Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Control Officer ... may issue a citation to the owner of such animal specifying the section or sections of this chapter so violated and identifying the specific nature of the violation. Such citation shall impose upon the owner the obligation of appearance to answer the charges specified in the citation ... at the time and place indicated on the citation. LMCO § 91.073(A). If an officer decides to issue a violation notice in lieu of a citation, that notice must “stipulate a compliance date and associated fee and late fee, as well as a waiver provision providing that the person to whom the violation notice is issued waives all rights to protest such violation and waives all rights to a hearing on the issues relating to that viola tion.” LMCO § 91.073(B). LMCO § 91. 57 (6th Cir.2001) . Furthermore, the circumstances as here
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that evidence of other allegations of torture was inadmissible in part because it was not similar to the allegations made by defendant
B. holding that the district court did not err in finding that the plaintiff failed to provide adequate notice of new allegations where the plaintiffs complaint gave the defendants no notice of the specific factual allegations presented for the first time in the plaintiffs opposition to summary judgment
C. holding that because the allegations purportedly suppressed by the government were not material an evidentiary hearing further exploring the  allegations themselves and the governments knowledge of the allegations is unnecessary
D. holding that a parking citation provided adequate notice where it was reasonably calculated to inform the vehicle owners of the allegations against them and the procedures available to obtain a hearing to contest the allegations
E. holding that the plaintiffs complaint was valid because despite general allegations it provided notice
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.