Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
this is a distinction without a difference. The DOT clearly argued to the jury that the evidence of such consideration defined the amount of any business losses. 3 Although the DOT argues that other evidence in the record could have supported the jury’s verdict, there is no way to determine what effect the irrelevant evidence regarding the Assignment may have played in its deliberations based on the DOT’s arguments in the case. Additionally, we find that the trial court made another evidentiary error, as addressed below, which may have improperly affected the parties’ presentation of evidence and argument at trial. 4 “Admissions in judicio apply only to facts in litigation in a particular case.” Liberty Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Diamond, 231 Ga. 321, 323 (III) (201 SE2d 400) (1973) . 5 That Lovein made this affirmative agreement
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an attorneys filing a notice of appearance on behalf of his or her client constitute a waiver of service of process by the client
B. holding that a public administrator was not entitled to attorneys fees in a claim against the estate of a former guardian where the case was not one where attorneys fees were authorized and there was no evidence to support the award
C. holding that attorneys statement in prior litigation that if his client won that case she would make no further claims on estate at issue were not admissions in judicio
D. holding that admissions purportedly made by an accused by way of his agents or attorneys in pleadings from a civil case are not admissible in a criminal case unless shown to have been authorized by him
E. holding that attorneys acts within scope of his authority are binding on client
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.