Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
assess whether the goals are indeed worth the risks. (Id. at 386). “[T]o be confident in its Solicitor’s advice on matters ‘intimately related’ to Authority policy,” the Court explained, “the Board must have the right to demand that his loyalties lie with it and its agenda.... Given the political ramifications of any attendant legal advice, confidence sometimes may come only with the assurance that the Solicitor shares the same political ideology as the Board.” (Id.), quoting Ness, 660 F.2d at 522). The Court of Appeals concluded: “These situations are exactly the types for which the Supreme Court created the Elrod/Bmnti exception.” {Id.; see also, Battaglia v. Union County Welfare Board, 88 N.J. 48, 438 A.2d 530 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 965, 102 S.Ct. 2045, 72 L.Ed.2d 490 (1982)  The position of assistant county counsel is
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an agencys rulings with respect to whether a party was afforded the process it is due under the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution are subject to de novo review
B. holding that assistant united states attorney may file information requesting sentence enhancement based on prior conviction even though statute says that information must be filed by the united states attorney
C. holding the exclusion did not violate the equal protection clause of the wyoming constitution or the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution
D. holding termination of legal assistant to county welfare board based on political party affiliation was permissible under first amendment to the united states constitution
E. holding that the constitutional rights in a termination proceeding  are derived from the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment of the united states constitution and not the sixth amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.