Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Answering a call from '+140' will empty your bank account.

Q1: Why are people receiving calls from +140 numbers
A1: It was a gimmick to promote Sony LIV’s new series Undekhi

Q2: Will answering a call from a +140 empty your bank account
A2: No, because Sony LIV tweeted that it was a promotional activity and If you have received a call for our show Undekhi & it has disturbed you we would like to sincerely apologise to you. This was a test activity which has gone out accidentally & our intention was not to cause any kind of discomfort or panic. We sincerely regret any inconvenience.
user
justification: Q1 establishes what the claim is about and Q2 directly addresses the claim.
The answer to Q2 doesn't really address the question asked unless one assumes Sony LIV can be trusted. There is a better source in support of Q2 (link available in source given)
Still, it is clear that this claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant