Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
these circumstances, and assuming, solely for the purpose of this argument, that Maine law requires that a power of sale foreclosure auction meet the standard of commercial reasonableness, we cannot' agree with Oceanic’s argument that a fact-finder could" rationally conclude that the sale was commercially unreasonable. [¶33] Finally, Sloan’s Cove’s decision not to hire a licensed auctioneer does not render the sale unreasonable or require invalidation of the sale. ‘ Oceanic points to the auctioneering licensing statute, 32 M.R.S. § 285 (2015), which requires a person “who engages in the business of auc-tioneering, professes or advertises to be an auctioneer or advertises the sale of real, personal or mixed property by auction” to hold a valid auctioneer’s license. The pow per curiam) ; Williston v. Morse, 51 Mass. 17, 23 (1845)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plaintiff lacked standing after foreclosure sale to set aside the sale arid reinstate her right to redeem property based upon arguments that events surrounding the closing of the sale were improper
B. holding in the analogous context of choiceoflaw in relation to the sale of personal property that compensation for arranging the sale is assessed apart from underlying sale
C. holding that the new jersey real estate licensing act is applicable to the sale of a company through a stock sale
D. holding that an auction sale by an unlicensed auctioneer did not invalidate the sale
E. holding that failure to comply with rule requiring notice of sheriffs sale requires voiding of sale
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.