Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Woman in a video was mixing urine in food, she was Muslim and employed by a Hindu.

Q1: Is there a report of a woman  who mixed urine into the food of her employer
A1: Asha Kaushal (55), a resident of Bagh Mugalia locality, allegedly laced urine in the food at the kitchen of her employers Surendra Garden residence

Q2: Why did Asha Kaushal mix urine into the food of her employer
A2: Asha mentioned several reasons, including the employer's alleged undesirable behavior towards her younger daughter

Q3: Was Asha Kaushal a Muslim, working in a Hindu household?
A3: No answer could be found.
user
justification: The answers do not show any evidence for whether she was a Muslim and whether her employer was a Hindu so I can't support or refute the claim.

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant