Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
sense. Asking jurors to forget that Butler is a convicted child molester simply asks too much of fallible human beings. Some occurrences cannot be forgotten, notwithstanding the court’s admonishments to the contrary. This is one of those situations, or at least we cannot say beyond a reasonable doubt that it is not. We sustain point one. We also sustain point two based on the denial of a mistrial. Butler’s remaining two points are not reached. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. 1 . The court could have refused to administer the oath to Butler and refused to withdraw his un-sworn testimony from the jury's consideration on the ground that he had waived any complaint about his unsworn testimony. See Beck v. State, 719 S.W.2d 205, 212 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) . However, the court chose to administer the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a complaint is waived by the failure to object during the witness unsworn testimony
B. holding defendant waived complaint
C. holding claimed errors waived for failure to timely object
D. holding that a defendant waived a sentencing issue by failing to object in district court
E. holding complaint that sentence violated equal protection was waived because of failure to object at trial
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.