Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of paternity as if it were any other regulatory issue entrusted to that administrative body, judicial review of a decision of great importance affecting matters beyond the scope of the agency’s purview will have been significantly curtailed. Our common understanding of the essential nature of the parent-child relationship is such that we do not easily countenance the possibility that a person could be considered a child in one context, but not in another. However, if the question of paternity is decided by an administrative body — particularly one that is uneasy or ill-equipped to make the decision — there is the unwelcome possibility of different determinations of parentage in different fora. See Oubre v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 680 A.2d 699, 703 (D.C.1993) . Therefore, unless the governing statute has a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a summary judgment is a determination on the merits for res judicata and collateral estoppel purposes
B. holding that collateral estoppel and res judicata apply to quasijudicial agency decisions
C. holding that res judicata and collateral estoppel apply to arbitration award
D. recognizing exception to application of res judicata and collateral estoppel principles to decisions of administrative proceedings where there has been manifest error in the record
E. recognizing the doctrine of collateral estoppel in agency proceedings
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.