Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
who received it. Finally, Mr. White’s affidavit claims Continental has spent “well over $100,000 in promotion and advertising” of its esp® product line over the past seven years, and has benefitted from the promotional efforts of its nationwide distributor, Fisher Scientific. (Id. ¶¶ 9, 15.) This evidence lacks probative value for a variety of reasons. Continental’s alleged $100,000 promotional expenditure, over a seven year period, amounts to a paltry $15,000 per year, often the cost of a single advertisement in a national publication. Continental offers no evidence as to how it put these funds to use, nor does it provide a coherent explanation as to how these expenditures contribute to secondary meaning. See Aromatique, Inc. v. Gold Seal, Inc., 28 F.3d 863, 872 (8th Cir.1994) . Notably, White fails to itemize the amounts
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an agreement to pay sons college education expenses was nondischargeable support even though arkansas law does not require payment of such expenses
B. holding that an award for medical expenses is proper when the expenses have been incurred but not paid
C. recognizing importance of itemizing promotional expenses because not all such expenses contribute to the creation of secondary meaning
D. holding that debtors have the burden of proving that other necessary expenses on form b22c are actual reasonable and necessary expenses and that these expenses should be considered in light of schedule j and other relevant evidence
E. holding that in an agreement where the father agreed to pay reasonable expenses to the extent that such expenses are not provided by any scholarship grant or other assistance for his sons education those expenses did not include loan repayment because it was not one of the forms of enumerated assistance
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.