Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
The State has refused to disavow enforcement of the statute and is, in fact, vigorously defending the legality of the statute in the present action. In addition, albeit for public or non-consensual conduct, there have been prosecutions under Arkansas’s sodomy statute as recently as 1988. See, e.g., Young v. State, 296 Ark. 394, 757 S.W.2d 544 (1988)(conviction for nonconsensual sodomy under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-122); United States v. Lemons, 697 F.2d 832 (8th Cir. 1983) (conviction under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-122 for consensual conduct in a public restroom). In addition, our sodomy statute has been used outside the criminal context in ways harmful to those who engage in same-sex conduct prohibited by the statute. See, e.g., Stowe v. Bowlin, 259 Ark. 221, 531 S.W.2d 955 (1976) ; Thigpen v. Carpenter, 21 Ark. App. 194, 730
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that court should have allowed appellant to impeach appellees credibility as a witness by referencing appellees admitted engagement in sodomy
B. holding that the need to impeach credibility correspondingly increases as the importance of the witness credibility and testimony escalates
C. recognizing that statements in appellees brief can constitute judicial admissions
D. holding that conviction on appeal is not admissible to impeach witnesss credibility
E. holding that summary convictions of crimes involving dishonesty could be used to impeach the credibility of a witness
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.