Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and denied the rest. On March 1, 2004, Plaintiffs filed a Class Action Complaint in this Court alleging ERISA violations. After an extension of time, Defendants moved to dismiss on May 10, 2004. Plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment on June 22, 2004. On October 14, 2004, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint, which does not modify Plaintiffs’ original claims, but merely adds a new Count V. Defendants have also moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint. DISCUSSION A. Motion to Dismiss Standard For the purposes of the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, the Court assumes that the facts alleged in Plaintiffs’ Complaint are true, unless such allegations are contradicted by documents referenced in the Complaint. See Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc., 143 F.3d 1293, 1295-96 (9th Cir.1998) . A Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss will be
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the court need not accept as true  unwarranted factual inferences
B. holding that courts are to accept allegations in the complaint as being true including monell policies and writing that a federal court reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint has a limited task
C. holding that if a district court dismisses a  2255 claim without holding an evidentiary hearing we take as true the sworn allegations of fact set forth in the petition unless those allegations are merely conclusory contradicted by the record or inherently incredible
D. holding that a court need not accept as true conclusory allegations which are contradicted by documents referred to in the complaint
E. holding that a court need not accept a plaintiffs allegation if it contradicts documents properly considered with the complaint
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.