Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
“[n]ot all exceptional treatment is persecution.” Gonzalez v. Reno, 212 F.3d 1338, 1355 (11th Cir.2000). For example, in Zheng v. United States Att’y Gen., 451 F.3d 1287 (11th Cir.2006) (per curiam), we held that the petitioner, who was dragged by his arms to a detention yard, detained for five days, forced to watch reeducation videos, to stand in the sun for two hours, and to sign a pledge not to practice his religion, failed to establish past persecution. Id. at 1289-92. Because Zheng had presented no evidence that he was physically injured, we concluded that the “five-day detention during which he was not harmed [did] not compel the conclusion that he experienced past persecution.” Id. at 1290; see also Djonda v. United States Att’y Gen., 514 F.3d 1168, 1174 (11th Cir.2008) ; see also Tawm v. Ashcroft, 363 F.3d 740,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that insults harassment death threats and a beating did not compel eligibility for withholding of removal
B. holding that evidence of kidnapping at gunpoint interrogation and beating did not compel finding of persecution
C. holding that harassment threats and one beating did not constitute persecution
D. holding that minor abuse during brief detention did not compel finding of past persecution
E. holding that a minor beating even in conjunction with threats did not compel a finding of persecution
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.