Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Town of Portland v. "Wisconsin Elec. Power Co., the court stated: [Z]oning setback and yard requirements are considered by courts to promote a variety of public purposes. They are held to relate to provision for light and air, fire protection, traffic safety, prevention of overcrowding, rest and recreation, solving drainage problems, protecting the appearance and character of a neighborhood, conserving property values, and may, in particular cases, promote a variety of aesthetic and psychological values as well as ecological and environmental interests. Id., 198 Wis.2d 775, 543 N.W.2d 559, 560-61 (App.1995) (citing 3 The Law of Zoning and Planning § 34B.02[2] (1995). See also Hanna v. American Nat’l Bank and Trust, 266 Ill.App.3d 544, 203 IlI.Dec. 507, 514, 639 N.E.2d 1326, 1333 (1994)
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that service and notice in a technical sense are incidental where the main purpose of obtaining the appearance of parties and their participation is accomplished
B. holding purpose of setback restriction is to create easement of unobstructed air light and vision and to insure uniformity of appearance
C. holding that party waived special appearance
D. holding that court should interpret statute in light of purpose of whole instrument
E. holding that defendant did not waive his special appearance by filing a motion for new trial subject to the special appearance
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.