Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The Israeli Air Force has bombarded nuclear installations in Iran, practically putting an end to its nuclear ambitions.

Q1: What did the media report on  bombardments of nuclear installations in Iran?
A1: DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran will retaliate against any country that carries out cyber attacks on its nuclear sites, the head of civilian defence said, after a fire at its Natanz plant which some Iranian officials said may have been caused by cyber sabotage.

Q2: What was the media's reportage In connection with claims that the attacks were carried out by the Israeli Air Force?
A2: Two of the Iranian officials said Israel could have been behind the Natanz incident, but offered no evidence.

Q3: What was the comment by the Israel defence minister Benny Gantz about the incident?
A3: JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel’s defence minister said on Sunday it is not “necessarily” behind every mysterious incident in Iran, after a fire at the Natanz nuclear site prompted some Iranian officials to say it was the result of cyber sabotage.
user
justification: The claim wording uses 'Bombarded' whilst the Q&A pairs state that a bomp may have been planted, or cyber attack caused a fire, no Q&A pair state a bombardment..
Also, no evidence has been found as reported by the pairs to support any of the claims intent.

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant