Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Joe Biden then US former vice president in 2015 pressured the Ukrainian government to fire Viktor Shokin, the top Ukrainian prosecutor, because he was investigating Ukraine’s largest private gas company, Burisma, which had added Biden’s son, Hunter, to its board in 2014.

Q1: Was Victor Shokin investigating Burisma?
A1: No, because In 2015, the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine took the unprecedented step of telling the country it should fire prosecutors who were blocking an investigation of the owner of Burisma, where Hunter Biden was reportedly earning $50,000 a month.

Q2: Was Hunter Biden part of Burisma Board?
A2: Yes, because That Joe Biden's son Hunter was a member of the board of Burisma was only a decoration of no significance.

Q3: Why was Victor Shukin fired?
A3: In the eyes of many Ukrainians, his biggest failure was that nobody from the former regime was prosecuted for the killing of protesters here on Independence Square.
Parliamentarian Yehor Soboliev was the first official to demand the prosecutor's dismissal.

Another reason was failure to investigate grand corruption of Yanukovych. Ukrainian prosecutor general's office didn't want to help to provide evidence.
user
justification: There is no evidence that Joe BIden pressured the Ukrainian government to fire Viktor Shokin

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant