Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
challenged here was constructed to prevent one thing: seasonal holiday displays of a religious character. The absence of an explicit list of permissible subjects upon which discourse is permissible in this nonpublie forum does not mean that there is no “otherwise includible subject” for discussion in the forum. In Hedges, 9 F.3d at 1296-97, for example, the school board announced two policies prohibiting the distribution of “written material that is of a religious nature” and “written material ... which expresses religious beliefs or points of view.” This court recognized that the policies impliedly allowed the distribution of all other written material, and concluded that the prohibition of religious speech was unconstitutional. See also Good News/Good Sports Club, 28 F.3d at 1506-07 ; Searcey v. Crim, 815 F.2d 1389 (11th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that adam walsh act violates the eighth amendments prohibition against excessive bail and the fifth amendments guarantee of procedural due process
B. holding that adam walsh act violates the eighth amendments prohibition against excessive bail the fifth amendments guarantee of procedural due process and separation of powers
C. holding that a policy generally encouraging the moral character and development of youth by permitting on school premises the boy scouts and girl scouts but not permitting a religious youth organization violates the first amendments prohibition of viewpoint discrimination
D. holding that school policy prohibiting written material of a religious nature violates the fust amendment
E. holding unconstitutional a rule excluding all religious speech as viewpoint discrimination
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.