Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Article 78.” (citing N.Y. Pub. Off. Law § 89)). Accordingly, plaintiffs claim that defendant Pickering violated FOIL will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Section 1983. 7. First Amendment Mail Interference The First Amendment protects an inmate’s right to send and receive both legal and nonlegal mail, although prison officials may regulate that right if the restrictions they employ are “ ‘reasonably related to legitimate penological interests.’ ” Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 U.S. 401, 409, 109 S.Ct. 1874, 104 L.Ed.2d 459 (1989) (quoting Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89, 107 S.Ct. 2254, 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987)); see also Johnson v. Goord, 445 F.3d 532, 534 (2d Cir.2006)  (citation omitted). Legal mail is entitled to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that prisoners do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cells
B. holding that routine monitoring and recording of the calls of convicted prisoners does not violate the prisoners fourth amendment rights
C. holding that even capital prisoners have no constitutional right to counsel in habeas cases
D. recognizing a first amendment right to receive mail subject to uniform policies of opening mail to ensure prison security
E. holding that prisoners do have a right  albeit a limited one  to send and receive mail
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.