Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(further quotation omitted). Mr. Camp argues that the ALJ improperly determined that his mental impairments were not severe, despite evidence to the contrary. Our review of the administrative record raised one concern: Mr. Camp’s Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score of 50. A GAF score of 41-50 indicates “[sjerious symptoms ... OR any serious impairment in social, occupational, or school functioning.” American Psychiatric Assoc., Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 32 (4th ed.2000). But the mental health evaluator did not indicate that Mr. Camp’s GAF score impaired his ability to work. The score, without evidence that it impaired Mr. Camp’s ability to work, does not establish an impairment. Cf Howard v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 276 F.3d 235, 241 (6th Cir.2002) . Mr. Camp also asserts that the ALJ
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that this court could not affirm the aljs finding of gross misconduct because the alj failed to make findings on every material contested issue of fact
B. holding that perjured testimony standing alone does not constitute fraud upon the court
C. holding that a complaints reference to a guilty plea does not make the transcript of the plea proffer integral to the complaint
D. holding aljs failure to reference the gaf score in the rfc standing alone does not make the rfc inaccurate
E. holding that threats standing alone generally do not constitute past persecution
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.