Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
following assessment: As a practical matter of business, any time a shipper moves products to a terminal his ultimate intent is that they be distributed among various consumers at various consuming points. If this is the only intention, the interstate journey ordinarily ends at the terminal. However, if, at the time he moves products to a terminal his present intention is that they merely be put through the terminal on their way to specific consumers at specific consuming points the interstate journey does not end until the products reach those consumers at those points. Majure, 162 F.Supp. at 601 (finding unitary interstate transportation in a single-shipper, back-end paradigm involving through movement to specific consuming points to be interstate); see also Beggs, 167 F.2d at 704 ; Shew, 370 F.2d at 380-81 (finding interstate
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that interstate shipments to a warehousedistribution point through to samestate retail outlets retained their interstate character where the warehouse was merely a convenient instrumentality for the division of the shipments coming to it and the continuation of the movement of each part to the retail stores
B. holding that warehouse distributions to companyowned stores constituted interstate commerce since inter alia the company knew at the time oufiofstate shipments to the warehouse commenced that the shipments were bound for its retail stores
C. holding inter alia that common law claims were preempted
D. holding shipments from a distribution point supplied by outofstate shipments made pursuant to preexisting orders were interstate in character
E. holding that the halt of shipments of unprocessed milk without processing or commingling did not remove the interstate character of the shipments
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.