Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
holds, that the placement of traffic control devices is a discretionary duty. Because the placement of traffic control devices, i.e., the road construction signs, is a discretionary duty, § 11 — 46—9(1)(d) applies, and Hinds cannot be liable “whether or not the discretion be abused.” Even if an abuse of discretion standard were to apply to the placement of the road construction signs, the Court would find that Hinds did not abuse its discretion. The Court is aware that such a finding would require the Court to engage in fact finding. However, the Court finds that even if an abuse of discretion standard applied, no reasonable fact-finder could conclude that Hinds is liable for the placement of the road construction signs. See Gonzalez v. Denning, 394 F.3d 388, 395 (5th Cir.2004). The Court reaches this conclusion after
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a nonmovant could not oppose a summary judgment motion with an unauthenticated letter
B. holding that on appeal a nonmovant need not have answered or responded to the motion for summary judgment to contend that the movants summaiy judgment proof is insufficient as a matter of law to support summary judgment
C. holding that when there are no genuine issues of material fact summary judgment is appropriate
D. holding that summary judgment was appropriate when no reasonable factfinder could have found for the nonmovant
E. holding courts review motion for summary judgment in light most favorable to nonmovant
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.