Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
stay (to the extent it was applicable), and the Debtor— whose Chapter 13 case had no filed claims — filed a motion to allow a late proof of claim on behalf of an unsecured creditor. All arguments and submissions concerning these matters have been considered by the court, and the issues are ripe for decision. I. BACKGROUND The facts of this case are not in dispute. The Creditor is the holder of a deed of trust on the Debtor’s principal residence, which secures a note on which the Debtor owes about $114,040. The Debtor’s payments on the note were in arrears, and the Creditor conducted a foreclosure sale on December 29, 2005. The foreclosure sale was conducted in accordance with West Virginia law, and the Debtor’s real property was sold to Gracie Mews, LLC (“Grade Mews”) for $130 997) ; In re Rambo, 199 B.R. 747, 751
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the debtors were entitled to cure the mortgage arrearage through their chapter 13 plan because the creditors failure to record the sale deed prior to the bankruptcy filing rendered the sale incomplete under state law
B. holding that the debtor had the right to cure the default because the foreclosure sale was not complete under state law until it was confirmed by a court
C. recognizing the language of  1322c1 as a minimum floor in cutting off the debtors right to cure and permitting the debtor to cure until the deed was delivered to the successful bidder which would complete the sale under new jersey law
D. holding that the debtors could cure their arrearage until the expiration of the 10day upset bid period which would render the foreclosure sale complete under north carolina law
E. holding that the debtors could cure the default until the delivery of a sheriffs deed to the successful purchaser rendering the sale complete under new jersey state law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.