Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
formal County policies or longstanding County practices. a. Seizure under § 5150 It is undisputed that Deputy Perez made the decision to take Harvey into custody pursuant to § 5150. Section 5150 provides that “[w]hen any person, as a result of mental disorder, is a danger to others, or to himself or herself, or gravely disabled, a peace officer [or other designated persons] may, upon probable cause, take, or cause to be taken, the person into custody and place him or her in a facility designated by the county and approved by the State Department of Mental Health as a facility for 72-hour treatment and evaluation.” See Cal. Welf. & Inst.Code § 5150. The lawfulness of a detention under § 5150 is measured by Fourth Amendment standards. See Maag v. Wessler, 960 F.2d 773, 775 (9th Cir.1991) ; People v. Triplett, 144 Cal.App.3d 283, 287,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that under fourth amendment standards for determining probable cause for arrest and probable cause for search and seizure are same
B. holding that probable cause is a complete defense to an action for false arrest
C. holding seizure of suspected mentally ill person for psychiatric evaluation is analogous to a criminal arrest and must therefore be supported by probable cause
D. recognizing that an officer must have a reasonable articulable suspicion that the person has been is or is about to be engaged in criminal activity to frisk an individual for weapons and must have probable cause to conduct a further seizure
E. recognizing that an immigration arrest and detention needs to be supported by probable cause or reasonable suspicion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.