Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Organic foods are more nutritious than conventional foods.

Q1: What is organic food?
A1: USDA organic products have strict production and labeling requirements. Organic products must meet the following requirements:

Produced without excluded methods, (e.g., genetic engineering, ionizing radiation, or sewage sludge). 

Produced using allowed substances. 

Overseen by a USDA National Organic Program-authorized certifying agent, following all USDA organic regulations.

Q2: What is a food's nutrient content based on?
A2: A crops' vitamin content is based upon the plant's genetics and the conditions it is grown in.

Q3: Does organic farming increase a food's nutrient content?
A3: If the growing conditions are the same, and soil composition equivalent, a tomato's nutrient content will be the same whether grown "organically" or conventionally

Q4: Do lower levels of pesticides lead to better health?
A4: There is sufficient evidence to conclude that nonorganic food products contain higher levels of synthetic pesticides. However, a link between the consumption of an organic diet with health benefits is confounded by a number of lifestyle and demographic covariates. Therefore the health benefits from a decreased exposure to pesticides through organic food consumption remain unsubstantiated.
user
justification: The nutritional value seems to be the same fr both organic and conventionally grown foods. The issue comes into play after introducing pesticides. The conventional food are higher in pesticides, however, it is impossible to tell, how much this affects the general health, as there have not been enough studies on this yet. Therefore the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant