Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
United States “had gained no foothold” in the country). His entitlement to a removal procedure of the sort that would trigger the provisions of section 1362 was therefore limited to what Congress and the INS saw fit to provide. See, e.g., Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 693, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001) (observing that the full protections of the Due Process Clause apply only to “ ‘persons’ within the United States”); Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21, 32, 103 S.Ct. 321, 74 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982) (noting that “an alien seeking initial admission to the United States ... has no constitutional rights regarding his application, for the power to admit or exclude aliens is a sovereign prerogative”); U.S. ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 537, 544, 70 S.Ct. 309, 94 L.Ed. 317 (1950) . In this case, the applicable statutory
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that it is not
B. recognizing burden is on alien when alien is removable
C. holding that wjhatever the procedure authorized by congress is it is due process as far as an alien denied entry is concerned
D. holding that there is no due process violation where the ijs finding was not arbitrary and the alien was not denied a full and fair opportunity to present his claims
E. holding that an alien is entitled to the fifth amendment guarantee of due process which is satisfied by a full and fair hearing
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.