Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796, 815, 104 S.Ct. 3380, 82 L.Ed.2d 599 (1984) (quoting United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463, 471, 100 S.Ct. 1244, 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980)). In this case, the officers discovered 110 pounds of marijuana during a search pursuant to a warrant, the validity of which is not contested. The record is clear that the officers decided to procure this search warrant before the initial entry into the house. Moreover, the record reflects that the probable cause relied upon to obtain the warrant was based on information gathered by the officers before the initial entry into the house. Therefore, the officers’ initial entry into the house did not contribute in any way to the discovery of the marijuana appellant was charged with possessing. Cf. Guo, 64 S.W.3d at 668 ; State v. Aguirre, 5 S.W.3d 911, 914-15
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that where information obtained from illegal warrantless search of a briefcase was used to establish probable cause for the warrant to search briefcase evidence obtained pursuant to the warrant was properly suppressed
B. holding that the evidence obtained as part of an illegal stop should have been suppressed even where the defendants consented to the search
C. holding warrant valid where search warrant application affidavit was signed and probable cause existed for issuance of warrant
D. holding that evidence obtained from a search made subsequent to an illegal stop was admissible when before the search the police officer discovered that there was an outstanding arrest warrant for the defendant and the defendant was thereupon arrested pursuant to that warrant
E. holding that because evidence supporting search warrant was illegally obtained evidence recovered by executing warrant was fruit of the illegal search
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.