Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Hilary didn't respond for 13 hours.

Q1: Did Hillary Ignore Multiple Security Requests?
A1: The Benghazi attacks killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans. 

It’s true that the State Department did not honor requests for more security prior to the attacks, but there was no evidence that Clinton was made aware of those requests. 

As for Clinton’s response, none of the many congressional investigations about the attacks asserted (as Trump did) that she was inattentive throughout the hours in which the attacks occurred.

Moreover, it was not Clinton’s responsibility to send troops to the scene — the military chain of command took that responsibility. The Defense Department attempted to send help to the scene, but was unable to reach Benghazi before the deaths occurred.
user
justification: There was no sufficient evidence that Clinton was made aware of those requests for more security prior to the attacks. 

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant