Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
“the mere imposition of hardship on family relationships ... necessarily accompanies the order of any prison sentence”). Here, the district court explained that a below-Guidelines sentence was warranted because the Guidelines range was based on Edwards’s intended loss, not the actual loss he caused. But it is unexceptional that the actual losses were less than the intended losses. I expect the amount the run-of-the-mill thief intends to steal is usually greater than the amount he actually steals. The fact that the losses attributed to Edwards were intended rather than actual simply reflects the fact that Edwards got caught. He should not benefit from that fact. Fourth, we should consider whether the district court “base[d] the sentence on impermissible factors.” Hunt, 521 F.3d at 649 . Here, although the district court’s sentence
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that district court had not abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion to amend complaint
B. holding trial court abused its discretion when it struck the appellants intervention
C. recognizing that we review the sentence imposed by a district court under the abuse of discretion standard
D. holding that the district court abused its discretion when it imposed a belowguidelines sentence in part because it disagreed with the jurys finding that the defendant had the intent to defraud
E. holding that the bia abused its discretion in denying a motion to reopen when it failed to consider the argument before it
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.