Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
195 Cal. App.4th 414, 125 Cal.Rptr.3d 616, 618 (Cal.App.2011), Division 3 of California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal, agreed with Mendez and disagreed with Ramirez, stating that it “perceive[d] no sound basis to distinguish Graham’s reasoning where a term of years beyond the juvenile’s life expectancy is tantamount to an LWOP term.” The California Supreme Court recently granted review of these decisions. See People v. Caballero, 123 Cal.Rptr.3d 575, 250 P.3d 179 (2011), People v. Ramirez, 128 Cal.Rptr.3d 271, 255 P.3d 948 (2011), and People v. Nunez, 128 Cal. Rptr.3d 274, 255 P.3d 951 (2011). Unlike California, Georgia courts are, so far, consistent in their view that Graham is not implicated in a term-of-years sentence. See Adams v. State, 288 Ga. 695, 707 S.E.2d 359 (2011) ; Middleton v. State, 313 Ga.App. 193, 721
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that stiffer penalties for cocaine base transactions are not grossly disproportionate to the severity of the offense and therefore do not violate eighth amendment
B. holding that probation is not a sentence
C. holding that sentence of mandatory twentyfive years followed by life on probation for aggravated molestation of a fouryearold child does not implicate categorical eighth amendment restriction under graham nor is it grossly disproportionate for particular crime
D. holding that the eighth amendment does not require strict proportionality between crime and sentence but forbids only extreme sentences that are grossly disproportionate to the crime
E. holding that an effective life sentence of fortyfive years for seconddegree forgery was excessive and that a life sentence was cruel and unusual in violation of the eighth amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.