Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Hunter Biden was paid $3 million plus $183,000 a month to be a board member of a company that a lot of people said was corrupt.

Q1: What company is Hunter Biden a member of the board
A1: Burisma Holdings, Ukraine’s largest private gas producer, has expanded its Board of Directors by bringing on Mr. R
Hunter Biden as a new director.
user
justification: This claim does not have enough evidence. The QA pair only answers what supposed board Hunter Biden was part of. Corruption allegations in the claim are not examined further in the QA pairs. Therefore, there is not enough evidence for the claim. 

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant