drinkable water that won't kill you, to be a common cost. If it's a common cost, then we should collect taxes from everybody in a progressive way and take care of building the things that are common like clean water system. So I know, I heard the comparison you're making, but I would argue both in Pakistan and in the United States that the responsibility of local government should be to provide drinkable water for people as a capital cost that's a collective cost. And whether that cost is paid for from taxes, which could be collected in a progressive way, or fees, which typically are not collected in a progressive way. They don't look at ability to pay. I think we can have that debate about what's the fair way to collect the money. But once the money is collected, it should be used to get everybody a minimum amount of clean water. That's my argument. Yeah, and I think that also fits with the IWRM principle, like social equity and yeah, so. Yes, and to add to your point that, I mean, it is a IWRM is a collective approach. It's not about governments only. It's about people also, society, societal education. For example, if you're doing, you just said, use the word contamination. Who is doing contamination? We are doing contamination. We are mixing water water with water. We are doing water thefts. We are doing hold to the main water supply line to get more water for ourselves. That is something related to the societal education. If we do not educate people that water should be treated as a precious resource that it should not be contaminated