Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of his evidence.”). Here, at the time of the court’s involuntary dismissal of the entire petition, Former Husband had not yet finished presenting his casein-chief. Accordingly, “[b]y denying [Former Husband] the opportunity to complete [his] case-in-chief, the trial court denied [Former Husband his] due process.” A.N. v. M.F.-A., 946 So.2d 58, 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). The trial court further erred in dismissing the entire multi-count petition based solely on Former Husband’s inability to establish one of the listed grounds for modification. In actions involving numerous counts, dismissal of the entire case is proper only if the plaintiff has failed to establish a prima facie case as to each of the counts. See Xamnad, Inc. v. Patio Cafe, Inc., 486 So.2d 699, 700 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) ; see also Sec. Abstract & Ins. Co. v. Fid.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the trial court reversibly erred in dismissing the multicount complaint in its entirety when the facts therein supported at least one cause of action
B. holding that the trial court reversibly erred in involuntarily dismissing the case before the plaintiff finished presenting its caseinchief
C. holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing a complaint with prejudice based on the plaintiffs failure to amend the complaint by the deadline imposed by the court
D. holding that the trial court erred by dismissing the plaintiffs defamation claim
E. holding that district court erred in dismissing the indictment based on sufficiency of evidence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.