Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
since Elkin lacked standing to file a complaint for support, this action must be dismissed. Accordingly, we remand this action to the trial court directing that the order of support be vacated and the complaint for support be dismissed on the basis of lack of standing. We further direct that Mother be reimbursed any monies paid as a result of the existing support order. ¶ 12 We further note that even though Mother has the parental duty of supporting her child “until [her] child reaches 18 or graduates from high school, whichever event occurs later,” Blue v. Blue, 532 Pa. 521, 529, 616 A.2d 628, 633 (1992), she does not have to be subjected to her child dictating how or to whom the support should be allocated. See Oeler by Gross v. Oeler, 527 Pa. 532, 534-36, 594 A.2d 649, 650 (1991) . ¶ 13 In the present case, it is clear from
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that trial court properly terminated fathers obligation to support his seventeenyearold daughter who refused to live with father but instead chose to reside in her own apartment after her mother moved out of state where daughter offered no justifiable reason for not living with her father daughter only contended that her stepmother was too neat for her and that she wanted to live closer to her friends
B. holding that certifications of parent and child regarding her desire to live with her father were sufficient to warrant a plenary hearing
C. holding that daughter had no express authority to sign arbitration agreement for mother where no power of attorney and daughter did not discuss signing the agreement with her mother
D. holding that the applicant was entitled to asylum based on her fear that her daughter will be forced to undergo female genital mutilation because her fear of  being forced to witness the pain and suffering of her daughter is wellfounded
E. holding that the natural father who was incarcerated failed without justifiable cause to communicate significantly with his daughter and noting that he called his daughter once and that he did not attempt mail communication with her despite his awareness that the adoptive parents were represented by counsel and therefore he could have initiated contact through their counsel or the court to communicate with her
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.