Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
because the pistol found in his apartment was inoperable. Irving contends that because it was inoperable, the gun was relevant only to show propensity, which is impermissible. Alternatively, Irving contends that any probative value was outweighed by its potential for unfair prejudice. The government argues that the gun, although inoperable, tended to show that Irving was willing and intended to execute the plan to kill Watson. In the present case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the pistol into evidence. Irving's possession of the pistol tended to establish that he thought he was able to carry out the plan to kill Watson, and therefore that he intended to conspire to kill Watson and obstruct justice. See Coleman v. United States, 379 A.2d 710, 712 (D.C.1977) . The fact that the gun turned out to be
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that police officers testimony as to the victims prior inconsistent statements made to him on day of the alleged crime were not admissible as substantive evidence and could not be used to support a finding of guilt
B. holding that defendants prior possession of the physical means of committing the crime is some evidence of the probability of his guilt and is therefore admissible
C. holding that the admission of unlawfully seized evidence of a crime was admissible if the jury was instructed that the evidence could be considered only in assessing a defendants credibility and not for determining guilt
D. holding that an indictment is sufficient as long as it fully and clearly sets out the crime and the elements of the offense even if the evidence consists of proof of other means of committing the same crime
E. holding that error from the erroneous admission of evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendants guilt
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.