Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Mississippi passed the 5-71-226 Anti-Youth Subversion Act banning talking to minors about atheist Richard Dawkins.

Q1: Did Mississippi pass the 5-71-226 Anti-Youth Subversion Act banning talking to minors about atheist Richard Dawkins?
A1: No, because The Article was published on a Satire News site with a link to a page explaining the story was Satire.

Q2: When was the law passed
A2: This law was not passed and a page explains it as satire
user
justification: this is clearly satire, and was listed on a satire news site. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant