Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Poland lowered its retirement age using money from the EU.

Q1: Where does the funding Poland gets from the EU go towards?
A1: The funding Poland gets from the EU budget goes to specific schemes such as  supporting agriculture, infrastructure or economic development.

Q2: Is there evidence that the EU contributes to Poland's pension fund?
A2: No, because Obviously this funding could mean that Poland has more to spend overall, but there is no evidence that EU contributions are what directly fund its lowering of the pension age.

Q3: Is Poland a "net beneficiary" from the EU's budget?
A3: Yes, because Yes, Poland is one of the 'net beneficiary' countries from the EU's budget , which means it gets back more than it pays in.

Q4: Did Poland lower its retirement age?
A4: No answer could be found.
user
justification: Not enough evidence leads to the conclusion that Poland has either lowered its retirement age or uses the money from the EU to do so

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant