Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(615 SE2d 540) (2005) (noting that in the absence of a transcript, appellate court “must presume that the evidence supports the judge’s findings”); Portee v. State of Ga., 277 Ga. App. 536, 537 (1) (a) (627 SE2d 63) (2006) (“[W]hen a portion of the record which is necessary for our determination of one or more appellate issues is not before the court, the trial court’s express or implicit ruling as to those issues must be affirmed.”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 11 Murray v. Hooks, 313 Ga. App. 485 (722 SE2d 82) (2012), citing Nodvin v. State Bar of Ga., 273 Ga. 559, 560 (3) (544 SE2d 142) (2001). 12 See Portee, supra at 539 (5) (assertions that lacked an evidentiary basis demonstrated no reversible error); In the Interest of F. L. S., 232 Ga. App. 100, 101 (502 SE2d 256) (1998) ; Baugh v. Robinson, 179 Ga. App. 571, 572 (346
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding due process claim failed because plaintiff failed to explain how confrontation and crossexamination would have changed the outcome of his hearing
B. holding that partys failure to specify how his presence would have been of assistance at the hearing precluded the requisite showing of harm
C. holding that a violation of a defendants constitutional right to compulsory process requires at a minimum some plausible showing of how the excluded testimony would have been both material and favorable to his defense
D. holding that petitioners have not established the requisite  need    of the highest order
E. holding that for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim to be established a defendant must show that but for counsels error the outcome of his proceedings would have been different
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.