Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
evidence was sufficient to support Rawlins’s convictions for first-degree aggravated rape and child abuse. However, the Superior Court committed constitutional error in permitting the People to read the prior testimony of J.J. and Melendez into the record at Rawlins’s second trial because the Superior Court erred in finding that they were unavailable for purposes of the Confrontation Clause. Further, this Court cannot hold that this error was harmless since the People failed to file a brief in this case, thus failing to meet its burden of showing that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, we vacate the Superior Court’s January 16, 2014 judgment and remand for a new trial. 2 See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 53-54, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 158 L. Ed. 2d 177 (2004) . 3 Prior to reading JJ.’s and Melendez’s
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that testimonial hearsay statements of a witness who does not appear at trial are inadmissible under the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment unless the witness is unavailable to testify and the defendant has had a prior opportunity to crossexamine the witness
B. holding that testimonial evidence is admissible only if the declarant is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to crossexamine the declarant
C. holding that the confrontation clause bars admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless the witness was unavailable to testify and the defendant had a prior opportunity for crossexamination
D. holding that the admission of testimonial statements against a defendant is unconstitutional when the declarant does not appear at trial unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity for crossexamination
E. holding that an absent witnesss statements are admissible under the confrontation clause only where the declarant is unavailable and only where the defendant   had a prior opportunity to crossexamine
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.