Re: PathTools beta for testing 
On Oct 14, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Ken Williams wrote:

> I would only accept such a patch on style grounds, not performance  
> grounds.  And I'm not convinced it's a style improvement in this case.
>
> If you want to speed up PathTools by rather huge amounts, you might  
> try working with Mark Mielke on his pwd() improvements.  That's  
> where the time sink is.

For me, in my profiling on File::Next, canonpath is the biggie in  
File::Spec.  That's why I jumped on it.

Certainly the regex vs. substr matches are a win in both style and  
performance, though.

xoa

--
Andy Lester => kngf@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance


