Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
courts have held that “the UCC is a party’s exclusive remedy when statutory provisions are applicable to the factual circumstances of a given case.” Peters Family Farm, Inc. v. Sav. Bank, No. 10CA2, 2011 WL 497476, at *4 (Ohio Ct.App. Jan. 28, 2011); see also Dice v. White Family Cos., 173 Ohio App.3d 472, 480, 878 N.E.2d 1105 (Ohio Ct.App.2007) (“[T]he UCC provides the exclusive remedy where the dispute is governed by its statutory provisions. Common law causes of action may not be raised to circumvent the UCC’s rights, claims, and defenses where the statute applies.”); NCS Healthcare, Inc. v. Fifth Third Bank, N alternative legal theories, the above authority makes clear that the Ohio UCC provides the exclusive remedy to enforce negotiable instruments. Cf. NCS, 2005 WL 1484025 at *8 . Under these circumstances, Plaintiff fails to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that no substantial question of federal law was required to be answered to determine the plaintiffs statelaw legal malpractice negligence and breach of contract claims
B. holding the government liable to plaintiffs for breach of contract
C. holding that plaintiffs were entitled to a jury trial on claim of breach of fiduciary duty where underlying claim was a common law negligence action
D. holding that a plaintiffs common law breach of contract and negligence claims cannot be raised where the ucc already governs
E. holding that plaintiffs negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims are not independent of the breach of contract claim and summary judgment is warranted on these claims
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.