Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
on the leg are enough to demonstrate the imposition and fraud practiced upon this mentally weak and helpless individual. In addition, the claim agent had Ault to write in this release, 'I understand this release.' This brings forcibly to mind the act of the thief, who, in order to throw off suspicion, hurried down the street, exclaiming ‘Stop, thief!' ”). 7 . 481 So.2d 846, 848 (Miss.1985). 8 . Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). 9 . Compare Matsuura v. Alston & Bird, 166 F.3d 1006, 1008 (9th Cir.1999) (applying Delaware law and concluding that "plaintiffs who have been fraudulently induced to settle tort claims” “may rescind the contract or they may affirm the contract and sue for fraud”), Turkish v. Kasenetz, 27 F.3d 23, 28 (2d Cir.1994) , Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a settlement agreement is not a court order and therefore a violation of the settlement agreement would not subject a party to contempt
B. holding that under the pre1986 jurisdictional limitation a claim by the state which discovered the fraud investigated the fraud disclosed the fraud to the federal government and which was the original source of the information was jurisdictionally barred
C. holding that in the context of a settlement contract the defrauded party may either 1 rescind the settlement or 2 ratify the settlement retain the proceeds and institute an action to recover fraud damages
D. holding that a plaintiff cannot avoid the securities fraud exception by pleading mail fraud or wire fraud if the conduct giving rise to those offenses also amounts to securities fraud
E. holding that a party may ratify a settlement agreement induced by fraud retain the proceeds and sue to recover fraud damages
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.