Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
AT’s claim for damages against OFC. Because OFC had not breached its finance lease, and had no contractual obligation to provide conforming goods, AT did not state a claim against OFC for which relief could be granted. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6); see also Milledgeville Water Co. v. Fowler, 129 Ga. 111, 58 S.E. 643, 644 (1907) (“where contract relations exist, the parties assume toward each other no duties whatever besides those the contract imposes”) (internal quotation marks omitted). Finally, the district court appropriately awarded fees to OFC under the terms of the lease, which provided that “Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for all charges, costs, expenses and attorney’s fees.... ” See Georgia Subsequent Injury Trust Fund v. Muscogee Iron Works, 265 Ga. 790, 462 S.E.2d 367, 368 (1995) . AFFIRMED. * This disposition is not
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a public administrator was not entitled to attorneys fees in a claim against the estate of a former guardian where the case was not one where attorneys fees were authorized and there was no evidence to support the award
B. holding that a court has power to award attorney fees when authorized by contract statute or recognized ground of equity
C. holding the contract was not authorized by law
D. holding that although attorneys fees are usually not recoverable unless permitted by statute or contract contractual or statutory authorization was not necessary in a malpractice claim to recover attorneys fees and costs as damages
E. recognizing that under georgia law attorneys fees are allowed where authorized by statute or contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.