Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
each factor.” Hemmer, 729 F.2d at 17; see also Wellington, 102 F.3d at 506 (explaining that a district court is “not required to weigh all statutory factors equally” (internal quotation marks omitted)). Courts have unanimously held that a district court does not abuse its discretion in placing primary emphasis on the gravity of the juvenile’s offense. See Hemmer, 729 F.2d at 18 (“In light of the gravity of the crime involved [ (armed robbery) ], weighed against the other five section 5032 factors, we cannot say that the district court struck the balance improperly.”); see also Juvenile No. 1, 118 F.3d at 307 (explaining that “[t]he seriousness of the offense, for instance, can be given more weight than other factors” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Wellington, 102 F.3d at 506 ; A.R., 38 F.3d at 705 (holding that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a district court is entitled to give more weight to the seriousness of the offense than to other factors
B. holding that a challenge to the weight of the evidence is waived for failure to present the issue first to the trial court
C. holding that the weight of a classification determination depends upon all those factors which give it power to persuade
D. holding that more than notice to a defendant is required
E. holding that a secured creditor is not entitled to receive any more than that to which it was entitled pursuant to the terms of the confirmed plan
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.