RE: Resolution No 9 Jarek We were having some retention problems with Jacek for a variety of reasons.  After discussion in London we decided to increase his package. I believe it is highly unlikely that Jacek would be interested in working out of the Warsaw office for Enron Poland. Adam  -----Original Message----- From: 	Astramowicz, Jarek   Sent:	15 November 2001 16:47 To:	Overfield, Adam; Cattigan, Ed; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9 The package is significantly higher than what the industry peers would receive in this position and in this market. I wish we had a chance to discuss this issue internally first. In case I were to retain him as part of Enron Poland at a later date - I can not justify this level of remuneration as part of my budget. Jarek  -----Original Message----- From: 	Overfield, Adam   Sent:	15 November 2001 17:41 To:	Astramowicz, Jarek; Cattigan, Ed; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9 Jarek I have discussed this with Jacek.  The reason for increasing Jacek's package is retention. Adam  -----Original Message----- From: 	Astramowicz, Jarek   Sent:	15 November 2001 16:24 To:	Cattigan, Ed; Overfield, Adam; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9 Has this package been discussed with Jacek yet at all ?  -----Original Message----- From: 	Cattigan, Ed   Sent:	15 November 2001 16:56 To:	Overfield, Adam; Astramowicz, Jarek; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James Subject:	Resolution No 9 Hi Attached is resolution 9 filled in with Jacek's remuneration for you perusal prior to the Board meeting. regards Ed  << File: RESOLUTION NO 9.doc >>