Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
control,” id. at 248, 111 S.Ct. 1227 (internal quotation marks omitted), the statute’s langu riminate [made in the United States] ... does not create a claim under the civil rights acts — there must be an act.” (citing Landrigan v. City of Warwick, 628 F.2d 736, 742 (1st Cir.1980))). Accordingly, Section 1981’s territorial limitation is defined by the location of the subject of the discrimination, not by the location of the decisionmaker. We agree with those courts that have held “that an individual, whose primary workstation is abroad, cannot characterize otherwise extraterritorial employment as domestic solely because employment decisions were made ... in the United States.” Shekoyan v. Sibley Int’l Corp., 217 F.Supp.2d 59, 68 (D.D.C.2002); see also Pfeiffer, 755 F.2d at 559 ; DeYoreo v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 785
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding before the amendment providing the adea with extraterritorial force see note 2 ante that an adea claim by an american employee against an american employer was properly dismissed because the employee lived and worked overseas
B. holding that determination of whether someone is an employee under the adea must be made in accordance with common law agency principles
C. holding that attorneys fees under adea may not be recovered against a defendant who was not an employer of the plaintiff
D. holding that an employees private arbitration agreement with her employer precluded her from filing suit against the employer under the adea
E. holding that directing a verdict for employer on claim for willful violation of adea was harmless error because given jurys rejection of underlying adea claim it could noi have found willful violation of adea
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.