Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
determination.” Khalili v. Holder, 557 F.3d 429, 435 (6th Cir.2009). Maldonado-Reyes challenges the denial of his request for a continuance. “We review the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s denial of petitioner’s motion for continuance under an abuse-of-discretion standard.” Ilic-Lee v. Mukasey, 507 F.3d 1044, 1047 (6th Cir.2007). “An abuse of discretion occurs if ‘the denial ... was made without a rational explanation, inexplicably departed from established policies, or rested on an impermissible basis such as invidious discrimination.’ ” Id. (omission in original) (quoting Abu-Khaliel v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 627, 634 (6th Cir.2006)). The IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29. “Finding ‘good cause’ is crucial since a continuance, in effe .2008) . Maldonado-Reyes additionally argues that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an ij made an explicit credibility when the ij found testimony not credible based on several enumerated inconsistencies
B. holding that the ij did not abuse his discretion in denying request for further continuance where the ij granted previous request
C. holding that criminal aliens argument that the ij abused its discretion by not granting her a continuance does not present a constitutional claim or issue of law that this court has jurisdiction to consider
D. recognizing this court may affirm for any reason supported by the record
E. holding that where the ij had previously granted continuance requests this reason alone is a sufficient basis to affirm the ij
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.