Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
money or property utilized in the illegal sale of controlled substances. That section provides, in pertinent part: “(a) The following are subject to forfeiture: “(1) All controlled substances ... acquired in violation of any law of this state; “(2) All raw materials, products, and equipment of any kind which are used or intended for use for the manufacturing, ... processing, delivering, importing or exporting any controlled substance in violation of any law of this state; “(4) All moneys ... furnished or intended to be furnished by any person in exchange for a controlled substance in violation of any law of this state; all proceeds traceable to such an exchange; and all moneys ... used or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of any law of this st So.2d 151 (Ala.Civ.App.1992) ; Adams v. State ex rel. Whetstone, supra
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that forfeiture proceedings instituted eight months after the seizure of property failed to meet the promptness requirement
B. holding that later colloquy that took place between defendant and trial court concerning defendants decision to waive counsel did not cure earlier failure by court to fulfill requirements of nc gen stat  15a1242 because it did not take place until first day of defendants sentencing proceeding more than five months after defendant was permitted to proceed without assistance of counsel and approximately two months after defendant proceeding pro se pleaded guilty to murder
C. holding that double jeopardy clause did not apply to forfeiture proceeding before the court
D. holding that a forfeiture proceeding instituted four weeks after seizure met the promptness requirement of the statute
E. holding that forfeiture proceeding instituted more than seven months after property was seized did not meet the promptness requirement of  202  93c
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.