Using fastx_trimmer (part of the FASTXToolkit v. 0.0.13 (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/)), 10 bases from the 5’ end were trimmed to yield higher quality reads of 91 bp. Adaptor sequences were removed with Trimmomatic v. 0.33 (Bolger et al. 2014).
Sample text:```Illustra PuReTaq ReadyTo-Go PCR beads (0.5 ml tubes, GE healthcare) were used to amplify DTL, SLFN5, TRIM47, WRAP53 and CHN1 transcripts (denaturing at 94uC for 30 s, annealing at 58uC for 1 min and elongation at 72uC for 2 min, 25‚Äì35 cycles).```
Sample intent: background
Sample text:```The methods working directly on the count data can be broadly divided into parametric (baySeq [14], EBSeq [24], ShrinkSeq [27], edgeR [23], DESeq [7], NBPSeq [15] and TSPM [13]) and non-parametric methods (NOISeq [25] and SAMseq [26]).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Methods for extraction, amplification and sequencing of the nuclear 5.8S rRNA gene and the two flanking, ITS regions were as previously published (Ganley et al., 2004; Shipunov et al., 2008).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```A number of studies have been published recently, which analyze the location, orientation, and identity ofmacromolecular complexes, based on the outcome of template-matching (Brandt et al., 2009; Ortiz et al., 2010).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Our results confi rm previous studies that reached the same conclusion (Boushey et al 1994; Vermeulen et al 2000; Till et al 2005; Marcucci et al 2005).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```The lower abundance of fish at impacted reaches detected in our study agrees with the results of other authors, who in some cases found four times higher biomass at control reaches (Kube cka et al. 1997; Almod ovar & Nicola 1999).```
Sample intent: result
Sample text:```Our results confi rm previous studies that reached the same conclusion (Boushey et al 1994; Vermeulen et al 2000; Till et al 2005; Marcucci et al 2005).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```This is interesting in relation to the result from our previous CGH study (comparing the number of significantly hybridizing probes on the microarray) that showed high sequence divergence on the Z chromosome between the common whitethroat and the zebra finch [62]; and such patterns are also found in other species [48,51,69].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Methods for extraction, amplification and sequencing of the nuclear 5.8S rRNA gene and the two flanking, ITS regions were as previously published (Ganley et al., 2004; Shipunov et al., 2008).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Amplicon preparation, sequencing and data analysis were conducted for all 44 samples as described previously (Hospodsky et al., 2012).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```3, top) was constructed from the previously described 0.85-kb promoter construct (construct 6, Drews et al. 2005) by digestion with AscI and MluI followed by religation.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```A number of studies have been published recently, which analyze the location, orientation, and identity ofmacromolecular complexes, based on the outcome of template-matching (Brandt et al., 2009; Ortiz et al., 2010).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Illustra PuReTaq ReadyTo-Go PCR beads (0.5 ml tubes, GE healthcare) were used to amplify DTL, SLFN5, TRIM47, WRAP53 and CHN1 transcripts (denaturing at 94uC for 30 s, annealing at 58uC for 1 min and elongation at 72uC for 2 min, 25‚Äì35 cycles).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Because most off-target nicks are not adjacent to each other and do not form DSBs, these nicks are repaired precisely and rarely lead to indels (Ran et al. 2013a; Shen et al. 2014).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The methods working directly on the count data can be broadly divided into parametric (baySeq [14], EBSeq [24], ShrinkSeq [27], edgeR [23], DESeq [7], NBPSeq [15] and TSPM [13]) and non-parametric methods (NOISeq [25] and SAMseq [26]).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Because previous studies indicated that hexapeptides bind the junction core (29, 32), we tested two junctions, one with an AT-rich core and the other with a GC-rich core (Fig.```
Sample intent: result