Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to exhaust their tribal remedies before presenting their dispute to the district court.’ ” Kerr-McGee, 115 F.3d at 1507 (quoting Texaco Inc. v. Zah, 5 F.3d 1374, 1378 (10th Cir.1993)). It is unnecessary, however, for the court to engage in a detailed comity analysis because when none of the recognized exceptions to the doctrine apply, and the dispute concerns a “reservation affair” or the dispute “arises on the reservation” “there is no discretion not to defer” to the tribal courts. Kerr-McGee, 115 F.3d at 1507 (quoting Zah, 5 F.3d at 1378). Thus, federal courts may abstain without first analyzing the comity and tribal sovereignty issues discussed in National Fanners. See Potaluck Corp. v. Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians, No. 99-2051, 2000 WL 1721797, at *2 (D.Kan. Aug.23, 2000); See also Calumet Gaming Group-Kansas, 987
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a tribal housing authority established by tribal council pursuant to its powers of selfgovernment was a tribal agency rather than a separate corporate entity created by the tribe
B. holding that plaintiff who filed suit in federal court could not later file a declaratory judgment petition in state court making allegations substantially similar to those made in federal court and seeking resolution of primarily the same issues
C. holding that plaintiffs failure to raise his constitutional claims in the military court system bars him from raising them in federal court
D. holding that neither the tribe or its tribal court was necessary to the determination of the tribal courts jurisdiction given that the district courts judgment would be binding on the absent party and they did not have a legally protected interest at issue noting that the tribe was not a party to a relevant agreement or treaty with any party to the suit
E. holding that plaintiff a private corporation who had a contract dispute with tribe must exhaust its remedies in the tribal court system before it may raise the same issues in federal court
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.