Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
hospitals’ records undoubtedly assert that baby Joseph’s condition at the time of discharge was that of “no fever, alert, no distress”, and “good, stable”. However, plaintiffs’ experts conclude through their opinions after scrutinizing the hospitals’ records that the lack of sufficient documented objective vital signs at the time of discharge from HHM, and the mere reliance on the child’s appearance accompanied by a normal chest x-Ray at the time of discharge from San Pablo is meager evidence of baby Joseph’s stability at time of discharge. The Court must, therefore, leave the issue to be resolved by a jury’s weighing of the hospitals’ documented record against the opinion of plaintiffs’ experts suggesting that the records were insufficient. See Reeves, 530 U.S. at 150, 120 S.Ct. 2097 . Without entering into an opinion one way or
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that credibility determinations are reviewed only for substantial evidence
B. holding that credibility determinations are for the jury
C. holding that the jury is the judge of the weight and credibility given to witness testimony
D. holding that the postconviction court is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses
E. holding that credibility determinations the weighing of the evidence and the drawing of legitimate inferences from the facts are jury functions not those of a judge
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.