Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
by the employees that day. Under the circumstances, we do not view the agents’ interviewing of employees who had been detained during the execution of a search warrant as acts taken in “flagrant disregard” of the terms of the search warrant. Therefore, the extreme remedy of blanket suppression of the documentary evidence covered by the terms of the warrant was not required and the distinct court properly denied Appellants’ motion to suppress on this basis. 3. For similar reasons, we reject Appellants’ alternative contention that the district court should have held an evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress because there was a factual dispute as to whether the employees were forcibly detained and coercively questioned. Cf. United States v. Taylor, 13 F.3d 786, 789 (4th Cir.1994) . Appellants assert that they created a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing conflict
B. recognizing the conflict
C. holding that the court must consider the adequacy of the inquiry into the conflict the extent of the conflict and the timeliness of the motion
D. holding that when material facts that affect the resolution of a motion to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search are in conflict the appropriate way to resolve the conflict is by holding an evidentiary hearing after which the district court will be in a position to make findings
E. recognizing an exception to the conflict rule where the conflict arose after the award of the contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.