Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
U.S. 563, 97 S.Ct. 1963, 52 L.Ed.2d 582 (1977), the Court held that under subsection 1202(a), proof that the possessed firearm previously traveled in interstate commerce was sufficient to satisfy the statutorily required nexus between the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and commerce. Although Scarborough was a possession case rather than a receipt case, the Court noted parenthetically that there was no congressional intent to support a distinction between the two: “Congress was not particularly concerned with the impact on commerce except as a means to insure the constitutionality of Title VII.... All indications are that Congress meant to reach possessions broadly.” Id. at 575 n. 11, 97 S.Ct. at 1969 n. 11. See also United States v. Lopez, 2 F.3d 1342, 1347 (5th Cir.1994) ; United States v. Sherbondy, 865 F.2d 996, 999
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing power of states to engage in some regulation of interstate commerce
B. holding that the feloninpossessionofafirearm statute only requires a showing that the firearm at one time traveled through interstate commerce
C. recognizing that  the interstate nexus requirement is satisfied by proof of a probable or potential impact on interstate commerce
D. recognizing scarborough holding that commerce nexus satisfied upon showing that possessed firearm had traveled at some time in interstate commerce
E. holding that the connection between the robbery and interstate commerce was much more direct than in wang because at the time of the robbery the victim in walker was selling illegal drugs that had traveled through interstate commerce
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.