Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
issues relating to denial of due process because of prosecutorial misconduct and a Sixth Amendment violation of being denied counsel during pre-trial proceedings were not properly raised below); White v. State, 324 Md. 626, 640, 598 A.2d 187, 194 (1991) (citing Md. Rule 8-131(a) in holding that a claim that the defendants were deprived of their constitutional right to present witnesses in their defense was not properly before the Court because the argument was not made to the trial court); In re John H., 293 Md. 295, 303, 443 A.2d 594, 598 (1982) (citing Rule 885, a predecessor of Md. Rule 8-131(a), not reaching the issue of whether a statute was constitutional because the issue of constitutionality of the statute was not argued to the trial judge n. 2, 772 A.2d 1260, 1266 n. 2 (2001) . Rule 8-131(a) states: “RULE 8-131. SCOPE OF
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that claims based on an alleged violation of double jeopardy constitute fundamental error which absent a knowing and voluntary waiver may be raised for the first time on appeal
B. holding that claims which were not presented to the motion court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
C. recognizing in dicta the court of special appeals howell holding that double jeopardy claims may not be raised for the first time on appeal
D. holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
E. recognizing the general rule that a court of appeals will not consider an issue raised for the first time on appeal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.