the tribe was going to rate was going to maintain off reservation. And these are the rights that the tribe that the state thought the tribe had the ability to adjudicate if they didn't have a compact. And so the tribe, if a compact wasn't reached, the tribe could have gone to court and litigated upwards of 10,000 different water claims across Western Montana. And as a result, there was a lot of incentive for the state to come to a settlement that both quantified the tribe's rights and also protected the junior rights of non-tribal water users so that this, so that this, you know, didn't occur and there wasn't decades of litigation over these rights. So in terms of kind of negotiation topics that the barred discussed, there were on reservation rights pertaining to the irrigation project on reservation rights pertaining to the irrigation deliveries. So this is water from the irrigation project that has historically been used by non-tribal water users. And so their right to continue to receive that water. There was water from the Flathead System, meaning the Flathead River, its tributaries, and the Flathead Lake. And there were a were a number of non-consumptive rights. Off-reservation, there were in-stream flow rights, as well as state law-based non-irrigation rights, which I'll talk about a little more later. Actually, one thing that I didn't put here is the other thing that was obviously a part of this was off-reservation rights claimed by non-travel users, which is most, you know, most rights