Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
under section 1915(d) without prejudice. Graves v. Hampton, 1 F.3d 315 (5th Cir.1993). 3 . Denton v. Hernandez, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 118 L.Ed.2d 340 (1992). 4 . Id. at -, 112 S.Ct. at 1734. 5 . Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179, 181 (5th Cir.1985). These options are, of course, unnecessary in cases where the facts alleged are "fantastic or delusional scenarios” or the legal theory upon which a complaint relies is "indisputably meritless." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 1833, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). 6 . Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 103 S.Ct. 864, 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983); McCrae v. Hankins, 720 F.2d 863 (5th Cir.1983); Mitchell v. Sheriff Dept., Lubbock County, Tex., 995 F.2d 60 (5th Cir.1993). 7 . See, e.g., Caldwell v. Miller, 790 F.2d 589 (7th Cir.1986) . 8 . Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 97 S.Ct.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that although prison inmates have a first amendment right to access to the courts prison officials may regulate law library access including reasonable time place and manner of access taking into account the administrative needs of the institution
B. holding that the total denial of all access to the law library for seven months violated the plaintiffs constitutional right of access to the courts
C. holding that during a postriot lockdown refusal of access to main law library is constitutional as long as access to basic law library for initial legal research is permitted
D. holding that prisoner did not have right to access law library because he had courtappointed counsel
E. recognizing that inmates have no freestanding right to a law library or legal assistance
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.