Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
ADEA claims. We reject PwC’s construction of the worksharing agreement for another reason: it would effectively rewrite the ADEA’s administrative prerequisites, making them traps for the unwary, poised to spring into action and deny those who may have suffered employment discrimination their right to seek redress in federal court. Indeed, the Supreme Court has announced “a guiding principle for construing the provisions of Title VII,” Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 455 U.S. 385, 397, 102 S.Ct. 1127, 71 L.Ed.2d 234 (1982), which applies with equal force to the ADEA: a technical reading of the statute’s filing requirements is “particularly inappropriate in a statutory scheme in which laymen, unassisted by trained lawyers, initiate the process.” Love, 404 U.S. at 527, 92 S.Ct. 616 ; see also Oscar Mayer, 441 U.S. at 755, 99
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that unreviewed state administrative proceedings do not have preclusive effect on title vii claim
B. holding that a title vii claimant need not refile a charge after termination of state proceedings
C. holding that a title vii plaintiff could not hold coworkers liable in their individual capacities under title vii
D. holding that the antiretaliation provision of title vii reaches to employees who involuntarily participate in such proceedings and employees who do not seek to assist title vii claimant
E. holding that arbitration agreement that did not provide for award of attorney fees to successful title vii claimant was unenforceable because the right to attorneys fees  is central to the ability of persons to seek redress from violations of title vii
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.