Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Loschiavo for the proposition that § 1983 could be used to enforce regulations “which have the force of law”). The current Sixth Circuit precedent treats regulations as “laws” under § 1983 and looks to determine whether the regulation at issue creates rights. In essence, regulations are treated in the same manner as statutes for purposes of determining whether they create new enforceable rights under § 1983. A such, district courts in the Sixth Circuit must determine, just as with federal statutes, whether federal regulations presented by § 1983 plaintiffs create enforceable rights. This court questions whether the Sixth Circuit’s rule can be correct in light of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Alexander v. Sandoval and Gonzaga University v. Doe. See Save Our Valley, 335 F.3d at 937 . These two decisions, when read together,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that as the court has made clear in several recent decisions a claim that the application of government regulations effects a taking of a property interest is not ripe until the government entity charged with implementing the regulations has reached a final decision regarding the application of the regulations to the property at issue
B. holding federal regulations have the force of law and may create enforceable rights
C. holding that regulations do not create enforceable rights when they are too far removed from congressional intent
D. recognizing that these two recent supreme court decisions resolve the issue of whether federal regulations alone can create enforceable rights under  1983
E. holding that because federal regulations have the force of law they may create enforceable rights under  1983
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.