Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: This is the first health-care plan in the U.S. proposed by anyone in this presidential primary that lays out the full cost and how to pay for it.

Q1: What are the full costs that Elizabeth Warren has put forward in her health care plan?
A1: new federal spending of approximately $20.5 trillion over the 2020-2029 budget
window

Q2: What are the ways in which the health care plan would be paid for as laid out by Elizabeth Warren?
A2: 1. Employer Medicare Contribution
2.Additional Take-Home Pay Subject to Existing Taxes
3. Taxes on the Financial Sector, Large Corporations, and the Top 1% of Individuals
4.Better Enforcement of Existing Tax Laws
5.Immigration Reform
6.Elimination of the Overseas Contingency Operations Fund

Q3: Have there been presidential campaigns where the health plan has been less detailed than Elizabeth Warren's plan?
A3: Yes, because Letter from the 2008 Barack Obama campaign about the Health Care Plan is less detailed.

Q4: What is the estimated amount for Medicare-for-all spending?
A4: While we are not aware of any estimates of this particular proposal, similar proposals have been estimated to cost the federal government roughly $28-32 trillion over a decade.

Q5: How did Elizabeth Warren's opponents in the 2019-20 presidential primaries present their healthcare plans?
A5: Bernie Sanders' document presented a number of options to begin a discussion about the best way of financing Medicare-for-all.
user
justification: it does seem this health care plan is detailed about full costs and pay 

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant