a more integrated management approach felt sort of urgent and necessary as we as we move towards perhaps greater scarcity in certain water systems. But how would that work or theoretically how might that work in context in which we do have siloed entities responsible for things like water. And if you say, well, integrated management is the key to managing water in the future so that you can connect water with energy, with food, with land, but that's not how those entities are set up. Right. Yeah. Isn't aren't we basically setting up systems to fail if we say that they have to be integrated in order to do water management when we know that they're not, therefore what are we hoping for? That was a good question. I don't know if I have an immediate answer. I'll think about that though. I'm not sure there's a right answer. It seems to me that from a planning perspective, urban regional planning perspective, not a water perspective, there's always an argument for centuries that the way to plan cities effectively is to start with a clean, empty area and have a designer make a comprehensive