Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Pakistani media reported Clashes between Indian & Chinese forces in Naku La sector of North Sikkim resulted in China killing 158 Indian soldiers, Which is the same number which Pakistan beat India by in the Champion trophy final cricket game at the oval in England.

Q1: What was the final score of the 2017 Champion trophy final ?
A1: Pakistan 338 - India 158
(Difference of 180 runs)

Q2: Did India report any losses relating to this clash ?
A2: In a report by Hindustan times External affairs ministry spokesperson Gopal Baglay said Such reports are utterly baseless, malicious and mischievous,"

Q3: Did China report any losses relating to this clash?
A3: China described the reports from Pakistan as "Baseless & fake"

Q4: Did a clash take place?
A4: A report by business today says that while a clash did occur, only minor injuries were sustained by each side.
user
justification: the first Q and A pair show that the number match  part of the claim is correct, However the claim as a whole is shown to be false by the following Q and A pairs as they show no deaths occurred

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant