Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Being vegan for a year saves 1,000 square metres of forest.

Q1: Where does this figure come from?
A1: The vegan calculator

Q2: Are these figures widely accepted?
A2: No Peta and the Vegan Society both produce differing figures

Q3: How much tropical forest is lost daily?
A3: we are losing upwards of 80,000 acres of tropical rainforest daily

Q4: Is all of this 80,000 acres lost for meat production?
A4: Despite increased public awareness of the importance of tropical rainforests, deforestation rates are actually on the rise, mostly due to activities such as commercial logging, agriculture, cattle ranching, dam-building and mining, but also due to subsistence agriculture and collection of fuel wood.

Q5: Which source  does the figure in the claim  originate from?
A5: scientificamerican.com which states upwards of 80,000 acres of tropical rainforest is lost  daily

Q6: Does the scientificamerican give reasons for the loss of 80,000 acres of tropical rainforest is lost  daily?
A6: It states ''Pinning down exact numbers destroyed each day around the world, and for what purpose is nearly impossible''
user
justification: There is no evidence in the Q&As to show that this claim is correct, more information is required to know if this is true. 

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant