Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
brother Benjamin Culbertson, an attorney, filed a divorce action on August 5,1993 on grounds of Kristi Culbertson’s adultery. Attached to her Answer and Counterclaim, Kristi appended an affidavit stating that she was not involved in an adulterous affair. On August 23, 1993, the family court conducted a hearing regarding temporary custody of the Culbertsons’ minor daughter. At the hearing, in response to Kristi’s affidavit which was before the court and which denied adultery, Benjamin offered Thomas’s affidavit, including transcripts of telephone conversations taped by Thomas that revealed Kristi’s adulterous activity. It appears that at the time of this submission, Benjamin was aware of the statute and the Fourth Circuit’s opinion in Pritchard v. Pritchard, 732 F.2d 372 (4th Cir.1984) . Kristi’s counsel objected to the introduction
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing exception
B. holding that the trial court lacked authority to renew spousal support payments pursuant to a motion that was filed after the expiration of time during which spousal support was required to be paid under the original judgment
C. holding that there is no spousal exception to the statute
D. holding that there is no exception to rule 322c and that the limitations period is jurisdictional
E. holding that the trial court was without authority to modify a spousal support obligation when the modification proceeding was initiated ten years after the obligation to pay spousal support under the dissolution judgment had been terminated by order
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.