Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Defendant Adolfo Barron-Galvan appeals his conviction for being found in the United States after having been removed, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and the resulting sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment. We affirm. 1. Plain error did not occur when the government lawyer made certain statements at sentencing. See United States v. Maldonado, 215 F.3d 1046, 1051 & nn. 5-6 (9th Cir.2000) . The government stood by its recommendation of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plain error review applies where the defendant fails to object to the lack of an opportunity to allocute
B. holding that a defendant who fails to object to an error at a plea colloquy hearing must satisfy the plain error rule
C. holding that when a district court fails to provide reasons for imposing special conditions and the defendant fails to object we review for plain error
D. holding that where a defendant fails to challenge his plea in district court he must establish plain error
E. holding that we review for plain error whether the government breached its plea obligations when the defendant fails to object at sentencing
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.