Secondary structure match score between the predicted
 secondary structures from sequence by PSIPRED [29] and the actual secondary structures calculated from decoy by DSSP [30].
Sample text:```A number of studies have been published recently, which analyze the location, orientation, and identity ofmacromolecular complexes, based on the outcome of template-matching (Brandt et al., 2009; Ortiz et al., 2010).```
Sample intent: method
Sample text:```Indeed, strong correlations between inhibitions at different ISIs have been reported previously (Roshan et al. 2003) which would be consistent with this idea.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Because most off-target nicks are not adjacent to each other and do not form DSBs, these nicks are repaired precisely and rarely lead to indels (Ran et al. 2013a; Shen et al. 2014).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Because previous studies indicated that hexapeptides bind the junction core (29, 32), we tested two junctions, one with an AT-rich core and the other with a GC-rich core (Fig.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Unlabeled DNA substrates containing consensus 12-RSS, 23-RSS, Hox11 or non-specific DNA sequences (DAR81/82) were prepared from oligonucleotides described previously [11,24].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```In this study, we generalized previous results regarding the quasi-Gaussian shape and the scalar property using the SBF model [13,21,52].```
Sample intent: result
Sample text:```Discrepancies analogous to those between our results and those of simulations have, indeed, recently been observed in the case of the binary perceptron [18], the pspin interaction spin glass [19], and in the case of fluctuating manifolds in random media [20], where dynamically frozen phases were observed in regions of parameter space in which static approaches yielded ergodic phases.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Because previous studies indicated that hexapeptides bind the junction core (29, 32), we tested two junctions, one with an AT-rich core and the other with a GC-rich core (Fig.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```For monitoring purposes, the investigator also determined the polyp score (PS) based on the size of polyps at the first and last visits [14].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```…between output and input, CNF achieves almost 10% relative improvement over CRF. CNF also outperforms other methods including SVMpro (Hua and Sun, 2001), SVMpsi (Kim and Park, 2003), YASSPP (Karypis, 2006), PSIPRED (Jones, 1999), SPINE (Dor and Zhou, 2007) and TreeCRFpsi (Dietterich et al., 2004).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```In this study, we generalized previous results regarding the quasi-Gaussian shape and the scalar property using the SBF model [13,21,52].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Indeed, strong correlations between inhibitions at different ISIs have been reported previously (Roshan et al. 2003) which would be consistent with this idea.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Because most off-target nicks are not adjacent to each other and do not form DSBs, these nicks are repaired precisely and rarely lead to indels (Ran et al. 2013a; Shen et al. 2014).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```We screened for potential TF binding sites using STAMP [59], with the motifs’ position weight matrices (PWMs) retrieved from the TRANSFAC database [60].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```This is interesting in relation to the result from our previous CGH study (comparing the number of significantly hybridizing probes on the microarray) that showed high sequence divergence on the Z chromosome between the common whitethroat and the zebra finch [62]; and such patterns are also found in other species [48,51,69].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Unlabeled DNA substrates containing consensus 12-RSS, 23-RSS, Hox11 or non-specific DNA sequences (DAR81/82) were prepared from oligonucleotides described previously [11,24].```
Sample intent: background