Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
2757. Circuit courts have consistently applied this principle in sustaining plans designed to redress past discrimination’s lingering effects. See, e.g., Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California, 770 F.2d 752, 758 (9th Cir.1984) (“It is sufficient for the employer to show a conspicuous imbalance in its workforce” to justify a race-conscious remedy.), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3331, 92 L.Ed.2d 737 (1986); Bushey v. New York State Civil Service Commission, 733 F.2d 220, 228 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1117, 105 S.Ct. 803, 83 L.Ed.2d 795 (1985) (“[A] prima facie case of employment discrimination through a statistical demonstration of disproportionate racial impact” satisfies the remedial predicate.); Van Aken v. Young, 750 F.2d 43 (6th Cir.1984) ; Janowiak v. Corporate City of South Bend, 750
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that city may remedy imbalance in the composition of the fire department created by traditional segregative practices
B. holding that the city of denver police department is not a suable entity
C. holding that a volunteer fire department which was a nonprofit corporation was an agency of a political subdivision for the purposes of the flsa
D. holding no municipal liability in light of city administrators ultimate authority to approve or rescind departmental personnel decisions despite evidence that the fire chief was in charge of establishing rules regula tions policies and procedures for the operation of the fire department
E. holding that a city manager was the final policymaker for purposes of section 1983 liability because of provisions in the norfolk city code requiring that all orders rules and regulations applicable to the entire police department must be approved by the city manager other than some police standard operating procedures
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.