Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
8 S.W.3d at 638. 14 . See id. at 639. 15 . See Texas Ass'n of Bus. v. Texas Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 446 (Tex.1993); City of Saginaw v. Carter, 996 S.W.2d 1, 2 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1999, pet. filed). 16 . See Curbo v. State, 998 S.W.2d 337, 341 (Tex.App.—Austin 1999, no pet. h.); Little-Tex Insulation Co. v. General Servs. Comm’n, 997 S.W.2d 358, 360 (Tex.App.—Austin 1999, pet. filed); C Ann. §§ 554.002(a), 554.0035. 27 . Id. § 554.001(4) (emphasis added). 28 . See Thompson v. Travelers Indem. Co., 789 S.W.2d 277, 278 (Tex.1990). 29 . See Bennack Flying Serv., Inc. v. Balboa, 997 S.W.2d 748, 751 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1999, pet. dism’d w.o.j.); Household Credit Servs., Inc. v. Driscol, 989 S.W.2d 72, 86 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1998, pet. denied). 30 . See Curbo, 998 S.W.2d at 344 . 31 . See Continental Coffee Prods. Co. v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that there is no legitimate claim of entitlement to a grievance procedure
B. holding that an ineffective grievance procedure bars employers defense based on that procedure
C. holding that because plaintiffs were reasonable in interpreting defendants grievance procedure to apply only to active employees plaintiffs did not act in bad faith when they alleged that no applicable grievance procedure existed
D. holding that a jail inmate does not have a constitutional entitlement to an adequate grievance procedure and the ineffectiveness or even absence of a grievance procedure does not give rise to a constitutional claim
E. holding that inmates have no constitutionallyprotected liberty interest in access to grievance procedure
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.