Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
PCI Transp., Inc. v. Fort Worth & W. R.R. Co., 418 F.3d 535, 545 (5th Cir.2005) (no need to enjoin allegedly improper fees, when any improper fees levied would be recoverable upon success on the merits); Jayaraj v. Scappini, 66 F.3d 36, 39 (2d Cir.1995) (no need for injunction where failure to renew his employment contract for an additional term can be redressed by money damages upon success on the merits). 3 .Mr. Alvord accuses the appellees of filing the malpractice action separately as "an end run around amending the complaint in the present action.” We note that our holding would be no different if the malpractice action were in the same proceeding as the probate action, for the two claims are separate and distinct. See Astor Pictures Corp. v. Shull, 64 A.2d 160, 161 (D.C.1949) . 4 . D.C.Code § 14-302(a) (2001) ("In a civil
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding unanimity requirement not violated when charge stated two separate counts with two separate and distinct offenses in each case
B. holding that the separate and distinct claims of two or more plaintiffs cannot be aggregated to establish jurisdiction
C. holding that the evidence supported two separate convictions and punishments for two attempted robberies of two different victims who suffered separate and distinct harms
D. holding that if a single primary right should be invaded by two distinct and separate legal wrongs two causes of action would result
E. holding that congress envisioned two separate petitions filed to review two separate final orders
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.