Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
could not have been sexually assaulted, even though defendant planned to, and had taken substantial steps to, carry out the act. The State contends that because it was impossible for defendant to have completed the crime he had attempted, the instruction was correct. We disagree. “[C]lear and correct jury instructions are essential for a fair trial.” State v. Brown, 138 N.J. 481, 522, 651 A.2d 19 (1994). Jury instructions constitute “a road map to guide the jury, and without an appropriate charge a jury can take a wrong turn in its deliberations.” State v. Martin, 119 N.J. 2, 15, 573 A.2d 1359 (1990). “So critical is the need for accuracy that erroneous instructions on material points are presumed to be reversible error.” Ibid. Accord, State v. Rhett, 127 N.J. 3, 7, 601 A.2d 689 (1992) . Prior to the enactment of the New Jersey Code
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that instruction that omitted elements of crime that defense had conceded was error although not plain error
B. holding the denial of a proper question is always reversible error
C. holding that incorrect charges on substantive elements of a crime constitute reversible error
D. holding wrongful granting of states challenge for cause reversible error
E. holding that error in denying such challenge is reversible error without demonstration of prejudice
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.