Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Those most susceptible to the radiation from 5G technology are fetuses in utero and children.

Q1: Are children susceptible to the radiation from 5G technology?
A1: Children have smaller heads than adults.  Cell phones and wireless radiation can go deeper into their brains because children have a shorter distance from their skull to their brain center.

Q2: Are fetuses in utero susceptible to the radiation from 5G technology?
A2: Cell-phone use has rapidly increased during the last several decades (1). Cell phones generate radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF), resulting in local exposure of the human body to RF-EMF. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential effects of RF-EMF exposure on human health. Short-term exposure in adults is regarded as safe; however, potential health effects of long-term exposure and exposure of fetuses and children are not well studied (2, 3).

The interpretation of results from epidemiologic studies evaluating health effects of RF-EMF exposure from cell-phone use is challenging. Because of the technical evolution of mobile communication systems, similar levels of cell-phone use do not necessarily induce similar levels of RF-EMF exposure. Users’ exposure to RF-EMF from third-generation (3G) devices is much lower than that from second-generation (2G) devices (4). More recent technologies (4G/5G) also differ from 3G devices, though less, in terms of users’ exposure.

Q3: Does the radiation from 5G towers damage dna?
A3: Like FM radio waves, microwaves, visible light, and heat, they are forms of non-ionizing radiation. This means they do not directly damage the DNA inside cells, which is how stronger (ionizing)

Q4: Is 5G dangerous to children?
A4: Mobile signals in the UK are governed by exposure guidelines, and the consensus of reviews by independent public health authorities, including Public Health England, expert groups and the World Health Organization (WHO) is that these guidelines provide protection for all people (including children) against all established health hazards.
user
justification: Q&A 2 states that what is claimed 5G  exposure of foetuses and children is not well studied. However Q&A 3 states the 5g tech uses non-ionising type radiation which is shown to not be dangerous to dna, Also Q&A 4 shows that the WHO says it is safe for children

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant