Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
find under the First or Fifth Amendments for discrimination in federal employment. See Bush v. Lucas, 462 U.S. 367, 368, 103 S.Ct. 2404, 2406, 76 L.Ed.2d 648 (1983) (refusing to find a cause of action under the First Amendment for a disciplined federal employee because of the remedies available from the Civil Service Commission); see also Petrini v. Howard, 918 F.2d 1482, 1483-1484 (10th Cir.1990) (applying Bush to First Amendment claim of teachers for the Bureau of Indian Affairs). Second, Mr. Belhomme’s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 fails as a matter of law because this section applies to actions by state and local entities, not to the federal government. See Wheeldin v. Wheeler, 373 U.S. 647, 650 & n. 2, 83 S.Ct. 1441, 1444 & n. 2, 10 L.Ed.2d , 820 F.2d 1124, 1126-27 (10th Cir.1987) . For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the age discrimination in employment act was not preempted by the nlra
B. holding that direct evidence of discrimination is not required to prove discrimination in mixed motive cases under title vii
C. holding that a claim for discrimination in private employment is not preempted by title vii
D. recognizing title vii does not provide the exclusive remedy for all employment discrimination claims even if the title vii and section 1983 claim factually overlap
E. holding that title vii provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.