Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
by intervention, but the intervention shall be in subordination to, and in recognition of, the propriety of the main proceeding, unless otherwise ordered by the court in its discretion.” H o. 14, 15 (1918); Y.H. v. F.L.H., 784 So.2d 565, 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)); 84 Lumber Co. v. Cooper, 656 So.2d 1297, 1299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (stat ing that “intervention under [rule 1.230] assumes an interest in pending litigation which shall be in subordination to, and in recognition of, the propriety of the main proceeding”) (internal quotation omitted). Additionally, a contingent interest in the proceedings, as opposed to a direct and immediate interest, will not justify a party’s intervention. Harbor Specialty Ins. Co. v. Schwartz, 932 So.2d 383, 387 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Grimes, 591 So. 2d at 1094 . In the instant case, Infinity’s interest
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the trial court abused its discretion by granting a motion to intervene where the intervenors would not stand to gain or lose by direct legal operation and effect of the judgment in the action
B. holding that trial court was required to give full effect to supreme courts judgment and that by failing to do so the trial court abused its discretion
C. holding that the trial court erred by granting the defendants motion to dismiss
D. holding that the trial court did not err by granting defendants motion for summary judgment
E. holding trial court abused its discretion by refusing to conduct hearing and render decision on motion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.