Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
impose on Louisiana abortion providers. In the context of a challenge to the provisions of a regulatory scheme, such as that at issue here, hardship will often result first and foremost from the “adverse effects of a strictly legal kind” inherent in the provisions at issue. Ohio Forestry, 523 U.S. at 733, 118 S.Ct. 1665. The Supreme Court has explained that such legal harms inhere in laws or regulations that, for example, “command [some]one to do ... or to refrain from doing [something; ... grant, withhold, or modify any formal legal license, power, or authority; ... subject [some]one to ... civil or criminal liability; [or] create ... legal rights or obligations.” Id.; accord Nat’l Park Hospitality Ass’n v. Dep’t of Interior, 538 U.S. 803, 809, 123 S.Ct. 2026, 155 L.Ed.2d 1017 (2003) ; see also Texas, 497 F.3d at 499 (recognizing
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding inter alia that a creditor may take a security interest in a licensees liquor license
B. recognizing that adverse effects of a strictly legal kind may amount to a showing of hardship where a regulation inter alia modifies a plaintiffs formal legal license or subjects a plaintiff to  civil  liability quoting ohio forestry 523 us at 733 118 sct 1665
C. holding that the statement failure to pay will leave our client with no choice but to consider legal action did not violate  1692e5 by threatening legal action because at most the language  threatened that the creditor will have to consider legal action and therefore no action of any kind is threatened by defendant collection agency
D. holding inter alia that common law claims were preempted
E. holding that to establish tort liability in a negligence action there must be a legal duty on the part of the defendant to plaintiff
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.