Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the verdict only if the record contains no evidence, regardless of how it is weighed, from which the jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Agostino, 132 F.3d 1183, 1192 (7th Cir.1997); United States v. Hickok, 77 F.3d 992, 1002 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1200, 116 S.Ct. 1701, 134 L.Ed.2d 800 (1996); United States v. Moralez, 964 F.2d 677, 679 (7th Cir.1992). The jury found Granados guilty of conspiracy to commit extortion and attempt to commit extortion in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a). Extortion is the wrongful use of force or fear, including fear of economic harm, to obtain money or property from another person. See 18 U.S.C. § 1951(b)(2) (defining extortion); United States v. Sturman, 49 F.3d 1275, 1281 (7th Cir.1995) ; United States v. Lisinski, 728 F.2d 887, 890
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the village could regulate doortodoor solicitation based on a fear of an anticipated harm without proof of actual harm
B. recognizing  1951 includes fear of economic harm
C. holding that expenses includes costs
D. recognizing the economic realities test
E. holding that an asylum applicant must show at least a deliberate imposition of a substantial economic disadvantage in order for the harm to constitute economic persecution
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.