Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
as a file, URL, IP address, telephone number, television channel, radio station, application, or service.” '002 Patent, col. 10, lines 8-10. Although the term pointer is used in the field of computing, it is analogous to any tag that directs a person to an object or data located elsewhere. As the Special Master observed, “[a]n index (such as the card catalog at a library) contains pointers to information (the books stored in a systematic manner).” R & R on '081 and '002 Patents 31 (emphasis added). Thus, at its core, this patent is directed to the abstract idea of retrieving data located in another place by using a device with information that pinpoints the data’s location to facilitate its retrieval. See Bascom Research, LLC v. Facebook, Inc., 77 F.Supp.3d 940, 949-50 (N.D.Cal.2015) . This is the same idea at play when someone
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the defrauding of different people over an extended period of time using different means and representations may constitute but one scheme
B. holding out admission to practice law when not admitted to practice
C. holding that the due process clause does not require courts to abandon their ageold practice of seeking information from outofcourt sources to guide their judgment toward a more enlightened and just sentence
D. holding that because the statute requires commerce to use data from economically comparable countries to the extent possible commerce may not employ a methodology that requires using data from both economically comparable and economically dissimilar countries in the absence of a showing that using the data congress has directed commerce to use is impossible
E. holding that the concept of establishing and using relationships between documents is a common ageold practice that is not meaningfully different from classifying and organizing data
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.