Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
circuit court stated an incorrect reason for its denial.’ ” Long v. State, 675 So.2d 532, 533 (Ala.Crim.App.1996), quoting Swicegood v. State, 646 So.2d 159, 160 (Ala.Crim.App.1994). For the reasons that follow, we find that the circuit court was correct in summarily denying all but one of Bearden’s claims. I. Bearden contends that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to render the judgment or to impose the sentence. He makes two arguments in this regard. First, Bearden contends that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction because, he says, the affidavit submitted in support of the warrant for his arrest was not properly verified. Although couched in jurisdictional terms, this claim does not present a jurisdictional issue. See, e.g., Sumlin v. State, 710 So.2d 941 (Ala.Crim.App.1998) . Therefore, we agree with the circuit court
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding invalid warrant did not create probable cause for arrest
B. holding that a prosecutors preparation and filing of an information and a motion for an arrest warrant are protected by absolute immunity
C. holding that arrest warrant permits police to enter residence of person named therein to make arrest
D. holding that challenges to an arrest warrant are not jurisdictional
E. holding that an arrest warrant  without a search warrant  does not permit law enforcement authorities to enter a third partys home to legally search for the subject of the arrest warrant
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.