Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Judge. Ramond L. Walker, Jr., challenges the ord computer printout, that Walker was arrested on May 14, 2005, and was entitled to 1379 days of credit on count one. Thus, the court awarded him an additional 3 days’ credit on that count. However, Walker correctly alleged that he is entitled to 1380 days’ credit on that count. The relevant portion of the trial transcript shows that he was arrested on the two robberies shortly after 11:00 p.m., on May 13, 2005. The State does not dispute this information. Thus, Walker is entitled to jail credit for that day because he was in actual custody. See Bronk v. State, 25 So.3d 701, 703 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) . On remand, the postconviction court shall
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a rule 3800a motion that does not allege that the court records show the defendants entitlement to additional jail credit is facially insufficient
B. holding that a trial court may not rescind jail credit previously awarded even if the initial award was improper
C. holding that jail credit may be granted for presentence custodial period spent under a civil commitment order at state security hospital and observing that denying credit for time relating to probationary conditions is not inconsistent with that holding
D. holding that the statutory entitlement to presentence jail credit starts with the initial arrest for a criminal offense
E. recognizing statutory credit
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.