Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
rationale that an em ployer’s duty to provide a safe work place is inseparable from its general duties as an employer. See, e.g., Royster v. Montanez, 134 Cal. App.3d 362, 184 Cal. Rptr. 560 (1982); Holzworth v. Fuller, 122 N.H. 643, 448 A.2d 394 (1982); Gore v. Amoco Production Co., 616 S.W.2d 289 (Tex.Civ.App.1981); Stone v. United States Steel Corp., 384 So.2d 17 (Ala.1980). We conclude that this case falls within the latter category of cases, where application of the doctrine would undermine the policy sought to be achieved by the Workers’ Compensation Law. Therefore, we refuse to apply the doctrine here and affirm the entry of summary judgment in favor of Atlantic Federal on the wrongful death claims. See Doe v. St. Michael’s Medical Center, 184 N.J. Super. 1, 445 A.2d 40 (1982) ; see also Katchis v. Miami Heart Institute,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a plaintiff can show that she is qualified by presenting credible evidence that she continued to possess the objective qualifications she held when she was hired
B. holding that defendant had reasonable expectation of privacy in a hotel room rented by relatives when he had a key to the room and permission to use the room at will
C. holding that a hotel guest has a legitimate expectation of privacy in his room during the period of time for which the room is rented
D. holding that workers compensation statute barred suit of medical technologist who was allegedly raped and robbed in dormitory room which she rented from the hospital at which she was employed
E. recognizing that at least for certain purposes a hospital room is fully under the control of the medical staff yet for other purposes it is the patients room  because patient understands that nurses doctors food handlers and others enter and exit hospital room in accordance with medical need and hospital routine
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.