Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that foster parents have standing under federal law to raise foster child’s rights). We should join the growing number of our sister jurisdictions who have conferred standing to be heard to foster parents in proceedings related to children that have been in their care. Some states, such as Delaware, Nebraska, South Carolina, and West Virginia have conferred standing to foster parents via judicial decision. See In re C.M.D., 256 A.2d 266 (De.1969)(deciding that foster parents had standing to petition Family Court for custody of foster child); In re Jorius G., 249 Neb. 892, 546 N.W.2d 796 (1996)(finding that foster parents had standing to contest agency’s removal of foster child); Greenville County Department of Social Services v. Bowes, 313 S.C. 188, 437 S.E.2d 107 (1993); In re Harley C., 203 W.Va. 594, 509 S.E.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that the department is required to present clear and convincing evidence to support termination of a parents parental rights
B. holding foster parents not liable for willful act of their foster child
C. recognizing emotional bond between foster parents and child although ultimately determining foster parents did not have rights of parents in dependency action under chapter 2644 rcw
D. holding that natural parents could not lose parental rights to foster parents where the foster agreement contemplates a surrender of custody for only a temporary period of time
E. holding that foster parents have standing to intervene to seek termination of parental rights
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.