Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
it concluded that “neither the statutory text nor the legislative history discloses any congressional intent to categorically exclude attempt offenses from the scope of § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii)’s residual provision.” Id. We need go no further. IV. Criminal Possession of a Weapon Is a Violent Felony Lynch also argues that his 1989 conviction for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree is not a violent felony under the ACCA. Lynch asserts that since he never admitted to having “intent to use the weapon unlawfully against another,” his conviction was based on “mere possession” and cannot constitute a violent felony. Lynch, however, pled guilty to the charge at issue in state court. Under New York law, “[a] person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the se Cir.2005) . This Court, in United States v. Danielson,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that possession of a sawedoff shotgun under 26 usc  5861d is a crime of violence and noting that congress found certain firearms  sawedoff shot guns and grenades  to be inherently dangerous and lacking in usefulness other than for violent and criminal purposes
B. holding that shortbarreled shotguns are unprotected
C. holding that burglary is violent felony
D. holding that possession of a shortbarreled shotgun is a violent felony under the accas residual clause because sawedoff shotguns are inherently dangerous and lack usefulness except for violent and criminal purposes internal quotation marks omitted
E. holding that possession of sawedoff shotgun is violent felony as defined by armed career criminal act
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.