Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
he received and read the letter. „ He further testified that he was able to read the determination and understand that he disagreed with its conclusions. He argues only that he failed to properly comprehend the notice of his rights to appeal. In support, the only evidence regarding good cause for the late filing was Westbrook’s own testimony, and we defer to the Commission regarding witness credibility. Lucido, 441 S.W.3d at 174 (citation omitted). Although Westbrook broadly argues that it is “illogical” for the Appeals Tribunal to make assumptions based on “facts that are ... not in the record,” we find nothing in the decision that is illogical or based o d not establish good cause by showing he misplaced the document); Taylor v. St. Louis Arc, Inc., 285 S.W.3d 775 (Mo.App.E.D.2009) . Because competent and substantial evidence
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that claimant did not establish good cause because she erroneously thought the determination was not final
B. holding that claimant did not establish good cause by showing he was unable to comprehend the determination
C. holding that the defendant did not establish good faith as a matter of law
D. holding that plaintiff could not establish a prima facie case of discrimination because she was unable to present evidence that she was qualified for the position
E. holding lack of prejudice to the defendant is not good cause
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.