Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to Andrew Tagliamonte’s request, but, based on the charge of child neglect, sua sponte entered an order that he stay away from his minor son. In so doing, the trial court abused its discretion. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131(d)(2) authorizes the State to apply for modification of pretrial release conditions, but only on “showing good cause and with at least 3 hours’ notice to the attorney for the defendant.” A trial court is without authority sua sponte to modify a previously set pretrial release bond. See Cameron v. State, 127 So.3d 549, 550, 2012 WL 5349405, *1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (granting a writ of habeas corpus where trial court sua sponte “added significant and substantial conditions” to defendant’s release bond); Simmons v. State, 915 So.2d 732 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ; Griffin v. McRay, 890 So.2d 341 (Fla. 3d DCA
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding trial court may not increase bond on grounds not raised by the state without prior notice to defendant
B. holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
C. holding that issues not raised before the trial court cannot be raised on appeal
D. holding that issues not raised in the trial court may not be raised later on appeal
E. holding that the trial court may not grant summary judgment on a ground not raised in the motion
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.