Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
both the legal issues and the facts involved in this action are extraordinarily complex. Because the court finds that the Tofel Firm is not prepared to continue the Porzio Firm's representation, any counsel replacing the Porzio Firm would face insurmountable obstacles in attempting to prepare for the January 8, 1996 trial of the common law claims in this action. On the one hand, failure by this court to grant such replacement counsel a continuance of that trial would result in prejudice to the Laga Defendants. On the other hand, any further delay of that trial would result in prejudice to the other litigants in this matter. Such prejudice weighs heavily in the court's determination of whether to deny the Porzio Firm's motion. Johnson v. Johnson, 14 V.I. 466, 477 (D.V.I. 1977) ; Jacobs, 236 A.2d at 890 (attorney requesting
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding plaintiff could withdraw admissions despite pending motion by defendants for summary judgment
B. holding that the state had standing to oppose motions to withdraw filed by the public defender
C. holding that where the question to be resolved in the declaratory judgment action will be decided in a pending action it is inappropriate to grant a declaratory judgment
D. holding that it was inappropriate to allow petitioner to withdraw while motions were pending before the court and ready to be argued
E. holding that a motion to withdraw a guilty plea was not pending because nothing was left for the court to decide
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.