Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
or abuse in question. There is sufficient evidence in the record to implicate the father as the perpetrator of the abuse but not the mother. Detective LaRochelle, the lead detective investigating the allegations of child abuse, testified that he believed the father inflicted the injuries to the child, and also stated that the mother was not a suspect. After hearing from the parties and witnesses, the court concluded that the baby suffered egregious abuse and terminated the parental rights of both the father and mother. After a thorough examination of the record, we find that record is devoid of the clear and convincing evidence necessary under statute to terminate the mother’s parental rights. See R.P. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 975 So.2d 435, 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; T.V. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs.,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the clear and convincing standard provides appropriate due process in cases involving parental rights
B. holding that a trial courts findings of fact based on evidence that was essentially documentary in nature will not be overturned if there is reasonable and logical support for them in the record
C. holding that a trial courts determination that clear and convincing evidence supports the termination of parental rights will not be overturned unless found to be clearly erroneous or lacking in evidentiary support
D. holding that due process allows parental rights to be terminated only upon clear and convincing evidence of unfitness
E. recognizing that the department is required to present clear and convincing evidence to support termination of a parents parental rights
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.