Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and is guaranteed by the constitution.” We further held: The provision of the constitution must be construed liberally in favor of free and unrestricted access to the records, and that access can be denied only when a law, specifically and unequivocally, provides otherwise. Whenever there is doubt as to whether the public has the right of access to certain records, the doubt must be resolved in favor of the public’s right to see. To allow otherwise would be an improper and arbitrary restriction on the public’s constitutional rights. Id. Since Title Research Corp., we have reaffirmed that “the public has a constitutional right of access to court records.” Copeland I, supra, 930 So.2d at 941 (citing Title Research Corp., supra); In re John Doe, 96-2222 (La.9/13/96), 679 So.2d 900, 901 However, the fact that a document is filed in
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that factual pleadings on this issue are weak but sufficient
B. recognizing this as the general rule
C. recognizing that pleadings in the underlying case are subject to judicial notice by an appellate court
D. holding that draft pleadings are not subject to public records disclosure
E. holding that as a general rule pleadings filed in this court are public records and are not subject to being sealed
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.