Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
J.A. Jones Constr. Co., 357 So.2d 401, 402 (Fla.1978), to define statutes of repose and distinguish them from statutes of limitations). Consistent with their function, statutes of repose are understood to set “an outer limit beyond which [claims] may not be instituted.” Hess, 175 So.3d at 695. As such, they are generally regarded as establishing an absolute bar to the filing of any claim after the expiration of the repose period and as being immune to the efforts of claimants to avoid-it. See, e.g., May v. Ill. Nat'l Ins. Co., 771 So.2d 1143, 1156 (Fla.2000) (describing nonclaim statute in the probate code as' a statute of repose and as creating “a self-executing, absolute immunity to claims”); Sabal Chase Homeowners Ass’n v. Walt Disney World Co., 726 So.2d 796, 798 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) . On its face, section 726.110 is a repose
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing risks in construing statutes of limitations in favor of repose
B. holding that the legislature never intended for the dismissal and renewal statutes to overcome the statute of repose
C. holding that statute was one of repose because it embodies the most distinctive characteristic of a statute of repose the barring of the right to bring an action rather than the remedy prescribed
D. holding that statute of repose was not subject to toiling provision applicable to statute of limitations because among other reasons it would ignore fundamental distinctions between ordinary statutes of limitations and statutes of repose
E. holding that provision has the characteristics of a statute of repose
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.