Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the Federal Defendants challenge the Court’s jurisdiction, the Court will address their arguments first. 1. Claims against the Federal Defendants. The FTCA is the exclusive remedy for obtaining damages based on tortious conduct committed by a federal employee acting within the scope of his employment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b); 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)(1); Simpkins v. District of Columbia Gov’t, 108 F.3d 366, 371 (D.C.Cir.1997). Here, Plaintiff has sued four federal employees for damages based on alleged torts that those employees committed while acting in the scope of their employment as officers of the USSS. Compl. ¶¶ 8-9. Accordingly, Plaintiffs tort claims against the Federal Defendants are governed by the FTCA. See, e.g., Ignatiev v. United States, 238 F.3d 464, 465 (D.C.Cir.2001) . The United States’s waiver of sovereign
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the public duty doctrine applied to claims against the town and fire chief for negligence in responding to a fire call although plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to show the special duty exception applied
B. holding that the ftca applied to negligence claims against secret service uniformed division officers
C. holding that the plaintiffs claim against the united states for negligence was not a tort claim within the ftca where it was founded upon an alleged failure to perform explicit or implicit contractual obligations
D. holding that the assaultbattery exclusion applied to claims for negligence resulting in a shooting death
E. holding that the rule does not apply to bar tort claims against service providers
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.