Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
346 Ill. at 258. The promise does not have to be for the sole benefit of the third party as long as it is for its direct or substantial benefit. Town & Country Bank of Springfield v. James M. Canfield Contract hat an agreement in which the third party was identified as the user of the building being constructed and given the authority to consult with the contractor and revise the drawings and specifications was for the direct benefit of the user); (3) Bates & Rogers, 109 Ill. 2d at 233-34 (concluding that one party to the contract intended to extend the benefit of an exculpatory clause to its engineer where the contract described the relationship between the party and the engineer and specified the responsibilities of the engineer in detail); (4) XL Disposal, 168 Ill. 2d at 360-61 ; (5) East Peoria Community High School
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an order imposing sanctions against an attorney for one of the parties in a pending case is final and therefore immediately appealable by the attorney
B. holding that an attorney approval clause in a contract for the sale of real estate was a part of that contract and would have to be satisfied for the underlying contract to be enforceable
C. holding contract for sale of law practice which included duty on part of selling attorney to refer clients as consideration for the sale violated rpc
D. holding that an agreement in which one party promised to make monthly payments to the other partys attorney as part of an asset sale contract was for the direct benefit of the attorney
E. holding attorney general could not contract on behalf of the state to employ an assistant attorney beyond the attorney generals own term
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.