Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
their belief that probable cause existed to enter 214 South Fourth Street. The uncontradicted evidence that the officers were not in their usual patrol area and were unfamiliar with the home in question negates any thought that they used the situation which arose on May 13, 1999 as an excuse or ruse to gain entry to a known “drug house”. We are also struck by the great restraint that the police showed before they finally felt that they must enter the home. Even when they believed that a burglary was in progress they did not enter until they looked through the open window and saw the broken door latch and ransacked room. This, coupled with the open window, flight of four males from the home when the police approached, admission of two males that they were fleeing from the p th Cir.1982) , affirmed in relevant part, 710 F.2d 431
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that among the circumstances accepted as providing exigent circumstances for a warrantless search are those where a true emergency exists
B. holding that 911 call reporting domestic dispute and child telling officer that a man with a gun was inside fighting with her mom constituted exigent circumstances that justified warrantless entry into home
C. holding that exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry where officers were faced with a call reporting burglary in progress
D. holding that exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry where it seemed apparent that a burglary was in progress
E. holding that officers warrantless entry to locate and abate loud music late at night was justified by exigent circumstances
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.