Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Ann. § 21-3-201 to -203, -205 (Michie 1996), which prohibits age discrimination in public employment but does not manifest consent to be sued for such discrimination in federal court. See Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 239-40, 105 S.Ct. 3142, 87 L.Ed.2d 171 (1985) (“A state will be deemed to have waived its immunity only where stated by the most express language or by such overwhelming implication from the text as [will] leave no room for any other reasonable construction.”) (internal quotations omitted); Burk v. Beene, 948 F.2d 489, 493 (8th Cir.1991) . Accordingly, we affirm. 1 . The Honorable
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that tribes did not waive their immunity by intervening in  administrative proceedings because any waiver must be unequivocal and may not be implied
B. holding that the tribal defendants removal of the case amounted to a clear and unequivocal waiver of immunity in federal court
C. holding that the waiver of sovereign immunity must be clear and unequivocal
D. holding that the united states is liable for interest only in the event of a clear statutory waiver of sovereign immunity
E. holding that fraud on the court must be supported by clear unequivocal and convincing evidence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.