yeah, and so then the next one, so you talked about this a little bit, especially at the end, but I was wondering like how climate change might exacerbate the water resources in the future. And like, I guess specifically if certain stakeholders should be included. So you already mentioned a lot of stakeholders that are not being included. But it would be interesting if like ecologists either like representing the like two countries or some kind of neutral ecology representation to be included in the negotiations to really advocate for these environmental needs and not just the wants of the two countries like economically or technologically. Yeah, that's a great question. I think one of the suggestions that has emerged in recent years is officially adding NOAA to the US entity team to have a better advocate for sort of environmental impacts in that formal body. That is one of the things, or like other sort of representatives from the US Department of the Interior that could sort of be more of a voice for environmental concerns compared to like the power administrations who have sort of clear expertise on the hydroelectric side, but aren't necessarily equipped to consider salmon habitats and things like that. So that's one of the strategies that has been proposed. Has not happened yet. Awesome. Okay, so the next thing is about, so you did a good job of explaining the gains and losses from the treaties point of view, like which parties were suffering and which ones were really experiencing gain