Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
996 F.2d 1025, 1030 (10th Cir.1993). In Castaldo v. Denver Public Schools, 276 Fed.Appx. 839 (10th Cir.2008), the Tenth Circuit found that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it chose not to apply equitable tolling to the plaintiffs EEOC charge when the plaintiff alleged: (i) that his employer did not post notices regarding the filing of EEOC charges; (ii) that he was too incapacitated by his shoulder injuries to file an EEOC charge; and (iii) that he was proceeding pro se. See 276 FedAppx. at 841. The Tenth Circuit found no error in the district court’s conclusion that the failure to post EEOC notices was not a sufficient justification for equitable tolling. See 276 Fed.Appx. at 841. See also Wilkerson v. Siegfried Ins. Agency, Inc., 683 F.2d 344, 347 (10th Cir.1982). The district court noted that the plaintiff
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a person must file a claim under the civil rights act within three years of the date his or her cause of action accrues
B. holding that if good cause does not exist the court has the discretion to either dismiss the action without prejudice or direct that service be effected within a specified time
C. holding that a failure to file an appeal is within the scope of the waiver because the failure does not undermine the validity of the plea or waiver
D. holding that the simple failure to post  notices without intent to actively mislead the plaintiff respecting the cause of action does not extend the time within which a claimant must file his or her discrimination charge
E. recognizing the cause of action
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.