Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
photographs, items of personal hygiene, or other effects of a private nature whose public disclosure could offend a student’s reasonable expectations of privacy. Here, however, the search of KP.’s bag was conducted in the privacy of the principal’s conference room. Only school officials, no students, were present. More importantly, the search was presumably limited in good faith to actions necessary to uncover a metal object like a pistol. Such a search would not include an intentional hunt for other contraband, although if discovered, such items need not be ignored. For example, such a search would not entail reading written materials, scrutinizing photographs, activating cellphones, or inspecting small pockets, crevices, wallets, containers, or purses too small to harbor a gun. U 6) ; United States v. Hartwell, 436 F.3d 174, 180
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a random visual and manual search of bags and packages carried onto the new york city subway was minimally intrusive
B. holding that a search of bags carried onto an airplane was minimally intrusive
C. holding that random searches of subway passengers carryon bags which include the visual inspection of the contents of such bags to be minimal
D. holding tacit consent to search of person was insufficient to prove consent to search bags where bags were not in defendants actual possession defendant merely pointed out bags at officers request and officer never specifically asked for consent to search bags
E. holding that new york city agencies cannot be sued
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.