Re: approval of 630 geV photon results for EPS/LP and for the collaboration Mike,

Each point results from a fit to a distribution, right?  So that usually 
means that the errors are *smaller* than pure statistics would indicate.

   - John

Mike Strauss wrote:

> Taka, et.al.
> 	I don't know if you ever got your question answered or not.  The
> errors on Fig. 2 are the errors from the purity fit.  They are not simply
> statistical errors.  This means that they are inflated compared to purely
> statistical errors.  I agree that the one point in the CC with small error
> bars looks suspect, but in every analysis method I have used, I get the 
> same qualitative feature.  The caption to the plot could indicate that 
> the errors are the errors on the fit and are larger than statistical
> errors alone.
> 
> -Mike


------------------------------------------------------------------------

