Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
“subjects, or causes to be subjected,” a person to deprivation of a right. 42 U.S.C. § 1983; see, e.g., Board of County Com’rs of Bryan County, Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 402-03, 117 S.Ct. 1382, 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). As assistant coaches and an athletic trainer, Defendants Palladino, Mr. Ducar, Ms. Ducar, and Prentice were not Defendant Dorrance’s supervisors and had no authority over his behavior. In the absence of legal control over Defendant Dorrance, these Defendants’ reporting omissions cannot be said to have affirmatively caused the alleged deprivation of Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights. Therefore, the § 1983, failure-to-report claims against Defendants Palladino, Mr. Ducar, Ms. Ducar, and Prentice must be dismissed. See Reid v. Kayye, 885 F.2d 129, 131-32 (4th Cir.1989) ; see also Doe v. Rains County Indep. Sch.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that public defenders do not act under color of state law and therefore are not subject to suit under 42 usc  1983
B. holding that magistrate judge had jurisdiction to dismiss prison inmates action under 42 usc  1983 as frivolous without consent of defendants because defendants had not been served yet and therefore were not parties
C. holding that a state university is not a person within the meaning of  1983 and therefore is not subject to suits brought under  1983
D. holding that states and state officials acting in their official capacities are not persons subject to liability under  1983
E. holding that defendants were not in control and therefore were not supervisors and not subject to liability under  1983
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.