Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that, in addition to recruiting Hayes to prepare returns for Ellerbe, she twice hired him ■ to prepare her own returns. The first return included deductions not supported by the information Peeples had provided to Hayes, and Peeples was audited as a result. She testified that she subsequently instructed Hayes “to do my taxes, but only put the figures on my taxes of what I give you.” J.A. 564-65. The jury could reasonably infer that Peeples would not adhere to this policy for herself and yet provide Hayes with false information about her sister’s taxes. This inference is particularly strong in light of the substantial similarities connecting the misstatements in the Ellerbe return with those in other returns prepared by Hayes. Cf. Morgan v. Foretich, 846 F.2d 941, 944 (4th Cir.1988) . B.Counts 12 and 13: Ronald Gullette Like
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding defendants prior conviction for assault related to sexual abuse of a minor even though it did not require an act of sexual abuse because it required intent to commit sexual abuse  and such a mens rea demonstrate the offense was one relating to sexual abuse
B. holding that evidence that two halfsisters suffered similar sexual abuse tended to show that they were abused by their common parent or grandparents
C. holding that although there were six occurrences under the general liability policy there was only one sexual abuse occurrence where sexual abuse occurrence was defined as a single act or multiple continuous sporadic or related acts of sexual molestation or abuse caused by one perpetrator
D. holding that similar fact evidence regarding prior act of sexual misconduct by defendant was properly admitted to show the defendants common scheme plan or design to sexually exploit his patients and that such evidence is relevant even if it is not uniquely similar
E. holding evidence of past uncharged sexual encounters admissible in child sexual abuse case to show relationship between defendant and alleged victim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.