Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986)). The benefit of all reasonable presumptions and inferences runs to the party-opposing summary judgment. Matsushita Elec. Indus., 475 U.S. at 587-88, 106 S.Ct. 1348; Monon Corp. v. Stoughton Trailers, Inc., 239 F.3d 1253, 1257 (Fed.Cir.2001); H.F. Allen Orchards v. United States, 749 F.2d 1571, 1574 (Fed.Cir.1984) (noting that non-moving party shall “receive the benefit of all applicable presumptions, inferences, and intendments”). When resolving a motion for summary judgment, the court may neither make credibility determinations nor weigh the evidence and seek to determine the truth of the matter. Cf. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ; Rockwell Int'l Corp. v. United States, 147
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that it was not error for successor trial judge to direct a judgment for defendant based on the statute of limitations where initial judge had denied a motion for summary judgment on the same issue
B. holding that a trial court can only consider admissible evidence in ruling on a motion for summary judgment
C. holding that in ruling on a motion for summary judgment the trial court is limited to the grounds raised in the motion
D. holding that cjredibility determinations are questions of fact and should only be overturned in extraordinary circumstances
E. holding that cjredibility determinations the weighing of the evidence and the drawing of legitimate inferences from the facts are  not functions of a judge  ruling on a motion for summary judgment  
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.