Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Ford Motor refused. The parties thereafter appeared before the Policy Board, which affirmed the notice of termination, effective 30 days thereafter. Lanham Ford then filed suit in the Prince George’s County Circuit Court, following which the case arrived here. Lan-ham Ford complains that Ford Motor provided it with insufficient due process prior to and during the hearing before the Policy Board and asks this Court to grant it a new hearing with additional due process rights. III. In its Motion to Remand, Lanham Ford argues that Ford Motor has failed to present prima facie evidence that the amount in controversy satisfies the $75,000 jurisdictional threshold for federal jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); see also Lupo v. Human Affairs Int’l, Inc., 28 F.3d 269, 273-4 (2d Cir.1994) . It reiterates the argument that the object of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the burden is on the party seeking to exercise jurisdiction by clearly alleging facts sufficient to establish jurisdiction
B. holding that the burden is on defendant as the party invoking removal jurisdiction to establish the existence of a sufficient amount in controversy
C. holding that the burden is on the defendants to establish the existence of absolute legislative immunity
D. holding that the district court erred in not determining whether the amount in controversy necessary to create diversity jurisdiction was met at the time of removal
E. holding that the burden is on the plaintiff to allege facts sufficient to establish jurisdiction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.