Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
111 L.Ed.2d 695 (1990) (allegations insufficient where plaintiffs alleged interests in "unspecified portions of an immense [two-million-acre] tract of territory”). 14 . The court will grant a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56(c) "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). When ruling on a summary judgment motion, courts must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party- Bayer v. Dep't of Treasury, 956 F.2d 330, 333 (D.C.Cir. 1992); see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) . “[T]he nonmov-ing party 'must do more than
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing the courts obligation to assume all factual allegations to be true and to draw all reasonable inferences in plaintiffs favor
B. holding that courts must draw all justifiable inferences in the nonmoving partys favor and accept the nonmoving partys evidence as true
C. holding that courts are obligated to draw all reasonable inferences in plaintiffs favor
D. holding that courts must when reviewing motions for summary judgment evaluate disputed facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all justifiable inferences in its favor
E. holding that an appellate court viewing the evidence and all inferences of fact in light most favorable to nonmoving party can affirm a directed verdict only where no proper view of the evidence could sustain a verdict in favor of the nonmoving party
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.