Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
principles outlined here to assess whether Cricket has proven that the class includes more than 100 members. 5 . To the extent Cricket argues that its evidence categorically proves jurisdiction because Scott did not provide any rebuttal evidence, we reject that contention. Although Dart Cherokee states that “both sides submit proof” when a plaintiff challenges removal, 135 S.Ct. at 554, we do not read that to mean that if only one party submits proof it automatically carries the day. Rather, Dart Cherokee clarifies that a motion to remand challenging the amount in controversy reopens the record allowing both parties to submit evidence. When only one party submits evidence, we accept it as uncontroverted but must still test whethe 6 U.S. 500, 515, 126 S.Ct. 1235, 163 L.Ed.2d 1097 (2006)  (emphasis
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that jurisdictional terms are those that congress clearly states as threshold limitations on a statutes scope
B. holding that criminal statutes of limitations are not jurisdictional but are a bar to prosecution which can be waived by a knowing and voluntary guilty plea
C. holding that time limits in title vii are not jurisdictional but are instead like statutes of limitations
D. holding that the aedpa statute of limitations is not jurisdictional
E. holding that this courts sixyear statute of limitations is jurisdictional
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.