Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
view of the sexual innocence inference theory. Thus, Oatts was required to show that the prior sexual act occurred and that the prior sexual act was sufficiently similar to the present sexual act to give the victim the knowledge to imagine the molestation charge. Here, Oatts failed to show that the prior acts closely resembled those in the present case. Oatts’s attorney did not proffer any evidence that the prior molestation was similar to the current offense. Oatts’s attorney stated that the “similarities of the allegations are very, very close” and the current allegation “is that Mr. Oatts touched [A.S.] while they were in bed together, and in fact Tony touched [A.S.] while she was in bed.” Transcript at 120. However, Oatts did not offer sp c. 244, 683 N.E.2d 188, 192-193 (1997) , reh’g denied, appeal denied. II. The next
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding defendants prior conviction for assault related to sexual abuse of a minor even though it did not require an act of sexual abuse because it required intent to commit sexual abuse  and such a mens rea demonstrate the offense was one relating to sexual abuse
B. holding that the trial court did not err by excluding the victims earlier reports of sexual abuse because too many sexual details remain unaccounted for after consideration of what defendant hoped to prove with the prior sexual conduct
C. holding that sexual harassment need not take the form of sexual advances or other explicitly sexual conduct in order to be actionable under title vii
D. holding trial court was proper in admitting a doctors testimony that a delay between the occurrence of an incident of child sexual abuse and the childs revelation of the incident was the usual pattern of conduct for victims of child sexual abuse
E. holding that evidence of prior uncharged sexual conduct with the victim is admissible to corroborate the victims testimony
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.