Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
“considered the factors listed in U.S.C. 3553(a)” and imposed a fourteen-month sentence. Parker contends that the district court procedurally erred by not adequately explaining the reasons for the fourteen-month sentence. We review a district court’s revocation sentence using the same standards applied to initial sentencing decisions. United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009). We first review to ensure that the district court did not commit a significant procedural error. United States v. Dace, 660 F.3d 1011, 1013 (8th Cir. 2011). We then evaluate the substantive reasonableness of the sentence under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard. United States v. Timberlake, 6 e substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) . Accordingly, we affirm. 1 . The Honorable
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a court of appeals may apply a presumption of reasonableness to a district court sentence that reflects a proper application of the sentencing guidelines
B. holding that sentence within guidelines range enjoys a presumption of reasonableness
C. holding that we may apply a presumption of reasonableness to a sentence within the guidelines range
D. holding a court of appeals may apply a presumption of reasonableness to a district court sentence that reflects a proper application of the sentencing guidelines
E. recognizing a presumption of reasonableness
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.