Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
misrepresentation claim against him fails because they have failed to allege that he made a representation to any plaintiff. Plaintiffs respond that Morrison is alleged to have made a representation in his written opinion regarding the reverse merger in which he opined that all the requirements and SEC regulations had been complied with and that good and valuable consideration had been paid by all the alleged purchasers of the Literary Playpen, Inc. stock. The court concludes that the alleged misrepresentations in Morrison’s opinion letter are sufficient for the purposes of a motion to dismiss. Such allegations are sufficient since under Iowa law fraudulent misrepresentation claims may be based on statements made to third parties. See Clark v. McDaniel, 546 N.W.2d 590, 593 (Iowa 1996) . Therefore, this portion of Morrison’s motion
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding there is no duty to third parties on the part of a premises owner who could not have foreseen the criminal acts of third parties
B. recognizing that either party to a divorce action may bring in third parties who claim an interest in the property alleged to be community or third parties themselves may intervene and have their rights therein determined
C. holding that no direct contractual relationship is required between the alleged tortfeasor and the person who justifiably relies to his or her detriment on the alleged tortfeasors representations because under restatement second of torts section 533 1977 hereinafter restatement persons who fraudulently misrepresent the truth can be held liable to third parties if they have a reason to expect their misrepresentation will be communicated to third parties
D. recognizing the adoption of the restatement second of torts  552 1977 in boykin v arthur andersen  co 639 so2d 504 ala1994 and holding that a real estate appraiser had a duty to third parties that the appraiser intended to influence and to third parties that the appraiser knew his client intended to influence by means of the appraisal
E. holding the family court has jurisdiction to join third parties when property is alleged to be marital but is owned by a third party
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.