Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Nissan removed the appeal to the United States District Court, Central Division, which action is CIV. 05-3018. [¶ 15] In CIV. 05-1015, Billion was added as an additional plaintiff and an amended complaint was allowed. QUESTIONS OF STANDING IN APPEAL FROM ADMINISTRATIVE RULING [¶ 16] I turn now to the Central Division case, the appeal from the administrative decision. The first question to be addressed in that case is the question of “standing.” General principles will first be addressed. Standing is a threshold matter that, if absent, prevents this court from exercising jurisdiction. Arkansas Right to Life State Political Action Comm. v. Butler, 146 F.3d 558, 560 (8th Cir.1998). See Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 118 S.Ct. 1003, 1012-13, 140 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998) . The Constitution requires a party to satisfy
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that because article iii standing is jurisdictional it must be decided before other legal issues
B. holding that article iii standing is not a prerequisite to intervention
C. holding that federal courts may not consider other issues before resolving standing an article iii jurisdictional matter
D. holding that a court can dismiss a case under forum non conveniens before resolving any other jurisdictional issues
E. holding that article iii standing is necessary for intervention
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.