Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
judg ment.” Parker v. Conway, 581 F.3d 198, 201 (3d Cir.2009). In addition, the Supreme Court has stated that when a plaintiff recovers only nominal damages because he has failed to prove actual, compensable injury, “the only reasonable fee is usually no fee at all.” Farrar, 506 U.S. at 115, 113 S.Ct. 566. Section 1997e(d)(2) of the PLRA has been consistently interpreted by our Court and others to cap attorney’s fee awards in prisoner litigation to 150 percent of the judgment, which, in this case, would be $1.50. While we have not previously faced a challenge to this fee cap in the context of a nominal damages case, we have elsewhere considered whether it violates equal protection and, in that context, have confirmed that § 1997e(d)(2) imposes such a cap. See Parker, 581 F.3d at 204 . See also Collins v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the cap does not violate equal protection
B. holding missouri transfer rule did not violate equal protection
C. holding transfer rule did not violate federal equal protection
D. holding that doctrine does not violate equal protection
E. holding that the admission of his juvenile conviction did not violate equal protection
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.