Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
right to a salary while sitting, and unauthorized by either statute or Assembly rule. I. At the outset, we address the appealability of the Speaker’s action and this court’s jurisdiction. Prior to the adoption of the New Jersey Constitution of 1947, “persons aggrieved by action or inaction of state or local administrative agencies could seek review by applying for one of the prerogative writs.” Pascucci v. Vagott, 71 N.J. 40, 51, 362 A.2d 566 (1976). The 1947 Constitution superseded the prerogative writs “and, in lieu thereof,” afforded “review, hearing and relief ... in the Superior Court, on terms and in the manner provided by rules of the Supreme Court, as of right.” N.J. Const, art. VI, § 5, II4. Accordingly, “[i]n New Jersey, judicial revi , 579, 763 A.2d 295 (App.Div.2000) ; Amico v. N.J. Army Nat’l Guard, 242
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding a suit against an agency of the state is a suit against the state
B. holding that the state police is a state agency
C. holding that a state agency created under state law was a state actor
D. recognizing that state agencies which are independent of the state are citizens of the state
E. holding a state agency as an arm of the state cannot constitute a person under  1983 because it is a sovereign entity
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.