Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Kirsten Gillibrand in 2005 ran on Medicare for all.

Q1: Was Medicare for all a feature of Kirsten Gillibrand's 2005 Campaign?
A1: Yes she had a comprehensive Health Care Solutions Plan.
user
justification: Seems that she ran for the post. Therefore,the labels supported

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant