text:
We appreciate your visit to our website and your interest in our company, TestingTime AG, Weststrasse 50, 8003 Zurich, Switzerland, (hereinafter ‘TestingTime’) and its products.
(1) In the following section, TestingTime provides information about the collection of personal data when using the website. It is generally possible to use our website without providing personal data. However, if you would like to take advantage of particular services on this website, personal data may need to be processed. Personal data is all data that relates to you personally, e.g. name, address, email addresses, user behaviour.
Further data is only collected by TestingTime if the user has provided a declaration of consent. By providing a declaration of consent to TestingTime, the user agrees to the processing of their registered personal data within the framework of the scope specified in the consent form. The declaration of consent can be submitted during the test user’s registration process. The declaration of consent can be withdrawn at any time.
If a customer asks for personal data that is not yet saved in the TestingTime database for a specific product study, TestingTime will request the missing information from the test user by email. A response to the email by the test user is voluntary.
If the missing data is personal data that merits greater protection pursuant to Art. 9 GDPR, TestingTime will obtain an additional declaration of consent from the test user.
Note that the selection of test users for a study depends on whether the individual test user has provided a response to a particular question. This results in an increase in the likelihood of being selected as a test user for a study.
If a test user is selected for a study and confirms their registration for the study, TestingTime will forward the profile information they saved during registration as well as some personal information (‘screening’) related to the study (see example).
If a customer invites a new member or admin to his/her TestingTime team, he/she must have the person’s approval to share their email address with TestingTime and to eventually be contacted by TestingTime’s employees.
You can contact our data protection representative at info@datenschutzpartner.eu or via our postal address with the addition ‘Data Protection Representative’.
(3) When you contact TestingTime by email, the data you provide is stored by TestingTime for the purpose of answering your questions. The personal data collected for the purpose of contacting you includes your contact information, such as your first and last name, post code, phone number and email address. This information is used only for the purpose of contacting you and will not be processed in any other way. TestingTime deletes data obtained in this context once storage is no longer necessary or, if there is a legal obligation to retain it, restricts the processing of it.
(4) If TestingTime makes use of third-party service providers for individual functions within the service or would like to use your data for promotional purposes, you will be informed about the relevant processes in detail. This includes being informed of the criteria for the storage duration.
It is possible to object to cookies being set at any time by changing the settings in your internet browser. Cookies that have been set can be deleted. However, if you deactivate cookies, it may mean that you cannot use all functions of the website to the full extent.
You have the possibility of registering on the TestingTime website by providing personal data. The scope and nature of the personal data transmitted is determined by the particular input mask used for registration. The personal data you submit is collected and stored exclusively for internal use by TestingTime and for our own purposes.
When you register, your IP address is stored as well as the date and time of registration. This serves to prevent misuse of our services. The data is not transferred to third parties. An exception is made if there is a legal obligation to transfer data.
The registration of data is necessary in order for us to provide content and services. Registered persons have the possibility of having their stored data deleted or amended at any time. You can obtain information about the stored data concerning you at any time.
(2) You have the right to complain to a data protection supervisory authority about the processing of your personal data by TestingTime.
(1) If you have agreed to your data being processed, you can withdraw your consent at any time. Once you have expressed the withdrawal of your consent to TestingTime, TestingTime will no longer be permitted to process your personal data.
(2) If TestingTime bases the processing of your personal data on a balancing of interests, you can object to the processing. This is the case in particular if processing is not necessary for the purpose of fulfilling a contract with you, which is set out by TestingTime in each case in the description of functions below. When withdrawing your consent in this way, TestingTime requests an explanation of why it should not process your personal data in the way it does. If the objection is justified, TestingTime will examine the matter and either cease or adapt the data processing, or present you with compelling and legitimate reasons for why TestingTime will continue to process it.
(2) The IP address transmitted as part of the Google Analytics service is not combined with any other Google data.
(3) You can prevent cookies from being stored on your computer by changing your browser settings; however, in this case, you may not be able to use all of the website’s functions to the full extent. You can also prevent the storage of data created by the cookie and related to your use of the website (incl. your IP address) and Google’s processing of this data by downloading and installing the plug-in available via the following link: http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout.
(4) This website uses Google Analytics with the extension ‘_anonymizeIp()’. This means that further processing of IP addresses takes place in a truncated form, which prevents personal identification. Wherever the data collected from you does identify you personally, it is immediately excluded and the personal data deleted at once.
(5) TestingTime uses Google Analytics in order to be able to analyse usage of the website and make regular improvements. Using the statistics obtained, TestingTime can improve the website and make it more engaging for you as a user. In the exceptional cases when personal data is transmitted to the USA, Google is subject to the EU-US Privacy Shield, https://www.privacyshield.gov/EU-US-Framework. The legal basis for the use of Google Analytics is Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR.
(1) TestingTime uses the Google AdWords service in order to draw attention to attractive offers on external websites by means of advertising media (‘Google AdWords’). In connection with this, the success of individual advertising measures can be determined on the basis of the advertising campaign data. TestingTime uses this to track interest, to show you ads that may be of interest to you, to make this website more engaging for you and to achieve a fair calculation of advertising costs.
(2) These advertising materials are delivered by Google using ad servers. In this context, TestingTime uses ad server cookies, which allow certain performance parameters to be measured, such as ad impressions or the number of clicks by users. If you reach this website by clicking on a Google ad, Google AdWords stores a cookie on your computer. These cookies generally become void after 30 days and are not designed to identify you personally. The analysis data stored in this cookie usually includes the unique cookie ID, the number of ad impressions per placement (frequency), the last impression (relevant for post-view conversions) and opt-out information (flagging that the user would not like to be contacted any more).
(3) These cookies enable Google to recognise your internet browser. If a user visits certain pages of the website of an AdWords customer and the cookie stored on their computer is still valid, Google and the customer can recognise that they clicked on the ad and were redirected to this page. Each AdWords customer is allocated a different cookie. Thus, cookies cannot be tracked across AdWords customers’ websites. As part of the advertising measures described, TestingTime itself does not collect or process any personal data but, instead, occasionally receives statistical analysis provided by Google. Using this analysis, TestingTime can identify which of the advertising measures used are particularly effective. TestingTime does not receive any additional data from the use of advertising materials, and the user cannot be identified on the basis of this information.
(4) Due to the marketing tools used, your browser automatically establishes a direct connection with the Google server. TestingTime has no influence on the amount of data that is collected by Google through the use of this tool, nor on how the data will be used, and is therefore unable to provide any information in this regard. Through the integration of AdWords conversion tracking, Google is informed that you have accessed a particular part of our website or clicked on a TestingTime ad. If you are registered with a Google service, Google can connect your visit with your account. Even if you are not registered with Google or are not logged in, there is a possibility that the provider will detect and store your IP address.
