Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
829 S.W.2d at 271-72. 23 . Millers Mut. Fire Ins. Co. of Texas v. Texoma Directional Drilling Co., 622 S.W.2d 899, 901 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1981, no writ). 24 . Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Underwriters, Inc. v. McManus, 633 S.W.2d 787, 788 (Tex.1982). 25 . See Heyden Newport Chem. Corp., 387 S.W.2d at 24 (disagreeing with the Court of Civil Appeals who held that a court must look beyond the pleadings and policy); Brooks, Tarlton, Gilbert, Douglas & Kressler v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 832 F.2d 1358, 1367-68 (5th Cir.1987) (applying Texas law to hold that the proper question in determining duty is not what could have been pled, but what was pled). 26 . Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Underwriters, Inc., 633 S.W.2d at 788. 27 . Houston Petroleum Co. v. Highlands Ins. Co., 830 1464 (N.D.Cal.1992) ; Qualman v. Bruckmoser, 163 Wis.2d 361, 471
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that pecuniary damages are not property damages under insureds policy
B. holding that a plaintiff can seek statutory damages even in the absence of actual damages
C. holding that claims alleging negligent misrepresentation and failure to disclose seek economic damages not property damages within insureds policy
D. holding that economic loss rule precludes recovery of economic damages only in the absence of personal injury or property  damage claims
E. holding negligent misrepresentation sufficient
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.