Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A generation ago, 37 cents out of every US food dollar went into a farmer’s pocket. Today, it’s 15 cents.

Q1: What is a food dollar?
A1: The food dollar series measures annual expenditures by U.S. consumers on domestically produced food.

Q2: What was the farmers share of the food dollar in the 1970-1980 period ?
A2: A 2015 Congressional Research Service report, combining several data sets, indicates that the farm share was about 37 cents in the 1970-1980 period

Q3: What is the current farmers share of the food dollar?
A3: 14.6 cents however Under this metric, farm production receives only 7.8 cents of the dollar. The gap between 14.6 cents and 7.8 cents indicates that farms spent 6.8 cents of the money they earned to purchase products from the other industry groups. (After all, even farmers may eat at McDonald’s.) Since Warren used the phrasing about how much of the agriculture dollars “went into a farmer’s pocket,” the lower number of 7.8 cents may be more appropriate than 15 cents. (Even this figure, however, does not account for 1.4 cents that must go to hire labor, so the amount going into “the farmer’s pocket” is even lower.)
user
justification: This claim has conflicting evidence. According to the QA pairs, the claim is correct to state that "37 cents out of every US food dollar went into a farmer's pocket" as a 2015 Congressional Research Service report,  indicates that the farm share was about 37 cents in the 1970-1980 period. However, the claim that "today it's 15 cents" seems to be false, as the actual number is 7.8 cents- which is significantly lower. Therefore, this claim has conflicting evidence.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant