Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
771 F.2d 235, 242 (7th Cir.1985)(disapprov-ing “of a trial judge’s procedure in entering a jury room, despite agreement by both counsel and the presence of a court reporter, to give a supplemental instruction after the jury had already begun its deliberations” and noting that discourses between a judge and the jury during deliberations undermines the appearance of justice). In short, the Court cannot say, under the circumstances, that there exists no reasonable possibility that the jury’s verdict was not influenced by an improper communication. Cheek, 94 F.3d at 141. A criminal defendant has a right to a fair trial, U.S. CONST. amend. VI, and a right to be present at every stage of the trial. Fed. R.Crim. Pro. 43(a); see United States v. Coffman, 94 F.3d 330, 335-36 (7th Cir.1996); see also United States v. Pressley, 100 F.3d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the defendant is entitled to be present at all stages of his trial  and a judges response to a note from the jury is one of those stages
B. holding that an actual controversy must be extant at all stages of review not merely at the time the complaint is filed
C. holding that rule 43aentitles a defendant to be present at all stages of his trial and that cjommunication between the judge and the jury or a single juror is one of those stages
D. holding that defendants constitutional right to be present at all stages of his trial does not arise before the trial begins
E. holding that the right to counsel applies in all critical stages of state and federal criminal proceedings
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.