Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The minimum wage should be £18 an hour, because in 1999 one hour’s pay at minimum wage could buy you 72 Freddos, but in 2017 it could only buy you 30 Freddos.

Q1: How much did Freddos cost in 1999?
A1: The Freddo – that frog-shaped lump of Cadbury’s chocolate much appreciated by those who don’t want a whole Dairy Milk but wouldn’t mind a little something-or-other now you mention it – originally hit Britain’s shelves in the mid-90s, when it was priced at 10 pence.

Q2: What was the UK minimum wage in 1999?
A2: £3.60 - so you could get 36 freddos.

Q3: How much did Freddos cost in 2017?
A3: 30p.

Q4: What was the UK minimum wage in 2017?
A4: £7.50 for those aged 25 and over, and £7.05 for those aged 21-14.
user
justification: You could only buy 36 Freddos not 72 which makes the rest of the argument invalid.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant