Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Former President Barack Obama would have gone to war with North Korea.

Q1: How likely was it that the US was on the precipice of war with North Korea during Obama's tenure?
A1: Not very likely, ""There was no crisis brewing or heightened tension at the end of the Obama presidency," said Robert S. Ross, an Asia specialist with appointments at Boston College and Harvard University."

Q2: What was Obama's strategy with North Korea during his time as president?
A2: The overall policy toward North Korea during Obama’s tenure was "strategic patience" — the notion that "if we ignore them, they will go away and eventually implode," said John Pike, the director of globalsecurity.org.

There’s room for disagreement about how effective "strategic patience" was. But it was "not the same thing as preparing for war, or planning a war, or even intending to conduct a war," said Joseph DeThomas, a professor at the Penn State School of International Affairs. "Obama was doing none of those. He was upgrading military deployments in order to deter North Korea and to reassure allies."
user
justification: Although nothing confirmed for definite the consensus in the answers point towards it being unlikely.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant