Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
States v. Castro, 166 F.3d 728, 731 (5th Cir.1999). The evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the prevailing party. United States v. Brigham, 382 F.3d 500, 506 n. 2 (5th Cir.2004) (en banc). Due deference is given to the credibility determinations of the district court. United States v. Solis, 299 F.3d 420, 437 (5th Cir.2002). 3. Walker alleges that the search of her car was improper. The initial encounter with Walker was a valid stop pursuant to Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), because the officers had information from a reliable Cl; they knew Walker had been involved in drug trafficking in the past; and they knew that she was located in a high drug-trafficking area. See United States v. Gonzalez, 190 F.3d 668, 672-73 (5th Cir.1999) . We must also consider whether the officers’
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that flight from police can help establish reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop
B. holding that circumstances created reasonable suspicion for investigatory stop
C. holding that an officers reasonable mistake of law can give rise to the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a traffic stop under the fourth amendment
D. holding that a tip may provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify an investigatory stop
E. holding there was no reasonable suspicion which would justify an investigatory stop despite report of a domestic disturbance
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.