana, who have become the faces of the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act movement in India, are terrorist sympathisers.

Q1: Where did this allegation come from?
A1: According to reports, when social media users dug up the girls’ political and religious views, they found a Facebook post of Aysha condemning the hanging of the terrorist Yakub Memon.

Q2: What do the students say about this?
A2: In a media interview, Aysha says, “A lot of activists had different perspectives about Yakub Memon. So many of them were against his hanging. I’m a History student and have my own perspective. Indian Constitution allows me the right to speech and expression.”

She also says that her old posts are being used to propagate hatred and divert people’s attention from the right issues. She also added that she wouldn’t comment on her stand on the Yakub Memon issue right now and would want to concentrate on issues that are relevant right now.
user
justification: Based on she wouldn’t comment on her stand on the Yakub Memon issue 

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant