Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
forfeiture was not received. 18 U.S.C. § 983(e). This is the exclusive remedy after pursuing the administrative path for setting aside a forfeiture decision by the Office of the Solicitor. Id. In this case, the district court properly held that plaintiffs’ CAFRA claim is barred from judicial review. Plaintiffs received proper notice of the proposed forfeitures. Plaintiffs chose to pursue an administrative path and filed petitions for remission and petitions for supplemental remission. These petitions were reviewed by the Office of the Solicitor and denied. Because plaintiffs chose to pursue administrative remedies, they waived the opportunity for judicial forfeiture proceedings. See 50 C.F.R. § 12.24(a) (expressly providing that remedies are exclusive); Malladi Drugs, 552 F.3d at 889 ; Cole v. United States (In re $844,520), 136
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that if adequate administrative remedies are available it is improper to seek relief in court before those remedies are exhausted
B. holding that the remedies are exclusive
C. holding plaintiffs were not foreclosed from pursuing ucc remedies outside of written warranty because warranty notice provision did not specify that the remedies provided were exclusive of any other remedy
D. holding that remedies provided in the bankruptcy code for enforcing a chapter 11 plan of reorganization are not exclusive
E. holding that the act provides the exclusive procedures and remedies for common law causes of action based on allegations of deception fraud and misrepresentation
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.