Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
district] plan at issue — The parties’ dispute as to this Court’s jurisdiction centers [instead] on whether the Wilmington .plan is a ‘governmental plan’ within the meaning of ERISA and therefore is.exempt....”). For example, in Weiner, the Sixth Circuit examined whether it had subject-matter jurisdiction over an ERISA appeal involving the Portage County Benefit Plan and the City of Barberton Health Benefit Plan. Weiner, 108 F.3d at 88-89. There, the court agreed that these governmental plans qualified as “employee benefit plans” within the meaning of ERISA but nevertheless fell outside of the Act’s coverage due to the governmental plan exclusion from 29 U.S.C. § 1003(b)(1). See id. at 89-90.& n.3 (“[A] plan may be an ‘employee benefit plan’ and th F.Supp.2d 443, 445-47 (D.Vt.1999) ; Garvey v. Ruch Prudential HMO, Inc., No. 96 C
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that healthcare plan established by the state of vermont for eligible employees qualified for governmental plan exclusion
B. holding that plan language giving plan administrator power to determine which employees are eligible to participate in the plan and providing all parties dealing with the plan an interpretation of plan provisions on request indicates deferential standard of review of trustee eligibility decisions
C. holding that a group benefits policy purchased by the city for employees was a governmental plan even though the plan was offered and administered by a private insurer
D. holding that disability plan established by state university for benefit of employees qualified for governmental plan exclusion
E. holding that county governments healthcare plan qualified for governmental plan exclusion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.