there seems to be a consensus emerging around how they can leverage the treaty to address ecosystem functions and other environmental concerns such as climate change. This seems to be a priority for many of the non-formal stakeholders and has that has been reflected in statements made by the US and Canadian entities. There are lots of stakeholders who all have various views about how the treaty should be modernized. And there are even some stakeholders who believe that a formal treaty is unnecessary. So I think there is sort of a more, I think it's unlikely that that actually emerges as an option. But there's a question of whether the two sides could cooperate on flood control without a formal treaty or whether, you know, good treaties make good neighbors. So that's where that's where I'm at. Thank you. Yeah. Thank you. Jim, for excellent presentation. I think it's really nice the way that you have presented. It's really wonderful. So now I would like to, yeah, askop and Flora to make the comments and yeah, then we can discuss further. So what will you think will be the biggest challenge to overcome from the government side? I think it's sort of this fundamental question of the treaty that they have has basically worked for 60 years and people have been pretty happy with it on both sides. The US feels like they're overpaying for power but that's sort of been the main objection to the treaty as it currently stands. However, I think there is a fairly broad consensus that the treaty should be