Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of Article XVI mandates that all waivers must be in the form of a resolution, which shall be duly adopted by Defendant’s board of directors. Section D continues: The resolution shall identify the party or parties for whose benefit the waiver is granted, the transaction or transactions and the claims or classes of claim for which the waiver is granted, the property of the Corporation which may be subject to execution to satisfy any judgment which may be entered in the claim, and shall identify the court or courts in which suit against the Corporation may be brought. Any waiver shall be limited to claims arising from the acts or omissions of the Corporation, its Directors, officers, employees or agents, and shall be const ian Cmty., 138 Ariz. 378, 674 P.2d 1376, 1383 (Ariz.Ct. App.1983) ; Martinez v. S. Ute Tribe, 150 Colo. 504, 374
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that federal courts do not have jurisdiction to interpret a tribal constitution or tribal laws
B. recognizing that immunity may be waived
C. holding that tribal corporation waived immunity due to express provision within its charter allowing it to be sued in courts of competent jurisdiction
D. holding that disputes involving questions of interpretation of a tribal constitution and tribal law is not within the jurisdiction of the district court
E. holding that tribal sovereign immunity did not bar rico suit only after concluding that sue and be sued clause in tribal ordinance unequivocally expressed waiver of sovereign immunity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.