Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
time, is essentially moot. The whole issue of whether the Bankruptcy Court was acting without Jurisdiction in entering the Amended Final Judgment of Default hinges on the inclusion of the “execution issue” language that was included in the Amended Final Judgment of Default. The purpose of such language was to enable Appellee to enforce the judgment. However, at this time, Appellee is not in a position to execute upon or otherwise enforce its rights under the judgment because this Court, in Appeal Number 93-939-CIV-T-17B, set aside the Bankruptcy Court’s damage determination and remanded the case for an evi-dentiary hearing on damages. Such hearing has yet to take place and until is does this issue is essentially moot. See Mills v. Green, 159 U.S. 651, 16 S.Ct. 132, 40 L.Ed. 293 (1895) . CONCLUSION This Court has carefully reviewed
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that when an appellate court determines that it lacks jurisdiction the only thing it can do is dismiss the appeal
B. holding that an appeal is properly dismissed as moot when an appellate court lacks power to provide an effective remedy for the appellant should it find in his favor
C. holding that an appeal is not moot so long as the appellate court can fashion relief that is both effective and equitable internal quotation marks omitted alteration in original
D. holding that the appellant had an adequate remedy by appeal for his discovery violation allegations
E. recognizing that an effective waiver is not an absolute bar to appellate review
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.