Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
judge exercised discretion by declining to award the $80 claimed cost of the sneakers as too speculative and uncertain. Although it was error for the trial court to preclude defense counsel from inquiring into Pyle’s possible bias, that error did not have a “substantial and injurious” effect on the issue of the appropriate amount of restitution. Accordingly, the error was harmless. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Superior Court’s restitution judgment is affirmed. 1 . This first ruling is referred to in this Opinion as the “Marijuana Ruling." 2 . The trial judge’s second ruling is referred to as the "Threatening Call Ruling.” 3 . Filmore v. State, 813 A.2d 1112, 1116 (Del.2003). 4 . Jenkins v. State, 2004 WL 2743556, at *1-3, 2004 Del. Lexis 549, at *5-10 (Del. Nov. 23, 2004) . 5 . McGriff v. State, 672 A.2d 1027, 1030
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the court lacks jurisdiction over sixth amendment claims because the sixth amendment is not moneymandating
B. holding that the sixth amendment right to counsel does not attach until a prosecution is commenced that is at or after the initiation of adversary judicial criminal proceedings
C. holding that because the violation of probation vop hearing was neither a criminal prosecution nor a formal trial the sixth amendment does not apply
D. holding probation revocation is not a stage of a criminal prosecution
E. holding that a criminal defendant has a sixth amendment right to counsel at trial
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.