§ 158-149 Zoning Enforcement Officer.
§ 158-150 Certificate of compliance.
§ 158-151 Zoning Board of Appeals.
§ 158-153 Penalties for offenses.
§ 158-155 Interpretation of provisions; severability.
No building or structure shall be erected, or use instituted, or use reinstituted once discontinued, until a zoning permit has been issued therefor.
The exterior structural area of a building shall not be enlarged until a zoning permit has been issued therefor.
They may be located in a required yard, provided that they do not disrupt a neighbor's view or traffic safety (i.e., line of sight).
In no case shall the structure be located closer than 10 feet to the lot line or 40 feet to the road line.
The structure or use shall not conflict with the principal uses of the district.
Installation of fences or walls, provided that they meet the appropriate zoning regulations.
Routine maintenance and improvement (e.g., roofing, window replacement, siding replacement, etc.) that does not expand the exterior dimensions of the structure.
Construction of chimneys, placement of posts, and other similar accessory uses.
When establishing measurements to meet the required front yards and structure setbacks, the measurements shall be taken from the road line, lot line, or nearest high water elevation to the furthermost protruding part of the structure. This shall include such projecting facilities as cornices, eaves, porches, carports, attached garages, etc.
No such zoning permit or certificate of compliance shall be issued for any building or structure where said construction, addition, and exterior expansion or use thereof would be in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter, and further, no zoning permit shall be issued for construction or development upon a lot created under an approved subdivision until said approved subdivision plat has been duly filed with the office of the Jefferson County Clerk as required by § 135-9A.
A zoning permit issued under this chapter shall expire one year from the date of issue if construction is not started.
Any administrative use having ceased for a period of 12 months or longer shall be termed abandoned and may not be reinstituted without applying for and being granted a zoning permit, at which time such use shall be required to conform to this chapter.
Such other information as may be necessary to determine and provide for the enforcement of this chapter.
Application information, and other relevant data, shall be provided on a form issued by the Town.
A fee as determined by the Town Board shall be paid for each zoning permit issued. Costs of hearings, notices, postings, etc., shall be added to this fee when such requirements of the law must be met.
Temporary permits may be issued by the Zoning Enforcement Officer for conforming and nonconforming uses for a period not exceeding six months.
Such temporary permits must meet the intent and purpose of this chapter.
Temporary permits shall be based upon an agreement and plan of action to bring the use into compliance prior to the expiration of the permit.
Temporary permits shall be conditioned upon agreement by the owner or operator to remove any remaining nonconforming structures or equipment upon expiration of the temporary permit.
Temporary permits may be renewed such that the total time shall not exceed 18 months.
No use which has been previously approved under a site plan for operation and having been deemed discontinued as defined herein shall recommence operation under the previous site plan until an administrative review of the existing site plan is conducted pursuant to the codes in effect at the time and the Zoning Enforcement Officer deems that revision or an amended site plan is not necessary.
A site plan approved pursuant with the provisions of this article shall run with the land and apply to the type of business or activity for which originally applied. A subsequent change of use to another type of use requiring site plan approval or a special use permit will require approval of a new site plan and the issuance of a new zoning permit.
This chapter shall be enforced by the Zoning Enforcement Officer, who shall be appointed by the Town Board.
Approve and/or deny zoning permits.
Scale and interpret zone boundaries on Zoning Maps.
Approve and/or deny certificates of compliance.
Refer appropriate matters to the Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board, as needed.
Revocation of a zoning permit where there is false, misleading or insufficient information.
Revocation of a zoning permit and/or certificate of compliance where the applicant has not done what was proposed on the application.
Issue stop-work orders for noncompliance with this Zoning Chapter.
Issue appearance tickets before the Town Court for noncompliance with this chapter.
The Zoning Enforcement Officer shall report at regular Town Board meetings the number of permits issued.
No land shall be occupied or used and no building or structure hereafter constructed, erected, extended, used, or changes made in the use until a certificate of compliance shall have been issued by the Zoning Enforcement Officer stating that the building, structure, or proposed use thereof complies with the provisions of this chapter. Additionally, a draft stormwater prevention plan (SWPPP), as defined by and consistent with the standards of the Town of LeRay Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control Law (Chapter 133), is provided where required.
All certificates of compliance shall be applied for coincidentally with the application for a building permit. Said certificate shall be issued within 10 days after the erection and alteration shall have been approved as complying with the provisions of this chapter.
The Zoning Enforcement Officer shall maintain a record of all certificates, and copies shall be furnished upon request to any person having a proprietary or tenancy interest in the building affected.
A Zoning Board of Appeals is hereby created and shall consist of five members who shall be appointed by the Town Board on a staggered-term basis in conformance with Town Law.
The Town Board shall appoint a Chairman.
The Board of Appeals shall select a Secretary and shall prescribe rules for the conduct of its affairs.
The Board of Appeals may reverse or affirm, wholly or partly, or may modify the order, requirement, decision, interpretation or determination appealed from and shall make such order, requirement, decision, interpretation or determination as in its opinion ought to have been made in the matter by the administrative official charged with the enforcement of such ordinance or local law and to that end shall have all the powers of the administrative official from whose order, requirement, decision, interpretations or determinations the appeal is taken.
The Board of Appeals, on appeal from the decision or determination of the administrative official charged with the enforcement of this chapter, shall have the power to grant use variances.
No such use variance shall be granted by the Board of Appeals without a showing by the applicant that applicable zoning regulations and restrictions have caused unnecessary hardship.
That the alleged hardship has not been self-created.
The Board of Appeals, in the granting of use variances, shall grant the minimum variance that it shall deem necessary and adequate to address the unnecessary hardship proven by the applicant and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community.
The Zoning Board of Appeals shall have the powers, upon an appeal from a decision or determination of an administrative official charged with the enforcement of this chapter, to grant area variances.
In making its determination, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall take into consideration the benefit to the application if the variance is granted, as weighted against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant.
Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration shall be relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals but shall not necessarily preclude the granting of the area variance.
The Board of Appeals, in the granting of area variances, shall grant the minimum variance that it shall deem necessary and adequate and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community.
The Board of Appeals shall, in the granting of both use variances and area variances, have the authority to impose such reasonable conditions and restrictions as are directly related to and incidental to the proposed use of the property or the period of time such variance shall be in effect.
Such conditions shall be consistent with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Chapter and shall be imposed for the purpose of minimizing any adverse impact such variance may have on the neighborhood or community.
Meetings; minutes; records. Meetings of such Board of Appeals shall be open to the public to the extent provided in Article 7 of the Public Officers Law. Such Board of Appeals shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each member upon every question or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating such fact, and shall also keep records of its examinations and other official actions.
Filing requirements. Every rule, regulation, every amendment or repeal thereof, and every order, requirement, decision or determination of the Board of Appeals shall be filed in the office of the Town Clerk within five business days and shall be a public record.
Assistance to Board of Appeals. Such Board shall have the authority to call upon any department, agency or employee of the Town for such assistance as shall be deemed necessary and as shall by authorized by the Town Board. Such department, agency or employee may be reimbursed by any expenses incurred as a result of such assistance.
Unless otherwise provided by local law or ordinance, the jurisdiction of the Board of Appeals shall be appellate only and shall be limited to hearing and deciding appeals from and reviewing any order, requirement, decision, interpretation, or determination made by an administrative official charged with the enforcement of the local law adopted pursuant to this article.
The concurring vote of a majority of the members of the Board of Appeals shall be necessary to reverse any order, requirement, decision of determination of any such administrative official or to grant a use variance or area variance.
Appeals may be taken by any person aggrieved or by an officer, department, board or bureau of the Town.
Such appeal shall be taken within 60 days after the filing of any order, requirement, decision, interpretation or determination of the administrative officer charged with the enforcement of such local law by filing with such administrative official and with the Board of Appeals a notice of appeal, specifying the grounds thereof and the relief sought.
The administrative official from whom the appeal is taken shall forthwith transmit to the Board of Appeals all the papers constituting the record upon which the action appealed from was taken.
Upon the hearing, any party may appear in person or by agent or attorney.
An appeal shall stay all proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed from.
A stay shall not go into effect if the administrative official charged with the enforcement of such local law, from whom the appeal is taken, certifies to the Board of Appeals, after the notice of appeal shall have been filed with the administrative official, that by reason of facts stated in the certificate a stay would, in his or her opinion, cause imminent peril to life or property.
In such instance, proceedings shall not be stayed otherwise than by a restraining order which may be granted by the Board of Appeals or by a court of record on application, on notice to the administrative official from whom the appeal is taken and on due cause shown.
The Board of Appeals shall fix a reasonable time for the hearing of the appeal or other matter referred to and shall give public notice thereof within a publication of general circulation in the Town at least five days prior to the date thereof.
The costs of sending or publishing any notices relating to such appeal shall be borne by the appealing party and shall be paid to the Board prior to the hearing of such appeal.
The Board of Appeals shall decide upon the appeal within 62 days after the conduct of said hearing.
The time within which the Board of Appeals must render its decision may be extended by mutual consent of the applicant and the Board.
Filing of decision and notice. The decision of the Board of Appeals on the appeal shall be filed in the office of the Town Clerk within five business days after the day such decision is rendered, and a copy thereof shall be mailed to the applicant.
At least five days before such hearing, the Board of Appeals shall mail notices thereof to the parties having jurisdiction over any state land within 500 feet of the property affected by such appeal; and to Jefferson County as required by § 239-m of the General Municipal Law.
Such notice shall be accompanied by a full statement of the matter under consideration, as defined in Subdivision 1 of General Municipal Law § 239-m.
Compliance with State Environmental Quality Review Act.
The Board of Appeals shall comply with the provisions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act under Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and its implementing regulations as codified in Title 6, Part 617, of the New York Codes, Rules and Regulations.
A motion for the Zoning Board of Appeals to hold a rehearing to review any order, decision or determination of the Board not previously reheard may be made by any member of the Board.
A unanimous vote of all members of the Board then present is required for such rehearing to occur.
Such rehearing is subject to the same notice provisions as an original hearing.
Upon such rehearing, the Board may reverse, modify or annul its original order, decision or determination upon the unanimous vote of all members then present, provided the Board finds that the rights vested in persons acting in good faith in reliance upon the reheard order, decision or determination will not be prejudiced thereby.
Approval or disapproval of site plans, special use permits and subdivisions.
Submittal of an advisory opinion to the Zoning Board of Appeals for use and area variances.
Submittal of an advisory opinion to the Town Board for proposed amendments to this chapter.
Attach conditions and restrictions to an approved site plan that are reasonable, directly related and incidental to the site plan.
All other powers granted by state law and this chapter.
The Planning Board shall act in strict accordance with the procedures specified by this chapter.
All applications made shall be made in writing on forms prescribed by the Town and shall conform to the requirements of Article XVI.
Every decision of the Planning Board shall contain a full record of findings in the case.
The concurring vote of a majority of the members of the Planning Board shall be necessary to approve site plans.
The Planning Board may provide advisory opinions in the form of a positive recommendation or a negative recommendation and shall provide to the Zoning Board of Appeals or Town Board a reasonable explanation contained within the resolution in support of the Planning Board's opinion.
The Planning Board may also withhold the submittal of an advisory opinion in instances where the Planning Board lacks a proper motion on which to vote.
Whenever a violation of this chapter occurs, the Zoning Enforcement Officer, Town, or any person may file a complaint in regard thereto.
All such complaints must be in writing and shall be filed with the Zoning Enforcement Officer, who shall properly record and immediately investigate such complaint.
If the complaint is found to be valid, the Zoning Enforcement Officer shall issue a stop-work order requiring all work to cease until the violation is corrected.
If the violation is not corrected within the specified time, the Zoning Enforcement Officer shall take action to compel compliance.
If the violation is not corrected within the specified time, the Zoning Enforcement Officer shall issue the property owner of record an appearance ticket to appear before the Town Court to account for said violation.
Pursuant to Municipal Home Rule Law § 10 and Town Law § 268, any person, firm or corporation who commits an offense against, disobeys, neglects or refuses to comply with or resists the enforcement of any provision of this chapter shall, upon conviction, be deemed guilty of a violation. Each day an offense is continued shall be deemed a separate violation of this chapter.
A violation of this chapter is punishable by a fine not to exceed $350 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six months, or both, for conviction of a first offense; for conviction of a second offense, both of which were committed within a period of five years, punishable by a separate fine of not less than $350 nor more than $700 or imprisonment for a separate period not to exceed six months, or both; and upon conviction for a third or subsequent offense, all of which were committed within a period of five years, punishable by a separate fine of not less than $700 nor more than $1,000 or imprisonment for a separate period of not to exceed six months, or both.
In addition to the penalties provided above, the Town Board may also maintain an action or proceeding in the name of the Town in a court of competent jurisdiction to compel compliance with or restrain by injunction the violation of this chapter. The violator will be held responsible for all legal fees, consulting fees and any other costs incurred by the Town in enforcing this chapter.
By publishing a notice at least 10 days prior to the time of such hearing in the Town's official newspaper.
By referring the proposed amendments to the Clerk of the County Legislature and the Clerks of neighboring towns and villages at least 10 days prior to the public hearing.
In case of a protest against such change, signed by the owners of 20% or more of the area of land included in such proposed change, or of an adverse recommendation by the County Planning Board, the vote of the Town Board must have a seventy-five-percent majority in favor to adopt the amendments.
Interpretation and application of the provisions of this chapter shall be held to be minimal requirements, adopted for the promotion of the public health, safety or the general welfare. Whenever the requirements of this chapter differ from the requirements of any other lawfully adopted rules, regulations or ordinances, the more restrictive, or that imposing the higher standards, shall govern.
Should any section or provisions of this chapter be decided by the courts to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the law as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional or invalid.


text:
1. ROBERT1 ORR was born in Scotland, and died in Scotland. He married JANET LYLE November 22, 1768 in Kilmacolm, Renfrew, Scotland. She was born in Scotland, and died in Scotland.
i. WILLIAM2 ORR, b. February 25, 1770, Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland.
ii. MARGARET ORR, b. January 13, 1772, Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland.
2. iii. ROBERT ORR, b. Abt. 1774, Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland; d. December 17, 1861, New Glasgow, PEI.
2. ROBERT2 ORR (ROBERT1) was born Abt. 1774 in Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland, and died December 17, 1861 in New Glasgow, PEI. He married MARGARET CRAWFORD September 12, 1799 in Kilmacolm, Renfrew, Scotland, daughter of HUGH CRAWFORD and JANET RUSSEL. She was born 1771 in New Parish, Greenock, Renfrew, Scotland, and died May 29, 1849 in New Glasgow, PEI.
3. i. DAVID RENNIE3 ORR, b. August 1800, Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland; d. January 11, 1881, Breadalbane, PEI.
4. ii. JANET ORR, b. January 19, 1802, Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland; d. January 28, 1879, New Glasgow, PEI.
5. iii. MARGARET ORR, b. November 28, 1803, Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland; d. January 26, 1891, PEI.
iv. AGNES ORR, b. December 16, 1805, Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland.
6. v. MARY JANE ORR, b. December 13, 1807, Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland; d. July 02, 1860, New Glasgow, PEI.
7. vi. ROBERT ORR, b. October 10, 1809, Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland; d. January 29, 1878, New Glasgow, PEI.
8. vii. JAMES ORR, b. October 06, 1811, Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland; d. May 01, 1869, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
9. viii. WILLIAM ORR, b. October 11, 1813, Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland; d. April 24, 1894, San Felipe, California, USA.
10. ix. JOHN ORR, b. August 26, 1815, Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland; d. February 04, 1906, French River, PEI.
3. DAVID RENNIE3 ORR (ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born August 1800 in Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland, and died January 11, 1881 in Breadalbane, PEI. He married ELIZABETH SIMPSON April 09, 1840 in Cavendish, PEI, daughter of WILLIAM SIMPSON and MARY MILLAR. She was born Abt. 1802 in Cavendish, PEI, and died May 12, 1886 in Breadalbane, PEI.
11. i. ROBERT CRAWFORD4 ORR, b. Abt. 1842, New Glasgow, PEI; d. Abt. 1907, Gilroy Private Hospital, Gilroy, California, USA.
ii. WILLIAM HENRY ORR, b. New Glasgow, PEI; d. Aft. 1907, Nevada, USA.
12. iii. MARY MARGARET ORR, b. February 18, 1843, New Glasgow, PEI; d. January 11, 1925, South Westminster, British Columbia.
iv. DAVID RENNIE ORR, b. Abt. 1849, New Glasgow, PEI; d. April 04, 1881, Breadalbane, PEI.
4. JANET3 ORR (ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born January 19, 1802 in Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland, and died January 28, 1879 in New Glasgow, PEI. She married ALEXANDER LAIRD May 04, 1822 in PEI, son of JAMES LAIRD and ISOBEL LYLE. He was born 1797 in Kilmacolm, Renfrew, Scotland, and died April 15, 1873 in New Glasgow, PEI.
i. JAMES4 LAIRD, b. July 03, 1825, New Glasgow, PEI; d. January 31, 1898, Hunter River Station, PEI; m. JANE MACMILLAN, April 18, 1850, PEI; b. July 19, 1825, PEI; d. July 28, 1918, New Glasgow Mills, PEI.
13. ii. ROBERT LAIRD, b. August 07, 1827, New Glasgow, PEI; d. December 11, 1911, Kingston, Ontario.
14. iii. ALEXANDER LAIRD, b. 1830, New Glasgow, PEI; d. August 09, 1896, Wilmot Valley, PEI.
15. iv. DAVID LAIRD, b. March 12, 1833, New Glasgow, PEI; d. January 12, 1914, Bay St., Ottawa, Ontario.
v. WILLIAM LAIRD, b. June 1835, New Glasgow, PEI; d. February 13, 1911, New Glasgow, PEI; m. ELIZA JANE BRADSHAW; b. 1845; d. February 23, 1907.
vi. MARY LAIRD, b. Abt. 1840, New Glasgow, PEI; d. November 22, 1856, New Glasgow, PEI.
16. vii. ALBERT LAIRD, b. June 04, 1842, New Glasgow, PEI; d. August 28, 1926, New Glasgow, PEI.
viii. ANNE LAIRD, b. 1846, New Glasgow, PEI; d. January 25, 1896, Falconwood Hospital, Charlottetown, PEI.
5. MARGARET3 ORR (ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born November 28, 1803 in Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland, and died January 26, 1891 in PEI. She married JOHN ARTHUR Abt. 1825 in PEI, son of WILLIAM ARTHUR and JANET ALEXANDER. He was born September 1792 in Greenock, Scotland, and died April 11, 1870 in Gretna Green, Lot 21, PEI.
17. i. MARGARET4 ARTHUR, b. July 09, 1827, New Glasgow, PEI; d. July 14, 1901, Charlottetown, PEI.
ii. JEANETTE ARTHUR, b. July 26, 1829, New Glasgow, PEI; d. Aft. 1901, Summerside, PEI.
18. iii. JANE ARTHUR, b. October 29, 1831, New Glasgow, PEI; d. Aft. 1911, PEI.
19. iv. JAMES ARTHUR, b. February 10, 1835, PEI.
v. JOHN ARTHUR, b. February 10, 1838, PEI; d. June 05, 1913, PEI; m. MARGARET IRVING, March 14, 1886, Summerside, PEI; b. December 10, 1854, PEI; d. June 12, 1902, PEI.
20. vi. CHARLES S. ARTHUR, b. March 20, 1843, New Glasgow, PEI; d. March 1918, Summerside, PEI.
21. vii. MARY ARTHUR, b. April 04, 1845, New Glasgow, PEI; d. May 21, 1935, Alberta.
22. viii. WILLIAM A. ARTHUR, b. October 1824; d. November 11, 1909, Wellesley, Mass., USA.
6. MARY JANE3 ORR (ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born December 13, 1807 in Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland, and died July 02, 1860 in New Glasgow, PEI. She married CHARLES STEVENSON Abt. 1827 in New Glasgow, PEI, son of JOHN STEVENSON and MARGARET NISBET. He was born January 02, 1802 in Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland, and died January 17, 1890 in Greenmount, PEI.
23. i. MARGARET4 STEVENSON, b. October 27, 1828, New Glasgow, PEI; d. October 20, 1904, Mayfield, PEI.
ii. JOHN ALEXANDER STEVENSON, b. Abt. 1831, New Glasgow, PEI; d. June 06, 1842, New Glasgow, PEI.
24. iii. ROBERT STEVENSON, b. August 28, 1832, New Glasgow, PEI; d. May 26, 1906.
iv. MATILDA STEVENSON, b. 1834, New Glasgow, PEI; d. November 01, 1835, New Glasgow, PEI.
25. v. JANE STEVENSON, b. Abt. 1836, New Glasgow, PEI; d. October 12, 1935, California, USA.
vi. ALEXANDER STEVENSON, b. Abt. 1840, New Glasgow, PEI; d. October 15, 1843, New Glasgow, PEI.
26. vii. WILLIAM STEVENSON, b. September 21, 1841, New Glasgow, PEI; d. November 08, 1903, Idaho, USA.
viii. MARY STEVENSON, b. March 13, 1844, New Glasgow, PEI; d. January 26, 1892, Brockton, Mass., USA; m. JAMES C. POWERS.
ix. ELIZABETH STEVENSON, b. Abt. 1846, New Glasgow, PEI; d. September 09, 1849, New Glasgow, PEI.
27. x. MARTHA STEVENSON, b. Abt. 1848, New Glasgow, PEI; d. November 13, 1938, 95 Chestnut St., Winnipeg, Manitoba.
28. xi. AGNES STEVENSON, b. 1850, New Glasgow, PEI; d. June 22, 1890.
7. ROBERT3 ORR (ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born October 10, 1809 in Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland, and died January 29, 1878 in New Glasgow, PEI. He married JEAN SEMPLE December 31, 1839 in New Glasgow, PEI, daughter of JAMES SEMPLE and MARY INGLIS. She was born June 06, 1818 in Kilmacolm, Renfrew, Scotland, and died February 21, 1901 in New Glasgow, PEI.
i. ROBERT4 ORR, b. 1841, New Glasgow, PEI.
ii. MARY CAROLINE ORR, b. November 09, 1842, New Glasgow, PEI; d. December 02, 1927, New Glasgow, PEI.
29. iii. ANNIE ORR, b. October 26, 1844, New Glasgow, PEI; d. August 31, 1935, Argyle Shore, PEI.
iv. ALEXANDER ORR, b. Abt. 1845, New Glasgow, PEI; d. March 15, 1881, New Glasgow, PEI.
30. v. JAMES SEMPLE ORR, b. September 30, 1848, New Glasgow, PEI; d. 1936, Hollister, California, USA.
31. vi. AMELIA ORR, b. Abt. 1850, New Glasgow, PEI; d. Abt. 1950, Brockton, Mass., USA.
32. vii. WILLIAM WILSON ORR, b. November 06, 1853, New Glasgow, PEI; d. March 15, 1933, New Glasgow Mills, PEI.
33. viii. AMANDA JANE ORR, b. Abt. 1855, New Glasgow, PEI; d. Mass., USA.
ix. BENJAMIN BULMAN ORR, b. January 1860, New Glasgow, PEI; d. October 12, 1874, New Glasgow, PEI.
34. x. NELSON HOWARD ORR, b. August 01, 1863, New Glasgow, PEI; d. December 01, 1939, PEI.
8. JAMES3 ORR (ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born October 06, 1811 in Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland, and died May 01, 1869 in Halifax, Nova Scotia. He married JANE HOUSTON April 1837 in PEI, daughter of JAMES HOUSTON and JANET MILLER. She was born September 04, 1818 in Scotland, and died December 04, 1903 in French River, PEI.
i. CAROLINE BAGNALL4 ORR, b. December 01, 1838, PEI; d. July 22, 1893, PEI; m. JABEZ BURROWS, February 12, 1857, New London, PEI; b. 1833, Morwenstow, Cornwall, England; d. January 27, 1904, Kensington, PEI.
ii. NATHANIEL ORR, b. December 10, 1844, PEI; d. April 22, 1905, French River, PEI.
35. iii. JAMES HOUSTON ORR, b. June 09, 1846, PEI; d. August 01, 1908, French River, PEI.
