Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
codified in the FSIA, constitute an unconstitutional statutory delegation of congressional authority to the Executive in violation of the separation of powers embodied in the Constitution. In order to determine whether this statute violates the separation of powers inherent in the structure of the Constitution, we must first look at the relevant constitutional provisions. The Constitution assigns to Congress the power to define the jurisdiction of the lower federal courts. This power derives from Congress’s power in Article I “[t]o constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court,” U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, and in Article III to “ordain and establish” inferior courts, U.S. Const. art. Ill, § 1. See Kline v. Burke Constr. Co., 260 U.S. 226, 233-34, 43 S.Ct. 79, 67 L.Ed. 226 (1922) ; Fair Assessment in Real Estate Ass’n v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that decisions of lower federal courts interpreting federal law are not binding on state courts
B. holding that ejxcept in matters governed by the federal constitution or by acts of congress the law to be applied in any case is the law of the state
C. recognizing that oath taken to honor state constitution makes it the justices duty to apply the state constitution when it does not conflict with the federal constitution
D. holding that our courts are bound by the united states supreme courts interpretation of the federal constitution
E. holding that lower federal courts derive their jurisdiction wholly from the authority of congress  provided it be not extended beyond the boundaries fixed by the constitution
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.