Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and team meetings. Our Lady of All Souls used the property at Block 151, Lots 1.01, 3, and 49 on the tax map of the City of East Orange. As of the October 1,1993 assessment date, the parish property was used by both the Archdiocese and the East Orange Board of Education. The Archdiocese offered weekly Mass, and held deanery meetings in the church rectory. Additionally, religious artifacts and furnishings were stored for safekeeping. The East Orange Board of Education rented space for classes on what is now Lot 2, and eventually acquired the lot following a subdivision in December 1994. The Archdiocese maintained the same activities at the parish property on the October 1, 1994 and October 1, 1995 assessment dates. The we atter Day Saints v. Morris Tp., 3 N.J. Tax 572 (Tax 1981) . New Jersey courts have never addressed the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that denial of tax exemption for part of church property that was not necessary for occupancy and enjoyment of church did not violate first amendment
B. holding that tax exemption for church property does not violate establishment clause
C. holding that the fiveacre limitation on exemption for church property did not violate churchs constitutional protections of religious freedom where zoning ordinance required lot size in excess of five acres which resulted in partial taxation of church property
D. holding that requiring church to make contributions to workers compensation fund opposed by such church did not violate first amendment
E. holding that irs examination of corporate minute books of a church to determine whether it qualified for tax exemption was not unconstitutional interference with religious affairs of the church under the first amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.