Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
have clarified the issue for certiorari if the court had done so here. We hold that the court of appeals did not err in declining to hear oral argument. II., REFUSAL TO ADDRESS THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT ISSUE 120 On certiorari, Brown argues that the court of appeals erred when it refused to address the merits of the trial court's grant of summary judgment and claimed Brown had not adequately briefed the issue in her initial brief. Brown claims that the merits of the summary judgment, in particu s, 105 N.C.App. 499, 415 S.E.2d 201, 203-04 (1992) (denying appellees' motion to dismiss appellants' reply brief because new issues addressed in appellants' reply brief were in response to issues raised in appel-lees' briefs); The Doctors' Co. v. The Ins. Corp. of Am., 864 P.2d 1018, 1028 (Wyo.1993) ; see also 5 Am.Jur.2d Appellate Review § 559
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding argument is waived when raised for first time in reply brief
B. holding issue first addressed in appellants reply brief was not waived because it was in response to argument first presented in appellees brief
C. holding that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is waived
D. holding that issue raised for the first time in reply brief was waived
E. holding that issue first raised in appellees brief and then answered in appellants reply brief was properly raised for review
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.