Read the following excerpt from a US court opinion:
```
in part by the court’s observation that the Legislature had delegated “considerable deference and broad discretion” to the Tennessee DOC, from which it concluded that “[t]his broad grant of discretion also envisions that those persons intimately involved with the intricacies of the prison system and not the voting public are best equipped to establish policies and procedures for inmate discipline.” Mandela, supra, 978 S.W.2d at 534. With due respect to the Tennessee court, that is not the issue. Clearly, control over prison management is vested in DOC, subject to the Secretary’s overall supervision, and not the “voting public” or, indeed, the Judiciary. See State v. McCray, 267 Md. 111, 134, 297 A.2d 265, 277 (1972); see also Lumumba v. Morton, 280 N.J.Super. 400, 655 A.2d 487 (1995) . The question is simply whether inmate
```
What is the most suitable continuation to the opinion? Your options are:
A. holding prison official must have acted with reckless disregard for the inmates safety
B. holding that district court erred in dismissing inmates complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies when court did not address inmates allegation that prison officials failed to provide necessary grievance forms
C. holding that prison walls do not form a barrier separating prison inmates from the protections of the constitution
D. holding that prison rule prohibiting inmates from wearing shirts that could show military rank or group membership was not subject to formal apa rulemaking requirements
E. holding that prison officials failure to accommodate inmates meal requirements during ramadan violated his free exercise rights
Reply with [A, B, C, D, E] only.