Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: 100% neem coating resulted in improvement in soil health and a reduction in pest and disease attacks.

Q1: Has there been any information published on what effect Neem Coated Urea has on soil health and pest and disease attacks?
A1: The annual report (2017-18) of the Department of Fertilizers mentions that ‘the Neem Coated Urea has received high acceptance among the farmers considering its benefits on soil fertility/conservation, higher yield pest control’ but there is no more data other than this. The report does not back up this claim with research.

Q2: What are the advantages of the 100% Neem coating?
A2: No answer could be found.

Q3: What have reports found regarding 100% Neem Coating?
A3: A annual (2017-18) report of the Department of Fertilizers found that " The Neem Coated Urea has received high
acceptance among the farmers considering its benefits on soil
fertility/conservation, higher yield pest
control."
user
justification: There is no scientifically proven research to back up this report. 

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant