Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
therewith on a particular occasion." CRE 608(a), on the other hand, provides a limited exception that permits evidence of a witness's character for truthfulness or untruthfulness only after that character has been attacked: The credibility of a witness may be attacked or supported by evidence in the form of opinion or reputation, but subject to these limitations: (1) the evidence may refer only to character for truthfulness or untruthfulness, and (2) evidence of truthful character is admissible only after the character of the witness for truthfulness has been attacked by opinion or reputation evidence or otherwise. 115 This state's case law disfavors comments by one witness about another witness's truthfulness. See, e.g., People v. Gaff-ney, 769 P.2d 1081, 1085-86 (Colo.1989) ; Tevlin v. People, 715 P.2d 338, 341
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the trial court erred by admitting a doctors testimony that a child victims description of a sexual crime was very believable
B. holding that the trial court erred by permitting testimony regarding uncharged acts of sexual misconduct by the defendant and that a substantial likelihood existed that the forbidden inference contributed to the verdict given that the only evidence of each instance of child molestation came from the victims
C. holding that trial court erred but harmlessly by admitting into evidence for all purposes chart summarizing officers testimony
D. holding that the trial court had erred by excluding the expert testimony of a doctor
E. holding trial court was proper in admitting a doctors testimony that a delay between the occurrence of an incident of child sexual abuse and the childs revelation of the incident was the usual pattern of conduct for victims of child sexual abuse
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.