Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
was proper. The order of the trial court is therefore, AFFIRMED. SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur. 1 . Section 440.49(1), Florida Statutes (1981), provides workers’ compensation coverage "in respect of disability or death of an employee if the disability or death results from an injury arising out of and in the course of employment.” Section 440.11(1) provides that the employer’s liability for such workers’ compensation "shall be exclusive and in place of all other liability of such employer ... to the employee.” 2 . Larson, supra, citing to Montanaro v. Guild Metal Prods., Inc., 108 R.I. 362, 275 A.2d 634 (1971). 3 . The employer did not object to this practice. See Serean v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chem. Corp., 277 So.2d 732 (La.App.1973) cited in Larson's, supra at Section 21.60, . 4 .Whether this lobby was also used by the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that accident which occurred thirty minutes before work was within the course where employee customarily showed up early and employer never objected
B. holding that employer did not have duty to protect allegedly intoxicated employee from risk that employee would have automobile accident after leaving work
C. holding that an assault that occurred immediately after the employee was discharged was in the course of the employment
D. holding an employee is an agent of his employer where the employer assumes the right to control time manner and method of work
E. holding that issues of fact precluded summary judgment on the question of whether an employee was acting within the course and scope of his employment for purposes of insurance coverage when the employee was simply sitting in his vehicle in his employers parking lot waiting for the business to open at the time the accident occurred
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.