Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
it required to credit their opinions over other evidence that was relevant to her medical condition. See id. Because, as the district court decided, Ms. Atkins’ “evidence was not thorough enough to be considered reliable,” Aplt. App., Vol. 3 at 890, and the additional medical evidence she submitted “did not meet the degree of specificity [she] had been advised was required,” id. at 891, Sedgwick gave proper weight to Dr. Shadid’s and Ms. Burrows’ opinions. Sedgwick’s reliance on its consulting doctors’ paper review of the medical records of Dr. Shadid and Ms. Burrows was not, under the circumstances presented here, arbitrary and capricious. See Hufford v. Harris Corp., 322 F.Supp.2d 1345, 1359 (M.D.Fla.2004); see also Davis v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., 444 F.3d 569, 577 (7th Cir.2006) , cert. denied, No. 06-70, 2006 WL 2007574
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that review of medical history during an examination assisted doctors medical conclusions
B. recognizing it is common and reasonable for doctors to examine medical records and arrive at professional opinions
C. holding that expert report that sufficiently addressed certain claims against doctor employed by professional association was sufficient as to claims against professional association based on doctors negligence because the doctors negligence is imputed to the association under the professional association act
D. holding that an employer must permit cpa to examine employers records
E. holding that a patients settlement of a prior action brought against him by doctors for payment of a bill did not bar medical malpractice action against doctors
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.