Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
repeated attempts to get up and eventually took appellant to the patrol car to prevent “injury to himself or to me or to other persons out on the scene.” The first officer testified these steps were consistent with police protocol regarding how to treat a person who may be violent. She also testified she was still investigating the incident when she went to the patrol car and asked appellant what happened. See id. (“The investigative detention did not evolve into an arrest simply because appellant was escorted to the patrol car and handcuffed. [The officer] did only that which was reasonably necessary to ensure his own safety while investigating appellant’s possible involvementf.]”); see also Turner v. State, 252 S.W.3d 571, 580 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, pet. ref'd) . Appellant has not presented evidence to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that defendant had the right to refuse to answer questions put to him by police officer who had called him
B. holding that suspect was not in custody when officer handcuffed him for officer safety while transporting him to police station
C. holding that defendant was arrested  when the police officer took physical custody of him by grabbing his arm and returned him to the hotel for detention there
D. holding the defendant was not under arrest when police asked him to go to the station and then offered him a ride because he did not have transportation
E. holding in the context of a prosecution for second degree escape that although defendant was not handcuffed he had nonetheless been placed under arrest had had his liberty restrained in that he was not free to leave and at that point the first step in the process of transporting him to the police station had begun consequently the defendants arrest was complete and he was in custody
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.