Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of Ormond Beach, 383 So.2d at 672, the court recognized that a transfer of powers did not occur where both entities operated separate library systems, “the County established a county-wide unified library system in which all cities then operating libraries joined, except Ormond Beach. The cities which joined lost their authority to manage the library function and to make financial decisions regarding library affairs.” Ormond Beach claimed that allowing the county to assume library function in its city, where the city “has not requested the County to assume it and therefore a county tax on city property is improper.” Id. The Fifth District recognized that the trial court, in that case, correctly held that no transfer of powers occurred. Id.; see also Barms, 390 So.2d at 1189 (Fla.1980) . Here, although County’s goal may well be to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that a sheriff contracting for services with a municipality is clearly different from a municipality transferring or contracting away the authority to supervise and control its police powers to the county government
B. holding that the governments attorney had the implicit authority to bind the government although the contracting officer had the express authority
C. holding that jurisdiction over an appeal of a contracting officers decision is lacking unless the contractors claim is first presented to the contracting officer and that officer renders a final decision on the claim 
D. holding notice of the defect actual or constructive and a failure to act on the part of the municipality to remedy the situation are prerequisites to recovery in an action involving a municipality
E. holding that jurisdiction over an appeal of a contracting officers decision is lacking unless the contractors claim is first presented to the contracting officer and that officer renders a final decision on the claim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.