Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
For instance, a real estate license, state university transcript, or driver’s license may only be obtained from a particular governmental unit. A debtor who cannot obtain her real estate license will be unable to pursue her chosen profession; a debtor who cannot obtain his transcript will be unable to apply for certain jobs or further schooling; a debtor who cannot obtain a driver’s license will be unable to commute to many jobs or school. In re Stoltz, 315 F.3d at 90; see also Toth v. Michigan State Housing Development Authority, 136 F.3d 477, 480 (6th Cir.1998) (ruling that extensions of credit do not come within the section’s reach, and that the “target of § 523(a) is government’s role as a gatekeeper in determining who may pursue certain livelihoods”); In re Watts, 876 F.2d at 1093 . Thus, [bjeyond the area of driver’s licenses,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing governmental interest in rehabilitation
B. recognizing utswmc as a governmental unit under the act
C. holding that recovery against an individual employee is barred and may be sought against the governmental unit only  when suit is filed against both the governmental unit and its employee id  101106e
D. recognizing the indicia of authority from a governmental unit to the authorized person to pursue some endeavor as common in the enumerated items
E. holding that while qui tam actions by private parties could be on behalf of or for a governmental unit they are not actions by a governmental unit as required by the bankruptcy code
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.