Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Offender Act provides that, under certain circumstances, “the court may, without entering a judgment of guilt and with the consent of the defendant: (1) [djefer further proceeding and place the defendant on probation as provided by law; or (2) [sentence the defendant to a term of confinement as provided by law.” OCGA § 42-8-60 (a). Here, Kaylor was initially sentenced under the First Offender Act to fifteen years confinement, with the first four years to be served in confinement and the balance to be served on probation. Kaylor’s claim that the “explicit language of OCGA § 42-8-60 (a) allows for either probation or confinement, but not both, has already been decided adversely to [him].” (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Mason u. State, 310 Ga. App. 118, 119 (1) (712 SE2d 76) (2011) . This is because the First Offender Act
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
B. holding that claims which were not presented to the motion court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
C. holding that a claim not raised before the trial court will not be considered for the first time on appeal
D. holding that the trial court did not violate the first offender act by imposing a 15year probated sentence which included as a special condition confinement in a detention center for a designated time
E. holding that imposition of a habitual offender sentence on remand after the trial courts pronouncement of a nonhabitual sentence in the original proceeding does not violate double jeopardy
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.