Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the zipper missing at the crotch.” Docket # 65 at 17. At the end of the day, the Court commented to defense counsel, ‘You will deal with the clothing issue, so I won’t have to hear about that tomorrow morning?” T.217. Counsel replied that he would do so. Thus, Van Gorder apparently registered a complaint about his clothing that day, but it was not placed on the record. During the rest of the trial, there were no further objections from Van Gorder or defense counsel regarding Van Gorder’s attire. Van Gorder was not prejudiced by appellate counsel’s omission of this issue on direct appeal. First of all, the state appellate court would have dismissed the claim as unpreserved due to the defendant’s failure to object. E.g., People v. Brown, 259 A.D.2d 985, 688 N.Y.S.2d 861 (4th Dep’t 1999)  (citing N.Y.Crim. Proc. Law §§ 470.05(2),
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the defendant failed properly to preserve assignment of error for appellate review because the trial court had no opportunity to consider the defendants contention as presented on appeal
B. holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendants motion for a continuance when record showed that contrary to defendants contention state did not fail to comply with discovery duties and that defendant failed to show that denial resulted in harm to his case
C. holding that defendant did not preserve for review his contention that he was compelled to wear prison clothing and handcuffs during trial and declining to address claim as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice
D. holding that defendant did not preserve his challenge to alleged prosecutorial misconduct where he did not timely object
E. holding that a defendant was not entitled to the affirmative defense where the evidence did not support his contention that he did not aid in the homicidal act
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.