Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
is involved. What limits the viability of a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation is not the distinction between an economic and an interpersonal setting, but rather whether the person alleging misrepresentation was justified in her reliance on the truthfulness of the statements. It is true that the tort of fraudulent misrepresentation has its origins in commercial or transactional settings. See Neurosurgery & Spine Surgery, S.C. v. Goldman, 339 Ill. App. 3d 177, 185-86, 790 N.E.2d 925 (2003) (detailing the origins of the tort of fraudulent misrepresentation). Relying on Neurosurgery, defendants contend that fraudulent misrepresentation is only actionable in commercial cases involving pecuniary, but not physical, damages. A thorough review of the applicable law leads 87) . ‘Although the invasion of an economic
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that pecuniary damages are essential to a fraudulent misrepresentation cause of action
B. holding that misrepresentation was essential to plaintiffs claim
C. recognizing cause of action
D. recognizing wrongful adoption cause of action grounded in fraud and fraudulent misrepresentation
E. holding that pecuniary damages are not property damages under insureds policy
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.