dispatch within maharashtra jim , please find attached some slides that show the results of the henwood run giving dispatch for the dabhol plant within maharashtra . i have also sent the presentation we made to you to wade . he is to get back on when would be an appropriate time for him to go over the presentation with me . vince , stinson and i have placed ourselves on rebecca ' s calender for friday , and we will make the complete pitch to her . it would be great if you too could be present at the meeting . if it is possible , please do let me know . on the attached slides , please note that : the slides all assume that there is a 1 part power tariff , mseb liability for the entire capacity payment is not considered . the henwood model was with no power flowing out of maharashtra when variable o & m costs , fixed o though in some months ( jan ) it goes as high as $ 69 mm . hence , overall , mseb can pay for the dispatches as shown in the henwood run provided , they are not paying for the capacity payment for the whole 2184 mw plant . in conclusion , therefore , mseb has the need for between 1200 to 410 mw on a seasonal basis . this means that the power remaining to be sold to other states is the difference between that and 2184 mw . however , since the demand within maharashtra varies seasonally , it may mean that we need to market seasonal products to other states , not long term blocks . these are our conclusions . we may continue to work some more on the fuel and hedging side . if you have any more questions for me , please let me know , else for now there will not be any new henwood runs . regards , sandeep .