Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
action under § 113(f). The Supreme Court stated that, for the purposes of the case before it, “it suffices to demonstrate that costs incurred voluntarily are recoverable only by way of § 107(a)(4)(B), and costs of reimbursement to another person pursuant to a legal judgment or settlement are recoverable only under § 113(f). Id. The Court noted, however, that it was not suggesting that §§ 107(a)(4)(B) and 113(f) do not have any overlap at all. Id. at 2338 n. 6. The Court noted that a PRP may sustain expenses pursuant to a consent decree following a suit under § 106 or § 107(a): “In such a case, the PRP does not incur costs voluntarily but does not reimburse the costs of another party.” The Court did “not decide whether these compelled ., 565 F.Supp.2d 399, 402 (N.D.N.Y.2008) ; New York v. Next Millennium Realty, LLC, No.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that under the identical rule of professional conduct in alaska slinee the rule limits the clients authority to those decisions it follows that the lawyer has the ultimate authority to make other decisions governing trial tactiecsincluding whether to request lesser included offenses
B. holding that a third party has authority to consent to a search if the third party is a coinhabitant
C. holding that the supreme court has final appellate review of agency decisions
D. holding that there is nothing for a court to review when an agency has never issued a final and binding judgment that has the force of law
E. holding that nothing in atlantic research provides authority to change the circuits previous decisions holding that a party that has incurred expenditures under a consent order with a government agency and has been found partially liable under  113f1 may not seek to recoup those expenditures under section 107a
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.