Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
contains sufficient evidence for a jury to convict the defendant.” United States v. Tome, 61 F.3d 1446, 1455 (10th Cir.1995). Rather, reversal is appropriate where an error has a substantial influence on the outcome of a trial or leaves one in grave doubt as to whether it had such effect. United States v. Medina-Copete, 757 F.3d 1092, 1108 (10th Cir.2014). In determining whether Mr. Smith’s testimony had a substantial influence on the outcome of the trial, we And three factors relevant to this case: (1) the strength, importance, and pervasiveness of the erroneously admitted testimony; (2) the strength of the admissible evidence; and (3) whether the district court’s instructions to the jury mitigated any error. See, e.g., United States v. Turner, 285 F.3d 909, 914-15 (10th Cir.2002) ; Tome, 61 F.3d at 1455 (holding that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding although admission of victim impact testimony was error it was harmless in light of strong evidence against defendant
B. holding that error in admission of videotape was harmless because it was cumulative of childs properly admitted live testimony
C. holding that improper admission of expert testimony was harmless in light of otherwise overwhelming evidence and fact that testimony covering substantially the same area was introduced without challenge
D. holding improperly admitted testimony was cumulative to the other properly admitted evidence and was therefore harmless
E. holding that other evidence properly admitted at trial was sufficiently strong to permit the conclusion that the improper admission of unreliable expert testimony was harmless
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.