Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
award of prejudgment interest is normally left in the discretion of the trial judge. We find that the trial court did not err in assessing interest at 8%.... ” (citation omitted)). Defendants do not suggest an alternative rate of prejudgment interest, and the Court concludes that 8% is an appropriate rate under Mississippi law. Cf. Miss.Code Ann. § 75-17-1 (setting 8% per annum rate for claims on “notes, accounts and contracts”). Prejudgment interest will begin with the date the first suit was filed. See id. § 75-17-7 (establishing that prejudgment interest begins on “date determined by such judge to be fair but in no event prior to the filing of the complaint”); see also Sw. Recreational Indus., Inc. v. FieldTurf Inc., No. 01-50073, 2002 WL 32783971, at *9 (5th Cir. Aug. 13, 2002) . Finally, the Court may take judicial notice
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the district court erred by failing to determine and deduct the actual value of securities received by fraud victims
B. holding that district court erred by failing to follow prejudgmentinterest accrual date in state statute
C. holding that the district court erred in failing to properly charge the jury on defendants affirmative defenses
D. holding that district court erred in failing to consider evidence of secondary considerations
E. holding that a defendant waived a sentencing issue by failing to object in district court
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.