Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
condition, which the evidence primarily addressed and which United received for the first time on appeal. Thus, the physician suggested that United have Hall attend an IME if it intended to allow benefits based on Hall’s current condition. United immediately contacted Hall and set the IME within the extension deadline. A few days later, United sent another letter to Hall explaining this exact argument. Thus, United concludes that its request for an IME was made in good faith. The Court agrees. Accordingly, the Court finds that United’s plan allows it to require Hall to attend an IME during the appeal process and that Hall’s refusal to attend the IME resulted in him not exhausting his administrative remedies. See Zalka v. Unum Life Ins. Co., 65 F.Supp.2d 1369, 1371 (S.D.Fla. 1998) ; accord Hunter, 251 F.Supp.2d at 111-12
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the plaintiffs refusal to submit to an ime and immediately filing suit precluded the defendant from completing its administrative reviewing of her claim
B. holding that an employees private arbitration agreement with her employer precluded her from filing suit against the employer under the adea
C. holding that the timely filing of an administrative charge of discrimination is a prerequisite to bringing suit
D. holding that the plaintiff was precluded from asserting her failure to promote claim as a continuing violation
E. holding that plaintiffs failure to raise a claim in an administrative complaint with osha precluded pursuing that claim in district court
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.