Padova wrote that the plaintiffs "have cited no case law, and the court can find no basis for creating a cause of action . . . to fit this case. Holding that [tobacco companies] could limit plaintiffs' freedom . . . simply by targeting plaintiffs with intensive advertising that caused [them] to choose . . . dangerously defective mentholated tobacco products would require a radical departure from the jurisprudence of [federal civil rights laws], a departure this court is not prepared to make."