Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
consistent with the ruling of this Court., As only the City or the Commonwealth may appeal from an adverse ruling by this Court pursuant to Va. Code § 16.1-131.1 and the Court has ruled in their favor, endorsements are dispensed with in accordance with Rule 1:13 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. The Clerk is directed to remand this matter to the Chesapeake General District Court and to forward copies of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to all counsel of record and to The Honorable Michael R. Katchmark, Presiding Judge of the Chesapeake General District Court. Entry of this memorandum opinion shall constitute an order of the Court consistent with its directives. It is so ordered. 1 See Parker v. Commonwealth, 24 Va. App. 681, 686-90, 485 S.E.2d 150, 153 — 54 (1997) , cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1071. 2 See
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that   750170 is not void for vagueness nor constitutionally infirm for overbreadth
B. holding va code  182460a is not unconstitutionally vague
C. holding residual clause of acca void for vagueness
D. holding a law is void for vagueness when it offers no standard of conduct that was possible to know emphasis added
E. holding that va code  182603 is not void for vagueness
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.