Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
any commercial transactions and does not offer any products or services. (Id.) The “core notion” of commercial speech is that it “does not more than propose a commercial transaction.” Bolger v. Youngs Drug Prods. Co., 463 U.S. 60, 66, 103 S.Ct. 2875, 77 L.Ed.2d 469 (1983) (citations and quotations omitted); see Hoffman, 255 F.3d at 1184. However, the “boundary between commercial and noncommercial speech has yet to be clearly delineated.” Hoffman, 255 F.3d at 1184. On one end of the spectrum, an advertisement is “clearly commercial speech.” Id. at 1185; see e.g. Abdul-Jabbar, 85 F.3d at 409; Waits, 978 F.2d at 1097-98. On the other end of the spectrum is speech that, when viewed as a whole, expresses editorial comment on matters of interest to the public. See Hoffman, 255 F.3d at 1185 ; Montana, 34 Cal.App.4th at 793-95, 40
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the court may consider an article not attached to the complaint in determining whether to dismiss the complaint because the article was integral to and explicitly relied on in the complaint and because the plaintiffs did not challenge its authenticity
B. holding that magazine article that used an altered photograph of a male celebrity to showcase a designer gown was noncommercial speech because the article did not have the sole purpose of selling a particular product complemented the magazine issues focus on hollywood part and present and combined fashion photography humor and visual and verbal editorial comment
C. holding that a state law violates article i when it has the likely effect of disadvantaging a class of candidates for national office and has the sole purpose of indirectly creating qualifications in addition to those set forth in article i
D. holding that expelled student whose role in controversy merited only short blurb in a nine page magazine article did not assume position of prominence
E. holding newspapers article reporting that police officer had stated he and others planned to kill the city mayor was not capable of an innocent construction so as to be nonactionable whether read alone or in the context of the entire article the court rejecting the defendants assertion that the remainder of the article gave it a different innocent meaning and finding the entire focus of the article is the threat by a police officer on the life of the mayor and noting the headline announced policeman threatened mayor
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.