Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The national security law will only target an extremely small minority of people who have breached the law, while the life and property, basic rights and freedoms of the overwhelming majority of Hong Kong residents will be protected.

Q1: What is the law referred to in the claim?
A1: The Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

Q2: When was this law enacted?
A2: 30/06/2020

Q3: When was this law first violated?
A3: 01/07/2020
A man was arrested for holding a #HKIndependence flag in #CausewayBay, Hong Kong, violating the #NationalSecurityLaw.  This is the first arrest made since the law has come into force.

Q4: How many arrests were made under this law on 01/07/2020?
A4: More than 300 people have been arrested in #HongKong so far for offences like unlawful assemblies, disorderly conduct in public places, furious driving, and breach of the #NationalSecurityLaw, which accounted for 9 arrests (5 males & 4 females).

Q5: What measures can the HK Police take to implement the law?
A5: According to the rules, police may be authorized to conduct searches for evidence without a warrant in “exceptional circumstances.” Police may also apply for a warrant that requires a person suspected of violating the national security law to surrender their travel documents, thus restricting them from leaving Hong Kong.

Q6: Did any western countries react to the passing of this law?
A6: The US Congress has approved a bill rebuking China over its crackdown in Hong Kong amid protests against a strict “national security” law that outlaws so-called subversive or terrorist acts, as well as collusion with foreign forces intervening in the city’s affairs

Q7: Does the law contravene the right to freedom of speech?
A7: A Government spokesman made the following solemn statement today (July 2): The slogan "Liberate Hong Kong, the revolution of our times" nowadays connotes "Hong Kong independence", or separating the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) from the People's Republic of China, altering the legal status of the HKSAR, or subverting the State power.

     The spokesman stated that the HKSAR Government strongly condemns any acts which challenge the sovereignty, unification and territorial integrity of the People's Republic of China. The Law of the People's Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region prohibits secession, subversion of state power and other acts and activities which endanger national security. The HKSAR Government calls upon members of the public not to defy the law.
user
justification: The Q&As do not verify the claim as stated.  Two of the source answers are from Twitter accounts, without any further confirmation that the information is correct. And the last Q&A answer is unrelated to the question and the claim.
However, the evidence presented does lean towards the fact that it is not correct that more than "an extremely small minority of people who have breached the law" would be targeted. Therefore a refuted claim label is chosen.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant