Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
722, 724 (3d Cir.2009) ("If it is necessary to determine the amount of damages or to establish the truth of any averment by evidence, the court may conduct a hearing." (emphasis added and internal quotation marks omitted in Rainey) (quoting Durant v. Husband, 28 F.3d 12, 15 (3d Cir.1994) (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2)))). 9 ."Delay in realizing satisfaction on a claim rarely serves to establish the degree of prejudice sufficient to prevent the opening [of] a default judgment” in favor of a defendant who has appeared, Feliciano v. Reliant Tooling Co., Ltd., 691 F.2d 653, 656-57 (3d Cir.1982) (emphasis added), but the standard must apply differently when the district court is evaluating whether to grant default judgment against an absent defendant. Cf. Chamberlain, 210 F.3d at 164 . See also infra note 11. 10 . See Chamberlain,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that default judgment was not warranted where the defendant answered late but answered
B. holding that trial court must make entry of default prior to entry of default judgment and court may not make entry of default when there is no default in law or in fact
C. holding 1 that where a defendant who previously answered does not appear for trial a plaintiffs only remedy is to make a motion with the court to continue with that trial 2 that entry of default is not authorized and 3 that the hearing held under such circumstances is uncontested as distinguished from a default hearing 1 quoting warden v lamb 98 calapp 738 277 p 867 868 1929
D. holding that on appeal a nonmovant need not have answered or responded to the motion for summary judgment to contend that the movants summaiy judgment proof is insufficient as a matter of law to support summary judgment
E. holding that a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment precluded default judgment
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.