Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of that status, not cases adjudicating alleged violations of an alien's substantive due process rights during detention. See, e.g., Leng May Ma v. Barber, 357 U.S. 185, 78 S.Ct. 1072, 2 L.Ed.2d 1246 (1958) (concluding that temporary parole in United States while alien's admissibility was being determined did not entitle alien to benefit of statute giving Attorney General authority to withhold deportation of any alien "within the United States” if alien would thereby be subjected to physical persecution); Menon v. Esperdy, 413 F.2d 644, 647 (2d Cir.1969) (noting that “since a parole does not constitute an admission into the United States ... th[e] appeal involve[d] an exclusion ... rather than an expulsion”); Dong Wing Ott v. Shaughnessy, 247 F.2d 769, 770 (2d Cir.1957) (per curiam) , cert. denied, 357 U.S. 925, 78 S.Ct. 1368, 2
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that parole survives deportation
B. holding that the attorney generals discretionary power to suspend deportation did not apply to aliens within the country on parole because parole by statute was not to be regarded as an admission of the alien citation and internal quotation marks omitted
C. holding that a statute must be construed so that no part of the statute is rendered surplusage or superfluous internal quotation marks and citation omitted
D. holding that deportation does not extinguish term of parole
E. holding a parole rule equivalent to a statute
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.