Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
478 U.S. 675, 684, 106 S.Ct. 3159, 3165, 92 L. Ed.2d 549, 559 (1986). Moreover, we agree with the trial court that there is little doubt that, in the context of a boarding school, the school effectively acted as the “household” within which the abusive conduct occurred. The school acted in a parental capacity to the students within its care, providing for them necessary shelter, food, education, recreation, and succor. Its control over and duty of care for the students housed within its confines did not markedly differ from that assumed by parents. See Dale v. Boy Scouts of Am., 160 N.J. 562, 602, 734 A.2d 1196 (1999), rev’d on other grounds, 530 U.S. 640, 120 S.Ct. 2446, 147 L. Ed.2d 554 (2000). Compare Smith v. Estate of Kelly, 343 N.J.Super. 480, 502, 778 A.2d 1162 (App.Div.2001) . In a very real sense, the school and its
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that requiring church to make contributions to workers compensation fund opposed by such church did not violate first amendment
B. holding that the catholic church was not within a parishioners household
C. holding church services constitute property within meaning of  548
D. holding that denial of tax exemption for part of church property that was not necessary for occupancy and enjoyment of church did not violate first amendment
E. holding that irs examination of corporate minute books of a church to determine whether it qualified for tax exemption was not unconstitutional interference with religious affairs of the church under the first amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.