Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
regardless of whether or not the June 20th Order triggered the filing requirements of Rules 50 and 59, it is not necessary to decide if the June 20th Order triggered the 10-day filing requirement of these Rules. Specifically, if the June 20th Order did trigger the 10-day filing requirement, Schering’s motion may be considered by this Court because they were timely filed. If, however, the June 20th Order is not a “judgment” under Rule 50 and 59, Schering’s motion may nonetheless be considered by this Court because the filing requirements embodied in those Rules are maximum filing requirements and do not prevent a party from filing such motions prior to the entry of “judgment.” Although parties typically do' not file post-trial motions until entry of final judgment resolving al Cir.1981) , cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017, 102 S.Ct. 1711,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding trial court retains jurisdiction to consider motion for attorneys fees despite filing of notice of appeal of final judgment
B. holding summary judgment order was not a final judgment because it did not dispose of the defendants claim for attorneys fees
C. holding that a motion to reconsider filed after the entry of final judgment must be considered a motion to correct error
D. holding that the rule 12b6 ruling was not a final judgment and did not bind the district court at summary judgment
E. holding that district court improperly denied rule 50b motion filed after entry of final judgment because previous judgment which did not resolve issue of attorneys fees did not trigger rule 50b filing requirements
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.