Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
when he knowingly obtains or exercises control over anything of value of another without authorization, or by threat or deception, and knowingly uses, conceals, or abandons the thing of value in such manner as to deprive the other person permanently of its use or benefit. With regard to both the Dunn and McCarthy funds, both parties initially authorized Rishel to obtain control over the funds for the express purpose of purchasing baseball season tickets. After Rishel failed to purchase the tickets, both Dunn and the McCar- thys attempted to reach Rishel to no avail, and thereafter withdrew their authorization. To constitute theft pursuant to § 18-4-401(1)(b), "[clontrol of the property need not be unauthorized from the outset." People v. Treat, 193 Colo. 570, 568 P.2d 473, 476 (1977). "It is sufficient [for purposes of the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding evidence which established that use of property was permissive showed use of property was not adverse
B. holding that although authorization was initially given for property exercise of that control continued to be authorized only because the defendant deceived the rightful owner of the property into believing that a legitimate use was being made of the property
C. holding that because the property owner argued only a theory of taking that was no longer a valid theory property owner did not demonstrate his entitlement to relief
D. holding that property owner still has relief in the form of the return of his property though condemnation was complete and a highway was constructed across the property
E. holding that the debtor could retain exempt property because it was not property of the estate
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.