Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The US-Iran nuclear deal pushed back a nuclear breakout by 10–20 years.

Q1: What is the US-Iran nuclear deal?
A1: The Iran nuclear deal effectively shuts Iran’s pathways to nuclear weapons while preserving its legal right to civilian nuclear energy. The deal substantially lengthens the time Iran would need to enrich enough uranium for nuclear weapons, putting eyes on the program to detect any activity toward overt weaponization and drastically increasing the chance of detecting any so-called secret “sneakout.”

Q2: Is the Iran nuclear deal delaying a nuclear breakout?
A2: The deal extends the time Iran would need to produce an atomic bomb from two or
three months to at least one year, which would give the United States and its allies an
opportunity to react if the Iranians broke the agreement.

Q3: Does the Iran nuclear deal limit Iran's ability to produce nuclear weapons?
A3: It puts strong, verifiable limits on Iran’s ability to develop a nuclear weapon for at least the next 10 to 15 years and is potentially one of the most consequential accords in recent diplomatic history, with the ability not just to keep
Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon but also to reshape Middle East politics.

Q4: Will Iran be able to produce nuclear weapons once the limits are lifted?
A4: After 15 years, all physical constraints on enrichment imposed
by the agreement will be lifted. At that point, Iran could build an enrichment plant large enough to produce low-enriched uranium to fuel a nuclear power reactor within a matter of years.
user
justification: It seems that a nuclear breakout is a bit big of a statement, therefore the evidence is conflicting. From the 3rd QA it is evident that the deal is in place to prevent Iran from chaning middle eastern politics. Therefore the label is conflicting evidence

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant