Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
support for its conclusion that the firearm prohibition, found in § 5D1.3(d)(l), was a standard condition of a felon’s supervised release because “the specific condition that Defendant not possess a firearm is largely only a clarification of the more general mandatory condition that he not break the law.” Id. at 94. Despite Asuncion-Pimental’s reference to the illegality of a felon’s possessing a firearm, later cases have clarified that this was not the dispositive factor in the case. Instead, the Second Circuit has extended its holding to encompass all of the conditions of supervised release recommended in § 5D1.3(d), as long as the defendant meets the specific prerequisites enumerated by the Sentencing Guidelines. See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 299 F.3d 150, 154 (2d Cir.2002) ; cf. id. at 154-55 (holding that a condition
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the failure to articulate  orally that conditions  5d13d2 and 3 apply to a defendants sentence of supervised release does not create a conflict with the judgment imposing these conditions
B. recognizing district courts wide latitude in imposing supervised release conditions
C. holding that  3583e2 allows a district court to modify the conditions of supervised release without extending the term of that release
D. holding that further supervised release may be ordered as a sentence for violation of supervised release
E. recognizing that probation officers are mandated to enforce a sentencing courts terms and conditions of supervised release
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.