conference call on friday , march 17 th hello nick :
i agree e - mail is much easier .
there is a two - hour time difference between calif and texas , i . e . , 1 : 00 pm
texas time - 11 : 00 am calif time .
would tomorrow at 11 : 00 am calif time be ok with you ( 1 : 00 pm texas ) ?
this time is fine for vince , tom gros and stinson gibner .
can they call you and if so , what number ?
please let me know .
thanks !
shirley
713 - 853 - 5290
nick bambos on 03 / 16 / 2000 12 : 28 : 58 pm
to : shirley . crenshaw @ enron . com
cc : bambos @ stanford . stanford . edu
subject : re : visit to enron
shirley ,
it ' s easier to communcate by e - mail , since i am moving from
meeting to meeting ( but i have the laptop always with me ) .
please give me a phone number that i could call tomorrow .
what is the time difference between california and your
location ? i think it ' s 2 hours ( ca - > tx ) - is that right ?
i can do the conference call any time from 9 - 11 ca time .
would that be ok on your side ?
thanks ,
nick
vince . j . kaminski @ enron . com wrote :
>
> nick ,
>
> we can close the loop on our commitment to support the research projects
> before your visit to enron .
>
> my assistant , shirley crenshaw , will call you to set up a conference call
> with me , stinson gibner ,
> and tom gros from enron broadband services to discuss all the isssues .
> friday this week would work for
> both tom and me . i think we need about 15 minutes .
>
> vince
>
> p . s . shirley , nick ' s phone number is 650 796 8163 ( cell ) , 650 - 725 - 5525
> ( office ) .
>
> nick bambos on 03 / 12 / 2000 05 : 32 : 35 pm
>
> to : vince . j . kaminski @ enron . com , bambos @ stanford . stanford . edu
> cc :
> subject : visit to enron
>
> hello vince ,
>
> it was nice seeing you at stanford and many thanks for the lunch
> we had together . i really enjoyed our discussions , both at the
> technical level and otherwise .
>
> i promised to send you an e - mail regarding possible dates for
> a visit to enron . i delayed it for a week till my schedule was
> clearer . let ' s see if we can get a match with your schedule -
> mine is rather terrible :
>
> friday , 21 st of april looks good . but april 23 rd is easter
> sunday , so that may make it difficult for some people at enron
> to be around . let me know if that is the case . i am willing to
> visit then , because the week after that i am scheduled to be in
> japan and in the previous weeks i am all committed on fridays .
>
> friday , 19 th of may is the next possibility , but this probably
> is too far out . the main problem is that i am operating within
> a window of opportunity for attracting top students for this
> research . this window closes by the end of april , and it would be
> important for the student support funds to be in place then , so
> that i can make hard commitments to students and attract top
> talent . i am already reviewing files of students who have
> approached me for phd advising , and i am in a mode of doing " soft
> commitments to star - level students " to get this research and its
> potential on their radar screen . top students are highly sought
> after by advisors and i want to be an early player in this
> competition .
>
> does my visit to enron have to happen before we can set up the
> project and student support at stanford ? if so , doing it before the
> end of april is important for getting top people . if the visit can
> happen after we get the ball rolling , then we can schedule it in may .
> i assume there will be multiple visits both ways when the project gets
> going . please let me know what you think .
>
> best regards ,
>
> nick