Are those members of The Post's editorial board who are married willing to exchange their marriage licenses for civil union certificates? Or do they know that civil unions are not only separate but also unequal and therefore inadequate?

And can we please stop referring to "gay marriage" as if this is some kind of alternative to "regular marriage?" We're not talking Coke and Diet Coke here.

Just as couples today do not get either a same-race or interracial marriage license, same-sex couples don't want a kind of marriage license  that is different from heterosexual couples'. We just want access to the same marriage licenses as everyone else.
