Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
property “is not an exact science and, therefore, all that is required is that the distribution be equitable.” Kasser v. Kasser, 2006 VT 2, ¶ 30, 179 Vt. 259, 895 A.2d 134 (citation omitted). An equitable award does not, however, mean an equal one. Goodrich v. Goodrich, 158 Vt. 587, 593, 613 A.2d 203, 206 (1992). “A disparate property division is not ‘facially inequitable,’ and will not be reversed as long as the family court makes adequate findings that are supported by the evidence.” MacCormack, 2015 VT 64, ¶ 17 (quoting Wade v. Wade, 2005 VT 72, ¶ 20, 178 Vt. 189, 878 A.2d 303). Furthermore, we note that where the court finds that one party is primarily responsible for the debt, it acts within its discretion when it assigns all the debt to that party. See Wade, 2005 VT 72, ¶ 17 . We will thus uphold the family court’s
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a debt incurred for a personal family or household purpose is a consumer debt even though it is secured by the debtors real property
B. holding that a debt collectors filing of a lawsuit on a debt that appears to be timebarred  is an unfair and unconscionable means of collecting the debt
C. holding that the party challenging the dischargeability of a debt bears the burden of proving the debt nondischargeable by a preponderance of the evidence
D. holding that it was within family courts discretion to assign all debt to one party when court found that party to be at fault for debt
E. holding that effect of discharge of debt under bankruptcy code is the same as it was under the 1898 bankruptcy act it is not an extinguishment of the debt but only a bar to enforcement of the debt as a personal obligation of the debt or
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.