Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
possession of a gun or ammunition is admissible so long as it is sufficiently tied to the crime charged. For example, in Herman v. State, 896 So.2d 222, 229 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), we considered the trial court’s decision to admit evidence that the defendant in a murder case — where the victim was killed with a shotgun — owned a shotgun. The defendant’s shot r ammunition and the crime is too tenuous, such evidence is generally not relevant. In Cooper v. State, the Third District held that evidence of ammunition found on a murder defendant nine months after the murder which could not be definitively matched to the ammunition used in the murder was too tenuous to the crime to be admissible. 778 So.2d 542, 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). See also Sosa v. State, 639 So.2d 173, 174 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) . Here, there was an adequate nexus between the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that when a defendant voluntarily approached the immigration officer at the airport it cannot be said that he was discovered in or found in the united states
B. holding that trial court erred in allowing police officer to testify to contents of telephone records that were not introduced into evidence
C. holding that court erred in allowing 380 caliber cartridges found in murder defendants vehicle into evidence when there was no evidence connecting them to the crime especially in light of the fact that the investigating officer testified the bullet holes he discovered were consistent with 22 caliber ammunition
D. holding that it was error to admit into evidence 880 cartridges found in defendants car where there was no link established between the cartridges and the crime charged
E. holding that the protective sweep incident to the defendants arrest in front of his house on suspicion of murder was not justified because the evidence that an accomplice was involved in the murder did not equate to evidence that someone would be hiding out in the defendants house a month after the crime occurred and at the time of the arrest the officers were not chasing the defendant from a crime scene
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.