Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
(1948) (Police officers conducted an illegal, warrantless search of the room McDonald was renting in a boarding house and seized allegedly illegal items that belonged to him. He and his guest were arrested as a result of the search, were jointly tried, and were parties to the appeal. After concluding that the trial court erred in failing to suppress the evidence seized as a result of the illegal search, the Supreme Court of the United States held that such failure was prejudicial to both McDonald and his guest, noting that if the evidence had been properly suppressed, it would have been unavailable for the State to use against either defendant at trial. Thus, the Court reversed both defendants’ convictions.). 15 See generally McBee v. State, 296 Ga. App. 42,44 (1) (673 SE2d 569) (2009) . 16 The record shows that, after Jalim’s truck
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that officer may order driver out of vehicle once lawfully detained for traffic violation
B. holding that even if an officer has an ulterior motive that does not authorize him to conduct a traffic stop of a particular vehicle he may still lawfully execute the stop if he observes the driver violate a traffic law
C. holding that a traffic stop is valid under the fourth amendment if the stop is based on an observed traffic violation or if the police officer has reasonable articulable suspicion that a traffic or equipment violation has occurred or is occurring
D. holding that if an officer observes a driver commit a traffic violation he has probable causeand thus also the lesser included reasonable suspicionto stop that driver
E. holding that an officer may order a passenger out of a vehicle during a stop for a traffic infraction
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.