Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Democrats in the House of Representatives voted for the right of illegal immigrants to vote in the US.

Q1: Can immigrants vote in US federal elections?
A1: No, because US Federal Law prohibits aliens from voting in federal elections.

Q2: Did Dan Crenshaw file a Motion to Recommit the For the People Act?
A2: Yes, because It was introduced the same day as the Act was voted on.

Q3: Dis Democrats vote against to Motion to Recommit the For the People ACt?
A3: Yes, because 227 nays.

Q4: Is a Motion to Recommit legally binding?
A4: No, because . A “sense of” resolution is not legally binding
because it is not presented to the President for his signature

Q5: Is the H.R. 1 bill proposing changes to the voting rights of illegal immigrants?
A5: No, because There is no mention of changing the voting laws to allow illegal immigrants to vote.

Q6: What changes does the H.R. 1 bill propose to election laws?
A6: H.R. 1 makes critical reforms across three key areas:

Voting Rights
- Improve Access 
- Promote Integrity
- Ensure Security

Campaign Finance
- Guarantee Disclosure 
- Empower Citizens

Ethics and Accountability
- Fortify Ethics Law
- Impose Greater Ethics Enforcement
user
justification: Q&A 3 says democrats voted against a bill to illegal immigrants the right to vote in the US.
With Q&A 7 saying another bill connected to voting also does not give illegal immigrants this right as is claimed.


verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant