Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
349 (1979) [“Pedlar, Community Property”]. The article suggests the possibility that “the Devil himself could effectively receive a discharge in bankruptcy if he were married to Snow White.” Id. at 382. To this I would add: if he does not treat her better than his creditors, she will, by divorcing him, deny his discharge^ ] The cases are uniform in recognizing this effect of Section 524(a)(3). See, e.g., Soderling, 998 F.2d at 733 (“[a]ll claims against a marital community are discharged,” except for nondischargeable community claims); In re Homan, 112 B.R. 356, 360 (9th Cir. BAP 1989) (stating in dicta that after-acquired community property is immune from collection efforts, even if creditor’s claim is only against non-debtor spouse); In re Hull, 251 B.R. 726, 732 (9th Cir. BAP 2000) ; In re Rollinson, 322 B.R. 879, 883
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that section 4a12 is a broadly applicable section of the guidelines
B. holding that an unconstitutional act of congress has no legal effect
C. recognizing effect of section 524a3
D. holding that intent of parties to choice of law must be given effect
E. holding to the same effect
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.