Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: US Republican members of the budget-writing committee sidestepped adding any
regulations to Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operations (CAFOs).

Q1: Did the US Republican members of the budget-writing committee sidestepped adding any regulations to Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) ?
A1: No answer could be found.

Q2: What did the US Republican members of the budget-writing committee do with regards to oversight of large-scale farm regulations?
A2: The committee delayed action on measures on fee changes directly tied to CAFOs, it did not
reject them. And there are clear concerns about the impact of manure on drinking water,
including cases where fecal microbes has been detected in water.

Q3: Did Republicans on the budget-writing committee reject changes tied to CAFO?
A3: The Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules ultimately voted last fall to block a portion of the rule that had placed prohibitions on the movement of deer carcasses from CWD-affected counties. JCRAR members last month officially introduced their legislation to codify the suspension.

Q4: What were the changes proposed for the CAFO?
A4: Under the proposal, now going the Republican-controlled state Legislature, five more science positions and a new bureau would be added to the DNR.

The five positions would be charged with researching water and sources of contamination, while at least two would focus on synthetic chemicals known as PFAS that are present in things ranging from firefighting foam to food packaging.

Evers is looking to add five separate staff positions to oversee concentrated animal feeding operations, or CAFOs. And he wants to up the $345 annual permit fee that CAFO owners who hold a water pollutant discharge elimination system permit have to pay.

That fee would be increased to $660 annually beginning in the first year of the budget, according to a DNR spokesman.

The budget would also create a new permit issuance fee of $3,270 for the operation of a CAFO to be implemented in the first year of the biennium, per DNR. The language would also require CAFO operators to pay $3,270 every five years thereafter for permit reissuance.

Evers’ budget doesn’t include any provisions to increase state park fees or hunting and fishing fees. But it does propose allocating around $2.8 million over the biennium from the conservation fund for the state park system. The budget doesn’t note how much funding each park would receive.
user
justification: One QA pair states they delayed (sidestepped) which supports the claim but another QA pair states they voted to block a portion of the rule relating to placed prohibitions on the movement of deer carcasses from CWD-affected counties.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant