Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: No city in the state can quarantine itself without state approval.

Q1: Which country does the claim refer to?
A1: United States of America.

Q2: Which state may want to impose a quarantine on itself?
A2: New York state.

Q3: Can New York state legally impose to quarantine  itself?
A3: state Executive Law Section 24, says that the New York State Legislature can override a local action, and Executive Law Section 29-A, gives the governor power to override local laws or orders in a state emergency. In addition,  an executive order on March 7, said that local actions be approved.

Q4: Does a US city have the power to order quarantines without state approval
A4: Yes, because Executive Law Section 29-A, which gives the governor power to override local laws or orders in a state emergency. In addition, an executive order on March 7, required that local actions be approved.
user
justification: This claim is refuted. According to the QA pairs, there is legislature that allows certain states to override local laws during a state of emergency. For example, New York state has the ability to quarantine itself in accordance to 'Executive Law Section 29-A'. Therefore, this claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant