Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
deprived the defendant of a fair trial and resulted in a deprivation of the defendant’s liberty without due process of law, see People v Jones, 468 Mich 345, 354; 662 NW2d 376 (2003) (improper questioning by the prosecutor is nonconstitutional error); People v Mezy, 453 Mich 269, 285-286; 551 NW2d 389 (1996) (plurality opinion of WEAVER, J.) (applying the nonconstitutional harmless-error standard to review a claim of prosecutorial misconduct), while others hold that it constitutes constitutional error, People v Abraham, 256 Mich App 265, 272, 276; 662 NW2d 836 (2003) (“Generally, a claim of prosecutorial misconduct is a constitutional issue____”), citing People v Pfaffle, 246 Mich App 282, 288; 632 NW2d 162 (2001); but cf. People v Taylor, 159 Mich App 468, 471; 406 NW2d 859 (1987) . Thus, domestic decisions do not settle this
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a discovery exception to a statute of limitation applies only to the discovery of facts not discovery of the law
B. holding that nonconstitutional error is harmless if it did not have substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jurys verdict
C. holding that a nonconstitutional error is harmless where an appellate court has a fair assurance that the error did not substantially affect the verdict
D. holding that prosecutorial noncompliance with a discovery order is an error of nonconstitutional magnitude
E. holding that where appellant challenges a nonconstitutional error the criminal appeals reform act requires that he demonstrate that there is a reasonable possibility that the error affected the verdict
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.