Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
court had no jurisdiction. 22 . See, e.g., Leisnoi, Inc. v. United States, 170 F.3d 1188, 1192 (9th Cir.1999); McMaster v. United States, 177 F.3d 936, 939-40 (11th Cir.1999); Cadorette v. United States, 988 F.2d 215, 223 (1st Cir.1993). Leisnoi’s holding that “a third party’s claim of an interest of the United States can suffice if it clouds the plaintiff's title” is inapplicable here because the Levee District asserts its own title interest; it is not asserting a title interest on behalf of the United States. 170 F.3d at 1192. 23 . - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2199, 183 L.Ed.2d 211 (2012). 24 . 5 U.S.C. § 702. 25 . 28 U.S.C. § 2409a(a)i 26 . Patchak, 132 S.Ct. at 2205. 27 . Id. at 2210. 28 . Id. at 2207 (internal quotations omitted). 29 . See also Block, 461 U.S. at 286, 103 S.Ct. 1811
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the defendants dominion control and knowledge may be inferred if he had exclusive possession of the premises on which the object was found emphasis added
B. holding that trespass to try title is the method for determining title to  real property
C. holding that congress intended the qta to provide the exclusive means by which adverse claimants could challenge the united states title to real property emphasis added
D. holding that the only method by which an adverse possessor may convey the title asserted by adverse possession is to describe in the instrument of conveyance by means minimally acceptable for conveyancing of realty that which is intended to be conveyed
E. holding that the legal title holders to real property held it in constructive trust for the equitable title holder who was entitled to the real property based on an earlier contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.