Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
be varied by legislative action. Id. As the Florida Supreme Court stated in Ammer-man: [T]the term may be defined in different statutes or for different purposes. See 73 C.J.S. Property s. 2, p. 152. For example, Fla. Stat., s. 421.03(12), F.S.A. defines ‘real property' for the purposes of the housing authorities law; Fla. Stat., s. 475.01(11), F.S.A. defines ‘real property’ for the purposes of the real estate license law; Fla. Stat., s. 713.01(14), F.S.A. defines ‘real property for the purposes of the mechanics lien law. These definitions vary, because the statutory definitions usually apply only to the term as used in the particular statutory provision. Id. (emphasis added). We have recognized this legal principle. Miami Country Day Sch. v. Bakst, 641 So.2d 467, 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Applying this principle, the brothers argue
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that section 7750214b2 florida statutes 1993 prohibited conviction for fraud by person authorized to provide goods or services and grand theft based on the same facts
B. holding section 82705 florida statutes 1993 unconstitutional and certifying the question as one of great public importance
C. holding that a police department is not a person within the meaning of section 1983
D. holding that florida courts would apply florida law to contracts insuring real property located within the state
E. holding that a houseboat in a fixed location connected to a dock was a dwelling house within the meaning of section 22205 of the florida statutes 1993 defining when certain homesteads located on leased properties are entitled to protection from forced sale under article x section 4a
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.