like things are moving right along. And all of the sort of complexity seems to be driven by these other actors who are pushing for change. So I'm not sure if there's like necessarily a ton of disagreement between the the two countries around say like the inclusion of indigenous peoples in the negotiation process. Like I think both countries are sort of willing to expand the scope of the treaty to think about how those those tribes have been harmed over the last 60 years. But the conflict then is like how does the sort of collaborative treaty mechanism respond to the needs of these stakeholders on both sides of the border? Does that answer a question? Yeah, yeah, thanks. So the second issue that I wanted to mention that you mentioned climate sense is one of the future aspects that need to be considered. So is there any study that can provide details what are the expected impacts of the climate sense? Is it future flooding or is it the impact on the energy hydropower generation? So I think if you can mention those impact, I think then it could be much more, I think your suggestion could be much more solid. Yes, I think I left that out for complexity's sake here, but I think the main concern is sort of this shift from a basin that's driven by snow melt, to a basin that's driven by rain. And as that, like, as there is less snowmalt and more rain, the kind of flood control mechanisms change as well as the potential like management of hydropower over time. So yes, I do have sources for that and I will include those in my final case study. Yeah. Jim