Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Raw manuka honey kills every bacteria scientists throw at it, including antibiotic-resistant superbugs.

Q1: Can Manuka honey kill every known bacteria?
A1: To date, in vitro assays have found manuka honey can effectively inhibit all problematic bacterial pathogens tested

Q2: what conclusions have been found about Manuka honey?
A2: Great progress has been made recently in our understanding of therapeutic honey, yet its use in clinical medicine remains limited, even when conventional antibiotics are starting to fail. The complexity in honey, which is arguably its greatest strength in killing diverse pathogens and preventing resistance, complicates its study as many factors working together are likely to affect activity. We advocate further mechanistic studies using appropriately registered therapeutic manuka honey, in particular studies that use non-reductionist systems biology approaches, along with detailed chemical and microbiological analyses to elucidate how honey acts at the molecular, cellular and population level, how this can differ in different strains and species of microbial pathogens, and how the host cell responds

Q3: It seems that Manuka honey is very effective on topical wounds, but is it good at killing bacteria internally?
A3: Manuka may inhibit the bacteria that cause a sore (“strep”) throat or gingivitis, but the main components responsible for the antimicrobial activity won’t survive the digestion process.

Q4: Is manuka honey effective on topical wounds?
A4: Manuka honey isn’t a panacea or a superfood. But it is grossly underutilised as a topical treatment for wounds, ulcers and burns, particularly in the face of the looming global superbug crisis.
user
justification: The QA pairs confirm that when in direct contact it does kill the bacteria however only appears to work topically and not through ingesting for some bugs etc.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant