Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and injustice warrant the setting aside of an arbitration award.” Id. When a non-prevailing party seeks to vacate an arbitration award, it bears the burden in the trial court of bringing forth a complete record that establishes its basis for vacating the award. Anzilotti, 899 S.W.2d at 266; GJR Mgmt. Holdings, L.P., 126 S.W.3d at 263-64 (citing Kline v. O’Quinn, 874 S.W.2d 776, 790 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (op. on reh’g)). When there is no transcript of the arbitration hearing, the appellate court will presume the evidence was adequate to support the award. Jamison & Harris v. Nat’l Loan Investors, 939 S.W.2d 735, 737 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, writ denied); House Grain v. Obst, 659 S.W.2d 903, 906 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1983, writ ref'd n.r.e.) . Many Texas courts have held that without a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that arbitration award is binding on the parties
B. holding merely that the evidence was sufficient to support the award of attorneys fees
C. holding that the party seeking to vacate the award has the burden of providing the court with the evidence to support its arguments
D. holding the appellate court must presume adequate evidence to support the award when appellant sought to vacate the award based on gross mistake with no transcript of the arbitration proceedings
E. holding that an order remanding an arbitration award is not a final appealable order when the order does not also vacate the arbitration award
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.