Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and unqualified. Id. at 256, 103 S.Ct. at 2990-91. That interest must be balanced against the government’s interest in the health, education, and welfare of children as citizens. Stanley v. Illinois, 405 ed legal norms regarding the degree of suspicion a child welfare worker must possess before initiating custody proceedings. Callahan, 880 F.Supp. at 332 (conducting thorough review of all-circuit case law). See also Doe v. State of Louisiana, 2 F.3d 1412, 1417 (5th Cir.1993) (casé worker and supervisor entitled to qualified immunity because law not clearly established with respect to claim that case worker manipulated children to state false allegations of abuse), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1164, 114 S.Ct. 1189, 127 L.Ed.2d 539 (1994); Frazier v. Bailey, 957 F.2d 920, 929 (1st Cir.1992) ; Hodorowski v. Ray, 844 F.2d 1210, 1217 (5th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plaintiff failed to prove that child care workers alleged conduct in programming children to accuse parent of abuse violated amorphous right of family integrity
B. recognizing fundamental right of parents to care for their children
C. holding care custody and control of children is a fundamental right
D. recognizing duty of parent to control conduct of child
E. holding right to family integrity is nebulous in nature and not sufficiently particularized for government officials to know that their conduct in removing children from parents custody without court order violated parents substantive rights
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.