Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and procedure of the federal courts.” Cooler & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 393, 110 S.Ct. 2447, 110 L.Ed.2d 359 (1990). Rule 9011, like Fed.R.Civ.P. 11, “only applies to acts undertaken in a case before the court.” Davant v. Bailey (In re Bailey), No. 09-2564, Adv. No. 10-15, 2010 WL 3277908, at *2, 2010 Bankr.LEXIS 2449, at *4 (Bankr.N.D.W.Va. Aug. 13, 2010) (citing Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Burke, 897 F.2d 734, 739 (4th Cir.1990)). As evidence in support of her Motion, the Debtor cites to Beneficial’s failure to dismiss the Circuit Court case and the letter she received from Beneficial. Rule 9011 only applies to documents filed in this Court; therefore, the documents filed in State Court cannot be a basis for granting the Debtor’s Motion. See Nationwide, 897 F.2d at 739 ; In re Bailey, 2010 WL 3277908, at *2-4, 2010
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a district court could constitutionally impose rule 11 sanctions in a case in which was later determined that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction
B. holding that a motion for rule 11 sanctions is dispositive
C. holding that rule 11 sanctions may only be imposed upon the attorney who actually signs the documents in question
D. holding that regarding rule 9011 this court is only concerned with documents filed  in this court and thus filings in state court provide no basis to impose sanctions under rule 9011
E. holding that misrepresentations in documents filed in state court in no way constituted a basis for imposing federal rule 11 sanctions
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.