Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
471 (5th Cir.2002)). 19 . McCoy v. City of Shreveport, 492 F.3d 551, 557 (5th Cir.2007). 20 . Id. 21 . Laxton v. Gap Inc., 333 F.3d 572, 578 (5th Cir.2003). 22 . We also note that if the ALJ’s conclusion were relevant in this appeal, then the ALJ’s other conclusion — that "the facts fail to validate [Etienne's] assertion that the reason for her separation was due to the complaint she logged with the [EEOC]” — also presumably would be relevant. We doubt that Etienne desires such a result. 23 . Laxton, 333 F.3dat 579. (quoting Evans v. City of Hous., 246 F.3d 344, 355 (5th Cir. 2001)). 24 . Univ. of Tex. Sw. Med. Ctr. v. Nassar, - U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 2517, 2533, 186 L.Ed.2d 503 (2013). 25 . Cf. Pennington v. Tex. Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 469 Fed.Appx. 332, 338 (5th Cir.2012)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that summary judgment was appropriate where plaintiffs admissions in her deposition undermined her claims
B. holding that a oneday time period between the employees complaint and her supervisors recommendation to fire her was sufficient
C. holding that allegations that employees supervisors yelled at her told her she was a poor manager and gave her poor evaluations chastised her in front of customers and once required her to work with an injured back were insufficient to state title vii claim
D. holding that plaintiffs allegations that her supervisor was a lesbian and that she made improper remarks to her including telling the plaintiff to invite her to lunch and making comments about plaintiffs coworkers private lives and sexual preferences   and on one occasion approaching the plaintiff from behind hugging her and whispering in her ear a request for a cookie from another table did not suffice to establish a hostile working environment
E. holding that the plaintiffs evidence of pretext which included but was not limited to her supervisors statement that she had enough of the plaintiff going to her supervisor about her was not sufficient to preclude summary judgment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.