the negotiations. And it wasn't always a productive thing. So that's the question in terms of what went while it took so long. I think a negotiator helped a lot. And then I think eventually having, I mean, and this is where I think the water diplomacy framework does come to bear significantly, which is that I think once, once the two sides did have a shared understanding of the quantity of water in all the different locations and of the various, you know, various legal arguments and of the potential uses. Once there was that shared understanding, it was a lot easier to come to agreements because they understood from what, you know, point they were, they were compromising from. Whereas the tribes went into it with a lot more understanding and and would put up a very hard wall to begin with. And so having that shared understanding was was really important. Sorry, I think I've been able to do a little bit there, but I hope I got to your questions. So yes. I do have further specific questions. Yeah, one more. Yeah, yeah, it is related to the water diplomacy win-win framework. How do you think both parties agreed on this on a win-win side, for example, I read somewhere on the on I was doing some research on your yesterday and I said I read that the tribes were allocated the national bison range which I think somehow was an attractive thing for them for agreeing into this pretty. There's a secondary note with this question is, you mentioned in one of your slides that the number of non-tribes is kind of more than the actual tribal area