Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in checking on the welfare of someone who is not responsive to knocks on a window is high, as he could have been ill and in need of medical assistance, or he could have been intoxicated and about to drive off in the vehicle, which was running. Officer Ayler did not use any force with Cruz-Salazar and, in fact, unsuccessfully attempted to get him a ride home rather than arrest him. And Officer Ayler had no other means of making contact with Cruz-Salazar to check his welfare, as Cruz-Salazar was nonresponsive to his initial attempts at contact without opening the truck door. [16] We hold that Officer Ayler’s conduct did not violate Cruz-Salazar’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. See, e.g., Szabo v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 512, 470 S.W.3d 696 (2015) . For these same reasons, we hold that Officer
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding investigative stop based on officers observation of defendant apparently asleep in legally parked car was improper
B. holding officers conduct appropriate under community caretaking function and no fourth amendment violation where officer opened car door to wake defendant after observing him either unconscious or sound asleep in drivers seat of running vehicle and did not respond to knocks on the window
C. holding that officers encounter with defendant a frontseat passenger in a car stopped for speeding evolved into investigatory stop without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity when defendant refused to give officer his name and officer walked around to passengers door positioned himself there and called for backup when he did not know whether defendant had been wearing his seat belt while the car was in motion any reasonable person would believe they were not free to leave when officer positioned himself outside their car door and called for backup
D. holding a car was broken into or entered when defendant reached in through the open window of a car
E. holding that officers detaining a driver who parked and exited his car quickly as they approached in their patrol vehicle did not violate his fourth amendment rights by requiring him to get back in his car before questioning him
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.