Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
back condition that prevents the individual from performing any heavy labor job would be substantially limited in the major life activity of working because the individual’s impairment eliminates his or her ability to perform a class of jobs.” Id. Despite the broad nature of this example, the Court finds Whitfield also has not met her burden of proving she is substantially limited in the major life activity of work. While the record contains evidence of Whitfield’s medical limitations, there exists nothing connecting those limitations to ability to perform other jobs in the community. The general statement in the Interpretive Guidelines about back injuries, in isolation, cannot boost Whitfield over the summary judgment hurdle. Cf. McKay v. Toyota Motor Mfg., 110 F.3d 369 (6th Cir.1997) ; Bolton v. Scrivner, Inc., 36 F.3d 939 (10th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a trained computer technicians carpal tunnel syndrome did not render him disabled under the ada because he could still function as a computer repair technician
B. holding as a matter of law that a twentyfive pound lifting limitation does not constitute a significant restriction on ones ability to lift work or perform any other major life activity
C. holding as a matter of law that a permanent twentyfive pound lifting restriction does not constitute a significant restriction on ones ability to lift work or perform any other major life activity
D. holding plaintiff with carpal tunnel syndrome who could not perform heavy lifting failed to meet burden of establishing substantial limitation in major life activity of work
E. holding as a matter of law that a twentyfive pound lifting limitation particularly when compared to an average persons abilities  does not constitute a significant restriction on ones ability to lift work or perform any other major life activity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.