Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
police standards and that there were alternative techniques available for subduing him that presented a lesser threat of death or serious injury. Smith offered an expert declaration on the training of police dogs and police dog handlers. Discussing whether the officers' conduct comported with law enforcement standards, the expert relied upon California's Peace Officer Standards and Training, which are applicable to all state police officers and are a part of Department policy. He concluded that the officers could and should have used control holds to complete the arrest rather than to sic Quando on him onc 1994) (suggesting that the use of deadly force is objectively reasonable where a suspect points a gun at officers); Garcia v. United States, 826 F.2d 806, 812 (9th Cir.1987) . The issue presented by Smith is initially
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that deadly force was justified where a suspect violently resisted arrest physically attacked the officer and grabbed the officers gun
B. holding that officers positioning himself next to his patrol car with gun drawn and then firing was a discretionary use of deadly force
C. holding that apprehension by the use of deadly force is a seizure
D. holding that expert testimony on what constitutes deadly physical force and whether the use of force was justified should have been excluded
E. holding that deadly force was reasonable where the plaintiff attacked a border patrol agent with a rock and stick
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.