Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
federal courts that have encountered the FEGLIA preemption issue. Ms. Maretta cites a number of federal decisions that she claims stand for the proposition that FEGLIA preempts state laws providing for constructive trusts and other equitable remedies. In each of these federal cases, however, the plaintiffs asserted their entitlement to the decedent’s FEGLI proceeds through a divorce decree or separation agreement that required the insured to maintain his or her FEGLI policy for their benefit. These courts, employing the Ridgway rationale, held that the divorce decrees at issue directly conflicted with the FEGLIA provision granting an insured the absolute right to designate any beneficiaiy that he or she chooses. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Zaldivar, 413 F.3d 119, 120 (1st Cir. 2005) ; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Christ, 979
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that a divorce decree which obligated the divorcing husband to name the children of his first marriage as the irrevocable beneficiaries of an insurance policy precluded him from naming his new wife as a beneficiary entitled to a portion of the insurance benefits
B. holding that the asserted right of the insureds child based on his agreement with his mother during their divorce to name the child as his fegli beneficiary was preempted by feglia
C. holding that feglia preempted a state divorce decree which ordered the insured to maintain his fegli policy for the benefit of his children from his first marriage
D. holding debtor could not discharge that portion of his monthly army retirement benefits awarded to his wife pursuant to a divorce decree
E. recognizing that basis for deportation was aliens misrepresentation about his marriage not the validity of his marriage
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.