Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
regarding the failure of the trial court to conduct an in camera inspection. CONCLUSION We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. 1 . Appellees are the Texas Department of Public Safety Officers Association (“DPSOA”); Billy Don Ivey, Jerry Moore, and Charlie Adams (members of the Board of Directors of DPSOA); Mary Pat Becnel, now Maty Pat Holt (a former employee of DPSOA); and Jeff Heard, individually and d/b/a Jeff Heard & Company, and Jeff Heard & Company, P.C. (DPSOA’s accountant and his firm). 2 . Although Ginsberg involved the psychotherapist-patient privilege, the decision is premised on self-incrimination cases. See, e.g., Henson v. Citizens Bank, 549 S.W.2d 446 (Tex.Civ.App. — East-land 1977, no writ) . 3 . The supreme court in Republic Insurance
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the drug tax violated the privilege against selfincrimination
B. holding that a plaintiff in a civil action could be forced to either elect to invoke the privilege against selfincrimination or abandon the claim
C. holding that a witness may invoke the privilege against selfincrimination at trial despite testifying previously before a grand jury in the same case
D. holding that waiver of privilege against selfincrimination is proceeding specific
E. recognizing commonlaw privilege against selfincrimination
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.