Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
legal rights of the parties but also took steps toward decreeing a proper remedy. Thus in its January 20, 1998 order, the court resolved the merits of the Hospitals’ claims, and with its April 30, 1998 order, directed the Secretary to calculate the amount of outlier payments due to the Hospitals and to make payment accordingly. This latter order has spawned some confusion about our jurisdiction because of the general rule applicable to civil actions that “where assessment of damages or awarding of other relief remains to be resolved,” a district court’s judgment is not “ ‘final’ within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291.” Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737, 744, 96 S.Ct. 1202, 47 L.Ed.2d 435 (1976); see also A & S Council Oil Co. v. Lader, 56 F.3d 234, 238 (D.C.Cir.1995) . For it is clear that neither of the district
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an order compelling arbitration in an independent proceeding is appealable as a final order because in that context the order compelling arbitration resolves the sole issue before the court
B. holding an order of default was not final where it resolved only the question of liability and the case was continued for proof on the issue of damages
C. holding that an order remanding an arbitration award is not a final appealable order when the order does not also vacate the arbitration award
D. holding that an order granting a motion or application to compel arbitration is nonappealable because it is not listed in the uaa arbitration provision and because it is not a final order
E. holding that an order establishing liability but referring the issue of damages to arbitration is not final
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.