Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
were induced to forebear from filing suit. See Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Carter, 658 So.2d 560, 562-63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (finding a triable issue as to the estate’s estoppel to claim the limitations defense where the decedent’s surviv- or actively misled a hospital into believing that the decedent left no estate from which to collect outstanding bills), abrogated by May v. Illinois Nat’l Ins. Co., 771 So.2d 1143 (Fla.2000); Alachua County v. Cheshire, 603 So.2d 1334, 1337 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (applying equitable estoppel where the federal government, by continual assurances of payment, induced the plaintiff not to sue on a lien against government-seized property within the limitations period); Jaszay v. H.B. Corp., 598 So.2d 112, 113 (Fla. 4th D 2d 846, 848 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) ; Cape Cave Corp. v. Lowe, 411 So.2d 887,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an insurer acted in bad faith by failing to keep the insured informed of settlement negotiations
B. holding a settlement privilege exists as to thirdparty discovery of settlement negotiations
C. holding that continuing settlement negotiations if infected with an element of deception may create an estoppel
D. holding a court may eonsider settlement negotiations for the purpose of deciding a reasonable attorney fee award
E. holding the connection is an element
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.