Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
carries a firearm, shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such crime or violence or drug trafficking crime, be sentenced to imprisonment for five years. 3 . Section 922(k) provides in relevant part: It shall be unlawful for any person ... to possess or receive any firearm which has had the importer's or manufacturer's serial number removed, obliterated, or altered and has, at any time, been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce. 4 . We note additionally that even if the gun was first discovered at the scene of the arrest, the evidence in the record before us shows that a search of the glove compartment incident to defendant’s arrest would have been lawful. See New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 460-61 & n. 4, 101 S.Ct. 2860, 2864-65 & n. 4, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 . Moreover, given that defendant concedes the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding police incident to arrest of occupant of automobile may search entire passenger compartment of vehicle
B. holding that after making an arrest of the driver of a vehicle the police may search the passenger compartment of the vehicle
C. holding when a policeman has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile he may as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest search the passenger compartment of that automobile
D. recognizing that permissive search of car compartment incident to arrest is based on the fact that compartment is within reach of the arrestee
E. holding that after policeman has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile he may as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest examine the contents of any containers including glove compartments found within the passenger compartment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.