Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Martin Lewis, the founder of Money Saving Expert, recommends ignoring parking charge notices.

Q1: What advice did Martin Lewis recommend as regards parking charges
A1: He adviced that if you've broken the rules, pay up.

Q2: What is Martin Lewis' stance on unfair parking charges
A2: If you get an unfair ticket in a private car park, don't automatically pay it. These supposed 'fines' handed out are merely invoices, often unenforceable, and so we've three routes to fight unfair tickets

Q3: Has Martin Lewis previously confirmed that an older version of this claim does not represent his advice?
A3: yes. Lewis tweeted a fake claim and pointed out that it did not represent his advice.
user
justification: The person in the claim themselves is shown in Q&A 3 to have tweeted that this is a fake claim.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant