Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
prejudice as a result of the jury selection procedure. See N.C.G.S. § 15A-1443(c) (1999); State v. Miller, 339 N.C. 663, 681, 455 S.E.2d 137, 147, cert. denied, 516 U.S. 893, 133 L. Ed. 2d 169 (1995); State v. Fletcher, 348 N.C. 292, 312, 500 S.E.2d 668, 680 (1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1180, 143 L. Ed. 2d 113 (1999). Defendant further argues that the improper jury selection procedure violated his constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury. However, defendant did not raise this constitutional issue at trial; consequently, the trial court did not have the opportunity to consider or rule on this issue. N.C. R. App. P. 10(b)(1). Therefore, defendant has failed to preserve this assignment of error for appellate review. See State v. Fleming, 350 N.C. 109, 122, 512 S.E.2d 720, 730 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 145 L. Ed. 2d 274
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a defendant who fails to raise a specific issue as the basis for suppression in a motion to suppress to the district court has waived the right to raise that issue on appeal
B. holding the appellants failure to raise a particular issue in its directed verdict motion precludes appellate review of that issue
C. recognizing that the specific argument regarding an issue must be made in the trial court to preserve that issue for appellate review
D. holding that by fading to timely raise the issue before the trial court the defendant had waived the right to raise the issue on appeal that the trial court failed to consider less severe sanctions
E. holding that defendant failed to raise a constitutional issue at trial and thus waived appellate review of that issue
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.