Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in the facility. Thus, we find that the agreement was a contract of adhesion. B. Unconscionability A contract of adhesion is not ipso facto unenforceable. It is unenforceable only to the extent that it is found to be unconscionable. Lytle v. Citifinancial Services Inc., 810 A.2d 643 (Pa. Super. 2002). “Once a contract is deemed to be one of adhesion, its terms must be analyzed to determine whether the contract as a whole, or specific provisions of it, are unconscionable.” Denlinger Inc. v. Dendler, 415 Pa. Super. 164, 176, 608 A.2d 1061, 1067 (1992). A contract term is unconscionable if (1) the party challenging it had no reasonable choice in accepting it, as in the case of a contract of adhesion, and (2) the provision unreasonably favors the other party. Huegel, 796 A.2d at 357 . Although we have found the agreement to be a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding an entire arbitration clause is void and arbitration cannot be compelled where contract contained unconscionable clause and has a nonseverability clause
B. holding arbitration clause in credit card agreement unconscionable
C. holding that arbitration provisions that preclude class actions are not unconscionable
D. holding that an arbitration clause was not unconscionable because it did not unreasonably favor the defendants
E. holding that an arbitration agreement was procedurally unconscionable because it did not attach the aaa rules
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.