Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moody has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED * We do not address Moody’s illegal vehicle stop claim as this claim is raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that absent exceptional circumstances arguments not raised before the bankruptcy court in the first instance are waived
B. holding that issues raised for first time on appeal generally will not be considered absent exceptional circumstances of plain error or fundamental miscarriage of justice
C. holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal are generally waived absent exceptional circumstances
D. holding claims raised for first time on appeal will not be considered absent exceptional circumstances
E. holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered absent exceptional circumstances of plain error or fundamental miscarriage of justice
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.