Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
document, commonly referred to as the "blue seal document," stated: I, the Secretary of State, of the State of Maine, certify that the office of the Secretary of State is the legal repository of the Great Seal of the State of Maine and also custodian of the records relating to the revocation, restoration and suspension of operators’ licenses and registrations, and that the paper to which this is attached is a true copy from the records of this office. I further certify that, according to our records the license or right to operate of Morris D. Murphy, whose date of birth is July 9, 1958, was suspended effective September 15, 2008 by the Secretary of State Notice of suspension was sent by regular mail, no later than September 5, 2008 in accordance with the pro 406, 410-11 (2007) ; Washington v. Kronich, 160 Wash.2d 893, 161
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the same types of evidence used to prove a title vii claim also may be used to prove a  1983 claim
B. holding that such circumstantial evidence may be used to prove discrimination
C. holding that the invocation of a presumption of notice requires the agency to prove that the notice was properly addressed
D. holding that the government need not prove actual notice to the prisoner
E. holding that the dmv transcript used to prove revocation and notice was nontestimonial
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.