Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
prosecutor’s characterization of the defendant’s case as a ‘fairy tale.’ However, ‘[a] prosecutor is not precluded from vigorous advocacy, or the use of colorful adjectives, in summation.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Rivera, 971 F.2d 876, 884 (2d Cir.1992)). see also Pineda v. Miller, No. 03 CV 1344(NG)(MDG), 2006 WL 2239105, at *20 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2006) (“[T]he prosecutor’s comments regarding the weaknesses in petitioner’s defense [we]re proper responses to the efforts of defense counsel to attack the credibility of the undercovers.”) (citing United States v. Bautista, 23 F.3d 726, 733 (2d Cir.1994) (“The government is ordinarily permitted to respond to arguments impugning the integrity of its case.”) (citation omitted)); United States v. Elias, 285 F.3d 183, 190-92 (2d Cir.2002) . One habeas court in this Circuit has noted
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the trial judges misconduct at trial did not prejudice the defendant in light of the courts curative instructions
B. holding that prosecution comments during summation that grossly mischaracterized the defenses argument and said that the defense was  insulting a battered victim do not require a new trial when they constitute an aberration in an otherwise fair proceeding the trial judge issued a curative jury instruction and the defendant most likely would have been convicted even without the improper remarks
C. recognizing that a curative instruction may make it highly unlikely that improper comments misled the jury
D. recognizing that the defenses response argument at closing can ameliorate the improper prosecutorial comments
E. holding that in a criminal trial the trial court must correct or amend an improper instruction if the proper instruction is necessary for the jury to understand the case
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.