Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of the policy’s termination. The premium adjustment endorsement does not affect coverage, as Continental argues, and its adjustment process is not applicable for the losses here, which were reported long after the policy terms expired. See id. at 222, 133 N.W.2d at 36 (construing premium adjustment endorsement to avoid consequences that would have been drastic to the insured). b. Primary liability under missing policies. Canadian General was Domtar’s primary insurer from October 1956 to, February 1965. The actual Canadian General policies were lost for periods during that time. Although Lloyd’s did not otherwise dispute the existence or language of the lost policies, it was Lloyds’ position that the policies could have contained additional endorsements. See id. at 219, 133 N.W.2d at 35 . Lloyd’s argues that if Domtar has not
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a standard wcel policy with a maritime endorsement is an ocean marine policy
B. recognizing that endorsement would prevail if inconsistent with policy provisions
C. holding that an insured was not entitled to recover through their endorsement coverage where the policy actually required the insureds to repair rebuild or replace their  covered property before the endorsement would be triggered
D. holding it is settled that in construing an endorsement to an insurance policy the endorsement and the policy must be read together and the words of the policy remain in full force and effect except as altered by the words of the endorsement
E. recognizing that judicial estoppel might not be applicable if inconsistent positions result from change in public policy statutory provisions or facts
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.