Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: American daily 'The Washington Post' published a cartoon making fun of Congress president Rahul Gandhi

Q1: Is this the original cartoon?
A1: No the original illustration was part of the Buzzfeed comics

Q2: Was this specific illustration on this website or the original artists social media page?
A2: No, it could not be found. So it shows it was photoshopped.

Q3: Do searches of the washington post show the cartoon was published in there?
A3: Nothing can be found

Q4: Was the original cartoon publiheein the Washington post?
A4: No, because It was published on buzzfeed

Q5: Was the comic about Rahul Gandhi?
A5: No answer could be found.
user
justification: Evidence finds that Buzzfeed Comics published the cartoon, not The Washington Post. However, there is no proof of what the cartoon depicted. Was it Congress President Rahul Gandhi? or someone different? or of a completely different topic?

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant