Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the breadth of § 541 to hold that causes of action which accrued prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition are included in the bankruptcy estate). Upon the filing of a Chapter 7 petition, an interim Trustee is appointed to administer, inter alia, the property of the estate. See 11 U.S.C. § 701. The Trustee is the sole representative of the estate. See 11 U.S.C. § 323(a). As such, the Trustee has the exclusive right to prosecute causes of action that are property of the bankruptcy estate. See 11 U.S.C. § 323(b); see also Jones v. Harrell, 858 F.2d 667, 669 (11th Cir.1988) (concluding that a “trustee succeeds to all causes of action held by a debtor at the time the bankruptcy petition is filed”); In re Labrum & Doak, No. CIV.A. 99-753, 1999 WL 667284, at *1 (E.D.Pa. Aug. 26, 1999)  (quoting 11 U.S.C. § 323(b)). Thus, after a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a state officer sued in his individual capacity may be held personally liable for damages under 42 usc  1983 based upon actions taken in his official capacity
B. holding that the trustee alone has the capacity to sue and be sued 
C. holding that bank could not bring counterclaim in its capacity as trustee
D. holding that delaware law controlled delaware corporations capacity to sue or be sued
E. holding that the words sue and be sued when used in a statute do not by themselves waive immunity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.