Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
however, provide an extension of time to otherwise comply with a nonbankruptcy statutory deadline to record a continuation of a security interest or mortgage. See In re Chase, 2000 WL 33712297, at *9 (Bankr.D.Idaho 2000) (“Under Section 362(b)(3), the automatic stay does not prohibit the perfection of an interest in property if such perfection occurs within [thirty] days as provided by Section 547(e)(2)(A)”); In re Planned Protective Svcs., Inc., 130 B.R. 94, 98 (Bankr.C.D.Cal.1991) (“[T]he post-petition recordation of a lien interest generally would be a violation of the automatic stay. However, § 362(b)(3) provides an exception for acts of perfection which are authorized under ... 547(e)(2)(A)”) (footnote omitted); cf. In re Millivision, Inc., 331 B.R. 515, 522-23 (Bankr.D.Mass.2005) . In other words, if 201 Forest had filed for
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that although the automatic stay only applies to proceedings against the debtor  counterclaims seeking affirmative relief against a debtor implicate the automatic stay
B. holding judgment in violation of automatic stay void
C. holding that the automatic stay exception under  362b3 did not override the trustees  544a strong arm powers
D. holding that the protections of the automatic stay apply only to actions against the debtor
E. holding that the automatic stay did not bar the filing of a proof of claim where the debtor actively litigated a separate action during the pending bankruptcy proceeding because to permit the automatic stay provision to be used as a trump card played after an unfavorable result was reached  would be inconsistent with the underlying purpose of the automatic stay
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.