Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that the witnesses reported that a revolver was used. Trial counsel questioned Sergeant Nieto on the possibility of the revolver being fake, and Sergeant Nie-to responded that he “would think that someone would know a real gun from a fake gun.” Testimony from a complainant in close proximity to a weapon, describing it as a “gun,” a “revolver,” and a “pistol,” is sufficient to prove the use of a deadly weapon. Wright v. State, 591 S.W.2d 458, 459 (Tex.Crim.App.1979). It is true that courts have held that testimony regarding the use of a “gun” may be insufficient to support a finding of use and exhibition of a deadly weapon when the case presents separate evidence indicating the use of a toy gun. See Pena Cortez v. State, 732 S.W.2d 713, 715 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) . Here, there was testimony that described the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that testimony regarding a little pistol defendant carried was inadmissible where nothing in the record linked the little pistol to the gun used in the crimes charged
B. holding that evidence was sufficient to prove defendant constructively possessed the gun where although defendant denied ownership of the gun it was found near a knife of which defendant claimed ownership and where defendant was aware of the presence of the gun
C. holding that if a person threatens to shoot another with  a chocolate candy pistol there is no ability to commit  any injury with it on the person of another
D. holding direct testimony tying a defendant to a gun was not required when the gun was found in the defendants truck and when the defendant had both ammunition for the gun and a rack in which it could have been kept
E. holding that testimony regarding use of pistol was insufficient where it was uncontroverted that pistol was toy gun
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.