Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.

Claim: The murder of Oscar Grant, by a police officer in the United States, was never prosecuted by the DA.

Q1: What happened to the Oscar Grant in the claim?
A1: Oscar Grant, 22, was shot once while on the platform after a BART officer drew his gun during what officials called a volatile and chaotic scene. A gravely wounded Grant was taken to Highland Hospital, where he died

Q2: Was the officer who shot Oscar Grant charged with a crime?
A2: Yes, because A jury found former BART officer Johannes Mesherle guilty of involuntary manslaughter. killing Oscar Grant, on a BART platform on New Year's Day 2009.
user
justification: The second source shows that the officer was charged with manslaughter so the claim is refuted.

verdict: 'Refuted'
assistant