Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a further purpose or different character, altering the first [work] with new expression, meaning or message.” Id. “[T]he more transformative the new work, the less will be the significance of other factors, like commercialism, that may weigh against a finding of fair use.” Id. (quoting Campbell, 510 U.S. at 579, 114 S.Ct. 1164). See also, Pac. & S. Co., Inc. v. Duncan, 744 F.2d 1490, 1496 (11th Cir.1984)(noting that the distinction between creative and non-creative uses can be helpful in calibrating the balance in the fair use analysis). In some cases, the transformative nature of a work overshadows and outweighs its commercial purpose. This is particularly true in the realm of parody, as “a parody’s aim is, by nature, to transform an earlier work.” Suntrust Bank, 268 F.3d at 1269. . See also, Campbell, 510 U.S. at 579, 114
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the statutory definition of the term sell conspicuously excludes any requirement that the transfer be commercial in nature or conducted for a particular type of benefit or underlying purpose
B. holding that the fact that the fire was communicated to other property may reasonably be inferred from common knowledge of the operation of the established laws of nature in the familiar forms of combustion  and the effects of wind on fire 
C. holding a defense of alcoholism was outweighed by the seriousness of the offense and the appellants prior disciplinary record
D. holding that the appropriate sanction was to require the defendant to disclose the nature of the agreement with the witness
E. holding that the transformative nature of the wind done gone a parody of gone with the wind outweighed its commercial purpose
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.