Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
are not material to the court’s disposition of the case. 4 . Because of the timing of this filing — prior to any decision in the case, plaintiff's request for reconsideration is not ripe for judicial review. Reconsideration of an opinion or other action by a court presupposes an underlying prior action which the court may then reconsider. See Rule 59(b) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) (stating the requirement that "a motion for ... reconsideration of a judgment ... shall be filed no later than 10 days after the entry of the judgment” and therefore contemplating that the court will have rendered a decision or taken some other action in the case before the court may entertain a motion for reconsideration) (emphasis added); see also RCFC 59 rules committee note (2002) . Because the court, prior to this opinion, has
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that nonfinal orders may be revised at any time before a final judgment is entered
B. holding that motion for reconsideration renders deportation order nonfinal despite language of the 1990 amendments
C. recognizing that orders denying motions to reopen are treated as final orders of removal
D. recognizing that both final and nonfinal orders may be the subject of motions for reconsideration
E. holding that when reviewing a final judgment we generally also have jurisdiction to review all prior nonfinal orders and rulings which produced the judgment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.