Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
part; DISMISSED in part. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3. 1 . See Lara-Chacon v. Ashcroft, 345 F.3d 1148, 1151 (9th Cir.2003) (stating that we review de novo "whether a conviction under state law is a deportable offense”); 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) (stating that an alien is removable if he "has been convicted of a violation of (or a conspiracy or attempt to violate) any law ... relating to a controlled substance ..., other than a single offense involving possession for one’s own use of 30 grams or less of marijuana”). 2 . See 21 U.S.C. § 802(6), § 812 sched. 111(a)(3) (providing that methamphetamine is a controlled substance). 3 . See United States v. Velasco-Medina, 305 F.3d 839, 852-53 (9th Cir.2002) . 4 . See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that defendant was entitled to withdraw guilty plea upon habeas corpus proceedings where he pled guilty in exchange for an illegal sentence
B. holding that the abstract of judgment may not sufficiently establish that the defendant pled guilty to a specific crime when the only other document provided was the charge which simply contained the generic broad statutory language
C. holding that a defendant must demonstrate that he would not have pled guilty but for the error
D. holding circuit court had subject matter jurisdiction to accept a guilty plea where defendant was not indicted for the charge to which he pled guilty but signed a sentencing sheet which established defendant was notified of the charge to which he pled guilty
E. holding that in conjunction an information with a narrow charge and an abstract of judgment indicating that a defendant pled guilty to that charge prove the precise elements of the offense to which the defendant pled guilty
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.