Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(and other cell phones in the area) to identify the phone to the network for authentication. That process would be repeated at different locations until the target cell-phone number was identified— here, that included the identification of several prepaid cell phones subscribed to in fictitious names using a post office box address in California. Defendants assert that the identification information was obtained “illegally” — and therefore evidence derived from that infor mation should be suppressed — because the use of a cell-site simulator to capture “autonomously” transmitted information could not be authorized under the pen-registe e itself provide for the suppression of evidence as a remedy for its violation. See United States v. Thompson, 936 F.2d 1249, 1250-51 (11th Cir. 1991) . We agree with the district court that use of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding suppression is not a remedy for violation of vienna convention under federal law
B. holding that the appropriate remedy for a public trial violation was a new suppression hearing not a new trial because the remedy should be appropriate to the violation
C. holding that the fourth amendment remedy sought is suppression
D. holding suppression not available remedy for violation of 18 usc  1321 et seq
E. holding that suppression of the evidence or dismissal of an indictment are not required to remedy a violation of  6103
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.