Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: India has gone through the entire three months without a single person starving.

Q1: When was this claim made?
A1: 14/05/2020

Q2: What is the definition of starving?
A2: ADJECTIVE
1.  dying of hunger
2.  informal
very hungry; ravenous

Q3: Have there been any reports of people starving in this period?
A3: Yes, because Several centring workers and contractors in and around Moosapet and Kukatpally areas are on the verge of starvation, and desperately await support from government and non-government organisations.

Q4: Are there any reports of people going hungry in this period?
A4: Yes, because A survey revealed that almost 74 per cent — almost three out of four surveyed — said they had started eating lesser than before to cut costs and 61 per cent households did not even have enough money to buy a week's ration.

Q5: Did the Indian Government successfully stop starvation during the first three months of Covid?
A5: No. Workers and contractors in and around Moosapet and Kukatpally areas of Hyderabad were reported to be on the verge of starvation, and desperately awaiting support from government and non-government organisations. Although the government had announced that the migrant workers will be eligible for 12 kg of rice and ₹500 per person, none of these benefits had reached these workers.
user
justification: There is enough evidence of people not having enough to eat that the claim seems ridiculous.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant