Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Circuit Judge. In November 2006, Domick R. Nelson defaulted on a consumer debt of $751.87. On February 25, 2015, she filed a Chapter 13 petition in bankruptcy court. Midland Credit Management, Inc., as agent for the creditor, filed a proof of claim in bankruptcy court for the amount of the debt. According to the proof of claim, Nelson made no payment on the debt after November 2006. Nelson objected to the proof of claim, arguing it was time-barred. See § 516.120(1) RSMo 2000; Discovery Grp. LLC v. Chapel Dev., LLC, 574 F.3d 986, 990 (8th Cir. 2009) . The bankruptcy court agreed, disallowing
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that standard of review is a matter of procedural rather than substantive law
B. holding that statutes of limitations are considered substantive matters for purposes of the erie doctrine
C. holding that substantive aspects of claims under federal discrimination statutes and fcra are identical
D. holding that courts apply the procedural law of the forum and the substantive law of the jurisdiction originating the claim
E. recognizing that missouri statutes of limitations are procedural not substantive and merely suspend the remedy without extinguishing the right
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.