Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Trumps January 2018 travel ban was unlawful.

Q1: Under what law can Trump enforce a travel ban
A1: It thus vests the President with “ample power” to 
impose entry restrictions in addition to those elsewhere enumerated
in the INA. Sale, 509 U. S., at 187. The Proclamation falls well within this comprehensive delegation. The sole prerequisite set forth in
§1182(f) is that the President “find[ ]” that the entry of the covered aliens “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.”

Q2: Was President Trump's January 2018 travel ban lawful?
A2: Yes, because The President has lawfully exercised the broad discretion granted to him under §1182(f) to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States. Pp. 9–24.

Q3: Why was a travel ban placed on these countries?
A3: The Proclamation placed entry restrictions
on the nationals of eight foreign states whose systems for managing
and sharing information about their nationals the President deemed
inadequate. Foreign states were selected for inclusion based on a review undertaken pursuant to one of the President’s earlier Executive
Orders. As part of that review, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in consultation with the State Department and intelligence
agencies, developed an information and risk assessment “baseline.”
DHS then collected and evaluated data for all foreign governments,
identifying those having deficient information-sharing practices and
presenting national security concerns, as well as other countries “at
risk” of failing to meet the baseline.

Q4: Has the travel ban been challenged?
A4: Yes, because The American Civil Liberties Union and other partner organizations filed a federal lawsuit challenging President Trump’s Muslim ban executive order, charging it violates the Constitution — including the First Amendment’s prohibition of government establishment of religion and the Fifth Amendment’s guarantees of equal treatment under the law — and federal laws.

Q5: Did the U.S. Supreme Court authorize the president's travel ban?
A5: Yes, because On June 26, 2018 the United States Supreme Court upheld Presidential Proclamation 9645, allowing Travel Ban 3.0 to continue. The countries currently affected by the ban are Iran, Libya, Yemen, Syria, Somalia, Venezuela and North Korea. Chad was removed from this list in April 2018 and is no longer subject to this travel ban.
user
justification: Q&A 2 states the actuall law that made it legal for trump to issue a travel ban (§1182(f) to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States. Pp. 9–24.) thus refuting the claim the ban was unlawful.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant