Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
misdemeanor theft, was referred on February 20, 1990, when Gilkey was 14. On August 27, 1990, a sentence of probation with restitution was imposed for each of these first two offenses. The probation for these first two adjudications, however, was revoked on July 29, 1992, and Gilkey was ordered into custody. On November 3, 1992, when Gilkey was 17, he was referred to the juvenile court for his third juvenile adjudication, for carrying a concealed weapon. A sentence of continued custody was imposed for this third adjudication. Gilkey remained in custody until April 8,1993. Gilkey concedes that his confinement constituted a “juvenile sentence to confinement” for purposes of § 4A1.2(d)(2)(A). See Appellant Br. at 11; see also United States v. Birch, 39 F.3d 1089, 1095 (10th Cir.1994) . He claims, however, that only two points
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that although police initially took juvenile into custody juvenile arrested on drug charge did not have standing to challenge constitutionality of pretrial detention statute in relation to his drug case where juvenile was never detained for drug offense
B. holding juveniles statement inadmissible when after being placed in custody police took juvenile to police station and held juvenile in area where adult suspects were held instead of taking juvenile to a juvenile processing office or any of the places listed as an alternative in section 5202 and placing juvenile in specifically designated office for juveniles
C. holding defendants placement into kansas juvenile custody qualified as confinement within meaning of ussg  4a12d2a
D. holding individual defendants are not an employer within meaning of title vii
E. holding that chapter 39 provides the juvenile judge the flexibility to factor a childs safety into a custody decision at all stages of a juvenile proceeding
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.