Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and expenses incurred as a result of the wrongful removal or retention. 1988 WL 411501, at *7. ICARA, however, shifts the burden to a respondent to show why an award of fees, costs, and expenses would be “clearly inappropriately.]” [ (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 11607(b)(3)).] The First Circuit has explained that under § 11607(b)(3), the district court “has a duty ... to order the payment of necessary expenses and legal fees, subject to a broad caveat denoted by the words, ‘clearly inappropriate.’ ” Whallon v. Lynn, 356 F.3d 138, 140 (1st Cir.2004). Such caveat provides the district court “broad discretion in its effort to comply with the Hague Convention consistently with our own laws and standards.” Id.; see also Chafin [v. Chafin], [— U.S.-,] 133 S.Ct. [1017,] 1022[, 185 L.Ed.2d 1 (2013) ] . West v. Dobrev, 735 F.3d 921, 932 (10th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that an award of temporary attorneys fees and costs is based on an assessment of need and ability to pay as well as the reasonableness of the fees and costs
B. holding that expenses refers to costs
C. holding that the bankruptcy court properly disallowed fees when the bank could not demonstrate actual costs and expenses beyond its normal operating costs attributable to the debtors loan
D. recognizing that under  11607b3 a court ordering the return of a child generally must require respondent to pay the fees costs and expenses associated with the return
E. holding that federal express costs telephone expenses and postage expenses did not qualify as taxable costs
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.