Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
purpose served by obliterating a serial number on a firearm. Because a firearm with a serial number is equally effective as a firearm without one, there would appear to be no compelling reason why a law-abiding citizen would prefer an unmarked firearm. These weapons would then have value primarily for persons seeking to use them for illicit purposes. See United States v. Carter, 421 F.3d 909, 910 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that unmarked firearms have a “greater flexibility to be utilized in illicit activities” (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)); cf. United States v. Tagg, 572 F.3d 1320, 1326 (11th Cir.2009) (finding no Second Amendment protection for pipe bombs because they could not be used for legitimate lawful purposes); State v. Chandler, 5 La. Ann. 489, 489-90 (1850) . Nevertheless, a handgun with an obliterated
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that evidence of violent crimes and other illegal activities of defendants gang was not unduly prejudicial because defendant was not directly implicated and the evidence was probative of elements of the crimes that the defendant was charged with
B. holding south carolina conviction for failure to stop for a blue light to be violent felony under acca because prohibited conduct creates potential for confrontation and violence
C. holding that eighth amendment prohibited consideration at sentencing of personal characteristics of the victim and the emotional im pact of the crimes on the victims family
D. holding concealed weapons could be prohibited because of their tendency to be used in violent crimes on unsuspecting victims
E. holding intoxication is only a defense to specific intent crimes and not general intent crimes
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.