Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
but not cocaine. The court entered a revocation of probation and imposed a two-year sentence for battery on a law enforcement officer and resisting arrest with violence, with credit for time served on probation. However, the court’s written order of revocation of probation does not give defendant any credit for time served on probation, and finds that defendant committed each of the probation violations charged. We affirm the revocation of probation because defendant admitted several violations of his conditions of probation. However, the State properly concedes that the sentence must be reversed because the trial court erred in failing to enter a written order that conformed to its oral pronouncements at the sentencing hearing. See Whitehead v. State, 654 So.2d 658 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) ; Nodal v. State, 650 So.2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that when there is a variation between the oral pronouncement of sentence and the written memorialization of the sentence the oral pronouncement controls
B. holding that the failure of a written sentence to conform to the courts oral pronouncement cannot be raised in a rule 3800a motion
C. holding that in cases of direct conflict between a courts oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment the oral pronouncement controls
D. holding that courts written sentence must conform to oral pronouncement
E. holding that written judgment controlled over oral pronouncement
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.