Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
from summary judgment is de novo; such judgment is appropriate only when the record shows that ‘there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.’ ” In re Will of Jones, 362 N.C. 569, 573, 669 S.E.2d 572, 576 (2008) (quoting Forbis v. Neal, 361 N.C. 519, 523-24, 649 S.E.2d 382, 385 (2007)). B. Analysis 1. Lack of Consideration The essential elements of a valid, enforceable contract are offer, acceptance, and consideration. Copy Products, Inc. v. Randolph, 62 N.C. App. 553, 555, 303 S.E.2d 87, 88 (1983). When there is no genuine issue of material fact as to the lack of consideration, summary judgment is appropriate. See Penn Compression Moulding, Inc. v. Mar-Bal, Inc., 73 N.C. App. 291, 294, 326 S.E.2d 280, 283 (1985) . “A mere promise, without more, lacks a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding trial court should have entered summary judgment for defendant where undisputed evidence established that no new consideration was exchanged for plaintiffs renewed promise to pay preexisting debt
B. holding that district court should not have granted summary judgment solely on basis that motion for summary judgment was not opposed
C. holding that district court should not have granted summary judgment solely on basis that a motion for summary judgment was not opposed
D. holding that court should have ruled on certification even after granting summary judgment for the defendant
E. holding that the trial court correctly entered summary judgment in favor of defendant and denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment where plaintiff failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that defendant breached its duty to act in good faith
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.