Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
sense and meaning, as a ‘gift,’ an allocation or appropriation of something of value, without consideration to a ‘person, association or public or private corporation.’ ” Village of Deming v. Hosdreg Co., 62 N.M. at 28, 303 P.2d at 926-27. The Attorney General of New Mexico has identified two components prohibited by the Anti-Donation Clause: (i) “the state may not make any donation to or in aid of any private corporation;” and (ii) the state is prohibited against “lending or pledging of the state’s or municipality’s credit.” N.M. Attorney General Opinion No. 85-27 at 3,1985 WL 204889 (October 22,1985). New Mexico courts, and the New Mexico Attorney General’s Office, have generally, in analyzing the state’s Anti-Donation Clause, scrutinized contracts for consideration. 314 P.2d at 720 ; Hutcheson v. Atherton, 44 N.M. at 144, 99
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that legislative diminishment of tax obligation constituted an unconstitutional subsidy to the liquor industry in violation of the antidonation clause
B. holding an action for postpetition breach of an agreement to purchase property to be a core proceeding
C. holding that an appropriation to pay states share of emergency feed certificates issued to livestock owners for the purchase of hay was an unconstitutional subsidy of the livestock industry
D. holding husbands early retirement subsidy was not marital property as a vested right but an option contingent upon his continued employment and eventual qualification for the subsidy in nine years based upon value of the pension frozen at the time of dissolution
E. holding that an award of back pay is an issue for the court
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.