Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
estoppel, breach of contract, conversion, fraud and misrepresentation, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, tortious interference with a business relationship, and tortious interference with a contract relationship) relate to the defendants not paying plaintiff for services preformed in the plaintiffs employment capacity. Since the Agreement defines or “pertains to” the employment capacity of the plaintiff, these common law claims fall within the scope of the arbitration clause. The Agreement states that arbitration is appropriate in “any dispute arising under this Agreement to the maximum extent allowed by applicable law.” That would include plaintiffs claim for defamation in violation of state law. See McGinnis v. E.F. Hutton & Co., 812 F.2d 1011, 1013 (6th Cir.1987)  In this case, the alleged defamatory
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that termination is an adverse employment action
B. holding that a clause limiting arbitration to employment termination extends to a defamatory comment made after such termination about employees service
C. holding that although a reason was provided in the termination letter the without cause termination provision was applicable
D. holding requirement in contract to provide notice for termination but not limiting reasons for termination constitutes atwill employment relationship
E. holding that the close connection in time between the complaint and termination indicated that complaints could have been a motivating factor for employees termination
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.