Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
about what course of conduct is best, but a court must “remember that the ultimate issue is whether the patients’ basic liberty interests are being safeguarded, not whether the optimal course of treatment as determined by some expert is being followed.” Society for Good Will to Retarded Children, Inc. v. Cuomo, 737 F.2d 1239, 1248 (2d Cir.1984). “[Cjonstitutional standards are met when the professional who made a decision exercised ‘professional judgment’ at the time the decision was made.” Id. The court concludes that the Youngberg test is the appropriate standard in this case for determining whether the defendants’ violated M.H.’s substantive due process rights by their use of physical and mechanical restraints. See Society for Good Will to Retarded Children, 737 F.2d at 1245-46 ; see also Heidemann v. Rother, 84 F.3d 1021,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a students right to bodily integrity under the fourteenth amendment encompasses a students right to be free from sexual assaults by his or her teachers
B. holding that school district policy requiring that students obtain the review and approval of school officials prior to distributing any written material violated free speech rights of students
C. holding that students free speech rights were breached by school officials when they prohibited students from peacefully wearing freedom buttons that advocated the lawful and peaceful abolition of racial segregation
D. holding that youngberg standard was appropriate to analyze whether students at state operated school for the mentally retarded were deprived of their right to freedom from undue bodily restraint
E. holding that school officials may not limit the first amendment rights of students and teachers to freedom of speech and expression
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.