Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
loss suffered by Huffy was the direct result of the tumultuous economic environment during the class period and non-fraudulent bad news that was occurring simultaneously. Although that argument, supported by proper evidence, may demonstrate that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on this issue, should this lawsuit proceed to that stage, it does not cause this Court to conclude that the Plaintiffs have failed to plead the element of loss causation. On the contrary, they have set forth their theory of loss causation in detail, and that theory is based on more than the bare assertion that the Defendants’ alleged misrepresentations merely caused the value of Huffy’s stock to become inflated. Accord Ross v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 501 F.Supp.2d 1102, 1118-19 (S.D.Ohio 2007) . It bears emphasis, that, in ruling on a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding in action for breach of contract caused by wrongful foreclosure and sale of shares of stock plaintiff was entitled to recover the fair market value of the stock at the time of its sale
B. holding that plaintiffs failed to plead loss causation where their only allegation was the payment of artificially inflated prices for defendants securities and their complaint failed to provide defendants with notice of what plaintiffs relevant economic loss might be or of what the causal connection might be between that loss and the alleged misrepresentation at issue 
C. holding that plaintiffs allegations of loss causation complied with dura because they asserted that defendants misrepresentations had caused the value of the shares of stock to become inflated after which the disclosure of the true state of affairs caused the plaintiffs to lose millions of dollars
D. holding that the plaintiffs argument that the defendant caused plaintiffs inability to return to work cannot hold water because the socalled causation was insufficient to rise to the level of actionable harassment
E. holding that plaintiffs claims that defendants artificially inflated the companys share price so that they could sell their stock at a huge profit was undermined by the fact that one of the four defendants did not sell his stock during the class period
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.