(5) You can prevent your participation in this tracking process in various ways: a) by changing the relevant setting in your browser software (specifically, rejecting third-party cookies will result in you not receiving ads from third-party providers); b) by deactivating cookies for conversion tracking by changing the settings in your browser so that cookies from the domain ‘www.gooogleadservices.com’ are blocked, https://www.google.com/settings/ads (it should be noted that this setting will be deleted if you delete your cookies); c) by deactivating interest-based advertising from providers who are signed up to the ‘About Ads’ self-regulation campaign using the link http://www.aboutads.info/choices (it should be noted that this setting will be deleted if you delete your cookies); d) by permanent deactivation in your Firefox, Internet Explorer or Google Chrome browser using the link http://www.google.com/settings/ads/plugin. You may consequently not be able to use all functions of this service to the full extent.
(1) TestingTime has Facebook components integrated on its website.
(2) The operating company of Facebook is Facebook, Inc., 1 Hacker Way, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA. If a data subject lives outside the USA or Canada, the controller for the processing of personal data is Facebook Ireland Ltd., 4 Grand Canal Square, Grand Canal Harbour, Dublin 2, Ireland.
(3) Every time you access an individual page of this website that has a Facebook component (Facebook plug-in) integrated on it, the plug-in will cause the internet browser to automatically download and display the corresponding Facebook component on your computer. A complete overview of all Facebook plug-ins can be accessed at https://developers.facebook.com/docs/plugins/. As part of this technical process, Facebook receives information about which specific page of this website you have visited.
(4) If you are logged into Facebook at the same time, Facebook recognises which specific pages of this website you visit every time you access the website and for the entire duration of each visit to the website. This information is collected by the Facebook components and connected with your Facebook account by Facebook. If you click on one of the Facebook buttons integrated on our website, such as the ‘Like’ button, or if you post a comment, Facebook connects this information with your personal Facebook user account and stores this personal data.
(5) Facebook will be informed via the Facebook components whenever you visit this website, as long as you are also logged into Facebook at the time that you access it; this applies regardless of whether or not you click on the Facebook components. If you do not wish this information to be transmitted to Facebook in this way, you can prevent it by logging out of your Facebook account before accessing the website.
(6) Facebook’s published Data Policy, which can be accessed at https://www.facebook.com/about/privacy/, provides information about how personal data is collected, processed or used by Facebook. Furthermore, it explains the settings options that Facebook offers to protect your privacy. There are also various applications available that enable you to prevent data from being transmitted to Facebook.
The following table shows which tools are used by TestingTime to operate the website and carry out sales and marketing activities.
Switzerland TestingTime’s official websites are hosted by cyon in Switzerland.
USA The TestingTime server is operated by Heroku. The computer centre is located in Ireland.
USA TestingTime uses an mLabs database. All personal data is stored with mLabs. The computer centre is located in Ireland.
Dublin, Ireland TestingTime writes its log files to the servers of Logentries. The log files are automatically deleted after 7 days.
USA TestingTime uses AWS to store profile pictures of test users. The computer centre is located in Ireland.
Atlanta, GA 30308 USA TestingTime uses Mandrill to send automated and personal emails to test users and customers.
Niederlande TestingTime uses Messagebird to send automated and personal text messages to test users and customers.
USA TestingTime uses ActiveCampaign to send customers newsletters and track websites visited. This allows conclusions to be drawn automatically about a visitor’s buying intentions and target-oriented content to be delivered.
Germany TestingTime uses Unbounce to enable downloads of marketing material (e.g. white papers) via dedicated landing pages. A typical Unbounce page requires personal data so that the requested marketing material can be delivered by email.
USA TestingTime uses Zendesk to answer support requests. Requests sent to help@testingtime.com are automatically forwarded to Zendesk.
USA TestingTime uses Mailchimp to carry out test user recommendation campaigns.
USA TestingTime uses Workable to advertise vacancies and manage applications.
Switzerland TestingTime uses Bexio for bookkeeping and accounting.
1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA TestingTime uses the Google Suite as an internal office solution for email, calendar, documents and data storage.
Personal data is stored for the duration of the relevant legal retention period. After this period expires, the data is routinely deleted as long as there is no necessity for initiating or fulfilling a contract.
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR serves as the legal basis for processing operations for which TestingTime receives consent for a particular purpose. If processing of personal data is required to fulfil a contract to which you are party, the processing is then based on Art. 6(1)(b) GDPR. The same applies for processing operations that are necessary for carrying out pre-contractual measures. Where TestingTime is subject to a legal obligation that requires personal data to be processed, the processing will be based on Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR. In rare cases, the processing of personal data may be necessary in order to protect your vital interests or those of another natural person. In such case, the processing will be based on Art. 6(1)(d) GDPR. Finally, processing operations may also be based on Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR. This is the legal basis for operations which are not covered by any of the aforementioned legal bases if the processing is required to serve the legitimate interests of TestingTime or a third party, as long as your interests, fundamental rights and freedoms do not override them. The legitimate interests of TestingTime consist of carrying out our business operations.

matches:
Art. 9
Art. 6
Art. 6
Art. 6
Art. 6
Art. 6
Art. 6


text:
In the past few days, the federal government has filed a bevy of briefs expressing the views of the United States on issues ranging from the interpretation of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act to California’s ban on foie gras. The justices often pay close attention to the government’s recommendations; if they follow that practice here, they are not likely to add many new cases from this batch to their docket, because the government recommended that the Supreme Court grant review in just one case, involving the sweep of federal immigration law.
In Kansas v. Garcia, the state asked the justices to review a decision by the Kansas Supreme Court that reversed Ramiro Garcia’s conviction for identity theft after he used someone else’s Social Security number. The Kansas Supreme Court ruled that the state’s prosecution was superseded by the Immigration Reform and Control Act, a federal law that bars employers from knowingly employing undocumented immigrants.
The Supreme Court called for the government’s views in April, and yesterday the solicitor general filed a brief agreeing with Kansas that the court should take up the case. The federal law at issue prevents states from using information on or attached to a Form I-9, the form used to verify eligibility to work in the United States, in a criminal prosecution, the government told the justices, but it does not prohibit states from prosecuting someone using “information drawn from documents other than the I-9.” Even if there is no clear conflict between the Kansas Supreme Court’s decision and those of other federal courts of appeals and state supreme courts, the government explained, the Kansas Supreme Court’s ruling “is nevertheless an outlier” because it is so “expansive.” The government urged the justices not to take up a broad second question presented in the state’s petition involving the state’s police powers, but it suggested that the justices also consider whether, even if Congress did not say so specifically, Kansas’ prosecution of Garcia is nonetheless pre-empted, under a doctrine known as implied pre-emption.
