Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a ROPS for this particular tractor other than the information set forth in the owner’s manual that Bren-Tex provided the Hensens with the tractor. 15 . Because it is not before us, we express no opinion on whether Bren-Tex may recover the attorney’s fees or costs it incurred for the trial or appeal of its indemnity claim, as contrasted from its defense of the Hensens’ lawsuit. KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice, concurring. This court correctly reverses the trial court’s judgment because there was no evidence of independently actionable conduct by Bren-Tex that caused Michael Hensen’s death. There was no evidence to support independent liability in this regard as to the alleged DTPA and implied-warranty claims. The majority opinion also correctly holds that there was no eviden 1-83 (Tex.1995) ; Winn ex rel. Winn v. Pollard, 62 S.W.3d 611,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing under illinois law that pharmaceutical manufacturer has duty to warn of any dangers associated with offlabel use of product if such dangers were reasonably known
B. holding that a general contractor owed no duty to an employee of a subcontractor to warn of dangers of electrocution
C. holding manufacture had no duty to warn of the dangers of smoking because the dangers of cigarette smoking have long been known to the community
D. holding that manufacturer had no duty to warn its purchasers retailer and transporter of gas of dangers where those purchasers had operated a gas business for years were familiar with the trade journals and already knew the dangers
E. holding that seller of frontend loader had no duty to warn injured worker concerning the dangers of operating the loader without a rops because the dangers were obvious under an objective standard
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.