Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
considered employee’s actions in foreign state in determining whether minimum contacts existed to confer jurisdiction over South Carolina bail bondsman in foreign court). 8 . Dolan v. City of Camden, 233 S.C. 1, 103 S.E.2d 328 (1958) (municipalities, which have full and complete control over streets and highways within their corporate limits, are liable for injuries caused by failure to use reasonable care to keep them in a reasonably safe condition for public travel). 9 . 24A S.C.Code Ann. Regs. 61-16 § 613 (1992) (requiring hospitals to maintain certain minimum standards and equipment to provide emer gency care and services, including around-the-clock access to x-ray and routine laboratory services and a licensed physician). 10 . See e.g., Jackson v. Power, 743 P.2d at 1379-82 ; Gilbert v. Sycamore Mun. Hosp., 156 Ill.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a company providing administrative purchasing and financial services to a hospital was not a hospital and thus could not be held directly liable under emtala
B. holding that hospital may be held liable for negligence of emergency room physicians under apparent agency doctrine
C. holding that physicians as agents of the hospital are indistinguishable from the hospital for immunity purposes under the lgaa
D. holding that a general acute care hospital may not delegate its duty to provide physicians for emergency room care because the law imposes a duty on hospital to provide that health care
E. holding that a municipality may be held liable as a person under  1983
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.