Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a full investigation into Acosta’s behavior. Later that month, a new federal monitor advocate was assigned to the Minnesota region. In March of 1996, Costilla was required to go to a meeting where Acosta would be present. Although she talked to her supervisor about not attending, the supervisor again told her that she could not avoid meetings that Acosta would attend. The supervisor added that Costilla needed to be strong and attend the meeting because Minnesota’s connection to the national level depended on it. Due to the state’s untimely action, Costilla brought a complaint against the state in January 1996 alleging: sexual harassment under the MHRA; intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress; and breach of contra age Realty Corp., 507 F.Supp. 599, 608 (S.D.N.Y.1981) ; Woods-Pirozzi v. Nabisco Foods, 290
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding employer may be hable when its employee is sexually harassed by employers patrons and employer either ratifies or acquiesces in harassment by not taking immediate andor corrective action
B. holding employer hable for requiring hotel worker to wear sexually reveahng costume that lead to harassment by public
C. holding school district strictly hable for sexual harassment by its employees
D. holding employer could be hable for sexual harassment of employees by nonemployees including employers customers
E. holding employer may be hable for sexual harassment of employee by independent contractor
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.