Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
is made, the court, after notice and a hearing, shall determine the amount of such claim ... and shall allow such claim in suc scretion in this case. While Porges obtained a dismissal of his bankruptcy ease and chose not to convert his petition to a proceeding under another chapter of the Bankruptcy Code, he previously had sought bankruptcy protection and initiated the adversary proceeding. Porges thus subjected himself “ ‘to all the consequences that attach to an appearance,’ ” including the determination of liability on Gruntal’s claims. In re McLaren, 3 F.3d at 966 (quoting Hillman, 296 U.S. at 242, 56 S.Ct. at 211). A party seeking relief in bankruptcy court cannot avoid an adverse judgment by subsequently abjuring bankruptcy protection. See Pepper, 308 U.S. at 305, 60 S.Ct. at 244 . Finally, the exercise of a court’s equitable
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that where a court possesses jurisdiction over a disputed matter it may exercise its equitable powers to ensure that substance will not give way to form and that technical considerations will not prevent substantial justice from being done
B. holding that it may not
C. holding that congress may impose its will on the states as long as it is acting within the powers granted by the constitution
D. holding that any attempt by way of contract to deprive a city of  control over exercise of it police powers is void
E. holding a court of criminal appeals may not exercise its sentence approval powers to criticize a state court conviction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.