Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
or welfare that there is a virtual unanimity of opinion in regard to it....” Mamlin, 17 A.2d at 409. The legislature’s decision to lower the employee threshold from twelve to six to four, but not to one, indicates the lack of unanimous opinion that every employee should be protected from sex discrimination as Employee asserts. The legislature has had the opportunity to argue the merits of exempting small employers from compliance and to decide exactly where it should establish the threshold. It explicitly chose not to extend the protections against discrimination to employees of small employers. The wisdom of this decision is not before us. Where the legislature has spoken, we will not interpret statutory provisions to advance matters of public interest. See Geary, 319 A.2d at 176 . Rather, we are bound by the terms of the PHRA
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing first two exceptions
B. recognizing constitutionally mandated exceptions to that statutory principle
C. recognizing three exceptions to atwill doctrine
D. recognizing exceptions to immunity
E. recognizing that the legislature can create statutory exceptions to atwill employment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.