Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Wiggins was cited to support the arguments regarding the need for a reasonable investigation for mitigation evidence. The application then stated that such “deficient performance of trial counsel raises a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different” and cited the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments and Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The general rule is that arguments not raised before the district court are waived on appeal. State Indus. Prods. Corp. v. Beta Tech., Inc., 575 F.3d 450, 456 (5th Cir.2009). Errant headings in briefs, though, do not waive arguments. Balentine raised a Sixth Amendment argument. Both the magistrate judge and this court ruled on it. See Belt v. EmCare, Inc., 444 F.3d 403, 409 (5th Cir.2006) . Balentine’s claim was for ineffective
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding an issue not raised to the family court is not preserved for appellate review
B. holding that where an issue is raised in the district court but raised late and the district court declines to deem the issue waived the issue may be raised on appeal
C. holding that an issue not raised on appeal is waived
D. holding that an issue is preserved for appeal where the issue was sufficiently raised for the court to rule on it  
E. holding that an issue was not preserved for appellate review because appellants trial objection does not comport with the issue he raised on appeal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.