Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
see also Young Br. at 12-13 (conceding that "the district court did not directly use the weight of the PCC in determining [Young’s] offense level,” but that the weight of PCC was used to determine the quantity of pure PCP "supposedly capable of being produced from the PCC”). 6 . In 1991, Note 2 was an application note to § 2D1.4, which provided that "if a defendant is convicted of a conspiracy ... to commit any offense involving a controlled substance, the offense level shall be the same as if the object of the conspiracy ... had been completed.” U.S.S.G. § 2D1.4. The Sentencing Commission deleted § 2D 1.4 in 1992, and moved the relevant text of Note 2 to Application Note 12 of § 2D1.1. See U.S.S.G. app. C, amend. 447; United States v. Ynfante, 78 F.3d 677, 680-81 (D.C.Cir.1996) . 7 . The principal deficiency Young asserts is
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding rule 38 applies to frivolous criminal appeals as well as civil appeals
B. holding that cr 60b applies to criminal as well as civil judgments
C. holding that amended note 12 applies to choate as well as inchoate offenses
D. holding that sentence factor manipulation applies to statutory minimums as well as to the guidelines
E. holding that it is within the power of the legislature to determine that the community should be beautiful as well as healthy spacious as well as clean wellbalanced as well as carefully patrolled
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.