Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that the evidence was not relevant, made no determination as to whether it was constitutionally impermissible. It was therefore incumbent on Perry, in objecting to the admission of evidence about her lack of remorse, to raise the issue of due process to the trial court in order to preserve this objection for direct appeal. AFFIRMED. HOWARD and BEATTY, JJ., concur. 1 . Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. 2 . Perry cites the following authorities in support of her argument: Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976) (concerning references to a defendant’s silence after receiving Miranda warnings); State v. Reid, 324 S.C. 74, 476 S.E.2d 695 (1996) ; State v. Johnson, 293 S.C. 321, 360 S.E.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that impeachment by use of prearrest silence does not violate fifth or fourteenth amendments
B. holding references to a defendants lack of remorse violate the fifth eighth and fourteenth amendments
C. holding that the fifth amendments protection against selfincrimination is applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment
D. holding that execution of juveniles violates the eighth and fourteenth amendments
E. holding that complete ban on smoking in county jail does not violate eighth or fourteenth amendments
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.