Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the next sequential step is to ask whether the right was clearly established.” Id. However, if the allegations taken as true do not establish a violation, “there is no- necessity for further inquiries.” Id. The United States Supreme Court has noted that “[t]he qualified immunity standard ‘gives ample room for mistaken judgments’ by protecting ‘all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law.’” Hunter v. Bryant, 502 U.S. 224, 229, 112 S.Ct. 534, 116 L.Ed.2d 589 (1991) (per curiam) (citation omitted). Peng alleges that Gage violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free of an unlawful seizure because Gage arrested him without probable cause. Gage arrested Peng for robbery. In California, where the arrest occurred, “robbery” is defined as (9th Cir.1989) . Second, Peng asserts that there is a material
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that possessing property of another for the purpose of security on a debt does not give rise to probable cause to arrest
B. holding that the first amendment does not by itself give rise to a cause of action for damages
C. holding that failure to record an assignment does not give rise to a cause of action
D. holding that a dispute regarding payment of a restaurant bill does not give rise to probable cause to arrest
E. holding that arrest made with probable cause and without excessive force does not give rise to iied claim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.