Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
In their summary judgment motion, Defendants argued Plaintiff failed to show a vegan diet is central or indispensable to the practice of Buddhism. (Defendants’ .Brief in Support at 4-6.) The Magistrate Judge concluded “[wjhile a reasonable juror could perhaps conclude that such is the case, the evidence of record more than supports the conclusion that Plaintiffs religious beliefs are sincerely (and intensely) held.” (R & R at 894.) Defendants object, arguing whether a belief is sincerely held is a distinct issue from whether the belief is central to the practice of a religious faith. Defendants reassert that Plaintiff has not established that his request for a vegan diet is central to the practice of his religious faith. See Sequoyah v. TVA, 620 F.2d 1159, 1164 (6th Cir.1980)  (citing Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that defendant failed to raise a constitutional issue at trial and thus failed to preserve the issue for appellate review
B. holding that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case in a religious discrimination suit because among other reasons employer hired someone else with identical religious practices
C. holding the plaintiffs failed to establish the centrality or indispensability to their religious observances of the location at issue
D. holding that the plaintiffs location on the supply barge at the time of the accident did not alter his status
E. holding that religious exercise is any exercise of religion whether or not compelled by or central to a system of religious belief and that the use building or conversion of real property for the purpose of religious exercise shall be considered  religious exercise
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.