Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
been constitutional under the 1870 Constitution. Since the 1970 Constitution is also silent on the subject, a recall statute would likely be constitutional. The 1970 Constitution gives home rule units broad legislative powers and states that those powers are to be construed liberally. (Ill. Const. 1970, art. VII, §6.) Consequently, a home rule unit could enact a valid recall ordinance. Non-home rule units such as the city of Northlake do not have such power. The issue before this court, however, is not whether a recall procedure can be enacted by ordinance. The question is whether recall can be adopted by municipal referendum. In this respect, the powers of municipalities, whether home-ruled or not, are identical. (See Pechous v. Slawko (1976), 64 Ill. 2d 576, 582-83, 357 N.E.2d 1144 .) We find that article VII of the Illinois
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing district court application of the same rule
B. holding that the referendum powers of home rule units and nonhome rule units are the same
C. recognizing a referendum on a court judgment would violate separation of powers
D. recognizing rule
E. holding that federal credit unions are governmental units within the meaning  523a8
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.