Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
Criminal Appeals. The Air Force Rules of Practice and Procedure provide further guidance on the granted issue: When a case is remanded directly to the Court by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (hereinafter CAAP), it shall, when practical, be referred to the same numbered panel that last decided the case. A.P.C.C.A. R. 2.2(b). Nothing in the UCMJ, or rules of procedure provide Appellant the right to select a panel, or have his case considered by any particular panel. Article 66, UCMJ; A.F.C.C.A. R. 2.2(b); United States v. Vines, 15 M.J. 247, 249 (C.M.A. 1983). By law, the court may review eases en banc or in panels, and the chief judge of the court has broad authority to assign, remove and reassign judges to cases on the court’s docket. See Vines, 15 M.J. at 249 . In Vines, the accused’s case was sent to the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that the panel is bound by decisions of prior panels
B. holding that statements made only to supervisor and chief by police officer were matters of public concern
C. holding that a prior panel decision is binding on subsequent panels
D. holding that there are no restrictionsstatutory or regulatoryon the authority of the chief judge as administrative chief of the court to assign cases to panels as he wishes in addition the power to change panel assignment once made is likewise unrestricted
E. holding the chief of police was an atwill employee because the parties agreed that the chief of police was an appointed officer and the citys charter stated that officers shall be appointed and may be removed by the mayor with consent of the council
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.