Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
serious potential risk of physical injury to another,” 466 F.3d at 613-14, 615 (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii)). Nonetheless he argues that, in light of language in other opinions and the Golden dissent, we should reconsider our holding in Golden. See Chambers, 473 F.3d at 727 (in dicta) (noting that future research establishing whether failures to report or return to jail actually present a serious risk of physical injury might call into question the characterization of such crimes as violent felonies); Golden, 466 F.3d at 616-19 (Williams, J., dissenting) (reasoning that failure to report to jail does not create a serious risk of physical injury, and opining that characterizing it as such raises due process concerns); United States v. Piccolo, 441 F.3d 1084, 1088 (9th Cir.2006) . But in Chambers we recently rejected a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that california residential burglary is categorically a crime of violence under the residual clause of ussg  4b12a2 which requires the criminal conduct to present a serious potential risk of physical injury to another
B. holding that the texas offense of possession of a prohibited weapon could only qualify as a crime of violence under the residual clause of  4b12a2
C. holding that  16 encompasses conduct that constitutes a crime of violence ie breaking into and entering a persons home see ussg  4b12a2 burglary of a dwelling is a crime of violence and conduct that almost certainly does not ie breaking into and entering a vehicle 
D. holding that  459 is categorically a crime of violence under guidelines  4b12a2 because the usual or ordinary firstdegree burglary in california involves conduct that presents a serious risk of physical violence and injury to others
E. holding that a peaceful failure to return to a halfway house is not a crime of violence under ussg  4b12a2 a provision analogous to  924e2bii
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.