Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
satisfied that the action is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) (2003) (emphasis added). Thus, in three different statutory provisions, Congress has provided that a court shall dismiss a prisoner’s complaint if the court determines that the complaint is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief from an immune defendant. In Black’s Law Dictionary, the word “shall” is defined as follows: As used in statutes, contracts, or the like, this word is generally imperative or mandatory. In common or ordinary parlance, and in its ordinary signification, the term “ 07 S.Ct. 2415, 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987) ; and Hughes v. Thompson, 415 U.S. 1301, 1302,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that administrative exhaustion is mandatory despite legislatures use of the word may
B. holding that the use of the word shall in the extradition clause and the extradition act creates a mandatory duty
C. holding that a states use of the word shall is mandatory language
D. holding that the word may in the declaratory judgment act does not mean shall 
E. holding the word individuals is not the equivalent of the dictionary acts use of the word persons
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.