whether or not it's like the food water energy nexus where like every sector needs to be treated equally. I think like the fact that the IWRM puts the water like as the most important entity even though it is maybe creating some boundaries that the nexus wants to like get rid of, I think it's still really valuable because if you like get too broad, it's hard to make any progress, but maybe I've misinterpreted. I don't know. It seems like the future needs to be like more understanding and expansive and multi-centric, but also like how do we make progress if we can't get all those people to sit at the table and make an agreement in any regard. Yeah, I think in terms of the the aspect, of course, the IWRM is very interesting, but in terms of practice, this is the main limitations that to implement this theoretical framework in practice, this is highly criticized and this implementation through following the actual process of the framework. I haven't done, I haven't seen any studies that really went through the IWRM implementation. So that is the main challenging thing that the implementation of IWRM is very difficult and is one of the unassived goal of the IWRM. That's the main criticism. But in terms of the theoretical contribution that has been done, I think is highly valuable at the broader level. But for implementing, it needs kind of, yeah, some kind of implementation oriented approach. That's how I see. So, yeah. Any thought at the on? In practice, I guess, I mean, in practice