Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
divide the marital property. Moreover, the evidence sustains the trial court’s finding of “no real disparity in earnings” between the parties during the marriage. The wife has faded to demonstrate error in the failure of the trial court to reserve jurisdiction to award her periodic alimony in the future. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. AFFIRMED. THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, THOMAS, and DONALDSON, JJ„ concur. 1 . The wife also argues that the husband reported the income received from his operation of the restaurant on the parties' joint tax return. However, the evidence is undisputed that the husband does not own any part of the restaurant property, which solely belongs to his mother. See Bonner v. Bonner, 170 So.3d 697 (Ala.Civ.App.2015) . 2 . Section 30-2-51(b) provides that, subject
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding the family court has jurisdiction to join third parties when property is alleged to be marital but is owned by a third party
B. holding that the beneficiary of a trust was not the real party in interest regarding rights owned by the trust
C. holding that forfeiture of real property may be adjudicated before the seizure occurs because real property cannot abscond
D. holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property
E. holding that trial court cannot divide real property owned solely by third party witness
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.