Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
one of ADVA’s statutory duties is to assist veterans in presenting and pursuing claims against the United States for veteran’s benefits arising under laws of the United States or of Alabama if that veteran has given ADVA a power of attorney. Ala. Code § 31—5—4; see also Ala. Admin. Code r. 920-X-3-.01. But, an allegation that ADVA made an improper misrepresentation amounts to a negligence or legal malpractice claim, just as an allegation of improper medical care would amount to a medical malpractice claim. And, “[a] malpractice [claim] will not lie under [Section] 1983” because it is a claim arising under state common law—not a constitutional violation. Bass v. Sullivan, 550 F.2d 229, 232 (5th Cir.1977); see also Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976) . Accordingly, any malpractice claim alleged
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plaintiffs claim that medical providers did not comply with baker act was not subject to medical malpractice statutes ajlthough a medical diagnosis is necessary in order to involuntarily commit a patient the process of complying with the statute does not require medical skill or judgment
B. recognizing that prison officials should defer to medical professionals on medical matters
C. holding the provisions of a comprehensive medical malpractice act unconstitutional
D. holding that the ada does not create a remedy for medical malpractice
E. recognizing that even when a prisoner files suit under section 1983 alleging medical malpractice against prison medical officials medical malpractice does not become a constitutional violation merely because the victim is a prisoner
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.