Re: [d@DCC] MS censors UN document On 5/29/07, mgurst@vcn.bc.ca  wrote:
> One final note, to call the proceedings a "UN document" is a gross
> distortion... The conference was not I believe an "official" UN conference
> but may have been "endorsed" by one or another UN agency--it happens
> fairly often; and the proceedings were the proceedings of a mostly
> Austrian funded and sponsored conference that mattered very little in the
> great scheme of things and wasn't so far as I know of much significance
> even in the context of WSIS.

Thanks for your thoughts MG.  Again, more recent references would be
wonderful, but going on what you've provided thus far...

I understand that happens, (too often for my personal liking) but does
not the fact that a document "endorsed" by a UN agency (regardless of
the sponsorship of any individual or group of nations), regarding a
related conference, make said document - in it's final form - an
"official" UN document?

Perhaps it was sponsored by Austria, but if it is a UN document why
then should MS have _any_ control over the contents of the document?

There are many areas in which I could use schooling - politics first
among them.  =)

Thanks again.
- Scott.

-- 
Scott Elcomb

"Our Founders' faith in the viability of representative democracy
rested on their trust in the wisdom of a well-informed citizenry,
their ingenious design for checks and balances, and their belief that
the rule of reason is the natural sovereign of a free people." - Al
Gore (The Assault on Reason, 2008)

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."  - Benjamin Franklin

'"A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting
on its shoes."  - Mark Twain
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@list.digital-copyright.ca
http://list.digital-copyright.ca/mailman/listinfo/discuss

