Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The push by Assembly Democrats seeking Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations for a lawmaker were timed to make Vos look bad.

Q1: Who is 'vos' that the claim refers to?
A1: Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, Republican for Rochester

Q2: What accommodations for a lawmaker were democrats looking to peruse under the Americans with Disabilities Act?
A2: They were urging Assembly speaker to allow paralyzed lawmaker to call in to meetings

Q3: How could this accommodation request impact Robin Vos?
A3: On July 29, 2019 vos had said he thinks it is "disrespectful for someone to be asking questions over a microphone or a speakerphone.

Q4: When did democrats launce a bid to have accommodations made for a disabled lawmaker?
A4: Aug. 8, 2019

Q5: What were the accommodations asked for by the democrats?
A5: to accommodate his request to call into meetings by phone.

Q6: What date did he ask for this accomodation?
A6: Aug. 8, 2019

Q7: When did vos make his remarks about it being disrespectful to 'call into meetings''?
A7: July 29, 2019:
user
justification: QA pairs indicate Vos made the comment 10 days before the accommodations were asked for.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant