Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Purchasers in another location. These transactions allowed for the parties to cut down on transportation costs. Any diff referenced in U.C.C. § 1 — 201(b)(9) must be an antecedent or pre-existing debt. See In re Black Diamond Mining Co., 2011 WL 6202905, at *24 (stating that no pre-existing debt was due or owing by Black Diamond to Commodities at the time Commodities acquired the coal, and the transaction was thus not in total or partial satisfaction of a money debt); In re Mid-Atl. Piping Prods. of Charlotte, Inc., 24 B.R. 314, 328 (Bankr.W.D.N.C.1982) (stating that a person is not a BIOC “where a party receives goods in satisfaction of an antecedent money debt owed to that party”) (emphasis added); Kay v. City Bank & Trust Co. of Natchez, Miss., 358 F.Supp. 630, 639 (S.D.Ohio 1973)  (emphasis added); Fleet Capital Corp. v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that effect of discharge of debt under bankruptcy code is the same as it was under the 1898 bankruptcy act it is not an extinguishment of the debt but only a bar to enforcement of the debt as a personal obligation of the debt or
B. holding that reporting of historically accurate debt may violate the fcra when the reporting did not include that the debt was discharged in bankruptcy or that the debt was in dispute
C. holding that satisfaction of preexisting debt of corporate affiliate was sufficient to support jury finding of fair consideration for the transfer of valid security interest
D. recognizing satisfaction of a valid debt as adequate consideration in a transfer of real property
E. holding that the plaintiff was not a bioc because the plaintiffs purchase  was in partial satisfaction of a prior personal debt
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.