Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Trump rushed in reinforcements.

Q1: Where did Trump rush reinforcements into according to the claim?
A1: How Trump responded to a storming of the U.S. embassy in Iraq.

Q2: Did Donald Trump respond quickly with reinforcements for the storming of the embassy?
A2: Yes, because President Trump declared on Twitter that the Embassy is “safe” and that U.S. personnel had rushed to the scene.

Q3: How did Trump respond to the Storming of the US embassy
A3: In the immediate aftermath of the attack, the president held what he called a good meeting with advisers and approved sending a small contingent of Marines and two Apache helicopters to reinforce security at the embassy while tweeting that “The U.S. Embassy in Iraq is, & has been for hours, SAFE!”

Defense Secretary Mark T. Esper also announced Tuesday night that the administration was sending 750 troops to the region as “an appropriate and precautionary action taken in response to increased threat levels against U.S. personnel and facilities, such as we witnessed in Baghdad today.”
user
justification: From the 3rd QA it is evident that troops were indeed sent. therefore, the claim is supported

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant