Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
second-category Lopez power. Marek, 238 F.3d at 318 (footnote omitted) (quoting Photogrammetric Data Services, 103 F.Supp.2d at 882). Other courts have reached similar conclusions, upholding convictions based upon criminal statutes which serve to protect instrumentalities of interstate commerce even though the specific conduct involved arose from intrastate activities. For example, in United States v. Baker, 82 F.3d 273 (8th Cir.1996), the Eighth Circuit upheld the conviction of a police officer under the Travel Act, see 18 U.S.C.A. § 1952(a) (West 2000), premised upon extortion activity in which the officer escorted his victim, a man he had arrested, to an automatic teller machine to withdraw money in return for being released from custody. Because an interstate networ 9th Cir.1997) ; United States v. Kunzman, 54 F.3d 1522, 1527
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the defendants stipulation that the gun had moved in interstate commerce was sufficient evidence to support his conviction under 18 usc  922g1
B. holding that because cellular telephones and cellphone id numbers are instrumentalities of interstate commerce protectable under the second category of lopez no further inquiry was necessary to sustain conviction under 18 usca  1029a west 2000
C. holding the limitations to congresss commerce clause authority recognized in lopez have no effect on the establishment of the interstate commerce element of the hobbs act
D. holding after lopez that the interstate nexus element of the hobbs act still requires the government to show only a minimal connection to interstate commerce
E. holding that commerce clause authorizes congress to punish any particular criminal action even without proof of a relation to interstate commerce when the activity is part of a class of activities determined by congress to affect interstate commerce
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.