Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Property Mgmt. Co., Inc., 690 S.W.2d 546, 548-49 (Tex.1985). When a plaintiff moves for summary judgment against a defendant’s counterclaim, the plaintiff must negate one or more of the essential elements of the defendant’s counterclaim. Martin v. McDonnold, 247 S.W.3d 224, 229 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2006, no pet.). Because the trial court’s order did not specify the ground(s) on which the summary judgment was granted, and because there were multiple grounds on which summary judgment may have been granted in the instant case, the State is required to negate all grounds on appeal. See Star-Telegram, Inc., v. Doe, 915 S.W.2d 471, 474 (Tex.1995); State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. S.S., 858 S.W.2d 374, 381 (Tex.1993); Lewis v. Adams, 979 S.W.2d 831, 833 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.) ; Evans v. First Nat’l Bank of Bellville, 946
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that to establish grounds for reversal an appellant must challenge all grounds on which the trial court ruled against it
B. holding that summary judgment must be affirmed where multiple grounds are asserted and the appellant does not attack all grounds on appeal
C. holding that party may not appeal summary judgment in favor of opponent when grounds opposing summary judgment asserted on appeal were not raised before trial court
D. holding where movant asserts several grounds in support of its summary judgment motion and the trial court does not specify the grounds on which judgment was granted the reviewing court can affirm the judgment if any of the grounds are meritorious
E. holding that where specific grounds for an objection are stated at trial all other grounds are waived and will not be considered for the first time on appeal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.