Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
without merit. “The substantive component of the Due Process Clause protects those rights that are ‘fundamental,’ that is, rights that are ‘implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.’ ” McKinney v. Pate, 20 F.3d 1550, 1556 (11th Cir.1994) (en banc) (citation omitted); see also Greenbriar Vill., L.L.C. v. Mountain Brook, City, 345 F.3d 1258, 1262 (11th Cir.2003) (“Fundamental rights are those rights created by the Constitution.”) (citation omitted). In this case, Behrens has failed to allege the deprivation of any fundamental right. We have previously held that “[b]ecause there is no fundamental right to adopt or to be adopted, it follows that there can be no fundamental right to apply for adoption.” Lofton, 358 F.3d at 812; see also Mullins v. Oregon, 57 F.3d 789, 794 (9th Cir.1995) ; Lindley v. Sullivan, 889 F.2d 124, 131 (7th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that prospective adoptive parents do not have a fundamental liberty interest in adoption
B. recognizing parents fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children
C. holding that natural parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children
D. recognizing that noncustodial parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children
E. holding that there was no liberty interest where adoption placement agreement made it clear that adoption was not a foregone conclusion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.