Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: President Trump said he removed Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman from the White House's National security Council because his superior publicly stated that 'Vindman had problems with judgment, adhering to the chain of command, and leaking information'

Q1: Did President Trump say he removed Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman from the White House's National security Council because his superior publicly stated that 'Vindman had problems with judgment, adhering to the chain of command, and leaking information'?
A1: On Saturday morning, Trump tweeted: "Fake News @CNN & MSDNC keep talking about “Lt. Col.” Vindman as though I should think only how wonderful he was. Actually, I don’t know him, never spoke to him, or met him (I don’t believe!) but, he was very insubordinate, reported contents of my “perfect” calls incorrectly, &... ....was given a horrendous report by his superior, the man he reported to, who publicly stated that Vindman had problems with judgement, adhering to the chain of command and leaking information. In other words, “OUT”."

Q2: Why was Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman removed from the White House's National Security Council?
A2: Vindman's removal from a detail at the NSC came hours after the president told reporters he was "not happy" with the aide. 
An Army spokeswoman said in a statement that the two men had been transferred: "We can confirm that both Lt. Cols. Vindman have been reassigned to the Department of the Army, out of respect for their privacy, we will not be providing any further information at this time.
Earlier in the day the president made clear that he expected action on Vindman, but said the NSC would decide what to do with him.

“Well, I'm not happy with him,” the president told reporters in comments on the White House lawn. “You think I'm supposed to be happy with him? I'm not. They'll make that decision.”
user
justification: The answers show that the Lt was removed because of security issues so the claim is supported.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant