Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to review by the courts.” Goonsuwan v. Ashcroft, 252 F.3d 383, 390 (5th Cir.2001); see also Bonhometre v. Gonzales, 414 F.3d 442, 447 (3d Cir.2005) (“[A] claim is ‘available as of right’ if, at the very least, (1) the alien’s claim was within the jurisdiction of the BIA to consider and implicated agency expertise, and (2) the agency was capable of granting the remedy sought by the alien.”). “The principle underlying this policy is that courts should not address an immigration issue until the appropriate administrative authority has had the opportunity to apply its specialized knowledge and experience to the matter.” Padilla v. Gonzales, 470 F.3d 1209, 1214 (7th Cir. 2006) (citations omitted); See also I.N.S. v. Orlando Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) . The Government contends that this Court does
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the supreme court has final appellate review of agency decisions
B. holding that an appellate court cannot consider an issue that was not preserved for appellate review
C. holding that except in rare circumstances an appellate court should not intrude upon the domain which congress has exclusively entrusted to an administrative agency
D. holding that an appellate court has discretion to consider an issue not argued by the parties
E. recognizing the principle that an administrative agency error should not work to a claimants detriment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.