Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
at 756; Hughes, 401 F.3d at 547. Turner argues that her base offense level should have been 14, because she pled gui rner had not accepted responsibility for clear error. Denial of the adjustment because of continued criminal conduct after indictment is not clearly erroneous. United States v. Kidd, 12 F.3d 30, 34 (4th Cir.1993). We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in denying Turner the adjustment for continued drug use on pretrial release. Finally, in her supplemental brief, Turner asserts that the district court erred in applying the guidelines as a mandatory scheme to deny her a reduction for acceptance of responsibility. The court undeniably regarded the guidelines as mandatory, and therefore erred. United States v. White, 405 F.3d 208, 216-17 (4th Cir.2005) . However, a defendant must show that the error
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that under the booker remedial regime  the guidelines are no longer mandatory but are only advisory
B. holding that the fact that a sentence imposed under the prebooker mandatory guideline regime was at the bottom of the mandatory range is not enough to create a reasonable probability that the defendant would have received a different sentence upon resentencing under an advisory guidelines system
C. holding that even in the absence of a sixth amendment violation the imposition of a sentence under the former mandatory guidelines regime rather than under the advisory regime outlined in booker is plain error
D. holding that judicial factfinding at sentencing is permissible  indeed required  under an advisory guidelines regime
E. holding that sentencing under the mandatory guidelines regime creates a presumption of prejudice that the government must rebut with clear and specific evidence that the district court would not have  sentenced the defendant to a lower sentence if it had treated the guidelines as advisory
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.