Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
colluding with her or providing her with false information about the incident, to use concerns about his diabetic condition as a pretext for removing him from the public-works program. Finally, Davis asserted that there were similarly situated, non-homosexual, insulin-dependant diabetic inmates who participated in the public-works program and who were allowed to continue working in the program after this incident. The combined effect of these alleged facts, taken as true at this stage of the litigation, lead us to conclude that Davis has stated a plausible claim that he was improperly removed from the public-works program based upon the defendants’ anti-gay animus. Dismissal of this claim was improper. See Johnson v. Enable, 862 F.2d 314 (table), 1988 WL 119136, at *1 (4th Cir. 1988) . The district court mistakenly relied on a
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a prisoner stated a valid equal protection claim when he alleged he was denied a work assignment because of his sexual orientation
B. holding sexual orientation is fundamental to a persons identity
C. recognizing harassment claim under equal protection clause based on sexual orientation
D. holding that sexual orientation and sexual identity are immutable
E. holding that a prisoner stated a valid free exercise of religion claim where he alleged that prison officials refused to allow him to receive certain religious books
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.