Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
flight from an arresting officer within the definition of “resistance by force” would enlarge the realm of criminally-punishable actions without doing much to advance the goals of protecting police. The dangers of proscribing conduct too broadly for purposes of resisting arrest have been recognized by the drafters of Model Penal Code. The draft Code suggests that the crime of resisting arrest should only apply to conduct where the individual being arrested “creates a substantial risk of bodily injury to the public servant or anyone else, or employs means justifying or requiring substantial force to overcome the resistance.” Model Penal Code § 242.2. The accompanying commentary reads as follows: “The effect of this language is to exempt from criminal liab 928 N.E.2d 317, 320 (2010) . These cases demonstrate that ordinarily mere
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding fleeing police officers in a vehicle was a violent felony under the acca
B. holding that police officers who engaged in a dangerous highspeed chase of a fleeing suspect were immune from suit
C. holding a police officer who was pursuing a fleeing suspect was immune from his torts when he ran a red light and collided with plaintiffs vehicle
D. holding officers may seize any contraband that a fleeing suspect discards during flight because the suspect has abandoned the property
E. holding that a fleeing suspect created a substantial risk of bodily injury to officers when he ran from officers and scaled a fence abutting the precipice of a canal in dim light
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.