Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
States, 669 F.Supp.2d 32, 44 (D.D.C.2009); see also Gardner v. United States, 213 F.3d 735, 737 n. 1 (D.C.Cir.2000) (“Mr. Gardner’s defamation claim against the United States is barred, because suits for libel or slander are prohibited under the Federal Tort Claims Act.”). Therefore, the plaintiffs defamation and misrepresentation claims are dismissed for this independent basis. Moreover, with respect to the plaintiffs DCHRA claims, “[t]he D.C. Council, not Congress, enacted the DCHRA, and there is no federal statute that evinces Congress’s intent to waive the United States’ immunity from suit under the DCHRA.” Marcus, 813 F.Supp.2d at 17. Accordingly, the plaintiffs DCHRA claim is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See id.\ see also Jordan v. Evans, 404 F.Supp.2d 28, 31 (D.D.C.2005) . IV. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that sovereign immunity barred a wrongful death claim against the board and stating that the only question is whether the boards sovereign immunity protection was waived emphasis added
B. holding that sovereign immunity bars an attorneys lien against the united states
C. holding that sovereign immunity bars dchra claim against the department of commerce
D. holding that state sovereign immunity bars state constitutional claims
E. holding that sovereign immunity barred claim for compensatory sanctions against the government
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.