Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
upheld a finding of liability against a chief operating officer and a chief executive officer where the officers had a “ ‘significant ownership interest with operational control of significant aspects of the corporation’s day-to-day functions; the power to hire and fire employees; [the power to] determin[e][] salaries;[and the responsibility to] maintain [ ] employment records.’” Lambert, 180 F.3d at 1001-02, 1012 (quoting the district court’s jury instruction). “The evidence, moreover, strongly supports the jury’s determination that both Ackerleys exercised economic and operational control over the employment relationship with the sales agents, and were accordingly employers within the meaning of the Act.” Id. at 1012. See also Chao v. Hotel Oasis, Inc., 493 F.3d 26, 34 (1st Cir.2007) ; United States Dep’t of Labor v. Cole Enters.,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding president of corporation liable as employer where he inter alia maintained control over the corporations employment and pay practices and had the authority to make all major decisions regarding the corporations business affairs
B. holding that one who exercises daytoday control over the employee will be considered as the employer
C. holding that where daytoday operations were within sole control of the franchisee no agency relationship existed with franchisor
D. holding officer personally liable because he agreed to personally guarantee payment on an account
E. holding corporations president personally liable where he had ultimate control over businesss daytoday operations and was the corporate officer principally in charge of directing employment practices
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.