Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of employment, a demotion evidenced by a decrease in wage or salary, a less distinguished title, a material loss of benefits, significantly diminished material responsibilities, or other indices ... unique to a particular situation.” Terry, 336 F.3d at 138 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). Dunphy argues that the terms and conditions of his employment would have been materially altered by these transfers because they would have enabled him to work out of his home and thus avoid a long commute. While “the difference in location is certainly of tantamount importance to Plaintiff, it does not raise the denial of Plaintiffs transfer request to the level of an adverse employment action.” Duncan v. Shalala, No. 97 Civ. 3607, 2000 WL 1772655, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2000) ; Nonnenmann v. City of New York, 174 F.Supp.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a lateral transfer without a loss in benefits does not constitute an adverse employment action
B. holding that denial of a lateral transfer which would have allowed plaintiff to be near his wife was not an adverse employment action
C. holding that a transfer of job duties can constitute an adverse employment action
D. holding that a denial of transfer was not an adverse employment action where the plaintiff asserted only that the transfer would allow him to work closer to home
E. holding that denial of a bonus was not an adverse employment action
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.