Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of Jones indicated that Jones had no facial hair. According to Jones, the photo taken from the motel depicts him as having a "dark mustache and goatee.” Appellant's Brief at 45. However, the small amount of facial hair Jones had in this picture is not clearly visible, and is at most a few days' growth. The photo taken of Jones upon his arrest does more clearly show that Jones had a short goatee. Also, although we can find no indication of Jones’s actual height in the record, Jones insinuates that he is taller than Khan and Patel's description of approximately six feet. Nevertheless, such small discrepancies do not persuade us that Khan and Patel did not have an independent basis for their in-court identification of Jones. See Wethington v. State, 560 N.E.2d 496, 502 (Ind.1990) ; Little v. State, 475 N.E.2d 677, 683
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a victims outofcourt identification was sufficient to support adjudication
B. holding that the offense of sexual battery requires the state prove the victims lack of consent regardless of the victims age and charge the jury on the same
C. holding that jury may consider victims mental capacity in determining whether defendant acted with victims knowledge and consent
D. holding admissible testimony of the victims daughter regarding a telephone call from the defendant to the victim hours before the victims death and the victims emotions following the telephone call where defendant claimed accident
E. holding that victims had an independent basis for incourt identification of the defendant despite a three to fourinch discrepancy in their descriptions of the defendants height where the defendants appearance roughly corresponded with the victims initial descriptions
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.