Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
payment because the unsecured debt was otherwise dischargeable. Merely being a party to the agreement did not confer standing on McClellan to appeal the bankruptcy court’s order. In addition, the substance of McClellan’s argument on appeal is that the agreement should have been approved because it satisfied the requirements of § 524(c)(6)(A) , namely, that the agreement was in the debtor’s best interest and that it did not impose any undue hardship on the debtor. In sum, McClellan’s appeal is based entirely on its assertion that the agreement benefitted the debtor’s interests and, therefore, should have been approved. While the debtor could have prosecuted this appeal based upon whether the agreement was in his best interest, McClellan cannot. See Umpqua Shopping Ctr., 111 B.R. at 305 . Standing requires that an appellant rest its
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a request made within 180 days of a modified confirmation order  entered three months after the original confirmation order  but more than 180 days after the original confirmation order was timebarred
B. holding that a debtor cannot appeal a confirmation order on the basis that it unfairly discriminates against a class of claims
C. holding that ordinance restricting use of foreign languages on business signs overtly discriminates on the basis of national origin
D. holding in the instant case although creditor obtained relief from the automatic stay it failed to object or appeal from the confirmation order accordingly creditor is bound by the confirmation order
E. holding confirmation vested property in the debtor and therefore properly of the estate was not liable for postconfirmation taxes incurred by debtor
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.