Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A man, Emdadur Choudhury, who burned poppies on Remembrance Day 2011 as a counter protest and was fined £50 under the Public Order Act, paid the fine by using his benefits.

Q1: On Remembrance Day 2011, did a man named Emdadur Choudhury burn poppies?
A1: Yes, because He was found guilty of burning poppies at a protest in west London on Armistice Day.

Q2: Was Emdadur Choudhury fined £50 for burning the poppies on Remembrance Day 2011?
A2: Yes, because Emdadur Choudhury, 26, of Spitalfields, east London, was fined £50 for offences under the Public Order Act.

Q3: How did Emdadur Choudhury pay for his £50 fine?
A3: The extremist told how radical Muslim cleric Anjem Choudary had offered to foot the bill

Q4: Was Emdadur Choudhury on state benefits?
A4: Yes, because Emdadur Choudhury receives £792 in benefits from the state.
user
justification: The !st and 2nd Q&A pair coroberate the part of the claim stating that the named man did commit the crime claimed but not the part about the fine which The 4th Q&A pair does state that the man in the claim was receiving state benefits but no Q&A pair state if they were used to pay the fine in the claim. And even Q&A pair 3 only states that someone 'offered' to pay the fine for him.
so information is not proved wrong but information has been cherry-picked as he likely had to pay from benefits if he was out of work.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant