Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that the armed robberies were offenses “occurring on occasions different from one another” using Shepard-approved materials. “We review de novo whether crimes were committed on occasions different from one another within the meaning of the ACCA.” Weeks, 711 F.3d at 1261. II- McCloud contends that the Government failed to meet its burden of proof because the Shepard documents do not state the time and location of his prior convictions,' or otherwise indicate that the offenses were “temporally distinct.” See id.; Almedina, 686 F.3d at 1315. The Shepard documents in this case include the charging documents for each armed' robbery, the transcript of the plea colloquy, and undisputed statements in the PSI. McCloud’s arrest affidavits are not Shepard documents. See Sneed, 600 F.3d at 1383 ; of United States v. Rosales-Bruno, 676 F.3d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an ij could not consider a police report as part of the record of conviction to determine whether an alien had committed a firearms offense because the police report could encompass many offenses with which the alien was never charged or convicted
B. holding that the defendant may not state one ground at trial and another on appeal
C. holding that defendants prosecution on dui charges was not timeharred even though amended accusations were filed more than two years after offenses were committed because original citations pertaining to the same offenses and conduct were filed prior to the statute of limitations expiration
D. holding that courts may not use police reports to determine whether predicate offenses under  924e1 were committed on occasions different from one another 
E. holding that under the bail reform act for a defendant to have been convicted of two or more offenses constituting crimes of violence offenses must have been committed on different occasions
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.