Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
did not obtain legal title to the Property until after November 27, 2002, and most likely not until December 2, 2002. 5 . When constructive fraud in the conduct of the proceedings is alleged, such a judgment may only be entertained by the court if the motion to reopen was filed within one year of the date of the judgment. TP § 14-845(a). 6 . In Mr. Bailey’s affidavit and in the City’s brief, there is language suggesting that, once the City acquired title to the Property by condemnation, any taxes owed were automatically abated or forgiven, or taken as paid. The City has not cited any case or statute to support that assertion, nor have we found any. Indeed, United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in Prince George’s County, Md., 40 F.Supp. 436 (D.Md. 1941), supports a contrary assertion . Here, the City, a local municipalily, was
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property
B. holding that taxes are not private property that can be physically taken by the government
C. holding that property owner still has relief in the form of the return of his property though condemnation was complete and a highway was constructed across the property
D. recognizing that publicly targeting a property for condemnation resulting in economic damage to the owner generally does not give rise to an inverse condemnation cause of action unless there is some direct restriction on use of the property
E. holding that when federal government acquires property through condemnation it must account for state and local property taxes interest and penalties
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.