Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Corp. Act Ann. art. 5.10(B)(2) (Vernon 1997); Mudgett v. Paxson Mach. Co., 709 S.W.2d 755, 758-59 (Tex.App.1986); see also McKee v. American Transfer & Storage, 946 F.Supp. 485, 487 (N.D.Tex.1996). But see Western Resources Life Ins. Co. v. Gerhardt, 553 S.W.2d 783, 786 (Tex.Civ.App.1977) (noting exceptions for merger, consolidation, and fraud). 8 . See, e.g., Palmer G. Lewis Co. v. ARCO Chemical Co., 904 P.2d 1221, 1227 (Alaska 1995) ("When choice of law issues arise, we commonly refer to the Restatement (Second) of Conflicts for guidance."). 9 . See Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 145 cmt. d (1971) (''The courts have long recognized that they are not bound to decide all issues under the local law of a single state."); Ruiz v. Blentech Corp., 89 F.3d 320, 324 (7th Cir.1996) . 10 . See Black's Law Dictionary 448 (7th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an issue is preserved for appeal where the issue was sufficiently raised for the court to rule on it  
B. holding that issue in motion for rehearing is waived if original brief is not sufficient to acquaint the court with the issue and does not present an argument that would allow the court to decide the issue
C. holding that a federal court is obliged to determine its own jurisdiction for each case
D. holding that under the second restatement test a court therefore conducts a separate choiceoflaw analysis for each issue in a case attempting to determine which state has the most significant contacts with that issue
E. holding that the issue of waiver requires an analysis of the specific facts in each case
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.