To test the validity of the cognitive reflectivity–impulsiveness questionnaire, we examined the correlation of the cognitive reflectivity–impulsiveness questionnaire scores with the impulsiveness scores of novelty-seeking from the Temperament and Character Inventory [38, 39].
Sample text:```The items are internally consistent and reproducible and the questionnaire may therefore be considered to have at least as favourable levels of reliability as clinical scores used to assess outcomes (Koran 1975).```
Sample intent: result
Sample text:```Indeed, strong correlations between inhibitions at different ISIs have been reported previously (Roshan et al. 2003) which would be consistent with this idea.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Of interest to motor control researchers are several more recent studies that were designed to examine inhibitory effect in the context of actual aiming/reaching movements to targets (e.g., Briand et al.2000; Welsh and Elliott, 2004b).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The items are internally consistent and reproducible and the questionnaire may therefore be considered to have at least as favourable levels of reliability as clinical scores used to assess outcomes (Koran 1975).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```The tests were as follows: the C-MMSE [13], the LMT [18], the RCFT [19], the Boston Naming Test (the 30-item version) [20,21], the Animal Verbal Fluency Test [22], the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [23], the Trail Making Test‚Äì```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```The results for veridical recall replicated previous results in the literature (Bal-
lardini et al., 2008; McDermott & Watson, 2001), with the average recall of studied words increas-
ing monotonically as SOA increased.```
Sample intent: result
Sample text:```Our results on working memory performance are similar to those of earlier studies (e.g. Archbold et al., 2009; Cosentino et al., 2008; Naegele et al., 2006) in showing impaired working memory in the OSA group.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```The results for veridical recall replicated previous results in the literature (Bal-
lardini et al., 2008; McDermott & Watson, 2001), with the average recall of studied words increas-
ing monotonically as SOA increased.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```However, it was found that the behaviors on the insulator surface showed nonlinear properties during the flashover process [20].```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Pre- and post-test1 both included measurements of the S-reflex, M-wave, and H-reflex, followed by an MVC. S-reflex testing was performed at 0 , as in the study by Avela et al. (1999).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Following the experimental design proposed in Yannakakis and Hallam (2007c) and Yannakakis et al. (2008) for effectively capturing the level of entertainment, the test-bed game under investigation is played in variants.```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Third, since we compared the same groups of participants also with respect to basic visuomotor tasks (Huestegge et al. 2009a), we already know that the present cannabis group exhibits deficits in basic oculomotor control.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The response to a generated question will be supplied in the following conversations, which may be novel but not necessarily occur in the input as that in traditional QG (Du et al., 2017; Yuan et al., 2017; Tang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Mostafazadeh et al., 2016).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The items are internally consistent and reproducible and the questionnaire may therefore be considered to have at least as favourable levels of reliability as clinical scores used to assess outcomes (Koran 1975).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Indeed, strong correlations between inhibitions at different ISIs have been reported previously (Roshan et al. 2003) which would be consistent with this idea.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The tests were as follows: the C-MMSE [13], the LMT [18], the RCFT [19], the Boston Naming Test (the 30-item version) [20,21], the Animal Verbal Fluency Test [22], the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [23], the Trail Making Test‚Äì```
Sample intent: background