Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
reads: The pledge of allegiance to the flag ... shall be rendered by students standing with the right hand over the heart. The pledge of allegiance to the flag shall be recited at the beginning of the day in each public elementary, middle, and high school in the state. Each student shall be informed by posting a notice in a conspicuous place that the student has the right not to participate in reciting the pledge. Upon written request by his or her parent, the student must be excused from reciting the pledge. 2 . See Circle Schools v. Pappert, 381 F.3d 172 (3d Cir.2004) (applying strict scrutiny to, and holding unconstitutional, a requirement that a parent must be notified if a child chooses not to say the pledge); Sherman v. Cmty. Consol. Sch. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437 (7th Cir.1992) ; Goetz v. Ansell, 477 F.2d 636, 637-38 (2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding a regulation is contentneutral as long as it is justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech
B. holding that it may not
C. holding that mandamus is only available to confine an inferior comt to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty to do so
D. holding that congress may impose its will on the states as long as it is acting within the powers granted by the constitution
E. holding that a school may have its classes recite the pledge so long as it does not compel pupils to espouse its content
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.