Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Plaintiffs still believed the fees being charged were too high. From July 1, 1997 until the agreement terminated in late 1999, Plaintiffs paid the higher fees s ere decided unilaterall ment may be amended only in writing, by the agreement of the parties.” The Agreement does not require that amendments be signed. See T.R. Mills Contractors, Inc. v. WRH Enters., LLC, 93 S.W.3d 861, 865-66 (Tenn.Ct.App.2002) (a written agreement does not have to be signed to be binding). BCBST memorialized the terms in writing and sent the proposed written amendment to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs paid the amounts specified by the proposed written amendment but refused to sign it. The two requisites of amendment under the Agreement were met: written terms and the agreement of the parties to amend. See id. . Although a signed writing is a superior way
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that when a contract is signed by one party but not the other the manifestation of consent by the nonsigning party is sufficient to bind that party
B. holding that an arbitration agreement enforceable against party who signed the agreement even where the other party did not sign it because generally it is enough that the party against whom the contract is sought to be enforced signs it
C. holding that validity of contract may be established by one or more writings signed by party to be charged
D. holding that successful party is one who is the ultimate prevailing party in the litigation
E. holding that parol evidence is admissible to show that an individual who signed a contract but is not named in the body is a party to the contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.