Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
or whether it indicates that compliance with the request for information might be compelled; (7) whether the officer physically touches the person of the citizen; (8) whether an officer's show of authority or exercise of control over an individual impedes that individual's ability to terminate the encounter; (9) the duration of the encounter; and (10) whether the officer retains the citizen's identification or travel documents. Id. (citing People v. Paynter, 955 P.2d 68, 73-75 (Colo.1998)). In addition to these factors, we have considered whether, and under what cireum-stances, a police officer's request for a citizen's identification and subsequent check for outstanding warrants transforms a consensual encounter into an investigatory stop. See Martinez, 200 P.3d at 1058-59 ; Padgett, 932 P.2d at 814 (holding that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that defendant was not free to leave when officer directed defendant to stay while he conducted a warrants check
B. holding officers had reasonable suspicion to identify passengers and check for outstanding warrants after traffic stop when the officers previously had been notified that car contained named felony parole violator
C. holding that the forceable stop at issue was an investigatory stop rather than an arrest
D. holding that the defendant had been subjected to an illegal arrest when after detectives requested and did not return his airline ticket and drivers license he was asked to come with the officers from the concourse into an interrogation room approximately 40 feet away where his suitcases were searched
E. holding that the police subjected the defendant to an investigatory stop when they directed the de fendant to come out of the bathroom and into a separate room and then ran a clearance check to determine whether the defendant had any outstanding warrants
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.