Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to withdraw his pleas on the basis that he pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would not be sentenced as a habitual offender. The portion of the transcript of the plea hearing that Harris attached to his motion appears to support this claim. However, Harris again failed to allege prejudice, because he failed to allege that he would not have pleaded if he had known that the trial court would sentence him as a habitual offender. When a defendant, in a rule 3.850 motion, seeks to withdraw his plea on the ground that it was involuntary because he was provided incorrect information regarding the consequences of the plea, he must allege that he would not have accepted the plea if he had been fully aware of the consequences. See State v. Taylor, 738 So.2d 988 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) . Again our affirmance is without prejudice to
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding in direct conflict with the second third and fifth districts that allegations of affirmative misadvice by trial counsel on the sentenceenhancing consequences of a defendants plea for future criminal behavior in an otherwise facially sufficient motion are cognizable as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
B. holding that a defendant must be allowed to withdraw a plea entered based upon the misadvice of counsel regarding potential penalties to be faced upon entry of the plea
C. holding that in order to establish prejudice based on misadvice regarding sentence length defendant must allege generally that he would not have pleaded but for the bad advice
D. holding that the defendant was entitled to have his plea accepted absent a sound reason for rejecting the plea
E. holding that for a facially sufficient claim that the plea was involuntary based on misadvice of counsel defendant must allege he would not have accepted the plea agreement but for the misadvice
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.