Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
to be a conviction or impose any civil disabilities ordinarily resulting from a conviction for a crime.” (Emphasis added.) Additionally, recognizing that juvenile adjudications are “quasi-criminal in nature” necessarily demonstrates that juvenile adjudications are, in fact, not criminal. Indeed, Black’s Law Dictionary defines the term “quasi” as: “Seemingly but not actually; in some sense or degree; resembling; nearly.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1363 (9th ed.2Q09) (emphasis added). Thus, although it. is correct to characterize juvenile-delinquency proceedings as “quasi-criminal in nature,”- such a characterization does not mandate a finding that a juvenile adjudication is the functional equivalent of a criminal conviction. See also Jennings v. State, 384 So.2d 104, 105 (Ala.1980) . Additionally, under Rule 32.1, I cannot
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding when observable defects in a highway have existed for a time so long that they ought to have been observed notice of them is implied and is imputed to those whose duty it is to repair them
B. holding that it is the conduct required to obtain a conviction rather than the consequences resulting from the crime that is relevant
C. recognizing that our juvenile statute removes juveniles who have committed a crime from the jurisdiction of the criminaljustice system and establishes an entirely separate system to minister to them a system whose aim is rehabilitative rather than retributive
D. holding that whether the defendant is a member of a group specifically authorized to possess firearms is an affirmative defense rather than an element of the crime
E. recognizing that the statute of limitations provision of the aedpa is an affirmative defenses rather than jurisdictional
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.