Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Joe Biden told Ukrainian government leaders that if they did not sack the prosecutor going after his son then they would not give them a $2 billion loan.

Q1: Did  the Ukrainian government investigate  Burisma Holdings?
A1: Since May 7, 2014 GPO has been investigating case No42014000000000375 of alleged criminal activity of subsidiaries of Burisma in Ukraine,

Q2: Who was the lead investigator in Ukraine investigation of Burisma?
A2: Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin

Q3: Did Vice President Joe Biden tell the Ukrainian government that if they did not sack the prosecutor investigating Burisma then they would not give them a loan?
A3: n his own words, Biden described how he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull U.S. loan guarantees,  if it did not fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin

Q4: How much was the loan being threatened to e removed?
A4: $1 billion in U.S

Q5: Who is Joe Biden's Son?
A5: younger son, Hunter Biden.

Q6: Was Hunter Biden connected with the Burisma company being investigated in Ukraine?
A6: Burisma Holdings employed Biden’s younger son, Hunter, as a board member.

Q7: Did Vice president Joe Biden acknowledge his sons role at Burisma before asking for the prosecutor in Ukraine be fired?
A7: Biden’s office was quoted, on the record, acknowledging Hunter Biden’s role in Burisma in a New York Times article about the general prosecutor’s Burisma case that appeared four months before Biden forced the firing of Shokin. The vice president’s office suggested in that article that Hunter Biden was a lawyer free to pursue his own private business deals.
user
justification: While the majority does seem to back up the claim, the claim states a $2bn USD loan but the answers say $1bn USD loan.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant