Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
affairs, including the authority to limit tribal sovereignty. See U.S. Const, art. I, § 8, cl. 3 (granting Congress the power to regulate Indian commerce); Worcester, 31 U.S. at 243, 6 Pet. at 561, 8 L.Ed. at 501 (stating that “[t]he whole intercourse between the United States and [Indian tribes] is, by our Constitution and laws, vested in the government of the United States”); McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Comm’n, 411 U.S. 164, 93 S.Ct. 1257, 36 L.Ed.2d 129 (1973) (stating that Congress, in its exercise of power under the Indian Commerce Clause and Treaty Clause of the Constitution, has been the sole source of federal policy for Indian affairs); Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation, 447 U.S. 134, 154, 100 S.Ct. 2069, 2081, 65 L.Ed.2d 10, 29 (1980) ; Delaware Tribal Business Committee v. Weeks,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing that palmyra is under united states sovereignty
B. holding that the fifth amendment did not apply to tribal government
C. holding that federal courts do not have jurisdiction to interpret a tribal constitution or tribal laws
D. holding the governors emergency powers to take private property for the public benefit was a special sovereignty interest but the relief requested was not so much of a divestiture of the states sovereignty to render the suit as one against the state itself
E. holding that tribal sovereignty is dependent on and subordinate to only the federal government not the states
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.