Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Muslims were filmed while attacking a Hindu Temple in Uttar Pradesh in India.

Q1: What have reports said about the attack?
A1: Villagers who went to pray at the temple on Sunday morning found the gate shut and heard cries for help. Temple priest Vinod Sharma and sewadar Sultan were murdered in the attack.

Q2: What has the police discovered about the incident?
A2: When the rural and Karnal police broke into the temple and entered inside the temple, priest Vinod Sharma of Badnara village of Nising and Sevadar Sultan, a resident of Saharanpur in UP, were found lying dead inside. He was stabbed to death with a sharp weapon, while priest Ravindra Sharma of Bhambrehari village of Assandh, priest Ajay Sharma of Sangoha village and servant Harjinder Singh were seriously injured. His hands and feet were tied with cloth and rope. Karnal SP Surendra Singh Bhauria, DSP Virendra Saini reached the spot along with the police force. The SP has given instructions to get the matter investigated on every aspect. there, Being adjacent to the border, the Jhinjhana police also gathered information about the case.

Q3: Have the attackers been identified?
A3: Hindi news websites that reported the murders have not mentioned the identity of the suspects or even insinuated that they could be Muslims. The investigation in the case is ongoing.
user
justification: There's no evidence of it being Muslims that attacked the temple or of a film that shows it was Muslims 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant