Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
conclusory and far from artful,” Jennings v. Am. Postal Workers Union, 672 F.2d 712, 716 (8th Cir.1982), we construe Henley’s complaint as alleging a violation of her right to be free from the use of excessive force under the Fourth Amendment inasmuch as she is asserting that certain individual defendant 5 (8th Cir.2001) (“Intentional sexual harassment by persons acting under color of state law violates the Fourteenth Amendment and is actionable under § 1983.”). To the extent that Henley’s complaint asserts the violation of rights secured by the Constitution and committed by persons acting under color of state law, we conclude the district court erred in dismissing her section 1983 action for failure to comply with Title VIPs procedural requirements. See, e.g., Notari, 971 F.2d at 588 ; cf. Jennings, 672 F.2d at 716 (concluding
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding section 1983 provides remedy only if plaintiff proves elements of malicious prosecution under state law and establishes that misuse of the legal proceedings was so egregious that he suffered deprivation of rights secured by fourteenth amendment
B. holding that plaintiffs may bring a section 1983 claim for damages to vindicate their rights under idea
C. holding plaintiffs allegations defendant acted under col or of state law to violate rights secured by the fourteenth amendment are sufficient to defeat summary judgment of plaintiffs section 1983 claim
D. holding a plaintiff must allege the violation of a right secured by the constitution and laws of the united states to state a claim under  1983
E. holding that the plaintiffs state law claims are preempted by federal law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.