Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Friendly, J., and dissenting opinion of Lombard, J.) 4 . A recent case in which the same situation prevailed is LaMade v. Wilson (1975) 168 U.S.App.D.C. 108, 512 F.2d 1348. There the trial court had ruled such evidence admissible. The issue of a curative instruction was not raised and the only issue was one of admissibility. 5 . 375 U.S. at 255, 84 S.Ct. at 317. 6 . 58 Am.Jur. § 530, p. 124. For an instance in which an appropriate instruction cured an impermissible reference to collateral benefits, see Edwards v. Steinns (4th Cir. 1953) 207 F.2d 734, 735. To the same effect, are Mixon v. Lovett (1970) 122 Ga.App. 517, 177 S.E.2d 826, 827, and Finley P. Smith, Inc. v. Schectman (Fla.App.) 132 So.2d 460, 466; cf. Franklin v. Sandersville Railroad Company (5th Cir. 1971) 445 F.2d 270, 271  The point, however, has been most often
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the verdict must be sustained if there is any competent evidence to support the verdict
B. holding there is no dutyimposed on trial judge to question jurys verdict of liability but no damages unless requested to by a party
C. holding that jurys damagesrelated questions and verdict of liability with clearly inadequate damages of only medical expenses but no noneconomic damages in case where liability was hotly contested strongly suggested compromised verdict
D. holding that admission of hearsay constituted harmless error when there was more than sufficient other evidence in the record to support the verdict
E. holding that a verdict of no liability made any reference to collateral benefits harmless
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.