Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of appeal, Davis learned that neither McCulley nor his sister would be able to pay for the appeal. In his motion, Davis further states that he advised McCulley in writing that he would not represent him on appeal and advised him how to file a pro se appeal. Davis notes further |sthat McCul-ley filed his own notice of appeal and indicated to him that he would pursue the appeal himself. Davis further states that he did not attempt to lodge the record and does not know how the record arrived at the clerk’s office. Nonetheless, Davis states that he does not want McCulley to lose his right to appeal and further states that if the motion for rule on clerk is granted, he intends to file a motion for leave to withdraw. The majority cites Sanders v. State, 329 Ark. 363, 952 S.W.2d 133 (1997) , for the proposition that, when an attorney
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding limited in lupo v lineberger 313 ark 315 317 855 sw2d 293 294 1993
B. holding limited by hammon v state 347 ark 267 66 sw3d 853 2002
C. holding a writ was appropriate when the authorization was not limited as to time and not limited to specific healthcare providers
D. recognizing a state agencys powers are limited to 1
E. holding that lien avoidance under  522f is not limited by state exemptions
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.