Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of a burden for purposes of the UUP test. Section 5 of the Charity Act After it concluded that Theater was not a “purely public charity” under the HUP test, the trial court then decided that Theater also did not qualify for an exemption under the Charity Act. It concluded that Theater did not prove that, upon dissolution, its assets would be donated to a charity or that it renders a substantial portion of its services gratuitously. Theater challenges both conclusions as inconsistent with the uncontradicted evidence. County responds that once the trial court determined that Theater did not qualify as a “purely public charity” under the HUP test, its analysis should have ended. Mesivtah Eitz Chaim of Bobov, Inc. v. Pike County Board of Assessment Appeals, 615 Pa. 463, 44 A.3d 3, 9 (2012) . County argues that this Court should remand
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the district courts question do you also understand that under some circumstances you or the government may have the right to appeal any sentence that i impose did not comply with rule llbln and failed to properly notify the defendant about the waiver of his appellate rights
B. holding that if you do not qualify under the hup test you never get to the statute
C. holding that it is not extortion to threaten economic harm when you have a legal right to engage in the activity you threaten
D. holding that verbal threats such as we going to get you you better drop the suit do not rise to the level of adverse action
E. holding do you think i need a lawyer to be ambiguous
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.