Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
on or after June 30, 1994, to register as sex offenders. Id. at 373. In 2001, the Act was amended to require all offenders con-vieted of certain sex offenses to register as sex offenders regardless of conviction date. Id. The State determined that Wallace was required to register under the Act, but our supreme court held that the Act, as applied to Wallace, violated the prohibition on ex post facto laws contained in the Indiana Constitution "because it impose[d] burdens that [had] the effect of adding punishment beyond that which could have been imposed when his erime was committed." Id. at 384. We note that Herron has waived his ex post facto argument because he did not present the issue to the trial court. See Saunders v. State, 848 N.E.2d 1117, 1122 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trams. demied . Waiver notwithstanding, the Act is not an ex
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an issue not presented to the trial court will not be considered on appeal
B. holding that a party may not raise a claim on appeal that was not presented to the trial court
C. holding that a party may not raise an issue for the first time on appeal
D. holding that complaint on appeal must be the same as that presented in the trial court
E. holding that a deposition that was not presented to the trial court could not be considered on appeal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.