Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: In the United States, the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) admitted in federal court that it does not have studies to support the claim that vaccines do not cause autism.

Q1: What does the CDC say about vaccines causing autism?
A1: studies have shown that there is no link between receiving vaccines and developing ASD.

Q2: Has the CDC said in federal court that it des not have the studies to support the claim that vaccines do not cause autism?
A2: No answer could be found.

Q3: Has the CDC submitted studies that show vaccines do not cause autism?
A3: Yes, because 20 studies submitted in a legal case.
user
justification: The 3rd Q&A pair states that the CDC submitted 20 studies to a legal case, confirming no link between vaccines and autisim, However no other Q&A pair state if the claim mentioning a court case is true, But as the 3rd does mention a 'legal case' then it could be likely this is the case in the claim but also shows the did submit studies, which combined refutes the claim.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant