Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
presented for summary judgment purposes.” Id. at 1020. Additionally, our conclusion resulted from construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff-Appellant. Id. at 1020-21. “We review the district court’s refusal to take judicial notice of proffered materials for an abuse of discretion.” Crawford v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 647 F.3d 642, 649 (7th Cir.2011). Here, we easily conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to take judicial notice of the HPL contract. The district court correctly concluded that Plaintiff-Appellant’s legal argument was not the proper kind of fact that may be judicially noticed under Federal Rule of Evidence 201(b). See Gen. Elec. Capital Corp. v. Lease Resolution Corp., 128 F.3d 1074, 1081 (7th Cir.1997)  (citation and quotation marks omitted). HPL’s
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding trial court order denying states petition for an order of public use and necessity for good cause appearing did not constitute a finding of fact or a conclusion of law
B. holding that a bankruptcy courts sale order is a final order for res judicata purposes
C. holding that in order for a fact to be judicially noticed indisputability is a prerequisite
D. holding it is a question of fact
E. holding that the point on appeal and the objection in the trial court must be the same in order for it to be preserved for appeal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.