Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
should be made only rarely, and because the Court has already adjusted downward Class Counsels’ rates and hours to make them reasonable, the Court DECLINES to make any adjustment to the lodestar figure. See Clark, 803 F.2d at 990-91 (1986). Accordingly, the Court awards attorneys’ fees in the amount of $197,318.27. II. Costs “An award of standard costs in federal district court is normally governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), even in diversity cases.” Champion Produce, Inc. v. Ruby Robinson Co., 342 F.3d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.2003) (citation omitted); see Drumm v. Morningstar, Inc., 695 F.Supp.2d 1014 (N.D.Cal.2010) (“Since the awarding of costs here is procedural, not substantive, federal law governs.”); In re Glacier Bay, 746 F.Supp. 1379, 1393-94 (D.Alaska 1990) . Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that judgment based on terms of settlement agreement must be interpreted under law of contracts rather than law of judgments
B. holding that state court with jurisdiction over  301 claim should have applied federal labor law rather than state contract law
C. holding that federal circuit would henceforth apply its own law rather than regional circuit law to questions involving the relationship between patent law and other federal and state law rights
D. holding that state law claim regarding breach of settlement agreement was preempted by federal labor law
E. holding that federal law regarding costs applies rather than more generously interpreted state law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.