Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
13 plan. See 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a) (the protection of automatic stay is not listed as a requirement for confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan). The plain language of § 1325(a) mandates confirmation if Debtors meet the nine requirements set forth therein. Congress did not mandate the dismissal of a case or the denial of confirmation if the automatic stay terminated prior to confirmation pursuant to § 362(c)(3) or (4) and therefore the Court finds that the termination of the automatic stay does not necessarily deprive a debtor of the right to continue under Chapter 13, obtain confirmation of a plan, and ultimately obtain a discharge if the debtor complies with the terms of the plan. See United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc., 489 U.S. 235, 241, 109 S.Ct. 1026, 103 L.Ed.2d 290 (1989) . In addition to the ability of a debt- or to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that circuit courts failure to apply statute according to its clear and unambiguous terms amounted to failure to apply clearly established law
B. holding that courts should not substitute their judgment for that of the directors of a corporation 
C. recognizing court must enforce unambiguous contract according to its terms
D. holding that when a statutes terms are clear and unambiguous on their face there is no room for statutory construction and a court must apply the statute according to its literal meaning
E. holding that when the language of a statute is clear courts should not substitute their judgment for that of congress and should enforce the statute according to its terms
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.