Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Circuit Court of Appeals which concern precisely this issue. See Lebrón-Torres v. Whitehall Laboratories, 251 F.3d 236 (1st Cir.2001) and Gelabert-Ladenheim v. American Airlines, Inc., 252 F.3d 54 (1st Cir.2001). After considering Defendant’s request, at the conclusion of the August 22, 2001 Settlement Conference, the Court ordered Defendant to file its motion and legal memorandum by September 6, 2001. Plaintiffs’ response was due on September 21, 2001. Having received the parties’ submissions, the Court will now decide, in light of Lebrón and Gelabert, whether Plaintiff is substantially limited in the major life activity of “working” for the purposes of the ADA. Defendant has proceeded pursuant to Sutton v. United Air Lines, 527 U.S. 471, 483, 119 S.Ct. 2139, 144 L.Ed.2d 450 (1999)  to discuss the undisputed facts of the case at
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that epilepsy qualifies as a disability under the ada
B. holding evidence of a 13 permanent partial disability insufficient to establish disability for purposes of ada
C. holding that under pre1989 law there must be an individualized determination of whether an individual has an actual disability and reversing a summary judgment that held that a person did not have protected status to claim discrimination based on a back injury
D. holding that whether a person has a disability under the ada is an individualized inquiry
E. holding that an employers inquiry into the reason for an employees work absences was a permissible jobrelated inquiry under the ada
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.