Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Seligmann, A Diller A Dollar: Section 1983 Claims in Special Education Lawsuits, 36 Ga. L.Rev. 465, 525-26 (2002) ] (noting that measuring available relief at the time when the injury occurred ensures that "the IDEA process is not ... ignored, with the potential consequence of more educational harm being done to the child until no remedy but damages remain”). Cudjoe, 297 F.3d at 1067. 5 . "Hurting him” here refers to the general emotional trauma the Muskrats reported to the school, not the medical consequences they now attribute to the timeouts. Cf. App. 1063-65 (deposition of Mrs. Muskrat in which she admits the Muskrats never told school officials that timeouts were producing severe stress symptoms in J.M.). 6 . See Doe v. Hawaii Dept. of Educ., 334 F.3d 906, 908-09 (9th Cir.2003) ; Gottlieb v. Laurel Highlands Sch. Dist., 272
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that all claims that law enforcement officers have used excessive force  deadly or not  in the course of an arrest investigatory stop or other seizure of a free citizen should be analyzed under the fourth amendment and its reasonableness standard
B. holding that all claims that law enforcement officers have used excessive force deadly or not  in the course of an arrest investigatory stop or other seizure of a free citizen should be analyzed under the fourth amendment and its reasonableness standard
C. holding that excessive force claims are to be treated under the fourth amendment
D. holding that whether an officers force was reasonable must be analyzed under the reasonableness standard of the fourth amendment
E. holding that excessive force by a school official should be analyzed under the fourth amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.