Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
adjudicative administrative proceedings,” we confirmed again that “under the general statutory authorizations for appeal, agencies are entitled to appeal from adverse circuit court judgments where the functions of the agencies ‘are so identified with the execution of some definite public policy as the representative of the State, that their participation in litigation affecting their decisions is regarded by the Legislature as essential to the adequate protection of the State’s interests.’ ” Id. at 294, 643 A.2d at 416 (quoting Consumer Protection v. Consumer Pub., supra, 304 Md. at 743, 501 A.2d at 54). That approach was followed as well in Board of Liquor v. Hollywood, 344 Md. 2, 684 A.2d 837 (1996), where we overruled Liquor License Board v. Leone, 249 Md. 263, 239 A.2d 82 (1968)  and found standing to appeal. We could have
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a county liquor license board had no standing to appeal the reversal of its decision
B. holding that members of the board of trustees of an elementary school had standing to challenge the actions of the county board of education because they suffered an actual injury when the county board nullified their unanimous vote to reject a candidate for principal of the elementary school
C. holding that a reviewing court is not to substitute its decision for that of the board
D. recognizing that third class county assessment law establishes standing of board to appeal
E. holding that the county had no standing to sue the state to recover taxes illegally obtained from citizens unless the money belongs to the county
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.