the two sides turned their attention entirely to negotiate an interim agreement once they realize the long overtake to come to a final agreement. And then because of a number of, for a number of political reasons, they abandoned the interim agreement. When the compact failed in the state legislature in 2013, because that's what occurred, the first compact was agreed , it went to the state legislature, it failed. And much of the opposition at the time was Republican representatives expressing concern that the compact didn't sufficiently protect non-travel water uses. And some of it was legitimate concern, though some of it appears to have been political grandstanding. Then the state and the tribes agreed to a limited reopening. Two years later, when the legislature meets again, they pass it. And then it went to the US Congress, where it sat for five years in different forms with slight amendments occurring all over the place until finally it passed as a part of the COVID-19 stimulus bill in December. And just days after that, the tribe council passed it and now it's awaiting a bureaucratic review that is expected to be simple, routine. I was told by John Carter, the former staff attorney for the tribes, that one thing that helped the revised agreement passed two years later was extensive dialogue with a couple of key Republicans who were willing to learn more about the agreement, but whose opposition in 2013 faded by 2015 once they understood the big thing better. So that's I think something that I will return to at the end