Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
J. Jacqueline Moore appeals the summary denial of her motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which raised eleven claims. Because the rationale for denial, along with record attachments, supports the trial court’s ruling with respect to ten of the claims, we affirm as to those issues without further discussion. However, we reverse the summary denial of Moore’s first claim, and remand for an evidentiary hearing on that claim only. Moore was convicted of attempted first degree murder with a firearm following a jury trial on that charge. Her conviction was affirmed on appeal. Moore v. State, 942 So.2d 897 (Fla. 5th DCA 20 ) ; Rigdon v. State, 621 So.2d 475 (Fla. 4th DCA
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that evidence was sufficient to prove defendant constructively possessed the gun where although defendant denied ownership of the gun it was found near a knife of which defendant claimed ownership and where defendant was aware of the presence of the gun
B. holding direct testimony tying a defendant to a gun was not required when the gun was found in the defendants truck and when the defendant had both ammunition for the gun and a rack in which it could have been kept
C. holding that evidence of violent crimes and other illegal activities of defendants gang was not unduly prejudicial because defendant was not directly implicated and the evidence was probative of elements of the crimes that the defendant was charged with
D. holding that it was error to admit into evidence a gun purchased by the defendant which was not connected with the charged crimes
E. holding that it was error to admit into evidence 880 cartridges found in defendants car where there was no link established between the cartridges and the crime charged
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.