Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
private agreement that lured his investment. D'Amico also testified that Freeman attended the meeting at which Sudeen explained the structure of the investment. D’Amico's check was deposited in one of Sudeen’s accounts for which Freeman was a signatory, the funds of which were traced to lulling payments that Freeman made to other investors. 8 . United. States v. Faulkner, 17 F.3d 745, 766 (5th Cir.1994) ("We have held that in some cases the likelihood of criminal wrongdoing is so high, and the circumstance surrounding a defendant’s activities and cohorts are so suspicious, that a failure to conduct further inquiry or inspection can justify the inclusion of the deliberate ignorance instruction.") (internal citations omitted); see United States v. Gray, 105 F.3d 956, 967 (5th Cir.1997) ; see also United States v. Stouffer, 986 F.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding no deliberate indifference when a failure to take reasonable measures was due to defendants mistake
B. holding that the deliberate indifference instruction was appropriate where the defendant handled calls from irate loan applicants who received no money but made only made a trivial attempt to discern whether anything was wrong
C. holding that disgorgement was appropriate only as to the profits made prior to the time insider information was made public
D. holding that the eighth amendment protects prisoners only from deliberate indifference to their serious medical needs
E. holding that when no objection was made to jury instruction evidence to support finding based on instruction should be assessed in light of the instruction given
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.