Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the duration of the proceedings, to cross-examine the State’s witnesses, and to call and subpoena witnesses on the defendant’s own behalf. See generally Rule 5-302 NMRA. {17} Because grand jury proceedings are conducted by a prosecutor acting under the indirect supervision of the grand jury judge, we rely on the structural protections of the grand jury statutes and procedural rules to preserve the target’s rights and the integrity of the grand jury process. If the target of a grand jury investigation establishes, pretrial, that the grand jury proceedings were conducted in violation of these structural protections, the target is entitled to dismissal of the indictment and is not required to demonstrate prejudice. See, e.g., De Leon v. Hartley, 2014-NMSC-005, ¶¶ 16-17, 316 P.3d 896 ; Davis, 1977-NMSC-049, ¶4 (holding “that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the supervisory control of the district court may be exercised through its equitable jurisdiction
B. holding district court should have abstained pursuant to younger and thus remanding to district court to dismiss without prejudice
C. holding that the prosecuting attorneys failure to instruct grand jurors on the record of the elements of the relevant criminal offenses warranted dismissal of the indictment without a showing of prejudice
D. holding that there was no prejudice where had the district court allowed the moving party the proper opportunity to respond the evidence would have been properly in front of the district court
E. holding that the district court should have quashed an indictment without requiring the target to show prejudice because the district attorney improperly exercised control over the selection and excusal of grand jurors and the defendant brought this to the attention of the district court before trial
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.