Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Doctors were banned from social media during the pandemic, for calling the pandemic a ‘hoax’.

Q1: What does this claim refer to?
A1: A controversial press conference by Doctors Dan Erickson and Artin Massihi of Accelerated Urgent Care, Bakersfield.

Q2: How did the US medical authorities react to the press conference?
A2: Joint Statement issued on April 27, 2020:

The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American Academy of Emergency Medicine (AAEM) jointly and emphatically condemn the recent opinions released by Dr. Daniel Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi. These reckless and untested musings do not speak for medical societies and are inconsistent with current science and epidemiology regarding COVID-19. As owners of local urgent care clinics, it appears these two individuals are releasing biased, non-peer reviewed data to advance their personal financial interests without regard for the public’s health.

COVID-19 misinformation is widespread and dangerous. Members of ACEP and AAEM are first-hand witnesses to the human toll that COVID-19 is taking on our communities. ACEP and AAEM strongly advise against using any statements of Drs. Erickson and Massihi as a basis for policy and decision making.

Q3: Did Doctors Dan Erickson and Artin Massihi call the pandemic a hoax?
A3: No, because they talked about the coronavirus pandemic both at the state and local levels.

Q4: Is the press conference video still available on YouTube?
A4: No, because It has been removed for violating YouTube's community guidelines.
user
justification: Q&A 4 does state that 2 doctors had their YouTube video removed, but only for violating the guidelines for which it doesn't say further. but Q&A 3 states they did not call the pandemic a hoax in the removed video, so More relevant evidence is needed.

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant