Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: “India let 65 lakh tonne of grain go waste in four months, even as the poor went hungry.

Q1: Which Government body is responsible for distribution of food in India?
A1: Food Corporation of India

Q2: What was their response to the claim?
A2: Misleading news published in 
@scroll_in
 on Food Grains gone waste, FCI's rebuttal attached

Q3: Did FCI add to their tweet?
A3: Yes, because They added a letter.

Q4: What did they say in the letter?
A4: They explained that the statistics quoted in the article were a gross misinterpretation of the facts, that the article had claimed that a large amount of grain had gone to waste, when it was simply in transit. They said the figure of 71.8 lakh metric tonne of wasted stock was 'imaginary' and the amount was 1,930 metric tonnes and that was largely due to  'natural calamities like floods'
user
justification: Although some food was wasted due to floods whilst on transit, it was a gross misinterpretation 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant