Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
DOT submitted a copy of the Uniform Traffic Complaint and Summons/Voluntary Assessment (Complaint) that it had received from the state of Delaware. The Complaint, which was issued by an Aider-man’s Court in Newark, Delaware, indicated that Licensee pled guilty to violating a local ordinance relating to “D.U.I. — Alcohol.” (R.R. at 31a.) In Delaware, an Alderman’s Court is a small local court with jurisdiction over misdemeanors, municipal ordinances and traffic offenses that occur within the town limits. (Trial ct. op. at 4-5.) After considering the matter, the trial court granted Licensee’s appeal. In doing so, the trial court relied upon Tripson v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 773 A.2d 195 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001), appeal denied, 568 Pa. 690, 796 A.2d 320 (2002) . Because the Complaint appeared to come
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the burden of proving lack of negligence is on the owner
B. holding that under the compact dot has the burden of proving that it received the outofstate conviction report from the party states licensing authority
C. holding that the burden of proving a violation of the idea lies on the party seeking relief during the administrative process
D. holding that the government bears the burden of proving voluntary consent under the totality of the circumstances
E. holding that the state had the burden of proving the defendants two prior convictions in order to obtain the felony dui conviction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.