Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The Biden-Sanders agenda proposes to end cash bail, releasing dangerous criminals onto US streets.

Q1: Do the Biden-Sanders Unity Task Force recommendations support ending cash bail?
A1: Democrats support eliminating the use
of cash bail and believe no one should be imprisoned merely for failing to pay fines or fees.

Q2: Is the End Cash Bail proposal aimed at dangerous criminals?
A2: No, because Such concerns led California to make the controversial decision in August 2018 to eliminate cash bail altogether, a move that the bail bond industry blocked pending a 2020 statewide referendum. In the new system, judges would detain defendants pretrial only if they are deemed dangerous or likely to skip court.

Q3: Are there states that don't have the authority to determine if someone is dangerous for pre-trial release?
A3: Thanks to a 1971 law, New York is the only state in the country where judges don’t have the authority to consider a person’s possible “dangerousness” in determining the conditions of their release before trial. When reform negotiations in the state began and the door was opened to modifying that system, some lawmakers wanted to add dangerousness as a sanctioned factor for pre-trial release, in exchange for the total abolition of bail in the state. Progressive reformers bristled—arguing that too often, judges ascribe dangerousness in ways that amplify the racial discrimination that pervades the justice system. Ultimately, they pursued a compromise that did not add dangerousness but preserved bail only for the most serious crimes.
user
justification: The proposal is to end cash bail, unless the person is deemed dangerous or likely to skip court.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant