Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
could have supported a conclusion by the finder of fact that the mother also abused cocaine during this time. Illegal drug use in violation of the court’s order in this circumstance endangered DJ.W.’s emotional well-being because it increased the risk that his relationship with his biological mother would be permanently severed. See Walker, 312 S.W.3d at 617-18. Drug use that significantly impairs a parent’s ability care for a child jeopardizes the child’s physical and emotional well-being. We hold that the evidence in this case was legally sufficient to permit a reasonable factfinder to form a firm belief or conviction that the mother engaged in conduct that endangered D.J.W.’s physical or emotional well-being. See Tex. Fam.Code ANN. § 161.001(1)(E); In re J.O.A., 283 S.W.3d at 346 . With respect to the mother’s
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding prior drug deals admissible to prove knowledge of the drug trade
B. holding that evidence of prior drug transactions was admissible under rule 404b to show inter alia intent to enter into the drug conspiracy and knowledge of the conspiracy
C. holding that evidence of admitted drug use before the birth of the children missed drug tests after removal of children and a failed drug test between removal and the final hearing established legal sufficiency of evidence to show endangerment under section 1610011e
D. holding that evidence of continued drug use after pregnancy may be conduct which endangers a childs wellbeing under section 1610011e
E. holding evidence of prior drug use admissible to show motive and the nature of the defendants relationship with coconspirators
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.