Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that the first part of MCL 600.5851(7) establishes a specific time in which a person under the age of eight must file a claim, with Miller, supra at 202, which defines a statute of limitations as a statute requiring a person to bring a claim within a specified time. In other words, statutes like MCL 600.5851(1) and MCL 600.5852 contain language that “saves” a claim that may otherwise be barred, while the language within MCL 600.5851(7) “gives” two distinct periods in which this particular class of claimants may file suit. Thus, the plain language of MCL 600.5851(7) provides an alternative limitations period (the tenth-birthday rule) that, depending on the facts of a particular case, may provide a plaintiff with more time than the “general” two-year period to sue. Miller, supra at 202 . Key to this conclusion is both that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that duration of limitation is a factor in determining whether limitation is significant
B. holding that a discovery exception to a statute of limitation applies only to the discovery of facts not discovery of the law
C. holding that limitation period begins to run at the time of the breach
D. holding that the discovery rule within mcl 6005838a2 is an alternative to the other periods of limitation and it is itself a period of limitation
E. recognizing that a principal may limit the authority of its agent and such limitation will be binding on a third party who is aware of the limitation
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.