Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Germ scientists have confirmed that the ‘five-second rule’ for eating food off the floor is fairly accurate.

Q1: Has there been a scientific study into the "5 second rule" of dropping food on the ground and it being ok to eat for 5 seconds afterwards?
A1: yes t was the project of high school senior Jillian Clarke during a six-week internship in the food science and nutrition department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Meredith Agle, then a doctoral candidate, supervised the study.

Q2: How was the experiment carried out?
A2: "Jillian swabbed the floors around the University in the lab, hall, dormitory, and cafeteria to see how many organisms we could isolate."

 "We examined the swabs, and there were very few microorganisms. That surprised me. I told her to do it again."

Said Meredith Agle who supervised the experiment.

Q3: What were the findings when run again?
A3: The results were the same.

Q4: Was their a control element to the experiment?
A4: To control the study, cookies and gummi bears were placed on both rough and smooth sterile tiles covered with measured amounts of E. coli. "We did see a transfer of germs before five seconds"  "We were dealing with a large number of cells."

Q5: Was there anything in the experiment which may have affected the end result?
A5: "I think the floors were so clean, from a microbiological point of view, because floors are dry, and most pathogens like salmonella, listeria, or E. coli can't survive without moisture." Agle Said.

Q6: whats there further research done to dismiss the claim
A6: further research was done and experts dismissed the claim
user
justification: From the last Q&A you can see that the results were dismissed and so the claim is refuted. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant