Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
may "take judicial notice of a document filed in another court ... to establish the fact of such litigation and related filings.” Global Network Commc’ns, Inc. v. City of New York, 458 F.3d 150, 157 (2d Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). 4 . The district court did not reach the defendants' other arguments for dismissal, including Best Buy and Speakeasy’s argument that RTI’s claim that they “assisted” in filing the California Action did not satisfy the plausibility standard for pleading, see Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678-80, 129 S.Ct. 1937, and the Covad Defendants’ argument that they were not bound by the Agreement. Because we affirm the district court's dismissal under Lear, we do not reach these arguments. 5 . Cf. Aro Corp. v. Allied Witan Co., 531 F.2d 1368, 1374 (6th Cir.1976) . 6 . This case differs from MCA in that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the rationale of the consent decree cases was fully applicable where a stipulated dismissal and settlement resolved pending patent litigation and there were other licensees and alleged infringers who had an incentive to challenge the patents validity
B. recognizing that in patent infringement eases a finding of noninfringement prevents a court from reaching an affirmative defense asserting the patents invalidity because the validity issue becomes immaterial to the disposition of the case and that any determination of the patents validity by the district court in such a case should be vacated
C. holding that applicable federal patent law made patents personal and unassignable without consent of the licensor
D. holding that the complaint placed the defendant on notice when it alleged ownership of the asserted patent named the individual defendants cited the patents that are allegedly infringed described the means by which the defendants allegedly infringed the patents and pointed to specific sections of the patent law invoked
E. holding that a dismissal of a defendant who did not agree to settlement is not a favorable termination if dismissal of that defendant was a condition of settlement
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.