Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(Miss.1989); Whitehurst v. State, 540 So.2d 1319, 1327 (Miss.1989); Gangl v. State, 539 So.2d 132, 135-36 (Miss. 1989); Griffin v. State, 533 So.2d 444, 447-48 (Miss.1988). The statute does not discuss amendments to the indictment, but permits the submission of lesser included offense instructions. Sanders v. State, 479 So.2d 1097, 1105 (Miss.1985). Larceny is a lesser included offense of robbery, in that larceny contains all of robbery’s elements save force or threat of force. Jones v. State, 567 So.2d 1189, 1192 (Miss.1990). Moreover, several other states allow prosecution-sponsored amendments to lesser included offenses because the defendant is presumed to be on notice of lesser included offenses to the original charge. Williams v. United States, 641 A.2d 479, 482-83 (D.C. 1994) . See also Green v. State, 619 So.2d 952, 953
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a defendants fifth amendment rights were violated when an interpreter was withdrawn by the court
B. holding fifth amendment not violated under above rationale
C. holding that the fifth amendment did not apply to tribal government
D. holding the same with respect to violations of the fifth amendment
E. holding that the statement ill take the fifth was an assertion of the fifth amendment privilege
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.