Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of this new judge-made rule suggests a return to the former hostility of judges to contracts to arbitrate as attempts to oust courts of their jurisdiction. 5. Engaged in settlement negotiations for years without raising the arbitration clause Finally, the majority argue that arbitration may be waived simply by taking part in settlement discussions. This may be the most insidious part of the majority’s decision on a waiver of arbitration. Allowing mere attempts to settle to have the effect of waiving arbitration is a very pernicious holding. It is also incoherent with essential law and policy. So preferred is settlement of commercial disputes that the supreme court has forcefully articulated a strong public policy encouraging it. See Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla.1985) . And when parties attempt to effect a private
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that property settlement agreements may be specifically enforced
B. recognizing that a contract which is incomplete uncertain or indefinite in its material terms will not be specifically enforced in equity
C. holding that restrictive covenants are not favored by the law and should be strictly construed as they are an interference with an owners free and full enjoyment of his property
D. recognizing that an insurance contract will generally be enforced as written unless to do so would violate the law or public policy
E. holding settlements are highly favored and will be enforced whenever possible
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.