Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of money, funds, or other assets from the financial institution. United States v. Christo, 129 F.3d 578, 580 (11th Cir.1997) (citing United States v. Mancuso, 42 F.3d 836, 847 (4th Cir.1994)). Any conduct charged in the indictment which may have placed the bank at a financial risk occurred prior to June 19, 1987. Once Anderson had control of the money, the scheme ended. Otherwise, under the government’s theory, the scheme could continue as long as Anderson maintained control of the money, thus defeating the purpose of criminal statutes of limitations. So long as she did not take part in any additional conduct that would have placed the bank at a separate, distinguishable risk, the statute of limitations continues to run. Cf. United States v. Meador, 138 F.3d 986, 994 (5th Cir.1998) . The conduct on which the government hangs its
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the legislature never intended for the dismissal and renewal statutes to overcome the statute of repose
B. holding that criminal statutes of limitation should be construed in favor of the accused
C. recognizing risks in construing statutes of limitations in favor of repose
D. holding that statute of repose was not subject to toiling provision applicable to statute of limitations because among other reasons it would ignore fundamental distinctions between ordinary statutes of limitations and statutes of repose
E. holding that provision has the characteristics of a statute of repose
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.