Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
districts in which they serve. Sullivan, 106 S.W.3d at 189. Texas law places control of probation departments in the hands of district judges, who are elected state officials. See PYCA Indus., Inc., 81 F.3d at 1417 n. 3. In Shore, the court explained that because the district judges are empowered to employ and dismiss individuals in the probation department, any actions by the director “would be as an agent for the Judges.” 414 F.Supp. at 385; see Sullivan, 106 S.W.3d at 189. The Shore court further explained that “any equitable relief granted must therefore be directed against the ‘Judges ....”’ 414 F.Supp. at 385; see Sullivan, 106 S.W.3d at 189 (citing Clark v. Tarrant County, 608 F.Supp. 209, 211 (N.D.Tex.1985), rev’d in part on other grounds, 798 F.2d at 739 (5th Cir.1986) ). Because ultimate control over JCCSCD staff
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that probation department employees are not county employees
B. holding that county and district attorneys are officers within the judicial department
C. holding that a county had no duty to bargain with a union of its employees
D. holding that the commissioner of the department of pensions and security had statutory authority to reassign state employees to the county level
E. holding that employees of county jail that housed federal prisoners pursuant to contract with the federal government were not federal employees even though county jail had to comply with federal rules and regulations
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.