Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Sen. Ted Cruz's 2018 campaign tried to trick elderly Texans with suspicious mailers

Q1: Was there anything controversial about any campaign letters sent out by Senator Ted Cruz in 2018?
A1: Ted Cruz’s Senate re-election campaign has been sending voters in Texas a fund-raising letter in an envelope labeled “summons enclosed,” drawing criticism from some who called it misleading and raising questions about whether such a practice was legal.

Confusion arises not just from the letter itself but from the envelope it arrives in.

The fund-raising appeal comes in an envelope with the words “SUMMONS ENCLOSED — OPEN IMMEDIATELY” written across it in large capital letters. In the upper left-hand corner are three lines of text: “Official Travis County Summons, Voter Enrollment Campaign Division, Ted Cruz for Senate 2018.”

Q2: Were the 2018 campaign letters sent out by Ted Cruz in envelopes labelled “summons enclosed”, directly targeting elderly Texans?
A2: No, because However the concern that elderly voters could be tricked was raised when a photo of one of the letters was posted to Twitter on Sunday by Sean Owen, a data scientist who said it arrived at his home in Austin, Tex., and was addressed to his grandmother, who lived there until she died in April.

“My grandmother was facing cognitive decline at the end of her life and I think if she’d read this she might have been deceived by it,” he said in a phone interview. “It feels shady.”

Q3: Were the 2018 campaign letters sent out by Ted Cruz in envelopes labelled “summons enclosed”, illegal?
A3: No, because The practice is legal according to Myles Martin, a spokesman for the Federal Election Commission, who said the salient question was whether a mailing contains a disclaimer saying that it came from a political campaign. And this one did.

Aside from that, he said in an email, “the F.E.C.’s regulations don’t speak to how candidates may choose to word particular solicitations to potential contributors.”

The letter inside the envelope is more clearly part of a fund-raising effort. The Cruz campaign logo appears at the top of the letter and recipients are given the option to donate a preselected amount of money or to write in their own denominations.

The letter echoes its envelope, though, in its use of language — like “campaign summons” and “conservative affirmation” — that sounds more legal than colloquial.

Q4: Did the 2018 campaign letters sent out by Ted Cruz in envelopes labelled “summons enclosed” raise any ethical concerns?
A4: Yes, because The San-Antonio Express News wrote an editorial headlined: Cruz should rethink his "summons" mailer.
The editorial said:
“.. the problem is the Cruz campaign has made the envelope look much like a legal summons, which can be pretty serious. A summons occurs when a person is sued or ordered to appear in court. Most people are probably not thrilled about getting such a summons.

A reader brought this mailer to our attention because she viewed it as misleading and intimidating. 

… we think the Cruz campaign could do without the legal summons language on the envelope. It’s just too official looking…. It’s understandable he would want to summon conservative support. But certainly his campaign can do that without making it look like a legal threat, right?”
user
justification: Q&A 1 confirms what the claim says about Ted Cruz sending mailers out, However Q&A 2 points out they were not aimed only at elderly people but elderly people did receive them too, so some cherry picking, 
Q&A 4 points out that people did think they were designed to trick people though so also confirming what the claim says about tricking elderly people, but not elderly people only so again some cherry picking.


verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant