and address the saltwater intrusion to the Johor River Basin. So that's an example of both Johor and Singapore were suffering from a reduced quality of water in the river basin. So Singapore agreed to fund a project that would improve these and ensure a longer term water resource. So now I would love to talk about the water diplomacy framework and how this fits in. So the Singapore Malaysia water conflict is unique because there's only two parties involved sharing water resources that are not physically common. The water networks are defined through several water agreements where water is being traded rather than shared. However, Joe Horn and Singapore still mutually benefit from the terms of the existing agreements and they have acknowledged that publicly. The water diplomacy framework acknowledges the complexity of managing competition, feedback and interconnection between the natural and societal domains in the context of the political domain. So that is absolutely true in this circumstance, there were ongoing societal tensions between Singaporean and Malaysian communities at every level over a lot of issues, not just water. And so, and then Joe Hor has been experiencing increasing water problems in the natural domain related to water quantity as well as quality, which threatens both stakeholders. And finally, because the media was so involved in covering the water negotiations, the group of stakeholders with opinions is actually much larger than the officials that are involved in the signing of the agreements. And as a result