Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
only in the way and to the extent that it would have been punishable if the territory embraced by the reservation remained subject to the jurisdiction of the State.” 219 U.S. at 10, 31 S.Ct. at 214. Within this framework, the federal assessment could be imposed in this case only to the extent of $15.00, the most that could be charged a defendant under the Virginia victim compensation scheme. Such a result seems counterintuitive, or at least impractical. Although the result follows from the reasoning of Press Publishing Co., it is not clear whether fines— especially unique fines such as the special assessments — must be treated in the same way as sentences of incarceration for purposes of the “like punishment” analysis. But cf. United States v. Kendrick, 636 F.Supp. 189 (E.D.N.C. 1986) ; cf. also United States v. Patmore, 475 F.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the court of criminal appeals has jurisdiction to review fines under the criminal sentencing reform act of 1982 because sentence is a broad term which encompasses a fine probation a term of imprisonment or any other form of punishment imposed by the court
B. holding that trial courts failure to give reasonabledoubt instruction sua sponte during punishment phase for extraneous offenses offered during punishment was harmless error in part because the jury assessed punishment far below maximum available despite states plea for maximum
C. holding that misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated constitutes a crime of violence under ussg  4b12a
D. recognizing that felony and misdemeanor dwi are separate offenses because a prior conviction is an essential element of felony driving while intoxicated but it is not an element of the misdemeanor offense
E. holding that punishment in this court for an offense under ncgs  1381 north carolinas driving while intoxicated statute cannot exceed a fine of 1000 or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year the maximum punishment for a misdemeanor under 18 usc section 1 because to allow the greater punishment that could be imposed under state law would conflict with the federal policy of limiting us magistrates nonconsensual jurisdiction to that allowed under the federal definition of a misdemeanor
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.