Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
it considered the proposed density urban. 35 The principal cases cited by the parties are Patzkowsky v. Klamath Cty, 8 Or LUBA 64, 71 (1983) (requiring county to discuss whether subdivision into one-acre lots in area 14 miles from UGB and two miles from nearest unincorporated community would comply with Goal 14); 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Clackamas County, 3 Or LUBA 316, 327, 330 (1981) (to designate one-, two- and five-acre residential zones without addressing their impact on UGBs violates Goal 14); Medford v. Jackson Cty, supra, n 19, 2 Or LUBA at 389-91 (describing as “quasi-urban” a 2,600-acre area between Medford and Eagle Point containing 4,300 residents and the largest concentration of industry in the county); Metropolitan Serv. Dist. v. Clackamas Cty, 2 Or LUBA 300, 307 (1981) ; In the Matter of Linn County’s Comprehensive
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that even when a defendant moves under rule 50 at the close of plaintiffs evidence  and autocentro did not even do that  if a defendant wishes to renew a motion for judgment as a matter of law at the posttrial stage with a view to having denial of that motion considered by the court of appeals the defendant is required to have moved for judgment as a matter of law at the close of all the evidence
B. holding that indigents have a right to a transcript on appeal as announced in griffin v illinois 351 us 12 76 sct 585 100 led 891 to be retroactive
C. holding that a foreclosure advertisements property description that included two unavailable subdivision lots was not defective as a matter of law
D. holding that although 13 lots on 31 acres 1 12 miles from ugb and 12 lots on 28 acres 12 mile from ugb are not necessarily  urban as a matter of law close proximity to ugb requires county to consider whether ugb would be affected by the approval of these subdivisions
E. holding that the trial court abused its discretion in giving virtually no consideration to the mothers historical role as primary caregiver in a custodyrelocation order regarding a twelve 12 yearold child
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.