Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
jurisdiction over the custody determination.” We conclude that the juvenile court did not have the power to assume jurisdiction over the case or to make a custody determination. Even assuming that the father’s dependency petition was sufficient to invoke the juvenile court’s jurisdiction, and we maintain that it was not, the juvenile court failed to address the allegation of dependency in any of its orders or judgments. There is no mention of dependency in the juvenile court’s final judgment entered on July 17, 2008, yet the juvenile court proceeded to make an adjudication of the child’s custody. In K.C.G. v. S.J.R., 46 So.3d 499, 501-02 (Ala.Civ.App.2010), this court stated: “Once the dependency jurisdiction of a juvenile court has been properly invoked, the juvenile court has an 2) ; J.W. v. W.D.J., 743 So.2d 467, 469
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that juvenile court that had never declared child dependent had no jurisdiction to enter order affecting visitation rights of father
B. holding that once juvenile court found children dependent it had exclusive jurisdiction to determine their custody
C. holding that juvenile court never assumed jurisdiction to determine issue of custody of child when evidence revealed that there was no emergency situation rendering the child dependent as al leged in mothers petition
D. holding that juvenile court that determined child was not dependent had no jurisdiction to thereafter determine custody of child
E. holding that juvenile court has no jurisdiction to consider constitutional claims
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.