Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and the defendants’ decisions because those decisions allegedly violated the very statute that plaintiff alleges conferred state agency powers on these defendants. There thus can be no close nexus between the Commonwealth and the allegedly unlawful acts of the defendants here. We therefore find that defendants’ responsibilities under, and alleged violation of, the Pennsylvania statute do not render them state actors, regardless of which test we employ. Plaintiff has alleged nothing which would warrant a finding of state action in this matter. We note that former Chief Judge Lord and Judge Newcomer reached the same conclusion, without the guidance of the Lugar trilogy, years ago. See Cardio-Medical Assocs. v. Crozer-Chester Med. Ctr., 536 F.Supp. 1065, 1091 (E.D.Pa.1982) (Lord, C.J.) ; Holton v. Crozer-Chester Med. Ctr., 419
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that ccmc and its employees were not state actors under either the symbiotic relationship or close nexus test
B. recognizing the test for business nexus is distinct from transactional nexus and its test for dissociation
C. recognizing the  logical nexus  test as appropriate
D. holding that foster parents are not state actors
E. holding that massachusetts statute did not create a sufficiently close nexus between private hospital and the state to warrant labeling private actors state actors
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.