Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of the elements of a cause of action.’ ” Id. (quoting Coody v. A.H. Robins Co., 696 S.W.2d 154, 156 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1985, writ dism’d by agr.)); Reynolds v. Guido, 166 S.W.3d 789, 793 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2005, pet. denied). When asserting a limitations defense at the pleading stage, the defendant’s burden to establish the accrual date includes negating the applicability of the discovery rule. Doe v. L cognizing a two-year statute of limitations for DTPA and negligence claims under Texas law). The Texas statute of limitations for fraud and breach of contract claims is four years. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 16.004(a)(4) (Vernon 2002) (fraud); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 16.051 (Vernon 2008) (breach of contract); Newby v. Enron Corp., 542 F.3d 463, 468 (5th Cir.2008) ; Stine v. Stewart, 80 S.W.3d 586, 592
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that either a fouryear or a twoyear limitations period applies to claims under the idea in ohio for tuition reimbursement either way the claims were timebarred
B. holding that fouryear residual statute of limitations applied to claim for commonlaw rescission
C. recognizing a fouryear statute of limitation for fraud claims
D. holding fouryear period for statutory actions applies to section 440205 claims
E. holding that duration of limitation is a factor in determining whether limitation is significant
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.