Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to avoid creating a protected liberty interest: "Good conduct time is a privilege and not a right.” Tex. Govt.Code § 498.003. On the other hand, the causa] relationship between a disciplinary infraction and loss of goodtime credits appears to make Texas law indistinguishable from the law at issue in Wolff. See Tex. Govt.Code § 498.004 ("If ... the inmate commits an offense or violates a rule of the division, the department may forfeit all or any part of the inmate’s accrued good conduct time.”). The Fifth Circuit has addressed the issue from a variety of angles, but no case directly addresses the issue of whether Texas prisoners have a constitutional interest in their accrued good-time credits under current Texas law. See Hallmark v. Johnson, 118 F.3d 1073, 1079-1080 (5th Cir.1997) ; Allison v. Kyle, 66 F.3d 71, 74 (5th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that depriving inmates of statecreated right to goodtime credits in prison disciplinary proceedings requires due process
B. holding that texas parole statutes do not create a protected liberty interest under an older statutory scheme
C. holding that inmates serving life terms were not entitled to goodtime credits because state statute expressly foreclosed the granting of goodtime credits to such inmates
D. holding that there is no protected liberty interest in the restoration of goodtime credits forfeited for disciplinary infractions under an older statutory scheme
E. holding that a prisoner cannot be deprived of a protected liberty interest in goodtime credits without procedural due process
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.