Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
could be expected to go (e.g., walkways, driveways, porches) * * *.” 1 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 2.3(f) at 412 (1987). Thirdly, it appears that defendant was using his residence also as a commercial outlet for drugs and that his customers typically walked near the garbage on the way to the back entrance, facts that further suggest a diminished expectation of privacy by petitioner in the area where the garbage was placed. In Dunn, the Court stated that it was “especially significant” that the police possessed objective data indicating that the barn was not being used for intimate activities of the home but was being used in the unlawful manufacture of elicit drugs. 107 S.Ct. at 1139-1140; cf., Dow Chemical Co. v. United States, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1819, 90 L.Ed.2d 226 (1986) . All these factors combine to persuade us that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that for purposes of aerial surveillance using sophisticated equipment the open areas of an industrial or business complex are not analogous to the curtilage of a dwelling but falls somewhere between open fields and curtilage
B. holding canine sniff of an unattended vehicle parked outside the curtilage of defendants home was not a search within the meaning of the fourth amendment
C. holding that a warrantless search of garbage located within the curtilage of the defendants home violated his fourth amendment rights
D. holding that aerial observation of a greenhouse within the curtilage from a helicopter passing at an altitude of four hundred feet did not violate owners reasonable expectation of privacy
E. holding that defendant lacked reasonable expectation of privacy in garbage located outside curtilage of home
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.