it needs the water. And while they say that they will be independent by 2061 that has not been proven. And I think furthermore an ongoing water relationship for Singapore is convenient because Singapore has already made long-term infrastructure investments and already have good existing relationships with the water representatives there so rather than trying to find a different importing place to get water from it makes sense that Singapore want to stick with Malaysia. And finally Malaysia would benefit because they need the increased supply of treated water and they need assistance stimulating progress in increasing their supply long term, since they have no progress in water treatment, development, water conservation development or water pollution regulation. So finally, a couple other ways that the water diplomacy framework could be utilized include utilizing an impartial moderator. So it was really successful when they lodged the document with the UN after they split politically to ensure that Malaysia would not renudge on their agreement. And I'm really confused why they haven't done that since. It seems like incorporating some more impartial stakeholders could really help promote progress. And secondly, I think it'd be interesting if they would start conversations about signing a new agreement unrelated to the water supply but kind of more toward a joint agreement