Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the basis of the inside influence or economic leverage of a particular creditor.” H.R.REP. 103-835. State and Federal governments “must abide by the regular processes of the bankruptcy court applicable to all claimants.” 140 Cong.Ree. H10752-01, H10772. III. Conclusion We conclude on the basis of the foregoing discussion that Congress has the authority to abrogate the Eleventh Amendment when it acts pursuant to the powers accorded it under the Bankruptcy Clause, Art. I, § 8, cl. 4; that it expressly and unequivocally did so when it enacted § 113 of the Reform Act, 11 U.S.C. § 106; and that § 113 applies retroactively to this case. Accordingly, the judgment is Reversed and the cause Remanded. 1 . But see Seminole Tribe of Florida v. State of Florida, 11 F.3d 1016, 1023 (11th Cir.1994) . 2 . To the extent 11 U.S.C. § 106(a) could be
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that congress has specifically abrogated the eleventh amendment defense when legislating pursuant to  5 of the fourteenth amendment and its article i  8 plenary power over commerce but refusing to extend authority to abrogate to legislation enacted pursuant to the indian commerce clause the indian gaming regulatory act
B. holding that federal legislation with respect to indian tribes  is not based upon impermissible racial classifications and noting that article i  8 of the constitution gives congress the power to regulate commerce  with the indian tribes
C. holding that congress could abrogate the eleventh amendment pursuant to the commerce clause
D. holding that the eleventh amendment bars con gress from using its power under the indian commerce clause of article i to expand the jurisdiction of the federal courts under article iii
E. holding that congress may abrogate a states immunity pursuant to its enforcement power under  5 of the fourteenth amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.