Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
granted and are subject to dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6). III. SUMMARY For the preceding reasons, the Court: 1) DISMISSES Plaintiffs’ RICO claims because they fail to state claims for which relief may be granted, and because the WDCA reverse-preempts those claims under the McCarran-FergusonAct; and 2) DISMISSES Plaintiffs’ state-law claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress against Defendants for failure to state claims for which relief may be granted. SO ORDERED. 1 . While Cass urt deferred to the state administrative agency’s primary jurisdiction only on the ground that the Eñe doctrine would compel such deferral. See 73 C.J.S. Public Administrative Law and Procedure § 72; Virginia Imports, Inc. v. Kirin Brewery of Am., LLC, 296 F.Supp.2d 691, 698, 698 n. 1 (E.D.Va.2003) . 3 . While Cassens contends that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the state police is a state agency
B. holding that a federal court in diversity jurisdiction must apply state substantive law
C. holding that federal courts sitting in diversity should apply state law that determines the outcome of the case
D. holding that federal courts sitting in diversity shall apply state substantive law
E. holding that in a diversityjurisdiction case involving only state claims the primaryjurisdiction doctrine does not apply in favor of a state agency as compared to a federal agency and holding that even if the doctrine were to apply a federal district court sitting in diversity would defer to a state agencys primary jurisdiction only if state courts would so defer
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.