Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
actions do not fall under section 5-60-101’s lawful exceptions, which include autopsies, embalming, or us ing the body for medical and scientific purposes. Therefore, in viewing the light most favorable to the State, we should give deference to this jury verdict and hold that substantial evidence supported Ham-monds’s conviction of abuse of a corpse. C. Jury instruction I would affirm the circuit court’s refusal to give Hammonds’s proffered jury instruction. Nonmodel jury instructions are to be given only when the trial court finds that the model instructions do not accurately state the law or do not contain the necessary instruction on the subject at hand. Jackson v. State, 359 Ark. 297, 197 S.W.3d 468 (2004); see also Misskelley v. State, 323 Ark. 449, 915 S.W.2d 702 (1996) . Any party that | ^wishes to challenge the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding no error in rejecting the appellants proffered instruction even though that statement was based on language from case law when the amci instruction was a proper statement of the law
B. holding that the requested instruction was not required under rule 4325c because even assuming that the requested instruction was a correct statement of law the trial judge exercised his discretion properly
C. holding that when no objection was made to jury instruction evidence to support finding based on instruction should be assessed in light of the instruction given
D. holding that a prior inconsistent statement was admissible and the defendant failed to ask for a limiting instruction that the jury could not use the statement as substantive evidence
E. holding that even though the reasonable doubt instruction given in the case was not the preferred instruction it was not a misstatement of the law and therefore was legally appropriate
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.