Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
580, 587 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, no pet.). A conclusory statement is one that does not provide the underlying facts to support the conclusion. Paragon Gen. Contractors, 227 S.W.3d at 883; Rizkallah, 952 S.W.2d at 587. A conclusory statement can be either a legal conclusion or factual conclusion. See Rizkallah, 952 S.W.2d at 587. Harrison’s averments arguably concerned only two of the representations on which Methodist relied to support its breaeh-of-warranty action: “Zurich had experienced and expert personnel to handle all claims”; and “Zurich would provide a customized claims program that would control Methodist’s loss costs.” Even if Harrison’s affidavit was some evidence Zurich breached these warranties, his aver-m s “opinion.” See Ryland Group, Inc., 924 S.W.2d at 122 . Accordingly, Harrison’s averments were
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that interested partys affidavit opposed to motion for summary judgment and governments deposition to explore facts asserted in affidavit do not constitute distinct proceedings
B. holding that facts alleged in an employees affidavit were insufficient to raise an issue of fact for the purposes of defeating a summary judgment where the affidavit contradicted the employees earlier deposition statements
C. holding that affidavit in support of summary judgment may not be based upon factual conclusion or conclusions of law
D. recognizing that an interested witnesss affidavit reciting he estimates or believes cer tain facts to be true will not support summary judgment
E. holding that a court may not consider hearsay contained in an affidavit when ruling on a summary judgment motion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.