Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
advances. Moreover, this assertion is supported by Kin-man’s statement that the notion of being gay was so upsetting to her that it led her to attempt suicide. If Kinman’s opposition to the idea of being gay was as strong as she alleges, it is possible that any advances by a member of her own sex would have indeed been unwelcome. Furthermore, as the Supreme Court noted in Meritor Savings Bank, the relevant question is not whether Kinman voluntarily participated in sexual relations, but rather whether the advances were unwelcome. 477 U.S. at 68, 106 S.Ct. at 2406. To distinguish between an actual desire for a relationship on one hand, and a mere acquiescence to tendered sexual advances on the other, it is necessary to consider the power disparity be 830 F.Supp. 1288, 1297 (N.D.Cal.1993)  and Rowinsky v. Bryan Indep. School District,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding employer may be hable for sexual harassment of employee by independent contractor
B. holding that the district was not liable under respondeat superior for a teachers sexual assault of a student even though it occurred on school grounds and during school hours because the criminal misconduct was not within the scope of the teachers employment
C. holding school district strictly hable for sexual harassment by its employees
D. holding that school districts are hable for peer sexual harassment in their schools under title ix only if they have actual knowledge of the harassment and act with deliberate indifference in response to it
E. holding school district hable for teachers sexual harassment of student only upon knowing failure to act
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.