Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
remand the case and direct the FCC to supplement the record. See 28 U.S.C. § 2347(c) (the court of appeals may “order ... additional evidence ... to be taken by the agency’’ where requested to do so by one of the parties). 3) The court may transfer the case to the district court for a full hearing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2347(b)(3). 4) The court may appoint a special master pursuant to F.R.A.P. 48 to hold hearings and gather any additional information the court needs to decide the just compensation issue. 5) The court may fashion any other “appropriate modes of procedure” to gather the evidence it needs to conduct its factual inquiry pursuant to its authority under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C § 1651. See Harris v. Nelson, 394 U.S. 286, 299, 89 S.Ct. 1082, 1090-91, 22 L.Ed.2d 281 (1969) . Depending on the particular facts of a case,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that removal to federal court was proper for claims asserted under all writs act
B. holding that this court has authority in appropriate circumstances to issue writs under all writs act 28 usc  1651a
C. recognizing the all writs act gives federal courts authority to issue writs of coram nobis to correct fundamental errors in criminal proceedings where the person is no longer in custody
D. recognizing that courts may rely on them authority under the all writs act in issuing orders appropriate to assist them in conducting factual inquiries
E. holding that district court had jurisdiction to consider claims under the all writs act
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.