Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Hampton Williams, II, was convicted by a jury on several counts related to his participation in a large-scale, ten-year long conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, and was sentenced to life in prison. Specifically, Williams was convicted of one count of conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and fifty grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (2006); one count of conspiracy to launder money, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (2006); one count of cocaine distribution, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) 27 S.Ct. 2456, 2465-66, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007) ; United States v. Benkahla, 530 F.3d 300, 312
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that if a jury is to be provided the defendant at capital sentencing regardless of whether the sixth amendment requires it the jury must stand impartial and indifferent to the extent commanded by the sixth amendment
B. recognizing that its sixth amendment cases do not automatically forbid a sentencing court to take account of factual matters not determined by a jury and to increase the sentence in consequence
C. holding that there is no sixth amendment right to jury sentencing
D. holding that the fact of a prior conviction for sentencing purposes need not be proved to a jury or admitted by defendant to satisfy the sixth amendment
E. holding federal sentencing guidelines are subject to jury trial requirements of sixth amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.