Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: CNN admitted the Entire Russian Collusion Theory Was A Hoax

Q1: Where was it claimed that CNN admitted the entire Russian collusion theory was a hoax?
A1: The claim was made in the headline of an article on the website Last Minute News (TheLast-News.com):
"CNN Breaks Down, Finally Admits Entire Russian Collusion Theory Was A Hoax"

Q2: Does the content of the article on the Last Minute News website make the same claim as its headline (that CNN admitted the Russian collusion theory was a hoax)?
A2: No, because The article states:
“It must have been very painful for the folks at CNN to write the report below, but it sure looks like the entire Russian collusion thing was a hoax perpetrated by rogue elements of the FBI, as CNN reports:

"A former FBI lawyer is under criminal investigation after allegedly altering a document related to 2016 surveillance of a Trump campaign adviser, several people briefed on the matter told CNN.

The possibility of a substantive change to an investigative document is likely to fuel accusations from President Donald Trump and his allies that the FBI committed wrongdoing in its investigation of connections between Russian election meddling and the Trump campaign.””

Q3: Does the CNN article on which the claim is based state that the Russian collusion theory is a hoax?
A3: No, because There is no mention of the Russian collusion theory being a hoax, the article states:
“American intelligence agencies and the Justice Department have not swayed from their finding that Russia interfered in the 2016 election by hacking the Democrats and spreading pro-Trump propaganda online. And even former top Trump campaign officials have corroborated special counsel Robert Mueller’s finding that the Trump campaign planned some of its strategy around the Russian hacks, and had multiple contacts with Kremlin-linked individuals in 2016”.
user
justification: From the Q&A it seems CNN never said what is in the claim, so it is refuted. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant