which is the word being used by the negotiators, there's sort of five main issues that have been raised during these ongoing conversations. This is not an exhaustive list, lots of other things that have been brought up as well. But I think it sort of summarizes the most significant arguments. So I'm going to walk through each of these five. So first, as I mentioned, issue number one is that 2024, the current flood risk management provisions change to a less defined approach. And instead of Canada providing a set amount of flood control every year, it will be as an on call basis, and the US will pay on an annual basis based on how much flood risk has been assessed. So this is sort of the core part of the original treaty and it will expire unless measures are taken to renew or modify it. And in addition, it is the earliest date at which the treaty can be terminated provided that either Canada or the United States provides 10 years written notice. No one has provided this, so the treaty will not be determined or be terminated in 2024. But it sort of catalyzed this era of renegotiations beginning around 2011, 2012. That's issue one. Issue number two is that since the original treaty negotiation process in the 1960s, stakeholders outside of the main negotiating parties have argued that the treaty neglects ecosystem needs. So the renegotiation process has opened the door for a variety of environmental advocates. In particular