Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
passed over for promotions. See Dkt. No. 6 at ¶ 11. Although Plaintiff does not expressly provide the allegations contained in this internal discrimination complaint, it is clear that he was alleging that he was passed over in retaliation for his advocacy in opposition to the Roman Catholic Church’s handling of sexual abuse cases and in support of sexual abuse victims. Moreover, a second possible “protected activity” occurred on April 6, 2011 when he reported to Defendant OASAS’ Affirmative Action manager and Human Resources that Defendant Felter subjected Mm “to harassment and public ridicule” in front of co-workers. See id. at ¶ 14. Although Plaintiff may have felt that he •was the subject of retaliation, the amended complaint makes clear that Pl 11 F.Supp.2d 481, 488 (S.D.N.Y.2002) . Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that many actions taken by an employer though unfavorable to an employee do not constitute a basis for discrimination because they do not qualify as an ultimate employment decision
B. holding that relief granted under title vii is against the employer not individual employees whose actions constituted a violation of title vii emphasis in original
C. holding that complaints regarding violation of employer policies unrelated to impermissible discrimination do not fall within the scope of title vii and therefore do not qualify for protection under the statute
D. holding individual defendants are not an employer within meaning of title vii
E. holding the employees complaints must give adequate notice to the employer that the employee is complaining of conduct prohibited by title vii
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.