Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
or in privity with a party in the first action.” Id. at 802 (emphasis in original). The second requirement need not detain us. Fullerton pled guilty to a violation of Tex. Penal Code § 19.02. By entering this plea, he admitted that he intended to kill his victims or at least knew that his actions would cause their deaths. In other words, his convictions were valid because he admitted that the deaths were not accidents. The convictions are inconsistent both with the Buckners’ suggestion that Fullerton’s delusions made the shootings acts of self-defense and with their contention that he was legally insane during the incident. If the criminal proceedings decided anything, it was that the shootings were not “occurrences.” See Dinnery v. State, 592 S.W.2d 343, 352-54 (Tex.Crim.App.1979) . The first and third requisites for issue
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding it is fundamental error to convict a defendant of crime not charged and which is not a lesser included offense of the charged crime
B. holding that possession of a weapon is not in an of itself a crime
C. holding that a brady violation is waived by guilty plea
D. holding that a judicial confession in a guilty plea is itself sufficient evidence to support the crime charged
E. holding that a defendants guilty plea was unconditional where the guilty plea was not in writing and the government did not consent to it being conditional
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.