Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Chief Justice. AltaPointe Health Systems, Inc. (“AHS”), appeals from an order entered by Judge Don Davis of the Mobile County Probate Court denying its petition for an award of expert-witness fees in civil-commitment proceedings. This case presents a matter of first impression: Whether a publicly funded organization is entitled to expert-witness fees for an employee who gives expert testimony at involuntary civil-commitment hearings. I. Facts and Procedural History The board of directors of AHS, the community mental-health agency for Mobile County and Washington County, is appointed by the governing bodies that authorize and fund it. See § 22-51-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975; Ex parte Greater Mobile-Washington Cnty. Mental Health-Mental Retardation Bd., Inc., 940 So.2d 990, 1005 (Ala.2006) . An AHS employee provides expert-witness
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an action naming a state entity as a defendant did not constitute an action against the state because the state entity was sued in its capacity as receiver
B. holding that the state police is a state agency
C. holding a state agency as an arm of the state cannot constitute a person under  1983 because it is a sovereign entity
D. holding that if property is not property1 of the public entity then the public entity cannot be subject to suit under the dangerous condition waiver
E. holding that ahs although a public corporation  21512 alacode 1975 is an independent entity rather than a state agency
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.