In the third case, Association des Éleveurs de Canard et d’Oies du Québec v. Becerra, the justices have been asked to intervene in a challenge by a group of Canadian duck and goose farmers to California’s ban on foie gras (which the farmers describe as “perhaps the most maligned (and misunderstood) food in the world”). The farmers argue that the ban is superseded by federal laws governing the sale of poultry products in the United States; California’s attorney general counters that the state’s law is intended to prevent animal cruelty – a subject not addressed by the federal laws at issue.
The federal government urged the justices to stay out of all three cases. It argued that Missouri v. California and Indiana v. Massachusetts were not suitable cases for the court to exercise its original jurisdiction, “which the Court has repeatedly stated should be exercised only sparingly.” And it told the justices that the California law on foie gras was not trumped by federal agricultural laws; moreover, the lower court’s decision did not conflict with any ruling by either the Supreme Court or the federal courts of appeals.
The False Claims Act allows both the government and private individuals to bring lawsuits (to recover up to three times the damages incurred by the government) alleging fraud in government contracting. If the lawsuit is successful, a private party can receive part of the funds recovered by the government. In Gilead Sciences Inc. v. United States ex rel. Campie, the justices have been asked to decide whether an FCA lawsuit can go forward when the government continues to pay for a product – here, drugs used to treat HIV – even after it learns about allegations that manufacturers had made false statements to the Food and Drug Administration about where it would produce the active ingredients in the drugs.
City of Cibolo v. Green Valley Special Utility District arises from a dispute over efforts to provide sewer services in an area between Austin and San Antonio. In 2003, the utility district received a federal loan to fund its water service; it has certificates giving it the exclusive rights under state law to provide water and sewer services. Under federal law, when a rural utility receives such a loan, it is protected against competition for the “service provided or made available through” the utility while the loan is outstanding.
The questions presented in the case are whether the law applies only to the service funded by the loan – here, water but not sewer – and whether a duty to provide the service is enough to establish that the service has been provided. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled for the utility, and the city (which also seeks to provide the services) asked the Supreme Court to weigh in.
The solicitor general agreed with the city that the 5th Circuit’s ruling is “incorrect,” but he nonetheless urged the Supreme Court to deny review, telling the justices that the case could soon be moot because the utility has applied for a loan for its sewer system. The justices should not review the second question presented in the city’s petition, the solicitor general added, because the city did not raise it in the lower court.
de Csepel v. Republic of Hungary is yet another chapter in the battles over art seized by the Nazis and their allies during World War II. The art collection at the heart of this case was confiscated from the family of Baron Mor Lipot Herzog, who filed a lawsuit against Hungary and its museums in federal district court in Washington, D.C., to try to recover the art, arguing that the art had been taken in violation of international law.
Hungary countered that it cannot be sued in U.S. courts because a federal law, the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, gives it immunity. The FSIA contains an exception that would allow lawsuits when “rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue”; the question that the court has been asked to review is whether the exception applies to the family’s case. After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that it did not, the family went to the Supreme Court, which asked the federal government to weigh in.
In Osage Wind v. Osage Minerals Council, the justices have been asked to take up a dispute arising from the development of a wind-energy project on land in Oklahoma established as a reservation for the Osage Nation. There are two questions at issue in the case: whether the minerals council could appeal a decision against the United States in a lawsuit that the government had filed; and whether Osage Wind engaged in “mining” – for which it needed a mineral lease – when it removed soil, sand and rock to build cement foundations for wind turbines. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit answered both questions in the affirmative, prompting Osage Wind to seek Supreme Court review.
The solicitor general urged the justices to deny review, telling them that although only parties to a case may normally appeal a judgment against them, there is a “narrow exception” to that rule that the minerals council satisfies. And the “interpretation of the word ‘mining’ in [the Department of the] Interior’s regulations governing mineral leases on Indian lands” also does not warrant Supreme Court review, the government wrote.

matches: v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v.


The USPTO issued a notice of proposed rule making on 5 January 2012 to address the amendment of 35 U.S.C §122 by the AIA authorizing pre-grant submissions to the USPTO with comments. Comments to the USPTO are due 5 March 2012. The countdown has begun.
The AIA amends 35 USC §122 by adding subparagraph (e) effective 16 September 2012. Subparagraph (e) will permit anonymous third-party submissions of printed publications to the USPTO for the examiner’s consideration together with comments regarding the relevance of each publication. The submission must be filed with the USPTO (a) prior to issuance of a notice of allowance and (b) prior to (1) six months after publication of the patent application or (2) issuance of the first Office action on the merits, whichever of (1) or (2) is later. In view of the time it has taken the USPTO to process patent applications, the first event to cut off third-party pre-grant submissions will generally be the first Office action on the merits.
The USPTO proposes to implement this change by replacing 37 CFR §1.99 with new 37 CFR §1.290 and amending current 37 CFR §1.291 governing third-party protests against pending applications.
Current 37 CFR §1.99 limits third-party submissions to a maximum of 10 printed documents and a time period of two months from the date of publication of the patent application and prohibits comments regarding the relevance of the documents submitted. 35 USC §122(e) allows for an unlimited number of documents, grants longer time periods for submission than current 37 CFR §1.99 and, contrary to 37 CFR §1.99, requires comments regarding relevance regardless of the publication status of the application.
Under these circumstances, the proposed removal of 37 CFR §1.99 appears to be a reasonable resolution of the conflict.
New 37 CFR §1.290 does not add anything to the requirements of new subparagraph (e) of 35 USC §122 other than specifying how to submit the printed documents to the USPTO.
Current 37 CFR §1.291 already permits third-party submission of printed publications with comments regarding their relevance (referred to therein as a “protest”). In addition, this rule allows third parties to submit information other than printed publications, such as evidence concerning inequitable conduct before the USPTO (see 37 CFR §1.291(e)), which appears to be outside the scope of 35 USC §122(e) AIA.
This rule further requires that the third-party submission must be served on the applicant and, if the application has been published, the third-party must obtain applicant’s consent to admission of the submission.
The proposed amendments to 37 CFR §1.291 are mainly clarifications. Subparagraph (b) would be amended to require submission of a post-publication submission prior to issuance of a notice of allowance rather than “matched with the application in time to permit review during prosecution”. The amendments to subparagraph (c) relate solely to how to cite the submitted documents. In essence, 37 CFR §1.291 would remain essentially unchanged.
As amended, this rule would continue to include submission of documents beyond the scope of 35 USC §122(e) AIA. As an administrative agency, the USPTO is generally not permitted to implement changes extending beyond statutory authority.
In view of the similarities between these proposed rules, what happens when a third-party plans to submit a printed publication with comments in a time frame compatible with both 37 CFR §§1.290 and 291? Can the third-party arbitrarily choose which rule applies? Or must the third-party comply with both rules? What would be the purpose of having two rules governing the same activity?
New subparagraph (e) of amended 35 USC §122 will require a third-party statement of relevance regardless of whether or not the application has been published even though subparagraph (c) still does not allow post-publication protests without the applicant’s consent. Continuing to define a protest as any third-party submission with comments seems no longer appropriate.
