Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
way, generally somewhat raised, especially intended for pedestrians, and adapted to their use, usually constructed in this country as a part of the street at or along the side of the part thereof especially designed and constructed for the passage of vehicles and animals, there being often, if not generally, a gutter, also constituting a portion of the street, between such parts; and when the sidewalk is spoken of as being on a specific side of a designated street, it is to be understood to be a part so reserved of that street at or along the specific side of the roadway.” Central Life Assurance Soc’y v. City of Des Moines, 185 Iowa 573, 577, 171 N.W. 31, 32 (1919) (quoting Wabash R.R. v. DeHart, 32 Ind.App. 62, 64, 65 N.E. 192, 193 (1902)) (citations omitted). This def , 561 (1936) ; City of Elmhurst v. Buettgen, 394 Ill. 248,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that sidewalk is that part of a street that has been set aside for use by pedestrians
B. holding that in a city or town a sidewalk is that part of a street or highway that is intended or used by pedestrians
C. holding that in common parlance a sidewalk is the part of the street assigned to the use of pedestrians
D. holding that sidewalk is simply a part of the street set apart for pedestrians
E. holding that sidewalk is used to designate a portion of highway that has been set aside for pedestrians as distinguished from that which is used by vehicles
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.