Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
was an effort to get recklessness in, which would have changed the standard from the second circuit.”). 4 . As ove the truth of the information contained in them, but to show the lack of scienter on the part of the defendants. See Gray v. First Winthrop Corp., 82 F.3d 877, 885 n. 10 (9th Cir.1996). 7 . The argument over the stop ship reports exemplifies the problem with the generalized allegations in plaintiffs' complaint. If plaint also require direct involvement. See Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128, 152, 92 S.Ct. 1456, 1471, 31 L.Ed.2d 741 (1972) (approving of primary liability of bank employees who made a market in securities despite bank representations that its duty was to individual clients); Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 464 n. 2 (5th Cir.1981) ; Competitive Assoc., Inc. v. Laventhol,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding defendants liable for their various roles in fraudulent marketing of bonds
B. holding defendants personally liable for alleged conversion even when acting in corporate capacity
C. holding that individual defendants may not be held liable for violations under title vii
D. holding that state officials may be personally liable for actions taken in their official capacity
E. holding the government liable to plaintiffs for breach of contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.