Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
from the time of the damaged shipment until the time of the insurance payment. Because National Insurance, as subrogee, is only entitled to indemnity for its payment to Tabacalera, we believe that the district court did not err in computing prejudgment interest from the date that National Insurance paid Tabacalera’s claim. D. Simple Prejudgment Interest On cross-appeal, National Insurance also submits that the district court erred in awarding simple rather than compound prejudgment interest. As a general rule, the decision whether to award compound or simple prejudgment interest is left to the discretion of the trial court. See Gorenstein Enters., Inc. v. Quality Care-USA, Inc., 874 F.2d 431, 437 (7th Cir.1989); EEOC v. Kentucky State Police Dep’t, 80 F.3d 1086, 1098 (6th Cir.1996) ; Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., 56 F.3d 1538,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding prejudgment interest on attorneys fees paid prior to the entry of judgment
B. holding that prejudgment interest may inelude compound interest
C. holding in adea action that district court did not abuse its discretion by awarding compound rather than simple prejudgment interest
D. holding that prejudgment interest may include compound interest
E. holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding prejudgment interest at the colorado statutory rate of 8 percent
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.