Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
2. 19 . Dr. Strong’s Report at 2 (emphasis added). 20 . Dr. Strong’s Report at 2. 21 . Dr. Strong’s Report at 2. 22 . Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 46], 23 .28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1). 24 . Estate of Northrop v. Hutto, 9 So.3d 381, 384 (Miss.2009). This element, like all elements of a medical malpractice case, must be satisfied by expert testimony. Coleman v. Rice, 706 So.2d 696, 698 (Miss. 1997). 25 . Patterson v. Tibbs, 60 So.3d 742, 753 (Miss.2011). 26 . Drummond v. Buckley, 627 So.2d 264, 268 (Miss.1993). 27 . Dr. Strong’s Report at 1. 28 . Government's Brief at 4. 29 . Government’s Brief at 4. 30 . Conn's Brief at 2. 31 . Dr. Strong’s Report at 1. 32 . See Patterson, supra at n. 31. 33 . Dr. Strong’s Report at 2. 34 . Estate of Northrop v. Hutto, 9 So.3d 381, 387 (Miss.2009) . The expert "must articulate an objective
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding experts testimony was insufficient to survive summary judgment because the testimony at most showed the defendant deviated from the experts personal standard of care rather than the generally recognized and accepted standard of care
B. holding experts testimony was insufficient to survive summary judgment because the testimony at most showed the defendant deviated from the experts personal standard of care rather than the generally accepted standard of care
C. holding that standard of care need not be listed separately in report when same standard applies to each health care provider
D. holding that a manufacturers insert in and of itself may not establish the relevant standard of care in a medical negligence action but may be considered by the fact finder along with expert testimony to define the standard of care
E. holding that an experts personal preference does not establish a national standard of care
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.