Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to have occurred. It is therefore difficult to know exactly what effects such a tumor could produce. The district court thus had to make a difficult finding based on conflicting evidence regarding a rare tumor. The only undisputed facts were that the tumor existed during Stevens’s employment with the company, and that Stevens’s. symptoms subsided after the tumor was removed. After a review of' the record, we are not left “with a definite and firm conviction” that the district court made a mistake. Thus, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that the tumor caused Stevens’s headaches and personality changes from which- he suffered during his employment. Cf. Sentilles v. Inter-Caribbean Shipping Corp., 361 U.S. 107, 109, 80 S.Ct. 173, 175, 4 L.Ed.2d 142 (1959) . B. The company must provide maintenance and
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. recognizing the cause of action
B. holding that the incontestability provisions of the policy did not cause a preexisting illness to be covered because the illness first manifested itself before the policy became effective
C. holding lack of prejudice to the defendant is not good cause
D. holding plaintiffs counsels illness constitutes good cause
E. holding that a jury may draw an inference as to the cause of an illness despite the lack of unanimity among experts as to the cause
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.