Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
requests for leave to amend. In deciding whether to permit an amendment, a district court may consider factors such as “undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously! allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, [and] futility of amendment.” Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962). We conclude that the district court gave Rogers sufficient prior opportunity to plead his best case and amend his complaint, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Rogers’s case without permitting Rogers to file a third complaint. See, e.g., U.S. ex rel. Adrian v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 363 F.3d 398, 403-04 (5th Cir. 2004) . AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that district court had not abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion to amend complaint
B. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to file a third amended complaint where the plaintiff had already been given opportunities to amend and did not indicate what additional facts he could plead to correct the deficiencies in his complaint
C. holding district court did not abuse its discretion in not granting plaintiffs leave to amend complaint for a third time
D. holding no abuse of discretion after plaintiff had three opportunities to correct any deficiencies in its complaint
E. holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to amend complaint because the proposed amendment would have been futile
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.