Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of that information to investors and media did not independently violate the NDA. 56 . NDA ¶ 2 ("Each party agrees that ... the disclosing party’s Evaluation Material will be kept confidential and each party and its Representatives will not disclose ... any of the other party’s Evaluation Material in any manner whatsoever....”). 57 . Italics added. 58 .Alta Berkeley VI C.V. v. Omneon, Inc., 41 A.3d 381, 385-86 (Del.2012) (citing Elliott Assoc., L.P. v. Avatex Corp., 715 A.2d 843, 854 (Del. 1998)); GMG Capital Investments, LLC v. Athenian Venture Partners I, L.P., 36 A.3d 776, 779 (Del.2012) (citing E.I. du Pont de Nem-ours and Co., Inc. v. Shell Oil Co., 498 A.2d 1108, 1113 (Del.1985)). 59 .Italics added. 60 .Italics added. 61 . SI Mgmt. L.P. v. Wininger, 707 A.2d 37, 40 (Del. 1998) . 62 . Italics added. 63 . JDÁ ¶ 10. 64 .Cirrus
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that on review of a motion to suppress the appellate court is to give deference to a trial courts factual findings but legal conclusions are reviewed de novo
B. holding it is an abuse of discretion to grant a preliminary injunction because difficult legal issues are present without even considering likelihood of success
C. holding that the admission of evidence under an exception to the hearsay rule is reviewed for abuse of discretion
D. holding that the grant of an injunction is reviewed for abuse of discretion but without deference to the legal conclusions of the trial court
E. holding that the imposition of sanctions is reviewed for abuse of discretion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.