Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
them. The same .result applies in this case. Section 679.4061(1)⅛ provision governing discharge upon assignment establishes a rule of contract performance: it determines how a party to a contract may discharge an obligation to make payment on an account created by virtue of that contract—i.e., how it can perform its contractual obligation to pay—after the party has been notified the account has been assigned. Cf. Bldg. Materials Corp., 972 So.2d at 1092 (applying section 679.4061(1) in the context-of a claim for'breach of contract). The 'Department all but concedes that this rule would govern in a contract dispute between private parties. For the reasons we have explained, the rule governs here as well. See also Mooney v. Univ. Sys. of Md., 178 Md.App. 637, 943 A.2d 108, 110-12 (2008) , reversed on other grounds, 407 Md. 390, 966
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a state may waive its sovereign immunity
B. holding that sovereign immunity did not protect state agency from liability based on failure to pay assignee of contractual account receivable
C. holding that sovereign immunity does not protect the state from claims for statutory employment benefits that constitute a protected property interest
D. holding governmental immunity is no defense to contractual liability
E. holding that the commission is a commonwealth agency entitled to sovereign immunity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.