Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
contracts not to be performed within one year must be memorialized in some writin llows in Collins: The appellants attempt to distinguish Hogue from the instant facts, stating first that Hogue is not controlling in the context of public employees. We disagree. In the instant case, the appellants have failed to cite a specific statute or regulation that mandates that Bridgeport treat holiday, vacation, or sick pay as time actually worked for the purpose of calculating overtime pay. In the absence of such a law, Bridgeport, like a private employer, is free to promulgate a policy and subsequently modify that policy as long as employees are given reasonable notice of the modification. 206 W.Va. at 476, 525 S.E.2d d. of Police Comm'rs of Kansas City, 939 S.W.2d 565, 568 (Mo.Ct.App.1997) ; Swiger v. Civil Serv. Comm’r, 179 W.Va. 133,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the difference in compensation and benefit packages between police officers and other city government employees was justified by the functional differences between the employees and concluding that sjurely the court should not sit as a board of review for every decision of a state agency concerning employment conditions for different classes of government employees
B. holding enforceable employee manual that was distributed to all employees
C. holding that employees retaliatory discharge based on employees election to public office did not violate public policy
D. holding that probation department employees are not county employees
E. holding even in context of employee manual that policy which included agreement to provide annual salary increase of five percent did not constitute contract between city and employees and distinction between atwill employees and public employees was not dispositive in this context
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.