Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Workers v. Hechler, 481 U.S. 851, 855, 107 S.Ct. 2161, 95 L.Ed.2d 791 (1987); Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Reis, 451 U.S. 401, 405, 101 S.Ct. 1836, 68 L.Ed.2d 248 (1981); Local 334, 452 U.S. at 627, 101 S.Ct. 2546; Int’l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp., 383 U.S. 696, 701, 86 S.Ct. 1107, 16 L.Ed.2d 192 (1966). At the same time the Court has admonished federal courts not to engage in a “freewheeling inquiry” into what might be the most desirable rule irrespective of congressional pronouncements. Reis, 451 U.S. at 406, 101 S.Ct. 1836 (quotation omitted). Here, there is no dispute that the SEIU constitution is a “contract between labor organizations,” within the bailiwick of federal courts. See Local 334, 452 U.S. at 623, 101 S.Ct. 2546 . The SEIU constitution is an agreement between
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that labor union membership fell outside commerce
B. holding that union constitutions are contracts between labor organizations within section 301a
C. recognizing that union members interests are adequately represented by the union
D. holding that at will contracts of employment are subject to tortious interference with contracts claims
E. holding section 301a jurisdiction existed in a dispute between an international and a local union which arose under the union constitution and affirming a preliminary injunction against the suspended board members of the local
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.