Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
30 ."The question under the Eighth Amendment is whether prison officials, acting with deliberate indifference, exposed a prisoner to a sufficiently substantial risk of serious damage to his future health, and it does not matter whether the risk comes from a single source or multiple sources, any more than it matters whether a prisoner faces an excessive risk of attack for reasons personal to him or because all prisoners in his situation face such a risk.” Farmer, 511 U.S. at 843, 114 S.Ct. 1970 (internal quotation omitted and emphasis added). Thus, the risk must be cognizable, but the consequences of that risk need not yet have materialized, in order to define the time to begin to determine whether the defendant disregarded the risk. See Gates v. Cook, 376 F.3d 323, 341 (5th Cir.2004) . Rather, the defendant's action or inaction
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that prisoner stated a claim for relief under the eighth amendment for his exposure to secondhand smoke even though he reported no illness
B. holding that an inmate stated a cause of action under the eighth amendment by alleging that prison officials had with deliberate indifference exposed him to levels of ets that posed an unreasonable risk of serious damage to his future health
C. holding that an eighth amendment plaintiff did not have to prove that he was actually injured by exposure to raw sewage only that such exposure posed a serious health risk
D. holding that insurance coverage in the context of asbestosrelated diseases is triggered by exposure exposure in residence and manifestation
E. holding that plaintiff stated eighth amendment claim where he alleged exposure to ets causing aggravation of chronic asthma
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.