Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
period of disability income received in 1997 before or after the period of disability. We also hold that the commission erred to the extent that it may have included business profits rather than wages or their equivalent in its calculation of claimant’s pre- or post-injury wage. The propriety of including all net income of a sole proprietorship in the average weekly wage calculation, without differentiating between wages and scrutinized] to determine if the profits are the functional equivalent of wages.” Hotaling v. St. Johnsbury Trucking Co., 153 Vt. 581, 572 A.2d 1351, 1354 (1990) (citing 2 Arthur Larson, Larson’s Workers’Compensation Law % 60.12(e)); see The Washington Post, 675 A.2d at 42; cf. Pishotta v. Pishotta Tile & Marble, Inc., 613 So.2d 1373, 1375-76 (Fla.Ct.App.1993) . New York courts hold that “ ‘where a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that corporate profits may be considered personal earnings of sole shareholder to extent they are fairly attributable to management andor labor of sole shareholder rather than labor of others or mere return on capital
B. holding claims based on the fair labor standards act subject to arbitration
C. holding that state court with jurisdiction over  301 claim should have applied federal labor law rather than state contract law
D. holding a state court tort action for retaliatory discharge removable because it arose under  301 of the labor management relations act rather than illinois state law
E. holding that labor management relations act  303 which authorizes recovery of damages for employers injured by an unfair labor practice does not provide authorization for awarding attorneys fees for board proceedings
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.