Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
purpose of the form (drafted by and to give assistance to the clinic) and the circumstances of execution.” Id. at 1056. One of those circumstances was the husband’s execution of the consent forms in blank. The court, therefore, doubted that the form represented the parties’ intent in the event of a dispute between them. Id. at 1056-57. Nevertheless, the court addressed and rejected the enforceability of such an agreement: With this said, we conclude that, even had the husband and the wife entered into an unambiguous agreement between themselves regarding the disposition of the frozen preembryos, we would not enforce an agreement that would compel one donor to become a parent against his or her will. As a matter of public 6 U.S. 40, 51, 119 S.Ct. 977, 986, 143 L.Ed.2d 130, 144 (1999)  and Flagg Bros., Inc. v. Brooks, 436 U.S. 149,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that private insurers decision to seek review by private utilization review organization of reasonableness and necessity of medical treatment though authorized by pennsylvania workers compensation statute did not involve state action to the extent necessary to trigger due process guarantees under fourteenth amendment
B. holding that statute allows admissibility of evidence by affidavit to prove reasonableness and necessity of medical expenses
C. holding that a state medicaid agency can review the medical necessity of treatment prescribed by a doctor on a casebycase basis
D. recognizing private right of action
E. holding that while the fourteenth amendment is directed against state action and not private action the state action requirement is met in a civil action where state law is applied whether by statute or common law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.