Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: School attendance in South Africa increased “from 51% in 1994 to 99% today.

Q1: What was the school enrolment rates for children aged 7-15 in 1994 in South Africa?
A1: No exact answer could be found, but this is found - The South African Schools ‘Act (1996) makes schooling compulsory for children aged 7
to 15. This has resulted in the sustained participation of over 95% in schooling since the
mid to late 1990s

Q2: What was the school enrolment rates for children aged 7-15 in 2019 in South Africa?
A2: No answer could be found. But figures were found for 2017 with their being 14 million learners at school in 2017

Q3: What's the compulsory school age in South Africa?
A3: As stipulated in the South African Schools Act of 1996, all children between the ages of 7 and 15 are compelled to attend school.  Parents and guardians should ensure that all learners of this age are registered to go to school and that their children attend school regularly.
user
justification: The claim refers to school attendance but the QA pair relates to school  enrolment.

Many pupils maybe enrolled but fail to attend.

There is no QA pair stating attendance levels at time of claim to support or refute the 99% in claim.

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant