Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
is not the test.” Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974). III. DISCUSSION A. Section 1983 and Constitutional Claims Defendants correctly argue that plaintiffs § 1983 claim, through which he seeks vindication of a variety of constitutional rights, is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The time limitations for § 1983 claims are governed by the state’s statute of limitations for personal injury actions. Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 266-67, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985) (“When Congress has not established a time limitation for a federal cause of action, the settled practice has been to adopt a local time limitation as federal law ... ”); Jones v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co., 541 U.S. 369, 372, 124 S.Ct. 1836, 158 L.Ed.2d 645 (2004) . In Connecticut, the limitations period for
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing a fouryear statute of limitation for fraud claims
B. holding that the oneyear statute of limitations set out in 28 usc  2244d applies to  2241 petitions
C. holding that new uniform fouryear statute of limitations in 28 usc  1658 only applies to lawsuits made possible by post1990 enactments
D. holding that fouryear residual statute of limitations applied to claim for commonlaw rescission
E. holding that 28 usc  2401 is a jurisdictional statute of limitations
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.