Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Buncombe County Sheriff Quentin Miller says an ICE detainer request is not a valid warrant.

Q1: What was the Sheriff Quentin Miller's stance on ICE detainers
A1: Effective immediately, it is the policy of the Buncombe County Sheriff’s Office and the Buncombe County Detention Center that ICE detainers will not be honored.

Q2: What is an ICE detainer
A2: ICE detainers, also known as ICE holds or immigration detainers, are requests that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sends to local enforcement agencies (e.g. police, sheriff, local jail) asking for information about a person who is about to be released from custody and/or asking that the local agency hold that person for an extra amount of time in order to facilitate their deportation.

Q3: Do ICE retainers carry any judicial authority
A3: ICE detainers are not judicial warrants. An arrest warrant is an order signed by a judge that allows a police officer to detain a person because there is “probable cause” to believe that the person has committed a crime. “Probable cause” is the standard of proof that the government must show in order to deprive a person of his or her liberty under the Fourth Amendment.
user
justification: The 1st q&a pair says that the person named in the claim will not honour An ice detainer, the 3rd q&a pair stat that the 'ice detainers are not warrants'
Neither q&a pair link these pieces of information so there is no evidence that the person in the claim said what is claimed but it is strongly  inferred.

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant