Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the debtors’ consent to file this action. The leading case on such consent-based derivative suits, cited approvingly by both parties and the district court, specifies that they are permissible only as follows: A creditors’ committee [or secured creditor] may acquire standing to pursue the debtor’s claims if (1) the committee [or creditor] has the consent of the debtor in possession or trustee, and (2) the court finds that suit by the committee [or creditor] is (a) in the best interest of the bankruptcy estate, and (b) is necessary and beneficial to the fair and efficient resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings. In re Commodore Int’l, Ltd., 262 F.3d 96, 100 (2d Cir.2001) (intern standing by “obtaining] the permission of the bankruptcy court”); In re Gibson G'roup, 66 F.3d at 1442 . Even if permitted under the Bankruptcy Code,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing derivative standing if the bankruptcy court determines that certain conditions exist and certain prerequisites are met
B. recognizing derivative standing that bankruptcy courts can authorize
C. recognizing that certain conditions including rule amendments must be met before goal of providing the public electronic access to court records can be achieved
D. recognizing that the court has the power to grant leave upon certain conditions
E. recognizing conditions of release may curtail certain fundamental rights
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.