Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
is admissible). The designated evidence submitted in the present ease revealed that the personal injuries suffered by Rainwater in the accident caused severe pain and prevented him from working resulting in severe depression and an addiction to pain medication. Shortly before the suicide, Rainwater called 911, strangled and beat his former spouse, and tried to set the house on fire. After being arrested, Rainwater beat his head and hands on the door of his cell until police subdued him with foam. After that, Rainwater hanged himself in his cell. The resolution of the present case hinges upon determinations of proximate cause and decedent’s state of mind, matters which ordinarily must be decided by the jury and not by way of summary judgment motion. See McKinney, 597 N.E.2d at 1005-06 ; Nelson, 634 N.E.2d at 512 (holding that issue
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that courts should require very little evidence to survive summary judgment in a discrimination case because the ultimate question is one that can be resolved only through a searching inquiry  one that is most appropriately conducted by the factfinder upon a full record
B. holding that credibility determinations should not be resolved at the summary judgment stage
C. holding that issue of whether death was proximately caused by intervenihg and superseding cause was not appropriately resolved by summary judgment
D. holding that whether pleadings fail to state a cause of action may not be resolved by summary judgment
E. holding that the issue of defendants actual knowledge should not be resolved on summary judgment but should be left to the trier of fact
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.