Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
303 by the transfer of an illiquid promissory security that gave the creditor no more than it already had-its proportionate share of an interest in the debtor’s assets. The Alleged Debtor also observes that the Eden Rock Petitioners brought a lawsuit in New York State court, individually and derivatively, against Stillwater, Gerova and certain of their principals, and that judgment has never been entered for the Eden Rock Petitioners against Stillwa-ter. The fact that litigation is ongoing related “to a petitioning creditor’s claim is insufficient to rebut its prima facie validity.” See In re VitaminSpice, 472 B.R. 282, 293 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.2012), citing In re Red Rock Rig 101, Ltd., 397 B.R. 545 (10th Cir. BAP 2008); see also In re AMC Investors, LLC, 406 B.R. 478, 486 (Bankr.D.Del.2009) . Moreover, the Eden Rock lawsuit asserted
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that if a creditors claim is subject to a bona fide dispute that creditor lacks standing to file an involuntary petition
B. holding that there is no requirement that a petitioning creditor obtain a statecourt judgment in order to have standing to file an involuntary petition under  303 of the bankruptcy code
C. holding that creditor lacked appellate standing to appeal order of bankruptcy court absent permission of bankruptcy court
D. holding that tjhere is no requirement in the bankruptcy code that a debtor must prove that a plan is confirmable in order to file a petition
E. holding that creditor did not have actual knowledge of the bankruptcy filing where the debtor informed creditor of the possibility that a bankruptcy case would be filed
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.