Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
783 A.2d 543, 557 n. 54 (Del.2001); Security First Corp. v. U.S. Die Casting & Dev. Co., 687 A.2d at 568; Mattes v. Checkers Drive-In Rests., Inc., 2001 WL 337865, at *5 (Del.Ch.); Dobler v. Montgomery Cellular Holding Co., 2001 WL 1334182, at *3; Sahagen Satellite Tech. Group, LLC v. Ellipso, Inc., 791 A.2d 794, 796 (Del.Ch. 2000). 42 . The "credible basis” standard is also settled law in those states that look to Delaware law for guidance on matters of corporation law. See, e.g., Arctic Fin. Corp. v. OTR Express, Inc., 272 Kan. 1326, 38 P.3d 701, 703-04 (2002) (looking to Security First and Thomas & Betts for guidance regarding a books and records inspection under Kansas law); Towle v. Robinson Springs Corp., 168 Vt. 226, 719 A.2d 880, 882 (1998) ( , 2001 WL 1334182, at *4 (Del.Ch.) ; Saito v. McKesson HBOC, Inc., 2001 WL 818173,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the postconviction court is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses
B. holding that trademark infringement must be demonstrated by a preponderance of the credible evidence
C. holding that causes of actions against directors of corporations for breach of fiduciary duty are contract actions
D. holding that the plaintiffshareholders demonstrated a credible basis for its  220 claim tjhrough the testimony of their two trial witnesses and the documents introduced as evidence regarding the actions of the corporations board of directors through evidence of suspicious expense figures
E. recognizing a cause of action against a corporations directors brought by a creditor for the fraudulent misrepresentation of the corporations financial condition
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.