Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of the estate the debtor’s "aggregate interest in any property” up to a specified dollar amount. 7 . In his summary judgment opposition, Segal explained he did not disclose these payments because he mistakenly believed he was required to disclose amounts received during the two years immediately preceding the filing of his bankruptcy petition, rather t Act, courts have continued to rely on the standard articulated therei ether the monies due to Segal under the Consulting Agreement are post-petition wages, it is not clear to this Court that wages is the salient classification. Under § 541(a)(1), the dispositive issue is whether the debtor has a legal or equitable interest in the payments as of the commencement of the case, not whether the payments are wages. See Clark, 960 F.2d at 477 . And § 541(a)(6) refers to "earnings from
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an anticipated tax refund was property of the bankruptcy estate as of the date the bankruptcy case was filed
B. holding a football players earnings from games played after he filed for bankruptcy protection were not property of his bankruptcy estate under  541a1
C. holding that claims harming the debtor corporation that arose from prepetition conduct become property of the estate under 11 usc  541a1
D. holding that bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to control disposition of chapter 13 debtors property that is not property of the bankruptcy estate unless the property is related to the bankruptcy proceedings of the code
E. holding noncompete payments were not exempt from the debt ors bankruptcy estate as earnings from postpetition services under  541a6 because the noncompete agreement was inextricably intertwined with the debtors sale of stock that was an includable bankruptcy asset that predated debtors bankruptcy petition
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.