Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
by law, rule, or regulation having been followed; or (3) unsupported by substantial evidence.” Chase-Baker v. Dep’t of Justice, 198 F.3d 843, 845 (Fed.Cir.1999) (citing 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c)). On appeal, Ms. Plasai argues that the settlement agreement should be voided as involuntary. Because Ms. Plasai first questioned the voluntariness of the settlement agreement in a petition for review by the full board, not during the dismissal proceeding with the AJ, she has waived this argument before us. See Bosley v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 162 F.3d 665, 668 (Fed.Cir.1998) (“if the party ... raises an issue for the first time in a petition for review by the full Board, this court will not consider the issue.”); see also Sargent v. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 229 F.3d 1088, 1091 (Fed.Cir.2000) . However, even if Ms. Plasai had properly
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding an issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal
B. holding that an issue not raised on appeal is waived
C. holding issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal
D. holding that issues not raised before a district court are waived on appeal
E. holding that the issue of the voluntariness of a settlement agreement is waived on appeal if not raised before the board
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.