Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: More than a million Wisconsinites have voted to raise their own property taxes because Republicans have failed to fully fund our public schools for the past eight years

Q1: Are republicans to blame for the votes?
A1: No answer could be found.

Q2: What is meant by "Fully Fund" in the claim?
A2: Evers spokeswoman Baldauff said the "fully fund" part of the tweet references the caps Republicans have placed on school spending.

"At a minimum, fully funding our schools means allowing school spending to keep pace with inflation, with the state contributing a fair share of those costs," Baldauff said. "While the previous administration eventually restored some of the funding they cut (state support of costs), they held spending relatively flat. Districts were forced to use referenda, their only tool available, to protect educational programming, retain staff, and keep the lights on.
user
justification: Its not clear from the Q&A if people have actually voted to raise their own taxes. So the claim does not have enough evidence. 

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant