Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The Trump family took seats reserved for disabled guests at the 74th session of the UN General Assembly.

Q1: Where did the Trump family sit at the the United Nations headquarters in New York City, US  for the 74th session of the U.N. General Assembly?
A1: They sat in seats reserved for guests of the speaker, US President Donald Trump.

Q2: Why was it thought that the Trump family were sitting in seats allocated for disabled people at the 74th session of the U.N. General Assembly?
A2: A handicapped placard designates where two seats can be moved for allow for wheelchair access. In this case they were not needed and the seats were reserved for the Trump family.
user
justification: The answers explain that they were not sitting in disabled guests reserved seats so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant