Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
while the opponents argue that, no matter under what guise an individual is deprived of his liberty, he should be afforded these rights. ‘ ‘Suffice it to say that the constitutionality of withholding from juveniles all the rights given criminals has been upheld by the courts in almost every instance where it has been questioned.” Holman, supra, 39 Or L Rev at 316-17 (footnote omitted). See also Report of the Legislative Interim Committee on the Judiciary, Proposed Revision, Oregon Juvenile Code (1976). 11 See also State v. Gullings, supra, 244 Or at 176-77 (“The procedure is civil, not criminal, and equitable in that the remedies may be flexible and based upon ‘conscience’ and judgment, rather than upon more or less rigid rules of law.”); Hills v. Pierce, supra, 113 Or at 390 ; State v. Dunn, supra, 53 Or at 308-09
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that although the juvenile restitution statute does not expressly require the juvenile court to determine whether the juvenile has the ability to pay the restitution ordered as a condition of probation the policies underlying the adult restitutions command that a trial court make such an inquiry applies with equal force to juvenile courts
B. holding that the good faith requirement of the whistleblower statute was not met where the purpose of the employee at the time of the making of reports was not to protect the public but to protect the jobs of himself and his coworkers
C. holding that purpose of statute is to protect unwary consumers
D. holding that a statute is nonpenal if it imposes a disability not to punish but to accomplish some other legitimate governmental purpose emphasis added
E. holdingthat purpose of juvenile court is not to convict or punish but to protect
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.