Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
remedy under state law for employment discrimination claims. Hunt v. Wyle Lab., 997 F.Supp. 84, 91 (D.Mass.1997). Fortucci responds that her claim is not precluded because M.G.L. c. 151B, § 9 states that a claim can be brought in a civil action 90 days after the claim was filed with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination. Even if, for the moment, the Court assumes that Section 9 authorized her to bring a claim, it would be time barred. Under that section, an aggrieved party may bring a civil action “not later than three years af benefit when she is deprived of compensation for services rendered or when the intended purpose of the termination was to benefit the employer at the employee’s expense. Siles v. Travenol Labs., Inc., 13 Mass.App.Ct. 354, 433 N.E.2d 103, 106 (1982) . Fortucci contends that she was deprived of a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding employee not terminated in bad faith because no evidence suggested that employer discharged employee in order to retain em ployees previously earned sales commissions
B. holding that an employer is accountable to a discharged employee for unpaid compensation if the employee was terminated in bad faith and the compensation is clearly connected to work already performed
C. holding that an atwill employee can be discharged for any reason or no reason unless employee is discharged for reasons that contravene a clear mandate of public policy
D. recognizing a contract action when employee terminated in order not to receive earned bonuses or commissions
E. holding that an employee could not establish pretext when the employer in good faith believed that the employee engaged in misconduct regardless whether the employee in fact engaged in the misconduct
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.