Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
been violated. Section 704 of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa. C.S. § 704; Realmuto v. Department of Transportation, 161 Pa.Cmwlth. 613, 637 A.2d 769 (1994); Swoyer v. Department of Transportation, 156 Pa.Cmwlth. 1, 626 A.2d 1247 (1991), appeal dismissed, 533 Pa. 318, 623 A.2d 321 (1993). 4 . Unless the context "clearly indicates otherwise,” the term driver refers to any "person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle.” Section 102 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 102. 5 . Moreover, the purpose behind the acknowl-edgement requirement of section 1541 is not furthered by its application to Smith. The requirement of submitting an Acknowledgement Form is to ensure that the driver has notice of the suspension. See Commonwealth v. Kane, 460 Pa. 582, 333 A.2d 925 (1975) . Here, Smith does not argue that he did not
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that police chiefs suspension letter omitting statutorily required information about process for appeal of suspension did not deprive hearing examiner of jurisdiction over suspended officers appeal and require reinstatement of officer
B. holding the state did not meet its burden of proving defendant operated a motor vehicle while suspended where the only evidence of actual notice of suspension was that dot mailed defendant the notice of suspension
C. holding that a notice of deficiency was invalid where it was the second notice mailed for that year and the taxpayer timely petitioned the court as to the first notice
D. holding that due process is satisfied where notice is mailed to the wrong address if the appellant received actual notice
E. holding that the good behavior requirement of a suspended sentence defined the period of suspension
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.