Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 85, 86. Retail Property Trust, 768 F.3d at 947-48, n.5. 21 . ECF No. 16 at 6. 22 . 49 U.S.C. § 40103. 23 . United States v. Christensen, 419 F.2d 1401, 1404 (9th Cir. 1969). 24 . 49 U.S.C. §§ 40101-46507. 25 . 49 U.S.C. § 41713. 26 . 49 U.S.C. § 42121. 27 . ECF No. 16 at 6. 28 . Montalvo v. Spirit Airlines, 508 F.3d 464, 468 (9th Cir. 2007). 29 . Martin ex rel. Heckman v. Midwest Exp. Hldgs., Inc., 555 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. 2009). 30 . Ventress v. Japan Airlines, 747 F.3d 716, 719 (9th Cir. 2014). 31 . Montalvo, 508 F.3d at 468 (affirming dismissal of passenger's failure-to-warn claims); Martin, 555 F.3d at 812 (reversing dismissal of airline's indemnity claim); Ventress, 747 F.3d at 723 (affirming judgment on the pleadings). 32 . Montalvo, 508 F.3d at 468 ; Martin, 555 F.3d at 811-812 (holding that FAA
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding state failuretowarn claims were preempted because any warning label linking said drugs to suicide would have been false and misleading
B. holding that failuretowarn claims based on theory that faarequired warnings are insufficient are preempted
C. holding that the plaintiffs state law claims are preempted by federal law
D. holding the state law claims were not preempted
E. holding that a failuretowarn claim against a pharmaceutical company was not impliedly preempted
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.