Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: "Part of that was bailing out the automobile industry — saving thousands of jobs, tens of thousands of jobs over time. (Sanders) voted against that as well."

Q1: Which bailout was Biden referring to?
A1: "In October 2008, Congress approved the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)."

Q2: Did Sanders vote in support of the TARP?
A2: No, because "Sanders voted against a set of funds that financed most of the auto bailout, but the funds’ primary purpose was bailing out Wall Street firms, which Sanders strongly opposed."

Q3: Did Sanders vote in support of the December 2008 bailout proposal?
A3: Yes, because "Sanders voted in favor of a standalone meausre providing auto companies with $14 billion, which was separate from the Wall Street bailout funds he opposed."
user
justification: The answer and sources show that Sanders did not vote against all the bailout proposals and so the claim is cherry picking.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant