Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
.Id. at 266. 24 . Id. 25 . Id. 26 . Id. at 267. 27 . Int’l Paper Co., 788 S.W.2d at 305. 28 . Id. 29 . Id. at 306. 30 . See Webcon Group, Inc., 1 S.W.3d at 542-43. 31 . Smith, 17 S.W.3d at 597. 32 . RSMo 1994. 33 . McCormack v. Stewart Enter., Inc., 956 S.W.2d 310, 314 (Mo.App. W.D.1997). 34 . See id. 35 . Id. (citing Komosa v. Monsanto Chemical Co., 317 S.W.2d 396, 400 (Mo. banc 1958)). 36 . 421 S.W.2d 229 (Mo.1967). 37 . Id. at 234 (quoting Laughlin v. Boatmen's Nat’l Bank of St. Louis, 354 Mo. 467, 189 S.W.2d 974, 979 (1945)). 38 . Kinetic Energy Dev. Corp. v. Trigen Energy Corp., 22 S.W.3d 691, 697 (Mo.App. W.D. 1999) (quoting Baker v. Brown’s Estate, 365 Mo. 1159, 294 S.W.2d 22, 27 (1956)). 39 .Id. at 698. 40 . Baraba v. Stuart, 780 S.W.2d 136, 138 (Mo.App. E.D.1989). 41 . See id. . 42 . See Burger v. Wood, 446 S.W.2d 436, 444
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an expert is not competent to testify as to statutory interpretation
B. holding that a contractors experience in his profession qualifies him to testify as an expert to reasonable rates
C. holding that expert was qualified to testify regarding sexuallyabused children based on witness education professional license and experience
D. holding that the statute qualifies as an exemption 3 statute
E. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing plaintiffs expert witness to testify when it also allowed defendants expert witness who disputed the methodology used by plaintiffs expert to testify
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.