Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of access in the context of criminal trials, see Richmond Newspapers, 448 U.S. 555, 100 S.Ct. 2814, the federal courts of appeals have widely agreed that it extends to civil proceedings and associated records and documents. See, e.g., N.Y. Civil Liberties Union v. N.Y.C. Transit Autk, 684 F.3d 286, 305 (2d Cir.2011) (finding a right of access to administrative civil infraction hearings); Publicker Indus., Inc. v. Cohen, 733 F.2d 1059, 1061 (3d Cir.1984) (“We hold that the First Amendment does secure a right of access to civil proceedings.”); In re Cont’l Ill. Sec. Litig., 732 F.2d 1302, 1308 (7th Cir.1984) (finding a right of access to litigation committee reports in shareholder derivative suits); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Fed. Trade Comm’n, 710 F.2d 1165, 1177 (6th Cir.1983) . The California Supreme Court has also so
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the first amendment limits judicial discretion to seal documents in a civil case
B. holding that the rigorous first amendment standard should also apply to documents filed in connection with a summary judgment motion in a civil case
C. holding that the first amendment right of access applies to a summary judgment motion in a civil case
D. recognizing that first amendment provides qualified right of access to judicial documents
E. holding that there is no first amendment or common law right of access to documents which played no role in a judicial decision
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.