Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
F.3d at 560-62, 566-67. 17 . Id. at 566-67. 18 .Id. at 567. 19 . United States v. Hazlewood, 526 F.3d 862, 864 (5th Cir.2008). 20 . United States v. Scruggs, 714 F.3d 258, 262 (5th Cir.2013). 21 . 18 U.S.C. § 3231. 22 . Scruggs, 714 F.3d at 262 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). 23 . See id. at 263 ("Even though a [subsequent Supreme Court case] might have rendered the instant information factually insufficient, it did not divest the district court of subject matter jurisdiction over the case.” (emphasis in original, internal quotation marks omitted)); United States v. Scruggs, 691 F.3d 660, 668-69 (5th Cir.2012) (reaching a similar conclusion). 24 . United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 630-31, 122 S.Ct. 1781, 152 L.Ed.2d 860 (2002). 25 . See Scruggs, 691 F.3d at 668 . 26 . United States v. Carreon-Palacio, 267
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the abstract of judgment may not sufficiently establish that the defendant pled guilty to a specific crime when the only other document provided was the charge which simply contained the generic broad statutory language
B. holding that in connection with a motion to dismiss the court may consider a document not attached to the pleadings where the plaintiffs claim depends on the contents of a document the defendant attaches the document to its motion to dismiss and the parties do not dispute the authenticity of the document even though the plaintiff does not explicitly allege the contents of that document in the complaint
C. holding that a district court may not rely on a charging document without first establishing that the crime charged was the same crime for which the defendant was convicted
D. holding that there was no jurisdictional defect when the language of the charging document tracked the statutory language even though the facts proffered at the plea hearing were insufficient to establish that the defendant committed the crime
E. holding that the complaint pled a claim under the unamended  3729a2 in part because it tracked the language of the statute
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.