Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
disturb any of these Family Court rulings. He has not applied for a vacatur of the temporary custody order or the placement of the child in his temporary custody. Instead, Plaintiff only seeks specified monetary damages, see id. ¶¶ 739-42, and injunctive relief holding that various sections and procedures of the N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law unconstitutional prospectively, see id. ¶¶ 451-464, 728-29. Consequently, the Court follows the Second Circuit’s reasoning in McNamara and Green and finds that Rooker-Feldman does not apply to Plaintiffs claims that only seek monetary damages or prospective injunctive relief and do not seek to overturn a child custody award. See also Pittman v. Cuyahoga County Dep’t of Children and Family Servs., No. 06-3312, 2007 WL 2050840, at *3 (6th Cir. July 16, 2007) . III. Domestic Relations Exception Several
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the federal claims which arose from state court criminal contempt proceedings were inextricably intertwined with the state court action and thus the federal district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the claims pursuant to the rookerfeldman doctrine
B. holding rookerfeldman doctrine inapplicable to claims that do not require review of a judicial decision in a particular case
C. holding rookerfeldman doctrine deprived district court of jurisdiction to review decision of west virginia state bar
D. holding that the rookerfeldman doctrine is broad enough to bar all federal claims that were or should have been central to the state court decision
E. holding that rookerfeldman does not bar plaintiff claims that do not focus on the outcome of state court custody proceedings or other wise request reversal of a juvenile court decision
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.