Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
fail to cite this controlling authority. In this case, although Mahabir had yet to filé her appeal when the Superior Court ruled on the attorney’s fees motions, the time to appeal had not expired since the Superior Court did not rule on Mahabir’s motion for reconsideration until March 24, 2014, giving the parties until April 23, 2014, to file a notice of appeal. V.I.S.Ct.R. 5(a)(4) (“the time for filing the notice of appeal for all parties is extended until 30 days after entry of an order disposing of the last” post-judgment motion, except that “[a] motion for attorney’s fees shall not affect the running of the time for appeal”). Therefore, the litigation remained ongoing when the Superior Court ruled on both motions for attorney’s fees. Bryan v. Fawkes, 61 V.I. 416, 448 (V.I. 2014) ; see also Johnson v. McCaughtry, 265 F.3d 559,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that under the circumstances of that case an argument made for the first time in a motion for rehearing was waived
B. holding that a case remained pending where the time to file a rehearing petition had not expired
C. holding that dismissing a habeas petition as timebarred under the aedpa does not violate the suspension clause because petitioner had years to file the petition and gave no explanation why he failed to file on time
D. holding that a coram nobis petition remained pending until  the court of appeals denied petitioners application for leave to appeal the appellate divisions denial of his petition
E. recognizing that aedpa would not apply to a habeas petition that was pending at the time of its enactment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.