Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
must run while defendant is incarcerated for parole violation); cf. N.Y. Exec. Law § 259-i(3)(x)(D) (stating that harshest penalty for violating post-release supervision served after determinate prison sentence is “reincarceration up to the balance of the remaining period of post-release supervision, not to exceed five years”). In these circumstances, there is no denying that Bussey’s 22-month term of incarceration was served “in connection with” his conviction for a state crime. See Kamagate v. Ashcroft, 385 F.3d 144, 154 (2d Cir.2004) (stating that “in connection with” is expansive term synonymous with “relating to,” “associated with,” “with respect to,” and “with reference to” (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also United States v. Jackson, 426 F.3d 301, 304-05 (5th Cir.2005) . United States v. Garcia-Rodriguez, 640 F.3d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that work release qualified as incarceration
B. holding that the parole commission is required to state reasons for its finding that an inmate continues to be a poor candidate for parole release
C. holding that habeas petition challenging the state boards decision to defer his scheduled parole release date was rendered moot by prisoners release from custody on parole and subsequent incarceration for violating his parole
D. holding federal supervision tolled under  3624e during state incarceration for parole violation
E. holding a sentence is not limited to period of incarceration
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.