Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
abuse of discretion standard, I concur in the result. 1. Standard of Review As the majority notes, the parties on appeal disagree as to which standard of review is applicable to the trial court’s sentencing. There is inconsistency amongst jurisdictions concerning which standard of review applies to those alleged sentencing errors not preserved at trial. There are at least three categories in which standards of review are applied to sentencing. Some jurisdictions apply the abuse of discretion standard when addressing the substantive reasonableness of a sentence, whereas procedural errors not raised at trial are reviewed for plain error. See United States. v. Judge, 649 F.3d 453, 457 (6th Cir. 2011) (“[sentences are generally reviewed for an abuse of discretion, but wher 160 (Neb. 2011) ; State v. Georgius, 225 W. Va. 716, 696 S.E.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the decision whether to grant a continuance lies in the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion
B. holding that the admission or exclusion of evidence is within discretion of the trial court and that such determinations will not be disturbed on appeal absent clear abuse of discretion
C. holding that a sentencing determination will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion by the district court
D. holding that rulings on admissibility of evidence are within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a showing of abuse of that discretion
E. holding that a sentence imposed within statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion by the trial court
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.