Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
figure and it is not relevant to this appeal. 2 . Downey also brought claims under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e; the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq and Lo 2:04CV75-P-A, 2005 WL 1229695, at *5 (N.D.Miss. May 24, 2005) (concluding, in a case where the plaintiff "received every benefit to which she was entitled under the FMLA,” that Ragsdale implicitly invalidated 29 C.F.R. § 825.208(a)); Farina v. Compu-ware Corp., 256 F.Supp.2d 1033, 1056-57 (D.Ariz.2003) (noting that under Ragsdale, a plaintiff "must show that she detrimentally relied on and was prejudiced by Defendant's improper notice” and that "[pllaintiff provides no evidence that she was prejudiced”); Felder v. Winn-Dixie La., Inc., No. Civ.A. 03-1438, 2003 WL 22966364, at *5 (E.D.La. Dec. 16, 2003) ; Smith v. Blue Dot Servs. Co., 283 F.Supp.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that lack of justiciable interest resulted in lack of standing to pursue claim and that lack of standing deprived the trial court of jurisdiction to act
B. holding lack of prejudice to the defendant is not good cause
C. holding in a case where it was not clear whether the plaintiff suffered prejudice from the lack of notice that a plaintiff could not obtain reinstatement based on lack of notice
D. holding that the case must be dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction where notice of appeal was untimely
E. holding that lack of notice regarding the classification of the disability did not prejudice the respondent
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.