Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
misconduct depend on factual determinations that were resolved against him, we will not substitute our judgment for that of the hearing committee on questions of fact. See Bristol, 2006-NMSC-041, ¶ 15, 140 N.M. 317, 142 P.3d 905 (“Because the hearing committee directly observes witness testimony, it is in the best position to weigh the evidence, resolve matters of credibility, and choose between the conflicting inferences that may be drawn from the evidence.”). Moreover, other than general assertions of prejudice, Respondent failed to specifically demonstrate how any of disciplinary counsel’s purported misconduct prejudiced Respondent’s defense or would result in a different outcome if rectified. See In re Castellano, 119 N.M. 140, 144, 889 P.2d 175, 179 (1995) (per curiam) . For all of the foregoing reasons, we reject
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding lack of prejudice to the defendant is not good cause
B. holding that an assertion of prejudice is not a showing of prejudice
C. holding that a showing of prejudice is generally required in the context of an ineffectiveassistance claim
D. holding that prejudice or injury is a necessary element of standing
E. recognizing that the burden of persuasion for a showing of prejudice was on the defendant
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.