Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
water charges in order to assist in meeting its debt obligations. 5 . The sole case cited by Engelman in support of its contention "that property owned by districts, like Engelman, created under Article XVI § 59 of the Texas Constitution are [sic] exempt from forced sale and taxation” sheds little light on the issue raised in this case. See Lower Colo. River Auth. v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co., 144 Tex. 326, 190 S.W.2d 48, 50 (1945) (noting in dicta that LCRA's enabling legislation exempted its property from forced sale). As mentioned above, there is no dispute that Engelman's water rights and allocations may not be the subject of a forced sale because these assets are the property of a governmental agency. See Satterlee v. Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Auth., 576 S.W.2d 773, 779 (Tex.1978) . 6 . The viability of these alternatives will
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding agencies of state government are part of the state for purposes of sovereign immunity
B. holding that state and local government agencies were not persons under the fca
C. holding that lcras property devoted exclusively to public use is exempt from taxation under article xi section 9
D. recognizing that tribal sovereign immunity extends to agencies and subdivisions of the tribe
E. holding that article xi section 9 extends to property held by government agencies
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.