Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
act that causes damage to the plaintiff. We stated: We recognize that some courts have spoken of the “last overt act” of a civil rights conspiracy as the time from which the statute begins to run, but do not believe those courts meant to depart from the traditional rule in civil conspiracies that the mere fact of a conspiracy does not toll the statute of limitations with respect to earlier clear-cut violations of rights that have not been concealed from the plaintiff. Id. at 404 n. 1 (citation omitted). As the appellants do not suggest that the violations that transpired in the course of this alleged conspiracy (such as the excessive use of force and the false arrest) were concealed from them, Hernandez Jimenez controls. See United States v. Wogan, 938 F.2d 1446, 1449 (1st Cir.1991) . The appellants attempt to withstand this blow
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that a prior panels holding is binding on all subsequent panels
B. holding that a prior panel decision is binding on subsequent panels
C. holding that in a multipanel circuit prior panel decisions generally are binding upon newlyconstituted panels
D. holding that the panel is bound by decisions of prior panels
E. holding that decisions by prior panels are binding
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.