Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
read a copy of the court’s January 21, 1997, order setting the default judgment damage hearing. Leigh contacted its current counsel which entered an appearance the next day, January 29,1997. Only at this point did Leigh begin to pursue the defense of this matter in a vigorous manner. While miscommunication due to poor internal communication systems is understandable, it is not excusable. Air Canada, 810 F.2d at 1537. It is not enough to argue that a mail clerk misplaced the complaint, Id., or to contend that the Postal Service lost the complaint, Baez, 518 F.2d at 350. Instead, organizations must have systems for “checking up on process to see that it has in fact reached its destination and that action is being taken.” Air Canada, 810 F.2d at 1537; see also Baez, 518 F.2d at 350 . Throughout this action Leigh lacked a system
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that internal procedural safeguards could and should have been established to prevent the loss of a complaint by the postal service and the consequent entry of default judgment
B. holding that in considering the appellants opposition to the motion for a default judgment it is proper to apply the rule 55c standard for setting aside the entry of a default
C. recognizing that a default judgment based on improper service is void
D. holding that entry of a default judgment was inappropriate where complaint merely recited statutory language and contained no facts
E. holding that trial court must make entry of default prior to entry of default judgment and court may not make entry of default when there is no default in law or in fact
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.