Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
witness’s testimony adversely. We have stated that “[i]n determining the intent with which a defendant acted, a district court is entitled to rely on ... all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from all of the evidence,” Khedr, 343 F.3d at 102, and that “[w]e generally defer to a sentencing court’s findings as to what a speaker meant by his words, and how a listener would reasonably interpret those words.” United States v. Gaskin, 364 F.3d 438, 466 (2d Cir.2004) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). These considerations fully support the district court’s conclusion that the totality of the timing and circumstances of Yarbrough’s phone call to the witness demonstrated a clear intent to threaten the witness. Cf United States v. Shoulberg, 895 F.2d 882, 884-86 (2d Cir.1990) . The fact that the witness stated that he did
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that willful failure to appear at sentencing supported obstruction of justice enhancement
B. holding that ussg  3c11 reaches attempts to obstruct whether direct or indirect in affirming obstruction of justice enhancement for incarcerated defendant who wrote a note stating that he did not trust at all a codefendant asking for location of codefendants residence and implying possibility of rough sexual altercation with codefendant upon defendants release from detention even though codefendant never received note because totality of circumstances surrounding note indicated an indirect attempt to obstruct justice
C. holding that the right to choose counsel cannot be manipulated so as to obstruct the orderly procedure in the courts or to interfere with the fair administration of justice
D. holding trial court in determining proper sentence of a defendant may validly consider codefendants belowguideline sentence where the codefendant is at least if not more culpable than defendant
E. holding that before a court imposes an enhancement for obstruction of justice the court must review the evidence and make independent findings necessary to establish a willful impediment to or obstruction of justice 
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.