Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
some apparently directive or dispositive words,” such as, “ ‘the plaintiffs motion [for summary judgment] is granted.’ ” Because the opinions or memo-randa sometimes lacked all the requisite elements of a judgment, and because judges sometimes later signed formal judgments in addition to those opinions and memoranda, Rule 58 was amended to clarify when a judgment became “effective, starting the time running for post-verdict motions and for the purpose of appeal.” Given this clear need for certainty, we should not cloud the issue of when a federal court judgment is “rendered” — it is “rendered” when it is set forth in writing on a separate document and entered on the civil docket, in compliance with Rule 58. See United States v. Woods, 885 F.2d 352, 353 (6th Cir.1989) (per curiam)  (emphasis added); Simon v. City of Clute, 825
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that because the district courts order failed to comply with rule 58 appellants notice of appeal cannot be considered late
B. holding that class claims that fail to meet the requirements of rule 23 may be properly dismissed by granting a rule 12b6 motion
C. holding that when the lower court has clearly evidenced its intent and the opposing party has not objected to the absence of a separate judgment the requirements of rule 58 are waived
D. holding that a district courts marginal order granting summary judgment did not meet the strict requirements of rule 58 because a party may reasonably be confused as to the standing of its ease when a decision is rendered in such an informal manner
E. holding that a portion of a district courts summary judgment order that determines which facts a party may or may not be able to prove at trial is not appealable
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.