Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the PRC process before challenging an adverse ruling in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.” Foster I at *5. The Postal Reform Act of 1970, under which the initial version of § 3662 was enacted, established the Postal Rate Commission to hear all claims involving postal rates and services. See 39 U.S.C. § 3662 (repealed 2006). The district court noted that courts have regularly held that early versions of § 3662 conferred exclusive jurisdiction to the Postal Rate Commission to hear these claims, despite its permissive language. Foster I at *4 (citing LeMay v. U.S. Postal Serv., 450 F.3d 797, 800 (8th Cir.2006); Bovard v. U.S. Post Office, No. 94-6360, 47 F.3d 1178, 1995 WL 74678, at *1 (10th Cir. Feb. 24, 1995); Azzolina v. U.S. Postal S 1 (3d Cir.2008) ; Delaware Valley Floral Group v. Shaw Rose
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding under third circuit law that the denial of a motion for reconsideration is reviewed for abuse of discretion
B. holding that denial of joinder motion is reviewed for abuse of discretion
C. holding that the imposition of sanctions is reviewed for abuse of discretion
D. holding that the standard of review for the denial of rule 11 sanctions is governed by the law of the regional circuit
E. holding under third circuit law that denial of rule 11 sanctions is reviewed for abuse of discretion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.