We provided a vignette that described a case of schizophrenia that was based on an interviewer-rated questionnaire that was used in a previous study conducted in Australia and Japan [14].
Sample text:```We used longitudinal sequence samples for 15 patients from two independent studies [13,22].```
Sample intent: background
Sample text:```The present observations support and extend earlier contentions that Parkinson patients prefer to adopt a closedloop control mode, adjusting their movements continuously on the basis of available visual information (Flowers 1976).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Estimation of overall mortality ratio (relative risk) was carried out using the random e ects model according to DerSimonian and Laird [9].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```We used longitudinal sequence samples for 15 patients from two independent studies [13,22].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Results from a RCT assessing in-person post-test genomic counseling on 199 OSU-CMPC participants were published previously [18].```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```The response to a generated question will be supplied in the following conversations, which may be novel but not necessarily occur in the input as that in traditional QG (Du et al., 2017; Yuan et al., 2017; Tang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Mostafazadeh et al., 2016).```
Sample intent: method
Sample text:```The results for veridical recall replicated previous results in the literature (Bal-
lardini et al., 2008; McDermott & Watson, 2001), with the average recall of studied words increas-
ing monotonically as SOA increased.```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```Estimation of overall mortality ratio (relative risk) was carried out using the random e ects model according to DerSimonian and Laird [9].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```In this study, we generalized previous results regarding the quasi-Gaussian shape and the scalar property using the SBF model [13,21,52].```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```While this method is known to be generally reliable, there are some questions about the representativeness of the data used [25].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```The response to a generated question will be supplied in the following conversations, which may be novel but not necessarily occur in the input as that in traditional QG (Du et al., 2017; Yuan et al., 2017; Tang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Mostafazadeh et al., 2016).```
Sample intent: method



Sample text:```Participants were undergraduates who had been followed during their college career as part of a longitudinal cohort study (see Bonanno et al., 2004; Papa & Bonanno, 2008).```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```We used longitudinal sequence samples for 15 patients from two independent studies [13,22].```
Sample intent: background



Sample text:```Our results confi rm previous studies that reached the same conclusion (Boushey et al 1994; Vermeulen et al 2000; Till et al 2005; Marcucci et al 2005).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```The items are internally consistent and reproducible and the questionnaire may therefore be considered to have at least as favourable levels of reliability as clinical scores used to assess outcomes (Koran 1975).```
Sample intent: result



Sample text:```[19] showed that the system quality and information quality perceived by virtual community users significantly impacts their perceived benefits of participation in virtual communities.```
Sample intent: method