Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
not been briefed and because the case can be resolved under sufh-ciency-of-the-evidence review, we assume without holding that a penis is not an "object” within the meaning of § 2246(2)(C). 3 . Additionally, Rule 412 also would bar the admission of this evidence. When a party seeks to offer evidence that “someone other than the defendant was the source of semen, injury, or other physical evidence,” the party is required to file a motion describing the proposed evidence at least fourteen days before trial and to notify the victim of the proposed evidence. Fed.R.Evid. 412(c)(1). Here, Brown Thunder neglected to file a Rule 412 motion and failed to notify H.C. or her guardian or representative of the proposed Speker evidence. See United States v. Eagle, 137 F.3d 1011, 1015 (8th Cir.1998)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in its ruling whether to proceed with a declaratory judgment action
B. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in striking fact statements that did not comply with the local rules
C. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence based upon the defendants noncompliance with the deadlines in rule 412c
D. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding hearsay evidence and evidence that violated the best evidence rule in deciding a summary judgment motion
E. holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the testimony of a witness that was not highly probative
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.