Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the district court’s disposition of this juvenile case. Bill did not ask to conditionally admit to the allegations against him, thereby reserving appeal of any legal issues. Instead, he entered an unconditional admission, and indicated that he understood there would be no appeal. It is longstanding law that no defenses can be raised on appeal after entry of a guilty plea, except that no offense has been charged. Commonwealth v. Elza, 284 S.W.3d 118 (Ky.2009). The effect of the guilty plea is to waive those other defenses and any appeal that seeks to raise them. Juveniles, -of course, are not held to the same level of competency as adults, simply as a matter of law. Nevertheless, they may waive their rights in juvenile proceedings. See Commonwealth v, B.J., 241 S.W.3d 324, 327 (Ky.2007) ; Kozak v. Commonwealth, 279 S.W.3d 129, 133
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding juveniles do not have constitutional right to a jury trial but striking down statute that allowed juveniles to receive adult sentence without a jury trial three justices dissented reasoning juveniles should be entitled to a juiy trial under all cases because changes to juvenile justice code treated juveniles like criminals
B. recognizing that defendant may waive miranda rights
C. holding that juveniles may waive constitutional rights
D. holding that juveniles may not waive counsel unless parent or guardian also waives that right
E. holding that juveniles may waive right to counsel only upon advice of counsel
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.