Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
show that 1) he is a qualified individual with a disability; 2) DOCCS is an entity subject to the acts; and 3) he was denied the opportunity to participate in or benefit from DOCCS’s services, programs, or activities or DOCCS otherwise discriminated against him by reason of his disability. Id. Wright undoubtedly satisfies the first two elements: DOCCS does not dispute that Wright is a qualified individual because he suffers from cerebral palsy and scoliosis or that DOCCS is an entity that is subject to the statutes. Fulton v. Goord, 591 F.3d 37, 43 (2d Cir. 2009) (recognizing that DOCCS is subject to the ADA and RA). Both the ADA and the RA undoubtedly apply to state prisons and their prisoners. See Pa. Dep’t of Corr. v. Yeskey, 524 U.S. 206, 209, 118 S.Ct. 1952, 141 L.Ed.2d 215 (1998) . The parties, however, dispute the third
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding ada claim was discharged
B. holding that direct threat under the ada includes threats to self
C. holding that public accommodation within meaning of title iii of ada includes more than actual physical structures
D. holding that control over the local prisons is within the authority of the individual counties
E. holding the ada unmistakably includes state prisons and prisoners within its coverage
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.