Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(Ind.App.1999) (recognizing that child has right to have his parents present during custodial interrogation); State v. Walker, 352 N.W.2d 239 (Iowa 1984) (statute implicitly requires that, after notification of parents, police wait before interrogation to allow parents time to come to station and consult with child); M.A.C. v. Harrison County Family Court, 566 So.2d 472 (Miss.1990) (hold ing that deliberate exclusion of parents from child’s interrogation renders statements inadmissible); Ezell v. State, 489 P.2d 781, 783-84 (OMa.Crim.App.1971) (finding that neither mother nor legal guardian of juvenile defendant was “capable of protecting defendant’s constitutional rights,” thereby rendering juvenile’s confession inadmissible); Edward C. v. Collings, 193 Mont 426, 632 P.2d 325 (1981) ; In re D.S., 263 N.W.2d 114 (N.D.1978)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that juveniles may not waive counsel unless parent or guardian also waives that right
B. holding relation back permitted where a complaint misnamed a parent as guardian rather than the child by and through the parent as guardian
C. recognizing juveniles right to counsel in certain juvenile proceedings
D. holding that juveniles may waive constitutional rights
E. holding that juveniles may waive right to counsel only upon advice of counsel
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.