that the response to that that would be most effective in the short term is to have a different track of local and non-governmental and scientific negotiators generate some of the elements of a supplementary subsidiary version, or addition to the existing agreement. And I think governors, governors in those states have been tracking every move in the State Department. I mean, my engagement in this case, I think I mentioned, happened when I was doing training for the State Department and the two guys who were appointed by the State Department to lead these conversations with zero, zero background in anything Northwest, water, Canada, that absolutely just thrown into this and they were saying, so we got a problem. These governors are telling us that they want to say what should happen. And we don't know, how should we negotiate that? That was the question they were asking is, how should we do this negotiation with these governors who don't have any official role while we're trying to negotiate with the Canadians? That was the conversation. And I don't think they figured it out. And I think there's the enormous pressure coming on the US government from the states. That's a thing I've been trying to untangle is the relationship of state governments to their representatives back to the federal government because so many state representatives and senators from the Northwest states have come out with various, you know, official statements and their perspective on these renegotiations and like what, you know