Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
denied, 529 Pa. 625, 600 A.2d 541 (1991). Here, Licensee first argues that the trial court erred in determining that he had, in fact, refused the blood test, maintaining that, although he refused to sign the hospital consent form, he agreed to submit to the actual blood test. Although acknowledging that our holding in Smith would defeat this argument, Licensee urges that we reconsider that opinion, contending that, in Smith, this court exceeded its authority and usurped legislative authority by superimposing upon section 1547 the requirement that a licensee execute a hospital consent form. In Smith, we relied on the underlying principles expressed in Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing v. Miller, 155 Pa.Cmwlth. 564, 625 A.2d 755 (Pa.Cmwlth.1993) , Lewis v. Commonwealth, 114 Pa.Cmwlth. 326,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that a request to the licensee to sign a consent form is not an impermissible precondition to testing
B. holding that a refusal to sign an implied consent form is not a refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test for purposes of section 1547
C. holding that because consent is not a statement and a request for consent is not an interrogation giving consent to search is a neutral fact which has no tendency to show that the suspect is guilty of any crime
D. holding consent not voluntary where police threatened to arrest defendants girlfriend if he refused to sign consent form
E. holding consent invalid where defendant threatened by officer that everyone in the house would go to jail if he did not sign consent form
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.