Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a bag of marijuana and an audiotape recording of the drug transaction, on which the defendant’s voice was identified. 85 S.W.3d at 462. In addition, a videotape recording was made of the informant’s actions as he entered the defendant’s car. Id. This evidence was held to sufficiently connect the defendant with the crime. Id. Likewise, in Jefferson, an officer testified that he searched the informant, placed an audio recording device on her and turned it on, observed the informant enter a house to make a drug transaction, turned the device off when she returned and introduced the recording into evidence and identified the defendant’s voice on the recording. This evidence was held sufficient to corroborate the informant’s testimony. 99 S.W.3d at 792; see also Brown, 159 S.W.3d at 708-11 ; Dennis v. State, 151 S.W.3d 745, 749
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that ownership of vehicle and presence at scene of crash sufficiently corroborated appellants statement
B. holding testimony of officer and narcotics investigator who both witnessed drug transaction coupled with audio recording of transaction constituted sufficient corroboration
C. holding that a controlled buy at a particular home provided probable cause for the search of that residence
D. holding informants testimony corroborated by evidence consisting of defendants presence at scene coupled with cash found in his pocket carrying serial numbers matching those provided to informant for controlled buy and videotape of transaction included conversation of defendant regarding prior drug sale
E. holding that affidavit officer submitted to state court judge coupled with officers sworn testimony before that judge regarding informants controlled drug purchases at defendants residence sufficed to establish probable cause
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.