Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: US  Attorney General William P. Barr mischaracterized special counsel Robert Mueller's remarks about his office's decision not to reach a determination about  whether President Donald Trump had committed obstruction of justice. This issue referred to Russia's attempts to damage Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.

Q1: How did Robert Mueller summarize the issues that arose during the course of the investigation into Russia and the presidential election
A1: He said that a conclusion couldn't be reached because of some directives in the US constitution and the DOJ's laws

Q2: Did William Barr agree with Robert Mueller on the inability of his team to reach a conclusion on the matter because of factors within the constitution that could not let him act
A2: William Barr downplayed the role that factors that Mueller stated affected his decisions and made assumptions as to why he did what he did in not reaching a conclusion

Q3: what is mischaracterization
A3: The act of characterizing something in an inaccurate or misleading way
user
justification: us attorney did downplay he role that factors that Mueller stated affected his decisions and made assumptions as to why he did what he did in not reaching a conclusion 

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant