Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: There is more bacteria found in a mans beard than in a dogs fur.

Q1: Who carried out the study?
A1: The study was led by a Swiss doctor, Dr Andreas Gutzeit.

Q2: What was the purpose of the study?
A2: To determine whether it would be hygienic to evaluate dogs and humans in the same MRI scanner.

Q3: How was the experiment carried out ?
A3: They compared the bacterial load in colony-forming units (CFU) of human-pathogenic microorganisms in specimens taken from 18 men and 30 dogs. In addition, They compared the extent of bacterial contamination of an MRI scanner shared by dogs and humans with two other MRI scanners used exclusively by humans.

Q4: What were the results of the study?
A4: The study shows a significantly higher bacterial load in specimens taken from men’s beards compared with dogs’ fur (p = 0.036). All of the men (18/18) showed high microbial counts, whereas only 23/30 dogs had high microbial counts and 7 dogs moderate microbial counts. Furthermore, human-pathogenic microorganisms were more frequently found in human beards (7/18) than in dog fur (4/30)
user
justification: The number of bacterial load in colony forming units taken from men's beards were more than that in dogs fur 

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant