Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to the question presented. Where the error is prejudicial, the defendant is entitled to have his motion reconsidered and passed upon as a discretionary matter.’ ” Johnson, 346 N.C. at 124, 484 S.E.2d at 376 (quoting State v. Lang, 301 N.C. 508, 510, 272 S.E.2d 123, 125 (1980)); see also Barrow, 350 N.C. at 646, 517 S.E.2d at 378. Here, the trial court instructed the jury, without objection from the parties, as follows: As to the second question, members of the jury, it is your duty to recall the evidence as the evidence was presented. So you may retire and resume your deliberation. From these instructions, we are convinced that the trial judge did not impermissibly deny the request based solely on the unavailability of the transcript. See Barrow, 350 N.C. at 648, 517 S.E.2d at 378-79 ; State v. Ashe, 314 N.C. 28, 35, 331 S.E.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to accept the defendants guilty pleas to two counts of the indictment and stating that even if the trial court erred the error had not prejudiced the defendant because he was found guilty by the jury of the charges to which he intended to plead and the evidence of the other crimes would have been admissible in the trial for the first degree murder charge
B. holding that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion in merely stating that the request could not be granted because there was no transcript at this point
C. holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a transcript of a recording even though defense counsel did not stipulate to its accuracy
D. holding that appellant failed to preserve error because it did not present appellate complaint to trial court
E. holding that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion by stating that it did not have the ability to present the transcript to the jury
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.