Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
618, 564 N.E.2d 1280, 1290-92 (1990). 35 . Id., 151 Ill.Dec. 618, 564 N.E.2d at 1292-93. 36 . Koenig v. McCarthy Const. Co., 344 Ill.App. 93, 100 N.E.2d 338, 340 (1951). 37 . 1999 Ill. Legis. Serv. P.A. 91-524 (S.B.458) (West) (Public Act 91-524, Medical Practice— Automatic External Defibrillator Act). 38 . TRW Inc. v. Andrews, 534 U.S. 19, 31, 122 S.Ct. 441, 151 L.Ed.2d 339 (2001). 39 . Allegis Realty Investors v. Novak, 223 Ill.2d 318, 307 Ill.Dec. 592, 860 N.E.2d 246, 252-55 (2006). 40 . 511 U.S. 244, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 128 L.Ed.2d 229 (1994). 41 . 5 Ill. Comp. Stat. 70/4 (1998). 42 . Allegis Realty Investors, 307 Ill.Dec. 592, 860 N.E.2d at 253. 43 . Id. 44 . The Illinois Good Samaritan Act also provides an exemption from civil liability for those using AE p.2d 802 (N.D.Ill.2005) . In Muno v. Condell Medical Center, 383
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the fact that the insurance agents perform functions that are an essential part of the companys normal operations is a decisive factor
B. holding that evidence of prior similar act was not relevant for the purpose of proving doctors negligence in performing operation at issue on particular occasion
C. holding that the samaritan act does not immunize doctors from suit when they are performing their normal job functions
D. holding that qualified immunity extends to government officials performing discretionary functions
E. holding advice of counsel does not per se immunize a person from a malicious prosecution suit
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.