Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
term of the probation, the trial court should be able to weigh that violation in its reevaluation of whether the defendant should be or should have been granted probation.... Once a defendant has been sentenced, the court may revoke or modify probation, upon a proper showing of a violation, at any time before the completion of the probationary period. Gardner v. State, 678 N.E.2d 398, 401 (Ind.Ct.App.1997) (internal citations and footnote omitted). Pugh claims the trial court abused its discretion by revoking her probation because her only probation violation was drinking vodka. Courts of this state have held on numerous occasions that the use of alcohol or drugs was sufficient to support the trial court's revocation of probation. See, e.g., Cox v. State, 706 N.E.2d 547, 552 (Ind.1999) , reh'g denied; Crump, 740 N.E.2d at 573
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding probation revocation is not a stage of a criminal prosecution
B. holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking defendants probation when urinalysis tested positive for use of morphine
C. holding that standard for revocation of probation is preponderance of the evidence
D. holding defendant cannot establish prejudice merely by alleging court held probation revocation hearing after defendants period of probation expired
E. holding defendants positive urinalysis test for marijuana use was sufficient to support revocation of defendants probation
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.