Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
482 F.3d 860 (6th Cir.2007), the Sixth Circuit found that an administrator had acted arbitrarily and capriciously where he failed to “ ‘review ... the quality and quantity of the ... evidence and the opinions on both sides of the issues.’ ” Id. at 865 (quoting McDonald v. W.S. Life Ins. Co., 347 F.3d 161, 172 (6th Cir.2003)). The court held that the administrator’s denial of benefits failed under this standard. Contrary to the plaintiffs assertion, the existence of a conflict of interest that arises from a plan administrator deciding issues in which the company has a financial interest does not require a different standard, although the conflict “shapes” the application of the arbitrary and capricious standard of review. Miller v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 925 F.2d 979, 984 (6th Cir.1991)  (citing Brown v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the heightened arbitrary and capricious standard applies where a plan administrator despite delegating its claim processing duties to a third party exercises the ultimate authority to determine for itself whether payments should be made out of its own assets
B. holding that a court is to factor an insurers dual role into its review under the arbitrary and capricious standard though the standard remains arbitrary and capri cious
C. holding that when applying an arbitrary and capricious standard of review the courts role is to determine whether the plan administrators decision was completely unreasonable
D. holding that where a company pays plan beneficiaries from its own assets its perpetual conflict with its profitmaking role as a business must shape  the application of the arbitrary and capricious standard
E. holding that a company that generated revenue from the sale of its assets remained in business
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.