Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
residents for the proposition that the public believed the proposed tower would be an eyesore and would diminish property values. The only written evidence pertaining to the survey is a brief description of how it was carried out and copies of numerous responses. The survey is of no value and the Court will disregard it. The Court has no basis upon which to judge the survey The Court does not know how the respondents were selected or how they were questioned. Furthermore, nothing in the record suggests that the survey has any statistical or scientific merit. The Court cannot say that the survey amounts to anything more than evidence of generalized and unfounded opposition to the proposed cell site. See BellSouth Mobility, Inc. v. Gwinnett County, 944 F.Supp. 923, 928 (N.D.Ga.1996) . Generalized, nonexpert objections to the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding damages do not constitute other equitable relief
B. holding that unsworn pleadings do not constitute proper summary judgment evidence
C. holding that personal disputes do not constitute persecution
D. holding that unsubstantiated personal opinions expressing generalized concerns  about the aesthetic and visual impacts on the neighborhood do not amount to substantial evidence
E. holding that an objectors generalized concerns do not constitute substantial evidence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.