Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
prejudice. As Plaintiff has not meet the standard for injunctive relief on the presented claims, his claims for injunctive relief are dismissed without prejudice. 2. Americans with Disabilities Act Plaintiff additionally alleges Defendants Marino and Armstrong violated the ADA by failing “to make a reasonable accommodation for the Plaintiffs disability by providing him ... the benefit of access to video teleconference equipment for his May 29, 201[4] [PCR] hearing....” (Docket Entry 1 ¶ 62). The ADA does not create private causes of action against individuals, see Boggi v. Med. Review and Accrediting Council, 415 Fed.Appx. 411, 415 (3d Cir.2011) (individual defendants cannot be sued in their individual capacities under the ADA); Emerson v. Thiel College, 296 F.3d 184, 190 (3d Cir.2002) , thus, Plaintiff may only bring an ADA claim
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that there is no right of recovery against individual defendants under the ada
B. holding that title ii of the ada is not applicable to the federal government
C. holding that there is no individual liability under title vii
D. holding no individual liability under the adea
E. holding there was no individual liability under titles i ii or iii of the ada
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.