Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(Vernon 1993)). The judge heard the case in the 122nd Judicial District Court, which is composed solely of Galveston County, see TexGov’t Code Ann. § 24.224(a) (Vernon 1988), and the case was pending in the 333rd Judicial District Court, which is composed of Harris County only, see TexGov't Code Ann. § 24.479(a) (Vernon 1988), so the phrase does not apply to this case. 4 . The opinion is unclear on whether the trial court actually ruled on the motions in Bowie County, or whether it ruled on them in Dallas County. See Mauzy, 899 S.W.2d at 699 (stating that the trial court "subsequently ordered the Dallas suit abated and transferred to Travis County”). 5 . The trial court in this case did more than hear oral argument at the summaiy judg .2d 229, 232 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1992, writ denied) . In Tigner v. State, 928 S.W.2d 540, 543
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that filing of charges by employer constituted retaliatory act
B. holding that portion of civil judg ment awarded under the idaho workmans compensation act was nondischargeable
C. holding that liquidated damages under fair labor standards act constitutes compensation for the retention of a workmans pay which might result in damages too obscure and difficult of proof for estimate other than by liquidated damages
D. holding that texas cause of action for retaliation does arise under its workers compensation laws
E. holding that filing of request for lump sum settlement constituted institution of a proceeding under the texas workmans compensation act
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.