Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in this court. Beyond the record provided for a direct appeal, Golden is not entitled to free transcripts to assist in the preparation of either a postconviction motion or a petition for extraordinary relief. Goggins v. Pinellas Co., Cir. Ct. of Sixth Jud. Cir., 685 So.2d 1334, 1335 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). As the trial court pointed out in its dismissal order, the transcripts requested are a part of the record for his direct appeal. Golden is not entitled to anything more. A motion to credit jail time is normally a motion authorized by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Hines v. State, 842 So.2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). However, rule 3.800(a) prohibits the filing of such a motion during the pendency of a direct appeal. See Day v. State, 770 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) . Since Golden filed his motion during the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that since district court of appeal properly found that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on a 3850 motion during the pendency of a direct appeal the district court of appeal should have vacated the order rather than affirming on the merits
B. holding that a rule 3800a motion that does not allege that the court records show the defendants entitlement to additional jail credit is facially insufficient
C. holding that the failure of a written sentence to conform to the courts oral pronouncement cannot be raised in a rule 3800a motion
D. holding that the public defender was not authorized to file a motion collaterally attacking the defendants sentence and affirming the trial courts dismissal of perrys rule 3800a motion filed by the public defender without prejudice to perrys right to file such a motion pro se
E. holding that effective january 13 2000 a party may not file a rule 3800a motion during the pendency of a direct appeal
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.