Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that requires special treatment. Each year, the major collections firms handle tens of thousands of payments on behalf of their clients. Requiring clients to endorse each monthly payment would require an extraordinary amount of effort, reduce the efficiency at both the client’s and firm’s office, and as a result, significantly increase the client’s costs. In addition, such a practice would likely delay the deposit of payments and thereby increase the number of insufficiently-funded checks. Although those circumstances are decidedly different from the examples set forth in IMO Opinion 635, there is no language in that opinion indicating that the extraordinary circumstances enu merated therein were intended to be exhaustive. See State v. Stevens, 115 N.J. 289, 300, 558 A.2d 833 (1989) . A cost effective collection system reduces
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that admission of rule 404b evidence was proper
B. holding the examples listed in evidence rule 55 now njre 404b were not exclusive
C. holding that rule 404b evidence is admissible in rebuttal
D. holding that proponent of 404b evidence must identify a proper 404b purpose for admission  that is at issue in  the case
E. holding that a new trial was the remedy for erroneous admission of rule 404b evidence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.