Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
On appeal, the Second Circuit reversed this bankruptcy court and the district court and held that “§ 546(a) applies to preference-avoidance actions brought by [debtors in possession (DIPs) ] as well as to those brought by trustees.” Id. 22 F.3d at 39. The court “concludefd] that for the DIP, the limitations period begins when the debtor files its petition and becomes a DIP under [Code] § 1101.” Id. 22 F.3d at 40. Century Brass only held, as every other circuit court considering the issue has held, that the limitation period of § 546(a)(1) applies to debtors in possession and that when no trustee is appointed in a Chapter 11 case, the starting date for the two-year period is the date the voluntary Chapter 11 case commenced. The court reserved decision 413, 1416-17 (9th Cir.1993) ; In re MortgageAmerica Corp., 831 F.2d 97, 98
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a chapter 7 trustee was the only person with authority to bring  a cause of action after the appointment of a trustee
B. holding on facts similar to those in dmart that the  546a limitation period runs from appointment of chapter 7 trustee after case was converted from chapter 11
C. holding that claims for alleged legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty against attorneys that represented the chapter 11 debtor in possession belonged to the bankruptcy estate and upon conversion of the case to chapter 7 such claims belonged to the chapter 7 trustee as successor to the debtor in possession
D. holding in a case where a chapter 11 trustee was appointed after a period during which the debt or had operated as debtor in possession that a chapter 11 trustee has two years from the date of his appointment not from the commencement of the chapter 11 case to bring avoidance actions
E. holding denial of motion to convert from chapter 11 to chapter 7 is interlocutory
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.