text:
· Organised 3rd Andhra Pradesh Neuro Scientists Meet (APNSA) in collaboration with department of Neurology on 28th and 29th June, 1996.
· Conducted Workshop on Endoscopic pituitary surgery on 25th Jan2011.
· The Cherukuri Narasimham and Subhadra Devi 2nd annual oration was Conducted on 08.03.2014 by the Department of Neurosurgery, SVIMS, Tirupati. Dr. K V R SASTHRY, Ex-Professor and Head Dept. of Neurosurgery, NIMHANS, BANGALORE, was the invited faculty.
· Organized the 21st State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association) – APNEUROCON 2014 on 20th, 21st and 22nd June 2014. The pre conference workshop for Neurosurgery is titled “Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery” held on 20th June 2014 at Tirupati.
· The Cherukuri Narasimham and Subhadra Devi 3rd annual oration was Conducted on 07.03.2015 by the Department of Neurosurgery, SVIMS, Tirupati. Dr. I. Dinakar, Retd. Prof. & Head, Dept. of Neurosurgery, NIMS, Hyderabad, was the invited faculty.
· The 1st Neurosurgery chair oration was conducted on 07.03.2015 by the Department of Neurosurgery, SVIMS, Tirupati. Dr. V. Satyanarayana Retd. Prof. & Head, Dept. of Neurology, KGH, Visakhapatnam, was the invited faculty.
· The Cherukuri Narasimham and Subhadra Devi 4th annual oration was Conducted on 08.03.2016 by the Department of Neurosurgery, SVIMS, Tirupati. Dr. Prof. A.S. Hegde, Professor & Head, Dept. of Neurosurgery, NIMS,Hyderabad, was the invited faculty.
· The Srinivasa Neurosurgery Endowment Oration 1st annual oration was conducted on 01.10.2016 by the Department of Neursurgey, SVIMS, Tirupati. Dr. V.K. Khosla, Director, Dept. of Neurosurgery, Fortis Hospital, Mohali, was the invited faculty.
· The Cherukuri Narasimham and Subhadra Devi 5th annual oration was Conducted on 08.03.2017 by the Department of Neurosurgery, SVIMS, Tirupati. Dr. V. Rajshekar, Professor of Neurosurgery, Dept. of Neurological Sciences, CMC, Vellore, was the invited faculty.
· The Srinivasa Neurosurgery Endowment Oration 2nd annual oration was conducted on 17.10.2017 by the Department of Neursurgey, SVIMS, Tirupati. Dr. D. Raja Reddy, (FRCS, FRACS) senior consultant, Neurosurgeon, Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, Ex-Director, NIMS, Hyderabad, was the invited faculty.
· The Cherukuri Narasimham and Subhadra Devi 6th annual oration was Conducted on 08.03.2017 by the Department of Neurosurgery, SVIMS, Tirupati. Dr. K. Satya Vara Prasad, Professor & HOD of Neurosurgery, KGH, Visakhapatnam was the invited faculty.
Dr B C M PRASAD attended the 21st annual conference of Scoliosis Research Society held at Valencia, Spain on 16-19 july 2014. International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques (IMAST).
Dr V V RAMESH CHANDRA attended the 21st annual conference of Scoliosis Research Society held at Valencia, Spain on 16-19 july 2014. International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques (IMAST).
Dr V V Ramesh Chandra attend the international conference – Hong Kong 2015– the Combined Congress of 12th HKIOF, 10th APSS and APPOS, presented a paper titled “Minimally Invasive TLIF using Cannulated and Fenestrated Augmented Pedicle Screws for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis in Patients with Osteoporosis” held at Hong Kong from 4th to 7th June 2015.
Dr B.C.M Prasad attended international conference “SPINE WEEK 2016” held at Singapore from 16th to 20th May 2016.
Dr V V Ramesh Chandra attended and presented a paper on “Comparative study of various minimally invasive lumbar discectomy procedures and open discectomy based on clinical outcome, muscle injury markers and post operative imaging changes” “SPINE WEEK 2016” held at Singapore from 16th to 20th May 2016.
