Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
state provide him with a free transcript of the separate trial of a codefendant, the defendant must show that that transcript will be valuable to him. “In the present case, defendant did not show in the trial court and does not show on appeal how the transcript of the Audison trial would have assisted in trial preparation or impeaching witnesses. Therefore, we hold that the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for the production of portions of the Audison trial transcript. 126 Mich.App. at 766-69, 337 N.W.2d at 917-18. Thus, where a defendant requested a transcript of a proceeding involving a codefendant, to which he was not a party, a number of jurisdictions have required a showing of particularized need. See People v. Russell, 7 Ill.App. 3d 850, 289 N.E.2d 106 (1972) . Similarly, in State v. Tison, 129 Ariz. 526,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the defendant was entitled to counsel when the offense for which he was tried could result in the imposition of a jail sentence
B. holding that the defendant may not state one ground at trial and another on appeal
C. holding that a defendant was entitled to a transcript of the trial of codefendants who were tried together and convicted where one of the convictions was reversed on the ground of reasonable doubt
D. holding that where there were two possible grounds to revoke defendants probation and only one ground was relied on to revoke his probation defendant was not entitled to jailtime credit when he was later convicted on the offense that constituted the other ground it did not matter that the authorities learned about the ground for revocation while investigating the offense for which he was convicted sjection 558031 requires only that custody be related to the offense on which credit is sought because his custody was not related to the convicted offense he did not get any credit
E. recognizing that a defendant may not raise one ground for objection at trial and argue a different ground on appeal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.