Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
issue of Claimant’s initial eligibility for benefits under the Act. Furthermore, the cases cited by the Department in support of its position are inapposite because they relate to circumstances in which a government entity has made a mistake in enforcing the law or administering its duty to the public at large, and do not relate to statutorily bestowed entitlements of government employees or specific private citizens. See Otte v. Coving-ton Township Road Supervisors, 589 Pa. 44, 650 A.2d 412 (1994) (Department of Environmental Resources mistakenly believed it was estopped from enforcing the provisions of the Sewage Facilities Act, Act of January 24, 1966, P.L. (1965) 1535, as amended, 35 P.S. §§ 750.1-750.20(a)); Commonwealth v. Barnes & Tucker Company, 455 Pa. 392, 319 A.2d 871 (1974) ; Commonwealth v. Western Maryland R.R. Co.,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the party did not waive its right to enforce the arbitration clause
B. holding that the commonwealth did not waive its right to enjoin the pollution of public waters by a mining company
C. recognizing the importance of public welfare and conservation of water in administering its public waters
D. holding that waters in utah are of two classes private and public and title to public waters is in the public all are equal owners that is have coequal rights therein
E. recognizing the right to waive a jury trial
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.