Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
numbness in both legs after he injured himself getting out of a car. His condition improved significantly after physical therapy, which helped him to walk more easily and increased his spinal flexibility. Yet, he did not regain full sensation below the knees. By the end of 2012, Gibbens reported during an examination that he was “doing well” and never experienced pain beyond five or six on a scale of ten. Our review of this mixed evidence is not intended to minimize Gibbens’s ordeal. The mere presence of “periodic improvements and cessation of treatment” cannot support an ALJ’s decision to discount the severity of a claimant’s medical condition when the ALJ fails to consider other record evidence of declining health. Gentry v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 741 F.3d 708, 723-24 (6th Cir. 2014) . However, that is not the circumstance in the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the alj did not err in discounting a claimants reports of pain where they were not supported by the medical record
B. holding that evidence relied on by alj was insufficient to undermine pain allegations where medical records were replete with claimants reports of pain and of prescriptions
C. holding that the alj erred by discounting claimants impairments on the basis that she ceased certain treatments where her decision to go without those prescriptions was driven by serious side effects of her medication rather than recovery
D. holding that lack of medical evidence cannot form the sole basis for discounting pain testimony but is a factor that an alj may consider
E. holding that evidence that patient who had a history of not taking medication and who murdered husband during a period when she was off of her medication and delusional tends to confirm the likelihood of serious harm to patient or others
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.