Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
statute of limitations argument nor their argument that the willfulness claim lacks specificity argument is well-taken. There are, however, alternative grounds on which COUNT IV must be dismissed. B. Lack of Personal Liability under the FMLA as to Mr. Dods Personal liability for violations of Federal employment laws generally has been rejected (unless the defendant engaged in “nondelegable acts” like harassment). The term “employer” in the FMLA should be construed consistently with the way that term has been construed in Title VII cases (and in cases under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et. seq.). See Frizzell v. Southwest Motor Freight, Inc., 906 F.Supp. 441 (E.D.Tenn.1995) . Ms. Carter urges, instead, that the court
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a civil rights plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under fmla against individual individual is not employer subject to liability under the act
B. holding that fmla permits individual liability for public officials
C. holding no individual liability under the adea
D. holding individual defendants subject to suit
E. holding that fmla does not impose individual liability
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.