Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and were in any event rescinded before they were enforced; and the last was a prudent precaution for this employer in these circumstances. Kader has demonstrated that an uneasy and stressful environment existed, but he has adduced no evidence to support an inference that his employer intentionally created an intolerable workplace. Kader’s showing is therefore insufficient as a matter of law: a claim.of constructive discharge must be dismissed as a matter of law unless the evidence is sufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to infer that the employer deliberately created working conditions that were “so difficult or unpleasant that a reasonable person in the employee’s shoes would have felt compelled to resign.” Stetson, 995 F.2d at 361 (citations and internal quotations omitted) . See also Martin v. Citibank, N.A., 762 F.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding defendants belief that his work was unfairly criticized is not sufficient for constructive discharge
B. holding the claim of constructive discharge does not accrue until an employee resigns
C. recognizing that a constructive discharge claim and a hostile work environment claim are not equivalent because a constructive discharge claim imposes a higher standard
D. holding that employee must prove that the sole reason for their discharge was their filing of a workers compensation claim to prevail on a claim of wrongful discharge under marylands workers compensation act
E. holding no claim for constructive discharge where employee was dissatisfied with his compensation assignments and criticisms of his work but rank and salary were never reduced
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.