Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: MMR Vaccine does not causes autism in Children.

Q1: Is there any data showing that vaccines can increase the risk of autism?
A1: The claim began with a 1998 study published in the Lancet, a British medical journal. The article has since been retracted. The study was led by gastroenterologist Andrew Wakefield, MD. It claimed that, in an examination of 12 children, evidence of the measles virus had been found in the digestive systems of kids who had shown symptoms of autism after an MMR vaccination.

Q2: What does recent research show?
A2: A massive 10-year study of more than 600,000 children has again confirmed that vaccines do not cause autism.

Published in the Annals of Medicine in March 2019, it found there was no link between kids being given the vaccine against the childhood diseases of measles, mumps and rubella – the MMR vaccine – and kids developing autism.
user
justification: The answers and sources show that there is strong evidence that the MMR vaccine does not cause autism in children so the claim is supported.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant