Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
F.2d 913 (2d Cir.1985). In essence, the plan becomes a binding contract between the debtor and the creditors and controls their rights and obligations. See In re Kentucky Lumber Co., 860 F.2d 674 at 679 (6th Cir.1988). “Absent special language in the plan, two propositions seem clear as a result of the substitution of plan obligations for pre-confirmation obligations. First, creditors may engage in all lawful collection activities to enforce plan obligations; second, creditors may not take any steps to collect pre-confirmation obligations.” Lander and Warfield; A Review And Analysis Of Selected Post-confirmation Activities In Chapter 11 Reorganizations, 62 Am.Bankr.L.J. 203, 217 (1988). See also Paul v. Monts (In re International Plastics, Inc.), 906 F.2d 1468, 1474-76 (10th Cir.1990) . CONCLUSION The Debtors’ confirmed plan became
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that confirmation of a chapter 11 plan creates a binding contract which may be enforced in state courts
B. holding that the good faith analysis for evaluating a chapter 11 petition and that in evaluating a chapter 11 plan are distinct
C. holding that provision in chapter 13 plan discharging postpetition interest on a student loan is binding on creditor under theory of res judicata where objection was not raised prior to plan confirmation and confirmation order was not appealed
D. holding that boilerplate language in a confirmation plan is binding if confirmed
E. holding that a confirmed chapter 13 plan is binding on all parties under 11 usc  1327a however the plan may be modified pursuant to 11 usc  1329
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.