Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: Peter Navarro said a Covid-19 study “showed an astonishing 50% reduction in the mortality rate for patients taking hydroxychloroquine,”

Q1: What is hydroxychloroquine?
A1: Hydroxychloroquine belongs to the family of medicines called “antimalarials” (AMs), which are also classified as disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, or DMARDs. These drugs were initially used to prevent and to treat malaria but are no longer used for those purposes and are now often used for lupus.

Q2: Has hydroxychloroquine been used to treat COVID-19?
A2: There was some early off-label use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19

Q3: Is there a study showing 50% reduction in the mortality rate for patients taking hydroxychloroquine?
A3: Yes, because A study from the Henry Ford Health System in Michigan did show a 50% reduction in the risk of death in those who received hydroxychloroquine vs other drugs like azithromycin

Q4: Does the FDA approve the use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 patients?
A4: No, because The FDA revoked the use of hydroxychloroquine for hospitalised patients, citing other trials showing it is unlikely to be effective.

Q5: Are there other studies which show different results  of the use of hydroxychloroquine?
A5: In this observational study involving patients with Covid-19 who had been admitted 
to the hospital, hydroxychloroquine administration was not associated with either a 
greatly lowered or an increased risk of the composite end point of intubation or 
death. Randomized, controlled trials of hydroxychloroquine in patients with Covid-19 
are needed. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.
user
justification: It appears from the Q&As that there is conflicting evidence with regards to the use of Hydroxychloroquine. As some reports have found it works whilst some haven't.

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant