Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
maximum for an indeterminate quantity of drugs, then the type and quantity of drugs is an element of the § 841 offense that must be charged in the indictment and submitted to the jury. submitted to the jury, it was error for the District Court to sentence the Friedmans to life terms on the ITAR counts. We assume, arguendo, that Gary Friedman’s request to charge the jury with determining whether the plot involved a plan to commit a “crime of violence” was sufficient to preserve the issue of the failure to charge the jury with determining whether the deaths of Kovach and Gould were caused by the “crime of violence,” and, accordingly, review the claim for harmless error pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 52(a). See Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 10-11, 119 S.Ct. 1827, 144 L.Ed.2d 35 (1999) ; see also United States v. Guevara, 298 F.3d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that knowledge element could not be deemed in favor of plaintiff where defendant objected to the omission of that element from the jury charge
B. holding that the omission of an element is subject to harmless error analysis
C. holding that the harmlesserror rule of chapman v california  applies to the failure of a trial judge to submit an element of the offense to the jury
D. holding that the omission of an element from the jury charge is subject to harmlesserror review
E. holding omission in the jury instruction of element of offense requires a new trial
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.