Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
CURIAM. The State presented insufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case for possession of alcohol by a minor under section 562.111, Florida Statutes. See State v. Williams, 742 So.2d 509, 511 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) . Even considering the relatively low burden of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that evidence regarding the high price the defendant had paid for the substance in question was relevant to show the substance was cocaine
B. holding that possession of a controlled substance is a crime only if the defendant knowingly possesses the substance and has knowledge of the nature of that substance
C. holding that quantity of the controlled substance does not have to be measurable to support a conviction for possession of such controlled substance particularly when the immeasurable amount of the substance is found on an implement used to consume the substance
D. holding that mens rea required for possession of a controlled substance is knowledge that defendant possessed a controlled substance
E. holding to prove possession the state must show that a defendant possessed a certain substance the substance was illegal and he had knowledge of the presence of the substance
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.