Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in Illinois, through its agents in the State, was occasional in the temporal sense. Compare Dal Ponte v. Northern Manitoba Native Lodges, Inc. (1991), 220 Ill. App. 3d 878, 884, 581 N.E.2d 329, 333 (declining to find personal jurisdiction over a Canadian corporation which solicited customers at Illinois fishing shows and accepted reservations because its relationship with the State was "more akin to occasional or casual activity”); Baldknobbers, Inc., 107 Ill. App. 3d at 238, 437 N.E.2d at 721 (finding that a country music promoter was not subject to court’s jurisdiction because its two to five annual solicitation visits to the State constituted at best only a sporadic or occasional presence here), with Huffman v. Inland Oil & Transport Co. (1981), 98 Ill. App. 3d 1010, 424 N.E.2d 1209 . Here, although Appleton does not earn a great
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a foreign corporation was amenable to process since the record disclosed a regular pattern of its plying the waterways of the state
B. holding that resident shareholder of s corporation is eligible for tax credit for taxes paid by corporation in another state and noting that this conclusion is consistent with the internal revenue code which provides that shareholders of an s corporation are entitled to a foreign tax credit for their share of foreign income tax paid by an s corporation
C. holding that the hague convention applied because while minnesota law permitted a foreign corporation to be served with process through the secretary of states office the applicable statute also required the secretary of state to mail a copy of the summons to the foreign corporation before service was effectuated
D. holding that a corporation is fairly regarded at home and so amenable to personal jurisdiction for suits relating to all of its activities including those outside the forum in its principal place of business and place of incorporation
E. holding that the actual amount of capital employed in the state by a foreign corporation was to be based on the property of the corporation that was within the state and that was used in business transacted within the state
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.