Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
as we do, that public participation in preliminary hearings provides a significant and positive role on the functioning of the judiciary. Id. at 12-13, 106 S.Ct. at 2742. B. Judicial Documents [¶ 20] While not specifically. finding that the First Amendment right to access attaches to judicial documents, the United States Supreme Court has observed, "It is clear that the courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records[.]" Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597, 98 S.Ct. 1306, 1312, 55 LEd.2d 570 (1978). Additionally, numerous federal courts have affirmed the right of public access to judicial documents pursuant to the First Amendment. Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino, 380 F.3d 83, 96 (2d Cir.2004) ; In re Providence Journal Co., 293 F.3d 1, 10
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that corporations have first amendment speech rights but declining to address the abstract question whether corporations have the full measure of rights that individuals enjoy under the first amendment
B. holding that a district judge does not enjoy the benefit of a legal presumption that the guidelines sentence should apply
C. holding no presumption of openness applies to midtrial hearings into juror misconduct because of the disruptive effect on the ongoing trial
D. holding that agency decisions enjoy a presumption of correctness
E. holding that docket sheets enjoy a presumption of openness under the first amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.