Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the Court noted that neither § 841(b)(1) nor the Sentencing Guide lines defined the words “mixture” or “substance.” Id. at 461-62, 111 S.Ct. at 1925-26. The Court therefore applied the ordinary dictionary meaning of the terms and concluded that the combination of the pure LSD and blotter paper is a “mixture” within the meaning of the statute. Id. at 462, 111 S.Ct. at 1925. Amendment 488 does not contradict Chapman because the Sentencing Commission has the authority to review the work of the courts and revise the Guidelines by adopting an interpretation of a particular guideline in conflict with prior judicial constructions of that guideline. See Stinson, — U.S. at —, 113 S.Ct. at 1919; see also Braxton v. United States, 500 U.S. 344, 348, 111 S.Ct. 1854, 1857, 114 L.Ed.2d 385 (1991) . At the time of the Chapman holding, the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the mere mandatory application of the guidelines  the district courts belief that it was required to impose a guidelines sentence  constitutes error
B. holding the state must prove that at the time of the homicide the defendant was engaged in the commission of the felony
C. recognizing that congress has the power to completely divest the courts of their sentencing discretion and that congress granted broad authority to the sentencing commission guided by specific goals and principles
D. holding that congress necessarily contemplated that the commission would review the work of the courts and revise the guidelines
E. holding that under the fsia congress contemplated waivers of a specific and explicit nature
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.