Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a dispositional review hearing could not be combined with a termination of parental rights proceeding because doing so "would bypass the steps established by the Legislature for final determination of a child's status." Id. at 816. AE. addresses a situation where the parents did not yet have the opportunity to fulfill the service plan, and thus, a termination hearing at the same time as the permanency hearing was inappropriate. See id. However, here, the juvenile court did not conduct a disposi-tional hearing and a termination hearing at the same time-it held a permanency hearing and a termination hearing concurrently. Utah Code Ann. § 78-8a-312(6)(c)(8upp.2000) explicitly allows termination and permanency hearings to be combined. Cf. In re KM., 965 P.2d 576, 582 (Utah Ct.App.1998) . C. Ruling Regarding Permission to Medicate
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that  2253 analysis may be done at the time the claim for relief is determined
B. holding proper for permanency plan to be determined at dispositional hearing
C. holding that the constitutional level of punitive damages is not a finding of fact that must be determined by the jury it may be determined de novo by the court
D. holding state of the law must be determined at time of challenged action
E. holding that where perception of bias arose during the hearing then it was proper for counsel to move for disqualification at the hearing and then to later reduce motion to writing to be in compliance with rule
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.