36. iv. WILLIAM CORNELIUS ORR, b. December 16, 1855, PEI; d. January 11, 1921, Kensington, PEI.
v. EMILY ORR, b. PEI.
vi. MARGARET JANE ORR, b. December 10, 1851, French River, PEI; d. January 19, 1886, French River, PEI.
vii. CYRUS ORR, b. Abt. 1851, PEI; d. Aft. 1903.
viii. JOHN ORR, b. PEI.
9. WILLIAM3 ORR (ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born October 11, 1813 in Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland, and died April 24, 1894 in San Felipe, California, USA. He married JANET SEMPLE 1841 in New Glasgow, PEI, daughter of JAMES SEMPLE and MARY INGLIS. She was born April 22, 1822 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died March 16, 1902 in Hollister, California, USA.
i. JAMES4 ORR, b. Abt. 1843, New Glasgow, PEI; d. December 30, 1860, New Glasgow, PEI.
37. ii. MARGARET CRAWFORD ORR, b. 1844, New Glasgow, PEI; d. 1936, California, USA.
38. iii. ELIZABETH ORR, b. April 07, 1846, New Glasgow, PEI; d. July 28, 1940, Santa Cruz Co., California, USA.
iv. WILLIAM ORR, b. April 15, 1848, New Glasgow, PEI; d. May 18, 1948, San Benito Co., California, USA.
v. ROBERT INGLIS ORR, b. March 16, 1850, New Glasgow, PEI; d. October 21, 1944, San Benito County, California; m. MARY VIRGINIA EARLY; b. November 22, 1866, Missouri, USA; d. January 07, 1952, San Benito Co., California, USA.
39. vi. LEMUEL ORR, b. April 26, 1852, New Glasgow, PEI; d. September 11, 1899, California, USA.
40. vii. OLIVER O. ORR, b. 1856, PEI; d. July 11, 1931, California, USA.
viii. MARY ORR, b. Abt. 1860, New Glasgow, PEI; d. USA; m. UNKNOWN LAMONT.
ix. ALBERT ORR, b. 1861, PEI; d. 1933, California, USA.
41. x. HARRIET MELVINA (HATTIE) ORR, b. April 08, 1862, New Glasgow, PEI; d. September 26, 1942, Los Angeles, California, USA.
xi. MARK ORR, b. Abt. 1864; d. Abt. 1880, Black Hills, Dakota, USA.
xii. RICHARD E. ORR, b. April 01, 1865, New Glasgow, PEI; d. January 21, 1943, Santa Clara Co., California, USA; m. ELLA G. JONES, May 14, 1900, California, USA.
10. JOHN3 ORR (ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born August 26, 1815 in Hardridge, Renfrew, Scotland, and died February 04, 1906 in French River, PEI. He married (1) JANE CURRY March 09, 1848, daughter of JAMES CURRY. She died October 24, 1852 in Darnley, PEI. He married (2) JANET STEVENSON December 28, 1854 in PEI, daughter of JOHN STEVENSON and ELIZABETH HOUSTON. She was born 1828 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died May 29, 1897 in French River, PEI.
i. JOHN C.4 ORR, b. 1850, New Glasgow, PEI; d. 1922, California, USA.
42. ii. PARMENAS ORR, b. March 19, 1856, New Glasgow, PEI; d. January 16, 1946, Kensington, PEI.
43. iii. ELIZABETH J. ORR, b. Abt. 1860, PEI; d. April 18, 1940, Milbridge, Maine, USA.
44. iv. GEORGE ORR, b. August 12, 1861, PEI; d. Bef. June 05, 1923, PEI.
v. AGNES MILLER ORR, b. July 12, 1864, PEI; d. November 07, 1943, San Benito County, California, USA.
45. vi. ANNIE ALEXANDRA ORR, b. September 10, 1866, PEI; d. March 24, 1927, Kensington, PEI.
46. vii. MINNIE ALICE ORR, b. February 16, 1877, French River, PEI; d. June 15, 1960, Calgary, Alberta.
11. ROBERT CRAWFORD4 ORR (DAVID RENNIE3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born Abt. 1842 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died Abt. 1907 in Gilroy Private Hospital, Gilroy, California, USA. He married MARTHA JANE BAGNALL April 27, 1871 in New Glasgow, PEI, daughter of WILLIAM BAGNALL and JANE STEVENSON. She was born 1844 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died June 11, 1887 in Gilroy, California, USA.
i. WILLIAM E.5 ORR, b. Abt. 1872, PEI; d. Bef. 1929, Shoshone, Idaho, USA.
ii. FRANK CLAYTON ORR, b. April 19, 1877, Gilroy, California, USA; d. November 01, 1952, San Diego, California, USA; m. PRISCILLA FLETCHER, Abt. 1912, 322 Union St., Watsonville, California; b. November 01, 1886, California, USA; d. May 07, 1964, San Diego, California.
12. MARY MARGARET4 ORR (DAVID RENNIE3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born February 18, 1843 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died January 11, 1925 in South Westminster, British Columbia. She married THOMAS BIGGAR March 12, 1863 in The Rocklin House, Charlottetown, PEI, son of JOHN BIGGAR and MARY ROGERSON. He was born November 14, 1837 in Springfield, PEI, and died June 19, 1906 in New Westminster, British Columbia.
i. JOHN WILLIAM5 BIGGAR, b. 1863, Breadalbane, PEI; d. 1864, Breadalbane, PEI.
ii. DAVID RENNIE BIGGAR, b. February 24, 1865, PEI; d. Aft. 1946, California, USA; m. EDITH HENRY.
iii. JOHN WILLIAM BIGGAR, b. December 02, 1867, PEI; d. June 19, 1941.
iv. JAMES OLIVER BIGGAR, b. January 29, 1869, PEI.
v. ROBERT ALEXANDER BIGGAR, b. 1871, PEI; d. 1876, PEI.
vi. RICHARD THOMAS BIGGAR, b. January 16, 1873, PEI; d. Aft. 1946, USA; m. MAUDE BLAIR.
vii. ERNEST BISMARCK BIGGAR, b. February 03, 1875, PEI; d. January 16, 1949, New Westminster, BC; m. MARY JEANETTE MURRAY, October 30, 1912.
viii. MARY MARGARET BIGGAR, b. April 18, 1877, PEI; d. October 16, 1968, New Westminster, BC; m. JAMES GRAHAM CHAPPELL, July 28, 1909, New Westminster, BC; d. June 01, 1956.
ix. IRA WINCHESTER BIGGAR, b. March 10, 1879, PEI; d. May 19, 1971, Whalley, British Columbia.
x. LINUS "ADOLPHUS" BIGGAR, b. March 10, 1881, PEI; d. September 17, 1962, Vancouver, British Columbia; m. JANE QUIBBLE, June 15, 1910, New Westminster, BC.
xi. ELIZABETH JANE MATILDA BIGGAR, b. March 28, 1883, Breadalbane, PEI; d. March 08, 1963, New Westminster, BC; m. ALBERT EDWARD TISDALE, December 25, 1911, South Westminster, BC; b. Abt. 1878; d. February 16, 1951, New Westminster, BC.
xii. ALBERT VICTOR BIGGAR, b. May 08, 1884, Breadalbane, PEI; d. February 28, 1946, 2773 W. 15 Ave., Vancouver, British Columbia; m. ANNIE BERTHA WILLIAMS, September 11, 1917, British Columbia; b. April 18, 1885, Head of Lochaber, Nova Scotia; d. July 14, 1971, Vancouver, British Columbia.
xiii. AGNES GRAHAM BIGGAR, b. March 27, 1886, Breadalbane, PEI; d. Aft. 1946; m. DWIGHT D. RUCKER, March 28, 1906, Vancouver, British Columbia; d. USA.
xiv. HARRY BRIGHT BIGGAR, b. June 01, 1889, Langley, British Columbia; d. Aft. 1946; m. SADIE CADELL, 1912.
13. ROBERT4 LAIRD (JANET3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born August 07, 1827 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died December 11, 1911 in Kingston, Ontario. He married (1) MARTHA HENDERSON CAMPBELL November 20, 1862 in Newbie Cottage, Tatamagouche, Nova Scotia, daughter of JAMES CAMPBELL. She was born Abt. 1834 in Nova Scotia, and died August 04, 1865 in Princetown, PEI. He married (2) BARBARA CAMPBELL November 12, 1868 in Strathalbyn, PEI. She was born in Nova Scotia, and died January 28, 1912 in Kingston, Ontario.
i. BESSIE POOL5 LAIRD, b. February 26, 1864, PEI.
ii. ALEXANDER LAIRD, b. August 01, 1865; d. 1917; m. CLARA CHARLOTTE HOBRECKER, April 28, 1898; b. August 06, 1872, Nova Scotia; d. July 24, 1966, Annandale Apts., Kingston, Ontario.
iii. ROBERT5 LAIRD, b. March 12, 1871, Malpeque, PEI; d. October 25, 1940, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario; m. HENRIETTA ODELL, April 28, 1898, Sunbury, Ontario; b. February 16, 1872, Belmont, Ontario.
iv. JAMES CAMPBELL LAIRD, b. April 12, 1873; d. June 23, 1959; m. MILDRED PEABODY, 1909; b. August 08, 1884, Silver Springs, Maryland, USA.
v. DAVID HENRY LAIRD, b. November 23, 1875, Malpeque, PEI; d. February 15, 1952, Winnipeg, Manitoba; m. FANNIE LOUISE LAIRD, December 29, 1907; b. November 18, 1876.
vi. ANNA LOUISE LAIRD, b. March 25, 1879, Malpeque, PEI; d. April 30, 1960, Toronto, Ontario; m. FRANK ARTHUR YEIGH, September 02, 1908, Kingston, Ontario; b. July 21, 1860, Burford, Ontario; d. October 26, 1935, Toronto, Ontario.
vii. WILLIAM LYLE LAIRD, b. June 24, 1883.
viii. WILLIAM LYLE LAIRD, b. June 06, 1884, Nova Scotia; d. Aft. 1960, USA; m. ELVA UNKNOWN.
ix. FRANCES CLYNE LAIRD, b. June 22, 1886, Nova Scotia; d. 1937, Toronto, Ontario.
x. JOHN MUNRO LAIRD, b. September 21, 1890, Charlottetown, PEI; d. June 03, 1976, Toronto, Ontario; m. MAY LOUISE BLANCHE TAYLOR, 1918; b. May 04, 1893, Toronto, Ontario; d. October 09, 1961, Toronto, Ontario.
14. ALEXANDER4 LAIRD (JANET3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born 1830 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died August 09, 1896 in Wilmot Valley, PEI. He married (1) REBECCA P. READ January 01, 1864 in PEI, daughter of EPHRAIM READ and ROSARA CHAPPELL. She was born Abt. 1842 in PEI, and died 1882 in PEI. He married (2) ANN CARRUTHERS September 30, 1886 in North Bedeque, PEI, daughter of SAMUEL CARRUTHERS and SOPHIA MUTTART. She was born September 28, 1853 in Cape Traverse, PEI, and died in PEI.
i. DORA5 LAIRD, b. August 12, 1866, Bedeque, PEI; d. October 20, 1931, 1164 Richelieu St., Vancouver, BC; m. HENRY CURTIS SHAW, July 16, 1894, 76 Cook St., Victoria, British Columbia; b. June 12, 1863, Stanhope, PEI; d. September 29, 1931, 1164 Richelieu St., Vancouver, BC.
ii. JAMES "ALBERT" LAIRD, b. Abt. 1868, PEI; d. September 18, 1886, Wilmot Creek, PEI.
iii. ALWIN ANSELL LAIRD, b. Abt. 1870, PEI; d. November 23, 1898, Vancouver, BC.
iv. WILLIAM EDWARD LAIRD, b. 1871, PEI; d. October 01, 1889, Wilmot Creek, PEI.
v. EMMA E. LAIRD, b. July 16, 1873, PEI.
vi. EDNA JEAN LAIRD, b. June 1876, PEI; d. February 22, 1947, Vancouver, British Columbia.
vii. MARY LOUISE LAIRD, b. February 22, 1877, PEI; d. September 26, 1910, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
viii. ROSARA LAIRD, b. Abt. 1878, PEI; d. February 22, 1931, Essondale, BC.
ix. AMY CASEY LAIRD, b. July 04, 1882, PEI; d. April 13, 1966, Vancouver, British Columbia.
x. DAVID GORDON5 LAIRD, b. October 10, 1889, North Bedeque, PEI; d. October 16, 1985, Vancouver, British Columbia; m. (1) EVELYN WEBER; m. (2) GERALDINE UNKNOWN.
xi. ALEXANDER LAIRD, b. October 10, 1891, PEI; d. June 19, 1935, Vancouver, British Columbia.
xii. ROBERT SCOTT LAIRD, b. September 06, 1895; d. August 12, 1965, Vancouver, British Columbia; m. BERNICE DESBRISAY.
