Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
after that, the State offered Exhibits 4, 5, and 6, and they were admitted over Orsag’s counsel's objection. Therefore, we disagree with Orsag that no testimony was elicited concerning State’s Exhibit 4. 3 . We note that Woodling did not specifically testify she was aware of prior “convictions" as the State asserts, but she testified she was with Orsag in 1995 when he was stopped for DWI in Harris County (Exhibit 5), and she "knew about” Orsag’s "DWI in Brazos County” (Exhibit 4). This, in conjunction with her confirmation that the prior judgments reflect Orsag's signature, is some evidence to support the prior convictions. See Thomas v. State, No. 2-08-125-CR, 2009 WL 2356891, at *6 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth July 30, 2009, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) . 4 . As discussed below, we assume for
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that copies of defendants convictions contained in pen packet were admissible under public records exception
B. holding that the district court did not err in continuing the trial without defendant when the trial had commenced in defendants presence he vigorously expressed his desire to be absent he was given ample opportunity to change his mind despite the disturbance he had created he had competent counsel and he knew of his right to be present
C. holding the state must prove that at the time of the homicide the defendant was engaged in the commission of the felony
D. holding defendants brothers testimony that he knew the defendant had served time in the penitentiary for something happening at the mhmr home and his identification of his brothers photograph in a pen packet was sufficient to prove up the defen  dants prior conviction for sexual assault
E. holding that the officers had sufficient evidence to believe that the defendant was inside the residence to execute the arrest warrant because the officers relied on the anonymous tip given to the defendants parole officer the drivers identification of the defendant as meaty in a photograph and his assertion that meaty was in the residence at that time selling drugs
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.