Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that we should reverse our prior precedents and hold that, under Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979), the Fourth Amendment permits visual strip searches of all jail detainees upon being booked into a detention facility, regardless of reasonable suspicion. Second, the County argues in the alternative that the district court erred in classifying hindering apprehension as a “minor offense,” and that the nature of Ms. Jimenez’s offense therefore justified the search regardless of the lack of individualized reasonable suspicion. For the following reasons, we disagree. A t a policy of strip searching every arrestee booked into a jail or detention facility does not violate the Fourth Amendment); Roberts v. Rhode Island, 239 F.3d 107, 112-13 (1st Cir.2001) ; Weber v. Dell, 804 F.2d 796, 802 (2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that mandatory visual strip search policy in county jail was unconstitutional
B. holding a visual strip and visual cavity search unreasonable when done beside a police car
C. holding that mandatory visual strip search policy at correctional institution intake center was unconstitutional
D. holding unconstitutional blanket jail policy of subjecting all arrestees to strip and visual body cavity searches
E. holding that mandatory routine visual strip search policy for all arrestees who were to be introduced into general jail population was constitutional
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.