Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Communications Act The Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) prohibits “intentionally accessing without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided,” and thereby obtaining access to an “electronic communication while it is in electronic storage.” 18 U.S.C. § 2701(a). It also provides for the recovery of civil damages by a person aggrieved by a violation of the statute. 18 U.S.C. § 2707(a). Rene alleges that the Defendants violated the SCA when they accessed her email messages. The Defendants contend that any email messages viewed by them were not in “electronic storage,” and, as a result, do not fall within the protections of the statute. “Electronic storage” is defined as “any temporary, intermediate storage .Supp.2d 965, 987 (C.D.Cal.2010) , and United States v. Weaver, 636 F.Supp.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an individuals access to a service or website that requires an indication of assent to contractual terms before access to the service or website will be granted was sufficient evidence that the user clicked i accept 
B. holding that even though an agreement was approved by the family court it retained its character as an agreement for purposes of legal analysis
C. holding that webmail messages opened and retained by the user absent a showing that the webmail service was archiving copies for backup purposes were not within the definition of electronic storage
D. holding that service is not avoided by service on a partys attorney as service on an attorney is ineffective unless he has been authorized to accept such service
E. holding that where weather alert service instructed user to reply stop to cease receiving text messages users message of stop to service was sufficient to create factual issue with regard to revocation of consent
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.