Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
commitments, the City has remained determined to implement the Lodi Environmental Remediation Program without imposing the burden of Site response costs on the City's innocent taxpayers or ratepayers. Accordingly, the City has sought to borrow from the capital markets additional funds on terms that would not impact the general or special funds of the City of Lodi. To that end, the City of Lodi identified a lender that was willing to provide funds to the City of Lodi for implementation of the Lodi Environmental Remediation Program on terms acceptable to the City Council. 33 . To date, we have declined to decide whether a municipality is a "private party” or the "State,” i.e., the government, for purposes of CERCLA § 107(a)(4). See Washington State Dep’t of Transp., 59 F.3d at 800 & n. 5 . Thus, it is not clear whether Lodi would
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding agencies of state government are part of the state for purposes of sovereign immunity
B. recognizing that state agencies which are independent of the state are citizens of the state
C. holding that state agencies are treated as states under the eleventh amendment
D. holding that state administrative departments and agencies are within cerclas definition of state under  107a4 and declining to reach the question whether a municipality is the state under that provision
E. holding that the state police is a state agency
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.