Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
329 Ga. App. at 518 (1) (punctuation omitted); accord In the Interest of L. T, 325 Ga. App. at 592. 14 Holcomb, 329 Ga. App. at 518 (1) (punctuation omitted); accord Luangkhot v. State, 292 Ga. 423, 424 (1) (736 SE2d 397) (2013); see also Deal, 294 Ga. at 173 (1) (a) (“[I]f the statutory text is clear and unambiguous, we attribute to the statute its plain meaning, and our search for statutory meaning is at an end.” (punctuation omitted)). 15 Horton v. Dennis, 325 Ga. App. 212, 216 (750 SE2d 493) (2013) (punctuation omitted); accord Joyner v. Raymond James Fin. Servs., Inc., 268 Ga. App. 835, 838 (2) (602 SE2d 871) (2004). 16 Cason v. Cason, 281 Ga. 296, 299 (3) (637 SE2d 716) (2006). 17 See, e.g., Lockwood v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 330 Ga.App. 513, 515-16(1) (767 SE2d 829) (2014) ; Nelson v. Nelson, 176 Ga.App. 107, 109 (2)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a court has power to award attorney fees when authorized by contract statute or recognized ground of equity
B. holding that an award of attorney fees was authorized by ocga  13111 a 3 when the requirements of that statute were satisfied
C. holding that offer of judgment statute does not provide a basis for an award of attorney fees and costs unless dismissal is with prejudice
D. holding because an award of attorney fees is discretionary court may consider attorney fees in relation to the underlying equities in the case
E. holding that the arbitration provision was substantively unconscionable because it precluded the award of attorney fees which were authorized in the relevant ohio consumer protection statute
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.