Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
need not accommodate a disability by foregoing an ‘esse 1995) (under Rehabilitation Act, employee with excessive absences related to claimed disability was not qualified individual). “Gross attendance problems can prevent a disabled person from being qualified for a position even when the attendance problem is related in whole or in part to the disability.” 1 H.H. PerRitt, Jr., Amerioans With Disabilities Act Handbook, § 3.06[E] at 124 (4th ed.2003). In fact, “[n]umerous federal courts have held that disabled employees cannot establish that they can sufficiently perform the essential functions of a job without showing they can maintain a regular and reliable level of attendance at that job.” Kennedy v. Applause, Inc., No. CV 94-5344 SVW(GHKX), 1994 WL 740765 (C.D.Cal. December 6, 1994) . It is undisputed that P & G’s Medical Account
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that inability to maintain regular and reliable level of attendance defeated plaintiffs qualification for the job
B. holding that removal of job responsibility did not constitute an adverse employment action because there was no change in the plaintiffs job position grade pay or benefits
C. holding ones satisfactory performance of duties leading to a promotion does establish a plaintiffs qualification for a job
D. holding that attendance is a minimum function of any job
E. holding that the plaintiffs argument that the defendant caused plaintiffs inability to return to work cannot hold water because the socalled causation was insufficient to rise to the level of actionable harassment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.