Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a warrant can be obtained. Id. at 2505-07. Therefore, ICE officers may make warrantless arrests for suspected immigration violations only when they have both probable cause for the arrest and probable cause that the subject is likely to escape. De La Paz v. Coy, 786 F.3d 367, 376 (5th Cir. 2015) (“[E]ven if an agent has reasonable belief, before making an arrest, there must also be a likelihood of the person escaping before a warrant can be obtained for his arrest.”); Westover v. Reno, 202 F.3d 475, 480 (1st Cir. 2000) (finding arrest was “in direct violation” of § 1357(a)(2) because “[w]hile INS agents may have had probable cause to arrest Westover ... there is no evidence that Westover was likely to escape”); Mountain High Knitting, Inc. v. Reno, 51 F.3d 216, 218 (9th Cir. 1995) ; United States v. Cantu, 519 F.2d 494, 496-97
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that suspicion must be individualized
B. holding that arrests under  1357a2 require an individualized determination of flight risk
C. recognizing that the act provides a detailed outline of traditional factors used to assess risk of flight
D. holding that whether a person has a disability under the ada is an individualized inquiry
E. holding that an alien must be released unless the government demonstrates at a bond hearing that the alien poses a risk of flight or a risk of danger to the community
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.