Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Jacob Rothschild owns a patent to coronavirus.

Q1: What is coronavirus?
A1: Coronavirus is not a single virus but a family of viruses which includes the common cold, SARS (the severe acute respiratory syndrome, of which there were outbreaks in 2002 and 2004) and this new coronavirus identified in people in Wuhan.

Q2: Are there any patents for this new coronovirus?
A2: There are no patents for this new coronavirus.

A patent application from 2015 does exist for a different type of coronavirus and is referred to by users in the comments to the post.

Q3: Is this the same virus as COVID-19?
A3: This patent refers to a “live attenuated” version of the avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV). This is essentially a weakened version of the virus, patented with the aim of eventually developing it into a vaccine against the disease for birds and other animals.

Q4: Is the patent owned by Jacob Rothschild?
A4: No, because This patent is held by the UK-based Pirbright Institute, researchers of viral diseases in livestock.

The Pirbright Institute is not owned by Jacob Rothschild. We can find no evidence of any link between Mr Rothschild and the Institute.

The Institute says that in 2018/19 it received £12.6 million from public funds through the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and £35 million from grants and commercial activity.
user
justification: There is no patent owned by anyone for coronavirus 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant