Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
outcome of the plea process.” Id. At the evidentiary hearing on his motion, Movant made no assertions that his trial counsel failed to adequately explain the charges against him or failed to object to the factual basis underlying his plea. In fact, in his testimony at the evi-dentiary hearing, Movant asserted his trial counsel wrongly advised him to plead guilty because she had failed to investigate three potential witnesses and she failed to explore certain issues relating to one of the victim’s in his case. Accordingly, the issue raised in Movant’s point relied on was not presented to the motion court in his Rule 24.035 motion and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. Day v. State, 208 S.W.3d 294, 295 (Mo.App.2006); see Amrine v. State, 785 S.W.2d 531, 535 (Mo. banc 1990) . Moreover, plain error review is not available
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding ineffectiveness cannot be raised for first time on appeal
B. holding that issues not properly presented to the bankruptcy court  cannot be raised  for the first time on appeal
C. holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
D. holding that claims which were not presented to the motion court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
E. holding that issues not raised before the district court cannot be asserted for the first time on appeal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.