Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Cincinnati, 622 F.3d at 534-35. After determining the type of forum, the Court addresses whether the limitations placed on Plaintiffs’ speech satisfy the constitutional standard applicable to that forum. Summum, 555 U.S. at 469-70, 129 S.Ct. 1125. Because Plaintiffs seek access to the Atrium’s Holiday Display, specifically the space next to the Nativity Scene, the Atrium is the space within which a determination of the relevant forum must be analyzed. United Food & Comm. Workers Union, Local 1099 v. S.W. Ohio Reg’l Transit Auth., 163 F.3d 341, 352 (6th Cir.1998) (where plaintiff sought access to advertising space located on exterior of public bus, the advertising space was the forum at issue); Air Line Pilots Ass’n, Int’l v. Dep’t of Aviation, 45 F.3d 1144, 1151-52 (7th Cir.1995) . See also Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plaintiff cannot be the only link between the defendant and the forum
B. holding that phone and facsimile communications to the forum purchase orders and payments sent to the forum a choice of law clause within the contract regarding the forum state and delivery of the product within the forum state were not enough to satisfy minimum contacts
C. holding that where plaintiff sought access to display cases in ohare airport terminal the display case and not the terminal itself was the relevant forum
D. recognizing that where plaintiff is from the forum state and defendant is from an alternate forum each forum can claim a connection to one of the parties
E. holding that inquiring about whether the defendant was carrying narcotics as he was leaving the terminal building of the portland international airport was not a stop within the meaning of ors 131605 et seq nor did it violate the defendants constitutional rights
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.