I think, if discussions started in the early 80s for example or the mid 80s. I think the other things that that impeded the timeline. First is that because partially because of that the tribes came into the negotiations with a lot of preconceived notions about what the kind of what the final agreement should look like. And there were a lot of news reports, for example, after their first, after their first formal negotiation session of all of these things that the tribes said that they wanted the final agreement that the states immediately threw up their hands and said absolutely not. And negotiations actually shut down for a year at that point. And so if those conversations could have started in the 80s when the tribes were beginning their process of studying the water quantity, the water quality, and if that, you know, the questions regarding the implementation could have been ongoing, I think a lot of a lot of anger and, you know, could have been mitigated. So a part of it was, was just, uh, there was so much, there was so much confrontation going into the agreement and very little trust. And so you, and, and the other thing I think that I think the second thing I want to say is that I think that the role of the negotiator was really important. Without the negotiator, a lot of, you know, a lot of the opportunity for building trust didn't occur. And it became, you know, they became venting sessions