Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
§ 10 (same); Nev. Const, art. 15, § 10 (same); Okla. Const, art. VI, § 13 (same); Pa Const, art. IV, § 8 (providing various methods of making appointments depending on office involved and time of vacancy); R.I. Const, art. IX, § 5 (same as Indiana); Tenn. Const, art. VII, § 4 (granting legislature power to establish method of filling vacancies); Vt. Const, art. II, § 20 (appointment power limited by constitution and law passed by legislature); Wis. Const, art. XIII § 9 (same). "Several state courts have held that such provisions have the effect of authorizing the legislature to vest itself with the power to make certain administrative appointments, and that no violation of separation of powers inheres in doing so. See, e.g., State ex rel. Rosenstock v. Swift, 11 Nev. 128, 142-43 (1876) ; Richardson v. Young, 122 Tenn. 471, 125 S.W.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing authority of legislature to choose officers of municipal corporations
B. holding that a corporations principal place of business for determining diversity jurisdiction under 28 usc  1332c1 is the nerve center meaning the corporations headquarters or the place where a corporations officers direct control and coordinate the corporations activities
C. recognizing the ability of corporations to protect property rights in federal court
D. recognizing the municipal authority to regulate traffic implies broad authority
E. recognizing a cause of action against a corporations directors brought by a creditor for the fraudulent misrepresentation of the corporations financial condition
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.