Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
entered pursuant to a nolo contendere plea constituted a “crime of violence” within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(1). The Information merely stated, “without elaboration,” that the defendant had committed “the crime of intimidation based on bigotry and bias ... in violation of General Statute No. 53a-181b.” Id. at 56. However, the court held that “the plea proceeding includes a lucid description of the conduct for which Palmer was convicted, that conduct manifestly constitutes a ‘crime of violence’ ..., and Palmer’s on-the-record agreement to the description of his conduct proffered by the prosecuting attorney results in the functional equivalent of a plea agreement with respect to that conduct.” Id. at 59; see also United States v. Etimani, 328 F.3d 493, 503-04 (9th Cir.2003) . The reasoning in Palmer is persuasive. As
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that for sentencing purposes the government does not need to allege a defendants prior conviction or prove the fact of a prior conviction where that fact is not an element of the present crime
B. holding that a courts inquiry as to disputed facts in connection with a prior conviction is limited to the terms of the charging document a plea agreement a transcript of the plea colloquy or a comparable judicial record
C. holding that the record did not establish that a prior conviction was for a sexual act for purposes of the 18 usc  2241c sentence enhancement but remarking that a transcript of etimanis plea of nocontest might have clarified the exact nature of his prior conviction but none was provided
D. holding district courts use of state psr from different prior conviction permissible to establish fact of pri or conviction considered for acca sentence enhancement
E. holding that to avoid the risk of unfair prejudice the parties should make use of a redacted record stipulation affidavit or other similar technique whereby the jury is informed only of the fact of a prior felony conviction but not the nature or substance of the conviction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.