Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
CURIAM. Aaron Shelton pleaded guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). On appeal, Shelton argues for the first time that his conviction is unconstitutional because Congress does not have power under the Commerce Clause to regulate the mere possession of a firearm, citing United States v. Lopez, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995) . Although Shelton stipulated that the firearms
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding the limitations to congresss commerce clause authority recognized in lopez have no effect on the establishment of the interstate commerce element of the hobbs act
B. holding that 42 usc  13981 exceeds congresss authority under the commerce clause
C. holding 18 usc  922o a valid exercise of congressional power under commerce clause
D. recognizing that there is an outer limit to congresss power under the commerce clause
E. holding unconstitutional 18 usc  922q as beyond congresss commerce clause power
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.