Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
with bench trials. Because the plaintiffs raised the issue in their pretrial submissions and because the court believes the correct question here is whether the evidence presented at trial establishes that the defendant S.R.O.s are entitled to qualified immunity, it rejects the defendant S.R.O.S argument that the plaintiffs abandoned the issue. 37 . Citing Headwaters Forest Def. v. Cnty. of Humboldt, 276 F.3d 1125, 1129-30 (9th Cir.2002); Park v. Shiflett, 250 F.3d 843, 852-53 (4th Cir.2001); LaLonde v. Cnty. of Riverside, 204 F.3d 947, 961 (9th Cir.2000); Adams v. Metiva, 31 F.3d 375, 386 (6th Cir.1994). 38 . Citing Jackson v. City of Bremerton, 268 F.3d 646, 652-53 (9th Cir.2001); Wagner v. Bay City, 227 F.3d 316, 324 (5th Cir.200 0, 276, 108 S.Ct. 562, 98 L.Ed.2d 592 (1988) ; Fraser, 478 U.S. at 686, 106 S.Ct. 3159
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the board of education violated a school teachers first amendment rights by dismissing him because he had criticized the board in a letter to the local newspaper
B. holding that a principal did not impinge students first amendment rights by censoring articles in a high school newspaper
C. holding that school district policy requiring that students obtain the review and approval of school officials prior to distributing any written material violated free speech rights of students
D. holding that a teacher was unjustified in censoring an article in the school newspaper because it was inconceivable that the use of the word damn one time in the article would have caused material and substantial interference with school activities
E. holding that school officials may not limit the first amendment rights of students and teachers to freedom of speech and expression
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.