Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
26 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970) . He adds that “property exceeding $20” is an
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding any fact other than a prior conviction that increases the maximum penalty beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt
B. holding that failure to explain the effect of a term of supervised release was harmless error where term of imprisonment combined with maximum imprisonment for violation of supervised release was still less than statutory maximum
C. holding in a case where the maximum time of imprisonment was extended because an indigent defendant was unable to pay a fine and court costs that a state may not constitutionally imprison beyond the maximum duration fixed by statute a defendant who is financially unable to pay a fine
D. holding that any fact other than a prior conviction may not be used to enhance a defendants sentence beyond the statutory maximum unless it is submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt
E. holding that state may not subject indigent defendants to period of imprisonment beyond statutory maximum
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.