Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
appellant) must include at least one of three statements in his notice of appeal. The three statements are: 1) that the appeal involves a jurisdictional defect, 2) that the substance of the appeal was raised below by written motion and ruled upon by the court, or 3) that the trial court granted permission to appeal. Tex.R.App. P. 25.2(b)(3). Moreover, it is the inclusion of these statements which vests us with jurisdiction over the appeal. Should they be omitted, we are restricted to considering only those points averring jurisdictional defects or impugning the voluntariness of the initial plea. Flowers v. State, 935 S.W.2d 131, 134 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) (involving the predecessor to the current rule of appellate procedure); see Watson v. State, 924 S.W.2d 711, 714-15 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) . As previously mentioned, appellant pled
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that an appellants obligation to timely perfect her appeal from the general sessions court is mandatory  and if it is not complied with the circuit court has no jurisdiction
B. recognizing that exception to requirement of timely filing of notice of appeal exists in cases where defendant either was not told of right to appeal or was not furnished attorney to exercise those rights or was furnished attorney for that purpose who failed to perfect and complete appeal
C. holding that prejudice should be presumed where counsel filed notice of appeal but failed to perfect the direct appeal
D. holding that the rule also applies to those attempting to perfect an appeal after their community supervision is revoked and they are adjudicated guilty
E. holding that a notice of appeal filed when an appeal bond is required to perfect is a bona fide attempt to invoke appellate jurisdiction and that the court of appeals dismissal was improper without first affording an opportunity to correct the defective perfection of appeal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.