Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to the trial court for an in camera inspection to determine whether they are to be disclosed. CONCURRING: G. MURRAY SNOW, Presiding Judge and PATRICK IRVINE, Judge. 1 . A Ponzi scheme is "[a] fraudulent investment scheme in which money contributed by later investors generates artificially high dividends for the original investors, whose example attracts even larger investments." Black’s Law Dictionary 1180 (7th ed.1999). It is named for Charles Ponzi, who in the 1920s was convicted of fraudulent schemes conducted in Boston. Id. 2 . The parties agree that the Commission waived its work-product immunity with its consulting expert, the accountant, when it designated him as an expert witness. See Emergency Care Dynamics, Ltd. v. Super. Ct., 188 Ariz. 32, 33, 932 P.2d 297, 298 (App.1997) . 3 . These are only some, but not all, of the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the trial court may rely on the testimony of an expert even if the expert did not interview the mother daughter or nonocs service providers
B. holding that an expert that had provided consulting services to the defendant relating to the litigation was not precluded from serving as an expert for the plaintiff
C. holding that the state could not impeach an expert witness with evidence concerning past issues with the payment of taxes
D. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing plaintiffs expert witness to testify when it also allowed defendants expert witness who disputed the methodology used by plaintiffs expert to testify
E. holding that a lawyer forgoes workproduct protection for communications with an expert witness concerning the subject of the experts testimony even if the expert also plays a consulting role
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.