Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
First, she must come forward with evidence either of past persecution or of a well-founded fear of future persecution. See Tamas-Mercea, 222 F.3d at 423. Second, she also must show that the persecution she endured (or is likely to endure in the future) was on account of her race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion. See id. “Persecution encompasses more than threats to life or freedom; non-life threatening violence and physical abuse also fall within this category.” Id. at 424. However, to sustain an asylum application, the conduct “must rise above mere harassment.” Roman, 233 F.3d at 1034. This court has recognized that actions such as “detention, arrest, interrogation, prosecution, imprisonment, illegal searches, confiscation of propert . Furthermore, we cannot say that the evidence
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that having to report to the police being subject to regular questioning and surveillance and having difficulty finding employment can reasonably be characterized as mere harassment
B. holding that the employment of some noncivil servants can properly be characterized as noncommercial
C. holding that defendant waived any objection to the accuracy of the presentence report by failing to object after having been given ample opportunity to do so
D. holding that an ex post facto claim can only be successful if the law can be characterized as punishment in the constitutional sense
E. holding that the existence and content of a police report are not properly the subject of judicial notice
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.