Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in part; dismissed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, the parties appeal from the district court’s order affirming in part and reversing in part the bankruptcy courts’ orders finding that a portion of GMAC’s claims in the underlying bankruptcy proceedings are unsecured. In light of our decision in In re Price, 562 F.3d 618 (4th Cir.2009) . Because the parties have settled the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding debtors negative equity in a tradein vehicle included in amount financed created a purchase money obligation within the meaning of 11 usc  1325a 2006 we summarily affirm the portion of the district courts order at issue in no 081850
B. holding bifurcation and cramdown are unavailable because negative equity is part of purchase money security interest
C. holding that  1325a is mandatory and that the general powers of the court codified in 11 usc  105a do not permit a court to confirm a plan that does not satisfy  1325a
D. holding that there was no presumption of a gift where the wifes money was used to make the purchase but title was placed in the name of the husband and finding the facts sufficient to establish a purchase money resulting trust in favor of the wife
E. holding bifurcation and cramdown are available because purchase money security interest does not include negative equity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.