the state government, the tribe and non-tribal members living on the reservation, as the final agreement reflect some kind of proportionality, equal proportion of gain, however measured, did everybody come out roughly the same relative to the gains that they got, not in terms of how many people, but just in terms of these different categories. Yeah that's a good question. I think in terms of number of people I really I don't know in terms of the categories the non irrigators on the reservation yes so not So non irrigators, meaning not the irrigation project users, not the non irrigators definitely did. The municipalities were portion are going to have sufficient water to grow. You know, homeowners and developers can build again for both reservation and non-reservation, not traveling, not travel members. There's a significant amount of enough water and now enough legal clarity that that was a gain in itself. The group, you know, off reservation as well, I think that a lot of the, off reservation, definitely the non-tribal members, not the of the citizens of the state gained a lot because the tribe of band, you know, gave up a lot of their claims. The one area where I think there's still disagreement on and I don't have a, I think that it's still very controversial and it will be throughout implementation is on reservation irrigators. I think our one group that's that still a number of whom still feel like they did not have sufficient, they did not gain sufficient protection by, as a result of the negotiations. Good