Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Board as an aid to Board deliberation. Id. at 177, 95 S.Ct. 1491. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court held that the reports had not been adopted or incorporated by the Board, as “the evidence utterly fails to support the conclusion that the reasoning in the reports is adopted by the Board as its reasoning, even when it agrees with the conclusion of a report....” Id. at 184, 95 S.Ct. 1491. Certainly, in situations like Grumman, where an agency, having reviewed a subordinate’s non-binding recommendation, makes a “yes or no” determination without providing any reasoning at all, a court may not infer that the agency is relying on the reasoning contained in the subordinate’s report. See Casad v. United States Dep’t of Health and Human Servs., 301 F.3d 1247, 1252-53 (10th Cir.2002) ; Afshar v. Dep’t of State, 702 F.2d 1125, 1143
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that police report of witnesss statement was inadmissible because witness had not adopted report as accurate when matter was fresh in his memory
B. holding an agency could not use a policy found in a departments employee manual as the rule of law to determine a contested issue because the agency never adopted a rule containing such a policy
C. holding that expert report addressing hospitals conduct was not required when plaintiffs sole theory against hospital was vicarious liability based on ostensible agency and explaining that the conduct by the hospital on which the agency relationship depends is not measured by a medical standard of care these are principles of agency law on which no expert report is required
D. holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to exclude an agency finding of no discrimination on the ground that the report would suggest to the jury that it should reach the same conclusion as the agency
E. holding that a report relied upon by agency in determining whether or not to award a grant had not been adopted as there is no indication in the record that in funding the  grant the agency expressly adopted the reasoning of the report
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.