Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
nce for West Virginia Lawyers, vol. 1, § 5-2(c) at 479 (1994)). Suggesting that Ms. Day might have changed her mind if called to the stand and instructed that she did not have a valid Fifth Amendment privilege to invoke, Appellant maintains that it was precipitous on the trial court’s part to assume that she would refuse to testify in open court. We agree. As the trial court correctly recognized during the in camera hearing, the Fifth Amendment privilege that Ms. Day was citing as a basis for not taking the witness stand was not available to her given both her acquittal and the grant of immunity extended to her. Following her acquittal, any lingering concerns that Ms. Day may have had with regard to self-incrimination were entirely extinguished by the grant of immunity. Because .2000) . Those courts that require the assertion of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing privilege
B. holding that juveniles request to call parent is assertion of fifth amendment privilege against selfincrimination
C. holding that the statement ill take the fifth was an assertion of the fifth amendment privilege
D. holding that a valid assertion of the fifth amendment privilege in a civil case may not be treated as an admission that allegations are true
E. recognizing that policy reasons undergirding assertion of fifth amendment privilege outside jurys presence apply even if privilege is invalid
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.