Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
over the years to reverse its position, I and my colleagues would not have undertaken this litigation on a contingent fee basis had it been thought that there was any likelihood of a fee being restricted to a small percentage of the amounts recovered. Although I knew that the Court ultimately sets the fee, and that no amount was guaranteed, I was specifically aware in taking the matter on that the usual range of fee awards in common fund cases was 20-30 percent. Additionally, Michael Malakoff, e because other class action attorneys refused to represent Plaintiffs and Adelman had difficulty finding co-counsel. The district court erroneously ignored these facts in concluding that it would not apply a risk multiplier. With respect to Plaintiffs’ counsel’s ho d 562, 583 (3rd Cir.1984) . We hold that risk should be assessed when an
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that risk is measured at the point when the attorneys time was committed to the case
B. recognizing the same point
C. holding that a defendants sentence is controlled by the law in effect at the time he committed the offense
D. holding that risk must be measured at the time the lawsuit is filed
E. holding that the point of accrual is better linked to a time at which the indemnitee is injured not the time at which the original plaintiff was injured
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.