Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
any court in a civil, criminal, or other matter without the consent of the defendant.”). 9 . KRS 533.256(1). 10 . The provisions permit programs that are "authorized by the Kentucky Supreme Court and providing for the pretrial diversion of misdemeanants,” KRS 533.262(2), e.g., those implemented in district court pursuant to CR 8.04. The statute also contains "grandfather” language permitting pretrial diversion programs in place as of July 15, 1998 to “continue for the purpose of supervising persons granted pretrial diversion prior to July 15, 1998, however no new pers ding that Court of Appeals properly denied petition for writ directing trial court to exclude certain evidence because "evidentiary errors may be corrected on appeal.”); St. Clair v. Roark, Ky., 10 S.W.3d 482, 485 (2000) ; Cavender v. Miller, Ky., 984 S.W.2d 848, 849
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that to grant a writ of mandamus a court in the exercise of its discretion must be satisfied that the writ is appropriate under the circumstances
B. holding it is settled that the supreme court may consider questions raised on the first appeal after which the court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari as well as those that were before the court of appeals upon the second appeal after which the court granted a petition for a writ of certiorari internal quotation marks omitted
C. holding that although double jeopardy is an appropriate subject for a writ of prohibition the court in which the petition is filed may in its discretion  decline to address the merits of the petition on grounds that there is an adequate remedy by appeal
D. holding no appeal permitted from dismissal of writ petition
E. recognizing the specific need for an appropriate double jeopardy review when an appeal is taken by the state from a lower courts dismissal of the criminal charges
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.