Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: In 2010, U.S. Rep Maxine Waters steered $12 million in Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funds to her husband’s private bank account. She was indicted but served no time

Q1: When was US Rep Maxine Walters cleared of any charges relating to the claim that she steered $12 million in Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funds to her husband’s private bank account?
A1: September 21, 2012
A House ethics panel has determined there is no evidence that Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) violated congressional rules when she called Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson in 2008 on behalf of minority-owned banks, despite her husband’s financial stake in one troubled institution.

Q2: Was Maxine Waters indicted for steering TARP money to her husband's private bank account?
A2: On Tuesday, the House Ethics Committee issued its final report in the case. Waters will not be charged with any violations of House ethics rules.
user
justification: The Q and As show that Waters was not indicted so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant