Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
an indictment which tracks the statutory language is sufficient. Id. Here, manner and means was not included in the statute; therefore, it was not required to be included in the indictment. The indictment alleged the elements of the offense and was sufficient. See Flores, 33 S.W.3d at 919 (concluding an information was defective because while the statute set forth manner and means, the information did not). Appellant appears to argue here that the State did not sufficiently identify how he “held himself out as a lawyer,” rendering the indictment defective. We hold that the words of the statute itself are not of “indeterminate or variable meaning” and, thus, tracking the statute was sufficient. See Nix v. State, 401 S.W.3d 656, 663 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, pet. refd) ; Cf. State v. Barbernell, 257 S.W.3d 248, 254,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an allegation as to the time of the offense is not an essential element of the offense charged in the indictment and within reasonable time limits proof of any date before the return of the indictment and within the statute of limitations is sufficient
B. holding indictment sufficient where the crux of the offense was not being a physician licensed to practice medicine in the state because defendant could reasonably prepare his case without further description of how he handled the affairs of his medical clinic
C. holding that an indictment gave sufficient notice when the indictment charged the elements of the offense
D. holding defendant not prejudiced by allowing the state to amend its indictment because he had more than adequate time to prepare his defense
E. holding that it is elementary that an indictment under the us constitution shall advise the accused of the nature and cause of the accusation against him in order that he may meet the accusation and prepare for his trial and that after judgment he may be able to plead the record and judgment in bar of further prosecution for the same offense
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.