Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
symbols.” Burkes, 953 F.Supp.2d at 179 (internal quotation marks omitted). But it is undisputed that racist symbol was not part of the action figure display that lies at the heart of Ms. Toomer’s racially hostile work environment claim. Ms. Toomer’s argument otherwise is that there is no “standard” that permits a court to determine “as a matter of law” when an African-American perceives a noose. PL’s Objs., ECF No. 99 at 14. Thus, she contends that whether or not the white cord in this case could fairly be described as a noose, she was confronted by “a horrific and frightening image,” and thus she was subjected to a hostile work environment. Id. But that line of reasoning ignores the objective component of the hostile work environment analysis. See Harris, 510 U.S. at 21, 114 S.Ct. 367  (emphasis added). A reasonable observer of the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a hostile work environment is a form of discrimination that is actionable under the statute
B. holding that a viable hostile work environment claim requires an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive
C. recognizing hostile work environment discrimination in ada context
D. recognizing that the elements of title vii sexually hostile work environment claims apply to icra sexually hostile work environment claims
E. recognizing a hostile work environment claim under section 1983
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.