Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and is protected from discrimination in connection with such decisions under Title VII and the ADEA.”) superseded by statute on other grounds as recognized by Mihalik v. Credit Agricole Cheuvreux N. Am., Inc., 715 F.3d 102, 108-09 (2nd Cir.2013); Wilkerson v. New Media Tech. Charter Sch., Inc., 522 F.3d 315, 320 (3rd Cir.2008) (“The failure to renew an employment arrangement, whether, afiwill or, for a limited period of time, is an employment action, and an employer violates Title VII if it takes an adverse employment action for a reason prohibited by Title VII.... ”); Jadwin v. Cnty. of Kern, 610 F.Supp.2d 1129, 1171 (E.D.Cal.2009) (“The non-renewal of Plaintiffs contract can qualify as an adverse employment action.”); Hernandez-Mejias v. Gen. Elec., 428 F.Supp.2d 4, 8 (D.P.R.2005) ; Kabes v. Sch. Dist. of River Falls, 387
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding in title vii case that plaintiff demonstrated adverse employment action in school districts decision not to renew principals contract for the following year but offering principal a demotion
B. holding that failure to renew contract was adverse employment action
C. holding that denial of a bonus was not an adverse employment action
D. holding that termination is an adverse employment action
E. holding that suspension with pay was not adverse employment action
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.