Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
2005). 2 . This court has not prohibited the filing of successive motions under rule 3.800(b)(2) so long as the motions are filed prior to thé initial brief. Generally, we try to accommodate counsels’ efforts to resolve sentencing issues for defendants while they still have legal representation. There is a point, however, where such motions can become an abuse of the system. In this case, all of the issues raised in .the second motion could have been discovered in time to be filed with the initial motion. 3 .We note that in Conroy we stated that the period could be extended for good cause, but not after it had expired. 933 So.2d at 687. 4 . We are aware that some existing case law has reviewed similar issues under rule 3.800(b). See Yisrael v. State, 938 So.2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) . 5 . We note that although Mr. Griffin's cost
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding the constitutional issue was not preserved and thus declining to issue an advisory opinion
B. holding that the issue of the applicability of section 8211 of the real property article to the facts of the case had not been preserved for appellate review where the issue was raised for the first time in the appellants motion to alter or amend the judgment under rule 2534
C. holding that an issue is preserved for appeal where the issue was sufficiently raised for the court to rule on it  
D. holding a crime and time letter admissible where issue was preserved by motion under rule 3800b
E. holding under former circuit court rule 76 the denial of the defendants directed verdict motion was not preserved for appeal where he failed to renew the motion after presenting evidence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.