Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Raising the US federally required minimum wage to $15 an hour would give 40 million workers a pay raise and push the wage scale up for everyone else.

Q1: What is the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) in the US?
A1: The EPI is an independent, nonprofit think tank that researches the impact of economic trends and policies on working people in the United States.

Q2: How did the US Economic  Policy Institute analyze the impact of raising the US federal minimum wage to $15 by 2025?
A2: A total of 39.7 million workers would benefit, including:

38.6 million adults ages 18 and older
23.8 million full-time workers
23.0 million women
11.2 million parents
5.4 million single parents
The parents of 14.4 million children

Q3: What is a US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report?
A3: This Congressional Budget Office report was prepared in response to interest expressed by a
number of Members of Congress. In keeping with CBO’s mandate to provide objective, impartial
analysis, the report contains no recommendations.

Q4: How did the CBO analyze the impact of raising the US federal minimum wage to $15 by 2025?
A4: In an average week in 2025, the $15 option would boost the wages of
17 million workers who would otherwise earn less than $15 per hour. 
The wages of many of the 10 million workers
whose wages would be slightly above the new federal minimum would also increase.
user
justification: Although millions of workers would receive a pay rise - it would be an estimated A total of 39.7 million workers would benefit. Also a contradiction of "boost the wages of
17 million workers who would otherwise earn less than $15 per hour. 
The wages of many of the 10 million workers
whose wages would be slightly above the new federal minimum would also increase". 

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant