Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
court cases, the wardens argue that defense counsels’ failure to inform Miller and Haynes of the prosecution’s right to appeal the imposition of a juvenile sentence does not comprise ineffective assistance because the prosecutor’s right of appeal represents a collateral, as opposed to a direct, consequence of the plea. We reject this argument on two grounds. First, the wardens’ reliance on circuit court cases is improper. The AEDPA prohibits use of lower court decisions in determining whether the state court deei sion is contrary to, or is an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law. Williams, 529 U.S. at 412, 120 S.Ct. 1495 (defining “clearly established law as determined by the Supreme Court” to mean holdings of Supreme Court decisions); Harris, 212 F.3d at 944 . Second, the wardens’ argument is incompatible
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that district court opinion which cites controlling authority that is pending review in florida supreme court allows supreme court to exercise jurisdiction
B. recognizing that the new  2254d is a retrenchment from former practice which allowed the united states courts of appeals to rely on their own jurisprudence in addition to that of the supreme court
C. holding that a state court criminal judgment is final for purposes of collateral attack in federal court at the conclusion of review in the united states supreme court or when the time for seeking certiorari review expires
D. holding that no federal court other than the supreme court may entertain a proceeding to reverse or modify a judgment of a state court
E. holding district court erred in relying on authority other than that of the supreme court of the united states in its analysis under  2254d
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.