Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the encounter and proceed on his or her way. T16 Due to the factors discussed above, we find that Hansen remained seized for Fourth Amendment purposes when, and because, Officer Huntington asked him whether there was alcohol, drugs, or weapons in the vehicle. Likewise Hansen was seized for Fourth Amendment purposes when Officer Huntington requested consent to search the car. The State concedes that Officer Huntington did not have a reasonable articulable suspicion of more serious eriminal activity to justify the investigative questions. Therefore, Hansen was illegally detained when Officer Huntington asked him questions that were not reasonably related in scope to the traffic violation which justified the initial sei-zare. See United States v. Walker, 933 F.2d 812, 816 (10th Cir.1991) . II. Voluntariness of Consent {17 We now turn
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an officers single unrelated question regarding weapons that took only seconds did not unreasonably extend traffic stop
B. holding that defendant was unreasonably seized under fourth amendment when officer detained him to ask questions unrelated in scope to the reasons that justified the initial traffic stop
C. holding that a traffic stop is reasonable under the fourth amendment when police have probable cause to believe a traffic infraction has occurred
D. holding that passengers of automobiles that are pulled over by a police officer for a traffic stop are seized under the fourth amendment
E. holding that a traffic stop is valid under the fourth amendment if the stop is based on an observed traffic violation or if the police officer has reasonable articulable suspicion that a traffic or equipment violation has occurred or is occurring
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.