Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
written in "John Doe” on the line designated for the name of the person applying for medical care on behalf of the individual in custody; he had not checked the box indicating that he is a D.C. police officer or given his rank; he did not complete the portion for Harris’ name, address, and age; and he did not fill out the sections requesting the facts which led him to believe that Harris was mentally ill and a threat to himself and/or others. 2 . We therefore do not decide whether the record creates a triable issue of "deliberate indifference.” We are quite doubtful, however, that the evidence shows more than some degree of negligence, which may not violate the due process clause, see Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 332-34 & n. 3, 106 S.Ct. 662, 665-66 & n. 3, 88 L.Ed.2d 662 (1986) . 3 . State tort liability may of course bear
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that negligence in the context of a tort claim relating to bodily injuries allegedly sustained by an inmate because of lack of maintenance of a prison stairway does not constitute a violation of constitutional due process but reserving the question of whether recklessness or gross negligence is sufficient to trigger the protections of constitutional due process
B. holding that doctrine does not violate due process
C. holding that mere negligence does not implicate the right to due process
D. holding that ordinary negligence and gross negligence are not separate causes of action
E. holding that negligence does not violate the due process clause but reserving the question whether gross negligence does
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.