Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
defense of her Indian status, and should not be considered for any purpose on appeal. Even so, these offenses show nothing pertinent because, for all we know, they are not even Bruce’s and we have no way of knowing whether tribal jurisdiction was contested or conceded. 2 . United States v. Rogers, 45 U.S. 567, 4 How. 567, 11 L.Ed. 1105 (1846). 3 . See Keys, 103 F.3d at 761(stating that lack of enrollment of two-year old who had been treated as member of the tribe by the tribe and her parents does not control determination of her Indian status); United States v. Broncheau, 597 F.2d 1260, 1263 (9th Cir. 1979) (upholding § 1153 indictment that charged defendant as an Indian against challenge that it was deficient for failing also to charge that he was enrolled as enrollment th Cir.1976) ; United States v. Heath, 509 F.2d 16, 19 (9th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that evidence of having filed an application for enrollment in the yurok tribe and previous entry on the pawnee tribal roll and the fact that defendants had held themselves out to be indians within the meaning of  1153 established indian status under  1153
B. holding that a tribe had the inherent authority to prosecute a nonmember indian for assaulting a tribal member while on the reservation and that federal assault charges stemming from the same incident and filed after the nonmembers tribal assault conviction were based on a separate power source and therefore  did not violate the double jeopardy clause
C. holding that there was no constitutional problem because defendants were not subjected to federal criminal jurisdiction under  1153 on account of their indian race but because they are enrolled members of the coeur dalene tribe
D. holding that indian tribes could only exercise criminal jurisdiction over tribal members and not other indians
E. holding that alleged victim was nonindian given that she was not an enrolled member of the oglala sioux tribe or any other tribe and wasnt eligible for enrollment because she had not completed the requirements for tribal enrollment the medical services she had received from the indian health service were not in her own right the fact that the oglala sioux tribe had taken custody and placed the victim under the care of her grandmother an enrolled member was too insignificant an involvement to show tribal recognition as the victim was not enrolled or eligible for enrollment and she did not attend powwows indian dances or other indian cultural events and lived offreservation except for a brief period before she was abused
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.