Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
physician. The physician that treated Street testified as to the adequacy of Street’s care. Street offers only his own conclusory statements to the contrary. "[Ijnadequate prison medical care violate[s] the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause [only when it amounts to] 'deliberate indifference to serious medical needs of prisoners'”. Id. at -, 114 S.Ct. at 1978 (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104, 97 S.Ct. 285, 291, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976)). Street's medical needs were met. While there is evidence that Street had requested more medical care (i.e., pain medication prior to his hospital visit), "there is no evidence that [the defendants] either w[ere] aware of or had any responsibility for this lack of medical attention.” Sanderfer v. Nichols, 62 F.3d 151, 155 (6th Cir.1995) . 14 . In Farmer, the Court noted, "At what
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that statements in medical records given for the primary purpose of medical diagnosis and treatment are nontestimonial
B. holding failure to check medical records of inmate that eventually died to be mere negligence
C. holding that constitutional right of privacy does not apply to medical records
D. recognizing negligence cause of action for failure to maintain medical records preservation of which was required by statute
E. holding that to the extent medical records may be properly categorized as business records such records are properly categorized as nontestimonial
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.