Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Sayfullo Saipov, the Uzbekistan-born suspect on trial for the 2017 truck attack in New York, US, is an example of chain migration, ie bringing many people into the US.

Q1: Did Sayfullo Saipov bring his wife over from Uzbeckistan?
A1: Saipov had won a U.S. green (residence) card in a 2010 lottery and left for the United States that same year where he had later married an Uzbek woman living there, Jahon said.

Q2: Did Sayfullo Saipov bring is parents over from Uzbeckistan?
A2: No, because His parents live in Tashkent
user
justification: This is claim is refuted. Sayfullo Sapio won US residency through a lottery system, not chain migration. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant