Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
dismiss Counts III-V pending adjudication of Count I. With regard to Count II, the court held that the power to revoke an objection is implied by the power to interpose one, and that the sixty-day period was intended only to limit the Attorney General’s authority to interpose objections. Id. at 211. Appellees urged that the claims set forth in the remaining counts were not subject to judicial review, because section 5 of the Voting Rights Act precludes judicial review of actions taken by the Attorney General under its provisions, and commits the decision to interpose objections wholly to agency discretion. However, the District Court deferred consideration of the review-ability of Counts III through V, and ruled on the basis of Harper v. Levi, 171 U.S.App.D.C. 321, 520 F.2d 53 (1975) , that the “procedural” issue raised by Count I
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the failure to object to an instruction constitutes a waiver of error
B. holding that the courts denial of either a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment and is not reviewable 
C. holding that where defendant failed to object to facts in psi relating to prior conviction the failure to object constituted an admission
D. holding that the failure to object to a trial courts instruction constitutes waiver
E. holding reviewable the attorney generals alleged failure to exercise his independent judgment before deciding not to object to a proposed voting change
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.