Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Russian law prohibits political activity in schools.

Q1: Does Russian law prohibit political activity in schools?
A1: No answer could be found.

Q2: Is there any evidence of political activity in Russian Schools?
A2: Yes, because Teachers, university professors and researchers called on their colleagues to show integrity in the March 4 presidential election. The open letter, which was signed by almost 150 workers in the field of science and education, was received on February 3 at the disposal of Kasparov.Ru .

"Teachers can do a lot to ensure that elections are fair - voting often takes place in school buildings, the composition of election commissions is often formed from teachers and heads of educational institutions," the authors of the appeal write.

Meanwhile, only those teachers who are members of United Russia will be members of election commissions in Moscow. In addition, a distribution order for a pro-Putin rally on February 4 on Poklonnaya Hill was sent to schools. Schools are required to provide several people to participate in the rally.

The publication also claims that employees of schools and state-owned companies are forced to go on February 4 to the opposition procession "For Fair Elections" from Yakimanka to Bolotnaya Square, but with posters and slogans in support of Vladimir Putin.

Q3: Has Putin visited schools during his term as president?
A3: Yes, because For example, he had the say about how to phrase new history books in 2013
user
justification: there isn't enough evidence about Russia's law about political activity in schools. 

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant