Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
had discriminated against him as a result of a handicap when it terminated him in March 1995. The Commission took no action during the next 180 days. As he was entitled to do, Mr. Ross withdrew this complaint and the Commission issued a notice of dismissal on December 11, 1996. Mr. Ross did not file his lawsuit against Jim Adams Ford until July 21, 2000. His complaint contained two counts. In count II, he alleged that he had been terminated in retaliation for filing a workers’ compensation claim. See § 440.205, Fla. Stat. (1993). The trial court dismissed this count because it was filed more than four years after Mr. Ross’s termination and was barred by the statute of limitations provided for statutory claims in section 95.11(8)(f). See Scott v. Otis Elevator, 524 So.2d 642 (Fla.1988) . Mr. Ross does not challenge this ruling on
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that for purposes of determining the appropriate limitations period section 14a actions are treated identically to actions under section 10b
B. holding fouryear period for statutory actions applies to section 440205 claims
C. holding fouryear statute of limitations in section 95113f applies to claims under florida civil rights act when commission on human relations fails to make reasonable cause determination within 180 days
D. recognizing a fouryear statute of limitation for fraud claims
E. holding that either a fouryear or a twoyear limitations period applies to claims under the idea in ohio for tuition reimbursement either way the claims were timebarred
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.