Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Detainees in US border patrol facilities told by guards to drink water from toilets.

Q1: Were detainees in border patrol facilities told by guards to drink water from toilets?
A1: Ocasio-Cortez responded to that tweet, saying it was indeed a toilet like that but the sink portion wasn’t working.

“This was in fact the type of toilet we saw in the cell. Except there was just one, and the sink portion was not functioning – @AyannaPressley smartly tried to open the faucet, and nothing came out,” Ocasio-Cortez said, referring to Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts. “So the women were told they could drink out of the bowl.”

Q2: Are Border Patrol agents making detainees in US border patrol facilities to drink out of toilets?
A2: It’s unclear whether the reference to toilets was to a sink/toilet combination unit and the tap water from the sink part.
user
justification: it is unclear what was being referred to in this case, the answers say "the women were told they could drink out the bowl" but It’s unclear whether the reference to toilets was to a sink/toilet combination unit and the tap water from the sink part.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant