Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
immunity is an affirmative defense. Perry v. Texas A & I Univ., 737 S.W.2d 106, 110 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.). Thus, the burden is on the defendant to establish all elements of the defense. Montgomery v. Kennedy, 669 S.W.2d 309, 310-11 (Tex.1984). Government employees are entitled to official immunity from suit arising from the performance of their (1) discretionary duties in (2) good faith as long as they are (3) acting within the scope of their authority. Baker v. Story, 621 S.W.2d 639, 644 (Tex.Civ.App in pursuit and roadblock entitled to immunity). Several states that have recently considered the issue have also held that the actions of a police officer during a high-speed chase are discretionary. See, e.g., Pletan v. Gaines, 494 N.W.2d 38 (Minn.1992) ; Youngblood v. Clepper, 856 S.W.2d 405, 408
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding state immune from suit brought in state court
B. holding fleeing police officers in a vehicle was a violent felony under the acca
C. holding that immunity did not shield officers involved in 25mile highspeed chase of traffic violator because decisions by officers to continue the chase were operational rather than discretionary acts
D. holding that police officers who engaged in a dangerous highspeed chase of a fleeing suspect were immune from suit
E. holding a police officer who was pursuing a fleeing suspect was immune from his torts when he ran a red light and collided with plaintiffs vehicle
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.