Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
274, 280 (1969). 2 . Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(e) specifically requires an advisement of the defendant’s right to compel the attendance of witnesses. 3 . SDCL 23A-27-6 provides: The report of a presentence investigation shall contain any prior criminal record of the defendant and such information about his characteristics, his financial condition, and the circumstances affecting his behavior as may be helpful in imposing sentence or in granting probation or in the correctional treatment of the defendant, and such other information as may be required by the court. 4 . It is important to note that this is not a case where a defendant sought to contest the factual allegations contained in a presentence report. See Hansen v. Kjellsen, 2002 SD 1, ¶ 11, 638 N.W.2d 548, 552 ; State v. Jensen, 1998 SD 52, ¶ 58, 579 N.W.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing the right of a defendant to comment upon the failure of the state to produce evidence
B. recognizing the defense has a right to comment on the presentence report and may introduce evidence
C. holding that if the government fails to object to the presentence report the district courts reliance on the report is reviewed for plain error
D. holding that the information contained in a presentence report is reliable because it is based upon the presentence officers research of the records contact with relevant agencies and the gathering of information which is required to be included in a presentence report
E. holding that the district court erred in requiring the defense to disclose a report which the defense did not intend to introduce into evidence and which was merely designed to aid in the crossexamination of a witness for the state
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.