Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of methamphetamine to the defendant and used that amount to increase his sentence under the Guidelines. See 408 F.3d at 682. The district court’s findings increased the defendant’s Guidelines sentencing range from 63 to 78 months to 121 to 151 months. See 408 F.3d at 682-83. The Tenth Circuit stated that, both before and after Congress’ passage of the Sentencing Reform Act, “sentencing courts maintained the power to consider the broad context of a defendant’s conduct, even when a court’s view of the conduct conflicted with the jury’s t, although the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Alleyne v. United States, ... — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 ... (2013), expands the rule from Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 ... (2000) , to cover facts that increase the mandatory
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that factors increasing a defendants sentence beyond the statutory maximum of the crime charged with the exception of prior convictions must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt
B. holding that facts that increase the maximum sentence a defendant faces must be proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt
C. holding facts that increase the maximum penalty for a crime must be submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt
D. holding that territorial jurisdiction must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt
E. holding that any fact that increases a sentence beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.