Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
R. LaFave, Jerold H. Israel, Nancy J. King, Orín S. Kerr, Criminal Procedure § 6.9(b) at 824 (3d ed.2007) ("it is not in the sense of shrewdness that Miranda speaks of intelligent waiver, and thus in this context intelligence is not equated with wisdom”) (quoting Collins v. Brierly, 492 F.2d 735 (3d Cir.1974)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 28 . See Dolchok v. State, 639 P.2d 277, 281 (Alaska 1982); Trumbly v. State, 515 P.2d 707, 708 (Alaska 1973); cf. Bowker v. State, 373 P.2d 500, 501-02 (Alaska 1962). 29 . 100 P.3d 440 (Alaska App.2004). 30 .422 U.S. 590, 95 S.Ct. 2254, 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). 31 . 470 U.S. 298, 105 S.Ct. 1285, 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985). 32 . Crawford, 100 P.3d at 446-47. 33 . Stock v. State, 191 P.3d 153, 156 (Alaska App.2008); Noyakuk v. State, 127 P.3d 86) ; State v. Bey, 112 N.J. 123, 548 A.2d 887,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that juveniles request for parent is invocation of fifth amendment rights
B. holding request to lie down and think about what happened  not a clear invocation of the right to silence
C. holding defendants request to lay down and think about what happened did not constitute invocation of right to silence as not every break in questioning compels renewed administration of the miranda warnings
D. holding a suspects request for some time to think alone was not an invocation of the right to silence
E. holding that a suspects invocation of the right to remain silent must be unequivocal to require that police questioning cease
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.