Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
§ 2000aa-7(a). 10 . Although not material to the analysis here, it is worth noting that one circuit has held that the government may use grand jury subpoenas to obtain documentary materials, but not work product materials. See Guest v. Leis, 255 F.3d 325, 341 (6th Cir.2001). 11 .The PPA also includes a provision allowing government officials to use search and seizure in cases where there is a valid concern that "the giving of notice pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum would result in the destruction, alteration, or concealment of such materials.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000aa(b)(3). This exception does not apply to work product materials. 12 . The Supreme Court has endorsed the use of video footage on summary judgment. See Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380, 127 S.Ct. 1769, 167 L.Ed.2d 686 (2007) . 13 . In her sworn declaration, Sennett states
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the court of appeals should not have relied on   visible fiction it should have viewed the facts in the light depicted by the videotape
B. holding that appellate court should have viewed facts of highspeed police chase in the light depicted by a videotape of the events
C. holding that when reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence all evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the government
D. holding that questions of reasonableness depend upon the facts and circumstances  the total atmosphere of the case citation omitted  which must be viewed in the light of established fourth amendment principles
E. holding record is viewed in light most favorable to verdict
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.