Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
. The new language states in relevant part, "The rights protected by this section are protected against impairment by nongovernmental discrimination and impairment under col- or of State law.” 42 U.S.C. § 1981(c). This language creates a right, but not a remedy, and therefore shows no Congressional intent to overrule Jett. See Butts v. County of Volusia, 222 F.3d 891, 894 (11th Cir.2000) ("[T]he section creates a right that private or state actors may violate but does not itself create a remedy for that violation.”). 7 . We may affirm a district court for any reason, including a reason not considered by the district court. Dismas Charities, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 401 F.3d 666, 677 (6th Cir.2005). 8 . Jones v. Bock overruled Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1103-04 (6th Cir.1998) , Burton v. Jones, 321 F.3d 569, 574 (6th
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a prisoner exhausted his administrative remedies even though his grievance was untimely
B. holding that the prisoner has the burden of demonstrating he has exhausted his administrative remedies in his complaint
C. holding that a texas prisoner who had not exhausted his clearly available administrative remedies was properly denied habeas relief in the district court
D. holding that a plaintiff has exhausted his administrative remedies when his claim is deemed denied because of failure of administrator to respond in a timely manner
E. holding that exhaustion requirement is satisfied so long as prisoner exhausted his administrative remedies with respect to new claims asserted in an amended complaint before filing that complaint
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.