Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
CURIAM. Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of his complaint for declaratory judgment challenging the constitutionality of the term “disorderly conduct” contained in Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-601.314, § 9-17. We affirm the trial court’s ruling because the term is not vague or overbroad. See Smith v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 799 So.2d 319, 319 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) ; D.L.B. v. State, 707 So.2d 844, 845 (Fla. 2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding va code  182460a is not unconstitutionally vague
B. holding  3631 not vague or overbroad
C. holding  241 not vague or overbroad
D. holding that the prohibition against fighting in fla admin code r 33601314  24 was not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad
E. holding factor b is not unconstitutionally vague
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.