Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
discharge. Ill The trial court determined by summary judgment that even if MacDougall were an employee, he did not demonstrate that he was wrongfully discharged. The Appellate Division sustained that determination. If on the retrial of this matter, the trial court determines that the working relationship was one of employment, then it must consider whether plaintiff was "wrongfully discharged. That issue, we note, has been fully briefed and argued on the appeal before us. Accordingly, we deem it appropriate to explain the standards that should inform and guide the trial court in the event it reaches the issue of wrongful discharge. A In Pierce, we recognized that “an employee has a cause of action for wrongful discharge when the discharge is c 157-59, 443 A.2d 728 (App.Div. 1982) ; O’Sullivan v. Mallon, 160 N.J.Super. 416,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that discharge of employee for having distributed expired drugs at employers direction did not violate clear mandate of public policy because the discharge implicated only the private interests of the parties
B. holding that federal law can provide source of state public policy for determining whether discharge of employee violated clear mandate of public policy
C. holding that discharge of employee to avoid paying commissions on future transactions did not violate clear mandate of public policy
D. holding that accountant terminated for refusing to violate professional codes stated cognizable claim for wrongful discharge
E. holding that discharge of pharmacist for refusing to violate state administrative regulation requiring pharmacist to be present at all times pharmacy operates for business and for reporting his employers intended violation pursuant to statutory provision and his professional code of ethics would violate clear mandate of public policy
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.