Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Americans do not need a licence to drive automobiles on public roads

Q1: Is driving without a license illegal in the USA?
A1: Penalties for Driving Without a License
Failure to produce a valid driver's license when asked by a police officer can lead to a number of penalties depending on the circumstances. Charges typically fall into one of two categories: correctable offenses and willful violations.

Correctable Offenses

Simply forgetting to carry your driver's license while driving a vehicle may lead to a "fix-it ticket," where you must later show proof that you fixed the violation in order to have the citation dismissed by the traffic court. Failure to present this evidence typically leads to fines or other penalties.

Willful Violations

Penalties for willful violations of licensing requirements, such as driving on a suspended or revoked license, are much more serious. Driver's licenses are frequently suspended for DUI offenses, since states have an interest in keeping dangerous drivers off the roads. Therefore, when a driver willfully drives with a suspended or revoked driver's license, they may be cited, arrested, and charged with a misdemeanor offense.

Q2: Did the U.S. Supreme Court rule that Americans do not need a licence to drive automobiles on public roads?
A2: No, because No record exists of this.
user
justification: The second answer and source shows that you have to have a licence to drive a vehicle in the US so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant