CONAGRA FOODS INC /DE/
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General Development of Business
ConAgra Foods, Inc. (“ConAgra Foods”, “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) is one of North America’s largest packaged food companies with branded and private branded food found in 99% of America's households, as well as a strong commercial foods business serving restaurants and foodservice operations globally. Consumers can find recognized brands such as Banquet®, Chef Boyardee®, Egg Beaters®, Healthy Choice®, Hebrew National®, Hunt's®, Marie Callender's®, Orville Redenbacher's®, PAM®, Peter Pan®, Reddi-wip®, Slim Jim®, Snack Pack®, and many other ConAgra Foods brands, along with food sold by ConAgra Foods under private brand labels, in grocery, convenience, mass merchandise, club, and drug stores. Additionally, we make frozen potato and sweet potato items as well as other vegetable, spice, bakery goods, and grain products for our commercial and foodservice customers.
At ConAgra Foods, we strive to provide food that delivers outstanding taste, nutrition, and value. We are also committed to finding better ways to be a good steward of our environment and giving back to the communities where we live and work.
We began as a Midwestern flour-milling company and entered other commodity-based businesses throughout our history. We were initially incorporated as a Nebraska corporation in 1919 and were reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in December 1975. Over time, through various acquisitions and divestitures, we changed the make-up of our company and focused on growing our branded food businesses to become the leading food company we are today. Making this shift involved acquiring a number of consumer food brands such as Banquet®, Chef Boyardee®, Marie Callender’s®, and Alexia®. Businesses we divested include dehydrated and fresh vegetable operations, a trading and merchandising business, packaged meat and cheese operations, and poultry, beef, and pork businesses, among others. Growing our food businesses has also been fueled by our innovation pipeline and organic growth of our brands. We are focused on delivering sustainable, profitable growth with strong and improving returns on our invested capital.
In 2012, we introduced our Recipe for Growth - our strategic roadmap for operating our business and delivering shareholder value. We established five strategic areas of focus for our business - Core/Adjacencies, International, Private Brands, People, and Citizenship. In January 2013, we took a big step forward in delivering on our Recipe for Growth by completing the acquisition of Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. ("Ralcorp"), a manufacturer of private branded food. The Ralcorp acquisition was a transformational move for our company making us the largest private brand packaged food business in North America.
With the acquisition of Ralcorp, we have established a portfolio that is value-focused and competitive. We are working to create a more successful, customer-centric, effective, and efficient company. As a result, process changes and new ways of working are being implemented.
As part of continually strengthening our operating foundation, our major profit-enhancing initiatives have centered on and continue to include:
•
Growing our branded and private branded portfolios through innovation;
•
Creating a more customer-focused company; becoming a strategic partner and influencer for the branded and private branded needs of our customers;
•
Making food that resonates with consumers; establishing or further developing qualities that differentiate us from other food companies and capabilities that are critical to our success; and expanding our presence in desired geographies or market segments;
•
Implementing high-impact, insights-based marketing programs for our customers and consumers;
•
Improving our trade spending effectiveness, enterprise business planning, and pricing analytics;
•
Achieving cost savings targets throughout our supply chain and creating a seamless technical organization to drive productivity, total delivered cost, and customized solutions; and
•
Implementing cost-reducing initiatives throughout the selling, general, and administrative functions.
Our efficiency and effectiveness initiatives continue to be implemented with a high degree of customer focus, food safety and quality, and commitment to our people.
Financial Information about Reporting Segments
As a result of the Ralcorp acquisition, we implemented organizational changes during the second quarter of fiscal 2014 that resulted in new reporting segments. We began reporting our operations in three reporting segments: Consumer Foods, Commercial Foods, and Private Brands. We believe this recent operating structure will enhance our focus on profitability, coordinated business execution, and resource allocation across our business. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the revised segment presentation. Prior to this change in organizational structure, we had four operating and reportable segments. The contributions of each reporting segment to net sales, operating profit, and identifiable assets are set forth in Note 20 “Business Segments and Related Information” to the consolidated financial statements.
Narrative Description of Business
We compete throughout the food industry and focus on adding value for our customers who operate in the retail food, foodservice, and ingredients channels.
Our operations, including our reporting segments, are described below. Our locations, including manufacturing facilities, within each reporting segment, are described in Item 2, Properties.
Consumer Foods
The Consumer Foods reporting segment includes branded food sold in various retail channels primarily in North America. Our food products are found in a variety of categories (meals, entrees, condiments, sides, snacks, and desserts) throughout grocery and convenience stores across frozen, refrigerated, and shelf-stable temperature classes. The Consumer Foods reporting segment no longer includes results for store brands (store brands are now part of the recently created Private Brands segment) or foodservice results (the foodservice business is now part of the Commercial Foods segment). The Consumer Foods reporting segment now includes additional international sales which were previously part of the Ralcorp Food Group segment.
Major brands include: Alexia®, ACT II®, Banquet®, Blue Bonnet®, Chef Boyardee®, DAVID®, Egg Beaters®, Healthy Choice®, Hebrew National®, Hunt’s®, Marie Callender’s®, Odom’s Tennessee Pride ®, Orville Redenbacher’s®, PAM®, Peter Pan®, Reddi-wip®, Slim Jim®, Snack Pack®, Swiss Miss®, Van Camp’s®, and Wesson®.
Commercial Foods
The Commercial Foods reporting segment includes commercially branded and private branded food and ingredients, which are sold primarily to commercial, foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segment's primary food items include: frozen potato and sweet potato items and a variety of vegetable, spice and frozen bakery goods which are sold under brands such as Lamb Weston® and Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings®. The Commercial Foods reporting segment now includes foodservice results which were previously part of the Consumer Foods segment, as well as frozen bakery foodservice results, which were previously part of the Ralcorp Frozen Bakery Products segment. Our milling business was included in the Commercial Foods segment for the periods covered by this report but was contributed to Ardent Mills shortly after the end of fiscal 2014.
Private Brands
The Private Brands reporting segment includes private branded and customized food items sold in various retail channels, primarily in North America. Our Private Brands are sold in a variety of categories in grocery and convenience stores including: hot and ready-to-eat cereal; snacks; condiments; bars and coordinated categories; pasta; and retail bakery goods. The recently created Private Brands reporting segment includes a significant portion of results from the former Ralcorp businesses and the store brands results which were previously part of the Consumer Foods segment.
Unconsolidated Equity Investments
We have a number of unconsolidated equity investments. Significant affiliates produce and market potato products for retail and foodservice customers.
Acquisitions
In September 2013, we acquired frozen dessert production assets from Harlan Bakeries. The purchase included machinery, operating systems, warehousing/storage, and other assets associated with making frozen fruit pies, cream pies, pastry shells, and loaf cakes. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.
In January 2013, we acquired Ralcorp. The results from our Ralcorp acquisition are included in each of our reporting segments, primarily Private Brands.
In August 2012, we acquired the P.F. Chang's® and Bertolli® brands frozen meal business. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.
Divestitures
In April 2014, we completed the sale of a small snack business, Medallion Foods. We previously reflected the results of this business within the Private Brands segment. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
In September 2013, we completed the sale of the assets of the Lightlife® business. We previously reflected the results of this business within the Consumer Foods segment. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Formation of Ardent Mills
On May 29, 2014, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2014, the Company, Cargill, Incorporated ("Cargill"), and CHS Inc. ("CHS") (collectively, the “Owners”), completed the formation of the previously announced Ardent Mills flour milling joint venture, which combined the North American flour milling operations and related businesses operated through the ConAgra Mills division of ConAgra Foods and the Horizon Milling joint venture of Cargill and CHS.
General
The following comments pertain to all of our reporting segments.
ConAgra Foods is a food company that operates in many sectors of the food industry, with a significant focus on the sale of branded, private branded, and value-added consumer food, as well as foodservice items and ingredients. We use many different raw materials, the bulk of which are commodities. The prices paid for raw materials used in making our food generally reflect factors such as weather, commodity market fluctuations, currency fluctuations, tariffs, and the effects of governmental agricultural programs. Although the prices of raw materials can be expected to fluctuate as a result of these factors, we believe such raw materials to be in adequate supply and generally available from numerous sources. From time to time, we have faced increased costs for many of our significant raw materials, packaging, and energy inputs. We seek to mitigate higher input costs through productivity and pricing initiatives, and through the use of derivative instruments used to economically hedge a portion of forecasted future consumption.
We experience intense competition for sales of our food items in our major markets. Our food items compete with widely advertised, well-known, branded food, as well as private branded and customized food items. Some of our competitors are larger and have greater resources than we have. We compete primarily on the basis of quality, value, customer service, brand recognition, and brand loyalty.
Demand for certain of our food items may be influenced by holidays, changes in seasons, or other annual events.
We manufacture primarily for stock and fill our customer orders from finished goods inventories. While at any given time there may be some backlog of orders, such backlog is not material in respect to annual net sales, and the changes of backlog orders from time to time are not significant.
Our trademarks are of material importance to our business and are protected by registration or other means in the United States and most other markets where the related food items are sold. Some of our food items are sold under brands that have been licensed from others. We also actively develop and maintain a portfolio of patents, although no single patent is considered material to the business as a whole. We have proprietary trade secrets, technology, know-how, processes, and other intellectual property rights that are not registered.
Many of our facilities and food items we make are subject to various laws and regulations administered by the United States Department of Agriculture, the Federal Food and Drug Administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other federal, state, local, and foreign governmental agencies relating to the food safety and quality, sanitation, safety and health matters, and environmental control. We believe that we comply with such laws and regulations in all material respects, and that continued compliance with such regulations will not have a material effect upon capital expenditures, earnings, or our competitive position.
Our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 17% of consolidated net sales for each of fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012.
At May 25, 2014, ConAgra Foods and its subsidiaries had approximately 32,800 employees, primarily in the United States. Approximately 41% of our employees are parties to collective bargaining agreements. Of the employees subject to collective bargaining agreements, approximately 16% are parties to collective bargaining agreements scheduled to expire during fiscal 2015. We believe our relationships with employees and their representative organizations are good.
Research and Development
We employ processes at our principal manufacturing locations that emphasize applied research and technical services directed at product improvement and quality control. In addition, we conduct research activities related to the development of new products. Research and development expense was $103.5 million, $93.1 million, and $86.0 million in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF JULY 16, 2014
Gary M. Rodkin has been our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors since October 1, 2005. Previously, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo Beverages and Foods North America (food and beverage company) from February 2003 to June 2005. He also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo Beverages and Foods North America in 2002, and President and Chief Executive Officer of Pepsi-Cola North America from 1999 to 2002. Mr. Rodkin has served as a director of Avon Products, Inc. (beauty and related products company) since 2007, and is also Chair of the Board of Boys Town (charitable organization) and Chair of the Omaha Chamber of Commerce's Prosper Omaha economic development campaign. He is past Chairman of the Grocery Manufacturers of America (consumer product company trade association).
John F. Gehring has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since January 2009. Mr. Gehring joined ConAgra Foods as Vice President of Internal Audit in 2002, became Senior Vice President in 2003, and most recently served as Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller from July 2004 to January 2009. He served as ConAgra Foods' interim Chief Financial Officer from October 2006 to November 2006. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods, Mr. Gehring was a partner at Ernst & Young LLP (an accounting firm) from 1997 to 2001.
Colleen R. Batcheler has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since September 2009 and Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from February 2008. Ms. Batcheler joined ConAgra Foods in June 2006 as Vice President, Chief Securities Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary. In September 2006, she was named Corporate Secretary. From 2003 until joining ConAgra Foods, Ms. Batcheler was Vice President and Corporate Secretary of Albertson's, Inc. (a retail food and drug chain). Previously, she was Associate Counsel with The Cleveland Clinic Foundation and an associate with Jones Day (a law firm).
Albert D. Bolles, Ph.D., was named Executive Vice President, Chief Technical and Operations Officer in May 2014. Dr. Bolles joined ConAgra Foods in 2006 as Executive Vice President, Research, Quality & Innovation. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods, he led Worldwide Research and Development for PepsiCo Beverages and Foods.
Paul T. Maass has served as President of the Private Brands and Commercial Foods segments since September 2013. He served as President of Commercial Foods since October 2010 and served as interim President of the Lamb Weston operations from 2010 until January 2013. Since joining ConAgra Foods in 1988 as a commodity merchandiser in the trading business, Mr. Maass quickly progressed in several roles at ConAgra Foods, including being named President and General Manager of ConAgra Mills® in 2003 and assuming responsibility for J.M. Swank® in 2007 and for Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings® in 2010.
Thomas M. McGough has served as President of the Consumer Foods segment since May 2013. Mr. McGough joined ConAgra Foods in 2007 as Vice President in the Consumer Foods organization and has provided leadership for many brand teams within ConAgra Foods, including Banquet®, Hunt's®, and Reddi-wip®. He most recently served as President, Grocery Products since 2011, leading the largest business within the Consumer Foods segment. Mr. McGough has over twenty years of experience in the branded packaged foods industry, beginning his career at H.J. Heinz in 1990.
Scott E. Messel has served as Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Corporate Secretary since July 2004. Mr. Messel joined ConAgra Foods in August 2001 as Vice President and Treasurer. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods, Mr. Messel served in various treasury leadership roles at Lennox International (a provider of climate control solutions), Flowserve Corporation (a manufacturer of flow management products and services), and Ralston Purina Company (a former manufacturer of cereals, packaged foods, pet food, and livestock feed).
Andrew G. Ross joined ConAgra Foods as Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer in November 2011. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods, he was a principal at McKinsey & Company, Inc. (consulting firm) from May 2002 until November 2011, where he led the firm's global consumer, retail, and marketing practices. Prior to that, he worked for William Grant & Sons, Ltd.
Nicole B. Theophilus has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer since May 2013. Ms. Theophilus joined ConAgra Foods as Vice President, Chief Employment Counsel in April 2006. In addition to her legal duties, she assumed the role of Vice President, Human Resources for Commercial Foods in 2008, and most recently served as Senior Vice President, Human Resources from November 2009 until May 2013. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods, she was an attorney and partner with Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin LLP (a law firm).
Robert G. Wise has served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller since December 2012. Mr. Wise joined ConAgra Foods in March 2003 and has held various positions of increasing responsibility with ConAgra Foods, including Vice President, Assistant Corporate Controller from March 2006 until January 2012 and most recently served as Vice President, Corporate Controller from January 2012 until December 2012. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods, Mr. Wise served in various roles at KPMG LLP (an accounting firm) from October 1995 to March 2003.
OTHER SENIOR OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF JULY 16, 2014
Joan K. Chow joined ConAgra Foods in February 2007 as Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods, she served Sears Holding Corporation (retailing) as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, Sears Retail from July 2005 until January 2007, and as Vice President, Marketing Services from April 2005 until July 2005. From 2002 until April 2005, Ms. Chow served Sears, Roebuck and Co. as Vice President, Home Services Marketing.
Allen J. Cooper joined ConAgra Foods in March 2003 and has held various finance and internal audit leadership positions with the Company, including Director, Internal Audit from 2003 until 2005; Vice President, Supply Chain Finance from 2005 until 2007; Senior Director, Finance; and most recently as Senior Director, Internal Audit. He was named to his current position in February 2009. Prior to joining the Company, he was with Ernst & Young LLP (an accounting firm).
Derek De La Mater joined ConAgra Foods in 1993 and has held various leadership roles in sales and business development within the Company. He was named to his current position in March 2014. He previously served the Company as President, Customer Development, from 2013 to 2014, Senior Vice President, Sales, from 2011 to 2013, and Vice President, Sales from 2006 to 2011.
Foreign Operations
Foreign operations information is set forth in Note 20 “Business Segments and Related Information” to the consolidated financial statements.
Available Information
We make available, free of charge through the “Investors-Financial Reports & Filings” link on our Internet website at http://www.conagrafoods.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. We use our Internet website, through the “Investors” link, as a channel for routine distribution of important information, including news releases, analyst presentations, and financial information.
We have also posted on our website our (1) Corporate Governance Principles, (2) Code of Conduct, (3) Code of Ethics for Senior Corporate Officers, and (4) Charters for the Audit/Finance Committee, Nominating, Governance and Public Affairs Committee, and Human Resources Committee. Shareholders may also obtain copies of these items at no charge by writing to: Corporate Secretary, ConAgra Foods, Inc., One ConAgra Drive, Omaha, NE, 68102-5001.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to various risks and uncertainties. Any of the risks and uncertainties described below could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and should be considered in evaluating us. While we believe we have identified and discussed below the key risk factors affecting our business, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be significant that may adversely affect our business, performance, or financial condition in the future.
Deterioration of general economic conditions could harm our business and results of operations.
Our business and results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in national or global economic conditions, including inflation, interest rates, availability of capital markets, consumer spending rates, energy availability and costs (including fuel surcharges), and the effects of governmental initiatives to manage economic conditions.
Volatility in financial markets and deterioration of national and global economic conditions could impact our business and operations in a variety of ways, including as follows:
•
consumers may shift purchases to more generic, lower-priced, or other value offerings, or may forego certain purchases altogether during economic downturns, which could result in a reduction in sales of higher margin products or a shift in our product mix to lower margin offerings adversely affecting the results of our Consumer Foods or Private Brands operations;
•
decreased demand in the restaurant business, particularly casual and fine dining, which may adversely affect our Commercial Foods operations;
•
volatility in commodity and other input costs could substantially impact our result of operations;
•
volatility in the equity markets or interest rates could substantially impact our pension costs and required pension contributions; and
•
it may become more costly or difficult to obtain debt or equity financing to fund operations or investment opportunities, or to refinance our debt in the future, in each case on terms and within a time period acceptable to us.
We may not fully realize the anticipated growth opportunities and cost synergies from the acquisition of Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. or in the expected time frame.
The anticipated benefits from our acquisition of Ralcorp Holdings, Inc., or Ralcorp, which we refer to as the Acquisition, will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated growth opportunities and cost synergies from the Acquisition.
Our success in realizing these growth opportunities and cost synergies, and the timing of this realization, depends on the successful integration of Ralcorp. There is a significant degree of difficulty and management distraction inherent in the process of integrating an acquisition as sizable as Ralcorp. Members of our senior management may be required to devote considerable amounts of time to this continuing integration process, which will decrease the time they will have to manage our Company, service existing customers, attract new customers, and develop new products or strategies. If senior management is not able to effectively manage the ongoing integration process, or if any significant business activities are interrupted as a result of the process, our business could suffer. There can be no assurance that we will successfully or cost-effectively integrate the Ralcorp business. The failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Even if we are able to fully integrate Ralcorp successfully, this integration may not result in the realization of the full benefits of the growth opportunities and cost synergies that we expect from this integration, and we cannot guarantee that these benefits will be achieved within anticipated time frames or at all. For example, we may not be able to eliminate duplicative costs. Moreover, we may incur substantial expenses in connection with the integration. While certain expenses will continue to be incurred to achieve cost synergies, such expenses are difficult to estimate accurately, and may exceed current estimates. Accordingly, the benefits from the Acquisition may be offset by costs incurred to, or delays in, integrating the businesses.
Our existing and future debt may limit cash flow available to invest in the ongoing needs of our business and could prevent us from fulfilling our debt obligations.
As of May 25, 2014, we had a substantial amount of debt, including $3.912 billion of senior notes that we issued, and a $900 million term loan that we entered into, in connection with the Acquisition. We have the ability under our existing revolving credit facility to incur substantial additional debt. Our level of debt could have important consequences. For example, it could:
•
make it more difficult for us to make payments on our debt;
•
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes;
•
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic or industry conditions;
•
limit our ability to obtain additional financing in the future to enable us to react to changes in our business; or
•
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to businesses in our industry that have less debt.
Additionally, any failure to meet required payments on our debt, or failure to comply with any covenants in the instruments governing our debt, could result in an event of default under the terms of those instruments and a downgrade to our credit ratings. A downgrade in our credit ratings would increase our borrowing costs and could affect our ability to issue commercial paper. In the event of a default, the holders of our debt could elect to declare all the amounts outstanding under such instruments to be due and payable. Any default under the agreements governing our debt and the remedies sought by the holders of such debt could render us unable to pay principal and interest on our debt.
We may not realize the benefits that we expect from our Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan, or SCAE Plan.
During fiscal 2014, we announced our Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan, or SCAE Plan, which was an expansion of the scope of the plan to integrate Ralcorp. The SCAE Plan includes steps to optimize the entire organization’s supply chain network and to improve selling, general and administrative effectiveness and efficiencies, as well as our continuing evaluation of plans for the integration of Ralcorp and related restructuring activities. The successful design and implementation of the SCAE Plan presents significant organizational design and infrastructure challenges and in many cases will require successful negotiations with third parties, including labor organizations, suppliers, business partners, and other stakeholders. In addition, the SCAE Plan may not advance our business strategy as expected. Events and circumstances, such as financial or strategic difficulties, delays and unexpected costs may occur that could result in our not realizing all or any of the anticipated benefits or our not realizing the anticipated benefits on our expected timetable. If we are unable to realize the anticipated savings of the SCAE Plan, our ability to fund other initiatives may be adversely affected. Any failure to implement the SCAE Plan in accordance with our expectations could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, the complexity of the SCAE Plan will require a substantial amount of management and operational resources. Our management team must successfully implement administrative and operational changes necessary to achieve the anticipated benefits of the SCAE Plan. These and related demands on our resources may divert the organization’s attention from existing core businesses, integrating financial or other systems, have adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers, and impact employee morale. As a result our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows may be adversely affected.
Increases in commodity costs may have a negative impact on profits.
We use many different commodities such as wheat, corn, oats, soybeans, beef, pork, poultry, and energy. Commodities are subject to price volatility caused by commodity market fluctuations, supply and demand, currency fluctuations, external conditions such as weather, and changes in governmental agricultural and energy policies and regulations. Commodity price increases will result in increases in raw material, packaging, and energy costs and operating costs. We may not be able to increase our product prices and achieve cost savings that fully offset these increased costs; and increasing prices may result in reduced sales volume,
reduced margins, and profitability. We have experience in hedging against commodity price increases; however, these practices and experience reduce, but do not eliminate, the risk of negative profit impacts from commodity price increases. We do not fully hedge against changes in commodity prices, and the risk management procedures that we use may not always work as we intend.
Volatility in the market value of derivatives we use to manage exposures to fluctuations in commodity prices will cause volatility in our gross margins and net earnings.
We utilize derivatives to manage price risk for some of our principal ingredients and energy costs, including grains (wheat, corn, and oats), oils, beef, pork, poultry, and energy. Changes in the values of these derivatives are recorded in earnings currently, resulting in volatility in both gross margin and net earnings. These gains and losses are reported in cost of sales in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings and in unallocated corporate items in our segment operating results until we utilize the underlying input in our manufacturing process, at which time the gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating profit. We may experience volatile earnings as a result of these accounting treatments.
Increased competition may result in reduced sales or profits.
The food industry is highly competitive. Our principal competitors have substantial financial, marketing, and other resources. Increased competition can reduce our sales due to loss of market share or the need to reduce prices to respond to competitive and customer pressures. Competitive pressures also may restrict our ability to increase prices, including in response to commodity and other cost increases. We sell branded, private brand, and customized food products, as well as commercially branded foods and ingredients. Our branded products have an advantage over private brand products primarily due to advertising and name recognition, although private brand products typically sell at a discount to those of branded competitors. In addition, when branded competitors focus on price and promotion, the environment for private brand producers becomes more challenging because the price difference between private brand products and branded products may become less significant. In most product categories, we compete not only with other widely advertised branded products, but also with other private label and store brand products that are generally sold at lower prices. A strong competitive response from one or more of our competitors to our marketplace efforts, or a consumer shift towards more generic, lower-priced, or other value offerings, could result in us reducing pricing, increasing marketing or other expenditures, or losing market share. Our profits could decrease if a reduction in prices or increased costs are not counterbalanced with increased sales volume.
Significant private brand competitive activity can lead to volatility in results and margin compression.
Private brand customer buying decisions are often based on a periodic bidding process. Our sales volume may decrease significantly if our offer is too high and we lose the ability to sell private brand products through these channels, even temporarily. Alternatively, we risk reducing our margins if our offer is successful but below our desired price. Either of these outcomes may adversely affect our results of operations.
Changes in our relationships with significant customers or suppliers could adversely affect us.
During fiscal 2014, our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 17% of our net revenues. There can be no assurance that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and other significant customers will continue to purchase our products in the same quantities or on the same terms as in the past, particularly as increasingly powerful retailers continue to demand lower pricing. The loss of a significant customer or a material reduction in sales to a significant customer could materially and adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.
Disruption of our supply chain could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our ability to make, move, and sell our products is critical to our success. Damage or disruption to our supply chain, including third-party manufacturing or transportation and distribution capabilities, due to weather, including any potential effects of climate change, natural disaster, fire or explosion, terrorism, pandemics, strikes, government action, or other reasons beyond our control or the control of our suppliers and business partners, could impair our ability to manufacture or sell our products. Failure to take adequate steps to mitigate the likelihood or potential impact of such events, or to effectively manage such events if they occur, particularly when a product is sourced from a single supplier or location, could adversely affect our business or financial results. In addition, disputes with significant suppliers, including disputes regarding pricing or performance, could adversely affect our ability to supply products to our customers and could materially and adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.
The sophistication and buying power of our customers could have a negative impact on profits.
Our customers, such as supermarkets, warehouse clubs, and food distributors, have continued to consolidate, resulting in fewer customers on which we can rely for business. These consolidations and the growth of supercenters have produced large, sophisticated customers with increased buying power and negotiating strength who are more capable of resisting price increases and can demand lower pricing, increased promotional programs, or specialty tailored products. In addition, larger retailers have the scale to develop supply chains that permit them to operate with reduced inventories or to develop and market their own retailer brands. These customers may also in the future use more of their shelf space, currently used for our products, for their store brand products. We continue to implement initiatives to counteract these pressures. However, if the larger size of these customers results in additional negotiating strength and/or increased private label or store brand competition, our profitability could decline.
Consolidation also increases the risk that adverse changes in our customers' business operations or financial performance will have a corresponding material adverse effect on us. For example, if our customers cannot access sufficient funds or financing, then they may delay, decrease, or cancel purchases of our products, or delay or fail to pay us for previous purchases.
We must identify changing consumer preferences and develop and offer food products to meet their preferences.
Consumer preferences evolve over time and the success of our food products depends on our ability to identify the tastes and dietary habits of consumers and to offer products that appeal to their preferences, including concerns of consumers regarding health and wellness, obesity, product attributes, and ingredients. Introduction of new products and product extensions requires significant development and marketing investment. If our products fail to meet consumer preferences, or we fail to introduce new and improved products on a timely basis, then the return on that investment will be less than anticipated and our strategy to grow sales and profits with investments in acquisitions, marketing, and innovation will be less successful. Similarly, demand for our products could be affected by consumer concerns or perceptions regarding the health effects of ingredients such as sodium, trans fats, sugar, processed wheat, or other product ingredients or attributes.
If we do not achieve the appropriate cost structure in the highly competitive food industry, our profitability could decrease.
Our future success and earnings growth depend in part on our ability to achieve the appropriate cost structure and operate efficiently in the highly competitive food industry, particularly in an environment of volatile input costs. We continue to implement profit-enhancing initiatives that impact our supply chain and general and administrative functions. These initiatives are focused on cost-saving opportunities in procurement, manufacturing, logistics, and customer service, as well as general and administrative overhead levels. Gaining additional efficiencies may become more difficult over time. Our failure to reduce costs through productivity gains or by eliminating redundant costs resulting from acquisitions could adversely affect our profitability and weaken our competitive position. If we do not continue to effectively manage costs and achieve additional efficiencies, our competitiveness and our profitability could decrease.
We may be subject to product liability claims and product recalls, which could negatively impact our profitability.
We sell food products for human consumption, which involves risks such as product contamination or spoilage, product tampering, other adulteration of food products, mislabeling, and misbranding. We may be subject to liability if the consumption of any of our products causes injury, illness, or death. In addition, we will voluntarily recall products in the event of contamination or damage. We have issued recalls and have from time to time been and currently are involved in lawsuits relating to our food products. A significant product liability judgment or a widespread product recall may negatively impact our sales and profitability for a period of time depending on the costs of the recall, the destruction of product inventory, product availability, competitive reaction, customer reaction and consumer attitudes. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image.
Additionally, as a manufacturer and marketer of food products, we are subject to extensive regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other national, state, and local government agencies. The Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, or the FDCA, and the Food Safety Modernization Act and their respective regulations govern, among other things, the manufacturing, composition and ingredients, packaging, and safety of food products. Some aspects of these laws use a strict liability standard for imposing sanctions on corporate behavior; meaning that no intent is required to be established. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we may be subject to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls, or seizures, as well as criminal sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. As previously disclosed, among the matters outstanding during fiscal 2014 related to the Company's 2007 peanut butter recall, is an ongoing investigation by the U.S. Attorney's office in Georgia and the Consumer Protection Branch of the Department of Justice. In fiscal 2011, we received formal requests from the U.S. Attorney's office in Georgia seeking a variety of records and information related to the operations of our peanut butter manufacturing facility in Sylvester, Georgia. We have been and continue
to be engaged in ongoing discussions with the U.S. Attorney’s office and the Department of Justice in regard to the investigation. We are pursuing a negotiated resolution, which we believe will likely involve a misdemeanor criminal disposition under the Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act.
Any damage to our reputation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Maintaining a good reputation globally is critical to selling our products. Product contamination or tampering, the failure to maintain high standards for product quality, safety, and integrity, including with respect to raw materials and ingredients obtained from suppliers, or allegations of product quality issues, mislabeling or contamination, even if untrue, may reduce demand for our products or cause production and delivery disruptions. Our reputation could also be adversely impacted by any of the following, or by adverse publicity (whether or not valid) relating thereto: the failure to maintain high ethical, social, and environmental standards for all of our operations and activities; the failure to achieve our goals with respect to sodium or saturated fat; our research and development efforts; or our environmental impact, including use of agricultural materials, packaging, energy use, and waste management. Failure to comply with local laws and regulations, to maintain an effective system of internal controls or to provide accurate and timely financial information could also hurt our reputation. Damage to our reputation or loss of consumer confidence in our products for any of these or other reasons could result in decreased demand for our products and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, as well as require additional resources to rebuild our reputation.
Our results could be adversely impacted as a result of increased pension, labor, and people-related expenses.
Inflationary pressures and any shortages in the labor market could increase labor costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition. Our labor costs include the cost of providing employee benefits in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, including pension, health and welfare, and severance benefits. Changes in interest rates, mortality rates, health care costs, early retirement rates, investment returns, and the market value of plan assets can affect the funded status of our defined benefit plans and cause volatility in the future funding requirements of the plans. A significant increase in our obligations or future funding requirements could have a negative impact on our results of operations and cash flows from operations. Additionally, the annual costs of benefits vary with increased costs of health care and the outcome of collectively-bargained wage and benefit agreements.
If we fail to comply with the many laws applicable to our business, we may face lawsuits or incur significant fines and penalties.
Our facilities and products are subject to many laws and regulations administered by the United States Department of Agriculture, the Federal Food and Drug Administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other federal, state, local, and foreign governmental agencies relating to the processing, packaging, storage, distribution, advertising, labeling, quality, and safety of food products, the health and safety of our employees, and the protection of the environment. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could subject us to lawsuits, administrative penalties, and civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, and recalls of our products. Our operations are also subject to extensive and increasingly stringent regulations administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, which pertain to the discharge of materials into the environment and the handling and disposition of wastes. Failure to comply with these regulations can have serious consequences, including civil and administrative penalties and negative publicity. Changes in applicable laws or regulations or evolving interpretations thereof, including increased government regulations to limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions as a result of concern over climate change, may result in increased compliance costs, capital expenditures, and other financial obligations for us, which could affect our profitability or impede the production or distribution of our products, which could affect our net operating revenues.
Climate change, or legal, regulatory, or market measures to address climate change, may negatively affect our business and operations.
There is growing concern that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere may have an adverse impact on global temperatures, weather patterns, and the frequency and severity of extreme weather and natural disasters. In the event that such climate change has a negative effect on agricultural productivity, we may be subject to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for certain commodities that are necessary for our products, such as corn, wheat, and potatoes. We may also be subjected to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for water as a result of such change, which could impact our manufacturing and distribution operations. In addition, natural disasters and extreme weather conditions may disrupt the productivity of our facilities or the operation of our supply chain. The increasing concern over climate change also may result in more regional, federal, and/or global legal and regulatory requirements to reduce or mitigate the effects of greenhouse gases. In the event that such regulation is enacted and is more aggressive than the sustainability measures that we are currently undertaking to monitor our emissions and improve our energy efficiency, we may experience significant increases in our costs of operation and delivery. In particular,
increasing regulation of fuel emissions could substantially increase the distribution and supply chain costs associated with our products. As a result, climate change could negatively affect our business and operations.
We are increasingly dependent on information technology, and potential disruption, cyber attacks, security problems, and expanding social media vehicles present new risks.
We are increasingly dependent on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit, and store electronic and financial information, to manage and support a variety of business processes and activities, and to comply with regulatory, legal, and tax requirements. If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain the proper technology infrastructure and to maintain and protect the related automated and manual control processes, we could be subject to billing and collection errors, business disruptions, or damage resulting from security breaches. If any of our significant information technology systems suffer severe damage, disruption, or shutdown, and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected, and we could experience delays in reporting our financial results. In addition, there is a risk of business interruption, litigation risks, and reputational damage from leakage of confidential information.
The inappropriate use of certain media vehicles could cause brand damage or information leakage. Negative posts or comments about the Company on any social networking web site could seriously damage its reputation. In addition, the disclosure of non-public company sensitive information through external media channels could lead to information loss. Identifying new points of entry as social media continues to expand presents new challenges. Any business interruptions or damage to our reputation could negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations, and the market price of our common stock.
In connection with Ralcorp's separation of its Post brand cereals business, Post agreed to indemnify Ralcorp for certain liabilities. However, there can be no assurance that the indemnity will be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that Post's ability to satisfy its indemnification obligations will not be impaired in the future.
Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement and the tax sharing agreement that Ralcorp entered into with Post in connection with the separation of Ralcorp's Post brand cereals business, Post agreed to indemnify Ralcorp for certain liabilities. Third parties may seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that Post agreed to retain or assume, and there can be no assurance that the indemnification from Post will be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that Post will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. In addition, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from Post any amounts for which we are held liable, we may be temporarily required to bear these losses ourselves.
Impairment in the carrying value of goodwill or other intangibles could result in the incurrence of impairment charges and negatively impact our net worth.
As of May 25, 2014, we had goodwill of $7.84 billion and other intangibles of $3.21 billion. The net carrying value of goodwill represents the fair value of acquired businesses in excess of identifiable assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date (or subsequent impairment date, if applicable). The net carrying value of other intangibles represents the fair value of trademarks, customer relationships, and other acquired intangibles as of the acquisition date (or subsequent impairment date, if applicable), net of accumulated amortization. Goodwill and other acquired intangibles expected to contribute indefinitely to our cash flows are not amortized, but must be evaluated by management at least annually for impairment. Amortized intangible assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be recoverable. Impairments to goodwill and other intangible assets may be caused by factors outside our control, such as the inability to quickly replace lost co-manufacturing business, increasing competitive pricing pressures, lower than expected revenue and profit growth rates, changes in industry EBITDA multiples, changes in discount rates based on changes in cost of capital (interest rates, etc.), or the bankruptcy of a significant customer and could result in the incurrence of impairment charges and negatively impact our net worth.
Following the impairment charges recorded in fiscal 2014, the carrying value of goodwill in our Private Brands reporting units included $328.7 million for Bars and Coordinated, $464.4 million for Cereal, $752.1 million for Pasta, $816.2 million for Snacks, $717.1 million for Retail Bakery, and $136.1 million for Condiments. If the future performance of one or more of the reporting units within the Private Brands segment falls short of our expectations or if there are significant changes in risk-adjusted discount rates due to changes in market conditions, we could be required to recognize additional, material impairment charges in future periods.
The termination or expiration of current co-manufacturing arrangements could reduce our sales volume and adversely affect our results of operations.
Our businesses periodically enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with manufacturers of products. The terms of these agreements vary but are generally for relatively short periods of time. Volumes produced under each of these agreements can fluctuate significantly based upon the product's life cycle, product promotions, alternative production capacity, and other factors, none of which are under our direct control. Our future ability to enter into co-manufacturing arrangements is not guaranteed, and a decrease in current co-manufacturing levels could have a significant negative impact on sales volume.
Ardent Mills may not achieve the benefits that are anticipated from the joint venture.
The benefits that are expected to result from the recently formed Ardent Mills joint venture will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated cost synergies in the transaction, Ardent Mills' ability to successfully integrate the ConAgra Mills and Horizon Milling businesses and its ability to successfully manage the joint venture on a going-forward basis. It is not certain that we will realize these benefits at all, and if we do, it is not certain how long it will take to achieve these benefits. If, for example, we are unable to achieve the anticipated cost savings, or if there are unforeseen integration costs, or if Ardent Mills is unable to operate the joint venture smoothly in the future, the financial performance of the joint venture may be negatively affected.
If we are unable to complete proposed acquisitions or divestitures or integrate acquired businesses, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.
From time to time, we evaluate acquisition candidates that may strategically fit our business objectives. If we are unable to complete acquisitions or to successfully integrate and develop acquired businesses, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, we may divest businesses that do not meet our strategic objectives, or do not meet our growth or profitability targets. We may not be able to complete desired or proposed divestitures on terms favorable to us. Gains or losses on the sales of, or lost operating income from, those businesses may affect our profitability. Moreover, we may incur asset impairment charges related to acquisitions or divestitures that reduce our profitability.
Our acquisition or divestiture activities may present financial, managerial, and operational risks. Those risks include diversion of management attention from existing businesses, difficulties integrating or separating personnel and financial and other systems, effective and immediate implementation of control environment processes across our employee population, adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers, inaccurate estimates of fair value made in the accounting for acquisitions and amortization of acquired intangible assets which would reduce future reported earnings, potential loss of customers or key employees of acquired businesses, and indemnities and potential disputes with the buyers or sellers. Any of these factors could affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our headquarters are located in Omaha, Nebraska. In addition, certain shared service centers are located in Omaha, Nebraska, including a product development facility, enterprise business services center, and an information technology center. The general offices and location of principal operations are set forth in the following summary of our properties. We also lease many sales offices mainly in the United States.
We maintain a number of stand-alone distribution facilities. In addition, there is warehouse space available at substantially all of our manufacturing facilities.
Utilization of manufacturing capacity varies by manufacturing plant based upon the type of products assigned and the level of demand for those products. Management believes that our manufacturing and processing plants are well maintained and are generally adequate to support the current operations of the business.
We own most of the manufacturing facilities. However, a limited number of plants and parcels of land with the related manufacturing equipment are leased. Substantially all of our transportation equipment and forward-positioned distribution centers containing finished goods are leased or operated by third parties. Information about the properties supporting our three business segments follows.
Consumer Foods Reporting Segment
Domestic general offices in Omaha, Nebraska, Naperville, Illinois, Miami, Florida, and Madison, Tennessee. International general offices in Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, China, Panama, and Colombia.
As of July 16, 2014, thirty-two domestic manufacturing facilities in Arkansas, California, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Wisconsin. Two international manufacturing facilities in Canada; one international manufacturing facility in Mexico; and one international manufacturing facility in Argentina. Interests in ownership of international manufacturing facilities in Mexico and India.
Commercial Foods Reporting Segment
Domestic general offices in Omaha, Nebraska, Eagle, Idaho, Downers Grove, Illinois, North Liberty, Iowa, and Tri-Cities, Washington. International general offices in China, Japan, Netherlands, and Singapore.
As of July 16, 2014, twenty-seven domestic manufacturing facilities in California, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington. Three international manufacturing facilities in Canada. Interests in ownership of manufacturing facilities in Minnesota, Washington, United Kingdom, Austria, and the Netherlands.
Private Brands Reporting Segment
General office in St. Louis, Missouri.
As of July 16, 2014, twenty-six domestic manufacturing facilities in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin. Three international manufacturing facilities in Italy and two international manufacturing facilities in Canada.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to various environmental proceedings and litigation, primarily related to our acquisition of Beatrice Company (“Beatrice”) in fiscal 1991. As a result of the acquisition of Beatrice and the significant pre-acquisition contingencies of the Beatrice business and its former subsidiaries, our consolidated post-acquisition financial statements reflect liabilities associated with the estimated resolution of these contingencies. These include various litigation and environmental proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to its acquisition by us. The litigation includes suits against a number of lead paint and pigment manufacturers, including ConAgra Grocery Products Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“ConAgra Grocery Products”), and the Company as alleged successors to W. P. Fuller Co., a lead paint and pigment manufacturer owned and operated by Beatrice until 1967. Although decisions favorable to us have been rendered in Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio, we remain a defendant in active suits in Illinois and California. The Illinois suit seeks class-wide relief in the form of medical monitoring for elevated levels of lead in blood. In California, a number of cities and counties have joined in a consolidated action seeking abatement of the alleged public nuisance. On September 23, 2013, a trial of the California case concluded in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara, and on January 27, 2014, the court entered Judgment against ConAgra Grocery Products and two other defendants, which orders the creation of a California abatement fund in the amount of $1.15 billion. Liability is joint and several. The Company believes ConAgra Grocery Products did not inherit any liabilities of W. P. Fuller Co. The Company will continue to vigorously defend itself in this case and has appealed the Judgment to the Court of Appeal of the State of California Sixth Appellate District. The Company expects the appeal process will last several years. The absence of any linkage between ConAgra Grocery Products and W. P. Fuller Co. is a critical issue that the Company will continue to advance throughout the appeals process. It is not possible to estimate exposure in this case or the remaining case in Illinois (which is based on different legal theories). If ultimately necessary, the Company will look to its insurance policies for coverage; its carriers are on notice. However, the Company cannot absolutely assure that the final resolution of this matter will not a have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
The environmental proceedings associated with Beatrice include litigation and administrative proceedings involving Beatrice's status as a potentially responsible party at 36 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or state-equivalent sites. These sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum, pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs, acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. Beatrice has paid or is in the process of paying its liability share at 34 of these sites. Reserves for these matters have been established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, the known volumetric contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in remediating sites. The reserves for Beatrice-related environmental matters totaled $61.6 million as of May 25, 2014, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites referenced above. We expect expenditures for Beatrice-related environmental matters to continue for up to 18 years.
We are a party to a number of lawsuits and claims arising out of our ongoing business operations. Among these, there are lawsuits, claims, and matters related to the February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products. Among the matters outstanding during fiscal 2014 related to the peanut butter recall is an ongoing investigation by the U.S. Attorney's office in Georgia and the Consumer Protection Branch of the Department of Justice. In fiscal 2011, we received formal requests from the U.S. Attorney's office in Georgia seeking a variety of records and information related to the operations of our peanut butter manufacturing facility in Sylvester, Georgia. These requests relate to the June 2007 execution of a search warrant at our facility following the February 2007 recall. During fiscal 2013 and 2012, we recognized charges of $7.5 million and $17.5 million, respectively, in connection with this matter. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we reduced our accrual by $6.7 million in connection with ongoing discussions with the U.S. Attorney’s office and the Department of Justice in regard to the investigation. We are pursuing a negotiated resolution, which we believe will likely involve a misdemeanor criminal disposition under the Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act. After taking into account liabilities recorded for these matters, we believe the ultimate resolution of this matter should not have a material adverse effect on our financial conditions, results of operations, or liquidity.
In addition to the investigation noted above, we were previously engaged in litigation against an insurance carrier to recover our settlement expenditures and defense costs associated with the peanut butter recall. During fiscal 2009, we recognized a charge of $24.8 million in connection with the insurance coverage dispute. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we reached a settlement on the insurance dispute, pursuant to which we were paid $25.0 million, in addition to retaining the defense costs previously reimbursed to us. We recognized the $25.0 million in income as a reduction to selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we received an additional reimbursement of settlement and defense costs of $3.5 million related to this matter, which was recognized in income as a reduction to SG&A expenses.
In June 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina. This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim® branded meat snacks. In June 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release, and not a deliberate
act. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we settled our property and business interruption claims related to the Garner accident with our insurance providers. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., our engineer and project manager at the site, filed a declaratory judgment action against us seeking indemnity for personal injury claims brought against it as a result of the accident. In the first quarter of fiscal 2012, our motion for summary judgment was granted and the suit was dismissed without prejudice on the basis that the suit was filed prematurely. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. refiled its action for indemnity. We will continue to defend this action vigorously. Any exposure in this case is expected to be limited to the applicable insurance deductible.
In April 2010, an accidental explosion occurred at our flour milling facility in Chester, Illinois. Two employees of a subcontractor and one employee of the primary contractor, Westside Salvage (“Westside”), on the site at the time of the accident suffered injuries. Suit was initiated against Westside and the Company for personal injury claims. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, a jury in Federal Court sitting in East St. Louis, Illinois, returned a verdict against the Company and Westside and in favor of the three employees. The verdict was in the amount of $77.5 million in compensatory damages apportioned between the Company and Westside and $100.0 million in punitive damages against the Company. Post-trial motions were filed by the Company and the trial court reduced the punitive award by approximately $7 million. We filed an appeal with the Seventh Federal Circuit Court of Appeals on the verdict and the damages in the third quarter of fiscal 2013. The appeal was argued in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 and we are awaiting a decision. Any exposure in this case is expected to be limited to the applicable insurance deductible, for which an amount of $3 million was accrued in a prior period.
Prior to our ownership of Ralcorp, a lawsuit was brought in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas by Frito-Lay North America, Inc. against Ralcorp and Medallion Foods, Inc., a subsidiary of Ralcorp, alleging that certain products manufactured by Medallion infringed Frito-Lays' patents and trademarks and misappropriated trade secrets. After a jury trial during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, jurors delivered a verdict in favor of Medallion and Ralcorp on all claims. The matter has been resolved and the case concluded.
The South Coast Air Quality Management District in California has issued notices to our Azusa, California facility, which was acquired in the Ralcorp acquisition, alleging historic air violations. The parties are negotiating a settlement which is expected to include a fine in excess of $0.1 million and an abatement program. We have asserted indemnity claims against the party that sold the Azusa facility to Ralcorp.
After taking into account liabilities recognized for all of the foregoing matters, management believes the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange where it trades under the ticker symbol: CAG. At June 22, 2014, there were approximately 20,700 shareholders of record.
Quarterly sales price and dividend information is set forth in Note 21 “Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)” to the consolidated financial statements and incorporated herein by reference.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table presents the total number of shares of common stock purchased during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that were purchased as part of a publicly announced repurchase program, and the approximate dollar value of the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the share repurchase program:
(1)
Pursuant to publicly announced share repurchase programs from December 2003, we have repurchased approximately 172.5 million shares at a cost of $4.1 billion through May 25, 2014. The current program has no expiration date.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(1)
Amounts exclude the impact of discontinued operations of the Fernando’s® operations, the Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ operations, the frozen handhelds operations, the Lightlife® operations, and the Medallion Foods operations.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis is intended to provide a summary of significant factors relevant to our financial performance and condition. The discussion should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Results for the fiscal year ended May 25, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be attained in the future.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
ConAgra Foods, Inc. (NYSE: CAG) is one of North America's largest packaged food companies with branded and private branded food found in 99% of America's households, as well as a strong commercial foods business serving restaurants and foodservice operations globally. Consumers can find recognized brands such as Banquet®, Chef Boyardee®, Egg Beaters®, Healthy Choice®, Hebrew National®, Hunt's®, Marie Callender's®, Orville Redenbacher's®, PAM®, Peter Pan®, Reddi-wip®, Slim Jim®, Snack Pack®, and many other ConAgra Foods brands, along with food sold by ConAgra Foods under private brand labels, in grocery, convenience, mass merchandise, club, and drug stores. Additionally, ConAgra Foods supplies frozen and sweet potato products as well as other vegetable, spice, bakery, and grain products to commercial and foodservice customers.
Fiscal 2014 earnings reflected decreases in Consumer Foods volumes and challenges in Private Brands profitability. We anticipate fiscal 2015 to be a year of stabilization and recovery. We plan to benefit from stronger underlying operations, generate sizeable productivity and administrative savings, and continue to realize substantial synergies from the Ralcorp transaction. Administrative savings are also expected to play a growing role in earnings as we implement effectiveness and efficiency initiatives that began in fiscal 2014. We generated cash of approximately $1.55 billion from continuing operations and repaid $612 million of debt during fiscal 2014. We intend to continue to focus on repayment of debt in fiscal 2015.
On May 29, 2014, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2014, the Company, Cargill, Incorporated ("Cargill"), and CHS Inc. ("CHS") (collectively, the “Owners”), completed the formation of the previously announced Ardent Mills flour milling joint venture, which combined the North American flour milling operations and related businesses operated through the ConAgra Mills division of ConAgra Foods and the Horizon Milling joint venture of Cargill and CHS (see “Formation of Ardent Mills” below).
Fiscal 2014 diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $0.70. Fiscal 2013 diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $1.85. Several significant items affect the comparability of year-over-year results of continuing operations (see “Items Impacting Comparability” below).
Items Impacting Comparability
Segment presentation of gains and losses from derivatives used for economic hedging of anticipated commodity input costs and economic hedging of foreign currency exchange rate risks of anticipated transactions is discussed in the segment review below.
Items of note impacting comparability for fiscal 2014 included the following:
•
a charge of $602.2 million ($572.8 million after-tax) related to goodwill impairment impacting reporting units within our Private Brands segment,
•
charges totaling $95.5 million ($59.9 million after-tax) in connection with our restructuring plans,
•
a benefit of $90.3 million ($55.7 million after-tax) in connection with the divestiture of three flour milling facilities,
•
charges of $78.9 million ($49.7 million after-tax) related to other intangible asset impairments, primarily relating to the Chef Boyardee brand,
•
a loss of $54.9 million ($34.4 million after-tax) related to forward starting swaps that were terminated in February 2014 upon the Company's decision to not refinance debt which matured in the fiscal fourth quarter of 2014,
•
charges of $53.0 million ($33.3 million after-tax) in support of our integration of the former Ralcorp business,
•
charges of $20.1 million ($12.4 million after-tax) of transaction-related costs, including the formation of the Ardent Mills joint venture, which was completed subsequent to the end of fiscal 2014,
•
a charge of $16.5 million ($10.4 million after-tax) in connection with the impairment of a small production facility,
•
a benefit of $10.2 million ($8.8 million after-tax) related to legal matters associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall, including a reduction of the legal accrual for pending matters (which is not tax deductible) and the reimbursement of settlement and defense costs from an insurer,
•
a charge of $8.9 million ($5.6 million after-tax) in connection with the impairment of certain assets received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier,
•
a benefit of $5.1 million ($3.2 million after-tax) in connection with the sale of land received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier,
•
a charge of $3.4 million ($2.6 million after-tax) reflecting the write-off of our share of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of the pension liability for an international potato venture, classified within equity method investment earnings, and
•
income tax benefits of $66.4 million from a change in estimate related to tax methods used for certain international sales, changes in deferred state tax rates relating to various changes in legal structure and state tax filing positions, resolution of foreign tax matters that were previously reserved, the effect of a law change in Mexico requiring deconsolidation for tax reporting purposes, and the resolution of certain income tax matters related to dispositions of foreign operations in prior years.
Items of note impacting comparability for fiscal 2013 included the following:
•
charges of $114.2 million ($78.0 million after-tax) of acquisition-related costs,
•
charges totaling $45.5 million ($28.4 million after-tax) in connection with our restructuring plans,
•
a benefit of $25.0 million ($15.3 million after-tax) related to the favorable settlement of an insurance matter associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall,
•
expenses of $21.6 million ($13.5 million after-tax) relating to the integration of Ralcorp,
•
incremental cost of goods of $16.7 million ($10.2 million after-tax) due to the fair value adjustment to inventory resulting from acquisition accounting for Ralcorp,
•
a charge of $10.2 million ($6.5 million after-tax) in connection with the impairment of certain assets received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier,
•
a charge of $7.5 million ($7.5 million after-tax) in connection with legal matters associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall,
•
charges of $6.2 million ($3.9 million after-tax) related to early extinguishment of debt as a result of early payments on our Term Loan Facility,
•
a charge of $5.7 million ($3.8 million after-tax) reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability,
•
charges of $4.5 million ($2.8 million after-tax) related to environmental remediation matters related to Beatrice Company,
•
charges of $3.0 million ($1.8 million after-tax) in connection with an accidental explosion that occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina (the "Garner accident"), and
•
incremental income tax expense of $18.3 million, principally from the income tax consequences of certain costs incurred in association with the Ralcorp acquisition.
Acquisitions
In September 2013, we acquired frozen dessert production assets from Harlan Bakeries for $39.9 million in cash. The purchase included machinery, operating systems, warehousing/storage, and other assets associated with making frozen fruit pies, cream pies, pastry shells, and loaf cakes. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.
In January 2013, we acquired Ralcorp for approximately $5.07 billion ($4.75 billion, net of cash acquired, plus assumed liabilities). Ralcorp manufactured private brands of products including: ready-to-eat and hot cereals, nutritional and cereal bars,
snack mixes and other snack products, crackers and cookies, snack nuts, peanut butter, preserves and jellies, syrups, dressings, frozen griddle products including: pancakes, waffles, and French toast, frozen biscuits and other frozen pre-baked products such as breads and rolls, frozen and refrigerated dough products, and dry pasta and frozen pasta meals. The results of operations of the Ralcorp business are included in each of our reporting segments, primarily Private Brands.
In August 2012, we acquired the P.F. Chang's® and Bertolli® brands frozen meal business from Unilever for $266.9 million in cash. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.
Discontinued Operations
In April 2014, we completed the sale of a small snack business, Medallion Foods, for $32.0 million in cash. The business results were previously reflected in the Private Brands segment. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We recognized a pre-tax loss of $5.8 million ($3.5 million after-tax) on the sale of this business in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we recognized an impairment charge related to allocated amounts of goodwill and intangible assets, totaling $25.4 million ($15.2 million after-tax), in anticipation of the divestiture of this business.
In September 2013, we completed the sale of the assets of the Lightlife® business for $54.7 million in cash. The business results were previously reflected in the Consumer Foods segment. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $32.1 million ($19.8 million after-tax) on the sale of this business, which was classified as discontinued operations in fiscal 2014.
Formation of Ardent Mills
On May 25, 2014, we sold three flour milling facilities located in Oakland, California, Saginaw, Texas, and New Prague, Minnesota, to Miller Milling Company LLC for a total cash consideration of $162.4 million. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $90.3 million ($55.7 million after-tax) during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. The related assets have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheet for the period presented prior to divestiture. These mills were divested pursuant to an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice related to the previously announced formation of the Ardent Mills flour milling joint venture. On May 29, 2014, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2014, the Company, Cargill, and CHS completed the formation of Ardent Mills. In connection with the closing of the Ardent Mills joint venture, the Company received total cash consideration of $565.3 million, before taxes (of which $162.4 million was recognized in fiscal 2014 from the sale of the three mills), and a 44% interest in the Ardent Mills joint venture. We expect to recognize a gain of approximately $625 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. The Company has allocated the net cash proceeds primarily towards debt reduction.
Restructuring Plans
We continue to execute a plan for the integration of Ralcorp and related restructuring activities and during fiscal 2014, our Board of Directors approved an expansion of the scope of the plan to include steps to optimize the entire Company’s supply chain network and improve selling, general and administrative effectiveness and efficiencies, referred to as the Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan (the “SCAE Plan”). This plan was previously referred to as the Ralcorp Related Restructuring Plan. As a part of this SCAE Plan, we expect to take actions to, among other things, continue the ongoing integration and restructuring of the operations of Ralcorp, optimize manufacturing assets, optimize the Company’s dry distribution and mixing centers, and improve operational effectiveness and reduce overall costs in the Company’s administrative areas.
Although we remain unable to make good faith estimates relating to the entire SCAE Plan, we are reporting on actions initiated through the end of fiscal 2014, including the estimated amounts or range of amounts for each major type of costs expected to be incurred, and the charges that have or will result in cash outflows. We now expect to incur approximately $325.0 million of charges in connection with the SCAE Plan, which includes $245.4 million of cash charges and $79.6 million of non-cash charges. In fiscal 2014 and 2013, we recognized charges of $83.7 million and $28.4 million, respectively, in relation to the SCAE Plan.
During fiscal 2012, we started incurring costs in connection with actions taken to attain synergies when integrating businesses acquired prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2013. These costs, collectively referred to as "acquisition-related restructuring costs", include severance and other costs associated with consolidating facilities and administrative functions. We expect to incur $23.8 million of charges, $15.9 million of which are cash charges, in connection with the acquisition-related restructuring costs. We have recognized cumulative pre-tax expenses of $23.4 million ($15.5 million of which have resulted in cash outflows) related to the acquisition-related restructuring costs. In fiscal 2014, we recognized charges of $9.4 million, primarily representing costs related to asset impairments on equipment. In fiscal 2013, we recognized charges of $9.5 million. The acquisition-related restructuring costs are substantially complete.
In February 2011, our Board of Directors approved a plan designed to optimize our manufacturing and distribution networks, which we refer to as the Network Optimization Plan. The Network Optimization Plan consists of projects that involve, among other things, the exit of certain manufacturing facilities, the disposal of underutilized manufacturing assets, and actions designed to optimize our distribution network. In connection with the Network Optimization Plan, we have incurred aggregate pre-tax costs of $76.7 million, including approximately $17.9 million of cash charges. In fiscal 2013, we recognized charges of $4.3 million in relation to the Network Optimization Plan. At the end of fiscal 2013, the Network Optimization Plan was substantially complete.
Prior to our acquisition of Ralcorp, the management of Ralcorp had initiated certain activities designed to optimize Ralcorp's manufacturing and distribution networks. We refer to these actions and the related costs as the "Ralcorp Pre-acquisition Restructuring Plans". These plans involved, among other things, the exit of certain manufacturing facilities. In connection with the Ralcorp Pre-acquisition Restructuring Plans, we have incurred $3.7 million of pre-tax charges ($1.9 million of which resulted in cash outflows). In fiscal 2014 and 2013, we recognized charges of $2.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively. At the end of fiscal 2014, the Ralcorp Pre-acquisition Restructuring Plans were substantially complete.
SEGMENT REVIEW
As a result of the Ralcorp acquisition, we implemented organizational changes during the second quarter of fiscal 2014 that resulted in new reporting segments. We began reporting our operations in three reporting segments: Consumer Foods, Commercial Foods, and Private Brands. We believe this recent operating structure will enhance our focus on profitability, coordinated business execution, and resource allocation across our business. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the revised segment presentation. Prior to this change in organizational structure, we had four operating and reportable segments.
Consumer Foods
The Consumer Foods reporting segment includes branded food sold in various retail channels primarily in North America. Our food products are found in a variety of categories (meals, entrees, condiments, sides, snacks, and desserts) throughout grocery and convenience stores across frozen, refrigerated, and shelf-stable temperature classes.
The Consumer Foods reporting segment no longer includes results for store brands (store brands are now part of the recently created Private Brands segment) or foodservice results (the foodservice business is now part of the Commercial Foods segment). The Consumer Foods reporting segment now includes additional international sales which were previously part of the Ralcorp Food Group segment.
Commercial Foods
The Commercial Foods reporting segment includes commercially branded and private branded food and ingredients, which are sold primarily to commercial, foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segment's primary food items include: frozen potato and sweet potato items and a variety of vegetable, spice and frozen bakery goods which are sold under brands such as Lamb Weston® and Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings®.
The Commercial Foods reporting segment now includes foodservice results which were previously part of the Consumer Foods segment, as well as frozen bakery foodservice results, which were previously part of the Ralcorp Frozen Bakery Products segment. Our milling business was included in the Commercial Foods segment for the periods covered by this report but was contributed to Ardent Mills shortly after the end of fiscal 2014.
Private Brands
The Private Brands reporting segment includes private branded and customized food items sold in various retail channels, primarily in North America. Our Private Brands are sold in a variety of categories in grocery and convenience stores including: hot and ready-to-eat cereal; snacks; condiments; bars and coordinated categories; pasta; and retail bakery goods.
The recently created Private Brands reporting segment includes a significant portion of results from the former Ralcorp businesses and the store brands results which were previously part of the Consumer Foods segment.
Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) from Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows in Segment Results
Derivatives used to manage commodity price risk and foreign currency risk are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives (except those related to our milling operations, see Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements) are recognized at fair market value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are subsequently recognized
in the operating results of the reporting segments in the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings.
The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted commodity consumption and the foreign currency risk of certain forecasted transactions, under this methodology:
As of May 25, 2014, the cumulative amount of net derivative gains from economic hedges that had been recognized in general corporate expenses and not yet allocated to reporting segments was $26.9 million. This amount reflected net gains of $25.7 million incurred during the fiscal year ended May 25, 2014, as well as net gains of $1.2 million incurred prior to fiscal 2014. Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect to reclassify to segment operating results gains of $26.5 million and $0.4 million to segment operating results in fiscal 2015 and 2016 and thereafter, respectively.
Fiscal 2014 compared to Fiscal 2013
Net Sales
Overall, our net sales increased $2.28 billion to $17.70 billion in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013, primarily related to the acquisition of Ralcorp.
Consumer Foods net sales for fiscal 2014 were $7.32 billion, a decrease of $235.9 million, or 3%, compared to fiscal 2013. Results reflected a 3% decrease in volume performance and a 1% decrease due to the impact of foreign exchange rates, partially offset by a 1% increase in price/mix. Volume performance from our base businesses for fiscal 2014 was impacted negatively by competitor promotional activity. Significant slotting and promotion investments related to new product launches, particularly in the first quarter, also weighed heavily on net sales in fiscal 2014. In addition, certain shipments planned for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 were shifted to the first quarter of fiscal 2015 as a result of change in timing of retailer promotions and this negatively impacted volume performance.
Sales of products associated with some of our most significant brands, including Bertolli®, Hunt's®, Odom's®, Libby's®, Reddi-wip®, Ro*Tel®, Slim Jim®, and Swiss Miss® grew in fiscal 2014, as compared to fiscal 2013. Significant brands whose products experienced sales declines in fiscal 2014 include Act II®, Banquet®, Chef Boyardee®, Healthy Choice®, Marie Callender's®, Orville Redenbacher's®, Snack Pack®, and Wesson®. A significant portion of the overall volume decline was driven by Healthy Choice, Orville Redenbacher’s and Chef Boyardee (which collectively have annual sales in excess of $1 billion). The Company has product and promotion changes, as well as refinements to consumer communication under way, which are expected to gradually improve the volume and profit performance of these brands throughout fiscal 2015.
Commercial Foods net sales were $6.19 billion in fiscal 2014, an increase of $124.2 million, or 2%, compared to fiscal 2013. Results for fiscal 2014 reflected a 3% benefit from the acquisition of the frozen bakery business of Ralcorp in January 2013. This increase was partially offset by the negative impact of the pass-through of $94.2 million of lower wheat prices in the milling
business. Results for fiscal 2014 also reflected increased volume of 2% in the segment's Lamb Weston specialty potato products business, driven by increased sales to international customers, partially offset by lower price/mix. Sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 to international customers were favorably impacted by increased promotional activity and accelerated orders due to concerns about the effect of a potential external labor dispute on West coast exports. Sales volume in the Foodservice business decreased in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 due to industry trends.
Private Brands net sales for fiscal 2014 were $4.20 billion. The increase of $2.39 billion represents a full year of ownership of the legacy Ralcorp business in fiscal 2014 compared to four months in fiscal 2013. While sales and profits for Private Brands continued to be softer than expected through fiscal 2014, the Company is currently focused on, and has recently organized to improve, sales force coverage, pricing strategies, customer service levels, and plant efficiencies. We have made pricing concessions to protect volumes as we address these challenges. The Company expects improved net sales and operating profit from Private Brands over time.
Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A") Expenses (Includes general corporate expenses)
SG&A expenses totaled $2.77 billion for fiscal 2014, an increase of $630.5 million compared to fiscal 2013. The increase in overall SG&A occurred as a result of the additional eight months of SG&A expenses for the Ralcorp business as well as the following changes from our base business:
•
a gain of $90.3 million from the divestiture of three flour milling facilities in connection with the formation of the Ardent Mills joint venture, which was completed subsequent to the end of fiscal 2014,
•
a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $77.7 million,
•
charges of $75.7 million related to intangible asset impairments, primarily the Chef Boyardee brand,
•
a decrease in advertising and promotion expenses of $48.9 million,
•
an increase in salaries and wages of $63.7 million,
•
a charge of $16.5 million in connection with the impairment of a small production facility,
•
a benefit of $10.2 million related legal matters associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall, including a reduction of the legal accrual for pending matters and the reimbursement of settlement and defense costs from an insurer,
•
a charge of $8.9 million in connection with the impairment of certain assets received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier, and
•
a benefit of $5.1 million in connection with the sale of land received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier.
SG&A expenses for fiscal 2014 (including legacy Ralcorp) also included:
•
charges of $605.4 million for the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets within our Private Brands segment,
•
expenses of $94.1 million in connection with our restructuring plans,
•
$53.0 million in support of our integration of the former Ralcorp business, and
•
transaction-related costs of $20.1 million, principally in connection with the formation of the Ardent Mills joint venture.
SG&A expenses from our base business in fiscal 2013 included:
•
a benefit of $25.0 million related to the favorable settlement of an insurance matter associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall,
•
a charge of $10.2 million in connection with the impairment of certain assets received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier,
•
a charge of $7.5 million in connection with legal matters associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall,
•
charges of $6.2 million related to early extinguishment of debt as a result of early payments on our Term Loan Facility,
•
a charge of $5.7 million reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability,
•
charges of $4.5 million related to environmental remediation matters related to Beatrice Company, and
•
charges of $3.0 million in connection with the Garner accident.
SG&A expenses for fiscal 2013 (including legacy Ralcorp) also included:
•
transaction-related costs of $108.2 million, principally relating to the acquisition of Ralcorp,
•
expenses of $31.9 million in connection with our restructuring plans, and
•
expenses of $21.6 million in support of our integration of the former Ralcorp business.
Operating Profit (Loss) (Earnings (loss) before general corporate expenses, interest expense, net, income taxes, and equity method investment earnings)
Consumer Foods operating profit for fiscal 2014 was $899.4 million, a decrease of $100.8 million, or 10%, compared to fiscal 2013. Gross profits in Consumer Foods were $125.4 million lower in fiscal 2014 than in fiscal 2013, driven by the impact of lower net sales, discussed above, and moderate inflation in product costs. These decreases were partially offset by reduced management incentive compensation and decreased advertising and consumer promotion costs of $50.6 million, reflecting heavy investment in fiscal 2013, rebalancing spending to strengthen promotional support and a focus on marketing effectiveness. Other items that significantly impacted Consumer Foods operating profit in fiscal 2014 included charges of $72.5 million related to impairment of intangibles assets, principally the Chef Boyardee brand, and charges totaling $25.6 million in connection with our restructuring plans. Items that significantly impacted Consumer Foods operating profit in fiscal 2013 included charges totaling $12.1 million in connection with our restructuring plans and charges of $10.9 million of transaction-related costs.
Operating profit for the Commercial Foods segment was $774.6 million in fiscal 2014, an increase of $43.3 million, or 6%, compared to fiscal 2013. Gross profits in the Commercial Foods segment were $38.2 million lower in fiscal 2014 than in fiscal 2013. Decreases in operating profit for fiscal 2014 were driven by lower gross profit in the Lamb Weston specialty potato operations related to the change in mix of sales to international and retail customers due to the impact of a major foodservice customer not renewing a sizable amount of potato business at the end of fiscal 2013, moderate inflation in key inputs, and poor quality raw potatoes affecting plant recovery and throughputs. The significant decreases in Lamb Weston results were offset by significant reductions in incentive compensation expenses in fiscal 2014 and a gain of $90.7 million gain from the divestiture of three flour milling facilities, in connection with the formation of the Ardent Mills joint venture, which was completed subsequent the end of fiscal 2014. Commercial Foods operating profit for fiscal 2014 also included a charge of $16.5 million in connection with the impairment of a small production facility, as well as a charge of $8.9 million for the impairment of certain nonoperating assets and a $5.1 million gain from the sale of land, both related to assets received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier. In addition, there were $4.8 million of charges in connection with our restructuring plans. Results for fiscal 2013 reflected a $10.2 million charge to reduce the carrying value of collateral received in connection with the bankruptcy of the onion products supplier to its estimated fair value based upon updated appraisals. Commercial Foods operating profit also included $6.1 million of charges in fiscal 2013 related to the execution of our restructuring plans. Included in the results of the Commercial Foods operating profit in fiscal 2013 was $3.1 million of incremental cost of goods sold due to the fair value adjustment to inventory resulting from acquisition accounting.
Private Brands operating loss for fiscal 2014 was $375.0 million compared to an operating profit for fiscal 2013 of $123.1 million. The majority of our Private Brands segment is comprised of the former Ralcorp business. The increase in net sales, discussed above, reflects the impact of the Ralcorp acquisition. Operating profits have been below expectations due to sales force, supply chain, and pricing actions, as well as cost challenges associated with integration and business transition. We expect these margin pressures to continue for the next few quarters as a result of the deliberate pricing concessions made in previous quarters
to improve customer relationships and remain competitive in the marketplace during fiscal 2014. In fiscal 2014, we recognized charges of $605.4 million in connection with the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets within the Private Brands segment. Also included in the operating loss for fiscal 2014 were $35.9 million of charges in connection with our restructuring plans. Included in the results of the Private Brands operating profit in fiscal 2013 was $13.6 million of incremental cost of goods sold due to the fair value adjustment to inventory resulting from acquisition accounting. Based on the challenges in the Private Brands segment in fiscal 2014 and the gradual nature of the anticipated recovery from fiscal 2014 earnings levels, the Company’s current profit projections for the Private Brands segment are below original plans for the next several years, despite continued expectations for achievement of strong cost-related synergies.
Interest Expense, Net
In fiscal 2014, net interest expense was $379.0 million, an increase of $103.4 million, or 38%, from fiscal 2013. The increase reflects the issuance of $3.975 billion of senior debt, outstanding borrowings of $900 million under a Term Loan Facility, and $716.0 million of senior debt that was exchanged in January 2013 in financing the Ralcorp acquisition, in addition to the issuance of $750.0 million of senior notes in September 2012. Interest expense in fiscal 2014 and 2013 reflected a net benefit of $12.1 million and $8.6 million, respectively, primarily resulting from interest rate swaps used to effectively convert the interest rates of certain outstanding debt instruments from fixed to variable.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense was $298.2 million and $400.7 million in fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) was 49% for fiscal 2014 and 34% in fiscal 2013. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2014 reflects the incurrence of an impairment of intangible assets, $529.2 million of which was non-deductible goodwill, as well as the benefit of normal, recurring, income tax credits and deductions, some of which expired on December 31, 2013. The fiscal 2014 effective tax rate also included a change in estimate related to tax methods used for certain international sales, favorable tax adjustments resulting from changes in legal structure and state tax filing positions, resolution of foreign tax matters that were previously reserved, the effect of a law change in Mexico requiring deconsolidation for tax reporting purposes, and the resolution of certain income tax matters related to dispositions of foreign operations in prior years. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2013 reflects the incurrence of various non-deductible transaction-related expenses, as well as a reduced domestic manufacturing deduction benefit, in connection with the acquisition of Ralcorp. The fiscal 2013 effective tax rate also included favorable tax adjustments resulting from the implementation of the 2012 American Taxpayer Relief Act during fiscal 2013.
We expect our effective tax rate in fiscal 2015, exclusive of any unusual transactions or tax events, to be approximately 34%.
Equity Method Investment Earnings
We include our share of the earnings of certain affiliates based on our economic ownership interest in the affiliates. Significant affiliates produce and market potato products for retail and foodservice customers. Our share of earnings from our equity method investments was $32.8 million ($30.0 million in the Commercial Foods segment and $2.8 million in the Consumer Foods segment) and $37.5 million ($35.7 million in the Commercial Foods segment and $1.8 million in the Consumer Foods segment) in fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. In fiscal 2014, earnings also reflected a $3.4 million charge reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of the pension liability.
Results of Discontinued Operations
Our discontinued operations generated an after-tax gain of $4.1 million in fiscal 2014 and an after-tax loss of $0.7 million in fiscal 2013. In fiscal 2014, we completed the sale of a small snack business, Medallion Foods, for $32.0 million in cash. We recognized an after-tax loss of $3.5 million on the sale of this business in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we recognized an impairment charge related to allocated amounts of goodwill and intangible assets, totaling $15.2 million after-tax, in anticipation of this divestiture.
We also completed the sale of the assets of the Lightlife® business for $54.7 million in cash. We recognized an after-tax gain of $19.8 million on the sale of this business in fiscal 2014.
Earnings Per Share
Our fiscal 2014 diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $0.70. Our fiscal 2013 diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $1.85. See “Items Impacting Comparability” above as several significant items affected the comparability of year-over-year results of operations.
Fiscal 2013 compared to Fiscal 2012
Net Sales
Overall, our net sales increased $2.1 billion to $15.43 billion in fiscal 2013, reflecting a 9% increase in our Consumer Foods segment and a 6% increase in our Commercial Foods segment relative to results in fiscal 2012, as well as increased sales due to the acquisition of Ralcorp during the third quarter of fiscal 2013.
Consumer Foods net sales for fiscal 2013 were $7.55 billion, an increase of $605.6 million, or 9% compared to fiscal 2012. Results reflected an 8% benefit from acquisitions and a 3% increase from net pricing/mix, offset by a 2% decrease in volume performance from our base businesses (those businesses owned for all of fiscal 2013 and 2012). Increase in pricing/mix was due to pricing initiatives taken toward the end of fiscal 2012. The decrease in volume performance from our base businesses is primarily attributable to volume elasticity or the dampening effect of price increases on sales volume in the marketplace for fiscal 2013.
Sales of products associated with some of our most significant brands, including Act II®, Hebrew National®, Hunt's®, Marie Callender's®, Orville Redenbacher's®, Pam®, Peter Pan®, Reddi-wip®, Ro*Tel®, Slim Jim®, Swiss Miss®, and Wesson® grew in fiscal 2013, as compared to fiscal 2012. Significant brands whose products experienced sales declines in fiscal 2013 include Banquet®, Blue Bonnet®, Chef Boyardee®, David®, Egg Beaters®, Healthy Choice®, Kid Cuisine®, Manwich®, and Snack Pack®.
Commercial Foods net sales were $6.07 billion in fiscal 2013, an increase of $320.0 million, or 6%, compared to fiscal 2012. Net sales in our flour milling business were $47.1 million higher in fiscal 2013 than fiscal 2012, principally reflecting the pass-through of $19.5 million of higher wheat prices in the milling business. Results for fiscal 2013 also reflected improved net pricing/mix of 5% in the segment's Lamb Weston specialty potato products business, while sales volumes were flat. Sales in Commercial Foods due to the acquisition of the Ralcorp frozen bakery business increased $97.4 million in fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012.
Private Brands net sales for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 were $1.81 billion and $638.3 million, respectively. The increase represented the ownership of Ralcorp for four months in fiscal 2013.
Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A") Expenses (Includes general corporate expenses)
SG&A expenses totaled $2.14 billion for fiscal 2013, an increase of $156.3 million compared to fiscal 2012.
SG&A expenses for fiscal 2013 reflected the following:
•
an increase in advertising and promotion expenses of $109.5 million,
•
charges of $108.2 million of transaction-related costs,
•
an increase in salaries and wages of $67.1 million,
•
an increase in incentive compensation expense of $57.6 million,
•
an increase of $49.8 million related to Ralcorp SG&A expenses not included in other items noted herein,
•
expenses of $31.9 million related to the execution of our restructuring plans,
•
an increase in stock compensation expense of $25.7 million,
•
a benefit of $25.0 million related to the favorable settlement of an insurance matter associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall,
•
expenses of $21.6 million relating to the integration of Ralcorp,
•
a charge of $10.2 million in connection with the impairment of certain assets received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier,
•
a charge of $7.5 million in connection with legal matters associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall,
•
charges of $6.2 million related to early extinguishment of debt as a result of early payments on our Term Loan Facility,
•
a charge of $5.7 million reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability,
•
charges of $4.5 million related to environmental remediation matters related to Beatrice Company, and
•
charges of $3.0 million in connection with the Garner accident.
SG&A expenses for fiscal 2012 included:
•
a charge of $336.2 million reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability,
•
a gain of $58.6 million, resulting from the remeasurement to fair value of our previously held noncontrolling equity interest in Agro Tech Foods Limited ("ATFL"), in connection with our acquisition of a majority interest in that company,
•
charges totaling $42.9 million in connection with our restructuring plans,
•
a charge of approximately $17.5 million in connection with legal matters associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall,
•
a benefit of $11.8 million resulting from insurance settlements for matters associated with peanut butter, and
•
a charge of $4.6 million in connection with the write-off of an insurance claim receivable.
Operating Profit (Earnings before general corporate expenses, interest expense, net, income taxes, and equity method investment earnings)
Consumer Foods operating profit for fiscal 2013 was $1.00 billion, an increase of $122.0 million, or 14%, compared to fiscal 2012. Gross profits in Consumer Foods were $253.6 million higher in fiscal 2013 than in fiscal 2012, driven by the impact of higher net sales, discussed above, and the benefit of supply chain cost savings initiatives, partially offset by moderate inflation in product costs (particularly for proteins, packaging, peanuts, sweeteners, and beans). Businesses acquired in fiscal 2013 contributed $26.8 million of operating profit to fiscal 2013. Other items that significantly impacted Consumer Foods operating profit in fiscal 2013 included:
•
an increase in advertising and promotion expense of $90.7 million,
•
an increase in incentive compensation expense of $31.7 million,
•
charges totaling $12.1 million in connection with our restructuring plans,
•
charges of $10.9 million of acquisition-related costs, and
•
an increase in salaries and wages of $11.7 million.
Items that significantly impacted Consumer Foods operating profit in fiscal 2012 included:
•
a gain of $58.6 million, resulting from the remeasurement to fair value of our previously held noncontrolling equity interest in ATFL, in connection with our acquisition of a majority interest in that company, and
•
charges totaling $55.9 million in connection with our restructuring plans.
Operating profit for the Commercial Foods segment was $731.3 million in fiscal 2013, an increase of $115.6 million, or 19%, compared to fiscal 2012. Gross profits in the Commercial Foods segment were $157.3 million higher in fiscal 2013 than in fiscal 2012, driven by higher gross profit in the Lamb Weston specialty potato operations due to increased net pricing/mix, as well as productivity improvements, partially offset by higher input costs. Results for fiscal 2013 also reflected a $10.2 million charge to reduce the carrying value of collateral received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier to its estimated fair value based upon updated appraisals. Included in the results of the Foodservice operating profit in fiscal 2013 was $3.1 million of incremental cost of goods sold due to the fair value adjustment to inventory resulting from acquisition accounting. Commercial Foods operating profit included $6.1 million of charges in fiscal 2012 related to the execution of our restructuring plans. In the third quarter of fiscal 2013, a significant foodservice customer did not renew a significant portion of its potato products purchase contracts with our Lamb Weston business, which we expected to have an unfavorable impact in fiscal 2014. Operating profit in the Foodservice business increased due to the acquisition of the Ralcorp frozen bakery business, which contributed $7.0 million in fiscal 2013.
Private Brands segment operating profit for fiscal 2013 was $123.1 million, an increase of $27.9 million compared to fiscal 2012. Included in the results of the Private Brands segment operating profit in fiscal 2013 was $13.6 million of incremental cost of goods sold due to the fair value adjustment to inventory resulting from acquisition accounting.
Interest Expense, Net
In fiscal 2013, net interest expense was $275.6 million, an increase of $71.6 million, or 35%, from fiscal 2012. The increase reflects the issuance of $3.975 billion of senior debt, borrowings of $1.5 billion under a Term Loan Facility, and $716.0 million of senior debt that was exchanged in January 2013 in financing the Ralcorp acquisition, in addition to the issuance of $750.0 million of senior notes in September 2012. Interest expense in fiscal 2013 and 2012 reflected a net benefit of $8.6 million and $8.9 million, respectively, primarily resulting from interest rate swaps used to effectively convert the interest rates of certain outstanding debt instruments from fixed to variable (these hedges were terminated in fiscal 2011).
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense was $400.7 million and $191.7 million in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) was 34% for fiscal 2013 and 29% in fiscal 2012. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2013 reflects the incurrence of various non-deductible transaction-related expenses, as well as a reduced domestic manufacturing deduction benefit, in connection with the acquisition of Ralcorp. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2012 is reflective of the benefit of normal, recurring, income tax credits and deductions combined with a lower pre-tax level of earnings (due in large part to the impact of the write-off of $396.9 million of actuarial losses under the method of accounting for pension benefits adopted in fiscal 2012), as well as a $58.6 million nontaxable gain on the remeasurement to fair value of our previously held noncontrolling equity interest in ATFL, in connection with our acquisition of a majority interest in that company. The fiscal 2013 effective tax rate also included favorable tax adjustments resulting from the implementation of the 2012 American Taxpayer Relief Act during fiscal 2013, while the fiscal 2012 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by the prior expiration of these tax benefits during fiscal 2012. In the third quarter of fiscal 2013, we received an adverse Mexican tax court ruling and recorded a reserve of $4.0 million.
Equity Method Investment Earnings
We include our share of the earnings of certain affiliates based on our economic ownership interest in the affiliates. Significant affiliates produce and market potato products for retail and foodservice customers. Our share of earnings from our equity method investments was $37.5 million ($1.8 million in the Consumer Foods segment and $35.7 million in the Commercial Foods segment) and $44.9 million ($4.9 million in the Consumer Foods segment and $40.0 million in the Commercial Foods segment) in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease in equity method investment earnings in the Commercial Foods segment were a result of higher input costs for a foreign potato processing venture, in addition to a charge of $2.1 million reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of the pension liability.
Results of Discontinued Operations
Our discontinued operations generated an after-tax loss of $0.7 million in fiscal 2013 and an after-tax gain of $6.5 million in fiscal 2012.
Earnings Per Share
Fiscal 2013 diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $1.85. Fiscal 2012 diluted earnings per share were $1.12, including $1.10 per diluted share from continuing operations and income of $0.02 per diluted share from discontinued operations. See “Items Impacting Comparability” above as several significant items affected the comparability of year-over-year results of operations.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sources of Liquidity and Capital
Our primary financing objective is to maintain a prudent capital structure that provides us flexibility to pursue our growth objectives. If necessary, we use short-term debt principally to finance ongoing operations, including our seasonal requirements for working capital (accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and inventories, less accounts payable, accrued payroll, and other accrued liabilities) and a combination of equity and long-term debt to finance both our base working capital needs and our non-current assets. We increased our indebtedness significantly during fiscal 2013 as a result of the Ralcorp acquisition. We have been focused on repaying a significant portion of our indebtedness subsequent to the Ralcorp acquisition. We are committed to maintaining an investment grade rating.
At May 25, 2014, we had a $1.5 billion revolving credit facility. The facility is scheduled to mature in September 2018. The facility has historically been used principally as a back-up facility for our commercial paper program. As of May 25, 2014, there were no outstanding borrowings under the facility. The facility requires that our consolidated funded debt not exceed 70% of our consolidated capital base in the four quarters commencing on January 29, 2014, and 65% thereafter, and that our fixed charges coverage ratio be greater than 1.75 to 1.0. As of May 25, 2014, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.
As of May 25, 2014, we had $137.0 million outstanding under our commercial paper program. The highest level of borrowings during fiscal 2014 was $395.0 million.
In fiscal 2013, we borrowed $1.5 billion under our Term Loan Facility. We are required to repay borrowings under the Term Loan Facility in equal installments of 2.5% per quarter beginning June 1, 2013 with the remainder of the borrowings to be paid on the maturity date unless prepaid in accordance with the terms of the Term Loan Facility. We may prepay borrowings without premium or penalty. As of May 25, 2014, we had $900.0 million outstanding under the Term Loan Facility. The Term Loan Facility matures on January 29, 2018. The Term Loan Facility interest rate is calculated based on LIBOR plus 1.75%. Net proceeds were used for the acquisition of Ralcorp. The Term Loan Facility requires that our consolidated funded debt not exceed 70% of our consolidated capital base in the four quarters commencing on January 29, 2014, and 65% thereafter, and that our fixed charges coverage ratio be greater than 1.75 to 1.0. As of May 25, 2014, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.
As of the end of fiscal 2014, our senior long-term debt ratings were all investment grade. A significant downgrade in our credit ratings would not affect our ability to borrow amounts under the revolving credit facility, although borrowing costs would increase. A downgrade of our short-term credit ratings would impact our ability to borrow under our commercial paper program by negatively impacting borrowing costs and causing shorter durations, as well as making access to commercial paper more difficult.
We repurchase our shares of common stock from time to time after considering market conditions and in accordance with repurchase limits authorized by our Board of Directors. In December 2011, the Company's Board of Directors approved a $750.0 million increase to our share repurchase authorization. Under the share repurchase authorization, we may repurchase our shares periodically over several years, depending on market conditions and other factors, and may do so in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. The authorization has no time limit and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. We repurchased 2.9 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $100.0 million under this program in fiscal 2014. The Company's total remaining share repurchase authorization as of May 25, 2014 was $181.9 million.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we completed the sale of the assets of the Lightlife business for $54.7 million in cash.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we acquired the frozen dessert production assets from Harlan Bakeries for $39.9 million in cash.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we completed the sale of Medallion Foods for $32.0 million in cash.
Subsequent to the end of fiscal 2014, we received $565.3 million in cash upon the closing of the Ardent Mills joint venture, which included $162.4 million associated with the sale of three flour milling facilities at the end of fiscal 2014.
Subsequent to our fiscal year end, in June 2014, we repaid $350.0 million of the principal amount outstanding under the term loan facility with a portion of the proceeds received in connection with the formation of Ardent Mills. We paid the remaining outstanding principal balance of $550.0 million under the term loan facility in July 2014, and terminated the facility, with a portion of the proceeds from the formation of Ardent Mills and approximately $330 million of borrowings under our commercial paper program.
Cash Flows
In fiscal 2014, we used $0.8 million of cash, which was the net result of $1.55 billion generated from operating activities, $514.1 million used in investing activities, $1.03 billion used in financing activities, and a decrease of $3.8 million in cash due to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Cash generated from operating activities of continuing operations totaled $1.55 billion in fiscal 2014, as compared to $1.41 billion generated in fiscal 2013. The increase in operating cash is largely due to the full year of results of the former Ralcorp business in fiscal 2014 as compared to four months of results in fiscal 2013. Operating cash outflows for interest payments increased $179.8 million to $395.7 million in fiscal 2014 as a result of the increase in debt from the Ralcorp acquisition.We contributed $18.3 million and $19.8 million to our pension plans in fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. In fiscal 2013, decreases in Consumer Foods inventories (excluding impacts of acquisitions) due to more stable commodity prices and utilization of prior physical positions were offset by increases in our Commercial Foods segment resulting from higher wheat prices and increased potato harvest yields. Also in fiscal 2013, tax related cash flow benefits of $180.1 million realized from lower current income tax payments as a result of paying off Ralcorp debt were largely offset by outflows of $130.1 million resulting from costs associated with the Ralcorp acquisition and $42.5 million in interest accrued by Ralcorp prior to the acquisition which was subsequently paid. In fiscal 2014, cash outflows included amounts associated with Ralcorp integration costs of $47.2 million and previously accrued acquisition related costs, primarily severance and retention costs of $24.4 million. We paid larger incentive compensation payments in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 (earned in fiscal 2013) than in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 (earned in fiscal 2012).
Cash used in investing activities totaled $514.1 million in fiscal 2014 versus $5.47 billion in fiscal 2013. Investing activities of continuing operations in fiscal 2014 consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $602.4 million, which increased from fiscal 2013 due to the increases associated with the former Ralcorp businesses, as well as several significant planned plant expansions and improvements. Additionally, we purchased certain frozen dessert production assets for $39.9 million in fiscal 2014. Investing activities in fiscal 2013 consisted primarily of the purchase of Ralcorp for $4.75 billion, net of cash acquired, capital expenditures of $453.7 million, and the acquisition of the P.F. Chang's® and Bertolli® brands frozen meal business from Unilever for $266.9 million in cash. Investing activities of discontinued operations generated $86.7 million in fiscal 2014 primarily from the sale of assets of the Lightlife and Medallion Foods businesses.
Cash used for financing activities of continuing operations totaled $1.03 billion in fiscal 2014 compared with cash generated from financing activities of $4.13 billion in fiscal 2013. In fiscal 2014, we decreased our total debt by $612.4 million, including the repayment of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.875% senior notes upon maturity in April 2014. In fiscal 2013, we issued long-term debt that generated $6.22 billion in cash and repaid $2.07 billion in debt, primarily $1.44 billion paid for principal and contractual amounts on Ralcorp notes tendered in connection with the Ralcorp acquisition and prepayment of $600.0 million of the Term Loan Facility. In conjunction with the Ralcorp acquisition, we issued common stock for $269.2 million in net cash proceeds in fiscal 2013. During fiscal 2014 and 2013, we paid dividends of $420.9 million and $400.7 million, respectively. In fiscal 2014 and 2013, we repurchased $100.0 million and $245.0 million, respectively, of our common stock as part of our share repurchase program. Amounts generated from employee stock option exercise proceeds and issuance of other stock awards were $103.7 million and $274.4 million in fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $183.1 million at May 25, 2014 and $183.9 million at May 26, 2013, of which $146.3 million at May 25, 2014 and $166.4 million at May 26, 2013 was held in foreign countries. The Company makes an assertion regarding the amount of foreign earnings intended for permanent reinvestment outside the United States, with the balance available to be repatriated to the United States. The cash held by foreign subsidiaries for permanent reinvestment is generally used to finance the subsidiaries' operational activities and future foreign investments. No related tax liability has been accrued as of May 25, 2014. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company's foreign subsidiaries repaid $92.9 million of intercompany notes to domestic subsidiaries. These loan repayments did not result in significant additional income taxes. In addition, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, certain of the Company's foreign subsidiaries extended short term loans to domestic entities totaling $37.8 million. Such loans were repaid in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. At May 25, 2014, management does not intend to permanently repatriate
additional foreign cash. Any future decision to repatriate foreign cash could result in an adjustment to the deferred tax liability after considering available foreign tax credits and other tax attributes. It is not practicable to determine the amount of any such deferred tax liability at this time.
We estimate our capital expenditures in fiscal 2015 to be approximately $600 million.
Management believes that existing cash balances, cash flows from operations, existing credit facilities, and access to capital markets will provide sufficient liquidity to meet our working capital needs, planned capital expenditures, and payment of anticipated quarterly dividends for at least the next twelve months.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We use off-balance sheet arrangements (e.g., leases accounted for as operating leases) where sound business principles warrant their use. We also periodically enter into guarantees and other similar arrangements as part of transactions in the ordinary course of business. These are described further in “Obligations and Commitments,” below.
Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated
We have variable interests in certain entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we are not the primary beneficiary. We do not consolidate the financial statements of these entities.
We hold a 50.0% interest in Lamb Weston RDO, a potato processing venture. We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston RDO. We receive a fee for these services based on a percentage of the net sales of the venture. We reflect the value of our ownership interest in this venture in other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, based upon the equity method of accounting. The balance of our investment was $12.6 million and $15.2 million at May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, respectively, representing our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture. The capital structure of Lamb Weston RDO includes owners' equity of $25.4 million and term borrowings from banks of $42.8 million as of May 25, 2014. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this venture.
We lease certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the assets being leased, representing our only variable interest in these lessor entities. These leases are accounted for as operating leases, and accordingly, there are no material assets or liabilities associated with these entities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have no material exposure to loss from our variable interests in these entities. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreements, the expected remaining useful lives of the assets leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entities.
OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
As part of our ongoing operations, we enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future payments under contracts such as lease agreements, debt agreements, and unconditional purchase obligations (i.e., obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices, such as "take-or-pay" contracts). The unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into in our normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available. Of these items, debt and capital lease obligations, which totaled $8.9 billion as of May 25, 2014, were recognized as liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations, which totaled $2.9 billion as of May 25, 2014, were not recognized as liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
A summary of our contractual obligations as of May 25, 2014 was as follows:
1 Amount includes open purchase orders and agreements, some of which are not legally binding and/or may be cancellable. Such agreements are generally settleable in the ordinary course of business in less than one year.
We are also contractually obligated to pay interest on our long-term debt and capital lease obligations. The weighted average coupon interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of May 25, 2014 was approximately 4.2%.
The operating lease obligations noted in the table above have not been reduced by non-cancellable sublease rentals of $32.3 million.
We own a 49.99% interest in Lamb Weston BSW, LLC ("Lamb Weston BSW"), a potato processing venture with Ochoa Ag Unlimited Foods, Inc. ("Ochoa"). We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston BSW. Under certain circumstances, we could be required to compensate Ochoa for lost profits resulting from significant production shortfalls ("production shortfalls"). Commencing on June 1, 2018, or on an earlier date under certain circumstances, we have a contractual right to purchase the remaining equity interest in Lamb Weston BSW from Ochoa (the "call option"). We are currently subject to a contractual obligation to purchase all of Ochoa's equity investment in Lamb Weston BSW at the option of Ochoa (the "put option"). The purchase prices under the call option and the put option (the "options") are based on the book value of Ochoa's equity interest at the date of exercise, as modified by an agreed-upon rate of return for the holding period of the investment balance. The agreed-upon rate of return varies depending on the circumstances under which any of the options are exercised. As of May 25, 2014, the price at which Ochoa had the right to put its equity interest to us was $41.9 million. This amount, which is presented within other noncurrent liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, is not included in the "Contractual Obligations" table above as the payment is contingent upon the exercise of the put option by Ochoa, and the eventual occurrence and timing of such exercise is uncertain.
As part of our ongoing operations, we also enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future cash payments only upon the occurrence of a future event (e.g., guarantees of debt or lease payments of a third party should the third party be unable to perform). In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the following commercial commitments are not recognized as liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. A summary of our commitments, including commitments associated with equity method investments, as of May 25, 2014 was as follows:
In certain limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. We guarantee certain leases and other commercial obligations resulting from the 2002 divestiture of our fresh beef and pork operations. The remaining terms of these arrangements do not exceed two years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $5.4 million as of May 25, 2014.
We are a party to various potato supply agreements. Under the terms of certain such potato supply agreements, we have guaranteed repayment of short-term bank loans of the potato suppliers, under certain conditions. At May 25, 2014, the amount of
supplier loans effectively guaranteed by us was $34.4 million, included in the table above. We have not established a liability for these guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our required performance under the guarantees is remote.
We were a party to a supply agreement with an onion processing company where we had guaranteed, under certain conditions, repayment of a secured loan (the "Secured Loan") of this onion products supplier to the onion products supplier's lender. The amount of our guarantee was $25.0 million. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we received notice from the lender that the onion products supplier had defaulted on the Secured Loan and we exercised our option to purchase the Secured Loan from the lender for $40.8 million, thereby assuming first-priority secured rights to the underlying collateral for the amount of the Secured Loan, and cancelling our guarantee. The onion products supplier filed for bankruptcy during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we acquired ownership and all rights to the collateral, consisting of agricultural land and a processing facility. During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, we recognized an impairment charge of $10.2 million in our Commercial Foods segment to reduce the carrying amount of the collateral to its estimated fair value based upon updated appraisals. During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we recognized an additional impairment charge of $8.9 million in our Commercial Foods segment to reduce the carrying amount of the plant assets to their estimated fair value based upon expected sales proceeds. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we sold the agricultural land and recognized a gain of $5.1 million in our Commercial Foods segment. Based on our estimate of the value of the processing facility, we expect to recover the remaining carrying value through our sale of this asset.
Federal income tax credits were generated related to our sweet potato production facility in Delhi, Louisiana. Third parties invested in certain of these income tax credits. We have guaranteed these third parties the face value of these income tax credits over their statutory lives, through fiscal 2017, in the event that the income tax credits are recaptured or reduced. The face value of the income tax credits was $26.7 million as of May 25, 2014. We believe the likelihood of the recapture or reduction of the income tax credits is remote, and therefore we have not established a liability in connection with this guarantee.
The obligations and commitments tables above do not include any reserves for uncertainties in income taxes, as we are unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate amount or timing of settlement of our reserves for income taxes. The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at May 25, 2014 was $84.9 million. The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at May 25, 2014, that, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate was $50.8 million. Recognition of these tax benefits would have a favorable impact on our effective tax rate.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The process of preparing financial statements requires the use of estimates on the part of management. The estimates used by management are based on our historical experiences combined with management’s understanding of current facts and circumstances. Certain of our accounting estimates are considered critical as they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and require significant or complex judgment on the part of management. The following is a summary of certain accounting estimates considered critical by management.
Our Audit/Finance Committee has reviewed management’s development, selection, and disclosure of the critical accounting estimates.
Marketing Costs-We incur certain costs to promote our products through marketing programs, which include advertising, customer incentives, and consumer incentives. We recognize the cost of each of these types of marketing activities as incurred in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The judgment required in determining marketing costs can be significant. For volume-based incentives provided to customers, management must continually assess the likelihood of the customer achieving the specified targets. Similarly, for consumer coupons, management must estimate the level at which coupons will be redeemed by consumers in the future. Estimates made by management in accounting for marketing costs are based primarily on our historical experience with marketing programs with consideration given to current circumstances and industry trends. As these factors change, management’s estimates could change and we could recognize different amounts of marketing costs over different periods of time.
We have recognized reserves of approximately $169.4 million for these marketing costs as of May 25, 2014. Changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual customer marketing program would not result in a material change in our results of operations or cash flows.
Advertising and promotion expenses totaled $417.4 million, $466.3 million, and $362.3 million in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
Income Taxes-Our income tax expense is based on our income, statutory tax rates, and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Significant judgment is required in determining our income tax expense and in
evaluating our tax positions, including evaluating uncertainties. Management reviews tax positions at least quarterly and adjusts the balances as new information becomes available. Deferred income tax assets represent amounts available to reduce income taxes payable on taxable income in future years. Such assets arise because of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, as well as from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Management evaluates the recoverability of these future tax deductions by assessing the adequacy of future expected taxable income from all sources, including reversal of taxable temporary differences, forecasted operating earnings, and available tax planning strategies. These estimates of future taxable income inherently require significant judgment. Management uses historical experience and short and long-range business forecasts to develop such estimates. Further, we employ various prudent and feasible tax planning strategies to facilitate the recoverability of future deductions. To the extent management does not consider it more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be recovered, a valuation allowance is established.
Further information on income taxes is provided in Note 14 “Pre-tax Income and Income Taxes” to the consolidated financial statements.
Environmental Liabilities-Environmental liabilities are accrued when it is probable that obligations have been incurred and the associated amounts can be reasonably estimated. Management works with independent third-party specialists in order to effectively assess our environmental liabilities. Management estimates our environmental liabilities based on evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, our known volumetric contribution, other potentially responsible parties, and our experience in remediating sites. Environmental liability estimates may be affected by changing governmental or other external determinations of what constitutes an environmental liability or an acceptable level of clean-up. Management’s estimate as to our potential liability is independent of any potential recovery of insurance proceeds or indemnification arrangements. Insurance companies and other indemnitors are notified of any potential claims and periodically updated as to the general status of known claims. We do not discount our environmental liabilities as the timing of the anticipated cash payments is not fixed or readily determinable. To the extent that there are changes in the evaluation factors identified above, management’s estimate of environmental liabilities may also change.
We have recognized a reserve of approximately $63.0 million for environmental liabilities as of May 25, 2014. The reserve for each site is determined based on an assessment of the most likely required remedy and a related estimate of the costs required to effect such remedy. Historically, the underlying assumptions utilized in estimating this reserve have been appropriate as actual payments have neither differed materially from the previously estimated reserve balances, nor have significant adjustments to this reserve balance been necessary.
Employment-Related Benefits-We incur certain employment-related expenses associated with pensions, postretirement health care benefits, and workers’ compensation. In order to measure the annual expense associated with these employment-related benefits, management must make a variety of estimates including, but not limited to, discount rates used to measure the present value of certain liabilities, assumed rates of return on assets set aside to fund these expenses, compensation increases, employee turnover rates, anticipated mortality rates, anticipated health care costs, and employee accidents incurred but not yet reported to us. The estimates used by management are based on our historical experience as well as current facts and circumstances. We use third-party specialists to assist management in appropriately measuring the expense associated with these employment-related benefits. Different estimates used by management could result in us recognizing different amounts of expense over different periods of time. We had recognized a pension liability of $451.8 million and $480.8 million, a postretirement liability of $283.2 million and $302.7 million, and a workers’ compensation liability of $107.7 million and $105.1 million, as of the end of fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. We also had recognized a pension asset of $18.8 million and $6.6 million as of the end of fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively, as certain individual plans of the Company had a positive funded status.
We recognize cumulative changes in the fair value of pension plan assets and net actuarial gains or losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the fair value of plan assets or the plan’s projected benefit obligation (“the corridor”) in current period expense annually as of our measurement date, which is our fiscal year-end, or when measurement is required otherwise under generally accepted accounting principles.
We recognized pension expense from Company plans of $(5.9) million, $23.5 million, and $421.8 million in fiscal years 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. Such amounts reflect the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability. This also reflected expected returns on plan assets of $252.9 million, $216.4 million, and $196.0 million in fiscal years 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. We contributed $18.5 million, $19.8 million, and $326.4 million to our pension plans in fiscal years 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. We anticipate contributing approximately $12.9 million to our pension plans in fiscal 2015.
One significant assumption for pension plan accounting is the discount rate. We select a discount rate each year (as of our fiscal year-end measurement date) for our plans based upon a hypothetical bond portfolio for which the cash flows from coupons and maturities match the year-by-year projected benefit cash flows for our pension plans. The hypothetical bond portfolio is
comprised of high-quality fixed income debt instruments (usually Moody’s Aa) available at the measurement date. Based on this information, the discount rate selected by us for determination of pension expense was 4.05% for fiscal 2014, 4.5% for fiscal 2013, and 5.3% for fiscal 2012. We selected a discount rate of 4.15% for determination of pension expense for fiscal 2015. A 25 basis point increase in our discount rate assumption as of the end of fiscal 2014 would have resulted in a decrease of $1.8 million in our pension expense for fiscal 2014. A 25 basis point decrease in our discount rate assumption as of the end of fiscal 2014 would have resulted in an increase of $7.3 million in our pension expense for fiscal 2014. For our year-end pension obligation determination, we selected discount rates of 4.15% and 4.05% for fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Another significant assumption used to account for our pension plans is the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. In developing the assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets for determining pension expense, we consider long-term historical returns (arithmetic average) of the plan’s investments, the asset allocation among types of investments, estimated long-term returns by investment type from external sources, and the current economic environment. Based on this information, we selected 7.75% for the long-term rate of return on plan assets for determining our fiscal 2014 pension expense. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in our expected long-term rate of return assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2014 would decrease/increase annual pension expense for our pension plans by $8.3 million. We selected an expected rate of return on plan assets of 7.75% to be used to determine our pension expense for fiscal 2015. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in our expected long-term rate of return assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2015 would decrease/increase annual pension expense for our pension plans by $8.7 million.
The rate of compensation increase is another significant assumption used in the development of accounting information for pension plans. We determine this assumption based on our long-term plans for compensation increases and current economic conditions. Based on this information, we selected 4.25% for fiscal years 2014 and 2013 as the rate of compensation increase for determining our year-end pension obligation. We selected 4.25% for the rate of compensation increase for determination of pension expense for each of fiscal years 2014, 2013, and 2012. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in our rate of compensation increase assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2014 would increase/decrease pension expense for our pension plans by $0.9 million for the year. We selected a rate of 4.25% for the rate of compensation increase to be used to determine our pension expense for fiscal 2015. A 25 basis point increase in our rate of compensation increase assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2015 would increase pension expense for our pension plans by $0.8 million for the year. A 25 basis point decrease in our rate of compensation increase assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2015 would decrease pension expense for our pension plans by $1.2 million for the year.
We also provide certain postretirement health care benefits. We recognized postretirement benefit expense of $9.9 million, $8.8 million, and $7.8 million in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. We reflected liabilities of $283.2 million and $302.7 million in our balance sheets as of May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, respectively. We anticipate contributing approximately $25.5 million to our postretirement health care plans in fiscal 2015.
The postretirement benefit expense and obligation are also dependent on our assumptions used for the actuarially determined amounts. These assumptions include discount rates (discussed above), health care cost trend rates, inflation rates, retirement rates, mortality rates, and other factors. The health care cost trend assumptions are developed based on historical cost data, the near-term outlook, and an assessment of likely long-term trends. Assumed inflation rates are based on an evaluation of external market indicators. Retirement and mortality rates are based primarily on actual plan experience. The discount rate we selected for determination of postretirement expense was 3.35% for fiscal 2014, 3.9% for fiscal 2013, and 4.3% for fiscal 2012. We have selected a weighted-average discount rate of 3.65% for determination of postretirement expense for fiscal 2015. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in our discount rate assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2013 would not have resulted in a material change to postretirement expense for our plans. We have assumed the initial year increase in cost of health care to be 10.0%, with the trend rate decreasing to 5.0% by 2022. A one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:
We provide workers’ compensation benefits to our employees. The measurement of the liability for our cost of providing these benefits is largely based upon actuarial analysis of costs. One significant assumption we make is the discount rate used to calculate the present value of our obligation. The weighted-average discount rate used at May 25, 2014 was 2.27%. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in the discount rate assumption would not have a material impact on workers’ compensation expense.
Business Combinations, Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (including property, plant and equipment), Identifiable Intangible Assets, and Goodwill-We use the acquisition method in accounting for acquired businesses. Under the acquisition method, our financial statements reflect the operations of an acquired business starting from the completion of the acquisition. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. Any
excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Significant judgment is often required in estimating the fair value of assets acquired, particularly intangible assets. As a result, in the case of significant acquisitions we normally obtain the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist in estimating fair values of tangible and intangible assets. The fair value estimates are based on available historical information and on expectations and assumptions about the future, considering the perspective of marketplace participants. While management believes those expectations and assumptions are reasonable, they are inherently uncertain. Unanticipated market or macroeconomic events and circumstances may occur, which could affect the accuracy or validity of the estimates and assumptions.
Determining the useful lives of intangible assets also requires management judgment. Certain brand intangibles are expected to have indefinite lives based on their history and our plans to continue to support and build the acquired brands, while other acquired intangible assets (e.g. customer relationships) are expected to have determinable useful lives. Our estimates of the useful lives of definite-lived intangible assets are primarily based upon historical experience, the competitive and macroeconomic environment, and our operating plans. The costs of definite-lived intangibles are amortized to expense over their estimated life.
We reduce the carrying amounts of long-lived assets, identifiable intangible assets, and goodwill to their fair values when the fair value of such assets is determined to be less than their carrying amounts (i.e., assets are deemed to be impaired). Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, which requires us to estimate the future cash flows anticipated to be generated by the particular asset being tested for impairment as well as to select a discount rate to measure the present value of the anticipated cash flows. When determining future cash flow estimates, we consider historical results adjusted to reflect current and anticipated operating conditions. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment by management in such areas as future economic conditions, industry-specific conditions, product pricing, and necessary capital expenditures. The use of different assumptions or estimates for future cash flows could produce different impairment amounts (or none at all) for long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets.
In assessing other intangible assets not subject to amortization for impairment, we have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. If we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, then we are not required to perform any additional tests for assessing intangible assets for impairment. However, if we conclude otherwise or elect not to perform the qualitative assessment, then we are required to perform a quantitative impairment test that involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
If we determine to perform a quantitative impairment test in evaluating impairment of our indefinite lived brands/trademarks, we utilize a “relief from royalty” methodology. The methodology determines the fair value of each brand through use of a discounted cash flow model that incorporates an estimated “royalty rate” we would be able to charge a third party for the use of the particular brand. When determining the future cash flow estimates, we must estimate future net sales and a fair market royalty rate for each applicable brand and an appropriate discount rate to measure the present value of the anticipated cash flows. Estimating future net sales requires significant judgment by management in such areas as future economic conditions, product pricing, and consumer trends. In determining an appropriate discount rate to apply to the estimated future cash flows, we consider the current interest rate environment and our estimated cost of capital. As the calculated fair value of our other identifiable intangible assets generally significantly exceeds the carrying value of these assets, a one percentage point increase in the discount rate assumptions used to estimate the fair values of our other identifiable intangible assets would not result in a material impairment charge.
In fiscal 2014, we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles. We recognized impairment charges of $72.5 million in our Consumer Foods segment, primarily for our Chef Boyardee® brand, and a $3.2 million impairment charge in our Private Brands segment for two small brands. We also recognized a $3.2 million impairment charge for an amortizable technology license in our Corporate expenses in fiscal 2014.
Goodwill is tested annually for impairment of value and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include deterioration in general economic conditions, adverse changes in the markets in which an entity operates, increases in input costs that have negative effects on earnings and cash flows, or a trend of negative or declining cash flows over multiple periods, among others. The fair value that could be realized in an actual transaction may differ from that used to evaluate the impairment of goodwill.
In testing goodwill for impairment, we have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not (more than 50%) that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we elect to perform a qualitative assessment and determine that an impairment
is more likely than not, we are then required to perform a quantitative impairment test, otherwise no further analysis is required. We also may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment and, instead, proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test
Under the qualitative assessment, various events and circumstances that would affect the estimated fair value of a reporting unit are identified (similar to impairment indicators above). Furthermore, management considers the results of the most recent two-step quantitative impairment test completed for a reporting unit and compares the weighted average cost of capital between the current and prior years for each reporting unit.
Under the two-step quantitative impairment test, the first step of the evaluation involves comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, which requires us to estimate the future cash flows anticipated to be generated by the reporting unit being tested for impairment as well as to select a risk-adjusted discount rate to measure the present value of the anticipated cash flows. When determining future cash flow estimates, we consider historical results adjusted to reflect current and anticipated operating conditions. We estimate cash flows for the reporting unit over a discrete period (typically four or five years) and the terminal period (considering expected long term growth rates and trends). Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment by management in such areas as future economic conditions, industry-specific conditions, product pricing, and necessary capital expenditures. The use of different assumptions or estimates for future cash flows or significant changes in risk-adjusted discounts rates due to changes in market conditions could produce substantially different estimates of the fair value of the reporting unit.
If the fair value of a reporting unit determined in the first step of the evaluation is lower than its carrying value, we proceed to the second step, which compares the carrying value of goodwill to its implied fair value. In estimating the implied fair value of goodwill for a reporting unit, we must assign the fair value of the reporting unit (as determined in the first step) to the assets and liabilities associated with the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Any excess of the carrying value of goodwill of the reporting unit over its implied fair value is recorded as impairment.
We implemented organizational changes during the second quarter of fiscal 2014 that resulted in new reporting segments. As a result, we reassigned goodwill to the new reporting units using a relative fair value allocation approach and performed a goodwill impairment analysis, which did not identify any potential impairments.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, in conjunction with our annual review for impairment, we performed a qualitative analysis of goodwill for each of the reporting units in our segments. Because sales and profits for Private Brands continued to fall below our expectations throughout fiscal 2014 and following preparation of plans for the business for fiscal 2015, we performed a quantitative analysis of goodwill of our Private Brands segment. Estimating the fair value of individual reporting units requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans and future industry and economic conditions. We estimated the future cash flows of each reporting unit within the Private Brands segment and calculated the net present value of those estimated cash flows using a risk adjusted discount rate, in order to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit from the perspective of a market participant. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of approximately 8.3% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to the respective historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value for five of our reporting units within the Private Brands segment. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities of each of these reporting units in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill of each reporting unit. We recognized impairment charges for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the historical carrying value of goodwill within each reporting unit. Accordingly, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we recorded a $602.2 million charge for the impairment of goodwill. The following reporting units within Private Brands were impacted: $66.4 million in Bars and Coordinated, $154.6 million in Cereal, $94.2 million in Pasta, $231.6 million in Snacks, and $55.4 million in Retail Bakery.
In the case of three of our reporting units within the Private Brands segment: Pasta, Snacks, and Retail Bakery, the estimated fair value of certain amortizing intangible assets (customer relationships) used in step two of our impairment analysis was substantially less than the carrying value of those assets and, as a result, the the carrying value of the Pasta, Snacks, and Retail Bakery reporting units exceeded the estimated fair values of those reporting units, even after the previously described goodwill impairment charges were recorded. The carrying value of the Private Brands amortizing intangible assets are expected to be recovered over their remaining lives (on an undiscounted basis) and, accordingly, no impairments were required to be recognized.
Following the impairment charges recorded in fiscal 2014, the carrying value of goodwill in our Private Brands reporting units included $328.7 million for Bars and Coordinated, $464.4 million for Cereal, $752.1 million for Pasta, $816.2 million for Snacks, $717.1 million for Retail Bakery, and $136.1 million for Condiments. If the future performance of one or more of the reporting units within the Private Brands segment falls short of our expectations or if there are significant changes in risk-adjusted discount rates due to changes in market conditions, we could be required to recognize additional, material impairment charges in future periods.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, which states that entities should present the unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction of the deferred tax asset for a net operating loss ("NOL") or similar tax loss or tax credit carryforward rather than as a liability when the uncertain tax position would reduce the NOL or other carryforward under the tax law. No new disclosures are necessary. This ASU will be effective for the first interim reporting period in fiscal 2015.
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Components of an Entity, which updates the definition of discontinued operations from current U.S. GAAP. Going forward only those disposals of components of an entity that represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results will be reported as discontinued operations in the financial statements. Currently, a component of an entity that is a reportable segment, an operating segment, a reporting unit, a subsidiary, or an asset group is eligible for discontinued operations presentation. Additionally, the existing condition that the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction has been removed. The effective date for the revised standard is for applicable transactions that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted, but only for disposals (or classifications as held for sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. The Company intends to early adopt this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. This will result in the presentation of historical results of our milling business, prior to the creation of the Ardent Mills joint venture, as discontinued operations, beginning in fiscal 2015. Such accounting treatment is precluded prior to the adoption of the new accounting standard.
In May 2014, after our fiscal year end, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for the Company in our fiscal year 2018. Early application is not permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report, including Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management's current views and assumptions of future events and financial performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances. We undertake no responsibility for updating these statements. Readers of this report should understand that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Many factors could affect our actual financial results and cause them to vary materially from the expectations contained in the forward-looking statements, including those set forth in this report. These factors include, among other things: our ability to realize the synergies and benefits contemplated by the acquisition of Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. ("Ralcorp") and our ability to promptly and effectively integrate the business of Ralcorp; and our ability to realize synergies and benefits contemplated by the recently formed joint venture combining the flour milling businesses of ConAgra Foods, Cargill, Incorporated, and CHS Inc.; risks and uncertainties associated with intangible assets, including any future goodwill impairment charges; the availability and prices of raw materials, including any negative effects caused by inflation or adverse weather conditions; the effectiveness of our product pricing, including product innovation, any pricing actions and changes in promotional strategies; the ultimate outcome of litigation, including the lead paint matter; future economic circumstances; industry conditions; our ability to execute our operating and restructuring plans; the success of our cost savings initiatives, and innovation and marketing investments; the competitive environment; operating efficiencies; the ultimate impact of any product recalls; access to capital; actions of governments and regulatory factors affecting our businesses, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; the amount and timing of repurchases of our common stock and debt, if any; and other risks described in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements included in this report, which speak only as of the date of this report.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The principal market risks affecting us during fiscal 2014 and 2013 were exposures to price fluctuations of commodity and energy inputs, interest rates, and foreign currencies. These fluctuations impacted all reporting segments.
Commodity Market Risk
We purchase commodity inputs such as wheat, corn, oats, soybean meal, soybean oil, meat, dairy products, sugar, natural gas, electricity, and packaging materials to be used in our operations. These commodities are subject to price fluctuations that may create price risk. We enter into commodity hedges to manage this price risk using physical forward contracts or derivative instruments. We have policies governing the hedging instruments our businesses may use. These policies include limiting the dollar risk exposure for each of our businesses. We also monitor the amount of associated counter-party credit risk for all non-exchange-traded transactions. To a lesser extent, we engage in wheat trading activities in the milling operations of our Commercial Foods segment. These trading activities are limited in terms of maximum dollar exposure, as measured by a dollars-at-risk methodology and monitored to ensure compliance.
Interest Rate Risk
From time to time, we use interest rate swaps to manage the effect of interest rate changes on the fair value of our existing debt as well as the forecasted interest payments for the anticipated issuance of debt. During fiscal 2010, we entered into interest rate swap contracts used to effectively convert the interest rate of our senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2014 from fixed to variable. During fiscal 2011, we terminated these interest rate swap contracts. As a result of this termination, we received proceeds of $31.5 million. The cumulative adjustment to the fair value of the debt instruments being hedged was included in long-term debt and was amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining lives of the debt instruments through fiscal 2014.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the fair value of certain of our senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2019 and 2020. The net notional amount of these interest rate derivatives at May 25, 2014 was $500.0 million, $250.0 million for each maturity. The maximum potential loss associated with these interest rate swap contracts from a hypothetical increase of 1% in interest rates is approximately $29.2 million. Any such gain or loss, to the extent the hedge is effective, are offset by fair value adjustments to the debt instruments being hedged.
As of May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, the fair value of our long term debt (including current installments) was estimated at $9.5 billion and $10.2 billion, respectively, based on current market rates provided primarily by outside investment advisors. As of May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, a 1% increase in interest rates would decrease the fair value of our long-term debt by approximately $553.9 million and $630.3 million, respectively, while a 1% decrease in interest rates would increase the fair value of our long-term debt by approximately $627.4 million and $706.5 million, respectively.
Foreign Currency Risk
In order to reduce exposures for our processing activities related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we may enter into forward exchange or option contracts for transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency for certain of our operations. This activity primarily relates to economically hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign denominated assets and liabilities.
Value-at-Risk (VaR)
We employ various tools to monitor our derivative risk, including value-at-risk ("VaR") models. We perform simulations using historical data to estimate potential losses in the fair value of current derivative positions. We use price and volatility information for the prior 90 days in the calculation of VaR that is used to monitor our daily risk. The purpose of this measurement is to provide a single view of the potential risk of loss associated with derivative positions at a given point in time based on recent changes in market prices. Our model uses a 95% confidence level. Accordingly, in any given one day time period, losses greater than the amounts included in the table below are expected to occur only 5% of the time. We include commodity swaps, futures, and options and foreign exchange forwards, swaps, and options in this calculation. The following table provides an overview of our average daily VaR for our energy, agriculture, foreign exchange, and other commodities for fiscal years 2014 and 2013. Other commodities below consist primarily of forward and option contracts for a commodities index, the market price of which is closely correlated with that of our commodity inputs. This index includes items such as agricultural commodities, energy commodities, and metals. The other commodities category below may also include items such as packaging and/or livestock.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(in millions, except per share amounts)
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(in millions)
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in millions, except share data)
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders' Equity
(in millions, except share data)
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Fiscal Years Ended May 26, 2013, May 27, 2012, and May 29, 2011
(columnar dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Fiscal Year - The fiscal year of ConAgra Foods, Inc. (“ConAgra Foods”, “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) ends the last Sunday in May. The fiscal years for the consolidated financial statements presented consist of 52-week periods for fiscal years 2014, 2013, and 2012.
Basis of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ConAgra Foods, Inc. and all majority-owned subsidiaries. In addition, the accounts of all variable interest entities for which we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date such determination is made. All significant intercompany investments, accounts, and transactions have been eliminated.
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates - The investments in, and the operating results of, 50%-or-less-owned entities not required to be consolidated are included in the consolidated financial statements on the basis of the equity method of accounting or the cost method of accounting, depending on specific facts and circumstances.
We review our investments in unconsolidated affiliates for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investments may not be fully recoverable. Evidence of a loss in value that is other than temporary includes, but is not limited to, the absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment, the inability of the investee to sustain an earnings capacity which would justify the carrying amount of the investment, or, where applicable, estimated sales proceeds which are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the investment. Management’s assessment as to whether any decline in value is other than temporary is based on our ability and intent to hold the investment and whether evidence indicating the carrying value of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. Management generally considers our investments in equity method investees to be strategic long-term investments. Therefore, management completes its assessments with a long-term viewpoint. If the fair value of the investment is determined to be less than the carrying value and the decline in value is considered to be other than temporary, an appropriate write-down is recorded based on the excess of the carrying value over the best estimate of fair value of the investment.
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition, including short-term time deposits and government agency and corporate obligations, are classified as cash and cash equivalents.
Inventories - We principally use the lower of cost (determined using the first-in, first-out method) or market for valuing inventories other than merchandisable agricultural commodities. Grain and flour inventories are principally stated at market value.
Property, Plant and Equipment - Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation has been calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective classes of assets as follows:
We review property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of an asset considered “held-and-used” is determined by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the use of the asset. If the carrying amount is greater than the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, the asset’s carrying amount is reduced to its estimated fair value. An asset considered “held-for-sale” is reported at the lower of the asset’s carrying amount or fair value.
Goodwill and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets - Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives (e.g., brands or trademarks) are not amortized and are tested annually for impairment of value and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. A significant amount of judgment is involved in
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include deterioration in general economic conditions, adverse changes in the markets in which an entity operates, increases in input costs that have negative effects on earnings and cash flows, or a trend of negative or declining cash flows over multiple periods, among others. The fair value that could be realized in an actual transaction may differ from that used to evaluate the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets.
In testing goodwill for impairment, we have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not (more than 50%) that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we elect to perform a qualitative assessment and determine that an impairment is more likely than not, we are then required to perform a quantitative impairment test, otherwise no further analysis is required. We also may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment and, instead, proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test.
Under the goodwill qualitative assessment, various events and circumstances that would affect the estimated fair value of a reporting unit are identified (similar to impairment indicators above). Furthermore, management considers the results of the most recent two-step quantitative impairment test completed for a reporting unit and compares the weighted average cost of capital between the current and prior years for each reporting unit.
Under the goodwill two-step quantitative impairment test, the evaluation of impairment involves comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. The first step of the test compares the carrying value of a reporting unit, including goodwill, with its fair value. We estimate the fair value using level 3 inputs as defined by the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Note 19 for the definition of the levels in the fair value hierarchy. The inputs used to calculate the fair value include a number of subjective factors, such as estimates of future cash flows, estimates of our future cost structure, discount rates for our estimated cash flows, required level of working capital, assumed terminal value, and time horizon of cash flow forecasts. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we complete the second step of the test to determine the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any, to be recognized. In the second step, we estimate an implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including any unrecognized intangible assets). The impairment loss is equal to the excess of the carrying value of the goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill.
We implemented organizational changes during the second quarter of fiscal 2014 that resulted in new reporting segments. As a result, we reassigned goodwill to the new reporting units using a relative fair value allocation approach and performed an analysis of the potential impairment of goodwill.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, in conjunction with our annual review for impairment, we performed a qualitative analysis of goodwill for each of the reporting units in our segments. As sales and profits for Private Brands continued to be softer than we expected through fiscal 2014, we performed a quantitative analysis of goodwill of our Private Brands segment. Estimating the fair value of individual reporting units requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans, industry and economic conditions. Refer to Note 8 for the details of the impairment charges in fiscal 2014.
In assessing other intangible assets not subject to amortization for impairment, we have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. If we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, then we are not required to perform any additional tests for assessing intangible assets for impairment. However, if we conclude otherwise or elect not to perform the qualitative assessment, then we are required to perform a quantitative impairment test that involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
In fiscal 2014, we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for other intangible assets not subject to amortization. The estimates of fair value of intangible assets not subject to amortization are determined using a “relief from royalty” methodology, which is used in estimating the fair value of our brands/trademarks. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the projected future cash flows generated by the respective intangible assets. Also subject to judgment are assumptions about royalty rates. Refer to Note 8 for the details of the impairment charges in fiscal 2014.
Identifiable intangible assets with definite lives (e.g., licensing arrangements with contractual lives or customer relationships) are amortized over their estimated useful lives and tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. Identifiable intangible assets with definite lives are evaluated for impairment using a process similar to that used in evaluating elements of property, plant and equipment. If impaired, the asset is written down to its fair value.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Fair Values of Financial Instruments - Unless otherwise specified, we believe the carrying value of financial instruments approximates their fair value.
Environmental Liabilities - Environmental liabilities are accrued when it is probable that obligations have been incurred and the associated amounts can be reasonably estimated. We use third-party specialists to assist management in appropriately measuring the obligations associated with environmental liabilities. Such liabilities are adjusted as new information develops or circumstances change. We do not discount our environmental liabilities as the timing of the anticipated cash payments is not fixed or readily determinable. Management’s estimate of our potential liability is independent of any potential recovery of insurance proceeds or indemnification arrangements. We do not reduce our environmental liabilities for potential insurance recoveries.
Employment-Related Benefits - Employment-related benefits associated with pensions, postretirement health care benefits, and workers’ compensation are expensed as such obligations are incurred. The recognition of expense is impacted by estimates made by management, such as discount rates used to value these liabilities, future health care costs, and employee accidents incurred but not yet reported. We use third-party specialists to assist management in appropriately measuring the obligations associated with employment-related benefits.
We recognize changes in the fair value of pension plan assets and net actuarial gains or losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the market-related value of plan assets or the plan’s projected benefit obligation (“the corridor”) in current period expense annually as of our measurement date, which is our fiscal year-end, or when measurement is required otherwise under generally accepted accounting principles.
Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss are transferred to customers upon delivery based on terms of sale and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized as the net amount to be received after deducting estimated amounts for discounts, trade allowances, and returns of damaged and out-of-date products. Changes in the market value of inventories of merchandisable agricultural commodities, the fair values of forward cash purchase and sales contracts, and exchange-traded futures and options contracts are recognized in earnings immediately.
Shipping and Handling - Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are included in net sales. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of goods sold.
Marketing Costs - We promote our products with advertising, consumer incentives, and trade promotions. Such programs include, but are not limited to, discounts, coupons, rebates, and volume-based incentives. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Consumer incentives and trade promotion activities are recorded as a reduction of revenue or as a component of cost of goods sold based on amounts estimated as being due to customers and consumers at the end of the period, based principally on historical utilization and redemption rates. Advertising and promotion expenses totaled $417.4 million, $466.3 million, and $362.3 million in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively, and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Research and Development - We incurred expenses of $103.5 million, $93.1 million, and $86.0 million for research and development activities in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
Comprehensive Income - Comprehensive income includes net income, currency translation adjustments, certain derivative-related activity, changes in the value of available-for-sale investments, and changes in prior service cost and net actuarial gains (losses) from pension (for amounts not in excess of the 10% “corridor”) and postretirement health care plans. We generally deem our foreign investments to be essentially permanent in nature and we do not provide for taxes on currency translation adjustments arising from converting the investment denominated in a foreign currency to U.S. dollars. When we determine that a foreign investment, as well as undistributed earnings, are no longer permanent in nature, estimated taxes are provided for the related deferred tax liability (asset), if any, resulting from currency translation adjustments. We reclassified $6.0 million of foreign currency translation losses to net income in fiscal 2012 due to our acquisition of a majority interest in Agro Tech Foods Limited ("ATFL") in India and the related remeasurement of our previously held noncontrolling equity interest in ATFL to fair value (see Note 2).
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
The following is a rollforward of the balances in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (except for currency translation adjustment):
The following details the income tax expense (benefit) on components of other comprehensive income (loss):
The following table summarizes the reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income:
Foreign Currency Transaction Gains and Losses - We recognized net foreign currency transaction losses from continuing operations of $13.5 million, $0.1 million, and $3.9 million in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively, in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Business Combinations - We use the acquisition method in accounting for acquired businesses. Under the acquisition method, our financial statements reflect the operations of an acquired business starting from the completion of the acquisition. The assets
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
Reclassifications - Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation.
Use of Estimates - Preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses as reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards - In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, which states that entities should present the unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction of the deferred tax asset for a net operating loss ("NOL") or similar tax loss or tax credit carryforward rather than as a liability when the uncertain tax position would reduce the NOL or other carryforward under the tax law. No new disclosures are necessary. This ASU will be effective for the first interim reporting period in fiscal 2015.
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Components of an Entity, which updates the definition of discontinued operations from current U.S. GAAP. Going forward only those disposals of components of an entity that represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results will be reported as discontinued operations in the financial statements. Currently, a component of an entity that is a reportable segment, an operating segment, a reporting unit, a subsidiary, or an asset group is eligible for discontinued operations presentation. Additionally, the existing condition that the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction has been removed. The effective date for the revised standard is for applicable transactions that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted, but only for disposals (or classifications as held for sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. The Company intends to early adopt this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. This will result in the presentation of historical results of our milling business, prior to the creation of the Ardent Mills joint venture, as discontinued operations, beginning in fiscal 2015. Such accounting treatment is precluded prior to the adoption of the new accounting standard.
In May 2014, after our fiscal year end, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for the Company in our fiscal year 2018. Early application is not permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.
2. ACQUISITIONS
In September 2013, we acquired frozen dessert production assets from Harlan Bakeries for $39.9 million in cash. The purchase included machinery, operating systems, warehousing/storage, and other assets associated with making frozen fruit pies, cream pies, pastry shells, and loaf cakes. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.
On January 29, 2013, we acquired Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. ("Ralcorp"). The total amount of consideration paid in connection with the acquisition was approximately $4.75 billion, net of cash acquired, plus assumed liabilities. We funded the merger consideration with existing cash on hand, borrowings under a new $1.5 billion senior unsecured Term Loan Facility (the "Term Loan Facility") and net proceeds from the issuance of new senior notes and common stock. The results from our Ralcorp acquisition are reflected principally within the Private Brands segment, and to a lesser extent within Commercial Foods and Consumer Foods.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
The following table summarizes the initial estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. We have adjusted amounts to reflect the disposition of Medallion Foods.
As a result of the Ralcorp acquisition, we recognized a total of $4.38 billion of goodwill and $2.17 billion of brands, trademarks and other intangibles, of which $17.5 million and $14.6 million, respectively, have been reclassified as assets held for sale to reflect the disposition of Medallion Foods. Amortizable brands, trademarks and other intangibles totaled $2.03 billion. Indefinite lived brands, trademarks and other intangibles totaled $134.1 million. Of the total goodwill, $397.0 million is deductible for tax purposes. The allocation of goodwill to Private Brands, Consumer Foods, and Commercial Foods was $3.52 billion, $512.0 million, and $350.6 million, respectively. See Note 8 for disclosure of subsequent impairment of related goodwill and indefinite lived brands.
In August 2012, we acquired the P.F. Chang's® and Bertolli® brands frozen meal business from Unilever for $266.9 million in cash. Approximately $100.1 million of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and $91.8 million was allocated to brands, trademarks and other intangibles. The amount allocated to goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.
In May 2012, we acquired Kangaroo Brands' pita chip operations for $47.9 million in cash. Approximately $20.4 million of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and $20.8 million was allocated to brands, trademarks and other intangibles. The amount allocated to goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. This business is included in the Private Brands segment.
In May 2012, we acquired Odom's Tennessee Pride for $96.6 million in cash, plus assumed liabilities. The business manufactures Odom's Tennessee Pride® branded frozen breakfast products and other sausage products. Approximately $32.4 million of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and $32.8 million was allocated to brands, trademarks and other intangibles. The amount allocated to goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.
In March 2012, we acquired Del Monte Canada for $185.6 million in cash, plus assumed liabilities. The acquisition includes all Del Monte® branded packaged fruit, fruit snacks, and vegetable products in Canada, as well as Aylmer® brand tomato products. Approximately $44.7 million of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and $80.9 million was allocated to brands, trademarks and other intangibles. The amount allocated to goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.
In November 2011, we acquired National Pretzel Company for $301.9 million in cash, net of cash acquired, plus assumed liabilities. National Pretzel Company is a private brand supplier and branded producer of pretzels and related products. Approximately $178.5 million of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and $68.2 million was allocated to brands, trademarks
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
and other intangibles. The amount allocated to goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. This business is included in the Private Brands segment.
In November 2011, we acquired an additional equity interest in ATFL for $4.9 million in cash, net of cash acquired, plus assumed liabilities. ATFL is a publicly traded company in India that markets food and food ingredients to consumers and institutional customers in India. Approximately $130.3 million of the acquisition value was allocated to goodwill and $42.2 million was allocated to trade names. The amount allocated to goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes. As a result of this additional investment, we own a majority interest (approximately 52%) in ATFL, and we began consolidating the financial statements of ATFL in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. Prior to our acquisition of a majority interest in ATFL, we accounted for our noncontrolling interest (approximately 48% of the outstanding common shares) under the equity method. The fair value of ATFL was determined based upon the closing price of ATFL common shares as of the date of the acquisition of this additional investment. Consolidated financial results of ATFL are included in the Consumer Foods segment in periods subsequent to our acquisition of a majority interest.
For each of these acquisitions, the amounts allocated to goodwill were primarily attributable to anticipated synergies, product portfolios, and other intangibles that do not qualify for separate recognition.
Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in these acquisitions were recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of acquisition.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations as if the acquisitions of Ralcorp, National Pretzel Company, Del Monte Canada, Odom's Tennessee Pride, the Kangaroo Brands' pita chip operations, the P.F. Chang's and Bertolli brands' frozen meals business, and the majority interest in ATFL (collectively, the acquirees) had occurred at the beginning of the year acquired and the preceding year. The acquirees' pre-acquisition results have been added to ConAgra Foods' historical results. The pro forma results contained in the table below include adjustments for amortization of acquired intangibles and depreciation expense, as well as related income taxes.
The pro forma results exclude selling, general and administrative expenses for the transaction incurred by Ralcorp prior to the acquisition of $84.4 million, including items such as consultant fees, accelerated stock compensation, and other deal costs; selling, general and administrative expenses for the transaction incurred by the Company of $71.4 million, including consultant fees, financing costs, and other deal costs; and cost of goods sold totaling $16.7 million in non-recurring expense related to the fair value of inventory adjustment at the date of acquisition.
These pro forma results may not necessarily reflect the actual results of operations that would have been achieved, nor are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations.
3. RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES
Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan
We continue to execute a plan for the integration of Ralcorp and related restructuring activities and during fiscal 2014, our Board of Directors approved an expansion of the scope of the plan to include steps to optimize the entire organization’s supply chain network and improve selling, general and administrative effectiveness and efficiencies, referred to as the Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan (the “SCAE Plan”). This plan was previously referred to as the Ralcorp Related Restructuring Plan. As a part of this SCAE Plan, we expect to take actions to, among other things, continue the ongoing integration and restructuring of the operations of Ralcorp, optimize manufacturing assets, optimize the Company’s dry distribution and mixing centers, and improve operational effectiveness and reduce overall costs in the Company’s administrative areas. This reporting addresses the estimated amounts or range of amounts for each major type of cost expected to be incurred, and the charges that have or will result in cash outflows. In connection with the SCAE Plan, we expect to incur approximately $325.0 million of charges, which includes $245.4 million of cash charges and $79.6 million of non-cash charges.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
We anticipate that we will recognize the following pre-tax expenses association with the SCAE Plan (amounts include charges recognized in fiscal 2014 and 2013):
During fiscal 2014, we recognized the following pre-tax expenses for the SCAE Plan:
Included in the above results are $60.5 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $23.2 million in non-cash charges.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
We recognized the following cumulative (plan inception to May 25, 2014) pre-tax expenses related to the SCAE Plan in our Consolidated Statement of Earnings:
Liabilities recorded for the SCAE Plan and changes therein for fiscal 2014 were as follows:
Acquisition-related Restructuring Costs
During fiscal 2012, we started incurring costs in connection with actions taken to attain synergies when integrating businesses acquired prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2013. These costs, collectively referred to as "acquisition-related restructuring costs", include severance and other costs associated with consolidating facilities and administrative functions. In connection with the acquisition-related restructuring costs, we expect to incur charges of $23.8 million, $15.9 million of which are charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $7.9 million of which are non-cash charges. At the end of fiscal 2014, the acquisition-related restructuring costs were substantially complete.
During fiscal 2014, we recognized the following pre-tax expenses for acquisition-related restructuring costs, primarily representing impairment of equipment, all within our Consumer Foods segment:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
We recognized the following cumulative (plan inception to May 25, 2014) pre-tax acquisition-related exit costs in our Consolidated Statement of Earnings:
Included in the above results are $15.5 million of charges that have resulted in cash outflows and $7.9 million of non-cash charges.
Administrative Efficiency Restructuring Plan
In August 2011, we made a decision to reorganize our Consumer Foods sales function and certain other administrative functions within our Commercial Foods and Corporate reporting segments. These actions, collectively referred to as the "Administrative Efficiency Plan", were intended to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the affected sales and administrative functions. In connection with the Administrative Efficiency Plan, we have incurred pre-tax cash and non-cash charges of $18.7 million, primarily for severance and costs of employee relocation. At the end of fiscal 2013, the Administrative Efficiency Plan was substantially complete.
We recognized the following pre-tax expenses associated with the Administrative Efficiency Plan in the fiscal 2012 to 2013 timeframe:
Included in the above results are $16.8 million of charges that have resulted in cash outflows and $1.9 million of non-cash charges.
Network Optimization Plan
During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, our Board of Directors approved a plan designed to optimize our manufacturing and distribution networks. We refer to this plan as the "Network Optimization Plan". The Network Optimization Plan consists of projects that involve, among other things, the exit of certain manufacturing facilities, the disposal of underutilized manufacturing assets, and actions designed to optimize our distribution network. At the end of fiscal 2013, the Network Optimization Plan was substantially complete.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
In connection with the Network Optimization Plan, we have incurred pre-tax cash and non-cash charges of $76.7 million. We have recognized expenses associated with the Network Optimization Plan, including but not limited to, impairments of property, plant and equipment, accelerated depreciation, severance and related costs, and plan implementation costs (e.g., consulting and employee relocation). We recognized the following pre-tax expenses associated with the Network Optimization Plan in the fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2013 timeframe:
Included in the above results are $17.9 million of charges that have resulted in cash outflows and $58.8 million of non-cash charges.
2010 Restructuring Plan
During fiscal 2010, our Board of Directors approved a plan related to the long-term production of our meat snack products. The plan provided for the closure of our meat snacks production facility in Garner, North Carolina, and the movement of production to our existing facility in Troy, Ohio.
Also in fiscal 2010, we made a decision to consolidate certain administrative functions from Edina, Minnesota to Naperville, Illinois. We completed the transition of these functions in fiscal 2011. This plan, together with the plan to move production of our meat snacks from Garner, North Carolina to Troy, Ohio, is collectively referred to as the 2010 restructuring plan ("2010 plan").
In connection with the 2010 plan, we incurred pre-tax cash and non-cash charges of $67.3 million cumulatively since inception, of which $2.6 million was recognized in fiscal 2012. By the end of fiscal 2012, the 2010 plan was complete.
Ralcorp Pre-acquisition Restructuring Plans
At the time of its acquisition, Ralcorp had certain initiatives underway designed to optimize its manufacturing and distribution networks. We refer to these actions and the related costs as "Ralcorp Pre-acquisition Restructuring Plans". These plans consisted of projects that involved, among other things, the exit of certain manufacturing facilities. In connection with the Ralcorp Pre-acquisition Restructuring Plans, we have incurred $3.7 million of charges that resulted in cash outflows of $1.9 million and non-cash charges of $1.8 million. In fiscal 2014, we recognized charges of $2.4 million. In fiscal 2013, we recognized charges of $1.3 million. At the end of fiscal 2014, the Pre-acquisition Restructuring Plans costs was substantially complete.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
4. SENIOR LONG-TERM DEBT
The aggregate minimum principal maturities of the long-term debt for each of the five fiscal years following May 25, 2014, are as follows:
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we repaid the entire principal balance of $500.0 million of our 5.875% senior notes, which were due April 15, 2014.
During fiscal 2013, we issued senior unsecured notes in an aggregate principal amount of $750.0 million. These notes were issued in three tranches of $250.0 million each: 1.35% senior notes due September 10, 2015; 2.10% senior notes due March 15, 2018; and 3.25% senior notes due September 15, 2022.
During fiscal 2013, in order to finance a portion of our acquisition of Ralcorp, we (i) issued senior unsecured notes in an aggregate principal amount of $3.975 billion, (ii) issued senior unsecured notes in an aggregate principal amount of $716.0 million in exchange for senior notes issued by Ralcorp, (iii) assumed senior notes issued by Ralcorp in an aggregate principal amount of $460.7 million, which were prepaid in fiscal 2013, and (iv) borrowed $1.5 billion under our new Term Loan Facility.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Our senior unsecured notes in an aggregate principal amount of $3.975 billion were issued in four tranches: 1.3% senior notes due January 25, 2016 in an aggregate principal amount of $750.0 million; 1.9% senior notes due January 25, 2018 in an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion; 3.2% senior notes due January 25, 2023 in an aggregate principal amount of $1.225 billion; and 4.65% senior notes due January 25, 2043 in an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion. During fiscal 2014, we repaid $63.0 million of 4.65% senior notes due in 2043 prior to maturity, resulting in a net gain of $3.7 million.
Our senior unsecured notes in an aggregate principal amount of $716.0 million were issued in exchange for senior notes issued by Ralcorp pursuant to our offer to exchange (i) any and all 4.95% senior notes due August 15, 2020 issued by Ralcorp for up to an aggregate principal amount of $300.0 million of new 4.95% senior notes due August 15, 2020 issued by ConAgra Foods and cash and (ii) any and all 6.625% senior notes due August 15, 2039 issued by Ralcorp for up to an aggregate principal amount of $450.0 million of new 6.625% senior notes due August 15, 2039 issued by ConAgra Foods and cash. Our senior unsecured notes in an aggregate principal amount of $716.0 million consist of the following:
Senior notes issued by Ralcorp in an aggregate principal amount of $33.9 million were not exchanged and remain outstanding, consisting of 4.95% senior notes issued by Ralcorp due August 15, 2020 in an aggregate principal amount of $17.2 million (with an effective interest rate of 2.83%) and 6.625% senior notes issued by Ralcorp due August 15, 2039 in an aggregate principal amount of $16.7 million (with an effective interest rate of 4.82%) (collectively, the "Ralcorp Notes"). The Ralcorp Notes are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at May 25, 2014.
During fiscal 2013, we offered to purchase for cash any and all 7.29% senior notes due August 15, 2018 issued by Ralcorp, floating rate senior notes due August 15, 2018 issued by Ralcorp, and 7.39% senior notes due August 15, 2020 issued by Ralcorp, in a total aggregate principal amount of $664.5 million. Pursuant to this offer, we purchased senior notes issued by Ralcorp in a total aggregate principal amount of $631.5 million. Ralcorp's 7.29% senior notes due August 15, 2018 in an aggregate principal amount of $33.0 million were not tendered for purchase and remained outstanding (the "Ralcorp Discharged Notes"). During fiscal 2013, we paid $44.8 million, consisting of principal, interest, and contractual amounts payable to satisfy and discharge the Ralcorp Discharged Notes, which were satisfied and discharged by the trustee during fiscal 2013. We recognized a charge of $1.3 million as a cost of early retirement of debt.
Upon our acquisition of Ralcorp, we assumed senior notes issued by Ralcorp in an aggregate principal amount of $460.7 million (the "Ralcorp Callable Notes"), and gave notice of our intent to prepay them during the third quarter of fiscal 2013. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we prepaid the Ralcorp Callable Notes at the contractually determined value of $562.5 million. This did not result in a significant gain or loss.
During fiscal 2013, we borrowed $1.5 billion under our unsecured Term Loan Facility with a syndicate of banks. We are required to repay borrowings under the Term Loan Facility during the term of the facility in equal quarterly installments of 2.5% per quarter commencing on June 1, 2013, with the remainder of the borrowings to be paid on the maturity date of the facility, unless prepaid prior to such date in accordance with the terms of the Term Loan Facility. During fiscal 2013, we prepaid $600.0 million of the $1.5 billion borrowings and recognized a charge of $6.2 million as a cost of early retirement of debt. The Term Loan Facility matures on January 29, 2018. We elected to base the interest rate of the borrowings on LIBOR plus 1.75%. As of May 25, 2014, the total interest rate on our borrowings was 1.902%. Certain of our wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries may, under certain circumstances, be required to guarantee our obligations under the Term Loan Facility.
In connection with the aforementioned financing for the Ralcorp acquisition, we capitalized $52.1 million of debt issuance costs and recognized expense of $27.3 million in related fees during fiscal 2013.
During fiscal 2012, we repaid the entire principal balance of $342.7 million of our 6.75% senior notes, which were due September 15, 2011.
Our most restrictive debt agreements (the revolving credit facility and our Term Loan Facility) require that our consolidated funded debt not exceed 70% of our consolidated capital base, and that our fixed charges coverage ratio be greater than 1.75 to 1.0 on a four-quarter rolling basis. At May 25, 2014, we were in compliance with our debt covenants.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Net interest expense consists of:
Interest paid from continuing operations was $395.7 million, $215.6 million, and $211.9 million in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
Our net interest expense in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012 was reduced by $8.6 million, $9.2 million, and $9.9 million, respectively, due to the impact of the interest rate swap contracts entered into in fiscal 2010. The interest rate swaps effectively changed our interest rates on the senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2012 and 2014 from fixed to variable. During fiscal 2011, we terminated the interest rate swap contracts and received proceeds of $31.5 million. The cumulative adjustment to the fair value of the debt instruments that were hedged (the effective portion of the hedge) was amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the lives of the debt instruments (through fiscal 2014).
During fiscal 2014, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the fair value of certain of our senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2019 and 2020, effectively converting interest on this debt from fixed rate to floating rate. These swaps, which are designated as fair value hedges, reduced our interest expense by $4.1 million in fiscal 2014.
As a result of our acquisition of Ralcorp, the senior unsecured notes issued in exchange for senior notes issued by Ralcorp of $716.0 million and the senior notes issued by Ralcorp that remain outstanding of $33.9 million were recorded at fair value. The combined fair value adjustment on these notes was $163.8 million and is being amortized within interest expense over the life of the respective notes. Our net interest expense in fiscal 2014 and 2013 was reduced by $7.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, as a result of this amortization.
Subsequent to our fiscal year end, in June 2014, we repaid $350.0 million of the principal amount outstanding under the term loan facility with a portion of the proceeds received in connection with the formation of Ardent Mills. We paid the remaining outstanding principal balance of $550.0 million under the term loan facility in July 2014, and terminated the facility, with a portion of the proceeds from the formation of Ardent Mills and approximately $330 million of borrowings under our commercial paper program.
5. CREDIT FACILITIES AND BORROWINGS
At May 25, 2014, we had a $1.50 billion multi-year revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions that matures in September 2018. The multi-year facility has historically been used principally as a back-up facility for our commercial paper program. As of May 25, 2014, there were no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility. Borrowings under the multi-year facility, based on our fiscal year-end credit rating, bear interest at 1.3% over LIBOR and may be prepaid without penalty. The multi-year revolving credit facility requires us to repay borrowings if our consolidated funded debt exceeds 70% of our consolidated capital base during the first four quarters commencing on January 29, 2014, then 65% thereafter, or if our fixed charges coverage ratio is less than 1.75 to 1.0 on a four-quarter rolling basis. As of May 25, 2014, we were in compliance with the credit agreement’s financial covenants.
We finance our short-term liquidity needs with bank borrowings, commercial paper borrowings, and bankers’ acceptances. As of May 25, 2014, we had $137.0 million outstanding under our commercial paper program at an average weighted interest rate of 0.40%. As of May 26, 2013, we had $185.0 million outstanding under our commercial paper program at an average weighted interest rate of 0.42%.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
6. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Medallion Foods
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we completed the sale of a small snack business, Medallion Foods, for $32.0 million in cash. The business results were previously reflected in the Private Brands segment. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the discontinued business have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented prior to divestiture. We recognized a pre-tax loss of $5.8 million ($3.5 million after-tax) on the sale of this business in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we recognized an impairment charge related to allocated amounts of goodwill and intangible assets, totaling $25.4 million ($15.2 million after-tax), in anticipation of this divestiture.
Lightlife® Operations
In the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we completed the sale of the assets of the Lightlife® business for $54.7 million in cash. This business produced and sold vegetarian-based burgers, hot dogs, and other meatless frozen and refrigerated items. The results of this business were previously reflected in the Consumer Foods segment. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $32.1 million ($19.8 million after-tax) on the sale of this business in fiscal 2014. The assets of the discontinued Lightlife business have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented prior to divestiture.
The results of the aforementioned businesses which have been divested are included within discontinued operations. The summary comparative financial results of discontinued operations were as follows:
Formation of Ardent Mills
On May 25, 2014, we sold three flour milling facilities located in Oakland, California, Saginaw, Texas, and New Prague, Minnesota, to Miller Milling Company LLC for a total cash consideration of $162.4 million. This amount is included within the receivable on sale of flour milling assets line of our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $90.3 million ($55.7 million after-tax) during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. The related assets have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented prior to divestiture. These mills were divested pursuant to an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice related to the previously announced formation of the Ardent Mills flour milling joint venture, which was completed subsequent to the end of fiscal 2014. On May 29, 2014, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2014, the Company, Cargill, Incorporated ("Cargill"), and CHS Inc. ("CHS") (collectively, the “Owners”), completed the formation of Ardent Mills. In connection with the closing of the Ardent Mills joint venture, the Company received total cash consideration of $565.3 million before closing costs and working capital adjustments (of which $162.4 million was recognized in fiscal 2014 for the sale of the three mills), and a 44% interest in the Ardent Mills joint venture. We expect to recognize a pre-tax gain of approximately $625 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 in connection with the formation of the Ardent Mills joint venture.
The Company has allocated the net cash proceeds primarily towards debt reduction.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Other Assets Held for Sale
During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we began actively marketing for sale an onion processing facility and farmland previously acquired from an onion products supplier. These assets are held within our Commercial Foods segment. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we sold the farmland for proceeds of $15.1 million. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $5.1 million ($3.2 million after-tax) on the sale of this land in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. The processing facility assets have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. The assets related to the farmland have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented prior to sale.
The assets and liabilities classified as held for sale reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
7. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
Variable Interest Entities Consolidated
We own a 49.99% interest in Lamb Weston BSW, LLC ("Lamb Weston BSW"), a potato processing venture with Ochoa Ag Unlimited Foods, Inc. ("Ochoa"). We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston BSW. Under certain circumstances, we could be required to compensate Ochoa for lost profits resulting from significant production shortfalls ("production shortfalls"). Commencing on June 1, 2018, or on an earlier date under certain circumstances, we have a contractual right to purchase the remaining equity interest in Lamb Weston BSW from Ochoa (the "call option"). We are currently subject to a contractual obligation to purchase all of Ochoa's equity investment in Lamb Weston BSW at the option of Ochoa (the "put option"). The purchase prices under the call option and the put option (the "options") are based on the book value of Ochoa's equity interest at the date of exercise, as modified by an agreed-upon rate of return for the holding period of the investment balance. The agreed-upon rate of return varies depending on the circumstances under which any of the options are exercised. As of May 25, 2014, the price at which Ochoa had the right to put its equity interest to us was $41.9 million. This amount is presented within other noncurrent liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have determined that Lamb Weston BSW is a variable interest entity and that we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. Accordingly, we consolidate the financial statements of Lamb Weston BSW.
We hold a promissory note from Lamb Weston BSW, the balance of which was $36.1 million at May 25, 2014. The promissory note is due in December 2015. The promissory note is currently accruing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 200 basis points with a floor of 3.25%. In addition, as of May 25, 2014, we provided lines of credit of up to $15.0 million to Lamb Weston BSW. Borrowings under the lines of credit bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 200 basis points with a floor of 3.25%. The amounts owed by Lamb Weston BSW to the Company are not reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, as they are eliminated in consolidation.
Our variable interests in Lamb Weston BSW include an equity investment in the venture, the options, the promissory note, certain fees paid to us by Lamb Weston BSW for sales and marketing services, the contingent obligation related to production shortfalls, and the lines of credit advanced to Lamb Weston BSW. Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
with this venture is equal to our equity investment in the venture, the balance of the promissory note extended to the venture, the amount, if any, advanced under the lines of credit, and the amount, if any, by which the put option exercise price exceeds the fair value of the noncontrolling interest in Lamb Weston BSW upon its exercise. Also, in the event of a production shortfall, we could be required to compensate Ochoa for lost profits. It is not possible to determine the maximum exposure to losses from the potential exercise of the put option or from potential production shortfalls. However, we do not expect to incur material losses resulting from these potential exposures.
Due to the consolidation of these variable interest entities, we reflected the following in our Consolidated Balance Sheets:
The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating the Lamb Weston BSW entity do not represent additional claims on our general assets. The creditors of Lamb Weston BSW have claims only on the assets of Lamb Weston BSW. The assets recognized as a result of consolidating Lamb Weston BSW are the property of the venture and are not available to us for any other purpose, other than as a secured lender under the promissory note and lines of credit.
Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated
We also have variable interests in certain other entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we are not the primary beneficiary. We do not consolidate the financial statements of these entities.
We hold a 50% interest in Lamb Weston RDO, a potato processing venture. We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston RDO. We receive a fee for these services based on a percentage of the net sales of the venture. We reflect the value of our ownership interest in this venture in other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, based upon the equity method of accounting. The balance of our investment was $12.6 million and $15.2 million at May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, respectively, representing our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture. The capital structure of Lamb Weston RDO includes owners' equity of $25.4 million and term borrowings from banks of $42.8 million as of May 25, 2014. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this venture.
We lease certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the assets being leased, representing our only variable interest in these lessor entities. These leases are accounted for as operating leases, and accordingly, there are no material assets or liabilities associated with these entities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have no material exposure to loss from our variable interests in these entities. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreements, the expected remaining useful lives of the assets leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entities.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
8. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for fiscal 2014 and 2013 was as follows:
Other identifiable intangible assets were as follows:
We implemented organizational changes during the second quarter of fiscal 2014 that resulted in new reporting segments. As a result, we reassigned goodwill to the new reporting units using a relative fair value allocation approach and performed a goodwill impairment analysis, which did not identify any potential impairments.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, in conjunction with our annual review for impairment, we performed a qualitative analysis of goodwill for each of the reporting units in our segments. Because sales and profits for Private Brands continued to fall below our expectations throughout fiscal 2014 and following preparation of plans for the business for fiscal 2015, we performed a quantitative analysis of goodwill of our Private Brands segment. Estimating the fair value of individual reporting units requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans and future industry and economic conditions. We estimated the future cash flows of each reporting unit within the Private Brands segment and calculated the net present value of those estimated cash flows using a risk adjusted discount rate, in order to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit from the perspective of a market participant. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of approximately 8.3% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to the respective historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value for five of our reporting units within the Private Brands segment. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities of each of these reporting units, in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill of each reporting unit. We recognized impairment charges for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the historical carrying value of goodwill within each reporting unit. Accordingly, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we recorded a $602.2 million charge for the impairment of goodwill. The following reporting units within Private Brands were impacted: $66.4 million in Bars and Coordinated, $154.6 million in Cereal, $94.2 million in Pasta, $231.6 million in Snacks, and $55.4 million in Retail Bakery.
In the case of three of our reporting units within the Private Brands segment; Pasta, Snacks, and Retail Bakery, the estimated fair value of certain amortizing intangible assets (customer relationships) used in step two of our impairment analysis was substantially less than the carrying value of those assets and, as a result, the carrying value of the Pasta, Snacks, and Retail Bakery reporting units exceeded the estimated fair values of those reporting units, even after the previously described goodwill impairment charges were recorded. The carrying value of the Private Brands amortizing intangible assets are expected to be recovered over their remaining lives (on an undiscounted basis) and, accordingly, no impairments were required to be recognized.
Following the impairment charges recorded in fiscal 2014, the carrying value of goodwill in our Private Brands reporting units included $328.7 million for Bars and Coordinated, $464.4 million for Cereal, $752.1 million for Pasta, $816.2 million for Snacks, $717.1 million for Retail Bakery, and $136.1 million for Condiments. If the future performance of one or more of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
reporting units within the Private Brands segment falls short of our expectations or if there are significant changes in risk-adjusted discount rates due to changes in market conditions, we could be required to recognize additional, material impairment charges in future periods.
In fiscal 2014, we also elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for non-amortizing intangible assets, which are comprised of brands and trademarks. We recognized impairment charges of $72.5 million in our Consumer Foods segment, primarily for our Chef Boyardee® brand and a $3.2 million impairment charge in our Private Brands segment for two small brands. We also recognized a $3.2 million impairment charge for an amortizable technology license in Corporate expenses in fiscal 2014.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we completed the sale of Medallion Foods within the Private Brands segment. Related allocated goodwill and amortizing intangible assets of $17.5 million and $14.4 million , respectively, were reclassified to noncurrent assets held for sale. During fiscal 2014, we recognized impairments of $17.5 million and $7.9 million, of the allocated goodwill and amortizing intangible assets, respectively, which are reflected in discontinued operations.
Amortizing intangible assets, carrying a weighted average life of approximately 23 years, are principally composed of customer relationships, licensing arrangements, and intellectual property. For fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, we recognized amortization expense of $111.4 million, $55.7 million, and $20.8 million, respectively. Based on amortizing assets recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 25, 2014, amortization expense is estimated to average $108.5 million for each of the next five years, with a high expense of $109.2 million in fiscal year 2015 and decreasing to a low expense of $107.0 million in fiscal year 2019.
9. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is calculated on the basis of weighted average outstanding common shares. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of basic weighted average outstanding common shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock unit awards, and other dilutive securities.
The following table reconciles the income and average share amounts used to compute both basic and diluted earnings per share:
At the end of fiscal 2014 and 2012, there were 3.1 million and 11.3 million stock options outstanding, respectively, that were excluded from the computation of shares contingently issuable upon exercise of the stock options because exercise prices exceeded the average market value of our common stock during the period. At the end of fiscal 2013, there were no stock options outstanding that were excluded from the computation of shares contingently issuable upon exercise of the stock options.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
10. INVENTORIES
The major classes of inventories were as follows:
11. OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Other noncurrent liabilities consisted of:
12. CAPITAL STOCK
We have authorized shares of preferred stock as follows:
Class B-$50 par value; 150,000 shares
Class C-$100 par value; 250,000 shares
Class D-without par value; 1,100,000 shares
Class E-without par value; 16,550,000 shares
There were no preferred shares issued or outstanding as of May 25, 2014.
We have repurchased our shares of common stock from time to time after considering market conditions and in accordance with repurchase limits authorized by our Board of Directors. In December 2011, our Board of Directors approved a $750.0 million increase to the share repurchase program. We repurchased approximately 2.9 million shares of our common stock for approximately $100.0 million, 9.1 million shares of our common stock for approximately $245.0 million, and approximately 13.8 million shares of our common stock for approximately $352.4 million in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively, under this program.
13. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
In accordance with stockholder-approved plans, we issue share-based payments under various stock-based compensation arrangements, including stock options, restricted stock units, cash-settled restricted stock units, performance shares, and other share-based awards. In accordance with stockholder-approved plans, we issue share-based payments under various stock-based compensation arrangements, including stock options, restricted stock units, cash-settled restricted stock units, performance shares, and other share-based awards. The shares to be delivered under the plan may consist, in whole or part, of treasury stock or authorized but unissued stock, not reserved for any other purpose.
On September 25, 2009, the stockholders approved the ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan, which authorized the issuance of up to 29.5 million shares of ConAgra Foods common stock. At May 25, 2014, approximately 12.2 million shares were reserved
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
for granting additional options, restricted stock units, cash-settled restricted stock units, performance shares, or other share-based awards.
Stock Option Plan
We have stockholder-approved stock option plans that provide for granting of options to employees for the purchase of common stock at prices equal to the fair value at the date of grant. Options become exercisable under various vesting schedules (typically three to five years) and generally expire seven to ten years after the date of grant.
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for stock options granted:
The expected volatility is based on the historical market volatility of our stock over the expected life of the stock options granted. The expected life represents the period of time that the awards are expected to be outstanding and is based on the contractual term of each instrument, taking into account employees’ historical exercise and termination behavior.
A summary of the option activity as of May 25, 2014 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below:
We recognize compensation expense using the straight-line method over the requisite service period. During fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, the Company granted 3.6 million options, 3.9 million options, and 4.1 million options, respectively, with a weighted average grant date value of $4.71, $2.93, and $3.26, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $46.9 million, $77.2 million, and $41.5 million for fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The closing market price of our common stock on the last trading day of fiscal 2014 was $31.61 per share.
Compensation expense for stock option awards totaled $12.6 million, $12.8 million, and $15.4 million for fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The tax benefit related to the stock option expense for fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012 was $4.7 million, $4.8 million, and $5.7 million, respectively.
At May 25, 2014, we had $11.6 million of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock options that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 years.
Cash received from option exercises for the fiscal years ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012 was $104.6 million, $259.8 million, and $217.8 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercises totaled $17.4 million, $28.7 million, and $15.4 million for fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
Share Unit Plans
In accordance with stockholder-approved plans, we issue stock under various stock-based compensation arrangements, including restricted stock units, cash-settled restricted stock units, and other share-based awards (“share units”). These awards
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
generally have requisite service periods of three years. Under each arrangement, stock is issued without direct cost to the employee. We estimate the fair value of the share units based upon the market price of our stock at the date of grant. Certain share unit grants do not provide for the payment of dividend equivalents to the participant during the requisite service period (vesting period). For those grants, the value of the grants is reduced by the net present value of the foregone dividend equivalent payments. We recognize compensation expense for share unit awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. All cash-settled restricted stock units are marked-to-market and presented within other noncurrent liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The compensation expense for our stock-settled share unit awards totaled $26.1 million, $26.7 million, and $25.5 million for fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The tax benefit related to the stock-settled share unit award compensation expense for fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012 was $9.8 million, $9.9 million, and $9.5 million, respectively. The compensation expense for our cash-settled share unit awards totaled $12.4 million and $8.0 million for fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. The tax benefit related to the cash-settled share unit award compensation expense for fiscal 2014 and 2013 was $4.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes the nonvested share units as of May 25, 2014 and changes during the fiscal year then ended:
During fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, we granted 0.9 million, 1.0 million, and 1.8 million stock-settled share units, respectively, with a weighted average grant date value of $36.22, $25.59, and $26.11, respectively. During fiscal 2014 and 2013 we granted 0.8 million and 0.9 million cash-settled share units, respectively, with a weighted average grant date value of $36.89 and $24.74, respectively.
The total intrinsic value of stock-settled share units vested was $46.4 million, $24.3 million, and $23.2 million during fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
At May 25, 2014, we had $43.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to share unit awards that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.
Performance-Based Share Plan
Performance shares are granted to selected executives and other key employees with vesting contingent upon meeting various Company-wide performance goals. The performance goals for the performance periods ending in fiscal 2014 and 2015 are based upon our operating cash flow return on operations, a measure of operating cash flow as a percentage of invested capital, and revenue growth, each measured over a defined performance period. The performance goals for the performance period ending in fiscal 2016 are based upon our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA") return on capital, and revenue growth, each measured over the defined performance period. The awards actually earned will range from zero to two hundred twenty percent of the targeted number of performance shares for each of the performance periods. A payout equal to 25 percent of approved target incentive is required to be paid out if we achieve a threshold level of cash flow return on operations for the performance periods ending in fiscal 2014 and 2015, and a threshold level of EBITDA return on capital for the performance period ending in fiscal 2016. Awards, if earned, will be paid in shares of our common stock. Subject to limited exceptions set forth in the performance share plan, any shares earned will be distributed at the end of the performance period. The value of the performance shares is adjusted based upon the market price of our common stock at the end of each reporting period and amortized as compensation expense over the vesting period.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
A summary of the activity for performance share awards as of May 25, 2014 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below:
The compensation expense for our performance share awards totaled $6.5 million, $19.9 million, and $0.8 million for fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The tax benefit related to the compensation expense for fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012 was $2.4 million, $7.4 million, and $0.3 million, respectively.
The total intrinsic value of share units vested (including shares paid in lieu of dividends) during fiscal 2014 and 2012 was $10.4 million and $16.0 million, respectively.
Based on estimates at May 25, 2014, the Company had $9.1 million of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to performance shares that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
Accounting guidance requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow in our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. As a result, in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, our net operating cash flows decreased and our net financing cash flows increased by approximately $18.9 million, $21.3 million, and $8.7 million, respectively.
14. PRE-TAX INCOME AND INCOME TAXES
Pre-tax income from continuing operations (including equity method investment earnings) consisted of the following:
The provision for income taxes included the following:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Income taxes computed by applying the U.S. Federal statutory rates to income from continuing operations before income taxes are reconciled to the provision for income taxes set forth in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings as follows:
Income taxes paid, net of refunds, were $253.6 million, $249.0 million, and $191.5 million in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
The tax effect of temporary differences and carryforwards that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following:
At May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, net deferred tax assets of $109.2 million and $177.0 million, respectively, were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets. At May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, net deferred tax liabilities of $1.44 billion and $1.54 billion, respectively, were included in other noncurrent liabilities.
The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at May 25, 2014 was $84.9 million, excluding a related liability of $29.6 million for gross interest and penalties. Included in the balance at May 25, 2014 are $8.2 million of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. Any associated interest and penalties imposed would affect the tax rate. As of May 26, 2013, our gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $100.0 million, excluding a related liability of $30.4 million for gross interest and penalties. Included in the balance at May 26, 2013 are $8.0 million of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Interest and penalties recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings was a benefit of $1.3 million in fiscal 2014, $1.2 million in fiscal 2013 and $0.6 million in fiscal 2012.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013 that, if recognized, would favorably impact our effective tax rate was $50.8 million and $61.8 million, respectively.
We accrue interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as part of income tax expense.
We conduct business and file tax returns in numerous countries, states, and local jurisdictions. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has completed its audit for tax years through fiscal 2013 and all resulting significant items for fiscal 2013 and prior years have been settled with the IRS. Other major jurisdictions where we conduct business generally have statutes of limitations ranging from 3 to 5 years.
We estimate that it is reasonably possible that the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to $7 million over the next twelve months due to various state and foreign audit settlements and the expiration of statutes of limitations.
The change in the unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended May 25, 2014 was:
We have approximately $74.6 million of foreign net operating loss carryforwards ($50.8 million will expire between fiscal 2015 and 2035 and $23.8 million have no expiration dates) and $22.1 million of Federal net operating loss carryforwards which expire between fiscal 2015 and 2024. Included in net deferred tax liabilities are $46.5 million of tax effected state net operating loss carryforwards which expire in various years ranging from fiscal 2015 to 2034. Substantially all of our foreign tax credits will expire in fiscal 2018. State tax credits of approximately $30.1 million will expire in various years ranging from fiscal 2015 to 2019.
We have recognized a valuation allowance for the portion of the net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards, and other deferred tax assets we believe are not more likely than not to be realized. The net impact on income tax expense related to changes in the valuation allowance for fiscal 2014 was a benefit of $1.5 million. For fiscal 2013 and 2012, changes in the valuation allowance were a charge of $1.1 million and a benefit of $7.1 million, respectively. The current year change principally relates to decreases to the valuation allowances for state and foreign net operating losses and credits.
As of May 25, 2014, undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries amounted to approximately $560 million. Those earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested and accordingly, no U.S. federal income taxes have been provided thereon. We have not provided U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative earnings of non-U.S. affiliates and associated companies that the Company considers to be reinvested indefinitely. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of U.S. income taxes that would be incurred in the event that we were to repatriate the cumulative earnings of non-U.S. affiliates and associated companies. Deferred taxes are provided for earnings of non-U.S. affiliates and associated companies when we determine that such earnings are no longer indefinitely reinvested.
15. OPERATING LEASES
We lease certain facilities, land, and transportation equipment under agreements that expire at various dates. Rent expense under all operating leases from continuing operations was $179.5 million, $162.0 million, and $133.8 million in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
A summary of non-cancellable operating lease commitments for fiscal years following May 25, 2014, was as follows:
16. CONTINGENCIES
In fiscal 1991, we acquired Beatrice Company ("Beatrice"). As a result of the acquisition of Beatrice and the significant pre-acquisition contingencies of the Beatrice businesses and its former subsidiaries, our consolidated post-acquisition financial statements reflect liabilities associated with the estimated resolution of these contingencies. These include various litigation and environmental proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to its acquisition by us. The litigation includes suits against a number of lead paint and pigment manufacturers, including ConAgra Grocery Products Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“ConAgra Grocery Products”), and the Company as alleged successors to W. P. Fuller Co., a lead paint and pigment manufacturer owned and operated by Beatrice until 1967. Although decisions favorable to us have been rendered in Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio, we remain a defendant in active suits in Illinois and California. The Illinois suit seeks class-wide relief in the form of medical monitoring for elevated levels of lead in blood. In California, a number of cities and counties have joined in a consolidated action seeking abatement of the alleged public nuisance. On September 23, 2013, a trial of the California case concluded in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara, and on January 27, 2014, the court entered Judgment (the “Judgment”) against ConAgra Grocery Products and two other defendants, which orders the creation of a California abatement fund in the amount of $1.15 billion. Liability is joint and several. The Company believes ConAgra Grocery Products did not inherit any liabilities of W. P. Fuller Co. The Company will continue to vigorously defend itself in this case and has appealed the Judgment to The Court of Appeal of the State of California Sixth Appellate District. The Company expects the appeal process will last several years. The absence of any linkage between ConAgra Grocery Products and W. P. Fuller Co. is a critical issue that the Company will continue to advance throughout the appeals process. It is not possible to estimate exposure in this case or the remaining case in Illinois (which is based on different legal theories). If ultimately necessary, the Company will look to its insurance policies for coverage; its carriers are on notice. However, the Company cannot absolutely assure that the final resolution of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
The environmental proceedings associated with Beatrice include litigation and administrative proceedings involving Beatrice's status as a potentially responsible party at 36 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or state-equivalent sites. These sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum, pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs, acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. Beatrice has paid or is in the process of paying its liability share at 34 of these sites. Reserves for these matters have been established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, the known volumetric contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in remediating sites. The reserves for Beatrice-related environmental matters totaled $61.6 million as of May 25, 2014, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites referenced above. We expect expenditures for Beatrice-related environmental matters to continue for up to 18 years.
In certain limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. At the time in which we initially provide such a guarantee, we assess the risk of financial exposure to us under these agreements. We consider the credit-worthiness of the guaranteed party, the value of any collateral pledged against the related obligation, and any other factors that may mitigate our risk. We actively monitor market and entity-specific conditions that may result in a change of our assessment of the risk of loss under these agreements.
We guarantee certain leases resulting from the 2002 divestiture of our fresh beef and pork operations. The remaining terms of these arrangements do not exceed 2 years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $5.4 million as of May 25, 2014.
We are a party to various potato supply agreements. Under the terms of certain such potato supply agreements, we have guaranteed repayment of short-term bank loans of the potato suppliers, under certain conditions. At May 25, 2014, the amount of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
supplier loans we have effectively guaranteed was $34.4 million. We have not established a liability for these guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our required performance under the guarantees is remote.
We were a party to a supply agreement with an onion processing company where we had guaranteed, under certain conditions, repayment of a secured loan (the "Secured Loan") of this onion products supplier to the onion products supplier's lender. The amount of our guarantee was $25.0 million. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we received notice from the lender that the onion products supplier had defaulted on the Secured Loan and we exercised our option to purchase the Secured Loan from the lender for $40.8 million, thereby assuming first-priority secured rights to the underlying collateral for the amount of the Secured Loan, and cancelling our guarantee. The onion products supplier filed for bankruptcy during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we acquired ownership and all rights to the collateral, consisting of agricultural land and a processing facility. During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, we recognized an impairment charge of $10.2 million in our Commercial Foods segment to reduce the carrying amount of these assets to their estimated fair value based upon updated appraisals. During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we recognized an additional impairment charge of $8.9 million in our Commercial Foods segment to reduce the carrying amount of the plant assets to their estimated fair value based upon expected sales proceeds. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we sold the land and recognized a gain of $5.1 million in our Commercial Foods segment. Based on our estimate of the value of the processing facility, we expect to recover the remaining carrying value through our sale of this asset.
Federal income tax credits were generated related to our sweet potato production facility in Delhi, Louisiana. Third parties invested in certain of these income tax credits. We have guaranteed these third parties the face value of these income tax credits over their statutory lives, through fiscal 2017, in the event that the income tax credits are recaptured or reduced. The face value of the income tax credits was $26.7 million as of May 25, 2014. We believe the likelihood of the recapture or reduction of the income tax credits is remote, and therefore we have not established a liability in connection with this guarantee.
We are a party to a number of lawsuits and claims arising out of our ongoing business operations. Among these, there are lawsuits, claims, and matters related to the February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products. Among the matters outstanding during fiscal 2014 related to the peanut butter recall is an ongoing investigation by the U.S. Attorney's office in Georgia and the Consumer Protection Branch of the Department of Justice. In fiscal 2011, we received formal requests from the U.S. Attorney's office in Georgia seeking a variety of records and information related to the operations of our peanut butter manufacturing facility in Sylvester, Georgia. These requests relate to the June 2007 execution of a search warrant at our facility following the February 2007 recall. During fiscal 2013 and 2012, we recognized charges of $7.5 million and $17.5 million, respectively, in connection with this matter. We have been and continue to be engaged in ongoing discussions with the U.S. Attorney's office and the Department of Justice in regard to the investigation. We are pursuing a negotiated resolution, which we believe will likely involve a misdemeanor criminal disposition under the Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we reduced our accrual by $6.7 million. After taking into account liabilities recorded for these matters, we believe the ultimate resolution of this matter should not have a material adverse effect on our financial conditions, results of operations, or liquidity.
In addition to the investigation noted above, we were previously engaged in litigation against an insurance carrier to recover our settlement expenditures and defense costs associated with the peanut butter recall. During fiscal 2009, we recognized a charge of $24.8 million in connection with the insurance coverage dispute. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we reached a settlement on the insurance dispute, pursuant to which we were paid $25.0 million, in addition to retaining the defense costs previously reimbursed to us. We recognized the $25.0 million in income as a reduction to selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses during fiscal 2013. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we received an additional reimbursement of settlement and defense costs of $3.5 million related to this matter, which was recognized in income as a reduction to SG&A expenses.
In June 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina. This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim® branded meat snacks. In June 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release, and not a deliberate act. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we settled our property and business interruption claims related to the Garner accident with our insurance providers. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., our engineer and project manager at the site, filed a declaratory judgment action against us seeking indemnity for personal injury claims brought against it as a result of the accident. In the first quarter of fiscal 2012, our motion for summary judgment was granted and the suit was dismissed without prejudice on the basis that the suit was filed prematurely. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. refiled its action for indemnity. We will continue to defend this action vigorously. Any exposure in this case is expected to be limited to the applicable insurance deductible.
In April 2010, an accidental explosion occurred at our flour milling facility in Chester, Illinois. Two employees of a subcontractor and one employee of the primary contractor, Westside Salvage ("Westside"), on the site at the time of the accident suffered injuries. Suit was initiated against Westside and the Company for personal injury claims. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, a jury in Federal Court sitting in East St. Louis, Illinois, returned a verdict against the Company and Westside and in favor
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
of the three employees. The verdict was in the amount of $77.5 million in compensatory damages apportioned between the Company and Westside and $100.0 million in punitive damages against the Company. Post-trial motions were filed by the Company and the trial court reduced the punitive award by approximately $7 million. We filed an appeal with the Seventh Federal Circuit Court of Appeals on the verdict and the damages in the third quarter of fiscal 2013. The appeal was argued in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 and we are awaiting a decision. Any exposure in this case is expected to be limited to the applicable insurance deductible, for which an amount of $3 million was accrued in a prior period.
Prior to our ownership of Ralcorp, a lawsuit was brought in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas by Frito-Lay North America, Inc. against Ralcorp and Medallion Foods, Inc., a subsidiary of Ralcorp, alleging that certain products manufactured by Medallion infringed Frito-Lays' patents and trademarks and misappropriated trade secrets. After a jury trial during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, jurors delivered a verdict in favor of Medallion and Ralcorp on all claims. The matter has been resolved and the case concluded.
We are a party to an agreement with a third party wherein we have rights to the use of certain intellectual property designed to assist the Company in improving the operating efficiency of its manufacturing operations. In connection with this agreement, the Company is required to make yearly payments of $2.5 million to the third party. Beginning in fiscal 2015, the Company may be required to make additional payments to the third party based upon a contractual formula for manufacturing efficiencies achieved in applicable production facilities. Our best estimate of the required payment for fiscal 2015 is $6.0 million. If additional operating efficiencies are attained in future periods, the amount of the payments due to the third party could increase materially. The obligation to make such payments is contingent upon achievement of such operating efficiencies and accordingly, it is not currently possible to determine the ultimate amount of such payments. This agreement requires such contractual payments to occur each year from fiscal 2015 through March of fiscal 2021.
After taking into account liabilities recognized for all of the foregoing matters, management believes the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. It is reasonably possible that a change in one of the estimates of the foregoing matters may occur in the future and, as noted, while unlikely, the lead paint matter could result in a material final judgment. Costs of legal services associated with the foregoing matters are recognized in earnings as services are provided.
17. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Our operations are exposed to market risks from adverse changes in commodity prices affecting the cost of raw materials and energy, foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates. In the normal course of business, these risks are managed through a variety of strategies, including the use of derivatives.
Commodity and commodity index futures and option contracts are used from time to time to economically hedge commodity input prices on items such as natural gas, vegetable oils, proteins, packaging materials, dairy, grains, and electricity. Generally, we economically hedge a portion of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs for periods of up to 36 months. We may enter into longer-term economic hedges on particular commodities, if deemed appropriate. As of May 25, 2014, we had economically hedged certain portions of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs using derivative instruments with expiration dates through December 2015.
In order to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we enter into forward exchange, option, or swap contracts from time to time for transactions denominated in a currency other than the applicable functional currency. This includes, but is not limited to, hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign-denominated assets and liabilities. As of May 25, 2014, we had economically hedged certain portions of our foreign currency risk in anticipated transactions using derivative instruments with expiration dates through July 2017.
From time to time, we may use derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, to reduce risk related to changes in interest rates. This includes, but is not limited to, hedging against increasing interest rates prior to the issuance of long-term debt and hedging the fair value of our senior long-term debt.
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
During 2011, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the interest rate risk related to our forecasted issuance of long-term debt in April 2014 (based on the anticipated refinancing of the senior long-term debt maturing at that time). We designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of the forecasted interest payments related to this anticipated debt issuance and recorded the unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive loss. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we determined that we
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
would not issue long-term debt to refinance the debt maturing in April 2014. Accordingly, we recognized a charge to earnings, within selling, general and administrative expenses, of $54.9 million in fiscal 2014.
During fiscal 2013, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk related to our issuance of long-term debt to partially finance the acquisition of Ralcorp. We settled these contracts during the third quarter of fiscal 2013 resulting in a deferred gain of $4.2 million on senior notes maturing in 2043 and a deferred loss of $2.0 million on senior notes maturing in 2023, both recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss. These amounts are being amortized as a component of net interest expense over the lives of the related debt instruments. The unamortized amounts of the deferred gain and deferred loss at May 25, 2014 were $3.9 million and $1.8 million, respectively.
Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedges
During fiscal 2010, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the fair value of certain of our senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2012 and 2014. We designated these interest rate swap contracts as fair value hedges of the debt instruments.
During fiscal 2011, we terminated these interest rate swap contracts and received proceeds of $31.5 million. The cumulative adjustment to the fair value of the debt instruments being hedged was included in long-term debt and was amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining lives of the debt instruments through fiscal 2014.
During fiscal 2014, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the fair value of certain of our senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2019 and 2020, effectively converting interest on this debt from fixed rate to floating rate. We designated these interest rate swap contracts as fair value hedges of the debt instruments. The notional amount of the interest rate derivatives outstanding at May 25, 2014 was $500.0 million.
Changes in fair value of such derivative instruments are immediately recognized in earnings along with changes in the fair value of the items being hedged (based solely on the change in the benchmark interest rate). In fiscal 2014, we recognized a gain of $9.1 million representing the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts and a loss of $6.8 million representing the change in fair value of the related senior long-term debt. Of these offsetting gains and losses, net gains of $2.3 million are classified within selling, general and administrative expenses.
The entire change in fair value of the derivative instruments was included in our assessment of hedge effectiveness.
Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows
Many of our derivatives do not qualify for, and we do not currently designate certain commodity or foreign currency derivatives to achieve, hedge accounting treatment. We reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivatives used to economically hedge anticipated commodity consumption and to mitigate foreign currency cash flow risk in earnings immediately within general corporate expense (within cost of goods sold). The gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item being economically hedged is recognized in cost of goods sold.
Economic Hedges of Fair Values - Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We may use options and cross currency swaps to economically hedge the fair value of certain monetary assets and liabilities (including intercompany balances) denominated in a currency other than the functional currency. These derivatives are marked-to-market with gains and losses immediately recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses. These substantially offset the foreign currency transaction gains or losses recognized as values of the monetary assets or liabilities being economically hedged change.
Derivative Activity in Our Milling Operations
We also use derivative instruments within our milling operations, which are part of the Commercial Foods segment. Derivative instruments used to economically hedge commodity inventories and forward purchase and sales contracts within the milling operations are marked-to-market such that realized and unrealized gains and losses are immediately included in operating results. The underlying inventory and forward contracts being hedged are also marked-to-market with changes in market value recognized immediately in operating results.
For commodity derivative trading activities within our milling operations that are not intended to mitigate commodity input cost risk, derivative instruments are marked-to-market each period with gains and losses included in net sales of the Commercial
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Foods segment. Net derivative losses from trading activities of $6.3 million, $11.5 million, and $6.4 million were included in the results of operations for the Commercial Foods segment for fiscal years 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
All derivative instruments are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The fair value of derivative assets is recognized within prepaid expenses and other current assets, while the fair value of derivative liabilities is recognized within other accrued liabilities. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we offset certain derivative asset and liability balances, as well as certain amounts representing rights to reclaim cash collateral and obligations to return cash collateral, where master netting agreements provide for legal right of setoff. At May 25, 2014, $6.2 million, representing an obligation to return cash collateral, was included in other accrued liabilities, and, at May 26, 2013, $10.2 million, representing a right to reclaim cash collateral, was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Derivative assets and liabilities and amounts representing a right to reclaim cash collateral or obligation to return cash collateral were reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities, at May 25, 2014, on a gross basis, prior to the setoff of $17.6 million to total derivative assets and $11.4 million to total derivative liabilities where legal right of setoff existed:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities, at May 26, 2013, on a gross basis, prior to the setoff of $12.5 million to total derivative assets and $22.7 million to total derivative liabilities where legal right of setoff existed:
The location and amount of gains (losses) from derivatives not designated as hedging instruments in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings were as follows:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
As of May 25, 2014, our open commodity contracts had a notional value (defined as notional quantity times market value per notional quantity unit) of $1.5 billion and $1.6 billion for purchase and sales contracts, respectively. As of May 26, 2013, our open commodity contracts had a notional value of $1.8 billion and $1.5 billion for purchase and sales contracts, respectively. The notional amount of our foreign currency forward and cross currency swap contracts as of May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013 was $170.1 million and $359.0 million, respectively.
We enter into certain commodity, interest rate, and foreign exchange derivatives with a diversified group of counterparties. We continually monitor our positions and the credit ratings of the counterparties involved and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party. These transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties. We have not incurred a material loss due to nonperformance in any period presented and do not expect to incur any such material loss. We also enter into futures and options transactions through various regulated exchanges.
At May 25, 2014, the maximum amount of loss due to the credit risk of the counterparties, had the counterparties failed to perform according to the terms of the contracts, was $68.0 million.
18. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
We have defined benefit retirement plans ("plans") for eligible salaried and hourly employees. Benefits are based on years of credited service and average compensation or stated amounts for each year of service. We also sponsor postretirement plans which provide certain medical and dental benefits ("other postretirement benefits") to qualifying U.S. employees. Effective August 1, 2013, our defined benefit pension plan for eligible salaried employees was closed to new hire salaried employees. New hire salaried employees will generally be eligible to participate in our defined contribution plan.
We recognize the funded status of our plans and other benefits in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For our plans, we also recognize as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, the net of tax results of the actuarial gains or losses within the corridor and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized in net periodic benefit cost. For our other benefits, we also recognize as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), the net of tax results of the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized in net periodic benefit cost. These amounts will be adjusted out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as they are subsequently recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost.
During fiscal 2012, we amended certain of our postretirement benefit plans to incorporate design changes. As a result of the plan amendments, we remeasured our postretirement obligation at September 8, 2011. The discount rate used to measure the other postretirement benefits obligation at September 8, 2011 was 4.3% compared to the May 29, 2011 discount rate of 4.9%. All other significant assumptions remained unchanged from the May 29, 2011 measurement date. Calculated gains of $27.6 million as a result of the remeasurement, primarily due to favorable plan amendments, were recognized as a credit to other comprehensive loss. As a result of these plan amendments, our net expense related to these plans was reduced by approximately $5.2 million during fiscal 2012.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
The changes in benefit obligations and plan assets at May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013 are presented in the following table.
The funded status and amounts recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013 were:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $3.9 billion and $3.7 billion at May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, respectively.
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013 were:
Components of pension benefit and other postretirement benefit costs included:
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss were:
Weighted-Average Actuarial Assumptions Used to Determine Net Expense
We amortize prior service cost for our pension plans and postretirement plans, as well as amortizable gains and losses for our postretirement plans, in equal annual amounts over the average expected future period of vested service. For plans with no active participants, average life expectancy is used instead of average expected useful service.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) expected to be recognized as components of net expense during the next year are as follows:
Plan Assets
The fair value of plan assets, summarized by level within the fair value hierarchy described in Note 19, as of May 25, 2014, were as follows:
The fair value of plan assets, summarized by level within the fair value hierarchy described in Note 19, as of May 26, 2013, were as follows:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Level 1 assets are valued based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. The majority of the Level 1 assets listed above include the common stock of both U.S. and international companies, mutual funds, master limited partnership units, and real estate investment trusts, all of which are actively traded and priced in the market. Level 2 assets are valued based on other significant observable inputs including quoted prices for similar securities, yield curves, indices, etc. The Level 2 assets listed above consist primarily of commingled equity investments where values are based on the net asset value of the underlying investments held, individual fixed income securities where values are based on quoted prices of similar securities and observable market data, and commingled fixed income investments where values are based on the net asset value of the underlying investments held. Level 3 assets are those where the fair value is determined based on unobservable inputs. The Level 3 assets listed above consist of alternative investments where active market pricing is not readily available and, as such, we use net asset values as an estimate of fair value as a practical expedient. For real estate funds, the value is based on the net asset value provided by the investment manager who uses market data and independent third party appraisals to determine fair market value. For the multi-strategy hedge funds, the value is based on the net asset values provided by a third party administrator. For private equity and private energy funds, the investment manager provides the valuation using, among other things, comparable transactions, comparable public company data, discounted cash flow analysis, and market conditions.
Level 3 investments are generally considered long-term in nature with varying redemption availability. Certain of our Level 3 investments, with a fair value of approximately $635.4 million as of May 25, 2014, have the ability to impose customary redemption gates which may further restrict or limit the redemption of invested funds therein. As of May 25, 2014, Level 3 investments with a fair value of $2.2 million have imposed such gates.
As of May 25, 2014, we have unfunded commitments for additional investments of $38.6 million in the private equity funds, $27.6 million in the private energy funds, and $80.0 million in real estate funds. We expect unfunded commitments to be funded from plan assets rather than the general assets of the Company.
To develop the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption for the pension plans, we consider the current asset allocation strategy, the historical investment performance, and the expectations for future returns of each asset class.
Our pension plan weighted-average asset allocations and our target asset allocations, by asset category were as follows:
The Company’s investment strategy reflects the expectation that equity securities and multi-strategy hedge funds will outperform debt securities over the long term. Assets are invested in a prudent manner to maintain the security of funds while maximizing returns within the Company’s Investment Policy guidelines. The strategy is implemented utilizing indexed and actively managed assets from the categories listed.
The investment goals are to provide a total return that, over the long term, increases the ratio of plan assets to liabilities subject to an acceptable level of risk. This is accomplished through diversification of assets in accordance with the Investment Policy guidelines. Investment risk is mitigated by periodic rebalancing between asset classes as necessitated by changes in market conditions within the Investment Policy guidelines.
Other investments are primarily made up of cash and master limited partnerships.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Level 3 Gains and Losses
The change in the fair value of the plan’s Level 3 assets is summarized as follows:
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the benefit obligation of the postretirement plans.
A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost rates would have the following effect:
We currently anticipate making contributions of approximately $12.9 million to our pension plans in fiscal 2015. We anticipate making contributions of $25.5 million to our other postretirement plans in fiscal 2015. These estimates are based on current tax laws, plan asset performance, and liability assumptions, which are subject to change.
The following table presents estimated future gross benefit payments for our plans:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Multiemployer Pension Plans
The Company contributes to several multiemployer defined benefit pension plans under collective bargaining agreements that cover certain of its union-represented employees. The risks of participating in such plans are different from the risks of single-employer plans, in the following respects:
a.
Assets contributed to a multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.
b.
If a participating employer ceases to contribute to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers.
c.
If the Company ceases to have an obligation to contribute to a multiemployer plan in which it had been a contributing employer, it may be required to pay to the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan and on the history of the Company’s participation in the plan prior to the cessation of its obligation to contribute. The amount that an employer that has ceased to have an obligation to contribute to a multiemployer plan is required to pay to the plan is referred to as a withdrawal liability.
The Company’s participation in multiemployer plans for the fiscal year ended May 25, 2014 is outlined in the table below. For each plan that is individually significant to the Company the following information is provided:
•
The “EIN / PN” column provides the Employer Identification Number and the three-digit plan number assigned to a plan by the Internal Revenue Service.
•
The most recent Pension Protection Act Zone Status available for 2013 and 2012 is for plan years that ended in calendar years 2013 and 2012, respectively. The zone status is based on information provided to the Company by each plan. A plan in the “red” zone has been determined to be in “critical status”, based on criteria established under the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), and is generally less than 65% funded. A plan in the “yellow” zone has been determined to be in “endangered status”, based on criteria established under the Code, and is generally less than 80% funded. A plan in the “green” zone has been determined to be neither in “critical status” nor in “endangered status”, and is generally at least 80% funded.
•
The “FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented” column indicates whether a Funding Improvement Plan, as required under the Code to be adopted by plans in the “yellow” zone, or a Rehabilitation Plan, as required under the Code to be adopted by plans in the “red” zone, is pending or has been implemented by the plan as of the end of the plan year that ended in calendar year 2013.
•
Contributions by the Company are the amounts contributed in the Company’s fiscal periods ending in the specified year.
•
The “Surcharge Imposed” column indicates whether the Company contribution rate for its fiscal year that ended on May 25, 2014 included an amount in addition to the contribution rate specified in the applicable collective bargaining agreement, as imposed by a plan in “critical status”, in accordance with the requirements of the Code.
•
The last column lists the expiration dates of the collective bargaining agreements pursuant to which the Company contributes to the plans.
For plans that are not individually significant to ConAgra Foods the total amount of contributions is presented in the aggregate.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
The Company will be listed in its plans' Forms 5500 as providing more than 5% of the plan's total contributions for the National Conference of Firemen & Oilers National Pension Fund for the plan year ending in calendar year 2013.
The Company was not listed in the Forms 5500 filed by any of the other plans or for any of the other years as providing more than 5% of the plan’s total contributions. At the date our financial statements were issued, Forms 5500 were not available for plan years ending in calendar year 2013.
In addition to the contributions listed for fiscal 2014 in the table above, we recorded an additional expense of $0.2 million and $14.2 million in fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively, related to our expected incurrence of certain withdrawal costs.
Certain of our employees are covered under defined contribution plans. The expense related to these plans was $40.2 million, $30.7 million, and $24.2 million in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
19. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FASB guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price assets or liabilities. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities,
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, and
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions and best estimate of what inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The fair values of our Level 2 derivative instruments were determined using valuation models that use market observable inputs including interest rate curves and both forward and spot prices for currencies and commodities. Derivative assets and liabilities included in Level 2 primarily represent commodity and foreign currency option and forward contracts, interest rate swaps, and cross-currency swaps.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of May 25, 2014:
The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of May 26, 2013:
Certain assets and liabilities, including long-lived assets, goodwill, asset retirement obligations, and cost and equity investments are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
During fiscal 2014, the $20.3 million carrying amount of a potato processing and storage facility (level 3 asset) was written down to its fair value of $3.8 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $16.5 million to selling, general and administrative expenses in the Commercial Foods segment. The fair value measurement used to determine the impairment was based upon the expected sales price.
During fiscal 2013, the $40.8 million carrying amount of agricultural land and a processing facility (level 3 assets) acquired from an onion products supplier was written-down to its fair value of $30.6 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $10.2 million. The fair value of the measurement used to determine the impairment was based upon updated appraisals. In 2014, the processing facility, with a carrying value of $19.7 million was written-down to its fair value of $10.8 million resulting in an impairment charge of $8.9 million. The fair value of the measurement used to determine the impairment was based upon expected sales price. The impairment charges are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Commercial Foods segment (see Note 16).
During fiscal 2014, the $68.9 million carrying amount of assets held for sale (level 3 assets, which were disposed of in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014) of the discontinued operations of Medallion Foods within the Private Brands segment were written-down to their fair value of $43.5 million. The resulting impairment charge of $25.4 million is included in discontinued operations. The fair value measurement used to determine the impairment was based upon the expected business sales price (see Note 6).
During fiscal 2014, a goodwill impairment charge of $602.2 million was recognized within the Private Brands segment. See Note 8 for a discussion of the methodology employed to measure this impairment.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
During fiscal 2014, impairments of certain indefinite-lived brands were recognized in the amounts of $72.5 million and $3.2 million in the Consumer Foods and Private Brands segments, respectively. The fair values of these brands were estimated using the “relief from royalty” method.
During fiscal 2014, an impairment charge of $3.2 million was recognized in corporate expenses, as the company determined an amortizing technology license was no longer expected to produce future economic benefit. Accordingly, the carrying value of the asset was entirely written off.
The carrying amount of long-term debt (including current installments) was $8.9 billion as of May 25, 2014 and $9.4 billion as of May 26, 2013. Based on current market rates, the fair value of this debt (level 2 liabilities) at May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, was estimated at $9.5 billion and $10.2 billion, respectively. Included in the May 25, 2014 long-term debt carrying amount, and excluded from the above fair value table, is $0.5 billion of hedged debt that, along with the related hedge instruments, is adjusted for changes in fair value based solely on the change in the related benchmark interest rate (see Note 17).
20. BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION
As a result of the Ralcorp acquisition, we implemented organizational changes during the second quarter of fiscal 2014 that resulted in new reporting segments. We began reporting our operations in three reporting segments: Consumer Foods, Commercial Foods, and Private Brands. We believe this recent operating structure will enhance our focus on profitability, coordinated business execution, and resource allocation across our business. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the revised segment presentation. Prior to this change in organizational structure, we had four operating and reportable segments.
The Consumer Foods reporting segment includes branded food sold in various retail channels primarily in North America. Our food products are found in a variety of categories (meals, entrees, condiments, sides, snacks, and desserts) throughout grocery and convenience stores across frozen, refrigerated, and shelf-stable temperature classes. The Consumer Foods reporting segment no longer includes results for store brands (store brands are now part of the recently created Private Brands segment) or foodservice results (the foodservice business is now part of the Commercial Foods segment). The Consumer Foods reporting segment now includes additional international sales which were previously part of the Ralcorp Food Group segment.
The Commercial Foods reporting segment includes commercially branded and private branded food and ingredients, which are sold primarily to commercial, foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segment's primary food items include: frozen potato and sweet potato items and a variety of vegetable, spice and frozen bakery goods which are sold under brands such as Lamb Weston® and Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings®. The Commercial Foods reporting segment now includes foodservice results which were previously part of the Consumer Foods segment, as well as frozen bakery foodservice results, which were previously part of the Ralcorp Frozen Bakery Products segment. Our milling business was included in the Commercial Foods segment for the periods covered by this report but was contributed to Ardent Mills shortly after the end of fiscal 2014.
The Private Brands reporting segment includes private branded and customized food items sold in various retail channels, primarily in North America. Our Private Brands are sold in a variety of categories in grocery and convenience stores including: hot and ready-to-eat cereal; snacks; condiments; bars and coordinated categories; pasta; and retail bakery goods. The recently created Private Brands reporting segment includes a significant portion of results from the former Ralcorp businesses and the store brands results which were previously part of the Consumer Foods segment.
We do not aggregate operating segments when determining our reporting segments.
Intersegment sales have been recorded at amounts approximating market. Operating profit for each of the segments is based on net sales less all identifiable operating expenses. General corporate expense, net interest expense, and income taxes have been excluded from segment operations.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Net sales by product type within each segment were:
Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) for Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows in Segment Results
Derivatives used to manage commodity price risk and foreign currency risk are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives (except those related to our milling operations, see Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements) are recognized at fair market value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are subsequently recognized in the operating results of the reporting segments in the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings.
The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted commodity consumption and the foreign currency risk of certain forecasted transactions, under this methodology:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)
As of May 25, 2014, the cumulative amount of net derivative gains from economic hedges that had been recognized in general corporate expenses and not yet allocated to reporting segments was $26.9 million. This amount reflected net gains of $25.7 million incurred during the fiscal year ended May 25, 2014, as well as net gains of $1.2 million incurred prior to fiscal 2014. Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect to reclassify to segment operating results gains of $26.5 million and $0.4 million to segment operating results in fiscal 2015 and 2016 and thereafter, respectively.
Other Information
At May 25, 2014, ConAgra Foods and its subsidiaries had approximately 32,800 employees, primarily in the United States. Approximately 41% of our employees are parties to collective bargaining agreements. Of the employees subject to collective bargaining agreements, approximately 16% are parties to collective bargaining agreements scheduled to expire during fiscal 2015.
Our operations are principally in the United States. With respect to operations outside of the United States, no single foreign country or geographic region was significant with respect to consolidated operations for fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012. Foreign net sales, including sales by domestic segments to customers located outside of the United States, were approximately $2.2 billion, $1.9 billion, and $1.6 billion in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. Our long-lived assets located outside of the United States are not significant.
Our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 17% of consolidated net sales for each of fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, significantly impacting the Consumer Foods and Private Brands segments.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates accounted for approximately 14% and 15% of consolidated net receivables as of May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, respectively, significantly impacting the Consumer Foods and Private Brands segments.
21. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)
(1)
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated independently for each of the quarters presented. Accordingly, the sum of the quarterly earnings per share amounts may not agree with the total year.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
ConAgra Foods, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ConAgra Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, common stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 25, 2014. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ConAgra Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 25, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of May 25, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated July 16, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Omaha, Nebraska
July 16, 2014
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company's management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of May 25, 2014. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report and determined that there was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
ConAgra Foods' management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting of ConAgra Foods (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). ConAgra Foods' internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. ConAgra Foods' internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of ConAgra Foods; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of ConAgra Foods are being made only in accordance with the authorization of management and directors of ConAgra Foods; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of ConAgra Foods' assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluations of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of the changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
With the participation of ConAgra Foods' Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management assessed the effectiveness of ConAgra Foods' internal control over financial reporting as of May 25, 2014. In making this assessment, management used criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). As a result of this assessment, management concluded that, as of May 25, 2014, its internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The effectiveness of ConAgra Foods' internal control over financial reporting as of May 25, 2014 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, a copy of which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
/s/ GARY M. RODKIN
Gary M. Rodkin
President and Chief Executive Officer
July 16, 2014
/s/ JOHN F. GEHRING
John F. Gehring
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
July 16, 2014
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
ConAgra Foods, Inc.:
We have audited ConAgra Foods, Inc.'s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of May 25, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, ConAgra Foods, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 25, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, common stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 25, 2014, and our report dated July 16, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Omaha, Nebraska
July 16, 2014
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information with respect to our Directors will be set forth in the 2014 Proxy Statement under the heading “Voting Item #1: Election of Directors,” and the information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding our executive officers is included in Part I of this Form 10-K under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant,” as permitted by Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K.
Information with respect to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by our Directors, executive officers, and holders of more than ten percent of our equity securities will be set forth in the 2014 Proxy Statement under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and the information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information with respect to the Audit / Finance Committee and the audit committee’s financial experts will be set forth in the 2014 Proxy Statement under the heading “Board Committees-Audit / Finance Committee,” and the information is incorporated herein by reference.
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller. This code of ethics is available on our website at www.conagrafoods.com through the “Investors-Corporate Governance” link. If we make any amendments to this code other than technical, administrative, or other non-substantive amendments, or grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of this code to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, or Controller, we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date, and to whom it applies on our website at www.conagrafoods.com through the “Investors-Corporate Governance” link.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information with respect to director and executive compensation and our Human Resources Committee will be set forth in the 2014 Proxy Statement under the headings “Non-Employee Director Compensation,” “Board Committees-Human Resources Committee,” and “Executive Compensation,” and the information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners, directors and management will be set forth in the 2014 Proxy Statement under the heading “Information on Stock Ownership,” and the information is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information about shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants, and rights under existing equity compensation plans as of our most recent fiscal year-end, May 25, 2014.
(1)
Column (a) includes 1,242,326 shares that could be issued under performance shares outstanding at May 25, 2014. The performance shares are earned and common stock issued if pre-set financial objectives are met. Actual shares issued may be equal to, less than, or greater than the number of outstanding performance shares included in column (a), depending on actual performance. Column (b) does not take these awards into account because they do not have an exercise price. The number of shares reflected in column (a) with respect to these performance shares assumes the vesting criteria will be achieved at target levels. Column (b) also excludes 3,030,303 restricted stock units and 760,775 deferral interests in deferred compensation plans that are included in column (a) but do not have an exercise price. The units vest and are payable in common stock after expiration of the time periods set forth in the related agreements. The interests in the deferred compensation plans are settled in common stock on the schedules selected by the participants.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information with respect to Director independence and certain relationships and related transactions will be set forth in the 2014 Proxy Statement under the headings “Corporate Governance-Director Independence” and “Board Committees-Audit / Finance Committee,” and "Board Committee - Human Resources Committee" and the information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information with respect to the principal accountant will be set forth in the 2014 Proxy Statement under the heading “Voting Item #4: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Auditor,” and the information is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
a) List of documents filed as part of this report:
1. Financial Statements
All financial statements of the Company as set forth under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements, notes thereto.
3. Exhibits
All exhibits as set forth on the Exhibit Index, which is incorporated herein by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, ConAgra Foods, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
By:
/s/ GARY M. RODKIN
Gary M. Rodkin
President and Chief Executive Officer
July 16, 2014
By:
/s/ JOHN F. GEHRING
John F. Gehring
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
July 16, 2014
By:
/s/ ROBERT G. WISE
Robert G. Wise
Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller
July 16, 2014
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 16th day of July, 2014.
* John F. Gehring, by signing his name hereto, signs this annual report on behalf of each person indicated. Powers-of-Attorney authorizing John F. Gehring to sign this annual report on Form 10-K on behalf of each of the indicated Directors of ConAgra Foods, Inc. have been filed herein as Exhibit 24.
By:
/s/ JOHN F. GEHRING
John F. Gehring
Attorney-In-Fact
Schedule II
CONAGRA FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
For the Fiscal Years ended May 25, 2014, May 26, 2013, and May 27, 2012
(Dollars in millions)
(1)
Primarily allowances acquired through fiscal 2013 and 2012 business acquisitions.
(2)
Bad debts charged off and adjustments to previous reserves, less recoveries.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
ConAgra Foods, Inc.:
Under date of July 16, 2014, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of ConAgra Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of May 25, 2014 and May 26, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, common stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 25, 2014, which are included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ConAgra Foods, Inc. for the fiscal year ended May 25, 2014. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related consolidated financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this consolidated financial statement schedule based on our audits.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Omaha, Nebraska
July 16, 2014
EXHIBIT INDEX
All documents referenced below were filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by ConAgra Foods, Inc. (file number 001-07275), unless otherwise noted.
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
*2.1
Agreement and Plan of Merger among Ralcorp Holdings, Inc., ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Phoenix Acquisition Sub Inc. dated as of November 26, 2012, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 24, 2013
*2.2
Master Agreement by and among ConAgra Foods, Inc., Cargill, Incorporated, CHS Inc. and HM Luxembourg S.A R.L. dated as of March 4, 2013, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2013
*2.2.1
Amendment No. 1 dated April 30, 2013 to Master Agreement by and among ConAgra Foods, Inc., Cargill, Incorporated, CHS Inc. and HM Luxembourg S.A R.L., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2.1 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2013
*2.2.2
Acknowledgment and Amendment No. 2 dated May 31, 2013 to Master Agreement by and among ConAgra Foods, Inc., Cargill, Incorporated, CHS Inc. and HM Luxembourg S.A R.L., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2.2 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2013
*2.2.3
Acknowledgment and Amendment No. 3 to Master Agreement dated as of the 24th of July, 2013 by and among ConAgra Foods, Inc., Cargill, Incorporated, and CHS Inc. in connection with that certain Master Agreement, made as of the 4th day of March, 2013, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 23, 2014
*2.2.4
Acknowledgment and Amendment No. 4 to Master Agreement dated as of the 27th of March 2014, by and among ConAgra Foods, Inc., Cargill, Incorporated and CHS Inc. in connection with that certain Master Agreement, made as of the 4th day of March, 2013
*2.2.5
Acknowledgment and Amendment No. 5 to Master Agreement dated as of the 25th of May 2014, by and among ConAgra Foods, Inc., Cargill, Incorporated and CHS Inc. in connection with that certain Master Agreement, made as of the 4th day of March, 2013
3.1
ConAgra Foods' Certificate of Incorporation, as restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of ConAgra Foods' current report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005
3.2
Amended and Restated By-Laws of ConAgra Foods, Inc., as Amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of ConAgra Foods' current report on Form 8-K dated November 29, 2007
4.1
Indenture, dated as of October 8, 1990, between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association)), as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of ConAgra Foods' Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 033-36967)
**10.1
ConAgra Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated Non-Qualified CRISP Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2008
**10.1.1
Amendment One dated November 29, 2010 to the ConAgra Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated Non-Qualified CRISP Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011
**10.2
ConAgra Foods, Inc. Non-Qualified Pension Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2008
**10.2.1
Amendment One dated December 3, 2009 to ConAgra Foods, Inc. Nonqualified Pension Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2010
**10.2.2
Amendment Two dated November 29, 2010 to the ConAgra Foods, Inc. Non-Qualified Pension Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011
**10.3
ConAgra Foods, Inc. Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2008
**10.3.1
Amendment One dated December 10, 2010 to ConAgra Foods, Inc. Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan (September, 2009 Restatement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011
**10.4
ConAgra Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2008
**10.4.1
Amendment One dated December 3, 2009 to the ConAgra Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2010
**10.4.2
Amendment Two dated November 29, 2010 to ConAgra Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011
**10.4.3
Amendment Three dated March 6, 2013 to ConAgra Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 24, 2013
**10.4.4
Amendment Four dated May 21, 2013 to ConAgra Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4.4 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2013
**10.4.5
Amendment No. 5 dated December 9, 2013 to ConAgra Foods, Inc. Amended and Restated Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (January 1, 2009 Restatement), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 23, 2014
**10.5
ConAgra Foods 1990 Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2005
**10.6
ConAgra Foods 1995 Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2005
**10.7
ConAgra Foods 2000 Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2005
**10.8
Amendment dated May 2, 2002 to ConAgra Foods Stock Plans and other Plans, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2002
**10.9
ConAgra Foods 2006 Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2006
**10.9.1
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (ConAgra Foods 2006 Stock Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods' current report on Form 8-K dated October 3, 2006
**10.9.2
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employees (ConAgra Foods 2006 Stock Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 26, 2006
**10.9.3
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (ConAgra Foods 2006 Stock Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 26, 2006
**10.9.4
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (ConAgra Foods 2006 Stock Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 26, 2006
**10.9.4.1
Amendment One to Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (ConAgra Foods 2006 Stock Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2008
**10.9.5
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (ConAgra Foods 2006 Stock Plan) (Post-July 2007), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2008
**10.10
ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods' current report on Form 8-K dated September 28, 2009
**10.10.1
Form of Stock Option Agreement (ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan) for Non-Employee Directors under the ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 30, 2009
**10.10.2
Form of Stock Option Agreement (ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 30, 2009
**10.10.3
Form of Stock Option Agreement for certain named executive officers (ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 30, 2009
**10.10.4
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 30, 2009
**10.10.4.1
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan) (Choice Program), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 29, 2010
**10.10.4.2
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan) (Choice Program-post November 2010), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011
**10.10.5
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for stock settled RSUs (ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan post July 2012), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 26, 2012
**10.10.6
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan) (Ralcorp Transaction), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10.6 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2013
**10.10.7
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011
**10.10.8
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (ConAgra Foods 2009 Stock Plan) (post July 2012), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 26, 2012
**10.11
ConAgra Foods Executive Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ConAgra Foods' current report on Form 8-K dated September 28, 2009
**10.12
ConAgra Foods, Inc. 2008 Performance Share Plan, effective July 16, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended August 24, 2008
**10.13
ConAgra Foods, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan Requirements dated December 10, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011
**10.14
Form of Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement between ConAgra Foods and its executives (pre September 2011), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2008
**10.14.1
Form of Change of Control Agreement between ConAgra Foods and its executives (post September 2011), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended November 27, 2011
**10.15
Form of Executive Time Sharing Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 25, 2007
**10.16
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between ConAgra Foods and Gary M. Rodkin, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2008
**10.17
Stock Option Agreement between ConAgra Foods and Gary M. Rodkin incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ConAgra Foods' current report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2005
**10.18
Letter Agreement between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Brian L. Keck dated September 7, 2010, as amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 28, 2011
**10.19
Amendment to Stock Option Agreements between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Brian L. Keck dated March 14, 2014
**10.20
Letter Agreement between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Paul Maass dated May 16, 2013, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2013
**10.21
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation Program for the Fiscal 2014 Plan Year
10.22
Credit Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2011, by and among ConAgra Foods, Inc., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and a lender, Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent and a lender, and the other financial institutions party thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly report on Form10-Q for the Quarter Ended November 27, 2011
10.22.1
Amendment No. 1 to the Revolving Credit Agreement, entered into as of December 21, 2012, among ConAgra Foods, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent and a lender and the other financial institutions party thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of ConAgra Foods' Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 27, 2012
10.22.2
Amendment No. 2 to the Revolving Credit Agreement entered into as of August 27, 2013, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods, quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended November 24, 2013
10.23
Bridge Loan Agreement, entered into as of December 21, 2012, among ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner, and the other financial institutions party thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods' Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 27, 2012
10.24
Term Loan Agreement, entered into as of December 21, 2012, among ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Bank, N.A., as syndication agent and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner, and the other financial institutions party thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ConAgra Foods' Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 27, 2012
Statement regarding computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
Subsidiaries of ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Consent of KPMG LLP
Powers of Attorney
31.1
Section 302 Certificate
31.2
Section 302 Certificate
32.1
Section 906 Certificates
101.1
The following materials from ConAgra Foods' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 25, 2014, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders' Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and (vii) document and entity information.
* Schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. ConAgra Foods agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of any omitted schedule upon request.
** Management contract or compensatory plan.
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4) of Regulation S-K, certain instruments with respect to ConAgra Foods' long-term debt are not filed with this Form 10-K. ConAgra Foods will furnish a copy of any such long-term debt agreement to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
*END OF FORM 10-K*