Re: [UAI] Fuzzy logic and probability Hello Professor Zadeh,

I'm sorry to come late to the party. You have emphasized that
probability does not address, not very well or not directly,
imprecision in descriptions. On that point we are in agreement.
What is not clear to me is the motivation for the rules which
are conventionally categorized as fuzzy logic. Is there an
argument (analogous to, let's say, Cox's work in probability)
which relates those rules to some more primitive assumptions
or axioms? Forgive me if you have already answered this question.

All the best,
Robert Dodier


