Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
False Claims Act. Disagreeing, Wood argues that Congress’s decision to create the Institute as a “nonprofit corporation incorporated under the laws of the District of Columbia, or ... comparable successor nongovernmental entity,” 22 U.S.C. § 3305(a)(1) — (2), demonstrates that the Institute is not a governmental entity enjoying sovereign immunity, but rather a private corporation providing services to the government. Wood likens the Institute to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, the American National Red Cross, and Amtrak, three corporations created by the federal government and chartered under state or District of Columbia law that courts have held (or observed in dicta) are not part of the government for some purposes. See Ralis v. RFE/RL, Inc., 770 F.2d 1121, 1124-25 (D.C.Cir.1985) ; Marcella v. Brandywine Hosp., 47 F.3d 618,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding age discrimination claim barred
B. holding that claims arising under the age discrimination in employment act may be subject to arbitration
C. holding that radio free europeradio liberty is not a government controlled corporation within the meaning of the age discrimination employment act
D. recognizing equitable nature of back pay award under age discrimination in employment act
E. holding that the age discrimination in employment act was not preempted by the nlra
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.