Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
seat with his foot. Both defendants denied this. This testimony is not credible because a CB is not illegal, and there would have been no motivation to hide it under a seat. Instead, it was in front of the console on the floor where the documents were kept. Stark moved the CB when he went into the console to retrieve the papers. Finally, defendants gave a consistent story that they were traveling to Vermont to go mountain-biking and offered proof, including the mountain bikes. The government argues that th 1, 100 S.Ct. 2752, 65 L.Ed.2d 890 (1980) (expressing concern in the airport search context about a drug courier profile that would “describe a very large category of presumably innocent travelers who would be subject to v ted States v. Garcia, 897 F.2d 1413, 1418-19 (7th Cir.1990) ; United States v. Miller, 821 F.2d 546, 549
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that defendant who was a passenger in a car had joint constructive possession of drugs found next to the defendants luggage in truck of car even where she disclaimed ownership of the drugs
B. holding that because the government was unable to prove that a truck in which illegal drugs were discovered was stolen the driver and passenger had standing to challenge the search
C. holding a driver had standing to suppress the drugs found in the underwear of the drivers passenger during an unreasonably prolonged roadside stop of both driver and passenger
D. holding that the consent of the driver was invalid when the officer knew that the passenger was the owner of the automobile
E. holding that the driver of a car who had permission to use the car had standing to challenge its search
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.