Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
12(e); Wallace, 597 F.3d at 798; United States v. Deitz, 577 F.3d 672, 692 (6th Cir.2009) (“Thus, because the record reveals that Deitz failed to file a Rule 14(a) motion prior to trial, he waived his objection.”); see also United States v. Rox, 692 F.2d 453, 454 (6th Cir.1982) (determining that the defendant waived her objection to misjoinder when she failed to raise the issue until the third day of trial and could not challenge the allegedly improper joinder on appeal). A court may grant relief from the waiver “[f]or good cause,” Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(e); Wallace, 597 F.3d at 798, where the defendant can “articulare] some compelling reason for not filing the motion within the deadline,” United States v. Walden, 625 F.3d 961, 966 (6th Cir.2010); see also Wallace, 597 F.3d at 798-99 . The defendant did not file a motion to sever
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the verdict must stand because defendant waived her right   has suffered no constitutional harm as a result of all charges being tried together in a single trial and failed to make  any substantive objections to the allegedly improper joinder quoting abboud 438 f3d at 567
B. holding that a defendant has a constitutional right to counsel as a matter of right on direct appeal
C. holding that a communication between the judge and juror which is unrelated to the case being tried is not improper and prejudicial
D. holding that a defendant was entitled to a transcript of the trial of codefendants who were tried together and convicted where one of the convictions was reversed on the ground of reasonable doubt
E. holding that defendant failed to raise a constitutional issue at trial and thus waived appellate review of that issue
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.