Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
cash flow in nine months, when the equity in the real estate is also considered, Magnolia’s interest in cash collateral is adequately protected. Debtor’s argument is flawed for several reasons. First, whether Magnolia’s interest in the hotel room revenues is characterized as personal property or as real property, Magnolia has a continuing security interest in the revenues under § 552(b)(2). Unlike other forms of cash collateral, a pre-petition security interest in hotel room revenues continues to attach to post petition revenues. 11 U.S.C. § 552(b). Under these circumstances, the offer of a replacement lien on the post-petition rents is meaningless because the creditor already has a lien on these assets. See In re Buttermilk Towne Center, LLC, 442 B.R. 558, 566 (6th Cir. BAP 2010) ; In re Las Torres Dev., LLC, 413 B.R. 687,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the state has no obligation to provide adequate housing
B. holding preliminary hearings in colorado do not provide adequate opportunity for crossexamination
C. holding that the equal protection and due process clauses of the fifth and fourteenth amendments do not provide a sufficient basis for jurisdiction because they do not mandate payment of money by the government
D. holding that future rents do not provide adequate protection for the debtors expenditure of prior months rents
E. holding professional rules do not provide basis for civil liability
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.