Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
identifying physical characteristic outside [the Fifth Amendment’s] protection.” Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 266-67, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967). This is so because “[t]he handwriting itself (as opposed to the content of a written statement) is physical, not testimonial evidence.” United States v. McDougal, 137 F.3d 547, 559 (8th Cir.1998) (citing Gilbert, 388 U.S. at 266-67, 87 S.Ct. 1951). Thus, it is settled that a defendant in a criminal case may be compelled to furnish a handwriting exemplar and it is also settled that “introducing samples of the defendant’s handwriting at trial do[es] not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.” McDougal, 137 F.3d at 559. A prosecutor is likewise permitted to comment on, and indeed prese 10th Cir.1978) . Given these conclusions, it is now necessary
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that defendant had no right to withhold the requested exemplars
B. recognizing right to withhold lifesustaining treatment from a formerly competent adult in a permanent vegetative state
C. holding that a plaintiff had no injury in fact and consequently no standing when it had no enforceable contract right against the defendant
D. recognizing the right to counsel on appeal
E. holding defendant had no constitutional right to a mitigation specialist or a right to an effective one
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.