Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
If, on the other hand, you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any of these propositions has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the defendant not guilty. A statement is false if untrue when made and then known to be untrue by the person making it or causing it to be made. Govt. Sug. Jury Instr. No. 27-28 (emphasis supplied). The district court denied both of Roster’s good faith defense instructions, concluding that the “knowledge” element of the mail fraud and false statement charges encompassed any good faith defense. We agree with the district court’s conclusion. An action taken in good faith is the other side of an action taken knowingly. United States v. Schwartz, 787 F.2d 257, 265 (7th Cir.1986); cf. Brimberry, 961 F.2d at 1291 . On the mail fraud charges, the district
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a jury is presumed to follow the trial courts instructions
B. holding that requiring the jury to unanimously find liability for exemplary damages necessarily includes a finding on the underlying theory of liability
C. holding that the law presumes that the jury will follow the courts instructions
D. holding that the district courts instructions requiring the jury to find that the defendant acted willfully to convict on income tax evasion necessarily encompassed the defendants theory on good faith reliance
E. holding the trial courts subsequently corrected instruction that the jury must find the defendant personally committed the offenses in order to convict the defendant on those charges did not prejudice the defendant
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.