Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Water coverage now stands at 63%, up from 57% in Kenya.

Q1: What is the definition of Water Coverage?
A1: 1.1	Water Coverage	Population with access to water services (either with direct service connection or within reach of a public water point) as a percentage of the /total population under utility’s nominal responsibility

Q2: Which organisation in Kenya monitors Water Coverage in that country?
A2: Water Services Regulatory Board. (WASREB)

Their mandate states their powers and functions include:
'Determine and prescribe national standards for the provision of water services and asset development for water services providers.'

Q3: At the time of the claim (July 23 2020) what did the Water Services Regulatory Board say about water coverage in Kenya?
A3: The Water Services Regulatory Board (WASREB) has released the 12th issue of Impact Report. The report is meant to give feedback to the public on how the water services sector is performing, with a view to holding to account institutions charged with service delivery. The report relies on data collected annually from Water Service Providers (WSPs) through the Water Regulation Information System (WARIS).  The 12th edition covers the period 2018/2019 and analyses the performance of 87 Water Service Providers and 47 Counties.

Q4: At the time of the claim, is their any evidence in the WASREB report for the figure of 63% coverage?
A4: No. The report refers to the period 2018/19 and states: 'The average Water Coverage was 59%, which is a growth of 2 percentage points from 2017/18 where coverage was 57%.'

Q5: So is there any data from the year in the claim?
A5: No, this period is not covered
user
justification: there isn't enough data from the year of the claim to confirm if the water coverage has gone up to 63%

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant