Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
discretion by failing to give adequate consideration to the Defendant’s financial circumstances, the uncertainty of the degree and duration of her support network, and the realities of her earnings versus her expenses.” The State countered that “Rule 3(b) ... does not permit direct appeal of a trial court’s disposition of a motion to modify the terms of probation.” The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed with the State that Rule 3(b) does not specifically provide that a defendant may appeal a trial court’s decision regarding modification of probation conditions. We agree as well. Unlike civil litigants, who have an appeal as of right from any final judgment, parties in criminal cases do not always have an appeal as of right under the Rules o 4 WL 50788, *3 (Tenn.Crim.App. Jan.12, 2004) . In Adler, this Court examined whether parties
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that denial of the petitioners motion for credit for time at liberty was not appealable under rule 3 or through a commonlaw writ of certiorari
B. recognizing the right to petition for writ of certiorari as a form of appellate review
C. holding review of district court order imposing sanctions is by application for issuance of a writ of certiorari
D. holding that the oneyear period begins to run after the time for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari has expired
E. holding that the defendant did not have an appeal as of right or grounds for a commonlaw writ of certiorari to review a trial courts denial of sentencing credits
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.