Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
was performed for the purposes of both the guilt phase and the penalty phase. After the panel returned a guilty verdict, counsel discussed mitigation strategy with Wickline two or three times. Wickline did not want to speak with a psychiatrist or a probation officer or involve his family. Consequently, Wickline and his counsel reached the decision to focus on their strongest mitigating factor — that the Lerches facilitated the murders by participating in drug dealing and attempting a drug rip-off. Wickline made the final decision to proceed with this strategy. Based on the record evidence of Wickline’s strategic choices, counsel’s investigation and presentation of mitigating evidence did not fall below an objective standard of reasonableness. See Coleman I, 244 F.3d at 545-46 . But see Coleman II, 268 F.3d at 452 (finding
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the sixth amendment right to counsel embodies the right to effective assistance of counsel
B. holding that counsel cannot be found ineffective for failing to pursue a particular mitigating factor where despite a reasonable investigation by counsel counsel was not put on notice of any such mitigating evidence
C. holding that petitioner was not deprived of the right to effective assistance of counsel at sentencing where petitioner did not cooperate with counsel regarding the investigation and identification of mitigating evidence imposed restrictions upon counsel and refused to submit to further psychological or psychiatric testing
D. holding that the statutory right to counsel at a civil commitment hearing implicitly includes the right to the effective assistance of that counsel
E. recognizing that a criminal defendants right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.