Subparagraph (c) of 35 USC §122 refers to a protest “or other form of pre-issuance opposition”. This seems to suggest an equivalence between the term “protest” and the term “opposition”. An opposition implies a contested matter in which the third-party becomes a party to the proceedings before the Office with ensuing rights to participate in those proceedings and appeal against adverse decisions. It seems quite plausible that Congress did not want to allow participation during examination to the point that the third-party could become a party to the proceedings.
The fact that the AIA places authority for conducting post grant review and inter partes review proceedings with the TTAB and not with the examining corps. (as is currently the case with inter partes reexamination) also suggests a desire to limit the participation of third parties during the pre-grant phase to the initial submission.
This objective seems to already be achieved by proposed new 37 CFR §1.290, which does not provide for third-party participation. Therefore, one alternative to amending 37 CFR §1.291 may be to also remove that rule along with the removal of 37 CFR §§1.99 and 292.
What is your view? Should Rule 291 be deleted? Are there alternatives?
Comments may be sent to the USPTO via e-mail address preissuance_submissions@uspto.gov.


text: 746 of riparian owners was not in force in that jurisdiction;m that the law of prior appropriation had existed under the Republic of Mexico and had been the settled law of the Territory by legislation, custom, and judicial decision;198 and that the appropriation doctrine had superseded the riparian doctrine as a matter of necessity arising from the climatic and agricultural conditions of the region.199 The State supreme court has held to the same effect.200 New Mexico, while not the first State to enact ground-water legisla- tion, has pioneered in this field in that its ground-water administrative statute, after having been declared unconstitutional and subsequently reenacted in corrected form, was the first of the Western State ground- water statutes to be put into active operation and has set the pattern for much of the subsequent legislation in that field in the West. The first New Mexico statute, enacted in 1927,201 was declared invalid in Yeo v. Tweedy202 because it violated a constitutional prohibition against legislation by mere reference to title of preexisting legislation. However, the supreme court held in that case that the 1927 statute, while objectionable in form, was declaratory of existing law, was not subversive of vested rights of owners of lands overlying the waters of an artesian basin the boundaries of which had been ascertained, and was fundamentally sound. At the ensuing session of the legislature the present law was enacted; and it has been amended or supplemented subsequently in various particulars.203 This law provides that the waters of underground streams, channels, artesian basins, reservoirs, or lakes, having reasonably ascertainable boundaries, belong to the public and are subject to appropriation. Intending appropriators for irrigation or industrial uses of water must first make application to the State Engineer for permits. Claimants of vested ground-water rights may file declarations of their claims. Water rights not exercised for four years are forfeited. In certain instances artesian conservancy districts and the State Engineer have concurrent authority in regulating the installation and use of artesian wells.204 m Trambleyv. Luterman, 6 N. Mex. 15, 25, 27 Pac. 312 (1891). 198 United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irr. Co., 9 N. Mex. 292, 306, 51 Pac. 674 (1898). 188 Albuquerque Land & Irr. Co. v. Gutierrez, 10 N. Mex. 177, 236-237, 61 Pac. 357 (1900); Hagerman Irr. Co. v. McMurry, 16 N. Mex. 172, 181-182, 113 Pac. 823 (1911). 200 Snow v. Abalos, 18 N. Mex. 681, 693, 140 Pac. 1044 (1914); Carlsbad Irr. Dist. v. Ford,46 N. Mex. 335, 341,128 Pac. (2d) 1047 (1942). 201N. Mex. Laws 1927, ch. 182. 202 Yeo v. Tweedy, 34 N. Mex. 611, 286 Pac. 970 (1930). ¦"N. Mex. Laws 1931, ch. 131; Stats. 1941, Ann., §§ 77-1101 to 77-1111; Laws 1943, ch. 70; Laws 1947, ch. 21; Laws 1949, ch. 178. 204 N. Mex. Stats. 1941, Ann., §§ 77-1201 to 77-1212. See Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy Dist. v. Peters, 50 N. Mex. 165, 183, 173 Pac. (2d) 490 (1945,1946).


· The Buck Act extends federal jurisdiction to anyone receiving federal funds.
· The doctrine of Tacit Procuration grants them the power of attorney.
· You enriched yourself at others' expense, thereby creating an obligation, per the definition of “constructive contract”.
· You claimed that you were eligible for benefits available only to wards of a foreign welfare program. According to James Madison it “is an absurdity” to claim that the Constitution allows any federal benefits to the common man.
· You voluntarily claimed citizenship within your federal government. (Kitchens case) Thereby giving up your natural rights.
· Taxes (and along with it, the brutal force needed to collect) are legal if you applied for a government benefit "for which it can ask a return." (Supreme Court’s Murdock case).
· You have a government fictitious (intended to deceive) all capitalized name on your ID cards. They are not even allowed to address you by your Christian name.
· By claiming to be a US resident, rather than an inhabitant, you've agreed to remain on your lord’s plantation.
· Even the definition of `allegiance' proves that you have an "Obligation of fidelity and obedience" to your federal lord.
· You cannot even challenge jurisdiction once you avail yourself of any benefits. (Supreme Court’s Ashwander case).
· They own the equitable rights to your labor, you pledged yourself as collateral.
· Your status is irrevocable.
Now you're ready for the bad news.
The takeover of the world is now complete. The foreign takeover of America is now complete. Your federal government went bankrupt and was surrendered to a foreign creditor in 1933, and ceased all operations. Your federal government now acts ONLY as agents of their foreign masters. You owe absolute allegiance to your foreign owners. The two-horned second Beast that issues SSNs was revealed when the US government went bankrupt in 1933.
You have already volunteered into this system. It is already a done deal. It is irrelevant that President Bush, the elder, told the UN that the New World Order was America’s goal. It is irrelevant that Clinton’s 1993 national security directive declared its intent to put U.S. troops under UN command.
Here are 8 little topics. See if you can connect the dots and see the Big Picture. People; Catch a clue.
In the year 1320 the Scots made the Declaration of Arbraoath, which was a plea to the Pope to replace the British King. So soon we forget.
"... to capture, vanquish and subdue the Sarccens, pagans and other enemies of Christ to take all their possessions and property and to put them into perpetual slavery."
Spain's King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella were Catholic monarchs who financed Columbus.
Christopher Columbus went forth to declare lands and inhabitants of the New World as property of the Catholic Church. I repeat again: "... to take all their possessions and property and to put them into perpetual slavery."
On May 3, 1493 upon confirming the discovery of the New World, Pope Alexander the sixth, issued the Intercetera Bull: "The Catholic faith ... be everywhere increased and spread and barbarous Nations be overthrown and brought to the faith..."
In Papal Bull of September 26, 1493 entitled "Dudum Siquidem" Pope Alexander VI extended Spain's rights to the New World. Spain's rights come from the Pope (if the Pope did indeed have legitimate right to Spain). Columbus' Book of Privileges written in 1502 before his final voyage, a copy of which is in the US National Archives, has a transcription of this Papal Bull.
If true, then the Pope has a legitimate claim on America. Both from the Spanish and English roots.
Act of Supremacy (1534) vested in the king power to declare and punish heresies. Henry VIII burned copies of the English translation of the New Testament. Tyndale was executed in 1536 for translating the Bible into English. This is entirely consistent with the Catholic censorship of books required by their Fifth Lateran Council, Session 10 (and earlier Bible ban by their Council of Toulouse*). Queen Elizabeth forbid preaching on December 27, 1558. (But she was gracious enough to allow the reading of “the Ten Commandments in the vulgar tongue, without exposition or addition of any manner, sense, or meaning to be applied and added...”) This is entirely consistent with the Catholic censorship of preachers required by their Fifth Lateran Council, Session 11. The Bible was banned until King James published his sanitized translation of the Bible in 1611. The Bible wasn’t all that was burned. When Mary I restored the Roman Catholic Church she burned 300 Protestants who had been excommunicated by the Pope.
The Catholics then settled Maryland as a Catholic colony, named for the Virgin Mary. Even Encarta says that Maryland was created as a refuge for English Catholics. Lord Baltimore, whose father was the Secretary of State to Charles I, founded Maryland. His property in the 1663 property records is called “Rome”. This information was in earlier editions of the Catholic Encyclopedia under the article on John Carroll, but it was deleted from the 1967 edition to keep you from knowing that Washington D.C. was built on property titled to Rome.
· and to put them into perpetual slavery."
Social Security Administration Headquarters are not in Washington DC. They are in Baltimore. Social Security Numbers and Cards are issued from Baltimore.
After the Revolutionary War King George III and Ben Franklin signed The Treaty of Paris in 1783. This allows the United States to exist. Ben Franklin did not sign the treaty as a representative of the American people, he signed it with his title of Esquire, as an agent of the King. The very treaty that allows the US to exist also acknowledges that King George retains his title over the Holy Roman Empire and the United States of America as Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector. Did your government school teach you this?
Congress somehow knew when they passed the Residence Act of July 16, 1790 that a large tract of land along the Potomac would become available (By the way, according to British Legal dictionaries, the word `Residence' means `agent'). And, right on schedule, on March 30, 1791 seventeen Maryland landowners signed agreements with President Washington to donate and sell, what were termed "reservations," that would become Washington DC.
The District of Columbia is a district in Maryland. A state's border is not changed just because someone sells his property. The District of Columbia is still on Maryland soil. The current Maryland state constitution does not define its’ boarders. Maryland even kept Washington DC from freeing the slaves in 1850; go to the Maryland archives Volume 102, Volume 1, Debates 660 at www.mdarchives.state.md.us/megafile/msa The original charter of Maryland is available at www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/states/ma01.htm also see www.archivesofmaryland.net. Notice that the English charter for Maryland requires all exports from Maryland to go exclusively to England.
By rights, the Catholic church has a legitimate claim to anything attached to Washington DC. Your US government officially recognizes this particular religion. The US has an ambassador to the Vatican. Washington DC has the National Cathedral. Georgetown University is a Catholic university controlling, to an unknown extent, political thought.
The District of Columbia is a district within Maryland. The District of Columbia is land cession from Maryland. `Cession' is not the word `ceded'. The word "cession" is used in your Constitution in Article 1, section 8 clause 17 for the government acquisition of Washington DC. It does not use words that imply permanent federal jurisdiction, or even federal land title to Washington, DC. Cession, in ecclesiastical law means, "... vacating a benefice without proper dispensation." And just in case you were afraid to ask: The word "Benefice" is defined in Black's Law Dictionary as "A term derived from the feudal law, in which it signified a permanent ... estate held by feudal tenure." Original States are church property (see Appendix M). Maryland was the Catholic’s state. If the Pope did not properly vacate the benefice known as Washington DC, then the Pope still has a legitimate claim to this permanent estate held by feudal tenure, and all property attached to it, and all future income from that property.
I want to again remind you that you cannot complain. The Supreme Court says, 92 US 551, "It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government."
If you think this excuses you from Roman law, think again. The Supreme Court’s phrase “so far as applicable” remains unexplained, but if Maryland can keep Washington DC from freeing slaves in 1850, what chance do you have after swearing an oath to be their permanent ward?
Standing atop the US Capitol Dome (esteemed above all others, out in the open for all to behold, a most prominent symbol on the only building in Washington DC from which emanates your authority to control your civil servants) is the goddess Minerva wearing a crown decorated with five pointed pentagrams. This statue was made IN ROME by artist Thomas Crawford. The ceiling of the Capitol dome is a painting by Italian artist Constantino Brumidi that depicts the Apotheosis of George Washington. Surrounding George Washington are figures of gods, some 15 feet tall. They include Ceres, Vulcan, Mercury, Neptune, Minerva and 13 state goddesses pictured as protectors of American ideals. Shown as the intermediary between heaven and earth is the goddess Justitia, followed by an eagle. Notice that the eagle is symbolic of defying God’s laws, such as gravity. Notice that all the people below the eagle are crouching.
Is their “In god We Trust” the God that you trust?
An oath is always a religious ritual. Did you swear a perjury oath to their god in order to get a graven mark issued by a final world government so you could buy and sell?
According to the book Art in the United States Capitol, which is House Document number 94-660, in the painting on the rotunda ceiling there is a depiction of America handing to Ceres, who is the Roman goddess of agriculture, a team of horses pulling a reaper. I thought this would have been the other way around; that gods provide for people. Perhaps this symbolizes the famine curse that will soon hit America. Ezekiel 14:13 "Son of man, if a country sins against me by being unfaithful and I stretch out my hand against it to cut off its food supply and send famine upon it and kill its men and their animals." There is much more to the symbolism in this painting. Young America is depicted as a freed slave (wearing a temporary liberty cap) whose liberty is a privilege that can be revoked at any time. By the way: In a 65 foot tall statue named “Republic,” unveiled in 1893, by artist Daniel Chester French (he is famous for his seated Lincoln in the Lincoln Memorial), this liberty cap had been removed by “Republic” and is displayed on a pole as a trophy.
For more information on the early history of Washington D.C. see David Ovason’s book The Secret Architecture of our nation’s Capitol. By Harper Collins Publishing ISBN 0-06-019537-1.
The phrase "supreme Law of the Land" is used in the US Constitution, Article 6, paragraph 2 to refer equally to treaties as well as to your Constitution itself.
A treaty with Tripoli ratified by two-thirds of the Senate and signed by President Adams in June of 1797 correctly states in Article 11: "... the government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion...”. This quote is from the English language version signed by President Adams, in US archives, even though the original foreign version of this treaty is now missing this controversial clause.
President Adams and two thirds of the Senators in 1797 knew the truth about Washington DC.
In Appendix O I explain that the judicial branch of government no longer exists. You have never known the real judicial system. You have only known Satan's counterfeit.
I have not confirmed this yet, but if you want to do some research, please verify that The Supreme Court in Cromelin v. US confirmed that US District judges are not employees of the US government.
Topic 3: PERSONS are government property.
As explained in appendix C, US citizens are citizens of your federal government. But not state citizens. Read Appendix C now. As I explained, government entitlements such as social security or welfare, can only be appropriated for those persons that are wards of the government administered program.
Topic 4: You do not have the authority to buy or sell.
Just as it is in any corporate takeover, employees automatically become the subordinates of the new management, you likewise were surrendered to the new management. Except that your status is permanent and irrevocable.
In exchange for federal entitlements, the 1936 Conference of Governors agreed to pledge the earnings and earning power of the individuals of each State to overcome the bankruptcy. They never did overcome the bankruptcy.
The International Monetary Fund is the bankruptcy receivership. The Secretary of the Treasury is the US governor of the bankruptcy receivership. I will now prove that he owns you. Title 12 United States Code, section 95(b) gives the Secretary of the Treasury complete power over you. Whatever drastic actions he wants to take in order to control you are already authorized by law. His actions "heretofore or hereafter taken" have already been pre-approved by congress in 1933. This law claims its authority comes from the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, as amended. This 1917 Act regulates and punishes trading with the enemy. When your nation was conquered in 1933, you were acknowledged as the new government's enemy! It's just like any other war where the victor's occupation forces take over government operations after the surrender. The phrase "as amended" in 12 U.S.C. § 95(b) means that, on March 9, 1933, domestic transactions were removed from the exclusions to the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act (40 Stat L. 411, subdivision b of section 5). Trading with the Enemy is always illegal. Prior to March 9, 1933 domestic transactions were always legal. Domestic transactions must be legal because civil servants were never delegated the authority to make their masters’ transactions illegal. After March 9, 1933 all domestic transactions are illegal. Your nation has been conquered. You are the enemy of the occupation forces. Again: trading with the enemy is always illegal, but now your domestic trading is with the enemy of the foreign occupiers. Domestic transactions can now be regulated and punished. I repeat: domestic transactions are illegal. NO MAN MIGHT BUY OR SELL. Biblical prophecy has come true! Don't be deceived just because he hasn't yet cracked down completely.
It is lawful to trade with surrendered people. It is illegal to trade with the unsurrendered enemy. But guess who surrendered. It is those who fall for the deception and agree to be regulated by the Secretary of the Treasury’s “actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken...”.
Excerpts from the "United Nations Secretariat, Revised System of National Accounts Draft Chapters and No. 90-24912-2005-1AC" section F.5 International Organization, 68(3); section G. The Residence of Institutional Units; section G.1 Introduction 70.
I have not been able to find this document, nor have I been able to contact Mr. Garcia.
While I'm speaking of the topic of not having any authority to buy or sell, there is another topic to consider. If you think that you will be able to barter openly when the crackdown comes, or somehow work for Christian IOUs, think again. No one has the authority to buy or sell, and that includes barter. The Credit Control Act, Public Law 91-151, section 206(11) pre-authorizes the Federal Reserve Board to "prohibit or limit any extension of credit under any circumstances the Board deems appropriate". Punishable per section 210 by a year in jail.
In 1931 the traitors in your Congress substituted your previous national anthem with your current anthem that does not mention God (Since the very definition of anthem is a “choral composition with a nonliturgical religious text” you cannot even claim to have an anthem). Then in 1933 a 32-degree Mason became president, and the coin of the realm was seized and prohibited. Gold coins, although required by your constitution as your only lawful money, were outlawed and new currency was circulated with the Latin words around the pyramid NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM announcing the New World secular order. Secular means without God. When a conquered people start using the money of the occupation forces, they, simply by their action of accepting the currency, the "coin of the realm," acknowledge the authority of the new government. You are their enemy. You have been conquered. To the victor go the spoils. "The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government."
Can using the coin of the realm be used as evidence that you've surrendered? Christ and the apostles also lived in occupied territory. Christ's statement to Render unto Caesar could very well have meant "return" the money to Caesar and do not acknowledge his claim on your nation by your use of the coin of his realm. It could also have meant don't render what is God's unto Caesar (such as, for example, the firstfruits of your labor - withholding). It could also have meant that nothing belonged to Caesar because Caesar was occupying the land without authority. Example: If a citizen of occupied Europe during World War II were told "Render unto Hitler what is Hitler's, and render unto God what is God's", the citizen would understand the phrase to mean that nothing belongs to Hitler. So it was in Caesar’s Palestine - Nothing belonged to Caesar. So it is to this very day, right here in America.
To repeat the conclusions so far: The Secretary of the Treasury works for the IMF. He controls you by absolute powers that are already pre-approved by congress. When you volunteer into his jurisdiction (by signing an application for a SSN or by signing a 1040 form) you become subject to his “actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken...” You cannot buy or sell without his permission.
Topic 5: SSNs are issued by a foreign power.
The Application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 form. The Department of the Treasury, not the Social Security Administration, issues this form. Although the current SS5 forms do not state what department publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the Treasury forms. (You can get a photocopy of the SS5 you filled out by submitting form SSA-L996 to the SS Administration). I will now prove that this Department of the Treasury IS a foreign power.
Go to Title 31 US Code chapter 3 and search the list of organizations of the Department of the Treasury. You will not find the IRS listed. Allow me to repeat this essential fact is several ways, until you understand: There are two separate departments that have the same identical name. The US government’s Department of the Treasury does not have an IRS. The Department of the Treasury that has the IRS is not a part of the US government. The IRS’s Department of the Treasury is foreign. You signed up to a foreign power to get a SS number and to pay your fair share. Your Department of the Treasury is not the US government’s Department of the Treasury.
This is entirely consistent with the Treaty of Paris. The arch-treasurer of the Holy Roman Empire remains in charge of their assets here in America. The Treasury Department and their IRS must remain under a foreign power. People who have Social Security numbers must remain under this foreign Empire because the US government cannot make entitlement payments, as I explained in my “Federal Entitlements” chapter. For further proof: Go to any large library and find the United States Code Annotated. In the index look up INCOME TAX, CITIZENS and notice that the two references for income tax on citizens are for citizens living abroad and citizens about to leave the country.
The Secretary of the Treasury is the head of the Treasury Department that issues SSNs. He does not owe allegiance to the US. He has allegiance to a foreign power.
