Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Choice policy” refers to an insurance policy issued by Medica to Randall. 2 . Although Patch and Syring were covered by separate PHP policies, the policy language at issue in this case was identical in each PHP policy. 3 . Allen v. United States, 668 F.Supp. 1242, 1247 (W.D.Wis.1987) (interpreting a federal statute that only allowed subrogation when there was tort liability); Arizona Property & Cas. Ins. Guar. Fund v. Herder, 156 Ariz. 203, 208-09, 751 P.2d 519, 524 (1988) (interpreting "persons or organizations who may be legally responsible” for bodily injuries in limit-of-liability clause involving "amounts otherwise payable for damages” to include only parties who were responsible for the infliction of the injuries); Employers Health, 161 Wis.2d at 945-47, 469 N.W.2d at 175-76 ; Hamed v. County of Milwaukee, 108 Wis.2d 257,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a clause providing that the insurer has a right to recover damages from a responsible third party referred to a tortfeasor because the use of damages in bodily injury cases means pecuniary compensation resulting from an unlawful or negligent act by a wrongdoer
B. recognizing that compensation from a collateral source indepen dent of the wrongdoer will not reduce the damages recoverable from the wrongdoer
C. holding that pecuniary damages are not property damages under insureds policy
D. holding no right to recover for economic loss resulting from defendants injury to a third party with whom plaintiff has contractual business relationship
E. holding that the right to recover a particular measure of damages in a workers compensation case is fixed as of the date of injury
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.