Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
time in their reply brief). The BIA did not violate petitioners’ due process rights. It is undisputed that the BIA mailed its decision to petitioners’ attorney of record, that he received it, and that petitioners failed to inform the BIA of their change of address. Further, the record shows that the IJ told petitioners that they were required to inform the agency if they changed their address and that he gave them the change of address form. We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ remaining contentions because they arise from the agency’s underlying decision to deny cancellation of removal. Petitioners failed to seek review of that decision within the 30-day time limit prescribed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995) . DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part. *** This
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that this time requirement is mandatory and jurisdictional
B. holding that a time limit for filing a complaint as a creditor in bankruptcy proceedings is not jurisdictional
C. holding that time limit for filing petition for review is mandatory and jurisdictional
D. holding that the time limit for filing a petition for review of a final order of deportation is jurisdictional
E. holding that the statutory time limit for filing a petition for review is mandatory and jurisdictional and therefore not subject to equitable lolling
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.