Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
have applied the burden-of-proof rules used to enforce the presumption favoring arbitration to contractual jury waivers. See In re Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A., 115 S.W.3d 600, 609-10 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, orig. proceeding) (applying presumption of validity to contractual jury waiver — i.e., presuming that jury waiver was knowingly and voluntarily made — based on statement in jury waiver provision itself that waiver was “knowing and voluntary”). The standards governing the enforceability of arbitration clauses are inapplicable to prelitigation contractual jury waiver provisions for several reasons. First, public policy favors arbitration, while the same cannot be said of the waiver of constitutional rights. Compare In re Bruce Terminix Co., 988 S.W.2d 702, 704 (Tex.1998)  with RDO Fin. Servs. Co., 191 F. Supp.2d at
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that public policy favors limiting the duration of spousal maintenance to encourage a transition toward independence
B. holding that public policy favors the exclusion of intentional acts as contained in the mjua policy
C. recognizingpublic policy favors arbitration
D. recognizing that texas public policy favors charitable gifts
E. holding that public policy favors reasonable conduct by consumers regardless of whether a product is defective and does not relieve a consumer of the responsibility to act reasonably
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.