Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Mandatory vaccinations is in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code.

Q1: What is the Nuremberg Code?
A1: The Nuremberg Code is a 10-point set of rules for the conduct of human experiments articulated in 1947 in the trials of Nazi doctors and bureaucrats convicted of crimes against humanity for their roles in concentration camp experiments.

Q2: What does the Nuremberg Code say about vaccines and vaccinations?
A2: Nothing.

Q3: So doe's the Nuremburg code have anything to do with Vaccines ?
A3: No, it only addresses Human experimentation. Vaccines are not mentioned at any point.
user
justification: Q&A 2 and 3 show that vaccination is not even mentioned in the Nuremberg  code so makes the main point in the claim Null, as mandatory vaccination cannot be a violation of the code if there in no mention of vaccination at all.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant