Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
plain language of the statute, which refers to persons “born ... of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States” and pertains only to the acquisition of citizenship “at birth.” See Marquez-Marquez v. Gonzales, 455 F.3d 548, 556-57 (5th Cir.2006) (rejecting the same argument based upon a plain reading of the statute). Accordingly, we reject Colaian-ni’s contention that he acquired citizenship pursuant to former § 301(a)(3) as a result of his adoption. III. Equal Protection: Former INA §§ 320-322 We review Colaianni’s equal protection claim under a rational basis standard. See 140 L.Ed.2d 575 (1998) (“Congress obviously has a powerful interest in fostering ties with the child’s citizen parent and the United States during his or her formative years.”); Smart, 401 F.3d at 122 . For much the same reasons, the requirement of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that congress has a legitimate interest in ensuring that a child who becomes an american citizen has a real relationship with a family unit and with the united states
B. recognizing that where insured has been paid in full insurer is the real party in interest
C. holding that the plaintiff must demonstrate that defendants contacts with the united states as a whole support the exercise of jurisdiction consistent with the constitution and laws of the united states
D. holding that upon approval by congress a compact between states becomes federal law that binds the states
E. recognizing statutory nature of stay but concluding that court still has interest in ensuring compliance
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.