Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Hamilton v. Tenn. Secondary Sch. Athletic Ass’n, 552 F.2d 681, 682 (6th Cir.1976) (privilege of participation in interscholastie sports is outside due process protections); Albach v. Odle 531 F.2d 983, 984 (10th Cir.1976) (interscholastic athletic participation not a constitutionally protected right); Zehner v. Central Berkshire Reg’l Sch. Dist., 921 F.Supp. 850, 862 (D.Mass.1995) (taking part in interscholastic athletics was not constitutionally protected claim of entitlement); Simkins, 434 N.W.2d at 368 (interscholastie participation is mere expectancy); Bruce v. S.C. High Sch. League, 258 S.C. 546, 189 S.E.2d 817, 819 (1972) (participation in high school extracurricular activities is a privilege); Menke v. Ohio High Sch. Athletic Ass’n, 2 Ohio App.3d 244, 441 N.E.2d 620, 623 (1981) ; Whipple, 629 P.2d at 386 (“While we think
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding high school which allowed student secular noncurricular activities to meet on school property was required to provide equal access to a christian student group
B. holding drug testing high school student athletes was constitutional
C. holding right to be fundamental
D. holding that no special relationship existed between the school and student
E. holding that student has no fundamental right to participate in high school athletics
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.