Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
and her statements were further corroborated by her mother [and other witnesses].”). 15 Harper v. Barge Air Conditioning, Inc., 313 Ga. App. 474, 475 (1) (722 SE2d 84) (2011) (punctuation omitted); see also OCGA§ 15-12-134. 16 Wood v. B &S Enters., Inc., 314 Ga. App. 128, 133 (4) (723 SE2d 443) (2012) (punctuation omitted). 17 Harper, 313 Ga. App. at 475 (1) (punctuation o 879, 884 (3) (694 SE2d 707) (2010) (“It is well settled that the permissible range of the state’s closing argument is very wide.”). 23 Id. (punctuation omitted). 24 Arrington v. State, 286 Ga. 335, 346 (16) (c) (687 SE2d 438) (2009). 25 The examining physician testified it is not unusual to observe a lack of injuries when oral sodomy and digital penetration are alleged. 26 See Arrington, 286 Ga. at 346 (16) (c) . 27 Pearson v. State, 277 Ga. 813, 815 (3)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the district court correctly instructed the jury that there had to be a substantial similarity between the indictment and the proof in order to find the defendant guilty
B. holding that defendants claim that state engaged in burdenshifting was without merit when state argued that defendant had not rebutted evidence and trial court instructed jury as to burden of proof
C. holding that the trial court correctly instructed the jury that the defendant had to establish by evidence that outweighed the evidence against him that he lacked the capacity to form specific intent
D. holding that a challenged jury instruction did not impermissibly shift the burden of proof when the trial court elsewhere instructed the jury that the state must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt
E. holding that any potential prejudice regarding burdenshifting is diminished by the prosecutors statement that the burden of proof is the governments and the courts explicit instructions regarding the burden of proof in the jury charge
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.