Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
submitted a written curative instruction and asked the court to include it in the court’s final jury instructions: The Cincinnati Insurance Company was mentioned by Mr. Gratzianna. The Cincinnati Insurance Company does not insure Mr. Whitaker or Milford Towing or the Plaintiff. There is no evidence before you that the defendants or plaintiff have or do not have insurance. Whether such insurance exists has no bearing upon any issue in this case. You must not discuss or consider it for any purpose. The district court characterized Gratzi-anna’s comment as not “even a foul tip. It was just a loose comment that I think right now is better off left quiet without any further instruction to highlight ... the comment itself.” The court agreed to address the iss 1565-66, 1568-69 (11th Cir.1992) . This Court held long ago that, when a trial
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that when no objection was made to jury instruction evidence to support finding based on instruction should be assessed in light of the instruction given
B. holding that failure to comply with state contemporaneous objection rule bars federal review absent a showing of cause and prejudice
C. holding that any misstatements of law during closing argument are presumed cured by final instruction
D. holding mistrial unwarranted where contemporaneous objection was made to single mention of insurance and court gave cautionary instruction
E. holding no prejudice occurred where party made contemporaneous objection to brief remark about insurance during closing argument and court gave cautionary instruction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.