Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
J. Appellants, Eric Russell Lewis and Mary Loughran Lewis (the Lewises) were injured when the car in which they were riding was struck by a vehicle which was being chased by appellee, Officer Robert Epstein (Epstein). Epstein was employed by appellee, The Seminole Department of Law Enforcement (SDLE). The Lewises’ filed suit against Epstein and SDLE; the complaint was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, based on the doctrine of sovereign immunity. We affirm the dismissal of the complaint against SDLE. See Houghtaling v. Seminole Tribe of Fla., 611 So.2d 1235 (Fla.1993); see also Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Mfg.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that tribal sovereign immunity did not bar rico suit only after concluding that sue and be sued clause in tribal ordinance unequivocally expressed waiver of sovereign immunity
B. recognizing that tribal sovereign immunity extends to agencies and subdivisions of the tribe
C. holding that an indian tribe is subject to suit only where congress has authorized the suit or the tribe has waived its immunity
D. holding that as a matter of federal law an indian tribe is subject to suit only where congress has authorized the suit or the tribe has waived its immunity
E. holding that florida does not have jurisdiction in a suit by other persons against an indian tribe absent express waiver of tribal sovereign immunity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.