Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
at 1273-1274. Rodgers v. Western-Southern Life Ins. Co., 12 F.3d 668, 675 (7th Cir.1993). Consequently, the Court refuses to conclude that one incident is, as a matter of law, insufficient to support a hostile work environment claim. That conclusion, coupled with the evidence that the incident at issue was especially severe, leads this Court to conclude that Plaintiff has submitted sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to the hostile work environment claim. Courts have pointed out that the racial epithet of “nigger” is particularly offensive. See Rodgers, 12 F.3d at 675. In Rodgers, the Seventh Circuit stated that the word “nigger” is unambiguously racist and held that its use on even a few occasions affects the terms and conditions 878, 885 (7th Cir.1998) . Consequently, the Court concludes that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that referring to a female colleague as dancing girl or call girl ignoring her except to comment on her appearance and another female employees quitting because of the same person was not sufficient to establish a prima facie case of hostile work environment because the offensive utterances do not rise to the level required by the supreme courts definition of a hostile work environment
B. holding that evidence of a single battery and two offensive remarks over six months did not establish a hostile environment
C. holding that a single offensive racist comment was not sufficient to establish a hostile work environment
D. recognizing a hostile work environment claim under section 1983
E. holding that a viable hostile work environment claim requires an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.