Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
considered the claim of the mother to be more analogous to a direct claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress. As explained by the Court in Giardina, “the medical malpractice causing an infant stillbirth constitutes a tort against the parents, entailing the direct infliction of injury, their emotional distress and mental suffering, for which they are entitled to recover compensatory damages.” 111 N.J. at 413, 545 A.2d 139. In reaching that conclusion the Court drew on cases involving so-called wrongful-birth and wrongful-life causes of action, which recognize direct claims by parents for the infliction of emotional distress from negligent advice or genetic counselling in anticipation of or during pregnancy, see, e.g., Procanik v. Cilio, 97 N.J. 339, 352, 478 A.2d 755 (1984) ; Schroeder v. Perkel, 87 N.J. 53, 63-64, 432
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress when hospital negligently failed to release to parents their sons braindead corpse
B. recognizing claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress when medical malpractice during pregnancy resulted in stillborn child
C. holding that doctors failure to inform parents of availability of amniocentesis that deprived parents of opportunity to terminate pregnancy forms basis of direct claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress
D. holding that family could assert claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress against doctor who negligently interpreted a german measles test thereby depriving parents of opportunity to consider terminating pregnancy
E. holding that parents could assert direct claim for emotional distress against doctor who failed to inform them of genetic risk of having another child
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.