Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Morales, 98 S.W.3d 343, 348 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2003, pet. denied). The answer to the question of whether prejudgment interest may be calculated on attorneys’ fees that have been paid prior to judgment, as in this case, is less than clear, with our sister courts splitting on the issue, and the supreme court remaining silent. The Dallas Court of Appeals has expressly held that .under no circumstances may prejudgment interest be recovered on attorneys’ fees. See Carbona v. CH Med., Inc., 266 S.W.3d 675, 688 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.). However, other courts have taken a less rigid view and have allowed a trial court to award prejudgment interest on attorneys’ fees paid prior to judgment. See Nova Cas. Co. v. Turner Const. Co., 335 S.W.3d 698, 706 (Tex.App.-Houston 2011, no pet.) ; Williams v. Colthurst, 253 S.W.3d 353, 362
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding prejudgment interest at the colorado statutory rate of 8 percent
B. holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees
C. holding in patent litigation that district court did not abuse its discretion by awarding simple rather than compound prejudgment interest
D. holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding prejudgment interest on attorneys fees paid prior to the entry of judgment
E. holding in adea action that district court did not abuse its discretion by awarding compound rather than simple prejudgment interest
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.