Federal Law 22 U.S.C. § 286a(a) requires the President to appoint the US Governor of the International Monetary Fund. This appointment is given to the Secretary of the Treasury (see Legislative History of Public Law 94-564 page 5942 where Congress is explaining how they are implementing the Bretton-Woods Treaty). If the President appoints someone to an official office required by law, and that position requires him to control you with powers pre-approved by Congress implementing a treaty, don't you think his salary would be paid by his employer? Title 22 US Code, section 286a(d)(1) prohibits your US government from paying the US Governor of the International Monetary Fund. That's right! His employer pays his salary. Who's chain of command are your under? [Note for those who do their homework: the "Agreement" mentioned in 22 U.S.C. 286a is the Bretton-Woods Treaty, which stipulates that the fund pay the governors. Also notice that the Secretary of the Treasury is forced to accept amendments on behalf of the US, whether we want them or not].
The Secretary of the Treasury is the US representative to the International Monetary Fund. He also one of the two US representatives to INTERPOL, and has allegiance to its' superiors.
The Secretary of the Treasury and the US Attorney General were designated as the US representatives to INTERPOL in 1958. The word “representative” is very misleading.
"In the exercise of their duties, the Secretary General and the staff shall neither solicit nor accept instructions from any government or authority outside the organization. They must abstain from any action that might be prejudicial to their international task. Each Member of the Organization shall undertake to respect the exclusively international character of the duties of the Secretary General, and the staff, and abstain from influencing them in the discharge of their duties."
That's right! The Secretary of the Treasury must abstain from advising them in the discharge of their duties. He cannot give advice; he can only take orders. He is not the US representative to the IMF; he is the IMF's manager OF the US. The Secretary of the Treasury takes orders on how to manage IMF property. You are IMF property.
Inquiring minds might want to know just what "international task" and "exclusively international character of the duties" that are being discharged. Hint: the INTERPOL emblem is a world globe with a sword through it.
The Secretary of the Treasury is not an officer of the United States. It is, of course, prohibited for US officers to act as agent of foreign principals (18 U.S.C. § 219). And, of course, US officers cannot hold office until they take an oath of office that they will bear true faith and allegiance to support the Constitution of the United States, per 5 U.S.C. § 3331. Although my letters go unanswered, I have been told that the Secretary of the Treasury has NOT taken such an oath, nor could my two FOIA requests locate an oath of office. I have also been told that an INTERPOL Internal Memorandum of June 6, 1972 required all members to expatriate from their countries. And furthermore, 8 U.S.C. § 1481(a) revokes the citizenship of anyone who takes formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign power.
To repeat the conclusions so far: You are property of a subsidiary of the International Monetary Fund. The Secretary of the Treasury administers IMF property. The Secretary of the Treasury has allegiance to foreign powers, and takes his orders from them, not from you. The Secretary of the Treasury controls federal PERSONS by absolute powers that are already pre-approved by congress. No man within his jurisdiction may legally buy or sell without his permission. If you have a Social Security Number you have a permanent irrevocable status as a federal PERSON.
Page 650 of Public Law 104-208, Part B, Title IV, in with the other defense appropriations legislation (as if you were the enemy), requires a national Identification card for all Americans. No one will be able to get a job without one. That's right! For the first time in history, your Federal Government must pre-authorize private employment contracts. The program will be administered by this same Treasury Department. This will be encoded on your state driver's license, or for those who don't drive, a separate ID card. Federal agencies will only accept state ID's that conform to Treasury standards. Do you have a problem with this?
Topic 7: You and all your labor and your children have been sold.
You are commercial merchandise, and your children are no longer protected by your Constitution that attempted to secure the blessings of liberty to your posterity.
GATT is a treaty is with an international political monster that evolved out of the European Economic Committee (EEC, also called the common market or European Union). The EEC was established at the Vatican on March 25, 1957, and controls most of all commerce in the world. The EEC is now headed by a Frenchman, Jacque Delores, a devout Catholic. The 1991 Maastricht agreement by 12 (now 15, 13 of which are socialist) European nations created an international political body with it's own parliament and tribunals, and limits the powers of member nations. This tribunal controls, to some extent, treaties of member nations. Why do they require the US to number your children? Answer: They own your children.
AND YES, MARKING YOUR CHILDREN WITH AN SSN DID SELL THEM INTO SLAVERY, JUST READ THE FIRST FIVE WORDS OF SECTION 3101(a) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, which I’ve quoted in my Common Facts chapter.
The GATT treaty forces your US government to issue Social Security Numbers to newborns. Isn't it curious that Revelation 13:12 says that the second beast, which is the beast that issues the mark, exercises the power of the first beast? Isn’t is curious that Christian infants are immediately claimed as property of the EEC beast? Revelation 12:4 says "... and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born."
If you want to do further research, start by browsing through Title 22 of the US Code, and notice all the laws that require deposits to foreign banks. Then notice that on the back of every cancelled check that you've ever written to the IRS (before 1999) has an endorsement for the payment of debt obligations of the US. That's right. Your IRS payments do not run the government. Your IRS payments do not even go to Congress for them to decide whether or not to pay their debts. Your payments are levied directly to the bankruptcy receivership, just as you would expect in any bankruptcy. (Details: they first go the states unemployment fund's bank account at the Federal Reserve Bank per section 904 of the Social Security Act , then to the UN Bank for Reconstruction and Development per 22 U.S.C. § 286, created by the Bretton Woods Treaty, then after one year they go to the IMF's Rothchild bank). Then notice that all money is backed, not by gold in Fort Knox, but by "the full faith and credit" of the United States. This means that you and your future labor are the collateral for this credit. Then recognize that the US cannot pay the National Debt. Then prepare to be seized as collateral for all that money deposited by Title 22. The GATT treaty merely takes inventory of legitimate collateral. You volunteered, so stop your mocking. You were warned not to be surety for strangers (Prov. 6:1, 11:15 , 17:18). After you are prepared to face the consequences under man's law, prepare to "be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb" per Revelation 14:10.
Peculiar things happened in 1998. Starting with the 1998 tax returns, for the first time ever, tax payment checks are made payable the US Treasury, not to the IRS. Black’s Law Dictionary Seventh edition was published and it no longer had an entry for UNITED STATES, which had always been the definition given by the Supreme Court’s Hooven decision, and a new entry “United States of America” appeared which did not have an official definition. And new currency is issued which no longer indicates which Federal Reserve Bank issued the note. Perhaps Bush the elder and Clinton were right all along. They have been telling you for years that the federal government would be privatized.
The book Guardians of the Grail by J.R. Church (ISBN 0-941241-02-5, Prophecy Publications) traces the roots of all nations' central banks including your Federal Reserve Board as well as the Bank of England, and the EEC back to the 12th century Knights Templar, who's stated objective was to own the world. If true, that would mean all the world is now enfranchised to these bankers who once owed allegiance to the Catholic Church. They are working to promote a world leader from the Morovingian clan. This includes the Habsburg dynasty whose Charles V is displayed on the ECU coin, and Juan Carlos of Spain. The definition of Protestant in Black’s Law Dictionary say that it is emperor Charles V that Protestants protest.
