Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a claim or the day suit is filed. Johnson & Higgins of Tex., Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc., 962 S.W.2d 507, 531 (Tex.1998). However, how this rule applies to cases where damages accrue at times subsequent to either date is an issue that the Texas Supreme Court has not yet addressed. This court must predict how the Texas Supreme Court would decide this issue. In making an “Erie guess” in a diversity case, this court will “seek guidance by looking to the precedents established by intermediate state appellate courts only when the state supreme court has not spoken on an issue.” Webb v. City of Dallas, 314 F.3d 787, 795 (5th Cir.2002) (internal quotations and citations omitted). However, 147-CV, 2001 WL 893986, at *8 (Tex.App.—Dallas Aug.9, 2001, no pet.) (not designated for publication) . These cases, however, do not factor into this
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that prejudgment interest is based on the amount of the judgment not the total amount of damages awarded by the jury because nonsettling defendants have no control over settlement negotiations and should not be forced to pay prejudgment interest on settling defendants parts of a damages award
B. holding that prejudgment interest should not be calculated based on a monthbymonth basis
C. holding that prejudgment interest may include compound interest
D. holding that prejudgment interest may inelude compound interest
E. holding that prejudgment interest should not be calculated based on a paycheckbypaycheck basis
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.