Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
issue, “[w]hat is the physical location and size of the 'Quarry Property’ in the May 2000 Agreement?” Sourant similarly named "[w]hat is the meaning of 'Quarry Property' in the May 2000 Agreement" as a material and contested issue. 5 . Sourant argues Murphy Farrell is not entitled to declaratory relief because, among other reasons, the right-of-first-refusal provision violates the rule against perpetuities and, alternatively, Sourant did not breach the provision. But because the trial court ruled Sourant breached the provision, it necessarily found the provision valid and enforceable. The propriety of that ruling is not raised on appeal and is therefore final and serves as law of the case. See Bogard v. Cannon & Wendt Elec. Co., 221 Ariz. 325, 332, ¶ 24, 212 P.3d 17, 24 (App.2009) ; Bilke v. State, 221 Ariz. 60, 63, ¶ 11, 209
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that rulings not challenged on appeal are implicitly affirmed
B. holding that judgment may be affirmed on any ground supported by the record
C. holding that a sentencing decision will be affirmed if challenged factor is permissible and other factors are not challenged
D. holding that summary judgment must be affirmed where multiple grounds are asserted and the appellant does not attack all grounds on appeal
E. holding that judgment may be affirmed on any ground supported by record
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.