Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
judgment on the property interest claim. To the extent the defendants seek dismissal of the liberty interest claim under Rule 12(b)(6), the motion will be denied. 3.Interrogations Stultz also claims that Holcomb, Connaughton, Esposito, Thorpe, Hill, Penny, and Howard denied him due process by interrogating him on three separate occasions without advising him that he was under investigation or being considered for disciplinary action. Upon review of the amended complaint, the court concludes that Stultz has not sufficiently alleged that the interrogations deprived him of a constitutionally protected liberty or property interest. See Wootten v. Commonwealth, No. 6:14-CV-00013, 2016 WL 1345276, at *14 n. 8, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35949, at *43 n. 8 (W.D.Va. Mar. 23, 2015) (Moon, J.) . Accordingly, the court will dismiss this
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that defendants mere allegations of ineffective assistance were insufficient to prevail on such a claim
B. holding that similar allegations were insufficient to state a due process claim
C. holding that evidence of other allegations of torture was inadmissible in part because it was not similar to the allegations made by defendant
D. holding insufficient the plaintiffs generic allegations
E. holding that in similar factual situation no due process violation occurred
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.