Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Bay Boot-ery account. D. In or about July, 1995, Michael caused Thomas Lazarus of Federated Insurance Company to mail an approved estimate, authorizing the payment of over $27,000 for repairs to a late model Mercedes to Finish Line Too in Garden City Park. E. On or about July 10, 1995, Michael caused Federal Insurance Company to issue and send through the mail a check payable to Bristol Manor in the amount of $27,796.37 for repairs to a Mercedes Benz automobile. F. The defendants used or caused to used the mails on numerous other occasions, the precise dates of which are presently unknown. Compl. ¶ 87. Reviewing these allegations as a whole the Court finds that Zigman has sufficiently pled a single instance of mail fraud sufficient to support a RICO claim. See Altman, 48 F.3d at 103 . In paragraph A, Zigman alleges that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding a defendant may be convicted of mail fraud if he knowingly and willfully participates in a fraudulent scheme created and set in motion by others
B. holding that the first element of mail fraud  knowing participation in a scheme to defraud  can extend beyond the specific mailing and that the loss calculation for a mail fraud conviction may include any loss from the fraudulent scheme that the mailing furthered
C. recognizing that where the looting is complete before the mailing is made a claim for mail fraud will not lie
D. recognizing that a mailing must be sufficiently related to the fraudulent scheme to support a charge of mail fraud
E. holding that mailing of titleregistration forms satisfied mailing requirement because they contributed to success of the scheme
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.