Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A Muslim woman who ordered a drink from a Target Starbucks was given a cup with “ISIS” written on the cup instead of her name.

Q1: Where did this supposedly happen?
A1: Aishah went to the St. Paul-Midway Target Starbucks on July 1, 2020. She was wearing a hijab and a face mask. Aishah repeated her name to the barista several times.

Q2: Did the barista write the word ISIS on the cup?
A2: Yes, because The barista said that she could not hear the name and that is why she wrote “ISIS” on the cup. ISIS is the acronym for the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. It is considered a fringe terrorist group.

Q3: Was the action considered a  hate crime by anyone?
A3: Yes, because CAIR-MN calls for firing of St. Paul Starbucks worker who wrote ‘ISIS’ on Muslim woman’s coffee cup
user
justification: Q&As support this claim. 

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant