Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
prompting Bush to re-enter the home and shoot at Gina. See A.R.S. §§ 13-303, -1001(A)(1), - 1105(A)(1). The aggravated assault convictions were established by evidence that Bush shot Gina twice and seriously injured her soon after he initially entered the home. See A.R.S. §§ 13-303, -1203(A), -1204(A)(1) and (2). ¶ 139 Other considerations set forth in Gordon support imposition of consecutive sentences. Because the attempted murder and aggravated assaults occurred at different times during the home invasion and involved separate acts, it was possible for Forde to commit the former crime without committing the latter ones. Also, the aggravated assaults caused Gina to suffer physical injuries that were not inherent in the attempted murder. See Gordon, 161 Ariz. at 315, 778 P.2d at 1211 . For all these reasons, Forde’s conduct
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that uncharged sexual acts committed upon the same victim are admissible to show the conduct of the defendant toward the victim and to corroborate the evidence of the offense charged in the indictment
B. holding that a lesser crime cannot be a lesser included offense of a greater crime if the lesser crime contains an essential element not included in the greater crime
C. holding that a defendant more likely committed multiple acts if the defendants conduct in committing the lesser crime caused the victim to suffer an additional risk of harm beyond that inherent in the ultimate crime
D. holding that if a crime is broadly defined the court can look beyond the elements of the crime
E. holding the crime of conspiracy is committed or not before the substantive crime begins
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.