Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Facebook post stating that Democrats are asking why should their be a  Second Amendment.

Q1: what is the democrats' stance on the second amendment
A1: Nearly two-thirds of Democrats (64%) say there would be fewer mass shootings in the U.S. if it were harder for people to legally obtain guns;

Q2: what is the source of ths claim
A2: Facebook

Q3: Do tighter gun laws mean the second amendment is effectively abolished?
A3: The Second Amendment, as courts have come to interpret it, undoubtedly protects a fundamental constitutional right, but it also leaves room for a potentially wide range of regulation.
user
justification: There is no evidence offered that Democrats are asking why should there be a Second Amendment.

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant