Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The post-1994 governments have cumulatively bought less than 7% of the targeted 30% of land meant for redistribution over a period of 25 years.

Q1: How much agriculture land did South Africa have in 1994 ?
A1: Approximately 82 million hectares of white owned agricultural land

Q2: What amount of land did the Government have as a target to distribute?
A2: 30% of this land to the previously disadvantaged by 2014. This constitutes approximately 24.5 million hectares of the said agricultural land.

Q3: Approximately how much land has been restored to date?
A3: About 30% of the 24.5m has been targeted by 2014.

Broken down as follows 
1994/95 - May 2009, amounts to 6.7m ha + 882 238ha (land redistribution: 2009 to-date) + 368 483ha (restitution: 2009 to-date), totalling 7.950 721m ha

Q4: Has the post-1994 governments cumulatively bought less than 7% of the targeted 30% of land meant for redistribution over a period of 25 years ?
A4: No, it has bought about 20% of the targeted 30% of the land.
user
justification: Q&A 4 states that the post-1994 governments bought around 20% of the targeted 30% of land for redistribution, not the 7% of the targeted 30% as claimed.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant