Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
over KOH’s claims arises independently under article XI, section 7 of the Hawaii Constitution in light of specific provisions therein protecting native Hawaiian rights. Second, Respondent/Appellee-Appellee Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) was required to hold a contested case hearing prior to the issuance of a conservation district use permit (CDUP or permit), as a matter of constitutional due process, because Respondent/ Ap-pellee-Appellee University of Hawaii (UH) had a “property interest” in the CDUP, and the issuance of the CDUP would adversely impact KOH’s ability to engage in native Hawaiian traditional and customary practices as protected by art. XII, § 7 of the Hawaii Constitution. See Pele Defense Fund v. Puna Geothermal Venture, 77 Hawaii 64, 881 P.2d 1210 (1994) . Third, jurisdiction arises under the public
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that foreign states are not persons entitled to rights under the due process clause
B. holding parental rights are constitutionally protected fundamental interest
C. holding that constitutional due process protections mandate a hearing where the issuance of a permit implicating an applicants property rights adversely affects the constitutionally protected rights of other interested persons who have followed the agencys rules governing participation in contested cases
D. recognizing the right to trial by jury is a constitutional right to be given the same protections as other constitutional rights
E. holding that a rule which affects only the process of enforcing litigants rights and not the rights themselves does not exceed the constraints of the rules enabling act
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.