Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and health insurance and death benefits could not survive even minimum scrutiny under Alaska’s Equal Protection Clause and were invalid). 3 . Similarly, Procito argues that extending Nimitz and Kurtz to same-sex families would violate the Due Process Clauses of Article I, Sections 1 and 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. She argues that adopting a construction of Section 402(b) of the Law that categorically excludes same-sex couples from being able to establish the “necessitous and compelling” nature of their reasons for leaving employment would create an "irrebuttable presumption,” which would deprive them of the "meaningful opportunity to be heard” guaranteed by Due Process. See Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing v. Clayton, 546 Pa. 342, 684 A.2d 1060 (1996) . 4 . In a reply brief Procito asserts that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing irrebuttable presumption as synonymous with conclusive presumption which is a presumption that cannot be overcome by any additional evidence or argument because it is accepted as irrefutable proof that establishes a fact beyond dispute
B. holding due process was violated by the automatic rejection of an unwed fathers custodial relationship without granting the father opportunity to present evidence regarding his fitness as a parent
C. holding that oneyear license suspension based on single epileptic seizure without opportunity to present evidence of fitness created irrebuttable presumption in violation of due process rights
D. holding that an illinois statute that conclusively presumed every father of a child born out of wedlock to be an unfit person to have custody of his children violated the due process clause and that due process required the father to be given an opportunity to present evidence regarding his fitness as a parent
E. holding twoyear delay created rebuttable presumption of due process violation and citing cases in which delays of seventeento eighteenmonths either gave rise to or warranted inquiry into possible due process violation
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.