Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
possesses no inherent power to impose sanctions, and that any such power must be expressly delegated by statute. For example, in Great Am. Banks, Inc. v. Division of Admin. Hearings, Dep’t of Admin., 412 So.2d 373 (Fla.1st DCA 1981), this court held that a hearing officer had no statutory authori ty to impose sanctions upon a party for the failure to make discovery, and that Section 120.58(3), Florida Statutes, as it then existed, provided the exclusive method of enforcing a discovery order, i.e., by filing a petition for enforcement in the circuit court. We further stated that to the extent that the agency’s rules providing for sanctions conflicted with section 120.58(3), they were invalid. Accord Hillsborough County Hosp. Auth. v. Tampa Heart Inst., 472 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) . In 1984 the legislature amended section
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a court may sua sponte dismiss pursuant to rule 41b for failure to comply with a court order
B. holding that an administrative agency is not subject to a contempt proceeding for failure to comply with an order
C. holding that any person who receives written notice of an agency decision that does or may determine substantial interests and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hearing quoting florida administrative code rule 281061114
D. holding that florida administrative code rule 285211 which purported to allow an agency or hearing officer to dismiss a proceeding or enter a default as a sanction for failure to comply with a procedural order was invalid
E. holding dismissal for failure to comply with rule 8 was dismissal of entire action which was appealable final order
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.