Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
written judgment controlled over oral pronouncement of sentence). This is particularly true when the written order is included in the appellate record and. no issue is raised as to its accuracy. Ablon, 537 S.W.2d at 267. Oral cumulation orders entered pursuant to article 42.08 are void unless they are reflected in the written judgment. Dutton v. State, 836 S.W.2d 221, 228-29 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.); Tex. Code Crim. PROC. Ann. art. 42.08 (Vernon Supp.1997). Thus, the written order in this case controls. Appellant directs this court to the portion of the reporter’s record at which the trial court orally pronounced the sentences would run consecutively. However, the written judgment provides as follows: IT IS ORDERED by the -Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. ref'd) . In any event, even if appellant had preserved
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding cruel and unusual punishment complaint not preserved
B. holding prison officials ultimately violated the plaintiffs right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment
C. holding the constitutional right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment may be waived
D. holding that a cruel and unusual punishment claim is not jurisdictional and therefore may not be raised for the first time on appeal
E. holding that what constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is a question of law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.