Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
see United States v. Gomez-Perez, 215 F.3d 315, 319 (2d Cir. 2000). We have considered Lisi’s remaining arguments and conclude that they are without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED in part and the appeal is DISMISSED in part. 1 . Lisi also argues Aat he received ineffective assistance of counsel from Touger in connection with Ae motion to withdraw his guilty plea, because Touger failed to submit evidence that he was prejudiced by ineffective assistance on Ae part of Zelin. But any such claim would depend on the existence of such evidence, none of which appears in the present record. Accordingly, any such claim would have to be made by a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Billy-Eko v. United States, 8 F.3d 111, 114 (2d Cir. 1993)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding aat ineffective assistance claims are appropriately brought in  2255 petitions  because resolution of such claims often re quires consideration of matters outside the record on direct appeal
B. holding that ineffective assistance of counsel claims should be brought in collateral proceedings not on direct appeal
C. holding ineffective assistance of counsel claims may be decided on direct appeal where the district court has developed a record on the ineffectiveness issue
D. holding that defendant may raise claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal only if ineffective assistance is conclusive from the record
E. holding that because ohio law required ineffectiveassistanceofcounsel claims be raised in an application to reopen the direct appeal of the criminal case such claims were part of the direct appeal entitling defendant to the assistance of counsel
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.