Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
as a basis for a RICO violation, those allegations must meet a heightened sentation to whom and the general content of the misrepresentation. See Saporito, 843 F.2d at 675; Rolo v. City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust, 155 F.3d 644, 658-59 (3d Cir.1998); Klein v. General Nutrition Companies, Inc., 186 F.3d 338, 345 (3d Cir.1999); see also First Capital Asset Mgmt., Inc. v. Satinwood, Inc., 385 F.3d 159, 178 (2nd Cir.2004) (requiring RICO violation based on bankruptcy fraud to be pleaded with heightened particularity); see also Lum, supra, (requiring mail and wire fraud-based RICO claim to be subject to Rule 9(b) pleading standard). In addition to mail and wire fraud, the Amended Complaint also pleads the predicate acts of money Coast Ingredients, Inc., 2004 WL 941815 *19 (W.D.N.Y.) ; and see Perlman v. Zell, 938 F.Supp. 1327,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the fact that federal rule of civil procedure 9b requires a heightened pleading standard for some claims but not for a section 1983 claim against a municipality means that the rules do not require a heightened pleading standard for such a claim
B. holding that claim of trading in counterfeit goods need only meet rule 8a2 notice pleading standard
C. recognizing that the federal pleading standard is a less stringent standard than the delaware pleading standard
D. holding where party fails to challenge specificity of pleading it waives right to claim that pleading fails to meet legal requirements
E. holding that a constructive fraud count need not comply with rule 9s heightened pleading standard
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.