Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the law restricting third party beneficiary status remained unchanged by our decision in Montana. Accord Roedler v. Dept. of Energy, 255 F.3d 1347 (Fed.Cir.2001). Accordingly, because the shareholders did not stand to directly benefit under the contract, they are at most incidental beneficiaries of the contract with no rights to enforce the contract against the United States. We reverse the Court of Federal Claims summary judgment of liability in favor of the shareholders and remand the case so that the court may consider any remaining claims asserted by the shareholders. II. FDIC’s Breach of Contract Claims We review the Court of Federal Claims’ legal conclusion that the FDIC has asserted a justiciable claim de novo. See Alger v. United States, 741 F.2d 391, 393 (Fed.Cir.1984) . Article III, section 2 of the United States
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that we review a district courts interpretation of a statute de novo
B. holding that we review legal conclusions of the court of federal claims de novo
C. holding that we review constitutional challenges de novo
D. holding appellate court reviews legal conclusions de novo
E. holding that we review issues of statutory interpretation de novo
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.