Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
tort law; d.) the moral aspects of the defendant’s conduct; and e.) the prevention and punishment aspects of liability. See W. Prosser & W. Keeton, Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts § 4, at 20-26 (5th ed.1984). Larson was deprived of his parental rights for seven years in clear violation of the custody decree. Similarly, Jessica was denied the right to a relationship with her father during a critical stage in her development. Although this precious lost time can never be regained, some form of redress undoubtedly is in order. Tort law long has protected “relational” interests, such as between family members, from interference. Prosser & Keeton, supra, § 124, at 915; see, e.g., In re Parks, 267 Minn. 468, 127 N.W.2d 548 (1964); Miller v. Monsen, 228 Minn. 400, 37 N.W.2d 543 (1949) . In 1978, however, our legislature abolished
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that third party may not recover contribution against parent where child has no cause of action against parent for negligent supervision
B. holding child could bring action for enticement of parent
C. recognizing duty of parent to control conduct of child
D. holding when real estate is conveyed to a child and consideration is paid by the parent the parent has the burden of proving a gift was not intended
E. holding that a superior court can adjudicate a child as a child in need of aid based on the acts of just one parent
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.