Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
delegate to local school boards the responsibilities of providing educational services, “[t]here is no question but that local boards of education acts as agencies of the state when they are fulfilling the statutory duties imposed upon them pursuant to the constitutional mandate of article eighth, § 1.” Id. at 258, 438 A.2d 88. The court concludes that the torts allegedly committed by the defendants-assault, infliction of emotional distress and negligence-stem from the defendants providing special education services pursuant to a delegated state responsibility. The defendants are therefore entitled to sovereign immunity from liability on counts five, six and seven of the complaint. See Todd M. v. Richard L., 44 Conn.Supp. 527, 539-40, 696 A.2d 1063 (Conn.Super.Ct. July 14, 1995) ; see also Milhomme v. Levola, No.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the doctrine of sovereign immunity applies to defendants who were providing transportation services to a disabled child as part of the childs iep
B. holding that a determination of the proper esy services must be contemplated by the childs iep and linked to his or her developmental goals
C. holding that the defense of sovereign immunity is not available in the absence of a statute providing immunity to a municipal corporation in a negligence action
D. holding agencies of state government are part of the state for purposes of sovereign immunity
E. holding that in the absence of a statute providing immunity the defense of sovereign immunity is not available to a municipal corporation in an action for damages alleged to be caused by the tortious conduct of the municipality
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.