Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
first enacted section 499A.1(1), it contained the same phrases that are the subject of this litigation. Compare 1947 Iowa Acts ch. 250, § 1 (codified at Iowa Code § 499A.1 (1950)), with Iowa Code § 499A.1(1). A search of the 1946 Code shows the general assembly used language similar to section 499A.1Q) in other sections of the Code. See, e.g., Iowa Code § 504.1 (1946) (requiring incorporators of nonprofit corporations to be “persons of full age, a majority of whom shall be citizens of the state”), repealed by 1990 Iowa Acts ch. 1164, § 27. The use of the phrase “persons of full age” denotes that the person performing the organizing has reached the age of majority and is capable of executing a contract. See Martin v. Stewart Motor Sales, 247 Iowa 204, 207-08, 73 N.W.2d 1, 3-4 (1955) ; cf. Black’s Law Dictionary 78 (3d ed. 1933)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that adea plaintiff had failed to make a prima facie case of age discrimination when he was replaced by someone only two years younger and within the protected age group and there was no other evidence of age discriminatory motive
B. holding an individual not of full age who misrepresents his or her age cannot invoke the defense of infancy to void a contract
C. holding that a statement of fact relating to the plaintiffs age was not direct evidence of age discrimination because the relevance of the comment is provided by inference
D. holding that comments relating to age made some three to fifteen or more years prior to plaintiffs discharge were not relevant to show that he was fired because of his age
E. holding age discrimination claim barred
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.