Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a remand— will the employer finally be able to argue to this Court that the full commission correctly held Bone’s claim was not compensable back in June of 2008. Because I believe the issue of compensability was finally decided by the full commission and the circuit court, sitting in an appellate capacity, could not thwart further appellate review by ordering a remand, I would find the order appealable under section 1-23-390. See Mungo, 383 S.C. at 278, 678 S.E.2d at 829 (“Although the circuit court remanded the issue of the precise damages to be awarded to Claimant, the single commissioner would have no choice but to award some damages to Claimant. Accordingly, the circuit court’s order constitutes a final decision and is appealable.”); Brown, 366 S.C. at 387-88, 622 S.E.2d at 551 . Nothing in Charlotte-Meeklenburg impacts this
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding circuit courts order that apportionment was required was final and appealable even though the court remanded for a determination of the amount of apportionment due
B. holding adjudication order based upon a determination on the merits in juvenile court is a final and appealable order
C. holding that an order was interlocutory in nature despite the trial courts certification of the order as a final appealable judgment
D. holding that superior court erred in reversing trial courts order granting new trial and remanding for a new trial limited to apportionment of damages
E. holding that a rehearing order was not final or appealable
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.