Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Rules provide pleading requirements for fraud claims in federal court, and are therefore the governing authority on this issue. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, most causes of action need contain only “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). “Special matters,” such as fraud claims, however, must be “stated with particularity.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b) (“Rule 9(b)”). The elements of a fraud claim requiring particularity include “ ‘the time, place, and contents of the false representations, as well as the identity of the person making the representations and what he obtained thereby.’ ” Harrison, 176 F.3d at 783-84. Also, reasonable detrimental reliance on a misrep ah River Co., 352 F.3d 908, 921-22 (4th Cir.2003) . In the complaint in the instant case, the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that if the federal claims are dismissed before trial  the state claims should be dismissed as well
B. holding that confidential sources need not be named provided they are described in the complaint with sufficient particularity to support the probability that a person in the position occupied by the source would possess the information alleged
C. holding that fraud claims were wrongfully dismissed for insufficient particularity as they provided sufficient notice of the facts of the alleged misconduct
D. holding that the fraud claims against the defendant should not have been dismissed as the complaint provided him with fair notice of the claims made against her
E. holding that notice of judgment was insufficient
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.