Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Id. The result of this balancing test, the Seventh Circuit concluded, is that an order damaging only an attorney’s professional reputation, while potentially a significant enough injury to satisfy the case or controversy requirements of Article III, is not a “final decision” for the purposes of § 1291 and, therefore, not appealable. Id.; Bolte v. Home Ins. Co., 744 F.2d 572, 573 (7th Cir.1984). The Seventh Circuit did, however, leave open the possibility that an attorney damaged by an order finding misconduct alone could seek relief by a writ of mandamus. Clark, 972 F.2d at 820. The Fifth and District of Columbia Circuits fall into the second category and both allow attorneys to appeal orders that find misconduct alone. Walker v. City of Mesquite, 129 F.3d 831, 832-33 (5th Cir.1997) ; Sullivan v. Committee on Admissions and
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the importance of an attorneys professional reputation and the imperative to defend it when necessary obviates the need for a finding of monetary liability or other punishment as a requisite for the appeal of a court order finding professional misconduct
B. holding professional rules do not provide basis for civil liability
C. holding that a violation of the rules of professional conduct may not be used as evidence and citing terry cove north for the proposition that the sole remedy for a violation of the rules of professional conduct was the imposition of disciplinary measures
D. holding that a professional owes no duty to third persons unless the professional had actual knowledge that those persons would rely on his rendering of professional services
E. holding that as a general matter membership or shareholder status in a professional corporation does not shield an attorney from individual liability for his own mistakes or professional misdeeds
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.