Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
present at the scene of a recently committed crime may be permissible without violating the Fourth Amendment. Such a stop is especially deemed permissible where only a limited number of persons are present at the scene of a violent crime. Wold v. State, 430 N.W.2d 171, 175 (Minn.1988). We agree with this reasoning. Professor LaFave, in his discussion of allowing police to “freeze” a situation, certainly does not condone a “dragnet approach,” which results “in the temporary seizure of a large number of persons within the range of [a suspect’s] possible flight.” 4 LaFave, supra, § 9.4(g), at 195. But rather in this context, “selective investigative procedures” are necessary “whereby seizures are made only of those as to whom there exists a ‘reasonable possibi 7 S.W.2d 919, 920-21 (1985) . An officer's reasonable and articulable
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the initial stop by officer was based on reasonable suspicion that defendant was impersonating a police officer although another officer arrested defendant for privacy act violation
B. holding officer who received a radio dispatch about a loud party disturbance at an apartment created by a person who left in brown jeep did not give officer reasonable suspicion to stop defendant in brown jeep because officer had no reason to suspect that a misdemeanor involving personal or property damage had been committed as required by ark rcrim p 31 to justify temporary detention
C. holding that an officer had reasonable suspicion to justify an investigatory stop of an automobile where the officer received a dispatch that a black male in a black bmw with a temporary license tag was selling controlled substances and the officer observed a person in an automobile fitting that description less than one minute later
D. holding officer had reasonable suspicion of criminal activity necessary to support traffic stop where officer received dispatch that defendant committed disorderly conduct and record check showed parked truck was registered to defendant
E. holding that notwithstanding the officers testimony that he had no suspicion of criminality the officer was aware of facts that would give rise to reasonable suspicion in the mind of a reasonable officer
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.