Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: An employee of the Bojangles' fast food chicken restaurant placed a sign on a door banning customers who wear pro-Trump hats or shirts

Q1: What did the Bojangles authority say in response to criticism of denying services to those wearing pro Trump gear
A1: Bojangles official twitted " An incident happened at our store near Bojangles' Coliseum earlier this week. A manager made a bad decision to close the dining room. We apologize. That manager is no longer employed by us. At a different store, a customer posted a sign that is not true. We welcome ALL customers"

Q2: What did an employee of Bojangles do
A2: A Bojangles employee locked the dining room after the Trump rally because they were probably overwhelmed
user
justification: This claim is refuted. Bojangles restaurant was closed after a Trump rally due to overwhelmed employees. This manager was then fired. Bojangles has stated that they welcome all customers. No incident took place regarding signage not allowing Trump supporters into their establishment. Therefore, the claim is refuted. 

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant