Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
yet the district court, like the hearing officer in Arlington County, succumbed to its temptation to inject itself into matters of professional educational judgment. 7 . For example, the ALJ stated that DB claimed the IEP goals drafted by Dr. McCarthy were the "only appropriate ones for the Child,” and noted that Drs. McCarthy and Antell "testified in great detail as to the inferiority of the AACPS IEP and the superiority of the special education services that the Child is receiving at the Summit School.” ALJ Op. at 24 (J.A. 29). Yet the ALJ reached a completely opposite result, holding that the IEP complied with IDEA. 8 . As discussed above, AB’s report card for his year at Millersville, ante n. 3, also supports the ALJ's findings. See Rowley, 458 U.S. at 207 n. 28, 102 S.Ct. 3034 . 9 . Additionally, Appellees argue, relying on
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that among other factors the location and level of the precedent as well as its age are important factors in a qualified immunity analysis
B. recognizing that achievement of passing marks and advance ment from grade to grade are important factors in determining educational benefit
C. holding that most important factors in evaluating confusion in product configuration eases are marketing and labeling of products
D. recognizing same factors
E. holding that the family court is required to consider all relevant factors in determining alimony
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.