Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
emphasizes, furthermore, “[T]he Lebron Court explained that while Amtrak is part of the Government for purposes of the constitutional obligations of Government — -such as the obligation to respect an artist’s First Amendment rights' — Amtrak is not part of the Government for purposes of the inherent powers and privileges of the Government.” Pl.’s Opp. & Reply at 8 (emphases in original). AAR’s due-process challenge plainly belongs in the former camp. Just as the Government is obligated to respect individuals’ First Amendment rights, see Lebron, 513 U.S. at 399, 115 S.Ct. 961, so too is it constitutionally required to respect their due-process rights. Consistent with the standard Plaintiff itself enumerates, then, Amtrak is a governmental entity in the context of this claim. See id. . Perhaps recognizing that Lebrón poses an
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that amtrak is part of the government for purposes of the first amendment because the government created amtrak by special law to further governmental objectives and retained authority to appoint a majority of amtraks corporate directors
B. holding a federal credit union not to be a government actor for constitutional purposes
C. holding that amtrak is an agency of the government  for purposes of the constitutional obligations of government
D. holding that where the government inter alia retains for itself permanent authority to appoint a majority of the directors of a corporation the corporation is part of the government for purposes of the first amendment
E. holding agencies of state government are part of the state for purposes of sovereign immunity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.