Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: “Oklahoma 100% positive coronavirus test rate after Trump Tulsa rally.”

Q1: What data did the claim speaker Chris Hayes use for this claim?
A1: Oklahoma authorities weekend Covid 19 testing testing figures.

Q2: Were the Oklahoma authorities weekend Covid 19 testing testing figures correct and complete?
A2: The figure quoted did not provide a clear or complete picture because it was not the final numbers for Oklahoma’s weekend testing.

Q3: Did the claim speaker make any follow-up comments relating to their claim?
A3: Hayes said, The problem the claim is the lag in the way that Oklahoma reports its data. With fewer but almost entirely positive tests being reported on the weekends and then larger numbers including negative tests

Q4: Was the whole of Oklahoma at the rally
A4: Few persons attended the rally so there cant be a direct link to the rally even if all persons at the rally tested positive
user
justification: Its clear that the claim is not true as there are too many inconsistencies to the covid testing and reporting. Plus not many people attended the rally. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant