Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Pennington, judge of the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas. 5 . The trial court also denied the District’s motion to sever the partial summary judgment granted by the trial court. Because the trial court denied the severance motion, the court's summary judgment ruling is not at issue in this appeal. 6 . (emphasis added). The fact that the Board approved the permit applications upon the condition that the District’s General Manager confirm each applicant’s installation of a water well flow meter, compliance with the Rules of the Kinney County Groundwater Conservation District, and payment of all fees due and owing to the District does not diminish or affect the definitiveness of the District’s order in this instance. See Tex.-New Mexico Power Co., 806 S.W.2d at 233 . 7 . The District argues the cases cited in
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that conditions placed on the issuance of a permit do not necessarily diminish or eliminate the definitiveness of the order approving the permit
B. recognizing the importance of a determination on the merits with respect to the issuance of a permanent injunction
C. holding that issuance of an order to show cause satisfied this requirement
D. holding that once district court entered order approving the settlement of class claims it could not alter the class in the absence of egregious error
E. holding the acquisition of vested rights requires the issuance of a permit and some substantial expenditure obligation or change in relation to the land
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.