Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
his left arm to the bar on the right side of his body. (Pelayo Dep. Tr. at 204-05, 207.) 2 . The PA defendants have not relied on the numerous cases that have found some administrative intrusions to be reasonable where the Government sought to prevent hazardous conditions. See Bd. of Ed. of Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 92 of Pottawatomie Cnty. v. Earls, 536 U.S. 822, 828, 122 S.Ct. 2559, 153 L.Ed.2d 735 (2002) (quoting Treasury Emps. v. Von Raab, 489 U.S. 656, 667-68, 109 S.Ct. 1384, 103 L.Ed.2d 685 (1989) (internal quotation marks omitted)); see, e.g., Mich. Dep’t of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444, 455, 110 S.Ct. 2481, 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990) (upholding brief stops at a sobriety checkpoint); United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 566-67, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976) . 3 . The alleged liability of the PA is based
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that officers may consistent with the fourth amendment conduct a brief investigatory stop when they have a reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot
B. holding that the federal action at issue must be authorized
C. holding that the fourth amendment applies to searches conducted by public school officials and noting it would be anomalous to say that the individual and his private property are fully protected by the fourth amendment only when the individual is suspected of criminal behavior
D. holding random traffic stops for license and registration checks are contrary to fourth amendment
E. holding that stops for brief questioning about immigration status at the border rou tinely conducted at permanent checkpoints are consistent with the fourth amendment and need not be authorized by warrant
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.