Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of. A. Error as to Jury Instructions Given 148 We will first dispose of the Gorostietas' argument regarding jury instructions 16, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, and 28. "It is well established that a reviewing court will not address arguments that are not adequately briefed." State v. Thomas, 961 P.2d 299, 304 (Utah 1998); see also State v. Thomas, 1999 UT 2, 111, 974 P.2d 269; Walker v. U.S. Gen., Inc., 916 P.2d 908, 908 (Utah 1996). Rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that the "[bJrief of the appellant shall contain ... [an] argument [that] shall contain the contentio . 3655, 1995 WL 1315955, 1995 Phila. Cty. Rptr. LEXIS 11, **17 (affirming admission of bills where physician testified as to reasonableness and necessity); Martinez v. Kurdziel, 612 A.2d 669, 676 (R.1.1992) ; Castillo v. Am. Garment Finishers Corp., 965
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the government must satisfy its burden of proving contract damages
B. holding that the burden of proving lack of negligence is on the owner
C. holding that statute does not eliminate plaintiffs burden to prove reasonableness and necessity of past medical expenses
D. holding that statute does not remove plaintiffs burden of proving causation and reasonableness
E. holding that the burden of proving that the employee did not make reasonable efforts is on the defendant
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.