Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
See California ex rel. Cooper v. Mitchell Bros.’ Santa Ana Theater, 454 U.S. 90, 92, 102 S.Ct. 172, 70 L.Ed.2d 262 (1981); see also Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union, 542 U.S. 656, 679, 124 S.Ct. 2788, 159 L.Ed.2d 690 (2004) (Scalia, J., dissenting) (defining “prurient interest” as “seek[ing] a sexual response from”). Whether an image appeals to a prurient interest is a question of fact for a jury to determine. See Smith v. United States, 481 U.S. 291, 300-01, 97 S.Ct. 1756, 52 L.Ed.2d 324 (1977) ( ss of whether or not they subjectively wish to view sexually explicit or obscene materials, may be treated by the State as legally unable to consent to do so. See, e.g., Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville, 422 U.S. 205, 212-14, 214 n. 10-11, 95 S.Ct. 2268, 45 L.Ed.2d 125 (1975) . Such is the case under 18 U.S.C. § 1470, in
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing the states undoubted police power to protect children its power to adopt more stringent controls on communicative materials available to youths than on those available to adults and its ability to suppress from minors material obscene as to them
B. recognizing broad district court discretion to stay proceedings as an incident to its power to control its docket
C. holding that the power to terminate a contract atwill subsumes the power to modify its terms
D. holding that the subpoena power of a court cannot be more extensive than its jurisdiction
E. recognizing the federal courts ability to impose inherent power sanctions on parties
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.