Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
occurred). 22 . See Leighton, 1990 WL 84704, at *2-3; In re Beatrice Companies, Inc., 1987 WL 36708, at *2-3. 23 . As noted by the dissenting justice, the Defendants objected to Lapiner’s intervention based on his failure to own Isrameo stock at the time of the wrongdoing alleged in the derivative action, but the Defendants did not object to the trial court’s consideration of Lapiner’s objections. 24 . See Tex. Bus. Orgs.Code Ann. § 21.552. 25 . See Tex. Ass’n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 445-46 (Tex. 1993) (stating that standing is a component of subject-matter jurisdiction and that lack of standing may be raised for the first time on appeal); Schwartzott v. Etheridge Property Management, 403 S.W.3d 488, 498 n. 4 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, no pet.) ; Trojacek v. Estate of Kveton, No.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that lack of justiciable interest resulted in lack of standing to pursue claim and that lack of standing deprived the trial court of jurisdiction to act
B. recognizing fundamental error as an exception to the general rule of preservation
C. recognizing exception to preservation rules for fundamental error that is highly prejudicial
D. holding that if these preservation requirements are met any error in the denial of a challenge for cause is reversible error
E. holding that preservation of error in the trial court is not necessary as to lack of standing
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.