Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
property be abruptly and unexpectedly plucked from the embrace of the person, not from that person’s figurative biosphere,” and reversed a conviction where the victim’s purse was sitting on the bench beside her when it was taken. Here, Thomas argues that the jury instruction allowed the jury to convict if the property was taken from “the custody of the victim.” Thomas did not object to the instruction, however, and thus is entitled to relief only if the instruction can be said to constitute fundamental error. An erroneous instruction rises to the level of fundamental error where “the error in the instruction relate[s] to an element of the crime that is a contested issue.” Caldwell v. State, 920 So.2d 727, 731 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); see also Reed v. State, 837 So.2d 366, 369 (Fla.2002)  (quoting Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862, 863
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that failure to submit an element of the offense to the jury is subject to harmless error analysis
B. holding that a jury instruction directing the verdict on one element deprived defendant of the right to a jury determination on every element of the charged offense and thus constituted structural error
C. holding that failure to give proper instruction regarding disputed element of crime charged was fundamental error requiring reversal and stating that fundamental error is not subject to harmless error review
D. holding jury instruction that inaccurately defines element of crime is fundamental error if the inaccurately defined  element is disputed and the inaccurate definition is pertinent or material to what the jury must consider in order to convict 
E. holding that the trial court committed fundamental error in not instructing the jury on the knowledge element of the offense of resisting an officer without violence when that element was in dispute at trial
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.