Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Nigeria's capital expenditure in 2016 was N1.2 trillion and 2017 was N1.5 trillion.

Q1: What was the capital expenditure component of Nigeria's spending in 2016?
A1: The capital expenditure component of the spending in 2016 was only N173bn of the projected N1.58tn. However, some of the capital expenses were carried into the new fiscal year 2017 in line with the clause attached to the Appropriation act.

Q2: What was the capital expenditure component of Nigeria's spending in 2017?
A2: the Minister of Power, Works and Housing (PWH), Babatunde Raji Fashola suggest that his ministry did not complete any capital project in 2017, despite receiving the largest capital expenditure allocation across all parastatals. 

Despite the Ministry's reports, the Debt Management Office (DMO) stated that it released ₦1.2 trillion to finance capital projects in 2017. Given the size of Mr Fashola's ministry, it is improbable that they received none of these funds. The implication is that the Ministry received these funds too late in the year to execute for that calendar year.

That is highly plausible. Afterall, in December 2017, the Minister of Finance announced the Ministry released ₦750 billion for capital projects. These projects effectively become 2018 projects.
user
justification: It seems that the  umbers were slightly different, therefore the claim is refuted

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant