Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
as "the Petitioners.” 3 . The policy originally was with CNA Personal Insurance, the predecessor in interest of Encompass. 4 . The numerical figures were apparently added by the insurance agent, per an instruction on the form. 5 . The General Assembly subsequently increased the minimum coverage amounts to their current levels. Chapter 441, Laws of Maryland 2010 (raising minimum personal injury liability coverage to $30,000 per person up to $60,000 per accident); Chapter 681, Laws of Maryland 1999 (raising minimum property damage coverage to $15,000). 6 . Even if a waiver is executed by the "first named insured,” it is ineffective if the insurer’s notice of the effect of the waiver is deficient. IN § 19-510(c); cf. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Powell, 292 F.3d 201 (4th Cir.2002) . In this case, however, Petitioners apparently
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that in order for insured to qualify for uim benefits there must have been a liability policy in effect um coverage does not satisfy this requirement
B. holding public policy of um statute not violated by exclusion of um coverage for passenger of vehicle driven by excluded driver
C. holding that waiver of um coverage was ineffective under south carolina law because insurer did not adequately advise insured party about um coverage
D. holding um did not act under color of state law when it terminated an employee
E. holding named driver exclusion eliminating liability coverage as well as um coverage did not contravene um statute because statute required um coverage only if the claimant otherwise qualifies for liability coverage under the policy
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.