Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Encinitos fails to discuss how it was harmed as a result of any delay. See id. Accordingly, we conclude ExxonMobil did not waive its right to mandamus relief. CONCLUSION We conclude the trial court abused its discretion in denying ExxonMobil’s motion to abate. Accordingly, we conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus. The trial court is ordered to (1) vacate the June 21, 2010 Order Denying Defendants’ Amended Motion to Abate, and (2) enter an order granting Defendants’ Amended Motion to Abate. The writ will issue only if the trial court fails to comply within fourteen days. 2 . Encinitos Ranch, et al. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., et al., No. 07-12-14420-CV (79th Dist. Ct., Brooks County, Tex.). 3 . See In re AutoNation, Inc., 228 S.W.3d 663, 668 (Tex.2007) (orig.proceeding) ; In re AIU Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 109, 118
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a permissive forum selection clause containing a waiver of any claims of forum non conveniens amounts to a mandatory forum selection clause at least where the plaintiff chose the designated forum
B. holding that mandamus was appropriate for forum selection clauses because failing to enforce such a clause resulted in judicial inefficiency by enabling forumshopping wasting judicial resources delaying adjudication on the merits and skewing settlement dynamics contrary to the parties contractedfor expectations
C. holding enforceable forum selection clauses in arbitration agreements
D. holding that claims were not related to a license agreement which contained a forum selection clause in part because the bulk of the claims were against a defendant who was not a party to the agreement for breaches of employment contracts which did not contain forum selection clauses and for disclosure of trade secrets
E. holding that a forum selection clause was not enforceable against defendants that were not parties to the contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.