Home 
 
 5,000 pounds of meat 
 
 1,600 pounds of produce 
 
 This is how much food our residents consume in one month. It may take a village to raise a child but it takes the support and care of donors to feed and care for these majestic animals. 
 
 We are Lion’s Gate Sanctuary. We provide a safe haven for lions, tigers, bears, and wolves, oh my! With the generosity of others we are able to fulfill our mission to provide an environment that is conducive to a happy, tranquil life filled with love, respect, and the very best of care for our residents. 
 
 Please take a moment to get to know about us and the animals who need your help. 
 
 SAVE the Animals of Lion’s Gate Sanctuary! 
 
 Due to various circumstances, Lion’s Gate Sanctuary has to move for the safety and comfort of our animals. We need your help! Please click here for more information. ||||| By Jennifer Brice 
 
 AGATE, Colo. (CBS4) – There’s a sad story in Elbert County after a wildlife sanctuary euthanized all of its animals — a total of 11 animals — lions, tigers, and bears. 
 
 The Lion’s Gate Sanctuary in Agate said killing the animals was the only option after county commissioners denied it’s request to relocate. 
 
 Jim Hansen has lived near the sanctuary for many years. He was sad to hear that that the animals, which went there for safekeeping and care, were euthanized. 
 
 “It’s kind of disheartening,” he said. “At the same time I don’t know exactly what kind of problems they are facing down there.” 
 
 In a statement to CBS4, the sanctuary owners said ongoing flooding and damage prevented them from continuing their operations and caring for the animals at the present location. They wanted to move the sanctuary to another location, land also in Elbert County, and owned by them. 
 
 Elbert County commissioners denied that request. Commissioner Danny Wilcox told CBS4’s Jennifer Brice by phone it was denied it because of numerous safety concerns with the proposed move, and the sanctuary would go from a remote area to a more densely populated place. 
 
 Dr. Joan Laub, a sanctuary owner, said she is devastated about the loss of the animals. She said they thought about relocating the animals. She added that the animals “would not have survived a move to a new facility” because they were all seniors, some with disabilities. 
 
 Laub added that they had a safety problem with a permanent solution for the animals. In an email she told Brice, “Multiple governing bodies signed off on the relocation. They based their decision on the law. The three county commissioners denied the permit based upon emotions and their self-serving agenda, i.e., votes.” 
 
 In a statement emailed Wednesday evening, the Elbert County Commissioners described themselves as shocked and saddened by the news: “The decision by the operators of Lion’s Gate to euthanize all their animals comes as a total surprise to the County for two reasons. Only two weeks earlier, the operators of the facility assured the County in a public forum that if the application was denied, they would continue to operate at their current location as they had for the previous 10 years. Additionally, the Keenesburg Wildlife Sanctuary publicly offered to care for the animals at their facility if Lion’s Gate was unable to do so.” 
 
 Wilcox said he did not know the outcome of this would result in the animals being euthanized. He said he specifically asked the owners what their plan would be if the approval was denied. He said he was told that the sanctuary owners would continue operate as-is based on the ages of the animals. 
 
 Additional Resources 
 
 Click here to read the full statement from Lion’s Gate Sanctuary and read the full statement from below from Elbert County commissioners on the matter: 
 
 Elbert County Commissioners were saddened to learn of the decision made by the owners of Lion’s Gate Sanctuary to euthanize their eleven animals. 
 
 After a lengthy public hearing on April 12th, the County denied the special use application to relocate several lions, tigers and bears to a substantially more populated and developed area. This decision was based on concerns that the proposed plan for relocation of these animals was not adequately resourced, nor were exigency plans clearly defined which would ensure the safety of the animals and the surrounding residents. 
 
 The decision by the operators of Lion’s Gate to euthanize all their animals comes as a total surprise to the County for two reasons. Only two weeks earlier, the operators of the facility assured the County in a public forum that if the application was denied, they would continue to operate at their current location as they had for the previous 10 years. Additionally, the Keenesburg Wildlife Sanctuary publicly offered to care for the animals at their facility if Lion’s Gate was unable to do so. Given these facts, the news that Lion’s Gate euthanized all 11 animals at the same time and so shortly after the decision to deny the move comes as a shock. 
 
 “The most important consideration in this land use issue was ensuring the safety of the many citizens residing in the vicinity of the proposed relocation site. We would have loved to have seen these animals be allowed to live out their lives at the Elbert County location that had been their home for more than a decade.” – Commissioner Chris Richardson. 
 
 Jennifer Brice is a reporter with CBS4 focusing on crime and courts. Follow her on Facebook or on Twitter @CBS4Jenn. ||||| ELIZABETH — Animal trainer Peter Winney wants to bring six lions and tigers to his girlfriend’s ranch south of Elizabeth, but the couple has faced allegations of smuggling cats, according to state wildlife records obtained by The Denver Post. 
 
 Winney was convicted once for bringing two lion cubs into the state without proper documents and charged two other times with having unlicensed animals. 
 
 He said the 2003 conviction was a misunderstanding over paperwork, though it cost him his wildlife license for a year. 
 
 Elbert County commissioners will decide Wednesday whether Winney and Joan Laub, a psychologist, can keep six big cats at a sanctuary they have built in a rural but residential neighborhood, pending state and federal permits. 
 
 At a zoning hearing last month, dozens of area residents criticized the proposal, concerned about safety, property values and whether the scent of lions and tigers would spook nearby horses and livestock. 
 
 “When we settled in this neighborhood, we never anticipated we would be awakened in the predawn hours by a lion’s roar,” said neighbor Ed Steinman. 
 
 No one seemed aware that Winney has been charged three times in cases involving unlicensed lions and tigers, resulting in a dismissal, an acquittal and a conviction. 
 
 “It’s a vendetta thing,” Winney said Monday of the Division of Wildlife. 
 
 Tim Holeman, a spokesman for the division, said the agency is doing a thorough but fair job. “The delicate balance between the needs of wildlife and human activity demands nothing less,” he said. 
 
 Like Winney, Laub also has been charged with offenses involving the state Division of Wildlife, but a Douglas County judge sealed her records in 2004, citing privacy. 
 
 The charges against her stemmed from the cases involving Winney, Laub said, and she was never convicted. 
 
 In August 2001, Winney’s business associate, Adam Fishman, took a tiger to the Elbert County Fair in Kiowa. Turned away, Fishman instead exhibited the cat at the County Seat bar in Kiowa, according to state wildlife records. 
 
 When authorities investigated eight days later, Winney and Fishman could not produce a license for two lions and two tigers they were keeping at another sanctuary. 
 
 Winney said the cats were never his, and the district attorney’s office dismissed the case. Fishman has since left the state and could not be located for comment. 
 
 In November 2001, Winney fetched two sick lion cubs from a faltering sanctuary in South Dakota and brought them to a refuge near Colorado Springs for life-saving care. 
 
 Winney said Monday that he thought he had obtained the clearances he needed from local and federal officials in South Dakota, and his conviction was the result of a poor legal defense. 
 
 After exhausting his appeals, Winney lost his wildlife license. It was suspended for one year, until November. 
 
 In May 2002, Winney and Fishman brought two tigers to a party at Laub’s home in Parker. 
 
 One tiger allegedly pinned down a 2-year-old child, and Winney was charged with failing to have a license for the tigers. State records are unclear about details of the incident, but Winney said no one was ever in danger. He was acquitted by a jury. 
 
 “Oh well, I’m sure I will have another opportunity in the future,” district wildlife manager Gene Abram wrote in a 2003 e-mail to colleagues after Winney’s acquittal. 
 
 Holeman said Winney’s record would not be a factor in any future application for the Elbert County sanctuary. 
 
 “We consider each application on its merits,” he said. 
 
 Winney has touted his experience as an animal trainer in his qualifications to oversee the proposed sanctuary, including two years as “sole handler” for Siegfried & Roy in Las Vegas. 
 
 A spokeswoman for Siegfried & Roy characterized Winney’s role with the showmen as in a “junior capacity.” 
 
 Winney is “not an expert, if that’s the impression,” said spokeswoman Kala Peterson. 
 
 Winney said Peterson’s characterization is inaccurate and just part of Siegfried & Roy’s effort to present themselves as the sole experts in their act. 
 
 “In the cat world when you join the family, you’re in the family, but when you leave you’re no longer part of the family,” he said. 
 
 Staff writer Joey Bunch can be reached at 303-820-1174 or jbunch@denverpost.com. ||||| A Colorado community is in shock after an animal sanctuary battling housing problems resorted to euthanizing all 11 of its exotic animals, despite the county planning commission claiming other facilities had offered to take them in. 
 
 Lion’s Gate Animal Sanctuary in Agate announced in a statement last week that it had euthanized five bears, three lions and three tigers. The statement blamed the deaths on the Elbert County’s planning commission for refusing the sanctuary’s request to move to another site because of flooding. 
 
 “The flooding and resulting damage prevents us from reasonably continuing our operation and caring for our animals safely,” the organization had said in an earlier online petition for their move. 
 
 Facility owners Peter Winney and Joan Laub reasoned in their statement last week that they wouldn’t have had to euthanize the animals if the local government officials had not denied their request to move. They identified the animals killed as “Victims of Elbert County Commissioners.” 
 
 (Story continues below slideshow.) 
 
 BEFORE YOU GO PHOTO GALLERY Animal Sanctuary Euthanizes Lions, Tigers And Bears After Flooding Concerns 
 
 County Chairman Danny Wilcox, who was one of the three voting commissioners, said the new location the group chose was in a more urban and populated area, making the conditions unsafe for the general public. The animal sanctuary also never told the commissioners that they’d resort to killing the animals, he said. 
 
 “We were shocked,” he told HuffPost on Thursday of the sanctuary’s actions, which he said have resulted in people threatening him, the other commissioners and even his grandchildren. 
 
 Jennifer Churchill, a spokeswoman for Colorado Parks and Wildlife, described the sanctuary’s decision as unprecedented. 
 
 “This has never happened before in our state,” she told HuffPost. 
 
 Wilcox said the board pointedly asked the owners what would happen to the animals if their request to move was denied, and they said they’d “continue to operate as they had for the last 10 years.” 
 
 “They believe that we made them euthanize the animals. That’s the story that’s evidently being told and we did not do that,” he said. “In fact, we verified that the animals would continue to live.” 
 
 He added that two sanctuaries, which he declined to identify, contacted the county and offered to take in the animals if they could not be moved. 
 
 But in a press release, the county identified one of those facilities as the Wild Animal Sanctuary in Kennesburg, about 70 miles north of Lion’s Gate. 
 
 John Moore via Getty Images The Wild Animal Sanctuary in Kennsburg, Colorado, said it would have taken in the animals if asked. 
 
 Pat Craig, who runs that sanctuary, said they “could have easily taken them.” 
 
 “Eleven is pretty small,” he told HuffPost Wednesday of the number of bears, tigers and lions that needed homes. “They could have easily called.” 
 
 Craig’s 720-acre facility, whose website boasts that it hosts more than 400 animals, including tigers, bears, lions, leopards and wolves, it has taken in from around the world. 
 
 In February, the group took in five big cats and two bears from a zoo in Argentina. Craig said they also recently received 27 animals from South Dakota. 
 
 An attempt to reach the Lion’s Gate owners for comment was not successful. 
 
 A statement published to Lion’s Gate’s Facebook page on Thursday argued that the animals could not be moved because they were “too old and many had disabilities and special needs.” The sanctuary denied that they resorted to killing the animals because of the county commissioners, even though they had previously described the animals as the county’s victims. 
 
 Instead, they said they euthanized the animals because they were old and “many had disabilities and special needs” that prevented them from being moved. It was no longer safe for the animals or for the public for them to be at their current location, they wrote. 
 
 Cathy Bosier, who said she has volunteered at Lion’s Gate Sanctuary for the last year and a half, said the owners are no longer talking to the media, but described them as devastated by the animals’ deaths, which she called a “last resort.” 
 
 “They felt their hands were forced. They were backed into a corner and their hands were forced,” she told HuffPost on Wednesday. “Everything else was tried and this was the last thing.” 
 
 Asked if the commissioners knew that euthanasia was their last resort, she answered: “Yeah, pretty much.” 
 
 Bosier said the facility reached out to a neighboring sanctuary for help but the animals’ old age prevented their move. She described the animals as around 20 years of age. 
 
 “The move to a larger sanctuary would have killed them,” she said. 
 
 David Mercado / Reuters This lion named Kiara was relocated to The Wild Animal Sanctuary park in 2011. She was one of 25 lions that were rescued from traveling circuses in Bolivia. 
 
 Addressing Craig’s facility, she said: “There’s no way they’re equipped to care for these animals with special needs.” 
 
 Craig denied this claim. 
 
 “We locate older animals,” he said. “The age has no factor.” 
 
 Craig suggested that the reasons behind the animals’ euthanasia are deeper than they appear. 
 
 A 2006 report by the Denver Post highlighted Winney’s previous legal trouble involving wild animals, including “allegations of smuggling cats” and other documentation and licensing issues. Craig said the owners’ inability to get additional licenses for their sanctuary prohibited them from acquiring additional means of funding. 
 
 “It severely restricted what they could do,” he said. 
 
 Bloomberg via Getty Images The Wild Animal Sanctuary in Keenesburg, Colorado, boasts 720 acres and hundreds of animals. 
 
 Wilcox, the county chairman, noted that this was the second time the facility had requested this move. The previous one, in 2006, was also denied. 
 
 This time around, Wilcox said, the owners cited flooding issues as a way to be considered for a special-use permit. He called the flooding concerns “questionable,” however. 
 
 “We went out to look at the site prior to the hearing. We went out and looked at all the issues surrounding it, looked at the fencing, looked at the topography,” he said. “The research that we did brought up a lot of issues and concerns.” 
 
 According to the Denver Post, residents around the current location had complained for years about safety and noise issues related to the facility. 
 
 One neighbor told local Denver station ABC 7 that when the lions roared the whole ground shook. ||||| Lion’s Gate wild animal sanctuary has euthanized all 11 of its animals, its hand forced when the Elbert County commissioners denied the refuge’s request to move, co-owner Joan Laub said. 
 
 Laub told KMGH-Channel 7 that the animals had to be euthanized because recurring flooding on the property made conditions unsafe. 
 
 The sanctuary euthanized three lions, three tigers and five bears on April 20, according to KUSA-Channel 9. 
 
 On April 12, Elbert County commissioners unanimously voted to deny the sanctuary’s request to move from eastern Elbert County to a location near Elizabeth, the Denver Post reported. 
 
 Commissioner Grant Thayer said the unanimous vote to deny the sanctuary a special-use permit was made because “it was felt that the community impact would be best served if it was denied.” 
 
 It was the second time the board of commissioners voted against a move for the facility, with a previous board turning down a similar request by Lion’s Gate in 2006. 
 
 For years, neighbors living near the proposed relocation site had said it was not appropriate for a rural neighborhood mostly known for an equine lifestyle. They worried about safety and complained about the possibility of lions roaring at all times of day and night. 
 
 Lion’s Gate owners, Laub and Peter Winney, argued at a planning commission meeting in March that the animals were elderly and posed little security risk. As for noise, Laub said the sanctuary’s two male lions might roar once a day for only seconds at a time. 
 
 The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Department told Denver7 officials were aware of the mass euthanasia and the burial of all 11 animals on the sanctuary grounds. But it said no regulations were violated. 
 
 Pat Craig, the founder and executive director of the Wildlife Sanctuary in Keenesburg, which is the state’s largest with 450 animals, told Denver7 he was surprised the sanctuary’s owners didn’t try to find new homes for the animals. 
 
 “In this specific case with Lion’s Gate, they have so few animals, they would easily be able to place every animal with another wildlife sanctuary,” Craig said.” “I can guarantee you that a lot of organizations would be glad to help.”
– Amid a "shocking" tragedy, locals say something smells fishy in central Colorado. On April 12, after the owners of the Lion's Gate wild animal sanctuary requested to move to a nearby but more urban location citing safety concerns after recurring flooding on the property, Elbert County commissioners voted no, citing safety concerns, reports the Denver Post. Then on April 20, the sanctuary suddenly euthanized all 11 of its animals—three lions, three tigers, and five bears—and the Lion's Gate web site went dark, showing only the words, "This account has been suspended." The owner of a nearby, larger sanctuary says he had offered to take the animals, but co-owner Dr. Joan Laub and a sanctuary volunteer say the senior animals wouldn't have survived a move to a larger sanctuary and that the county commission's vote forced the sanctuary's hand, reports CBS4. On a Care2 Petition page launched months ago, Laub wrote that Colorado Parks and Wildlife had authorized a move to 85 acres the sanctuary also owns in a more urban part of the county, though she listed 18 animals at the time. County Chairman Danny Wilcox, meanwhile, tells Huffington Post that the commission is "shocked" the animals were put down after the owners had said they'd continue to operate if their request was denied. A spokeswoman for Colorado Parks and Wildlife calls the killings unprecedented: "This has never happened before in our state." One of the owners was once accused of smuggling cats, per the Denver Post in 2006, and the owner of the larger sanctuary theorizes to the Huffington Post that issues with licensing made it difficult for Lion's Gate to get funding. (See why this vet killed herself with a euthanasia drug.)