Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
U.S. 756, 767 n. 8, 107 S.Ct. 3102, 3109 n. 8, 97 L.Ed.2d 618 (1987) (“We normally presume that a jury will follow an instruction to disregard inadmissible evidence inadvertently presented to it, unless there is an overwhelming probability that the jury will be unable'to follow the court's instructions and a strong likelihood that the effect of the evidence would be devastating to the defendant”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); United States v. Walker, 99 F.3d 439, 443 (D.C.Cir. 1996) ("We have no cause to doubt that the jury followed the court's curative instructions [to disregard improper testimony], therefore we do not believe the trial judge abused his discretion in denying the motion for a mistrial.”); United States v. Burroughs, 935 F.2d 292, 295 (D.C.Cir.1991) . 7 . See United States v. Glover, 153 F.3d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the sixth circuit erred in finding that the state courts jury instructions were contrary to clearly established federal law
B. holding that ujnless there is some good reason for finding otherwise  courts proceed on the basis that the jury does comply with cautionary instructions
C. holding that sometimes the risk of prejudice can be allayed by proper cautionary instructions
D. holding that a jury is presumed to follow the trial courts instructions
E. holding that the law presumes that the jury will follow the courts instructions
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.