Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
issue on the merits. 3 . In her Respondent’s brief, Quick relies on this court’s opinion in Kolb v. Cook, 284 S.C. 598, 602, 327 S.E.2d 379, 382 (Ct.App.1985), in which we held a tort claimant seeking to recover damages from sources other than the distributable or distributed assets of the probate estate does not need to file a verified claim or account with the personal representative of the deceased tortfeasor. Quick asserts the funds from the UGMA account were not a distributable asset of the probate estate because she has a vested title in the proceeds from account and she is entitled to a constructive trust. While we find this argument intriguing, we decline to consider it on appeal. See I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant, 338 S.C. 406, 420 n. 9, 526 S.E.2d 716, 723 n. 9 (2000) . 4 . In light of our disposition herein, we
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that an appellate court reviews a trial courts decision whether or not to grant equitable relief only for an abuse of discretion
B. holding that it was within the trial courts discretion to refuse any additional discovery and that the courts refusal to allow additional discovery was not an abuse of discretion
C. holding that such a decision was within the trial courts discretion
D. holding trial courts findings of fact inadequate to facilitate effective appellate review and reversing decision after independent review of record
E. holding when reversing a lower courts decision it is within an appellate courts discretion as to whether to address any additional sustaining grounds
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.