Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in many cases with the problem of making difficult and time-consuming factual determinations based on stale records. We believe that a court’s time and energy would be better spent in handling its current caseload.... Glenn, 558 So.2d at 8; see also Reed v. State, 837 So.2d 366, 370 (Fla. 2002) (refusing to apply a new rule retroactively to child abuse cases because it “would require courts to revisit numerous final convictions and to extensively review stale records”); Williams, 421 So.2d at 515 (refusing to apply a new rule retroactively because it would entail hearings with “evidence possibly long since destroyed, misplaced, or deteriorated” and witnesses who “may not be available or [whose] memory might be dimmed”); [State v. Towery, 204 Ariz. 386, 64 P.3d 828, 835 (Ariz. 2003) ] . 904 So.2d at 411-12. Thus, we concluded that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that conducting new sentencing hearings for arizonas 90 death row prisoners many requiring witnesses no longer available would impose a substantial and unjustified burden on arizonas administration of justice
B. holding that recklessness even for fiduciaries is no longer sufficient
C. recognizing cause of action for wrongful death
D. holding that because plaintiff no longer has available administrative remedies his action must be dismissed with prejudice
E. recognizing that section 5  is inapplicable when the parties have specified an exclusive arbitral forum but that forum is no longer available
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.