Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Vitamin D helps protect against COVID-19.

Q1: How can Vitamin D help reduce COVID-19?
A1: Vitamin D may strengthen the immune system, particularly of people whose Vitamin D levels are low

Q2: Is there evidence to suggest that vitamin D could prevent or treat COVID-19?
A2: We found no clinical evidence on vitamin D in COVID-19. There was no evidence related to vitamin D deficiency predisposing to COVID-19, nor were there studies of supplementation for preventing or treating COVID-19.

Q3: Could vitamin D help decrease the chance of covid 19?
A3: “There are many crackpot claims about miracle cures floating around,” he wrote, “but the science supports the possibility – although not the proof – that Vitamin D may strengthen the immune system, particularly of people whose Vitamin D levels are low.”
user
justification: the question/answer pairs show that while vitamin D can help the immune system, there is no evidence that it prevents covid-19

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant