Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
D.C.Code Ann. § 32-505 (providing medical review committee records a qualified privilege from discovery); Fla.Stat.ch. 766.101(5) & 395.0191(8) (1993) (stating that "the investigations, proceedings, and records of the [medical review committee] shall not be subject to discovery or introduction into evidence”); Ga.Code Ann. § 31-7-143 (1998) ("the proceedings and records of medical review committees shall not be subject to discovery or introduction into evidence in any civil action”); Ill.Comp.Stat.Ann. § 5/8— 2101 (West 1992) (stating records of medical committees intended to reduce morbidity and mortality are privileged); Md.Health Occ. CodeAnn § 14-501 (1991 & 1994 Supp.) (providing that records of medical review committees are not discoverable); Tenn Code Ann. § 63-6-219 (1997) ; Tex Health & Safety Code Ann. § 161.032(a)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing confidentiality essential to function of medical peer review committees and to improvement of health care and protecting the records of such committees from discovery
B. holding that hospitals may be found liable for conspiring with members of medical staff and that evidence of pretextual sham peer review proceedings presented jury question whether hospitals conspired with peer review committees in violation of sherman act
C. recognizing an individuals right of privacy in the content of health records and noting that health records are the property of the health care entity maintaining them
D. recognizing an overwhelming public interest in promoting improvement in health care through the mechanism of physician peer review
E. holding that the state privilege should not apply when the peer review records sought directly related to the allegations challenging the peer review process
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.