Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
individuals without first obtaining class certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.” Gen. Tel. Co. of the Nw. v. EEOC, 446 U.S. 318, 333-34, 100 S.Ct. 1698, 64 L.Ed.2d 319 (1980). Additionally, we .have noted, in a different posture, that the EEOC is not required to provide documentation of individual attempts to conciliate on behalf of each potential claimant in a class action. EEOC v. Bruno’s Restaurant, 13 F.3d 285, 289 (9th Cir.1993). In Bruno’s, the defendant restaurant fired its pregnant waitresses. The EEOC investigated and found reasonable cause to believe that the defendant had illegally discriminated against them. Id. at 286-87. The defendant rejected the EEOC’s efforts to settle and the EEOC brought suit. The district court dismissed the EEOC’s action ) ; EEOC v. Keep. Indus., Inc., 748 F.2d 1097,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that the court has rejected the notion that the agency must expressly parse or refute on the record each individual argument or piece of evidence offered by the petitioner internal quotation marks omitted
B. holding that an employer violates the nlra when it fails to provide information that is needed by the bargaining representative for the proper performance of its duties internal quotation marks omitted
C. holding the eeoc is not required to provide documentation of individual attempts to conciliate on behalf of each potential claimant internal quotation marks omitted
D. holding that compliance with rule 3 is both a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite to appeal internal quotation marks omitted
E. recognizing that this court has rejected the notion that the agency must expressly parse or refute on the record each individual argument or piece of evidence offered by the petitioner internal quotation marks omitted
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.