Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
when agency action has become final). If there is no “final agency action,” as required by the controlling statute, a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Federal Power Comm’n v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 304 U.S. 375, 383-85, 58 S.Ct. 963, 966-68, 82 L.Ed. 1408 (1938); Geyen v. Marsh, 775 F.2d 1303, 1308-09 n. 6 (5th Cir.1985); see generally Charles A. WRIGHT et al„ Federal Practice & Prooedure § 3942 (1977). A final agency action is one that imposes an obligation, denies a right, or fixes a legal relationship. United States Dep’t of Justice v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 727 F.2d 481, 493 (5th Cir.1984). An agency’s initiation of an investigation does not constitute final agency action. See FTC v. Standard Oil Co., 449 U.S. 232, 239-45, 101 S.Ct. 488, 493-96, 66 L.Ed.2d 416 (1980) ; Dow Chemical Co. v. EPA, 832 F.2d 319, 325
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding a rod to be final agency action
B. holding that ftc issuance of a complaint meets the apa definition of order and therefore is agency action even if not final agency action
C. holding that epa action initiating permitting proceedings was not final agency action
D. holding fda seizure action did not constitute final agency action
E. holding issuance of administrative complaint to initiate proceedings not final agency action
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.