Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
medical reporting. 13 See NRS 616B.324 (explaining that a self-insured employer’s administrator is the employer’s agent). 14 See Schmidt v. Beeson Plumbing and Heating, 869 P.2d 1170, 1175, 1175 n.7 (Alaska 1994); Barrington v. Employment Sec. Com’n, 286 S.E.2d 576, 578 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982) (“It is well established that the doctrine of equitable estoppel may be applied in workers’ compensation cases.”); Appleby v. Workers’ Safety & Comp. Div., 47 P.3d 613, 619 (Wyo. 2002) (explaining that substantive legal issues like equitable estoppel may be determined by an administrative agency as part of a contested workers’ compensation case and has been applied to prevent strict application of statutory limitations periods); see generally Lentz v. McMahon, 777 P.2d 83, 88-91 (Cal. 1989) ; Matter of Harrison Living Trust, 121 Nev.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that administrative agencies routinely apply equitable estoppel in administrative hearings and that permitting them to do so is consistent with administrative remedy exhaustion requirements and separation of powers
B. recognizing that administrative agencies lack to power to consider or determine constitutional issues
C. holding that requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies is appropriate where doing so can protect administrative agency authority and promote judicial efficiency
D. recognizing the transition of the administrative hearing process from the division of motor vehicles to the office of administrative hearings
E. recognizing that administrative agencies are not bound by rules of evidence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.