Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
over Lloyds. “As federal courts have held on many occasions, [ ] customer-initiated bank-to-bank wire transfers do not establish the ‘continuous and systematic’ purposeful presence necessary to establish personal jurisdiction over a foreign bank.” Dtex, LLC v. BBVA Bancomer, S.A., 405 F.Supp.2d 639, 645 (D.S.C.2005) (and cases cited therein), aff'd. 214 Fed.Appx. 286 (4th Cir.2007) (affirming on basis of district court’s “comprehensive and exhaustive” opinion). The sporadic visits by Lloyds’ employees to Tennessee also do not support the exercise of jurisdiction. Again, this is not the type of “continuous and systematic conduct” required to support general jurisdiction over a defendant. See Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Tryg Int’l Ins. Co. Ltd., 91 F.3d 790, 793-94 (6th Cir.1996) ; Landoil Res. Corp. v. Alexander & Alexander
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that limited jurisdiction existed over foreign defendants given their intent to affect the forum their licensing agreements and coordination of release strategies noting that the three foreign defendants did more than merely have their music product end up in california by happenstance as tjhere were crosslicensing agreements between all of the members of the universal group and a coordinated plan existed among  all of the defendants to distribute the barbie girl song around the world including the united states
B. holding that foreign corporate defendants purchases and attendant activity in state were insufficient to confer texas with general jurisdiction
C. holding that a foreign defendants participation in a reinsurance pool as well as several prior reinsurance agreements with two local companies was insufficient to establish general jurisdiction
D. holding that evidence of outofstate defendants indirect ownership interests in the nursing homes operating and management companies insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction in florida
E. holding that an interactive website allowing clients to bank online was insufficient to confer general jurisdiction over a foreign bank
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.