Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
1. The majority’s proposition that the Commission does not exercise a function that “appertains to” the judicial branch is simply wrong. As this Court stated in Young: The Judicial Conduct Commission plays a highly important, albeit not a determinative, role in the administration of judicial discipline by investigating and conducting confidential hearings regarding complaints against justices and judges. Consequently, the Commission exercises a type of judicial authority and operates within the judicial branch. Original op. ¶ 84. We also pointed out in Young that other jurisdictions “have also held judicial conduct commissions with similar authority to be within the judicial branch.” Id. ¶ 85 (citing Whitehead v. Nevada Comm’n on Judicial Discipline, 110 Nev. 874, 878 P.2d 913 (1994) ). ¶47 The majority denigrates the important
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding executive branch prosecution of disciplinary charges against judge before commission violated separation of powers clause in nevada constitution
B. holding that lack of notice of charges in disciplinary proceedings violates the due process clause
C. recognizing separation of powers doctrine
D. holding that where the conviction was final the disciplinary commission was not authorized to assume the roles of both an accusatory tribunal and the ultimate determiner of guilt and that the separation of responsibility between the disciplinary board and the disciplinary commission provides constitutional due process
E. holding that the presidential privilege is inextricably rooted in the separation of powers under the constitution
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.