Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in a concrete factual circumstance. United States v. Argomaniz, 925 F.2d 1349, 1356 (11th Cir. 1991) (Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination); Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. West, 748 F.2d 540, 542 (10th Cir.1984) and Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc., 738 F.2d 1336, 1342 (D.C.Cir.1984) (assertion of privilege in general). 2 . Gillock advises that Florida law is relevant to the inquiry. But since the privilege asserted is a federal one which should be uniform in all of the states, Florida law cannot be dispositive of the issue. 3 . The circuit declined to extend the reasoning of this case, providing immunity to state legislators, to the legislative acts of a municipality. Berkley v. Common Council of City of Charleston, 63 F.3d 295 (4th Cir.1995) . 4 . The analogy to the law clerks in the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that koon overruled prior circuit law to the contrary
B. holding that prior circuit caselaw requiring district courts to gauge the extent of a departure by drawing analogies to the guidelines was overruled by koon
C. holding that schlitz was overruled to that extent
D. holding that almendareztorres was not overruled by apprendi
E. holding that  3501 overruled mcnabbmallory
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.