Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: As of December 2019 the Narendra Modi govt had enacted a new law on self-defence, to combat crimes against women in India.

Q1: What new self-defence laws did Modi government enact?
A1: There is no record of any new self-defense laws enacted by Modi government to combat crimes against women. Right of Private defense (section 96 of the Indian Penal Code) is an existing law.

Q2: WHat does section 233 of the IPC refer to?
A2: It refers to punishment for counterfeiting coins, not for self defence

Q3: Was there any new law enacted for self defense for crimes that are committed against women?
A3: No, because The only ocde that exists are the sections 96 to 106 of the Indian Penal Code. These state the right of an individual for self-defence. However there is nothing specific about women protecting against crimes
user
justification: There was no such law so it is false

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant