Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Virgin Atl. Airways, Ltd. v. National Mediation Bd., 956 F.2d 1245, 1255 (2d Cir.1992)). 14 . Grand Crossing, L.P. v. United States Underwriters Ins. Co., No. 03 Civ. 5429, 2008 WL 4525400, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2008) (quoting S.E.C. v. Ashbury Capital Partners, No. 00 Civ. 7898, 2001 WL 604044, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 31, 2001)). Accord Commerce Funding Corp. v. Comprehensive Habilitation Servs., Inc., 233 F.R.D. 355, 361 (S.D.N.Y.2005) ("[A] movant may not raise on a motion for reconsideration any matter that it did not raise previously to the court on the underlying motion sought to be reconsidered.”). 15 . United States v. Treacy, No. 08 Cr. 0366, 2009 WL 47496, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2009) (quotation omitted). Accord Shrader v. CSX Transp. Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir.1995) . 16 . Makas v. Orlando, No. 06 Civ. 14305,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the bia may deny a motion to reopen on the ground that the movant has not established prima facie eligibility for the underlying relief sought
B. holding that constitutional questions will not be decided if case can be decided on other grounds
C. holding that district court lacked power to decide personal jurisdiction issue already decided by district of columbia superior court
D. holding that a party may not use a rule 60b motion as an occasion to relitigate its case
E. holding that a court will deny the motion when the movant seeks solely to relitigate an issue already decided
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.