Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Before the February, 1977, Lynchburg Grand Jury, 563 F.2d 652, 655 (4th Cir.1977); In re the Grand Jury Empaneled January 21, 1975, 536 F.2d 1009, 1011 (3d Cir.1976); In re Gopman, 531 F.2d 262, 265 (5th Cir.1976); In re Investigation Before the April 1975 Grand Jury, 531 F.2d 600, 605 n. 8 (D.C.Cir.1976). However, all of these cases come from an era when disqualification orders were widely presumed to be immediately appealable. See generally Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 496 F.2d 800, 804-05 (2d Cir.1974) (en banc) (collecting cases). Since then, the Supreme Court has refused to allow interlocutory appeals in every disqualification case that has come before it. See Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Roller, 472 U.S. 424, 430, 105 S.Ct. 2757, 86 L.Ed.2d 340 (1985) ; Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 270,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an order disqualifying counsel in a civil case is not a final judgment
B. holding that final judgment in a criminal case means sentence
C. holding that an order not denominated a judgment is not final for purposes of appeal
D. holding that an order authorizing a sale is a final judgment
E. holding that a district court judgment is not a final judgment appealable by the defendant unless it includes the final adjudication and the final sentence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.