Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
” Id. (quoting Mennonite Bd. of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791, 798 n. 4, 103 S.Ct. 2706, 77 L.Ed.2d 180 (1983)). Reasonable diligence does not require a debtor to conduct “ ‘impracticable and extended searches ... in the name of due process.’ ” Id. (quoting Mullane, 339 U.S. at 317, 70 S.Ct. 652). To that end, “[a] debtor does not have a ‘duty to search out each conceivable or possible creditor and urge that person or entity to make a claim against it.’ ” Id. (quoting Charter, 125 B.R. at 654). Efforts beyond a careful examination of a debtor’s own books and records are generally not required. Id. at 347. For unknown claimants or creditors, it is well established that “constructive notice of the bar claims date by publication satisfies the requirements of due process.” Id. at 348 ; see Brown v. Seaman Furniture Co., 171 B.R.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding publication in local and national editions of the new york times sufficient notice to claimant in pennsylvania
B. holding death caused by unknown object provides sufficient notice
C. holding that notice published in the new york times and the wall street journal was sufficient to satisfy due process owed to unknown creditors
D. holding publication in the wall street journal sufficient notice to unknown creditor injured in louisiana
E. holding publication notice in the wall street journal adequate under bankruptcy law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.