Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
on December 7, 1990. Since Hodari D. was not decided by the Supreme Court until April 23, 1991, the district court did not have the benefit of its guidance in ruling on these motions. Hodari D.’s predecessors include Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 328-32, 110 S.Ct. 2412, 2415-17, 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990) (defining and distinguishing the government’s burdens regarding reasonable suspicion and probable cause); Brower v. Inyo County, 489 U.S. 593, 596, 109 S.Ct. 1378, 1381-83, 103 L.Ed.2d 628 (1989) (where a suspect was caught when stolen car he was driving at high speeds to elude pursuing police, crashed into police roadblock, holding there was not a "stop” until the suspect crashed into a blockade); United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 9, 109 S.Ct. 1581, 1586, 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989) . 9 . See Brower, 489 U.S. at 596, 109 S.Ct. at
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that factors that ordinarily constitute innocent behavior may provide a composite picture sufficient to raise reasonable suspicion
B. holding innocent facts when considered together can give rise to reasonable suspicion
C. holding that such factors may constitute a substantial burden
D. holding that while each separate item standing alone did not provide reasonable suspicion a combination of factors clearly satisfied the reasonable suspicion requirement
E. holding that factors which by themselves were quite consistent with innocent travel collectively amounted to reasonable suspicion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.