Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the plant site. Acting under CERCLA, the EPA imposed administrative liability, not only on the polluters, but on the insured auto dealerships who had sold the pollutants to the polluters. Id. at 1518. The pollution exclusion contained in the policy at issue in Industrial Indemnity was identical to the one at issue in the present case. The Honorable William Terrell Hodges, United States District Judge, in reviewing issues nearly identical to those raised in this case, held that “sudden has a temporal meaning to it as well as a sense of the unexpected.” 731 F.Supp. at 1520 (citing C.L. Hauthaway & Sons v. American Motorists Ins., 712 F.Supp. 265, 268 (D.Mass.1989) (ordinary and common usage of term “sudden” includes temporal aspect of immediacy, abruptne ., 856 F.2d 31, 34 (6th Cir.1988) . Applying the definition of “sudden and
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a single thunderstorm was a sudden and dangerous occurrence
B. holding that negligent construction is not sudden unexpected or unanticipated and does not constitute an accident
C. holding that the indictment was sufficient to satisfy the continuity requirement since it alleged that the defendants conduct occurred over a period of eight years
D. holding that more than a year between the protected activity and the discharge is not close enough to support the causal connection requirement
E. holding that the phrase sudden and accidental is not a synonym for unexpected and unintended and that the discharge of coal dust over an eight year period was not sudden
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.