Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
instructions to determine the amount of attorneys’ fees incurred by Cimco in enforcing its contract with Bartush.” We note that Cimco put on evidence of attorneys’ fees at trial, but Cimco’s attorneys’ fees question was conditionally submitted upon a "yes” answer to question 1, a finding that Bartush breached first in question 2, and a "no” answer to question 4, Because the jury found Cimco breached first in question 2, it did not answer Cimco's attorneys’ fees question. Cimco did not object to the conditional submission of its attorneys’ fees question; consequently, Cimco has failed to preserve any error from the jury’s failure to answer its attorneys’ fees question. See, e.g., Envtl. Procedures, Inc. v. Guidry, 282 S.W.3d 602, 631 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) ; Hunter v. Carter, 476 S.W.2d 41, 46 (Tex.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that party that failed to object to instruction that jury not answer a question based on its answer to the prior question waived that partys right to have the jury make findings as to the subsequent question
B. holding failure to object to conditioning instructions waived error arising from the jurys failure to answer question when answer could not be implied and that lack of objection waived right to new trial to have jury answer questions
C. holding party that failed to object to instruction conditioning submission of a jurys question on its answer to a question waived that partys right to have the jury make findings as to the subsequent question
D. holding appellant could not complain of jurys failure to answer question because the charge instructed the jury not to do so based on its answer to a prior question and because appellant did not object to this instruction
E. holding appellant could not obtain a new trial so that jury could answer liability question because the charge instructed the jury not to answer the question based on its answer to a prior question and because appellant did not object to this instruction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.