Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that the district court erred in reaching this conclusion because 39 U.S.C. § 409 states that “[ejxcept as otherwise provided in this title, the United States district courts shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction over all actions brought by or against the Postal Service.” He also points out that the language of section 3662 is permissive rather than mandatory. See 39 U.S.C. § 3662 (“Any interested person ... may lodge a complaint ... ”) (emphasis added). Mr. Foster made the same arguments before the district court, and that court found them to be unpersuasive. We also consider these arguments to be unavailing. As the district court pointed out, the legislative history of § 3662 suggests that “Congress intended a plaintiff to e LLC, 597 F.3d 1374, 1378 (Fed.Cir.2010) ; Long v. Atlantic City Police Dep’t, 670 F.3d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the standard of review for the sufficiency of the evidence is the same as the standard for denying a motion for a directed verdict
B. holding that state law provides the standard of review for a denial of a rule 50 motion in a diversity case
C. holding that the standard for a motion for judgment on the pleadings is the same as the standard for a motion to dismiss
D. holding that the standard of review for the denial of a motion for reconsideration is governed by the law of the regional circuit
E. holding under third circuit law that the denial of a motion for reconsideration is reviewed for abuse of discretion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.