Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
or was. At trial, Fromhold explained, Extrapolation refers to being able to relate a particular concentration from one point in time to a time before or after. Retrograde extrapolation implies we’re going back in time before we have a specific value. Scientific principles that are involved that deal with the alcohol absorption, distribution, and elimination. The very factors that come into play to be able to make that type of estimate. See id. at 908-09 (defining retrograde extrapolation as “the computation back in time of the blood-alcohol level — that is, the estimation of the level at the time of driving based on a test result from some later time”). Danielson and Fromhold identified the Widmark formula as the technique used when conducting retrograde extrapolation. See id. at 909 . The experts also testified regarding the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that ridas elimination of habeas corpus does not violate the suspension clause where the petitioner had a means for seeking relief direct review  and simply failed to pursue the relief that the statutory scheme allows
B. holding that a son could be bound by a contract that he signed even though his fathers name and not his appeared in the body
C. recognizing burdixdana represents the majority view but rejecting its interpretation of 18 usc  3282
D. recognizing the collateral order doctrine for the first time
E. recognizing emp widmark first calculated absorption and elimination rates in the body and his work still represents the benchmark for other scientists studies today
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.