Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Italy decided not to treat its elderly population with coronavirus.

Q1: What is the official stance of the Italian government on this matter??
A1: Allocation is a very complex and delicate choice," the choice to prioritize certain patients is "not a value judgments but a way to provide extremely scarce resources to those who have the highest likelihood of survival and could enjoy the largest number of life-years saved."

Q2: Were already scarce resources in favour of younger people over elderly people in Italy during covid?
A2: It was only proposed that “It may become necessary to establish an age limit for access to intensive care.”
and, 
- Those who are too old to have a high likelihood of recovery, or who have too low a number of “life-years” left even if they should survive, would be left to die.
user
justification: Their decision was based on chances of survival

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant