Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
49 . See, e.g., Anastas v. American Sav. Bank (In re Anastas), 94 F.3d 1280, 1285-86 (9th Cir.1996); Feld, 203 B.R. at 367; See also American Express Travel Related Serv. Co, v. Christensen (In re Christensen), 193 B.R. 863, 866 (N.D.Ill.1996); Chevy Chase Bank, FSB (In re Briese), 196 B.R. 440, 448 (Bankr.W.D.Wis.1996). Contra Feld, at 367 n. 1 Walters), 208 B.R. 651, 654-55 (W.D.La.1997); FCC Nat’l Bank v. Etto (In re Etto), 210 B.R. 734, 739-40 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1997); AT&T Universal Card Serv. Corp. v. Akdogan (In re Akdogan), 204 B.R. 90, 97 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1997) (stating that a creditor must do a credit check or some other circumstances must exist to prove it did not extend credit blindly); Bank One Columbus, N.A. v. McDaniel (In re McDaniel), 202 B.R. 74, 78 (Bankr.N.D.Tex. 1996) ; AT&T Universal Card Serv. v. Richards (In re
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that  523a2a requires justifiable but not reasonable reliance
B. holding that in fraud and nondisclosure claims a plaintiff must show actual and justifiable reliance
C. holding that a creditor cannot sit back and do nothing and still meet the standard for justifiable reliance when it had an opportunity to make an adequate examination and investigation
D. holding standard under section 523a2a is justifiable reliance
E. holding no justifiable reliance as a matter of law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.