Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
individual may have a possible immigration or criminal violation in the United States. In this instance, two lookouts were placed on the name Sandy Garcia, the first being a one-day lookout based on the perceived irregularity of a Dominican citizen traveling from Buenos Aires to Dulles, as reflected in defendant’s flight itinerary. The second, more general lookout was based on the fact that a previous immigration violation included in the government's records suggested that possible imposters were using the name Sandy Garcia and his corresponding birth date and A number. 3 . This last statement obviously aroused Officer Ho’s suspicion, as it was inconsistent with defendant’s contemporaneous statement that he had been outside the United States for the past two mon 1287 (11th Cir.1991) . 6 . To be sure, the unlawful reentry statute
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the fourteenth amendment which makes persons bom in the united states and subject to its jurisdiction citizens of the united states and requires that representatives be apportioned among the states based on population excluding indians not taxed did not make an indian a citizen of the united states
B. recognizing that any party who voluntarily approaches an ins station cannot be said to have been found or discovered in the united states
C. holding that sovereign immunity does not bar extinguishment of united states junior lien in proceeding in which united states was not a party
D. recognizing federal constitutional claim against the united states
E. holding that when a defendant voluntarily approached the immigration officer at the airport it cannot be said that he was discovered in or found in the united states
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.