Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Terry’s and Silverman’s hostile environment harassment of Faragher. IV.Standards of Review We review the district court’s finding of fact under the clearly erroneous standard of review. Pullman-Standard v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273, 287-88, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 1789, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982). We review the district court’s conclusions of law and its application of law to facts de novo. Massaro v. Mainlands Section 1 & 2 Civic Ass’n, Inc., 3 F.3d 1472, 1475 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 808, 115 S.Ct. 56, 130 L.Ed.2d 15 (1994). V.Contentions of the Parties Faragher contends that Terry’s and Silver-man’s positions as top lifeguard commanders make them prototypical agents of the City. Faragher argues that this status, combined with Terry’s and Silverman’s conduct, makes the -16 (9th Cir.1989). This Circuit has concluded that in a pure
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the timeliness of the employees suit is measured from the later of the date the employee knew or should have known of the employers final action or the date the union appeals procedure is exhausted or otherwise broken down to the employees disadvantage
B. holding that a viable hostile work environment claim requires an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive
C. holding that a single offensive racist comment was not sufficient to establish a hostile work environment
D. holding that employers are liable for failing to remedy or prevent a hostile or offensive work environment of which managementlevel employees knew or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known
E. recognizing a hostile work environment claim under section 1983
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.