Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: COVID-19 Removal Cards kill Coronavirus

Q1: What is a Covid19 removal card/tag?
A1: According to Air Doctor, the tags "eliminate all forms of microbial life" and provide "ultimate protection against airborne infection diseases", including for children, pregnant women and immuno-compromised people such as cancer patients.

Q2: Does the air doctor card work against covid-19?
A2: the Japanese consumer affairs agency (in Japanese) on May 15, 2020 warned the public that the product was ineffective against COVID-19.

(translate)
user
justification: This claim is refuted. According to the QA pairs, the air doctor card "eliminate all forms of microbial life" and the claim states that this removal card can kill COVID-19. However, the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency warned in May 15, 2020 that the product was 'ineffective against COVID-19', meaning the removal cards do no kill the virus. Therefore, this claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant