Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
her liable for tortious interference. Therefore, Defendants’ motion to dismiss Counts III and V are granted. Under New York law, a claim for tortious interference requires “the existence of a valid contract between plaintiff and a third party, defendant’s knowledge of the contract, defendant’s intentional procurement of the third-party’s breach of the contract without justification, actual breach of the contract, and damages resulting therefrom.” Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc. et. al., 88 N.Y.2d 413, 424, 646 N.Y.S.2d 76, 668 N.E.2d 1370 (1996). Where the defendants have an economic interest in the contract, however, alleging the above elements is insufficient. See White Plains Coat & Apron Co., Inc. v. Cintas Corp., 8 N.Y.3d 422, 426, 835 N.Y.S.2d 530, 867 N.E.2d 381 (2007)  (footnotes omitted). The plaintiff must also
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that economic interest defense is available inter alia where defendants were significant stockholders in the breaching partys business where defendant and the breaching party had a parentsubsidiary relationship where defendant was the breaching partys creditor and where the defendant had a managerial contract with the breaching party at the time defendant induced the breach of contract with plaintiff
B. holding in response to plaintiffs arguments that defendants had conspired with the alleged breaching party that the absence of a contractual relationship between the parties requires dismissal of the section 301 claim
C. holding that jurys verdict for the defendant in a breach of contract action did not establish the absence of breach because the jury was instructed that it could find for the defendant if it concluded that the defendant had not breached the contract or if the defendant proved an affirmative defense
D. holding merely that to the extent a breaching party claims that the appropriate measure of damages is the difference between the contract price and the market price it holds the burden of proving that there is in fact an available market for the goods in issue
E. holding that the measure of damages for breaching a building construction contract is ordinarily such sum as is required to make the building conform to the contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.