Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Individual Defendants acted outside the scope of authority because the Complaint alleges wrongful actions,” id. at 395, and that Lockamy and Wood were “not entitled to sovereign immunity because they were merely employees of SCTC and were not ‘tribal officials,’ ” id. at 397. II Two issues are presented for our resolution on appeal: (1) whether the district court correctly concluded that SCTC was entitled to tribal immunity; and (2) whether the court correctly concluded that the Individual Defendants were also entitled to the protection of tribal immunity. SCTC’s Immunity from Suit Indian tribes are “domestic dependent nations” with sovereignty over their members and terr Ed.2d 119 (2007); Ramey Constr. Co. v. Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation, 673 F.2d 315, 320 (10th Cir.1982) . While the Supreme Court has expressed
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a casino that functioned as an arm of the tribe enjoyed tribal immunity
B. holding that the tribes housing authority was exempt from the adea a general statute because the tribal entity was not just a business but also functioned as an arm of tribal government by providing housing to tribe members
C. holding that a tribal housing authority established by tribal council pursuant to its powers of selfgovernment was a tribal agency rather than a separate corporate entity created by the tribe
D. recognizing that tribal sovereign immunity extends to agencies and subdivisions of the tribe
E. holding that an inn which was a subentity of the tribe rather than a separate corporate entity enjoyed tribal immunity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.