Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
is no longer available. We held that the claimant’s quitting his job due to lack of transportation did not justify reinstatement of his benefits because his loss of earning power was unrelated to his disability. In Beattie, the claimant sustained a disabling work-related injury. Subsequently, his benefits were suspended when the claimant returned to work as a church minister for another employer without a wage loss. However, the claimant became uncomfortable with the position and, eventually, quit because of stress and interpersonal problems. Under these circumstances, the court concluded that he was not entitled to reinstatement of total disability benefits. 12 . When an employer that seeks to modify a claimant’s benefits ref ard of Review, 59 Pa.Cmwlth. 627, 430 A.2d 722 (1981) . In other words, by instituting the transfer
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a job offer which required a claimant to make a daily round trip commute of 232 miles was unreasonable even though the claimant would be provided with a motel room because this would require the claimant to be away from home at least four nights a week
B. holding trial court order denying states petition for an order of public use and necessity for good cause appearing did not constitute a finding of fact or a conclusion of law
C. holding that claimant must show good cause for failure to submit evidence to alj and appeals council
D. holding that claimant did not establish good cause by showing he was unable to comprehend the determination
E. holding that the necessity either to relocate or commute 80100 miles each way daily constituted good cause for the claimant to decline reassignment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.