Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of the lack of objection from Plaintiff, the Court recommends the award of costs for all the 1,181 copies sought. Defendant also requests that it be allowed to recover $.19 per page for all recoverable copies. [D.E. 44]. In making this request, Defendant relies on Pawnbrokers and Secondhand Dealers Ass’n v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 711 F.Supp. 1084, 1086 (S.D.Fla.1989), which held that $.25 per page was reasonable. Id. In view of the advances in technology, however, a review of more recent cases in the Eleventh Circuit indicate that a rate of $.10 to $.14 per copy is more reasonable. Ferguson v. Bombardier Serv. Corp., 2007 WL 601921, * 6 (M.D.Fla. Feb. 21.2007) (reasonable rate of ten to fifteen cents per page); James v. Wash Depot Holdings, Inc., 242 F.R.D. 645, 652 (S.D.Fla.2007) . Applying the higher rate of $0.14 per copy to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that higher rate would not be awarded for supplemental fees because there was no showing that any special factor justifies an increased rate for litigating the attorney fees motion
B. holding reasonable rate of ten cents per page for copying in southern district nineteen to fifteen cents per page as unnecessarily high without factual support for increased rate for higher inhouse rate
C. holding that with respect to the eaja the local or national market rate for legal services cannot be a special factor used to increase the rate beyond the statutory rate
D. holding that the proper rate for prejudgment interest is the rate fixed by the parties in a contract
E. recognizing that 90 per hour is a reasonable rate for a paralegal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.