Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
because of her disability, and because of the disproportion in the parties’ earning potential. Robert argued that he was entitled to a disproportionate share of the parties’ estate because of the fraud committed by Elaine and her fault in the termination of their marriage. The record demonstrates, however, that the trial court’s disposition of the parties’ estate was not nearly as unequal as Elaine suggests. Each party was awarded the car that was in his or her possession. Elaine was able to keep all of the items that she removed from the house, including the disputed antique china cabinet, and she was able to keep half of the money that was in their joint account at the time that they separated. She was required to return to Robert the flat screen television that he won thro 93 (1888) . 2 . The trial court’s findings of fact did
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that first husband had no knowledge of his exwifes second marriage until four days before the second marriage was annulled so he was not inconvenienced and alimony was reinstated
B. holding that money invested in voluntary investment plan during marriage was marital property because it was property acquired during marriage
C. holding husband could not have marriage annulled because wife was pregnant by him at time of marriage
D. holding that the law to be applied in determining the validity of  an outofstate marriage is the law of the state in which the marriage occurred
E. recognizing that basis for deportation was aliens misrepresentation about his marriage not the validity of his marriage
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.