Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The 5G radiation is bad for humans.

Q1: Has there been any testing of 5G on humans?
A1: Yes, because There has been research on exposure to radio frequencies over the years.

Q2: Are all radio frequencies the same?
A2: Yes, because Higher frequency waves come from x-rays, uv rays and gamma rays, and are ionising and can damage DNA in humans.

Q3: What type of radiation is 5g?
A3: 5g is non-ionising radiation, like 4g and 3g.

Q4: Is there any evidence that non-ionising radiation, like 5g can harm humans?
A4: No, because There is no convincing evidence that exposure to the radio waves of 5G can have any adverse health effects.
user
justification: There's no evidence supporting this claim.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant