Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
would result in direct and immediate hardship and would entail more than possible financial loss. " Winter, 900 F.2d at 1325. The district court found DSC’s risk of additional seizures and injunction actions “too speculative to warrant judicial intervention.” DSC claims the district court erred in failing to distinguish between the potential risks of tentative FDA policy statements and the very real liabilities imposed by a final, announced enforcement position and actual seizures. Again, DSC’s position assumes that the FDA has made a final determination as to the general status of CoQlO. In light of our rejection of DSC’s finality argument, we hold the district court correctly found that DSC failed to show sufficient hardship to require bypassing final agency 86 n. 18 (D.C.Cir.1985) . 2 . The cases are also distinguishable on the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding fda seizure action did not constitute final agency action
B. holding a rod to be final agency action
C. holding that epa action initiating permitting proceedings was not final agency action
D. holding a general prediction set forth in order does not constitute final agency action
E. holding that epa regions policy statement does not constitute final agency action because it does not compel action
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.