Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Mike Pence moved decisively when confronted with a disturbing HIV outbreak in a rural Indiana county in 2014-15 when he was governor of the state.

Q1: When did health authorities first notice an unusually high number of HIV cases in Scott County, Indiana during the outbreak in 2014-15?
A1: November 2014

Q2: After health authorities first noticed an unusually high number of HIV cases in Scott County, Indiana, how long did it take for Mike Pence to declare a public health emergency and authorize a needle exchange program for the county?
A2: 4 months - the Governor of Indiana declared a public health emergency on March 26, 2015 after health authorities first noticed the unusually high number of HIV infections in November 2014.

Q3: Could the scale of the HIV outbreak in Scott County, Indiana in 2014-15 have been reduced by an earlier public health response?
A3: Yes, because Yale University researchers concluded that “an earlier public health response could have substantially reduced the total number of HIV infections.”
user
justification: Q1 is badly worded but can be understood.
Apart from that Q&As lead to the conclusion that the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant