Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
he or she is innocent of these allegations would do. Wyche and McCord are thus archetypal eicirmsic-fabrication cases. Moreover, the confession cases the majority relies upon are wholly distinguishable. Many of these confession cases involve situations where the police lie to the suspect by falsely claiming that a eodefen-dant has already confessed and implicated the suspect, so the suspect might as well come clean. See, e.g., Frazier, 394 U.S. at 739, 89 S.Ct. 1420; Burch, 343 So.2d at 833 (substantially similar, but involving “failed polygraph” ruse). Even in those cases that do not involve this precise species of misrepresentation, the misrepresentation is still intrinsic to the case the police are actually investigating. See, e.g., Escobar v. State, 699 So.2d 988, 994 (Fla. 1997) , abrogated on other grounds by Connor v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that physical brutality led to an involuntary confession
B. holding that impermissible police procedures rendered confession involuntary
C. holding that agents promise to inform prosecutor of defendants cooperation does not render a subsequent confession involuntary
D. holding that later declarations during defendants confession leading officers to evidence of the crime constituted part of one continuous confession that began at the police station
E. holding that pjolice misrepresentation alone does not necessarily render a confession involuntary in the context of a case where police allegedly misrepresented that they possessed physical evidence of the crime at issue
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.