Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
not in terms of what the individual can exact from the government.’ ” Northwest Indian Cemetery, 485 U.S. at 451, 108 S.Ct. 1319 (1988) (quoting Sherbert, 374 U.S. at 412, 83 S.Ct. 1790 (Douglas, J., concurring)); Roy, 476 U.S. at 700, 106 S.Ct. 2147. Contrary to the Borough’s position, however, the principle of Lukumi and Fraternal Order of Police-that government cannot discriminate between religiously motivated conduct and comparable secularly motivated conduct in a manner that devalues religious reasons for acting-applies not only when a coercive law or regulation prohibits religious conduct, but also when government denies religious adherents access to publicly available money or property. See Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398, 404-05, 83 S.Ct. 1790, 10 L.Ed.2d 965 (1963) ; Davey v. Locke, 299 F.3d 748, 753-54 (9th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that free exercise clause prohibits state from devaluing religious reasons for seeking unemployment benefits
B. holding  1001 prosecution for false statements in unemployment benefits not precluded by unemployment benefits statute specifically addressing topic
C. holding that religious exercise is any exercise of religion whether or not compelled by or central to a system of religious belief and that the use building or conversion of real property for the purpose of religious exercise shall be considered  religious exercise
D. holding that religionneutral law that is generally applicable does not violate free exercise clause despite incidental effect on religious practice
E. recognizing a religious institutions right to free exercise of religion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.