Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
revealed sufficient evidence to confirm the original allegation of [sic] Mr. Bhatt and several supervisor’s [sic] destroying or dismissing citations. This investigation found, however, insufficient evidence to prove or disprove the allegations linking Mr. Bhatt or anyone else to criminal activity in obtaining illegal monetary benefits.” Calix, the author of the report, however, testified, “[A] ticket that’s destroyed in the sense I wrote it down meaning V, 2003 WL 21750608, at *3-*6 (Tex. App.-Austin Jul. 30, 2003, pet. denied) (mem.op.) (stating there was legally insufficient evidence plaintiffs subjective belief — that the conduct she reported violated the law — was objectively reasonable); Duvall v. Tex. Dept, of Human Servs., 82 S.W.3d 474, 482-83 (TexApp.-Austin 2002, no pet.) ; Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice v. Terrell, 18
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding although there was some evidence plaintiff subjectively believed conduct he reported violated the law there was legally insufficient evidence this belief was reasonable
B. holding probationer who did not receive notice of specific offenses she was believed to have committed but had notice of probation terms states attorney believed were violated and of the facts constituting violation was not harmed
C. holding that the proper standard to apply  is to assume that the facts have occurred as reported and then determine  whether those facts constitute a violation of law or rule adopted pursuant to law
D. recognizing that the focus must be on whether the facts alleged would place a reasonably prudent person in fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial
E. holding there was no evidence a reasonably prudent employee in similar circumstances would have believed facts reported by plaintiff were a violation of law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.