Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
addressed only Dr. Keszler’s conduct and did not mention SADI or implicate its behavior. Id. at 671. The supreme court rejected this argument, holding that “[w]hen a party’s alleged health care liability is purely vicarious, a report that adequately implicates the actions of that party’s agents or employees is sufficient.” Id. at 671-72. Although Gardner involved a corporation rather than a professional association, we conclude that its reasoning is equally applicable here. Therefore, we reject OGA’s assertion, at least concerning “purely vicarious” liability claims, that Dr. Brewer’s expert reports concerning Drs. Jacobs and Gunn did not sufficiently implicate OGA. See id.; Ctr. for Neurological Disorders, P.A. v. George, 261 S.W.3d 285, 295 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, pet. denied) . Here, OGA did not object to Dr. Brewer’s
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that no expert reports specifically addressing conduct of professional corporation and professional association were required when plaintiffs alleged only vicarious liability based on medical negligence of entities physicians explaining that the entities conduct is not measured by a medical standard of care but rather their liability was solely vicarious
B. holding that a professional owes no duty to third persons unless the professional had actual knowledge that those persons would rely on his rendering of professional services
C. holding that expert report that sufficiently addressed certain claims against doctor employed by professional association was sufficient as to claims against professional association based on doctors negligence because the doctors negligence is imputed to the association under the professional association act
D. holding a condominium association had no duty to a woman who had committed suicide after the association removed the womans dog because while the association knew the dog was essential to the womans will to live the association had no authority to prevent the womans suicide
E. recognizing contributory negligence as a defense to professional malpractice claims
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.