Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the above-mentioned classes employing any person in this Commonwealth.” 8 . See Second Supplemental Memorandum of Law of Plaintiff Scungio Borst & Associates in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment of Robert DeBolt, undated, at 1-3 (R.R. at 66-68). 9 . 410 SLD and Kenworth did not appeal the judgment against them and are not involved in the instant appeal. 10 . See, inter alia, Ward v. Whalen, Í8 Pa. D. & C.3d 710 (Ct.Com.Pl.Allegheny 1981) (Wettick, J.) (interpreting Section 260.2a as permitting actions against agents in their personal capacities); Amalgamated Cotton Garment and Allied Indus. Fund v. Dion, 341 Pa.Super. 12, 491 A.3d 123 (1985) (approving Ward but limiting it to instances where an employer itself defaults); Mohney v. McClure, 390 Pa.Super. 338, 568 A.2d 682 (1990) . 11 . Act of Feb. 17, 1994, P.L. 73, No. 7 §
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that such classifications are permissible only when suitably tailored to serve a compelling state interest
B. recognizing that employment actions can be adverse even if such actions are subsequently withdrawn
C. holding that causes of actions against directors of corporations for breach of fiduciary duty are contract actions
D. holding that a city police officers negligent actions involved in the pursuit of a speeding automobile were entitled to the protection of sovereign immunity
E. holding that such actions are permissible only against officers and agents involved in salient decisionmaking
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.