Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
appeals did not present any analysis, it is clear that the court made a choice of law decision. This Court presumes that the court of appeals followed the directive of the Supreme Court despite the absence of any explicit discussion on the threshold choice of law issue. 41 . The Fifth Circuit does not cite authority to justify this part of its holding. Defendants attempt to distinguish Griffin because there are no funds on deposit withthis Court (or in any court) for any of the Plaintiffs. Other Texas cases establish, however, that the policy proceeds do not have to be located in Texas for the insurable interest doctrine to apply. The doctrine serves to protect the lives of Texas citizens irrespective of the vagaries of the location of the policy proceeds. See Cheeves, 28 S.W. at 275 ; Tamez, 999 S.W.2d at 15 ("[I]t is against
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing the public interest exception
B. holding that the primary justification of insurable interest doctrine was that the public has an interest that no inducement shall be offered to one man to take the life of another
C. holding in 1894 that it is against the public policy of this state to allow any one who has no insurable interest to be the owner of a policy of insurance upon the life of a human being
D. holding that insurable interest doctrine does not entitle deceased insureds estate to a reformation of the insurance contract but a constructive trust on the policy proceeds
E. holding that the primary and overarching consideration in custody determination is the best interest of the child
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.