Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that the state has placed its imprimatur on a particular religious creed. This symbolic inference is too dangerous to permit.” Brandon v. Board of Ed. of Guilderland Cent. School District, 635 F.2d 971, 978 (2d Cir.1980); see Roemer v. Board of Public Works, 426 U.S. 736, 750, 764, 96 S.Ct. 2337, 2346, 2353, 49 L.Ed.2d 179 (1976). Here, since defendants display Martin’s painting in a high school auditorium, students view the painting each time they enter the auditorium. Further, defendant School District uses the auditorium for numerous events at which elementary students are required to attend. Susan Affidavit, Doc. 7 at ¶ 4. Accordingly, this court’s scrutiny of the painting and its placement must be all the more discriminating. See Grand Rapids, 473 U.S. at 390, 105 S.Ct. at 3226 . Taking into account the significant message
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that when a defendant raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel the trial judge must conduct an inquiry into the claim
B. holding that the inquiry into endorsement test must be conducted with particular care when many of the citizens perceiving the governmental message are children in their formative years
C. recognizing parents fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children
D. recognizing fundamental right of parents to care for their children
E. holding that natural parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.