Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and seven years imprisonment plus a $10,000 fine for Count Four, unauthorized possession of ammunition. He argues that the crimes of unauthorized possession of a firearm and unauthorized p mendment, no person may “be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” U.S. CONST, amend. V. The Double Jeopardy Clause applies to imprisonment and monetary penalties, and protects against multiple punishments for the same offense. United States v. $184,505.01 in U.S. Currency, 72 F.3d 1160, 1165 (3d Cir. 1995) (internal citations omitted). In determining whether two crimes are the same offense for double jeopardy purposes: The applicable rule is that where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the V.I. 2005) . To convict under title 14, section 2256 of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that reasonable reliance is not an element of the defense
B. holding that a claim of exemption is an affirmative defense which must be specifically pleaded
C. holding that the running of the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense
D. holding that whether the defendant is a member of a group specifically authorized to possess firearms is an affirmative defense rather than an element of the crime
E. holding that fair use is an affirmative defense
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.