Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
[the victim] was dying, did she c tention that the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing argument by invoking the victim’s memory and referring to spiritual authority. As noted, the prosecutor stated in closing remarks, “[i]t is fitting and proper that I do this for [the victim’s] memory,” and “this closing speech [has] become, for me, sort of a benediction for all the evil that we have been confronted with in this case.” N.T., Oct. 28, 1994 at 3. The prosecutor further concluded his remarks by stating, “God bless you.” Id. at 18. The trial court held that such references did not amount to the type of religious inferences that warrant the grant of a new trial. PCRA Court Opinion, Oct. 13, 2010, at 24 (citing Commonwealth v. Chambers, 528 Pa. 558, 599 A.2d 630, 644 (1991) ). The PCRA court reiterated the trial court’s
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a new trial was warranted where there is reasonable probability that the false testimony introduced by the government influenced the outcome of the trial
B. holding that a new trial was warranted where the prosecutor stated as the bible says and the murderer shall be put to death
C. holding that the district court abused its discretion in denying the defendants timely motion for the substitution of the participating prosecutor in order to permit the defense to call the prosecutor as a witness
D. holding that a seven week suspension of the speedy trial clock was warranted under the ends of justice provision where the chief prosecutor was ill and new assistant prosecutors required time to prepare for trial
E. holding that where the courts instructions caused a jury to consider erroneous criterion of liability plaintiff was prejudiced and new trial was warranted
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.