Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
limitations period on Plaintiffs hybrid claim. 2. Federal Tolling Principles. The Ninth Circuit has not ruled on whether mental incompetency may toll federal statutes of limitations. Indeed, in Atkins v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 685 F.2d 1146 (9th Cir.1982), the Court explicitly left open the question of whether a plaintiffs mental incompetency could toll the statute of limitations on the Federal Employer’s Liability Act. After finding that the Plaintiff had not established facts sufficient to support a finding that he was mentally incompetent, the Court stated, Because we find no issue of fact, we need not decide whether the plaintiffs in-competeney will ever toll the FELA statute of limitations. But see, Brooks v. Southern Pacific Co., 105 Ariz. 442, 445, 466 P.2d 736, 739 (1970) . Id. at 1148 (citation in original). The cases
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the untimely petition in that case tolled the aedpa statute of limitations
B. holding that the statute of limitations is tolled during a malicious prosecution suit when a timely complaint is filed
C. holding statute of limitations should not be equitably tolled for taxpayer who filed a refund claim after the applicable statute of limitations
D. recognizing that  2244dlds statute of limitations can be tolled
E. holding that fela statute of limitations is tolled by incompetence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.