there have been roadblocks and issues and renegotiations as a result of the complexity of this process and just how many parties were apart. So there are a couple of other contextual things that I want to bring up because I think they're important to kind of understanding the contentiousness of the conversations around the compact. Three court cases that I'm not try to pronounce it, Choti, one, two, and three I guess. There were three court cases cases that were far between 1996 and 2003 and argued before the Supreme Court. And actually, the last one was only, yeah, only found kind of during the actual negotiations. I was on the Supreme Court made its ruling. And it recognized the distinction between state appropriate water rights and reserve water rights. And the ruling was that new and amended water use permits on the reservation had to show that their proposed uses would not quote unreasonably interfere with a planned use for which water has already been reserved. And what the Supreme Court said again and again, as this case was re-fought in different forms, only the first one was actually called Jody, as it was fought in different forms, what they argued was that because the state and because private non-tribal water users couldn't show proof that their claims were not unreasonably interfering with a planned use, then that burden could not be met. And so a new water use permit could not be issued. And so this decision had a few significant impacts. It gave the tribes, the CSKT