Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to continue a defendant’s supervised release after a violation rather than revoke the release term). It immediately invited defense counsel to speak about whether there should be a revocation, and there is no error in the court deciding that LeBoeuf s violations and conduct as testified by Hernandez warranted revocation and imprisonment as opposed to a continuance on release. Furthermore, the district court’s other remarks during the hearing show that its various references to “punishment” did not invoke § 3553(a)(2)(A). The court explained that the 24-month sentence it imposed “adequately addresses the factors the Court should consider,” and also that those factors were not reflected in the advisory guideline range. The court’s references to the factors that “ 00 (6th Cir.2007) . Therefore, any error by the district court
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that district court may consider  3553a2a and noting circuit split on the issue
B. recognizing split among district courts
C. recognizing circuit split
D. recognizing a split of authority on this issue
E. recognizing split
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.