Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
discrimination cases, by stating that: “Commonality requires the plaintiff to demonstrate that the class members ‘have suffered the same inju ry.’ ” Wal-Mart, 131 S.Ct. at 2551 (quoting Gen. Tel. Co. of Sw. v. Falcon, 457 U.S. 147, 157, 102 S.Ct. 2364, 72 L.Ed.2d 740 (1982)). “This does not mean merely that they have all suffered a violation of the same provision of law,” but instead that their claims “depend upon a common contention ... of such a nature that is capable of classwide resolution—which means that determination of its truth or falsity will resolve an issue that is central to the validity of each one of the claims in one stroke.” Id. Although “for purposes of Rule 23(a)(2) even a single common question will do,” id. at 2556 (internal citation an 48, 56 (3d Cir.1994) . See also Californians for Disability Rights,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding individual defendants subject to suit
B. holding that where both liability and damages depend on individual factual determinations claims may only be determined on individual basis
C. holding that courts should consider the merits of the litigants claims the nature of the factual issues the litigants ability to present his claims and the complexity of the legal issues
D. holding that individual factual differences among the individual litigants or groups of litigants will not preclude a finding of commonality
E. holding jurisdiction over an individual may not usually be predicated on jurisdiction over a corporation unless the corporation is the alter ego of the individual or when the individual perpetrates a fraud
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.