Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in a consistent and uniform manner subject to State criteria and oversight.” N.R. § l-1801(b)(2). When the State Critical Area Program was adopted, a local jurisdiction could choose whether to adopt a local program. If it did not, the State Critical Area Commission was directed to adopt a program for that jurisdiction. In either event, the program had to comply with the criteria in N.R. § 8-1808. See N.R. §§ 8-1809 and 8-1810. Section 8-1808(d) sets forth the requirements for granting a variance from the critical area requirements. Those requirements include a finding that a failure to grant a variance would result in unwarranted hardship to the applicant. Prior to 2002, the Court of Appeals decided Belvoir Farms Homeowners Ass’n, Inc. v. North, 355 Md. 259, 734 A.2d 227 (1999) ; White v. North, 356 Md. 31, 736 A.2d 1072
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the unwarranted hardship standard was less restrictive than the constitutional taking standard and meant the denial of the reasonable and significant use of the property
B. holding that even if the standard for waiver is clear the standard was not met
C. recognizing that the federal pleading standard is a less stringent standard than the delaware pleading standard
D. recognizing a new sandin standard under which there is no liberty interest and no constitutional violation  if the sandin atypical and significant hardship standard is not met
E. holding that the standard of proof for dischargeability actions is the preponderance of the evidence standard
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.