Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Jones that the appointment was for three years, she understood and believed that to be the case. Id. at 1082. The court concluded that “[w]hen Dr. Jenkins took action to renew or confirm Mr. Young’s three-year appointment, he was acting in conformity with the agreement he made with Mr. Young in 1984.” Id. at 1083. Having found that Oates’ ouster was not motivated by sex discrimination, the court dismissed the action and entered judgment for the District. This appeal followed. Discussion A. Analytical Framework To make out her claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Oates must establish that, acting under color of law, defendants deprived her of her constitutional right not to be discriminated against on account of her sex. See Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228, 99 S.Ct. 2264, 60 L.Ed.2d 846 (1979) . It is apparent that the District officials in
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing federal constitutional right to be free from gender discrimination that is not substantially related to the achievement of important governmental objectives
B. holding right to testify was federal constitutional right
C. holding that a plaintiff could not assert a  1981 claim based on gender discrimination
D. holding that the same standard applies to claims of discrimination based upon gender and age
E. holding race and gender discrimination claim barred
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.