Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
constitutional and other rights.” Rule 10-101(B) NMRA 2002. The purposes of the Children’s Code and the children’s court rules are similar and we see nothing to prevent the application of Rule 10-230.1(B) ninety-day limit for determining a child-initiated motion to reconsider filed pursuant to Section 32A-2-23(G). {16} Child also acknowledges that both this Court and the Supreme Court have held thirty- and ninety-day jurisdictional time limits to be reasonable. See State v. Trujillo, 117 N.M. 769, 771, 877 P.2d 575, 577 (1994); Hayes, 106 N.M. at 808, 751 P.2d at 188 (stating that as a matter of law a motion is denied if the court does not enter a final ruling on it within a reasonable time frame of ninety days); Chavez-Rey v. Miller, 99 N.M. 377, 380, 658 P.2d 452, 455 (Ct.App.1982) . Child argues that his case can be
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that trial court has no power to allow party to amend motion for new trial more than thirty days after trial court signed the final judgment and that denial of amended motion for new trial filed more than thirty days after judgment preserved nothing for appellate review
B. holding court lost jurisdiction to enter its order after thirty days and the motion was denied by operation of law
C. holding that the requirement to serve a motion for attorney fees or costs within thirty days after filing of judgment applies even where the final judgment reserves jurisdiction to award same
D. holding that the trial court had no jurisdiction to modify its final order more than 30 days after its final judgment
E. holding that a coa is deemed denied if the district court does not address its issuance within thirty days
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.