Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
58 F.3d 896, 903-04 (3d Cir.1995) (“the fact that the ... plans used terms such as ‘lifetime’ or ‘for life’ to describe the duration of retiree medical benefits, while at the same time expressly reserving the company’s right to terminate the plans under which those benefits were provided, did not render the plans ‘internally inconsistent’ and therefore ambiguous.”). When the benefit plans and the collective bargaining agreement are read as a whole contract, it is clear that the phrase “will be covered” cannot mean a lifetime of unaltered coverage, as the plaintiffs contend, because the health benefit plans contain language in which the insurance company and NSTAR reserve the right to change or cancel coverage. See DeGeare v. Alpha Portland Indus., Inc., 837 F.2d 812, 816 (8th Cir.1988) , vacated and remanded on other grounds, 489
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that disability benefits are not retirementtype benefits
B. holding that employers promise to provide welfare benefits until death of retiree did not create vested rights because employer had expressly reserved the right to terminate or amend the plan
C. holding employers promise that retiree benefits will continue did not create vested lifetime benefits in the face of a termination clause
D. holding that rights in a government benefits program were not vested property for purposes of the takings clause of the fifth amendment
E. holding that retirement benefits are accrued benefits under erisa
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.