Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and assent of the parties “perform[s] a cautionary function whereby the parties’ acceptance is considered and deliberate.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). Aguiar further contends that the settlement judgment entered in the dis trict court is unlawful because it constitutes a waiver of his Title VII rights that is not knowing and voluntary. He argues that the settlement judgment waives his rights because it restricts him to bringing certain claims before Magistrate Judge Katz for the next two years, and then bars him from bringing those claims at all after two years. The agreement to bring claims in a particular forum, however, is not a waiver of Aguiar’s Title VII remedies and is enforceable. See 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1456, 1469, 173 L.Ed.2d 398 (2009) . Further, we do not read the settlement
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that age discrimination claim was subject to compulsory arbitration
B. holding that claims arising under the age discrimination in employment act may be subject to arbitration
C. holding that the faa requires arbitration of age discrimination claims when a valid arbitration agreement exists
D. recognizing parties right by contact or agreement to submit or to agree to submit controversies to arbitration 
E. holding that an agreement to submit age discrimination claims to arbitration does not constitute a waiver
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.