Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
details of the previous molestation and thus failed to show that the prior molestation was similar to the current offense. We also conclude that Oatts did not offer specific details of the videotape and thus failed to show that the conduct in the videotape was similar to the current offense. Oatts failed to show that either the prior molestation or videotape were similar to the current offense. Oatts also failed to show that the evidence was relevant or that the probative value outweighed the prejudicial effect. Under the circumstances, we cannot say that the exclusion of the evidence violated Oatts’s right to cross examine witnesses under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 13 of the Indiana Constitution. See Grant, 75 F.Supp.2d at 217-218 ; People v. Hill, 289 Ill.App.3d 859, 225 Ill.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that application of the rape shield law to a case in which the underlying events occurred prior to the enactment of the rape shield law was not a violation of the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws
B. holding that a death sentence for a conviction for the rape of a child where the crime did not result and was not intended to result in death of the victim was barred by the eighth amendment
C. holding that mistake as to the age of the victim is no defense to statutory rape
D. holding that a trial court does not commit plain error unless the error is clear under current law
E. holding that the trial court did not commit constitutional error by excluding evidence about the pri or rape of the tenyearold victim when she was five years old because the defendant did not proffer evidence that the prior rape was similar to the current incident
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.