Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
satisfy the duly of fair representation implied by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. 7 . The relevant portion of Section 160(b) with which the Cannon court was concerned stated as follows: “No complaint shall issue based upon any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge with the Board and the service of a copy thereof upon the person against whom such charge is made ...” See 832 F.2d at 304 n. 2 (emphasis supplied). 8 . See Winkels v. George A. Hormel & Co., 874 F.2d 567, 569 (8th Cir.1989) (disagreeing with Cannon majority and ruling that there is no requirement that federal procedural rules be imposed when a hybrid case is initiated in state court); Gorwin v. Local 282, I.B.T., 838 F.Supp. 116, 123 (S.D.N.Y.1993) ; Juliano v. Stroehmann Bakeries, Inc., 734
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that outofstate defendants transmittal into new york of ceaseanddesist letter to new york plaintiff for purported trademark infringement was insufficient to create jurisdiction over defendant in a new york declaratory judgment action
B. holding that while the fourteenth amendment is directed against state action and not private action the state action requirement is met in a civil action where state law is applied whether by statute or common law
C. holding venue proper where proper when the action was commenced
D. recognizing forum selection clause providing that no such claim shall be commenced prosecuted or continued in any forum other than the courts of the state of new york located in the city and county of new york or in the united states district court for the southern district of new york as clear and unambiguous expression of parties selection of exclusive forum in affirming district courts dismissal of action commenced in united states district court for the district of new jersey
E. holding that plaintiffs hybrid  301fair representation action was not time barred where plaintiff commenced timely action in state court under new york civil rules
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.