Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
consent to a search cannot form any part of the basis for reasonable suspicion." Wood, 106 F.3d at 946; see United States v. Dozal, 173 F.3d 787, 794 (10th Cir.1999). Haley's conduct in relue-tantly agreeing to a search of the luggage and refusing to consent to a search of the car is not a cireumstance supporting reasonable suspicion. See United States v. Hunnicutt, 135 F.3d 1345 (10th Cir.1998)("Any other rule would make a mockery of the reasonable suspicion and probable cause requirements, as well as the consent doctrine. These legal principles would be considerably less effective if citizens' insistence that searches and seizures be conducted in conformity with constitutional norms could create the suspicion or cause that renders their consent unnecessary."); Karnes, 62 F.3d at 495 ; United States v. Carter, 985 F.2d 1095, 1097
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the fact that defendant granted consent to police to search some items and then refused to give consent to additional searches cannot support a finding of reasonable suspicion
B. holding that refusal to consent to search cannot support a finding of reasonable suspicion
C. holding that consent searches do not require probable cause to justify the search of a home
D. holding the drivers refusal to consent to search of automobile did not give rise to reasonable suspicion that vehicle contained narcotics
E. holding that it was objectively reasonable for the police to conclude that the general consent to search the respondents car included consent to search a bag within that car
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.