Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
officials); Doe v. State of La., 2 F.3d 1412, 1421 (5th Cir.1993) (concurring opinion) (noting that while “the actions of which Doe complains are egregious”, that fact alone “does not mean that he has asserted the violation of a federally protected right, as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1983”); Fee v. Herndon, 900 F.2d 804, 808 (5th Cir.) (“[T]he Constitution is not a criminal or civil code to be invoked invariably for the crimes or torts of state educators who act in contravention of the very laws designed to thwart [abuse by teachers].”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 908, 111 S.Ct. 279, 112 L.Ed.2d 233 (1990). In fact, this Court has even held that a rape perpetrated by a state official was not an act under color of state law. City of Green Cove Springs v. Donaldson, 348 F.2d 197 (5th Cir.1965) ; see also Screws, 325 U.S. at 108-09, 65 S.Ct.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a janitorial workers sexual assault of a student deviated from his duties and was clearly outside of the scope of his employment
B. holding that a police officers rape of an arrestee was outside the scope of his employment
C. holding neither a phone call by the police requesting an arrestee to come to the station for questioning nor the questioning of an arrestee at the station was a seizure within the meaning of the fourth amendment
D. holding intentional assault by coworker to be outside the course and scope of employment
E. holding that transportation of arrestee to police station is service of police under the ada
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.