Topic 8: United Nations registration for SSN numbered PERSONS.
The United Nations is involved in assigning social Security Numbers to newborn children, and probably everyone else.
In the next paragraph, I am going to quote a Federal Regulation that deceptively refers to the UN as if it was New York City. To understand the legal definition of the term "New York City" as it used in the Code of Federal Regulations, you must first understand that the UN has its headquarters in New York City, and that UNITED NATIONS LAW SUPERSEDES ANY FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL LAW "WITHIN THE HEADQUARTERS DISTRICT". This is according to a federal law known as Title 22 US Code section 287(d); Section 8. Apparently New York City is on UN soil.
"(2) Birth registration document. SSA may enter into an agreement with officials of a State, including, for this purpose, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and New York City, to establish, as part of the official birth registration process, a procedure to assist SSA in assigning social security numbers to newborn children."
Perhaps someone can explain the above quoted law. Tell me if I have this right: Social Security numbers have been assigned for six decades, but now officials of the UN headquarters district can establish a new procedure to assign Social Security numbers. Hummm.
Notice the phrase "the official birth registration process". The legal definition of the word Birth has two meanings, either natural birth, or coming into legal existence. Example: a corporation has a birth. Birth is the event, such as signing a form, that creates legal existence in the eyes of the law.
After you read my notes on birth certificates, return here and study this until you convince yourself that a birth certificate is prima facie evidence that you are, at best, a PERSON without birthrights, and at worst, property of a government. Then reread my notes on the GATT treaty requiring SSNs at birth, above.
If you have a number you are a commodity in foreign commerce.
At the future fall of Babylon merchants will weep when souls cannot be traded in international commerce. Rev 18:10-20 (and notice the last item of verse 13).
You do not have the right to buy or sell. All domestic transactions are illegal. The Secretary of the Treasury, who's allegiance is to foreign powers, is already pre-approved to regulate your transactions. Your SSN comes from this same authority. Your new ID card will be issued by this same authority. The Catholic church has a legitimate claim on their property. By your own authority (signature), on a permanent irrevocable record you registered yourself into the system. This registration is somehow regulated by UN headquarters. You have a number of this authority. You cannot legally buy or sell without permission of this authority. The GATT treaty (with the EEC) requires SSNs at birth. The EEC was established at the Vatican. The National debt is owed to multinational banking cartels. These cartels might have been established by Catholic crusaders. Your national debt cannot be paid. Your future labor has been hypothecated as collateral for the national debt, and has been seized.
There are rumors that anyone who tries to get out of the Beast system has all their government files transferred to the Secret Service's Phoenix project (This is unrelated to the UFO project of the same name). The Secret Service is a branch of the Treasury Department. If anyone finds out anything, please let me know.
Deliverance? Don't count on it. There are many examples where godly nations pray for deliverance only to be further enslaved or destroyed. Psalm 74 . Ezekiel 6&7, Habakkuk 1, Isaiah 58. If God willed these godly nations to be destroyed, what chance does America have? God even warned his chosen people in 1st Samuel 8:18 (NIV): "When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, and the LORD will not answer you in that day."
Your duty was to control your servants. You failed. William Penn the founder of Pennsylvania warned us in 1681: "Unless we are governed by God, we will be ruled by tyrants."
Even God's chosen people were enslaved for tolerating a leader who sinned openly (Jerimiah 15:4).
As I said earlier, the word “cataclysm” means wash down. Prepare America for a good scrubbing. The thicker the encrusted filth, the rougher the abrasive that is needed. God has always used pagan nations to punish disobedient nations. Conquering nations are instruments of His discipline (Isa 8:4-10 , 10:5-6, 45:1-3, Jer 5:15-18, 20:4-5, 24:10, Eze 21:15-23, 30:24-26, 32:11-15).
"For our transgressions are multiplied before You, And our sins testify against us; For our transgressions are with us, And as for our iniquities, we know them: In transgressing and lying against the LORD, And departing from our God, Speaking oppression and revolt, Conceiving and uttering from the heart words of falsehood. Justice is turned back, And righteousness stands afar off; For truth is fallen in the street, And equity cannot enter. So truth fails, And he who departs from evil makes himself a prey. Then the LORD saw it, and it displeased Him That there was no justice."
"The end is now upon you and I will unleash my anger against you. I will judge you according to your conduct and repay you for all your detestable practices. I will not look on you with pity or spare you; I will surely repay you for your conduct and the detestable practices among you. Then you will know that I am the LORD. "This is what the Sovereign LORD says: Disaster! An unheard-of disaster is coming. The end has come! The end has come! It has roused itself against you. It has come! Doom has come upon you--you who dwell in the land. The time has come, the day is near; there is panic, not joy, upon the mountains. I am about to pour out my wrath on you and spend my anger against you; I will judge you according to your conduct and repay you for all your detestable practices. I will not look on you with pity or spare you; I will repay you in accordance with your conduct and the detestable practices among you. Then you will know that it is I the LORD who strikes the blow. "The day is here! It has come! Doom has burst forth, the rod has budded, arrogance has blossomed! Though they blow the trumpet and get everything ready, no one will go into battle, for my wrath is upon the whole crowd. Outside is the sword, inside are plague and famine; those in the country will die by the sword, and those in the city will be devoured by famine and plague. ...They will throw their silver into the streets, and their gold will be an unclean thing. Their silver and gold will not be able to save them in the day of the Lord's wrath. They will not satisfy their hunger or fill their stomachs with it, for it has made them stumble into sin. ...I will hand it all over as plunder to foreigners and as loot to the wicked of the earth, and they will defile it. ...Prepare chains, because the land is full of bloodshed and the city is full of violence. I will bring the most wicked of the nations to take possession of their houses; I will put an end to the pride of the mighty, and their sanctuaries will be desecrated. When terror comes, they will seek peace, but there will be none."
America will be captured, vanquished, and subdued. Or did God change?
Verse 15: "... we have made a lie our refuge and falsehood our hiding place."
Verse 18: "... when the overwhelming scourge sweeps by, you will be beaten down by it.
Verse 19: "As often as it comes it will carry you away: morning after morning, by day and by night, it will sweep through. The understanding of this message will bring sheer terror"
Verse 22: "Now stop your mocking or your chains will become heavier: the Lord, the Lord Almighty, has told me of the destruction decreed against the whole land."
"Therefore thus saith the LORD; Ye have not hearkened unto me, in proclaiming liberty, every one to his brother, and every man to his neighbour: behold, I proclaim a liberty for you, saith the LORD, to the sword, to the pestilence, and to the famine; and I will make you to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth."
Wake up. Spread the news to a lukewarm, disobedient Christianity. Time is running out.