Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that any judgment against the State of New Jersey, the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development, or the Division of Workers’ Compensation would be paid by New Jersey’s state treasury. Dist. Ct. Op. at 13-15. Because the State of New Jersey was thus the real party at interest, the District Court properly held that these entities are immune from a suit seeking money damages. Fitchik v. N.J. Transit Rail Operations, Inc., 873 F.2d 655, 659 (3d Cir.1989). As Hogg’s made neither a demand for injunctive relief, nor any allegation of a continuing violation of constitutional rights, there is no basis for excepting the application of Eleventh Amendment immunity in this case. See Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 676-78, 94 S.Ct. 1347, 39 L.Ed.2d 449 F.2d 1298 (3d Cir.1971) . As noted, the District Court also dismissed
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding state university is not a person under  1983
B. holding that a state is not a person within the meaning of  1983
C. holding that a state is not a person under 42 usc  1983
D. holding state is not a proper defendant under  1983
E. holding that state of new jersey is not a person under  1983 and thus not amendable to suit under that statute
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.