Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
are not recordings of “oral communications” and shall be turned over to Plaintiffs and Defendants for purposes of this litigation. III. 18 U.S.C. § 2517(3) ■ Although the Court has held that the face to face recordings are not recordings of “oral communications,” the issue remains whether the interception of telephone calls by Whitacre may also be disclosed in this litigation. In Briggs, supra, the Fifth Circuit stated that a telephone conversation is a “wire communication” as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(1). Briggs, 630 F.2d at 417. Such communications are protected against interception by electronic, mechanical, or other devices regardless of the speaker’s expectation of privacy. See id. at 417 n. 4; see also United States v. Harpel, 493 F.2d 346, 349 (10th Cir.1974) . Accordingly, the Court’s preceding
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth
B. holding that a person does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy with regard to physical characteristics which he or she routinely exposes to public view
C. recognizing lack of requirement to prove reasonable expectation of privacy with regard to intercepted wire communications
D. holding that this lack of any reasonable expectation of continued employment suffices to establish the lack of property in the constitutional sense and hence the lack of a viable due process claim
E. holding that society recognizes a reasonable expectation of privacy
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.