Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
21, 2011 EEOC Addendum; November 15, 2012 EEOC Charge. Accordingly, the plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies with respect to the Federal Defendants and her Title VII and ADEA claims fail on this independent basis. See Johnson v. Ashcroft, No. 00-cv-2743, 2001 WL 34366564, at *3 (D.D.C. June 21, 2001) (dismissing for failure to exhaust administrative remedies where the plaintiff did “not name either of the federal defendants” in the plaintiffs EEOC complaint). The plaintiffs Complaint also asserts a claim of wrongful discharge related to her termination. Yet, Title VII and the ADEA provide the exclusive remedy for federal employees alleging race and age discrimination. See Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 96 S.Ct. 1961, 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976) ; Chennareddy v. Bowsher, 935 F.2d 315, 318
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 provides the exclusive remedy for claims of employment discrimination by federal agencies
B. recognizing title vii does not provide the exclusive remedy for all employment discrimination claims even if the title vii and section 1983 claim factually overlap
C. holding that title vii provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment
D. holding that a claim for discrimination in private employment is not preempted by title vii
E. holding that title vii did not provide exclusive remedy for sex discrimination in public employment claim could also be brought under equal protection clause
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.