Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
action). Nevertheless, insofar as the PHRA can be generally analogized to a combination of actions in tort and contract, pre-Seventh Amendment common law required a jury trial in such actions. C. Wright, supra, at p. 610. A far greater aid to this Court’s Seventh Amendment inquiry, and properly the crux of any Seventh Amendment analysis, is the nature of the remedy sought by the plaintiff. Beard v. Braunstein, 914 F.2d 434, 438 (3d Cir.1990), citing Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg, 492 U.S. 33, 109 S.Ct. 2782, 2793, 106 L.Ed.2d 26 (1989). As made clear in her prayer for relief in Count III, plaintiff seeks remedies that are both equitable, e.g., reinstatement, and legal, e.g., compensatory and punitive damages. Protos v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 797 F.2d 129, 138 (3d Cir.1986) . Since the plaintiff seeks a determination of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that conduct must be beyond the fraud which supported compensatory damages to award punitive damages
B. holding that punitive damages do not need to be proportional to compensatory damages
C. holding that when compensatory damages are nominal a much higher ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages can be contemplated
D. holding compensatory and punitive damages constitute legal remedies
E. holding that equitable relief under  502a3 does not include compensatory and punitive damages
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.