Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the shootings to any of the charges in the indictment. Its only real probative value is to establish the criminal propensities of those involved. And even if this evidence did have some probative worth, the details of the Amoco double homicide are so chilling that its prejudicial impact substantially outweighs any such probative value. The admission of this evidence thus constitutes error that is plain. See United States v. Lejarde-Rada, 319 F.3d 1288, 1291 (11th Cir.2003) (“It is the law of this circuit that, at least where the explicit language of a statute or rule does not specifically resolve an issue, there can be no plain error where there is no precedent from the Supreme Court or this Court directly resolving it.”); United States v. Gore, 298 F.3d 322, 324-25 (5th Cir.2002) . In sum, admission of this evidence was an
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plain error exists when 1 an error was committed 2 that was plain 3 that affected the defendants substantial rights and 4 the error seriously affects the fairness integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings
B. holding that the courts review is conducted under the plain error standard
C. holding that error was plain when the district courts ruling was obviously contrary to the text of a federal statute
D. holding that any error was harmless and thus not plain error
E. holding that omission was not plain error
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.