it's an additional burden to his daily income. What if the state would have provided him a water supply network with a certain pricing and the state had ensured that that water was clean enough to drink like for example I in Pakistan can't drink water directly from tap I'm not sure about drinking water directly from the tap but here in in my residence in Ithaca I drink water directly from tap. So by this I'm saving money from the bottle water and then I'm saving money for installing my own boring system or pumping system. So if the state provided me with clean water with certain price in which they are maintaining the infrastructure, which is lesser than the amount which I am spending back home on bottled water and boring water costs like do well or something like that. Then do you don't think that the approach would be most better, the pricing, water pricing approach would be better in this scenario? You're paying rent in Ithaca that includes water cost. And if you lived in Flint, Michigan, you would be paying not that much different rent, but you couldn't drink the water from the top because it's been allowed to become contaminated. And the city doesn't have the resources to rebuild the whole system. So we've pushed on to individuals the cost of getting water in some cities where we've allowed the water to become contaminated. Maintaining clean water is, I would argue, a common cost, not an individualized cost. While you can go buy water in bottles, we still expect the availability of clean water from the tap