Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Consuming certain plants will stop women from getting pregnant.

Q1: Are there any plants that are approved as contraceptives?
A1: No, because None on the NHS approved methods of contraception.

Q2: Are any plants considered dangerous when used as contraceptives?
A2: Yes, because Several are listed by the UN.

Q3: Is there a natural contraceptive?
A3: Yes, because Natural family planning is a type of contraception which does not rely on any contraceptives but your awareness of your fertility. Couples who use the fertility awareness method track the woman’s cycle and they only have sex on days when conception is unlikely.

Q4: Do consuming certain plants will stop women from getting pregnant ?
A4: The given plants in the claim are misguided to potentially dangerous and diverts from the NHS’s list of approved contraceptive methods. 
Figs, ginger, asafoetida are all common foodstuffs. However, they are not a substitute for contraception and should not be used if you want to prevent pregnancy.
But their are palnts that are harmful for already pregnant women but that does not mean that they are contraceptive and prevent pregnancy.The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) says that papaya is possibly unsafe for pregnant women to eat and should be avoided as it could poison the foetus or cause birth defects.Tea and leaf extracts from the pennyroyal plant do not have serious side-effects, according to the NIH, but the oil of the plant has been called “highly toxic” and linked to liver damage and death. It is unsafe and should not be used if you want to prevent pregnancy.Smartweed also should not be used if you want to prevent pregnancy.
This claim is false as the given foods in the claim do not prevent pregnancy.
user
justification: The Q&A pair show that the claim is misguided, and that the plants are not a substitute for contraception, and that the plants used to make the claim could be harmful to pregnant women.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant