Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
motion.”). 4 . United States v. Delgado, 672 F.3d 320, 331 (5th Cir. 2012) (en banc) (quotation marks, citation, and emphasis omitted) 5 . United States v. Bowen, 818 F.3d 179, 186 (5th Cir. 2016) (per curiam) (quotation marks omitted and alterations adopted). 6 . Id. (quotation marks omitted). 7 . Delgado, 672 F.3d at 332; see also United States v. Grant, 683 F.3d 639, 642 (5th Cir. 2012) ("The jury retains the sole authority to weigh any conflicting evidence and to evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.”) (quotation marks omitted). 8 . Bowen, 818 F.3d at 188. 9 . United States v. Parada-Talamantes, 32 F.3d 168, 169-70 (5th Cir. 1994); see also United States v. McCall, 553 F.3d 821, 825-27 (5th Cir. 2008) (finding that the prosecution had introduce Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (table) . Because Covarrubia was issued before January
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that although portion of trial courts jury charge was inapplicable any error in providing it was harmless in light of the fact that charge considered as a whole was not likely to confuse or mislead the jury
B. holding that admission of hearsay constituted harmless error when there was more than sufficient other evidence in the record to support the verdict
C. holding that improper use of a summary chart was harmless because the evidence was merely cumulative and there was overwhelming evidence of the charged crime
D. holding that although the instruction at issue could have been worded more specifically the jury instructions as a whole did not mislead the jury as to the law
E. holding that admission of a summary chart was harmless because it was clear that the summary did not mislead the jury and the evidence introduced at trial was more than sufficient to prove the elements as to each defendant
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.