Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
retaliated against. Accordingly, Texas Tech and TTUHSC’s 12(b)(1) motion is DENIED. A State Must be a “Person” Within the Meaning of the False Claims Act Having addressed the issue of whether Texas Tech and TTUHSC are immune from suit because of their status as state institutions, and having found that they are not entitled to sovereign immunity, the court turns now to unraveling the mystery of what is a “person” for purposes of the False Claims Act. The False Claims Act does not define the word person. See 31 U.S.C. § 3729. Ordinarily, “ ‘in common usage, the term “person” does not include the sovereign, [and] statutes employing the [word] are ordinarily construed to exclude it.’ ” Will v. Michigan Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 64, 109 S.Ct. 2304, 2308, 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989) (quoting Wilson v. Omaha Indian Tribe, 442 U.S.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a state is not a person under 42 usc  1983
B. holding that 42 usc  1983 does not provide a remedy for flsa violations
C. holding that in actions brought under 42 usc  1983 federal courts apply the states statute of limitation for personal injury
D. recognizing that title iii enforcement statute 42 usc  12188 which incorporates the remedies of 42 usc  2000a3a does not include money damages
E. holding that person in 42 usc  1983 does not include states
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.