Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
“only if the resulting error was not harmless.” United States v. Dickerson, 248 F.3d 1036, 1048 (11th Cir.2001) (quotation omitted). An error is harmless if it “had no substantial influence on the outcome and sufficient evidence uninfected by error supports the verdict.” Id. (quotation omitted). Relevant evidence “may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.” Fed.R.Evid. 403. Presentation of cumulative evidence exists where testimony of several witnesses would be the same, and one witness’s testimony would be sufficient. See United States v. Haynes, 554 F.2d 231, 234 (5th Cir.1977) . Here, even assuming that the testimony of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence where the evidence would serve only to impeach  testimony
B. holding that a trial court abused its discretion by excluding the testimony of an expert witness where the testimony would have been relevant to show that the defendant breached a duty of care
C. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in limiting testimony to only one witness where additional witnesses would have provided the same testimony
D. holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the testimony of a witness that was not highly probative
E. holding juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in admitting expert testimony
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.