Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that order. 2. GM II Having resolved the question of whether this court had jurisdiction to issue the original writ of mandamus, we turn to the relatively more straightforward question of whether we have jurisdiction to issue the writ for which petitioners now pray. We conclude that we do. Our jurisdiction is premised, as it was in GM I, on the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). Under that act, the courts of appeals have the authority to, inter alia, issue writs of mandamus to district courts to ensure compliance with earlier mandates. U.S. v. Cannon (In re U.S.), 807 F.2d 1528, 1529 (11th Cir.1987); Oswald v. McGarr, (In re General Motors Corp. Engine Interchange Litigation), 620 F.2d 1190, 1195-96 (7th Cir.1980). Cf. In re Allied-Signal, Inc., 915 F.2d 190, 192-93 (6th Cir.1990) . GM premises its current request for a writ of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that to grant a writ of mandamus a court in the exercise of its discretion must be satisfied that the writ is appropriate under the circumstances
B. recognizing authority but declining to issue writ
C. recognizing that laches is a proper ground for refusing to issue a writ of mandamus
D. recognizing a split of authority on this issue
E. recognizing the two lines of child custody cases but declining to resolve conflict
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.