Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Did Conservative MP, Mark Francois deny the existence of the gender pay gap?

Q1: Did Mark Francois deny the existence of the gender pay gap in parliament?
A1: No, because there is no record in Hansard of Mark Francois stating this.

Q2: Did Mark Francois deny the existence of the gender pay gap outside of parliament?
A2: No answer could be found.

Q3: Whilst speaking in the UK House of Parliament, did Mark Francois deny the existence of the gender pay gap ?
A3: Hansard records all speeches made in the UK Houses of Parliament. Hansard has no record of Mark Francois mentioning the gender pay gap.

Q4: Whilst speaking outside the UK House of Parliament, did Mark Francois deny the existence of the gender pay gap ?
A4: No answer could be found.
user
justification: There is no record of the MP saying anything about the gender pay gap and there is no info if they said anything outside of the houses of parliament so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant