Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
134 S.Ct. 2175, 2183, 189 L.Ed.2d 62 (2014) (distinguishing between statutes of limitations, which are subject to equitable tolling, and statutes of repose, which are not). In determining whether a time period set by federal law is a statute of limitations, the Court considers the “functional characteristics” of the statute, that is, whether the time period at issue serves the policies of a statute of limitations. Lozano, 134 S.Ct. at 1234-35 & n.6. A statute of limitations is generally “[a] law that bars claims after a specified period; specifically, a statute establishing a time limit for suing in a civil case, based on the date when the claim accrued (as when the injury occurred or was discovered).” Black’s Law Dictionary 1636 (10th ed. 2014); see also CTS Corp., 134 S.Ct. at 2182  (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1546 (9th ed.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the cause of action accrued on the date of sale
B. holding that a plaintiffs  1983 claim accrued on the date of the alleged illegal search and seizure
C. holding that the payments accrued
D. holding that a statute of limitations creates a time limit fpr suing in a civil case based on the date when the claim accrued
E. holding that the plaintiffs cause of action accrued on the date of the repealer statute not on the date the wrong occurred despite the federal courts ruling as to the statutes unconstitutionality
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.