Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(1). An employee working in a “bona fide administrative capacity” is someone: (1) Compensated on a salary or fee basis at a rate of not less than $455 per week ...; (2) Whose primary duty is the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to the management or general business operations of the employer or the employer’s customers; and (3) Whose primary duty includes the exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance. 29 C.F.R. § 541.200(a) (emphasis added); see also Foster v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 710 F.3d 640, 642 (6th Cir.2013). An employee who satisfies all three elements falls within this “administrative exemption.” See Renfro v. Ind. Mich. Power Co., 497 F.3d 573, 576 (“Renfro II”) (6th Cir.2007) . Although the parties do not dispute that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that in order to establish liability under the ada the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant was an employer within the meaning of the statute
B. holding that an employer must establish all three elements of the defense with regard to its employees in order to prevail
C. holding that an alien must establish that he was prejudiced by the alleged error in order to prevail on a due process claim
D. holding that an employer did not regard the plaintiff as disabled
E. holding that an alien must show error and substantial prejudice in order to prevail on a due process claim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.