Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to demonstrate that she is a resident of Alabama. One must be a resident of Alabama in order to serve as an administrator of an estate here; § 43-2-22, Ala.Code 1975, provides, in part: “(a) No person must be deemed a fit person to serve as executor who is under the age of 19 years, or who has been convicted of an infamous crime, or who, from intemperance, improvidence or ■ want of understanding, is incompetent to discharge the duties of the trust. Nor shall any nonresident of the state be appointed as administrator unless he is at the time executor or administrator of the same estate in some other state or territory or jurisdiction, duly qualified under the laws of that jurisdiction.” (Emphasis added.) But see § 43-2-191, Ala.Code 1975, and Ex parte Adams, 168 So.3d 40, 45 (Ala.2014) . On June 3, 2014, the same day on which the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plea in bar may be based only on grounds set forth in statute
B. holding that oneyear limitations period set forth in  2255 is not a jurisdictional bar and is thus subject to equitable tolling
C. holding that the specific date restriction set forth in  541a5 controls and that  1306a1 does not eliminate that restriction
D. holding that it is generally sufficient that an indictment set forth the offense in the words of the statute itself
E. holding that an executor named in a will is not subject to the nonresident restriction set forth in  43222
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.