Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
purpose of inducing CONA to enter into a contract and that CONA relied on the false representation, incurring an injury. Regarding CONA’s aiding and abetting fraud claim, CONA alleged that C & B provided substantial assistance to New America in accomplishing the fraud by misrepresenting that all five wastewater easements had been signed and recorded. Considering CONA’s claims and factual allegations against C & B, it is evident that CONA is complaining only of an injury that was caused by C & B’s alleged false representation a claims of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, deceptive trade practices, and unjust enrichment did not require certificate of merit because gist of claims was that appellant had engaged in pervasive and systemic overbill-ing) and Parker Cnty., 2009 WL 3938051, at *3 . Accordingly, we hold that the trial court did
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a cause of action for breach of contract accrues at the time of the breach
B. holding that trial court erred by dismissing breach of contract claim because appellee made promises to perform specific acts in contract the breach of which would give rise to a breach of contract action
C. recognizing that the elements of a claim for breach of contract are 1 existence of a valid contract and 2 breach of the terms of that contract
D. holding breach of contract claim not preempted as a straightforward breach of contract action as it alleged violation of specific covenant
E. holding immaterial breach did not constitute breach of contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.