I've mentioned to you a couple times along the way, um, that it's invisible, but the states and the provincial governments in Canada are in fact very much calling the shots. Yeah. And they're not officially part of the entities. But remember that the US entity is led by the State Department because allegedly this is an international negotiation. And the State Department has no relationships with the governors of all those states, no longstanding working relationships, which has caused some severe difficulty for those governors. It may be, you don't have to do this, but you might want to imagine as a last little piece of your paper what it might be like and how helpful it might be to imagine a second track of negotiations convened by the US governors and the provincial leadership in BC with First Nations and Tribes. I mean, they would have enormous credibility. They said, we're getting together because we are convinced that the future of this agreement, whether it's strengthened or renewed or replaced, it needs to take account of changing conditions from 60 years ago and we feel those when we have responsibilities. And if they were to organize a set of sessions with NGOs and touch this on their own. The State Department, I promise you, would cut the same way that the Canadian agencies would show up, but they wouldn't be there in their official capacity. And if they just took three or four questions, maybe even two or three questions, that are not addressed for the future in the existing treaty