Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the scenes look at all the cool kids, EXPN-style.” Most importantly, however, we observe that the page features slang phrases such as “[d]udes rollin’ deep” and “[kickin' it with much flavor,” neither of which is susceptible to a literal interpretation, and neither of which one would expect to hear uttered by anyone but a teenager or young adult. A reasonable viewer exposed to the main page would expect to find precisely that type of youthful, non-literal language on the rest of the site. Next, we examine the “specific context and content of the statements, analyzing the extent of figurative or hyperbolic language used and the reasonable expectations of the audience in that particular situation.” Underwager, 69 F.3d at 366. Again, the al.App.3d 543, 216 Cal.Rptr. 252, 257 (1985) . The “Green Carpet Gallery” pokes fun at many
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding as a matter of law that natural condition present was open and obvious to all who would encounter it
B. holding that an obvious joke told during an obvious comedy performance was not defamatory as a matter of law
C. holding that because of unsettled case law district courts error was not obvious and therefore not plain
D. holding that an error is plain if it is clear or obvious
E. holding danger was not so obvious to invitee as to relieve defendant of liability as a matter of law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.