Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: EU change to mesh sizes has reduced fishermen’s income by 40%.

Q1: What changes did the EU make to fishermen's mesh net sizes?
A1: '...mesh sizes are now minimum sizes and do not prevent fishermen from using larger mesh sizes if they want to.'

Q2: Has this change in mesh size reduced fishermen's income by 40%?
A2: "Some claimed it could lose up to 40% of their income from just this one ruling" but this comes from an unknown source cited in an interview in a Cornish news site.

Q3: Did the EU's decision to increase the size of fisherman’s meshes will reduce the fisherman's income to 40% ?
A3: The larger the mesh the easier it is for small fish to escape nets undamaged. 
EU regulation has changed and there is now a minimum mesh size in certain areas. That came in place on 1 July 2019.
The European Parliament and Council had two months to object to the delegated act on fishing regulations, but this didn’t happen so it is now law. It’s also now in UK law. The fishermen catching squid too and some claimed it could lose up to 40% of their income from just this one ruling but this hasnt been proved.
user
justification: The claim even states there is no proof of the fishermen loosing 40% of their income

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant