Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
activity. State v. Taylor, 599 P.2d 496, 503 (Utah 1979). “[T]he transactions leading up to the offense, the interaction between the agent and the defendant, and the response to the inducements of the agent” must all be evaluated. Id. Moreover, “[e]xtreme pleas of desperate illness or appeals based primarily on sympathy, pity, or close personal friendship, or offers of inordinate sums of money, are examples, depending on an evaluation of circumstances in each case, of what might constitute prohibited police conduc ts of money, or large quantities of marijuana for an extremely low price. Rather, Wakefield used the market rate to determine the price of the marijuana. Furthermore, Wakefield did not make repeated requests or badger J.D.W. to buy the marijuana. Cf. Sprague, 680 P.2d at 406 . J.D.W. immediately responded positively to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that where defendant was not subject to custodial interrogation agent did not violate the fifth amendment by contacting defendant for questioning after defendant refused to answer questions without a lawyer present
B. holding testimony of undercover drug agent regarding tips that defendant was selling drugs and description of defendant were inadmissible hearsay given the statements specifically referred to defendant
C. holding that uncharged amounts of drugs may be included as relevant conduct even if the defendant never actually possessed or distributed the drugs
D. holding that agent entrapped defendant by goading defendant and repeatedly requesting drugs from him
E. holding that evidence that the defendant and a witness sold drugs together was relevant to prove how the witness knew the defendant
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.