Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Rashida Tlaib claimed in 2020 that Detroit spend $294 million on police in 2019, and $9 million on health.

Q1: Where did Rashida Tlaib get the financial information?
A1: Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for fiscal year 2019

Q2: Is there an official chart proving what was spent on police and health in Detroit 2019?
A2: Yes, because This URL has a chart which has the figures from 2019

Q3: What was the spending on the police from that report?
A3: Detroit Police Department expenditures from the general fund totaled about $293.7 million.

Q4: What was the spending on health from that report?
A4: Health Department expenditures were about $9.3 million.
user
justification: Q&A 3 confirms what is claimed (294 million) to have been the total spent by Detroit on police in 2019  with a total shown as (293.7 million) which is close enough given the large figure.
Q&A 4 shows 9.3 million spent on health by detroit, which is only just above what is claimed at 9 million spent so close enough to support the claim. as although they are 2019 figures, Q&A 1 shows that that is what the speaker of the claim used for their claim.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant