Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Id. at 526, 104 S.Ct. 3194 (emphasis added). In reaching this conclusion, the Hudson Court cited Bell with approval and at no point overruled Bell’s holding or analysis. Moreover, Hudson does not stand alone. It is one of a pair of opinions issued the same day on the constitutionality of cell searches. In the other case, Block v. Rutherford, 468 U.S. 576, 1 2 (6th Cir.1988) (ruling Hudson inapplicable in a strip search case because it “dealt with the search of a cell as opposed to the search of an individual”); Forbes v. Trigg, 976 F.2d 308, 312 (7th Cir.1992) (stating that “prison inmates retain protected privacy rights in their bodies, although these rights do not extend to their surroundings” and citing Hudson and Bell); Thompson v. Souza, 111 F.3d 694, 699 (9th Cir.1997) ; Dunn v. White, 880 F.2d 1188, 1191 (10th Cir.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that even after hudson the prisoners privacy interest in the integrity of his own person is still preserved under bell
B. holding that hudson overruled bells assumption and abrogated convicted prisoners fourth amendment rights
C. holding that government has obligation to provide for health needs of incarcerated prisoners
D. holding that governments asserted interest in protecting the privacy of arrestees is substantial under central hudson
E. holding that incarcerated prisoners have fourth amendmentprotected privacy interests after hudson and despite hudsons broad language
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.