Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
P.2d 164, 167 (Colo.App.1998) (excluding an employer’s contribution to an employee’s pension plan from the calculation of weekly benefits); Luce v. United Techs. Corp., 247 Conn. 126, 717 A.2d 747, 755 (1998) (finding that the calculation of “wages” under the state’s workers’ compensation laws does not include pensions); Rainey v. Mills, 733 S.W.2d 756, 758 (Ky.Ct.App.1987) (declining to find statutory support to include fringe benefits, such as employer pension plan contributions, in weekly wage calculation); Barnett v. Sara Lee Corp., 97 Md.App. 140, 627 A.2d 86, 90-91 (1993) (finding that pension plans could not be considered in the calculation of weekly wages for the purpose of determining a claimant’s industrial loss of use); In re Gagnon, 158 N.H, 391, 965 A.2d 1154, 1159 (2009) ; Shaw v. U.S. Airways, Inc., 362 N.C. 457, 665
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the statute of limitations applicable to a section 301 suit was the same as that which applies to suits against an employer for breach of the collective bargaining agreement
B. holding that an employers contributions to an employees retirement account are not included in the calculation of a weekly wage for workers compensation purposes
C. holding that an employee may sue for breach of a collective bargaining agreement without the union
D. holding that weekly wages are calculated using a claimants pretax pay and therefore it was not unjust for the collective bargaining agreement to exclude employer payments to an employees pension plan from the definition of wage
E. holding that the claim accrued after the employer denied a request for arbitration as untimely under the collective bargaining agreement
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.