Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
doctrine as codified at 17 U.S.C. § 107. (Def.’s’ Br. at 2). In support of their fair-use defense argument, the defendants have submitted video of the original WWITB video and the South Park episode “Canada on Strike.” (Docket # 10). Ordinarily, courts may not rely upon materials outside of the pleadings when considering a motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) without converting the motion to one for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(d). There is an exception to this general rule, however, where the material in question is expressly referenced in the complaint and is central to the plaintiffs claim. See Tierney v. Vahle, 304 F.3d 734, 738 (7th Cir.2002); see generally Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308, 322, 127 S.Ct. 2499, 168 L.Ed.2d 179 (2007) . Here, there is no doubt that the two videos
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that in considering a rule 12b6 motion a court may only rely on the complaint its proper attachments documents incorporated into the complaint by reference and matters of which a court may take judicial notice
B. holding that a court may consider documents that have not been incorporated by reference where the complaint relies heavily upon its terms and effect which renders the document integral to the complaint
C. holding that a court may rely on documents incorporated into the complaint by reference and matters of which a court may take judicial notice in deciding whether a complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted
D. recognizing that a court may rely on matters of which a court may take judicial notice
E. holding that a court in deciding a rule 12b6 motion may consider a document that is incorporated by reference into the complaint
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.