Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
charge. Appellants objected to the submission of special issues on the use of a deadly weapon at any stage of the trial, but they particularly argued that if such special issues were to be submitted they should be submitted during the punishment stage of trial. Appellants argued at trial, as they do on appeal, that the deadly weapon issue is clearly an issue to be decided during punishment and that it would be inappropriate to submit such an issue during the guilt-innocence stage of trial. However, this argument is inaccurate. See Luken v. State, 780 S.W.2d 264, 268 (Tex.Crim.App.1989) (acknowledging that Court of Criminal Appeals has never said deadly weapon issue must be resolved at punishment stage of trial); McIntosh v. State, 865 S.W.2d 753, 771 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1993, pet. refd) . In fact, the clear wording of sections 4(a)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding party may raise jurisdictional issue at any stage of proceedings
B. holding that trial court is not prohibited from submitting special issue on use of a deadly weapon at the guiltinnocence stage of trial
C. holding that the application of the fair use doctrine at the pleading stage is appropriate
D. holding that the filing of a motion for a new trial is a critical stage of the prosecution and that an indigent defendant is constitutionally entitled to the assistance of counsel at that stage
E. holding if a deposition is taken for discovery only  not for use at trial the deposition is not a stage of trial for which the defendant must be present
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.