Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the dismissal’s effect had it not been withdrawn. 6 . We rule here only that the power of the trial court to rescind an order of dismissal continues “at least” until entry of the order on the docket. That is all that is needed to dispose of this appeal. After formal entry of an order of any type, a trial court's jurisdiction over the matter and power to rescind or amend the order may be governed by application of this jurisdiction’s procedural rules and case law. See generally Clement v. District of Columbia Dep't of Human Servs., 629 A.2d 1215 (D.C. 1993). 7 . We note further that our decision today is in accord with the decisions of several other jurisdictions that have considered the present issue. See, e.g., Arizona v. Johnson, 113 Ariz. 506, 557 P.2d 1063, 1066 (1976) (en banc)  (quoting Belcher v. Superior Court, 105 Ariz.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that a tenmonth delay in filing a dismissal motion was reasonable
B. holding that a trial court does not lose jurisdiction in a matter by ordering its dismissal before jeopardy has attached unless there is an abuse of discretion in vacating the order of dismissal and reinstating the case for trial
C. holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by ordering a separate trial for the counterclaims where the convenience of the parties would be served
D. holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering a new trial based on a 250000 award for a mental distress claim
E. holding that in considering dismissal of an appeal the court should exercise discretion to determine whether dismissal is appropriate in the circumstances presented by the case
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.