Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of Pinewood on the date of the judgment between Ritchie and defendants. After the judgment, defendants were granted a preliminary injunction against Ritchie and all companies in which he maintains an ownership interest “from selling, disposing of, secreting, transferring or encumbering any assets until the post-judgment collection proceedings are completed[.]” Among those entities enjoined by the lower court was Pinewood, and, by extension, the assets Pinewood holds as trustee. Pinewood was not a named defendant in the injunction. According to the complaint, neither Ritchie nor Pinewood maintain an ownership interest in those trust assets. The preliminary injunction was later vacated by this Court. Harris v. Pinewood Dev. Corp., 176 N.C. App. 704, 707-08, 627 S.E.2d 639, 642 (2006) . Plaintiffs allege that while that appeal was
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that district courts order granting motion for default judgment was erroneous  because a default judgment cannot be entered until the amount of damages has been ascertained 
B. holding that plaintiffs were not entitled to a preliminary injunction
C. holding that a hearing must be held to determine credibility in preliminary injunction cases
D. holding that nc gen stat  1355 does not allow a preliminary injunction to be entered until either a judgment has been returned wholly or partially unsatisfied or the terms of nc gen stat  1355 are met
E. recognizing the inappropriateness of a preliminary injunction where credibility determinations must be made but granting a preliminary injunction because the legal and factual issues have been sufficiently illuminated
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.