Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The public thinks disruption caused by protests is “completely unacceptable” by a ratio of five to one.

Q1: What is the report the claim is referring to?
A1: On 21 September 2020, the Home Secretary commissioned us to conduct
an inspection into how effectively the police manage protests. This followed
several protests, by groups including Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter and
many others.

Q2: Who conducted the research?
A2: HMICFRS

Q3: How does the HMICFRS describe its own findings?
A3: As part of its inspection, HMICFRS found more than two thirds of people thought it was unacceptable for protests to involve violence or serious disruption to residents and businesses.

However, the public’s views were more divided when protest caused only minor inconvenience to people locally, with little support for police use of force when protesters were not violent.

Q4: What do the public think about the disruption caused by protests?
A4: As part of its inspection, HMICFRS found more than two thirds of people thought it was unacceptable for protests to involve violence or serious disruption to residents and businesses.

However, the public’s views were more divided when protest caused only minor inconvenience to people locally, with little support for police use of force when protesters were not violent.
user
justification: Claim states 5 out of 6 but QA pairs state 2 out of 3 which mathematically is 4 out of 6. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant