Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
are reasonable. See Nat’l Ass’n of Concerned Veterans, 675 F.2d at 1327. The plaintiff’s invoice “ ‘need not present the exact number of minutes spent[,] nor the precise activity to which each hour was devoted[,] nor the specific attainments of each attorney.’” Holbrook, ion of the DCPS fee schedule to determine prevailing attorney rates for IDEA cases. See Jackson, 696 F.Supp.2d at 103 (declining to apply the DCPS fee schedule because the defendant provided no evidence to show how it represented prevailing market rates and because precedent supported application of the Laffey Matrix). The defendants here have not offered any evidence to indicate the methodology by which the DCPS fee schedule was calculated, nor why it should be applied in this case. See Cox, 754 F.Supp.2d at 76 . The court therefore declines to apply the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that commentary to the guidelines is treated as an agencys interpretation of its own legislative rule
B. holding that defense counsel need only consult and be governed by his clients wishes when the question arises as to whether or not a plea of guilty should be entered trial by jury waived or whether the defendant should take the witness stand in his own defense
C. holding that the laffey matrix should apply because the defendant offered no reasoned defense for its own guidelines
D. holding that a district judge does not enjoy the benefit of a legal presumption that the guidelines sentence should apply
E. holding that blakely does not apply to the federal sentencing guidelines
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.