We train skip-gram2 (Mikolov et al., 2013) and glove3 (Pennington et al., 2014) based on the corpus by using existing implementations.
Sample text:```We use BLEU (up to 4-grams) (Papineni et al., 2002) as evaluation metric, which computes the precision of n-grams in generated summaries with gold-standard abstracts as the reference.```
Sample intent: background
Sample text:```The results for veridical recall replicated previous results in the literature (Bal-
lardini et al., 2008; McDermott & Watson, 2001), with the average recall of studied words increas-
ing monotonically as SOA increased.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```(orb), egl, and BicD (Costa et al., 2005; Mach and Lehmann, 1997; Suter and Steward, 1991).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```NP3L [10] is consistently outperformed by our methods, while for UPnP [8] our NPnLupC outperforms it in the noisy cases.```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```The studies on VA are conducted for several languages and actual datasets are acquired for different languages including English [12, 13], German [14], French [15], Spanish [16] and Chinese [17–19].```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```have been proposed as potential alternatives to the Turing Test, specifically targeting its potential weaknesses and inadequacy [1].```
Sample intent: background
Sample text:```Our results confi rm previous studies that reached the same conclusion (Boushey et al 1994; Vermeulen et al 2000; Till et al 2005; Marcucci et al 2005).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```have been proposed as potential alternatives to the Turing Test, specifically targeting its potential weaknesses and inadequacy [1].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```We use BLEU (up to 4-grams) (Papineni et al., 2002) as evaluation metric, which computes the precision of n-grams in generated summaries with gold-standard abstracts as the reference.```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```The results for veridical recall replicated previous results in the literature (Bal-
lardini et al., 2008; McDermott & Watson, 2001), with the average recall of studied words increas-
ing monotonically as SOA increased.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```(orb), egl, and BicD (Costa et al., 2005; Mach and Lehmann, 1997; Suter and Steward, 1991).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The studies on VA are conducted for several languages and actual datasets are acquired for different languages including English [12, 13], German [14], French [15], Spanish [16] and Chinese [17–19].```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```NP3L [10] is consistently outperformed by our methods, while for UPnP [8] our NPnLupC outperforms it in the noisy cases.```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Only one published paper (Enock et al. 2014) has examined this question, and thatwas in the context of anABM training study.```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```In this study, we generalized previous results regarding the quasi-Gaussian shape and the scalar property using the SBF model [13,21,52].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Discrepancies analogous to those between our results and those of simulations have, indeed, recently been observed in the case of the binary perceptron [18], the pspin interaction spin glass [19], and in the case of fluctuating manifolds in random media [20], where dynamically frozen phases were observed in regions of parameter space in which static approaches yielded ergodic phases.```
Sample intent: result