Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
conferred upon the commissioners court by law. Commissioners Court of Titus County, 940 S.W.2d at 80; Ector County, 843 S.W.2d at 479. Therefore, it is beyond dispute that the district court’s jurisdiction includes appellate jurisdiction and general supervisory control over the county commissioners court, and that jurisdiction can only be invoked under the circumstances just described. The issue squarely before us is how that jurisdiction is invoked. Invoking the Distr ex.App.-E1 Paso 1993, no writ) (noting that a formal action or suit must be filed in order for district court to exercise its superviso ry control over the commissioners court); Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Liberty-Danville Fresh Water Supply District No. 1, 506 S.W.2d 931, 934 (Tex.Civ.App.-Tyler 1974, writ refd n.r.e.) ; J.R. Phillips Investment Company v. Road
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a plenary suit is required to invoke the district courts supervisory control over the commissioners court
B. recognizing the supervisory power of appellate courts
C. recognizing plenary power of district court to alter interlocutory orders
D. holding that while town counsel had final supervisory authority over the hiring and firing of employees in plaintiffs position it did not have supervisory authority over the mayors constructive discharge of plaintiff
E. holding that the supervisory control of the district court may be exercised through its equitable jurisdiction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.