Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
vacate the TTD award. Employer argues that because “Claimant opted not to continue employment with the City, Claimant is not entitled to [TTD] benefits from the City and the City was under no obligation to offer light duty work to Claimant.” We are not persuaded by Employer’s argument. The clear weight of the evidence supports the trial court’s finding, affirmed by the panel, that Claimant’s termination from employment was not voluntary. Employer’s characterization of the events following Claimant’s receipt of the “Final Lay-off Notice” as a voluntary resignation lacks record support. ¶ 14 First, we note that “continued employment is not a statutory requirement for eligibility for workers’ compensation benefits.” Patterson v. Sue Estell Trucking Co. Inc., 2004 OK 66, 8, 95 P.3d 1087 . An employer is not relieved from its
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an injured dump truck driver who was at fault in a workrelated automobile accident and cited for driving with a suspended license could not be denied ttd benefits even though employer fired him after his injury
B. holding that probable cause existed to arrest for driving on a suspended license under state law
C. holding motorist entitled to hearing before taking his license under statute that required loss of license if uninsured driver involved in an accident
D. holding that an evidentiary basis for the search was  lacking  because gant was arrested for driving with a suspended license an offense for which police could not expect to find evidence in the passenger compartment of his car
E. holding that a truck driver who was on call was not compensated for an injury in a motel room provided by his employer
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.