Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Bellingcat set out to prove Petrov and Boshirov - two men suspected by British authorities of poisoning Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury, England on March 4, 2018 - were secret Russian spies.

Q1: Are Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov Russina spies?
A1: The Kremlin denied any Russian state involvement in the poisoning.

Q2: Who are Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov?
A2: On September 5th, the British police named two suspects in the attempted murder of Sergei Skripal, a former colonel in Russian military intelligence who later spied for the United Kingdom. Skripal was poisoned with a nerve agent in the cathedral city of Salisbury, earlier this year. According to security officials, Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov—most likely aliases of agents of the G.R.U., Russia’s military-intelligence service—landed at Gatwick Airport on the afternoon of Friday, March 2nd, on an Aeroflot flight from Moscow.

Q3: What is the GRU?
A3: The Main Intelligence Directorate, better known by the acronym GRU from its Russian name, is the Kremlin's military intelligence arm.

Q4: Are the GRU spies?
A4: Sergei Skripal, a former GRU spy who was poisoned this spring in Britain and barely survived.
user
justification: There's no QA pair attributed to knowing who or what Bellingcat in the claim is referring to

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant