Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in the initial inquiry, it likewise cannot be rewarded for engaging in the most cursory of investigations into this child's heritage, notwithstanding Mother’s unequivocal assertions that Father was an enrolled member of the Cherokee Nation. I construe the events following that initial response from Cherokee Nation as Appellants’ good-faith reliance on the tribe’s representations that Baby Girl was not Cherokee and ICWA was not applicable. Ignoring the bonding that occurred here is simply ignoring the reality of this case. 72 . By way of supplemental citation, Father contends Mother’s preference that Baby Girl be placed with Appellants is, standing alone, insufficient to constitute good cause warranting deviation from section 1915(a). See In re T.S.W., 276 P.3d 133 (Kan.2012) . I do not disagree. Although I recognize that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that probation does not constitute a sentence
B. holding placement preference of birth mother alone does not constitute good cause to deviate from placement preferences under icwa
C. holding that perjured testimony standing alone does not constitute fraud upon the court
D. holding lack of prejudice to the defendant is not good cause
E. holding that the accrual of attorneys fees alone is sufficient to establish cause
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.