Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
C.R.S. (2006). 2 . 25 U.S.C. § 1911(b) (2000) states: In any State court proceeding [concerning] ... an Indian child not domiciled or residing within the reservation of the Indian child’s tribe, the court, in the absence of good cause to the contrary, shall transfer such proceeding to the jurisdiction of the tribe, absent objection by either parent, upon the petition of either parent or the Indian custodian or the Indian child's tribe.... 3 . Article VI, section 15 of the Colorado Constitution establishes the juvenile court of the city and county of Denver. Denver is the only county to have separate probate and juvenile courts. Other counties in Colorado handle probate and juvenile matters in their district courts. 4 . See, e.g., L.L. v. People, 10 P.3d 1271, 1274, 1277 (Colo.2000) . While L.L. was a case of guardianship in the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding foster parents not liable for willful act of their foster child
B. recognizing childrens need for stability and permanency and thus upholding placement of children in permanent guardianship of foster parents
C. holding that a superior court properly considered the childrens need for permanency a crucial need for young children in evaluating the best interests of the child in a termination proceeding
D. recognizing that prolonged pattern of failed treatment threatens childrens future stability
E. recognizing need for custodial stability and permanency planning for children adjudged dependent or neglected and removed from physical custody of their parents without terminating the parentchild relationship
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.