Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
award of the prize is determined by chance. K.S.A. 21-4302(b); State ex rel. Stephan v. Finney, 254 Kan. 632, 644, 867 P.2d 1034 (1994). It is undisputed that the first two elements are present. The only issue in this case is whether Kandu Challenge is a game of chance. The district court applied a “ 'dominant factor ” test to answer this question. The source of this test in Kansas is Games Management, Inc. v. Owens, 233 Kan. 444, 662 P.2d 260 (1983). In Games, our Supreme Court held that under the facts of the case, certain video poker games were not prohibited gambling devices. 233 Kan. at 448-49. After resolving this main issue, the court also examined the State’s argument thát the winners of the video poker games were determined by chance. 194 Neb. 715, 717, 235 N.W.2d 398 (1975) . Three Kings does not directly challenge the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the first amendment protects communicative aspects of video games
B. holding that while broadcasts of basketball games are copyrightable the scores of basketball games represent purely factual information which any patron of an nba game could acquire from the arena as such the underlying games are not copyrightable
C. holding that poker and bridge are predominately games of chance
D. holding that broadcasts of national basketball association games are copyrightable but that the games themselves are not copyrightable as such copyright preemption did not apply
E. holding that the video games at issue are expressive and qualify as speech for purposes of the first amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.