Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Machete called Machete Kills, that the Program is unconstitutional because it violates rights protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. See Machete Productions, L.L.C. v. Page, 809 F.3d 281 (5th Cir.2015). The court held that because the Program statutes and regulations made clear that grants were discretionary, Machete Productions could not demonstrate that it had a clearly established right to the grant funds such .that it had a property interest in a Program grant that triggered the Due Process Clause. Id. at 290. The court also held that the Program's statutes and regulations were not unconstitutionally vague. Id. (citing National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569, 588-89, 118 S. Ct. 2168, 141 L.Ed.2d 500 (1998) ). 14 . Because of our disposition of Machete's
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the due process clause protects only those liberty interests created by the state
B. holding that montana constitutions equal protection clause protects against arbitrary and discriminate state action 
C. holding that when the consequences of the conviction are not severe and imminent an appeal is moot when the judgment is voluntarily satisfied
D. holding that while due process clause protects against arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement of vague standards when government is acting as patron rather than as sovereign the consequences of imprecision are not constitutionally severe
E. holding that the due process clause protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.