Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
attorney fees given absence of prejudice to opposing party resulting from extension of time limit). Nor did the court abuse its discretion by failing to specify its reasons for extending the time for filing the motion. Cf. Nat’l Broker Assocs., Inc. v. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc., 211 Ariz. 210, ¶ 38, 119 P.3d 477, 485 (App.2005) (trial court does not abuse discretion “by summarily overruling objections to an untimely statement of costs”). ¶ 14 Bingham further argues the trial court committed reversible error in awarding-attorney fees in the quiet title action pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1103 because Cain did not tender five dollars along with a request for the execution of a quit claim deed as required by § 12-1103(B). See Lange v. Lotzer, 151 Ariz. 260, 262, 727 P.2d 38, 40 (App.1986) . We review a fee award under this statute for
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that prevailing party to contract dispute may recover attorneys fees either pursuant to contract or pursuant to statute
B. recognizing that the party seeking attorney fees bears the burden of proving entitlement to those fees
C. holding that the absence of a formal injunction does not preclude the plaintiff from recovering costs and attorney fees under mcl 152714
D. holding payment of five dollars to other party prerequisite for recovering attorney fees pursuant to  121103b
E. holding that a violation of  221973 may subject the insurer to penalties in an amount not to exceed two times the damages sustained or five thousand dollars whichever is greater attorney fees though are not recoverable
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.