Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
upon the argument that parole is a "privilege.” 5 LaFave § 10.10(b), at 525-26. The United States Supreme Court rejected this theory two years after the Iowa Supreme Court did. See Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 482, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 2601, 33 L.Ed.2d 484, 495 (1972). The Court stated: It is hardly useful any longer to try to deal with this problem in terms of whether the parolee's liberty is a "right” or a "privilege.” By whatever name, the liberty is valuable and must be seen as within the protection of the Fourteenth Amendment. Id. 4 . Our ultimate resolution of this case does not render the conditions of a parole agreement unenforceable. The State may ordinarily impose any reasonable condition on the grant of parole. Cf. State v. Valin, 724 N.W.2d 440, 445-46, 448-49 (Iowa 2006) . A violation of that condition can result in a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a defendant who scored more than sixty points on his sentencing scoresheet and was not convicted of an offense specifically referenced in the drug offender probation statute was ineligible to receive drug offender probation
B. holding that probation and suspension of sentence may not be revoked based solely on a violation or criminal offense that was committed before the offender was actually placed on probation
C. recognizing that probation condition required probationer to enter into and successfully complete a sex offender treatment program but finding that no condition of probation was imposed that required him to admit to a counselor the sexual acts charged
D. holding that probation is not a sentence
E. recognizing the state may impose reasonable conditions of probation but holding that a probation condition requiring a sex offender who was convicted of operating while intoxicated to be subjected to a penile plethysmograph exam for sexual arousal was unreasonable
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.