Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: £1 billion was given to 13 companies for PPE but no PPE has been supplied.

Q1: How much was given by the UK government to companies for the purchase of PPEs
A1: £1 billion

Q2: Where any of the contracts delivered
A2: Chief Operating Officer of Ayanda Capitol Ltd said that their contract was successfully fulfilled.

Q3: Which country does the claim refer to?
A3: United Kingdom.

Q4: What Companies doe s the claim say did not deliver the PPE paid for?
A4: - Uniserve Ltd of Essex,
- Ayanda Capital
- P14 Medical Ltd
- PestFix
- Clandeboye Agencies Ltd,
- Medicine Box Ltd
-  Initia Ventures Ltd
- Monarch Acoustics Ltd 
-  Luxe Lifestyle Ltd
- Aventis Solutions Ltd 
- Medco Solutions Ltd,
- Toffeln Ltd,
- MGP Advisory,-

Q5: Did any company's listed in the claim not deliver the promised PPE?
A5: No answer could be found.

Q6: Were there any problems with PPE?
A6: Yes, because £4 billion of unusable PPE bought in first year of pandemic was tobe burnt “to generate power”
user
justification: We do not have sufficient evidence to verify if "no PPE has been suppolied".

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant