Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Kobe Bryant was locked in a legal battle with big pharma over the right to use the phrase "Black Mamba”.

Q1: Was Kobe Bryant involved in a legal battle over the right to use his nickname Black Mamba?
A1: Yes, because Bryant has been battling the pharmaceutical company Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals for years. Hi-Tech is attempting to trademark the name “Black Mamba HYPERRUSH.” Bryant is fighting them saying they were ripping off his famous nickname.

Q2: Which company was Kobe Bryant involved in a legal battle with over the right to use his nickname Black Mamba?
A2: Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals

Q3: Is Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals a big pharma company?
A3: No, because Big pharma is a term that encompasses the largest players in the pharmaceutical industry including AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Maxim, Merck, Monsanto, Pfizer, Roche, Tanabe, Wyeth.
user
justification: It seems that Kobe Bryant was in a legal battle with a firm about the phrase'Black mamba" but it was not with a big Pharma. 

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant