Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Islamic State (IS) “doesn’t exist anymore,

Q1: Has the killing of IS leaders in the past prevented the growth of the organization
A1: No, after the killing of the successor in 2010 Baghdadi  was named the new Caliph and he rallied new troops again

Q2: Is IS only linked to Syria and Iraq
A2: IS also claimed twin blasts in the Lebanese capital Beirut which killed at least 41 people. Militants from the Lebanese movement Hezbollah have been fighting in neighbouring Syria on the side of IS' enemy, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

And then on 13 November, at least 128 people were killed in a wave of attacks around Paris. IS said it was behind the violence - French President Francois Hollande described it as "an act of war".
user
justification: The source and answer show that Islamic state does still exist so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant