Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Voting by mail results in widespread fraud

Q1: Is there any study's on the possible link between mail in voting and election fraud?
A1: Postal voting is open to fraud on an "industrial scale" and is "unviable" in its current form, a top judge has said.

Q2: Is there any evidence that mail in voting increases voting fraud in elections?
A2: Vote fraud in the United States is exceedingly rare

 with mailed ballots and otherwise. Over the past 20 years, about 250 million votes have been cast by a mail ballot nationally. The Heritage Foundation maintains an online database of election fraud cases in the United States and reports that there have been just over 1,200 cases of vote fraud of all forms, resulting in 1,100 criminal convictions, over the past 20 years. Of these, 204 involved the fraudulent use of absentee ballots; 143 resulted in criminal convictions.

Q3: Does voting by mail have the highest rate of fraud in an election?
A3: ‘Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.” 

 It’s the conclusion of the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform, chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker III.

Q4: What are the statistics for voter fraud via mail?
A4: . The
research from the federal government during this period made clear that voter fraud is rare. For
example, in 2002 the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) began investigating voter fraud. In fact, only
24 people were convicted or pleaded guilty to illegal voting between 2002 and 2005 nationally (L. C.
Minnite 2007).Given the millions of ballots that were cast over this period, the 24 cases were minuscule.
user
justification: Two of the Q&As show that fraud is rare in postal votes so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant