The Chinese version of AFI was translated by Chiu [27] and has been used in 116 Taiwanese outpatients with memory disorders with satisfactory internal consistency reliability and construct validity [28].
Sample text:```The validated Malay version of GAD-7 which was found to have good sensitivity and specificity was used in this study [27].```
Sample intent: background
Sample text:```The validated Malay version of GAD-7 which was found to have good sensitivity and specificity was used in this study [27].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```[20] found that the enhancement that this procedure would provide in terms of explaining trauma symptoms is limited, and they concluded that the relative gains are not worth the methodological complexity.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The tests were as follows: the C-MMSE [13], the LMT [18], the RCFT [19], the Boston Naming Test (the 30-item version) [20,21], the Animal Verbal Fluency Test [22], the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [23], the Trail Making Test‚Äì```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Indeed, strong correlations between inhibitions at different ISIs have been reported previously (Roshan et al. 2003) which would be consistent with this idea.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The items are internally consistent and reproducible and the questionnaire may therefore be considered to have at least as favourable levels of reliability as clinical scores used to assess outcomes (Koran 1975).```
Sample intent: result
Sample text:```The validated Malay version of GAD-7 which was found to have good sensitivity and specificity was used in this study [27].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```The studies on VA are conducted for several languages and actual datasets are acquired for different languages including English [12, 13], German [14], French [15], Spanish [16] and Chinese [17–19].```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Importantly, brain atrophy measures based on T1w images are shown to correlate with the amount of tau deposition and neuropsychological deficits, thus validating its use as a biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Frisoni et al., 2010).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Indeed, strong correlations between inhibitions at different ISIs have been reported previously (Roshan et al. 2003) which would be consistent with this idea.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```While this method is known to be generally reliable, there are some questions about the representativeness of the data used [25].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Note that in their pioneering paper Calvet and Fisher (2002) proposed the simplified version of the construction of Mannersalo et al (2002).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The items are internally consistent and reproducible and the questionnaire may therefore be considered to have at least as favourable levels of reliability as clinical scores used to assess outcomes (Koran 1975).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```The results for veridical recall replicated previous results in the literature (Bal-
lardini et al., 2008; McDermott & Watson, 2001), with the average recall of studied words increas-
ing monotonically as SOA increased.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```The tests were as follows: the C-MMSE [13], the LMT [18], the RCFT [19], the Boston Naming Test (the 30-item version) [20,21], the Animal Verbal Fluency Test [22], the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [23], the Trail Making Test‚Äì```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Our results confi rm previous studies that reached the same conclusion (Boushey et al 1994; Vermeulen et al 2000; Till et al 2005; Marcucci et al 2005).```
Sample intent: result