Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Scotland’s youth unemployment rate fell by 0.3 percentage points over 2019.

Q1: Where does the data for this claim come from?
A1: X02 Regional labour market: Estimates of unemployment by age

Q2: How much did the rate of youth employment change  in 2019?
A2: In the year to July 2019, youth unemployment in Scotland increased by 0.9 percentage points.

Q3: What is the view of the independent UK Statistics Authority on the claim?
A3: Data from the LFS at this level of detail are not considered reliable, and are not classed as National Statistics. The APS is the more reliable data source for estimates of youth unemployment, due to its larger sample size, particularly when considering a breakdown by age and country within the UK. It would be helpful to make this clear both in the summary published by the Scottish Government and any related use of the estimates, including on social media.

We welcome the Scottish Government’s commitment to working with the Office for National Statistics (ONS) to improve the presentation of youth unemployment rates in Scotland, and its wish to consider whether it is appropriate to continue publishing estimates based on the LFS.

Q4: Why are the ONS statistics considerered more reliable than those quoted in the claim?
A4: It is based on a larger sample size.
user
justification: The evidence finds that the claim came from data which is not as reliable. The correct figure on Scotland's youth employment in 2019 was an increase of 0.9 percentage points.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant