Tomato genomic DNA was prepared as described by Edwards et al. (1991). PCR with genomic DNA was performed using the primer pairs listed in Table S1.
Sample text:```3, top) was constructed from the previously described 0.85-kb promoter construct (construct 6, Drews et al. 2005) by digestion with AscI and MluI followed by religation.```
Sample intent: method
Sample text:```Because previous studies indicated that hexapeptides bind the junction core (29, 32), we tested two junctions, one with an AT-rich core and the other with a GC-rich core (Fig.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Unlabeled DNA substrates containing consensus 12-RSS, 23-RSS, Hox11 or non-specific DNA sequences (DAR81/82) were prepared from oligonucleotides described previously [11,24].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Quantitative geneticists have documented numerous cases of such interactions (Stuber et al. 1992; Ragot et al. 1995; Cockerham and Zeng 1996; Melchinger et al. 1998).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```3, top) was constructed from the previously described 0.85-kb promoter construct (construct 6, Drews et al. 2005) by digestion with AscI and MluI followed by religation.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Similar results were obtained for several other plant species in previous studies (peanut, common bean, chestnut, black gram) (Raina et al. 2001; Marotti et al. 2007; Goulao et al. 2001, Souframanien and Gopalakrishna 2004).```
Sample intent: result
Sample text:```Unlabeled DNA substrates containing consensus 12-RSS, 23-RSS, Hox11 or non-specific DNA sequences (DAR81/82) were prepared from oligonucleotides described previously [11,24].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Results from a RCT assessing in-person post-test genomic counseling on 199 OSU-CMPC participants were published previously [18].```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```This study supports the theory of a tumor origin from multipotential progenitor cells.(14) Reports of the Ki67 labeling index have demonstrated great variety.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```This is interesting in relation to the result from our previous CGH study (comparing the number of significantly hybridizing probes on the microarray) that showed high sequence divergence on the Z chromosome between the common whitethroat and the zebra finch [62]; and such patterns are also found in other species [48,51,69].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Because previous studies indicated that hexapeptides bind the junction core (29, 32), we tested two junctions, one with an AT-rich core and the other with a GC-rich core (Fig.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Similar results were obtained for several other plant species in previous studies (peanut, common bean, chestnut, black gram) (Raina et al. 2001; Marotti et al. 2007; Goulao et al. 2001, Souframanien and Gopalakrishna 2004).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Amplicon preparation, sequencing and data analysis were conducted for all 44 samples as described previously (Hospodsky et al., 2012).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```The PCR product was digested with AgeI/NotI and ligated between the G and the L gene (similar to Roberts et al., 1999) into the vectors pVSVCT-1 and pVSVCT-9 (Schnell et al., 1998), which had been digested with XmaI/NotI.```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Quantitative geneticists have documented numerous cases of such interactions (Stuber et al. 1992; Ragot et al. 1995; Cockerham and Zeng 1996; Melchinger et al. 1998).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Illustra PuReTaq ReadyTo-Go PCR beads (0.5 ml tubes, GE healthcare) were used to amplify DTL, SLFN5, TRIM47, WRAP53 and CHN1 transcripts (denaturing at 94uC for 30 s, annealing at 58uC for 1 min and elongation at 72uC for 2 min, 25‚Äì35 cycles).```
Sample intent: background