Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that the victim was killed in the parking lot and that he staged her death to look like a sexual assault, the grass which was clutched in the victim’s hand tells another tale — one where she was still struggling for life at the edge of the pond after being sexually assaulted. The jury recommended the death penalty by a vote of twelve to zero. The trial court found such a punishment was appropriate after considering all the evidence and properly weighing the aggravators against the miti-gators. Specifically, the court found four aggravating factors, one statutory miti-gator, and numerous nonstatutory miti-gators. Upon review, we find that the circumstances of this case are similar to other cases in which we have upheld the death penalty. See Orme v. State, 677 So.2d 258, 263 (Fla.1996) ; Schwab v. State, 636 So.2d 3, 7 (Fla.1994)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding the death sentence proportional for the firstdegree murder conviction where the aggravators included prior violent felony conviction and hac
B. holding death sentence proportionate where defendant murdered wife and children and trial court found three aggravators previous capital felony ccp and hac and two statutory mitigators extreme disturbance and no prior criminal history
C. holding the death sentence proportional for the sexual battery beating and strangulation of victim where there were three statutory aggravators hac pecuniary gain and sexual battery and both statutory mental mitigators
D. holding that the defendant could be convicted of sexual battery a lesser crime not included in the offense for which he was indicted where the defendant requested that sexual battery be submitted to the jury
E. holding the death sentence proportional for the firstdegree murder conviction where only the hac aggravator was found
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.