Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
for child support from May 16, 1986, to March 18, 1989. That portion of the trial court’s judgment which awards attorney fees to Lisa which were properly allocable to her attorney’s representation of Gary is REVERSED, and we REMAND this cause to the trial court for a determination of the proper amount of attorney fees. In all other respects, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed. SMITH, J., concurs and dissents with opinion. 3 . We note that the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution has been held to be co-extensive with article 1, section 3 of the Texas Constitution. See Twiford v. Nueces County Appraisal Dist., 725 S.W.2d 325, 328 n. 5 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.); see also Burroughs v. Lyles, 142 Tex. 704, 711, 181 S.W.2d 570, 574 (1944) . We base our interpretation of section 13.42
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that white persons may state a claim under section 1981 and noting  the racial character of the rights being protected 
B. recognizing that rights under article i section 11 are subject to reasonable limitations
C. holding states are not persons for the purposes of section 1983
D. holding that states are persons but conceding that this change was not envisioned as broadening the class of persons who could be held liable under the act
E. holding that this section article 1 section 3 guaranteeing all persons equality of rights was designed to prevent any person or class of persons from being singled out as a special subject for discrimination
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.