Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court, the judge must dismiss the petition....” Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for "the United States District Courts, Rule 4. III. DISCUSSION Defendant requests that the Court reconsider his sentence of 46 months incarceration in light of the fact that the Court sentenced Alicia Gaytan to 38 months of incarceration for related charges. The Court finds that Defendant’s request shall be denied for the reasons described herein. Courts have consistently held that the mere fact that a codefendant receives a lesser sentence than defendant is not a basis for granting relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See generally, e.g., Hilbrich v. United States, 371 F.2d 826 (7th Cir.1967) ; Montalvo v. United States, 174 F.Supp.2d 10,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that where appellant moved to recuse trial judge from deciding the motion for new trial the judge of the administrative district was required to designate a judge to hear the recusal motion
B. holding that a defendant was not entitled to a relief under section 2255 when he asserted that the sentencing judge who was not the trial judge was influenced by the sentence imposed by the trial judge on a codefendant
C. holding that the defendant is not entitled to be sentenced by the judge who took his plea when the judge made no promise to sentence him
D. holding that the fact that a judge had ruled against the defendant is not a basis for finding the judge prejudiced
E. holding that when the defendant admitted that he pleaded guilty for reasons other than to have the judge who took his plea sentence him the defendant could properly be sentenced by a different judge
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.