Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
satisfied section XIV of Procedure 00-01-003, they still did not establish that Mr. Pavey, who could not write his own grievance and did not have access to help from his fellow inmates, did not reasonably rely on the assurance that his excessive-force allegations would be investigated. We make one final observation. Section 1997e(a) may prove to be irrelevant if further development of the record shows that prison officials rendered the established grievance procedures unavailable to Mr. Pavey by lending him no assistance in creating what would qualify as a written grievance while at the same time isolating him from other inmates who might have assisted him. Mr. Pavey always has insisted — and the defendants never have denied — that he was confined to his cell in pain co 2d Cir.2004) ; Mitchell v. Horn, 318 F.3d 523, 529 (3d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that threats to an inmates safety after his use of the prison grievance system supported a retaliation claim
B. holding nonexhaustion to be an affirmative defense
C. holding that district court erred in dismissing inmates complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies when court did not address inmates allegation that prison officials failed to provide necessary grievance forms
D. holding that a prisoner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies when he did not utilize grievance procedures that permitted waiver of the time limit for good cause
E. holding that defendants are estopped from raising nonexhaustion as an affirmative defense when prison officials inhibit an inmates ability to utilize grievance procedures
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.