Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
bank with fewer than 20 employees that section 24, Fifth, has been impliedly repealed by the ADEA, reasoning that they are not in conflict inasmuch as the ADEA covers only employers with 20 or more employees; stating in dictum that, “arguably,” section 24, Fifth, has been impliedly repealed by the ADEA to the extent that they are, in fact, in conflict); compare Ana Leon T. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (6th Cir. 1987) 823 F.2d 928, 931 (per curiam) (dealing with section 4, Fifth, of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended, codified at section 341, Fifth, of title 12 of the United States Code, its common designation, which, in line with the model of section 2 , 809 P.2d at pages 1301-1303 (same); compare Moodie v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, supra, 835 F.Supp. at pages 752-753 ; Moodie v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding to the effect that section 24 fifth has been impliedly amended by title vii
B. holding to the effect that section 1432a as impliedly amended by title vii preempts state law without limitation as to only conflicting state law
C. holding outside of the context of title vii or the adea that section 24 fifth preempts state law to the extent but only to the extent that it conflicts
D. holding to the effect that section 341 fifth as impliedly amended by title vii preempts state law to the extent but only to the extent that it conflicts
E. holding outside of the context of title vii or the adea to the effect that section 341 fifth preempts conflicting state law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.