Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
claims. The irrelevance of the exception, howevér, is obvious in light of Mr. Chavez’s failure to cite any extraordinary circumstances. Instead, he circles back to his “ripeness” argument and states that “[ujnless the Government can read [his] mind, it has absolutely no idea what the basis — factual or legal — may be for appealing on the grounds of ineffective assistance and so the Government has absolutely no factual basis in which to root an argument that there are no ‘extraordinary circumstances’ lending themselves to a direct appeal.” Resp. at 12. But it is Mr. Chavez’s burden, not the government’s, to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances to justify a.direct appeal of ineffective assistance of counsel claims. See United States v. Porter, 405 F.3d 1136, 1144 (10th Cir.2005) . Last, Mr. Chavez maintains that enforcement
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a defendant must generally raise claims of ineffective counsel in a collateral proceeding not on direct review
B. holding that a petitioner should wait to raise claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel until collateral review
C. recognizing that it is the defendants burden to demonstrate a reason to depart from the general practice that a defendant must generally raise claims of ineffective assistance counsel on collateral review
D. holding that defendant may raise claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal only if ineffective assistance is conclusive from the record
E. holding that as a general rule a petitioner should wait to raise claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel until collateral review
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.