Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
video surveillance, respectively), not the location of a search, which is addressed by the wording of Rule 41. This court in any case declines to legislate by reading into the statute language that Congress did not place there. a. Nature of the Rule 41 Violation A Rule 41 violation is either “technical” or “procedural,” as courts have phrased it, or constitutional. See, e.g., Adams, 2016 WL 4212079, at *6 (“The Court views a Rule 41(b) violation to be a technical or procedural violation.... ”). “[Ujnless a clear constitutional violation occurs, noncompliance with Rule 41 requires suppression of evidence only where (1) there was prejudice in the sense that the search might not have occurred or would not have been so abrasive if the rule had been followed, or (2) ther 515 (D.D.C. 2013) ; U.S. v. Master, 614 F.3d 236, 241 (6th Cir.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the district court which erred in its conclusion that there was jurisdictional defect abused its discretion in denying a plaintiffsmotion for leave to amend his complaint because the proposed amendment would not cure the jurisdictional defect
B. holding that a violation of the forum defendant rule is a jurisdictional defect
C. holding jurisdictional defect voids judgment when defect exposes such personal jurisdictional deficiencies as to violate due process
D. holding error to be fundamental when record shows jurisdictional defect
E. holding that a rule 41b violation constituted a jurisdictional flaw inexcusable as a technical defect
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.