Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: 1.9 million more children are in good and outstanding schools.

Q1: Where countries schools does the claim refer to?
A1: England, U.K.

Q2: Who rates schools performance  in the U.K?
A2: The Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted) inspects and regulates services that care for children and young people and services that provide education and skills for learners of all ages.

Q3: do 1.9 million children attend a school rated good or outstanding by Ofsted in the U.K?
A3: Yes, because It’s factually accurate

Q4: How many children are in schools that havn't been rated by Ofsted?
A4: 580,000 pupils were in schools that hadn’t even been inspected since 2010.

Q5: Does the 1.9 million figure give an accurate impression of how schools in the U.K work for their pupils?
A5: It’s factually accurate, The problem is that it fails an important test of any statistic – it does not show the user what the
producer believes it shows. In this case, it does not adequately demonstrate that standards in
schools have improved since 2010, at least not to the extent that a quarter of all pupils are in
significantly better schools because of any policy intervention
user
justification: Figure fails to honestly account for rise in school population and change in grading system.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant