Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
job performance. There is no suggestion of unlawful conduct or other impropriety. The Board’s decision is based on the lack of compatibility between Mr. McBride and the manner in which the Board desires the Authority to be operated. In Bristol Virginia School Board v. Quarles, the court held that public termination for “ineffective leadership” and “lack of communication with personnel” did not implicate protected liberty interests. 235 Va. 108, 366 S.E.2d 82, 85 (1988) (outlining the trend among federal courts to implicate liberty interests in eases involving “specific charges of moral turpitude, criminal activity, or serious character defects,” but not in cases involving “unelaborated charges relating to job performance”). See Robertson v. Rogers, 679 F.2d 1090, 1092 (4th Cir.1992) ; Bunting v. City of Columbia, 639 F.2d 1090,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that prospective adoptive parents do not have a fundamental liberty interest in adoption
B. holding that a prisoners loss of privileges for thirty days was not a property right that would constitute a violation of his constitutionally protected liberty interest
C. holding that a superintendents comments to prospective employers that plaintiff was terminated for incompetence and outside activities did not infringe on a protected liberty interest
D. holding there is no protected liberty interest in maintaining the foster family relationship
E. holding that a threeday suspension without pay did not infringe police officers liberty interest
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.