Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
as to the rights of the parties thereto and their privies.” Stewart v. SunTrust Mtg., 331 Ga. App. 635, 638 (3) (770 SE2d 892) (2015) (punctuation omitted). Further, “[a] lender owes a borrower a duty to exercise a power of sale in a security deed fairly, which includes complying with statutory and contractual notice requirements.” Thompson-El v. Bank of America, 327 Ga. App. 309, 310-311 (2) (759 SE2d 49) (2014). In her complaint, James asserts that BANA breached the terms of the security deed by failing to provide proper notice of default and her right to cure as mandated by Paragraph 22 of that deed. These allegations are sufficient to support a breach of contract claim, and the trial court erred in dismissing it. See Babalola v. HSBC Bank, USA, 324 Ga. App. at 755 (2) (b) ; see also Stewart v. SunTrust Mtg., 331 Ga.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that breach of contract claim related back to misrepresentation claim because operative facts upon which the breach of contract claim was based were contained in the misrepresentation counts of the original complaint
B. holding that complaint alleging that creditors failed to comply with the notice provisions contained in the security deed stated a claim for breach of contract
C. holding that party must comply with notice and cure provisions before seeking remedy for default under contract
D. recognizing that the elements of a claim for breach of contract are 1 existence of a valid contract and 2 breach of the terms of that contract
E. holding that plaintiff stated a claim for breach of contract when it alleged the government failed to purchase insurance for plaintiff as agreed by contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.