Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
conduct of the defendant and his agents is a principal cause of the great disparity in the number of persons of each race who are registered and eligible to vote.” (Emphasis added) The figures themselves reveal the obvious: neither unregistered whites nor unregistered Negroes pay the poll tax, theoretical duties of citizenship notwithstanding. 11 . Pub.L.No.89-110, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., 79 Stat. 437, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1973 et seq., approved August 6, 1965. 12 . See United States v. Ward (Louisiana), 5 Cir., 1965, 352 F.2d 329, modifying on rehearing 349 F.2d 795; United States v. Ramsey, 5 Cir., 1965, 353 F.2d 650 [No. 2315, Nov. 12, 1965]. 13 . United States v. Mississippi, S.D.Miss., No. 3791, pending. See also United States v. Texas, W.D.Tex., 1966, 252 F. Supp. 234 [Feb. 9, 1966] . 14 . See 30 Fed.Reg. 9897 (August 7,1965);
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding texas poll tax unconstitutional
B. holding texas flagdesecration statute facially unconstitutional
C. holding that where the entity was incorporated in texas and the shareholders reside in texas and the bankruptcy case is pending in texas texas law  not arizona law  should be applied
D. holding that the twentyfourth amendment abolished the poll tax as a requirement for voting in federal elections
E. holding texas franchise tax constitutional
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.