Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
ND 161, ¶ 5, 652 N.W.2d 354, and states that “[a]ny party to any proceeding heard by an administrative agency, except when the order of the administrative agency is declared final by any other statute, may appeal from the order within 30 days after notice of the order has been given as required by section 28-32-39.” An “order” is defined in N.D.C.C. § 28-32-01(7) as “any agency action of particular applicability which determines the legal rights, duties, privileges, immunities, or other legal interests of one or more specific persons.” Section 28-32-42(3)(a), N.D.C.C., emphasizes that “[o]nly final orders are appealable. A procedural order made by an administrative agency while a proceeding is pending before it is not a final order.” [¶ 7] The requirement o N.W.2d 249, 251 (N.D.1992) ; Ceartin v. Ochs, 479 N.W.2d 863, 865
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a disqualification order in a criminal case is not appealable
B. holding order granting a new trial is not a final appealable order because it does not terminate the action or any of the claims or parties in the action
C. holding that this court lacked preliminary authority to review the district courts jurisdiction because there was no immediately appealable order before the court
D. holding order partially vacating a judgment was not appealable because it does not provide the ultimate decision in the case and questions remained before the district court
E. holding appealable a case dismissed in effect by the district courts order
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.