Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
she was required to stand “at some points” but “not all day” while substitute teaching. (Id. at 15). In sum, the evidence of record demonstrates that Plaintiff may have a diminished tolerance for a normal daily activity, but the record does not demonstrate that Plaintiffs condition substantially limits her major life activity of standing. See Chanda, 234 F.3d at 1222. The Court now turns to the question of whether Plaintiffs congenital heart disease substantially limits her major life activity of lifting. In her first deposition, Plaintiff testified that she has been restricted from lifting items weighing more than thirty pounds. (First Reis Depo. at 17). Plaintiff is able to engage in basic personal activities. She can bathe herself, prepare her own , 101 F.3d 346, 349 (4th Cir.1996) ; Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-Am., Inc., 85
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a lifting restriction did not substantially limit a computer technicians ability to engage in the major life activity of working
B. holding that a lifting restriction of ten pounds did not constitute a physical impairment that substantially limited a major life activity
C. holding that a twentyfive pounds lifting restriction did not substantially limit any major life activities
D. holding that a permanent lifting restriction of no more than twentyfive pounds on a continuous basis is not substantially limiting
E. holding as a matter of law that a permanent twentyfive pound lifting restriction does not constitute a significant restriction on ones ability to lift work or perform any other major life activity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.