Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
may permit a doctor to exercise judgment in choosing among several courses of treatment. “The error-of-judgment rule . . . stems in part from the recognition that if there is more than one acceptable treatment option, then the selection of any one of them is not negligence. Thus, a doctor is not liable for untoward results if he or she used reasonable care in selecting one of those options.” Rogers v. Meridan Park Hospital, 772 P.2d 929, 930-31 (Or. 1989). In this case, the defendants assert that in the course of treating Mrs. Francoeur, Dr. Piper had multiple options from which to choose, each of which met the standard of care, and the fact that the option he chose resulted in Mrs. Francoeur’s amputation does not, standing alone, constitute negligence. The defendant argues that 995) ; Deyo v. Kinley, 565 A.2d 1286, 1292-93 (Vt.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a plaintiff must show that a defendant did not have an honest good faith belief in marking its products
B. holding that an insurers violation of covenant of good faith and fair dealing was actionable under the consumer protection act
C. holding term good faith in iowa code section 23272 rests on a defendants subjective honest belief
D. holding good faith and honest error in judgment instructions erroneously imply only badfaith and dishonest deviations actionable
E. holding that the transaction must be fair and equitable and in good faith
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.