Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
sought blood tests to establish his paternity of a child born while the mother of the child was married to another man. While holding that it was necessary for the trial court to consider the impact of a paternity action on the child before the paternity proceedings, the Supreme Court of Washington reasoned: “Child development experts widely stress the importance of stability and predictability in parent/child relationships, even where the parent figure is not the natural parent. .... A paternity suit, by its very nature, threatens the stability of the child’s world. We are concerned that the best interests of the child standard, too broadly interpreted, could become a blanket license for any person to disrupt long-fostered family relationships by claiming to be the (A.D.1991) ; Weidenbacher v. Duclos, 234 Conn. 51, 661
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the best interest of the child is the paramount concern in determining whether to order blood tests to determine paternity
B. holding that the trial court erred by not considering whether ordering blood tests to disestablish paternity was in the best interest of the child
C. holding that husband who was excluded from paternity of children and could not intervene in a paternity action to obtain custody would be able to bring an independent action per tql
D. holding that the trial court must specifically consider whether it would be in the best interest of the child for the case to proceed before a putative father may be permitted to seek blood tests in an attempt to rebut the presumption of paternity
E. holding that although a putative father had standing to bring a paternity action the action could not proceed and the blood tests could not be ordered unless the trial court determined that the paternity action would serve the best interest of the child
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.