Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
No. 146, Ex. C. While the obituary states that Jeanne Decker was defendant John Nelson Decker’s wife of fifty-one years, it establishes nothing more than that. See id. Therefore, plaintiff has failed to establish that Jeanne Decker was a representative of the estate of her late husband John Nelson Decker or that he had an estate. 2. “Successors” Under Rule 25(a), a “successor” of the deceased party is also a proper party for substitution. A successor of the deceased party is a “distributee” of the decedent’s estate if the decedent’s estate has been distributed at the time the motion for substitution has been made. Gronowicz v. Leonard, 109 F.R.D. 624, 626 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (citations omitted); see e.g., Hardy v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc., 842 F.Supp. 713, 716-717 (S.D.N.Y.1993) . a. Mary Beth Ciaschi Pethybridge As
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing a fallacy that the wife has  an estate or interest in the husbands lands in his lifetime as she can mortgage as her separate property  
B. holding that a wife is not liable simply by virtue of the marital relationship for her husbands fraudulent acts
C. holding that the deceased defendant trustees wife was a representative of her husbands estate and a proper party for substitution purposes where the wife was the primary distributee of her deceased husbands estate
D. holding that proper forum for debtor to challenge actions of coexecutor of debtors deceased husbands estate was state probate court not bankruptcy court
E. holding the family court properly awarded a wife attorneys fees incurred as the result of her husbands contempt
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.