Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
P.2d 1275 (1991). Here LKO sued for a judicial declaration of its understanding of the agreement with Mr. Fair and TCG. ¶25 In Hizey, clients sued their attorney and alleged legal malpractice based on the lawyer’s conflict of interest. Hizey, 119 Wn.2d at 256-57. The trial judge refused to let an expert testify on rules of professional conduct and refused to instruct the jury on those rules. Id. at 257-58. The Supreme Court affirmed. The court held that a violation of ethics rules must be pursued through a disciplinary proceeding. Id. at 259. And the court held that such violations may not serve as the basis for a private cause of action. Id. at 259, 261. The court reasoned that a claim for legal malpractice focuses on the duty of care owed to the client, which is establishe 28 (1991) ). At least one legal scholar has suggested
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding contract for sale of law practice which included duty on part of selling attorney to refer clients as consideration for the sale violated rpc
B. holding that an attorney approval clause in a contract for the sale of real estate was a part of that contract and would have to be satisfied for the underlying contract to be enforceable
C. holding that the validity of a contract for a commission for the sale of real estate is determined by the law of the state where the contract is made
D. holding that an agreement in which one party promised to make monthly payments to the other partys attorney as part of an asset sale contract was for the direct benefit of the attorney
E. holding in the analogous context of choiceoflaw in relation to the sale of personal property that compensation for arranging the sale is assessed apart from underlying sale
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.