Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the stop of Johnson’s vehicle had not been converted to an impoundment, the mobility requirement of the automobile exception was satisfied. In conclusion, the searching officers had probable cause to believe that defendant’s backpack contained evidence of a crime, and the vehicle in which it was found was mobile when stopped. Therefore, the search was justified by the automobile exception. Affirmed. 1 Defendant does not appeal from two additional convictions for manufacture of a controlled substance and two further convictions for possession of a controlled substance. 2 Defendant does not contend that, because he had no interest in the vehicle, there was insufficient evidence to connect him with the contraband in the trunk. Cf. State v. Herrin, 323 Or 188, 194, 915 P2d 953 (1996) . 3 Therefore, cases addressing the mobility of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that officers lacked objective probable cause to search the defendants car and belongings where drug paraphernalia was found in possession of passengers with no interest in the vehicle and there was no reason to believe that either passenger had additional property with her
B. holding that defendants suspect activity in the trunk and passenger compartment of his car immediately after he engaged in an apparent drug sale established probable cause to search the vehicle for drugs and drug money
C. holding that the officers examination revealed that there was probable cause to believe that the property was stolen
D. holding that officers had objective probable cause to search the pocket of a jacket found on the seat of the defendants truck where the discovery of marijuana in two different locations in the truck combined with the defendants possession of marijuana reasonably led officers to believe that other caches would be found elsewhere in the vehicle
E. holding that passengers lacked any reasonable expectation of privacy and therefore had no standing to challenge the search of the vehicle
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.