Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
“it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). Here, Plaintiffs are the nonmoving party. II. DISCUSSION Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ consolidated, amended complaint on several grounds, the first of which is that Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Section 13 of the 1933 Securities Act provides that a federal securities fraud action must be brought within one year following the discovery of the untrue statement or omission giving rise to the claim. 15 U.S.C. § 77m; see also Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson, 501 U.S. 350, 364, 111 S.Ct. 2773, 115 L.Ed.2d 321 (1991) ; Theoharous v. Fong, 256 F.3d 1219, 1228 & n.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that  10b and rule 10b5 apply to frauds against brokers
B. holding that a person violates  10b and rule 10b5 when he misappropriates confidential information  in breach of a duty owed to the source of the information
C. holding that actions asserting claims based on  10b and rule 10b5 must be initiated within a year of discovering the facts establishing the violation
D. holding only purchasers and sellers of securities can recover under section 10b and rule 10b5
E. holding that section 10b and rule 10b5 suits must be commenced within one year after the discovery of the facts constituting the violation and within three years after such violation
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.