Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the information but that they were nonetheless unable to comply with the scheduling order deadline. Nothing in the district court’s “good cause” analysis would have changed given that the court identified four specific reasons for concluding that the Appellants had demonstrated an overarching and persistent lack of diligence throughout the case. While the dissent theorizes on the district court’s “general frustration ... with various other delays” in the case, post at 829 n. 2, the district court’s reasoning is precisely the appropriate analysis to determine the existence of “good cause.” That is, in considering whether “good cause” excuses compliance with a scheduling order deadline, the district court must examine whether the movant had been dilig 1419 (11th Cir.1998) (per curiam) . As noted, the Appellants alleged from the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion where it determined that plaintiffs failed to show good cause to amend complaint after dispositive motion deadline
B. holding that good cause did not exist where counsel waited months after filing of the pleadings to propound written discovery and did not take oral depositions of known key individuals to their claims until after the deadline for amending the complaint
C. holding that good cause existed where the plaintiff did not establish a sufficient evidentiary basis to support new claims until after the deadline for amending his complaint and moved to amend immediately after the new evidence came to light
D. holding that good cause did not exist where movant was on notice of information that with some investigation would have led to timely discovery of the basis for the motion to amend
E. holding that the insurer was estopped from asserting coverage defenses when it waited to file a declaratory action until 10 months after it had notice of the claim and several months after it had notice of a potential settlement of the underlying litigation
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.