Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(claiming ineffective assistance of counsel), he concedes that the basis of his trial counsel’s objection in the trial court did not include his present contention that MAI-CR3d 310.50 and § 562.076 violate his right to due process of law or to present a defense. Rule 28.03 provides that counsel must make specific objections to instructions considered erroneous before the jury retires, stating distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds of the objection. It also provides that the objections must be raised in the motion for new trial in accordance with Rule 29.11. Assignments of error cannot be broadened or changed by raising them for the first time on appeal. State v. Howard, 896 S.W.2d 471, 493 (Mo.App.S.D.1995). See also State v. Reichert, 854 S.W.2d 584, 591 (Mo.App.S.D.1993) . In addition, “[t]o preserve a constitutional
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a sufficiency challenge must be preserved in the trial court in a parental termination case to be reviewed on appeal
B. holding that the point on appeal and the objection in the trial court must be the same in order for it to be preserved for appeal
C. holding that issues must be briefed to be preserved on appeal
D. holding an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the trial court in order to be preserved for review
E. holding that complaint on appeal must be the same as that presented in the trial court
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.