Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
requirement applies to “for cause” drug testing as well as random drug testing. DOC chose not to apply these procedures in White’s case. DOC has never shown that its refusal to apply the established procedure in this case was anything other than arbitrary. The agency’s arbitrary abandonment of its published procedure encroached upon petitioner’s due process rights. See Wareham v. Singletary, 700 So.2d 427, 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (“In Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974), the Supreme Court held that inmates facing disciplinary charges must be afforded certain minimal safeguards.”). By denying relief, the circuit court condoned the denial of due process. Certiorari is therefore appropriate. See Plymel v. Moore, 770 So.2d 242, 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) . Accordingly, we grant the petition for
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a denial of due process warrants mandamus relief
B. holding that the denial of counsel to a father at a shelter hearing constituted a denial of due process renewable by certiorari
C. holding that the denial of due process in a particular case is subject to harmless error analysis
D. holding that to declare a denial of due process we must find a denial of fundamental fairness
E. holding that plaintiffs who sought injunctive relief under 42 usc  1983 could get same relief in a state court mandamus action
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.