Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
rights are never property rights or that the Government may always take them for their own benefit without compensation. Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guar. Corp., 475 U.S. 211, 223-24, 106 S.Ct. 1018, 89 L.Ed.2d 166 (1986) (internal conditional grant of funds to California did not subject the federal government to liability for California’s actions. Second, California’s legislature cannot be considered to have acted under federal ore, cannot be construed as a grant of authority for California to pass legislation on behalf of the federal government. This is not even a case in which Congress first regulated a particular field and then delegated its authority to regulate that field to another sovereign entity. See United States v. Mazurie, 419 U.S. 544, 95 S.Ct. 710, 42 L.Ed.2d 706 (1975) . California had, at all times, the inherent
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding indian tribes subject to gamblingrelated taxes from which states are exempt
B. holding in the context of an adea claim that an indian tribes sovereign immunity had not been abrogated by congress and subject matter jurisdiction did not exist
C. holding that federal legislation with respect to indian tribes  is not based upon impermissible racial classifications and noting that article i  8 of the constitution gives congress the power to regulate commerce  with the indian tribes
D. holding that congress which regulated the introduction of alcoholic beverages in indian country could validly delegate to indian tribes its authority to regulate that subject matter because indian tribes themselves possessed independent authority over the subject matter
E. holding the constitution vests the federal government with exclusive authority over relations with indian tribes
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.