Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
of G.S. 75-1.1, damages may be recovered either for the breach of contract, or for violation of G.S. 75-1.1 .. . .” Marshall v. Miller, 47 N.C. App. 530, 542, 268 S.E.2d 97, 103 (1980), modified and aff'd, 302 N.C. 539, 276 S.E.2d 397 (1981). Colonial argues that there should be a division of the breach of contract action and the § 75-1.1 claim. However, as evidenced by the jury verdict, the breach of contract accompanied by aggravating factors is what gave rise to the § 75-1.1 claim. Moreover, the court will not allow a defendant to divide the breach of contract action and the conduct which aggravated the breach when in substance there is but one continuous transaction amounting to unfair and deceptive trade practices. See Garlock v. Henson, 112 N.C. App. 243, 435 S.E.2d 114 (1993) . C Pre-judgment interest may be awarded on
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that trial court erred by dismissing breach of contract claim because appellee made promises to perform specific acts in contract the breach of which would give rise to a breach of contract action
B. holding that a cause of action for breach of contract accrues at the time of the breach
C. holding immaterial breach did not constitute breach of contract
D. holding that where there was a breach of contract accompanied by aggravating factors that it was proper to treble the breach of contract damages
E. recognizing that the elements of a claim for breach of contract are 1 existence of a valid contract and 2 breach of the terms of that contract
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.