Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
legislature’s stated goal when it enacted § 82-1451(0) to “more effectively protect the public health, safety, and welfare,” we conclude that the nondisclosure provisions of § 32-1451.01(0) and (E) do not apply when the Board “determines that a criminal violation may have occurred involving the delivery of health care[.]” A.R.S. § 32-1451(0). ¶ 15 This is not the only situation in which the legislature has distinguished between civil and criminal cases when addressing evidence involving confidential or privileged information. For example, the legislature has enacted separate statutes for the corporate attorney-client privilege, providing a broader privilege in civil proceedings than in criminal proceedings. See Roman Catholic Diocese of Phoenix, 204 Ariz. at 231, ¶ 16, 62 P.3d at 976 . Although the Diocese in that case argued that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that state legislature may at pleasure create or abolish public offices
B. holding that the legislature may create or expand privileges by statute
C. recognizing that the legislature can create statutory exceptions to atwill employment
D. holding that when the legislature enacts a statute it is presumed that the legislature is aware of existing statutes
E. holding that in order for there to be state debt in the constitutional sense one legislature in effect must obligate a future legislature to appropriate funds to discharge the debt created by the first legislature
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.