Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
her individual capacity. In Miller v. Maxwell’s Intern. Inc., 991 F.2d 583 (1993), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that there was no individual liability under the ADEA. The court explained that the statutory scheme of the ADEA itself indicates that Congress did not intend to impose individual liability on employees. The ADEA limits liability to employers with 20 or more employees, 29 U.S.C.A. § 630(b), in part because Congress did not want to burden small entities with the costs associated with litigating discrimination suits. Surely Congress would not wish to impose the same civil liability on individual employees that it decided to remove from small entities with limited resources. Id. at 587. See also Birkbeck v. Marvel Lighting Corporation, 30 F.3d 507, 510 (4th Cir.1994) . This conclusion is supported by the law of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that there is no individual liability under law 44
B. holding that individual employees are not proper defendants in adea lawsuits
C. holding no individual liability under the adea
D. holding that there is no individual liability under title vii
E. holding that there is no disparate impact claim under the adea
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.