Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Roughly one in four fish eaten in the United States was caught here and sent to Asia for processing before being re-imported for American consumers

Q1: Does the United States send fish caught in the country to Asia for processing and then re-import it back to the United States?
A1: Yes, because An estimated $900 million in fish and seafood on that list (of proposed tariffs) is first caught in the U.S., sent to China for processing into items like fish sticks and fillets, and then imported by U.S. companies to sell to American consumers.

Q2: What percentage of fish eaten in the United States was caught in the country, sent to Asia for processing and then re-imported back to the United States?
A2: No answer could be found.

Q3: Are there reliable figures to account for domestic consumption of fish and its origin?
A3: No, because Unfortunately, a dark cloud looms over seafood trade as tariffs recently imposed by the United States and retaliatory tariffs imposed by China and other countries hit US seafood exporters and importers, resulting in higher seafood prices for US consumers. Accounting for the realities of globalized supply chains is not only needed for better statistics that support evidence-based policy but is also key to supporting the US seafood industry, achieving sustainable production, and meeting consumer demand.
user
justification: Not enough evidence provided in QA pairs to support or refute the claim.

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant