Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
v. Chambers County Comm’n, 514 U.S. 35, 49-51, 115 S.Ct. 1203, 131 L.Ed.2d 60 (1995); Limone v. Condon, 372 F.3d 39, 51-52 (1st Cir.2004). The Secretary offers no developed argumentation on this point and, as matters stand, we believe that this case is not a credible candidate for the exercise of pendent appellate jurisdiction. 4 . The Secretary makes a fifth argument: that the relief ordered by the district court requires Puerto Rican officials to act in contravention of local law. The district court refused to address this argument on the ground that the Secretary did not sufficiently specify the nature of the alleged violations. That ruling is supportable, and it precludes reliance on the argument here. See Teamsters Union v. Superline Transp. Co., 953 F.2d 17, 21 (1st Cir.1991) . In all events, the Secretary's appellate
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
B. holding arguments not raised on appeal waived
C. holding that issues not raised before the trial court cannot be raised on appeal
D. holding that arguments not squarely raised in the trial court cannot be advanced on appeal
E. holding that issues not raised in the trial court may not be raised later on appeal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.