Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Since 1973 the income of the bottom 90% of Americans didn't budge.

Q1: When was this claim made?
A1: 01/04/2019

Q2: Has US income for this period been studied?
A2: No, because The Congressional Budget Office published a Distribution of Household Income covering 1979 to 2015.

Q3: Did the Congressional Budget Office Distribution of Household Income report of 2015 indicate that for 90% of the population income did not increase or decrease?
A3: No, because Various tables indicate that incomes increased before and after taxes & etc.

Q4: Have US wages for the bottom 90% stalled since 1973?
A4: The chart shows clear wage stagnation for the bottom 60 percent of the income scale. The rate did go up for the 70 and 80 percent levels.

Q5: Has the share of pre-tax national income for the bottom 90% of American stayed the same since 1973?
A5: No, because This shows that both the bottom 50 percent and the next 40 percent have taken declining shares of the nation’s income since 1973.
user
justification: The Q&A pair state that data for the period in the claim in unavailable, and best available data concludes a worse outcome than stated

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant