Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
helpful to the jury’s determination of facts at issue.” Ariz. R. Evid. 702 cmt. (2012). But the comment also observes that “[t]he trial court’s gatekeeping function is not intended to replace the adversary system.” Id. Rather, “[c]ross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence.” Id.; cf. Daubert, 509 U.S. at 596, 113 S.Ct. 2786. ¶ 12 Daubert left unclear whether the particular application of a generally reli oach of leaving challenges to an expert’s application of a methodology exclusively to the jury. Such challenges are instead a proper subject of the trial court’s gatekeeping inquiry. But cf. United States v. Bonds, 12 F.3d 540, 563 (6th Cir.1993) . ¶ 14 But not all errors in the application of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that federal law governs res judicata effect of an earlier federal judgment based on federal law
B. holding that a statute of limitations defense raised for the first time during trial was waived construing a previous version of federal rule of criminal procedure 12 that was not substantively different from the current version
C. recognizing general rule
D. holding under earlier version of federal rule 702 that in general criticisms touching on whether the lab made mistakes in arriving at its results are for the jury
E. holding officials are entitled to qualified immunity for reasonable mistakes of law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.