Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and grand jury testimony were revealed before the State placed them in witness protection. Specifically, rsonal safety in this case outweighs the defendants’ right of confrontation, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in this ease by ordering disclosure of the witnesses’ current addresses and telephone numbers. The district court’s disclosure order ignores the safety concerns articulated by the prosecution which the court itself acknowledged in its order delaying disclosure of the witnesses’ identities. Furthermore, the disclosure order defeats the purpose of placing the witnesses under witness protection, which is designed to protect the safety of prosecution witnesses by making their location unknown. See United States v. Watson, 599 F.2d 1149 (2d Cir.) , modified, 690 F.2d 15 (2d Cir.1979); United
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the defendants due process rights were violated when the trial judge singled out the only defense witness and indicated to that witness that he expected the witness to he and would personally ensure that the witness was prosecuted for perjury and thereby effectively drove that witness off the stand
B. holding that the state could ask leading questions of its witness a codefendant who had entered a plea after witness initially refused to answer questions in violation of her plea agreement
C. holding that trial court properly barred certain questions about witness who was in federal witness protection program
D. holding that promises made by the prosecution to a witness in exchange for that witness testimony relate directly to the credibility of the witness
E. holding that mistrial was warranted for trial court allowing questions concerning prior malpractice lawsuits against witness because evidence of prior malpractice actions against a witness is not relevant to the witness competency or knowledge
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.