Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
26 (1995)) (“We have construed the provisions of the RA and the ADA in light of their close similarity of language and purpose.”); see also MX Group, 293 F.3d at 333-335 (finding standing under both the ADA and RA); Innovative Health, 117 F.3d at 47 (same). 5 . See 28 C.F.R. § 41.31(b)(1)(i) (including drug addiction as a “physical or mental impairment” that may qualify an individual as a “handicapped person” under the RA), cited in Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U.S. 624, 632, 118 S.Ct. 2196, 141 L.Ed.2d 540 (1998). 6 . We have previously noted that a corporation has standing to bring constitutional claims on its own behalf. Safeguard Mut. Ins. Co. v. Miller, 472 F.2d 732, 733 (3d Cir.1973); see also First Nat’l Bank v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765, 780 n. 15, 98 S.Ct. 1407, 55 L.Ed.2d 707 (1978) ; Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding school boards are persons within the meaning of the fifth amendment due process clause
B. holding that the flsa is not within the purview of section 5 of the fourteenth amendment
C. holding that bankruptcy jurisdiction is not within section 5 of the fourteenth amendment
D. recognizing that corporations are persons within the meaning of the fourteenth amendment
E. holding municipalities  are not persons within the meaning of the due process clause of the fifth or fourteenth amendments
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.