Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Russia is not using illegitimate sanctions against Georgia.

Q1: Is Russia using illegitimate sanctions against Georgia?
A1: We have seen the Russian consumer-protection agency politicize trade and ban certain products when political relations with Russia deteriorate, not only in Georgia, but also in the Baltics, Moldova, Ukraine, and Central Asia,” Sergi Kapanadze, the Dean of the Caucasus School of Governance at the Caucasus University in Tbilisi wrote in a 2014 policy memo for the European Council on Foreign relations.

Q2: What are the sanctions imposed by Russia against Georgia?
A2: After the Rose Revolution brought Saakashvili to power in 2004, Moscow soon began applying energy sanctions to the recalcitrant Georgian leader. As with other defiant ex-Soviet states, Georgia was subjected to massive gas price increases. From 2004 to 2006 the price demanded by Gazprom, the Russian state gas monopoly, increased by nearly 500 percent, from $50 to $235 per thousand cubic meters.19 Moscow tried to portray this as a ‘normal’ price increase, designed to bring Georgia in line with prices charged to Moscow's West European purchasers, which the Kremlin described as the “world market price.” Yet the political rationale was clear. First, price increases were targeted carefully to states which angered Moscow. Georgia, in fact, was treated the worst of any state—it was the first to be forced to pay full ‘Western’ prices, even ahead of Ukraine. Russia's most dramatic action, though, took place on January 22, 2006. Just days earlier it had stopped gas supplies to the Ukraine, allegedly over a pricing dispute. But it seemed that simply turning off the gas valves, even in midwinter, was not enough of a punishment for Georgia. Russia announced that both main gas lines to Georgia had been cut by bomb blasts, allegedly the work of Chechen separatists.23 Doubts were quickly raised. Why would Chechens target Georgia, a state which was at worst neutral in their dispute with Russia—and perhaps covertly a supporter, as Moscow alleged? Although it was never proven, many believed that Moscow had cut the lines deliberately, to weaken Saakashvili's government. Georgia suffered through a few days of closed schools and factories and freezing homes until gas service was restored.24

Q3: What's meant by illigitimate sanctions?
A3: Max Weber
famously defined political legitimacy as the de facto ability of a political regime to
secure acceptance based on belief (‘Legitimita¨tsglaube’) as opposed to securing compliance based on coercion alone.6 In ‘Reply to Habermas’ Rawls dismisses the sociological
or descriptive concept of political legitimacy associated with Weber as insufficient.7 Not
because he thinks that Weber is wrong to focus on de facto acceptance of political
authority, but because Rawls thinks that any sufficient definition of legitimacy would
Langvatn 133
Downloaded from psc.sagepub.com by guest on January 18, 2016
have to acknowledge that there must be a benchmark of appropriate acceptance, or a
benchmark for when our belief that something is legitimate is appropriate. A full examination of political legitimacy must also ask whether
the agent who made the decision is authorized to make the decision, and whether the
decision has been made in accordance with established and recognized procedures that
are themselves appropriately authorized and sufficiently just.
user
justification: the russian santions against georgia are not legal and authroised. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant