Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
2112, 2189 ("[traditionally, the interest of truth in the administration of justice has been subordinated in the law to the interest of preserving privileged communications where [certain] relationships have been involved: ... husband-wife_ [18 U.S.C. §2517(4)] is intended to vary the existing law only to the extent that an otherwise privileged communication does not lose its privileged character because it is intercepted by a stranger"). See also 18 Pa. C.S.A. § 5711 ("[n]o otherwise privileged communication intercepted in accordance with, or in violation of, the provisions of this chapter shall lose its privileged character.”); U.S. v. Geller, 560 F.Supp. 1309, 1326 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff'd, 3rd Cir., 745 F.2d 49 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1109, 105 S.Ct. 786, 83 L.Ed.2d 780 (1985) . 28 . 370 U.S. 139, 82 S.Ct. 1218, 8 L.Ed.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding for the purposes of 18 usc  924e that being a felon in possession of a firearm is not a violent felony as defined in 18 usc  924e2b
B. holding that 18 usc  1919 did not implicitly repeal 18 usc  1001
C. holding 18 pacsa  7508 effectuates the legislative purpose of reducing drug crimes
D. holding that 18 pacsa  5711 and its federal counterpart 18 usc  25174 prevent the government from introducing recordings of communications between spouses resulting from tap on third partys telephone
E. holding that the relating to parenthetical in 18 usc  1961 was merely to aid identification of 18 usc  2314 rather than to limit its application
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.