Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and he accompanied the officers in their search of the garage, during which the officers discovered sixty-five bundles of marihuana. • The time between the officers’ arrival at appellant’s residence and appellant’s written consent was about ten to fifteen minutes. We conclude that the totality of the circumstances, as outlined above, show appellant’s consent was not freely and voluntarily given. Rather, appellant’s consent was the result of coercive police tactics aimed at forcing appellant to consent to a search of his residence. First, the officers knew they could not obtain a warrant to search appellant’s residence solely based upon the anonymous tip because the tip, standing alone, did not establish probable cause. See State v. Steelman, 93 S.W.3d 102, 108 (Tex.Crim.App.2002) ; see also Elardo v. State, 163 S.W.3d 760, 768
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding anonymous tip that someone at the residence was dealing drugs did not amount to anything the tip was never substantiated and none of the occupants were ever charged with drug dealing
B. holding that there was sufficient probable cause to search a defendants residence after evidence of drug dealing was found in his car during a traffic stop that was conducted when the defendant was coming from his residence and noting that under such circumstances a practical commonsense conclusion could be made that the drugs and money had been at the defendants residence a short time before the stop
C. holding that the officers had sufficient evidence to believe that the defendant was inside the residence to execute the arrest warrant because the officers relied on the anonymous tip given to the defendants parole officer the drivers identification of the defendant as meaty in a photograph and his assertion that meaty was in the residence at that time selling drugs
D. holding that the fact that the defendant did not handle the drugs is not dispositive of his involvement in drug dealing
E. holding an informants tip can establish reasonable suspicion without investigative confirmation if the tip is credible
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.