Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
repairs totaling $30,027.63 were necessary to make the appraisal value accurate were credible by a preponderance of the evidence." While a reevaluation of the value of the repairs and the use of an adjusted amount would not necessarily have been an abuse of discretion, we are unable to determine if the new figure was based on a reevaluation or a transcription error based on the language of the order. We remand this issue for clarification. v. CONCLUSION We AFFIRM the judgment below in all but three aspects, which we REMAND to the trial court for further proceedings to det that tort damages are separate property except where intended to replace pre-divorce lost earnings). 14 . 68 P.3d 1232 (Alaska 2003). 15 . Id. at 1235. 16 . See Hansen v. Hansen, 119 P.3d 1005, 1013 (Alaska 2005) . 17 . See id.; see also Abood, 119 P.3d at
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that separate property may become marital property if spouse donates it to marital unit with intent at time of donation that property become marital
B. holding that circuit court erred in failing to consider that marital property in the form of marital earnings was used to pay debt against nonmarital property
C. holding that assets acquired subsequent to separation are not considered marital property absent evidence that spouse used marital property to obtain them
D. holding that the trial court erred in finding that marital property was the former wifes separate property based on a nonseparation agreement in which the former husband purported to relinquish any interest in the marital property
E. holding that separate property valued at 45000 was transmuted to marital property when improved by 3800 of marital property
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.