Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
type of drug was in the truck. When Sergeant Witte asked how much methamphetamine was in the truck, Shoen responded “a little bit” without additional questioning from the officers. ¶ 14 Moreover, the officers did not attempt to intimidate Shoen into remaining at the storage unit. In fact, their advice was just the opposite: They recommended that he call someone to pick him up so he could leave. Shoen agreed to speak with the officers and appeared comfortable throughout the encounter; he willingly answered the officers’ questions and allowed them to look in his truck bed. See Paynter, 955 P.2d at 73 (deeming an encounter consensual because the defendant’s liberty was not restrained and his voluntary cooperation was elicited through non-coercive questioning); Thomas, 839 P.2d at 1178 ; Marujo, 192 P.3d at 1006 (noting that a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an encounter was consensual where the defendant was comfortable during the encounter chose not to leave and acquiesced to the officers request to answer questions
B. holding officers request for passengers identification during stop constituted lawful consensual encounter
C. holding that once the officer asked the defendant to exit his vehicle the encounter became a stop because the defendant was no longer free to leave
D. holding that the officers mere use of her spotlight and flashlight did not transform the consensual encounter into an investigatory stop
E. holding that request of passenger in vehicle lawfully stopped for traffic infraction for her identification was consensual encounter where there was no evidence that defendant was intimidated or forced to comply with request
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.