Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
charged the following: “Name calling, insults and profanity, absent the showing of special damages is not slander.” The trial judge seemed troubled by the broad statement of law offered by defense counsel. The judge did not believe he could give the charge as proposed without some quote or further explanation. The judge was correct, and it would have been an incorrect statement of the law to have charged the jury that insults or profanity cannot be defamatory, as extrinsic facts may be proven to show the defamatory nature of the remarks. We find the charge as a whole was proper, and note that the judge did not preclude the defense from arguing that the alleged defamatory statements were mere insults or name-calling. Keaton v. Greenville Hosp. Sys., 334 S.C. 488, 514 S.E.2d 570 (1999) . Accordingly, we find no error in the trial
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding jury charge is proper if as a whole it is free from error and reflects the current and correct law of south carolina
B. holding that sufficiency of the evidence is measured against a hypothetically correct jury charge
C. holding error in calculation of amount due on accelerated note secured by deed of trust does not require reversal of cause appellate court may correct judgment
D. holding that the constitutional guarantee of a right to trial by jury includes the right to a complete and correct charge of the law so that each issue of fact raised by the evidence will be submitted to the jury on proper instructions
E. holding a jury charge which is substantially correct and covers the law does not require reversal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.