Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
tending to show that Bree-land’s weapon was manufactured as a shotgun and later altered, and he acknowledged at oral argument that the weapon had apparently been modified. The evidence at trial supporting this conclusion consisted of Officer Barnett’s testimony that the stock appeared to have been sawed off and filed down, and the weapon itself, the stock of which has been visibly changed into a pistol-grip. Viewing this evidence and all reasonable inferences to be drawn f 7, 124 (5th Cir.1995) (“To warrant reversal of a conviction, prosecutorial misconduct must be so pronounced and persistent that it casts serious doubts upon the correctness of the jury’s verdict.”). We similarly decline to reverse Bree-land’s conviction based on the allegedly erroneous admission of a (5th Cir. 1995) . Ill For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that any error that court may have made in admitting inadmissible evidence was harmless because government presented overwhelming evidence establishing defendants guilt
B. holding any error in admitting eye witness testimony was harmless because it was cumulative to other overwhelming evidence that established defendants guilt
C. holding that error from the erroneous admission of evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendants guilt
D. holding the error harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt
E. holding improperly admitted evidence was harmless error given the overwhelming evidence of guilt
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.