Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The restrictions that Donald Trump placed on travel to and from China, saved a lot of lives, probably hundreds of thousands by early April 2020.

Q1: Do travel bans stop covid from spreading?
A1: Not only are travel bans likely to be ineffective with a disease like the novel coronavirus, but there are also likely to be widespread economic, social, and public health impacts from the ban.

Q2: Do travel bans stop viruses from spreading?
A2: evidence from previous health crises demonstrates that travel bans don’t work, and may even be more harmful than the problem they intend to address.

Q3: Any evidence that travel bans could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives during covid?
A3: Not only are travel bans likely to be ineffective with a disease like the novel coronavirus, but there are also likely to be widespread economic, social, and public health impacts from the ban."

Q4: Any reports on how restrictive a travel ban needs to be to work?
A4: travel bans have to be highly restrictive (i.e. discontinuation of over 90% of air travel) to have any impact.

Q5: How restrictive was trumps travel ban?
A5: His ban only applied to  no refugee admissions for 120 days, and blocked citizens of only seven countries from entering the US for at least 90 days
user
justification: Travel bans don't prevent the spread of viruses. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant