Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
F.2d 1566,1571 (11th Cir.1990). In this case, the summary to the Revised Commentary states that the Commentary “applies and interprets the requirements of Regulation Z” and that the revisions “provide guidance” on certain issues addressed therein. 61 Fed. Reg. 14952. Moreover, for reasons discussed more specifically below, the Board’s interpretation applying TILA and Regulation Z to pawnbrokers is in accordance with the prevailing law. Therefore, the Revised Commentary applies to the case at hand unless it is demonstrably irrational. The Board’s application of TILA to pawnbrokers is not demonstrably irrational. Although few courts have addressed the issue, those which have uniformly hold that pawnbrokers are subject to TILA See Burnett v. Ala Moana Pawn Shop, 3 F.3d 1261 (9th Cir.1993) ; Hyde v. Hutto Enterprises, Inc., 1994 WL
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that  1447c applies to counsel
B. holding that fourteenth amendment only applies to state action
C. holding tila applies to pawnbrokers
D. holding exemption applies to nondebtor
E. holding that the fourteenth amendment only applies to state action
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.