Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Plaintiffs have not specifically alleged which representations they saw, heard, or read, Plaintiffs have not sufficiently pled which affirmations or promises formed the “basis of their bargain.” Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted as to Plaintiffs’ express warranty claim. 2. Breach of Warranty Defendants contend that Plaintiffs have failed to allege that Defendants breached any express or implied warranty. Defendants argue that Plaintiffs failed to allege that the Products did not work for them or that they suffered any injury arising from use of the products. The Court is not persuaded by Defendants’ argument. Although Plaintiffs have not alleged sufficient facts regarding the express promises and affirmations of fact made by Defendants, the gist of their , at *14 . The cases cited by Defendants are
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the plaintiff failed to allege breach of a valid and enforceable contract but stated a claim for promissory estoppel
B. holding that plaintiff stated a claim for breach of contract when it alleged the government failed to purchase insurance for plaintiff as agreed by contract
C. holding that plaintiff stated a claim for breach of express warranty where plaintiff alleged that align did not have proven digestive health benefits as advertised by procter  gamble and was nothing but sugarfilled capsules injected with a small amount of unremarkable bacteria
D. holding plaintiff lacked standing to challenge small business status of awardee because plaintiff was not a small business
E. holding that although the express warranty claim was not federally preempted the plaintiff had not alleged sufficient facts for the claim to survive dismissal under rule 8 where the pjlaintiff alleged no facts demonstrating that defendants made any affirmations specifically to plaintiff or her physician so as to form the basis of the bargain
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.