Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
I was coming in and out and I could feel it. I could feel every time he kicked me.... Borlawsky Dep. at 51-2. I assume that observing intimate activity of an arrestee without justification can sometimes be a Fourth Amendment violation, but the plaintiffs evidence simply does not make that case here under the circumstances of involuntary admission to a psychiatric ward on a doctor’s advice with concern for the plaintiffs risk to herself or others. See Cookish v. Powell, 945 F.2d 441, 447 (1st Cir.1991) (noting that inadvertent, occasional, casual and restricted observation of inmate’s body by an officer of opposite sex does not violate the Fourth Amendment and emergency circumstances, like harm to oneself, allows more direct observation); Ellis v. Meade, 887 F.Supp. 324, 332 (D.Me.1995) . Likewise, kicking an arrestee can amount to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding seizure of evidence in plain view reasonable under fourth amendment
B. holding that officers view of plaintiffs shower in light of his suicide watch did not violate the fourth amendment
C. holding that warrantless arrest based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment
D. holding that the observation of evidence in plain view is not a search for purposes of the fourth amendment and does not require a warrant
E. holding that an arrest made by an officer outside his jurisdiction does not violate the fourth amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.