Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
precise method of sale is prescribed by contract or decree, some discretion is necessarily granted to the trustee ... making the sale, as to the manner in which the property will be offered. That discretion will naturally be affected by the character and location of the property and other circumstances peculiar to the case, so that it is impossible to lay down a hard and fast rule[.] Jackson, 249 Md. at 16-17, 238 A.2d at 87 (quoting Webster, 176 Md. at 254-55, 4 A.2d at 438); see Waters, 165 Md. at 75, 166 A. at 432-33. For example, a trustee has the discretion to determine whether the property should be sold as a whole, or divided into separate parcels. Webster, 176 Md. at 254, 4 A.2d at 438; Gittings, 156 Md. at 577-78, 144 A. at 841; see also Fagnani, 418 Md. at 388, 15 A.3d at 292 . Similarly, a trustee has discretion to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property
B. holding that treating trust rather than trustee as attorneys client is inconsistent with the law of trusts
C. holding that the trustee of a nominee trust functions more as an agent than as a true trustee
D. holding that standard of review is a matter of procedural rather than substantive law
E. holding that as a matter of law a trustee may foreclose on an undivided one half interest rather than the entire property citation omitted
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.