Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
The Sales Associate acknowledges that he/she is not an employee nor a partner, but a Sales Associate with an independent contractor status, with no rights of [worker’s] compensation, salary, pension, sick leave, sick pay, or other attributes of an employee relationship. The Sales Associate will not be treated as an employee with respect to the services performed by such salesperson as a real estate agent for federal tax purposes. Finally, after the relationship ended, MacDougall could not use any remaining prospects, listings, or referrals. Nevertheless, several facts suggest that Weichert exerted substantial control over MacDougall. MacDougall worked in an office maintained by Weichert, a Weichert manager supervised MacDougall’s work, Weichert requir 1, 30, 539 A.2d 744 (App.Div.1988) ; Giudice v. Drew Chem. Corp., 210 N.J.Super.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that federal law can provide source of state public policy for determining whether discharge of employee violated clear mandate of public policy
B. holding that discharge of employee to avoid paying commissions on future transactions did not violate clear mandate of public policy
C. holding that the discharge of an employee hospitalized for illness did not violate public policy
D. holding that an employee has no right of action against an employer for wrongful discharge where no clear mandate of public policy is violated thereby
E. holding that discharge of employee for having distributed expired drugs at employers direction did not violate clear mandate of public policy because the discharge implicated only the private interests of the parties
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.