Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
The three-judge panel found that, in addition to complying with federal and state law, the General Assembly desired to create districts “more competitive for” the majority party. The panel noted the “undisputed” fact that in North Carolina “racial identification correlates highly with political affiliation.” The desire to create districts more competitive for the majority party had to occur within the requirements of the state constitution’s Whole County Provision. Thus, while the three-judge panel noted the General Assembly’s desire “to equalize population among the districts,” for state redistricting purposes, this finding must be viewed in the context of the Whole County Provision, which recognizes political subdivisions. See Stephenson I, 355 N.C. at 366, 562 S.E.2d at 386 . In light of the Whole County Provision,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that despite district courts restriction on crossexamination of government witness concerning the sentencing benefits he would earn through testifying for the government it did not violate defendants confrontation rights because of defense counsels effective impeachment of the government witnesses credibility and sentence reduction
B. holding that amtrak is an agency of the government  for purposes of the constitutional obligations of government
C. recognizing the importance of the county to our system of government and that it is through counties mainly that the powers of government reach and operate directly upon the people quoting white v commrs of chowan cty 90 nc 437 438 1884
D. holding that whether error in failing to ask a question about bias in favor of law enforcement testimony requires reversal hinges on such factors as the importance of the government agents testimony to the case as a whole the extent to which the question concerning the venire persons attitude toward government agents is covered in other questions  the extent to which the credibility of the government agentwitness is put into issue and the extent to which the testimony of the government agent is corroborated by nonagent witnesses internal quotation marks and citation omitted
E. recognizing the importance of the employers knowledge of the disability
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.