Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
party who seeks to seal an entire record faces an even heavier burden.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)). The rationale underlying the “good cause” standard for nondispositive orders, namely that “the public has less of a need for access to court records attached only to non-dispositive motions because those documents are often unrelated, or only tangentially related, to the underlying cause of action,” does not apply to this case. See Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179 (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, the parties seek to seal the entire record of the proceedings in the district court, including the court’s opinion. The district court properly invoked the “compelling reasons” standard in considering the sealing request. See Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 894 (2d Cir.1982) . The only reasons provided for sealing the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a nonstatutory postponement  does not constitute an irregularity in the foreclosure proceeding itself that could justify setting aside a foreclosure sale
B. holding that a failure to comply with the foreclosure statutes invalidates a foreclosure sale
C. holding that only the most compelling reasons can justify the total foreclosure of public and professional scrutiny to a courts basis for the adjudication
D. holding that after a judgment entry grants a decree of foreclosure and order of sale the foreclosure action cannot be dismissed as the judgment is final
E. holding that foreclosure on mortgage not state action and thus could not trigger due process clause scrutiny
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.