Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
partially closed to the public. They argue further that the denial of their 10(e) motion prevents them from having a complete record to be able to brief this court on the closure issue. We disagree. As the district court correctly observed, Rule 10(e) is a mechanism by which the court can “correct omissions from or misstatements in the record for appeal.” Order at 2, Aug. 26, 2011, ECF No. 557 (citing S & E Shipping Corp. v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co., 678 F.2d 636, 641 (6th Cir.1982)). The Rule does not, however, “allow the court to add to the record on appeal matters that might have been but were not placed before it in the course of the proceedings.... ” United States v. Hillsberg, 812 F.2d 328, 336 (7th Cir.1986); see also Anthony v. United States, 667 F.2d 870, 875 (10th Cir.1981) . In this case, the district court denied the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that where the appellant has failed to demonstrate error the court is not required to search the record for an error
B. holding appellants issue was rendered moot because appellant was given the opportunity to make a record in support of his motion for new trial and appellate court considered that record in disposing of only issue raised in the motion for new trial
C. holding that to grant a new trial the error must be more than harmless
D. holding that 10e motion to supplement the record must be denied where appellant knew of but failed to introduce the relevant evidence at trial because rule 10e does not grant a license to build a new record
E. holding where record fails to establish whether and how appellant presented motion for new trial to the trial court it was not timely presented
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.