Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
will not be considered by the Supreme Court. If the Court of Civil Appeals did not decide all properly preserved and briefed issues, the Supreme Court may, if it should vacate COCA's opinion, address undecided matters. Hough v. Leonard, 1993 OK 112, ¶ 15-16, 867 P.2d 438, 445-46. 34 . Oklahoma statutes, 12 O.S.2001 § 551 et seq., provide a comprehensive scheme that governs trials. The terms of 12 O.S.2001 § 651 provide: "A new trial is a reexamination in the same court, of an issue of fact or of law or both, after a verdict by a jury, the approval of the report of a referee, or [a claim of fundamental prejudicial error in the verdict form] is insufficient to warrant reversal of the verdict and judgment of the jury.” LPCX Corp. v. Faulkner, 1991 OK 46, ¶ 32, 818 P.2d 431, 440-41 ; In Nichols v. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co.,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that appellants failure to have trial proceedings transcribed precluded appellate review of whether trial court gave jury improper instruction
B. holding that licensee was not estopped from challenging the validity of a trademark
C. holding defendants were precluded from challenging the validity of jury verdict forms for failure to have complained at trial
D. recognizing that verdict must be affirmed by jury in open court to have force and validity
E. holding bars failure to present evidence on an issue to which the parties had stipulated precluded the attorney from challenging the accuracy of the finding
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.