Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
C. Defendant’s timely assertion of his right to a speedy trial ¶47. Bateman filed a demand for a speedy trial on February 3, 2010, two days after his arraignment, and 310 days after his arrest. Therefore, Bateman claims that this factor should weigh in his favor. ¶ 48. “Although it is the State’s duty to ensure that the defendant receives a speedy trial, a defendant has some responsibility to assert this right.” Taylor, 672 So.2d at 1261. “[F]ailure to assert this right will make it difficult for a defendant to prove that he was denied a speedy trial.” Barker, 407 U.S. at 532, 92 S.Ct. 2182. This Court has held that this factor weighs against a defendant who waits a significant amount of time after arrest to demand a speedy trial. C.f., Noe v. State, 616 So.2d 298, 301 (Miss.1993) ; Wall v. State, 718 So.2d 1107, 1113
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that aggressiveness with which defendant asserted his speedy trial right was lacking because he merely filed one demand for speedy trial and opposed his original counsels withdrawal
B. holding that the defendants failure to assert his right to a speedy trial until one year after his arrest weighed heavily against him under this barker factor
C. holding that defendants assertion of his right to a speedy trial two months before his trial began did not satisfy this barker factor
D. recognizing that djelay arising from hearing the defendants motions not caused by the prosecution is not weighed against the prosecution in a speedy trial analysis
E. holding that a defendants failure to assert the right to speedy trial must be weighed against him in barker analysis
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.