Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
“tend to exchange prudent caution for timidity,” thereby hindering the performance of an already difficult job. Kari, 582 N.W.2d at 924 (quoting Pletan, 494 N.W.2d at 41). The same reasoning applies to government-employed ambulance crews providing emergency medical care. Fear of potential civil liability arising from their actions in an emergency situation could cause crew members to hesitate in providing treatment, thereby increasing the risk to patients. Finally, we note that the fact that a written protocol exists does not transform an otherwise discretionary act into a ministerial one. Field-level actions taken by public officials may be discretionary even when there are extensive regulations that dictate procedure. See Kelly v. City of Minneapolis, 598 N.W.2d 657, 665 (Minn.1999) . In treating the unconscious Virginia Bailey,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that despite the fact that police conduct is governed by extensive regulations statutes and caselaw officers responding to dispatch or making an arrest are engaging in discretionary conduct because they are required to make splitsecond decisions based on incomplete information
B. holding that attorneys engaging in conduct involving dishonesty amounts to conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law
C. holding that mandatory military procedures and regulations cannot be ignored by the agencies themselves even where discretionary decisions are involved
D. holding intent as an element for disciplining an attorney for engaging in conduct involving dishonesty fraud deceit or misrepresentation is proven by establishing that the conduct was deliberate or knowing
E. holding that when regulations are intended to have different purposes and are not dependent on each other they are not intertwined
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.