Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Justice. The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. See Ex parte Bonner, 926 So.2d 339 (Ala.2005) ; see also Ex parte V.S., 918 So.2d 908
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that rule 32 is a postconviction remedy
B. holding that an appellant cannot raise an issue on appeal from the denial of a rule 32 petition which was not raised in the rule 32 petition
C. holding that appellate courts may not on appeal from the dismissal of a rule 32 petition consider claims not raise in the rule 32 petition
D. holding that where the petitioner alleges that he failed to receive notice of the dismissal of his rule 32 ala rcrim p petition in time to effect a timely appeal therefrom and the events about which the petitioner complains all occurred before june 1 2005 the effective date of the amendment to rule 32 providing a different remedy for obtaining an outoftime appeal from the dismissal of a rule 32 petition a petition for a writ of mandamus is the only appropriate remedy
E. holding that appellate courts may not on appeal from the dismissal of a rule 32 petition consider claims not raised in the rule 32 petition
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.