Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
requesting only reconsideration of an order awarding attorney fees tolls the effectiveness of a notice of appeal because the Millers’ Rule 60(b) motions not only challenged the attorney fee award but also sought to vacate the district court's announced judgment of dismissal. See Jones v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., 223 F.3d 130, 137-138 (2d Cir.2000) (recognizing that a Rule 60(b) motion seeking attorney fees is covered by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(4)(A)(vi) when the motion also addresses the merits of the judgment). 3 . Vacating the district court’s order does not inappropriately reverse this Court’s prior motion panel decision to dismiss, based on lack of jurisdiction, the Millers' appeal of the district court's Rule 60(b) order. See United States v. Houser, 804 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir.1986) . 4 . Also before the Court are Appellants'
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that under the law of the case doctrine an issue of fact or law decided on appeal may not be reexamined by the appellate court on a subsequent appeal
B. recognizing that ruling of one trial judge does not preclude another trial judge reconsidering interlocutory ruling
C. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in reconsidering a prior interlocutory ruling
D. holding that the law of the case doctrine does not bar a panel reviewing the merits of an appeal from reconsidering a motions panels jurisdictional ruling
E. holding that an unappealed ruling is the law of the case
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.