Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Morse v. Ripken, 707 So.2d 921, 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). The law, however, distinguishes between pure expressions of opinion, which are constitutionally protected, and mixed expressions of opinion, which, like factual statements, are not. Pure opinion occurs when the defendant makes a comment or states an opinion based on facts which are set forth in the a ion is based are stated in the article, but those “facts” are either incomplete or incorrect, or the speaker’s assessment of them is erroneous, the statement may imply a false assertion of fact. In that event, the statement is not protected as pure opinion. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 18-19, 110 S.Ct. 2695, 111 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990); see also Anson v. Paxson Commc’ns Corp., 736 So.2d 1209, 1211 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) . Whether a statement is one of fact or one of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that false arrest and false imprisonment claim were not duplicative
B. holding that defendants who were treated to expensive dinners and offered money were not adequately induced to show that they were not predisposed
C. holding that defendants were not in control and therefore were not supervisors and not subject to liability under  1983
D. holding that all claims submitted by defendant were false because they were acquired by kickback
E. holding that false remarks on a radio talk show were not automatically shielded from liability because they were opinion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.