Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A video claiming to show “shocking secrets of the food industry” said You can check whether honey has been diluted with sugar syrup by washing it in water to reveal a honeycomb pattern and the honey’s genetic memory.

Q1: Why does a honeycomb-like pattern sometimes appear when you mix honey in water?
A1: University of the Sunshine Coast's Dr Peter Brooks, a chemist with extensive knowledge of the chemical composition of honey, said he would not trust results to come out of DIY tests found on the internet. "We see a lot of honeys coming through our lab … they can be anything from thin, depending on the species of tree it comes from, or it can be very thick," Dr Brooks said. "I imagine honeys we test in our labs, half of them would pass these tests and half would fail, almost randomly. "And if you get a good fake honey, one that simulates honey fairly well, you can't tell the difference by the tests they're proposing between a good fake honey and a normal honey. "Good fake honeys are made to mimic a real honey, and they're very hard to tell the difference between them sometimes. I don't think you can tell the difference on these simple tests."

Q2: Does honey have a genetic memory?
A2: No, because Honey is made up of carbohydrates, proteins, amino acids, vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and other compounds. It contains no genetic material, therefore does not have 'genetic memory'.
user
justification: The evidence finds that the honeycomb pattern in honey can differ depending on the species of tree it came from. It is even very hard to tell the difference between fake and real honey. Honey also has no genetic memory and is made up of carbohydrates, proteins, amino acids, vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and other compounds. Hence, this claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant