Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
is that drawing any inferences from a party’s failure to call a witness equally available to both sides is impermissible.”). Andrews contends that the prosecutor “effectively shifted the burden of proof in this prosecution to the defendant.” Assuming arguendo that the prosecutor’s remarks were improper, Andrews’ argument that the burden of proof was shifted is not supported by the record, because the district court gave the following instructions to the jury: “[T]he defendant is presumed by the law to be innocent. The law does not require a defendant to prove his innocence or to produce any evidence at all. The government has the burden of proving the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and if it fails to do so, you must acquit the defendant.” See Iredia, 866 F.2d at 117-18 . Plain error is not shown. D Andrews contends
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the burden of proof is on the claimant
B. holding that the prosecutors comment regarding the defendants failure to call a potential witness did not shift the burden of proof because it did not implicate the defendants fifth amendment right not to testify
C. holding that prosecutors comment  if there was  evidence available to defense lawyers dont you think they would put it on  did not require reversal because district courts instruction  that burden was on the government  should have sufficiently erased any doubts as to which party had the burden of proof
D. holding the prosecutors argument if it was there they can bring it to you was not an improper jury argument
E. holding that the burden is on the plaintiff
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.