Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Getting drugs in Britain almost easier than ordering pizza.

Q1: Has there been a survey done on this claim in the Britain?
A1: The only survey done was a global survey and was not specific to Britain.

Q2: What data does the claim use for the statement?
A2: The first part of Dame Carol Black's independent review of drugs.

Q3: What was the independent review about?
A3: About what more can be done to tackle the harm that drugs cause.

Q4: Does the report mention how easy it is to obtain drugs in Britain?
A4: It does state users will likely accessed drugs through a friend, rather than directly from a dealer,

Q5: Is there any mention of 'Pizza' in the document?
A5: No, because A search of the document returns no results for the word 'Pizza'

Q6: Has any report compared getting drugs is as easy as getting pizza?
A6: Yes, because A global drug survey did say Cocaine can be delivered faster than pizza, but it  does not show the UK's specific figures in the study
user
justification: There's no conclusive evidence that was found showing if the claim is true or not, so there doesnt seem to be enough evidence to make a definitive decision.

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant