Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
inquiring into the legitimacy of the regulatory claims would mire the bankruptcy courts in “mini-trials of purely state regulatory issues.” Id. at 10 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). In McMullen, we cited Spookyworld in noting “the tenuousness of the arguments for engrafting such a ‘bad faith’ exception ... noting the emergent rule that bankruptcy eoui'ts should not inquire into the legitimacy of ongoing administrative enforcement proceedings in determining whether the police power exception applies to them.” 386 F.3d at 328 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Moreover, even if the Partnership pi’evailed on this claim, it is questionable whether it would be able to collect much in the way of damages. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(k)(1); Spookyworld, 346 F.3d at 7 . Furthermore, any recovery likely would be
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding judgment in violation of automatic stay void
B. holding that the denial of a motion to find a violation of the automatic stay was a final order
C. holding that a debtor that is a corporation cannot sue under  362h for a violation of the automatic stay
D. holding that although the automatic stay only applies to proceedings against the debtor  counterclaims seeking affirmative relief against a debtor implicate the automatic stay
E. holding that the protections of the automatic stay apply only to actions against the debtor
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.