Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.” Greaves, 121 B.R. at 235 (quoting Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950)). Miller & Custom fail to note, however, that the 4 (9th Cir. BAP 1994), aff'd, 56 F.3d 70 (9th Cir.1995). “When it is found that there has been defective service of process, the judgment is void: ‘A person is not bound by a judgment in litigation to which rica, AFL-CIO, 491 F.2d 245, 249 (4th Cir.1974) (“It is axiomatic that a federal court cannot acquire in personam jurisdiction over a defendant who does not voluntarily appear unless he is served with process in a manner authorized by federal statute or rule.”); Mooney Aircraft, Inc. v. Donnelly, 402 F.2d 400, 406 (5th Cir.1968) . The only exception to this principle arises
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that service of a statecourt summons and complaint after removal to federal court is valid service
B. recognizing that a default judgment based on improper service is void
C. recognizing that it is well settled law that an action is commenced by the service of a summons and without valid service of process the trial court has no jurisdiction to act
D. holding such service satisfies due process
E. holding that absent valid service of process proceedings are void from the outset
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.