Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A 24 year old Indian Hindu man Hitesh Mulchandani in the city of Pune was murdered by a Muslim gang for raising his voice against public urination.

Q1: Was the murder of Hitesh Mulchandani in the city of Pune India, carried out by Muslim gang ?
A1: Pimpri Inspector Kalyan Pawar said, “The accused are on record criminals who have killed Hitesh over a spat. Amin was handed over to us by the hotel staff. However the others are absconding while we have launched a hunt to trace them.”

Q2: Does the murder of Hitesh Mulchandani in the city of Pune India, has any religious inclination ?
A2: A youth was allegedly abducted and mercilessly killed in Pimpri following a spat with a gang of criminals who were urinating outside a hotel near Pimpri railway station in wee hours of Tuesday.

The victim was identified as Hitesh Govardhan Mulchandani (24) a resident of Pimpri Camp.

The accused were identified as Amin Khan of Mominpura, Shahbaaz Qureshi of Kasarwadi, Arbaaz Sheikh of Khadki, Akshay Bhosale alias Linga of Sangvi and one Langda of Sangvi.

The Pimpri police said that five accused came at Krunal Bar and Restaurant at Radhika Chowk near Pimpri railway station. The accused had reportedly come there for drinks.

One of the accused identified as Amin Khan was allegedly urinating outside the hotel when the hotel staff objected.

The police added that the objection of the hotel staff led to a huge spat between Amin and the staffers

The police further said the hotel owner Rohit Sukheja arrived there with his friends including Hitesh Mulchandani. Hitesh tried to bring peace between the groups however it fired back at him.

When Rohit’s friend, Sahil Lalwani intervened to stop Amin, he allegedly got into fisticuffs. Amin also allegedly broke a bottle of beer on the head of another friend of Kailash Patil and injured him.

Q3: what is india's stand on public urination
A3: Any person who, on any road or in any open place or street or thoroughfare within the limits of any town to which this section shall be specially extended by the State Government, commits any of the following offences, to the obstructions inconvenience, annoyance, risk, danger or damage of the residents or passengers shall, on conviction before a Magistrate, be liable to fine not exceeding fifty rupees, or to imprisonment with or without hard labor not exceeding eight days;”
user
justification: There is no information about the religion of the gang. Nor the reason that they murdered the man. They were alledged to be urinating but there is no mention as to whether anyone challenged them about this. 

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant