Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the law was passed, as the processes of manufacture had been conducted, color was an approximate, or general indication of quality. Suppose this to be so, does it derogate from the fact that color was the standard which Congress, with the lights which it had, saw fit to adopt? Does it not tend to fortify that fact? If it be found by experience that the standard is a fallacious one, can the executive department supply the defects of the legislation? Congress alone has the authority to levy duties. Its will alone is to be sought. Id. at 700. In this case, Congress has provided a clear and unambiguous test: the quantity of soluble non-sugar solids. Following the Supreme Court in Merritt, this Court will not disturb Congress’ will. Furthermore v. United States, 32 C.C.P.A. 175, 184 (1945) ; Robert G. Lynch Co. v. United States, 49
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that with respect to the eaja the local or national market rate for legal services cannot be a special factor used to increase the rate beyond the statutory rate
B. holding that the proper rate for prejudgment interest is the rate fixed by the parties in a contract
C. holding that once a rate is filed with the appropriate agency except for review of the agencys orders the courts can assume no right to a different rate on that ground that in its opinion it is the only or the more reasonable rate
D. holding that mixing just enough cotton with wool to secure a lower rate of duty with no valid commercial purpose for the addition was within the importers legal right
E. holding that the addition of a enough cereal to dog food to place it in a tariff provision with a lower rate of duty was within the importers right to fashion merchandise to obtain a lower rate of duty
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.