Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 3127 (Integer Literal Support and Syntax): %o	and %b Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Eric Smith
>  wrote:
>> I've been double checking the PEP 3127 implementation in py3k and the
>>  backport I did to 2.6.  The PEP says this about the % operator:
>>
>>  "The string (and unicode in 2.6) % operator will have 'b' format
>>  specifier added for binary, and the alternate syntax of the 'o' option
>>  will need to be updated to add '0o' in front, instead of '0'."
>>
>>  The %b operator was not added to 3.0, so I'll look into doing that in
>>  both 2.6 and 3.0 (which I opened as issue 2416).
>>
>>  What should be done for '%#o' formatting in 2.6?  The above sentence
>>  from the PEP implies it should be modified to add '0o' instead of '0',
>>  even in 2.6.  But that seems like a bad idea to me.  Maybe it should
>>  stay as-is, but add a -3 warning?  Unfortunately, there'd be no way to
>>  change your code to get rid of the warning, short of switching to
>>  str.format() or adding a __future__ import (shudder).  In 3.0, '%#o'
>>  already adds the leading '0o'.
> 
> I think this is such a tiny detail we shouldn't bother with a -3 warning.
> 
> I agree that in 2.6, %#o should continue to do what it does in 2.5.
> Can you update the PEP?

Done in r61845.

Eric.


_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
zvllln-eum@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev%40tangomu.com


