Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
we must affirm the circuit court. By the Court. — Judgment affirmed. 1 Generally, a defendant who pleads guilty waives all non-jurisdictional defects and defenses. See County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis. 2d 431, 434, 362 N.W.2d 439 (Ct. App. 1984). However, Wis. Stat. § 971.31(10) (2011-12) creates an exception to this rule, allowing appellate review of an order denying a motion to suppress evidence, notwithstanding a guilty plea. Smith, 122 Wis. 2d at 434-35. All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version. 2 While Scull originally filed his notice of appeal in December 2011, our decision in this case has been delayed by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. _, 133 S. Ct. 1409 (2013), and our subsequent request tha Cir. 1997) ; United States v. Broadway, 580 F. Supp. 2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that canine sniff not a search under the fourth amendment
B. holding that a trained dogs detection of odor in a common corridor of a hotel does not contravene the fourth amendment and that the information developed from such a sniff may properly be used to support a search warrant affidavit
C. holding that a canine sniff is a search for purposes of the fourth amendment
D. holding that a dog sniff of the area outside the door of a hotel room is not a search under the fourth amendment or the texas constitution because the dogs sniff does not explore the details of the hotel room and the sniff reveals nothing about the room other than the presence of cocaine in which there is no legitimate privacy interest
E. holding that the fourth amendment requires that a defendant be allowed an opportunity to challenge the veracity of an affidavit supporting a search warrant
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.