Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of justice.” Davis v. Superior Court (Hannah), 25 Ariz.App. 402, 403, 544 P.2d 226, 227 (1976); see also Rashidi v. Albright, 818 F.Supp. 1354, 1355-56 (D.Nev.1993) (“Failure to ‘otherwise defend’ presumes the absence of some affirmative action on the part of a defendant [that] would operate as bar to the satisfaction of the moving party’s claim.”). A defendant in a cause of action who moves for summary judgment contests a plaintiffs claim and argues that it presents “no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Ariz. R. Civ. P. 56(e). A summary judgment in a defendant’s favor bars satisfaction of the plaintiffs claim and necessarily defeats it. ¶ 15 Other jurisdictions that have cons 3d 34, 962 N.E.2d 322, 324 (2011) ; M & A Const. Corp. v. Akzo Nobel Coatings,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment precluded default judgment
B. holding that district court has discretion when deciding to convert a defendants motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment
C. holding that motion to dismiss cannot be treated as summary judgment
D. holding that the courts denial of either a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment and is not reviewable 
E. holding that trial court may not grant summary judgment by default  when the movants summary judgment proof is legally insufficient
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.