Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
training on the use of force demonstrate that at the time of Sample’s shooting, there was a clearly established constitutional right for a suspect to be free from deadly force except where the suspect poses an imminent or immediate threat either to officers or others. One of the first articulations of this right came in Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1, 105 S.Ct. 1694, 85 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). Under Gamer, the police may not use deadly force against a citizen unless “the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.” Id. at 3, 105 S.Ct. 1694. This same standard has been repeatedly followed by the Sixth Circuit in deadly force cases. Whitlow, 39 Fed.Appx. 297, 302-03, 2002 WL 1455317, at *5 ; Sova v. City of Mt. Pleasant, 142 F.3d 898
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that expert testimony on what constitutes deadly physical force and whether the use of force was justified should have been excluded
B. recognizing that deadly force is only justified where a suspect poses an immediate threat
C. holding that deadly force was justified where a suspect violently resisted arrest physically attacked the officer and grabbed the officers gun
D. holding the use of deadly force is constitutionally permissible only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm either to the officer or to others
E. holding that an officer cannot use deadly force unless a suspect poses an imminent threat of serious physical harm
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.