Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Democrats are pushing for an implanted microchip in humans, and everyone to be vaccinated.

Q1: Do Democrats want to implant people with microchips ?
A1: No, 
There is a resolution that was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 1 "to authorize the secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID-19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes." But H.R. 6666 doesn’t mention microchips or suggest that people should or will be chipped if they’re tested for COVID-19.

Q2: Are Democrats aiming to get everyone vaccinated?
A2: No however the Supreme Court long ago decided that the government has that power. This authority is now used in all 50 states.
user
justification: It seems that there is no validity to the claim based on the 2nd QA, therefore it is refuted

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant