Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and the creditor is free to foreclose upon the case’s conclusion without violating the discharge injunction. Johnson, 501 U.S. at 84, 111 S.Ct. 2150 (“[A] bankruptcy discharge extinguishes only one mode of enforcing a claim-namely, an action against the debtor in personam— while leaving intact another — namely, an action against the debtor in rem.”). Any deficiency that remains after the creditor forecloses on its liens and sells the property continues to exist, but is an uncollectible debt. Thus, following the discharge, the debt becomes nonrecourse debt. Id. at 86, 111 S.Ct. 2150 (“Insofar as the mortgage interest that passes through a Chapt ll.2008) (finding discharge a necessary prerequisite to permanency of lien avoidance); In re Lilly, 378 B.R. 232, 236-37 (Bankr.C.D.Ill.2007) . The court respectfully declines to reach the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that where there was no value in the collateral to secure the claim after application of section 506a creditor did not hold a secured claim and therefore lacked basis for asserting rights under 11 usc  1325a5
B. holding that by virtue of section 1325a5 holder of secured claim retains the lien until the underlying debt is paid in full
C. holding that the words allowed secured claim in  506d refer to a claim that is secured by a lien and allowed under  502
D. holding that operation of state law requiring lien holder to renew lien in state court was not stayed by section 362 because extension  simply allows the holder of a valid lien to maintain the status quo  a policy not adverse to bankruptcy law but rather in complete harmony with it
E. holding that the lien bond releases the property from the lien but the lien is then secured by the bond
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.