Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
not, in itself, confer a liberty interest in a full-time education. Giano, supra, at *3. Prison officials need not provide an educational program tailored to the specific needs and circumstances of the inmate. Gi-ano, supra, at *3 (“neither § 136 nor DOCS policies require a prison to provide an inmate with specialized educational programs”); Clarkson v. Coughlin, 898 F.Supp. 1019, 1041 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (“only the provision of no ed ucation at all or education that was wholly unsuited to the goals of a particular inmate’s socialization and rehabilitation trigger due process protections” under § 136); Jones v. Grunewarld, 644 F.Supp. 256, 259 (S.D.N.Y. 1986) (§ 136 does not provide an inmate a protected property interest in a' scholarship); Lane v. Reid, 575 F.Supp. 37, 39 (S.D.N.Y. 1983) . Federal courts have, moreover, consistently
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that  136 does not provide inmate a protected property interest in full time program of education
B. holding that prisoner had no liberty interest in remaining in voluntary boot camp program despite fact that completion of program qualifies inmate for early release
C. holding that a professionals license is a protected property interest
D. holding that any constitutionally protected property interest an employee has as a result of his employment contract is satisfied by payment of the full compensation due under the contract
E. holding that sovereign immunity does not protect the state from claims for statutory employment benefits that constitute a protected property interest
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.