Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
through his lawful deputy” (Doc. 26 at 9; see id. at 2), and Garcia-Contreras does not contest this {see Doc. 29 at 6-7). This is consistent with the parties' indications that service was accomplished through personal delivery. (See, e.g., Doc. 4 at 5 (referring to "the delivery of the complaint ... to the Plaintiff”).) Because the court's resolution of this claim rests ultimately upon the timing, not the manner, of service, the manner of service is not dispositive. 16 . To the extent Defendants’ position relies upon the assumption that only communications with the consumer can constitute "collection of the debt,” they have not provided any authority to support it and it is contrary to case law. Cf., e.g., Edeh v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc., 748 F.Supp.2d 1030, 1035-36 (D.Minn.2010) , aff'd, No. 10-3441, 413 Fed. Appx. 925, 2011
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that reporting of historically accurate debt may violate the fcra when the reporting did not include that the debt was discharged in bankruptcy or that the debt was in dispute
B. holding that reporting a consumers debt to a creditreporting agency constitutes collection of the debt under  1692gb
C. holding that an entity engaged in collection activity on a defaulted debt acquired from another is a debt collector under the fdcpa even though it may actually be owed the debt
D. holding that effect of discharge of debt under bankruptcy code is the same as it was under the 1898 bankruptcy act it is not an extinguishment of the debt but only a bar to enforcement of the debt as a personal obligation of the debt or
E. holding that a debt collectors filing of a lawsuit on a debt that appears to be timebarred  is an unfair and unconscionable means of collecting the debt
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.