Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
at least $300,000 because of injury to two or more persons in any one accident or, at the option of the insurer, up to at least $300,000 in a single limit for these coverages, except for policies issued under the Assigned Risk Plan. Also, at least $5,000 for damage to property of others in any one accident. Additionally, insurers may offer higher benefit levels than those enumerated above as well as additional benefits. However, an insured may elect to purchase lower benefit levels than those enumerated above. Your signature on this notice or your payment of any renewal premium evidences your actual knowledge and understanding of the availability of these benefits and limits as well as the benefits and limits you have selected. 75 Pa.C.S. § 1791. 2 . For example, compare Hughes, at 539 , with Brethren Mutual Insurance Company v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding insureds failure to comply with notice provision in insurance policy resulted in no coverage for a newly acquired car
B. holding that insurance company could sue in insureds name following assignment of insureds interest against tortfeasor
C. holding insurance application containing umuim coverage limits and insureds signature was insufficient for  1734s purposes
D. holding that liability insurance policy that expressly excluded coverage for the insureds intentional acts did not cover punitive damages award assessed against the insured and stating in dictum that public policy forbids insurance coverage for punitive damages
E. holding insurance application with umuim coverage designation and insureds signature was suffi cient for  1734s purposes
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.