Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
breached the duty; (3) the breach proximately caused the plaintiff injury; and (4) damages resulted. Id. at 665. Attorney-Client Relationship. The AMn Gump Defendants deny that they represented Grady and Chama, and thus deny that they owed a duty to them. The Court, however, concludes that there is sufficient evidence in the record to determine that an attorney-client relationship was formed between the AMn Gump Defendants and Grady. The Court has found that Kelso was an agent of Grady’s who had the authority to hire counsel for Grady and Chama to design and implement the Chama reorganization scheme; Kelso did hire counsel for Grady and Chama for this purpose. An agent may employ counsel for Ms principal. See Randolph v. Resolution Trust Corp., 995 F.2d 611, 616 (5th Cir.1993) , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1294, 127
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing this possibility in vacating a summary judgment and remanding the determination as to whether an attorneyclient relationsmp existed
B. holding that before granting an unopposed summary judgment motion the court must inquire whether the moving party has met its burden to demonstrate undisputed facts entitling it to summary judgment as a matter of law
C. holding that a court may consider undisputed summary judgment type evidence when determining whether a reasonable possibility of recovery under state law exists
D. holding that consideration of summary judgment motion should await determination of jurisdiction
E. holding that summary judgment was improper where genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether prison officials prevented inmate from filing grievances
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.