15. DAVID4 LAIRD (JANET3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born March 12, 1833 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died January 12, 1914 in Bay St., Ottawa, Ontario. He married MARY LOUISA OWEN June 30, 1864 in Georgetown, PEI, daughter of THOMAS OWEN and ANN CAMPBELL. She was born in PEI, and died July 10, 1895 in Charlottetown, PEI.
i. DAVID "RENNIE"5 LAIRD, b. 1865; d. August 28, 1948, Cavendish Apts., Charlottetown, PEI; m. ALETHE GUNN, June 07, 1893, Boston, Mass., USA; b. January 20, 1864, Cape Traverse, PEI; d. 1903.
ii. MARY ALICE LAIRD, b. February 07, 1867, Charlottetown, PEI; d. December 09, 1945, PEI; m. JOHN ALEXANDER MATHIESON, September 15, 1896, PEI; b. May 19, 1863, Brackley Point, PEI; d. January 07, 1947, PEI.
iii. ARTHUR GORDON LAIRD, b. December 17, 1868, Charlottetown, PEI; d. February 19, 1951, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; m. HARRIET REMINGTON, 1900, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; b. 1867; d. 1901.
iv. WILLIAM CHARLES LAIRD, b. 1870, PEI; d. 1958; m. ISABELLE HANNAH NASH, October 13, 1902, Zion Church, Charlottetown, PEI; b. 1868, Nova Scotia; d. July 31, 1958, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
v. JAMES HAROLD LAIRD, b. June 1872; d. 1944; m. ROSE DESJARDINE.
vi. FANNIE LOUISE LAIRD, b. November 18, 1876; m. DAVID HENRY LAIRD, December 29, 1907; b. November 23, 1875, Malpeque, PEI; d. February 15, 1952, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
16. ALBERT4 LAIRD (JANET3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born June 04, 1842 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died August 28, 1926 in New Glasgow, PEI. He married MARGARET JANE LAIRD March 26, 1875 in Cavendish, PEI, daughter of ALEXANDER LAIRD and JANE LOCKERBY. She was born August 27, 1854 in PEI, and died in PEI.
i. ALEXANDER J.5 LAIRD, b. May 1876, New Glasgow, PEI; d. August 26, 1938, Scotsgard, Saskatchewan.
ii. GEORGE "ERNEST" LAIRD, b. March 18, 1878, New Glasgow, PEI; d. March 06, 1936; m. EUPHEMIA BELLE ROSS, April 1908, PEI; b. June 19, 1881, Wheatley River, PEI; d. July 22, 1939, Mayfield, PEI.
iii. CECIL ROBERT LAIRD, b. February 06, 1880, New Glasgow, PEI; d. March 13, 1954, New Glasgow, PEI.
iv. WILLIAM EDGAR LAIRD, b. February 04, 1882, New Glasgow, PEI; d. April 15, 1925, Scotsgard, Saskatchewan; m. CASSIE GORDON READ, March 06, 1917, Read's Corner, PEI; b. December 22, 1888, Read's Corner, PEI; d. 1963, Saskatchewan.
v. ELSIE JANE LAIRD, b. January 22, 1888, New Glasgow, PEI; d. February 18, 1973, Garden of the Gulf Home, Charlottetown, PEI.
17. MARGARET4 ARTHUR (MARGARET3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born July 09, 1827 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died July 14, 1901 in Charlottetown, PEI. She married JAMES MCINSTRY November 26, 1846 in PEI, son of JAMES MCINSTRY and JANE MCNEILL. He was born December 20, 1816 in Port Glasgow, Renfrewshire, Scotland, and died July 04, 1905 in New Glasgow, PEI.
i. ELIZABETH5 MCINSTRY, b. October 23, 1853, PEI; d. March 23, 1939, Bedeque, PEI; m. JOHN S. JACK, Abt. 1885, PEI; b. February 13, 1864, PEI; d. September 02, 1948, Prince County Hospital, Summerside, PEI.
ii. JOHN ARTHUR MCINSTRY, b. August 16, 1857; d. October 27, 1950, Brockton, Mass., USA; m. MARGARET ANN KINSMAN, December 27, 1881, North Bedeque, PEI; b. Abt. 1846; d. May 25, 1934, Quincy, Mass., USA.
iii. EMMA JANET MCINSTRY, b. June 08, 1859, Cavendish, PEI; d. August 27, 1933, New Haven Conn., USA; m. GEORGE LEANDER PETHICK, July 23, 1881, The Manse, Cavendish, PEI; b. November 18, 1862, PEI; d. July 29, 1900, New Haven, Conn., USA.
iv. ANNABELLA MCINSTRY, b. June 03, 1862, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. May 04, 1937, Park Corner. PEI; m. JAMES A. JACK, December 31, 1892, Residence of D McDowell, Summerside, PEI; b. September 01, 1872, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. May 28, 1950, Charlottetown, PEI.
v. MATILDA MCINSTRY, b. Abt. 1864.
vi. JAMES ALLAN MCINSTRY, b. May 16, 1866; d. February 23, 1867.
vii. CAROLINE MCINSTRY, b. Abt. 1868.
viii. ROBERT LAIRD MCINSTRY, b. March 14, 1869, Cavendish, PEI; d. 1952; m. (1) SARAH JANE JELLEY; b. 1871, PEI; d. 1907, PEI; m. (2) JANE TURPEL MURRAY, February 14, 1917, St. Eleanors, PEI; b. November 13, 1880, St. Eleanors, PEI; d. October 13, 1957, Hunter River, PEI.
ix. HAMMOND MCINSTRY, b. 1870, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. June 28, 1965, Chelton, PEI; m. CHRISTINA UNKNOWN, July 20, 1922.
18. JANE4 ARTHUR (MARGARET3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born October 29, 1831 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died Aft. 1911 in PEI. She married JOHN MCLEOD July 25, 1854 in PEI. He was born October 15, 1832 in New London, PEI, and died Aft. 1901.
i. JOHN MCKAY5 MCLEOD, b. March 20, 1855, PEI; d. August 13, 1928, Baltimore, Maryland; m. WILHELMINA MARIA JOHNSON, 1880; b. December 31, 1863, USA; d. December 15, 1940, USA.
ii. MERENDA MCLEOD, b. 1867, PEI; d. January 24, 1946, PEI; m. FREDERICK HENRY GORRILL, Abt. 1888, PEI; b. 1863; d. November 15, 1933, Northam, PEI.
iii. SOPHIA T. MCLEOD, b. Abt. 1869, PEI.
iv. MARY C. MCLEOD, b. Abt. 1873, PEI.
19. JAMES4 ARTHUR (MARGARET3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born February 10, 1835 in PEI. He married MARY JANE BAKER July 19, 1871 in PEI. She was born November 25, 1844 in Nova Scotia.
i. JOHN OSCAR5 ARTHUR, b. February 05, 1875, PEI; d. May 20, 1960, Florida, USA.
ii. DAVID RUSSELL ARTHUR, b. July 09, 1876, PEI; d. Aft. 1936, Mass., USA.
iii. ANNIE ARTHUR, b. March 24, 1877, PEI; d. April 17, 1935, Beverley, Mass., USA; m. J. H. MORGAN; d. Aft. 1935.
iv. ELIZABETH MAUD ARTHUR, b. February 13, 1879, PEI; d. Bef. 1960.
v. ETTA MAY ARTHUR, b. May 22, 1882, French River, PEI; d. December 07, 1969, PEI; m. PRESTON CAMPBELL, November 15, 1916, St. Marks Church, Kensington, PEI; b. August 05, 1886, PEI; d. October 14, 1968, PEI.
vi. GERTRUDE PEARL ARTHUR, b. December 25, 1883, PEI; d. 1955, PEI; m. JAMES ARMINIUS RICHEY MEEK, PEI; b. October 01, 1863, PEI; d. 1954, PEI.
vii. HENRY ARTHUR, d. Bef. 1960, Mass., USA.
20. CHARLES S.4 ARTHUR (MARGARET3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born March 20, 1843 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died March 1918 in Summerside, PEI. He married (1) MARY JANE IRVING December 30, 1864 in PEI, daughter of ROBERT IRVING and MARGARET CAMERON. She was born August 25, 1844 in PEI, and died April 04, 1898 in PEI. He married (2) MARY ELLEN THOMAS October 05, 1901 in Parsonage, Methodist Church, Bedeque, PEI. She was born in PEI.
i. JAMES HOWARD5 ARTHUR, b. April 22, 1866, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. March 03, 1935, 17 Russel St., Summerside, PEI; m. EVA DEVONA MACWILLIAMS, PEI; b. September 14, 1880, Lot 28, PEI; d. September 30, 1955, Charlottetown, PEI.
ii. ROBERT SAMUEL ARTHUR, b. March 11, 1867, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. January 20, 1924, Summerside, PEI; m. ANNE MCGILVRAY.
iii. MARGARET A. ARTHUR, b. Abt. 1868, PEI; m. ALBERT MCEACHERN.
iv. JOHN ALBERT ARTHUR, b. May 22, 1869, PEI; d. Aft. 1935, Louisiana, USA.
v. MINNIE B. ARTHUR, b. July 14, 1872, PEI; d. Bef. 1935, PEI.
vi. WILLIAM C. ARTHUR, b. Abt. 1874, PEI; d. Aft. 1935, Louisiana, USA; m. MARTHA GAMBLE; b. 1871; d. 1904.
vii. EDITH JANE ARTHUR, b. April 10, 1876, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. January 23, 1933, Summerside, PEI.
viii. FRANK R. ARTHUR, b. February 05, 1879, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. Aft. 1935, Vancouver, BC.
ix. FREDERICK ARTHUR, b. Abt. 1885, PEI; d. Bef. 1918, Vancouver, British Columbia.
21. MARY4 ARTHUR (MARGARET3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born April 04, 1845 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died May 21, 1935 in Alberta. She married DAVID MACDOWELL February 22, 1871 in Summerside, PEI, son of JOHN MACDOWELL and ELLA DUNNING. He was born January 13, 1844 in Kensington, PEI, and died December 24, 1904.
i. JOHN ELDON5 MACDOWELL, b. August 30, 1871, Margate, PEI.
ii. EDWARD "EVERETT" MACDOWELL, b. March 31, 1873, Margate, PEI; d. October 05, 1955, Ponoka Alberta; m. JENNIE GERTRUDE CURRIE, June 27, 1906, PEI; b. October 08, 1881, PEI; d. August 01, 1939.
iii. SAMUEL RODD MACDOWELL, b. September 06, 1874, Margate, PEI; d. June 15, 1930, Portland Maine, USA; m. (1) ELLEN UNKNOWN; m. (2) LORETTA LETTIMORE, September 01, 1908, Portland, Maine, USA; d. 1927, USA.
iv. ARTHUR WELLINGTON MACDOWELL, b. July 09, 1876, Summerside, PEI; d. March 12, 1970, Summerside, PEI; m. MELISSA GERTRUDE MACDONALD, September 25, 1901, PEI; b. September 22, 1880, PEI; d. February 22, 1967, Summerside, PEI.
v. ELLEN MAY MACDOWELL, b. February 22, 1878, Summerside, PEI; d. January 26, 1949, Harvey Ave, Kelowna, British Columbia; m. GEORGE INGLIS, October 06, 1919, Lacombe, Alberta; b. 1881, Inverness, Scotland; d. June 02, 1942, Benvoulin Rd., Kelowna, British Columbia.
vi. WILLARD ALLAN MACDOWELL, b. June 30, 1882, Summerside, PEI; d. August 09, 1969, Fredericton, PEI; m. ANNIE MAE MURRAY, September 04, 1907, PEI; b. May 16, 1878, PEI; d. July 24, 1946, Hunter River, PEI.
vii. LEONARD WALMER MACDOWELL, b. December 19, 1885, PEI; d. March 04, 1943, Lacombe, Alberta; m. FLORENCE AGNES NEAL.
viii. WENDALL MORTON MACDOWELL, b. October 21, 1889, Summerside, PEI; d. March 29, 1977, South Portland, Maine, USA; m. ROSE ANN MCBREDY, March 07, 1916, Portland, Maine, USA; b. May 14, 1894, Portland Maine, USA; d. July 04, 1971, Portland Maine, USA.
ix. ANNIE "ETHEL" OLIVIA MACDOWELL, b. September 14, 1892, Summerside, PEI; d. April 21, 1981, Kelowna, British Columbia.
