Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: South-South zonal head of Nigeria’s anti-graft agency, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ishaq Salihu, addressed a group of protesters in its Port-Harcourt office, Rivers state recently over the trial of George Turnah.

Q1: Did Youths storm EFCC’s South-South office in Port Harcourt, Rivers State on June 3rd 2020 as stated in the claim
A1: No, this story was first published online on June 1st 2017.

Q2: Was George Turnah having a trial to protest over?
A2: His trial was in 2016 and he was never rearrested.

Q3: was the evidence provided proven to be a correct happening
A3: several Google searches revealed that the claim is at least three years old as the exact content of the report was first posted online on Nairaland
user
justification: this didn't happen recently, it is misrepresented and therefore false. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant