Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to all remaining counts. 4) Defendants’ Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs Counter-Statement of Material Facts is DENIED. 1 . A shakedown is a routine procedure on the RHU, wherein corrections officers search inmates' cells for contraband. (Barnes Dep. 18:16-19:1.) 2 . 42 U.S.C. § 1985 requires the action of "two or more persons.” 3 . To the extent that Plaintiff is arguing the Defendant Macon had a history of making racially inappropriate comments (see Doc. 32, Ex. SS, TT, UU), Barnes has not shown that any of those comments were made toward him or ever even heard or perceived by him. Even if Barnes did hear of these incidents second-hand, they would not be sufficient to create a hostile work environment. See Caver, 420 F.3d at 263 . 4 . The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that comments not directed at plaintiff including a supervisor who called another worker the nword were relevant to the evaluation of hostile work environment claim
B. holding that a viable hostile work environment claim requires an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive
C. holding that supervisors routine vulgar references to plaintiff could not support a hostile work environment claim because plaintiff was unaware of the comments and to show that he or she perceived the environment as hostile a title vii plaintiff must at least have been aware of those comments
D. recognizing a hostile work environment claim under section 1983
E. holding that plaintiff cannot meet hostile work environment threshold simply by pointing to comments directed at other individuals
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.