Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
violations of the FDCPA. D. Attorneys’Fees and Costs Since Plaintiff successfully demonstrated that Absolute violated the FDCPA, she is entitled to “costs of the action, together with a reasonable attorney’s fee.” 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3). As a result, the undersigned turns to Plaintiffs request for attorney’s fees and costs. 1. Attorneys’ Fees “The starting point in fashioning an award of attorney’s fees is to multiply the number of hours reasonably expended by a reasonable hourly rate.” Loranger v. Stierheim, 10 F.3d 776, 781 (11th Cir. 1994); Hepsen v. J.C. Christensen and Assocs., Inc., No. 10-12231, 2010 WL 3329836 (11th Cir. Aug.25, 2010) (calculating attorneys’ fees under FDCPA using lodestar); Moton v. Nathan & Nathan, P. C., 297 Fed.Appx. 930, 931-32 (11th Cir. 2008) . The product of the reasonable hourly rate and
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees
B. recognizing that a school district must be a prevailing party in order to be entitled to attorneys fees under the idea
C. holding that back rent is debt under the fdcpa
D. holding that lodestar analysis must be used to calculate attorneys fees under the fdcpa
E. holding that unsegregated attorneys fees must be remanded
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.