Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
relief, because it was filed almost five years after Dearman pled guilty. See Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-5(2) (Rev. 2015) (a motion for post-conviction relief must be filed within three years after the entry of a judgment of conviction based on a guilty plea). The court also noted that the underlying statute of limitations issue was discussed on the record at Dearman’s plea hearing. At her plea hearing, Dear-man’s attorney acknowledged that the prosecution was not barred by the statute of limitations because a warrant was issued for her arrest within about six weeks of the offense. See Miss. Code Ann. § 99-1-7 (Rev. 2015) (“A prosecution may be commenced, within the meaning of Section 99-1-5 by the issuance of a warrant .... ”); see also Conerly v. State, 607 So.2d 1153, 1158 (Miss. 1992) . ¶ 3. The circuit court correctly ruled that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a valid guilty plea waives a statute of limitations defense
B. holding that the defendants guilty plea was valid where the district court carefully questioned the defendant about whether he understood the consequences of his guilty plea
C. holding statute of limitations is not jurisdictional and can be waived by a voluntary plea of guilty
D. holding entry of guilty plea waives challenges to the deprivation of constitutional rights that occurred prior to the entry of the guilty plea  emphasis added
E. holding entry of a guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional issues
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.