Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
work release. Defense counsel’s advice implying that Ostrander was eligible for work release and that he had a very good prospect of receiving it soon after sentencing was unrealistic. 46 F.3d at 355. Ostrander was not eligible for work release and a minimal amount of research by defense counsel would have informed him of that. The Court had no difficulty in concluding that Ostrander had received ineffective assistance of counsel: We think that this misadvice falls well below the range of competence we must expect from defense lawyers.... There is a difference between a bad prediction within an accurate description of the law and gross misinformation about the law itself. If the lawyer simply underestimates the sentence, there may not be ineffective assistance.... We can 4th Cir.2013) . Not only does Ross’s case include gross
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding statute of limitations is not jurisdictional and can be waived by a voluntary plea of guilty
B. recognizing defense counsels misrepresentations can undermine validity of guilty plea citing tollett v henderson 411 us at 26667 93 sct 1602
C. holding that ineffective assistance can render a guilty plea involuntary
D. holding failure to advise of right to subpoena witnesses does not affect the validity of a guilty plea
E. holding that a valid guilty plea waives a statute of limitations defense
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.