Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
was error not to have allowed it. Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals reversed, and case remanded to that court with instructions to reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County and remand the case for a new trial. Costs to be paid by Montgomery County. 1 . With respect to a few offenses, the Legislature has resolved the matter by statute. See Maryland Code (1957, 1976 Repl. Vol., 1980 Cum. Supp.), Art. 27, § 616. 2 . The Turberville court found it proper for a defense counsel in that case to argue in his closing presentation, that one of the several defendants should be convicted of a lesser offense than that charged. Turberville, supra at 404, 303 F.2d at 411. Compare Roberts, supra, and Turberville with People v. Flanders, 183 Colo. 268, 516 P.2d 418 (1973) . Rodowsky, J., concurring in part and
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that prior convictions relevant only to the sentencing of an offender found guilty of the charged crime do not need to be charged in an indictment or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt
B. holding but offering no authority for the position that the defense counsel could neither argue nor receive an instruction distinguishing the crime charged from a lesserunincluded offense not charged
C. holding that admission of prior crime similar to the one charged increases likelihood that jury will convict based on past pattern of behavior rather than on facts of charged offense
D. holding that fedrevid 404b does not restrict evidence of crimes that arose out of the same series of transactions as the charged offense or that are necessary to complete the story of the charged crime
E. holding it is fundamental error to convict a defendant of crime not charged and which is not a lesser included offense of the charged crime
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.