Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
value of the profit, including reasonable overhead, the lessor would have made from full performance ... together with any incidental damages ... due allowance for costs reasonably incurred and due credit for payments or proceeds of distribution.” 7 . Other "tests” have been adopted. For example, in Sunrick v. Pacific Foods of Oregon, 2004 WL 1124495 (D.Or.2004), the District Court for the District of Oregon held that "[a]s an alleged lost volume seller, Pacific therefore bears the burden of establishing that its production capacity was such that, if Sunrich had not breached the Packing Agreement, Pacific would have been able to meet Sunrich’s requirements, as well as the needs of alternative buyers.” See also Van Ness Motors v. Vikram, 221 N.J.Super. 543, 535 A.2d 510, 511 (A.D.1987) ; Iran v. Boeing Co., 771 F.2d 1279 (9th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that purchaser could rescind contract where seller failed to disclose a fact  the flooding of the subject real estate  that seller knew purchaser would regard as material
B. holding that a nondealer seller of a car had no duty either to install seatbelts or to warn of them absence to purchaser
C. holding that a person who obtains drugs from a seller is not an accomplice of the seller
D. recognizing that most other jurisdictions have held that to qualify as a lost volume seller under section 27082 the seller needs to show only that it could have supplied both the breaching purchaser and the resale purchaser
E. holding that under mississippi law a purchaser is a bona fide purchaser for value without notice unless there is actual notice or circumstances which would put a purchaser on inquiry notice
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.