Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of the trial court and will be sustained’ on review absent' an abuse of discretion. Id. The State is correct that Johnson’s cooperation with the police is an insufficient statutory ground to justify the downward departure sentence. The statutory mitigating factor of cooperation is found in section 921.0026(i), Florida Statutes (2011). Cooperation requires more than a confession to .the authorities after arrest and guilty, plea. See State v. Knox, 990 So.2d 665, 668 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). “A departure sentence is not warranted where a defendant merely “cooperated after [the] offense was discovered because that cooperation did not solve a crime.”” Id. Johnson’s cooperation did not resolve the current offenses or any other offense. See State v. White, 894 So.2d 293, 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 2Q05). See also State v. Collins, 482 So.2d 388
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that agents promise to inform prosecutor of defendants cooperation does not render a subsequent confession involuntary
B. holding that an officers promise to bring defendants cooperation to the attention of the prosecutor did not make confession involuntary
C. holding that confession was voluntary although agents had promised to inform prosecutor of defendants cooperation
D. holding that federal agents indication to defendant that his cooperation would be reported to the united states attorney did not make defendants confession involuntary
E. holding that cooperation was insufficient where the defendants cooperation was based on his confession to the charged crimes
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.