Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The common theme with mass shooters is that the assailants were on psychotropic drugs.

Q1: Is an increase in use of psychiatric medications is causing an increase of violence?
A1: The problem with the argument blaming medications,however, is that though there has been a signicant increase in the use of psychiatric medications, there has not been a corresponding increase in violence. In fact, just the opposite has occurred. Violent crime has decreased dramatically.

Q2: How many shooters were on psychiatric medications — or coming off them — at the time of their attacks?
A2: The following data is drawn from the sample of 48 shooters profiled in my book School Shooters: Understanding High School, College, and Adult Perpetrators. Out of 24 secondary school shooters, only two were taking medication at the time of their attacks: Eric Harris and Jeffrey Weise. Alvaro Castillo might have been, or he may have stopped his medication within three weeks of his attack and thus still have been coming off the drug. If we include him, then 12.5% of the sample was taking medications. Put differently, over 87% of the secondary school shooters were not on psychiatric medications at the time of their attacks. Furthermore, there is no evidence that medication made Harris, Weise, or Castillo manic or psychotic. The numbers are essentially the same for the college and adult shooters.
user
justification: The source links present evidence that this claim is incorrect.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant