Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
attacks. See Williams, 480 Fed.Appx. at 256 (“A prison guard is deliberately indifferent if he intentionally denies or delays access to medical care.” (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Walker v. Butler, 967 F.2d 176, 178 (5th Cir.1992))). Moreover, the parties agree that Stewart’s medical condition was known by the prison guards. Our review of the summary judgment evidence indicates that Appellees also intentionally disregarded the established treatment plan for Stewart. See Chapman v. Johnson, 339 Fed.Appx. 446, 448 (5th Cir.2009) (per curiam) (unpublished) (stating that a defendant is not entitled to summary judgment based on qualified immunity when the defendant knew of prisoner’s injury and treatment protocol but failed to follow it); see also Easter, 467 F.3d at 465 . Accordingly, the district court erred when it
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that summary judgment was improper on qualified immunity grounds when defendant was aware of prisoners need for medical treatment but failed to provide it
B. holding that summary judgment in favor of the defendant was appropriate because the plaintiff failed to designate evidence that demonstrates that the defendant abused the qualified privilege
C. holding that it was error for the district court to overrule  appellants motion for summary judgment without reference to the qualified immunity defense
D. holding that summary judgment for defendant officials on the basis of qualified immunity was improper given officials indefinite refusal to treat plaintiffs cavity
E. holding that an interlocutory appeal lies from a denial of summary judgment on a qualified immunity claim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.