Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
court clearly abused its discretion in denying Dillard’s motion to compel arbitration. Accordingly; without hearing oral argument, we conditionally grant the writ of mandamus and order the trial court to vacate its order denying Dillard’s motion to compel arbitration, and to enter a new order compelling arbitration of Garcia’s claims. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(c). We are confident the trial court will comply, and our writ will issue only if it does not. 1 . Cf. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. Webster, 128 S.W.3d 223, 230 n. 2 (Tex.2003) (citing cases supporting the rule that “if a party retains the unilateral, unrestricted right to terminate the arbitration agreement, it is illusory."); Tenet Healthcare Ltd. v. Cooper, 960 S.W.2d 386, 388-89 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet. dism’d w.o.j.)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an employee handbook did not constitute a valid unilateral contract between the employee and employer in the absence of adequate independent consideration
B. holding that an arbitration agreement in an employee handbook was illusory where the employer expressly reserved a right to unilaterally rescind any provisions of the handbook
C. holding that contractual relationship between student and university did not include terms of the handbook because university retained right to unilaterally modify terms of handbook without notice plaintiff neither negotiated for nor assented to terms of contract and relevant correspondence did not call special attention to handbook
D. holding that no modification of the original employment contract occurred when the employer unilaterally issued a new handbook
E. holding that an agreement to arbitrate is illusory if as here the employer can unilaterally modify the contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.