Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the district court’s judgment as a matter of law for Monroe County on the state law negligence claim. Mississippi waives sovereign immunity for itself and its political subdivisions in § 11-46-5 of the Mississippi Code, but subjects this blanket waiver to numerous exceptions, including those listed in § 11-46-9. In pertinent part, § 11-46-9 provides: (l) A governmental entity and its employees acting within the course and scope of their employment or duties shall not be liable for any claim: (m) Of any claimant who at the time the claim arises is an inmate of any detention center, jail, workhouse, penal farm, penitentiary or other such institution, regardless of whether such claimant is or is not an inmate of any detention center, jail, workhouse, pena d 1325, 1332 (5th Cir.1994) . For these reasons, we find that the district
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that it is inappropriate to reach constitutional issues when a case can be decided on other grounds
B. holding that issues decided by an intervening supreme court case need not be identical to be controlling
C. holding that constitutional issues need not be decided where narrower grounds exist for according relief
D. recognizing in a takings case that issues of statutory interpretation and other matters of law may be decided on motion for summary judgment
E. holding that constitutional questions will not be decided if case can be decided on other grounds
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.