Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
sold, handled, distributed or disposed of by you....” Section V, 15.a. The court was unable to locate any Indiana or Seventh Circuit case law dealing with the definition of “product” as that term is used in CGL insurance policies, and, in fact, neither party in this case cites any case that specifically defines the term. The Ninth Circuit offers some assistance in the case of Hydro Systems, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co., 929 F.2d 472 (9th Cir.1991), wherein the court wrote: Several courts have examined the meaning of the term “product” as it relates to product hazard exceptions. The majority of courts “define ‘products’ as goods or services which the insured deals in as his stock or trade.” CPS Chem. Co. Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co., 199 N.J.Super. 558, 489 A.2d 1265, 1270 (1984) ; see also Paxton-Mitchell Co. v. Royal Indemn.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to enjoin some products but not others
B. holding that industrial wastes were not products under a products hazard exception because they were not intended for consumption sale or use by others 
C. holding that i4i was not required to prove that its specific customers stopped using i4is products because they switched to the infringing word products
D. recognizing that substantial change is a defense to a products liability claim
E. recognizing products liability and products actions based on negligence as part of the general maritime law
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.