Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
claim is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED. 1 . Plaintiff Toyee, while declining to concur in the relief sought by this motion pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a) (E.D.Mich. November 7, 1994), has not submitted a response to Reno’s motion to dismiss. 2 . In his brief in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment, presently pending before this court, Toyee argues that "the arrogance and intentional political posturing that defendant attributed to plaintiff on the basis of this event [the T-shirt incident] clearly contributed to the alleged "unprofessional attitude” that admittedly was the primary factor in the decision to discharge [Toyee]. (emphasis in the original) 3 . Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a federal cause of action for damages arises upon a federal agents unconstitutional conduct
B. holding that a single cause of action arises out of the same set of facts
C. recognizing an action for damages against unknown federal agents for the violation of constitutional rights
D. recognizing cause of action for damages against federal agents acting under their authority who allegedly violated plaintiffs fourth amendment rights
E. holding plaintiff may sue federal agents for money damages for violation of his constitutional rights
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.