Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
employer who has contracted to provide services to an exempt political subdivision does not retain sufficient control over the employment relationship to engage in meaningful collective bargaining, § 2(2) deprives the Board of jurisdiction.” The Memorial Hospital decision explained that when the private employer does not have sufficient control over labor relations to engage in meaningful bargaining, the Board is without jurisdic ng Board properly exercised jurisdiction when employer fully controlled the essential employment terms, including hiring, firing, discipline, grievance procedures, and benefits, although employer’s “flexibility with regard to wages and benefits undoubtedly is hampered by budget ceilings” imposed by governmental agency); R.W. Harmon & Sons, 664 F.2d at 251 ; Memorial Hospital, 624 F.2d at 185-189
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding board properly exercised jurisdiction when employer controlled the basic bargaining subjects wages seniority grievance procedures vacation insurance and retirement plans
B. holding that opening day and duty days were not mandatory subjects of collective bargaining
C. holding transfer to another job that would violate seniority rights under collective bargaining agreement unreasonable
D. holding that the terms and conditions placed on applicants are not subjects of mandatory bargaining
E. holding that many courts have recognized that an employer may make reasonable inquiries into the retirement plans of its employees
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.