Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Second, 18 U.S.C. § 1153(a) includes as enumerated offenses under the IMCA “murder, manslaughter, ... [and] felony child abuse or neglect.” 18 U.S.C. § 1153(a). Given that 18 U.S.C. § 1153(a) discusses both manslaughter, and felony child abuse or neglect, it is difficult to say that 18 U.S.C. § 1112(a) qualifies as defining both manslaughter and felony child abuse or neglect. A court should strive to give both of these words in the IMCA operative effect when interpreting the statute. See United States v. Nordic Vill., Inc., 503-U.S. at 35, 112 S.Ct. 1011. Allowing involuntary manslaughter under 18 U.S.C. § 1112(a) to define both manslaughter, and felony child abuse or neglect, would run contrary to this canon of construction. See United States v. Other Medicine, 596 F.3d at 680-81 . Consequently, the Court declines to adopt
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that 18 usc  113a5 could not serve as more than one enumerated crime under the imca specifically both an assault against an individual who has not attained the age of 16 years and felony child abuse or neglect
B. holding that the categorical approach applies to the identical definition of crime of violence in 18 usc  16
C. holding that sexual assault of a child qualified as crime of violence under 18 usc  16
D. holding dui causing serious bodily injury is not a crime of violence under 18 usc  16
E. holding that a conviction for simple assault under pennsylvania law does not qualify under 18 usc  16b by way of 11 usc  1101a43 as an aggravated felony
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.