Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
not the Columbia County Probation and Parole Office — as a defendant, and avers that “Defendant Columbia County is a municipality within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that, at all times relevant hereto, operated the Columbia County Probation Department.” .App. 1220. However, Columbia County denied this claim in its answer, stating that “it is specifically denied that Columbia County operated the County Probation Department with respect to the allegations of the Second Amended Complaint,” and asserting that “Defendant Panetta was acting as an officer of the court, which is a branch of the state for purposes of the alleged claims.” App. 1288. This assertion'is sup ported by the rule this Court articulated in Benn v. First Judicial District of Pa., 426 F.3d 233, 241 (3d Cir.2005) , which we underscored in Haybarger, 551 F.3d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that local school boards were not entitled to eleventh amendment immunity even though entitled to sovereign immunity in the same degree as the state itself from tort suits
B. holding that judges have immunity from suit for judicial acts
C. holding that school districts do not share in the commonwealth of pennsylvanias eleventh amendment sovereign immunity because they are not alter egos of the commonwealth
D. holding that pennsylvanias judicial districts are entitled to immunity from suit under the eleventh amendment
E. holding that the department of corrections was entitled to eleventh amendment immunity from suit under section 1981
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.