Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
like the determination that inoculation against biological or chemical attack is warranted, Minns, 155 F.3d at 451 (emphasis added), or the determination of what constitutes appropriate “defense of national borders.” Tiffany, 931 F.2d at 278. This case simply does not involve the exercise of “professional military discretion.” As the Third Circuit held in rejecting the argument that the discretionary function exception barred a negligence claim against the government for the conduct of a Navy employee: This case is not about a national security concern, but rather a mundane, administrative, garden-variety, housekeeping problem that is about as far removed from the policies applicable to the Navy’s mission as it is possible to get. Gotha v. United States, 115 F.3d 176, 181 (3d Cir.1997) . These words are equally applicable here. The
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding discretionary function exception is no shield to claim of negligence in failing to provide handrails or adequate lighting on footpath
B. holding asserted negligence in failure to provide adequate lighting or warning in federally controlled parking lot not shielded by discretionary function exception
C. holding that the discretionary function exception may apply in the absence of a conscious decision 
D. recognizing a discretionary function exception to that waiver
E. holding that an agent acting outside his delegated authority is not protected by the discretionary function exception
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.