Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
for all the world like there’s not much of a future for the Debtors’ case because they can’t even pay their own way, normal on-going operating expenses, to keep their heads above water. They’re falling further in the hole. Given this, I find that the Debtors’ .failure to pay their post-petition income taxes as and when due constitutes cause for the conversion or the dismissal of this case.... (December 14, 1994, Hearing Transcript, pp. 7-8.) On December 20, 1994, the Debtors filed a notice of appeal with the Bankruptcy Court. The appellants/Debtors filed their brief on February 8,1995, and the United States filed its brief on March 10, 1995. This court heard oral arguments on May 25, 1995, and, after considering both the briefs and the arguments advanced by the parties, affirms the , affd, 949 F.2d 401 (10th Cir.). Also,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that such a decision was within the trial courts discretion
B. holding that a bankruptcy court is given wide discretion to convert a chapter 11 case to chapter 7 for cause and an order for conversion is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
C. holding that a debtors right to convert his or her chapter 7 case is not absolute
D. holding that a bankruptcy courts decision to convert or dismiss a chapter 11 case is a matter within its discretion
E. holding denial of motion to convert from chapter 11 to chapter 7 is interlocutory
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.