Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
July 6, 2011) (characterizing database keyword searching as the nontaxable “ESI equivalent of having a room full of reviewers physically review paper documents”); Race Tires, 674 F.3d at 170 (approving of cases “recognizing] that gathering, preserving, processing, searching, culling and extracting ESI simply do not amount to ‘making copies’ ”). To be sure, it may be more or even most convenient for a producing party to create a database of ESI. But activities undertaken only “for the convenience of counsel are not taxable.” Gupta v. Walt Disney World Co., No. 6:05-cv-1432-Orl-22UAM, 2007 WL 2002454, at *3 (M.D.Fla. July 5, 2007) (citing Helms v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 808 F.Supp. 1568, 1570 (N.D.Ga.1992), aff'd, 998 F.2d 1023 (11th Cir.1993) (table)); see CBT Flint, 737 F.3d at 1330 . Defendants are not entitled to an award of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that producing party need only make requested documents available for inspection and need not pay for copying costs
B. holding that copying costs are taxable if they are necessary to make copies of information required to be produced and not incurred just to make copies for the convenience of the producing party
C. holding that where the defendants  107 claim was based on remediation costs they incurred and may incur in the future as the result of a lawsuit instituted under  107a they did not demonstrate that they incurred necessary costs of response within the meaning of  107a
D. holding that courier and messenger costs are not taxable costs
E. holding that travel and visa costs are incurred by guestworkers for the primary benefit and convenience of their employer and thus are not other facilities that can be counted as wage credits pursuant to 29 usc  203m
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.