Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
standard has been met in this case, I would vacate the district court’s order and remand with instructions to reconsider the balance of the public and private interests consistent with this opinion. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent. 1 . This sentence represents the entirety of the state court’s factual findings regarding the parties' private interests in this case. As discussed infra, however, the district court described these findings differently in its order. 2 . Plaintiffs' interest in being present for trial is a private interest weighing in favor of ' Plaintiffs' choice of forum which should be considered separate and apart from the issue of whether Guatemala provides an adequate forum. See Mujica v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 381 F.Supp.2d 1134, 1150 (C.D.Cal.2005) ; Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLC, 221 F.Supp.2d 1116,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding plaintiffs are not deprived of a liberty interest because they cannot have the best job in their field
B. holding that only relevant factors must be considered
C. holding that the plaintiffs first amendment retaliation claims are deficient because in each case the incidents upon which plaintiffs base their pleadings concerned personal grievances expressed as employees generally relating to their official duties work schedules working conditions or employer administrative policies and internal operations rather than to any matters of public concern raised by plaintiffs as private citizens
D. holding that because plaintiffs would be able to file their case in colombia  plaintiffs concerns as to their safety are more appropriately considered in the private interest factors analysis
E. holding banks that bought securities on behalf of their clients had sufficient interest in the case to serve as lead plaintiffs
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.