Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Bill Gates admits that 700,000 people will be harmed or killed by his coronavirus vaccines

Q1: Where did the claim originate?
A1: Naturalnews.com

Q2: What is known about naturalnews.com
A2: NewsGuard, a company that uses trained journalist to rank the reliability of websites, describes naturalnews.com as:

A network of sites promoting both medical and non-medical conspiracy theories, particularly the false claim that vaccines are linked to autism.
According to NewsGuard the site does not maintain basic standards of accuracy and accountability

Q3: Does the story relate to anything Bill Gates actually said?
A3: What Gates really said was that making a vaccine that is effective in older people is "a huge challenge" because flu vaccines are less effective for the elderly. "And doing that so that you amp it up so that it works in older people, and yet you don't have side effects, if we have one in 10,000 side effects that's way more, 700,000 people who will suffer from that."
user
justification: From the 2nd QA it is evident that the website is a scam one. Therefore there is no validity to the claim and it is refuted

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant