Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
as an alternative to the federal exemptions set forth in the Bankruptcy Code? It is not unreasonable to expect that the state’s policy judgment will be set forth with sufficient clarity to permit the bankruptcy court administering the estate to identify the state exemptions with reasonable certainty. While state courts frequently refer to statutes which prohibit only certain forms of judicial process as “exemption” statutes, the term “exemption” “conventionally connotes protection against all forms of pro-cess_” William T. Vukowich, Debtors’ Exemption Rights, 62 Geo.L.J. 779, 816 (1974). Therefore, it is appropriate, in our view, to give the word its common meaning in the absence of any legislative indication to the contrary. See, e.g., Scarlett v. Barnes, 121 B.R. 578 (W.D.Mo.1990) . This approach not only provides us with the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding in the absence of definitive state authority under missouri law a cause of action is not exempt unless immune from all types of judicial process
B. recognizing the cause of action
C. holding state immune from suit brought in state court
D. holding that if an individual is possessed of state authority and purports to act under that authority his action is state action
E. holding that proceeds of a personal injury settlement are not exempt under missouri law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.