Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
on by the Blasingame court have been overruled. Zamore v. Whitten, 395 A.2d 435 (Me.1978) was overturned by Bahre v. Pearl, 595 A.2d at 1035 and Kenney v. Porter, 557 S.W.2d 589 (Tex.Civ.App.1977) was overturned by Kenney v. Porter, 604 S.W.2d at 301-02. 21 .In his concurrence to the Court of Appeals’ opinion, Judge Susano asserted that he felt bound by the Blasingame decision, but urged the Supreme Court to “revisit Blasingame” because he felt that “the cases espousing the majority view are arguably the better-reasoned cases on the subject at hand.” 22 .It is not necessary for us to address the policy debate concerning whether closely-held stock is commonly dealt in on securities exchanges or markets or is commonly recognized as a medium for investment because the O 70, 374 (1980) ; Nelson v. Brostoff, 70 Or.App. 486, 689 P.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding failure to establish terms of an oral loan agreement precluded the existence of a breach of contract claim
B. holding that a federal habeas court may grant specific performance of a plea agreement in the face of evidence that the state has breached the terms of such an agreement
C. holding that the judicial admission exception did not apply to prove the existence of an oral agreement for the sale of stock where the defendant offered his deposition testimony acknowledging that the parties agreed to have a document transferring the stocks drafted by an attorney because the defendants references to the agreement were in terms of a tentative or incomplete agreement and because any admission of such a contract would necessarily have to include a statement of the price and quantity terms
D. holding in a suit to establish the existence of an oral agreement for the sale of stock that the judicial admission exception was not satisfied by the plaintiffs deposition testimony acknowledging that before negotiations had broken down the parties had reached an agreement with regard to price and quantity of stock and had drafted a document reflecting the agreement
E. holding part performance of an oral agreement necessary to take the oral agreement out of the statute of frauds must be consistent only  with the existence of the alleged oral contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.