Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
202 (1986). 87 . Little, 37 F.3d at 1075. 88 . Martin v. John W. Stone Oil Distrib., Inc., 819 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir.1987); Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c)(2). 89 . Gowland v. Aetna, 143 F.3d 951, 953 (5th Cir.1998) (citing 44 C.F.R. §§ 61.4(b), 61.13(d)). 90 . Id. at 954; Wright v. Allstate Insurance Co., 415 F.3d 384, 387 (5th Cir.2005). 91 . Richardson v. Am. Bankers Ins. Co. of Fla., 279 Fed.Appx. 295, 298 (5th Cir.2008) (citing 44 C.F.R. pt. 61, app. A(l) art. VII(R)). 92 . Copeland v. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2004 WL 325577 (E.D.La. Feb. 18, 2004) citing Gowland, 143 F.3d at 954. 93 .Kidd v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 392 Fed.Appx. 241, 244 (5th Cir.2010) (citing Marseilles Homeowners Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Fid. Nat’l Ins. Co., 542 F.3d 1053, 1055-56 (5th Cir.2008) (per curiam) ); 44 C.F.R. § 61, app. (A)(1), arts. VII(J),
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a plaintiff could recover actual damages under the tcpa for loss of credit if the plaintiff submitted sufficient proof of the amount damages requested
B. holding that an injured former employees lawsuit was not barred by res judicata where he never authorized the union to represent his interest in a previous lawsuit over the same benefits
C. holding that despite assurances from the insurance company that the insured could file the pol after femas deadline the insured could not collect because the insured was responsible for timely filing
D. holding that the insured could not maintain a lawsuit for additional federal benefits because he had not submitted a sworn proof of loss
E. holding that proof of loss is not evidence of extent of loss and insured is not precluded from showing his damages were greater than shown in proof of loss
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.