Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
proposition that the imposition of principles of comparative negligence is an appropriate method for apportioning liability when the misrepresentation is only negligent. See Aztlan Lodge No. 1 v. Ruffner, 155 Ariz. 163, 745 P.2d 611 (1987) (court held jury should have been instructed on contributory-negligence theory in negligent-misrepresentation action by sellers against real estate broker and its agent); Darner Motor Sales Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co., 140 Ariz. 383, 682 P.2d 388 (1984) (court held that question of contributory negligence is for the trier of fact and turns on the reasonableness of an insured’s failure to read the policy and his reliance on statements made by the agent); Robinson v. Poudre Valley Federal Credit Union, 654 P.2d 861 (Colo.Ct.App.1982) ; McElroy v. Boise Cascade Corp., 632 S.W.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding negligent misrepresentation sufficient
B. holding that pecuniary damages are essential to a fraudulent misrepresentation cause of action
C. holding that contributorynegligence principles apply to recipient of a negligent misrepresentation and to negligence that results in pecuniary loss
D. holding that the plaintiffs negligent misrepresentation and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims are governed by opla
E. holding economic loss rule did not bar negligent misrepresentation claim where parties had no contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.