Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of her continued failure to cooperate and open disobedience to plaintiff in administrative matters; and 4. On May 8, 1996, plaintiff sent a letter to defendant President Judge Bonavi-tacola stating that he would attend a meeting of the Administr s instance, plaintiff has made sufficient allegations to demonstrate that his complaints did not relate solely to the removal of his personal responsibilities but also touched on the issues of the proper role of a guberna-torially appointed President Judge versus a judicially appointed Court Administrator and the extent of political influence on administrative decisions in the judiciary, issues which are of general public concern. See Complaint ¶¶ 43, 48-49, 51; Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 149, 103 S.Ct. 1684, 1691, 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983) . And the fact that these communications were
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that even as to an issue that could arguably be viewed as a matter of public concern if the employee has raised the issue solely in order to further his own employment interest his first amendment right to comment on that issue is entitled to little weight
B. holding that the trial judge did not err by denying a motion to recuse that alleged in part that a defendant had previously worked on the judges election campaigns
C. holding that a question relating to whether assistant district attorneys felt pressured to work on political campaigns touched on a matter ofpublic concern even though the rest of the questions in the questionnaire at issue did not
D. holding that if the speech in question does not address a matter of public concern there is no first amendment violation
E. holding that the absence of a motivating desire to address a matter of public concern was not dispositive as to whether the speech addressed a matter of public concern
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.