As a result, individuals are likely to form impressions that an organization’s policies are unfair if they believe that those polices systematically disadvantages their in-group (cf. Lowery et al., 2006).
Sample text:```In this sense, accidentally encountered information is also always algorithmically framed and often personalised by for example previous searches and geographical location (e.g. Abel et al., 2011; Feuz et al., 2011; Hannak et al., 2013).```
Sample intent: background
Sample text:```Discrepancies analogous to those between our results and those of simulations have, indeed, recently been observed in the case of the binary perceptron [18], the pspin interaction spin glass [19], and in the case of fluctuating manifolds in random media [20], where dynamically frozen phases were observed in regions of parameter space in which static approaches yielded ergodic phases.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Participants were undergraduates who had been followed during their college career as part of a longitudinal cohort study (see Bonanno et al., 2004; Papa & Bonanno, 2008).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```[19] showed that the system quality and information quality perceived by virtual community users significantly impacts their perceived benefits of participation in virtual communities.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The methodology is primarily influenced by the Grounded Theory approach, which has been used successfully in previous studies (Jones, 2004; Orlikowski & Iacono, 2001).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```have been proposed as potential alternatives to the Turing Test, specifically targeting its potential weaknesses and inadequacy [1].```
Sample intent: background
Sample text:```These policies are known to present comprehension problems to users [15, 19] and often are used to inform the interaction design for such systems, e.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```have been proposed as potential alternatives to the Turing Test, specifically targeting its potential weaknesses and inadequacy [1].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Our results confi rm previous studies that reached the same conclusion (Boushey et al 1994; Vermeulen et al 2000; Till et al 2005; Marcucci et al 2005).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```However, discretionary policy can result in expectations traps and
1
multiple equilibria, see Albanesi et al. (2003), King and Wolman (2004) and Blake and Kirsanova (2012), and a simple New Keynesian model is not appropriate to investigate many consequences of policy delegation.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```This seems to be the main drawback of the current implementation in comparison to the method of Black Jepson (“refined” in Table 1).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```[19] showed that the system quality and information quality perceived by virtual community users significantly impacts their perceived benefits of participation in virtual communities.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The items are internally consistent and reproducible and the questionnaire may therefore be considered to have at least as favourable levels of reliability as clinical scores used to assess outcomes (Koran 1975).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```However, many authors [62,65,68,69,78,79,83,84] suggest that women-specific services ‘‘must do more than segregate clients and employ only female staff’’ [65].```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The methodology is primarily influenced by the Grounded Theory approach, which has been used successfully in previous studies (Jones, 2004; Orlikowski & Iacono, 2001).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```We assessed participants’ dehumanization of Arabs by using
the Ascent scale of blatant dehumanization (Kteily et al., 2015).```
Sample intent: method