Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
for his conclusion that Mrs. Kyle developed blood clots and pulmonary emboli that were the cause of her respiratory arrest as a result of failure [t]o provide appropriate post operative drugs. Because Hillery objected only on the grounds that the report was conclusory concerning the element of causation, and did not mention the elements of standard of care or breach, we do not address that portion of Hillery’s issue concerning standard of care and breach. See Tex.R.App. P. 33.1(a); Hawkins v. Herrera, 296 S.W.3d 366, 370 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, no pet.) (refusing to address objections by defendant physician who did not raise objections in trial court); see also Plemons v. Harris, No. 02-08-00326-CV, 2009 WL 51290, *3 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth Jan. 8, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op.) ; Williams v. Mora, 264 S.W.3d 888,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that complaint on appeal must be the same as that presented in the trial court
B. holding that an issue was not preserved for appellate review because appellants trial objection does not comport with the issue he raised on appeal
C. holding that defendant failed to preserve for appellate review complaint that prosecutors use of postarrest silence against defendant violated the texas constitution because complaint did not comport with defendants trial court objection based solely on the federal constitution
D. holding objection to expert report made in trial court must comport with complaint asserted on appeal
E. holding that appellant did not preserve his complaint for review because the grounds raised on appeal did not comport with those urged to the trial court as justifying suppression
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.