Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
precisely assert a paramount title to Tracts A and A2. In fact, they conceded Mother held legal title to these tracts. Rather, they asserted they held equitable title to the tracts and sought specific performance as a remedy for Mother’s alleged breach of the contracts to sell the tracts. Further, our appellate courts have traditionally viewed the main purpose of a cause of action seeking specific performance as the pursuit of equitable relief and thus have found such a claim to be equitable in nature. See Ingram v. Kasey’s Assocs., 340 S.C. 98, 105, 531 S.E.2d 287, 290-91 (2000) (applying the equitable standard of review to the findings of fact in a specific performance action); Lowcountry Open Land Trust v. Charleston S. Univ., 376 S.C. 399, 406, 656 S.E.2d 775, 779 (Ct. App. 2008) . Based on the foregoing, we view the two
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an action for specific performance lies in equity
B. holding that an employees action against her employer for negligent supervision lies not in tort but with an action for breach of contract
C. holding  1983 action lies for warrantless arrest without probable cause
D. holding that an action for the negligence of an architect in the performance of professional services is an action for breach of contract
E. holding  he who seeks equity must do equity 
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.