Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of immunity.” Lymon v. Aramark Corp., 728 F.Supp.2d at 1251. Accord Barreras v. State of N.M. Corr. Dep’t, 133 N.M. 313, 319, 62 P.3d 770, 776 (Ct.App.2003) (“In the absence of affirmative legislation, the courts of this state have consistently declined to permit individuals to bring private lawsuits to enforce rights guaranteed by the New Mexico Constitution, based on the absence of an express waiver of immunity under the Tort Claims Act.”); Chavez v. City of Albuquerque, 124 N.M. 479, 482, 952 P.2d 474, 477 (Ct.App.1997) (noting that a plaintiff cannot seek damages for violations of rights under the New Mexico Constitution against a city or its employees or agents unless the NMTCA waives immunity); Rubio v. Carlsbad Mun. Sch. Dist., 106 N.M. 446, 449, 744 P.2d 919, 922 (CtApp. 1987) ; Begay v. State, 104 N.M. at 488, 723 P.2d at
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that nature of alleged bias must be personal and not arising out of litigation
B. recognizing absolute immunity for attorneys and board members of the texas medical board
C. holding that a  1983 claim for damages was not prohibited by claim preclusion because the plaintiff could not have sought damages in his prior article 78 proceeding arising out of the same facts
D. holding that no waiver of immunity exists for damages arising out of alleged educational malpractice claim against a school board
E. holding that no recovery exists for speculative damages
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.