Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a § 2255 waiver because Second Circuit law clearly upholds waivers of direct appeals and had not struck down § 2255 waivers that have come before it). General enforcement of § 2255 waivers may be subject to exceptions, just as enforcement of direct appeal waivers is. For example, in this Circuit, a direct appeal waiver cannot bar claims that the plea was not knowing and intelligent, that the sentence imposed is in excess of the maximum penalty provided by statute, that the sentence is based on a constitutionally impermissible factor such as race, or that defendant was denied ineffective assistance of counsel after entry of the guilty plea. Attar, 38 F.3d at 732-33; Wessells, 936 F.2d at 167. Such exceptions may be warranted for § 2255 waivers as well. See DeRoo, 223 F.3d at 922-24 . But see Cockerham, 237 F.3d at 1187 (holding
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding an attorneys mistaken prediction about a possible sentence does not render a defendants plea unknowing and involuntary
B. holding defendant cannot waive claims of an illegal sentence a sentence violating terms of plea agreement an unknowing and involuntary plea and ineffective assistance of counsel
C. holding that an issue of ineffective assistance of counsel is rendered moot when a defendant receives an illegal sentence
D. holding that plea did not waive claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to seek suppression
E. holding that ineffective assistance can render a guilty plea involuntary
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.