Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the following five requirements to be entitled to reimbursement from the Section 443 Fund: (1) a supersedeas must have been requested; (2) the request for supersedeas must have been denied; (3) the request must have been made under Section 413 of the Act; (4) payments were.continued because of the order' denying supersedeas; and (5) in the final outcome of the proceedings, it was determined that such compensation was not, in fact, payable. See, e.g., H.A. Harper Sons, Inc. v. WCAB (Sweigart), 84 A.3d 363, 366 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2014). As will be discussed in further detail infra, there is 'no dispute among the parties that the fund established under Séction 443 does not permit reimbursement of attorney’s fees. See Universal AM-CAN, Ltd. v. WCAB (Minteer), 870 A.2d 961 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005) . 4 . As noted, the County's reimbursement
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that attorneys fees could notbe reimbursed from the section 443 fund
B. holding that a party may recover attorneys fees under section 38001 only if the party prevails on a cause of action for which attorneys fees are available and recovers damages
C. holding that appellate court should reverse and remand issue of attorneys fees where damages are reduced on appeal in a manner that could affect the determination of reasonable and necessary attorneys fees
D. holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees
E. holding that attorneys fee award in a common fund case must be  reasonable under the circumstances
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.