Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
court to reverse a criminal conviction obtained in an otherwise fair proceeding.” United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 11, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). We “must consider the probable effect the prosecutor’s [comments] would have on the jury’s ability to judge the evidence fairly,” “within the context of the trial.” Id. at 12, 105 S.Ct. 1038. a. Barragan, Franco, and Gutierrez An “important factor contributing to the prejudicial effect of improper statements is the strength of the case against a defendant.” Sanchez, 659 F.3d at 1260 (quoting Weather spoon, 410 F.3d at 1151). The evidence against Barragan, Franco, and Gutierrez was overwhelming, and they do not argue otherwise. Thus, we conclude that the prosecutor’s remarks did not prejudice them. See Nobari, 574 F.3d at 1082 . b. Fernandez The evidence against Fernandez
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the admission of a family photo was harmless error in light of the overwhelming evidence in support of the conviction
B. holding that while the prosecutors question was improper in light of the overwhelming evidence there was no reversible error in the denial of defendants motion for mistrial
C. holding the error harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt
D. holding that error from the erroneous admission of evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendants guilt
E. holding that prosecutors remarks were harmless in light of overwhelming evidence against defendants
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.