re : storage deal 47472 and 60747 julie :
can you cut off deal 47472 going forward ? i am forwarding the message from
tommy yanowski . let me know if this is a problem .
thanks , karie ( 36759 )
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by karie hastings / hou / ect on 03 / 27 / 2000
09 : 25 am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
enron technology
from : tommy j yanowski 03 / 27 / 2000 08 : 45 am
to : karie hastings / hou / ect @ ect
cc : julie meyers / hou / ect @ ect
subject : re : storage deal 47472 and 60747
karie : deal number 60747 should be the good deal . deal number 60747 is an
interruptible storage deal and contract 96016959 is an interruptible
contract . storage deal 47472 is a firm storage deal . since it doesn ' t agree
with the firmness of the contract , i would probably cut off that deal going
forward . - tommy
karie hastings
03 / 23 / 2000 05 : 35 pm
to : tommy j yanowski / hou / ect @ ect , julie meyers / hou / ect @ ect
cc :
subject : storage deal 47472 and 60747
tommy :
there are two storage deals that are using the same contract number . julie
meyers believes that deal 47472 is the correct deal , but wants to check with
you first since you put in deal 60747 . let me know when you look at them if
we need to cut off or kill deal 60747 .
thanks ,
karie ( 36759 )
deal contract
47472 96016959
60747 96046959