Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Persons at 1091; Stephanie I. Splane, Tort Liability of the Mentally III in Negligence Actions, 93 Yale L.J. 153, 157-58, 169 (1983). 18 Ellis, Tort Responsibility of Mentally Disabled Persons at 1084-85; Splane, Tort Liability of the Mentally III at 156 n.20. 19 In Payne v. Milwaukee Sanitarium Found., Inc., 81 Wis. 2d 264, 270, 260 N.W.2d 386 (1977), the court said: It was not too long ago that hospitals for the mentally ill were known as asylums for the insane. Emphasis was (S.C. Ct. App. 1989), rev'd on other grounds, 412 S.E.2d 417 (S.C. 1991) (observing that for subjective standard to apply, the plaintiffs mental capacity must be diminished to a degree that makes the plaintiff totally unable to appreciate danger); Galindo v. TMT Transp., Inc., 733 P.2d 631 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986) ; Macon-Bibb County Hosp. Auth. v. Appleton,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that due regard describes a standard between ordinary care and recklessness
B. holding that an injured plaintiff with a diminished mental capacity that does not amount to total insanity can be found contributorily negligent but nonetheless should be held to a subjective standard of care
C. holding that standard of care need not be listed separately in report when same standard applies to each health care provider
D. holding employers to an ordinary prudence standard of care
E. holding that ordinary standard of care determines whether a mentally disabled plaintiff can be contributorily negligent
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.