Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Referring to the Standardized Civil Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia, No. 9-03 (2002 ed. rev.), which had been provided to the jurors. 7 . At the outset, we reject Ms. Blackwell’s argument that because this was a complex medical malpractice case with no fewer than four breaches of the applicable standard of care alleged, the jury was obligated to reach unanimity on each theory of breach before determining whether a particular breach proximately caused Ms. Bowman’s death. The trial court correctly noted that, by consenting to a verdict form that simply asked one single question about breach instead of requesting a special verdict form specifically addressing each of the alleged breaches, appellants forfeited this argument. See Burke v. Scaggs, 867 A.2d 213, 221 (D.C.2005) ; Nimetz v. Cappadona, 596 A.2d 603, 606-08
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding in a medical malpractice case involving several theories of liability that the appellant by not requesting a special verdict form has forfeited his right to complain on appeal that the jury might not have been unanimous in its views
B. holding that where a jury fails to return unanimous answers to some of the questions on a special verdict form the trial judge can enter judgment on the basis of the unanimous verdicts if they are dispositive of the case
C. holding that despite a jury verdict against the insured hospital for medical malpractice liability was not beyond dispute
D. holding that party did not waive right to trial by jury by requesting directed verdict
E. holding that a defendant in a medical malpractice case who acquiesced to a general verdict form despite several theories of breach could not then challenge the verdict on the basis that jurors may have relied on a theory not supported by sufficient evidence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.