Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
not appear to have any connection to a willing buyer’s estimate of the price he would -pay for the property. The contribution by these costs to the property’s value is speculative. To the extent the inclusion of such costs in the valuation is an attempt , to collect - reimbursement for Defendant’s prior investment in the property, the costs are impermissible, as the Fifth Amendment does not guarantee the landowner ■ a -return on his investment. [United States ex rel. & for Use of TVA v. Powelson, 319 U.S. 266, 285, 63 S.Ct. 1047, 87 L.Ed. 1390 (1943)]. United States v. 15,478 Square Feet of Land, more or less, situate in the City of Norfolk, VA, 2011 WL 2471586, at *6 (E.D.Va. June 20, 2011); see also Crosby v. Pickaway Cnty. Gen. Health Dist., 303 Fed.Appx. 251, 262-63 (6th Cir.2008) . Further, none of the experts, including
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property
B. holding that general authorization to service real estate loans included claims regarding fees for prepayment of mortgage loans
C. holding that landowners could not recover consequential damages due to delay or for the interest on incurred construction loans utilities insurance and real estate taxes for the period after county agency allegedly effected a regulatory taking by revoking permits previously granted to install sewage system on property
D. holding petitioner could not deduct real estate taxes imposed on property he did not own because these taxes were not imposed on him
E. holding that a tax appeal on real property is a lien on the real estate and not a personal obligation of the landowner
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.