Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
judgment. It is inherently of such character that the voters, no matter how intelligent, cannot be expected to investigate and have access to all the information which we may assume the city council, with the aid of their attorney, acquire. Full information should be obtained and carefully considered before a conclusion is reached. Oakman v. City of Eveleth, 163 Minn. 100, 203 N.W. 514, 517 (1925). See also Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. of Minneapolis v. City of Minneapolis, 293 Minn. 227, 198 N.W.2d 531, 536-37 (1972) (stating a proposed city charter amendment that would have allowed citizens to refer actions such as the settlement of lawsuits could create a “chaotic situation” in city government); Peterman v. Village of Pataskala, 122 Ohio App.3d 758, 702 N.E.2d 965, 967 (1997) . The dissent’s self-generated contention to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing cause of action
B. holding that discrimination against a municipal employee could trigger municipal liability under  1983 through official policy or custom
C. holding that legislative immunity does not depend on motivation for legislative action even if the motive was to impinge on plaintiffs free speech rights
D. recognizing that citizens who exercise their rights under the initiative provisions act as and become in fact the legislative branch of the municipal government 
E. recognizing a settlement prevented a municipal referendum as it was not a legislative action
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.