Ten quality criteria were used to evaluate the selection, administration, interpretation, and reporting of pain scales meaning each study review resulted in a
Pain Research and Management 5
score of between zero and ten.
Sample text:```The items are internally consistent and reproducible and the questionnaire may therefore be considered to have at least as favourable levels of reliability as clinical scores used to assess outcomes (Koran 1975).```
Sample intent: result
Sample text:```The literature describes substantial variation in dentists’ assessments of clinical, community, and behavioral factors that influence their decisions to provide a particular restorative treatment for their patients (21-23).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```5 concentrations were computed for each participant using a hierarchical spatiotemporal model fit with a pragmatic estimation procedure described elsewhere [30,31].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Nevertheless, one area of ethics for HTA that indeed is considerably underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA is quality assessment of ethics analyses in HTA [10], [11].```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Our results confi rm previous studies that reached the same conclusion (Boushey et al 1994; Vermeulen et al 2000; Till et al 2005; Marcucci et al 2005).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```For monitoring purposes, the investigator also determined the polyp score (PS) based on the size of polyps at the first and last visits [14].```
Sample intent: background
Sample text:```Here we use the value of ten (because our previous study showed this is the number of items that can be managed efficiently in the browser‚Äôs sidebar [Moreau et al., 2002]).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Only one published paper (Enock et al. 2014) has examined this question, and thatwas in the context of anABM training study.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Nevertheless, one area of ethics for HTA that indeed is considerably underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA is quality assessment of ethics analyses in HTA [10], [11].```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Our results confi rm previous studies that reached the same conclusion (Boushey et al 1994; Vermeulen et al 2000; Till et al 2005; Marcucci et al 2005).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Eight of the included studies examined the history of changes made to each registry record in order to compare published outcomes with the primary outcome as stated in the registry at either the time of study initiation or prior to completion of enrollment [7, 16, 20, 22, 24, 30, 31, 36].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```[20] found that the enhancement that this procedure would provide in terms of explaining trauma symptoms is limited, and they concluded that the relative gains are not worth the methodological complexity.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The validated Malay version of GAD-7 which was found to have good sensitivity and specificity was used in this study [27].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```We assessed participants’ dehumanization of Arabs by using
the Ascent scale of blatant dehumanization (Kteily et al., 2015).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```We used longitudinal sequence samples for 15 patients from two independent studies [13,22].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```The literature describes substantial variation in dentists’ assessments of clinical, community, and behavioral factors that influence their decisions to provide a particular restorative treatment for their patients (21-23).```
Sample intent: method