Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
The defendant argued that the victim consented to the beating because the two had an agreement that if the victim “consumed any alcoholic beverages (and/or became intoxicated), [defendant] would punish her by physically assaulting her.” Id. Appropriately, the court held unequivocally that “no one has the right to beat another[,] even though that person may ask for it.” Id. at 31. Accordingly, we hold that consent is not a defense to a charge of assault with significa Dec. 221, 623 N.E.2d 811, 814 (1993) ("[W]e are inclined to agree with the commentators and a number of our sister States who found consent not to be a defense to a battery based on injurious touching.”). 5 . Helton v. State, 624 N.E.2d 499, 514-15 (Ind.Ct.App.1993); see also Jaske v. State, 539 N.E.2d 14, 18 (Ind.1989) ; cf. Durr v. State, 722 So.2d 134, 135
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that consent is not a defense to the charge of second degree assault where the assault occurred in the context of a prison fight between inmates
B. holding that consent to participate in the initiation into a prison gang is not a defense to the charge of battery
C. holding that assumption of the risk is not an available defense for civil battery
D. holding that battery is an inherently included offense of aggravated battery
E. holding that in pennsylvania lack of informed consent claims utilize a battery standard that is a physician commits battery where the patient does not consent to the procedure on his person thus constituting a harmful or offensive contact
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.