Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
has been a "legislative delegation” of regulatory authority to an administrative agency, Chevron, 467 U.S. at 844, 104 S.Ct. 2778, courts must defer to that agency’s interpretation of that statute, so long as that interpretation is "based on a permissible construction of the statute,” id. at 843, 104 S.Ct. 2778. The NLRB’s interpretation of the Act receives this "Chevron deference” unless its interpretation is unreasonable. See N.L.R.B. v. Ky. River Cmty. Care, Inc., 532 U.S. 706, 713, 121 S.Ct. 1861, 149 L.Ed.2d 939 (2001). 4 . The holding of N.L.R.B. v. C. & C. Plywood Corp., 385 U.S. 421, 87 S.Ct. 559, 17 L.Ed.2d 486 (1967), is not to the contrary. That case dealt with the jurisdiction of the Board to adjudicate matters turning on contractual interpretation. Id. at 428, 87 S.Ct. 559 ; see also Bath Marine Draftsmen’s Ass’n v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that terms of 29 usc  156 authorizing the nlrb to make such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of the act grant the nlrb broad rulemaking authority
B. holding that this court must remand to the bia to allow it to address in the first instance an issue that it has not yet considered
C. holding with respect to a certified claim that congress has determined that submission of a  claim to the contracting officer in the first instance is a jurisdictional prerequisite to filing a suit in the claims court
D. holding that appellate court erred by reaching question of changed country conditions where neither bia nor ij had been given a chance to address it in the first instance
E. holding that the nlrb has the authority to interpret cbas in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of enforcing a statutory right which congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.