Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: There were 25% cuts to local government spending between 2010 and 2015.

Q1: Which location does the claim refer to?
A1: United Kingdom.

Q2: Was there 25% of cuts to local government spending between 2010 and 2015 in the U.K?
A2: Analysis by the National Audit Office found that council funding in England from central government and council tax combined decreased by 25% in real terms between 2010/11 and 2015/16.

Q3: Does only England and Wales make up the whole of the UK?
A3: United Kingdom made up of England, Scotland, and Wales

Q4: Who made the claim
A4: Andrew Marr

Q5: Was he referring to the whole united kingdom ?
A5: Only England and Wales share locale government spending so likely only those as he was speaking of public spending and the police workforce.

Q6: What was the percentage decrease in the spending power of local government in the UK between 2010 and 2015
A6: The Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government measures the impact of reducing government funding on local authority income via ‘revenue spending power’. This indicator captures the main streams of government funding to local authorities alongside council tax. We found that nationally revenue spending power fell by 25% in real terms from 2010-11 to 2014-15
user
justification: there were 25% cuts to local spending. 

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant