Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Too much exposure to 5G, can literally fry the human central nervous system.

Q1: What is 5G?
A1: It is the next generation mobile phone network and it promises much higher connection speeds, lower latency (response times) and to be more reliable than the creaking 4G networks we have now.

Q2: Can exposure to the 5G signal be bad for health?
A2: At this time, there has been very little research showing that the RF waves used in 5G networks are any more (or less) of a concern than the other RF wavelengths used in cellular communication.

Q3: Can 5G signals penetrate the body?
A3: The higher frequency waves used for 5G are less able to penetrate the body than lower frequency waves currently used,  so in theory they might be less likely to have any potential health effects.
user
justification: There is no evidence that 5G is harmful to humans or fries the human central nervous system.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant