Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Professor Tasuku Honjo worked in the Wuhan laboratory in China for four years.

Q1: Where does Professor Honjo currently work?
A1: Professor Honjo works as a Deputy Director-General and Distinguished Professor at the Kyoto University Institute for Advanced Study (KUIAS).

Q2: Has Professor Honjo ever worked in the Wuhan laboratory in China?
A2: No, because There is no evidence to suggest that Professor Honjo worked at the Wuhan laboratory in China.
user
justification: Source for both answers shows this man's CV/work biography but I think we need to establish what "the Wuhan laboratory" is called.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant