Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
firearms in Razzano were pursuant to a department policy rather than in connection with a court order. Razzano, 765 F.Supp.2d at 185. 7 . To the extent that the Defendants instead refer to Panzella's state-law claims, those claims cannot serve as a basis of jurisdiction, This is because the Defendants did not seek immunity from suit on those claims, and hence cannot seek an interlocutory appeal from the denial of immunity. 8 . The County also argues that its adherence to New York law regarding the treatment of the firearms did not constitute a "policy” as required for a county to be liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pursuant to Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S, 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). See Vives v. N.Y.C., 524 F.3d 346, 353-56, 358 (2d Cir. 2008) . Leaving aside the fact that we are here
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a city manager was the final policymaker for purposes of section 1983 liability because of provisions in the norfolk city code requiring that all orders rules and regulations applicable to the entire police department must be approved by the city manager other than some police standard operating procedures
B. holding that a jurys finding that a city had delegated its final policymaking authority in the area of law enforcement to a city police chief was supported by the evidence and warranted imposing liability upon the city
C. holding that citys enforcement of the entire state penal code would not constitute a city policy because the city was required to follow state law
D. holding that a city may be held liable on account of the unconstitutional conduct of city officials only if the citys policy or custom played a part in the violation
E. holding that city attorneys promise in an oral settlement agreement for city to annex and rezone land was within the legal authority of the city of joliet to accomplish and were not absolutely void acts per se therefore city could be estopped from avoiding enforcement of contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.