Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
supplemental jurisdictio y action premised on alleged bad faith termination from IAI “cannot be maintained against parties with whom no employment relationship existed — i.e., the named defendants other than IAI.” Rothmeier contends that respondents breached fiduciary duties owed to him by terminating him from the partnerships in bad faith. However, the partners here acted pursuant to (1) the IAI Venture I partnership agreement, which provided for automatic termination of Rothmeier’s partnership interest upon his termination from IAI and (2) the IAI Venture II partnership agreement, which provided for termination of a partner’s interest at the sole discretion of the other partners. Neither agreement abrogates the fiduciary character of the partnerships. See Appletree, 494 N.W.2d at 893 . Moreover, under Delaware law, a partner
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a statutorilyimposed fiduciary obligation created an express trust fiduciary relationship for purposes of  523a4
B. holding that partners have a fiduciary relationship and are held to high standards of integrity in their dealings with each other
C. holding that partners may not agree to eliminate the fiduciary character of their relationship
D. holding that general partners must notify limited partners of partnership opportunity to purchase adjacent property but not addressing whether  9404 requires affirmative consent of partners after such notice
E. holding that the relationship of partners is of a fiduciary character and imposes upon them the obligation to exercise good faith and integrity in their dealings
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.