Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
third issue, which faults trial counsel for failing to ensure a complete record was made of the voir dire. The present record includes only part of the voir dire proceedings, that is, the individual voir dire strikes and final jury selection. During the motion for new trial hearing, counsel said it was his typical practice to have the voir dire recorded and that there was no trial strategy associated with the failure to ensure that a full record was made of voir dire. Mere failure of counsel to request recordation of the voir dire examination is not ineffective assistance of counsel per se. Ybarra v. State, 890 S.W.2d 98, 112 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1994, pet. ref'd); Wills v. State, 867 S.W.2d 852, 857 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, pet. ref'd); see also Thompson, 9 S.W.3d at 813 . “Some injury resulting from the failure to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing reluctance to designate any error as per se ineffective assistance
B. holding that constructive amendments which are per se reversible under harmless error analysis are also per se reversible under plain error analysis
C. holding that criminal defense counsels failure to file notice of appeal when requested to do so is per se ineffective assistance
D. holding that an attorneys conflict of interest gives rise to a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under the sixth amendment and establishes prejudice per se
E. recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.