Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
it. Because we find that H.B. 1544 attempts to regulate the use of the information legally obtained, we turn to Anderson Courier’s second issue involving commercial free speech. In determining whether a regulation of commercial speech survives First Amendment scrutiny, we look to the factors set forth in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission, 447 U.S. 557, 100 S.Ct. 2343, 65 L.Ed.2d 341 (1980). Under the Central Hudson test, if a state wishes to regulate truthful, non-deceptive speech relating to a commercial transaction, the state bears the burden of showing that: (1) the state has a substantial interest in supporting the regulation; (2) the regulation directly and materially advances that interest; and (3) the regulatio 1792, 123 L.Ed.2d 543 (1993) . Despite its substantial interests, the State
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that preventing fraud maintaining ethical standards and privacy were substantial interests
B. recognizing that preventing gang activity and maintaining order in the prison population were legitimate penological goals
C. holding that the government interest in preventing crime is compelling
D. recognizing a broader ethical duty of confidentiality
E. holding that privacy and maintaining ethical standards in statelicensed professions were substantial interests
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.