Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the States, so that it would be inappropriate to infer a cause of action based solely on federal law. Id. at 78, 95 S.Ct. 2080. (quotations omitted). Subsequent Supreme Court decisions have focused the Cort analysis to “emphasize the centrality of the second factor — Congressional intent; treating the other factors as ‘proxies of for the Eleventh Circuit in Arrow Airways, Inc. v. Dade County, 749 F.2d 1489 (11th Cir.1985) held that “[b]ased upon the ... lack of any evidence in the 1982 Act of an intent to create a private right of action, we conclude that the district court properly held that Appellants had no express or implied cause of action under 49 U.S.C. § 2210.” Id. at 1491; see also Four T’s, Inc. v. Little Rock Municipal Airport Commission, 108 F.3d 909, 915-16 (8th Cir.1997) ; accord Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. County of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that no private right of action exists
B. holding that no private right of action exists under any of the provisions of the airport and airway improvement act
C. recognizing that no private right of action exists for subsection a violations
D. recognizing private right of action
E. holding that a private right of action exists
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.