Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
reflected in Document 00813. The 00813 rates similarly do not prohibit a contractor’s payment of higher wages to his employees. After a dispute arose about the switch, in a letter sent to Mor-ganti, the City wrote that it would reimburse the Hobby Airport contractors and subcontractors for variances between the 00812 rate and the 00813 rate. In response to the letter, Morganti requested the difference between the rates on behalf of itself and its subcontractors, including SES. The City denied the claim. It took the position that the switch to the 00813 rate did not harm Morganti and SES because none of their employees received a wage increase due to the switch. SES’s presiden , No. 14-04-00120-CV, 2006 WL 176862, at *3 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 26, 2006, no pet.) (mem. op.) . 2) Analysis Here, SES maintains that it
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plaintiffs failure to allege citizenship of first defendant did not constitute good cause for second defendants failure to timely join in removal petition
B. holding that plaintiffs failure to notify attorney of receipt of right to sue letter and failure to confirm that the attorney had received the letter did not warrant the application of equitable tolling
C. holding that defendants failure to disclose sublease did not cause breachofcontract damages because plaintiffs deal fell through for reasons independent of failure to notify plaintiff
D. holding breachofcontract claim was preempted
E. holding that plaintiffs failure to secure financing for deal caused its damages rather than any action by defendant in breach of contract claim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.