Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 56, and all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such a motion by Rule 56.” See Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 776 So.2d 81 (Ala.2000). In that case, a copy of a garage-liability policy was attached to the complaint, and the defendant filed a motion for a judgment on the pleadings. This Court stated that the fact that the garage-liability policy was attached to the complaint and considered by the trial court did not require that Thompson's motion for a judgment on the pleadings be converted to a motion for a summary judgment, citing Wilson v. First Union National Bank of Georgia, 716 So.2d 722, 726 (Ala.Civ.App.1998). JOHNSTONE, Justice (concurring in the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the trial courts consideration of documents attached to the complaint whose identity and authenticity were not in dispute did not require conversion of a motion to dismiss into a motion for a summaiy judgment
B. holding that the court may consider an article not attached to the complaint in determining whether to dismiss the complaint because the article was integral to and explicitly relied on in the complaint and because the plaintiffs did not challenge its authenticity
C. holding that it was appropriate for the district court to refer to the documents attached to the motion to dismiss since the documents were referred to in the complaint
D. holding that unauthenticated documents may be considered in support of a motion for summary judgment where the documents were not objected to or their authenticity disputed
E. holding that the courts denial of either a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment and is not reviewable 
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.