Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
battery claim where the jury failed to award any compensatory or nominal damages. (Dkt. 91 at 12 n.4) If the court’s ruling was error, it was invited error. Invited error precludes a court from “invoking the plain error rule and reversing.” United States v. Davis, 448 F.2d 560, 564-65 (5th Cir. 1971). Second, she contends that the district court plainly erred by instructing the jury that nominal damages are awarded in an amount that “you ... decide [is appropriate] under all of the facts and circumstances of the case.” (Dkt. 96 at 312.) Smith contends that Georgia law requires a jury to award, at a minimum, nominal damages for an intentional tort. See, e.g., Norton v. Holcomb, 285 Ga.App. 78, 646 S.E.2d 94, 101 (2007); see also Jeter v. Davis, 33 Ga.App. 733, 127 S.E. 898, 901 (1925) . Under Georgia law, compensatory or nominal
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plaintiff was not entitled to a presumption of nominal damages when she had failed to request them
B. holding that the right to nominal damages was waived in a breach of duty action when plaintiff failed to raise the issue of nominal damages until after the verdict
C. recognizing that a plaintiff would at least be entitled to nominal damages by proving the elements of an intentional tort
D. holding that when plaintiff has proven injury but has failed to prove the amount of damages the plaintiff is only entitled to nominal damages
E. holding that plaintiff waived the right to nominal damages in an excessive force case because nominal damages were not requested until after the verdict
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.