Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
it may award full attorney’s fees; we will set such an award aside only if it is “manifestly unreasonable and amounts to a clear abuse of discretion.” Given Mr. Song’s failure to argue this issue, we find no reason to disturb the award of full fees to Ms. Song for defending against Mr. Song’s motion to set aska 1972) (same, regarding a Rule 60(b)(1) motion). 8 . O'Link v. O'Link, 632 P.2d 225, 230 (Alaska 1981). 9 . See Carvalho v. Carvalho, 838 P.2d 259, 261 n. 4 (Alaska 1992). 10 . Cf. Cushing v. Painter, 666.P.2d 1044, 1045-46 (Alaska 1983) (finding that the court violated basic fairness by issuing final custody order with^out notice after expedited, interim hearing). 11 . AS 25.24.220(g). 12 . See Aarvig v. Aarvig, 248 N.J.Super. 181, 590 A.2d 704, 706-07 (N.J.Super.App.Div.1991) ; Bond v. Bond, 69 Ohio App.3d 225, 590 N.E.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a settlement agreement is not a court order and therefore a violation of the settlement agreement would not subject a party to contempt
B. holding that a court may only enforce a settlement agreement if it constitutes an enforceable contract
C. holding that the trial court had authority to enforce a marital property settlement agreement that had not been incorporated into the parties final divorce decree
D. holding that trial court is without authority to modify a settlement agreement but may enforce and interpret it
E. holding that court may not refuse to enforce noncompete agreement solely because geographical area is unreasonable but rather must modify unreasonable restriction and enforce agreement as modified
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.