Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
CURIAM. AFFIRMED. DELL, C.J., and FARMER, J., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion. GLICKSTEIN, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with the majority on the merits of the action, but disagree on the award of attorneys’ fees by the trial court. As to that, I would reverse and remand with direction to apportion appellant’s responsibility for same in accordance with the interest he received. See § 64.081, Fla.Stat. (1993); Diaz v. Security Union Title Ins. Co., 639 So.2d 1004, 1006 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 649 So.2d 232 (Fla.1994) ; Daugharty v. Daugharty, 441 So.2d 1160 (Fla.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that cotenants of property each possessing a onehalf interest in property are each hable for onehalf of the attorneys fees awarded
B. holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property
C. holding imposition of constructive trust on onehalf of brothers interest in decedent mothers real property for benefit of sister was particularly appropriate where there was evidence mother had orally stated that brother and sister should share all of her property equally even though deed for real property listed brother as sole owner
D. holding party should have segregated attorneys fees for fraud claim from attorneys fees for contract claim based largely on the difference between the essential elements of each claim
E. holding that awarded fees were reasonable and that proof that attorneys fees are necessary apart from testimony as to the reasonableness of the fee is not required
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.