Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
identified as the individual in the field cultivating and caring for the patch, and (3) the final harvesting of the field had been completed immediately pri- or to the search warrant application, the issuing magistrate judge reasonably could have inferred that the defendant had recently harvested a large quantity of marijuana plants and that the most likely place to store these plants and the implements used in the harvesting would be at his residence adjacent to the patch. See United States v. Reyes, 798 F.2d 380, 382 (10th Cir.1986) (“It is reasonable to assume that certain types of evidence would be kept at a defendant’s residence and an affidavit need not contain personal observations that a defendant did keep such evidence at his residence.”); see also Rowland, 145 F.3d at 1205 . The affidavit also included the opinion of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that issuing judge may draw reasonable inferences from the material presented in the warrant application
B. holding that fact finder may draw reasonable inferences from evidence and choose which inference is most reasonable
C. holding that courts are obligated to draw all reasonable inferences in plaintiffs favor
D. holding court obligated to draw all reasonable inferences in plaintiffs favor
E. holding that triers of fact may draw only reasonable inferences
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.