Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
bank is probably prohibited from dishonoring the check that is otherwise valid. Finally, case law dealing with similar facts has addressed whether the creditor must turn over the funds, not its receipt of the property after lawful presentment of a negotiable instrument. See, e.g., In re Thomas, 311 B.R. 75, 79-80 (Bankr. W.D.Mo.2004). The Seventh Circuit’s decision in In re Roete, 936 F.2d 963 (7th Cir.1991), is not instructive as the check in that case was dishonored. The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf 516 U.S. 16, 116 S.Ct. 286, 133 L.Ed.2d 258 (1995), also is not helpful because the bank froze the debtor’s account without violating the automatic stay to preserve its setoff rights, and setoff rights are not present 290 B.R. 487 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2003) ; In re Boscia, 237 B.R. 184
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding creditor willfully violated the automatic stay in refusing after notified of debtors bankruptcy filing to turn over debtors funds in his possession
B. holding refusal to turn over property seized prepetition constituted violation of stay once notice of the stay had been given
C. holding that the automatic stay terminates as to the debtor personally and as to his nonestate property but that the stay persists as to property of the bankruptcy estate
D. holding that creditors failure to voluntarily turn over property lawfully seized prepetition constituted violation of automatic stay
E. holding secured creditors refusal to turn over property of debtors estate to debtor upon demand constituted an exercise of control over such property in violation of automatic stay
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.