RE: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate Decis	ion of Commissioner Wood Nope.  Loretta is straddling the fence.  Duque and Bilas are opposed. Brown
hasn't a real clue.  Davis isn't sure.  Sempra doesn't care because the MOU
is more important.  SoCalGas can't lobby.  Might just get voted out....

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Cherry, Brian
Subject: RE: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate
Decision of Commissioner Wood


You're kidding.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cherry, Brian [mailto:BKC7@pge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:11 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate
Decision of Commissioner Wood


Probably. I'll find out later this week.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:06 AM
To: Cherry, Brian
Subject: RE: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate
Decision of Commissioner Wood


Thanks?  Brown going to vote for it?

-----Original Message-----
From: Cherry, Brian [mailto:BKC7@pge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:32 AM
To: Dasovich Jeff (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate
Decision of Commissioner Wood




>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Cherry, Brian  
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:29 AM
> To:	Anderson, David W (Law)
> Subject:	FW: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement
Alternate
> Decision of Commissioner Wood
> 
> 
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Cherry, Brian  
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:28 AM
> To:	Andrew Niven (E-mail); Benjamin Campbell (E-mail); Dan
McLafferty
> (E-mail); Dan Thomas (E-mail); David Anderson (E-mail); Dede Hapner
> (E-mail); Dennis Gee (E-mail); Donald Petersen (E-mail); Frank Lindh
> (E-mail); G Jefferson (E-mail); Gary Guerrero (E-mail); Geoffrey
Bellenger
> (E-mail); George Clavier (E-mail); J Reidenbach (E-mail); Jerry Miller
> (E-mail); John Armato (E-mail); John Clarke (E-mail); Joshua Bar-Lev
> (E-mail); Karen Tomcala (E-mail); Kevin Ernst (E-mail); Kirk Johnson
> (E-mail); Les Buchner (E-mail); Les Guliasi (E-mail); Linda Agerter
> (E-mail); Lisa Lieu (E-mail); Lise Jordan (E-mail); Mark Huffman
(E-mail);
> Michael Katz (E-mail); Neha Patel (E-mail); Patrick Golden (E-mail);
Paul
> Sivley (E-mail); Randall Litteneker (E-mail); Ray Williams (E-mail);
> Richard Hall (E-mail); Rodney Boschee (E-mail); Sandra Burns (E-mail);
> Sandy Dickinson (E-mail); Shaun Halverson (E-mail); Shelly Malekos
> (E-mail); Shirley Woo (E-mail); Stuart Tartaglia (E-mail); Todd Arnett
> (E-mail); Trista Berkovitz (E-mail)
> Subject:	Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate
> Decision of Commissioner Wood
> 
> Last evening, Commissioner Wood released his alternate to Commissioner
> Bilas' Revised Proposed Decision in the Natural Gas Strategy case.
> Commissioner Wood's alternate rejects the Comprehensive Settlement
> Agreement, which would unbundled SoCalGas' intrastate transmission
system,
> and approves the Interim Settlement proposal, which would make minor
> changes to SoCalGas' windowing procedures, establish hector Road as an
> alternate receipt point, and establish pools for gas trading, among
other
> minor changes.  However, Commissioner Wood's alternate goes further,
> rejecting the unbundling of core interstate transportation from rates
and
> eliminating completely the core's contribution to ITCS (interstate
> transportation cost surcharges), which cost the core approximately
$7-10
> Million per year.
> 
> I'll forward a copy of the alternate to you as soon as it is
available.


**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you. 
**********************************************************************

