Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
innocence by giving jurors an instruction that minimized the significance of their anonymity. Before jurors filled lowed its anonymity discussion by instructing jurors that the defendants enjoyed a presumption of innocence, and repeated that instruction both at the beginning and conclusion of the trial. See Preliminary Instruction at 3, reprinted in J.A. I 260; Trial Tr. (Sept. 18, 1989) at 46, reprinted in J.A. VIII; id. (Dec. 1, 1989) at 74, reprinted in J.A. XVII. This step further mitigated any prejudice from the anonymous jury procedure. See Tutino, 883 F.2d at 1133; see also Crockett, 979 F.2d at 1216 (finding repeated instructions on presumption of innocence to protect defendant from possibility of prejudice resulting from impan-elment of anonymous jury); Vario, 943 F.2d at 241 . Nevertheless, appellants find fault in the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that trial court took adequate steps to safeguard defendants presumption of innocence where judge failed to instruct jurors as to reason for their anonymity but fully instructed them on presumption of innocence
B. holding that no amount of boiler plate instructions to the jury  not to draw any inferences as to the judges feelings about the facts from his asking questions or that they are free to disregard factual comment by the judge or as to the presumption of innocence  could be expected to erase from a jurys mind the part taken in this trial by the district judge
C. holding trial courts failure to recite a presumption of innocence instruction seriously jeopardized the defendants federal constitutional right to due process and a fair trial
D. holding that it was fundamental error for a sentencing court to consider a criminal defendants protestations of innocence because due process guarantees an individual the right to maintain innocence even when faced with evidence of overwhelming guilt
E. holding that a district court order denying anonymity to the parties is a collateral order
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.