Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
capacity to make that choice intelligently and understanding^,’ any subsequent plea should be deemed involuntary as a matter of law and the appellate court would have the authority to reverse absent a motion to withdraw or a contemporaneous objection. Id. at 213 (alteration in original) (quoting Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.165(b)(2)). A. Case number 2014-CJ-655 The unverified “I choose to represent myself’ form and the trial court’s five questions to D.A.C. are inadequate to constitute the “thorough” waiver of counsel required by rule 8.165(b)(2). See T.G., 800 So.2d at 211 (“Although the inquiry for juveniles must be at least equal to that accorded adults, courts should be even more eáreful when accepting a waiver of counsel from juveniles.”); A.S. v. State, 62 So.3d 695, 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) ; G.T. v. State, 948 So.2d 900, 902 (Fla. 2d
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that lower courts misunderstood the requirement for finding a valid waiver of the right to counsel where neither the trial court nor the arizona supreme court undertook to focus on whether edwards understood his right to counsel and intelligently and knowingly relinquished it
B. holding fundamental error occurred because the trial court failed to inquire thoroughly whether the juvenile understood her right to counsel and had the capacity to intelligently choose to waive counsel and failed to obtain the required verified written waiver
C. recognizing that the sixth amendment guarantees a defendant the right to counsel and the right to waive counsel
D. holding that accused must competently and intelligently waive the right to counsel
E. holding that one must voluntarily and intelligently waive the right to counsel
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.