Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Donald Trump's fuel efficiency plan would reduce the cost of cars “by more than $3000” and make them “substantially safer.”

Q1: What is the aim of Donald Trumps Fuel efficacy plan?
A1: The aim is to amend certain existing
Corporate Average Fuel Economy
(CAFE) and tailpipe carbon dioxide
emissions standards for passenger cars
and light trucks and establish new
standards,

Q2: Will the fuel efficacy plan reduce the cost of a car?
A2: a $2,340 reduction in total ownership costs on a 2030 vehicle. That includes $1,850 less for technology costs — or how much the car’s price would fall

Q3: Will Trumps efficiency plan make cars safer?
A3: Regulatory provisions fully offset this effect, producing a near zero change in accident fatalities.
user
justification: The answers and sources show that the price reduction is less that $3000 and would not change the safety of the car so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant