Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Former Ukraine President Poroshenko actively worked on behalf of US Secretary Hillary Clinton.

Q1: Was Poroshenko  a former president of Ukraine?
A1: Yes, because He was president from 7 June 2014 to 20 May 2019

Q2: Had Petro Poroshenko ever worked closely with Hillary Clinton?
A2: Ukrainian Government worked to aid Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential elections. The actions taken by government officials included disseminating “documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested The they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers.

Q3: Is there evidence that Hillary Clinton met or worked with Petro Poroshenko personally?
A3: Yes, because Hillary Clinton and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko met shortly before the 2016 election
user
justification: The Ukrainian Government under Poroshenko administration worked to aid Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential elections.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant