Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
is a contract and the rules of contract law are applicable to plea agreements. State v. Frazier, 697 So.2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). A party may waive any right to which he is legally entitled under the Constitution, a statute, or a contract. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. E.D.S. Federal Corporation, 631 So.2d 353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). A defendant will not be relieved of an obligation that was included as a specific component of a plea agreement that was bargained for and voluntarily entered into by defendant. Allen v. State, 642 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). 722 So.2d at 907; see also A.D.W. v. State, 777 So.2d 1101, 1104 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (acknowledging that “plea agreements are controlled by contract law”); State v. Frazier, 697 So.2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) . 7 . Harrell, 721 So.2d at 1187 (holding that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plea agreements executed pursuant to fedrcrimp 11c1c are binding on the district court
B. holding that the federal expert witness compensation rules are in direct conflict with the state rules even when the state rules allow for a greater recovery
C. holding that the burden is upon the state under the applicable federal rules of evidence
D. holding that immunity agreements are analogous to plea agreements and are enforced under principles of contract law within the constitutional safeguards of due process
E. holding that the rules of contract law are applicable to plea agreements
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.