Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(2004). “Common issues ... predominate if they ‘ha[ve] a direct impact on every class member’s effort to establish liability and on every class member’s entitlement to injunctive and monetary relief.’ ” Klay v. Humana, Inc., 382 F.3d 1241, 1255 (11th Cir.2004) (citation omitted). Each party must be able to prove their own individual case, and in so doing, prove the case of the other unnamed class members. See Earnest v. Amoco Oil Co., 859 So.2d 1255, 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). If Plaintiffs must still present a great deal of individualized proof or argue individualized legal points to establish most or all of the elements of their claims, class certification is not appropriate. See Klay, 382 F.3d at 1255; see also Terry L. Braun, P.A. v. Campbell, 827 So.2d 261 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) . A. Failure to prove elements of claims Here,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that fmla does not impose individual liability
B. holding no individual liability under the adea
C. holding that where both liability and damages depend on individual factual determinations claims may only be determined on individual basis
D. holding jurisdiction over an individual may not usually be predicated on jurisdiction over a corporation unless the corporation is the alter ego of the individual or when the individual perpetrates a fraud
E. holding that there is no individual liability under title vii
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.