Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
more or less probable. Minn. R. Evid. 401. Although the first CHIPS petition was not pleaded as a basis for the termination petition, the district court took judicial notice of all court records relating to the first CHIPS petition, and appellant did not object. The neglect incident was relevant to whether appellant demonstrated a pattern of failing to comply with the duties of parenthood, including providing a safe and clean environment for the child. It was also relevant to projecting appellant’s future ability to provide a safe environment and suitable level of care for the child. Appellant’s hearsay argument is also unavailing. The reports were admissible under the public-records hearsay exception. Cf. Gardner v. Comm’r of Pub. Safety, 423 N.W.2d 110, 114 (Minn.App.1988) ; see generally Minn. R. Evid. 803(8)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting highly probative and relevant evidence of other crimes
B. holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting gangrelated evidence
C. holding that court was within its discretion to refuse to consider reports that did not meet the supreme courts standards for admitting reports into evidence
D. holding juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in admitting expert testimony
E. holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting police reports in civil case under publicrecords exception
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.