Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Purdue Pharma has been able to act with complete impunity and pay no consequences for the opioid crisis. Not a single night in jail.

Q1: Has Purdue Pharma faced legal action in the past?
A1: Yes, because John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney for the Western District of Virginia, and Virginia
Attorney General Bob McDonnell announced today that The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc.,
along with its President, Chief Legal Officer, and former Chief Medical Officer have pleaded guilty to charges of misbranding Purdue’s addictive and highly abusable drug OxyContin.

Q2: What was the reason for Purdue Pharma's legal action?
A2: The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., and the three executives have
admitted that Purdue fraudulently marketed OxyContin by falsely claiming that OxyContin
was less addictive, less subject to abuse, and less likely to cause withdrawal symptoms than
other pain medications when there was no medical research to support these claims and
without Food and Drug Administration approval of these claims.

Q3: What were Purdue Pharma's consequences for the charges of misbranding of Purdue’s addictive and highly abusable drug OxyContin?
A3: Purdue and the three executives will pay a total of $634,515,475.

Q4: Has Purdue Pharma faced any other legal action?
A4: Yes, because Five more states filed lawsuits against Purdue Pharma on Thursday, bringing to 44 the total number accusing the OxyContin maker of fueling the nation's opioid crisis.

Q5: has the company been able to act with complete impunity and pay no consequences
A5: No, because In 2007, the company and three executives pleaded guilty in federal court to charges relating to “misbranding” OxyContin. Collectively, they agreed to pay more than $634 million in fines and other payments — what was described by the New York Times as “one of the largest amounts ever paid by a drug company in such a case.
user
justification: Purdue Pharma has indeed faced consequences for the opioid crisis. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant