Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
F.2d 77, 79 (4th Cir.1989); Bruce v. Riddle, 631 F.2d 272, 279 (4th Cir.1980). Their actions are in a “legislative capacity” if they are an “integral part,” Gravel v. United States, 408 U.S. 606, 625, 92 S.Ct. 2614, 2627, 33 L.Ed.2d 583 (1972); Eastland v. United States Servicemen’s Fund, 421 U.S. 491, 504, 95 S.Ct. 1813, 1821, 44 L.Ed.2d 324 (1975), of legislative actions undertaken by the local governmental body. Scott v. Greenville County, 716 F.2d 1409, 1423 (4th Cir.1983) (indicating that county council members acted in their legislative capacity if the action taken by the council in which they participated was legislative). Not all actions undertaken by local governmental bodies that have legislative responsibilities are necessarily “legislative.” E.g., Scott, 716 F.2d at 1423 ; Trevino v. Gates, 17 F.3d 1189, 1191 (9th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding a dedication of a rightofway in connection with a subdivision did not vest rights in the property owner for the purpose of estopping the county from changing the zoning classification absent a showing that the planning commission or county knew that the sewer permit would not be granted or that the countys subdivision regulations guaranteed the zoning of the property would not change
B. holding that county councils action in delaying consideration of zoning permit was not legislative
C. recognizing that the zoning code of a homerule city is a legislative enactment
D. recognizing that zoning and rezoning are legislative matters
E. holding a zoning authority acts in an arbitrary and capricious manner when it denies a permit meeting the general zoning qualifications solely because of the type of building to be constructed
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.