Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint and Try This Matter by Jury, filed December 18, 1991, is hereby DENIED. 2) The Civil Rights Act of 1991 does not apply retroactively to cases pending at the time of enactment. 1 . All factual recitations contained in this Order have been alleged in the litigants’ pleadings. 2 . We expressly limit our opinion to cases filed and pending prior to the date of enactment. Accordingly, we decline to address whether the Act applies to cases filed after the Act’s effective date that challenge pre-Act conduct. 3 . Compare Wagner Seed Co. v. Bush, 946 F.2d 918, 924 (D.C.Cir.1991) and Simmons v. Lockhart, 931 F.2d 1226, 1230 (8th Cir.1991) and Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co, 913 F.2d 958, 963-64 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1990) and DeVargas, 911 F.2d at 1384  with United States v. Peppertree Apartments,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the georgetown presumption is the better rule
B. recognizing presumption
C. recognizing added presumption
D. recognizing this presumption
E. holding that the bradley presumption is the better rule
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.