Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the presentence investigation report. Without holding a hearing, or making findings of fact, the district court imposed the obstruction enhancement. The two-point enhancement increased McKnight’s offense level to 43, mandating that the district court impose a life sentence on McKnight. Because of the life sentence in this case, and the absence of findings to support the obstruction enhancement, we carefully review the record and McKnight’s contentions on appeal. II. Discussion The appellant McKnight first asserts error by the district court in refusing to allow McKnight to withdraw his guilty plea. We reject this claim. The record shows no abuse of discretion by the district court in rejecting this contention. See United States v. Thompson, 906 F.2d 1292, 1295, 1298-99 (8th Cir.1990) . The evidence indicates that McKnight freely
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing the late date of a motion to withdraw filed three weeks before trial
B. holding that district court abused discretion in denying motion to withdraw plea based on intervening supreme court decision that may have rendered factual basis of plea insufficient
C. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to withdraw guilty plea filed three weeks after entering the plea
D. holding the trial court abused its discretion in denying the defendants motion to withdraw his guilty plea because the defendant did not admit to facts demonstrating the required mental state
E. holding that a district courts application of the wrong legal standard on a motion to withdraw a plea constitutes an abuse of discretion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.