Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
summary judgment is granted as to Plaintiffs’ ordinary negligence claims because there is no genuine issue of material fact as to whether the Vanhorns were volunteers acting for a nonprofit organization within the scope of their responsibilities. A. Volunteers “Volunteer” is defined as “an individual performing services for a nonprofit organization or a governmental entity who does not receive [] compensation (other than reasonable reimbursement or allowance for expenses actually incurred) [] or [] any other thing of value in lieu of compensation, in excess of $500 per year[.]” 42 U.S.C. § 14505(6). An individual generally qualifies as a “volunteer” if he is not compensated. Segway, Inc. v. Special Olympics Conn., Inc., 2015 WL 1244509, **7-8 (Conn.Super. Feb. 23, 2015) (unpublished) ; McGeorge v. Town of Hamden, 2012 WL 1434904,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that there was a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment
B. holding no issue of material fact as to whether defendant was volunteer because he received no compensation
C. holding that a plaintiff had no injury in fact and consequently no standing when it had no enforceable contract right against the defendant
D. holding no prejudice occurred because no new information was presented on the material matter in dispute
E. holding that there was a triable issue of fact whether a defendant who applied a sprayon fireproofing material was an agent for the manufacturer of the material and thus whether plaintiff is in privity with the manufacturer
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.