Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Am. v. SPM Flow Control, Inc., 180 S.W.3d 761, 785 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2005, pet. granted, judgm’t vacated w.r.m.). A claim need not demand an exact amount or list every element of damage. Id. “The abuse of discretion standard applies to the trial court’s factual findings as they relate to prejudgment interest; but the de novo standard applies to the trial court’s application of the law to the facts.” Figueroa v. Davis, 318 S.W.3d 53, 66 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, no pet.). When settlement credits are at issue, the declining-principal formula should be used, under which settlements are credited w W.3d 819, 824-25 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2003, pet. denied) (rejecting argument that trial court abused its discretion in 2d 702, 705 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1996, writ denied) . Because the trial court must revisit
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding issues not raised in appellate brief are waived
B. holding that issues not fairly presented to the trial court are waived
C. holding that appellate court may only review issues actually presented to and considered by the trial court
D. holding that issues not raised before a district court are waived on appeal
E. holding that arguments not presented to the district court in response to a motion for summary judgment are waived
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.