Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
at some later date. Id. Therefore, a reasonable basis for the different classification of unwed fathers and unwed mothers in section 78-30-4 is the fact that while identification of both parents of an illegitimate child is necessary, identification of a child’s mother is automatic because of her role in the birth process, while identification of the father is not. A reasonable basis for the different classification of filing and nonfiling fathers is the state’s need to distinguish those fathers who have accepted legal responsibility for the care of their children from those fathers who have not. Id. ¶ 21 Based on this analysis and prior decisions, section 78-30-4.13 does not violate C.F.’s right to equal protection. See Lehr, 463 U.S. at 261-62, 103 S.Ct. at 2993-94, 77 L.Ed.2d 614 ; Wells, 681 P.2d at 204; In re J.P., 648 P.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding transfer rule did not violate federal equal protection
B. holding that statute that imposed different requirements to establish parental rights on father than on mother did not violate fathers right to equal protection under the law
C. holding that termination of fathers parental rights should be reversed since it was done to facilitate childs adoption and would prejudice rights of child and mother to receive support from father
D. holding that doctrine does not violate equal protection
E. holding that new york statutory scheme governing adoption did not violate unmarried fathers right to equal protection by according different legal rights as between birth mother and putative father
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.