Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
or reasonable and prudent at the time.” (citations omitted)). 22 . Thrift contends that the Second Note was a renewal of the First Note; the Hubbards do not agree with this characterization. 23 . At the time Thrift wrote the letter, he believed that the stock transfer had not satisfied the original debt. 24 . Peerless argues that allowing compounded interest would impermissibly add to the contract. Awards of prejudgment interest are damages, however, and need not be specified in the contract nor agreed to by the parties. 25 . See Enterprise-Laredo Assocs. v. Hachar's, Inc., 839 S.W.2d 822, 839 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1992, writ denied) (''[Pjrejudgment interest may be awarded on a breach of contract claim.”); O’Reilly v. Grafham, 797 S.W.2d 399, 401-02 (Tex.App.—Austin 1990, no writ) . 26 . Tex.Rev.Stat.Ann. art. 5069-1.05, § 1
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding teague applies to capital cases
B. holding that strickland applies to cases involving successive representation
C. holding that cavnar rule applies to nonpersonal injury economic damages cases
D. holding that eaja applies to court proceedings for review of social security cases
E. holding that rule 9b applies to fca
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.