Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
ROBERT M. DOW, JR., District Judge. I. Background In May 2011, KZF Development (KZF) and/or Dundee Partners (Dundee) removed approximately 180 trees from a 6.8 acre residential parcel in Northbrook, Illinois (the Site). Plaintiffs Robert and Sheryl Long allege that the tree removal c ycling Corp., 629 F.3d 387, 399-400 (4th Cir.2011) . Moreover, Plaintiff may only allege ongoing
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an identical notice requirement in resource conservation and recovery act was a mandatory precondition to suit
B. holding that clean water acts notice provision is a condition precedent to all claims
C. holding that the limitation act does not apply to claims brought under the clean water act
D. holding that adequate notice is a mandatory precondition of a clean water act citizen suit
E. holding that denial of permit under section 404 of the clean water act was a taking
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.