Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
he hesitate to answer questions at any time.” The trial court made extensive findings of fact in accord with this evidence. Defendant did not except to any of these findings. Id. The Court then held that “[f]rom these findings the trial court correctly concluded that the statement ‘was made freely, voluntarily, understanding [sic] and knowingly ....’” Id. at 20, 277 S.E.2d at 529. The Court concluded, therefore, that the trial court properly admitted the defendant’s incriminating statements. In this case, the trial court made comparable findings based on similar evidence. Under McCoy, therefore, the trial court’s findings in this case support its conclusion that defendant’s three statements were voluntary and admissible. See also State v. McKoy, 323 N.C. 1, 17, 372 S.E.2d 12, 20 (1988) , vacated on other grounds, 494 U.S. 433, 108
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that trial court did not err
B. holding that even though defendant began to display physical signs of withdrawal his waiver was voluntary because he remained coherent and responsive was aware of what was going on and told the  agents that he was able to continue with questioning
C. holding that district court did not err in admitting defendants prior conviction during governments caseinchief to rebut defendants expected defense announced in opening statements that he was not involved in the offense
D. holding that trial court did not err in admitting statements made two hours after defendants blood alcohol level was 026 when trial court found that during questioning the defendant was coherent and that his answers  were extremely reasonable responsive and appropriate 
E. holding that a defendants statement made outside of police custody was voluntary because he was awake and relatively coherent during the questioning despite painful injuries
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.