Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Morrissey’s earlier services is clearly wrong in light of the court’s other findings. They include the findings (a) that “Sr. Mon[z]on had never agreed to any specific hourly rates and clearly none that approached or exceeded $200 per hour,” 782 F.Supp. at 905; (b) that Morrissey ha .S.2d at 382, 489 N.E.2d at 1284 (same). Based on Mar Oil’s rejection of the very first bill, sent in January 1981 and asking for $75,-000, Morrissey knew that, without specificity as to time spent, Monzon would not allow the bill to be paid. Statements made by an attorney to a client in such circumstances in order to induce payment of the attorney’s bills should generally be binding on the attorney. See generally Prager v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance Co., 245 N.Y. 1, 4, 156 N.E. 76 (1927) ; Finkelstein v. Kins, 124 A.D.2d 92, 95, 511
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an attorneys services were personal services rendered or labor done under the predecessor statute to section 38001
B. holding that an attorneys arguments are not evidence
C. holding that an attorneys bills are high evidence as to the maximum value of the attorneys services
D. holding that beneficiaries could not sue attorneys of the trust for legal malpractice because beneficiaries are not direct recipients of the attorneys services
E. holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.