Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the plea-agreement-disclosure requirement. Although Wilder did not testify pursuant to a plea agreement, the Court finds that the prosecutor’s repeated reference to the “minimal” benefit afforded Wilder for his testimony was improper. The Court also finds that the prosecutor’s statements tended to mislead the jury, prejudiced Petitioner by hamstringing his efforts to explore fully Wilder’s motives for testifying, and were deliberately placed before the jury by the prosecutor. In addition, considered in the context of the relative weakness of the prosecution’s case, which relied heavily on Wilder’s testimony and the testimony of admitted drug dealers, the prosecutor’s misconduct rendered the trial fundamentally unfair. See Scott v. Foltz, 612 F.Supp. 50, 58 (E.D.Mich.1985) (Cohn, J.) . The Court finds that the state court’s
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the prosecutors statement about a witnesss truthfulness was proper because the evidence showed that the witness complied with the plea agreement not that he told the truth simply because he entered into the plea agreement
B. holding specific performance of plea agreement proper remedy where defendant testified against all of his coconspirators and where court later unilaterally breached original plea agreement by imposing a ninety day term of incarceration in addition to sentence of probation that had been earlier agreed to without first providing1 defendant with opportunity to withdraw plea on the record
C. holding witnesss false testimony regarding plea agreement was reasonably likely to have impacted the jurys judgment where case essentially amounted to a credibility contest between the witness who testified falsely regarding a plea agreement and the defendant
D. holding that where judgment and sentence for nonexistent crime had to be vacated upon remand the state shall have the option of withdrawing from the entire plea agreement since the plea agreement was based on a material mistake of law which works to the benefit of the defendant
E. holding that a defendant must have knowledge of the likely consequences of entering the guilty plea in order for a plea to be voluntary and knowing
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.