Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims cannot be procedurally barred and thus may always be raised for the first time on post-conviction. See Stiles v. State, 902 P.2d 1104, 1108 (Okl.Cr. 1995). 13 . Sellers v. State, 889 P.2d 895, 897-98 (Okl.Cr. 1995); Castro v. State, 880 P.2d at 388; Mann v. State, 856 P.2d 992, 994 (Okl.Cr. 1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1869, 128 L.Ed.2d 490 (1994); Nguyen v. State, 844 P.2d 176, 178 (Okl.Cr.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 3006, 125 L.Ed.2d 697 (1993). 14 . 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The United States Supreme Court has not specifically set forth a standard by which to assess the effectiveness of appellate counsel. See Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 392, 105 S.Ct. 830, 833, 83 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985) . However, this Court has applied the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that when a state provides a first appeal as of right due process requires that defendants receive the effective assistance of counsel during that appeal
B. holding that defendants are entitled to effective assistance of appellate counsel on their first appeal as of right
C. holding that the due process clause requires that criminal defendants be provided the effective assistance of counsel on their first appeal of right but declining to devise the means by which to define the appropriate standards for judging claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel
D. recognizing that a criminal defendants right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel
E. holding a criminal defendant has the right to effective assistance of counsel during a plea process
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.