Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
is not an element weighing against allowing summary judgment. Rather, it is an issue with respect to the amount of damages to which TKO is entitled that still must be assessed by a finder of fact. Although TKO anticipates it, Reilly does not raise the issue of duress. Therefore, I do not address it. However, given the fact that Reilly held the agreement for a period of one to six months before signing it, and that Reilly had the assistance of counsel during that time period, I note that it would be difficult for Reilly to maintain that he was under such pressure as to have been deprived of his free will or free agency in signing the agreement. See Mills v. Swords Lumber Co., 63 Conn. 103, 105 (1893). See also Zebedeo v. Martin E. Segal Co., Inc., 582 F.Sup. 1394, 1417 (D. Conn. 1984)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that it is peculiarly the jurys function to pass upon what would meet the requirements or satisfy the mind of the theoretical reason able ordinary person which the law gives to the jury as a standard by which to measure human conduct
B. holding that the plaintiff alleged sufficient facts in his complaint to state a claim for wrongful discharge where he alleged he was discharged due to his political affiliation and activities
C. holding that alleged wrongful conduct must induce a fearful state of mind in the person signing which makes it impossible for him to exercise his own free will 
D. holding that a prisoner stated a valid free exercise of religion claim where he alleged that prison officials refused to allow him to receive certain religious books
E. holding that a person is seized when a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.