Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in education records, it does limit the instances in which an educational agency can release such records. 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(b)(l). In addition, the IDEA refers to special education records as “confidential.” 20 U.S.C. § 1417(c). These express statutory mandates recognize privacy interests in special education records that Father may invoke on behalf of his son. ¶ 25 We now turn to the impact that the confidentiality of the records has on their discoverability in the present special action. We emphasize that the issue here is not relevancy for admissibility at trial rt of Appeals that congressional policy evidenced by FERPA places “significantly heavy burden on the party seeking access to student records”); Poole v. Hawkeye Area Cmty. Action Program, 666 N.W.2d 560, 565 (Iowa 2003) ; Anderson by Anderson, 255 A.D.2d at 410, 680
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that records relating to a student court were not education records
B. holding that university students redacted disciplinary records were not education records
C. holding that nonparty siblings school records were relevant because of expert testimony that genetics may account for some of the symptoms exhibited by the plaintiffs
D. holding that the school records of the plaintiffs nonparty siblings were admissible at trial when expert testimony established that the records were relevant according to standard relevancy test
E. holding that municipal court records were admissible under  official records or public documents  exception
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.