Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
held that any challenge to counsel’s performance must be reviewed on direct appeal. Id. at 187. Petitioner’s reliance on Geist misses at least two marks. First, unlike a proceeding for termination of parental rights, in which the state brings the direct weight of its power to bear on parents who risk losing the fundamental right of parenthood, id. at 186, petitioner has been convicted of a crime in an underlying proceeding. In contrast to the challenge of the defending parent in Geist, petitioner’s motion did not address the performance of counsel in the underlying proceeding that resulted in a deprivation of his liberty interests. Here, unlike in the criminal proceeding, petitioner is the party who is ultimately responsible for prosecuting the action. See McClure, 110 Or App at 123-24 . In sum, this is a collateral civil
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding statute of limitations for filing petition for postconviction relief not tolled by general savings statute tolling limited to reasons enumerated in state postconviction relief act
B. holding that a postconviction petitioner is responsible for filing the petition and selecting the issues for litigation
C. holding filing of motion for reconsideration does not toll the 30day deadline for filing petition for review
D. holding that time limit for filing petition for review is mandatory and jurisdictional
E. holding that untimely petition for postconviction petition divests trial court of jurisdiction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.