Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
545, 219 Ill.Dec. 823, 672 N.E.2d 331 (1996) (suppressing juvenile’s confession where his mother’s attempts to see her son “were clearly frustrated by the police so that they could create an intimidating atmosphere and obtain a confession”); People v. Montanez, 273 Ill.App.3d 844, 210 Ill.Dec. 295, 652 N.E.2d 1271 (1995) (same); In re J.O., 231 Ill.App.3d 853, 173 Ill.Dec. 406, 596 N. (1986) (same). The second approac ing that juveniles are not permitted to waive privilege against self-incrimination unless friendly adult is present and gives guidance); In re E.T.C., 141 Vt. 375, 449 A.2d 937 (1982) (interpreting Vermont Constitution to require presence of interested adult during custodial interrogation of juvenile); State ex rel. J.M. v. Taylor, 166 W.Va. 511, 276 S.E.2d 199 (1981) . Cf. Sevion v. State, 620 N.E.2d 736
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that juveniles may waive constitutional rights
B. holding that a federal criminal defendant may waive jury trial without advice of counsel
C. holding that juveniles may waive right to counsel only upon advice of counsel
D. holding that juveniles may not waive counsel unless parent or guardian also waives that right
E. recognizing that the sixth amendment guarantees a defendant the right to counsel and the right to waive counsel
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.