Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Nos. A97 484 984, A97 484 985, A97 849 320 (Immig. Ct. N.Y. City June 14, 2002). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. Even assuming that the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, to the extent that it was affirmed by the BIA, was marred by serious error and that the IJ abused her discretion by denying Huang a continuance, remand would be futile because Huang has not submitted any evidence from which a reasonable fact finder could conclude that she suffered past persecution, had a well-founded fear of future persecution, or has demonstrated that it is more likely than not that her life or freedom would be threatened if she were returned to China. See Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 434 F.3d 144, 161-62 (2d Cir.2006) ; Ramsameachire v. Ashcroft, 357 F.3d 169, 178
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a remand is appealable only when the remand disposes of an important legal issue that would be effectively unreviewable at a later stage of litigation
B. holding that remand is unnecessary when it is clear that the same decision would have been reached in the absence of the errors
C. holding that a remand need not be ordered despite legal errors if remand would be futile
D. holding that a remand on a claim that could not be supported by the record would be a waste of judicial resources
E. holding that remand is appropriate when the erroneous aspects of the bias reasoning are not tangential to its findings  and that the evidence supporting those findings is not so overwhelming as to make remand futile
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.