Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the officer testified that he felt the lump in the front pocket of the defendant's jacket and that he examined the lump with his fingers and determined it to be crack cocaine wrapped in cellophane. Id. The Supreme Court adopted the Minnesota Supreme Court's holding that the search was unconstitutional. The rationale for finding the search unconstitutional was because the officer concluded that the lump was contraband only after " 'squeezing, sliding and otherwise manipulating the contents of the defendant's pocket'-a pocket which the officer already knew contained no weapon." Id. at 378, 113 S.Ct. at 2138. Therefore, despite the officer's lawful right to place his hands on the defendant's jacket pursuant to the Terry exc , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 856, 110 S.Ct. 161, 107 L.Ed.2d 118 . Second, the officers were justified in
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a tip may provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify an investigatory stop
B. holding there was no reasonable suspicion which would justify an investigatory stop despite report of a domestic disturbance
C. holding that taillight and license plate violations justify investigatory stop of automobile
D. holding that circumstances created reasonable suspicion for investigatory stop
E. holding that an areas reputation for criminal activity alone cannot justify an investigatory stop
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.