Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
general and conclusory allegation that “Axesa’s actions and omissions undoubtedly created a hostile work environment.” In order to defeat summary judgment, Plaintiffs cannot rest on conclusory allegations. See Hadfield v. McDonough, 407 F.3d 11, 15 (1st Cir.2005). Moreover, in their objections, Plaintiffs did not cite to any specific record citation in support of this assertion. Thus, Plaintiffs failed to again comply with Local Rule 56(e). This Court also notes that Plaintiffs failed to object to the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that Cintron’s comments were “too mild” to form the basis for a hostile work environment claim. Therefore, this Court need not effect a de novo review of this portion of the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning. Davet v. Maccarone, 973 F.2d 22, 31 (1st Cir.1992) . For the reasons just stated, this Court finds
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding the failure to file objections to a magistrates report issued pursuant to 28 usc  636b1 waives the right to appeal all issues both factual and legal
B. holding that district courts adoption of the magistrate judges report and recommendation one day after issuance did not constitute reversible error where district court conducted a meaningful review of the report and recommendation
C. holding that a partys failure to raise objections to the report and recommendation waives the partys right to review in the district court
D. holding that failure to object in a timely fashion to a magistrate judges report and recommendation generally constitutes a waiver of the defaulting partys right to appeal provided that the parties received clear notice of the consequences of their failure to object
E. holding that the court will review the report and recommendation for clear error
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.