Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that stem from an independent source such as state law-rules or understandings that secure certain benefits and that support claims of entitlement to those benefits.” Id. {14} A statutory scheme providing for the receipt of government benefits may give rise to property interests protected by the due process clause. In Mathews, the United States Supreme Court determined that the private interest affected by state action was the claimant’s continued receipt ofbenefits, which was a source of income, pending a final decision on his claim for Social Security disability benefits. See 424 U.S. at 339-40. Similarly, a private interest affected by state action is a claimant’s continued receipt of welfare benefits. See Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 267, 90 S.Ct 1011, 25 L.Ed.2d 287 ; Roth, 408 U.S. at 576 (“a person receiving
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an administrator was not in substantial compliance with  1133 where the initial denial notice omitted one of the grounds later relied on for the denial of benefits
B. holding that a termination of benefits must go handinhand with a termination of the liability of an employer
C. holding that the pretermination hearing has one function only to produce an initial determination of the validity of the welfare departments grounds for discontinuance of payments in order to protect a recipient against an erroneous termination of his benefits citations omitted
D. holding that an evidentiary hearing is not required prior to the termination of social security disability benefits
E. holding that the district courts application of batson was clearly erroneous but then reviewing the record to make our own determination as to the validity of the objection
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.