Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
751 (1888) (“The provision of the present constitution enlarging the homestead exemption cannot be given retroactive application ... so as to embrace in 1877 all property which in 1859 did not exceed in value the enlarge exemption prescribed by the constitution of 1876, without regard to value in 1877.”); Wright v. Straub, 64 Tex. 64, 66 (1885); McLane v. Paschal, 62 Tex. 102, 106-07 (1884). 12 . See Dallas Power & Light Co. v. Loomis, 672 S.W.2d 309, 310 (Tex.App.—Dallas, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 13 . See In re Niland, 825 F.2d 801, 807 n. 2 (5th Cir.1987) (suggesting that earlier amendments were not retroactive until Tex. Prop. Code § 41.002(c), passed in 1984, applied changes in the definition of homestead to homesteads "whenever created”); In re Starns, 52 B.R. 405, 413 (S.D.Tex.1985) ; In re Barnhart, 47 B.R. 277, 282
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that amendment receives retroactive application because tex propcode  41001c provides retroactivity
B. recognizing that the application of a retroactive amendment is discretionary
C. holding retroactive application
D. holding that retroactive application of statute turns on legislative intent and whether retroactivity works either unconstitutional interference with vested rights or manifest injustice
E. holding no retroactive application
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.