Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to third parties because trademark law does not specifically excuse the licensor from accepting performance from a person other than the original licensee. Second, NCP argues that even if trademark law did make such an excuse for the licensor, NCP had consent to license the trademark from rights derived from the Settlement and License Agreements. We agree with the Bankruptcy Judge and hold that the Appellant had no rights to the Blanks’ trademark that were as sumed by NCP in its bankruptcy proceedings. 1. Section 365(c)(1) A debtor in possession, as well as a trustee, may, subject to the bankruptcy court’s approval, “assume any executory contract from itself as debtor.” City of Jamestown v. James Cable Partners, L.P. (In re James Cable Partners, L.P.), 27 F.3d 534, 537 (11th Cir.1994) (applying 11 U.S.C. § 365(a)); K-4, Inc. v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding creditor willfully violated the automatic stay in refusing after notified of debtors bankruptcy filing to turn over debtors funds in his possession
B. holding that the trustees preference actions against each of the defendants was precluded as a matter of law by the debtors earlier assumption of its agreements with them 
C. holding that debtors in possession generally have rights powers and duties of trustees
D. holding that possession of a pistol in public requires knowing possession
E. holding that the csu board of trustees and individual trustees sued in their official capacity are a political arm of the state and as such are immune from suit
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.