Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and diligence that is exercised by pastoral care providers. Pastoral care provider can only mean one thing. Some jurisdictions have attempted to characterize the tort of clergy malpractice as an action for breach of a fiduciary relationship. The allegation of a breach of fiduciary duty, however, is “simply an elliptical way to state a clergy malpractice claim.” Dausch, supra, 52 F.3d at 1428. Plaintiffs third count for breach of fiduciary duty is explicit that it is only in Reverend MacDonell’s capacity “as pastoral care provider and pastoral counselor to her” that he breached any fiduciary duty. The authorities cited by the Court, ante at 563-64, 696 A.2d at 703-04 concern the law of wills, trusts, and property. See Gray v. Ward, 929 S.W.2d 774, 1996 WL 364794 at *8 (Mo.Ct.App.1996) . Absent such interests, analyzing and defining
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding general fiduciary duties of confidence trust loyalty and good faith insufficient to establish the necessary fiduciary relationship for purposes of  523a4
B. holding that to establish an exception to the statute of frauds it must first be shown that an agreement to convey was actually reached that an oral contract must be established by clear and convincing evidence and that the chapter 7 trustee failed to establish that there was any parol contract for conveyance of property from debtors parents to the debtor
C. holding that the end of a conspiracy must be affirmatively shown
D. holding that to establish a fiduciary relationship under restatement of torts and missouri law it must be shown that the cleric possessed or managed things of value
E. holding that missouri law applied to the plaintiffs breach of fiduciary duty claim because it is corporate law that defines the contours of that duty
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.