Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
by incorporation of federal law. The United States Supreme Court has resolved only a handful of cases in the civil rights area over the years. The literature is full of documentation of various splits in the federal circuits on numerous questions that the Supreme Court has not resolved. The stability of incorporating a handful of Supreme Court precedents is outweighed by dragging into Iowa law the many controversies in the federal caselaw that have not been resolved. 23 .No one would suggest, for instance, that if Iowa were to adopt a statute modeled after the statute of another state, we would be compelled to follow the interpretations of the supreme court of the other state in interpretation of Iowa law, See Crosby v. Alton Ochsner Med. Found., 276 So.2d 661, 665 (Miss. 1973) . 24 . For an interesting discussion, see Tyler
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding unconstitutional the provision in a georgia abortion statute limiting abortions to georgia residents
B. holding under the mississippi constitution that it is always and in every case reversible error for the courts of mississippi to deny an accused the right to have a jury decide guilt as to each and every element
C. holding that georgia refund statute signifies state waiver of immunity only to the extent provided by the express terms of the statute
D. holding that when mississippi adopted a statute modeled after a georgia enactment decisions of the georgia courts did not bind mississippi courts in interpretation of the statute
E. recognizing twoyear statute of limitations for section 1981 claims filed in federal court in georgia
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.