Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in charge of other state actors who actually committed the violation.” Id. Rather, “the plaintiff must establish a deliberate, intentional act by the supervisor to violate constitutional rights.” Id. at 994-95 (quotations and citations omitted). Mr. Spencer’s filings do not provide a basis for the imposition of supervisor liability. And in the supervisors’ official capacities, Mr. Spencer was required to demonstrate that his injuries were the result of a municipal “policy or custom.” Novitsky v. City of Aurora, 491 F.3d 1244, 1259 (10th Cir.2007) (“A municipality cannot be held liable for its officers’ actions under § 1983 unless those actions were caused by a policy or custom of the municipality.”); Myers v. Okla. County Bd. of County Comm’rs, 151 F.3d 1313, 1316 n. 2 (10th Cir.1998) . A “ ‘custom’ ... mean[s] an act that,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that punitive damages are not recoverable against a state official sued in his or her official capacity
B. recognizing that suits against municipal officers acting in an official capacity are treated the same as those against a municipality
C. holding that a suit against a state official in his or her official capacity is a suit against the state itself and not cognizable under  1983
D. holding that an official capacity suit should be treated as a suit against the entity
E. holding that a suit against a state official in his or her official capacity is not a suit against the official but rather is a suit against the officials office
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.