Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The Trump campaign welcomed and made full use of Russian intervention  in the 2016 U.S presidential election.

Q1: How did Russia intervene in USA 2016 presidential elections?
A1: The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and
systematic fashion. Evidence of Russian government operations began to surface in mid-2016. In
June, the Democratic National Committee and its cyber response team publicly announced that
Russian hackers had compromised its computer network. Releases of hacked materials—hacks
that public reporting soon attributed to the Russian government—began that same month.
Additional releases followed in July through the organization WikiLeaks, with further releases in
October and November

Q2: Did Russian government contact Trump Campaign to offer assistance during the 2016 presidential campaign?
A2: The investigation established multiple links between Trump Campaign officials and
individuals tied to the Russian government. Those links included Russian offers of assistance to
the Campaign.

Q3: Did Trump's Campaign accept the Russian offers of assistance?
A3: In some instances, the Campaign was receptive to the offer, while in other instances
the Campaign officials shied away. Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the
Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference
activities.

Q4: What did the investigation conclude?
A4: In sum, the investigation established multiple links between Trump Campaign officials and
individuals tied to the Russian government. Those links included Russian offers of assistance to
the Campaign. In some instances, the Campaign was receptive to the offer, while in other instances
the Campaign officials shied away. Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the
Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference
activities
user
justification: The investigation into the matter could not prove that the
Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference
activities 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant