Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
basis, but displayed poor focus, grandiosity and religiosity, id. at 448, and appeared to display disorganized thought pattern and loose associations, id. at 449. The ALJ explained that he gave very little weight to Dr. Johnson-Miller’s evidence because it was quite conclusory and provided very little explanation of the evidence relied upon, and because her opinions departed substantially from the rest of the evidence. Mr. Akers argues on appeal that Dr. Johnson-Miller’s report was not conclusory. We disagree. Dr. Johnson-Miller expressly relied quite heavily on Mr. Akers’ subjective complaints and provided little or no explanation of the basis of her conclusions, thus, the ALJ was entitled to give her report little weight. See Bernal v. Bowen, 851 F.2d 297, 301 (10th Cir.1988) . We find no merit in Mr. Akers’ claim that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a treating physicians diagnosis could be rejected for specific and legitimate reasons that are supported by substantial evidence in the record
B. holding that the weight given to a treating physicians opinion is limited if the opinion consists only of conclusory statements
C. holding that a conclusory opinion may be rejected
D. holding that the weight given a treating physicians opinion is limited if the opinion consists only of conclusory statements
E. holding that a treating physicians opinion may be rejected if it is brief conclusory and unsupported by medical evidence
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.