Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the easement. An express easement properly encompasses technological developments that “further the particular purpose for which the easement is granted.” Id. (citing Restatement (Third) OF PROPERTY (SERVITUDES) §§ 1.2 Cmt. d, cmt. a, 4.10 & cmt. a). Citing the Restatement, Marcus Cable expressly recognized, as an example of appropriate application of the doctrine of technological advancement or development, that a holder of an easement granted in 1940 for the purpose of telephone transmission could properly attach transmitters to its poles for cellular telephone transmissions unless that use would interfere unreasonably with the ser-vient estate. See id., 90 S.W.3d at 702 (citing Restatement (Third) of PROPERTY (Servitudes) § 4.10 illus. 13); see also Cor-ley, 246 F.Supp.2d at 578-79 . We hold that the express terms of the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing application of federal deliberative process privilege to internal state communications
B. holding that defendants communications sent into tennessee did not constitute purposeful availment because all were in response to communications initiated by the plaintiff
C. holding ban preempted by federal communications commission regulations
D. holding that easements using terms telephone telegraph and communications could properly be utilized for both internal communications and for thirdparty voice and data communications
E. recognizing qualified privilege for confidential presidential communications
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.