Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The Russian government has no desire to create problems for the new Ukrainian government but to tolerate a situation in which people living in the territory of these Donetsk and Luhansk republics are generally deprived of any civil rights. This is already crossing the line from the point of view of human rights.

Q1: Is the Donetsk part of Russia?
A1: No. Donetsk has been temporarily occupied by Russia by force.

Q2: Is Luhansk part of Russia?
A2: No. Luhansk has been temporarily occupied by Russia by force.

Q3: Does the Russian government have no desire to create problems for the new Ukrainian government?
A3: The Russian government has seized Ukrainian land by force. It is therefore unlikely that they have no desire to create problems.

Q4: Are people living in the territory of Donetsk and Luhansk deprived of any civil rights?
A4: Yes. There is a war in Ukraine. This is depriving them of civil rights.
user
justification: Clearly this isnt the case, as the evidence finds, Russia has occupied parts of Ukraines territory and created conflict in these regions between the two nations.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant