Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
claim. Mr. Stevens appealed to this court. Discussion Our review of Veterans Court decisions is limited by statute. Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a), we may review “the validity of a decision of the [Veterans] Court on a rule of law or of any statute or regulation ... or any interpretation thereof (other than a determination as to a factual matter) that was relied on by the Court in making the decision.” Unless the appeal presents a constitutional issue, we “may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law ed record can be considered “an accurate account” of his service in the military. The question of whether the record is accurate is also a factual matter, outside the jurisdiction of this court. See Waters v. Shinseki, 601 F.3d 1274, 1278 (Fed.Cir.2010) . Third, Mr. Stevens “requests]” that this
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a challenge to the proper weight of the evidence is a question of fact outside this courts jurisdiction
B. holding that constitutional right of privacy does not apply to medical records
C. holding that records of personal phone calls made by staff employees of the house of representatives fall outside the current definition of public records and were properly redacted
D. holding that records relating to a student court were not education records
E. holding that a claim that medical records were falsified was a factual question outside of the courts jurisdiction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.