Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
after hearing testimony from K.J. and K.S.'s mother. As a result of this violation of probation, on June 18, 2003, the juvenile court granted wardship of K.S. to the- DOC for a recommended period of six months. K.S. now appeals. Analysis K.S.'s argument is that the juvenile court never. properly obtained jurisdiction during the entirety of these proceedings because it failed to strictly follow the statutory prerequisites for obtaining jurisdiction at the time of the original delinquency filing in May 2002. . Indiana courts have held for many years that strict compliance with the statutory prerequisites for obtaining jurisdiction at the commencement of delinquency proceedings is required of juvenile courts. See, eg., Shupe v. Bell, 127 Ind.App. 292, 300-01, 141 N.RE.2d 351, 355 (1957)  (emphasis added). The statutes governing the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that judicial review is not available of the governments certification under 18 usc  5032  as required to initiate a juvenile delinquency proceeding that inter alia an appropriate court of a state  does not have available programs and services adequate for the needs of juveniles
B. holding juvenile court under statutes then in effect could not acquire jurisdiction in delinquency proceeding in the absence of a delinquency petition filed by the probation officer under an order of the court authorizing the same
C. holding that a delinquency proceeding places a juvenile in jeopardy for purposes of the double jeopardy clause
D. holding that youth in juvenile delinquency proceeding was not entitled to a jury trial on the issue of restitution under ors 419c450
E. holding that the order of the juvenile court authorizing the filing of a delinquency petition is one of the essential documents needed when considering a challenge to juvenile jurisdiction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.