Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
process that determines who shall rule and govern in the county. Id. at 469-70, 73 S.Ct. 809. Defendants claim that these cases apply only where the state has provided for a direct primary, whereas New York has opted for an indirect delegate primary election followed by a convention at which those delegates vote on the nomination. This variation in the process of public choice does not release the State from its First Amendment obligations. The animating principle in Classic and Terry is that constitutional protection extends to each State-created or State-endorsed “integral part of the election machinery,” not merely to one particular kind of primary election. Classic, 313 U.S. at 318, 61 S.Ct. 1031; see also Terry, 345 U.S. at 469, 73 S.Ct. 809; Bullock, 405 U.S. at 146, 92 S.Ct. 849 . Consistent with that view, we previously held
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that electoral restrictions that affect a political partys ability to perform its primary functions  organizing and developing recruiting supporters choosing a candidate and voting for that candidate in a general election  can constitute severe first amendment burdens
B. holding that it violated the first amendment to prohibit announcement of views on disputed legal and political issues by candidates for judicial election
C. holding that ohio election law forbidding all anonymous political leafletting violated the first amendment but noting that the right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct
D. holding that the countys permit fee violated the first amendment
E. holding that primary election ballot filing fee violated fourteenth amendment and noting that the primary election may be more crucial than the general election in certain parts of texas
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.