Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the proposed amended judgment offered by Valley Oak, the'trial court stated, “Baratta is correct that this order still doesn’t comply with what I think the second district is looking for or any appellate court, and that is some findings of fact.” Nevertheless, the trial court signed the proposed amended judgment as presented and attached certain portions of the transcript of the prior evidentiary hearing. Baratta now seeks review of this amended judgment for attorney’s fees and costs. In Rowe, the supreme court adopted the federal lodestar .approach for determining a reasonable attorney’s fee under a prevailing party attorney’s fee statute or contractual provision. Rowe, 472 So.2d at 1146; Freedom Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Biltmore Constr. Co., 510 So.2d 1141, 1142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) . In doing so, the court recognized that while
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the party prevailing on the significant issues in the litigation is the party that should be considered the prevailing party for attorneys fees
B. holding that the prevailing market rate can be established with reference to information concerning recent fee awards by courts in comparable cases
C. holding that a defendant is the prevailing party within the meaning of statutory provisions awarding attorneys fees to the prevailing party even when the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the action
D. holding that prevailing party has no standing to appeal
E. holding that rowe applied to both statutory and contractual prevailing party fee awards
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.