Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of the class. Although it is not necessary for the putative class representatives’ claims to be identical to those of absent class members, due process precludes certification if the named plaintiffs possess potentially conflicting interests that may impair the vigorous prosecution of the class claims. In re Baldwin-United Corp. Litig., 122 F.R.D. at 428. Where class members have conflicting interests, each group must receive its own representation; it is n onably well represent the class. The named policyholders who were defrauded share the same incentive as absent policyholders who were defrauded to establish the alleged fraud and to maximize the overall recovery. Weiss Aff. at ¶252; see also Weiss v. York Hosp., 745 F.2d at 811; New York Life, 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 652, at *29 . And, there are no disparate interests to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the filing of a class action by a class representative without standing tolls the period of limitations with regard to all asserted members of the class and that the amendment of the complaint by the addition of a class member with standing relates back to the original complaint
B. holding that a a representative plaintiff acts as fiduciary for the others requiring the representative to act in the best interest of class
C. holding that the claims of the class representative and class members must be based on the same legal or remedial theory
D. holding representation adequate where policyholders represented mix of characteristics representative of the mix found in the class itself
E. holding that in class action the claim or defense of the representative party must be typical of the claim or defense of each member of the class
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.