Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: According to Rahul Gandhi India's Modi government has made a law which allows the shooting of tribals.

Q1: What law was Rahul Gandhi referencing in his speech?
A1: Amendments to the Indian Forest Act 1927

Q2: What is the Amendments to the Indian Forest Act 1927?
A2: An act to provide for conservation, enrichment and sustainable management of forest resources and matters connected therewith to safeguard ecological stability to ensure provision of ecosystem services in perpetuity and to address the concerns related to climate change and international commitments.

Q3: Does this act allow for the shooting of tribals?
A3: Any forest officer, may if necessary, to prevent the commission of any offence under this Act or under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, or to apprehend any person engaged in the commission of an offence under the said Acts, or who has committed such offence, use as little force including firearms and do as little injury to person and property, as may be consistent with the prevention of the offence.

Q4: Is this act an official law or just a provision?
A4: It is a 'draft'- not officially passed yet.
user
justification: The law allows a forest officer to use necessary force if a person is committing an offence against the Wildlife (Protection) Act. Also, the law hasn't officially passed yet

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant