Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Graves “had many chances.” R.N., T.N.’s father, testified that Graves’s behavior with Billy was “very peculiar,” such as “riding around the countryside when he should be in school. Putting him up in an apartment. And telling other people that that’s his son.” R.N. further testified that he was “not alleging” that Graves used Billy for “sexual reasons.” None of these statements constitutes evidence of an extraneous offense. Rather, each of the witnesses denied knowledge of any improper conduct with other boys. Accordingly, with respect to Graves’s relationships with other boys, the trial court did not err in failing to instruct the jury, sua sponte, that the State must prove extraneous offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. See Bluitt v. State, 137 S.W.3d 51, 54 (Tex.Crim.App.2004) . Prior Convictions During punishment, the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that under the bail reform act for a defendant to have been convicted of two or more offenses constituting crimes of violence offenses must have been committed on different occasions
B. holding that when no objection was made to jury instruction evidence to support finding based on instruction should be assessed in light of the instruction given
C. holding that trial courts instruction implying that the jury had to be unanimous in imposing a sentence of life imprisonment violated defendants constitutional rights because this instruction could have been clearerand should have been
D. holding that such an instruction is a useless act if no unadjudicated offenses have been introduced
E. holding that defendant was not entitled to entrapment instruction when there was insufficient evidence to support such an instruction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.