Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
is not briefed anywhere in appellants' brief or reply brief. 6 . Rule 16 was amended effective November 1, 1999, to correspond with the 1993 amendment to rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. However, the new procedures are applicable only to cases filed on or after November 1, 1999. See Utah R.Civ.P. 16 advisory committee note. Therefore, the applicable rule for the case before us is taken from the 1997 Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. . 7 . The 1999 amendment to rule 37 is also applicable only to cases filed after November 1, 1999. See Utah R.Civ.P. 37 advisory committee note. Therefore, rule 37 of the 1997 Utah Rules of Civil Procedure is the applicable rule to be applied in the case before us. 8 . See also Larsen v. Decker, 196 Ariz. 239, 995 P.2d 281, 286 (Ct.App.2000) ; McAllister v. George, 73 Cal.App.3d 258, 140
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding violation was willful and substantial
B. holding that statute does not alleviate plaintiffs burden to provide additional evidence that medical bills were reasonable and necessary
C. holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion when it found that no foundation had established bills were caused by and were reasonable and necessary results of accident
D. holding trial court did not abuse its discretion by ruling based only on affidavits
E. holding that abuse of discretion in denying a 60b motion is established only when no reasonable person could agree with the district court and there is no abuse of discretion if a reasonable person could disagree as to the propriety of the courts action
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.