Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Rule 9(G)(l)(b)(vi) creates what appears to be an exception to an exception. Again, that rule provides that "[r]ecords of juvenile proceedings as declared confidential by Ind.Code § 31-39-1-2 [are excluded from public access], except those specifically open under statute.” Read literally, that rule states that all court records are public, except those specifically confidential by statute, except those specifically open by statute. It is not clear if the records "specifically open by statute” are the same records that are "accessible to the public” in the first place. See Admin. R. 9. 8 . One may think that our earlier statement that the transcript here is presumptively confidential is obviously true, or at least that it should be obviously true. See In re T.B., 895 N.E.2d at 345-46 . But the commentary to Administrative Rule
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that section 5601c does not authorize appeals from juvenile courts transferring a child to district court for criminal proceedings under section 5402 of the family code
B. recognizing that incidents in which inmates have obtained drugs weapons and other contraband are welldocumented in case law and regularly receive the attention of the news media
C. holding that representatives of the news media have the standing to contest a court order restricting public access to legal proceedings
D. holding under indiana code section 313262 that the juvenile court erred in releasing the transcript of a confidential proceeding to news media
E. holding that access rights of the news media and of the general public are identical in scope
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.