Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and permanent injunction. The denial of a motion for contempt is not appealable because it is not a final order. Norman v. Norman, 692 S.W.2d 655, 655 (Tex.1985); Velez v. DeLara, 905 S.W.2d 43, 46 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1995, no writ). We therefore overrule points three and four by which Chambers complains of the court’s assessment of the final judgment. We can review the declaration that the agreed temporary injunction was void ab initio because of the lack of a bond. The supreme court has construed strictly the requirement of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 684 that, before a trial court issues a temporary restraining order or temporary injunction, the applicant shall execute and file with the clerk a bond to the adverse party. Goodwin v. Goodwin, 456 S.W.2d 885, 885 (Tex.1970) ; Lancaster v. Lancaster, 155 Tex. 528, 291
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing the importance of a determination on the merits with respect to the issuance of a permanent injunction
B. holding that the injunction did not constitute a claim
C. holding that injunction order simply setting out elements necessary for relief and failing to identify the injury from denial of the injunction was conclusory and void
D. holding that the failure of the applicant to file a bond before the issuance of the temporary injunction renders the injunction void ab initio
E. holding an appeal of injunction moot where the injunction expired three months before the appellate court heard arguments in the case
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.