Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
may limit affirmative defenses to a particular category of crimes without offending due process). Thus, the General Assembly may establish affirmative defenses and limit the cireumstances in which they apply, as long as they do not intrude on other constitutional protections. Id. 119 The separation of powers doe-trine "does not require a complete division of authority among the three branches, however, and the powers exercised by different branches of government necessarily overlap." Crowe, 126 P.3d at 205-06 (quoting Dee Enters. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, 89 P.3d 430, 433 (Colo.App.2003)). The authority of the judicial and legislative branches commonly overlaps because the distinction between procedural rules and substantive law is often blurred. See Wiedemer, 852 P.2d at 436 ; People v. McKenna, 196 Colo. 367, 371, 585
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding rules of procedure interpreted in same manner as statutes
B. holding that motorcycle training course is not a matter of public necessity and release does not violate public policy
C. holding that duty existed as a matter of public policy independent of the restatement
D. holding that federal law can provide source of state public policy for determining whether discharge of employee violated clear mandate of public policy
E. holding that statutes of limitation although indirectly affecting court procedure primarily concerned a matter of public policy
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.