22. WILLIAM A.4 ARTHUR (MARGARET3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born October 1824, and died November 11, 1909 in Wellesley, Mass., USA.
i. DAUGHTER5 ARTHUR, m. J. DANA TILTON.
23. MARGARET4 STEVENSON (MARY JANE3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born October 27, 1828 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died October 20, 1904 in Mayfield, PEI. She married SAMUEL WYAND March 18, 1848 in New Glasgow, PEI, son of JOHN WYAND and MARY WORLEDGE. He was born October 14, 1819 in Debenham, Suffolk, England, and died December 01, 1906 in Mayfield, PEI.
i. WILLIAM5 WYAND, b. May 27, 1849, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. July 01, 1870, PEI.
ii. CHARLES WYAND, b. March 23, 1851, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. October 08, 1941, Mayfield, PEI; m. (1) ELIZABETH MACKAY, March 01, 1877, PEI; b. Abt. 1851; d. January 19, 1897, PEI; m. (2) MARY EVA LINKLETTER, November 08, 1899, Summerside, PEI; b. February 26, 1866, Linkletter Road, Lot 17, PEI; d. February 07, 1943, Mayfield, PEI.
iii. ALBERT WYAND, b. February 28, 1853, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. April 22, 1927; m. (1) ELLA DUBENDORF; m. (2) SARAH BECK.
iv. SILAS TYLER WYAND, b. August 13, 1855, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. April 06, 1936, Heward, Saskatchewan; m. EMILY JANE MACKAY, December 24, 1886, PEI; b. October 30, 1862; d. June 12, 1934, Heward, Saskatchewan.
v. WALLACE WYAND, b. May 23, 1857, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. 1935; m. (1) MARGARET WEBSTER; m. (2) ELIZABETH BROWN.
vi. JANE WYAND, b. May 24, 1859, Cavendish Road, PEI; m. RICHARD ALLAN CLARK, June 16, 1880; b. August 16, 1854; d. March 23, 1903.
vii. HENRY CALEB WYAND, b. June 23, 1861, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. December 16, 1943, North White plains, New York, USA; m. WILHELMINA SQUAREBRIGGS, 1898, PEI; b. 1861, Summerside, PEI.
viii. LEMUEL WYAND, b. May 06, 1864, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. July 11, 1889, Cavendish Road, PEI.
ix. CHESTER WYAND, b. April 21, 1866, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. October 21, 1948; m. CATHERINE B. JELLEY, December 08, 1893, Linkletter Road, PEI; b. PEI.
x. MARGARET ANN WYAND, b. June 10, 1868, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. September 10, 1893, Cavendish Road, PEI.
xi. ALLAN WYAND, b. January 23, 1871, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. November 28, 1949, Mayfield, PEI; m. (1) BERTHA B. LAMONT, June 06, 1895, Summerside, PEI; b. April 21, 1873, New London, PEI; d. September 21, 1904, PEI; m. (2) KATHERINE IRENE CAMPBELL, Abt. 1906, PEI; b. September 03, 1879, Montague, PEI; d. July 10, 1952, Charlottetown, PEI.
24. ROBERT4 STEVENSON (MARY JANE3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born August 28, 1832 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died May 26, 1906. He married ANN SEMPLE December 24, 1857 in PEI, daughter of JAMES SEMPLE and MARY INGLIS. She was born July 06, 1836 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died April 03, 1911.
i. JAMES SEMPLE5 STEVENSON, b. December 06, 1858, New Glasgow, PEI; d. December 16, 1949, Brockton, Mass., USA; m. NELLIE ALDEN, July 02, 1884, Brockton, Mass., USA; b. USA; d. Bef. 1949, Mass., USA.
ii. ISAAC MURRAY STEVENSON, b. September 19, 1860, New Glasgow, PEI; d. January 30, 1915, Mass., USA; m. SARAH JANE WILSON, May 06, 1886; b. Richmond, PEI.
iii. BENJAMIN BULMAN STEVENSON, b. December 24, 1862, New Glasgow, PEI; d. January 26, 1946, New Bedford, Mass., USA; m. SARAH MCDONALD, August 23, 1887, PEI; b. Abt. 1866, Breadalbane, PEI; d. February 13, 1950, New Bedford, Mass., USA.
Res.: New Glasgow; aft 1913 New Bedford, Mass.
iv. MARGARET JANE STEVENSON, b. December 10, 1864, New Glasgow, PEI; d. September 01, 1951; m. ALEXANDER TOOMBS, November 16, 1892, PEI; b. March 06, 1864, Cavendish Road, PEI; d. May 11, 1954, PEI.
v. BESSIE ANN STEVENSON, b. April 24, 1867, New Glasgow, PEI; d. May 01, 1950, Cavendish, PEI; m. ALBERT WALTER MACNEILL, January 10, 1895, New Glasgow, PEI; b. December 25, 1860, Cavendish, PEI; d. December 18, 1928, Cavendish, PEI.
vi. RICHARD WEBSTER STEVENSON, b. July 22, 1869, New Glasgow, PEI; d. September 14, 1926, PEI; m. CLARA INEZ MACKENZIE, October 02, 1901, Cavendish, PEI; b. March 03, 1876, PEI; d. February 13, 1975, PEI.
vii. ROBERT INGLIS STEVENSON, b. October 31, 1871, New Glasgow, PEI; d. Aft. 1946, Mass., USA; m. MARGARET M. MCDONALD, September 26, 1906, PEI; b. Abt. 1875, Hartsville, PEI.
viii. JOHN ALEXANDER STEVENSON, b. June 02, 1874, New Glasgow, PEI; d. May 07, 1876, New Glasgow, PEI.
ix. MARY AGNES STEVENSON, b. March 02, 1876, New Glasgow, PEI; d. October 14, 1876, New Glasgow, PEI.
x. JENNIE ALVARETTA STEVENSON, b. April 15, 1878, New Glasgow, PEI; d. April 04, 1964, PEI; m. ROBERT ALEXANDER MACKENZIE, December 01, 1909, PEI; b. May 23, 1865, PEI; d. March 16, 1952, Cavendish, PEI.
25. JANE4 STEVENSON (MARY JANE3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born Abt. 1836 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died October 12, 1935 in California, USA. She married WALTER "HERBERT" HEAD January 05, 1860 in New Glasgow, PEI, son of ROBERT HEAD and EMILY. He was born Abt. 1833 in Ugborough, Devon, England.
i. ROBERT5 HEAD, b. Abt. 1860, PEI; m. MARGARET RAMSAY, August 28, 1883; d. October 11, 1932, Gilroy, California, USA.
ii. CHARLES HEAD, b. Abt. 1861, PEI.
iii. HERBERT WILLIAM HEAD, b. October 10, 1863, PEI; d. September 21, 1960, Monterey, California; m. SADIE JANE NEWLOVE, November 14, 1888, Orcutt, California, USA; b. Abt. 1866, California.
iv. EMILY HEAD, b. Abt. 1866, PEI.
v. HIRAM HEAD, b. Abt. 1869, PEI.
vi. ELLA HEAD, b. Abt. 1873, PEI.
26. WILLIAM4 STEVENSON (MARY JANE3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born September 21, 1841 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died November 08, 1903 in Idaho, USA. He married JULIA GLASS June 14, 1882 in Idaho, USA, daughter of A. J. GLASS. She was born 1830 in Ohio, USA, and died 1898 in Idaho, USA.
i. GRACE M.5 STEVENSON, b. Abt. 1884.
27. MARTHA4 STEVENSON (MARY JANE3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born Abt. 1848 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died November 13, 1938 in 95 Chestnut St., Winnipeg, Manitoba. She married THEOPHILUS S. MACLEOD August 08, 1870 in Summerside, PEI. He was born Abt. 1848, and died January 02, 1902.
i. UNKNOWN5 MACLEOD, m. R. D. BELL.
28. AGNES4 STEVENSON (MARY JANE3 ORR, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born 1850 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died June 22, 1890. She married ALEXANDER MACKAY November 04, 1869 in New Glasgow, PEI. He was born 1846 in PEI, and died February 17, 1894 in PEI.
i. ELDON ELLSWORTH5 MACKAY, b. August 05, 1870, PEI; d. July 04, 1937, Charlottetown, PEI; m. JANE FLORENCE SMITH; b. July 23, 1869, New Glasgow, PEI; d. March 19, 1955, PEI.
ii. HOWARD T. MACKAY, b. 1872.
iii. ELLA M. MACKAY, b. Abt. 1874.
iv. HARRIET MACKAY, b. Abt. 1876.
v. LEONARD MACKAY, b. September 07, 1878, New Glasgow, PEI.
vi. MARY JEANETTE MACKAY, b. Abt. 1881, New Glasgow, PEI; d. November 21, 1895, PEI.
vii. WILLIAM MACKAY, b. Abt. 1883.
29. ANNIE4 ORR (ROBERT3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born October 26, 1844 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died August 31, 1935 in Argyle Shore, PEI. She married ISAAC FRENCH July 08, 1867 in New Glasgow, PEI, son of THOMAS FRENCH and MARY KELLOW. He was born August 14, 1842 in Westmoreland, PEI, and died January 07, 1918 in New Glasgow Mills, PEI.
i. MARY "CAROLINE"5 FRENCH, b. June 28, 1868, New Glasgow Mills, PEI; d. February 01, 1951, Charlottetown, PEI; m. (1) CHARLES "EDWARD" MOORE, February 01, 1888, PEI; b. September 25, 1866, Milton, PEI; d. December 08, 1909, Brookfield, PEI; m. (2) JOHN FERGUSON, Aft. 1910, PEI; b. October 01, 1859, Hampton, PEI; d. August 21, 1946, Argyle Shore, PEI.
ii. ALBERT ELMER FRENCH, b. April 26, 1872, New Glasgow Mills, PEI; d. 1955, USA; m. FANNIE WINNIFRED JONES, USA; b. USA; d. USA.
iii. JAMES "RUSSELL" FRENCH, b. 1874, New Glasgow Mills, PEI; d. Mass., USA; m. ANNIE GILLIS; b. September 06, 1871, Culloden, PEI; d. Abt. 1960, Mass., USA.
iv. JANIE ROBERTA FRENCH, b. March 01, 1877, New Glasgow Mills, PEI; d. May 09, 1952, Charlottetown, PEI; m. NEIL ARCHIBALD MACNEVIN, September 05, 1910, Brockton, Mass., USA; b. February 12, 1879, PEI; d. April 19, 1947, Argyle Shore, PEI.
v. ETHEL FRENCH, b. May 19, 1879, New Glasgow Mills, PEI; d. October 1965, New Hampshire, USA; m. HENRY COOPER, Mass., USA; d. USA.
vi. LESLIE ELLSWORTH FRENCH, b. 1880, New Glasgow Mills, PEI; d. Brockton, Mass., USA; m. MAY UNKNOWN, USA; b. September 09, 1878, USA; d. March 1966, USA.
