Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(emphasis in original). “The burden must have more than a minimal impact on religious exercise, and there must be a close n Chicago, 342 F.3d 752, 761-62 (7th Cir.2003) (“CLUB”) (finding that “the scarcity’ of affordable land available for development in R zones, along with the costs, procedural requirements, and inherent political aspects of the Special Use, Map Amendment, and Planned Development approval processes” did not impose substantial burden on religious institutions); Roman Catholic Bishop of Springfield v. City of Springfield, 760 F.Supp.2d 172, 187 (D.Mass.2011) (finding that a routine application process did not violate RLUIPA), vacated in part on other grounds, 724 F.3d 78 (1st Cir.2013); Hale O Kaula Church v. Maui Planning Comm’n, 229 F.Supp.2d 1056, 1071 (D.Haw.2002) . Indeed, to exempt religious institutions from
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the burden is on the plaintiff
B. holding that the defendant countys two denials of variance permits under the circumstances had to a significantly great extent lessened the prospect of the religious institution being able to construct a temple in the future thus imposing a substantial burden on the religious institutions religious exercise
C. holding that religious exercise is any exercise of religion whether or not compelled by or central to a system of religious belief and that the use building or conversion of real property for the purpose of religious exercise shall be considered  religious exercise
D. holding that requiring plaintiffs to show a substantial burden from nonneutral government actions would make petty harassment of religious institutions and exercise immune from the protection of the first amendment
E. holding that laws requiring special use permits did not impose a substantial burden on religious institution
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.