Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
development of a full factual record.” Appellant’s Opening Br. 13. Sarvis’s demand for discovery, however, misapprehends the nature of a motion to dismiss. Here, the district court properly recognized that “[t]o survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, a complaint must ‘provide enough facts to state a claim that is plausible on its face,’ ” Sarvis, 80 F.Supp.3d at 696 (quoting Robinson v. Am. Honda Motor Co., 551 F.3d 218, 222 (4th Cir. 2009)), and that to reach facial plausibility, Sarvis must “plead[] factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009)). The pr rtarian Party of Ill., 591 F.2d 22, 25-27 (7th Cir. 1979) . It remains far from clear, moreover, that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding illinois high school associations version of the transfer rule did not violate federal equal protection
B. holding that doctrine does not violate equal protection
C. holding that where racial bias motivated its original enactment a facially neutral felon disenfranchisement law violated the equal protection clause
D. holding that an illinois countys facially neutral twotiered ballot ordering system did not violate the equal protection clause
E. holding transfer rule did not violate federal equal protection
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.