Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and she had complaints from writing bad checks; (4) Latonya Bush— excluded because related to a murder suspect who had been arrested and worked for defense attorney; (5) Diane Saffore— excluded because disagreed with the death penalty; (6) Darlene Edwards — excluded because disagreed with the death penalty; (7) Shirley Blevins — excluded because a relative was convicted of capital murder in that county and she or one of her family members was represented by defense counsel, Burdine; (8) Joyce Ann Cox— excluded because previously arrested for shoplifting. The trial court found that the reasons proffered by the State were race-neutral. ¶ 13. We find that the reasons articulated by the State are race-neutral. This Court has previously sanctioned these reasons. See Mack, 650 So.2d at 1300 ; Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d at 1351 (holding
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that opposition to a gangs criminal activity is not a protected political opinion
B. holding that leaning towards the death penalty is not the same as an automatic vote for the death penalty
C. recognizing a distinction between pure opinion which does not imply that it is based upon undisclosed facts and mixed opinion which implies that it is based upon facts which justify the opinion but are unknown to those reading or hearing it
D. holding that it is proper to exclude potential venire persons for criminal activity and based upon opinion of the death penalty
E. holding that the death penalty is unconstitutional as applied to juvenile defendants
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.