Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
conflation of state procedural requirements and the 48-hour period during which a probable cause determination should be made for warrantless arrests, with the entirely independent substantive due process right to an initial appearance. Moreover, even assuming the City maintained a policy that resulted in individuals not being afforded initial appearances in a manner compliant with the Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure, plaintiff concedes that all new detainees who were not released on bond would be brought to Municipal Court, held on most Thursdays. All reported cases finding liability for violation of the substantive due process right to which plaintiff points have involved significantly longer periods of detention without an initial appearance. E.g., Hayes, 388 F.3d at 674-75 ; Armstrong, 152 F.3d at 577-79 (fifty-seven
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that continued detention violated due process where a moratorium on removals to haiti in the aftermath of an earthquake rendered the petitioners detention indefinite
B. holding thirtyeight day preappearance detention violated due process
C. holding that juvenile pretrial detention implicates due process rights
D. holding that detention of approximately eight months violated due process
E. holding thirty day detention beyond the expiration of a sentence constitutes a deprivation of due process
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.