Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
cancellation. But we reject this argument because it obviates the phrase “benefits accrued.” Under Louisiana law, we should not assume that two different terms in a statute are synonymous. See Colwell v. State, 506 So.2d 941, 944 (La.Ct.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 508 So.2d 89 (La.1987); Spragio v. Board of Trustees of the State Employees Group Benefits Program, 468 So.2d 1323, 1326 (La.Ct.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 472 So.2d 32 (La.1985). Mrs. Gahn, on the other hand, argues that she “incurred” the expense for the treatment of her liver cancer when she was diagnosed with the disease, and she relies on prior interpretations of coverage provisions in insurance policies to support that position. See, e.g., Valladares v. Monarch Ins. Co., 282 So.2d 569, 572-73 (La.Ct.App. 4th Cir.) , writs denied, 284 So.2d 603, 604 (La.1973);
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that cost of plastic surgery to repair scarring was an expense incurred within one year of the accident even though the physician waited more than a year after the accident to perform the operation
B. holding that the debtor gave his prior express consent even though he didnt give his number until one year after debt was incurred
C. holding that a complaint filed within three years of an accident complied with the michigan court rules and was not barred by the statute of limitations even though service was made more than three years after the accident
D. holding that an insureds personal belief that he was not liable for an accident provided no basis for submitting the question of the reasonableness of his delay in notification to a jury when the insured knew the day after the accident that it had been claimed that the cable he had installed had caused the accident
E. recognizing that in the usual case no information or evidence comes to light more than one year after imposition of sentence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.