Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
here confirm that Officer Cuellar’s first approach to Reyes to ascertain whether he could render assistance was purely a consensual encounter from which Reyes was free to walk away. However, this encounter evolved into an investigatory stop when, upon approaching Reyes, Officer Cuellar noticed that the scooter had no key and that Reyes was nervous and sweating. These observations, combined with the time of day; the fact that Reyes was coming from the direction of a scooter store; Officer Cuellar’s knowledge of recent scooter thefts in the area; and Reyes’ statements that the scooter belonged to a friend whose last name and address he did not know, all gave rise to a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity might be afoot. See State v. Lennon, 963 So.2d 765, 768 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) . As we stated in Lennon, 963 So.2d at 768: In
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that police officer may stop a suspect if the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that criminal activity may be afoot
B. holding that an officer can stop an individual if the officer has reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal activity is underfoot
C. holding that absent probable cause to arrest a police officer may approach an individual to conduct a brief investigatory stop when the officer has a reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal conduct is afoot
D. holding officer may search vehicle for weapons if officer has reasonable belief based on articulable facts that officer or another may be in danger
E. holding that an officer  may detain a person in order to determine identity and circumstance when that officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that criminal activity may be afoot
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.