I'm not sure the exact numbers again, not travel members of all the reservation, but it's a few times that the town of Polson, which is the biggest town on the reservation, has a population of about three and a half thousand, and there are many other small towns. So those, they were, those rights, the tribes were given a, you know, this agreement quantified, just to clarify, if anybody didn't make this clear before, this agreement quantified the tribe's rights on the reservation. But then there's still other water. So that other water then, because the tribe rights are quantified, can now be claimed by non-tribal users on the reservation. But that makes sense. With regards to the irrigation project, the irrigation project included a number of delivery schedules, and those delivery schedules were specifically to provide water to non-tribal irrigators who have historically used that water. And there was a lot of disagreement about that. Those irrigators, many of them argued that the amount of water they were being allocated was insufficient and they were going to have to move their lands. And the state of Montana agreed to actually support them by helping to invest and kind of, you know, drip agriculture and other things. But it will protect it over the long term their rights, the non-travel rights on the reservation, but the one limitation is that the travel rights, which are quantified now have priority. I took his name question to refer to proportionality. If you look at the overall benefits that are allocated to the federal government