Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(2) he claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated that the disposition of the action in his absence may (i) as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that interest or (ii) leave any of the persons already parties subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations by reason of his claimed interest. If he has not been so joined, the court shall order that he be made a party. If he should join as a plaintiff but refuses to do so, he may be made a defendant, or, in a proper case, an involuntary plaintiff. Tex.R. Civ. P. 39(a); g that it was error for the trial court not to join non-party lessors who had a financial interest in the leases and pooling agreement); Longoria, 255 S.W.3d at 183 ; Tex. Oil & Gas Corp. v. Ostrom, 638 S.W.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding trial court has discretion to require joinder of royalty interest owners whose interests will be directly and possibly adversely affected by decree in trespass to try title action
B. holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding violation was willful and substantial
C. holding that the trial court did not err in denying a plea in abatement to obtain joinder of other royalty owners in a pooled unit on grounds that the presence of the other royalty owners was not necessary to determine whether sabre pooled in bad faith and breached the terms of the lease
D. holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to require joinder of owners of nonpossessory royalty interests and possibilities of reverter in partition suit between owners of mineral leasehold estate although it would be wise to join them
E. holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the energy company defendants lessors the owners of royalty interests in the property at issue and the owners of the mineral estate in unleased part of the 9200 acres should be joined as parties if feasible
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.