Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Migrant children housed at U.S. Customs and Border Protection detention facilities at the border are receiving access to key supplies, including toothbrushes, appropriate meals, blankets, showers as soon as they can be provided and medical screening.

Q1: Has the Office of Inspector General inspected and reported on the conditions at Border Patrol Facilites?
A1: Yes, because During the week of
June 10, 2019, they travelled to the Rio Grande Valley in Texas, inspected facilities and issued a report.

Q2: According to the 2019 IG report on Border Patrol facilities, were children receiving appropriate meals?
A2: No, because Two facilities had not provided children access to hot meals — as is required by the TEDS standards — until the week we arrived. Instead, the children were fed sandwiches and snacks for their meals.

Q3: According to the 2019 IG report on Border Patrol facilities, did children have access to showers?
A3: No, because Children at three of the five Border Patrol facilities we visited had no access to showers.
user
justification: The inspection results and a date that this happened provides concise evidence that even if these services were provided in some places, it was certainly not across the board. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant