Re: [SM-USERS] sendmail verbose output ---------------------------------------- > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:04:41 -0800 > From: evhq@squirrelmail.org > To: bspsggvwcfmo-bvbmb@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] sendmail verbose output >  > On Feb 19, 2008 3:55 PM, Mohit Tewari  wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > My set up is > > Debian - Etch / php5.2.08/apache2/squirrelmail1.5.1/plugins installed - calendar, squirrelspell, 'html_mail, spam_buttons. > > For composing and sending mails through squirrelmail we use exim4 with additional -v argument for verbose output. > > Some of our users want Delivery  Receipt, which is not working in squirrelmail 1.5.1 >  > Please do not use 1.5.1.  It possibly contains a number of gaping > security exploits and is very old code.  If you want to use > development code, please get a 1.5.2 snapshot.  Delivery receipts are > handled by the MTA, not SquirrelMail, however (SM only sends the > request), so you might be barking up the wrong tree unless you can > clarify yourself. >  > >, so I am thinking of  redirecting the verbose output  from exim to a > file (that with contain all the helo ehelo etc) and  provide that as > delivery receipt. > > So appreciate if any one can point to the right place to look for redirecting the verbose output from exim while sending mails. >  > Dunno, maybe someone else can answer this part. >  >  > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >  >  > squirrelmail-users mailing list > Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines > List address: bspsggvwcfmo-bvbmb@lists.sourceforge.net > List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user > List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users Thanks for the prompt reply. Yes we will be moving to 1.5.2 version of squirrelmail but not right away. I know delivery receipts are handled by the MTA, however I just want to redirect the output produced by exim when squirrelmail calls exim for delivering the messages. Squirrelmail opens a stream(popen) and writes the headers, message etc. to that stream, I want to redirect the  output of that stream to a file, which possibly should contain the handshake and other info by exim. Hope I am a little clear about want I want to achieve. Thanks _________________________________________________________________ Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging.Â You IM, we give. http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforgenet/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users >From oqhik.grwzxwv@gmail.com  Sat Apr 26 15:48:51 2008 Message: 9 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:06:28 +0100 From: "Roman Hausner"  Subject: Re: [Wekalist] Questions about the experimenter To: "Weka machine learning workbench list." 	 Message-ID: 	<513439826510226251v439ua65ju22625f34jf82651u@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Peter Reutemann  wrote: > Not really. If the Experiment setup changes, then the number of columns > can change. That's why the file-based output cannot be resumed. If you > use a database as results backend, you can resume experiments, add new > datasets/classifiers. It's also handy, if you experiment runs out of > memory and your virtual machine dies. Then you can just restart Weka > with more memory and only run the experiments that haven't finished yet. > Thank you for your very valuable and helpful answers! I indeed decided to switch to Mysql .. i can always convert to arff by reading in the table in the explorer and saving to arff. What I am not sure about: is there a way to have seperate experiment results in one database? I was not able to achieve this (everything seems to go into the Results0 table automatically) and had to use a different mysql database for each experiment that i want to keep seperated. > 3) When one shows the summary or Ranking, a lot of pairwise significance > > tests are used. > > Are these tests Bonferroni adjusted? (does the "corrected" shown with > paired > > t-test indicate > > Bonferroni correction for multiple significance tests or is this a > different > > kind of correction? > > Copy/paste from the weka.experiment.PairedCorrectedTTester Javadoc: > > Behaves the same as PairedTTester, only it uses the corrected resampled > t-test statistic. > > For more information see: > > Claude Nadeau, Yoshua Bengio (2001). Inference for the Generalization > Error. Machine Learning.. > I dug that up and as far as my little understanding of statistics goes, the corrected t-test corrects for the under-estimate of variance when one does repeated CVs. So it seems that there is no (automatic) Bonferroni adjustment -- at least it is nowhere mentioned in Weka. > > 4) If one uses a DB, will essentially the same data be stored in the > table > > as in the ARFF file? > > In other words, would it be possible to transfer an experiment from an > ARFF > > file to the > > table or vice-versa at a later time? > > Never done that before, but I reckon you can do that with the > DatabaseLoader/DatabaseSaver of the weka.core.converters package. > Converting from DB to ARFF I just achieved by loading the data into the explorer from the DB and saving as ARFF. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://list.scms.waikato.ac.nz/pipermail/wekalist/attachments/20080215/acfc4a84/attachment.html ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Wekalist mailing list iuxxdkqk@list.scms.waikato.ac.nz https://list.scms.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/wekalist End of Wekalist Digest, Vol 60, Issue 22 ****************************************