Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the Supreme Court in Heller. See Heller, 554 U.S. at 635, 128 S.Ct. 2783. This Court finds further support for its conclusion in recent decisions of the Illinois Appellate Court, which has also concluded that Heller and McDonald affirm a Second Amendment right to bear arms in the home but not outside of the home. See People v. Williams, 2011 IL App (1st) 091667-B, 357 Ill.Dec. 247, 962 N.E.2d 1148, 1153-54 (Ill.App.Ct.2011) (finding that the 355 Ill.Dec. 193, 959 N.E.2d 221, 227-28 (Ill.App.Ct.2011) (same); Mimes, 352 Ill.Dec. 119, 953 N.E.2d at 77 (same); People v. Ross, 407 Ill.App.3d 931, 939-40, 349 Ill.Dec. 762, 947 N.E.2d 776 (2011) (same); Aguilar, 408 Ill.App.3d at 142-50, 348 Ill.Dec. 575, 944 N.E.2d 816 (same); Dawson, 403 Ill. App.3d at 510, 343 Ill.Dec. 274, 934 N.E.2d 598 . This Court concludes that the Illinois UUW
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that the right to bear arms is fundamental
B. holding that the right to drive is not a fundamental right
C. holding right to be fundamental
D. holding that us supreme court cases do not define the fundamental right to bear arms to include activity barred by the auuw statute
E. holding that because defendants did not prevent plaintiff from acquiring another weapon they did not impede plaintiffs right to bear arms
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.