Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the relevant clause as a whole, including the title, ‘Taxes,’ ” the Court of Federal Claims found “it was plainly intended as a price-adjustment mechanism in the event the Oil Companies were assessed additional or unanticipated taxes as a result of their avgas production.” Shell Remand Decision, 108 Fed.Cl. at 432 (emphasis added). It accorded a “fairly narrow tax-related meaning” to “charges,” interpreting it to mean “an encumbrance, lien, or other like financial burden or liability, especially one .that relates to real property.” Id. at 432-33. Such an interpretation, the trial court found, was consistent with the noscitur a sociis canon of interpretation, which “ ‘counsels that a word [be] given more precise content by the neighboring words with which it is associated.’ ” Id. at 432  (internal citation omitted). The Court of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding attorneys must be given reasonable notice of the charges they face before the referees hearing on those charges
B. holding that  charges should be given more precise content by taxes and fees 
C. holding that the gas laws mandate that pilots be in lieu of all state city and local taxes or charges did not bear on the utilitys authority to pay franchise fees that were not in the nature of property taxes and that the utility was required to pay both franchise fees and pilots
D. holding that permit fees imposed by statute were not taxes
E. holding that plaintiff explained why statements were fraudulent where the complaint alleged that defendants statements requested port fees and customs taxes  but no such fees or taxes were due
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.