Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
rather than automatically assumed is also consistent with federal regulations requiring a transferee to take affirmative steps to assume mortgage debt. According to 12 C.F.R. § 591.5(c), the Act's limitations on the enforceability of due-on-sale clauses do “not prohibit a lender from requiring, as a condition to an assumption, continued maintenance of mortgage insurance by the existing borrower’s successor in interest, whether by endorsement of the existing policy or by entrance into a new contract of insurance.” Id. (emphasis added). 4 . Several other state appellate courts have also permitted the trier of fact to consider extrinsic evidence in circumstances similar to those surrounding the August 2010 Agreement. See Gonzales v. Gauna, 28 N.M. 55, 206 P. 511, 513 (N.Mex.1922) ; Schuster v. Snawder, 101 S.W. 1194 (Ky.1907)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that defendant was not resident of his mothers household even though his drivers license listed his mothers address and he received mail there because he expressed a belief that his residence was in a different location than his mothers home he rented and occupied his own residence and he testified that he was only living with his mother after expiration of his lease until he could find another place to live
B. holding that son had no homestead interest in property even though he resided upon it with his fathers consent because son had neither title nor a present right to possess land nor right to demand partition from father who was his cotenant
C. holding that a defendant did not otherwise defend even though he had appeared before the court
D. holding that adult child who maintained his own residence separate from his fathers household but regularly vacationed and kept gear at his fathers vacation home was not a resident of his fathers household and therefore not an insured under his fathers insurance policy covering the vacation home
E. holding that a son could be bound by a contract that he signed even though his fathers name and not his appeared in the body
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.