Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the debtor’s unexpired residential leases are not automatically deemed rejected, and a debtor in possession is generally permitted to assume or reject an unexpired residential lease at any time prior to confirmation of a plan. Id. § 365(d)(2). First, even if bona fide leases exist between the Movants and the Debtors, they are not leases of nonresidential real property. See In re Independence Vill., Inc., 52 B.R. 715, 722 (Bankr.E.D.Mich.1985) (agreeing with the debtor that a lease of property used by the debtor to operate a life-care facility was not a- lease of “nonresidential real property,” as people resided in the leased property and the fact that the debtor corporation did not reside thereupon was irrelevant); see also In re Care Givers, Inc., 113 B.R. 263 (Bankr.N.D.Tex.1989) ; Matter of Terrace Apts., Ltd., 107 B.R. 382,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that court did not err in interpreting lease using testimony of expert in real estate leases
B. holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property
C. holding that leases of real property upon which the debtor operated senior nursing homes were not leases of nonresidential real property
D. holding that a tax appeal on real property is a lien on the real estate and not a personal obligation of the landowner
E. holding that forfeiture of real property may be adjudicated before the seizure occurs because real property cannot abscond
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.