Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
v. City of Kotzebue, 627 P.2d 623, 630 n. 10 (Alaska 1981) (citing § 302B to reject a jury instruction that "[eJvery person who, himself, is exercising ordinary care, has a right to assume that every other person will perform his duty and obey the law"). 15 . Restatement (SEconp) or Torts § 302B emt. d. 16 . Restatement (SEconp) or Torts § 302B emt. e. 17 . Id. These examples have been paraphrased. Comment e would also hold an actor liable for the crimes of a third party if the actor has a special relationship with the victim, and the Restatement gives additional examples of such relationships. But as we have discussed above, no such special relationship was present here. 18 . Restatement (SEconp) or Torts § 302B cmt. eH. 19 . See, eg., Fiala v. Rains, 519 N.W.2d 386, 389 (Iowa 1994) ; Taylor v. Louis, 349 S.W.3d 729, 737
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a receiver is not liable when he acts as would an ordinarily prudent man in the management of his own affairs
B. holding that the fourth amendment was not violated when police officers with probable cause to believe that a man had hidden marijuana in his home prevented that man from entering the home for about two hours while they obtained a search warrant
C. recognizing exigency to permit warrantless home entry where officer entered home to protect victim of domestic battery who contacted police saying that she was afraid that her boyfriend would seriously harm her
D. holding that it was not foreseeable that an abusive boyfriend would be waiting to attack another man that his girlfriend brought home one night
E. holding defendants girlfriend had authority to consent to search as a joint occupant
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.