Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
question is one of first impression for this court, the Ninth Circuit has previously held that “both applicants for and recipients of [service-connected death and disability] benefits possess a constitutionally protected property interest in those benefits.” Nat’l Ass’n of Radiation Survivors v. Derwinski, 994 F.2d 583, 588 n. 7 (9th Cir.1992). Additionally, seven of our sister circuits have addressed similar questions concerning statutorily mandated benefits. “Every regional circuit to address the question ... has concluded that applicants for benefits, no less than benefits recipients, may possess a property interest in the receipt of public welfare entitlements.” Kapps v. Wing, 404 F.3d 105, 115 (2d Cir.2005); see, e.g., Kelly v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 625 F.2d 486, 489-90 (3d Cir.1980) ; Mallette v. Arlington Cnty. Employees’
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding an applicant for a disabled childs annuity was denied due process
B. holding that petitioner did not exhaust his due process claim that he was denied a full and fair hearing by arguing that due process was violated on the ground that the ij admitted uncertified evidence
C. holding that the due process clause confers a right to direct a childs education
D. holding that the defendant was denied due process because the procedural rule was not followed in any respect by the trial court
E. holding that no ada violation was shown because the disabled were not denied benefits that were otherwise available
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.