Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
information from class counsel on the risks and potential value of the litigation;” the “contingency, novelty and difficulty” of the case; and “the skill shown by counsel”). “As always, when determining attorneys’ fees, the district court [is] guided by the fundamental principle that fee awards out of common funds be reasonable under the circumstances.” Glass v. UBS Fin. Servs., Inc., 2007 WL 221862, *14 (N.D.Cal.2007), aff'd, 331 Fed.Appx. 452 (9th Cir.2009) (internal quotation marks and emphasis omitted). 1.The Result Obtained for the Class. “The result achieved is a significant factor to be considered in making a fee award.” In re Heritage Bond Litig., 2005 WL 1594403, *19 (C.D.Cal.2005); see Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 436, 103 S.Ct. 1933, 1941, 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983) . As the court previously found, the settlement
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the most critical factor is the degree of success obtained
B. holding that the standard for permanent injunction is the same as that for preliminary injunction with the one exception being that the plaintiff must show actual success on the merits rather than likelihood of success
C. holding that status as a prevailing party does not by itself entitle a plaintiff to attorneys fees rather the most critical factor in determining a fee awards reasonableness is the degree of success obtained emphasis added
D. holding that the quantity of relief obtained as compared to what the plaintiff sought to achieve are key elements in determining the degree of success
E. recognizing that the third factor permanence is the most important
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.