Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
de novo on appeal. See Kincaid, 147 N.C. App. at 97, 555 S.E.2d at 297. The Fourth Amendment protects the right of individuals to be free from “unreasonable searches and seizures.” U.S. Const, amend. IV. This protection is applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081, 1090 (1961). The right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures applies to seizures of the person, includ was a suspicious person described as a Hispanic male. There was no approximate age, height, weight or other physical characteristics given as part of the description, nor was there a description of any specific clothing worn by the suspicious person. Cf. State v. Lovin, 339 N.C. 695, 703-04, 454 S.E.2d 229, 234 (1995) ; State v. Jordan, 120 N.C. App. 364, 367-68,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding reasonable suspicion is based on totality of circumstances
B. holding circumstances supporting reasonable suspicion included a description of a suspicious person with a lot of hair a gold watch and large frame glasses
C. holding that inquiry notice exists where a reasonable investor of ordinary intelligence would have discovered the suspicious information and recognized it as suspicious
D. holding that passenger conduct can be a factor supporting reasonable suspicion
E. holding circumstances supporting reasonable suspicion to make a stop included that the defendant was on a comer on which recent multiple drugrelated arrests had been made
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.