Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: This year alone, MPs have cost the British taxpayer £92,993,748 in expenses.

Q1: What were MP's expenses in 2017/18
A1: around £35 million

Q2: What year were MP's expenses £93 million?
A2: 2007/8

Q3: What similar claims were circulating on social media in the past?
A3: Fact-checker Snopes.com investigated similar unverified claims about members of the US Congress in January 2000.

Q4: What was Snopes.com's relevant comments on these claims?
A4: Later versions of this item changed the subjects from “members of Congress” to members of Parliament from Canada, India, or the UK, or to players from the NFL and NBA.

Q5: What have reports in the media been about the UK MP expenses?
A5: A web search using press reader.com reveals a letter published by the Courier Advertiser Perth and Perthshire (Scotland) on 26 December 2011. The relevant extract:

And collectively, this year alone, they have cost the British tax payer £92,993,748 in expenses! Which company is this? It’s the 635 members of the House of Commons.

Q6: What date was the current claim made?
A6: This claim was dated 29/03/2019
user
justification: in the year of this claim, the expenses were not even close to 35 million. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant