Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
The Second Amended Complaint also includes a cause of action for copyright infringement. Prior to trial that claim was voluntarily dismissed. 4 .The parties are in agreement that the common law claims are governed by New York law, as Defendants Belliard and Fell’s employment took place in New York, as did all of the events at issue in the case. 5 . Courts in this jurisdiction, typically in the context of settlement agreements or licensing agreements, have recognized that such agreements not to challenge the validity or enforceability of intellectual property "necessarily involve the public interest and have enforced such agreements only to the extent that enforcement does not result in a public injury.” Idaho Potato Comm’n v. M & M Produce Farm & Sales, 335 F.3d 130, 136 (2d Cir.2003)  (discussing cases following Lear, Inc. v.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding defendants were precluded from challenging the validity of jury verdict forms for failure to have complained at trial
B. holding that the continued use of licensed trademark after termination of franchise agreement constituted trademark infringement and breach of contract
C. holding that the defendants reference to the plaintiffs trademark in the metatags of the defendants web page was a violation of trademark law
D. holding that licensee was not a registrant exclusive licensee or assignee of trademark but still had standing to assert false designation claim under 15 usc  1125a
E. holding that licensee was not estopped from challenging the validity of a trademark
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.