Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Ghislaine Maxwell tested positive for Covid-19 in jail.

Q1: Who is Ghislaine Maxwell?
A1: Ghislaine Maxwell was, according to her accusers, Jeffrey Epstein’s protector and procurer, his girlfriend and his madam. She was, by all accounts, a soul mate and a mirror image. He grew up in Brooklyn with no money to speak of and never finished college. She is Paris-born, Oxford-educated, a jet-setter who partied with princes and billionaires.

Together, Epstein and Maxwell allegedly built what prosecutors, police and a growing number of women described as a sex-trafficking operation that crisscrossed the nation to provide Epstein with three young girls a day.

Q2: Where did the article stating that Ghislaine Maxwell has tested positive for Covid-19 in jail occur?
A2: The Brown Valley Observer

Q3: Is the Brown Valley Observer a satirical news source?
A3: Yes, because This is an entertainment website written to satirize news events, politics, and popular faces and ideas, and to provide commentary on social attitudes and trends.
While familiar names of celebrities and other media figures as well as familiar agencies and organizations are used, all news stories contained within are fictional in nature. Most of the words and actions attributed to these figures are created entirely by the author, who has tiny, feminine hands, and who was once friend-zoned by his own sister.
The purpose of this site is to entertain. Failing that, we’ll settle for “bother” or “annoy”. We’re not a particularly proud publication.
Please do not attempt anything described in any of these articles, except under strict hip-hop supervision.
Similarities between events published here and any actual events involving pretty much anyone would really be a shame.
user
justification: The answers show that the claim was featured on a satirical website and is not true so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant