Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
whether the trial court found that adultery caused the dissolution of the marriage or related to pre- or post-separation conduct, (2) state the basis for the trial court’s award to Cynthia of more property than she requested, and (3) contained no explanation for the trial court’s “harsh rebuke” that Daniel had made a game of the divorce and the dissolution of his business and that his conduct constituted a “mockery of our judicial system.” Daniel asserts he is “left guessing” as to the basis for the trial court’s ruling and cannot adequately address the findings on appeal. Daniel’s complaints necessarily relate to the trial court’s failure to make additional findings pursuant to rule of civil procedure 298. See Moore v. Moore, 383 S.W.3d 190, 200-01 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2012, pet. denied) . Rule of civil procedure 298 provides that,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding the findings of fact required to support an alimony award are sufficient if findings of fact have been made on the ultimate facts at issue in the case and the findings of fact show the trial court properly applied the law in the case
B. recognizing appellate courts must not make fact findings
C. holding the appellant carries the burden of demonstrating error in the family courts findings of fact
D. holding because defendant does not argue in his brief that these findings of fact are not supported by    evidence in the record this court is bound by the trial courts findings of fact
E. recognizing distinction between findings of fact under section 6711 of the family code and findings of fact under rules of civil procedure
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.