Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the purposes of section 607A.6 were accomplished despite the fact the judge delegated to the court attendant the judge’s statutory responsibility to excuse potential jurors. See Coble, 301 N.W.2d at 237 (concluding that procedure allowing jury commissioners to excuse potential jurors, rather than judge as required by statute, did not frustrate legislative goals). -For this reason, Chidester is unable to shoyv that he has been prejudiced and therefore, the State’s violation of section 607A.6 was . not material as required by rule 17(3). See State v. Clift, 202 Kan. 512, 449 P.2d 1006, 1008 (1969) (refusing to reverse defendant’s conviction where he showed no prejudice from fact that bailiff excused potential jurors rather than the judge, as required by statute); Martel, 689 A.2d at 1330 . The trial court did not err in denying
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding statutory challenge to juryselection procedure failed in absence of showing of prejudice
B. holding that we will not reverse in the absence of prejudice
C. recognizing that the burden of persuasion for a showing of prejudice was on the defendant
D. holding that in the absence of demonstrated prejudice remand is unnecessary
E. holding that an assertion of prejudice is not a showing of prejudice
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.