Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Russia has historically reaffirmed its role as a state  that is the guarantor of stability and security, and is a party that brings peace, not agression.

Q1: Has Russia historically been a state that is the guarantor of stability and security?
A1: Russian Occupied Crimea which was seen as a ‘Land Grab’

Q2: Has Russia historically been a state that brings peace, not aggression?
A2: The International Criminal Court has found  Russia's Invasion Of Ukraine Is A 'Crime,' Not A Civil War
user
justification: Both Question and Answer pairs return evidence that proves Russia has been aggressive and commited crime by invading Ukraine and was found by the International Criminal Court, therefore the claim must be refuted as both answers suggest quite the opposite to the claim.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant