Facebook Inc. on Wednesday disavowed comments by company director and venture capitalist Marc Andreessen that appeared to support the colonization of India—sentiments which also received a ringing denunciation from the company’s chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg. 
 
 Mr. Andreessen also apologized for the remarks, made late Tuesday on Twitter, after Indian regulators banned a Facebook program offering free access to a limited set of Internet sites. 
 
 ... ||||| Splash News/Corbis 
 
 Marc Andreessen needs to tweet a billion apologies. 
 
 The prominent Silicon Valley investor and Facebook board member on Wednesday took to Twitter to apologize for a series of offensive tweets he posted the night before. 
 
 The short missives touched a nerve because they appeared to reference India's colonial history. The world's second-most populous country, with more than a billion people, was a British colony until 1947. 
 
 Here's the backstory: On Monday, India's Telecom Regulatory Authority blocked Facebook's Free Basics, which seeks to bring a limited number of Internet sites and services for free to areas of the world where online access is unavailable. 
 
 The decision was part of a ruling on Net neutrality, the principle of equal access to all types of content and services on the Internet. Facebook, the country concluded, was violating those ideals by picking which services were accessible for free. 
 
 Andreessen, well known for his fiery Twitter personality, called the decision "morally wrong" because India was denying poor people at least partial Internet connectivity. Afterward, he responded to a tweet that suggested he supports "Internet colonialism." 
 
 "Anti-colonialism has been economically catastrophic for the Indian people for decades. Why stop now?" Andreessen wrote in a now-deleted tweet captured by Quartz and Business Insider. 
 
 Andreessen's venture capital firm, Andreessen Horowitz, had no further comment. Andreessen said he withdrew his comments "in full and without reservation." 
 
 Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Wednesday tried to distance himself from his board member. "I want to respond to Marc Andreessen's comments about India yesterday," wrote Zuckerberg on his Facebook page. "I found the comments deeply upsetting, and they do not represent the way Facebook or I think at all." 
 
 A Facebook spokeswoman also reiterated the sentiment in a statement. "We strongly reject the sentiments expressed by Marc Andreessen last night regarding India." 
 
 Andreessen's faux pas comes as Silicon Valley companies increasingly try to woo India and other developing countries to their services. Google and SpaceX are also trying to beam down Internet access to rural regions via balloons and satellites, for example. 
 
 All of this comes as the technology sector becomes a bigger player on the world's stage. When Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the US in September, he met with Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Apple's Tim Cook.
– Facebook just lost an important legal fight in India, and now one of its board members has complicated its next steps. The mess started when Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen took to Twitter to criticize India's decision to block Facebook from offering free but limited Internet access to poor areas. At one point, when a critic likened Andreessen's position to "Internet colonialism," he shot back, "Anti-colonialism has been economically catastrophic for the Indian people for decades. Why stop now?" recounts the Wall Street Journal. That sentiment drew widespread condemnation and prompted Mark Zuckerberg himself to quickly distance himself from it. And in a series of tweets, Andreessen apologized for his "ill-informed and ill-advised comment." On his Facebook page, Zuckerberg used stronger language, describing the tweet as "deeply unsettling" and making clear that the company "strongly" rejects it. The controversy revolves around a program called Free Basics. As CNET explains, an Indian court declared that the concept violated Net neutrality rules because it would have provided free access to the Internet but only to a limited number of services. The controversy "comes at an inopportune time" for Facebook, which wants to establish a bigger presence in the country but now needs a new strategy after the misstep with Free Basics, notes the New York Times. As for Andreessen, "I will leave all future commentary on all of these topics to people with more knowledge and experience than me," he wrote.