Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(Second) of Torts, this Court is confident that the position most likely to be adopted by the Massachusetts courts is that a violation of well-established industry standards may indeed satisfy the improper means element of tortious interference. The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts’ most thorough evaluation of the improper means element for tortious interference occurred in United Truck Leasing Corp. v. Geltman, 406 Mass. 811, 817, 551 N.E.2d 20 (1990). In Geltman, the Court included within the ambit of “improper means” violations of a statute or a rule of common law, threats, misrepresentation, defamation, or any other improper means. Id. (emphasis added). The inclusion of the phrase “any other improper means,” makes this Court reluc o., 283 Or. 201, 582 P.2d 1365, 1371 (1978)  ; Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin and Creskoff
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that im proper means may be wrongful by reason of a statute or other regulation or a recognized rule of common law or perhaps an established standard of a trade or profession
B. holding that the parentsubsidiary privilege could be lost by using wrongful means including fraud misrepresentation threats violence defamation trespass restraint of trade intimidation molestation or any other wrongful act recognized by statute or common law
C. holding that the phrase provided by law means prescribed or provided by statute
D. holding that interpreting a statute or an administrative rule or regulation presents a purely legal question subject to de novo review
E. holding that the other source of law might be a moneymandating constitutional provision statute or regulation that has been violated or an express or implied contract with the united states
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.