Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in which the Supreme Court stated that the Barker test, originally developed to determine when the United States has denied a defendant his Sixth Amendment right to speedy trial, see Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), also “provides an appropriate framework for determining whether [a delay between entrance of a protective order and final determination of forfeiture] violate[s] the due process right to be heard at a meaningful time." $8,850.00, 461 U.S. at 564, 103 S.Ct. at 2012. She claims that with this statement, the Supreme Court recognized that any person whose property is restrained under § 853(e) is entitled to a post-restraint adversarial hearing under the Due Process Clause. See also United States v. Crozier, 111 F.2d 1376 (9th Cir.1985) . We note that these "supporting” cases were
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding school boards are persons within the meaning of the fifth amendment due process clause
B. holding on the facts of the case that the fifth amendment due process clause required a postrestraint hearing for a criminal defendant and a third party whose property was restrained under  853e
C. holding that due process requires a hearing appropriate to the nature of the case
D. holding that entitlement to benefits is a property interest protected by the due process clause of the fifth amendment to the united states constitution
E. holding that an alien is entitled to the fifth amendment guarantee of due process which is satisfied by a full and fair hearing
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.