Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
an attorney’s duty to provide adequate representation does not encompass the duty to foresee and protect a client from his own possible suicidal tendencies. Citing a string of cases which rigidly follow McPeake, common carrier defendant COLTS urges us to come to the same conclusion regarding COLTS responsibility to suicide decedent George Hudalc. Pennsylvania state courts and federal courts applying Pennsylvania law appear to have consistently relied on the McPeake decision. See Ferris v. Cleveland, Civil Action No. 3:10-1302, 2012 WL 2564782 (M.D. Pa. 2012) (granting a motion in limine that excluded testimony of a neuropsychologist to identify the causal relationship between a motor vehicle accident and the decedents suicide); Puza v. Carbon County, 586 F.Supp.2d 271 (M.D. Pa. 2007) ; Cooper v. Frankford Health Care System, Inc.,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that federal courts have statutory habeas jurisdiction over petitions filed by guantanamo detainees
B. holding that prison conditions are those aspects of prison life affecting the entire prison population
C. holding that prison guards who are employees of a private prison management firm are not entitled to a qualified immunity from suit brought by prisoners under  1983
D. recognizing that prison regulations designed to provide security are not only legitimate but are central to all other correctional goals
E. holding that architects who designed prison were not liable for pretrial detainees suicide
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.