Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
true or false. Certainly, different members of the general public might provide different specific definitions of this term or might emphasize different factors in assessing whether housing is “decent, safe, and sanitary.” However, the fact that each individual's exact definition of the meaning of this phrase might differ does not undermine the proposition that the general meaning of the concept is commonly understood. As we have noted in another, quite different context, despite the fact that certain words or phrases might “strike distinct chords in individual jurors,” they can nevertheless have a “plain meaning of sufficient content that the discretion left to the jury” is “no more than that inherent in the jury system itself.” Milton v. Procunier, 744 F.2d 1091, 1096 (5th Cir.1984) ; see also James v. Collins, 987 F.2d 1116,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that failure to appear for sentencing is a continuing offense because a convicted criminal has a continuing obligation to face sentencing and presents an ongoing threat to the integrity and authority of the court so long as he has not appeared
B. holding that the right applies at capital sentencing in particular
C. holding presumptive sentencing standards applied retroactively where defendant objected at sentencing hearing on the basis that the presumptive sentencing standards applied to his case
D. holding that the texas capital sentencing scheme is permissibly applied when the sentencing jury evaluates the terms deliberately probability criminal acts of violence and continuing threat to society without any specific definitions
E. holding a specific sentencing statute controls over the general sentencing provisions of section 9031
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.