Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
49, 108 S.Ct. 2250 (“The traditional definition of acting under color of state law requires that the defendant in a § 1983 action have exercised power possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law.” (internal quotations omitted)). The Tenth Circuit has stated that whether there is a real nexus in a particular case depends on the circumstances of the case: The under color of law determination rarely depends on a single, easily identifiable fact, such as the officer’s attire, the location of the act, or whether or not the officer acts in accordance with his or her duty. Instead one must examine “the nature and circumstances of the officer’s conduct and t f Pawnee Cnty., Okla., 894 F.2d 1176, 1182-92 (10th Cir.1990). In Jojala, v. Chavez, the plaintiff was a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the defendant who was an elementary school teacher on contract only from august to may who sexually abused children at a nonschoolsponsored summer camp over the summer did not act under color of state law
B. holding that private attorney who acted as courtappointed counsel for child in state juvenile delinquency proceedings was not acting under color of state law
C. holding that a nurses aide who sexually assaulted a patient while under heavy sedation was not acting under color of state law because as there was no allegation it was the aide who sedated the patient the sexual assault conduct   could have been done by anyone who wandered into the patients room
D. holding um did not act under color of state law when it terminated an employee
E. holding that to prevail on a  1983 claim a plaintiff must allege that the defendant acted under color of state law in other words that there was state action
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.