Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
its character. Woertman v. People, 804 P.2d 188, 190 (Colo.1991). Such evidence "forms an integral and natural part of an account of the crime, or is necessary to complete the story of the crime for the jury." People v. Quintana, 882 P.2d 1366, 1373 (Colo.1994) (quoting United States v. Williford, 764 F.2d 1493, 1499 (11th Cir.1985)); see People v. Lobato, 187 Colo. 285, 289-90, 530 P.2d 493, 496 (1975) ("[Where ... the events leading up to a crime are a part of the scenario which explain the setting in which it occurred, no error is committed by permitting the jury to view the criminal episode in the context in which it happened."). For example, res gestae evidence can be used to explain the cireumstances surrounding an arrest. People v. Walters, 821 P.2d 887, 890 (Colo.App.1991) . Evidence considered to be part of the res
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a person is seized when a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave
B. holding that sheriffs testimonythat when he arrived on the scene he believed that a crime was occurringwas admissible
C. holding that a military police officer was entitled to qualified immunity from an excessive force suit when he objectively reasonably believed that he used reasonable force
D. holding that a defendant charged with voluntary manslaughter would be entitled to an acquittal on the ground of selfdefense if he reasonably believed that he was in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm from which he could save himself only by using deadly force
E. holding that the defendant was placed in official detention when two police officers approached him and told him that he was under arrest as the defendant could not reasonably have believed that he was free to leave
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.