Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Iain Duncan Smith gets free stationery as a financial benefit for being an MP in the UK House of Commons.

Q1: Is stationery free for politicians in the UK?
A1: IPSA will not pay claims for any of the following:
a. alcoholic drinks;
b. stationery provided by the House of Commons;
c. newsletters;
d. funding of any material, other than websites, that contains a party political logo or
emblem; or
e. personal accountancy or tax advice.

Q2: Can politicians claim for stationery in the UK?
A2: Equipment and supplies for the office or surgery - including computers, printers, faxes, photocopiers, desks, stationery, phone bills, some postage costs (in addition to AOE, MPs can also claim for a certain amount of Commons stationery and pre-paid envelopes)
user
justification: The UK House of Commons updated version of the Green Book grants such Expenses.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant