Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
P. 44, 47, 48(a), that the State had failed to argue accomplice liability and arguing that D.B. had not been given an opportunity to present a defense to this alternate theory. Although a post-judgment motion on an issue is not necessary if D.B. had otherwise raised the issue, a timely postjudgment motion may in some instances be used to preserve an issue not previously raised if the court considers and rules on the issues raised in a postjudgment motion. Cf. Normandeau v. Hanson Equip., Inc., 2009 UT 44, ¶ 23, 215 P.3d 152 (" [OJnee trial counsel has raised an issue before the trial court, and the trial court has considered the issue, the issue is preserved for appeal. " (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)); State v. Belgard, 830 P.2d 264, 265-66 (Utah 1992) . 111 D.B.'s failure to object either at trial,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that issues not raised before the trial court cannot be raised on appeal
B. holding issues not raised to and ruled upon by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review
C. holding issues not raised before the district court are not preserved for appeal
D. holding that issues raised and dealt with in posttrial evidentiary hearings are preserved for appeal
E. holding that issues not raised before a district court are waived on appeal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.