Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The average development allocation by Kenya's counties over the last six financial years has been 40% surpassing the legal requirement of at least 30%

Q1: What was the development budget share in 2017/18?
A1: 33.9% which was the lowest  over last 6 years

Q2: What was the development budget share in 2014/15?
A2: 44.4% which was the highest in last 6 years

Q3: In Kenya, what was the AVERAGE  development budget share of total budget, over the period 2013 to 2019?
A3: The average share was 39.9% , which can be rounded to 40%.
user
justification: Evidence finds that development budgets reached 44.4% in 2014/15, which is above the legal requirement of at least 30%. The average share for the period 2013–2019 was 39.9%, which was most likely rounded up to 40% in the claim. Hence, this claim is supported.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant