Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
[the father] to [the mother] in the sum of $2,730.00.” The trial court further ordered the father to pay the attorney for the mother the sum of $2,789.08 within 180 days for the fees incurred in the action. The father filed a timely postjudgment motion, which the trial court granted in part and denied in part. The father timely appealed to this court. The father first argues that the trial court erred in awarding the mother “living expense assistance.” The father contends that Alabama law does not recognize such an award, except for periodic alimony, which, he says, the mother did not request and could not recover. The father further notes that the mother petitioned only for postminority support for their adult disabled daughter, see Ex parte Brewington, 445 So.2d 294, 297 (Ala.1983) , which, he says, can be awarded only in
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that third party may not recover contribution against parent where child has no cause of action against parent for negligent supervision
B. holding that court in habeas petition has no authority to condition visitation right of parent upon payment for support and maintenance
C. recognizing that a parent can petition for postminority support for a disabled child
D. holding that a superior court can adjudicate a child as a child in need of aid based on the acts of just one parent
E. recognizing duty of parent to control conduct of child
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.