Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
claims on direct appeal. This court affirmed Mr. Blandin’s conviction and sentence without a written opinion. Blandin v. State, 27 So.3d 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (table). Mr. Blandin filed a timely motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, raising in Ground I the ineffective assistance of counsel claims that were previously raised in his amended motion for new trial. In summarily denying these claims, the postconviction court erroneously found them to be barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. In Corzo v. State, 806 So.2d 642, 645 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), this court held that when an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is raised on direct appeal and the appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed witho DCA 1984) . Mr. Blandin’s case cannot be distinguished on
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the postconviction court erred in finding the ineffective assistance of counsel claim proeedurally barred because the courts opinion did not comment specifically on the ineffective counsel argument and the overall holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the jurys verdict could not be viewed as an adjudication on the merits of the ineffective assistance claim
B. holding that to the extent defendants claim is one of ineffective assistance of counsel it is not cognizable on direct appeal and rule 2915 is the exclusive procedure by which a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel can be advanced
C. recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel
D. holding that defendant may raise claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal only if ineffective assistance is conclusive from the record
E. holding that the defendants ineffective assistance of counsel claims which were raised in a motion for a new trial and challenged on direct appeal were not barred in postconviction by the doctrine of res judicata because the defendants conviction and sentence were affirmed without a written opinion expressly addressing the claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.