Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
environment, .... 40 C.F.R. § 1500.2. The regulations further propose no fewer than nine alternate means of providing notice to the public where a proposed action will, like this one, primarily implicate local concerns. 40 C.F.R. § 1506.6(b)(3); see also Human Soc’y of the United States v. Glickman, Civil Action No. 98-1950, Tr. Hr’g Mot. T.R.O. at 11 (D.D.C. Jun. 23, 1998). The Court finds that FWS provided the public with insufficient information regarding the proposed action and its potential environmental impacts and insufficient time in which to comment on the Draft EA. Accordingly, the agency’s approach to public involvement and consideration of what public input it did receive do not support a finding that it took a “hard look” at the problem and alternative m 47 (9th Cir.1984) ; cf. Wroncy v. Bureau of Land Management, 777
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding five day public comment period on a portion of an ea insufficient remanding for further public comment
B. holding that there was no abuse of discretion in denying mistrial based on a comment that the defendant was in prison where the comment provided the jury with little detail
C. holding the prosecutors statements were not an inappropriate comment on the defendants failure to testify but rather a comment on the defendants failure to present convincing evidence to support his defense
D. holding that comment by prosecutor in closing argument that defense counsel did not produce evidence of the defendants innocence was not a comment on the defendants failure to testify
E. holding that the agency failed to provide for any public participation in the ea process and ordering 45 day period for public comment on ea
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.