Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
opportunity to do so, the court deprived Taylor a meaningful opportunity to prove bias. The majority distinguishes Herndon on the basis that here “the district court asked all of the jurors about the extent to which they were aware of the reported remark.” Maj. Op. 350. This characterization of the facts omits the critical fact that the court did not question Juror One (and only Juror One) whether she could contin trict court must provide the defendant a meaningful opportunity to prove [juror bias]”); United States v. Walker, 1 F.3d 423, 431 (6th Cir.1993) (“By denying the reasonable request to inquire into the jurors’ states of mind, the defendants were deprived of the opportunity to meet their burden of proving actual juror bias----”); see also Remmer, 347 U.S. at 230, 74 S.Ct. 450 . The majority correctly obseryes that Taylor
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that to determine whether a statement was voluntary the court must consider the totality of all the surrounding circumstances  both the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation and decide  whether a defendants will was overborne by the circumstances surrounding the giving of a confession
B. holding that although this court affords broad discretion to the district court in determining the type of investigation necessary to determine juror bias the district court must provide the defendant a meaningful opportunity to prove the same
C. holding that because parties elected to bring the case to the appellate court in the first instance the appeal could not then be dismissed just to confer jurisdiction upon the district court to determine the issues
D. holding that it was permissible to ask whether a juror would consider death sentence if juror determined aggravating circumstances outweighed mitigating circumstances
E. holding that the district court should determine the circumstances the impact thereof upon the juror and whether or not it was prejudicial in a hearing with all interested parties permitted to participate
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.