Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
invasion, and Issa’s blood found on a wooden fence slat in the back yard of the subject home, Issa’s counsel argued in his closing that his client went with others to the victims’ home but abandoned the robbery plan, was then shot by one of the other perpetrators, and remained in the back yard for some time after being wounded. And in a further effort to explain why all three victims testified that the perpetrator who struggled with C. D. was shot, Issa’s counsel posited that this unknown perpetrator faked being wounde r v. State, 293 Ga. 282, 283 (745 SE2d 646) (2013) (punctuation omitted); accord Gordon v. State, 334 Ga. App. 633, 634 (780 SE2d 376) (2015). 61 Gordon, 334 Ga. App. at 634 (punctuation omitted); see McNair, 293 Ga. at 283 (noting that the rule of 7 5 SE2d 187) (2015)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the defendant was guilty of leaving the scene because the injured party and a police officer were present at the scene within a reasonable time after the accident
B. holding counsels failure to object to victim impact testimony and evidence was not ineffective assistance of counsel when the trial record was silent as to counsels strategy
C. holding that trial counsels strategy of explaining that defendant was at the scene of crime to deal drugs rather than commit robbery was not unreasonable
D. holding that trial counsels decision to submit evidence to the jury that his confession was coerced rather than submitting the evidence to the judge in a motion to suppress was a matter of trial strategy and thus did not constitute ineffective assistance
E. holding that counsels failure to object or request a limiting instruction for evidence of defendants incarceration was sound trial strategy
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.