Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
which a fair-minded jury could find that intentional racial discrimination on the part of the Defendants caused Andromeda to close. See Denny, 456 F.3d at 434. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss Count III. VI. Supplemental Jurisdiction The rulings above dispose of Plaintiffs’ federal claims. The state law claims (Counts VI-V) remain. This Court could retain the state law claims only by exercising its supplemental jurisdiction. This case does not, however, present a compelling reason for this Court to decide claims that arise solely under state law. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Counts VI-V. The dismissal is without prejudice so that they may be refilled in state court if Plaintiffs so elect. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); Revene v. Charles County Commr’s, 882 F.2d 870, 875 (4th Cir.1989) . VII. Conclusion For the reasons stated
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the lower court should have entered a final order on custody
B. holding appeal from an order dismissing action without prejudice was properly before this court
C. holding that a district court retained supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiffs statelaw claims after dismissing the plaintiffs federal claims and did not abuse its discretion by declining to remand the case to state court
D. holding that an order dismissing a claim without prejudice is a final appealable order if the statute of limitations for that claim has expired
E. holding that the district courts order dismissing the pendent statelaw claims  should have been entered without prejudice
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.