Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
that the trial court did instruct the jury to disregard the prosecutor's question. 17 . Hawkins v. State, 135 S.W.3d 72, 77 (Tex.Crim.App.2004). 18 . Id.; Mosley v. State, 983 S.W.2d 249, 259 (Tex.Crim.App.1998) (op. on reh’g), cert, denied, 526 U.S. 1070, 119 S.Ct. 1466, 143 L.Ed.2d 550 (1999). 19 . Hawkins, 135 S.W.3d at 77; see also Simpson v. State, 119 S.W.3d 262, 272 (Tex.Crim.App.2003), cert, denied, 542 U.S. 905, 124 S.Ct. 2837, 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004). 20 . Ovalle v. State, 13 S.W.3d 774, 783 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); Hamilton v. State, No. 02-04-00435-CR, 2005 WL 3008449, at *2 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth Nov. 10, 2005, pet. refd) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Calderon v. State, 847 S.W.2d 377, 380 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1993, pet. refd). 21 . See Calderon, 847 S.W.2d at 380-81 . 22 . See Orona v. State, 791 S.W.2d 125,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the district courts swift response instructing the jury to disregard the improper comment prevented  the improper comment from materially affecting the verdict
B. holding that instruction to disregard cured error from prosecutors improper comment during voir dire
C. holding that a judges comment on the issues in the case although not technically correct could be cured by instruction
D. holding improper admission of extrinsic evidence may be cured by adequate limiting instruction
E. holding almost any improper argument may be cured by an instruction to disregard
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.