Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Purdue Pharma has had to pay no consequences for their connection to the opioid crisis and overdose deaths in the US

Q1: Did Purdue Pharma have anything to do with the opioid crisis and overdose deaths in the US?
A1: Purdue Pharma, which is privately owned by the Sackler family, is named as a plaintiff in dozens of lawsuits across the country for its role in contributing to one of the country’s worst drug crises. The Sacklers and Purdue have been accused of aggressively marketing OxyContin using deceptive sales and marketing practices and downplaying its abusive and addictive properties.

Q2: Has Purdue Pharma paid money in any lawsuits made against them?
A2: Purdue Pharma will pay $270 million to settle a historic opioid lawsuit in Oklahoma.
user
justification: Purdue Pharma will pay $270 million to settle a historic opioid lawsuit in Oklahoma

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant