Erin, with your presentation. You really picked a very complicated case study because it involves a lot of stakeholders. So as it involves a lot of stakeholders, so my first question would be, how do you think that all stakeholders came into one page? And why do you think, why do you think this treaty, this this treaty took so much time to, you know, finally conclude? Because it involved a lot of litigation. What was the things which were not going in the right direction before? And what was the thing which happened this time to make it in the right direction? In terms of why it took so long, there are a couple of things. When the Water Commission was created, when the Compact Commission was created in the late 70s, you know, they had about about a little over a dozen thing, you know, agreements to negotiate with the federal government and with the state's tribes. And they decided they purposefully did all of the others and then did and then did the Flathead Reservation one because the latter one was the most complicated. And I think that actually, that actually wasn't a good thing. I think that there was a lot of a lot of study and animosity and kind of divergence that that occurred in those in those intervening decades. In part, I think because the tribes saw what was coming out of these other agreements and immediately began formulating alternate things, alternate ideas because they didn't like what the other agreements were saying. And so a lot more could have been done, a lot more could have been earlier, I think