30. JAMES SEMPLE4 ORR (ROBERT3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born September 30, 1848 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died 1936 in Hollister, California, USA. He married MARY GRAHAM May 14, 1870 in Charlottetown, PEI. She was born November 06, 1849 in Stanley Bridge, PEI, and died 1929 in California, USA.
i. ELIZABETH (BESSIE)5 ORR, b. May 09, 1871, New Glasgow, PEI; d. Aft. 1928, California, USA; m. JAMES WEBB, Abt. 1889, California, USA; d. California, USA.
ii. ROBERT HALL ORR, b. March 18, 1873, New Glasgow, PEI; d. December 23, 1964, California, USA; m. HILDA LETITIA EATON, July 23, 1902; b. August 23, 1877, Kansas, USA; d. February 07, 1949, Los Angeles, California, USA.
iii. FLORENCE P. ORR, b. October 03, 1876, PEI; d. Bef. 1928, California, USA; m. JOSEPH G. OGDEN, Bef. 1900, California, PEI; b. March 1860, Maryland, USA; d. Aft. 1920, California, USA.
iv. MARY ORR, b. Abt. 1877, PEI.
v. JAMES SEMPLE ORR, b. October 27, 1877, California, USA; d. Aft. 1964.
vi. JANE ORR, b. Abt. 1878, PEI.
vii. ADA ORR, b. November 19, 1878, California, USA; d. Aft. 1964; m. (1) UNKNOWN BROOKS, California, USA; m. (2) FRANK BRUCE; b. Abt. 1875.
viii. JOHN N. ORR, b. November 29, 1879, California, USA; d. Aft. 1928.
ix. ANGIE L. ORR, b. January 05, 1883, California, USA; d. October 23, 1965, Yuba, California, USA; m. AARON SARGENT WELLMAN, July 06, 1904, California, USA; b. December 02, 1878, California, USA.
x. BENJAMIN BULMAN ORR, b. June 18, 1888, California, USA; d. 1928, California, USA.
xi. VIRENA ANNIE ORR, b. November 11, 1890, California, USA; d. October 05, 1981, Santa Cruz Co., California, USA; m. JAMES MICHAEL PRENDERGAST, April 20, 1910, California, USA; b. June 11, 1885, California, USA; d. January 03, 1961, Capitola, Santa Cruz Co., California.
31. AMELIA4 ORR (ROBERT3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born Abt. 1850 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died Abt. 1950 in Brockton, Mass., USA. She married JOHN BROWNELL October 01, 1885 in Brockton, Mass., USA, son of CHANEY BROWNELL and ELIZA UNKNOWN. He was born Abt. 1841 in Jolycure, New Brunswick.
i. WILLIAM CHAUNCEY5 BROWNELL, b. April 1891, Brockton, Mass., USA; d. February 09, 1892, Brockton, Mass., USA.
32. WILLIAM WILSON4 ORR (ROBERT3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born November 06, 1853 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died March 15, 1933 in New Glasgow Mills, PEI. He married MARY ALICE BULMAN June 1888 in PEI, daughter of CHRISTOPHER BULMAN and MARGARET BUNTAIN. She was born February 23, 1857 in PEI, and died August 31, 1928 in New Glasgow Mills, PEI.
i. CHRISTOPHER BULMAN5 ORR, b. April 17, 1890, New Glasgow, PEI; d. January 25, 1970, New Glasgow Mills, PEI.
ii. MARGARET JANE ORR, b. November 27, 1892, New Glasgow Mills, PEI; d. May 05, 1985, Lennox Nursing Home, Charlottetown, PEI; m. ALVAH JUDSON MACNEILL, December 05, 1917, New Glasgow Mills, PEI; b. May 11, 1889, PEI; d. August 25, 1980, PEI.
33. AMANDA JANE4 ORR (ROBERT3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born Abt. 1855 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died in Mass., USA. She married ROBERT CARSON May 13, 1875 in New Glasgow, PEI. He was born Abt. 1849 in North Rustico, PEI, and died August 1928 in Cambridge, Mass., USA.
i. ROBERT B.5 CARSON, b. Abt. 1877, PEI; d. October 17, 1921, 41 Appleton St., Brockton, Mass., USA.
ii. MARY "LILLA" CARSON, b. Abt. 1880, PEI.
34. NELSON HOWARD4 ORR (ROBERT3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born August 01, 1863 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died December 01, 1939 in PEI. He married AMELIA ANN ROBERTSON December 29, 1890 in PEI, daughter of HENRY ROBERTSON and MARY MCLEAN. She was born May 02, 1863 in Cavendish, PEI, and died October 14, 1932 in New Glasgow, PEI.
i. JEAN SEMPLE5 ORR, b. October 29, 1891, New Glasgow, PEI; d. December 22, 1974, PEI; m. WILLIAM ALAN SIMPSON, December 27, 1916, Residence of Nelson Orr, New Glasgow, PEI; b. August 21, 1889, Bayview, PEI; d. March 10, 1969, PEI.
ii. ALEXANDER "WARFIELD" ORR, b. February 08, 1893, New Glasgow, PEI; d. January 03, 1980, PEI; m. MARY GERTRUDE TOOMBS, June 27, 1917, North Rustico, PEI; b. March 21, 1893, PEI; d. May 22, 1973, PEI Hospital, Charlottetown, PEI.
iii. MARY "ETHEL" ORR, b. July 15, 1895, New Glasgow, PEI; d. April 19, 1978, Wood Nursing Home, PEI; m. CLARENCE ALLAN STEWART, December 15, 1920, PEI; b. April 17, 1892, Bayview, PEI; d. July 16, 1966, Bayview, PEI.
iv. GEORGE "MILLAR" ORR, b. March 15, 1897, New Glasgow, PEI; d. October 24, 1970, PEI; m. (1) HANNAH MARGARET MACKENZIE, June 15, 1921, Cavendish, PEI; b. December 29, 1899, Lot 24, PEI; d. March 15, 1930, New Glasgow Mills, PEI; m. (2) IDA LILY PURSEY, February 25, 1931, United Church Manse, Cavendish, PEI; b. June 22, 1886, North Rustico, PEI; d. September 24, 1964, PEI.
35. JAMES HOUSTON4 ORR (JAMES3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born June 09, 1846 in PEI, and died August 01, 1908 in French River, PEI. He married JEMIMA DICKIESON July 31, 1875 in PEI, daughter of DANIEL DICKIESON and CATHERINE RAMSAY. She was born January 01, 1852 in Wilmot, PEI, and died August 23, 1932 in 404 7th Ave. East., Vancouver, British Columbia.
i. VINA BELL5 ORR, b. May 26, 1876, French River, PEI; d. January 10, 1951, 2283 West 7th, Vancouver, BC; m. JOHN FRANCIS WILSON; b. Liverpool, England; d. February 17, 1917, Vancouver, BC.
ii. FORREST LEE ORR, b. June 01, 1878, New London, PEI; d. May 27, 1938, Victoria, British Columbia; m. (1) CATHERINE "JEMIMA" MACPHAIL, October 28, 1908, PEI; b. September 05, 1874, Argyle Shore, PEI; d. May 28, 1912, Argyle Shore, PEI; m. (2) STELLA ORR, Aft. 1910; b. October 17, 1888, French River, PEI; d. June 29, 1969, PEI.
iii. FLORENCE ORR, b. Abt. 1879, French River, PEI; d. Aft. 1940, British Columbia.
iv. CAROLINE ORR, b. March 23, 1880, French River, PEI.
v. LOUIS HENRY ORR, b. March 23, 1880, French River, PEI; d. November 11, 1911, French River, PEI.
vi. AMY ORR, b. August 04, 1883, French River, PEI; d. Aft. 1901.
vii. FRANCES (FANNIE) ORR, b. August 05, 1886, French River, PEI; d. December 1940, Vancouver, British Columbia; m. JAMES JOHNSTONE; b. February 02, 1883, Lot 20, PEI; d. December 07, 1962, Hardisty, Alberta.
viii. MARGARET ORR, b. August 05, 1886, French River, PEI; d. Aft. 1951, British Columbia; m. UNKNOWN CAVANAUGH.
ix. UNKNOWN ORR, m. FRED THOMPSON.
36. WILLIAM CORNELIUS4 ORR (JAMES3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born December 16, 1855 in PEI, and died January 11, 1921 in Kensington, PEI. He married MINNIE UNKNOWN November 14, 1906 in The Manse, Summerside, PEI. She was born February 1872 in PEI.
i. CYRUS FIELD5 ORR, b. May 13, 1907, Kensington, PEI; d. May 09, 1953, New Westminster, BC; m. DORIS AGNES ELLIOTT.
37. MARGARET CRAWFORD4 ORR (WILLIAM3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born 1844 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died 1936 in California, USA. She married (1) WILLIAM MACLEOD May 25, 1865 in PEI. He was born Abt. 1830, and died April 05, 1871 in San Felipe, California, USA. She married (2) GEORGE J. JARVIS Abt. 1877 in California, USA. He was born 1847 in England, and died 1922 in USA.
i. EMMA5 MACLEOD, b. Abt. 1867, PEI.
ii. JENNIE MACLEOD, b. Abt. 1869, California, USA.
iii. WILLIAM MACLEOD, b. March 12, 1870, California, USA; d. August 25, 1963, Monterey, California, USA.
iv. MARGARET BERNICE5 JARVIS, b. 1879, California, USA; d. 1934.
v. GEORGE A. JARVIS, b. October 22, 1881, California, USA; d. September 30, 1963, Hollister, California, USA.
vi. ALICE MAUDE JARVIS, b. December 23, 1882, California, USA; d. May 11, 1958, Santa Clara Co., California, USA.
vii. AUSTIN MONROE JARVIS, b. April 28, 1884, California, USA; d. December 26, 1954, San Benito Co., California, USA.
viii. EDITHA J. JARVIS, b. February 12, 1887, California, USA; d. October 30, 1971, San Benito County, California.
ix. RUSSELL JARVIS, b. Abt. 1889, California, USA; d. February 26, 1975.
38. ELIZABETH4 ORR (WILLIAM3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born April 07, 1846 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died July 28, 1940 in Santa Cruz Co., California, USA. She married RICHARD P. WEBSTER September 02, 1869 in At William Orr's, New Glasgow, PEI. He was born Abt. 1842 in PEI.
i. JOHN HENRY5 WEBSTER, b. June 05, 1870, California, USA; d. October 24, 1959, California, USA.
ii. ALVINZA WEBSTER, b. August 15, 1872, California, USA; d. September 26, 1955, California, USA.
iii. FREDERICK WEBSTER, b. Abt. 1876, California, USA.
39. LEMUEL4 ORR (WILLIAM3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born April 26, 1852 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died September 11, 1899 in California, USA. He married FRANCES EDITH CHASE February 12, 1895 in San Benito Co., California, USA, daughter of NEWTON CHASE and ELSIE TANNER. She was born September 03, 1868 in California, USA.
i. NEWTON CARROLL5 ORR, b. June 12, 1897, San Benito Co., California, USA; d. September 12, 1983, Nevada, USA.
ii. ROBERT ALLEN ORR, b. May 25, 1900, California, USA; d. May 21, 1953, USA.
40. OLIVER O.4 ORR (WILLIAM3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born 1856 in PEI, and died July 11, 1931 in California, USA. He married ALTA M. PARKER February 12, 1888 in California, USA. She was born October 1866 in California, USA, and died 1929 in California, USA.
i. EARL O.5 ORR, b. September 1888, California, USA.
ii. HAZEL A. ORR, b. December 1892, California, USA.
41. HARRIET MELVINA (HATTIE)4 ORR (WILLIAM3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born April 08, 1862 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died September 26, 1942 in Los Angeles, California, USA. She married WILBUR MCCOBB Abt. 1879. He was born Abt. 1840 in Maine, USA, and died August 23, 1892 in California, USA.
i. ALMA D.5 MCCOBB, b. September 25, 1880, California, USA; d. March 17, 1962, Los Angeles, California, USA.
ii. OLIVER A. MCCOBB, b. January 17, 1884, California, USA; d. August 08, 1969, Los Angeles, California, USA.
