Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
was therefore largely immaterial to the revocation of appellant’s probation, we conclude that appellant’s due process rights were not violated. Accordingly, revocation of probation and ordered execution of the previously imposed sentence of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia is hereby Affirmed. 1 . D.C.Code § 48-904.01 (2001). 2 . D.C.Code § 22-2105 (2001). 3 . D.C.Code § 25 — 1001(a) (2001). 4 . During discussion on the admi pplying a "clear and convincing” standard, but the judge declined to do so because of the inconsistency between Lieutenant Murphy's testimony at the PWID trial and at the revocation hearing. Judge Keary's finding was not precluded by Judge Diaz’s acquittal on the PWID charge under the stricter standard for criminal conviction. See id. at 711
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that neither the doctrines of double jeopardy nor collateral estoppel apply to probation revocation proceedings after an acquittal on the charge used as basis to revoke probation
B. holding that probation revocation proceedings are clearly not criminal proceedings
C. holding that neither rule 11 nor the protections of boykin apply to probation revocation hearings and observing that less process is due in prison disciplinary proceedings than in probation revocation hearings
D. holding that it is sufficient grounds to revoke a probation if only one condition of the probation is broken
E. holding that the general rules of preservation apply in probation revocation proceedings
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.