enron plans oppose dynegy ferc power issue heads gas folks enron comed side dynegy power issue ferc since ees designates firm ld contracts sources comed network transmission system dynegy wants comed allow capacity contracts used plan file enron response friday original message nicolay christi l sent wednesday october 24 2001 8 58 lindberg susan herndon rogers misra narsimha sharfman guy sager elizabeth murphy harlan steffes james migden janine forster david baughman jr stroup kerry roan michael kingerski harry shapiro richard novosel sarah fulton donna presto kevin sturm fletcher j subject dynegy v comed update susan circulate draft response dynegy position later today comed plans file lengthy answer disputing dynegy stating transmission problems due use firm ld resources ferc precedent support capacity payment requirement enron respond similarly include argument dynegy actually trying create icap capacity requirement none dynegy pleading states comed failure enforce network designation provisions oatt also deprives dynegy capacity payments entitled also include statements continuation network v ptp transmission tariffs perpetuates types issues market tariff design advocate approved stop problems original message lindberg susan sent saturday october 20 2001 5 20 pm nicolay christi l herndon rogers misra narsimha sharfman guy sager elizabeth murphy harlan steffes james migden janine forster david baughman jr stroup kerry roan michael kingerski harry subject dynegy vs comed elo 2 6 info mentioned previous e mail october 17 dynegy filed complaint comed proceeding may particular interest enron given ees plans offer physical delivery illinois early 2002 outlined dynegy principal arguments dynegy requested fast track processing intervention comments file due friday oct 26 order file timely intervention meaningful comments decide comment need know thoughts soon possible elizabeth harlan copying would especially like know think dynegy characterization firm ld product main argument dynegy challenges comed published business practice allows marketer firm firm ld contracts designated network resources dynegy argues practice conflicts oatt provisions 1 network resources generation owned purchased leased network customer designated serve network load 2 network customer must demonstrate owns committed purchase generation pursuant executed contract order designate network resource dynegy theory firm ld network resource permits designation network resources committed sale others creating reliability problems firm ld eei contract capacity backed commitment purchase generation allows transmission customers get advantage generation capacity without actually paying cost capacity since retail providers allowed rely counter firm instead securing long term contracts adequate reserves carried serve retail load dynegy claims comed practice deprived dmg payments capacity ability earn revenues capacity properly designated network resources cites specific instances comed accepted transmission reservation requests new energy cilco parties designated illinois power network resource firm ld contracts place ip susan lindberg 713 853 0596