Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
submitted in support of their Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Federal Defendants and Nebraska argue that this extra-record evidence is impermissible under the APA’s limitation on “the scope of judicial review.. .to the administrative record that was before the Secretary at the time that he or she made the decisions.” Fed. Defs.’ Mot. at 5 (citing Environmental Defense Fund v. Costie, 657 F.2d 275, 285 (D.C.Cir.1981). While it is true that “[a]s a general rule, plaintiffs may not supplant or supplement the administrative record,” Fed. Defs.’ Mot. at 6 (citing Peterson Farms I v. Madigan, 1992 WL 118370 (D.D.C.1992)), this Circuit has recognized that courts may consider extra-record evidence in its review of agency actions under certain circumstances. See Costle, 657 F.2d at 286. . The D.C. Circuit has also recognized that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the proper inquiry for the categorical approach is whether the conduct covered by the crime presents the requisite risk of injury in the ordinary case
B. holding that a party seeking to seal a judicial record  bears the burden of overcoming  the compelling reasons standard
C. holding appeal of termination is limited to information that is part of the record
D. holding that in determining whether the defendant has a prior conviction for burglary under the armed career criminal act the federal court may look only to the terms of the charging document the terms of a plea agreement or transcript of colloquy between judge and defendant in which the factual basis for the plea was confirmed by the defendant or to some comparable judicial record of this information
E. recognizing a judicial venture outside the record for background information or to determine the presence of the requisite fullness of the reasons given
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.