Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
F.2d 1287, 1296 (D.C.Cir. 1980)); see also Time, Inc. v. Firestone, 424 U.S. 448, 454, 96 S.Ct. 958, 47 LEd.2d 154 (1976). [7] 7. Lerman v. Flynt Distrib. Co., 745 F.2d 123, 136-37 (2d Cir.1984) (relying on Gertz, 418 U.S. at 351-52, 94 S.Ct. 2997; Time, Inc., 424 U.S. at 454-55, 96 S.Ct. 958; Wolston v. Reader's Digest Ass'n, 443 U.S. 157, 166, 99 S.Ct. 2701, 61 L.Ed.2d 450 (1979); Hutchinson v. Proxmire, 443 U.S. 111, 135-36, 99 S.Ct. 2675, 61 LEd.2d 411 (1979)). 8 . 47 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR.) 73.1202 (2004) provides that All written comments and suggestions received from the public by licensees of commercial AM, FM, TV and Class A TV broadcast stations regarding operation of their station shall be maintained in the local public 187 F.Supp.2d 605, 609, 612 (S.D.W.Va.2002)  (quoting Suriano v. Gaughan, 198 W.Va. 339,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a defendant was not entitled to the affirmative defense where the evidence did not support his contention that he did not aid in the homicidal act
B. holding that evidence that the petitioner had a political opinion that he expressed it to his persecutors and that they threatened him only after he expressed his opinion compelled the conclusion that the threats were connected to his political opinion and not only to his failure to provide money in response to demands from the persecutors that predated his expression of his political opinion
C. holding that the district court did not err in continuing the trial without defendant when the trial had commenced in defendants presence he vigorously expressed his desire to be absent he was given ample opportunity to change his mind despite the disturbance he had created he had competent counsel and he knew of his right to be present
D. holding that campaign volunteer who had expressed support for one of candidates political positions in television advertisement and who also posed for photographs with candidate did not become limitedpurpose public figure because his actions were not sufficiently significant and because he did not assume a position that  propelled him to the forefront of the campaign
E. holding that firefighter who was expelled from volunteer fire company could not bring declaratory action seeking declaratory judgment that provision under which he was expelled was overbroad because he had not alleged with sufficiently credible facts that the challenged provision would be applied against him in the future
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.