Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
complaint. See also Chandler v. City of Dallas, 2 F.3d 1385, 1393 (5th Cir.1993) (“An employer’s belief that an employee is unable to perform one task with an adequate safety margin does not establish per se that the employer regards the employee as having a substantial limitation on his ability to work in general.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1386, 128 L.Ed.2d 61 (1994); Partlow v. Runyon, 826 F.Supp. 40, 43-44 (D.N.H.1993) (quoting Forrisi v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 931, 933 (4th Cir.1986) (“ ‘An employer does not necessarily regard an employee as handicapped [under the Rehabilitation Act] simply by finding the employee to be incapable of satisfying the singular demands of a particular job.’ ”)). See also, Horton v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 1993 WL 356894 *4 (N.D.Cal. Sept. 3, 1993) . B. Is Plaintiff a “Qualified Individual with
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plaintiffs evidence showing that defendant refused to allow her to work as flight attendant because of her weight failed to demonstrate that defendant perceived her as substantially limited in any major life activity
B. holding that evidence of discussions with a supervisor regarding a health condition submission of various doctors notes to a former supervisor hospitalization and the occurrence of several telephone calls reporting her hospitalization was insufficient to show a record of disability because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that her impairment substantially limited a major life activity
C. holding that plaintiffs attempt to amend her allegations through opposition would not be allowed inasmuch as complaint did not identify any major life activity that had been jeopardized due to her alleged mental impairment
D. holding that evidence that defendant provided plaintiff with certain accommodations for her condition was insufficient to establish that defendant regarded her as disabled for purposes of ada absent showing that the defendant maintained any misperceptions about her condition
E. holding that plaintiffs claim that she was disabled because her major life activity of breathing was substantially limited by her respiratory condition would provide a basis for protection under the ada
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.