Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
County, 839 F.2d 225, 226-27 (4th Cir.1988) (quoting Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 344, 96 S.Ct. 2074, 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976)). Here, the plaintiff does refer to state law, Va.Code Ann. § 2.1-116.1 et seq. (Michie 1995 & Supp.2000) (the “Law-Enforcement Officers’ Procedural Guarantees” statute), as the basis of his property interest in continued employment. While this state law provides the plaintiff with such an interest, see Kersey v. Shipley, 673 F.2d 730, 732 (4th Cir.1982), it also “provides for more process than what the Constitution would otherwise require.” Riccio v. County of Fairfax, 907 F.2d 1459, 1467 (4th Cir.1990) (emphasis in original). For this reason, the specific procedures it establishes need not be complied with fully to satisfy federal due process. See id. at 1468  Rather, to determine whether due process has
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that even if the plaintiff had asserted a cause of action under the virginia wrongful death act against the city police officers the police officers would be entitled to sovereign immunity
B. holding in virginia county police officers  1983 action against ms department and various county officials that the departments violation of the law enforcement officers procedural guarantees does not necessarily compel a finding of a due process violation
C. holding the evidence supported the police officers failure to follow the directives in the montgomery county police departments field operations manual
D. holding that county and district attorneys are officers within the judicial department
E. recognizing county officers as  those whose general authority and jurisdiction are confined within the limits of the county in which they are appointed who are appointed in and for a particular county and whose duties apply only to that county and through whom the county performs its usual political functions 
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.