Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
moved to dismiss at the March 8 hearing. It was therefore defendant’s responsibility to present evidence of materiality at that time. See id. at 274. Defendant failed to do so. Thus the only record evidence concerning the issue of Argyle’s materiality is the above-quoted exchange between the trial court and defense counsel, which took place at the December 10 hearing. We therefore address whether that evidence is sufficient to support the trial court’s finding. The December 10 exchange between the trial court and defense counsel reveals that defense counsel was not able to make a plausible showing that Argyle’s testimony would be favorable to the defense, but rather could only speculate as to how he thought Argyle might testify. Cf. State v. Lairby, 699 P.2d 1187, 1195 (Utah 1984) . Moreover, as delineated infra in our analysis
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that trial court did not err in refusing to allow defendant to introduce evidence of witnesss pending indictment when witnesss testimony regarding defendants participation in murder was virtually identical to witnesss written statement which was sworn to on day of murder and prior to offense for which witness was indicted
B. holding that trial court did not err in refusing to parse witnesss testimony or to have it replayed in its entirety
C. holding that hospitalization of witnesss wife and his desire to be by her side was not a substantial basis for admitting witnesss testimony from first trial
D. holding that a witnesss testimony or an exhibit may not explicitly and directly contain an opinion as to a trial witnesss credibility
E. holding that where no description of witnesss evidence offered and no suggestion made as to how testimony would affect defendants case trial court did not err in refusing to issue certificate ordering witnesss attendance
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.