Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
121 S.Ct. 365. The Court reached this holding on the bases that the property at issue had to be property that was valuable in the hands of the victim, not just valuable in the hands of the defendant, and that an unissued video poker bcense did not constitute property that was valuable in the hands of the State of Louisiana. Id. at 22-27, 121 S.Ct. 365. In contrast to the facts in Cleveland, because a government has a property right in tax revenues when they accrue, see Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co., 338 U.S. 561, 566, 70 S.Ct. 386, 9.4 L.Ed. 346 (1950), the tax revenues owed Canada and the Province of Ontario by reason of the Defendants’ conduct in the present case constitute property for purposes of the wire fraud statute. United States v. Brewer, 528 F.2d 492, 495 (4th Cir.1975)  (emphasis' ádded). Indeed, the Court in
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that sales puffery cannot constitute mail fraud to support rico claim
B. recognizing that a mailing must be sufficiently related to the fraudulent scheme to support a charge of mail fraud
C. holding that instructions are sufficient which substantially follow the language of the statute or use equivalent language
D. holding that the first element of mail fraud  knowing participation in a scheme to defraud  can extend beyond the specific mailing and that the loss calculation for a mail fraud conviction may include any loss from the fraudulent scheme that the mailing furthered
E. holding that plain language of the mail fraud statute condemns any scheme to defraud in which the mails are employed including the evasion of  sales and use taxes
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.