Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: A greater proportion of 16 year olds vote in elections in Scotland, Wales and Austria than 18 and 20 year olds.

Q1: In Austria, what is the turnout rate of 16 and 17-year-olds to elections
A1: Even though 16- to 17-year-olds exhibit somewhat lower  general  interest  in  politics  and  lower  internal  efficacy,  turnout  is  generally  higher compared to older first-time voters and similar to the electorate’s average, they follow electoral campaigns to the same extent as do other young voters, and  they  exhibit  considerably  high levels of external efficacy and satisfaction with democracy

Q2: In Scotland in 2017, what percentage of 16 to 17-year-olds voted compared to the 18-24-year-olds
A2: 51 per cent of 16- and 17- year-olds claim to have voted, compared with 39 per cent of those aged 18 to 24

Q3: In Wales, what is the turnout rate of 16 and 17-year-olds to elections?
A3: 16 and 17 year olds will be able to vote for the first time at the Senedd Elections in 2021, as part of the biggest changes to the democratic process in Wales in half a century.
user
justification: Only QA 2 confirms the rate of voting was higher for 16-17 year olds in Scotland.
QA 1 says 16-17 year olds in Austria vote more than older first time voters without stating what age the ‘older’ voters are.
QA 3 implies 16-17 year olds in Wales could not vote at the time the claim was made, therefore the claim could not be true for Wales.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant