Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2343, 2350, 171 L.Ed.2d 299 (2008) (explaining that when a plan administrator both appraises and pays benefits claims, the resulting conflict of interest must be weighed in determining “whether there is an abuse of discretion”). But because this case is properly decided on a contractual time bar, whether the circuits might have differed on the merits is beside the point Affirmed. 1 . ERISA is the acronym for Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(l)(B)(2006), the federal statute comprehensively governing employee health and pension plans and providing federal remedies and a federal forum for wrongful denial of.benefits. 2 . See State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Denman Tire Corp., 240 F.3d 83, 87 (1st Cir.2001)  (internal citations and quotation marks
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the time within which suit may be brought after disallowance of a claim by irs is not controlled by a statute of limitation as generally understood but on conditions under which the united states has consented to be sued
B. holding that limitation period begins to run at the time of the breach
C. holding that limitations provision of section 1821d14 of firrea is applicable to suit on note brought by fdics assignee preempts state fouryear limitations period and extends limitation period to six years
D. holding that an earlier version of  11707 was not intended to operate as a statute of limitation but rather was meant to restrict  the freedom of carriers to fix the period within which suit could be brought
E. recognizing that under illinois law parties are free to contract for a time period within which a suit may be brought  which is less than the general statute of limitation period applicable to written contracts
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.