Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
The court then adjudicated his guilt, imposing a sentence of ten years confinement with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Di vision. Appellant subsequently filed a pr o be binding, stating, “Texas Code of Criminal Procedure ... expressly denies a defendant the right to appeal from a trial court’s determination to adjudicate.” 28 S.W.3d 627, 633 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi, 2000, no pet.). Article 42.12 § 5(b) expressly allows, however, an appeal of all proceedings after the adjudication of guilt on the original charge. Examples of proceedings after adjudication that may be appealed include the assessment of punishment and the pronouncement of sentence. Perez, 28 S.W.3d at 633; See also Jones v. State, 39 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 2001, no pet.) . Appellant does not complain of any error
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding no ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim for failure to raise as basis for appeal of conviction ineffective assistance of trial counsel where basis for the latter claim was inadequate
B. holding that the postconviction court erred in finding the ineffective assistance of counsel claim proeedurally barred because the courts opinion did not comment specifically on the ineffective counsel argument and the overall holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the jurys verdict could not be viewed as an adjudication on the merits of the ineffective assistance claim
C. holding that defendant may raise claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal only if ineffective assistance is conclusive from the record
D. holding that a court of appeals has jurisdiction to review claim of ineffective assistance of counsel occurring after the adjudication of guilt
E. recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.