Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the late arraignment or from any defect in the arraignment colloquy itself. Therefore, he has shown no violation of Idaho Criminal Rule 10 and no deprivation of due process in the arraignment that was conducted. Herrera also asserts that the district court erred by allowing the late filing of the amended information. His appellate argument implies that until the day of trial, he was entirely unaware that the amended information containing a persistent violator al legation had been filed by the prosecutor without leave of court. In the proceedings below, defense counsel never expressly said that he had not informed Herrera of the sentence enhancement allegation in the amended information that had been improperly filed months earlier. Herrera neverthel P.3d 397, 399-400 (Ct.App.2008) . Herrera has shown no trial prejudice
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the defendants due process rights were violated when the trial judge singled out the only defense witness and indicated to that witness that he expected the witness to he and would personally ensure that the witness was prosecuted for perjury and thereby effectively drove that witness off the stand
B. holding that the state courts determination that the petitioner could not show prejudice because he did not allege that the witness was available to testify was a reasonable application of federal law to the facts of the case
C. holding that the governments late disclosure of a statement by a government witness did not require reversal under the jencks act where the defendants were allowed a second chance to crossexamine the witness
D. holding that reversal for late disclosure of a states witness requires trial prejudice and defendants claim that he turned down an attractive plea offer because he thought the state could not prove its case without the witness does not demonstrate prejudice
E. holding that prejudice existed when an attorney was both the trial counsel and a necessary witness
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.