Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the government contractor defense in a subsequent lawsuit. Here, however, Mr. Hayashi’s e-mail to Mr. Jarrett cannot be similarly characterized as a specification of Defendant JTSI’s obligation under the contract for security and information services. II. Count II: Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy Plaintiffs also claim that they were terminated in violation of public oth a Common Law Parnar Claim and a Claim Under § 378-62 Simultaneously Although Parnar claims may be brought where there would otherwise be no remedy for wrongful termination, Parnar claims are generally duplicative, and thus disallowed, where statutes and regulations creating the public policy have their own built in remedy. See Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co., 76 Hawaii 454, 464, 879 P.2d 1037, 1047 (1994) ; see also Batacan v. Reliant Pharmaceuticals,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that public policy claims are unavailable where the statute in question provides the employee with a wrongful discharge remedy
B. recognizing tort of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy
C. holding that federal law can provide source of state public policy for determining whether discharge of employee violated clear mandate of public policy
D. holding that where statutory or regulatory provisions which evidence the public policy themselves provide a remedy for the wrongful discharge provision of a further remedy under the public policy exception is unnecessary
E. holding a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy is not available where the employee has an existing statutory remedy
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.