Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of the Fort Worth Zoo Master Plan and the Forest Park Master Plan. Appellant’s point of error number one is overruled. By his point of error number two, appellant contends, even if the trial court was correct in its interpretation of Chapter 26, holding that it does not apply with respect to a change in the use of public land from one park use to another, that the construction of the Diorama in Forest Park constitutes such a substantial change in park use as not to exempt such construction from the provisions of Chapter 26. Appellant states that there are no Texas cases directly on point regarding the proper uses of parkland and cites us the following foreign cases in support of his position: Fairhope Single Tax Corp. v. City of Fairhope, 281 Ala. 576, 206 So.2d 588, 590 (Ala.1968) ; Anderson v. Thomas, 166 La. 512, 117 So. 573,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that despite moving mobile homes onto the property a mobile home park was not in operation since regulations required permits to operate such a park and the property owner had not applied for such permits
B. holding that rental value was properly included as part of damages on action for breach of building contract where contractor failed to complete building within contracted time
C. holding that a municipal corporation was forbidden to construct an auditorium in a park as such construction would practically destroy the lot as a park and convert its use into a public square
D. holding an initial four dollar fee allowing reentry during the course of the patrons stay permitted the use of a vehicle in the park and did not constitute a charge for the recreational use of the park
E. holding that a civic center building or recreational building on property dedicated to the city as park property was inconsistent with its use as a park
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.