Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
court to Claims Court. In the instant matter, this very court is the proper forum for the proceeding erroneously filed in our district court. That fact should make the case for transfer all the more compelling. This court’s qualification as the proper forum also suggests the appropriateness of our rendering the transfer decision here and now. It would be a curious procedure indeed to remand this aging matter to the district court so that a district judge could decide whether or not to ticket as a “transfer” the parties’ return trip here. Nor is such a convoluted procedure necessary to a fair decision: all the considerations relevant to “the interest of justice” appear from the record to be within our plain view. See Brock v. L.R. Willson & Sons, Inc., 773 F.2d 1377, 1388 (D.C.Cir.1985) . To assure that we have given that interest
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that remand is unnecessary when it is clear that the same decision would have been reached in the absence of the errors
B. holding that it is appropriate to remand to the plan administrator when the administrative record is incomplete
C. holding that remand is unnecessary when only one conclusion is supportable on the record
D. holding that in the absence of demonstrated prejudice remand is unnecessary
E. holding remand unnecessary where outcome is clear as a matter of law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.