Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
tire had at one time possessed confidential information for the construction of OTR’s Outrigger tire. The district court therefore drew a reasonable inference that West, through its manufacturer, improperly used trade secrets related to OTR’s Outrigger tire. See id. 3. The district court did not clearly err in finding that OTR was likely to suffer irreparable harm absent a preliminary injunction. Loss of control over business reputation and damage to goodwill are cognizable irreparable harms in the trademark infringement context. See Herb Reed Enters., LLC v. Fla. Entm’t Mgmt., Inc., 736 F.3d 1239, 1250 (9th Cir.2013). Although the district court’s finding of reputational injury was not based on any evidence that West’s lookalike tire was an inferior product, see id. at 1250-21 , the court’s finding of goodwill injury was
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a party who can show a significant risk of irreparable harm has demonstrated that the harm is not speculative
B. holding that temporaryinjunction orders simple recitation of conclusory statement that plaintiff will suffer an irreparable injury for which it has no other adequate legal remedy does not satisfy rule 683s requirement that a temporary injunction order specify reasons why plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm for which there is no adequate remedy at law
C. holding that the threat of irreparable harm must be immediate
D. holding that likelihood of irreparable harm must be based on evidence in the record not unsupported and conclusory statements regarding harm the plaintiff might suffer
E. holding that a movant for a preliminary injunction must first demonstrate that it is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of the requested relief
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.