Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
consistent with this opinion. 1 . West 2000. 2 . West 2000. 3 . Emphasis added. 4 . Emphasis added. 5 . Neither the bankruptcy court nor the district court addressed future costs; they are not at issue here. 6 . In re Soileau, 488 F.3d 302, 305 (5th Cir.2007) (citing In re Berryman Prods. Inc., 159 F.3d 941, 943 (5th Cir.1998)). 7 . 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(7). 8 . 260 F.3d 400, 403 (5th Cir.2001) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1133 (6th ed.1990); Black’s Law Dictionary 1153 (7th ed.1999)). 9 . See, e.g., Pa. Dep’t of Pub. Welfare v. Davenport, 495 U.S. 552, 565, 110 S.Ct. 2126, 109 L.Ed.2d 588 (1990) (Blackmun, J., dissenting) (“When analyzing a bankruptcy statute, the Court, of course, looks to its plain language.”); Kelly v. Robinson, 479 U.S. 36, 43, 107 S.Ct. 353, 93 L.Ed.2d 216 (1986) . 10 . Kelly, 479 U.S. at 48 n. 9, 107 S.Ct.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that this courts construction of a statute becomes as much apart of the statute as the words of the statute itself and that change is a matter that addresses itself to the general assembly not this court
B. holding that the starting point in every case involving construction of a statute is the language itself  quoting blue chip stamps v manor drug stores 421 us 723 756 95 sct 1917 44 led2d 539 1975 powell j concurring
C. holding that if the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous a court must derive legislative intent from the words used without involving rules of construction or speculating as to what the legislature intended
D. holding that review of the construction of a sentencing statute is de novo
E. holding principle of statutory construction is to give effect to every clause and word of a statute
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.