Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
an additional continuance nine days before trial; and the Court had already continued resolution of this case eight times (docs.# 32, # 52, # 66, # 79, # 93, # 94, # 96, # 97). Moreover, the government indicated that the additional discovery material consisted mostly of summaries of earlier disclosed evidence. Under these circumstances, the Court finds that it was entirely proper to require that the trial proceed as scheduled. Cf. United States v. McHorse, 179 F.3d 889, 904 (10th Cir.1999) (affirming denial of motion to continue trial more than a half day where the defendant had just received additional discovery material, but continuance motion was made the day of trial and three prior continuances had been granted); United States v. Lefkowitz, 125 F.3d 608, 620 (8th Cir.1997) . B. Denial of Motion to Suppress Huber also
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the trial court abused its discretion in not allowing defendant to withdraw his waiver of jury trial where a lengthy continuance already had been granted
B. holding that trial court did not abuse discretion in denying motion to sever because trial of three defendants would not create confusion
C. holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to continue due to pretrial publicity in part because court instructed jury on three separate occasions to consider only evidence presented in the courtroom
D. holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion for continuance when not in proper affidavit form
E. holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to continue trial three months where although trial was complex and records were voluminous court had already granted two prior continuances and continuance of three weeks was sufficient to prepare for trial
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.