Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
CURIAM. Tyrone D. Lester appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Lester was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to life in prison with a mandatory minimum fifteen-year term as a habitual violent felony offender. He now raises five claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. For the reasons expressed below, we reverse as to three of his allegations; we affirm a .1999) . The trial court apparently recognized that
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that defendants may agree to departure from sentencing guidelines in plea bargain
B. holding that in light of the trial courts inquiry the defendants verbal responses and the defendants answers to the questions on the transcript of plea the trial court did determine that defendant was fully informed of the consequences of his choice to enter an alford plea
C. recognizing that both parties to a plea bargain make various concessions and gain certain advantages during plea negotiations and underscoring that a criminal defendant having availed himself of the advantages of a plea agreement cannot welch on his part of the bargain internal quotation marks and citation omitted
D. holding defendant did not show required prejudice from counsels alleged failure to advise him about eligibility for parole under the sentence agreed to in the plea bargain
E. holding the inherent prejudice in such cases results from the defendants inability due to counsels neglect to make an informed decision whether to plea bargain
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.