Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Both were behaving nervously. Appellant tries to dismiss this behavior by asserting that nervousness “is an entirely natural reaction” to the presence of law enforcement and that Ms. Lewis might have “had any number of reasons” to give the police a “single inaccurate statement.” Even if these assertions were true, “[a] determination that reasonable suspicion exists ... need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.” United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266, 277, 122 S.Ct. 744, 151 L.Ed.2d 740 (2002). Instead, Officer Chih reasonably could suspect that Ms. Lewis and her son had been trying to mislead the police so they would not find appellant and his brother and that appellant’s nervousness reflected his fear of being caught— both reasonable possibilities which lent furt . 1996)  (internal quotation marks omitted). III. Did
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a temporary detention designed to last only until a preliminary investigation here the showup identification procedure either generated probable cause or resulted in the release of the suspect is consistent with the fourth amendment
B. recognizing that for fourth amendment purposes an arrest warrant supported by probable cause carries with it limited authority to enter a dwelling in which a suspect lives when there is reason to believe that the suspect is within
C. holding that pretrial detention resulting from legal process unsupported by probable cause violates the fourth amendment
D. holding a fourth amendment terry detention is not a custodial arrest and the use of handcuffs does not automatically convert a temporary detention into a fourth amendment arrest
E. holding that statute allowing issuance of detention order based on reasonable grounds not amounting to probable cause to arrest to suspect the person described in the affidavit committed the offense did not violate the fourth amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.