Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Iran’s hostilities substantially increased after the foolish Iran nuclear deal was signed in 2013 and they were given $150 billion, not to mention $1.8 billion in cash

Q1: When was the Iran nuclear deal signed?
A1: July 14th 2015 so not 2013 as stated in claim.

Q2: Were Iran given $1.8 Billion in cash?
A2: Yes but it had nothing to do with the Iran Nuclear agreement and was an old settlement between the countries.
user
justification: This claim is refuted. Firstly, the Iran nuclear deal was signed in 2015 not 2013- so this part of the claim is false. Also the "$1.8 billion in cash" deal is true but completely unrelated to the Iran nuclear deal. Therefore, the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant