Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The US Government may be using parts of one of the national emergencies that (President Barack Obama) signed having to do with cartels, criminal cartels

Q1: What are emergency powers?
A1: Congressionally-authorized emergency presidential powers are sweeping and dramatic, and range from suspending all laws regulating chemical and biological weapons, including the ban on human testing (50 U.S.C.

Q2: Did Obama use emergency powers  to do with criminal cartels?
A2: Obama did use emergency powers to freeze the financial assets of four foreign criminal operations, but it’s unclear how that would help build a wall.

On July 25, 2011, Obama announced that "significant transnational criminal organizations constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States."
user
justification: From the Q&As it does seem that Barack Obama did in fact use an emergency power when dealing with cartels.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant