Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and thereby rendered him ineligible for long-term disability benefits. B. Watson’s Eligibility to Sue Under ERISA § 404(a) 1. Equitable Relief Sought ERISA § 409(a), 29 U.S.C. § 1109(a), establishes that claims for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA § 404(a) are for the purpose of making “good to [an employee welfare] plan any losses to the plan resulting from each such breach” and “to restore to such plan any profits of such fiduciary which have been made through use of assets of the plan by the fiduciary,” id. Thus, compensatory damages are only available to restore a plan to its uninjured condition; individuals cannot obtain compensatory or punitive damages for breach of fiduciary duty. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Russell, 473 U.S. 134, 144, 105 S.Ct. 3085, 87 L.Ed.2d 96 (1985) ; Degnan v. Publicker Indus., Inc., 42
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding compensatory and punitive damages constitute legal remedies
B. holding that because an erisa plan is not a participant beneficiary or fiduciary subject matter jurisdiction did not exist under  502e of erisa over a suit brought by such a plan
C. holding that a plan participant or beneficiary may not recover extracontractual damages in an erisa suit for breach of fiduciary duty under  502a2 and 409a only the plan may recover damages in such cases
D. holding that fiduciary could not be held personally liable to plan participant or beneficiary for extracontractual compensatory or punitive damages
E. holding that punitive damages do not need to be proportional to compensatory damages
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.