Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Size shall be 38 mm thick by 400 mm in height by 1 meter in length, unless othenoise indicated [,]” while paragraph 2.2.2 provides that: “Precast concrete units shall have a compressive strength of no less than 17 MPa, reinforced with 150 mm by 150 mm by W1.4 WWF wire mesh, and 300 mm (height) by 1 m (length) by 40 mm (thickness) in size unless indicated.” Fort Hood Contract No. DACA63-02-C-0015, Specification Section 03100A, Paragraph 2.2 (emphases added). It is undisputed that the “unless indicated” language refers to the drawing detail. Thus, the specifications refer the contractor to the drawing detail to determine if the size of the material for the retainers is different than the size quoted in the specifications. See AD. Roe Co., Inc., A.S.B.C.A. No. 23,425, 79-1 BCA ¶ 13,575 . Second, it is undisputed that the drawing
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that only provisions relating to work specifications and performance were incorporated into the subcontract because the relevant clauses limited the incorporation of the terms insofar as they relate  to the work undertaken herein
B. holding that the specifications reference to commercially available vacuum sensors constituted sufficient structure as one skilled in the art would have understood the reference
C. holding that unless otherwise specified language in the contracts specifications referred to the drawings and served to modify the specifications direction to only apply paint so that the instructions would also include applying a liquid glaze coating on some of the walls in accordance with the drawings
D. holding that subcontract requirement that work    be performed in accordance with specifications in prime contract meant that prime contract governed the manner of the performance of the work not    the basis for computing the amount to be paid the subcontractor
E. holding that the specifications reference to a selector sufficed as one skilled in the art would have understood the term
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.