Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Hillary Clinton is on trial for the 2002 terror attack on Americans in Benghazi, Libya.

Q1: Was Hillary Clinton put on trial for the 2002 terror attack on Americans in Benghazi, Libya?
A1: A court case involving Clinton was in court, but she wasn’t on trial.

Q2: Did the United States setup a House Committee to question Hillary Clinton over  2002 terror attack on Americans in Benghazi, Libya?
A2: Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spent 11 hours answering questions from the House Benghazi Committee Thursday. At one point, the hearing devolved into a yelling match between Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy and Democrats on the committee.

The bickering followed Gowdy's questions regarding Clinton's email correspondence with Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime Clinton family friend and informal adviser. Democrats on the committee suggested Gowdy's line of questioning was unfair and politically motivated.

"If you think we've heard about Sidney Blumenthal, wait for the next round!" Gowdy declared before abruptly calling a recess in the middle of the marathon hearing.

Gowdy questioned why Clinton exchanged so many emails with Blumenthal pertaining to Libya, even though Blumenthal "could not get hired by our government... had never been to Libya, [and] had no expertise with Libya."

    Hillary Clinton's Benghazi testimony: A viewer's guide
    What Hillary Clinton will say before the Benghazi panel

Gowdy suggested it was suspicious that Blumenthal, "all the while working with the Clinton Foundation and some pseudo-news entities, had unfettered access to you." By contrast, Gowdy said that Clinton's records showed "not a single email to and from Ambassador [Chris] Stevens," the administration's trusted man on the ground in Libya and one of the four Americans killed in the September 11, 2012 attack on a U.S. facility in Benghazi.

Q3: What did Hillary Clinton say about  the 2002 terror attack on Americans in Benghazi, Libya ?
A3: The moment Hillary Clinton seemed to realize that her testimony Thursday before the House Select Committee on Benghazi was not going to be a big problem for her or for her campaign came about forty-five minutes in. When the hearing opened, she had regarded the chairman, Trey Gowdy, of South Carolina, with irritated skepticism. She looked as if she might say something rash, if not throw something, and perhaps she might have. Nearly three years ago, in a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Benghazi, she lashed out after having been asked many times about U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice’s comments on the Sunday talk shows about what had instigated the attack, on September 11, 2012, in which four Americans, including Chris Stevens, the Ambassador to Libya, died. “What difference, at this point, does it make?” Clinton demanded. Out of context, she sounded unmoved by the men’s deaths. Now, in the House hearing, it seemed to dawn on her that the proper response to her Republican interrogators was not outrage but pity.

Peter Roskam, of Illinois, was laying out a scenario in which Clinton’s assumption of a leadership role on Libyan policy “didn’t come easy,” when he stopped and said, in case he might be overwhelming her, “I can pause while you’re reading your notes from your staff.” Clinton replied, “I can do more than one thing at a time, Congressman—thanks.” A minute or two later, Roskam said, “Go ahead and read the note if you need to.” This time, Clinton laughed. “I’m not done with my question,” Roskam said; he was just doing her a “courtesy.” “That’s all right,” Clinton responded, with a friendly wave of her hand. From then on, she was in control. “I’m sorry that doesn’t fit your narrative, Congressman. I can only tell you what the facts are,” she told Jim Jordan, of Ohio, who is the chairman of the Freedom Caucus. As he spoke, she rested her chin on the palm of one hand, as if he were not much more than a loud boor at a party who, puzzlingly, doesn’t seem to kn
user
justification: The first answer shows that Clinton was not on trial but was involved in the case so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant