Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
has held that SORA is rationally related to a “legitimate state interest of protecting the public.” See Golba, 273 Mich App at 620. Put another way, SORA in general is rationally related to the Legislature’s stated purpose of protecting the people of Michigan from those who have committed offenses that “pose[] a potential serious menace and danger to the health, safety, morals, and welfare of the people, and particularly the children, of this state.” MCL 28.721a; see also Temelkoski, 307 Mich App at 270 (“SORA . . . has a rational connection to a nonpunitive purpose . . . .”); Fonville, 291 Mich App at 380. However, the issue of whether the requirement of registration for offenders who commit the crime of unlawful imprisonment of a minor without a sexual purpose survives r 27 (2010) ; People v Cintron, 46 AD3d 353, 354; 848 NYS2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the requirement of sex offender registration for the defendants conviction of false imprisonment of a minor was not cruel and unusual punishment and did not violate substantive or procedural due process
B. holding that even though the offense was not of a sexual nature requiring the defendant to register as a sex offender following his conviction for false imprisonment of a minor was rationally related to the government interest in protecting the public and did not violate the defendants right to due process or equal protection under the law
C. holding cruel and unusual punishment complaint not preserved
D. holding that sex offender registration and notification do not constitute punishment
E. holding evidence was legally insufficient to support conviction for violation of sex offender registration requirement
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.