Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the examination room during the questioning of Ms. Rodriguez certainly did not undermine the fairness or the validity of the trial. He was able to see and hear the entire interrogation of Carmen Rodriguez, and his attorney was present in the examination room. There is no indication in the record that the petitioner was impeded from consulting with counsel either before or after the examination. Accordingly, his exclusion from the examination room, assuming it was an error, is subject to harmless error analysis. See Feliciano, 223 F.3d at 112 (conducting portion of voir dire outside hearing of defendants subject to harmless error analysis where defendants present during entire jury selection process and were provided with opportunity to consult with counsel); Yarborough, 101 F.3d at 898 ; Vilella, 49 F.Supp.2d at 238 (colloquy
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that defendants who do not object to jury instructions at trial are subject to a plain error standard of review on appeal
B. holding trial errors are subject to a harmless error analysis
C. holding that the omission of an element is subject to harmless error analysis
D. holding brief hearing not part of trial proper in defendants absence subject to harmless error standard
E. holding that where defendants counsel objected to the trial judges evidentiary rulings in evidentiary hearing but did not object to the defendants absence any claim of error due to defendants absence had been waived
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.