Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The Australian state of Western Australia has recently passed a “COVID-19 Emergency Powers Act” that authorises forcible medical examination and vaccination in schools.

Q1: Is there a “COVID-19 Emergency Powers Act” in Western Australia?
A1: No answer could be found.

Q2: Is there an act in Western Australia that authorises forcible medical examination and vaccination in schools regarding covid?
A2: No, there is a study being conducted but this is not forced upon people.

The McGowan Government is partnering with the Telethon Kids Institute in a study to test for COVID-19 among school students and staff without symptoms.

The study has three aspects, the first is a surveillance study in which a sample of staff and students from 40 identified schools will be tested for COVID-19 at monthly intervals over a period of three months, possibly longer depending on the number of cases detected. Parents will be advised of the outcome of tests.
user
justification: This claim is refuted. According to the QA pairs, there is no such thing as "forcible... vaccination" in schools. This concept is just not existent. Instead, in Austrailian schools they are implementing a type of covid-19 test to be conducted in monthly periods which is to the full disclosure of the parents. There is no "forcible" action happening anywhere. The "COVID-19 Emergency Powers Act" does not even existent as no evidence could be provided for its existence. Therefore, this claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant