Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of its status as that of a mail carrier similar to the U.S. Postal Service would, in any event, not be availing in its bid for immunity. Cf. Richardson, 521 U.S. at 408, 117 S.Ct. at 2106 (rejecting defendant's argument that "[sjince private prison guards perform the same work as state prison guards, ..., they must require immunity to a similar degree”); cf. also id. at 409, 117 S.Ct. at 2106 (stating that approach based on primary activity of private defendants "bristles with difficulty, particularly since, in many areas, government and private industry may engage in fundamentally similar activities, ranging from electricity production, to waste disposal, to even mail delivery ” (emphasis added)). 32 . Cf. Warner v. Grand County, 57 F.3d 962, 965-67 (10th Cir.1995) (pre-Richardson) ; Sherman v. Four County Counseling Ctr., 987
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that director of crisis center who was private individual and who acted under color of state law by conducting strip search of female detainees for contraband at request of police officer had qualified immunity from  1983 suit arising out of searches because she acted as agent of officer who also had qualified immunity
B. holding under facts presented that probation officer was entitled to at least qualified immunity
C. holding that private attorney who acted as courtappointed counsel for child in state juvenile delinquency proceedings was not acting under color of state law
D. holding that qualified immunity is not merely immunity from damages but also immunity from suit
E. holding that officer had qualified immunity from  1983 action brought by arrestee because officer had probable cause to arrest based on statements of a witness store clerk who signed a criminal information and deposition detailing the theft and establishing each of the elements of the crime of larceny
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.