Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 1 . We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 2 . Highway 80 runs northeast from the border town of Douglas, Arizona, through the sparsely populated “bootheel'' section of southwestern New Mexico before intersecting Interstate 10. 3 .It is unclear from the record whether the present stop was one of the two or in addition to the others. 4 . Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). 5 . At oral argument, Montes-Ramos' counsel advised the Court that Montes-Ramos is no longer in custody. Because he is challenging the underlying conviction, not the sentence, Montes-Ramos' appeal is not moot. See Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211, 222, 67 S.Ct. 224, 91 L.Ed. 196 (1946) . 6 . The Fifth Circuit went on to conclude the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that where a conviction survives an apprendi challenge under plain error review a sentence appropriate for that conviction also survives
B. holding that forfeiture is an element of the sentence imposed following conviction
C. holding that  once the sentence imposed for a conviction has completely expired the collateral consequences of that conviction are not themselves sufficient to render an individual in custody for the purposes of a habeas attack upon it
D. holding that when the consequences of the conviction are not severe and imminent an appeal is moot when the judgment is voluntarily satisfied
E. holding the petitioners challenge of his conviction is not rendered moot by the expiration of the underlying sentence because collateral consequences flowing from the conviction give the petitioner a substantial stake in the judgment of conviction which survives the satisfaction of the sentence imposed on him
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.