Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
6 Section 7 of the NLRA provides that “[e]mployees shall have the right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations.” 29 U.S.C. § 157. It also broadly protects the right of employees to “ ‘engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining.’ ” Teamsters Local Union No. 117 v. Dep’t of Corr., 179 Wn. App. 110, 119, 317 P.3d 511 (2014) (quoting 29 U.S.C. § 157). Picketing intended to induce an emp & Joiners of Am., Local 25, 430 U.S. 290, 304-05, 97 S. Ct. 1056, 51 L. Ed. 2d 338 (1977) (no federal preemption of an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress although the conduct was arguably an unfair labor practice); Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of Am., Local 114, 383 U.S. 53, 61, 86 S. Ct. 657, 15 L. Ed. 2d 582 (1966) . 9 The NLRA permits the NLRB to seek a federal
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that state jurisdiction over claims by union members against employer for false arrest false imprisonment and malicious prosecution were not preempted under garmon
B. holding that false statements in a labor dispute that were injurious to employers reputation were not preempted
C. holding that false arrest and false imprisonment claim were not duplicative
D. holding the state law claims were not preempted
E. holding that false statements are constitutionally protected
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.