Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Company was forced kicking and screaming to settle.”); id. ("They are intent now on buying your vote.”). Compare Riley, 529 A.2d at 252. 22 . See, e.g„ id. at 1 ("They are so afraid of you finding out what they are up to.”); id. at 2 ("They haven’t disclosed any of this because they want you to think that they are doing this all on their own.”). 23 . Doe v. Cahill, 884 A,2d at 465 (noting the known unreliability of internet blogs and chat rooms). See also Riley, 529 A,2d at 252 (same for newspaper editorials); SunEnergy 1, LLC v. Brown, 2015 WL 7776625, at *4 (Del. Super. Nov. 30, 2015) (same for online reviews). 24 . Austin, 418 U.S, at 284, 94 S.Ct. 2770 (calling plaintiff a "traitor" in the course of a labor dispute was nonactionable opinion); Bresler, 398 U.S, at 14, 90 S.Ct. 1537  25 . Reid v. Spazio, 970 A.2d 176, 183-84
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an insurance contract should be construed as a reasonable person in the position of the insured would have understood it and that if the language used in the policy is reasonably susceptible to different constructions it must be given the construction most favorable to the insured
B. holding that for the administrative position of the government to be substantially justified it must have a reasonable basis both in law and fact
C. holding governments position unreasonable where government advanced no legal authority for its position and applicable principle of law was long settled
D. holding in the chevron context that deference to what appears to be nothing more than an agencys convenient litigating position would be entirely inappropriate
E. holding a characterization of a real estate developers position as blackmail to be nonactionable opinion because in context even the most careless reader must have perceived that the word was no more than rhetorical hyperbole a vigorous epithet used by those who considered breslers negotiating position extremely unreasonable
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.