Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
bills that [she had with her that day] that would indicate whether or not [the] property was occupied back in 2006.” Id. at 16. She also admitted that she did not produce her 2007 utility bills, although the defendant had requested such documents prior to the examination. Id. at 17; see also Def.’s Mot., Ex. 6 (Aug. 14, 2007 Letter Requesting Documents). In light of the evidence cited by the defendants (of which these are only a few examples), a reasonable juror could conclude that the plaintiff breached the insurance policy by not carrying out her duties as the insured party, thereby rendering the policy void. See Claflin, 110 U.S. at 96-97, 3 S.Ct. 507 (ruling that providing false statements during the purchase of a property was a breach of the policy); Taubman, 160 F.2d at 162 ; Stover, 658 F.Supp. at 160 (concluding that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an insured partys refusal to produce requested documents constituted a breach of the insurance contract
B. holding insurer did not have to cover insured for a breach of contract because it was not an accident
C. holding that party may not recover damages for breach of contract where its own bad faith caused the other partys breach
D. holding that an insurance contract between the parties and a breach thereof by the defendant is an element of a bad faith refusal claim
E. recognizing that the elements of a claim for breach of contract are 1 existence of a valid contract and 2 breach of the terms of that contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.