Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
here, the private actor possesses considerably more information and has the opportunity for a greater degree of reflection, it is not unreasonable to expect more careful consideration on the part of the private citizen of the appropriateness of the assistance that he is furnishing. In all cases, however, the private citizen’s belief is unreasonable when the assistance he furnishes to a law enforcement official is a patently abusive misuse of police authority. Finally, an assisting private person who materially deviates from the directions given to him by law enforcement cannot reasonably expect that his unsupervised actions will be shielded from liability. This principle is, again, consistent with the common law basis for recognizing qualified immunity. See Firestone, 38 N.W. at 886-87 ; Edger, 54 A. at 989 (holding private
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the government was to be treated as a private person and a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the agents exceeded their ability to arrest because while a law enforcement officer may arrest a person without a warrant  given probable cause  a private person may only arrest someone for a crime  committed  in his presence
B. holding that private person requested to assist known police officer in making arrest is not liable if in his acts he confines himself to the order and direction of the sheriff
C. holding that a person who cut and removed timber pursuant to the direction of the person in possession of the property but without the written consent of the company holding legal title to the land could be held liable under the gtccs
D. holding that the subjective reason for making the arrest need not be the criminal offense as to which the known facts provide probable cause
E. holding that although jury found officer not to have had probable cause for arrest officer was entitled to immunity because law was not clearly established as to circumstances in which officer found himself
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.