Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
from the anxiety of incarceration). c. The Possibility that the Defense Will be Impaired The “impairment of one’s defense is the most difficult form of speedy trial prejudice to prove because time’s erosion of exculpatory evidence and testimony ‘can rarely be shown.’ ” Doggett, 505 U.S. at 655 (citing Barker, 407 U.S. at 532). Prejudice may be evident if witnesses are unable to recall accura of trial will be approximately thirty-five months. Because, “[e]xcessive delay presumptively compromises the reliability of trial in ways neither party can prove or, for that matter, identify,” Francis, 63 V.I. at 754, the Court finds that the 1,056 day (approximately 35 months) delay in this case is presumptively prejudicial. Accord, United States v. Ferreira, 665 F.3d 701, 706-08 (6th Cir. 2011) . However, “presumptive prejudice ... is
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding prejudice created by improvements to and conveyance of land during pendency of delay
B. holding that a tenmonth delay did not bar the motion where there was no demonstration of prejudice and because disqualification is in the public interest where there is an ethical violation
C. holding that 35month delay created a presumption of prejudice without demonstration of specific cause
D. holding that the district courts decision to delay jury instructions and deliberations did not warrant a presumption of prejudice
E. holding that a twoyear delay did not bar the motion where there was no demonstration of unfair prejudice
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.