Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the issue of whether a grace period, i.e., a period between the recognition of the right to obtain a marriage license and a couples' obligation to do so, might otherwise be warranted. Additionally, because marriage was .available to same-sex couples at the time of Mr. Sapp’s death, the Court does not address the parties’ respective arguments regarding the earlier availability of domestic partnership. 7 . The terms “lawful” and "valid” aré nearly synonymous in this context, and cases "tend[ ] . to use the latter term in enunciating the doctrine.” Vryonis, 202 Cal. App. 3d at 723, 248 Cal.Rptr. 807 (citations omitted). "Although ' in many situations there is little practical difference between lawful and valid," the use of the latter term "may engender confusion” in some contexts. Id . "The putative marriage doctrine protects the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the belief in a valid religious marriage is insufficient to come within the doctrine
B. holding that the test for good faith is the actual belief of the party and not the reasonableness of that belief
C. holding that the law to be applied in determining the validity of  an outofstate marriage is the law of the state in which the marriage occurred
D. recognizing doctrine
E. recognizing that basis for deportation was aliens misrepresentation about his marriage not the validity of his marriage
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.