Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
vacated on other grounds, 516 U.S. 1105, 116 S.Ct. 900, 133 L.Ed.2d 834 (1996); see also United States v. Scafe, 822 F.2d 928, 932 (10th Cir.1987) ("A defendant t.Ct.App.1994) (reversing for failure to instruct on justifiable use of nondeadly force, noting "it is the nature of the force and not the end result that must be evaluated”); White v. Commonwealth, 333 S.W.2d 521, 524 (Ky.1960) ("[Wjhere no deadly weapons are involved and the defendant is entitled to an instruction on involuntary manslaughter, an unintentional homicide, he is entitled to a further instruction on the theory of defense against ordinary assault and battery, against the menace of mere bodily harm as distinguished from the threat of death or great bodily harm.’’); State v. Hare, 575 N.W.2d 828, 833 (Minn.1998) . We cannot therefore agree with the dissent
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that illegal use of a weapon is one of the predicate offenses for manslaughter where there is no intent to cause death or great bodily harm
B. holding that although the first shot might have been justified in selfdefense a second shot to the victims body cannot be so justified when danger of death or great bodily harm ceases
C. holding that where use of reasonable nondeadly force causes death defendant entitled to instruction on selfdefense
D. holding it error to give selfdefense instruction requiring that defendant believe his actions were necessary to avert death or great bodily harm when defendant claimed that the victims death was accidental
E. holding that when both parties agree that the facts of the case entitled defendant to a selfdefense instruction failing to so instruct the jury was error
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.