the treaty made no explicit provision for other values such as water flow benefits for salmon and steelheads, continuing to exacerbate these ecosystem problems created by this era of hydropower expansion. So these are the three. Here you can see a map of all of the dams in this in the system. The three dams in Canada up here. Can you see my mouse in purple and the Libby Dam in Montana. So those were the four dam that were built as a result of the Columbia River Treaty, but the consequences of the treaty affect the entire hydroelectric power generation across the entire base. So it's like, very involved, even though there were only three dams actually generated as a result of the treaty. So the treaty has been sort of widely regarded as an example of successful cooperation and successful transbound renegotiations really built on this foundation of mutual gains. In 2011 when the renegotiation process began, the British Columbia government came out with a statement saying that the Columbia River is known it throughout the world is sort of the most successful models of a transboundary water treaty. Other countries see the agreement as a benchmark on cooperation to create and share benefits. So I thought that was sort of an interesting statement. And while the treaty did authorize this equal sharing of additional hydropower results from additional water storage and coordinated water releases