Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
over Plaintiffs claims under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1340, 1346(a)(1) or 26 U.S.C. §§ 6330, 7429. 2. The United States Court of Federal Claims Does Not Have Jurisdiction Over Tort Claims. The Complaint alleges numerous claims of fraud, including “mail fraud,” “constructive fraud,” “misrepresentation of material facts” and “conspiracy to defraud.” See Compl. at 1. These claims, however, sound in tort. The United States Court of Federal Claims’ jurisdiction does not extend to cases sounding in tort. See 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a) (“[t]he United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim ... for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort.” (emphasis added)); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997) . Jurisdiction to hear such claims exclusively
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the united states court of federal claims lacked jurisdiction over claims arising from the violation of a criminal statute
B. holding that the court of federal claims lacked jurisdiction over claims arising from the violation of a criminal statute
C. holding that the tucker act grants the united states court of federal claims jurisdiction to grant nonmonetary relief in connection with contractor claims including claims requesting an interpretation of contract terms
D. holding that plaintiffs negligence claims sounded in tort and thus could not be transferred to the united states court of federal claims
E. holding that the united states court of federal claims lacks jurisdiction over claims sounding in tort including fraud
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.