Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
“a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in various classes” by reference to “the average person having comparable training, skills and abilities.” 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(j)(3)(i) (emphasis added); McKay, 110 F.3d at 373 (same); Thompson v. Holy Family Hosp., 121 F.3d 537, 539-40 (9th Cir.1997) (same). Given that the determination of whether a claimant is disabled is made on an individual basis, and that the court may consider the manner in which a claimant’s personal education and prior work experience limits his ability to pursue employment in other sectors of the economy, the district court’s conclusion that Burns is disabled was reasonable and does not conflict with decisions by this and other circuits that similar lifting restrictions do not render claimants “disabled” und r.1998) . But see Williams v. Channel Master Satellite
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a trained computer technicians carpal tunnel syndrome did not render him disabled under the ada because he could still function as a computer repair technician
B. holding that plaintiffs hernia condition was not sufficient to render her disabled under the ada
C. holding that an entity that serves the disabled lacks standing under the ada
D. holding plaintiff with carpal tunnel syndrome who could not perform heavy lifting failed to meet burden of establishing substantial limitation in major life activity of work
E. holding that the plaintiffs evidence that his back injury precluded him from performing at least 50 of the jobs previously available to him was enough to classify him as disabled under the ada
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.