Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the confidential informant was a buyer or recipient because the enhancement applies with respect to the undercover officer who was undisputedly a buyer and recipient. JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge, concurring. I concur in full in Parts I — III of the opinion. With respect to Part TV, I would caution against deciding this case on the rationale utilized in the majority court opinion. "While the opinion correctly states that the individual’s possession of the firearm in question need not be actually unlawful, it overlooks the fact that the defendant must have had knowledge or reason to believe that the individual to whom the firearm was transferred had certain prior convictions or is under a criminal justice sentence. See United States v. Asante, 782 F.3d 639, 643-44 (11th Cir.2015) ; United States v. Howard, 539 Fed.Appx. 904,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the defendants actions fell under the unlawful possession prong where the defendant transferred at least one firearm to a known felon
B. holding that the government must prove the defendant knew of the features of the firearm that brought it within the scope of the act
C. holding that the government failed to prove the defendants actions fell under the unlawful possession prong bjecause the government failed to present any evidence that the defendant knew that his conduct would result in a firearm being transferred to an individual falling under the narrow guidelines definition of an individual in unlawful possession
D. holding that both the unlawful possession and unlawful use prongs were met and noting that the firearm transferred to the individual was not registered making the individuals possession of it necessarily unlawful
E. holding that the government was required to prove that the defendant lacked a license to possess a firearm but not that the defendant possessed the firearm for any duration of time
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.