Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Commission also seeks a declaratory judgment that Nebraska has violated its fiduciary and contractual obligations under the Compact, an accounting, the removal of Nebraska from further supervision of the licensing process and appointment of a third party to exercise supervision of the licensing process. 5 . "No State shall, without the consent of Congress, ... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power....” 6 . Entergy Arkansas, Inc., v. State of Nebraska, 68 F.Supp.2d 1093, 1097-98 (D.Neb.1999) (Commission’s suit was not barred by the Eleventh Amendment), aff'd, 241 F.3d 979, 987-88 (8th Cir.2001). 7 . The early history of the Compact Clause is also described in Virginia v. West Virginia, 246 U.S. 565, 597-602, 38 S.Ct. 400, 59 L.Ed. 1272 (1918) . See also United States Steel Corp. v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that party timely objected to appointment of special master and did not waive its right to object when it objected to appointment several days before it participated in proceedings before special master
B. recognizing that  the virginia supreme court has consistently applied the one year statute of limitation  to defamation actions 
C. holding that because the special master saw the witnesses and heard the testimony he has broad discretion in determining credibility
D. holding that the court had the power to enforce a 12 million judgment recommended by a special master and adopted by the court in favor of virginia and against west virginia
E. holding that reviewing court should accord deference to special masters decision and may not substitute its own judgment for that of the special master
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.