Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the court, a defendant may enter a conditional plea of guilty, “reserving in writing the right to have an appellate court review an adverse determination of a specified pretrial motion.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2); see also United States v. Cain, 155 F.3d 840, 842 (7th Cir.1998). This is a narrow exception to the ordinary rule that a defendant who pleads guilty cannot appeal his conviction. United States v. Dimitrov, 546 F.3d 409, 416 (7th Cir.2008). To preserve an issue for appeal, a conditional plea must “precisely identify which pretrial issues the defendant wishes to preserve for review.” United States v. Markling, 7 F.3d 1309, 1313 (7th Cir.1993). All non-jurisdictional issues not specifically preserved in the conditional plea agreement are waived. See, e.g., Dimitrov, 546 F.3d at 416 ; United States v. Doherty, 17 F.3d 1056,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding an issue was preserved in part because the trial court immediately understood the basis of the objection
B. holding that although the defendant had preserved his objection to the constitutionality of a mental state requirement he had not preserved another constitutional objection
C. holding that claim was preserved for subsequent appeal by objection at original sentencing hearing
D. holding that error was preserved by running objection because of defendants immediate objection to states specific question in combination with trial courts comments showing that it understood nature of defendants objection
E. holding that a claimed violation of the right to a public trial must be preserved for review by a timely objection at trial
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.