Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
6 . The appellant raises the following AOEs: 1) The guilty findings for all child pornography offenses are legally insufficient because the Government failed to introduce evidence that 18 U.S.C. § 2252A existed at the time of the appellant’s offenses; 2) The specification alleging an attempt to entice a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity fails to state an offense by not expressly alleging an underlying state statute criminalizing the activity; 3) The military judge erred when he admitted over defense objection evidence of uncharged misconduct from the appellant's statements to Naval Criminal Investigative Service; 4) The military judge erred where he admitted over defense objection at *10-12, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11429, at *32-38 (E.D.Wis. Feb. 16, 2007) . 15 . Although we decline to accept the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that boards findings were insufficient where they merely repeated language of relevant statute and rejecting claim that voting foims of the members of the board which also simply mirrored the language of the relevant statute without specific findings were findings sufficient to permit judicial review
B. holding when a statute defines manner or means of committing an offense indictment need not allege matters beyond the language of the statute
C. recognizing that a 2422b indictment that merely tracks the language of the statute without identifying an underlying statute may be insufficient
D. recognizing that an indictment may be dismissed in part
E. holding that the statute qualifies as an exemption 3 statute
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.