Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Va. 571, 9 S.E.2d 454, 458 (1940). The Virginia Supreme Court has not had occasion to decide this question, and as a result, this court must interpret Virginia law. (a) Background While the precise issue in this case has arisen recently in a number of Virginia state courts, no judicial consensus has emerged. The plaintiff’s argument carr GV96001893 (Charlottesville Gen. Dist. Ct.1996) (same); Babb v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 2:95cv630 (E.D.Va. March 7, 1996) (permitting plaintiff to recover only the discounted medical fees paid by her health insurers). Analogous issues have been decided in bankruptcy cases where personal injury plaintiffs sought to recover medical expenses subsequently discharged in bankruptcy. See Walker v. Long, No. LU-3591 (City of Richmond Cir. Ct. Oet.20, 1993) ; Morganthal v. Piper, CL 94-2496 (Va. Beach
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that state did not submit sufficient evidence to establish amount of restitution to victim for medical bills incurred when it did not introduce any medical bills
B. holding that plaintiff could not recover medical bills that were discharged in bankruptcy
C. holding that plaintiff could recover medical fees not actually paid by the insurance company pursuant to an insurance contract
D. holding that statute does not alleviate plaintiffs burden to provide additional evidence that medical bills were reasonable and necessary
E. holding that statute provides medical bills are admissible as evidence of necessary fair and reasonable charges
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.