Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
“have his cake and eat it too.” Id. at 282. Under basic principles of contract law, “[d]efendants must take the bitter with the sweet.” Id. at 283; see also United States v. Cianci 154 F.3d 106, 110 (3d Cir.1998) (“Under the law of this circuit, [a defendant] cannot renege on his agreement”). “When the government breaches a plea agreement, the general rule is to remand the ease to the district court for a determination whether to grant specific performance or to allow withdrawal of the plea.” United States v. Nolan-Cooper, 155 F.3d 221, 241 (3d Cir.1998). However, “we have allowed for an exception when the circumstances dictate that there is only one appropriate remedy for the defendant.” Williams, 510 F.3d at 427; see, e.g., United States v. Badaracco, 954 F.2d 928, 941 (3d Cir.1992) ; see also Nolan-Cooper, 155 F.3d at 241
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the government was not responsible for delay from withdrawal of guilty plea
B. holding that permitting withdrawal of the defendants plea would be an empty remedy as he had already served much of his sentence
C. holding that defendant was responsible for the delay from the withdrawal of his guilty plea
D. holding that prosecution is generally entitled to specific performance or withdrawal of plea following defendants breach but because the government waived its right to withdrawal of plea only the possibility of specific performance remained
E. holding that because the defendants challenge to his sentence implicated his plea agreement the defendants request must be construed as a petition for postconviction relief
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.