Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Hillary ignored multiple requests for security

Q1: Was Hilary Clinton aware of requests for more security from the U.S Ambassador to Libya, prior to September 11th 2012?
A1: There is no evidence to suggest Hilary Clinton was made aware of requests for more security from the U.S Ambassador to Libya, prior to September 11th 2012.

Q2: Did the State Department ignore requests for more security from the U.S Ambassador to Libya made prior to September 11th 2012?
A2: True.
user
justification: One set of QA appears to suggest that theres no evidence to suggest that Hilary Clinton was aware of the requests for more security prior to September 11 2012 where as the second QA suggests that the state department ignored the requests but makes no mention specifically of Hilary Clintons involvement.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant