Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
This latter principle has given rise to Fifth Amendment claims in the context of court-ordered therapy requiring an admission of criminal conduct.- See generally William Wesley Patton, The World Where Parallel Lines Converge: The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination in Concurrent ■ Civil and Criminal Child Abuse Proceedings, 24 Ga. L.Rev. 473 (1990); Jessica Wilen Berg, Note, Give Me Liberty or Give Me Silence: Taking a Stand on Fifth Amendment Implications for Court-Ordered Therapy Programs, 79 Cornell L.Rev. 700 (1994); Scott Michael Sol-koff, Note, Judicial Use Immunity and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination in Court Mandated Therapy Programs, 17 Nova L.Rev. 1441 (1993). Courts have viewed such situations differently. E.g., Mace v. Amestoy, 765 F.Supp. 847, 850-52 (D.Vt.1991) ; Gyles v. State, 901 P.2d 1143,1148-50 (Alaska
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding state had violated the defendants fifth amendment rights and consequently was prohibited from using any of the information revealed during courtordered treatment program in later separate criminal prosecution
B. holding defendants fifth amendment rights had been violated when his probation was revoked based on his failure to complete a sexual treatment program that required incriminating admissions
C. recognizing that probation condition required probationer to enter into and successfully complete a sex offender treatment program but finding that no condition of probation was imposed that required him to admit to a counselor the sexual acts charged
D. holding that a defendants probation cannot be revoked solely on the basis of hearsay
E. holding that a defendants fifth amendment rights were violated when an interpreter was withdrawn by the court
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.