Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
uniformly rejected attempts to abrogate pursuant to other Article I powers. See Fed. Mar. Comm’n v. S.C. State Ports Auth., 535 U.S. 743, 749-50, 122 S.Ct. 1864, 152 L.Ed.2d 962 (2002) (“Congress, pursuant to its Article I powers, cannot abrogate state sovereign immunity ....”); Bd. of Trustees v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 364, 121 S.Ct. 955, 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001) (“Congress may not, of course, base its abrogation of the States’ Eleventh Amendment immunity upon the powers enumerated in Article I.”); Kimel v. Fla. Bd. of Regents, 528 U.S. 62, 78, 120 S.Ct. 631, 145 L.Ed.2d 522 (2000) (“Congress lacks power under Article I to abrogate the States’ sovereign immunity.”); Fla. Prepaid Postsecondary Educ. Expense Bd. v. Coll. Sav. Bank, 527 U.S. 627, 636, 119 S.Ct. 2199, 144 L.Ed.2d 575 (1999) ; Seminole Tribe, 517 U.S. at 65, 72, 116 S.Ct.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that congress could not abrogate state sovereign immunity pursuant to the patent clause of article i
B. holding that congress could abrogate the eleventh amendment pursuant to the commerce clause
C. holding that congress had no power under article i to abrogate state sovereign immunity
D. holding that congress did not properly abrogate states eleventh amendment immunity from suits under the patent act
E. holding that congress may abrogate a states immunity pursuant to its enforcement power under  5 of the fourteenth amendment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.