Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Chris Jacobs is a "Never-Trumper", i.e. someone who does not support Donald Trump

Q1: Has Chris Jacobs critized Trump?
A1: Chris Jacobs critized the Trump administration for not declaring the heroin and opioid crisis a national emergency.

Q2: Has Jacobs said he supports Trump?
A2: Chris Jacobs released a statement saying that he supports Trump's agenda.

Q3: Did Chris Jacobs vote for Trump in 2016?
A3: But Jacobs has recently affirmed his support for the president, arguing that he would be a more effective ally in the House.

"I voted for the president, I support his agenda and I’m running for Congress because the president needs somebody in the 27th congressional district who can win this seat in 2020 and help move his agenda in Congress," Jacobs said in a statement
user
justification: The Q&A pair state that chris jacobs was only critical of the way trump handled a certain situation, but supports him overall.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant