Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
549 S.W.2d 698, 704 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977) (reversing and remanding because trial court erroneously overruled motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence); see also Tex. R. App. P. 21.3 (setting out grounds for granting a new trial, many of which refer to newly discovered evidence). In addition, if trial counsel is aware of exculpatory evidence that is not effectively used at trial, the defendant can make an ineffective claim in his motion for new trial. Tex. R. App. P. 21.7 (the court “may receive evidence by affidavit or otherwise”). Finally, counsel can be deficient when he fails to object to erroneous language in a jury charge. Willis v. State, No. 06-02-00108-CR, 2003 WL 21524704 (Tex. App.-Texarkana July 8, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) ; McDade v. State, No. 06-01-00134-CR, 2002 WL
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the failure of defense counsel to object to erroneous punishment charge authorizing an illegal sentence is ineffective assistance of counsel
B. recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel
C. holding that failure to object to admissible evidence was not ineffective assistance of counsel
D. holding that an issue of ineffective assistance of counsel is rendered moot when a defendant receives an illegal sentence
E. holding that the appropriate vehicle for claims alleging that defense counsel violated a defendants right to testify is a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.