Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
was within the seope of Dr. Faust's protec-tible interest. Id. However, we concluded that the portion of the covenant prohibiting Dr. Norlund from acting as an opto-metric liaison or medical optometrist with any ophthalmologist in specified counties was overbroad because that provision was beyond the seope of Dr. Faust's protectible in venant's provision that a radio dise jockey would "not engage in activities" at certain radio stations listed in the covenant was over-broad because it would have prevented the employee from being employed in any capacity by any radio station listed in the covenant and "extended far beyond" the former employer's legitimate interest in the employee as an on-air personality); Burk v. Heritage Food Serv. Equip., Inc., 737 N.E.2d 803, 812 (Ind.Ct.App.2000) ; Frederick v. Prof'l Bldg. Maint. Indus. Inc.,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that any acts in which employee engaged with intent to woo plaintiffs wife away from him during business meetings and trips simply had no connection to business of employer
B. holding that the covenants clause prohibiting the employee from being employed  with any corporation  which competes with or otherwise engages in any business of the employer was overbroad because it prohibited the employee from working for a competitor in any capacity
C. holding that monitoring telephone calls is in the ordinary course of business where the employer has reason to suspect an employee of disclosing confidential information to business competitor
D. holding that existence of deliberate and informed consent turns on whether it is understood between the employee and his employers that he is to remain in the allegiance of the first employer  or is to be employed in the business and subject to the direction of the temporary employer
E. holding that injunction prohibiting doctor from seeing any patients from medical practice that formerly employed him as provided for in covenant not to compete was not overbroad and should not have been limited to only those patients he treated while employed by practice
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.