Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in a civil manner free of displays of force, intimidation, or strong-arm tactics. Moreover, as in Gaddy, 698 So.2d at 1155, the defendant in this case initiated the portion of the discussion that led to his confes.sion. McLeod indicated that he wanted to cooperate with Officer Burch. Thus, this case is less like Weeks, 531 So.2d at 644, where the officer’s inducement actually caused the defendant to make an inculpatory statement, and more like Gaddy, 698 So.2d at 1155, where the officer’s inducement did not actually cause the defendant to confess. Absent the exertion of physical or psychological force or any particular and peculiar susceptibility to inducement on the part of McLeod, the officer’s stating that he would make McLeod’s cooperation known to the district (1st Cir.1985)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that agents promise to inform prosecutor of defendants cooperation does not render a subsequent confession involuntary
B. holding that confession was voluntary although agents had promised to inform prosecutor of defendants cooperation
C. holding that federal agents indication to defendant that his cooperation would be reported to the united states attorney did not make defendants confession involuntary
D. holding that cooperation was insufficient where the defendants cooperation was based on his confession to the charged crimes
E. holding that an officers promise to bring defendants cooperation to the attention of the prosecutor did not make confession involuntary
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.