Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Gualberto Chavez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen deportation proceedings after he was ordered deported in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. See Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 888, 890-91 (9th Cir.2002). We grant the petition. The IJ abused his discretion by denying Chavez’s motion to reopen. See Jerezano v. INS, 169 F.3d 613, 615 (9th Cir.1999) . Chavez stated in his motion to reopen that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that denying a petitioners motion to reopen when he arrived 15 to 20 minutes late was an abuse of discretion
B. holding that the bia abused its discretion in denying a motion to reopen when it failed to consider the argument before it
C. holding that an order denying a petitioners motion to reopen proceedings so that he could apply for adjustment of status was not a judgment regarding the granting of relief and was thus reviewable
D. holding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petitioners motion to dismiss under 11 usc  707a
E. holding that bia abused its discretion in denying motion to reopen
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.