Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
review filed with an appropriate court of appeals in accordance with this section shall be the sole and exclusive means for judicial review of any cause or claim under the United Nations Convention Against Torture. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(4). This Circuit has expressly held that the above provision of the REAL ID Act eliminates habeas jurisdiction over FARR Act claims. Kiyemba v. Obama, 561 F.3d 509, 511 (D.C.Cir.2009), reh’g denied (July 27, 2009), r Cir.2007) (distinguishing St. Cyr on the grounds that there existed “a plausible reading of the statutes before the [Supreme] Court under which habeas review ... was not barred,” whereas § 2242(d) clearly precluded “consideration of CAT and FARR Act claims on habeas review”); see also O.K. v. Bush, 377 F.Supp.2d 102, 118 n. 17 (D.D.C.2005) ; Al-Anazi v. Bush, 370 F.Supp.2d 188, 194
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that any defect in removal procedure must be cured within the 30day removal period or it is fatal to the removal and defendants failure to attach exhibits to the notice of removal within that time required remand
B. holding that the farr act is expressly limited to claims arising out of a final order of removal and does not confer any legal rights outside of the removal setting
C. holding that review of an original removal decision and a subsequent removal order are distinct
D. holding that a final order of removal is sufficient by itself to establish the requisite custody
E. holding that term order of removal does not include aliens ineffective assistance of counsel claim concerning attorneys actions taken after order of removal becomes final
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.