Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: US Republican Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez opposed it a proposed $4.6 billion US emergency aid bill, saying it wasn’t humanitarian.

Q1: Did Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez vote against a proposed $4.6 billion US emergency aid bill?
A1: Yes, because Confirmed via votes result page shown in source.

Q2: Did Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez say the bill wasnt humanitarian?
A2: Yes, because she said: "The $4.6 billion wasn’t humanitarian at all. It had NO accountability measures for facilities that abuse children and families. It didn’t fix the problem, just funded abuse."
user
justification: Seems from the question and answer pair that the Senator did vote against the bill. Therefore, the claim is supported

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant