Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
be awarded only to compensate actual injury or, in the case of exemplary or punitive damages, to deter or punish malicious deprivations of rights. Carey, 435 U.S. at 266, 98 S.Ct. 1042. The FTCA’s waiver of sovereign immunity is limited to damages “for injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death.” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1). In situations where Congress has limited the ability of plaintiffs to collect damages due to governmental wrongs—such as the FTCA—courts have recognized that such a statutory limitation does not preclude the award of nominal damages for a violation of a constitutional right. See, e.g., Bush v. St. Tammany Par., 754 F.2d 1132, 1133 (5th Cir.1984) (affirming award of nominal damages for FTCA violation); Allah v. Al-Hafeez, 226 F.3d 247, 251 (3d Cir.2000) ; Perkins v. Kansas Dep’t of Corr., 165 F.3d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing availability of nominal damages for violations of constitutional rights notwithstanding statutory bar in prison litigation  reform act 42 usc  1997ee
B. holding that nominal damages are appropriate for deprivations of constitutional rights that do not result in actual injury
C. holding that under  1983 violations of constitutional rights are actionable for nominal damages without proof of actual injury
D. holding that the right to nominal damages for eighth amendment violations can be waived if such damages are not timely requested
E. holding that a prisoners claim was saved by his request for nominal and punitive damages even though he could not recover compensatory damages under the prison litigation reform act
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.