Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
patients that physicians were independent contractors and provided patients with consent forms that informed patients of physicians’ independent-contractor status); Peter v. Vullo, 234 N.C.App. 150, 162, 758 S.E.2d 431, 439 (2014) (noting that hospital expressly gave notice via consent form that ■physician was an independent contractor); Cantrell v. Northeast Georgia Med. Ctr., 235 Ga.App. 365, 366, 508 S.E.2d 716, 718 (1998) (noting that hospital posted sign over registration desk and gave patients treatment-consent forms advising patients that physicians were not hospital employees); and Holmes v. University Health Sery., Inc., 205 Ga.App. 602, 603, 423 S.E.2d 281, 283 (1992) (noting that forms plaintiff encouraged the Bains to think that Dr. 38, 735 P.2d 460 (Ct. App. 1987) ; and Gilbert, 156 Ill.2d at 526, 622 N.E.2d at
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that where hospital used balance billing its lien was unenforceable because the hospital had been paid in full for the services it provided to patient and there was consequently no debt to secure by the existence of the lien
B. holding that vicarious liability claim against union based on medical malpractice of treating physician is not preempted by erisa
C. holding that because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding the expert report adequate as to the vicarious liability claim against the hospital based on the actions of the doctors plaintiffs suit against the hospital including her claim that the hospital was vicariously hable for the actions of its nurses could proceed
D. holding that claim that hospital provided inadequate supervision leading to patients sexual assault by another patient constituted health care liability claim
E. holding issue of vicarious liability was for jury where patient did not have opportunity to choose physician who was provided by hospital
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.