Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
102, 104 (1888). The Iowa Supreme Court similarly held “that the communication by a husband of a venereal disease to his wife, knowingly, is good and sufficient cause for a divorce, and is cruelty of the most flagrant kind.” Holmes v. Holmes, 186 Iowa 336, 170 N.W. 793, 794 (1919). The Maryland Court of Appeals held that “if a spouse, although knowing he or she is afflicted with a venereal disease, yet continues to maintain sexual relations and communicates the disease to the other spouse, such action constitutes extreme cruelty.” Kline v. Kline, 179 Md. 10, 16 A.2d 924, 925 (1940). And the Supreme Court of holding that knowing communication of an STD to a wife was “extreme cruelty” and grounds for divorce); Cadle v. Cadle, 28 Tenn.App. 498, 191 S.W.2d 561, 561-62 (Tenri.Ct.App.1945) . While the most recent of the above-cited
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing a claim of cruel inhuman and degrading treatment based on alleged sexual abuse
B. holding that communication of a venereal disease would constitute cruel and inhuman treatment
C. recognizing that denying outofeell exercise for extended periods may constitute cruel and unusual punishment
D. holding that what constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is a question of law
E. holding cruel and unusual punishment complaint not preserved
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.