Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
its services in commerce. See OBH, 86 F.Supp.2d at 186; Planned Parenthood, 1997 WL 133313 at *3. The court considers each of Plaintiffs assertions in turn. 1. Hyperlinks The use of a plaintiffs trademark as the domain name for a website satisfies the “commercial use” requirement if the website contains a hyperlink that connects users to another of a defendant’s websites if it operates for “commercial purposes.” See OBH, 86 F.Supp.2d at 185-86. However, where a “website contain[s] no commercial links, but rather contain[s] links to a [website], which in turn contain[s] advertising” or has a commercial purpose, this does not satisfy the “commercial use requirement of the statute.” See Bosley Medical, 403 F.3d at 678; see also TMI, Inc. v. Maxwell, 368 F.3d 433, 435, 438 (5th Cir.2004) ; see also Taubman Co. v. Webfeats, 319 F.3d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding but for requirement not satisfied where investigation had no unique special factual features that but for the requirement of the act would have permitted a quick termination if the investigation were conducted outside the act
B. holding that there is nothing improper with defendants purchase of sponsored links when defendants actually sell plaintiffs products  on their website
C. holding that a competitive commercial purpose is not of itself improper
D. holding that challenge to oneyear residency requirement for divorce action was not moot even though plaintiff had since satisfied requirement
E. holding that the commercial use requirement is not satisfied where defendants site itself had no outside links
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.