Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Republicans didn’t like the fact that democrats removed mandatory minimums for first-time offenders.

Q1: What legislation is being discussed?
A1: The final legislation included a so-called “safety valve” provision that limited the use of mandatory minimum federal sentences for some drug offenses. A defendant could qualify to be exempt from those mandatory sentences if he or she met certain criteria, including: that the defendant didn’t use violence or possess a gun or dangerous weapon during the act, no one was killed or seriously injured, and the defendant wasn’t “an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of others in the offense.”

Q2: What is the three strikes rule?
A2: Mandatory life imprisonment without possibility of parole for Federal
offenders with three or more convictions for serious violent felonies or
drug trafficking crimes.

Q3: What this supported by Biden?
A3: Biden did not back the three strikes provision, but he did back a Republican amendment that was added to the Senate legislation. Biden is on record at the time as saying he supported a three-strikes provision for “serious [violent] felonies against a person,” but he was against including nonviolent offenses and expressed concern that minor crimes could get swept up in the measure.

Q4: Was this supported by Biden?
A4: Biden did not back the three strikes provision, but he did back a Republican amendment that was added to the Senate legislation. Biden is on record at the time as saying he supported a three-strikes provision for “serious [violent] felonies against a person,” but he was against including nonviolent offenses and expressed concern that minor crimes could get swept up in the measure.

Q5: What was the Republicans stance on the removal of mandatory minimums for first-time offenders by the democrats?
A5: No answer could be found.
user
justification: None of the evidence found comes to a conclusion on what the Republicans think about the Democrats removing the policy of mandatory minimums, it's safe to assume the Republicans did not agree with its removal by the Democracts but the QA didnt manage to discover any evidence backing that assumption.

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant