Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
1833, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989); and Schultea v. Wood, 47 F.3d 1427, 1434 (5th Cir.1995). The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, effective April 26, 1996, moved the relevant statutory provision addressing dismissal for frivolousness from former subsection (d) of Section 1915 to new subsection (e)(2)(B) and expanded the scope of that statute to expressly authorize dismissals of lawsuits as frivolous regardless of whether a filing fee or any portion thereof had been paid. See Jackson v. Stinnett, 102 F.3d 132, 136-37 (5th Cir.1996); and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)®. 89 . See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. at 327, 109 S.Ct. at 1833; and Schultea v. Wood, 47 F.3d at 1434. 90 . See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. at 325, 109 S.Ct. at 1831; Siglar v. Hightower, 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir.1997), ; McCormick v. Stalder, 105 F.3d 1059, 1061
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that claims under 42 usc  1983 are not personal injury tort claims
B. holding that a state is not a person under 42 usc  1983
C. holding that a state prisoner may not challenge the constitutionality of his conviction in a suit for damages under 42 usc  1983
D. holding that emotional distress requires a showing of either physical symptoms or mental illness
E. holding that title 42 usc  1997ee requires proof of a physical injury before a prisoner can recover for emotional or mental distress holding that verbal abuse is not actionable under section 1983 and also recognizing a de minimus standard for 8th amendment excessive force claims
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.