Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(Pl.’s Opp. at 20.) Plaintiff is correct that subsection (d)(2) of section 476 authorizes Indian tribes to bring lawsuits “to enforce the provisions” of the IRA in federal court; however, this language alone does not a sovereign immunity waiver make. Indeed, as this Court reads subsection (d)(2), Congress is speaking to the power of a federal court to consider cases of this nature (actions to enforce the provisions of the IRA), and does not mention who may properly be named as a defendant in any such suit, much less expressly permit such enforcement actions to proceed against the United States. Consequently, subsection (d)(2) is, at most, ambiguous as far as the defense of sovereign immunity is concerned, and that section therefore fails to qualif ’n, 89 F.3d 897, 901 (D.C.Cir.1996) . Instead, courts considering whether a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the united states is liable for interest only in the event of a clear statutory waiver of sovereign immunity
B. holding that federal courts have no subject matter jurisdiction to hear a claim against the united states or one of its agencies absent a clear waiver of sovereign immunity
C. holding that 28 usc  1331 does not constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity
D. holding that 28 usc  1331 which states that district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the constitution laws or treaties of the united states does not constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity
E. holding that 28 usc  1361 which provides that district courts shall have original jurisdiction  to compel an officer or employee of the united states  to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff does not constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.