Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
“‘An issue raised for the first time on appeal is not subject to appellate review because it has not been properly preserved and presented.’ ” Id. at 794 (citing Pate v. State, 601 So.2d 210, 213 (Ala.Crim.App.1992)). “[T]o preserve an issue for appellate review, it must be presented to the trial court by a timely and specific motion setting out the specific grounds in support thereof.” McKinney v. State, 654 So.2d 95, 99 (Ala.Crim.App.1995) (citation omitted). Snow’s challenges to defects in the circuit court’s consideration of the presumptive sentencing standards are waivable and were, in fact, waived when Snow failed to object to those defects in the circuit court and thereby preserve his arguments for review on appeal. Compare Clark v. State, 166 So.3d 147 (Ala.Crim.App.2014) ; Hyde v. State, 185 So.3d 501
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding circuit courts decision to depart from the presumptive sentencing recommendation and impose a prison sentence was reversible error where defendant objected on the basis that the state failed to give notice of aggravating factors that would justify a dispositional departure from the presumptive sentencing recommendation and the trial court failed to state on the record a reason for its departure
B. recognizing that sentencing facts are based on the evidence and testimony presented at sentencing under a preponderance of the evidence standard
C. holding presumptive sentencing standards applied retroactively where defendant objected at sentencing hearing on the basis that the presumptive sentencing standards applied to his case
D. recognizing the limited appellate review of sentences imposed under the initial voluntary sentencing standards
E. holding that at resentencing the state must present evidence on an enhanced sentencing factor despite having done so at the prior sentencing hearing
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.