Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
prong of the Central Hudson test. Rather, their dispute centers around the remaining three prongs. 2. Governmental Interest The defendants argue that the governmental interest behind § 189.635 is to protect accident victims’ privacy and safety by keeping the personal information contained in such reports out of the hands of the general public. We are persuaded that such an interest is substantial, as evidenced by the fact that a number of other courts that have considered similar statutes have reached the same conclusion. See Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc., 515 U.S. 618, 115 S.Ct. 2371, 132 L.Ed.2d 541 (1995); Lanphere & Urbaniak v. Colorado, 21 F.3d 1508 (10th Cir.1994); Speer v. Miller, 864 F.Supp. 1294 (N.D.Ga.1994); cf. Kallstrom v. City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055 (6th Cir.1998) ; United Reporting Publishing Corp. v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that disclosure of information contained in undercover officers personnel files violated the officers privacy interest in preserving their lives and personal security
B. holding that personnel records or conduct investigative records regarding police officers are exempt from disclosure under virginias freedom of information act which exempts personnel records from disclosure
C. holding a citys policy of freely releasing information from undercover officers personnel files created a constitutionally cognizable special danger
D. recognizing as a privacy right the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters
E. recognizing a right to privacy in avoiding disclosure of personal matters
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.