Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
965, 975 (3d Cir. 2010)). As we explained in Hughley, “[b]ecause it is well established that the court of last resort for a state or territory is not bound by decisions of its regional federal court of appeals or any other lower federal court — even those interpreting the United States Constitution — but need only follow the United States Supreme Court, the possibility of future review by this Court could provide a justification for the Superior Court to consider [a petitioner’s] habeas corpus petition on the merits,” even where the issues raised in the petition have already been addressed by the Appellate Division and Third Circuit in an appeal taken before this Court’s creation. Hughley, 61 V.I. at 337-38; see also Hodge v. Bluebeard’s Castle, Inc., 62 V.I. 671, 685-92 (V.I. 2015) ; Hamed v. Hamed, [63 V.I. 529, 534-35 (2015)]
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the supreme court has final appellate review of agency decisions
B. holding that the panel is bound by decisions of prior panels
C. holding that this court considers third circuit and appellate division case law as persuasive authority only
D. holding that this court is not bound by decisions of the appellate division or the third circuit even where those decisions concern the same parties and legal issues
E. holding that this courts review of board decisions is limited to final orders or final decisions
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.