42. PARMENAS4 ORR (JOHN3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born March 19, 1856 in New Glasgow, PEI, and died January 16, 1946 in Kensington, PEI. He married STANFORD JANE CLARKE October 27, 1887 in Summerside, PEI, daughter of WILLIAM CLARKE and ANNE LING. She was born April 18, 1866 in New Glasgow Road, PEI, and died July 08, 1942 in Kensington, PEI.
i. STELLA5 ORR, b. October 17, 1888, French River, PEI; d. June 29, 1969, PEI; m. FORREST LEE ORR, Aft. 1910; b. June 01, 1878, New London, PEI; d. May 27, 1938, Victoria, British Columbia.
ii. JOHN WILFRED ORR, b. Abt. 1891, French River, PEI; d. April 18, 1897, French River, PEI.
iii. E. JEANETTE ORR, b. April 22, 1896, PEI; d. February 25, 1986, Prince County Hospital, Summerside, PEI.
iv. ANNA "ELSIE" ORR, b. September 07, 1898, French River, PEI; d. December 09, 1984, Kensington, PEI; m. HAROLD LAIRD, October 14, 1920, Presbyterian Church; b. October 24, 1893, Kelvin Grove, PEI; d. October 25, 1959, Prince County Hosp., Summerside, PEI.
v. DAISY IRENE ORR, b. 1901, PEI; d. April 27, 1964, Kensington, PEI; m. PRESTON JAMES KENNEDY, January 11, 1922, Presbyterian Church, Summerside, PEI; b. 1896, PEI; d. June 28, 1959, PEI Hosp., Charlottetowm, PEI.
43. ELIZABETH J.4 ORR (JOHN3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born Abt. 1860 in PEI, and died April 18, 1940 in Milbridge, Maine, USA. She married GEORGE E. CHIPMAN November 20, 1878, son of GEORGE CHIPMAN and REBECCA TURNER. He was born April 15, 1860 in Milbridge, Maine, USA, and died March 30, 1923 in Milbridge, Maine, USA.
iii. AGNES REBECCA CHIPMAN, b. July 11, 1897, Milbridge, Maine, USA; m. RUSSELL TURNER, November 26, 1919, Milbridge, Maine, USA; b. January 03, 1895, Milbridge, Maine, USA; d. March 1970, Maine, USA.
44. GEORGE4 ORR (JOHN3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born August 12, 1861 in PEI, and died Bef. June 05, 1923 in PEI. He married BETHIA AUGUSTINE SIMS November 16, 1892 in French River, PEI, daughter of LEMUEL SIMS and BETHIA BINNS. She was born September 08, 1873 in PEI, and died July 26, 1941 in San Benito County, California.
i. LEMUEL JOHN5 ORR, b. April 23, 1893, French River, PEI; d. August 31, 1964, French River, PEI; m. LAURA MAE MACGREGOR; b. November 28, 1891, PEI; d. April 16, 1976, Garden of the Gulf N. H., Charlottetown.
45. ANNIE ALEXANDRA4 ORR (JOHN3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born September 10, 1866 in PEI, and died March 24, 1927 in Kensington, PEI. She married DAVID COLE March 19, 1890 in French River, PEI. He was born June 22, 1857 in PEI, and died March 26, 1935 in New London, PEI.
i. FLORENCE5 COLE, b. September 03, 1885, Lot 21, PEI.
46. MINNIE ALICE4 ORR (JOHN3, ROBERT2, ROBERT1) was born February 16, 1877 in French River, PEI, and died June 15, 1960 in Calgary, Alberta. She married HENRY "STANLEY" BERNARD March 08, 1899 in PEI, son of CHARLES BERNARD and ANN SMITH. He was born November 02, 1875 in PEI, and died Aft. 1960 in Alberta.
i. ALMA5 BERNARD, b. September 1902, PEI.
ii. DORIS ANNIE BERNARD, b. PEI; m. STEPHEN MCLURE ROBSON, July 1941, Calgary, Alberta; b. British Columbia.

matches: v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v.


On Feb. 13, the House of Representatives passed H.J. Res. 37, a joint resolution that purports to direct the executive branch to end U.S. support for the Saudi-led military campaign against Houthi rebels in Yemen. This is the first major legislative action that either chamber has taken on the Yemen conflict in this Congress, and it may signal a renewal of the heated debate on the subject that took place in both the House and the Senate at the end of last year.
The Saudi-led military intervention in Yemen has come under criticism both for harming civilians through its military operations and for severely hampering the flow of goods and foreign assistance into the country, contributing to what many consider to be the world’s worst humanitarian crisis. While the humanitarian crisis in Yemen has been the subject of widespread bipartisan concern within Congress, there is disagreement on what steps the United States should take to address the situation. On one side, the vast majority of congressional Democrats and a number of Republicans, particularly in the Senate, have increasingly sought to directly pressure Saudi Arabia and its allies into adjusting their conduct by threatening to reduce the level of U.S. support being provided. On the other, the Trump administration and its supporters in Congress have resisted this approach, arguing that the Saudi-led coalition plays a vital role in combating Iranian influence in Yemen and that U.S. support reduces the risk that the Saudi-led military campaign will harm civilians. Late last year, this debate ultimately led several Senate Republicans—motivated in part by the Trump administration’s refusal to hold the Saudi government accountable for the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi—to join Senate Democrats in a historic vote that passed a joint resolution similar to H.J. Res. 37. But neither that nor any other Yemen-related measures were enacted into law before Congress adjourned.
Serious doubts remain about the political prospects for H.J. Res. 37 and other Yemen-related legislation, not to mention the legal effect they will have if enacted. But the fact that such measures are once again being debated may be a sign that the pressure to change U.S. policies in Yemen is once again building. And unlike last time, if the Trump administration does not change course, this effort may result in real legal restrictions on the policies that the administration may pursue.
Both H.J. Res. 37 and its Senate counterpart, S.J. Res. 7, were introduced shortly after the 116th Congress convened in January 2019. They will look familiar to anyone who followed the debate on Yemen in the last Congress, as both are closely modeled on the joint resolution that the Senate ultimately passed in December. The main thrust of both resolutions is to direct the president to “remove [U.S. armed forces] from hostilities in or affecting the Republic of Yemen,” except for operations against al-Qaeda and associated forces. Other provisions disclaim any interpretations affecting cooperation with Israel, require certain reports, and—most important—define “hostilities” to include “in-flight refueling” of non-U.S. aircraft involved in missions as part of the ongoing civil war in Yemen.
Both H.J. Res. 37 and S.J. Res. 7 are designed to take advantage of certain special procedures that Congress added to the War Powers Resolution in 1983, which are now codified at 50 U.S.C. § 1546a. In the Senate, these procedures allow the sponsors of eligible resolutions to force votes and avoid filibusters and other obstructions, facilitating a debate even if congressional leadership or individual senators oppose the measure in question.
Reliance on § 1546a is new on the House side: the Yemen resolution that was introduced in the House in the last Congress relied on an older set of special procedures original to the War Powers Resolution, which allow for the use of concurrent resolutions and are codified at 50 U.S.C. § 1544(c) and 50 U.S.C. § 1546. These latter procedures, however, have been constitutionally suspect since the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. Chadha, which found a similarly structured statutory provision to be unconstitutional because it did not provide the president with the opportunity to veto as required by the Presentment Clause. Shortly after Chadha, Congress enacted § 1546a as a constitutional alternative, using joint resolutions, which do provide the president with the opportunity to veto. Unlike with § 1544(c), however, Congress installed meaningful special procedures only on the Senate side. For this reason, in the last Congress, House Democrats relied on the special procedures for concurrent resolutions in § 1544(c) and § 1546 to force debate on the Yemen conflict over the objections of Republican House leadership, even though the resolution itself likely would not have legal effect even if enacted. Now that Democrats control the House again, these special procedures are not needed, so the House debated H.J. Res. 37 through normal procedures.
On Feb. 6, the House Committee on Foreign Affairs voted 25-17 along party lines to advance H.J. Res. 37 to the House floor. Debate took place on Feb. 13. The House considered and ultimately adopted two amendments. One by Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) that was passed 252-177 installed a rule of construction that preserved the president’s ability to share intelligence information if he deems it to be in the U.S. national interest—an exception that opponents fear will allow the Trump administration to continue supporting the Saudi-led coalition even if H.J. Res. 37 becomes law. A second amendment by Rep. David Kustoff (R-Tenn.) that was passed 424-0 introduced a series of “findings” provisions asserting that it is in the U.S. national interest to combat anti-semitism and maintain a strong relationship with the state of Israel, an apparent response to the controversy surrounding Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)’s comments on Israel earlier in the week. A third amendment that would have narrowed the definition of “hostilities” to those “directed at Houthi forces” was discussed but never brought to a vote. As amended, H.J. Res. 37 passed 248-177, with 18 Republicans in support.
From here, the action seems likely to shift to the Senate, where both H.J. Res. 37 and S.J. Res. 7 now sit with the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. A majority of senators could vote to discharge it to the floor, proceed to consideration and ultimately adopt the resolution. This would require that the unanimous Democratic (and independent) senators be joined by at least four Republicans. That said, six of the seven Republican senators who ultimately voted for the joint resolution on Yemen in December—Susan Collins (R-Me.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Mike Lee (R-Ut.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Todd Young (R-Ind.)—remain in office. Thus far, these senators seem content to give the Trump administration some time to re-evaluate its policies and avoid a confrontation with the new committee chairman, Sen. James Risch (R-Id.), who has thus far proven less inclined to challenge the president than his predecessor. If push comes to shove, however, they may yet prove supportive of moving S.J. Res. 7 forward.
If the Senate passes S.J. Res. 7 or amends H.J. Res. 37 before passing it, then the resulting joint resolution will need to be reconciled with H.J. Res. 37 as passed by the House and the final version adopted by both chambers. At this point—or if the Senate just passes the current version of H.J. Res. 37 outright—it would be presented to the president, who has already made clear that he intends to veto. Overriding his veto would require two-thirds of both the House and the Senate, a higher level of support than any Yemen-related measures have received in either chamber to date.
Moreover, there is some doubt as to what legal effect the joint resolution would have even if enacted. The Defense Department has repeatedly (and to some extent credibly) argued that the activities that the United States is pursuing in support of the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen—the provision of defense articles and services, certain intelligence support, and military advice—do not constitute “hostilities” as the term is used in the War Powers Resolution, meaning that the joint resolution would have no legal effect. And while Congress may in theory be able to amend the definition of “hostilities” in the joint resolution to encompass those activities, doing so too aggressively may trigger a procedural fight as to whether the resulting joint resolution is still eligible for the special procedures provided by § 1546a. Some members of Congress could also raise objections that these procedures are being abused—a possibility that Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Tex.), the ranking member on the House foreign affairs committee, raised explicitly in his dissent to the House report on H.J. Res. 37.
For these reasons, it remains unlikely that the joint resolution will become law or have a meaningful legal effect if it does. The debate over these measures, however, may still be an important means of forcing a public confrontation between the Trump administration and Congress, including members of the president’s own party. This will only underscore the unpopularity of the president’s policies and may bring with it substantial political costs, factors that will place additional pressure on the administration to change its approach.
H.J. Res. 37 and S.J. Res. 7 are not the only Yemen-related legislation currently under consideration. At least two other bills have been introduced in the House and the Senate, though both are currently still with relevant committees.
The first is the Saudi Arabia Accountability and Yemen Act of 2019 (or S. 398), which was introduced by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and is co-sponsored by a bipartisan group of senators. Based on a similar bill in the last Congress, S. 398—in addition to imposing a number of reporting requirements—would set certain limits on support for the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen, including the suspension of certain categories of arms sales, until there is substantial progress toward a resolution of the conflict, along with an outright prohibition on in-flight refueling of Saudi coalition aircraft until the costs of previously provided in-flight refueling services are reimbursed. The bill would also impose sanctions on persons either hindering humanitarian access to Yemen or supporting the Houthis there and would install certain emergency protections for Yemeni cultural property. Separately, S. 398 would also impose sanctions on anyone found to be complicit in the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi and would require a report on Saudi Arabia’s broader human rights practices, two issues that have become intertwined with debates over the Yemen conflict. At present, S. 398 is with the Senate foreign relations committee.
The second piece of legislation is the Yemen Refueling Prohibition Act (or H.R. 910) introduced by Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Ca.). Like the other proposed legislation discussed above, H.R. 910 would prohibit the use of federal funds to provide in-flight refueling to aircraft involved in “the ongoing coalition intervention in Yemen,” effectively codifying the Trump administration’s recent decision to end this form of support. This bill was referred to the House foreign relations and armed services committees, where it presently remains.
