Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
exist and the factual basis for each such claim.”). 20 See OCGA § 9-11-9.1 (e) (“If a plaintiff files an affidavit which is allegedly defective, and the defendant to whom it pertains alleges, with specificity, by motion to dismiss filed on or before the close of discovery, that said affidavit is defective, the plaintiff’s complaint shall be subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim____”); OCGA § 9-11-56 (c) (“The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law; but nothing in this Code section shall be const 6, 8 (658 SE2d 792) (2008) . 24 Kaminer, 282 Ga. at 834 (1) (citation
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that knowing but failing to communicate a correct diagnosis may constitute a separate act of negligence
B. holding that there was no evidence in the record to support appellants contention that the doctor committed a separate act of negligence by continuing to prescribe coumadin and that the doctors alleged failure to correct any previous negligence does not constitute additional acts of negligence
C. holding that the basis of liability is negligence and not injury
D. holding that ordinary negligence and gross negligence are not separate causes of action
E. holding that negligence does not violate the due process clause but reserving the question whether gross negligence does
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.