Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
38,122 includes several elements, each of which is capable of being readily understood: (1) a person must intend to obtain an economic benefit for himself by (2) holding himself e of law — a commercial enterprise— therefore, it is not facially overboard. See Cells, 354 S.W.3d at 32 (citing Manrique, 40 S.W.3d at 554). The State of Texas has a compelling interest in this regulatory framework; the benefit is to the citizens as a whole. See id. at 33 (citing Sperry v. Florida, 373 U.S. 379, 383, 83 S.Ct. 1322, 10 L.Ed.2d 428 (1963)) (recognizing that a state has a “substantial interest in regulating the practice of law within the State”) (other citations omitted). Appellant also urges that neither Cells nor Manrique had the benefit of Ex parte Lo, 424 S.W.3d 10, 24 (Tex.Crim.App.2013) . Appellant also argues the burden is on the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing the compelling interest in highway safety
B. holding that narrowtailoring requires a state to act with precision and to use the least restrictive means of achieving its compelling interest
C. holding grandparent visitation statute serves compelling state interest in maintaining grandparentgrandchild relationship where grandparents had raised child for period of time but agreeing with trial court that something more than childs best interest must be established to serve compelling state interest
D. holding the online solicitation statute was not narrowly drawn to effectuate a compelling state interest and there were more narrow means of achieving the states interest in protecting minors
E. holding total ban on indecent dialaporn telephone communications not narrowly drawn to serve the governments compelling interest in protecting children
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.