Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
see also United States v. Melecio-Rodriguez, 231 F.3d 1091, 1094 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (“An error in admitting testimony may be harmless if the testimony is corroborated by independent sources, or if it amounts to cumulative evidence on matters already before the jury.”). Special Agent Starmer’s hearsay testimony concerning the incident in Oklahoma mirrored Winfrey’s testimony. Although, like Special Agent Starmer, Winfrey acknowledged that he had no first-hand knowledge of the vehicle stop, Robinson did not object to Winfrey’s testimony as hearsay. See United States v. White, 11 F.3d 1446, 1451 (8th Cir.1993). Neither did Robinson object to Ousley’s hearsay testimony confirming the incident. Indeed, there is no indication that Robinson even disputed that the s 2 (8th Cir.2005) . Finally, the record is replete with other
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the improper admission of hearsay testimony concerning a childs report of sexual abuse warranted reversal where the childs otherwise uncorroborated testimony was the sole basis for conviction and the hearsay augmented the childs testimony with additional detail in certain areas
B. holding harmless the improper admission of a social workers hearsay testimony concerning a childs report of sexual abuse where the credibility of the childs testimony was supported by other witnesses
C. holding that the court erroneously admitted hearsay testimony from adults concerning a childs statements to them regarding her fathers sexual abuse
D. holding that the improper admission of hearsay testimony from two witnesses whose testimony was brief and consistent with the victims testimony did not constitute drumbeat repetition of the victims statements
E. holding that defendants absence from courtroom during childs testimony to jury instead of presenting videotape of childs testimony to jury with defendant present violated confrontation clause in absence of necessity or defendants consent
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.