Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
including vanity plates, is to aid in vehicle identification. See Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 304(b)(2)(C) (“[T]he primary purpose of motor vehicle plates is vehicle identification.”). Although a policy of vehicle identification is not necessarily inconsistent with a government’s intention to designate a public forum, the statement of such a legislative policy does not suggest, much less show, an intention to create a public forum. Second, as noted by counsel for the state at oral argument, Vermont’s vanity plates serve the purpose of raising revenue. Nothing about the revenue-raising aim of the vanity-plate regime suggests that Vermont intended to “create a forum for unlimited public expression.” DiLoreto v. Downey Unified Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 196 F.3d 958, 966 (9th Cir.1999) ; see New York Magazine v. Metropolitan Transp.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a municipal transit vehicle is not a public forum for first amendment purposes because the city is engaged in commerce and the advertising space in question although incidental to the provision of public transportation is part of a commercial venture
B. holding that a public school did not create a public forum by allowing commercial advertising on a baseball field fence
C. holding that public meeting did not satisfy public participation requirement because public did not receive adequate notice
D. holding that a public high school newspaper was a limited public forum not a traditional or designated public forum because there was no evidence that the school permitted indiscriminate use by the general public quoting hazelwood sch dist v kuhlmeier 484 us 260 267 108 sct 562 98 led2d 592 1988
E. recognizing that public utilities affect the public interest in that they render essential public services to a large number of the general public
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.