Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
faith in the performance of contracts.’ ” Dick Broad. Co. of Tenn. v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc., 395 S.W.3d 653, 660 (Tenn. 2013) (quoting Wallace v. Nat’l Bank of Commerce, 938 S.W.2d 684, 686 (Tenn. 1996)). “As a result of this covenant, each contracting party promises to per form its part of the contract in good faith and, in return, expects the other party to do the. same.” Goot v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson Cty., No. M2003-02013-COA-R3-CV, 2005 WL 3031638, at *7 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2005). “To avoid the imposition o A.2d 1121, 1132 (2001) (reversing grant of summary judgment to defendant with unilateral pricing authority under contract because of potential for evidence of lack of good faith); CHI of Alaska, Inc. v. Emp’s Reinsurance Corp., 844 P.2d 1113, 1121 (Alaska 1993) ; Cobb v. Ironwood Country Club, 233
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is limited to performance under a contract
B. holding that unilateral right to select independent counsel is subject to the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
C. holding that negligence alone is not sufficient to constitute a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing owed to insureds
D. recognizing cause of action for implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in atwill employment contract
E. recognizing that evidence of breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing may support punitive damages
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.