Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Michelle Obama had to Surrender her Law License because she committed  'Insurance Fraud'

Q1: Is there a record of Michelle Obama on the Illinois ARDC website?
A1: Michelle Obama is shown as a registered lawyer, admitted on 5/12/1989, and is noted as not authorised to practice.

Q2: Is there any record of Michelle Obama been disciplined or subject of a disciplinary proceeding in Illinois?
A2: No, because A search on the ARDC website does not list Michelle Obama as having a public record of discipline" or "pending proceedings" attached to her name.
user
justification: This claim is refuted. According to the QA pairs, Michelle Obama is indeed a registered lawyer who is noted ass not 'authorised to practice'. However, there is no record of why nor any discipline actions attatched to why she is 'not authorised to practice'. The claim states it is due to 'insurance fraud' which is not proven in the QA pairs. Therefore, this claim is refuted. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant