Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of pollutants. Id. at § 1362(16). “Discharge” of a pollutant or pollutants means “any addition of any pollutant to navigable waters from a point source.” Id. at § 1362(12). The USFS asserts that the plain meaning of “discharge” is limited to a point source or a nonpoint source with a conveyance. Defendant-intervenors claim that “discharge” is limited to point sources only, interpreting the phrase “without, qualification” in the discharge definition as allowing some types of nonpoint source activity to fall within the statutory definition of point source. These arguments contradict the plain meaning of the term “discharge.” The term “including” in the discharge definition permits additional, unstated meanings. National Wildlife Federation v. Gorsuch, 693 F.2d 156, 172 (D.C.Cir.1982) ; Exxon Corp. v. Lujan, 730 F.Supp. 1535, 1545
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that  3583e2 allows a district court to modify the conditions of supervised release without extending the term of that release
B. holding that the term includes in the cwa allows for additional unstated meanings
C. holding that  6905a of the cwa prevents any under claims under rcra that would be barred under the clean water acts cwa npdes permit shield
D. holding that an additional term did not materially alter the contract because the plaintiff cannot profess to be surprised by an additional term in an invoice when the price quotation contained the identical term
E. holding that as used in the cwa the term waters of the united states is not limited to the traditional tests of navigability
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.