Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the law (and we need not pass upon that issue), it was the duty of the town clerk — not Attorney Brule — to record and index the notice of intent in accordance with the General Laws. See Gerardi, 414 A.2d at 476 (noting that the town clerk is "bound to comply with the applicable [recording] statutes”). 7 .Mr. Beauregard argues that the motion justice erred when he ruled that there was “no dispute concerning the lack of [Attorney Brule's] malice.” Because we are affirming the grant of summary judgment based on the fact that Mr. Beauregard failed to show that the attorney defendants made a false statement about Mr. Beauregard’s ownership of the property which he wished to develop, we need not address the malice issue. See Lavoie v. North East Knitting, Inc., 918 A.2d 225, 228 (R.I.2007)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding we may affirm on any grounds supported by the record even those not relied upon by the district court
B. recognizing that this court may affirm summary judgment on grounds other than those relied upon by the motion justice
C. holding that this court may affirm a grant of summary judgment on any ground appearing in the record regardless of whether the circuit court relied on it
D. holding that the supreme court can affirm a trial justices decision on grounds other than those stated by the trial justice
E. recognizing that appellate court may affirm result on reasons different from those on which lower court relied
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.