Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
disclosure: “A record of an agency relating to a noncriminal investigation, including: .., -[i]nvestigative materials, notes, correspondence and reports.” Section 708(b)(17)(ii) of the RTKL (emphasis added). In the absence of definitions in the. RTKL for either “noncriminal” or “investigation,” we have concluded .that “noncriminal” applies to investigations- other than those which are criminal in nature and that “investigation” means “a systematic or searching inquiry, a detailed examination, or an official probe.” Dep’t of Health v. Office of Open Records, 4 A.3d 803, 810-811 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010). The inquiry, examination, or probe must be “conducted as part , of the agency’s official duties.” Id. at 814. See also Dep’t of Pub. Welfare v. Chawaga, 91 A.3d 257, 259 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2014) . In the present case, the OOR determined that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an official probe must be conducted pursuant to an agencys legislatively granted factfinding and investigative powers
B. holding that an agencys reasonable reading of an ambiguous statute must be affirmed
C. holding that the evidence must be sufficient to support the agencys findings of fact and that the agencys inferences from those facts must be reasonable
D. holding an action taken by an administrative agency in excess of its statutory powers is the well recognized exception to the general rule that an agencys final order  is immune from collateral attack
E. recognizing a state agencys powers are limited to 1
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.