Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A 5G test in the Netherlands resulted in the death of 297 birds.

Q1: Were there any 5g tests taking place around the time of the birds deaths?
A1: This is not the case. 5G has not been tested in the vicinity of the park. (translated)

Q2: Were the birds tested to find the cause of death?
A2: esearchers at the Natural History Museum in Rotterdam and Wageningen University did autopsies on 15 of the starlings. From the birds’ internal injuries, the researchers concluded that they had probably died from hitting objects (possibly the ground, tree branches or each other) at great force.

The exact reason why the birds hit the objects is not known, but the university suggested that it may have been caused by panic due to a hunting owl or another disturbance.

The university confirmed that the official cause of death was bleeding as a result of trauma, but that tests also found traces of a toxin from the seeds of a berry starlings are known to eat. But it’s not known if the toxins played a part in their death.
user
justification: 1st QA confirms there have been no 5G tests in the park in The Hague where the birds were found dead - therefore could not be the cause of death.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant