Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of Columbia v. Whitley, 640 A.2d 710, 712 (D.C. 1994) (quoting Mason v. United States, 346 A.2d 250, 251 (D.C. 1975)). 3 .The complaining witness had been served with a subpoena, but the government neither sought enforcement of the subpoena nor notified the court that the witness was under subpoena. The trial judge indicated that had he been informed of these facts, he "probably would have not dismissed the case” but only reassessed Lyles’ bond arrangements. 4 . District of Columbia Circuit precedent prior to February 1, 1971, is binding on this court. M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310, 312 (D.C.1971). 5 . The opinion does not specify whether the oral dismissal was with or without prejudice or dis 1, 466 P.2d 755, 757 (1970)); Gowler v. Oklahoma, 589 P.2d 682, 688 (Okla.Crim. App.1978) . 8 . In Smith v. Massachusetts, 543 U.S. 462,
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that because the plaintiff had not perfected service within 120 days of filing the complaint the complaint was subject to mandatory dismissal
B. holding that a trial judge has unquestionable authority to withdraw an order of dismissal that has not been fully perfected by filing
C. holding that a trial court does not lose jurisdiction in a matter by ordering its dismissal before jeopardy has attached unless there is an abuse of discretion in vacating the order of dismissal and reinstating the case for trial
D. holding the basic purpose of a financing statement is to provide notice to outside creditors that a secured claim has been perfected
E. holding that a federal court must order arbitration once it is satisfied that an agreement for arbitration has been made and has not been honored
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.