Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
suppression of these items that “he left in a company truck.” Plowman argues that he did not waive this ineffective assistance of counsel claim by entering his plea. We agree. A plea waives certain defenses for purposes of direct appeal. Lacey v. State, 831 So.2d 1267, 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Boddie v. State, 328 So.2d 877 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). However, a plea does not waive ineffective assistance of counsel claims regarding counsel’s failure to raise those defenses. See Skellie v. State, 849 So.2d 1220, 1220 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (“Although [defendant] waived all defenses by entering the plea, he nevertheless may be entitled to 3.850 relief if he can show that counsel did not adequately investigate or pursue a viable defense.”); Robinson v. State, 972 So.2d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) . Because this ground was not legally
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel
B. holding no ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim for failure to raise as basis for appeal of conviction ineffective assistance of trial counsel where basis for the latter claim was inadequate
C. holding that plea did not waive claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to seek suppression
D. holding that right to appeal claim of ineffective assistance of counsel alleging that counsel failed to convey plea negotiations timely and adequately inform of consequences of pleading guilty to jury for sentencing waived because plea of guilty to jury was independent of and not supported by alleged ineffective assistance of counsel claims
E. holding that failure to object to admissible evidence was not ineffective assistance of counsel
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.