Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez claimed Amazon was paying full-time employees so little that they required government food assistance.

Q1: How much did Amazon pay their workers in 2019?
A1: In November 2018, Amazon raised it's minimum wage to $15 an hour, or $35,096 for a full time employee.

Q2: What were Amazon wages prior to this date?
A2: Prior to 2018, half of Amazon's workers made less than $35,096 as the $15 an hour minimum wage wasn't yet in effect.

Q3: What is the federal poverty level in 2019?
A3: The federal poverty level in 2019 is $25,750.

Q4: How many Amazon workers rely on government food assistance?
A4: Depending on the state, as many as 1 in 3 Amazon workers get food stamps in Arizona, and 1 in 10 in both Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Q5: Is a full time worker for Amazon earning above the poverty line?
A5: Yes, because With the wage increase from amazon,full time employees earn above the poverty line.

Q6: With the wage increase will Amazon employees need to rely on government food assistance?
A6: This depends on the state, extra benefits, hours worked and age of children.  Some may still be eligible for food stamps.

Q7: At the time of the claim (June 2019) was their data to say amazon workers were using food assistance programs?
A7: Yes, because but only before the 2019 wage rise, was it a top employer of SNAP recipients in at least five states
user
justification: The QA pairs confirm that some but not all amazon workers were in receipt of food stamps with factors such as State, extra benefits, hours worked and age of children playing factors in who received them.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant