Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Trump's lawyer Jay Sekulow says Trump’s hold on Ukraine aid is like Obama with Egypt in 2013

Q1: Did Trump hold up aid money to Ukraine?
A1: The Trump administration is slow-walking $250 million in military assistance to Ukraine, annoying lawmakers and advocates who argue the funding is critical to keeping Russia at bay.

Q2: Why did the Obama government put a hold on Egypt aid?
A2: The decision to suspend these weapons came reluctantly, several months after the Egyptian military’s July 3, 2013, ouster of President Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood.  Fearing a rupture with the military that would jeopardize US security interests, the US administration did not take any punitive action immediately after Morsi’s overthrow.  Instead it adopted a cautious, wait-and-see approach, hoping, along with many Egyptians, that the coup would set the country quickly on a more democratic path.
user
justification: The sources and answers below show that the 2 scenarios are different and so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant