Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: People with no recourse to public funds are not yet able to claim free school meal vouchers in the UK

Q1: What does "no recourse to public funds" mean?
A1: No recourse to public funds (NRPF) is a standard condition applied to those staying here with a temporary immigration status to protect public funds. Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) is set as the general threshold for permitting migrants to access public funds. Migrants who are here without leave are also subject to no recourse to public funds. Therefore, most migrants do not have access to public funds as a matter of course.

Q2: During the pandemic do children from NRPF groups have access to free school meals?
A2: Some of them do:-
During the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, we are temporarily extending free school meal eligibility to include some children of groups who have no recourse to public funds (NRPF).

These groups are:

children of Zambrano carers
children of families with no recourse to public funds with a right to remain in the UK on grounds of private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
children of families receiving support under Section 17 of the Children Act 1989 who are also subject to a no recourse to public funds restriction
user
justification: Some can claim free school meals, and some can't. 

verdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'
assistant