Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
he was in the immediate area of the transaction shortly after the transaction. Unbeknownst to the arresting officer, another offic xclusionary rule have already been satisfied by the exclusion of the evidence from Mr. Mejia's criminal trial. See Townes, 176 F.3d 138, 146 (2d Cir.1999) (declining to extend exclusionary rule to § 1983 suit for, inter alia, false arrest and malicious prosecution). 28 . Mr. Mejia's account of the alleged phone call to his employee, Charlie Diego, in which an unidentified individual asked for the owner's name and asked whether the owner was Colombian, is inadmissible hearsay and cannot be considered on this motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(e) (providing that summary judgment must be opposed by "such facts as would r.1991) (pre-Richardson ) ; Calloway v. Boro of Glassboro Dep't of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that private physician who conducted cavity search of drug suspect pursuant to facially valid search warrant was entitled to qualified immunity in suspects  1983 action where he did not act on his own initiative or out of selfinterest he was uniquely qualified to perform search procedure and where court found that extending qualified immunity to physicians under the circumstances of this case would benefitf society by effectuating acceptable means to execute body cavity searches pursuant to a warrant issued on probable cause and benefit the party being searched by providing a safe means of conducting the search in a medically approved manner
B. holding physician in action based on illegal cavity search to standard of a reasonable physician
C. holding that acquiescence to a strip and body cavity search did not extend the scope of defendants consent to search his person because of the highly intrusive nature of the search
D. holding that a visual body cavity search requires probable cause and a search warrant
E. holding that search of backpack constituted a search of defendants person and was not authorized by search warrant for premises
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.