Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
IN PART. ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ„ concur. 1 . Despite the fact that Nicole’s current full-time job compensates her better than any job she had prior to or during her marriage, she still earns approximately one third of the income earned by Robert. 2 . We would also recede from the other panel decisions from our court that have followed or applied the same rule announced in Martin. See, e.g., Greene v. Greene, 895 So.2d 503 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Widmer v. Widmer, 713 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Fullerton v. Fullerton, 709 So.2d 162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Ingle v. Ingle, 640 So.2d 223 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). 3 . We note that a panel of this court several years ago signaled the court's willingness to reconsider Martin. See Alpha v. Alpha, 885 So.2d 1023, 1031-32 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)  (citations omitted). The trial courts within
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that although this court has not looked kindly on bridge the gap rehabilitative alimony awards in the past in a proper case it might do so in the future
B. holding that for 9year marriage where wife was 29years old and able to be selfsufficient rehabilitative alimony should have been awarded reversing permanent periodic alimony as inappropriate
C. holding that length of marriage and the proper amount or duration of alimony do not correlate in any mathematical formula
D. holding that the proper focus should be on whether the outofstate defendant engaged in any act that might provide the court with jurisdiction
E. recognizing such a ground for judicial review of arbitration awards in this circuit
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.