Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a class be treated the same, unless the creditor who is being treated less favorably agrees to less favorable treatment.”). Thus, the Amended Plan satisfies 11 U.S.C. §§ 1122 and 1123(a). Further, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1123(b), the Amended Plan properly preserves the Debtor’s ability to prosecute the Adversary Proceeding. See In re Tex. Gen. Petroleum Corp., 52 F.3d 1330, 1335 n. 4 (5th Cir.1995) (explaining that a debt- or may retain post-confirmation causes of action if the plan so provides). However, to the extent that the Amended Plan makes a blanket reservation of causes of action that may be pursued by the Debtor, these generic causes of action may not be preserved. See Dynasty Oil & Gas, LLC v. Citizens Bank (In re United Operating, LLC), 540 F.3d 351, 355-56 (5th Cir.2008) . Thus, in this particular respect, the Amended
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a debtor cannot appeal a confirmation order on the basis that it unfairly discriminates against a class of claims
B. holding that fraud on the court must be supported by clear unequivocal and convincing evidence
C. holding that controlling shareholder of postconfirmation debtor could not pursue unlisted preconfirmation claim on behalf of creditors
D. holding that a debtor must make a specific and unequivocal reservation of claims that would effectively put its creditors on notice of any claim it wishes to pursue after confirmation
E. holding that the waiver of sovereign immunity must be clear and unequivocal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.