Dr V V Ramesh Chandra attended and presented a paper on “Percutaneous TLIF with PMMA augmented pedicle screws” “SPINE WEEK 2016” held at Singapore from 16th to 20th May 2016.
o Dr. V.V. Ramesh Chandra, Podium presentation – “Clinicoradiological analysis of cervical disc replacement- our experience” at NSI, Mumbai on December, 2013.
o Dr. V.V. Ramesh Chandra, Poster presentation – “ Minimally invasive TLIF using cannulated and fenestrated augmented pedicle screws for lumbar spondylolisthesis in patients with osteoporosis” at NSI, Mumbai on December, 2013.
o Dr. V.V. Ramesh Chandra attended APNEUROCON 2013, Guntur on 13, 14 July 2013.
o Dr. VV Ramesh Chandra attended NSI Annual conference at Mumbai on 13,15 December 2013.
o Dr. VV Ramesh Chandra attended Minimal invasive Spine surgery 2013 update, Pune on December 2013.
o Dr. V. A. Kiran Kumar attended Academic program of the “Asian Australasian Society of Neurological Surgeons” (AASNS) Third International neurosurgery update at Mumbai on August 2013.
o Dr. V. Jayachandar attended Neuro navigation workshop at Fortis Hospital Bangalore on 6th, 7th Sep. 2013.
o Dr. V. Jayachandar attended CME –Back to basics neurology at SRMC CHENNAI 23rd Feb. 2013.
o Dr. M.A. Jagadish Kumar attended CME –Back to basics neurology at SRMC CHENNAI 23rd Feb. 2013.
o Dr. M.A. Jagadish Kumar attended NEUROVASCON 2013 Hyderabad on 25,26 Sep.2013.
o Dr. I. Kaushal attended APNEUROCON 2013, Guntur on 13, 14 July 2013.
o Dr. A. Sanjeev Kumar attended APNEUROCON 2013, Guntur on 13, 14 July 2013.
o Dr. M.A. Ameen attended APNEUROCON 2013, Guntur on 13, 14 July 2013.
o Dr. B C M Prasad attended CME on Metabolic Syndrome on 26.04.2014 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr. B C M Prasad attended the preconference workshop on “Minimally invasive Spine surgery” at APNEUROCON 2014 on 20th june 2014 at Tirupati and 21st State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association) – APNEUROCON 2014 on 21-22 June 2014 at Tirupati.
o Dr. B C M Prasad attended CME on Rational usage of blood on 11th October 2014 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr. B C M Prasad attended CME on Central Nervous System Infections held on 26th October 2014 at SVIMS Tirupati.
o Dr V V RAMESH CHANDRA attended CME on Metabolic Syndrome on 26.04.2014 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr V V RAMESH CHANDRA attended the preconference workshop on “Minimally invasive Spine surgery” at APNEUROCON 2014 on 20th june 2014 at Tirupati and 21st State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association) – APNEUROCON 2014 on 21-22 June 2014 at Tirupati.
o Dr V V RAMESH CHANDRA, attended work shop “1st Neuro-Endoscopic Skull Base Training Program” at Bangalore on Aug 2014.
o Dr V V RAMESH CHANDRA attended work shop “Meet the Masters –Spinal Deformity live workshop” Chennai on Aug 2014.
o Dr V V RAMESH CHANDRA attended annual conference of NSSA, “SPINE2014” and presented a paper on “Percutaneous TLIF with PMMA augmented pedicle screws” at Ahmedabad on Sep 2014.
o Dr V V RAMESH CHANDRA attended annual conference of NSSA, “SPINE2014” and presented a paper on “Cervical disc arthroplasty – clinic radiological analysis” at Ahmedabad on Sep 2014.
o Dr V V RAMESH CHANDRA attended annual conference of NSSA, “SPINE2014” and presented a paper on “Autologous stem cell transplantation in spinal cord injury” at Ahmedabad on Sep 2014.
o Dr V V RAMESH CHANDRA attended CME on Rational usage of blood on 11th October 2014 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr V V RAMESH CHANDRA attended CME on Central Nervous System Infections held on 26th October 2014 at SVIMS Tirupati.
o Dr V V RAMESH CHANDRA attended annual conference of NSI, “NSICON2014” and presented a paper on “Open Vs Minimally invasive TLIF for spondylolisthesis” on December 2014 at COIMBATORE.
