Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Over 130 legislators in the USA have endorsed legislation that would bankrupt our nation by providing free taxpayer-funded health care to millions of illegal aliens, forcing taxpayers to subsidize free care for anyone in the world who unlawfully crosses our borders.

Q1: What legislation does the claim refer to?
A1: Medicare for All in the u.S.

Q2: Would Medicare for all risk bankrupting the U.S?
A2: No, because A study of Medicare for All from the libertarian-oriented Mercatus Center at George Mason University put the cost at more than $32 trillion over 10 years.

Q3: Does Medicaid cover illegal immigrants in the U.S?
A3: No, because Federal law generally bars illegal immigrants from being covered by Medicaid.  But a little-known part of the state-federal health insurance program for the poor has long paid about $2 billion a year for emergency treatment for a group of patients who, according to hospitals, mostly comprise illegal immigrants.

Q4: Did legislators vote for Medicare for all?
A4: 17 Democratic senators backed the’ Medicare for All bill. In the House, 125 members signed on
user
justification: Federal law generally bars illegal immigrants from being covered by Medicaid.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant