Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
requirements to discuss the relevant socioeconomic impacts of the RBTI. In addition, the Fifth Circuit has long held that the “[djetermination of economic benefits and costs that are tangential to environmental consequences are within th[e] wide area of agency discretion.” S. La. Envtl. Council, Inc. v. Sand, 629 F.2d 1005, 1011 (5th Cir.1980). NEPA requires, at most, “a narrowly focused, indirect review of the economic assumptions underlying a federal project described in an impact statement.” Id. See also Sierra Club v. Sigler, 695 F.2d 957, 974-75 (5th Cir.1983) (finding that an agency need only consider “important” information relevant to a “significant” effect not based on “unreasonable speculation”); Town of Norfolk v. United States EPA, 761 F.Supp. 867, 887-88 (D.Mass.1991) ; Izaak Walton League of Am. v. Marsh, 655 F.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that contract language referring to amount of loss authorized appraiser only to place dollar value on loss and not to determine cause of damage or other coverage issues
B. holding the aggregate value of the land and its improvements is the controlling value
C. holding that there was no evidence of market value where owners testimony affirmatively showed that it was based on personal value
D. holding determination of property value in case to decide if assessed value was excessive is not a liquidated demand where only evidence of property value was the conclusory allegation of value in plaintiffs unsworn petition
E. holding that the failure to place a dollar value on a possible decrease in property value was not unreasonable
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.