Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
distinction between the school children in Schempp and the plaintiffs in Valley Forge. “We simply cannot see,” said the Court, “that respondents have alleged an injury of any kind ... sufficient to confer standing. Respondents complain of a transfer of property located in Chester County, Pa. The named plaintiffs reside in Maryland and Virginia.... They learned of the transfer through a news release.” Valley Forge, 454 U.S. at 486-87, 102 S.Ct. at 765-67 (footnotes omitted). The circuits have thus recognized that “[t]he practices of our own community may create a larger psychological wound than someplace we are just passing through.” Washegesic v. Bloomingdale Public Schools, 33 F.3d 679, 683 (6th Cir.1994). Plaintiffs who “are part of the [community where challenged (6th Cir.1985) . Though individuals offended by a religious
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing legislature reallocated the regulatory authority from the cities over the property on which dfw airport is located to the airport board
B. recognizing that presence of sectarian chapel in airport impaired use of airport by passengers
C. holding that a dog sniff of the exterior of luggage in a public airport does not constitute a search under the fourth amendment
D. holding that no private right of action exists under any of the provisions of the airport and airway improvement act
E. holding that county airport board and twenty board members in their representative capacities had sovereign immunity in suit for negligence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.