Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
limited arbitration provision are legal in nature,” we review the district court’s judgment de novo. Paul Revere Variable Annuity Ins. Co. v. Kirschhofer, 226 F.3d 15, 18-19 (1st Cir.2000). “The FAA reflects the fundamental principle that arbitration is a matter of contract.” Dialysis Access Ctr., LLC v. RMS Lifeline, Inc., 638 F.3d 367, 376 (1st Cir.2011) (quoting Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2772, 2776, 177 L.Ed.2d 403 (2010)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Employers and employees may contractually agree to submit federal claims, including claims under the ADA, to arbitration. Bercovitch v. Baldwin Sch., Inc., 133 F.3d 141, 149-51 (1st Cir.1998); see also Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20, 35, 111 S.Ct. 1647, 114 L.Ed.2d 26 (1991) ; Rosenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that claims arising under the age discrimination in employment act may be subject to arbitration
B. holding that title vii claim was subject to compulsory arbitration
C. holding age discrimination claim barred
D. holding that age discrimination claim was subject to compulsory arbitration
E. holding that the faa requires arbitration of age discrimination claims when a valid arbitration agreement exists
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.