Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
an objectively reasonable belief that the warrant was valid, they were lawfully present in Legg's apartment during execution of the warrant." Id. at 244. The Legg court further noted: "We recognize that an officer's reasonable good faith belief in the validity of a warrant does not cause his presence in an individual's home to be any less viola-tive of the Fourth Amendment.... Nonetheless, we conclude that the rationale of Leon should apply to render an officer lawfully present for purposes of applying the plain view doctrine as long as the officer possesses a reasonable good faith belief in the validity of the warrant and the warrant was issued by a detached and neutral magistrate." Id. at n. 2 (citations omitted). See also United States v. Morris, 904 F.2d 518 (9th Cir.1990) . 2. Inadvertence Frasier claims that the
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding that plain view requirement that there be a prior justification for the officers presence was met by search warrant and that even assuming that warrant was invalid good faith exception was applicable to permit admission of the evidence
B. holding that an arrest warrant  without a search warrant  does not permit law enforcement authorities to enter a third partys home to legally search for the subject of the arrest warrant
C. holding warrant valid where search warrant application affidavit was signed and probable cause existed for issuance of warrant
D. holding that the observation of evidence in plain view is not a search for purposes of the fourth amendment and does not require a warrant
E. holding that a warrant lacking a description of items to be seized was not facially invalid and finding in the alternative that even if the warrant were found to be deficient the seized evidence was admissible under the good faith exception
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.