Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Court in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Rylander v. State, 101 S.W.3d 107, 109-10 (Tex.Crim.App.2003). The appellant must first demonstrate trial counsel’s performance was deficient because it fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052). He must then show that “but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” Id. McCallum claims his counsel’s performance was deficient because he failed to object properly to the admission of evidence regarding McCallum’s membership in the Aryan Brotherhood. Counsel is not ineffective for failing to object to admissible evidence. See Ex parte White, 160 S.W.3d 46, 53 (Tex.Crim.App.2004) . We have determined this evidence was
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding ineffective assistance of counsel claim for failure to object to prosecutors comments cognizable in postconviction motion since court unable to review on appeal because trial counsel failed to preserve error
B. holding that to demonstrate a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel petition must establish that the alleged error was prejudicial in fact
C. holding that to establish ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to object during trial appellant must show trial court would have committed error in overruling objection
D. holding that failure to object to admissible evidence was not ineffective assistance of counsel
E. holding that for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim to be established a defendant must show that but for counsels error the outcome of his proceedings would have been different
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.