that the place is going to have anything to do with what that original plan was. And yet they still think there's planning going on. The planning is about the process of adaptation. Yeah. The planning is to create the institutions to be able to modify what you're doing collectively. So it's still planning. It's not planning it to achieve a preordained comprehensive idea. And I would argue in the water realm we ought to be worried about IWRM as an ideal because it presumes there are institutions with the authority, the power, with the knowledge to integrate across all of these multiple dimensions in spite of the fact that we have created the silos that you alluded to and that there are contending interests trying to pursue and maximize different outcomes for from their standpoint that are good from their standpoint. So for the reasons I worry about comprehensive planning, I worry about IWRM. So any other thoughts regarding IWRM? I think something related to what we were just talking about is like the interesting fact that in some ways the IWRM is like very broad but then in other ways a lot of people criticize it for not being broad enough, saying that like the adaptive water management system, like needs to replace or augment the IWRM because that is moving toward that like can we not only create water management