Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Transfers that the Debtor made to the Bank because the Defendant received, either directly or indirectly, the benefit of these transfers. However, the Mortgage Payment Transfers reduced a secured debt — the mortgage owed- on the Lake Property, The Debtor owed the-mortgage to the'Bank, in the same amount and with the same payment schedule,'whether or not the Defendant was living in the Lake Property. The benefit received by the Defendant on account of the Mortgage Payment Transfers is merely incidental. The Mortgage Payment Transfers reduced the mortgage such that the.Bank’s claim in the Debtor’s bankruptcy estate is significantly less than it would have been had the Debtor not made the Mortgage Payments. See Meister v. Jamison (In re Jamison), 21 B.R. 380, 381 (Bankr.D.Conn.1982) . Moreover, allowing the Trustee to recover the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a plaintiff who has not sustained any damage as the result of a transfer of property cannot seek to set that transfer aside as fraudulent
B. holding that even though a transfer of property eg money incidentally benefits another it cannot be said as a matter of law or logic that the transaction was a fraudulent transfer as to the party benefited
C. holding that suit arose from alleged fraudulent transfer of real property located in texas even though the allegedly fraudulent assignment occurred in california
D. holding that debtors cannot claim an exemption in a homestead after trustee avoided the transfer of the property as a fraudulent conveyance because the transfer by the debtors was voluntary
E. holding that transfer was proper remedy for improper venue even though the issue of transfer was not raised until the motion hearing in circuit court
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.