Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Japan has produced a cure for coronavirus disease (COVID-19).

Q1: What Japanese-made drug allegedly works against COVID-19?
A1: Avigan, also known as Favipiravir.

Q2: What is Avigan?
A2: Avigan is an anti-flu drug that has appeared to help coronavirus patients recover. The drug was approved for use in Japan in 2014.

Q3: Is Avigan effective against COVID-19?
A3: According to Zhang Xinmin, Avigan has been effective, with no obvious side-effects, in helping coronavirus patients recover. 

In a clinical trial in Shenzhen involving 80 participants, patients who took Favipiravir showed greater chest improvement and took less time to test negative for the genomic trace of the virus, compared with patients not given the drug.

Q4: Who is Zhang Xinmin?
A4: An official at China's science and technology ministry.

Q5: Does the drug Avigan have any possible side effects?
A5: Yes, because Studies found that the drug may cause fetal deaths or deformities.

Q6: Why has South Korea decided to not import the drug Avigan to combat COVID-19?
A6: South Korea's ministry of food and drug safety also decided not to import Avigan after infectious disease experts ruled that there was not enough clinical data to prove the drug's efficacy.
user
justification: It seems from all QAs o, that Avigan does not have enough validity to be be the cure for covid, Therefore, the claim is refuted

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant