Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
would not be applicable to him during the entire period w e facts is consistent with the text of the regulation, with precedent, and with the policy underlying the administration of the salary basis test of “avoiding] the imposition of massive and unanticipated overtime liability.” Auer, 519 U.S. at 461, 117 S.Ct. 905. AFFIRMED. 1 . Initially, plaintiffs claimed the City had imposed a total of four improper suspensions without pay. Two of the four, however, were permissible week-long Monday-to-Friday suspensions, and are, therefore, not relevant to whether the City had a practice of improper deductions. See 29 C.F.R. § 541.118(a) (1998) ("[A]n employee need not be paid for any workweek in which he performs no work.”); Childers v. City of Eugene, 120 F.3d 944, 946 n. 2 (9th Cir.1997) . 2 . Plaintiffs contend that their position is
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding weeklong suspensions do not violate the flsa
B. holding that the flsa does not preempt a state law contractual claim that seeks to recover wages for time that is compensable under the contract but not under the flsa
C. holding that the flsa preempted plaintiffs fraud claim
D. holding under flsa
E. holding that the flsa does not preempt state law contract provisions that are more generous than the flsa demands
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.