Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Burn pits - open air waste incineration sites — are behind the purported increase in brain cancer in veterans.

Q1: Is there a prevalence of brain cancer in veterans of the iraq war more than veterans of other war efforts
A1: The prevalence of brain cancer in the veterans of the gulf war and Iraq war are the same at 0.03%

Q2: Are there a group of veterans that have higher prevalence of brain cancer than the veterans of the Iraq  war
A2: The Vietnam veterans have higher prevalence at 0.04%

Q3: Is there a co-relation between burn pits and brain cancer
A3: It is unable to say whether long-term health effects are likely to result from exposure to emissions from the burn pit

Q4: What war does the claim refer to that the veterans in the claim are returning from?
A4: The Iraq war.

Q5: Is there a prevalence of brain cancer in veterans of the Iraq war more than veterans of other wars?
A5: The prevalence of brain cancer in the veterans of the gulf war and Iraq war are the same at 0.03%

Q6: Do many Veterans claim to have been diagnosed with brain cancer due to burn pits in Iraq war?
A6: Yes, because The site burnpits360.org shows they support thousands of victims of invisible war wounds.
user
justification: There is not enough evidence to say whether burn pits are the reason behind the increase.

verdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'
assistant