Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
plaintiffs interests.” Obstfeld, 621 F.Supp.2d at 93-94 (quoting ZB Holdings, 144 F.R.D. at 45). “[A]ntagonism has generally not been found where the corporation does not, would not, or cannot express opposition to the initiation of the lawsuit.” Id. at 94 (quoting Netwolves Corp. v. Sullivan, No. 00-cv-8943 (AGS), 2001 WL 492463, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. May 9, 2001)); see also Net-wolves, 2001 WL 492463, at *7 (“[A] corporation that cannot act, a deadlocked corporation, is not considered ‘actively antagonistic’ to a lawsuit, within the meaning of Sperling and Swanson, because the corporation has not refused to sue, and will not clearly refuse to sue if it becomes able to render a decision.”); Cohen v. Heussinger, No. 89-cv-6941, 1994 WL 240378, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 1994) (So-tomayor, J.) ; Sonn, on Behalf of WLS Assocs. v. Korein, No.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that even assuming that the court recognized the allegaert exception that it would not apply where a firm that previously represented a corporation then represented a former director and officer of the corporation against the corporation because the duty of loyalty that the firm owes the corporation would go unprotected where the firm switches sides against its former client
B. holding that the actual amount of capital employed in the state by a foreign corporation was to be based on the property of the corporation that was within the state and that was used in business transacted within the state
C. holding that corporation and sole owner of corporation were separate legal entities and corporation was not party to contract signed by owner in individual capacity
D. holding that claims of corporation vest in corporation
E. holding that case did not fall within the boundaries of the sperling exception because plaintiff and defendant were coequal owners of the corporation and the proposed complaint does not allege that defendant controlled the corporation
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.