Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
rigorous review. Because a statement’s factuality “does not divorce the speech from its moral or ideological implications,” Stuart, 774 F.3d at 246, a person’s rig ave emerged, which in their own way have become as significant for. expressive liberty as the right not to be silenced by a disapproving public entity. One of those adjunct rights is the right to listen. See Rossignol v. Voorhaar, 316 F.3d 516, 522 (4th Cir. 2003) (observing that the-First Amendment “protects both a speaker’s right to communicate information and ideas to a broad audience and the intended recipients’ right to receive that information and those ideas”). Another is the right to express oneself through conduct. See Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty, Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 89 S.Ct. 733, 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969) . Yet another is the right not to utter
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that once a state establishes a public school system and require s its children to attend public school officials may not take away a students legitimate entitlement to a public education without adhering to the minimum procedures required under due process
B. holding that a public school may not without evidence  of substantial disruption punish students for wearing armbands protesting the vietnam war
C. holding that a school may not prohibit expressive activity unless there are facts which might reasonably have led school authorities to forecast substantial disruption of or material interference with school activities
D. holding that wearing black armband to school to protest vietnam war was expressive conduct
E. holding that students action wearing black armbands was expressive conduct entitled to first amendment protection
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.