Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a (statutory) trade secret, they did no legal wrong”) (Illinois law). 11 . The court notes that, in boilerplate fashion, FS’s complaint alleges that AOS "accepted the benefit of [FS's] assistance under such circumstances that it would be inequitable for the defendant to retain the benefit without payment.” (Compl. ¶ 34). Such wholly conclusory allegations, without anything more, run afoul of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which require that a pleading contain "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, -U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-57, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007)) (emphasis added) . 12 . FS dismisses Abbott Laboratories as an
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a complaint must contain enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face
B. holding that complaint must plead factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged
C. holding that a plaintiffs complaint must contain sufficient factual matter accepted as true to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face   that is factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged
D. recognizing that to survive dismissal a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter accepted as true to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face internal quotation marks omitted
E. holding that a complaint must contain only enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.