Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
disciplinary adjudication and expunge his record if he suffers no harm from the procedural error. Elkin, 969 F.2d at 54. Allowing a federal court to impose such sanctions would undermine the public interest in the proper enforcement of prison disciplinary rules and, therefore, is not justified. Id. Here, the Petitioner fails to identify how he was prejudiced in his ability to provide a defense by the alleged failure to receive advance written notice of the charges. Thus, he has failed to show that he was denied due process. Second, even if Plaintiff received no due process protections prior to his placement in DC custody, he can show no violation because he received regular periodic reviews by the Program Review Committee (PRC). See Shoats v. Horn, 213 F.3d 140 (3d Cir.2000) . Specifically, DC-ADM 801 concerning inmate
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that due process requires that a hearing be held within a reasonable time after confinement to administrative segregation and finding that five days plainly satisfied this requirement
B. holding that an inmate stated a claim under the due process clause when guards had placed her in a cell with a dangerous inmate
C. holding that periodic review by prc of status of prisoner held in administrative confinement for eight years afforded all due process to which inmate was entitled
D. holding that a prisoner is entitled to due process prior to being transferred to a mental hospital
E. holding that punitive conditions of pretrial confinement implicate due process
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.