Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
order regular community supervision if the de fendant is adjudged guilty of aggravated sexual assault under section 22.021 of the Penal Code. Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.12, § 3g(a)(l)(E). A trial judge also may not order shock community supervision if the defendant is ineligible for regular judge-ordered community supervision. See id. § 6(a)(1); State v. Posey, 330 S.W.3d 311, 315 (Tex.Crim.App.2011); State v. Dunbar, 297 S.W.3d 777, 780 (Tex.Crim.App.2009). Because imprisonment was the only punishment option, we hold that the trial judge did not err in failing to order a section 9 presentence investigation. Id. § 9(g)(3); see also Skinner v. State, No. 06-00-00184-CR, 2001 WL 193882, at *2 (Tex.App.-Texarkana Feb. 27, 2001, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) . Jimenez further contends that the trial court
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that defendant whom trial court had adjudicated guilty of aggravated sexual assault after defendant had violated community supervision agreement was ineligible for judgeordered community supervision and thus fit within section 9g3 exception
B. holding that an information charging defendant with offense of burglary that alleged that the defendant had committed an assault was not defective for failing to further allege specific facts that constituted assault
C. holding that no apprendi violation shown when trial court cumulated sentences for aggravated sexual assault and indecency with a child when appellant did not dispute that sentence for each count was within statutory range
D. holding that allegations of sexual assault by an employee of the church fell within coverage for sexual misconduct
E. holding criminal sexual assault and unlawful restraint included offenses of aggravated crimi nal sexual assault and vacating convictions and sentences on former offenses
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.