Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
his plea to count 35 thus fails. IV. For the foregoing reasons, we find that the factual resumes submitted in support of Hildenbrand’s and Stone’s guilty pleas are sufficient to sustain their convictions. The remaining issues appellants raise are related to their sentences. Because the defendants waived their right to appeal their sentences, we DISMISS THE APPEAL of their sentences, and AFFIRM their convictions. 1 . Count 36 alleged forfeiture of assets. 2 . See also our discussion of the similar term "benefit” infra under § 666 relating to Stone’s conviction. 3 . That the benefit is intended ultimately to pass to the low-to-moderate-income purchaser of the program homes does not change the result. See Fischer v. United States, 529 U.S. 667, 677, 120 S.Ct. 1780, 146 L.Ed.2d 707 (2000)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that there may be multiple beneficiaries of federal programs
B. holding that an agreement may provide elements of a plan by setting out rules under which beneficiaries will be entitled to care
C. holding that trust beneficiaries have no authority to maintain an action as third party beneficiaries of contracts between the trustee and agents of the trustee concerning the internal affairs of the trust
D. holding that beneficiaries could not sue attorneys of the trust for legal malpractice because beneficiaries are not direct recipients of the attorneys services
E. recognizing noncontracting parties rights as thirdparty beneficiaries of an insurance contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.