Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
tries to analogize its case to one considered by the Eighth Circuit in Frye v. Kansas City Missouri Police Department, 375 F.3d 785 (8th Cir.2004). In Frye, the plaintiffs demonstrated against abortion by standing on the side of a road holding signs, some of which contained pictures of mutilated fetuses. Id. at 788. Following complaints from drivers, the police gave the plaintiffs the choice of either relocating to a different portion of the road or taking down the graphic signs. Id. Several demonstrators were arrested under the loitering ordinance when they refused to obey. Id. The Eighth Circuit found no First Amendment violation. The court stated that the officers’ actions were not motivated by the content of the signs, but rather out of a concern for public safety. Id. at 790 . The facts in the instant lawsuit are
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that alleged whistleblowing action that took place five years before the plaintiffs termination was not close enough in time  to support a claim of retaliation
B. holding anticipatory warrant was invalid for lack of probable cause because at time warrant was issued the contraband was not on a sure course to the place to be searched and there was no assurance defendant would take contraband to that place
C. holding that the plaintiffs message was not suppressed but only regulated as to time place and manner
D. holding for purposes of a retaliation claim restricting  disruptive behavior constitutes the type of time place and manner regulation that survives even the most stringent scrutiny for a public forum
E. holding that as to each predicate act the plaintiff must allege the time place and contents of the misrepresentations
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.