Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
assigned the claim, and the collection service sought to have the judgment registered in Missouri. In the Missouri action, Burgess filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting that the South Dakota judgment was only against Dako and could not have an effect against him personally. The trial court in Mis sition that he had been doing business under variations of the name of “Tri-State Seed Company” since about 1985. He admitted that he had entered into the contract, offered as part of exhibit 1, with Toulousaine. The name on the contract with Toulousaine was “Tri-State Seed & Grain.” The address of “Tri-State Seed & Grain” is Olson’s home address. He admitted that he intended to cover this seed contract by purchasing seed from Palen. The stationery he 49, 560 N.Y.S.2d 269 (1990) ; Rink v. NPN, Inc., 419 N.W.2d 194 (N.D. 1988)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding entitys failure to register assumed name did not affect entitys capacity to defend suit or impair validity of any contract
B. holding that private individual could not bring a claim to remove a judges name from the roll of attorneys
C. holding that negligent breach of a duty assumed in a contract does not give rise to a separate tort claim
D. holding that an atwill employee may bring a cause of action under section 1981
E. holding that one who deals with a business entity under an assumed name may bring an action against it under the assumed name
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.