Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
In Beach Resorts International, there was neither a contractual agreement nor an applicable statute authorizing an award of attorney’s fees. The court noted that the mechanic’s lien statute, pursuant to which the proceedings were initiated, authorized attorney’s fees to the “prevailing party.” The court held, however, that there was no need to impose a lien to enforce the arbitrator’s award, since the defendant voluntarily paid the amount awarded, and therefore the plaintiff’s recovery was pursuant to the arbitration clause and. not the mechanic’s lien statute. Id. at 691. Accordingly, the court denied the motion for attorney’s fees. See Consolidated Labor Union Trust at 549. Compare Fitzgerald & Company, Inc. v. Roberts Electrical Contractors, Inc., 533 So.2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) . There are other cases which also reach the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding university grievance committee hearing was not an arbitration proceeding even though hearing had significant characteristics of arbitration without substantial evidence to support an arbitration agreement
B. holding that a subcontractor whose dispute with a contractor and a surety insurer was settled through arbitration could be awarded attorneys fees pursuant to sections 627428 and 627756 even though the arbitration award had been paid in full
C. holding that section nine does not limit confirmation of an award to the district court in the district of arbitration and confirmed a new york arbitration over whose parties the court had personal jurisdiction
D. holding that arbitration award is binding on the parties
E. holding trial court had no authority to award attorneys fees when arbitrator had stated he would not award attorneys fees
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.