Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
other disputed items should be included in the property distribution. III. Inclusion of Property that Sue Disposed of Prior to the Dissolution. The parties disagree with respect to whether other assets should be included as part of the property awarded to Sue: (1) the Blazer sold or given to Jami; (2) the cash value received by Sue when she canceled the policy on David’s life; and (3) the funds from the liquidated mutual fund that were not attributable to Sue’s inheritance. We begin our consideration of this issue with the observation that a spouse’s disposal of assets that would otherwise be subject to division in the dissolution may properly be considered in making an equitable distribution of the parties’ property. See In re Marriage of Cerven, 335 N.W.2d 143, 146 (Iowa 1983) . A. The Blazer. The evidence shows that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the fourth amendment protects property as well as privacy
B. holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property
C. holding that an obligation is in the nature of alimony when it is intended to provide support for the spouse rather than an equalization of property rights
D. holding that spouse could not claim exemption in property that was only property of other spouses estate
E. holding that property transferred by a spouse to avoid support obligation may be considered on the issue of property distribution as well as alimony
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.