Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
not, we believe, a factor that ought to have been eliminated from any consideration. Conclusion Because the bankruptcy court did not take into account all of the factors that it ought to have weighed and because it did not place the ultimate burden of establishing the § 523(a)(15)(B) exception on the debtor, we must vacate the decision of the district court and remand the case to that court with instructions to remand it to the bankruptcy court for new factual findings made under the proper burden of proof. Therefore, we vacate the judgment of the district court with directions that the case be remanded to the bankruptcy court for further consideration consistent with this opinion. Vacated And Remanded. 1 . Cf. Farrey v. Sanderfoot, 500 U.S. 291, 111 S.Ct. 1825, 114 L.Ed.2d 337 (1991) . Congress supplemented the reach of this
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing the right of a former spouse to seek contribution for payment of community debts not allocated by the divorce decree
B. holding that a debtors ability to utilize  522f to avoid a judicial lien is not dependent upon the debtor receiving a discharge  
C. holding that  522f doesnot permit a debtor to avoid a lien granted to the debtors former spouse under a divorce decree that extinguishes all previous interests the parties had in the property and in no event secures more than the spouses former interest
D. holding that in the absence of a hold harmless agreement a former spouse has no claim against the debtor to pay a debt listed on the divorce agreement as belonging to the debtor because such a debt is not incurred in connection with the divorce but was incurred in connection with the debtors and former spouses original transaction with the creditor
E. holding that the debtor must have had an interest in the property before the lien attached to take advantage of  522f
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.