Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to discharge its liabilities to all creditors who extended credit or whose claims arose before such return. N.Y. Partnership Law § 106(4) (McKinney 1988). 9 . The court cited Barbro Realty Co. v. Newburger, 53 A.D.2d 34, 385 N.Y.S.2d 68 (1st Dept.1976) for this proposition. Barbro held that a partner who joins a partnership during the term of a preexisting lease is personally liable for the partnership's rent payments while he or she is a partner. Id., 53 A.D.2d at 36, 385 N.Y.S.2d at 70 ("The lease agreement may have been executed prior to the entry of the defendants into the partnership, but the defendants, who were partners at the time of the default, may be held personally liable therefor.” (citing Glassman v. Hyder, 23 N.Y.2d 354, 296 N.Y.S.2d 783, 785, 244 N.E.2d 259, 261 (1968)  and In re Ryan's Estate, 294 N.Y. 85, 60
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that future rent is not attachable under statute providing that a debt is not attachable unless it is certain to become due
B. holding that back rent is debt under the fdcpa
C. holding that unearned rent is not a debt  and instead constitutes a contingent liability because rent does not accrue to the lessor as a debt unless the lessee has enjoyed the use of the land
D. holding that it is not
E. holding that effect of discharge of debt under bankruptcy code is the same as it was under the 1898 bankruptcy act it is not an extinguishment of the debt but only a bar to enforcement of the debt as a personal obligation of the debt or
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.