Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: It is a constitutional requirement in Kenya, that when the president is away, the deputy president must be in the country.

Q1: What does the Constitution say about the president and deputy?
A1: Subject to Article 134, when the President is absent or is temporarily incapacitated, and during any other period that the President decides, the Deputy President shall act as the President.

Q2: Has there been an issue before with the president and deputy being away at the same time?
A2: Both the president and the deputy president were away on Wednesday February 26.

Both President Kenyatta and his deputy have argued in before the ICC where they are both charged with crimes against humanity that the constitution does not allow them to be out of the country at the same time.
user
justification: From the first question and answer pair it does indeed seem, that the Kenyan deputy president requires to be present if the actual president is absent. Thereof, the claim is supported

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant