Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
154 F.3d 1129, 1132 (10th Cir.1998) (quotations and citations omitted). As a general rule, the grids may not be used conclusively if the claimant has nonexertional impairments that limit the ability to do the full range of work within a classification. See Thompson v. Sullivan, 987 F.2d 1482, 1488 (10th Cir.1993); see also 20 C.F .R. § 404.1569a(c)(2) (stating that “[i]f your impairment(s) and related symptoms, such as pain, only affect your ability to perform the nonexertional aspects of work-related activities, the [grids] do not direct factual conclusions of disabled or not disabled”). However, they may be used to direct a conclusion if the claimant’s nonexertional impairments do not significantly reduce the underlying job base. See Evans v. Chater, 55 F.3d 530, 532 (10th Cir.1995) . This is because only significant
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the record should contain evidence that the employee had demonstrated an ability to perform adequately
B. holding that under pwdcra the inability to perform a particular job does not constitute a substantial limitation instead the impairment must significantly restrict an individuals ability to perform at least a wide range of jobs
C. recognizing the majority rule
D. holding that the ability to perform a substantial majority of work in rfc assessment suffices for purposes of grids
E. holding that application of the grids is inappropriate if a claimant suffers from nonexertional impairments which diminish his or her ability to perform a full range of work
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.