Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
point to written language capable of reasonably being interpreted as creating a promise on the part of [the employer] to vest [the recipient’s] ... benefits.’ International Multifoods, 116 F.3d at 980 (quoting Schonholz, 87 F.3d at 78) (emphasis in the original). The court then examined the CBAs and the ERISA plan documents involved in the case in light of that standard. The court noted that each CBA provided for medical benefits “[d]uring the term of this Agreement,” and explained that “promising to provide benefits for a certain period of time necessarily establishes that once that time period expires, the promise does as well.” International Multifoods, 116 F.3d at 981 (citing LTV Steel Co. v. United Mine Workers of America (In re Chateaugay Corp.), 945 F.2d 1205, 1208 (2d Cir.1991) ). The court then concluded that this provision
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that retirement benefits are accrued benefits under erisa
B. holding that employers promise to provide welfare benefits until death of retiree did not create vested rights because employer had expressly reserved the right to terminate or amend the plan
C. holding employers promise that retiree benefits will continue did not create vested lifetime benefits in the face of a termination clause
D. holding that a cba provision which guaranteed retiree medical benefits during the term of this agreement established that retiree health benefits were no longer guaranteed once the agreement expired
E. holding that so long as the seller did not have an agreement with the buyer during the term of the listing agreement it was free to delay selling until after the listing agreement had expired even where the delay was for the purpose of escaping the payment of a commission
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.