Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Auto workers across Michigan could have lost their jobs if not for Barack Obama and Joe Biden

Q1: How did the Obama administration save the jobs of autoworkers according to  the claim?
A1: The federal bailout of General Motors Co, Chrysler and parts suppliers in 2009 saved 1.5 million U.S. jobs and preserved $105.3 billion in personal and social insurance tax collections, according to a study released on Monday.

The Bush and Obama administrations loaned the auto industry, including GM and Chrysler, which is now controlled by Italy’s Fiat, $80 billion to avoid the collapse of the industry that they felt would result in the loss of millions of U.S. jobs.

Q2: What does experts and the public think about the effect of this bail-out on saving Auto jobs in the US?
A2: The Center for Automotive Research (CAR) in Ann Arbor, Michigan, estimated in its study that the bailout saved a lot of jobs, even crediting for a rebound of the industry in 2010 after the initial fallout.
user
justification: From the 2nd QA it seems that the Obama administration indeed helped the autoworkers, therefore the claim is supported

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant