Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Plaintiff raises several other objections to the manner in which the ALJ and Appeals Council reached their decisions. First, he asserts that the ALJ improperly failed to consider Plaintiffs subjective complaints of pain. The Second Circuit has held that “the subjective element of pain is an important factor to be considered in determining disability.” Mimms v. Heckler (2d Cir.1984) 750 F.2d 180, 185. However, the Second Circuit has also held that “[t]he ALJ has discretion to evaluate the credibility of a claimant and to arrive at an independent judgment, in light of medical findings and other evidence, re garding the true extent of the pain alleged by the claimant.” Marcus v. Califano (2d Cir.1979) 615 F.2d 23, 27. See also Jordan v. Barnhart (2d Cir.2002) 29 Fed.Appx. 790, 794 . “If the Secretaries findings are supported by
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the alj properly relied on medical evidence undermining claimants subjective assessment of limitations
B. holding the alj may discredit complaints of claimant where inconsistencies appear in record
C. holding that an alj may consider a claimants household activities in evaluating complaints of disabling pain
D. holding that alj properly evaluated credibility where he cited specific instances where claimants complaints about pain and other subjective symptoms were inconsistent with the objective medical evidence of record
E. holding that an alj is entitled to make a credibility determination regarding the claimants subjective complaints after specifically addressing these complaints and reviewing the medical evidence in the record
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.