Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and (5) violated section 546.001 of the transportation code, which permits proceeding past a red light “after slowing as necessary for safe operation.” See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 546.001. In his deposition testimony, Price was asked the basis for his conclusion that Hallett violated section 546.001. Price responded, “[sjolely the fact that another car hit him.” Price stated that Hallett failed to properly clear the intersection before entering, but declined to characterize such conduct as “reckless.” Price agreed that an officer has a responsibility to refrain from entering an intersection against t states that Hallett failed to exercise due caution by disregarding the red light and that he should not have entered the intersection until he was certain t .App. LEXIS 2286, at **12-14 . We hold that Garrett’s statements are
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding written reprimand stating that officer failed to exercise due care and failed to comply with transportation code did not raise fact issue on reckless disregard
B. holding that defendant failed to raise a constitutional issue at trial and thus waived appellate review of that issue
C. holding that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion by stating that it did not have the ability to present the transcript to the jury
D. holding that defendant failed to raise a constitutional issue at trial and thus failed to preserve the issue for appellate review
E. holding officers failure to adhere to policy requiring emergency vehicles to come to complete stop and failure to remember looking both ways before entering intersection did not raise fact issue as to whether officer acted in conscious indifference to or reckless disregard for safety of others
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.