Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
his disabilities will force him to miss 10 days of work every month. We agree with this contention in part and disagree with it in part. In refusing to give controlling weight to a treating physician’s opinion, an ALJ must adhere to certain agency-imposed procedural requirements. The ALJ must “evaluate every medical opinion [ ] receive[d]” and must “give good reasons in [his] notice of determination or decision for the weight [ ] give[n]” to a treating physician’s opinion. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d); Wilson, 378 F.3d at 544. A treating physician’s opinion receives controlling weight when it is “well-supported by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques” and is “not inconsistent with the other substantial evidence.” Wilson, 378 F.3d at 544. Even when h Cir.2001) ; see also Hall v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that where a treating physicians opinion is contradicted by a consulting physician the alj must explain on the record the reasons for rejecting the opinion of the treating physician
B. holding that failure to provide good reasons to discredit a treating physicians opinion requires remand
C. holding that remand was not required and that the aljs failure to mention treating physicians opinion was harmless error because the alj adopted the treating physicians recommendations
D. holding an aljs failure to adequately explain the weight given to treating sources opinions not harmless because the aljs reasoning was not sufficiently specific to make clear that the alj recognized and evaluated the treating relationships
E. holding that where the alj had already  obtained and considered reports from treating physicians the alj had before him a complete medical history and the evidence received from the treating physicians was adequate for him to make a determination as to disability
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.