Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Illegal immigrants in Australia are by law entitled to a job, welfare and $70,000

Q1: In 2019, were illegal immigrants in Australia entitled to a job by law?
A1: No, because In 2019, the Australian Government made it clear that asylum seekers without a visa would never be settled in Australia.

Q2: In 2019, were illegal immigrants in Australia entitled to welfare by law?
A2: No, because In 2019, the Australian Government made it clear that asylum seekers without a visa would never be settled in Australia.

Q3: In 2019, were illegal immigrants in Australia entitled to a payment of $70,000 by law?
A3: No, because In 2019, the Australian Government made it clear that asylum seekers without a visa would never be settled in Australia.
user
justification: Without a visa, Illegal immigrants are unable to work, have access to welfare or receive money from the government.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant