Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
degradation and that Toyobo’s manufacturing process was not functioning properly); ¶ 67 (alleging that Toyobo omitted from report on Zylon degradation in extreme conditions data reflecting degradation in non-extreme conditions).) These misrepresentations tainted all of the vest manufacturers’ claims for payment from the government, as the government has alleged that “the Zylon fiber [Toyobo] sold for use in Zylon body armor was defective and degraded more quickly than Toyobo and the Zylon Vest Manufacturers represented[,]” and “[a]s a result ..., the United States paid for defective Zylon body armor.” (Id. ¶ 1.) Thus, the complaint states a § 3729(a)(1) claim under a fraudulent inducement theory. See Honeywell, 798 F.Supp.2d at 22, 2011 WL 2672624, at *6; Westrick, 685 F.Supp.2d at 137 . The government has set out in detail the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding the government was required by law to correct a defendants misrepresentations at a sentencing hearing and doing so did not violate the plea agreement
B. holding that government pled sufficiently an fca claim by alleging that defendants misrepresentations about zylon degradation induced the government to pay claims for payment
C. holding that an assignment was recognized by the government because the government issued a check made payable to the assignee as payment under the contract
D. holding that the government can use prearrest silence for impeachment purposes against a defendant because no government action induced the silence
E. holding that the term claim was not limited to claims submitted for payments due and owing from the government but included claims for favorable action by the government upon applications for loans
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.