Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the applicability of Schnuphase v. Storehouse Markets, 918 P.2d 476 (Utah 1996), were fully briefed by both parties and properly before the court for review. 121 The Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure require that an appellant's opening brief include "[a] statement of the issues presented for review," Utah R.App.P. 24(a)(5), and arguments containing the contentions and reasons for each issue presented, see id. 24(a)(9). In addition, the reply brief of an appellant "shall be limited to answering any new matter set forth in the opposing brief." Id. 24(c). 122 The appellee's brief, or opposing brief, must include the same elements as the appellant's brief. See id. 24(b). However, an appel Cir.1968) (noting that appellant had option to answer new issue raised in appe 2d 1278, 1280 (1994) ; Newsome v. North Carolina State Bd. of
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an argument raised only in fact section of opening brief and in reply brief is not properly raised
B. holding an appellant may not use the reply brief to argue issues not argued in the initial brief
C. holding an argument made in plaintiffs reply brief but not in their opening brief waived
D. holding that if an appellee raises an argument not addressed by the appellant in its opening brief the appellant may reply  citation omitted
E. holding that an argument is not preserved unless a party raises it in its opening brief
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.