Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
whose unborn child is killed”); Kan. Stat. Ann. § 65-6703(e) ("A woman upon whom an abortion is performed shall not be prosecuted under this section....”); Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 507A.010(3)("nothing in this chapter shall apply to any acts of a pregnant woman that caused the death of her unborn child”); La. Rev.Stat. Ann. § 14:87(A)(2) (penalties for criminalized abortions not applicable to pregnant women having abortions); Minn.Stat. § 609.266 (excluding the "pregnant woman” from liability for "crimes against unborn children”); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-335 (providing "[n]o civil or criminal penalty ... against the patient upon whom the abortion is performed”); Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2919.17(I)(expressly excluding women from liability for post-viability abortions); 18 Pa. Cons. , 1224 (2005) ; Hill-man v. State, 232 Ga.App. 741, 503
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding a fetus is not a child person or individual for purposes of criminal prosecution under the reckless injury to a child statute
B. holding for purposes of establishing the offense of reckless manslaughter against a pregnant woman a fetus is not a person
C. holding that the definition of person in the hawaii manslaughter statute did not include a fetus and thus did not apply when a woman caused the death of her fetus by smoking crystal methamphetamine
D. holding an unborn viable fetus is not a human being under the new mexico child abuse statute and the mothers use of cocaine during pregnancy was not child abuse
E. holding that a woman possessed immunity from criminal prosecution for causing injury or death to her fetus
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.