Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of Adam's minority. As to Monica, the requirement runs until the end of the alimony term or until she obtains health insurance through employment. 3 . Monica regularly receives the child support and alimony payments required of Russell by the divorce decree. 4 . See Schedule J, dated April 4, 1996. I note that Russell’s monthly income has increased substantially over the $2,383.33 he listed on Schedule I at filing. 5 . The debts at issue here are Russell's obligations to hold Monica harmless from certain of her creditors. Such obligations as Russell himself may have to those creditors (by contract or otherwise in the absence of the divorce decree) are outside the purview of § 523(a)(5) and § 523(a)(15). See, e.g., Ianke v. Ianke (In re Ianke), 185 B.R. 297, 300 (Bankr.E.D.Mo.1995) . 6 . Section 523(a)(5) provides: (a) A
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that insurance obligation was primary to indemnity obligation
B. holding that there may be an obligation to defend under an insurance policy even though there is no obligation to indemnify
C. recognizing that a divorce decree obligation to hold an exspouse harmless from a debt creates an obligation between the debtor and the exspouse separate from any obligation the debtor may owe to the creditor
D. holding that an alleged oral agreement between a manufacturer and a distributor lacked mutuality of obligation and was enforceable where the distributor had no obligation to sell any specific quantity and no obligation to meet any quotas
E. holding that a debt for attorney fees incurred by an exspouse in a postjudgment divorce contempt proceeding was nondischargeable
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.