Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
1 . Wade v. Hewlett-Packard Dev. Co. LP Short Term Disability Plan, 493 F.3d 533, 537 (5th Cir.2007). 2 . Id. 3 . Id. 4 . Corry v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston, 499 F.3d 389, 397 (5th Cir.2007). 5 . Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn,-U.S.-,-, 128 S.Ct. 2343, 2350, 171 L.Ed.2d 299 (2008) (quoting Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, 489 U.S. 101, 115, 109 S.Ct. 948, 103 L.Ed.2d 80 (1989)). 6 . Ellis v. Liberty Life Assurance Co., 394 F.3d 262, 270 n. 18 (5th Cir.2004). 7 . Corry, 499 F.3d at 397 (quoting Ellis, 394 F.3d at 273) (alteration and quotation marks omitted). 8 . Ellis, 394 F.3d at 273. 9 . Bellaire Gen. Hosp. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., 97 F.3d 822, 828 (5th Cir.1996). 10 . Duhon v. Texaco, Inc., 15 F.3d 1302, 1309 (5th Cir.1994). 11 .See Duhon, 15 F.3d at 1308 . 12 . See 2003 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 1274
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an employees inability to lift more than 30 to 40 pounds did not substantially limit his ability to engage in ordinary daily activities
B. holding abuse of discretion review is appropriate when erisa plan grants discretion to the plan administrator
C. holding that a plan administrator did not abuse its discretion in denying disability benefits to a sixtyfiveyearold man where medical evidence showed he was capable of performing sedentary to light work despite being unable to squat stoop bend or lift more than twentyfive pounds
D. holding that restrictions that plaintiff not lift more than twentyfive pounds or bend repetitively are not evidence of a permanent impairment that substantially limits any major life activity
E. holding that the plan administrator did not abuse her discretion by denying benefits when faced with conflicting medical reports
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.