Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that a municipality may be held liable under Section 1983 for a single decision by its properly constituted legislative body, regardless of whether that body had taken similar action in the past or intended to do so again in the future, because even a single decision by such a body unquestionably constitutes an act of official government policy. Id. at 480, 106 S.Ct. 1292. Justices Stevens and O’Connor, each writing separately, agreed with this portion of the plural 520 U.S. 781, 784-88, 117 S.Ct. 1734, 138 L.Ed.2d 1 (1997); Pembaur, 475 U.S. at 483, 106 S.Ct. 1292 (plurality); Dallas I.S.D., 153 F.3d at 216-17; and Flores, 92 F.3d at 263. See also Jett v. Dallas ISD, 491 U.S. 701, 737, 109 S.Ct. 2702, 105 L.Ed.2d 598 (1989); and Gros v. City of Grand Prairie, Texas, 181 F.3d at 617 . 166 . See McMillian, 520 U.S. at 786-87, 117
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the determination of whether there was joint access and control for actual authority is a fact question reviewed under the plainerror standard but a determination of whether the government reasonably relied on a third partys consent is a question of law to be reviewed de novo
B. holding that claim construction is an issue of law for the court not a question of fact for the jury
C. holding that a jurys finding that a city had delegated its final policymaking authority in the area of law enforcement to a city police chief was supported by the evidence and warranted imposing liability upon the city
D. holding that determination as to whether an official has been delegated final policymaking authority is a question of law for the court not one of fact for the juiy
E. holding that the question of whether a municipal official is a policymaking official is a matter of state law to be decided by the court
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.