Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
some tension among the different circuits as to the interaction between sections 107 and 113.” United States v. Hunter, 70 F.Supp.2d 1100, 1103 n. 4 (C.D.Cal.1999). For example, courts are split on the question of who may bring a CERCLA § 107 cost-recovery action, and more specifically, whether a PRP is entitled to bring a CERCLA § 107 cost-recovery action. We have held that a private PRP who incurs response costs may not bring a cost-recovery action under CERCLA § 107, and instead may only bring a claim for contribution under CERCLA § 113(f). Pinal Creek, 118 F.3d at 1301. We have not yet considered, however, whether a government PRP such as a municipality that similarly incurs response costs may bring a cost-recovery action under CERCLA § 107. Compare Hunter, 70 F.Supp.2d at 1108 , with City of Fresno, 1995 WL 641983, at **2-5
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that joint and several liability for entire actual loss could have been imposed on each fraud defendant as condition of probation
B. recognizing that joint and several liability of  107 seems unfair but the solution is found in apportionment and contribution
C. holding that where none of the events for accrual of a  113f1 contribution claim can arise because a prp has incurred response costs based on its agreement to remediate in accordance with a state agencys administrative order the relevant period of limitations and accrual is provided in  113g2 the court found that under such circumstances the contribution action becomes the initial action for cost recovery under cercla  107 thus bringing such action within  113g2 applicable to initial actions for recovery of the costs referred to in  107
D. holding that the government prp may bring a costrecovery action pursuant to cercla  107 thereby imposing joint and several liability on the defendant prp
E. holding that a statute imposing joint and several liability on a vehicle owner for a minors conduct while driving the vehicle with permission imputed financial liability rather than fault to the vehicles owner
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.