Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Marat Ginayatovich Umarov, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying his motion to reopen proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and we review de novo questions of law, including claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Hernandez v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1014, 1017 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review. Umarov’s contention that an acquaintance whom he knew not to be a lawyer provided him with ineffective assistance of counsel is foreclosed by Hernandez, 524 F.3d at 1020 . His due process contention therefore fails.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel
B. holding that knowing reliance upon the advice of a nonattorney cannot support a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel in a removal proceeding
C. holding that ineffective assistance of counsel in a removal proceeding may constitute a denial of due process if and to the extent that the proceeding is thereby rendered fundamentally unfair
D. recognizing claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel usually must be raised in collateral proceeding
E. holding no ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim for failure to raise as basis for appeal of conviction ineffective assistance of trial counsel where basis for the latter claim was inadequate
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.