Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
because, whereas the latter is necessarily satisfied out of, and thus constitutes a property interest in, marital property, the former is not satisfied out of, and thus cannot constitute a property interest in, marital property — instead, the former will be satisfied out of property that either no longer constitutes, or never constituted, marital property. The Court notes that its holding regarding the dichotomy that exists between in kind relief and equalization relief vis-a-vis the classification of a pre-petition equitable distribution right is not all that novel since at least one other court has also found such a dichotomy to exist, see In re Emelity, 251 B.R. 151, 154-157 (Bankr.S.D.Cal.2000), although such court’s analysis differs from this Court’s in other regards, see Id. . Also, so as to compare this Court’s decision
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that when a creditor files a proof of claim the bankruptcy court has core jurisdiction to determine that claim even if it was a prepetition contract claim arising under state law
B. holding that every prepetition debt is discharged subject to the provisions of  523
C. holding that creditors cannot allow postpetition funds to be automatically applied to a prepetition indebtedness absent some positive indication that debtors indeed intend to voluntarily assume their prepetition debts
D. holding that a prepetition equitable distribution right to equalization relief constitutes a discharged prepetition claim and distinguishing while agreeing with in re marriage of seligman 14 calapp4th 300 18 calrptr2d 209 214215 1993 wherein it was held that a prepetition equitable distribution right to in kind relief does not constitute a prepetition claim
E. holding that provision in prepetition agreement which precluded sale of assets by debtor was not a bar to a sale under section 363 because prepetition agreements purporting to in terfere with a debtors rights under the bankruptcy code are not enforceable
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.