Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the date of both the New Jersey Tort Claims Act amendment and the Supreme Court’s affirmance in State v. Michaels), would serve to bar plaintiff’s claim against these defendants unless plaintiff filed within the limitations period and satisfied the notice provision. Because plaintiff did not file her notice of claim until February 27, 1995, it would be untimely under this scenario. The court is puzzled as to why the individual defendants in opposing Newark’s motion to remand or to dismiss did not flag this issue. 13 . New Jersey courts have relied on this section of the Restatement in other contexts. See, e.g., Rubin v. Nowak, 248 N.J.Super. 80, 83, 590 A.2d 249 (App.Div.1991). 14 . With respect to criminal proceedings, see, e.g., Day v. Zubel, 112 Nev. 972, 922 P.2d 536, 539 (1996) ; Greenberg v. Wolfberg, 890 P.2d 895, 904, n.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that because the claims were dismissed with prejudice there was a final judgment for purposes of appellate review
B. holding that a dismissal in the interest of justice was a favorable termination for the purposes of a malicious prosecution action where the courts reasons for dismissing the criminal charges were not inconsistent with the innocence of the accused
C. recognizing the inherent anxiety associated with pending criminal charges
D. holding that the final termination of the criminal proceedings occurred when criminal charges  were dismissed with prejudice rather than when the accused was released from prison pending a retrial
E. holding that  1983 claims accrued when all charges were dismissed rather than a previous date on which the conviction was vacated on the theory that the charges remained pending until the dismissal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.