Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Jordan, 356 B.R. at 660; LaBarge v. Ireland (In re Ireland), 325 B.R. 836, 838 (Bankr. E.D.Mo.2005); Katz v. Araujo (In re Araujo), 292 B.R. 19, 24 (Bankr.D.Conn. 2003). “Such a showing then imposes upon the debtor an obligation to explain [her] non-compliance.” Missouri ex rel. Nixon v. Foster (In re Foster), 335 B.R. 709, 716 (Bankr.W.D.Mo.2006). Whether a violation of a court order warrants a denial of discharge is a matter within the trial court’s discretion. Commerce Bank & Trust Co. v. Burgess (In re Burgess), 955 F.2d 134, 138 (1st Cir.1992) (finding that the bankruptcy judge who issues an order is in the best position to evaluate whether a delay in compliance warrants denial of discharge); Devers v. Bank of Sheridan, Montana (In re Devers), 759 F.2d 751, 754 (9th Cir. 1985) ; In re Jones, 490 F.2d 452 at 456 (5th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding a trial courts decision involving withdrawal or discharge of counsel is subject to review for abuse of discretion
B. holding that the determination of whether statements are excited utterances is within the trial courts discretion and its ruling will be reversed only for an abuse of that discretion
C. holding that whether particular violations of its orders are so serious as to warrant a denial of discharge is a matter that is within the trial courts discretion
D. holding that such a decision was within the trial courts discretion
E. holding that denial of amendment is within discretion of trial court
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.