Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
When no definite term is set forth in a contract, the contract is terminable at will. Maddaloni v. Western Mass. Bus Lines, Inc., 386 Mass. 877, 879, 438 N.E.2d 351 (1982); Simons v. American Dry Ginger Ale Co., 335 Mass. at 524-25, 140 N.E.2d 649; Fall River Housing Joint Tenants Council, Inc. v. Fall River Housing Auth., 15 Mass.App.Ct. 992, 994, 448 N.E.2d 70 (1983) and cases cited. Mass Cash does not dispute the lack of dura-tional term in the contract, but it seeks to fit its contract into the category of cases which hold that where a contract contemplates the achievement of a definite end, but is silent as to its duration, a reasonable time is implied based on all relevant evidence. See, e.g., Thermo Electron Corp. v. Schiavone Construction Co., 958 F.2d 1158, 1164 (1st Cir.1992) ; Bushkin Assoc., Inc. v. Raytheon Co., 815
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an allegation as to the time of the offense is not an essential element of the offense charged in the indictment and within reasonable time limits proof of any date before the return of the indictment and within the statute of limitations is sufficient
B. holding that statutorilyrequired settlement of corporate net income taxes must be performed within the prescribed time limits
C. holding that the relevant time is the time of the employment decision
D. holding that for a suit to be brought in the venue in which the contract was to be performed the contract must expressly state where the performance of the contract was to occur
E. holding contract to sell a project which contained no time limits was to be performed within a reasonable time as determined by the court based on all the evidence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.