Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
not when the action for fraud was or should have been discovered. Boyle v. GMC, [468 Mich. 226] 661 N.W.2d 557, 558, 559-60 (Mich.2003). Although Khadher was not harmed until September 1, 2007, when the interest rate first changed, his cause of action accrued at closing on July 23, 2004. Consequently, the action expired on July 23, 2010. Khadher also asserts that Trott’s attorneys’ defrauded him by double charging him for attorney’s fees. The May 23, 2011 letter, however, identifies one charge for legal fees and the other for legal costs. Under the terms of the Mortgage, PNC can collect reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in pursuing remedies caused by the borrower’s default. See United Growth Corp. v. Kelly Mortgage & Inv. Co., 86 Mich.App. 82, 272 N.W.2d 340, 344 (1978) . Khader does not allege that the fees were
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that ic  7910 specifically excludes attorney fees from the scope of power given to the arbitrator to award expenses and fees incurred during arbitration
B. holding in an appeal from a postanswer default judgment that third prong of craddock test required appellant to offer to reimburse appellee for legal expenses he incurred in obtaining default judgment even though most of the fees incurred had not been paid
C. holding that an award for medical expenses is proper when the expenses have been incurred but not paid
D. holding that unit owner was liable for reasonable attorney fees incurred in imposing lien for unpaid association fees
E. holding attorney fees may be allowed for expenses incurred for default
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.