Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
retain jurisdiction. 1 413 U.S. 433, 93 S.Ct. 2523, 37 L.Ed.2d 706 (1973). 2 626 F.3d 170 (3d Cir.2010). Ray was decided after the motion judge denied defendant’s suppression motion. 3 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). 4 Officer Sztukowski testified that eight officers and police cars appeared at defendant’s home, and Officer D'Onofrio testified that four or five officers met him at the home. 5 See State v. Stott, 171 N.J. 343, 361, 794 A.2d 120 (2002) (stating that for community caretaker exception to apply police must be totally divorced from their criminal investigation responsibilities but citing to cases and factual circumstances applying the emergency aid exception); State v. Garbin, 325 N.J.Super. 521, 525-27, 739 A.2d 1016 (App.Div. 1999) , certif. denied, 164 N.J. 560, 753 A.2d 1153
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing emergency exception
B. recognizing exception
C. holding that community caretaker exception applied but citing and relying on cases discussing the emergency aid exception
D. recognizing the  community caretaker or public safety1 doctrine as an exception to the warrant requirement
E. recognizing that the community caretaking exception is distinct from the emergency aid or emergency assistance exception to the fourth amendment warrant requirement
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.