The errors are summed to create a total errors score, and, based on findings of Zartman et al. (2013), patients “fail” the test if they make five or more errors.
Sample text:```The area under the curve represents the probability that the logistic regression model will rank a randomly chosen positive instance (i.e., an error) higher than a randomly chosen negative instance (i.e., nonerror; Fawcett, 2006; Macmillan & Creelman, 2005).```
Sample intent: method
Sample text:```The tests were as follows: the C-MMSE [13], the LMT [18], the RCFT [19], the Boston Naming Test (the 30-item version) [20,21], the Animal Verbal Fluency Test [22], the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [23], the Trail Making Test‚Äì```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```The area under the curve represents the probability that the logistic regression model will rank a randomly chosen positive instance (i.e., an error) higher than a randomly chosen negative instance (i.e., nonerror; Fawcett, 2006; Macmillan & Creelman, 2005).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Our results on working memory performance are similar to those of earlier studies (e.g. Archbold et al., 2009; Cosentino et al., 2008; Naegele et al., 2006) in showing impaired working memory in the OSA group.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```For monitoring purposes, the investigator also determined the polyp score (PS) based on the size of polyps at the first and last visits [14].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```While this method is known to be generally reliable, there are some questions about the representativeness of the data used [25].```
Sample intent: background
Sample text:```…posttraining and follow-up was moderate in size after self-study instruction (mean d = −0.57; Martino et al., 2011; Miller et al., 2004; Moyers et al., 2008; Sholomskas et al., 2005) and after didactic workshop training (mean d = −0.55; Baer et al., 2004; Miller et al., 2004; Moyers et al., 2008).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```These policies are known to present comprehension problems to users [15, 19] and often are used to inform the interaction design for such systems, e.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Nowadays, there are only a few studies that have a systemic view on these accidents (Bentley 2008) and which try, by using detailed analysis (Gao and Abeysekera 2004, Leclercq and Thouy 2004, Bentley et al.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```[20] found that the enhancement that this procedure would provide in terms of explaining trauma symptoms is limited, and they concluded that the relative gains are not worth the methodological complexity.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Eight of the included studies examined the history of changes made to each registry record in order to compare published outcomes with the primary outcome as stated in the registry at either the time of study initiation or prior to completion of enrollment [7, 16, 20, 22, 24, 30, 31, 36].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```The tests were as follows: the C-MMSE [13], the LMT [18], the RCFT [19], the Boston Naming Test (the 30-item version) [20,21], the Animal Verbal Fluency Test [22], the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [23], the Trail Making Test‚Äì```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```While this method is known to be generally reliable, there are some questions about the representativeness of the data used [25].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Here we use the value of ten (because our previous study showed this is the number of items that can be managed efficiently in the browser‚Äôs sidebar [Moreau et al., 2002]).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```The area under the curve represents the probability that the logistic regression model will rank a randomly chosen positive instance (i.e., an error) higher than a randomly chosen negative instance (i.e., nonerror; Fawcett, 2006; Macmillan & Creelman, 2005).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Our results on working memory performance are similar to those of earlier studies (e.g. Archbold et al., 2009; Cosentino et al., 2008; Naegele et al., 2006) in showing impaired working memory in the OSA group.```
Sample intent: result