Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
but deemed unsalable. Perfetti moved for a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, and a permanent injunction against Defendants after learning that Defendants had diverted the candy to retail stores for sale rather than recycling it. For the reasons explained below, this Court grants Perfet-ti’s motion for a preliminary injunction. I. Facts This Court draws the facts from the Verified Complaint, the affidavits and sworn declarations filed by Perfetti, and the testimony and exhibits from the hearing on May 28, 2015. See Doe v. S. Iron R-l Sch. Dist., 498 F.3d 878, 880 (8th Cir.2007) (affirming a preliminary injunction based on a verified complaint and additional documents); Movie Sys., Inc. v. MAD Minneapolis Audio Distribs., 717 F.2d 427, 431-32 (8th Cir.1983) . Perfetti is a global manufacturer of candy
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that party may not rely on conclusory statements or an argument that the affidavits in support of the motion for summary judgment are not credible
B. holding that courts may rely solely on affidavits in granting preliminary injunctions
C. holding that a court may rely on otherwise inadmissible evidence including hearsay evidence at the preliminary injunction stage
D. holding that a school may assert the rights of its students parents and gathering cases granting injunctions to businesses on behalf of customers
E. holding that statements in affidavits based solely on hearsay are inadmissible as summary judgment evidence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.