Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of an “infamous crime,” Lucas v. McAfee, 217 Ind. 534, 541, 29 N.E.2d 588, 588 (1940) (Shake, J.). Although it contains a categorical limitation, the Infamous Crimes Clause does not contain a durational limitation. Consequently, if misdemeanor battery is an “infamous crime,” then it is only by legislative grace that Snyder’s right to vote was restored when he was released from incarceration. To be sure, the power to disenfranchise permanently persons convicted of any crimes even though they have completed their sentences might be limited by other provisions of the Indiana Constitution, such as the Proportionality Clause of Article I, § 16, and it may also be limited by the Equal Protection Clause, cf. Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24, 43-56, 94 S.Ct. 2655, 41 L.Ed.2d 551 (1974) . It is, however, unnecessary to consider here
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that section 2 of the fourteenth amendment permits states to disenfranchise convicted felons who have completed their sentences
B. holding the sixth amendment right to a jury trial applies to the states through the fourteenth amendment
C. holding that bankruptcy jurisdiction is not within section 5 of the fourteenth amendment
D. holding second amendment right is incorporated against the states through fourteenth amendment
E. holding the sixth amendment applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.