o Dr V V RAMESH CHANDRA attended annual conference of NSI, “NSICON2014” and presented a paper on “Autologous stem cell transplantation in spinal cord injury” on December 2014 at COIMBATORE.
o Dr. V. A. KIRAN KUMAR attended the preconference workshop on “Minimally invasive Spine surgery” at APNEUROCON 2014 on 20th june 2014 at Tirupati and 21st State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association) – APNEUROCON 2014 on 21-22 June 2014.
o Dr. V. A. KIRAN KUMAR attended the APNEUROCON 2014, 14th annual conference of cerebrovascular society of India, held on September 5-7 2014 at NIMHANS, Bangalore.
o Dr. V. A. KIRAN KUMAR attended CME on Central Nervous System Infections held on 26th October 2014 at SVIMS Tirupati.
o Dr. V. A. KIRAN KUMAR poster presented on topic “rare cranial nerve schwannomas of VIII, X and XII cranial nerves” at skull base con2014, 16th annual conference of skull base surgery society of India held at JIPMER, Pondicherry on 10-12 October 2014.
o Dr. V. JAYACHANDAR attended CME on Metabolic Syndrome on 26.04.2014 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr. V. JAYACHANDAR attended the preconference workshop on “Minimally invasive Spine surgery” at APNEUROCON 2014 on 20th june 2014 at Tirupati and 21st State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association) – APNEUROCON 2014 on 21-22 June 2014 at Tirupati.
o Dr. V. JAYACHANDAR attended NEUROVASCON 2014 annual Neurovascular conference held at NIMHANS, BANGALORE, presented paper – under award category titled – surgical outcome of decompressive craniectomy in CVA – a retrospective study on 5-7 September 2014.
o Dr. V. JAYACHANDAR attended Neuro Critical Care workshop at NEUROVASCON 2014 at NIMHANS, BANGALORE on 5th September 2014.
o Dr. V. JAYACHANDAR attended CME on Rational usage of blood on 11th October 2014 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr. V. JAYACHANDAR attended National conference on Minimally invasive spine surgery MISSICON – 2014 at Ahmadabad, Gujarat on 22-23 November 2014.
o Dr. V. JAYACHANDAR attended Cadevene workshop on MED technique at MISSICON – 2014 Ahmadabad, Gujarat on 23rd November 2014.
o Dr. M.A. JAGADISH KUMAR attended CME on Metabolic Syndrome on 26.04.2014 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr. M.A. JAGADISH KUMAR attended the preconference workshop on “Minimally invasive Spine surgery” at APNEUROCON 2014 on 20th june 2014 at Tirupati and 21st State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association) – APNEUROCON 2014 on 21-22 June 2014 at Tirupati.
o Dr. A. SANJEEV KUMAR attended “Walter E.Dandy educational course” held at Mahabalipuram, Chennai on 10-11 January 2014.
o Dr. A. SANJEEV KUMAR attended “Neuro update 2014” held at Chennai on 15-16 February 2014.
o Dr. A. SANJEEV KUMAR attended “Shine 2014” held at Chennai on 4-6 April 2014.
o Dr. A. SANJEEV KUMAR attended the preconference workshop on “Minimally invasive Spine surgery” at APNEUROCON 2014 on 20th june 2014 at Tirupati and 21st State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association) – APNEUROCON 2014 on 21-22 June 2014 at Tirupati.
o Dr. A. SANJEEV KUMAR attended CME on “Rational usage of blood” on 11th October 2014 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr. MOHAMMAD ABDUL AMEEN attended “Walter E.Dandy educational course” held at Mahabalipuram, Chennai on 10-11 January 2014.
o Dr. MOHAMMAD ABDUL AMEEN attended “Neuro update 2014” held at Chennai on 15-16 February 2014.
o Dr. MOHAMMAD ABDUL AMEEN attended “Shine 2014” held at Chennai on 4-6 April 2014.
o Dr. MOHAMMAD ABDUL AMEEN attended the preconference workshop on “Minimally invasive Spine surgery” at APNEUROCON 2014 on 20th june 2014 at Tirupati and 21st State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association) – APNEUROCON 2014 on 21-22 June 2014 at Tirupati.
