Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
217, 219 (3d Cir.1994). 36 . Id. at 219. 37 . Id. at 224-225. See also Elrod Holdings Corp., 426 B.R. 106, 111. 38 . In re Forklift LP Corp., 340 B.R. 735, 738-39 (D.Del.2006) (citing In re Parkline Corp., 185 B.R. 164, 169 (Bankr.D.N.J.1994)). 39 . Morris v. Sampson Travel Agency, Inc. (In re U.S. Interactive, Inc.), 321 B.R. 388, 392-93 (Bankr.D.Del.2005). 40 . Big Wheel Holding Co., Inc. v. Fed. Wholesale Co. (In re Big Wheel Holding Co.), 223 B.R. 669, 674 (Bankr.D.Del.1998). To the extent the ordinary course of business exception applies, the Court does not need to determine whether the third prong of § 547(c) is satisfied since the amended 2005 Code, as amended in 2005, requires only a showing that a transfer orp. (In re Sacred Heart Hosp.), 200 B.R. 114, 117 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1996) . 42 . Molded Acoustical, 18 F.3d at 225. 43 .
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a 14 month delay was unreasonable
B. holding that a five month delay was unreasonable
C. holding that a 13 month delay was unreasonable
D. holding that a six month delay was unreasonable
E. holding that a 16 month relationship was not of sufficient length
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.