Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of a complaint’s factual allegations. Id. In re DeLorean Motor Co., 991 F.2d 1236, 1240 (6th Cir.1993). Accordingly, to determine whether a complaint should be dismissed for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), this Court must examine the applicable substantive law and the facts alleged in the plaintiffs complaint. Preliminary Injunction Standard To determine whether to grant a preliminary injunction, a district court must consider: (1) the plaintiffs likelihood of success on the merits; (2) whether the plaintiff may suffer irreparable harm absent the injunction; (3) whether granting the injunction will cause substantial harm to others; and, (4) the impact of an injunction upon the public interest. Deja Vu of Nashville, Inc. v. Metro. 78 F.3d 1111, 1123 (6th Cir.1996) . The essence of this standard is “whether the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that trademark infringement under michigan common law is governed by the likelihood of confusion standard
B. holding that concurrent use of same mark on similar product was sufficient to demonstrate a likelihood of confusion
C. holding that as in an action alleging infringement of a mark likelihood of confusion is the essence of an unfair competition claim
D. holding that the use of the shoneys name over any subsidiary product line mark  reduces the likelihood of confusion
E. holding that even several isolated incidents of actual confusion are insufficient to support a finding of likelihood of confusion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.