Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
or she has not been made a party by service of process.’ ” Cossio, 163 B.R. at 154 (quoting Mason v. Genisco Technology Corp., 960 F.2d 849, 851 (9th Cir.1992)). Other courts have also held that a default judgment is void and should be set aside if there has been no proper service of the complaint. E.g., Combs v. Nick Garin Trucking, 825 F.2d 437, 442 (D.C.Cir.1987); Gold Kist, Inc. v. Laurinburg Oil Co., Inc., 756 F.2d 14, 19 (3d Cir.1985). Because a court asserts in personam jurisdiction to adjudicate the rights of a party through service of process, an in personam judgment is void where the requirements for effective service have not been satisfied. Combs, 825 F.2d at 442; see also, e.g., Hospital Mortgage Group, Inc. v. Parque Indus. Rio Canas, Inc., 653 F.2d 54, 56 (1st Cir.1981) ; Central Operating Co. v. Utility Workers of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the judgment was entered without jurisdiction and was therefore a nullity
B. holding that service of subpoena on plaintiffs counsel as opposed to the plaintiff himself renders such service a nullity
C. holding that a district courts order of dismissal with prejudice was a nullity because the court lacked jurisdiction
D. holding that if service is inadequate defendant never submitted to courts jurisdiction and underlying judgment is therefore a nullity
E. recognizing default judgment must generally be set aside without further showing if defendant never received service of process
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.