Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
mental institutions, like prisoners, are deprived of unrestricted association with friends, family, and community; they must contend with locks, guards, and detailed regulation of their daily activities. In addition, a person who has been hospitalized involuntarily may to a significant extent lose the right enjoyed by others to withhold consent to medical treatment. . . . We should not presume that he lacks a compelling interest in having the decisions to commit him and to keep him institutionalized made carefully, and in a manner that preserves the maximum degree of personal autonomy. Jones v. United States, 463 U.S. 354, 384-86 (1983). 30 Rachel, 254 Wis. 2d 215, ¶ 61 (citing Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71, 80 (1992)). 31 Lessard, 349 F. Supp. at 1091 (three-judge district court) . 32 State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 330, 541
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the possibility that a sex offender could face civil commitment under a state statute was a collateral consequence because civil commitment does not flow automatically from the plea
B. holding that attorneys mental illness may justify equitable tolling
C. holding prior version of wisconsin mental illness civil commitment statute constitutionally defective
D. holding that for an initial civil commitment the state has the burden of proof
E. holding that a mental illness limitation limiting the maximum payment for care of mental illness or care of nervous conditions of any type or cause is ambiguous because the plan contains no definition or explanation of the term mental illness  and thus construed against the insurance company does not include physically based illnesses
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.