Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
id. The qualified immunity defense shields officials from liability stemming from the perfor- manee of a discretionary function “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Id. (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818, 102 S.Ct. 2727, 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982)). [¶ 17] In the present case, the defendants are entitled to the qualified immunity defense because “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known 00 (D.Mass.1994) (finding “[a] public employee’s suspension with pay does not implicate a constitutionally protected property interest”); Bd. of Educ. v. Harrell, 118 N.M. 470, 882 P.2d 511 (1994) ; Hicks v. City of Watonga, 942 F.2d 737, 746
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a school principals suspension with pay did not implicate a constitutionally protected property interest
B. holding that investigatory suspension with pay was not adverse employment action
C. holding that a twoday suspension with pay does not deprive plaintiff of measurable property interest
D. holding that a suspension with pay does not violate any recognized property interest
E. holding that suspension with pay was not adverse employment action
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.