Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
saving it for when new counsel began representing Lance, was appropriate, because this form of Sixth Amendment claim does not involve the potential conflict of interest inherent where a lawyer accuses himself or herself of having made unprofessional choices. See id. at 87, n. 13 (noting, but declining to address, the possibility that a trial court’s denial of expert funds might raise Sixth Amendment concerns, in addition to due process concerns, that could be considered on direct appeal); Strickland, supra, 466 U. S. at 686 (noting that there are Sixth Amendment claims regarding governmental interference with the right to counsel that are distinct from claims regarding trial counsel’s own deficient performance). Compare Glover v. State, 266 Ga. 183, 183-185 (2) (465 SE2d 659) (1996) . Having been timely raised, the claim was
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a claim including a constitutional claim must have been asserted to the trial court to be raised on appeal
B. holding that a claim alleging that trial counsel himself or herself acted outside of the bounds of professional competence must be raised at the earliest practicable moment
C. holding that the defense of lack of venue must be made at the earliest opportunity to plead or it is waived
D. recognizing claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel usually must be raised in collateral proceeding
E. holding that a disqualification motion must be sought at the earliest possible moment after obtaining knowledge of facts demonstrating the basis for such a claim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.