Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that he was credible and that he has a well-founded fear of future persecution because of his past political activities in Serbia. II. ANALYSIS A. Standard of review “Because the BIA adopted the IJ’s decision with additional commentary, we review the decision of the IJ, as supplemented by the BIA, as the final administrative order.” Ceraj v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 583, 588 (6th Cir.2007). Questions of law involving immigration proceedings are reviewed de novo. Ali v. Ashcroft, 366 F.3d 407, 409 (6th Cir.2004). We will not disturb the IJ’s factual findings, or a determination that the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal, if substantial evidence supports such rulings. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) . Under this standard, we will not reverse a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a district courts ruling may be upheld on an alternative ground supported by the record
B. holding that the trial courts factual findings related to alimony will be upheld on appeal if supported by   any evidence  
C. holding that a factfinders rulings will be upheld if supported by reasonable substantial and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole
D. holding a determination regarding eligibility for asylum is conclusive if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole
E. holding that a finding of fact is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole if it would have been possible for a reasonable jury to reach the boards conclusion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.