Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(J.A. at 179.) The district court reasoned that “[i]f the parents believed that [FBDS was] denying the hool Disk 200 v. Illinois State Bd. of Ed., 79 F.3d 654, 656 (7th Cir.1996) (stating that the IDEA’S authorization to courts to grant “appropriate” relief “encompasses the full range of equitable remedies and therefore empowers a court to order adult compensatory education if necessary to cure a violation”); Parents of Student W. v. Puyallup School District, 31 F.3d 1489, 1496 (9th Cir.1994) (same); Pihl v. Massachusetts Dept. of Educ., 9 F.3d 184, 188 (1st Cir.1993) (same); Hall v. Knott County Bd. of Ed., 941 F.2d 402, 407 (6th Cir.1991) (same); Jefferson County Bd. of Educ. v. Breen, 853 F.2d 853, 857-58 (11th Cir. 1988) (same); Miener v. Missouri, 800 F.2d 749, 753 (8th Cir.1986) . Compensatory education involves
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a plaintiff who proves a cause of action under  1981 may recover punitive damages where the plaintiff is entitled to an award of compensatory damages even if nominal
B. recognizing appropriateness of compensatory education award and holding that plaintiff was entitled to recover compensatory education if she prevailed in her claim that she was denied a fape for several years
C. recognizing appropriateness in some circumstances of award of compensatory education beyond age 21 and re manding for determination of whether it should be awarded
D. recognizing that family court cannot eliminate compensatory part of maintenance award
E. recognizing appropriateness in some circumstances of award of compensatory education beyond age 21 and remanding for determination of whether it should be awarded
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.