Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
the Perry factors, namely, whether the statute puts the public on notice by clearly defining the required conduct. See Perry, 973 S.W.2d at 309. Of all the considerations set forth in Perry, we believe this factor is the most relevant to the statute at issue in this case because a statute which defines a violation in conditional terms is less likely to support the application of negligence per se than one which provides an absolute, and thus more definite, standard of care. Accordingly, we must determine whether the standard of conduct found in section 61(a) was defined with sufficient clarity to impose tort liability for a violation of that statute. See Perry, 973 S.W.2d at 309. Although article 6701d, entitled “Uniform Act Regulating Traff .App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1972, no writ) ; Hemphill v. Meyers, 469 S.W.2d 327, 328
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that whether a driver safely entered an intersection as per section 71c depends upon whether he acted prudently
B. holding that whether a driver operated his vehicle on an improved shoulder in safety as per section 54a depends upon whether he acted reasonably under the common law
C. recognizing that whether a consumer survey should be admitted depends among other things on whether the questions are leading or suggestive 
D. holding whether these explanations are reasonable or not depends upon matters that the jury must decide including witness eredibility
E. holding that whether a driver yielded the right of way as per section 74 depends upon whether he acted negligently or unreasonably
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.