Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: US President Barack Obama was directed by the Deep State to authorize millions in funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology  to finance a global biological attack timed to release within an  election year.

Q1: Was there any evidence to show that Obama funded the lab
A1: No, because There was no evidence to show thatb

Q2: Did Barack Obama fund the Wuhan lab?
A2: no facts or hard evidence to support such a bold assumption surrounding the initial source of the virus.

Q3: Has the U.S. government funded the Wuhan lab?
A3: Yes, because A U.S. NIH-funded $3.7 million project was approved by Trump's Covid-19 advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci in 2015,
after the Obama White House imposed a ban on 'monster-germ' research.

Q4: Why did the U.S. government fund the Wuhan lab?
A4: In October 2014, the federal government declared a moratorium on gain-of-function research to weaponize viruses related to influenza, Middle
East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). As a result, the research was
outsourced to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is currently at the center of scrutiny for the Covid-19
pandemic.

Q5: Where did COVID-19 originate from?
A5: The novel coronavirus originated from the Hunan seafood market at Wuhan, China where bats, snakes, raccoon dogs, palm civets, and other animals are sold, and rapidly spread up to 109 countries.

Q6: When did the COVID-19 outbreak occur?
A6: In December 2019, an outbreak of pneumonia associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan, China, and rapidly spread to other parts of China and overseas.1
user
justification: No evidence shows that Obama funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Also the lab ddi not perform a  global biological attack.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant