Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to avoid punishment for running away — did amount to an “all or nothing” defense. Accordingly, Pepe-Frazier has failed to establish that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in this regard. (c) Failure to object to the sentence for aggravated child molestation. Pepe-Frazier contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to challenge his sentence for aggravated child molestation (652 SE2d 501) (2007) (finding a “rare case” of gross disproportionality in holding that 10-year sentence for commission of consensual oral sex between 17-year-old defendant and 15-year-old victim constituted cruel and unusual punishment, given General Assembly’s recent sweeping change in the punishment for consensual teenage oral sex). 42 See Jones, 290 Ga. at 676 (3) . 43 OCGA § 17-10-2 (a) (2). 44 See Blue v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the failure of defense counsel to object to erroneous punishment charge authorizing an illegal sentence is ineffective assistance of counsel
B. holding cruel and unusual punishment complaint not preserved
C. holding that there was no ineffective assistance due to appellate counsels failure to challenge the trial courts denial of the motion to change venue because the defendant failed to show actual prejudice
D. holding that what constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is a question of law
E. holding that defendant failed to establish that he received ineffective assistance of counsel by counsels failure to challenge sentence as equating to cruel and unusual punishment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.