Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
temporary, lasting only from May 4, 1995 to August 10, 1995. Defendant reasons that even if the plaintiff suffered from bipolar disorder, that disorder could not substantially interfere with a major life activity because it lasted only four months. Plaintiff has a well-documented history of bipolar disorder since 1989. (Pl.’s Stmt. Ex. 2.) Defendant’s view of plaintiffs disability ignores the teaching of Sutton, where the Supreme Court acknowledged that medication may partially, but not wholly, relieve an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity, and expressly rejected the notion that partial amelioration of a disabling condition renders the individual ineligible for protection under the ADA. Sutton, 527 U.S. at 488, 119 S.Ct. 2139; accord Vande Zande, 44 F.3d at 544 . In addition, contrary to the defendant’s
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a proceeding on a writ of error coram nobis is part of the underlying criminal matter
B. holding that periodic alimony is not mandatory
C. holding evidence of a 13 permanent partial disability insufficient to establish disability for purposes of ada
D. holding that the periodic characteristic disabling manifestation is part of the underlying recognized disability
E. recognizing the importance of the employers knowledge of the disability
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.