Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
case has considered the precise issue posed by this case, courts in other states have recognized that liability may be imposed in the absence of a doctor-patient relationship. In Green, 910 F.2d at 296, for example, the Fifth Circuit found, between an employee and the doctor conducting an annual physical, a limited doctor-patient relationship that was sufficient to give rise to a duty of care in conducting the examination and reporting its results. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has similarly recognized an obligation to report abnormal results obtained during a preemployment physical examination, despite the absence of a doctor-patient relationship. Daly v. United States, 946 F.2d 1467, 1468 (9th Cir.1991) (interpreting Washington law); see also Betesh, 400 F.Supp. at 245-47 ; Meena v. Wilburn, 603 So.2d 866, 870
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that broker owed no fiduciary duty to client as a matter of law
B. holding as a matter of maryland law that employerretained radiologists who observed abnormalities owed a duty of care and breached it by failing to notify the examinee
C. recognizing duty of care owed by business invitor to invitee
D. holding that in the absence of a product malfunction a plaintiff cannot establish that a defendant breached any duty owed
E. holding that the issue of whether or not a defendant airline breached its duty of due care by failing to transfer a pregnant employee from a flight precluded summary judgment for the defendant on plaintiffs negligence claim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.