Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
term, or may so limit the application of any unconscionable term as to avoid any unconscionable result. Restatement (Second) of Pres. Comm’n, 652 N.W.2d 742, 749 (S.D.2002)); see also Johnson v. Rapid City Softball Ass’n, 514 N.W.2d 693, 697 (S.D.1994) (“A release is not fairly made and is invalid if the nature of the instrument was misrepresented or there was other fraudulent or overreaching conduct.”); Ryan v. Weiner, 610 A.2d 1377, 1382 (Del.Ch.1992) (“It is generally held that the unconseionability test involves the question of whether the provision amounts to a taking of an unfair advantage by one party over the other.” (quoting Jones Constr. Co. v. City of Dover, 372 A.2d 540, 552 (Del.Sup.1977))); Graham v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 565 A.2d 908, 912 (Del.1989) . There was no reasonable manner for
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a court will not notice error which has been invited by the party seeking to take advantage thereof on appeal
B. holding that a contracting party cannot be allowed to use his own breach to gain an advantage by impairing the rights that the contract confers on the other party
C. recognizing that before ordering disqualification the trial court should determine whether one party has obtained an unfair advantage over the other which can only be alleviated by removal of the attorney citations omitted
D. holding evidence insufficient to support finding of implied contract
E. holding that to support a finding of unconscionability a court must find that the party with superior bargaining power used it to take unfair advantage of his weaker counterpart
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.