Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
declared “that privileges, in general, are not favored in the law and therefore should be strictly construed.” Moretti v. Lowe, 592 A.2d 855, 857 (R.I.1991) (citing Jordan v. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Supreme Judicial District, 701 S.W.2d 644, 647 (Tex.1985)). Mindful that the primary function of the judicial process indisputably is truth-seeking, we have “declared that privileges do not aid the quest for truth, the core function of the adversary process[.]” Pastore v. Samson, 900 A.2d 1067, oviding for privileges “must not be used as a shield to obstruct proper discovery of relevant information[.]” Moretti, 592 A.2d at 858 (emphasis added). A party may not hide behind confidentiality to avoid disclosure of unfavorable evidence. See State v. Guido, 698 A.2d 729, 734 (R.I.1997) ; see also In re Doe, 717 A.2d 1129, 1135
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding letter that came into evidence without objection may be used to establish any material fact
B. holding that a statute providing for confidentiality of medical records may not be used to shield relevant and material evidence from legal process
C. holding that constitutional right of privacy does not apply to medical records
D. recognizing records material to selfdefense claim outweigh victims interest in confidentiality
E. recognizing a corporations legal rights to confidentiality and privilege
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.