Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
waiver of appeal paragraph. This paragraph essentially indicates that the defendant acknowledges that he’s been advised of his rights to appeal only in very limited circumstances and that he will not be allowed to challenge his conviction under Title 28, 2255; and Title 18, Section 3742; however, he is reserving the right to appeal any punishment in excess of the statutory maximum. THE COURT: And the statutory maximum in this case, Mr. McIntyre, at least with respect to Count 3, is 240 months. MR. WELDON: That is correct. THE COURT: You understand that? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. The record thus demonstrates that the district court made McIntyre fully aware of the waiver of his appellate rights regarding his sentence and thus complied with Rule ll(b)(l)(N). Cf. Almany, 598 F.3d at 240-41 . McIntyre’s only argument in opposition to the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that district comets inquiry do you have anything else for the record failed to satisfy requirement that the court clearly ask for objections to the sentence that have not been previously raised
B. holding that verbal threats such as we going to get you you better drop the suit do not rise to the level of adverse action
C. holding that the district courts question do you also understand that under some circumstances you or the government may have the right to appeal any sentence that i impose did not comply with rule llbln and failed to properly notify the defendant about the waiver of his appellate rights
D. holding that if you do not qualify under the hup test you never get to the statute
E. holding that it is not extortion to threaten economic harm when you have a legal right to engage in the activity you threaten
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.