Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
taken away by government regulation”) (quoting Allen v. City and County of Honolulu, 58 Haw. 432, 571 P.2d 328, 329 (1977)); Life of the Land, Inc. v. City Council of City & County of Honolulu, 61 Haw. 390, 606 P.2d 866, 902 (1980) ("The doctrine of equitable estoppel is based on a change of position on the part of a land developer by substantial expenditure of money in connection with his project in reliance, not solely on existing zoning laws or on good faith expectancy that his development will be permitted, but on official assurance on which he has a right to rely that his project has met zoning requirements, that necessary approvals will be forthcoming in due course, and he may safely proceed with the project.”); Denning v. County of Maui, 52 Haw. 653, 485 P.2d 1048, 1051 (1971) . 11 . See Pioneer Trust and Savings Bank v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a plaintiff could not show that she engaged in protected activity because she did not present evidence that she informed her employer that her complaints were based on race or age discrimination
B. holding that a person has standing to bring suit under the civil rights act if she or he can show that she or he was punished for trying to vindicate the rights of minorities
C. holding that an individual can waive any process to which he or she has a right
D. holding that a plaintiff can show that she is qualified by presenting credible evidence that she continued to possess the objective qualifications she held when she was hired
E. holding that a zoning estoppel plaintiff must show that he or she has been given assurances of some form by the county that his or her proposed construction met zoning requirements and that he or she had a right lo rely on such assurances
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.