Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
an appropriate sanction. 4 . This Court may not exercise sua sponte review when the Commission on Judicial Conduct recommends censure alone. R. Comm’n Judicial Conduct 29(a) ("A recommendation of censure shall be final unless the judge or disciplinary counsel files a petition to modify or reject the recommendation as provided in paragraph (c). ”). This Court does have the authority to review ”[a]ll other recommendations for formal sanctions” on its own motion. Id. In addition to censure, the Commission recommended that Judge MeVay pay a fine, which it viewed as a formal sanction under Rule 18(e). We therefore exercise sua sponte review of the entire recommendation, as the reviewable sanction is insepa-rabie from censure. Cf. In re Bemis, 189 Ariz. 119, 122, 938 P.2d 1120, 1123 (1997) . 5 . Rule 5 provides in part the following:
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the court had no power to sanction conduct that occurred in an arbitration
B. recognizing that an order of restitution  is available as a freestanding sanction to be imposed alone or in combination with other sanctions
C. holding that a postjudgment contempt sanction for refusal to obey orders whether it is characterized as a civil or a criminal sanction is immediately appealable as a final order under  1291
D. holding in an attorney discipline case that because a probation order a normally nonreviewable sanction was recommended in conjunction with a censure a reviewable sanction this court could review both sanctions as they were inseparable
E. holding that monetary sanction was not supportable as a compensatory civil contempt sanction because there was no proof of the amount of loss
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.