Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
between Allen and Forte. Id. at 1303. Importantly, the court observed that “contractors ... share an economic relationship and community of interest with the architect on a construction project,” id., and that “too much control over the contractor necessarily rests in the hands of the supervising architect for him not to be placed under a duty imposed by law to perform without negligence his functions as they affect the contractor.” Id. (quoting United States v. Rogers & Rogers, 161 F.Supp. 132, 136 (S.D.Cal.1958)). By recognizing an independent duty in tort, Forte Bros, represents an exception to the general rule propounded in Car-dente. Kennett, 798 A.2d at 418. The exception carries currency in the construction context, see Boren v. Thompson & Assoc., 999 P.2d 438, 445 (Okla.2000) , and has superficial appeal here, particularly
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding in part that the liability insurance company of the subcontractor which had named the general contractor as an additional insured on the subcontractors policy was liable to reimburse the general contractor for a settlement payment the general contractor had made to the subcontractors employee
B. holding that contractor owed general negligence duty to thirdparty by dangerous condition contractor created on road
C. holding that it was not essential to an action by a supplier on a payment bond under the miller act that a demand be made on the general contractor for payment  although there was evidence in the case from which it could be found that the materialman looked to the general contractor for payment  since the statute does not require a demand for payment but merely requires written notice of the claim
D. holding that duty to ensure that independent contractor performs its work in safe manner arises if the general contractor retains some control over the manner in which the independent contractor performs its work
E. holding relying in part on forte bros that an architectural firm had duty to ensure that general contractor had secured statutorily required payment bond before certifying payments to contractor
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.