Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
as denying to any party the right to trial by jury where there are substantial issues of fact to be determined. A summary judgment may be rendered on the issue of liability alone although there is a genuine issue as to the amount of damage.”). 21 See OCGA § 9-3-71 (a) (“[A]n action for medical malpractice shall be brought within two years after the date on which an injury or death arising from a negligent or wrongful act or omission occurred.”). 22 See OCGA § 9-11-10 (b) (providing that “[e]ach claim founded upon a separate transaction or occurrence and each defense other than denials shall be stated in a separate count or defense whenever a separation facilitates the clear presentation of the matters set forth”). 23 Cf. Deen v. Pounds, 312 Ga. App. 207, 211 (1) (718 SE2d 68) (2011) ; Goodman v. Satilla Health Servs., 290 Ga.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the basis of liability is negligence and not injury
B. holding that knowing but failing to communicate a correct diagnosis may constitute a separate act of negligence
C. holding that ordinary negligence and gross negligence are not separate causes of action
D. holding that negligence does not violate the due process clause but reserving the question whether gross negligence does
E. holding that there was no evidence in the record to support appellants contention that the doctor committed a separate act of negligence by continuing to prescribe reglan and that the doctors alleged failure to correct any previous negligence does not constitute additional acts of negligence punctuation omitted
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.