Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
or damage the property of another.” In order to convict Mr. Ellis of home invasion, the State was required to prove: • that Mr. Ellis entered the Residence; • that the Residence was an inhabited dwelling or a structure used in whole or in part as a home or place of abode; • that Mr. Ellis was not authorized to enter the Residence; • that the Residence did not belong to Mr. Ellis; and • that Mr. Ellis acted with specific intent to use force or violence upon the person of another or to vandalize, deface, or damage the property of another. See Cheney C. Joseph, and P. Raymond Lamonica, 17 LA. CIV. L. TREATISE, CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS § 10.62.8 (2d ed.2011)(defining elements of home invasion offense); see also State v. Hart, 10-1614, p. 6 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/2/11), 80 So.3d 25, 30  The first two elements of the offense are
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an illegal arrest occurred when the defendant was transported without probable cause from his home to the police station for fingerprinting and that the line is crossed when the police without probable cause or a warrant forcibly remove a person from his home or other place in which he is entitled to be and transport him to the police station where he is detained although briefly for investigative purposes
B. holding that the defendant failed to demonstrate legitimate expectation of privacy where he could not show that he had the owners permission to use the car or demonstrate prior use or control of the car
C. holding that to convict a defendant of home invasion pursuant to la rs 14628 the state is required to prove that he entered a dwelling owned by another without permission that the dwelling was used in whole or in part as a home that a person was present when he made the unauthorized entry and that he had the intent to use force or violence upon the person or to vandalize deface or damage the property
D. holding tila applies only to credit transactions secured by real or personal property used or expected to be used as the principal dwelling of the debtor
E. holding there was enough evidence to find the defendant abandoned his child when he claimed to have knowledge of cpss involvement he admitted that for periods of two years and six months he did not attempt any contact with his child and from the date he canceled a home study until the petition was filed he did not attempt to contact the child or cps or provide support even when he was out of jail
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.