Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(1979). Accordingly, in the interest of justice, SMUD is granted 30 days to amend the June 9, 1998 Complaint to articulate the regulatory takings claim discussed in the December 16, 2002 Response at 15 and properly allege the threshold elements discussed above. The Government’s motion to dismiss as to Count IV is denied. 2. Count V — Taking Of Real Property Claim. The complaint also alleges that the Government’s breach has “forced SMUD to devote economically valuable real property to the storage of the SNF in the ISFSI. The government has taken this real property by denying SMUD its rights as owner of this property to put it to other valuable economic uses.” Compl. at ¶ 72; see also id. at ¶¶ 71-73. Real property is constitutionally protected. See Cienega Gardens, 331 F.3d at 1328-31 . Therefore, taking these allegations as true,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property
B. recognizing that water rights constitute a real property interest
C. holding that forfeiture of real property may be adjudicated before the seizure occurs because real property cannot abscond
D. holding that inmates have a property interest in their money
E. holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in vested contractual rights
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.