Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
judicial opinions for the meaning of economic loss will support the conclusion that all monetary damages are economic. Unfortunately, the imprecise use of the term “economic loss rule” by this court led many to erroneously conclude that it was a rule of general application that precluded recovery in tort of virtually any harm that could be measured in dollars if a business relationship also existed between the parties. Ill ¶56 Third, again, the independent duty doctrine is not a rule at all; rather it is an analytical tool used by courts to decide whether there is an independent duty cognizable in tort in the first instance. Whether or not we recognize a tort often involves policy considerations. See, e.g., Thompson v. St. Regis Paper Co., 102 Wn.2d 219, 232, 685 P.2d 1081 (1984) ; MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing the tort of retaliatory discharge
B. recognizing tort of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy
C. recognizing common law tort claim for wrongful discharge in violation of ohio public policy based upon statutory and judicial sources
D. holding that the oneyear statute of limitations for a tort action for wrongful termination in violation of public policy applied to the plaintiffs erisa  510 claim
E. recognizing cause of action for wrongful discharge
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.