Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
aimed at establishing a defendant’s propensity to commit a crime. See Tenn. R.Evid. 404(b). The State contended that it was offering evidence of prior sexual misconduct not to prove the character of the defendant but, rather, primarily to corroborate the testimony of the victim concerning the incidents alleged in the indictment as well as to show the state of intimacy between the defendant and the victim, to explain the circumstances surrounding the charged offenses and to show the conduct of the defendant toward the victim. Accordingly, the State argued that the evidence of the defendant’s prior sexual misconduct was admissible under those limited circumstances. In support of its argument, the State cited several cases including State v. Lockhart, 731 S.W.2d 548 (Tenn.Crim.App.1986) , overruled by State v. Rickman, 876 S.W.2d 824
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that uncharged sexual acts committed upon the same victim are admissible to show the conduct of the defendant toward the victim and to corroborate the evidence of the offense charged in the indictment
B. holding the harmed victim need not be the victim of the offense of conviction
C. holding that evidence of incest with the same victim prior to or after the offense charged is admissible to corroborate proof of the incident relied upon for conviction
D. holding that evidence of prior uncharged sexual conduct with the victim is admissible to corroborate the victims testimony
E. holding that evidence of uncharged incest with the same victim is admissible to illustrate the relationship existing between the defendant and the victim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.