Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
be both efficient and attainable, especially if it left more money for actual education. 49 . See Texas Ass’n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 447-48. 50 . Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm’n, 432 U.S. 333, 344, 97 S.Ct. 2434, 53 L.Ed.2d 383 (1977). 51 . Texas Ass’n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 447 (noting that one requirement for associational standing is that neither claim asserted nor relief requested requires participation of individual members in the lawsuit); cf. Hunt, 432 U.S. at 345, 97 S.Ct. 2434 (approving associa . Anderson Cancer Ctr. v. Novak, 52 S.W.3d 704, 708 (Tex.2001); Texas Dep’t of Protective and Regulatory Servs. v. Sherry, 46 S.W.3d 857, 862 (Tex.2001); Bland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Blue, 34 S.W.3d 547, 558 (Tex.2000); see also Raines, 521 U.S. at 820, 117 S.Ct. 2312 . 55 . Texas Ass’n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 443.
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a sua sponte dismissal by the court for failure of the plaintiff to comply with an order of the court should operate as an adjudication on the merits because the defendant has been put to the trouble of preparing his defense because there was no initial bar to the courts reaching the merits
B. holding judicial efficiency and fundamental fairness to the litigants dictates that the merits of the application for supervisory writs should be decided when the judgment is arguably incorrect a reversal will terminate the litigation and there is no factual dispute to be resolved
C. recognizing that in those cases where the jurisdictional facts are intertwined with the facts central to the merits of the dispute it is the better view that  the entire factual dispute is appropriately resolved only by a proceeding on the merits citations omitted
D. holding that the power of a federal court to hear and to determine statelaw claims in nondiversity cases depends upon the presence of at least one substantial federal claim in the lawsuit  and the district court has considerable authority whether or not to exercise this power in light of such considerations as judicial economy convenience fairness to litigants and eomity 
E. holding that standing is an overriding and timehonored concern about keeping the judiciarys power within its proper constitutional sphere that required the court to put aside the natural urge to proceed directly to the merits of this important dispute and to settle it for the sake of convenience and efficiency
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.