Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
as a waiver of the Eleventh Amendment’s protection. Kennecott Copper Corp. v. State Tax Comm’n, 327 U.S. 573, 577, 66 S.Ct. 745, 747, 90 L.Ed. 862 (1946); Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 693, 98 S.Ct. 2565, 2574-75, 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978) (citing Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 427 U.S. 445, 96 S.Ct. 2666, 49 L.Ed.2d 614 (1976)). Here, neither the State of Alabama nor Congress has waived Eleventh Amendment immunity under §§ 1981, 1983 or 1985, and therefore, the aforementioned exceptions do not apply. Carr, 916 F.2d at 1524-25 (Exceptions to Eleventh Amendment immunity did not apply in § 1983 action, inasmuch as Congress had not abrogated Eleventh Amendment immunity in § 1983 cases and State of Alabama had not waived its immunity.); Sessions v. Rusk State Hosp., 648 F.2d 1066, 1069 (5th Cir.1981) ; Fincher v. Florida Dep’t of Labor &
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the eleventh amendment applies regardless of the nature of the relief sought
B. recognizing that section 1981 claims against a state agency are barred by the eleventh amendment
C. holding that the eleventh amendment applies in  1981 litigation
D. recognizing that claims against a state under  1981 are barred by the eleventh amendment
E. holding that the department of corrections was entitled to eleventh amendment immunity from suit under section 1981
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.