Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that just as the IJ may not rely on his or, her own speculation and conjecture, neither may the IJ rely on the speculation and conjecture of a government report. The conclusions in Agent Schultz’s report derive from his analysis of general trends and conditions in Sri Lanka, not from individualized facts about Suntharalinkam or the evi dence presented before the IJ. Moreover, the IJ must conduct an individualized credibility analysis, and it is improper to rely exclusively on a general assertion in a government report to declare an applicant not credible. See Ge, 367 F.3d at 1126 (to the extent that the IJ relied on blanket statements in the State Department report regarding detention conditions in China, the IJ’s finding was not sufficiently individualized); Shah, 220 F.3d at 1069 . Here, Schultz bases his conclusion that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an ij may not use general information contained in a state department report to discredit specific testimony regarding an applicants personal experience
B. holding that an ij need not first identify the particular pieces of missing relevant evidence and show that this evidence was reasonably available to the applicant when he or she is not otherwise credible
C. holding that an ij made an explicit credibility when the ij found testimony not credible based on several enumerated inconsistencies
D. holding that party may not rely on conclusory statements or an argument that the affidavits in support of the motion for summary judgment are not credible
E. holding that the ij may not rely on a factually unsupported assertion in a state department report to deem an applicant not credible
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.