Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: California is registering non-citizens to vote.

Q1: Are non-citizens allowed to vote in California?
A1: In the November 2016 election, San Francisco voters passed Proposition N, Non-Citizen Voting in School Board Elections, by a vote of 54% to 46%.

Proposition N is a Charter amendment that extends the voting rights in San Francisco School Board elections to non-citizen residents of San Francisco who are of legal voting age, not in prison or on parole for a felony conviction, and who are parents, legal guardians, or legally recognized caregivers of children under the age of 19 living in San Francisco.

Q2: Are non-citizens in San Francisco allowed to vote in state or federal elections?
A2: No, because They can’t vote in state or federal elections

Q3: Other than San Francisco, do other California cities allow non-citizens to vote on school boards?
A3: No, because San Francisco is the only place in America where the practice is currently legal.

Q4: What are the requirements for non-citizens to vote in the school board election?
A4: Proposition N is a Charter amendment that extends the voting rights in San Francisco School Board elections to non-citizen residents of San Francisco who are of legal voting age, not in prison or on parole for a felony conviction, and who are parents, legal guardians, or legally recognized caregivers of children under the age of 19 living in San Francisco.
user
justification: Q2 is not needed he answer is a 2nd answer to Q1.
The answer to Q3 is correct but, looking at the source, a better answer could have been given explaining this.
However, the Q&A clearly indicate that the claim is cherrypicking.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant