Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
are recoverable irrespective of the NCP. Gache v. Town of Harrison, N.Y., 813 F.Supp. 1037, 1046 (S.D.N.Y.1993). Weyerhaeuser can be held liable so long as it caused defendants to incur response costs, even if no actual migration of contaminants from the Wolcott Site or Canal D to the Damen Site is shown. See Matter of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. R. Co., 78 F.3d 285, 289-90 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 763, 136 L.Ed.2d 710 (1997), (observing that “CERCLA unequivocally imposes strict liability on the current owner of a facility from which there is a release or threat of release, without regard to causation.”); Dedham Water Co. v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc., 889 F.2d 1146, 1154 (1st Cir.1989) (same); United States v. Wade, 577 F.Supp. 1326 (E.D.Pa.1983) . Thus, Weyerhaeuser’s arguments that there is
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that when an indictment charges several acts conjunctively under a statute which subjects several alternative acts to the same punishment the government need only prove violation of one of the alleged acts to prove violation of the statute
B. holding that the injury was inflicted by the defendant when it occurred while the defendant applied force directly to the victims person
C. holding that predicate acts need not be in furtherance of the enterprise
D. holding that a cercla plaintiff need not directly link acts of each generator defendant to the environmental harm that prompted the cleanup
E. holding that the underlying suit did not seek to prevent unjust enrichment or to deprive defendant of the net benefit of its allegedly wrongful act but rather the underlying settlement was calculated by determining the individual harm suffered by each plaintiff
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.