Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
notified of infringement rests on the alleged infringer. To the extent that Newbridge contends that it was not put on notice of infringement, the Court likewise rejects Newbridge’s contention, as the record demonstrates otherwise. (See e.g. Tr. 1218-1219, 1487-1489, 3220-3222, 3266, PX 839). In addition to the foregoing failure to investigate and/or obtain valid opinions of counsel, the Court notes the existence of other aggravating factors against New-bridge including the prolonged nature of Newbridge’ infringement (Tr. 1487, 1816, 2967), its failure to discontinue its infringement once notified of Lucent’s law suit, and its failure to take remedial action to remedy its alleged infringement. See e.g. Del Mar Avionics, Inc. v. Quinton Instrument Co., 836 F.2d 1320, 1328 (Fed.Cir.1987) . Based on the jury’s findings of willful
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider the appeal because it was filed before the final order awarding attorneys fees
B. holding that a public administrator was not entitled to attorneys fees in a claim against the estate of a former guardian where the case was not one where attorneys fees were authorized and there was no evidence to support the award
C. holding that appellate court should reverse and remand issue of attorneys fees where damages are reduced on appeal in a manner that could affect the determination of reasonable and necessary attorneys fees
D. holding that enhanced damages and attorneys fees are appropriate where the district court found that the infringer did not procure a patent search and continued to manufacture and sell infringing products after the law suit was filed against it
E. holding that attorneys fees and costs spent by an insurance company to defend against civil suit filed by defendant are not recoverable under the vwpa
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.