Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
first year. DOT, meanwhile, continued to forward the balance of the commissions, minus a percentage for administrative costs, to the Commonwealth's Bureau of Blindness and Visual Services. (DOT’s brief at 4.) 12 . As noted previously, DOT terminated each of the five contracts effective January 14, 1990. Accordingly, the contracts for Site 55, Site 56, Site 62 and Site F were in the second renewal period at the time of termination; only the contract for Site 61 was still in the first renewal period. 13 . See also Central Transportation, Inc. v. Board of Assessment Appeals of Cambria County, 490 Pa. 486, 417 A.2d 144 (1980); Citizen Care, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, 118 Pa.Cmwlth. 397, 545 A.2d 455 (1988). But see Spatz v. Nascone, 368 F.Supp. 352 (W.D.Pa.1973) . 14 . Although it is true, as DOT argues in
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that where a contract results from joint efforts of attorneys for both sides contract should not be construed against either party
B. holding that prevailing party to contract dispute may recover attorneys fees either pursuant to contract or pursuant to statute
C. holding that construction that neutralizes any provision of a contract should not be adopted if the contract can be construed to give effect to all provisions
D. holding that person who is not party to contract does not have standing to challenge contract
E. holding an ambiguous contract will be construed against the party drafting the same
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.