Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Hearing at 11. The record indicates that all twelve defendants said, "[yles," and then the trial judge said, "[elv-eryone says yes." Id. The trial judge then addressed Barker individually, discussing the specifics of Barker's plea agreement. As the post-conviction court concluded, "there is no question that the twelve defendants were properly advised 'en masse' of the rights they were giving up by pleading guilty, and that the Court was satisfied that all twelve, including [Barker], understood and knowingly waived their rights." Appellant's Appendix at 183. Based upon our review of the record, we cannot say that the evidence is undisputed and leads inevitably to an opposite conclusion of the post-conviction court. See, e.g., Mescher v. State, 686 N.E.2d 418, 414-415 (Ind.Ct.App.1997) , reh'g denied, trans. denied. For the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that one must voluntarily and intelligently waive the right to counsel
B. holding that the defendants guilty plea was entered into knowingly voluntarily and intelligently
C. holding that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily
D. holding that the record must establish that a defendants guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily made and that the circuit court complied with rule 144 ala rcrim p
E. holding that where a criminal defendant has voluntarily and knowingly entered into a plea agreement in which he or she waives the right to appeal the defendant is not entitled to resentencing in light of booker 
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.