Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and Texas Crude’s assignees’ interests in the remaining 12.5 percent of the working interest. Defendant Burlington has also asserted a claim for indemnity against Texas Crude based on those parties’ [JOA] that may or may not become ripe, depending on final resolution of the question of law decided by this Order. 6 . The parties agree that the assignments at issue are unambiguous; they just disagree about what the assignments unambiguously mean. 7 . The 25% gas royalty provision also stated that it is "free and clear of all production and post-production costs and expenses.” Chesapeake Exploration, LLC v. Hyder, 483 S.W.3d 870, 873 (Tex. 2016). But the majority in Hyder noted that "[tjhis addition has no effect on the meaning of the provision” and may be regarded as surplusage. Id. . 8 . Burlington suggested at oral argument
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the pricereceived basis for payment in the lease is sufficient in itself to excuse the hyders from bearing postproduction costs
B. holding that a payment is under the plan when the debt is provided for in the plan
C. holding that the costs of severance taxes transportation processing and treatment are considered to be postproduction costs and are therefore borne proportionately by the lessee and the royalty owner
D. holding that it was not essential to an action by a supplier on a payment bond under the miller act that a demand be made on the general contractor for payment  although there was evidence in the case from which it could be found that the materialman looked to the general contractor for payment  since the statute does not require a demand for payment but merely requires written notice of the claim
E. holding that the term reverse payment is not limited to a cash payment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.