Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
process, “a federal court is not limited to the consideration of evidence that would be admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence; any relevant material or source may be consulted.” Ashenden, 233 F.3d at 477. The Court is more than satisfied that the learned opinions of the judges of the United States Courts of Appeal are an adequate source upon which to conclude that the English system is compatible with the requirements of due process of law. See, e.g., Society of Lloyd’s v. Turner, 303 F.3d 325, 331 (5th Cir.2002) ("the courts of England are fair and neutral forums”); Ashenden, 233 F.3d at 477. 6 . This principle continues to adhere to the Uniform Foreign Money Judgment Recognition Act in other states. See, e.g., Society of Lloyd’s v. Turner, 303 F.3d 325, 332-33 (5th Cir.2002) . 7 . The weakness in this argument is further
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding under texas version of the recognition act that public policy exception is not triggered simply because the body of foreign law upon which the judgment is based is different from the law of the forum or because the foreign law is more favorable to the judgment creditor than the law of the forum
B. holding that a party relying on foreign law must plead and prove it and partys failure to do so entitles court to assume that foreign law is the same as forum law
C. recognizing that where plaintiff is from the forum state and defendant is from an alternate forum each forum can claim a connection to one of the parties
D. holding that in cases of a false conflict of law a court may apply the law of the forum state
E. holding that courts apply the procedural law of the forum and the substantive law of the jurisdiction originating the claim
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.