Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of an action is the most critical aspect of the court’s authority to act. Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the power of the court to deal with the kind of action in question[, and] ... is conferred upon the courts by either the North Carolina Constitution or by statute.” In re McKinney, 158 N.C. App. 441, 443, 581 S.E.2d 793, 795 (2003) (citations omitted). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-200(a) confers on the trial court exclusive, original jurisdiction “over any case involving a juvenile who is alleged to be abused, neglected, or dependent.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-200(a) (2003). “ ‘[0]nce jurisdiction of a court attaches it exists for all time until the cause is fully and completely determined.’ ” In the Matter of Arends, 88 N.C. App. 550, 554, 364 S.E.2d 169, 171 (1988) (citation omitted) ; N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-201 (2003). “[A] court’s
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the superior court had no jurisdiction over the division of marital property when the district court had properly invoked jurisdiction over the property
B. holding that the district court may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over related statelaw claims once it has dismissed all claims over which it had original jurisdiction
C. holding that personal jurisdiction is not required to make an outofstate parent a party to custody action where the state court has subject matter jurisdiction under the uniform child custody jurisdiction act
D. holding that the trial court had continuing jurisdiction over all subsequent custody orders once the trial court acquired jurisdiction
E. holding that a subsequent action was not barred because the initial court did not have jurisdiction over the claim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.