Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Alleged Negligence Regarding Chock Straps and Lighting Plaintiff also contends that his workplace was unsafe because (a) the Nissan vehicle that allegedly injured him was “over-restrained,” such that it inched forward when plaintiff removed the chock straps securing it, Appellant’s Br. at 28, and (b) it was too dark for him to see the license plate holder. The district court noted that these claims “need not be considered” because plaintiff raised them for the first time in opposition to summary judgment. Hr’g Tr. at 16. We agree with the district court. See Greenidge v. Allstate Ins. Co., 446 F.3d 356, 361 (2d Cir.2006) (declining to reach merits of argument raised for first time in opposition to summary judgment); Syracuse Broad. Corp. v. Newhouse, 236 F.2d 522, 525 (2d Cir.1956) ; see also 5 Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding argument not raised in opening brief but raised for the first time in reply brief was waived
B. holding that an argument raised for the first time in response to defendants motion to dismiss instead of in an amended complaint was not properly raised before the district court and would not be considered on appeal
C. holding that claims raised for the first time in an opposition to a motion for summary judgment are not properly before a court
D. holding that arguments not raised in opposition to a motion for summary judgment are waived
E. holding that district court was justified in brushfing aside further argument not alleged in complaint but raised for first time in opposition to summary judgment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.