Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
position on what constitutes "examined.” 6 . According to Citrix’s invalidity expert Dr. Jeffay, the name "ReadMe” was a play on the Alice in Wonderland story, in which Alice confronts magical treats labeled "Eat Me” and "Drink Me.” 7 . However, courts have found software manuals to be sufficiently enabling. See Microstrategy Inc. v. Bus. Objects Americas, 410 F.Supp.2d 348, 362-63 (D.Del.2006), aff'd, 238 Fed.Appx. 605 (Fed.Cir.2007) ("manuals are themselves prior art and provide clear and convincing evidence sufficient to support a conclusion of invalidity”). 8 . Because the Court will limit its analysis to prior public use, Pixion's reliance on cases concerned only with prior publication is unavailing. See e.g. Net MoneyIN, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc., 545 F.3d 1359, 1369 (Fed.Cir.2008) . 9 . See also Interconnect Planning Corp. v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding prior publication must not only disclose all elements of the claim within the four corners of the document but must also disclose those elements arranged as in the claim internal citations omitted
B. holding that the elements of a hostile work environment claim are the same across discrimination contexts and applying those elements specifically to the age discrimination in employment act
C. holding that apprendi leaves undisturbed the principle that while the prosecution must indeed prove all the elements of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt the legislation creating the offense can place the burden of proving affirmative defenses on the defendant internal citations omitted
D. holding that the creditor must prove the elements of actual fraud
E. holding that the plaintiffs failure to meet any one of the elements requires dismissal of claim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.