Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: US Democratic California Sen. Dianne Feinstein once said, “All vets are mentally ill in some way and the (US)  government should prevent them from owning firearms.”

Q1: How does the US Congress Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 which followed  the mass shooting in Newtown, Connecticut US describe itself.
A1: A BILL
To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to
keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and for other purposes. 
v

Q2: Did Democratic California Sen. Dianne Feinstein have any concerns with an amendment proposed by  Republican Texas Sen. John Cornyn to allow military veterans to be exempt from the ban?
A2: The problem with expanding this is that, you know, with the advent of PTSD, which I think is a new phenomenon as a product of the Iraq War, it’s not clear how the seller or transferrer of a firearm covered by this bill would verify that an individual was a member, or a veteran, and that there was no impairment of that individual with respect to having a weapon like this...
...find a way that veterans who are incapacitated for one reason or another mentally, don’t have access to this kind of weapon

Q3: What did Tom Mentzer, Feinstein’s spokesman, say  when asked about the authenticity of the quote?
A3: Tom Mentzer, Feinstein’s spokesman, told The Associated Press that the quote was false.

Q4: What comment was recorded in resources her Senate website, social media and media outlets?
A4: Searched For: "all vets are mentally ill"	
No results found
user
justification: The question answer pairs are quite weirdly worded, therefore it is difficult to understand. However it seems that the senator did not make those statements from the lart answers. Therefore, the claim is refuted

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant