Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Unlawful use of handgun in commission of crime.—Any person who shall use a handgun in the commission of any felony or any crime of violence as defined in § 441 of this article, shall be guilty of a separate misdemeanor and on conviction thereof shall, in addition to any other sentence imposed by virtue of commission of said felony or misdemeanor ... be sentenced to the Maryland Division of Correction[.] Md. Code (1957, 1982 Repl. Vol., Supp. 1982), Art. 27, § 36B(d). It is manifest that the General Assembly intended that a separate sentence be imposed upon any person convicted of a violation of Section 36B(d), “in addition to any other sentence imposed by virtue of commission of said felony or misdemeanor.” Id.; see, e.g., Whack v. State, 288 Md. 137, 145-49, 416 A.2d 265 (1980) , cert. denied, 450 U.S. 990, 101 S.Ct. 1688,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that separate sentences may be imposed for a violation of section 36bd and the predicate offense where both convictions were the result of the same act so long as the charges are brought in a single trial
B. holding that the jurisdictional bar applies as long as an alien is removable regardless of whether the predicate offense was the reason for removal
C. holding that notwithstanding code  182231s application to successive trials conviction of both the completed substantive offense and the underlying conspiracy are permitted in virginia provided the convictions occurred as here in a single trial
D. holding that state may charge separately for the same offense but the convictions for more than one of the offenses cannot stand
E. holding each act of shooting from a vehicle constituted a separate and distinct crime explaining where completed offense has occurred a separate charge may be brought for a repetition of the same conduct
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.