Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A man, Emdadur Choudhury, who burned poppies on Remembrance Day 2011 as a counter protest and was fined £50 under the Public Order Act, laughed at his sentencing when in court.

Q1: Are there news reports that mention Mr Choudhury laughing in court?
A1: No answer could be found.

Q2: Were there reports of Mr Choudhury laughing after the trial?
A2: Yesterday he laughed at justice as he was handed a paltry £50 fine for setting light to poppies on Remembrance Day and yelling ‘British soldiers burn in hell’.

Q3: Was a  Emdadur Choudhury fined for burning poppies ?
A3: It is true that Emdadur Choudhury was fined £50 for offences under the Public Order Act after he burnt three poppies on Remembrance Day 2011 as part of a counter-protest.
user
justification: Q&A 2 states the person named in the claim did laugh in court as claimed, after he received a fine for 'burning poppies' on remembrance day which supports what is claimed he was in court for. as it shows he breached a public order act for doing it which is also part of the claim.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant