Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
extinct by mutual agreement between the parties” (citation omitted)). Moreover, Settlement Agreement I also stated that “[b]y copy of this agreement, the USPS is formally providing notification to [Plaintiff] that it is moving out of the Detroit, Michigan property on November 30, 2000.” Id. Ex. B H2 (emphasis added). Finally, the USPS’s decision to move out of the facility as of September 1999, and not using the facility thereafter, further evidences the intention of the parties to surrender the lease tenancy on November 30, 2000, not some unknown date in the future. See Gov’t Resp. To PFF H 4; see also Gov’t Resp. To PFF App. at 1-2. Third, Plaintiff argues that by retaining the keys subsequent t ank & Trust Co., 104 Ill.App.3d 636, 60 Ill.Dec. 314, 432 N.E.2d 1213, 1217-18 (Ct.1982) ; Brennan v. City of New York, 80 A.D. 251,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that it is a wellestablished rule that a tenant is estopped from denying the title of his landlord existing at the commencement of the tenancy
B. holding that where the landlord was aware the tenant had moved out a tenant who attached a lock to the door and accidentally retained the keys to the lock was not a holdover tenant
C. holding the landlord did not trespass when his agent entered the premises for the purpose of showing them to a potential tenant
D. holding that the tenant was not a holdover tenant despite retaining keys because the tenant recognized the termination of the tenancy relinquished possession of the premises and the landlord was able to gain access to the property
E. recognizing the general rule that the landlord is not liable for dangerous conditions existing once the tenant takes possession of the premises
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.