you know, how are the Washington senators coordinating with the Washington governor to get things back to the State Department like trying to tease out all of those? They're not? They're not? That's for show. That's, we're trying to make political capital on the legislative side. The key is the governors. The governors have the access to the White House. The governors only care later about getting the Senate to ratify any change in the treaty. Between now and then the House of Representatives, the governors don't care to talk to them. There's nothing they're going to do for this. So my sense is that when you see state legislators and congressional legislators from the states making noise about this issue, it's political self-promotion to try to gain some advantage from all of this, but it isn't because they expect to be part of solving it. Got it. That's good to know. What's helpful? But it is wonderful to have somebody say there's a successful treaty. I think that's great. A successful water treaty between two countries. Wonderful. It's basically worked the way it was supposed to do for a long time. And we have, you know, we have parallel negotiations after 50 years in Latin America. We didn't spend much time on it, but there are negotiations between different countries in Latin America where treaties that existed over shared waters for 50 years are up. And you can't just extend the treaty. Everything has changed so much. But nobody knows, well, but we've had this treaty at 50 years. It's worked. Why should we mess with it? Well