Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Shubham Baghel, one of the assailants in an attack on three people for carrying beef, is a member of a Hindutva organization called Sri Ram Sena.

Q1: Is Shubham Baghel a member of a Hindutva organisation called Sri Ram Sena?
A1: Through his Facebook profile, there is no confirmation on whether Baghel is a member of a Hindutva organisation called Sri Ram Sena.

Q2: Is Shubham Baghel a member of the Hindutva organisation called Sri Ram Sena
A2: Identifying themselves as members of Shriram Sena, Baghel, a habitual offender, had shared the video clip on his Facebook page a day after the assault

Q3: Is there any evidence on his facebook page that suggests his a member of the Hindutva organization
A3: No, because There is nothing that points to him being a member of the orginazation
user
justification: The answer to Q1 is not reliable evidence and the source reveals more than one user of this name.
Q2 isn't necessary, the answer is a 2nd answer to Q1. The answer lacks content, a is evidenced by the source. It is cherrypicked.
Q3 asks about what we already know from Q&A1.
There's simply not enough evidence to support/refute the claim


verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant