Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the time the Agreement was recorded Hoffenberg owned both parcels of land. Because the Agreement purported to convey an easement from Hoffenberg, as both grantor and grantee, the trial court held that Hoffenberg’s attempt to create an easement over his own property was void ab initio. The trial court further held that One Harbor neither proved the establishment of an easement by prescription nor an implied easement because the equitable arguments raised were not supported by the facts, the record or the law. We agree with the trial court’s findings. APPLICATION OF SECTION 687.07, FLORIDA STATUTES In reaching its decision, the trial court applied section 689.07, Florida Statutes (1959). Section 689.07 provides: (1) Every deed or conveyance of real estate heretofore (Tex.Com.App.1928) ; Bales v. Butts, 309 Mo. 142, 274 S.W. 679
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that an easement may entitle the easement owner to do acts which were not for the easement would constitute a nuisance
B. recognizing that one cannot have an easement in his own land
C. holding that one who possesses deeded easement need not use the easement to maintain his title and easement cannot be extinguished from nonuser alone
D. holding one cannot grant an easement to oneself one can only reserve such interest in land granted to another
E. holding that an easement agreement and an unrecorded easement plan created an easement
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.