Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the notes in the financial statement that over $4,000,000 of that loss was due to a onetime, nonrecurring compensation expense to Nexity’s founders. Review of Blackmon’s deposition testimony reveals that he understood from the Nexity officers that the company was progressing according to its general strategic plan. Nexity officers apparently stated only in general terms that Nexity was doing well. The following is an excerpt from Blackmon’s deposition transcript: “A: ... I had conversations with Ken [Vassey] about how Nexity was doing, and he assured me that Nexity was doing fíne, that all they needed tating that a person cannot blindly rely on an agent’s oral representations that are contrary to written disclosures); and Wamser v. J.E. Liss, Inc., 838 F.Supp. 393, 399 (E.D.Wis.1993). Therefore, the alleged oral
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that written judgment controlled over oral pronouncement
B. holding that oral pronouncement prevailed over the written order
C. holding that when the courts oral statements in the plea colloquy conflict with the written agreement the courts oral statements control
D. holding that written information cures oral misstatements and omissions
E. holding written judgment must conform to oral pronouncement
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.