Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
right to free speech and association under the First Amendment’) with Compl. at 7 para. (1) (requesting an order ”[d]eclaring that Defendants are unlawfully depriving plaintiffs of their right to engage in organization and other expressive activity in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.”). Defs.' Reply at 6 n. 6. 6 . The Court concludes that because Counts I and II of the plaintiffs' complaint are barred pursuant to the doctrine of res judicata, the Court need not address whether these counts state a claim for which relief may be granted. 7 . See Orange, 59 F.3d at 1273 (finding that the plaintiffs speech was a matter of public concern because it regarded "potential fraud at a public university.”); Spiegla v. Hull, 371 F.3d 928, 935-36 (7th Cir.2004) . Speech is not of public concern "when it is
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a public employees internal memoranda raising concerns about public corruption are protected first amendment speech because they addressed a matter of public concern
B. holding that issues of prison security public safety and official corruption are matters of public concern
C. holding police officer is a public official
D. recognizing a public employees first amendment right to address matters of legitimate public concern
E. holding that a public employees deposition testimony involves a matter of public concern if arguably a statement about misconduct or corruption in city government and regardless of whether testimony is given in employees official capacity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.