Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and a third party who supplied necessaries to the husband’s wife and children, providing the third party with a means of holding the husband liable for the support of his family. Id. As early as 1867, this Court expressly recognized a father’s liability for necessaries furnished to his child. Fowlkes v. Baker, 29 Tex. 135, 137 (1867); see also Cunningham v. Cunningham, 120 Tex. 491, 40 S.W.2d 46, 48 (1931) (noting that a father’s liability for necessaries furnished to his minor child “is generally enforced in England, ... the United States, and always in Texas”). Not long after, this Court recognized attorney’s fees incurred as a result of services rendered for the benefit of a minor may be treated as necessaries. See, e.g., Searcy v. Hunter, 81 Tex. 644, 17 S.W. 372, 373 (1891) ; Askey v. Williams, 74 Tex. 294, 11 S.W. 1101,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that trial court properly assessed mothers attorneys fees as necessaries against father in case in which trial court ordered father to pay mothers attorneys fees as child support but did not state that the fees were necessaries
B. holding that attorneys fees are necessaries in a civil suit to recover money or property for the minor
C. holding that attorneys fees are necessaries for the criminal de fense of a child
D. holding that reasonable attorneys fees for the benefit of a minor in defending the minor against a criminal charge were necessaries
E. holding that attorneys fees are necessaries for the criminal defense of a child
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.