Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: CORY AQUINO's Presidency of the Philippines is unconstitutional.

Q1: Was CORY AQUINO's Presidency of the Philippines ruled legitimate by any governing body?
A1: In a May 22, 1986 ruling, the Supreme Court resolved three petitions which questioned the legality of Aquino’s presidency, saying “the people have made the judgment”. 

The court said, in part: “For the legitimacy of the Aquino government is not a justiciable matter. It belongs to the realm of politics where only the people of the Philippines are the judge. And the people have made the judgment; they have accepted the government of President Corazon C. Aquino which is in effective control of the entire country so that it is not merely a de facto government but is in fact and law a de jure government. Moreover, the community of nations has recognized the legitimacy of the present government.

Q2: Did the supreme court making any other rulings regarding CORY AQUINO's Presidency of the Philippines?
A2: On October 24th 1986
The court again ruled on dismissing another petition questioning the validity of Aquino’s government: “There can be no question that President Corazon C. Aquino and Vice-President Salvador H. Laurel are the incumbent and legitimate President and Vice-President of the Republic of the Philippines.”
user
justification: It looks like this question has gone through the courts and the questions demonstrate these results, that the presidency is legitimate.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant