Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Dog meat was seized at Nashik railway station in India

Q1: Was dog meat photographed being seized at Nashik railway station in India?
A1: No, because Food officials stated that Rotten meat was seized from Chennai railway station which is not Nashik railway station  and it was not dog meat
user
justification: The question implies this was dog meat. It should have asked if dog meat was seized at Nashik.
The answer to the question is, instead, appended with "and it was not dog meat".

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant