Compared with typical antipsychotics, second-generation atypical antipsychotics have more acceptable side effect profiles and possibly broader symptom efficacy, especially concerning negative symptoms, thus advancing the treatment of schizophrenic patients (Bagnall et al., 2003).
Sample text:```Following the experimental design proposed in Yannakakis and Hallam (2007c) and Yannakakis et al. (2008) for effectively capturing the level of entertainment, the test-bed game under investigation is played in variants.```
Sample intent: background
Sample text:```Our results confi rm previous studies that reached the same conclusion (Boushey et al 1994; Vermeulen et al 2000; Till et al 2005; Marcucci et al 2005).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```These results corroborate studies that have demonstrated an enhancement of other types of reward with Dz-specific agonists [6,17,21,52].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```The present observations support and extend earlier contentions that Parkinson patients prefer to adopt a closedloop control mode, adjusting their movements continuously on the basis of available visual information (Flowers 1976).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```In addition, consistent with the result of our preclinical study, recent clinical study showed that alectinib was also highly active against ALK-positive NSCLC patients after treatment with crizotinib [21].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```hemicholinium-3, a depletor of endogenous acetylcholine (Parikh and Sarter, 2006); (ii) by enhancing cholinergic tone with AF-DX384, a selective M2/M4 autoreceptor antagonist, that blocks the self-inhibitory mechanism by which acetylcholine regulates its own release and (iii) by selectively blocking M1 muscarinic receptors, key modulators of both LTD and LTP (Calabresi et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2006; Bonsi et al., 2008).```
Sample intent: method
Sample text:```The present observations support and extend earlier contentions that Parkinson patients prefer to adopt a closedloop control mode, adjusting their movements continuously on the basis of available visual information (Flowers 1976).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```In addition, consistent with the result of our preclinical study, recent clinical study showed that alectinib was also highly active against ALK-positive NSCLC patients after treatment with crizotinib [21].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Our results confi rm previous studies that reached the same conclusion (Boushey et al 1994; Vermeulen et al 2000; Till et al 2005; Marcucci et al 2005).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```These results corroborate studies that have demonstrated an enhancement of other types of reward with Dz-specific agonists [6,17,21,52].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```The GITT model performs better than an empirical lag-time model [17], however, its predicted profiles tend to underestimate Cmax, which, if consistent, may suggest confounding systematic bias or invalid assumptions.```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```We used longitudinal sequence samples for 15 patients from two independent studies [13,22].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```hemicholinium-3, a depletor of endogenous acetylcholine (Parikh and Sarter, 2006); (ii) by enhancing cholinergic tone with AF-DX384, a selective M2/M4 autoreceptor antagonist, that blocks the self-inhibitory mechanism by which acetylcholine regulates its own release and (iii) by selectively blocking M1 muscarinic receptors, key modulators of both LTD and LTP (Calabresi et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2006; Bonsi et al., 2008).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Quantitative geneticists have documented numerous cases of such interactions (Stuber et al. 1992; Ragot et al. 1995; Cockerham and Zeng 1996; Melchinger et al. 1998).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```In line with our results, several previous studies demonstrated the anti-proliferative effect of PPARs agonists in several cell types [11-15].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```The response to a generated question will be supplied in the following conversations, which may be novel but not necessarily occur in the input as that in traditional QG (Du et al., 2017; Yuan et al., 2017; Tang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Mostafazadeh et al., 2016).```
Sample intent: method