Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the IML are not within the control of the state. Under the IML, appropriations are made to the Department’s instructional material fund, created by the state treasurer. Section 22-P5-5(A). Disbursements from the instructional material fund are made “by warrant of the department of finance and administration upon vouchers issued by” the Department. Section 22-15-6. The Department makes payment to an in-state depository for instructional material distributed to private schools as agents for their students. Sections22-15-7(B), -9(E). No funds are appropriated, to any private school. The mere indirect or incidental benefit to the private schools does not violate Article IV, Section 31. Cf. State ex rel. Interstate Stream Comm’n v. Reynolds, 1963-NMSC-023, ¶ 17, 71 N.M. 389, 378 P.2d 622 . Plaintiffs rely on Harrington v. Atteberry,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that imposition of government fees did not violate exempt status of religious organization
B. holding that the contracts clause article i section 10 clause 1 to the united states constitution does not apply to the actions of the federal government
C. holding that a nonprofit organization lacked standing under unruh because its civil rights had not been personally violated and it failed to show that any of its members would suffer injury
D. holding that the death penalty does not violate the prohibition against cruel punishments set forth in article 1 section 13 of the pennsylvania constitution
E. holding that incidental benefits to a nonprofit organization from appropriations made to the state engineer with absolute control of the expenditure does not violate article iv section 31
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.