Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the sale agreement mentioned above or the Debtor’s reacquisition rights under the Trust—are also property of the Debtor’s bankruptcy estate. Carlson v. Brandt, 250 B.R. 366, 372-73 (N.D.Ill.2000) (finding that a bankruptcy lawyer’s right to a future contingency fee is a contractual right that is property of the estate). Further, to the extent the Debtor has a right to sue either the Trust or the Petitioners, that chose in action also is property of the Debtor’s bankruptcy estate. Cable v. Ivy Tech State College, 200 F.3d 467, 472-73 (7th Cir.1999) (“The phrase ‘legal or equitable interests ... in property’ includes choses in action and other legal claims that could be prosecuted for benefit of the estate.”); see also Peterson v. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, 676 F.3d 594, 596 (7th Cir.2012) ; accord Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc., 417
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing property of the estate to include the estates chose in action against its auditor
B. recognizing that exempt property ceases to be property of the estate
C. holding a decedents estate is not a legal entity and only individuals administering the estate can be sued on estates behalf
D. holding that erisa benefits are not property of the estate
E. holding that for estate tax purposes property is to be valued as it exists in the hands of the estate
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.