Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Johnson and Wallace, saw two men flee the scene upon their approach. See Wardlow, 528 U.S. at 124, 120 S.Ct. 673 (stating that “[h]eadlong flight — -wherever it occurs — is the consummate act of evasion”). Furthermore, as the court discussed above, the “totality of the circumstances” to be considered in determining whether reasonable suspicion existed to support Johnson’s seizure also includes all of Johnson’s non-compliant conduct after being ordered to show his hands. See Valentine, 232 F.3d at 358. In the present case, as Silvers stepped out of the police car, Johnson had a “very surprised look” on his case. Tr. at 49. Because Johnson’s eyes got “real wide,” Silvers was led to believe that something was not right. Tr; at 49, 53, see also Wardlow, 528 U.S. at 124, 120 S.Ct. 673  As Silvers approached, Johnson pushed Senquiz
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding nervous behavior and inconsistent story justified reasonable suspicion and subsequent search
B. recognizing presence in a high crime area unprovoked flight and nervous evasive behavior as factors supporting a reasonable suspicion
C. holding that nervous behavior and failure to make eye contact did not give rise to reasonable individualized suspicion
D. holding that nervous evasive behavior is a pertinent factor in determining reasonable suspicion
E. holding that nervous evasive behavior such as flight is a relevant factor in an examination of reasonable suspicion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.