Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in effect, it is unrelated to the range of the defendant's punishments. Unlike parole, probation, or the length of imprisonment, the requirement to register as a sex offender is beyond the control of the trial court. The judge has no discretion whatsoever in determining whether the defendant will have to comply with registration statutes; instead, it is a legal obligation, predetermined by the legislature, placed on those convicted of particular crimes and is an automatic operation of statute. Similar to the consequence of losing one's driver's license or the right to possess a firearm, the registration requirement is intended to act not as a criminal punishment but as a prophylactic civil remedy. See, eg., Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84, 95-96, 123 S.Ct. 1140, 155 L.Ed.2d 164 (2003) ; United States v. Carel, 668 F.3d 1211, 1213
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that alaskas registration requirement was a civil remedy and nonpunitive
B. holding that an additional remedy does not constitute an additional requirement
C. holding that a hearing would serve no purpose because the registration act and notification law subject all sex offenders as defined by the registration act to the registration and notification provisions and law enforcement authorities have no discretion to determine which offenders would be exposed to public dissemination
D. holding that the postmark on the registration application was the determining factor when a registration is subsequently approved
E. holding copyright statutes registration requirement a nonjurisdictional condition although previously held to be jurisdictional
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.