Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
April 1997 and September 1997 were submitted as samples to the district court. This court has also examined them in camera. They contain: (1) dates; (2) names of timekeepers; (3) numbers of hours worked; (4) generic descriptions of activities, e.g., review files, update database, prepare for deposition, search and retrieve files, research on summary judgment motion; (5) occasional references to legal theories that were the subject of research; (6) occasional references to the source of documents being reviewed; and (7) total fees and disbursements for the month. The billing records carry no stamped or written indication that they are work product or protected by the attorney-client privilege. 4 . BCBS also relies on Annandale Advocate v. City of Annandale, 435 N.W.2d 24 (Minn. 1989) . But in that case, the subject of the report,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that police officers have a duty to conduct an investigation into the basis of the witness report
B. holding that investigative report regarding potential premises liability claim was protected work product
C. holding that police chiefs suspen  sion with pay was not an adverseemployment action
D. holding that hearsay within a police report was inadmissible
E. holding that investigative report into police chiefs conduct was protected as private personnel data
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.