The HapMap release 28 (merged data for phases I, II and III) [19,20] SNP data were downloaded from the HapMap website, converted to GenABEL format and trimmed to include only samples in the CEU and YRI populations for which there was matching RNA-seq data.
Sample text:```58% of ethnically matched control chromosomes.(8) Examination of the dbSNP shows that the frequency of the rs6746030 polymorphism in control samples is ethnicity dependent: American Caucasians of European descent, 12.```
Sample intent: method
Sample text:```Amplicon preparation, sequencing and data analysis were conducted for all 44 samples as described previously (Hospodsky et al., 2012).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Because previous studies indicated that hexapeptides bind the junction core (29, 32), we tested two junctions, one with an AT-rich core and the other with a GC-rich core (Fig.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Classification of Genetic Variants All genetic variants in our cohort and those reported in the manuscripts uncovered by the literature search were reassessed and classified according to the current guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics.13 For this evaluation, we used MAF data derived from the Exome Aggregation Consortium and the Exome Variant Server.```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Bork et al. (2010) reported that highly significant differences in methylation patterns were observed at specific CpG sites, such as those near homeobox genes between early and late cultures.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```3, top) was constructed from the previously described 0.85-kb promoter construct (construct 6, Drews et al. 2005) by digestion with AscI and MluI followed by religation.```
Sample intent: method
Sample text:``` The GRS was then calculated by summing across all SNPs (the GRS could theoretically range from 0 to 58).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Our heritability result is generally in agreement with the studies of Kien et al. (2008) in Eucalyptus urophylla and Zhao et al. (2014a) in poplar.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Classification of Genetic Variants All genetic variants in our cohort and those reported in the manuscripts uncovered by the literature search were reassessed and classified according to the current guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics.13 For this evaluation, we used MAF data derived from the Exome Aggregation Consortium and the Exome Variant Server.```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```This is interesting in relation to the result from our previous CGH study (comparing the number of significantly hybridizing probes on the microarray) that showed high sequence divergence on the Z chromosome between the common whitethroat and the zebra finch [62]; and such patterns are also found in other species [48,51,69].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```3, top) was constructed from the previously described 0.85-kb promoter construct (construct 6, Drews et al. 2005) by digestion with AscI and MluI followed by religation.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Amplicon preparation, sequencing and data analysis were conducted for all 44 samples as described previously (Hospodsky et al., 2012).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```This process is controlled not only by the protein-coding segments of the genome but also by non-coding regions, including loci that produce small RNAs (Grivna et al., 2006; He et al., 2009; Thomson and Lin, 2009).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Because previous studies indicated that hexapeptides bind the junction core (29, 32), we tested two junctions, one with an AT-rich core and the other with a GC-rich core (Fig.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Eight of the included studies examined the history of changes made to each registry record in order to compare published outcomes with the primary outcome as stated in the registry at either the time of study initiation or prior to completion of enrollment [7, 16, 20, 22, 24, 30, 31, 36].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```The methods working directly on the count data can be broadly divided into parametric (baySeq [14], EBSeq [24], ShrinkSeq [27], edgeR [23], DESeq [7], NBPSeq [15] and TSPM [13]) and non-parametric methods (NOISeq [25] and SAMseq [26]).```
Sample intent: background