Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
IX, Section 14 of the New Mexico Constitution provides: Neither the state nor any county, school district or municipality, except as otherwise provided in this constitution, shall directly or indirectly lend or pledge its credit or make any donation to or in aid of any person, association or public or private corporation or in aid of any private enterprise for the construction of any railroad except as provided. N.M. Const. Art. IX, § 14. “The Anti-Donation Clause ... prohibits the use of state or local governmental funds to benefit private organizations.” H. Stratton & P. Farley, Office of the Attorney General, State of New Mexico, History, Powers & Responsibilities, 1816-1990 at 125 (Univ. of N.M. Printing Servs.1990). In the context of New Mexico’s 8, 314 P.2d 714, 720 (1957); Hutcheson v. Atherton, 44 N.M. 144, 99 P.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding an action for postpetition breach of an agreement to purchase property to be a core proceeding
B. holding that an award of back pay is an issue for the court
C. holding that an appropriation to pay states share of emergency feed certificates issued to livestock owners for the purchase of hay was an unconstitutional subsidy of the livestock industry
D. holding that legislative diminishment of tax obligation constituted an unconstitutional subsidy to the liquor industry in violation of the antidonation clause
E. holding husbands early retirement subsidy was not marital property as a vested right but an option contingent upon his continued employment and eventual qualification for the subsidy in nine years based upon value of the pension frozen at the time of dissolution
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.