PPO multiple sequence alignments were generated using MUSCLE (Multiple Sequence Comparison by Log Expectation) [63] with default parameters (http://www. ebi.ac.uk/Tools/muscle/index.html).
Sample text:```3, top) was constructed from the previously described 0.85-kb promoter construct (construct 6, Drews et al. 2005) by digestion with AscI and MluI followed by religation.```
Sample intent: method
Sample text:```The methods working directly on the count data can be broadly divided into parametric (baySeq [14], EBSeq [24], ShrinkSeq [27], edgeR [23], DESeq [7], NBPSeq [15] and TSPM [13]) and non-parametric methods (NOISeq [25] and SAMseq [26]).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```A number of studies have been published recently, which analyze the location, orientation, and identity ofmacromolecular complexes, based on the outcome of template-matching (Brandt et al., 2009; Ortiz et al., 2010).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Results from a RCT assessing in-person post-test genomic counseling on 199 OSU-CMPC participants were published previously [18].```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Because previous studies indicated that hexapeptides bind the junction core (29, 32), we tested two junctions, one with an AT-rich core and the other with a GC-rich core (Fig.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```We screened for potential TF binding sites using STAMP [59], with the motifs’ position weight matrices (PWMs) retrieved from the TRANSFAC database [60].```
Sample intent: background
Sample text:```Because previous studies indicated that hexapeptides bind the junction core (29, 32), we tested two junctions, one with an AT-rich core and the other with a GC-rich core (Fig.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Extension of protein annotation We used BacProt (publication in progress, see [33] for details) to complement the present annotation of protein-coding genes for each Aquificales genome.```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Unlabeled DNA substrates containing consensus 12-RSS, 23-RSS, Hox11 or non-specific DNA sequences (DAR81/82) were prepared from oligonucleotides described previously [11,24].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Our genealogy, based on many alleles but only the first exon of bindin, is not entirely consistent with that of McCartney and Lessios (2004), based on fewer alleles but incorporating the entire molecule.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```This is interesting in relation to the result from our previous CGH study (comparing the number of significantly hybridizing probes on the microarray) that showed high sequence divergence on the Z chromosome between the common whitethroat and the zebra finch [62]; and such patterns are also found in other species [48,51,69].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```3, top) was constructed from the previously described 0.85-kb promoter construct (construct 6, Drews et al. 2005) by digestion with AscI and MluI followed by religation.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Our heritability result is generally in agreement with the studies of Kien et al. (2008) in Eucalyptus urophylla and Zhao et al. (2014a) in poplar.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Similarly, a synergistic effect of sequence differences at the resistin locus on obesity and risk of type II diabetes has been observed (Ma et al, 2002).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Results from a RCT assessing in-person post-test genomic counseling on 199 OSU-CMPC participants were published previously [18].```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```This process is controlled not only by the protein-coding segments of the genome but also by non-coding regions, including loci that produce small RNAs (Grivna et al., 2006; He et al., 2009; Thomson and Lin, 2009).```
Sample intent: method