Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
been isolated for over five years, with only a few months of relief in the interim. # * * The duration of Bailey’s confinement is a necessary component in the Sandin analysis. We therefore vacate the JUDGMENT dismissing Bailey’s complaint and REMAND the case where it can be determined whether Bailey is still subject to the conditions he challenges. The court can then assess whether, in light of conditions and duration of the segregated confinement, Bailey has sufficiently alleged a state-created liberty interest in his custodial classification. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. 1 . Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir.1985) , overruled on other grounds by Neitzke v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an evidentiary hearing can be used in pro se cases in place of a typical requirement for a more definite statement
B. holding a court can restrict future pro se pleadings if it first provides a pro se litigant notice and an opportunity to respond
C. holding that an evidentiary hearing may be used to develop the factual basis of a prisoner complaint
D. holding that upon a demon stration of abuse a court can restrict future pro se pleadings if it first provides a pro se litigant reasonable notice and an opportunity to respond
E. holding that although pro se briefs are liberally construed even pro se litigants must brief arguments in order to preserve them
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.