Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
for COA purposes, Gutierrez has not adequately shown pursuant t ns, Gutierrez claimed Harrell made a material misrepresentation when she stated: in the jury questionnaire, that she had never been charged, or arrested, with theft or shoplifting; and, during voir dire, that, although she had been charged with theft in 1979, the charges had been dismissed, and she had not been arrested. Gutierrez asserted Harrell had been arrested, charged, and convicted of theft, making her ineligible for jury service under Texas law. Furthermore, under McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood, Gutierrez claimed his due-process rights were violated, because his trial counsel did not make a for-cause challenge based on Harrell’s voir-dire answers. 464 U.S. 548, 104 S.Ct. 845, 78 L.Ed.2d 663 (1984) . The state-habeas court held Gutierrez had
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the trial courts order violated due process because it was unclear whether or not the defendant was required to appear on the date in question
B. holding that the due process clause is violated if the prosecution fails to disclose material evidence that is favorable to a criminal defendant
C. holding that due process was violated where a death sentence was imposed based on information in a presentence report and the defendant was not given an opportunity to deny or explain the information
D. holding due process violated where a potential jurors failure to answer a material question on voir dire deprived the defendant of information permitting a valid forcause challenge
E. holding that in a military criminal trial the governments use of classified information without permitting the defendant or his lawyers to view the information did not violate the defendants due process rights
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.