Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a final judgment that U.S. D.I.D. is liable on the injunction bond (absent future proceedings between the parties), the Court will and hereby does grant Plaintiffs request and stays any release of funds for fourteen days. Accordingly, on January 22, 2013, the Clerk of the Court shall issue a check payable to Windstream Communications, Inc., in the amount of $227,271.92, which is to be drawn from the $314,672.80 deposited by U.S. D.I.D. in the Court’s registry, and shall mail that check to Windstream’s counsel, Brian J. Butler, Esq., at Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, One Lincoln Center, Syracuse, N.Y. 13202. On that same date, the Clerk of the Court shall issue a check payable to U.S. D.I.D. Corporation for the remaining $87,400.88 deposited by U.S. D.I.D. in the C 80 n. 5 (3d Cir.1987) ; Pace v. Ross, No. 78 Civ. 2515, 1981 U.S.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that court had no supplemental jurisdiction over claim by shareholder for breach of merger agreement that was the subject of the dispute between the merger partners over which the district court had subject matter jurisdiction
B. holding that the district court possessed ancillary jurisdiction over a dispute concerning the disposition of an injunction bond
C. holding that nonliable party can only be subjected to those provisions of an injunction that are minor and ancillary
D. holding that the failure of the applicant to file a bond before the issuance of the temporary injunction renders the injunction void ab initio
E. holding that the district court retained jurisdiction to resolve a dispute over an injunction bond even where the underlying dispute had itself been dismissed for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.