Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
work on the project — including the land surveying tasks. In addition, there is substantial evidence that the construction documents produced by MLS were to be approved by either Comer or another engineer. Gregory Gardiner in his deposition even stated that he believed the services performed by MLS were engineering by nature and that the surveying services were incidental to the engineering work. While his statements are not dispositive as to the nature of the contract, they show that Gardiner believed MLS was to perform engineering services for his company. Under such circumstances, we believe that both the engineering and land surveying services encompassed by the cohtract are properly classified as professional and thus, are subject to KRS 413.245. See Vandevelde, 744 S.W.2d at 433 . It is important to note that while this
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a corporate entity must be represented by licensed counsel
B. holding that absent some statutory infraction the task of education belongs to the educators who have been charged by society with that critical task
C. holding that since the performer of a task which could be performed by a layperson represented that he was in fact a professional engineer krs 413245 applied
D. recognizing a defendants constitutional right to be represented by counsel of his own choice
E. holding that a defendant does not have the right to be represented by counsel in postconviction proceedings which are civil proceedings
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.