Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of life insurance as security for a child support obligation. The child support statute, S.C.Code Ann. § 20-3-160 (1976), has since its inception recognized the availability of life insurance as security for the support obligation. The statute is silent as to the appropriate standard, yet Wife is constrained by longstanding case law to concede that life insurance may not be required to secure the payment of child support in the absence of a compelling reason to do so. The alimony statute, S.C.Code Ann. § 20-3-130, was amended in 1990 to expressly provide for life insurance on the supporting spouse for the benefit of the supported spouse. Before 1990, such relief was available pursuant to case law. See Hardin v. Hardin, 294 S.C. 402, 404-405, 365 S.E.2d 34, 35-36 (Ct.App.1987) . Section 20-3-130(D), like the child support
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that there may be an obligation to defend under an insurance policy even though there is no obligation to indemnify
B. holding that husbands obligation to pay premiums on a life insurance policy for five years with wife as the beneficiary was periodic alimony
C. holding that an order requiring a party to purchase life insurance to secure a support obligation must have the requisite evidentiary basis and reversing for further proceedings to reevaluate the life insurance requirement set forth to secure child support obligations
D. holding that an obligation is in the nature of alimony when it is intended to provide support for the spouse rather than an equalization of property rights
E. recognizing that family court may under special circumstances require a supporting spouse to secure an alimony obligation with a life insurance policy
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.