Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in controlling acts of Congress or by interpretative decisions of this Court. 346 U.S. at 409-10, 74 S.Ct. at 205. The Court held that the federal maritime law applied in which contributory negligence did not bar recovery, only being considered as to degree. Although the accident happened in Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania law of contributory negligence which would have barred recovery was held not to apply. In Kermarec, a visitor on board a vessel berthed in New York Harbor was injured while leaving the ship by a fall down a stairway. The Court held that the owner of the ship in navigable waters under maritime law owed to Kermarec the duty of exercising reasonable care toward him. It held Ed.2d 928 (1994); Wahlstrom v. Kawasaki Heavy Indus., Ltd., 4 F.3d 1084, 1087-89 (2d Cir.1993) , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1060, 127
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that uniformity is as important in maritime survival actions as it is in maritime wrongful death actions
B. holding that federal maritime law and not state law applies to all actions for wrongful death in navigable state waters
C. holding that general maritime law preempts state law
D. holding that wrongful death actions asserted under admiralty jurisdiction lie under general maritime law for death caused by violation of maritime duties and are not limited to standards of liability created by state law
E. holding that platform workers death caused by an explosion on a platform bore no significant relation to maritime law even though the death occurred while the worker was located on a vessel in navigable waters
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.