Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
purposes of setting alimony award); Steiner v. Steiner, 788 So 2d 771, 778 (Miss 2001) (same); Holmes v. Holmes, 7 Va App 472, 485, 375 SE2d 387, 395 (1988) (same); Weberg v. Weberg, 158 Wis 2d 540, 544-45,463 NW2d 382, 384 (Ct App 1990) (same); see also Clauson v. Clauson, 831 P2d 1257, 1263 n 9 (Alaska 1992) (stating in dicta that a “state court is clearly free to consider post-divorce disability income and order a disabled veteran to pay spousal support even where disability benefits will be used to make such payments’’); Davis v. Davis, 777 SW2d 230, 232 (Ky 1989) (noting that, although VA disability benefits were not divisible as property, courts could resolve an inequitable property division with a spousal support award); but see Ex parte Billeck, 777 So 2d 105, 109 (Ala 2000) . Based on our reading of Mansell — and our
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding military service disability payments are community property
B. holding that wife was entitled to prejudgment interest on alimony and child support arrearages from the date those payments were due
C. holding that alimony obligation was discharged by social security payments received by the wife
D. holding social security disability payments and military disability payments are separate property after dissolution of marriage
E. holding that federal law precludes courts from considering va disability payments in awarding alimony
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.