Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
issue of liability as to their due process claim. See Order of June 6, 2002 (Docket No. 67). The plaintiffs’ second claim of political discrimination was tried before a jury from December 2-23, 2002, along with the damages phase of their due process claim. Ultimately, the jury rendered a verdict against plaintiffs, finding that defendants had not dismissed plaintiffs based on political grounds, and also awarding zero damages for the defendants’ violation of plaintiffs’ due process rights. See Verdict Forms (Docket Nos. 119-150). Notwithstanding, the Court upon entering judgment, awarded each plaintiff one dollar ($1.00) as nominal compensation for their due process claim. See Judgment of January 7, 2003 (Docket No. 152). See also Campos-Orrego v. Rivera, 175 F.3d 89, 98 (1st Cir.1999) . In their “Motion for New Trial ... ” (Docket
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that nominal damages award was appropriate where the evidence supporting the damages was speculative
B. holding that the right to nominal damages was waived in a breach of duty action when plaintiff failed to raise the issue of nominal damages until after the verdict
C. holding that when a jury finds section 1988 liability but fails to award damages nominal damages are available to plaintiff
D. holding that when plaintiff has proven injury but has failed to prove the amount of damages the plaintiff is only entitled to nominal damages
E. holding that the first amendment right to free speech is absolute and an award of nominal damages is required even if the defendant fails to object to the nominal damages instruction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.