Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Washington state prisoner Craig F. Weighall appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a grant of summary judgment. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment because Weighall did not raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the defendants’ chosen course of treatment of his amputation site was medically unacceptable. See id. at 1058 . AFFIRMED. ** This disposition is not
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a difference of medical opinion was insufficient as a matter of law to establish deliberate indifference
B. holding that deliberate indifference to a serious medical need establishes an eighth amendment violation
C. holding that a sentence of incarceration would constitute deliberate indifference to defendants medical needs
D. holding that a difference of opinion about the best course of medical treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference
E. holding that disagreement with a doctors judgment does not support a claim of deliberate indifference
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.