Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service .... 47 U.S.C. § 230 (1998) (bold emphasis added). In the leading case on Section 230 immunity, the federal Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Zeran v. Am. Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir.1997), noted that: By its plain language, § 230 creates a federal immunity to any cause of action that would make service providers liable for information originating with a third-party user of the service. Specifically, § 230 precludes courts from entertaining claims that would place a computer service provider in a publisher’s role. Thus, lawsuits seeking to hold a service provider liable for its exerci 206 F.3d 980, 984-86 (10th Cir.2000) . And even those courts which have not
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an online dating service provider was not liable when an unidentified party posted a false online profile for a popular actress leading her to receive sexually explicit phone calls letters and faxes at home
B. holding that a defamation claim based on statements in a written disciplinary notice was preempted
C. holding that a provider of software and hardware was not an information provider and thus could not be charged with negligent misrepresentation
D. holding that online service provider was immune from defamation claim based on inaccurate stock information
E. holding that a defamation claim is a personal injury tort claim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.