Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and Recommendation, ahead of the deadline for filing objections,, and enter an order consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. As officers of the Court, J.A. Besteman Company’s counsel indicated in their filings that, as of July 7, 2006, Carter’s Inc. is no longer in operation. Further-, J.A. Besteman Company states, “[i]t is unclear what action Carter’s Inc. is tak ing or will take, including bankruptcy, or as to what will happen to its assets impressed with Besteman’s PACA trust.” PL’s Br. at 2 (Docket # 14). Clearly, time is of the essence in this matter. Given the precarious situation presented in this case, the Court has conducted an expedited, yet careful, review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. See McGill v. Goff, 17 F.3d 729 (5th Cir.1994) , overruled on other grounds Kansa Reins. Corp.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that failure to object to magistrate judges recommendation waived issue on appeal
B. holding that district courts adoption of the magistrate judges report and recommendation one day after issuance did not constitute reversible error where district court conducted a meaningful review of the report and recommendation
C. holding that a partys failure to raise objections to the report and recommendation waives the partys right to review in the district court
D. holding that the court will review the report and recommendation for clear error
E. holding that by blindly adopting the magistrate judges findings apparently without ever having received a report and recommendation the district court violated  636b1
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.