Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: President Geingob of Namibia fined all those who attended the party he hosted to mark his political party Swapo’s (South West Africa People’s Organisation) 60th birthday during the coronavirus lockdown when gatherings were banned.

Q1: Did President Geingob host a party to mark his political party’s (SWAPO) 60th birthday during a coronavirus lockdown in Namibia?
A1: Yes, because The South West Africa People’s Organisation (SWAPO) birthday party took place in parliament on April 19, when Namibia was under lockdown and group gatherings were banned to limit the spread of coronavirus.

Q2: Have the people who attended the gathering to mark SWAPO’s 60th birthday been fined?
A2: Yes, because The president said that less than 10 people attended the event, including the Vice President, the Prime Minister and party’s Secretary General. All have since been fined Sh12,000 ($115).

Q3: Did President Geingob directly issue the fines to those who attended SWAPO’s 60th birthday party or were they issued by law enforcement agencies representing the Namibian government?
A3: Namibia’s President Hage Geingob on Thursday admitted to breaching coronavirus regulations last month by hosting a celebration to mark his party’s 60th anniversary and subsequently fining all the guests who attended.

Q4: Was each member of the party fined?
A4: No, because The criminal charge was against the Swapo Party and a single fine of N$2000 was paid.
user
justification: The president did not personally fine the people who attended the party so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant