Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
since it was not brought within the statutory “reasonable time.” W.S. 14-2-104(a)(ii). In addition, we hold that the petition is barred by the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel and judicial es-toppel. In 1977, Wyoming adopted a slightly modified version of the Uniform Parentage Act, W.S. 14-2-101 through 14-2-120. See generally, Uniform Parentage Act, 9B U.L.A. 287, 287-345 (1987 & 1991 Cum. Supp.). The Act was promulgated by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in response to several United States Supreme Court decisions premised on the discriminatory treatment of illegitimate children and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. See Gomez v. Perez, 409 U.S. 535, 93 S.Ct. 872, 35 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973) ; Weber v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 406 U.S. 164,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the word tort is not technically construed and hence a fathers breach of the statutory duty to pay child support for his illegitimate child constitutes a tortious act within the meaning of the statute
B. holding that the trial court had erred in imposing an obligation to pay child support when clear and convincing evidence established that the husband was not the father of the child
C. holding that an illegitimate child is guaranteed a right of support from his father
D. holding illegitimate child acknowledged by putative father stands on same footing as legitimate child under workers compensation statute
E. holding biological father responsible under uniform parentage act for back child support notwithstanding stepparents support of child
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.