Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
a more favorable sentence under the advisory sentencing guidelines regime mandated by Booker."), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 266, 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005); United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1074 (9th Cir.2005)(en banc) (”[R]emand to the district court is appropriate for the purpose of ascertaining whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the sentencing guidelines were advisory.”); United States v. Gonzalez-Huerta, 403 F.3d 727, 738 (10th Cir.2005)(en banc) ("[T]he District Court’s mandatory application of the Guidelines was not 'particularly egregious’ or a 'miscarriage of justice.’ ”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 495, 163 L.Ed.2d 375 (2005); United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1306 (11th Cir.2005) , reh’g denied, 406 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir.2005),
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that an appellant bears the burden of demonstrating error on appeal
B. holding that the defendant bears the burden under plainerror review
C. recognizing that the defendant bears the burden of establishing that plain error was prejudicial
D. holding that the defendant necessarily bears the burden of satisfying the third prong of the plain error test
E. holding the burden is on the defendant to demonstrate the error satisfies each prong of the plain error test
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.