Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
significant the fact that aid is provided to pupils and their parents, rather than directly to sectarian schools. As a result, “ ‘[a]ny aid . . . that ultimately flows to religious institutions does so only as a result of the genuinely independent and private choices of aid recipients.’” Ante, at 9, quoting Witters v. Washington Dept. of Services for Blind, 474 U. S. 481, 487 (1986). And, finally, the majority opines that “the task of a sign-language interpreter seems to us quite different from that of a teacher or guidance counselor.” Ante, at 13. But the majority’s arguments are unavailing. As to the first two, even a general welfare program may have specific applications that are constitutionally forbidden under the Establishment Clause. See Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U. S. 589 (1988) . For example, a general program granting
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the endorsing requirement does not violate the establishment clause
B. holding that adolescent family life act on its face did not violate the establishment clause but remanding for examination of the constitutionality of particular applications
C. holding that establishment of christmas day as legal public holiday did not violate establishment clause
D. holding that the presence of a cross on the city insignia did not violate the establishment clause
E. holding constitutional on its face the adolescent family life actan act providing grants to religious and other institutions giving counseling on teenage sexuality without expressly requiring that the funds not be used for religious purposesbut remanding for a determination of the acts constitutionality as applied
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.