Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to appoint a custodian is interlocutory and not immediately appealable. CONCLUSION The lower court did not err in refusing to grant a restraining order regarding the use of the Shapemasters’ name and logo. Further, the appointment of a custodian is interlocutory in nature and does not fall into a delineated exception. As such, the trial court’s (1991) (ruling issue was not preserved for appellate review where the trial court did not explicitly rule on the appellant's argument and the appellant made no Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment). 4 . It is not necessary for this court to address Appellants’ remaining issues because Appellants fail to provide legal authority to support their arguments. See First Sav. Bank v. McLean, 314 S.C. 361, 363, 444 S.E.2d 513, 514 (1994) . Moreover, Appellant’s remaining issues are
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an issue is waived when a party fails to provide adequate citation to authority
B. holding when a party fails to provide arguments or supporting authority for his assertion the party is deemed to have abandoned the issue
C. holding that where an appellant fails to raise arguments regarding an issue on appeal that issue is deemed abandoned
D. holding case moot where one party voluntarily abandoned its arguments
E. holding the appellant was deemed to have abandoned an issue for which he failed to provide any argument or supporting authority
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.