Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A U.S. federal judge released Benghazi evidence that puts former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in deep trouble.

Q1: When was this claim made?
A1: 15/02/2020

Q2: When and where was this claim published?
A2: 18/10/2018 by Patriot Journal.

Q3: What was the claim based on?
A3: In a combative exchange at a hearing Friday in Washington, D.C., a federal judge unabashedly accused career State Department officials of lying and signing "clearly false" affidavits to derail a series of lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

Q4: Has there been any evidence on Hilary Clinton mishandling her emails?
A4: No deliberate mishandling has been found
user
justification: Evidence finds that there was no deliberate mishandling by Hillary regarding her emails. A federal judge unabashedly accused career State Department officials of lying and signing "clearly false" affidavits to derail a series of lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Therefore, the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant