Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Republicans voted against military pay rises

Q1: How many republicans voted in favour of a military pay rise?
A1: When the Armed Services Committee passed the bill by a 33-to-24 vote on June 13, only two Republicans, Reps. Don Bacon (Neb.) and Elise Stefanik (N.Y.), voted in favour.

Q2: Did the other republicans not believe in a military pay rise?
A2: GOP members (republicans) said the sprawling defense bill was a package deal and that the package, as a whole, wasn’t good enough.

Q3: What did Rep. Mac Thornberry say about the pay rise
A3: The Chairman’s Mark supports a 3.1% military pay raise, essential end strength increases, an increase in compensation for military spouses to acquire professional licenses, and significant bipartisan housing reform to protect military families. The Mark continues reforms focused on sexual assault prevention and response. The Chairman’s Mark also prohibits the reduction of military health care personnel.

Q4: Did majority of Republicans support the bill
A4: “This morning, the House Armed Services Committee marked up a defense authorization bill for 2020 that will keep America safe and defend our allies and interests abroad. It is shameful that all but two Republicans on the Committee chose to make this vote partisan.  In doing so, they voted to deny our troops a pay raise, reject critical defense initiatives, and ignore the requests of our military.  They did this all because the Committee would not agree to add billions more in unnecessary funding that would have required severe and draconian cuts to our investments in education and skills training, health care access, and infrastructure development.
user
justification: The claim only says 'republicans' voted against the bill in the claim, and Q&A 1 does show that most did vote against it only 2 did not so a valid claim to make overall.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant