Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
his misrepresentations was justifiable. Mr. Ragonese strenuously argues that it was not, based upon the Falcones’ knowledge of certain facts, including the incompleteness of the project, Mr. Ragonese’s history of absence from the project, and the threatened subcontractor’s lien. Although Mr. Ragonese argues cursorily in his brief that the bankruptcy court erred in finding that his misrepresentations caused the Falcones’ loss, he excluded this issue from his Statement of Issues. During oral argument, Mr. Ra-gonese admitted that he had not raised the causation issue below and that he included it in his brief on appeal essentially as an afterthought. We therefore deem the causation issue waived. See City Sanitation, LLC v. Burdick (In re Am. Cartage, Inc.), 438 B.R. 1, 9-10 (D.Mass.2010) . The Falcones argue that their rebanee on Mr.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that where issue raised for first time on appeal was not encompassed or inferred by any listed issue it is waived
B. holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
C. holding that an issue not raised on appeal is waived
D. holding that court will not consider issue raised for first time on appeal
E. holding issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.