Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
mandatory language must always be construed as jurisdictional. Similarly, we conclude here that although the language requiring the trial to be held within thirty days is mandatory, the language is not necessarily jurisdictional because there are limited instances where the court would retain jurisdiction beyond the thirty-day time period, most notably where a continuance for good cause or in the interest of justice has been granted under section 394.916(2). The district courts in Kinder, Reese, and Osborne also made determinations that the language was not jurisdictional. Kinder, however, is the only decision that appears to recognize the analytical distinction between jurisdiction and whether the provision should be construed as mandatory or directory. See Kinder, 779 So.2d at 515 . Furthermore, because these indefinite
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the crossappeal time limit is jurisdictional
B. holding that the thirty day time limit was mandatory but not jurisdictional
C. holding 30day limit to be mandatory and jurisdictional
D. holding that time limit for filing petition for review is mandatory and jurisdictional
E. holding that this time requirement is mandatory and jurisdictional
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.