Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
reasons, I conclude that defendant does not qualify as an armed career criminal under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). IT IS ORDERED that this matter is scheduled for SENTENCING on Thursday, November 12, 2009, at 10:30 a.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties file any further sentencing motions or memoranda no later than November 5, 2009. 1 . Although the two Iowa convictions were entered on the same date, the offense dates were different. Under the guidelines, sentences imposed on the same day may in some cases be counted as one sentence, see U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2), but the ACCA looks to the date of offense, requiring that predicate convictions be “committed on occasions different from one another.” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). 2 . But cf. United States v. Dominguez, 992 F.2d 678, 682 (7th Cir.1993) . The CSA also forbids the distribution of a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that possession of a controlled substance is a crime only if the defendant knowingly possesses the substance and has knowledge of the nature of that substance
B. holding that mens rea required for possession of a controlled substance is knowledge that defendant possessed a controlled substance
C. holding that the sale of a noncontrolled substance which the defendant subjectively believes to be a controlled substance can constitute an attempt to distribute
D. holding that quantity of the controlled substance does not have to be measurable to support a conviction for possession of such controlled substance particularly when the immeasurable amount of the substance is found on an implement used to consume the substance
E. holding that knowledge that a substance is a controlled substance is an element of  952
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.