Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
concluded that plaintiffs’ claims generally meet the preliminary standard set by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) and the SRA, the Court must determine whether plaintiffs have pled with particularity all facts on which their beliefs about the falsity of defendants statements are formed. At this point in the analysis, the line between pleading falsity and pleading fraud becomes blurred. As defendants note, in the Second Circuit, the information and belief pleading requirement appears to be an integral part of the strong inference standard for pleading scienter. See Philip Morris, 75 F.3d at 812-813 (finding that plaintiffs’ allegations of negative internal reports failed to support claims of falsity and scienter); Wexner v. First Manhattan Co., 902 F.2d 169, 172-73 (2d Cir.1990) ; Crystal v. Foy, 562 F.Supp. 422, 424-25
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that conclusory allegation of leak of confidential information without more failed to create inference of fraudulent intent
B. holding records did not qualify as exempt confidential commercial information under exemption 4 because the information was not actually confidential
C. holding that conclusory allegation of conspiracy without supporting factual averments insufficient to state claim
D. holding that plaintiff could state a claim for conversion of confidential information
E. holding conclusory assertions of intent to cause insufficient without supporting facts
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.