Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: In Kenya, the average development budget allocation by counties over the last six financial years has been 40% surpassing the legal requirement of at least 30%.

Q1: How much is the amount allocated to each county s 2012/13 to 2018/19 (billions of shillings) ?
A1: Amounts to Kenya counties 2012/13 to 2018/19 (billions of shillings)
Year	Total Allocation as per County Allocation of Revenue Acts	Treasury transfers to counties as per the national treasury	Total amount of approved transfers in reports controller of budget for release to counties
2012/13*	9.8	9.7	9.7
2013/14	210	195.7	174.4
2014/15	242.5	231.1	228.5
2015/16	287.04	276.2	272.1
2016/17	302.2	305	299.7
2017/18	341.7	330.3	328.9
2018/19	372.7	263.41	200.92
TOTAL	1,765.9	1,611.4	1,514.2

Q2: Did The average development allocation by counties from 2012/13 to 2018/19  rose to 40% surpassing the legal requirement of at least 30%. ?
A2: County budgets 2013/14 to 2018/19 (billions of shillings)
Financial year	Recurrent budget	Development budget	Total budget	Development budget share of total budget
2013/14	160.7	100.4	261.1	38.5%
2014/15	181.4	144.9	326.3	44.4%
2015/16	208.8	158.6	367.4	43.2%
2016/17	240.9	158.4	399.3	39.6%
2017/18	271.3	139.2	410.5	33.9%
2018/19	276.4	187.5	463.9	40.4%
Total	1,339.5	889	2,228.5	39.9%
user
justification: If rounded up then indeed the percentages are up to 40%, therefore the claim is supported 

verdict: 'Supported'
assistant