Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Obama declared Flint water crisis a National Emergency and never fixed it.

Q1: Did Obama declare a national emergency for the Flint water crisis?
A1: No, because Obama did not declare a "national" emergency for flint. He did sign an Emergency declaration for Michigan which covered Flint since it is in that state.

Q2: Was the city of Flint in Michigan awarded funds for the water crisis?
A2: Yes $167,000,000 was awarded in funding for Flints water infrastructure.

Q3: Have works already began to repair and replace the water infrastructure in Flint?
A3: Overall, to date, service lines to 7,966 homes have been identified as lead and/or galvanized and have been replaced
user
justification: The answers and sources below show evidence that work has been done on water infrastructure and replacement of old pipes in the area of Flint so the claim is refuted. The crisis in Flint was not declared a national emergency.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant