Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
would have been permissible. In other words, our decision appears to have agreed with the premise that the government may use classified information without disclosure, if that information truly implicates national security. Here, the classified information implicates national security. 10 . We recognize that the utility of the methods described in text may be limited. For example, the information conveyed by an unclassified summary will be decidedly less helpful to the entity than the classified information itself. But limited utility is very different from no utility. An unclassified summary is analogous to privilege logs in the context of discovery disputes, yet their use is routine. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5); see also MGIC Indem. Corp. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir.1986) . 11 . Compare EO 13,224, § 1(a), (b) (blocking
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding party seeking disqualification waives attorneyclient privilege as to the court so the court may assess the contents of allegedly confidential information and the party may present the information either in a hearing out of the presence of the party against whom confidentiality is to be protected or in camera inspection
B. holding that on a motion for attorney fees the requesting party must disclose its time sheets to the other party redacted as necessary where protected by the attorneyclient privilege
C. holding that the party prevailing on the significant issues in the litigation is the party that should be considered the prevailing party for attorneys fees
D. holding that the information is not protected by attorneyclient privilege
E. holding that a party waives the attorneyclient privilege when it voluntarily consents to the disclosure of any significant part of the communication in issue
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.