Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A pizza place in Washington, D.C. -- Comet Ping Pong has ties to Hillary Clinton and other leading Democrats

Q1: What is Pizzagate?
A1: Pizzagate is the theory that holds that a particular pizza place in Washington, D.C. -- Comet Ping Pong -- is a front for a child sex-trafficking ring tied to Hillary Clinton and other leading Democrats.

Q2: Is there any evidence of Hillary Clinton and other leading Democrats links to comet ping pong?
A2: No, because There is not proven links at all

Q3: is there any evidence of child abuse happening at comet ping pong?
A3: No, because A man traveled to the area and fired an assault rifle inside the restaurant, determined to investigate the claims himself. No one was injured, there was no evidence of child abuse.
user
justification: No. There is not proven links at all

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant