Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
have found its way to the floor as a result of the actions by" husband appellant or wife appellant. There is no evidence from which the jury might reach a conclusion as to the cause of the presence of the grape in the aisle, and jurors may not be permitted to reach conclusion based upon guess or conjecture. Nor can we accept appellant’s argument to the effect that the display of non-packaged grapes on a counter some seven feet from the bags and across an aisle from the scale constitutes negligence in and of itself, since every reasonable effort was made to keep the passageway clean. Id., 419 Pa. at 234, 213 A.2d at 610. Similarly, in the present case, appellant has presented no evidence as to the cause of the presence of the grape on the floor. In addition, negligence is 481 (1990) ; but see Liles v. Balmer, 389 Pa.Super. 451,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that district court should not have granted summary judgment solely on basis that motion for summary judgment was not opposed
B. holding that improper use of a summary chart was harmless because the evidence was merely cumulative and there was overwhelming evidence of the charged crime
C. holding summary judgment order was not a final judgment because it did not dispose of the defendants claim for attorneys fees
D. holding that summary judgment was not improper merely because there was a possibility that literature not yet produced would support the claim
E. holding that district court should not have granted summary judgment solely on basis that a motion for summary judgment was not opposed
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.