Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
company. The member-agent allegedly funneled the substantial profits acquired by these schemes through her attorney’s trust account into M.I.’s bank accounts. Because the title company im-permissibly used the Fund’s title insurance and closing forms to conduct these deals, the Fund maintained that the substantial profits should be preserved so the money would remain available to insure the non-party purchasers. The trial court granted the Fund’s ex parte motion for injunction. Following a hearing, the trial court denied M.I.’s motion to dissolve the injunction, but modified some of its terms. The instant appeal and cross-appeal followed. Generally, an injunction seeking to freeze a bank account is improper. E.g., Hiles v. Auto Bahn Fed’n, Inc., 498 So.2d 997, 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) . However, injunc-tive relief is appropriate to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the loss of trade secrets cannot be measured in money damages
B. holding that the loss of money from a bank account does not constitute irreparable harm because that loss can be compensat ed by money damages
C. holding that the potential loss of valuable business may constitute irreparable harm
D. holding that monetary damages do not generally constitute irreparable harm
E. holding that loss of customers and resulting injury to goodwill can constitute irreparable harm that is not compensable by an award of money damages
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.