Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
interest in monitoring probationers. See Griffin, 483 U.S. at 876, 107 S.Ct. 3164. In Samson, the Supreme Court held that the state had a legitimate supervisory interest in warrantless, suspicionless searches of parolees. Samson, 126 S.Ct. at 2200-01. Specifically, this interest was considered legitimate because parolees are more likely to commit crimes in the future, and expeditious supervisory measures are required in order to prevent parolees from having the opportunity to “anticipate searches and conceal criminality.” Id. at 2201. This rationale finds foundation in the impracticability of obtaining a search warrant, a rationale similar to the underlying motivation used to support the administrative or “special needs” exception. See Schmerber, 384 U.S. at 770, 86 S.Ct. 1826 . The search at issue in Samson involved a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding officer liable for deprivation of constitutional rights despite argument that officer although present was not in control of the situation
B. holding a search permissible where the officer reasonably believed he faced an emergency situation that would result in the destruction of evidence
C. recognizing emergency exception
D. holding that the court must consider the totality of the circumstance when determining whether a law enforcement officer faced an emergency that justified acting without a warrant
E. holding that a military police officer was entitled to qualified immunity from an excessive force suit when he objectively reasonably believed that he used reasonable force
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.