Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
fact that people do so, and do so without being told they are free not to respond, hardly eliminates the consensual nature of the response. Unless the circumstances of the encounter are so intimidating as to demonstrate that a reasonable person would have believed he was not free to leave if he had not responded, one cannot say that the questioning resulted in a detention under the Fourth Amendment. 466 U.S. at 216-17, 104 S.Ct. at 1762-63 (citations omitted). Thus, Consiglio did not continue to detain Appellee by merely asking him a question about whether he was transporting contraband. When a traffic stop ceases to be a detention and the driver voluntarily consents to additional questioning, no further seizure occurs. See United States v. Sullivan, 138 F.3d 126, 133 (4th Cir.1998) ; United States v. Anderson, 114 F.3d 1059,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding detention lawful when police referred driver to secondary to check ownership of the vehicle after the driver admitted that the car did not belong to him and the registration revealed that the car was owned by another
B. holding that possession of a drivers license is irrelevant to the offense of failing to present a license which is completed by failing to present the license when requested to do so by an officer
C. holding warrant check lawful if detention not extended beyond time necessary to request license and registration and issue citation
D. holding that detention ended when police officer returned drivers license and registration and driver voluntarily consented to additional questioning
E. holding that traffic stop ceases to become a detention and becomes a consensual encounter when police officer returns license and registration unless driver has objectively reasonable cause to believe that he or she is not free to leave
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.