Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Corp., 97 B.R. at 180. 31. The retention of jurisdiction by the bankruptcy court after confirmation is particularly appropriate where, as here, the bankruptcy court expressly retains jurisdiction under the plan. Hospital and Univ. Property Damage Claimants v. Johns-Manville Corp. (In re Johns-Manville Corp.), 7 F.3d 32, 34 (2d Cir.1993) (“The bankruptcy court’s post-confirmation jurisdiction ... defined by reference to the Plan”); Mueller Indus., Inc. v. Sharon Steel Corp., 1992 WL 116314, *2 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (“[T]he bankruptcy court as a branch of .the district court is empowered to oversee the reorganization and issue orders necessary to ensure that it proceeds in' compliance with the terms of the approved plan”); In re Hardwicke Cos., Inc., 64 B.R. 113, 117-18 (S.D.N.Y.1986) . 32. Thus, this Court expressly retained
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a plan provision purporting to provide jurisdiction over any and all actions involving the debtor postconfirmation was invalid as beyond the scope of the bankruptcy code
B. holding that a bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction postconfirmation to adjudicate adversary proceeding concerning asset purchases at bankruptcy sale notwithstanding inclusion of language in the plan purporting to retain such jurisdiction in the bankruptcy court
C. holding that postconfirmation jurisdiction was proper in light of plan provision retaining such jurisdiction
D. recognizing that the iirira strips the court of jurisdiction over the attorney generals discretionary extreme hardship determination but retaining jurisdiction over constitutional due process claims
E. holding that the clause at issue granted jurisdiction but not exclusive jurisdiction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.