Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A 14-hour curfew will help to break the chain and curb the further spread of the coronavirus.

Q1: How long can coronavirus live on surfaces?
A1: viable virus
could be detected in aerosols up to 3 hours post aerosolization, up to 4 hours on copper, up to 24 hours on
cardboard and up to 2-3 days on plastic and stainless steel

Q2: What was the reasoning for the 14 hour curfew?
A2: That the corona virus life is 12 hours on a surface, so a 14 hour curfew will break the chain of coronavirus spread.

Q3: How long can corona virus live on surfaces
A3: Research (Doremalen et al 2020) published in the New England Journal of Medicine conducted by American scientists (preprint here) suggests that the new coronavirus (COVID-19) can live in the air for several hours and on some surfaces for as long as 2-3 days. They tested the virus by spraying into the air by a nebuliser mimicking the coughing action of an infected person. They found that it could be detected up to a minimum of 3 hours later in the air, up to 4 hours on copper surfaces, up to 24 hours on cardboard and up to 2-3 days on plastic and stainless steel surfaces.

Q4: Does the inability to detect the virus mean its not present
A4: Finally, the inability to detect the virus (under the detection threshold) is not equivalent to the complete elimination of the virus. However, to acquire an infection, one needs a minimum threshold or level or viral exposure
user
justification: A 14 hour curfew would not help break and curb further spread of coronavirus, especially when a virus can live up to 24 hours on
cardboard and up to 2-3 days on plastic and stainless steel.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant