Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
received title— subject to Cox’s repurchase option—to a tract that had been valued three months earlier at nearly $2.5 million. Christopher assumed the outstanding AgSouth mortgage, which had an unpaid principal balance of around $700,000, and paid Banks $500,000 for Banks’s share of the property’s equity. Christopher did not make any payment to Cox for his share of that equity. In other words, Christopher received title to the Cox tract in exchange for consideration equal to about half the property’s value: $1.2 versus $2.5 million. A gross disparity between the sale price and the actual value of the land is evidence of the parties’ intent to create a security interest—a mortgage—rather than a sale. See Russell v. Southard, 53 U.S. (12 How.) 139, 147-48, 13 L.Ed. 927 (1851) ; Conway’s Ex’rs and Devisees, 11 U.S. at 241
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that extraneous evidence is admissible to inform courts of all material facts surrounding the delivery of the deed and concluding that it is of great importance to inquire whether the consideration was adequate to induce a sale
B. holding that the delivery of the deed following a foreclosure sale was a ministerial act that was not prohibited by the automatic stay
C. holding that once the defendant is before the court the court will not inquire into the circumstances surrounding his presence there
D. holding that because the purchase price typically is not included in the deed this term of the contract of sale is not merged with the deed
E. holding that to determine whether a statement was voluntary the court must consider the totality of all the surrounding circumstances  both the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation and decide  whether a defendants will was overborne by the circumstances surrounding the giving of a confession
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.