Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the Report, the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the objection and motion for de novo review, and the papers filed in support of and in opposition to defendant’s motion to quash, the Court deems the matter suitable for decision on the papers, VACATES the hearing scheduled for January 21, 2005, and rules as follows: 1. The deadline to file an objection to the Report is ten court days after October 28, 2004, the date of service of the Report, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a), 72(b), ie., November 11, 2004, to which date three days are added to account for the service of the Report by mail, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(e), thus extending the deadline to November 14, 2004, to which date, because November 14, 2004 was a Sunday, one court day is added, see Fed.R.Civ 573, 580 (N.D.Cal.1999) . 3. The Court, having reviewed the file de
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that where plaintiff reata failed to demonstrate waiver of citys immunity from liability under tort claims act plaintiffs claims were properly dismissed and plaintiff was not entitled to replead
B. holding plaintiff must make some showing that an act giving rise to civil liability actually occurred finding plaintiff entitled to conduct discovery to learn identity of defendant where plaintiff offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate defendants committed an unlawful act
C. holding that plaintiff must present such evidence
D. holding that the defendants were entitled to qualified immunity where the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that speech was public concern
E. holding that in order to establish liability under the ada the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant was an employer within the meaning of the statute
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.