Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
properly bring a disciplinary action against a prisoner for filing a grievance that is determined by those officials to be without merit anymore than they can properly bring a disciplinary action against a prisoner for filing a lawsuit that is judicially determined to be without merit. That the Constitution does not obligate the state to establish a grievance 'procedure is, we believe, of no consequence here.... Sprouse v. Babcock, 870 F.2d 450, 452 (8th Cir. 1989) (emphasis added). Indeed, the Eighth Circuit recognizes that (1) an inmate possesses a First Amendment right to be free from retaliation for filing a grievance, id., while simultaneously recognizing that (2) an inmate does not have a due process “liberty interest in access to [a grievance] procedure,” Flick, 9 th Cir. 2006) . Like our sister circuits, we see no
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing retaliation involving promotion as adverse employment actions under the first amendment
B. recognizing that first amendment provides qualified right of access to judicial documents
C. recognizing first amendment petition right where inmate alleged retaliation for filing grievances
D. recognizing first amendment retaliation claim where official filed a disciplinary report following an inmates filing of a grievance
E. recognizing first amendment retaliation right
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.