Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
even if we were to accept Kovler's contention that he backed up his vehicle before taking the photographs, Kovler admitted that "the rear of his vehicle [was] no more than a foot beyond the pole” (marking the beginning of the stopping prohibited zone) as originally parked. (O.R. at 52.) 12 . Kovler also appears to argue that the trial court should not have considered this matter as an appeal. Rather, Kovler contends that the trial court should have required the City to file a civil complaint under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the matter to be fully litigated. Kovler envisions a process involving discovery and a full civil trial; however, Kovler offers no legal support for such a contention. See Boniella v. Com., 958 A.2d 1069, 1072 n. 8 (Pa.Cmwlth.2008) , appeal denied sub nom. In re Handgun, 600 Pa.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an appellate court is not required to review an appellants point relied on which appears without citation of applicable or relevant authority
B. holding issue spotting without legal citation precludes appellate review
C. holding that an appellate court cannot consider an issue that was not preserved for appellate review
D. holding the appellants failure to raise a particular issue in its directed verdict motion precludes appellate review of that issue
E. holding that lack of objection at trial precludes appellate review of allegedly misused evidence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.