Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
inconsistent with federal law and, therefore, preempted. Fla. Stat. Section 812.014(1) defines theft more broadly than the crime defined in 18 U.S.C. Section 661; the Florida statute makes punishable not only a taking but also knowing usage or attempts to use the property of another with intent to either, temporarily or permanently, deprive the other person of a right or benefit of the property or appropriate the property to his own use. Fla. Stat. § 812.014(1). Defendant would be subjected to additional punishments inconsistent with maritime law, including treble damages and payment of attorney’s fees and costs if Fla. Stat. Sections 812.014(1) and 772.11 were applied. GE Seaco Servs., Ltd. v. Interline Connection, N.V., No. 09-23864-CIV, 2011 WL 98406, at *5 (S.D.Fla. Jan. 12, 2011) . Florida’s civil theft statutory scheme does
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that appellate court should reverse and remand issue of attorneys fees where damages are reduced on appeal in a manner that could affect the determination of reasonable and necessary attorneys fees
B. holding attorneys fees not generally recoverable unless party prevails under cause of action for which attorneys fees are recoverable and damages are recovered
C. holding that a party may recover attorneys fees under section 38001 only if the party prevails on a cause of action for which attorneys fees are available and recovers damages
D. holding the attorneys fees and treble damages provisions of fla stat section 77211 are incompatible with maritime law
E. holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.