Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
have many statutory duties, the performance of which are mandatory to the administration of a bankruptcy estate, but whieh nevertheless may not yield a specific monetary recovery. Debtors’ counsel in Chapter 11 cases are not insurers of a successful reorganization and may be entitled to reasonable compensation even in a failed case. See Matters of Coastal Nursing Center, Inc., and Tybee Island Nursing Center, Inc., Ch. 11 Cases No. 93-40898 & 93-40899, slip op. at 5-9 (Bankr.S.D.Ga., Oct. 10, 1993) (Davis, J.). Nevertheless, where a debtor litigates distinct and separate claims within a Chapter 11 case, compensation is still dependent on whether the services were reasonable and necessary, which includes the factor of results obtained. See Resolution Trust Corporation, 996 F.2d at 1150 . Thus, while good faith, unsuccessful
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that absent other evidence of prevailing market rates the district judge may establish a reasonable rate based on his familiarity with the prevailing rates in the area
B. holding that the party prevailing on the significant issues in the litigation is the party that should be considered the prevailing party for attorneys fees
C. holding that successful party is one who is the ultimate prevailing party in the litigation
D. holding that federal prevailing wage rate statutes requirement that contractor pay not less specified minima presupposes possibility that successful bidder may have to pay higher rate to workers and that bidders reliance on governments representation of prevailing rate in computing its bid cannot be said to have been justified
E. holding that a court first should determined the reasonable hours and rate and then it may adjust the lodestar if the prevailing party was not completely successful in its efforts
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.