Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
counsel informed him that counsel had been relieved of his responsibility. Defendants further contend that even if the AG had known that former counsel was no longer Plaintiffs’ present counsel, it could not have served the motion for modification on anyone else since the addresses of the class representatives, Taylor and Yanich, cannot be found by the Arizona Department of Corrections. 2. DUE PROCESS A fundamental and elementary requirement of due process in any proceeding is notice and opportunity to be heard. In Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950), the Supreme Court established the standard for determining whether a party’s notice would meet due process scrutiny: An elementary and fundament d 1440, 1448-49 (9th Cir.1985) . A judgment entered in a manner inconsistent
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that entry of settlement decree without notice to putative class members violated the due process rights of the class members
B. recognizing that when a creditor does not receive adequate notice the creditor is not bound by the confirmation order
C. holding that due process rights were not violated when alien claimed a lack of actual notice but his attorney received notice
D. holding that the debtor in possession was liable for civil contempt when he disobeyed the courts order to turn over the cash collateral and violated 11 usc  363
E. holding that oneday notice provided to creditor before entry of cash collateral order violated due process
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.