Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
after a juror indicated that the verdict did not represent her individual verdict, and Muller asserted that the evide 6, 99 S.Ct. 2248, 60 L.Ed.2d 824 (1979) (concluding that the police violated the Fourth Amendment when, without probable cause, they seized the defendant from a neighbor’s home and transported him to the police station for interrogation without telling him he was free to go); Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721, 724-28, 89 S.Ct. 1394, 22 L.Ed.2d 676 (1969) (ruling that an unreasonable seizure occurred when police brought the defendant to the police station without probable cause, a warrant, or his consent for fingerprinting and brief questioning before he was released); see also Kaupp v. Texas, 538 U.S. 626, 631-33, 123 S.Ct. 1843, 155 L.Ed.2d 814 (2003) (per curiam) ; Deputy v. Taylor, 19 F.3d 1485, 1491 (3d Cir.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that suspect was not in custody when officer handcuffed him for officer safety while transporting him to police station
B. holding that police executed an illegal arrest when they took a teenage suspect from his home and brought him in handcuffs to the police station for questioning
C. holding that the line separating a terry stop and an arrest is crossed when police forcibly remove a person from his home or other place in which he is entitled to be and transport him to the police station where he is detained although briefly for investigative purposes
D. holding that an illegal arrest occurred when the defendant was transported without probable cause from his home to the police station for fingerprinting and that the line is crossed when the police without probable cause or a warrant forcibly remove a person from his home or other place in which he is entitled to be and transport him to the police station where he is detained although briefly for investigative purposes
E. holding that merely because questioning was designed to produce incriminating responses took place at the police station and occurred only after the defendant was identified as a suspect did not trigger miranda
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.