Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
agreement between Local 1812 and USIA, see Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”), Article II, § 1 (noting that bargaining unit includes “[a]ll non-professional and professional non-supervisory domestic General Schedule (GS & GG) ... employees of USIA nationwide”, with exceptions not applicable to Suzal); cf. id., Article XVI, § 3(b)(2) (observing that Smith-Mundt appointees “shall be assigned to positions identified as pay plan GG”), and under the terms of that agreement he could pursue grievances through the negotiated procedure even though he was outside the protection of the civil service laws, see id., Article XXIII, § 2(a) (entitling “any employee” to file a grievance). If dissatisfied with the Voice of America’s disposition of his grievances 743 F.2d 895, 912-15 (D.C.Cir.1984) . But both of Suzal’s theories about why the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that shortterm layoffs of seasonal employees in accordance with conditions agreed upon at the start of employment are not furloughs within the meaning of  7512
B. holding interest derived from shortterm notes is an integral part of lone stars business since the surplus finds are produced by that business the investments are shortterm liquid made with the intent that both the principal and interest are to be used in the regular course of the taxpayers trade or business 
C. recognizing that in the absence of a statutory definition statutory terms are construed in accordance with their ordinary or natural meaning
D. holding that the complaint stated a claim under the flsa where it alleged that parties were an employer and employees within meaning of act and that the defendantemployers operation constitutes an enterprise engaged in commerce  within the meaning of  the act
E. holding that a state is not a person within the meaning of  1983
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.