Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
occurred after his alleged onset date of disability. 9 . The information on the check-list form was for purposes of determining Phillips’ eligibility for state medical welfare benefits, not DIB or SSI. A finding of disability under the Act is a legal determination to be made by the ALJ. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1527(e), 416.927(e). The opinion expressed by checking a box on a form is conclusoty in nature. Indeed, Dr. Falatyn did not cite to any specific work restrictions resulting from Phillips' impairments that would have prevented him from performing all work activity. Under the Commissioner’s regulations, this kind of conclusory report is not entitled to significant weight. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1527(d)(2)(ii), 416.927(d)(2)(ii); see also Mason v. Shalala, 994 F.2d 1058, 1965 (3d Cir.1993) . 10 . The check-list form also contained boxes
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that credibility determinations are reviewed only for substantial evidence
B. holding recoupment statute itself served as a form of notice
C. holding that evidence in an inadmissible form may be considered at the summary judgment stage as long as the evidence is submitted in an admissible form at trial
D. holding that a form report that requires a physician only to check a box or fillin blanks is not substantial evidence by itself
E. holding that form 4340 is probative evidence in and of itself and shows in the absence of contrary evidence that notices and assessments were properly made
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.