Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Lawsuits challenging the emergency order to secure funding for a border wall shouldn't be heard in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Q1: What is the emergency order to secure funding for a border wall?
A1: President Donald Trump has officially declared a national emergency in order to secure funding for his border wall. 
Trump is issuing the declaration under the National Emergencies Act of 1976, which lets presidents issue an emergency declaration but under certain constraints — namely, Trump can only use specific powers Congress has already codified by law, and he has to say which powers he’s using. The act doesn’t define what counts as an emergency… there’s enough ambiguity in the law to let Trump declare an emergency. But the maneuver may not stand up to legal scrutiny once challenged in court. He is effectively trying to circumvent Congress — which is supposed to have the “power of the purse” and has decided against funding his border wall.

Q2: Which US states are part of the border wall between the US and Mexico?
A2: U.S. states along the border are California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas.

Q3: What lawsuits could emerge in the border states as a result of the emergency order to secure funding for the border wall?
A3: Long before Trump’s emergency declaration, one likely source of resistance has been clear: people who own land along the US-Mexico border where Trump wants the wall to be built.
The federal government can legally invoke “eminent domain,” a power to take private land or property and convert it into public use enshrined within the US Constitution, but if Trump tries to do so for the border wall, he could very well face a fight. Landowners could sue, as they did after Bush’s order, to keep the government from taking their land.

Q4: Are any of the border states covered by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals?
A4: Yes, because The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has appellate jurisdiction over:
District of Arizona
Central District of California
Eastern District of California
Northern District of California
Southern District of California
user
justification: The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has appellate jurisdiction over some of the states in the US southern border 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant