Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
MCM states, “[t]o constitute an offense under the UCMJ, the adulterous conduct must either be directly prejudicial to good order and discipline or service discrediting.” MCM (2005 ed.), Part IV, 1162c(2). To satisfy the prejudice prong of this terminal element, the offense must have a significant effect on unit or organizational discipline, morale or cohesion, or be “clearly detrimental to the authority or stature of or respect toward a service member.” Id. On the other hand, “service discrediting” conduct is punishable when it “has a tendency ... to bring the service into disrepute ... or lower it in public esteem.” Id. Moreover, there is no requirement that the Government show actual damage to the reputation of the military. Cf. United States v. Hartwig, 39 M.J. 125, 130 (C.M.A.1994). Rather, the test is whether the appellant’s
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that in context of article 133 ucmj 10 usc  933 violation for officers delivery of sexually lurid letter to child of tender years prosecution need not prove actual damage to the reputation of the military
B. holding that the government need not prove actual notice to the prisoner
C. holding as a matter of law that a child of the tender age of 3 years and 8 months could not have realized the risk or danger of an artificial body of water
D. holding that there is not an obvious need to train officers not to sexually assault women
E. holding an unborn child is not a child for purposes of criminal prosecution of mistreatment of a child
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.