Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Over 700,000 children [accessed] early childhood education in the last financial year

Q1: Did Cyril Ramaphosa  underestimate the number of children in early childhood development facilities in South Africa?
A1: yes. Ramaphosa put the number at “nearly one million children” in 2018. Then in 2019,  his figure was “over 700,000”. Both figures are an underestimate.

Q2: Is Ramaphosa's statement of "over" 700,000 technically correct, whilst being inaccurate?
A2: Yes, because The statement is technically correct as he stated "over" 700,000 children. But it is inaccurate as the 2017 general household survey reported that just over 2 million children under the age of four were attending a “day care centre, crèche, early childhood development centre (ECD) playgroup, nursery school or preprimary school”.

Q3: How many children were in some kind of pre-school in South Africa in 2016?
A3: 2,409,953 children were in some kind of pre-school in 2016. (Note: These were children who were younger than eight at the start of 2016.)

Q4: What has been said about Cyril Ramaphosas's claims on children's education numbers in 2018?
A4: They have been labelled as incorrect. He suggested that 1 million children had access to early childhood education, which is an underestimate

Q5: How many children were in some kind of pre-school in South Africa in 2017?
A5: No answer could be found.

Q6: How many children were in some kind of pre-school in South Africa in 2011?
A6: 1 013 229
user
justification: while the claim is technically correct, as the real figure IS "over 700,000" the figure is 2 million which is quite significantly more than 700,00 so while technically true, it is inaccurate. 

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant