Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the job of a single guard as of the time of trial; all that has been required, according to the record, is some adjustments in scheduling and job assignments, adjustments that are no more burdensome than those required from time to time for a variety of other non-penological reasons. Superintendent Vail acknowledged reluctantly that the changes had been made without causing any significant disruptions, and did not suggest any reason that the changes could not remain in effect. The burden on the prison—enlisting the cooperation of the guards’ union, adjusting job responsibilities, calling female officers away from their on-duty meals to perform searches—is minor, and a minor burden must be endured in order to preserve constitutional rights. See Salaam v. Lockhart, 905 F.2d at 1171 . (2) While the prison’s penological interest
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding prison nurse was not entitled to official immunity related to allegations that she failed to follow the prison policy related to inmate prescriptions because the prison policy regarding the maintenance and administration of inmates prescriptions does not depend on discretionary judgment calls
B. holding that state prison officials enjoy wide discretion in regards to a prison boards finding of guilt
C. holding that prison walls do not form a barrier separating prison inmates from the protections of the constitution
D. holding required changes in prison policy not burdensome in light of the overall cost of operating the prison
E. holding that prison conditions are those aspects of prison life affecting the entire prison population
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.