Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
from Ridgely’s harassment.” Pl.’s Opp’n at 22. She notes her doctor’s statement from the May 2007 letter that “it may be possible for [the plaintiff] to return to a position within DHHS in a part time capacity in 6-8 months,” but “she may not be able to to [sic] return to the office in which she is currently employed.” Def.’s Mot., Ex. 40. Given the doctor’s prognosis, the plaintiff potentially could have returned to work 13-14 months after she first went on leave, but the doctor offered no guarantee that she would return in that time. Furthermore, the letters .C. May 24, 2006) (stating that “[a]n employer is not required to provide an indefinite leave of absence”). Therefore, the plaintiffs request for an accommodation that would allow her to “complete her treatment 74 (2d Cir.1997) . Because the plaintiff argued to the OPM that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding parent entitled to credit for any social security disability benefits paid to child as a result of parents disability
B. holding that similarity between florida workers compensation disability law and social security disability law require that the alj give great weight to the florida determination
C. holding that an evidentiary hearing is not required prior to the termination of social security disability benefits
D. holding a social security number is not private
E. holding that a social security disability determination is a legal proceeding
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.