Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
or none at all." Id. at 110, 69 S.Ct. 463 (citing Central Lumber Co. v. South Dakota, 226 U.S. 157, 160, 33 S.Ct. 66, 57 L.Ed. 164 (1912)). 52 . In support of this conclusion, the Court referenced the following precedent: (1) Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104, 98 S.Ct. 2646, 57 L.Ed.2d 631 (1978) (reaffirming prior holdings that local governments may enact legislation intended to maintain the character and aesthetics of a municipality.); (2) Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas, 416 U.S. 1, 94 S.Ct. 1536, 39 L.Ed.2d 797 (1974) (upholding an ordinance that restricted land use to one-family dwellings on the grounds that a city's police powers encompass maintaining esthetics and societal values.); (3) Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26, 33, 75 S.Ct. 98, 99 L.Ed. 27 (1954)  53 . (Pl.’s Mem. in Supp. of Mot. for Summ.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that it is within the power of the legislature to determine that the community should be beautiful as well as healthy spacious as well as clean wellbalanced as well as carefully patrolled
B. holding that the fourth amendment protects property as well as privacy
C. holding that plaintiff bears burden of production as well as persuasion
D. holding that the state as well as the defendant has a right to rely on compliance with rule 16
E. holding that medical evidence as to nexus to service expressed as very well might have been although not conclusive suffices to well ground claim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.