Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the Rules “have the force of law” throughout the state Id. at 166. The Court expressly reaffirmed Holt, however, explaining that the Rule 16(a)(2) “exception to disclosure and inspection does not apply to investigative files in possession of state agents or law enforcement officers, where the files have been closed and are not relevant to any pending or contemplated criminal action.” Id. Four years later, in 1991, the General Assembly amended the Public Records Act by replacing the phrase “state statute” with the phrase “state law.” This Court has since held that the phrase “state law,” added by the 1991 amendment, encompasses the Rules of Civil Procedure such that documents shielded by the Rules need not be disclosed pursuant to the Public Records Act. See Ballard, 924 S.W.2d at 662 ; see also Swift v. Campbell, 159 S.W.3d 565,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that by vesting jurisdiction of gtla actions in circuit court where the tennessee rules of civil procedure applied the legislature intended to allow the tennessee rules of civil procedure to apply to gtla actions
B. holding that tennessee rule of civil procedure 24 is not applicable to proceedings in juvenile court
C. holding that the public records act does not mandate disclosure of documents sealed by a protective order entered pursuant to the tennessee rules of civil procedure
D. holding that a protective order prohibiting the disclosure of pretrial discovery does not offend the first amendment
E. holding that the public records act does not mandate disclosure of records protected by tennessee rule of criminal procedure 16
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.