Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The reason that they are separating these little children from their families is that they are using Section 1325 of that act, which criminalizes coming across the border to incarcerate the parents and then separate them. Some of us on this stage have called to end that section, to terminate it, some like Congressman O’Rourke have not.

Q1: Does Section 1325 of the United States Code criminalize illegal entry into the country?
A1: Yes, because Section 1325 is the part of the United States Code that criminalizes illegal entry into the country as a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment or fines.

Q2: Has Congressman O’Rourke opposed repealing the Section 1325 law?
A2: Yes, because Mr. O’Rourke has opposed repealing the law.

Q3: What is Section 1325 of the United States Code ?
A3: Section 1325 related to the punishment for illegal reentry to the UA. It states than an alien previously denied admission and removed,  shall be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.
user
justification: Evidence shows section 1325 criminalises crossing the border, and that O'Rourke opposed appealing it, but the claim is worded badly and is a copied quote. 

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant