Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that because the City had no control over Judge Travis in his judicial capacity, it had no power to authorize or ratify his conduct and thus could not be responsible for his acts. Plaintiffs contend Judge Travis was a city policy maker because the actions of municipal judges may constitute official municipal policy if the judge holds absolute sway over particular tasks. In Familias Unidas v. Briscoe, 619 F.2d 391, 404 (5th Cir.1980), the court found that under Texas law, county judges have duties such as presiding over county commissioners and preparing the county budget which can constitute official county policy making. A city may be liable for a judge’s acts if those acts are in accordance with city policy. Williams v. Butler, 863 F.2d 1398, 1402-03 (8th Cir.1988) (en banc) , cert. denied, 492 U.S. 906, 109 S.Ct. 3215,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that city managers single unconstitutional action was sufficient for the imposition of municipal liability
B. holding that a city may be held liable on account of the unconstitutional conduct of city officials only if the citys policy or custom played a part in the violation
C. holding that a jurys finding that a city had delegated its final policymaking authority in the area of law enforcement to a city police chief was supported by the evidence and warranted imposing liability upon the city
D. holding a city liable for personal injuries caused by a driver colliding with a girder in the center of a city street where the city did not give a warning
E. holding a city liable for the unconstitutional firing of two clerks by a municipal judge when it was clear the city had delegated to him final administrative authority over employment matters
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.