Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
120 S.Ct. 2446. In this case the Commonwealth is only imposing a procedural, formal requirement on the structure of an organization. The statute neither requires nor even suggests any forced association of gun owners with anyone of differing views. Furthermore, as the Commonwealth points out, requiring a club to obtain a license in order to enjoy a narrow range of privileges relating to large capacity weapons does not “implicate any constitutionally protected right of association because it does not involve ... protected associative activity.” Like an ordinance restricting attendance at certain dance halls to persons of a certain age, this regulation simply does not implicate the First Amendment. See City of Dallas v. Stanglin, 490 U.S. 19, 24, 109 S.Ct. 1591, 104 L.Ed.2d 18 (1989) . The plaintiffs are not being forced to join
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that raising chickens is not an expressive act for the purposes of the first amendment
B. holding that the first amendment does not protect true threats against the president
C. holding that where the first amendment does not protect a certain activity there can be no first amendment right of association to engage in that activity
D. recognizing that the first amendment protects the expressive activities associated with the voterregistration process
E. holding that the dancing regulated by the municipal ordinance simply does not involve the sort of expressive association that the first amendment has been held to protect
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.