By setting direct limits on the Trump administration—and avoiding any link to disputed terms such as “hostilities”—both S. 398 and H.R. 910 would have far more certain legal effects than H.J. Res. 37 and S.J. Res. 7 if enacted. But both face substantially more difficult paths to becoming law. Neither is eligible for § 1546a procedures nor any other special procedures, meaning they must go through the normal legislative process. As such, there are numerous ways that opponents of the legislation—particularly relevant committee chairs and the majority leader in the Senate—may prevent the bills from coming up for debate. Moreover, even if the House and the Senate passed these bills, they would still be subject to a likely presidential veto—and it seems unlikely that either could secure the two-thirds support necessary for Congress to override the veto.
Not all legislation, however, is so easy for the president to veto. Each year, Congress enacts omnibus legislation that bundles together various provisions into packages. These bills often include “must-pass” legislation that directly affects certain key federal functions or activities and is thus highly valued by the president. The classic example is the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) process, which Congress engages in each year to authorize salaries for armed service members as well as a range of military activities. Presidents are often reluctant to veto NDAAs, which can make the legislation popular vehicles for defense-related provisions that restrain or are otherwise disfavored by the president.
Congress has used the last two NDAAs for precisely this purpose when it comes to Yemen. The NDAA for fiscal 2018 obligated the executive branch to submit a report on the conduct and ramifications of the Saudi-led military campaign in Yemen as well as a strategy on Yemen for the United States. Congress ultimately omitted a provision in the original House version that would have prohibited the use of Defense Department funds for certain activities in Yemen, but included wording in the associated joint explanatory report noting Congress’s concern and discouraging the United States from entering the conflict there as a co-belligerent. The subsequent 2019 NDAA went even further by directing the Defense Department to conduct a review of U.S. support for the Saudi-led coalition and their involvement in possible legal violations. More important, Section 1290 threatened to withhold funding for in-air refueling services unless the secretary of state could certify that certain conditions had been met—namely, that Saudi Arabia had undertaken an “urgent and good faith” effort to negotiate an end to the conflict, acted to alleviate humanitarian suffering and reduced the harm to civilians resulting from military operations—or issued a waiver claiming that these activities were in the U.S. national interest and explaining why he could not issue the certification. And while Trump objected to both provisions in his signing statement, he did not veto the NDAA over them.
What happened next, however, underscores both the limits and the potential of these sorts of provisions. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo initially issued the required certification in September 2018, despite bipartisan skepticism that Saudi Arabia had actually satisfied the relevant requirements. The Wall Street Journal later reported that Pompeo had acted against the almost unanimous recommendation of his State Department staff, who had urged him to issue a waiver instead. This contributed to growing congressional frustration with the Trump administration’s policy toward Saudi Arabia and the Yemen conflict, ultimately leading the Trump administration to voluntarily cease providing the Saudi-led coalition with in-air refueling. As a result, the Trump administration has refused to issue another certification or waiver under Section 1290 despite bipartisan requests, on the apparent logic that Section 1290 no longer imposes any meaningful penalties for doing so.
If Congress wishes to put concrete legal restrictions on the executive branch’s actions in Yemen, the next NDAA—which will be drafted over the coming year and brought to a vote sometime in the fall—is the most likely vehicle. Presidential allies in the House and the Senate may seek to limit or avoid these provisions, but Democratic control of the House, combined with Republican reservations about Yemen policy in the Senate, make this a realistic possibility. The restrictions proposed in S. 398 are a likely model for such restrictions, though other formulations are also possible. And while the experience with Section 1290 underscores just how willing the Trump administration is to put its credibility on the line to preserve its close relationship with Saudi Arabia, Congress can make the requisite certifications and waivers narrower and more difficult to circumvent—or just remove them altogether in favor of hard legal restrictions, such as prohibitions on the types of support the United States is currently providing.
This does not, however, mean that these proposals are meaningless. Debating and negotiating these bills will help assemble the political coalitions that will be needed to enact more effective provisions later, and build the necessary political pressure to hold those coalitions together. Perhaps as important, they will also impose additional political costs on the Trump administration and underscore just how real the threat of meaningful congressional action has become—factors that may ultimately lead the administration to adjust problematic aspects of its Yemen policy before Congress forces it to do so.
Elizabeth Allan is a first-year student at Yale Law School. She holds Bachelor’s degrees in International Affairs and Arabic from the University of Georgia and an MPhil in Modern Middle Eastern Studies from the University of Oxford, where she studied as a Rhodes Scholar. She has also worked as a consultant in the Middle East and West Africa.


text:
We process the data of our customers within the scope of our contractual services, which include conceptual and strategic consulting, campaign planning, software and design development / consulting or maintenance, implementation of campaigns and processes / handling, server administration, data analysis / consulting services and training services, etc..
We process inventory data (e.g., customer master data, such as names or addresses), contact data (e.g., e-mail, telephone numbers), content data (e.g., text entries, photographs, videos), contract data (e.g., subject matter of contract, term), payment data (e.g., bank details, payment history), usage and metadata (e.g., within the scope of evaluating and measuring the success of marketing measures). We do not process any special categories of personal data, unless they are part of a commissioned processing. Affected parties include our customers, interested parties and their customers, users, website visitors or employees as well as third parties. The purpose of the processing is the provision of contractual services, billing and our customer service. The legal basis for the processing results from Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. b DSGVO (contractual services), Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. f DSGVO (analysis, statistics, optimisation, security measures). We process data which are necessary for the justification and fulfilment of the contractual services and point out the necessity of their specification. Disclosure to external parties shall only take place if it is necessary within the framework of an order. When processing the data provided to us within the framework of an order, we shall act in accordance with the instructions of the customer and the statutory requirements for order processing pursuant to Art. 28 DSGVO and shall not process the data for purposes other than those specified in the order.
We delete the data after expiry of statutory warranty and comparable obligations. The necessity of storing the data is reviewed every three years; in the case of statutory archiving obligations, deletion takes place after their expiration (6 J, in accordance with § 257 para. 1 HGB, 10 J, in accordance with § 147 para. 1 AO). In the case of data which has been disclosed to us by the client within the scope of an order, we delete the data in accordance with the specifications of the order, in principle after the end of the order.
We process the data of our contractual partners and interested parties as well as other clients, customers, clients, clients or contractual partners (uniformly referred to as “contractual partners”) in accordance with Art. 6 para. 1 lit. b. DSGVO in order to provide them with our contractual or pre-contractual services. The data processed, the type, scope and purpose and the necessity of their processing are determined by the underlying contractual relationship.
If users leave comments or other contributions (blog), their IP addresses may be used on the basis of our legitimate interests within the meaning of Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. f. of the German Civil Code. DSGVO for 7 days. This is done for our safety if someone leaves illegal contents (insults, forbidden political propaganda, etc.) in comments and contributions. In this case we can be prosecuted ourselves for the comment or contribution and are therefore interested in the identity of the author.
Furthermore, we reserve the right, on the basis of our legitimate interests pursuant to Art. 6 para. 1 lit. f. DSGVO, to process user data for the purpose of spam detection.
The data provided within the framework of comments and contributions will be stored permanently by us until the user objects.
Our podcasts are stored on the platform “Soundcloud”, offered by SoundCloud Limited, Rheinsberger Str. 76/77, 10115 Berlin, Germany and are played back from this platform.
For this purpose, we incorporate so-called Soundcloud widgets into our website and blog. This is playback software with which users can play the podcasts. Soundcloud can measure which podcasts are listened to and to what extent and process this information pseudonymously for statistical and business purposes. For this purpose, cookies can be stored in the user’s browser and processed for the purpose of creating user profiles, e.g. for the purpose of displaying advertisements that correspond to the potential interests of the user. In the case of users who are registered with Soundcloud, Soundcloud may assign the listening information to their profiles.
The use is based on our legitimate interests, i.e. interest in the secure and efficient provision, analysis and optimisation of our audio services pursuant to Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. f. DSGVO.
We use the Podcast Hosting service Podigee of the offerer Podigee UG, at the forest 2, 56249 Herschbach, Germany. The Podcasts are loaded thereby by Podigee or transferred over Podigee.
The use takes place on basis of our entitled interests, i.e. interest in a safe and efficient supply, analysis as well as optimization of our Podcast offer in accordance with art. 6 exp. 1 lit. f. DSGVO.
Podigee processes IP addresses and device information to enable podcast downloads/reproductions and to determine statistical data, such as the number of downloads. This data is anonymized or pseudonymized before it is stored in the Podigee database, unless it is necessary for the provision of podcasts.
Further information and possible objections can be found in Podigee’s data protection declaration: https://www.podigee.com/de/about/privacy/.
Here we, or our hosting provider (Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG)process inventory data, contact data, content data, contract data, usage data, meta and communication data of customers, interested parties and visitors to this online service on the basis of our legitimate interests in the efficient and secure provision of this online service in accordance with Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. f DSGVO i.V.m. Art. 28 DSGVO (conclusion of an order processing contract).
We, respectively our hosting provider (Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG), raise on the basis of our legitimate interests in the sense of Art. 6 para. 1 lit. f. DSGVO collects data about each access to the server on which this service is located (so-called server log files). The access data includes the name of the website accessed, file, date and time of access, amount of data transferred, notification of successful access, browser type and version, the user’s operating system, referrer URL (the previously visited page), IP address and the requesting provider.
The IP addresses are stored anonymously. To do this, the number of the last octet is deleted and replaced by a 0, i.e. 185.221.105.201 becomes 185.221.105.0. IPv6 addresses are also anonymised. The anonymised IP addresses are stored for 60 days for security reasons (e.g. to clarify misuse or fraud) and then deleted. Details of the directory protection user used are anonymised after one day. Data whose further storage is necessary for evidence purposes are excluded from deletion until the respective incident has been finally clarified.
Error logs, which log incorrect page views, are deleted after seven days. In addition to error messages, these include the IP address accessing the page and, depending on the error, the website accessed.
Access via FTP is logged with anonymous information on user name and IP address and stored for 60 days.
Log files for e-mail traffic via our mail servers are deleted after four weeks. The longer retention period is necessary for the analysis of disturbances during transmission or receipt, as well as for ensuring the functionality of the mail services and combating spam.
It is not possible to individually define the storage period.
In addition, user data is usually processed for market research and advertising purposes. For example, user profiles can be created on the basis of user behavior and the resulting interests of users. The usage profiles can in turn be used, for example, to place advertisements inside and outside the platforms that presumably correspond to the interests of the users. For these purposes, cookies are usually stored on the user’s computer in which the user’s usage behaviour and interests are stored. Furthermore, data can also be stored in the user profiles independently of the devices used by the users (especially if the users are members of the respective platforms and are logged in to them).
The processing of users’ personal data is carried out on the basis of our legitimate interests in effective user information and communication with users in accordance with Art. 6 Para. 1 letter f. DSGVO. If the users are asked by the respective providers for their consent to data processing (i.e. declare their consent e.g. by ticking a checkbox or confirming a button), the legal basis for processing is Art. 6 para. 1 lit. a., Art. 7 DSGVO.
– Google/ YouTube (Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA) – Privacy Statement: https://policies.google.com/privacy, Opt-Out: https://adssettings.google.com/authenticated, Privacy Shield: https://www.privacyshield.gov/participant?id=a2zt000000001L5AAI&status=Active.
We use webfonts from myfonts.com. Due to the license terms, page-view tracking is carried out by counting the number of visits to our website for statistical purposes and transmitting them to MyFonts. MyFonts Counter is a service of MyFonts Inc, 500 Unicorn Park Drive, Woburn, MA 01801, USA. For more information about MyFonts’ privacy practices, please visit: https://www.myfonts.com/info/terms-and-conditions.
We use the “conversion pixel” or visitor action pixel of Facebook Inc., 1601 S. California Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA (“Facebook”). By calling this pixel from your browser, Facebook can then recognize whether a Facebook ad was successful, e.g. whether it led to an online purchase. We only receive statistical data from Facebook without reference to a specific person. This enables us to record the effectiveness of Facebook advertisements for statistical and market research purposes. In particular, if you are logged on to Facebook, we also refer you to its data protection information https://www.facebook.com/about/privacy/.
Please go to www.facebook.com/settings?tab=ads if you wish to revoke your consent to Conversion Pixel.

matches:
Art. 6
Art. 6
Art. 28
§ 257
§ 147
Art. 6
Art. 6
Art. 6
Art. 6
art. 6
Art. 6
Art. 28
Art. 6
Art. 6
Art. 6
Art. 7