Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(2005). Here, two issues affect which version of the statute is applied. First, we determine whether the district court correctly used the version of the statute in effect on the commencement date of White’s action rather than the version in effect on her injury date. Second, we consider whether N.D.C.C. § 28-01-46 should be applied retroactively. A [¶ 9] The district court applied the version of N.D.C.C. § 28-01-46 in ef- feet on the commencement date of White’s action. The court relied upon Larson, stating: “[In Larson t]here was no reference to the date or time of the alleged negligent act, but rather, the Supreme Court referred to the date the action was commenced. “Here, this action was commenced in February of 2006. The applicable statute in effect in February of 2006 was t ) . [¶ 11] Unless amendments to N.D.C.C. §
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding the correct date to use when determining the controlling statute is date upon which the claim arose
B. holding that the statute does not begin to run until at least a demand has been made upon the government but determining that the facts of that case made it unnecessary to choose between the date of demand and the date of actual payment as the triggering date for the running of the statute of limitations
C. holding the petition date is the appropriate date to value the collateral when the debtors intend to remain in the home
D. holding that the date of discrimination is the date on which a decision not to hire a plaintiff becomes effective
E. holding that the date of the federal indictment not the date of the state arrest was the triggering date for the speedytrial act
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.