Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to consent in sexual battery cases. See Engle v. State, 290 Ga. App. 396, 398 (2) (659 SE2d 795) (2008); Carson v. State, 259 Ga. App. 21, 24 (5) (b) (576 SE2d 12) (2002); Hendrix v. State, 230 Ga. App. 604, 606 (3) (497 SE2d 236) (1997); see also Haynes v. State, 302 Ga. App. 296, 302 (3), n. 4 (690 SE2d 925) (2010) (applying age of consent to hold that the state is “not required to prove lack of consent to establish sexual battery”). Our cases in that regard are consistent with the principle, expressed by our Supreme Court in connection with a case involving rape, “that the element of‘against her will’was automatically shown by [the minor victim’s] age.” Drake v. State, 239 Ga. 232, 233 (1) (236 SE2d 748) (1977). See also Lee v. State, 300 Ga. App. 214, 216 (1) (684 SE2d 348) (2009)  (citations omitted; emphasis supplied);
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that battery is an inherently included offense of aggravated battery
B. holding that consent is not a defense to the crime of aggravated battery even though the defendant alleged that the victim  procured the weapon and invited the defendant to shoot him because the public has a stronger and overriding interest in preventing and prohibiting such acts
C. holding that the offense of sexual battery requires the state prove the victims lack of consent regardless of the victims age and charge the jury on the same
D. holding that the defendant could be convicted of sexual battery a lesser crime not included in the offense for which he was indicted where the defendant requested that sexual battery be submitted to the jury
E. holding state could prove aggravated sexual battery by showing among other things that the victim did not consent or lacked the capacity to consent in case where defendant father argued he had been addressing minor daughters medical and hygiene needs
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.