Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
its consent to be bound by [an international agreement].). Secondarily, a treaty may be self-executing upon ratification. See Foster v. Neilson, 27 U.S. (2 Pet.) 253, 314, 7 L.Ed. 415 (1829) (“Our Constitution declares a treaty to be the law of the land ... [it is regarded as] equivalent to an act of the legislature, whenever it operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision.”). When this is the case, the treaty acts in the same manner as an Act of Congress. See, e.g., Medellin v. Dretke, 544 U.S. 660, 125 S.Ct. 2088, 2103, 161 L.Ed.2d 982 (2005) (O’Connor, J. dissenting) (noting that Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations was self-executing); Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk, 486 U.S. 694, 699, 108 S.Ct. 2104, 100 L.Ed.2d 722 (1988) ; Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that service was not perfected on the defendant german corporation because the plaintiff had failed tostrictly comply with the servieeofprocess requirements of the hague convention
B. holding that service of process by international registered mail from germany to the united states satisfied the hague convention and constitutional due process
C. holding because fla stat  48161 required sending of notice and process directly to the defendant under schlunk hague convention applies
D. holding hague convention applies to service of foreign defendant pursuant to fla stat  48181 and 48161
E. holding that the hague service convention is selfexecuting
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.