Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
judg ment that the Crow Tribal Court exceeded its jurisdiction by ruling that Pease was not required to pay property taxes imposed by the County. Pease owns fee title to real property-located within the boundaries of the Crow Reservation. The property was allotted and patented in fee to Pease’s father under the Crow Allotment Act of 1920, 41 Stat. 751. Pease has failed to pay his state property taxes from 1987 to the present. In July 1991, he filed an action in Crow Tribal Court seeking to enjoin Yellowstone County from imposing state property taxes on his land. The parties agreed to stay the tribal court action pending the Supreme Court’s decision in County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakima Indian Nation, 502 U.S. 251, 112 S.Ct. 683, 116 L.Ed.2d 687 (1992) . After the Court decided Yakima, the tribal
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that agency could not claim confidentiality for tax returns that had been exhibits in tax court and were therefore public records
B. holding that arizona could not impose an income tax on reservation indians
C. holding that a states interest in the integrity of its property tax system lies at the core of the states sovereignty it is impossible to imagine that a state government could continue to exist without the power to tax
D. recognizing congressional intent to permit the states to tax railroad property at a higher rate than agricultural land
E. holding that states could impose an ad valorem property tax on fee land that had been allotted under the general allotment act
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.