Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard is of Indian-origin.

Q1: Is congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard Indian?
A1: I am not of Indian origin.

Q2: Is Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard of Indian heritage?
A2: Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard confirmed via a tweet that she is not of Indian-origin. 

@ronejoq @amisri I am not of Indian origin.

— Tulsi Gabbard (@TulsiGabbard) October 17, 2012

Q3: What is Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard's ancestry?
A3: she is of Mixed ancestry, her father is of Samoan and European ancestry. While her mother is a Caucasian of German ancestry (born and brought up in Decatur, Indiana).
user
justification: Answer 1 is a quote and is not identified as such until one looks at the source.
Q&A2 is what Q&A1 should have been.
Q&A3 confirms her ethnicity.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant