Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
arrested twice in the year preceding the stop, once for manufacturing methamphetamine and once for possession of marijuana. This information was validly considered as part of the reasonable suspicion calculus. However, given that Detective Schaffner’s records check did not indicate that either of those arrests had resulted in a conviction, the Court accords this factor little weight in the overall analysis. 2. Nervousness Similarly, nervous behavior is not in itself sufficient to create reasonable suspicion, but is a factor that may be considered in the analysis. United States v. Perez, 37 F.3d 510, 514 (9th Cir. 1994), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Mendez, 476 F.3d 1077, 1080 (9th Cir. '2007); see also United States v. Crap-ser, 472 F.3d 1141, 1156 (9th Cir. 2007) . The government contends that Garcia’s extreme
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding defendants nervousness in part presented officer with reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity
B. holding that reasonableness for qualified immunity purposes requires an objective inquiry into the totality of the circumstances
C. holding nervousness is of limited significance in determining whether reasonable suspicion exists
D. holding that eight factors including the drivers criminal record nervousness and lack of registration justified terry detention
E. holding that while nervousness may be considered as part of the totality of circumstances nervousness standing alone was insufficient to expand a terry stop into an inquiry into drug activity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.