Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
at 993. B. The People next argue that the evidence discovered by the arresting officers is admissible under the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule. Subsection 16-3-308(1), 8A C.R.S. (1986), provides that “[ejvidence which is otherwise admissible in a criminal proceeding shall not be suppressed by the trial court if the court determines that the evidence was seized by a peace officer, as defined in subsection 18-1-901(3)(1), C.R.S., as a result of a good faith mistake or a technical violation.” “Good faith mistake” is defined in subsection 16-3-308(2)(a) as “a reasonable judgmental error concerning the existence of facts or law which if true would be sufficient to constitute probable cause.” See also United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 104 S.Ct. 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984) ; Massachusetts v. Sheppard, 468 U.S. 981, 104
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing good faith exception to fourth amendment exclusionary rule
B. holding that the fourth amendment exclusionary rule should not bar the use of evidence obtained by police officers acting in good faith and with reasonable reliance on a facially valid search warrant
C. holding that the exclusionary rule under the fourth amendment applies to civil forfeiture proceedings
D. holding that an exception to the fourth amendment exclusionary rule applies where the police would have obtained the evidence if no illegality had occurred
E. holding that with respect to the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule article 1 section 11 of the wisconsin constitution affords additional protection than that which is afforded by the fourth amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.