Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
by ascertaining whether a Kansas statute or constitutional provision governing this case has expressly waived Eleventh Amendment immunity. See Atascadero, 473 U.S. at 238 n. 1, 105 S.Ct. 3142. Though Kansas has generally authorized suits brought in state court against state educational institutions, see Kan. Stat. Ann. § 76-713, its statutes have not expressly- waived Eleventh Amendment immunity. See Brennan, 451 F.2d at 1290; see also Atascadero, 473 U.S. at 241, 105 S.Ct. 3142 (“Although a State’s general waiver of sovereign immunity may subject it to suit in state court,- it is not enough to waive, the immunity guaranteed by the Eleventh Amendment ... [absent] intend ] to subject itself to suit in federal court.” (citations omitted)); Johns v. Stewart, 57 F.3d 1544 (10th Cir.1995) . Nor is there any waiver provision in the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the eleventh amendment protects a state from suit by its own citizens
B. holding that state did not waive eleventh amendment immunity by removing case to federal court
C. holding that the nyshrl does not waive the new yorks eleventh amendment immunity to suit in federal court
D. holding that utah did not waive its eleventh amendment immunity with respect to a suit brought in federal court because state statute provided for exclusive original jurisdiction in its own courts
E. holding that a state may waive its sovereign immunity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.