Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
any debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section: (1) The collection of any amount (including any interest, fee, charge, or expense incidental to the principal obligation) unless such amount is expressly authorized by the agreement creating the debt or permitted by law. 15 U.S.C. § 1692f. In Ohio, there is no right to recover court costs or statutory interest except for when a court enters a lawful judgment in an action validly commenced under law. See Ohio Rev.Code § 2335.19. Any debt collector’s attempt to recover court costs in the absence of a valid judgment constitutes a violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692f. See Shula v. Lawent, 359 F.3d 489, 491 (7th Cir. 2004); Veach v. Sheeks, 316 F.3d 690, 692 (7th Cir.2003) ; Duffy v. Landberg, 215 F.3d 871, 873-74 (8th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that college violated stay by not delivering transcript to chapter 7 debtor when debt had not yet been determined dischargeable
B. holding that an entity engaged in collection activity on a defaulted debt acquired from another is a debt collector under the fdcpa even though it may actually be owed the debt
C. holding that the name under which a debt collector is licensed to do business is the debt collectors true name for purposes of the fdcpa
D. holding that rawlings  a codefendant in the present action  is not a debt collector within the meaning of the fdcpa
E. holding that debt collector violated fdcpa when it held debtor liable for court costs that had not yet been awarded
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.