Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
diversity jurisdiction over cases between aliens. More specifically, “diversity is lacking ... where the only parties are foreign entities, or where on one side there are citizens and aliens and on the opposite side there are only aliens.” Universal Licensing, 293 F.3d at 581. For corporate citizenship, the version of section 1332(c) that was in effect at the time this action was commenced read: “a corporation shall be deemed to be a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business.” 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1) (2006). State, with a capital “S,” clearly refers only to the States of the United States. The diversity statute repeatedly dis f Syria & Leb., No. 04 Civ. 5434(RJH), 2005 WL 39917, at *6-7 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2005) ; Willems v. Barclays Bank D.C.O., 263 F.Supp.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the location of a corporations principal place of business for diversity purposes is the state where the corporation has its headquarters or nerve center
B. holding that a corporation is fairly regarded at home and so amenable to personal jurisdiction for suits relating to all of its activities including those outside the forum in its principal place of business and place of incorporation
C. holding  1332c does not apply to a domestically incorporated corporation with its principal place of business abroad
D. holding that for a domestic corporation the foreign principal place of business does not count
E. holding that if a domestic corporations principal place of business is abroad the foreign principal place of business cannot be considered for diversity jurisdiction purposes
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.