Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: In Kenya, the amount of total budgets, allocated for agriculture is just 3% less than the recommended allocation of 10%, as per the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) Malabo declaration.

Q1: How much was the county budget in Kenya for agriculture in 2017/2018
A1: KSh 23 billion

Q2: How much was the county budget in Kenya for agriculture in 2018/2019
A2: KSh 29 billion

Q3: How much was the estimated 10% that was agreed upon in the Malabo Declaration for for 2017/2018
A3: Ksh 46.2 billion

Q4: How much was the estimated 10% that was agreed upon in the Malabo Declaration for for 2018/2019
A4: KSh 46.2 billion

Q5: What is the difference in percentage between the actual money and the percentage amount agreed during the Malabo declaration
A5: The difference is 37%
user
justification: The 5th answer shows that the difference is more that 3% so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant