Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
scope of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.” The order at issue requires Exmark to “identify each ... tangible item responsive to each Request for Production or by general categories of documents.” According to Exmark, the order compels it to “organize its production in a manner more restrictive than the rules allow” because it eliminated its ability to produce documents and tangible things as they are kept in the normal course of business. Under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 196.3(c), “the responding party must either produce documents and tangible things as they are kept in the usual course of business or organize and label them to correspond with the categories in the request.” Tex.R. Civ. P. 196.3(c); see In re Colonial Pipeline, 968 S.W.2d 938, 942 (Tex.1998) (orig. proceeding) . Contrary to Exmark’s argument, the rules
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that section 231241f does not address the taxable situs of heavy equipment inventory
B. holding that a violation of  6103 does not require the application of the exclusionary rule
C. recognizing this rule
D. holding that this court does not necessarily require the claim to be specifically raised in an eeoc charge provided that it satisfies this scopeofinvestigation test
E. holding that this rule does not require the creation of an inventory of documents to be produced
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.