Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The ExIm Bank provided taxpayer-backed handouts to foreign companies such as Air China and Saudi Aramco.”

Q1: Which foreign company did the Ex-Im bank authorise a  loan to in 2012?
A1: In its largest job-supporting authorization to date, the board of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) has approved a $4.975 billion direct loan to Sadara Chemical Company for the export of American goods and services required in the construction of a petrochemical complex in Jubail Industrial City II in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Q2: What is the relation between Sadara Chemical Company and Saudi Aramco?
A2: Sadara Chemical Company, organized and existing under the laws of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, is a joint venture developed by the Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) and Dow.

Q3: Did the Ex-Im Bank provide loans for Air China?
A3: No answer could be found.
user
justification: the loans were provided to companies like air china and saudi aramco

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant