Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
951, 415 N.E.2d 936, 940-941 (1980), cert, denied, 451 U.S. 987,101 S.Ct. 2323, 68 L.Ed.2d 845 (1981), held that a New York statute violated the federal constitutional right of privacy when applied to persons deciding to engage in “ ‘deviant’ [sexual] conduct, so long as the decisions are voluntarily made by adults in a noncommercial, private setting.” The New York court also held that the statute, by proscribing certain sexual conduct by persons not married to each other, but not prohibiting the same conduct by persons married to each other, violated the right to equal protection of the laws. 51 N.Y.2d at 492, 434 N.Y.S.2d at 953, 415 N.E.2d at 942-943. See, e.g., Post v. State, 715 P.2d 1105, 1107, 1109 (Okl.Crim.App.), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 890, 107 S.Ct. 290, 93 L.Ed.2d 264 (1986) ; Commonwealth v. Bonadio, 490 Pa. 91, 415 A.2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing private right of action
B. holding that a statute violated the federal constitutional right of privacy when applied to heterosexual nonviolent consensual activity between adults in private and pointing out that twentytwo states have decriminalized private consensual sodomy between adults
C. holding lawrences recognition of right of individuals to engage in fully and mutually consensual private sexual conduct does not affect a states legitimate interest to interpose when consent is in doubt
D. holding that a private right of action exists
E. recognizing that deemed consolidation is consensual
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.