Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: By the way, in terms of the money, it got there two or three weeks ahead of schedule, long before it was supposed to be there

Q1: What date was the aid meant to get to Ukraine?
A1: Sept. 30 2019.

Q2: What date was the aid sent to Ukraine?
A2: Congress then extended the deadline to the 2020 fiscal year to allow for the disbursement of the remaining aid.

Q3: Was any aid designated for Ukraine delayed?
A3: Because of the freeze ordered by Mr. Trump, not all of the aid was spent before the deadline.

Q4: Were the remaining funds sent at a later date?
A4: With just two weeks left in the fiscal year, the Pentagon was unable to fully disburse the funds. According to testimony from Mark Sandy, an official in the Office of Management and Budget, about $35 million was left unspent. Congress then extended the deadline to the 2020 fiscal year to allow for the disbursement of the remaining aid.

“Had that provision not been included, then any unobligated funds as of Sept. 30 would have expired,” Mr. Sandy said.
user
justification: Not all of the aid was spent before the deadline. Due to limited time, the Pentagon was unable to fully disburse the funds.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant