Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Congress party claims regarding shortfall in Government earnings

Q1: What's the reason for the shortfall in government earnings
A1: Lower gross tax revenue in the year 2018-2019; Growth rate of Central Government’s Fiscal Indicators ( in per cent)
Items 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 PA 2019-20 BE*
Revenue Receipts 8.5 8.5 15.0 4.4 8.2 26.4
Gross Tax Revenue 9.3 16.9 17.9 11.8 8.4 18.3
Net Tax Revenue 10.8 4.4 16.7 12.8 6.0 25.3
Non-Tax Revenue -0.5 27.0 8.6 -29.4 22.3 32.9
Non-debt Capital 
Receipts#
23.0 22.3 3.8 77.0 -2.5 6.3
Non-debt Receipts 9.1 9.1 14.4 7.7 7.4 25.0
Total Expenditure 6.7 7.6 10.3 8.4 8.1 20.4
Revenue Expenditure 6.9 4.8 9.9 11.1 6.8 21.9
Capital Expenditure 4.8 28.6 12.5 -7.5 16.9 10.

Q2: Was there a shortfall in government earnings in 2018-19 to the tune of Rs.1.7 lakh crores?
A2: There is a difference which amounted to Rs. 1.7 lakh crores between the ‘Provisional Actuals’ of revenue receipts provided in the Economic Survey of India and the ‘Revised Estimates’ of revenue receipts as reported by the government for 2018-19. Since provisional actuals (PA) may be a better estimate of the actual figures, there could well be a shortfall in government earnings for 2018-19. Hence the claim is TRUE.
user
justification: The evidence shows a shortfall in government earnings

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant