Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Despite what Purdue Pharma has done; their connection to the opioid crisis and the overdose deaths throughout the United States, as of 26/06/2019 they have been able to act with complete impunity and pay no consequences.

Q1: What consequences have Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin paid in light of the alleged connection to the opioid crisis and the overdose deaths in the United States?
A1: Purdue Pharma, the maker of Oxycontin, has settled with Oklahoma for $270 million after it was accused of fueling the nation's opioid epidemic;  the charges that Purdue deceptively marketed OxyContin would have been on full display in a state hit hard by the opioid crisis.

Q2: As of the date of the claim have Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin faced criminal charges in light of the alleged connection to the opioid crisis and the overdose deaths in the United States?
A2: The company, Purdue Pharma, got five years probation and must pay the huge fines, and the three individuals involved - Michael Friedman, who is the former president; Howard Udell, who is the chief counsel; and Paul Goldenheim, the medical director, formerly - they all got three years probation and 400 hours of community service work.

Q3: What is complete impunity?
A3: Impunity means "exemption from punishment or loss or escape from fines".[1] In the international law of human rights, it refers to the failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice and, as such, itself constitutes a denial of the victims' right to justice and redress.

Q4: Was the US Opioid epidemic that involved the misbranding of Oxycontin a Human Rights violation and was there denial of the victims' right to justice and redress.
A4: To address America’s opioid epidemic from the premise that there is a right to the highest attainable standard of health, that standard must be applied to the epidemic; To prevent addiction, prescribing fewer opioids for shorter periods at lower dosages works.
user
justification: They have been punished as a consequence of court findings involving fines, probation and community service for employees.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant