Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the law); W. Va.Code § 61-2-9a (prohibiting “harassment”). Therefore, in light of the plaintiffs need to solicit donations to cover living expenses and medical bills, I FIND that the balance of equities tips in favor of issuing a preliminary injunction. E.Public Interest Although the defendants admit that preservation of First Amendment freedoms is a significant public interest, they argue that the public will be harmed by prohibiting enforcement of an “important public safety mechanism.” (Defs.’ Mem. [Docket 18], at 16-17). However, as I previously explained, the defendants can ensure safety near intersections by enforcing other statutes. Further, the public interest generally favors protecting First Amendment rights. See, e.g., Carey v. FEC, 791 F.Supp.2d 121, 135-36 (D.D.C. 2011) ; Mullin v. Sussex Cnty., Del., 861 F.Supp.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that campaign money laundering was in furtherance of political speech but an invalid exercise of free speech rights because it was illegal
B. holding that the plaintiffs right to political speech is fully in accord with the publics interest in free speech and association
C. recognizing that code is speech
D. holding that statute reaching beyond purely commercial speech to chill fully protected speech can merit application of the overbreadth doctrine
E. holding the right of free speech is not absolute at all times and under all circumstances
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.