Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
judge continued the polling, and when all of the other jurors responded that they found the defendant guilty, the judge returned to questioning the first juror, who eventually changed her verdict. We held that “to continue the poll in the absence of ... a request [by defense counsel] is error.” 273 A.2d at 845. Finally, in Kendall the first juror revealed during a poll that she had found the defendant not guilty on one of the seven counts at issue. The judge clarified that he was asking about the first co C.1983) (affirming a conviction because “unspoken communicative factors play[ed] a large role” in understanding what a juror meant when she said, “Guilty, I guess”); Ellis v. United States, 395 A.2d 404, 408 (D.C.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 913, 99 S.Ct. 2830, 61 L.Ed.2d 280 (1979) . Those cases are distinguishable on their
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that it was not reversible error to continue polling the remaining jurors on all counts when the disputed count was later dismissed
B. holding that to compare severity of sentences the proper procedure is first to disregard the sentence originally imposed on the dismissed count and then compare the total remaining sentence imposed on the remaining counts with the petitioners present position
C. holding that states appeal of trial courts dismissal of first count in a four count indictment under cj  12302cl was not ripe until final judgment on the remaining counts pled in the guilty plea and noting that upon imposition of the sentences on the remaining counts the situation  was ripe for the state to appeal or to perfect its earlier attempt to appeal
D. holding that severance was not required when a defendant was charged with five counts of forcible rape two counts of felonious restraint three counts of kidnapping two counts of armed criminal action two counts of forcible sodomy one count of second degree assault one count of first degree robbery and one count of stealing
E. holding that issues underlying all counts were sufficiently intertwined that the separate appeal of the summary judgment counts would complicate the trial of the remaining counts
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.