Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
To establish that the Customer List is entitled to trade secret protection until the trial on the merits, TMC must show a probability of success in proving that the Customer List is entitled to trade secret protection. 28. TMC did not show a probability of success in proving that the Customer List is entitled to trade secret protection pending trial on the merits because of 1) the extent to which the Customer List was known by employees and others involved in the business, 2) the lack of measures taken by AICE to guard the secrecy of the Customer List, and 3) the ease or difficulty with which the Customer List could be properly acquired or duplicated by others. (Emphasis added.) TMC does not challenge specific findings of fact. See McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex.1986) ; Aldine Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Ogg, 122 S.W.3d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that judgment on the pleadings will not be granted unless the movant clearly establishes that there are no material issues of fact and that he or she is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
B. holding that findings of fact are conclusive if supported by clear and convincing competent evidence even where the evidence might support contrary findings
C. holding that unless an affirmative defense is established as matter of law defendant bears burden of obtaining jury findings necessary to support defense
D. holding that motion to dismiss should not  be granted unless the moving party has established that there is no material issue of fact to resolve and that it is entitled to judgment in its favor as a matter of law
E. holding unchallenged findings of fact are binding unless contrary is established as matter of law or there is no evidence to support finding
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.