o Dr. B C M Prasad delivered a lecture on “congenital craniovertebral junction anomalies- problem based approach” at “Neurosurgery Educational workshop and seminars” (NEWS) on 8th March 2014 at Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences Hyderabad.
o Dr. B C M Prasad delivered a lecture on “Management of Craniovertebral Junction anomalies” at “VIZAG NEUROCLUB” on 26.12.2014 at Visakapatnam.
o Dr. B C M Prasad attended CME on “Holistic approach towards rheumatiod arthritis” conducted by the Department of Physiotherapy on 09.01.2015 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr. B C M Prasad delivered a lecture on “Neuro related problems, diagnostics and those which can be cured through surgery and latest in Neurosurgery” on 20.01.2015 by research center imarat (RCI) RCI Science Council (DRDO) at Hyderabad.
o Dr. B C M Prasad attended a joint CME program organized by Department of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Radiology on 7th February 2015 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr. B C M Prasad attended 2nd annual asram neurosurgery conference and presented a debate on “Microdiscectomy v/s Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy” at Eluru on 24th- 26th July 2015.
o Dr. B C M Prasad attended 2nd annual asram neurosurgery conference and delivered a lecture on “Spinal endoscopy indications and techniques” at Eluru on 24th- 26th July 2015.
o Dr. B C M Prasad delivered a lecture on “CT guidelines for Traumatic Brain Injury” at Continuing Medical Education programe in Narayana Medical College, Nellore on 24.12.2015.
o Dr V V Ramesh Chandra attended 28th annual conference of Association of Spine Surgeons of India (ASSI) - ASSICON2015 and presented “Extradural spinal arachnoid cysts institutuional experience” at Pune on 23rd -25th January 2015.
o Dr V V Ramesh Chandra attended 28th annual conference of Association of Spine Surgeons of India (ASSI) - ASSICON2015 and presented on “Autologous stem cell transplantation in spinal cord injury” at Pune on 23rd- 25th January 2015.
o Dr V V Ramesh Chandra attended a joint CME program organized by department of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Radiology on 7th February 2015 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr V V Ramesh Chandra attended 2nd annual asram neurosurgery conference and presented on “Endoscopic lumbar discectomy - multiple techniques” at Eluru on 24th- 26th July 2015.
o Dr V V Ramesh Chandra attended Asian Congress of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Techniques (ACMISST) and presented “Percutaneous TLIF with PMMA augmented pedicle screws” at Goa on 24th - 27th September 2015.
o Dr V V Ramesh Chandra attended 2nd Annual conference “MISSICON” and presented “Percutaneous TLIF with PMMA augmented pedicle screws” at Mumbai on 24th - 25th October 2015.
o Dr V V Ramesh Chandra attended 64th annual conference of neurological society of India (NSICON2015) and presented a paper on “Comparative study of various minimally invasive lumbar discectomy procedures and open discectomy based on clinical outcome, muscle injury markers and postoperative imaging changes” at Hyderabad on 17th - 20th December 2015.
o Dr V V Ramesh Chandra delivered a lecture on “CT anatomy of Traumatic Brain Injury” at Continuing Medical Education programe in Narayana Medical College, Nellore on 24.12.2015.
o Dr. V. Jayachandar attended a joint CME program organized by Department of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Radiology on 7th February 2015 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr. V. Jayachandar attended Dr. P.S Ramani’s cadaver work shop 2015 from 31st January 2015 to 1st February 2015 at Mumbai.
o Dr. A. Sanjeev Kumar attended a joint CME program organized by Department of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Radiology on 7th February 2015 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr. B.C.M. Prasad attended CME on “Spinal Deformity Correction” conducted by Sri Sathya Sai institute of Higher Medical Sciences, on 02nd - 3rd January at Bangalore.
o Dr. B.C.M. Prasad delivered a lecture on “Microsurgical anatomy of CP angle” at NRI Medical College, Guntur during 20th -21st February 2016.
o Dr. B.C.M. Prasad attended 23rd annual conference of Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientist’s Association (APNSA) “APNEUROCON2016” at Vijayawada during 25th-26th June 2016.
o Dr. B.C.M. Prasad attended 65th annual conference of the Neurological society of India; December 15th- 18th, 2016; Chennai, India.
o Dr. V V Ramesh Chandra attended 23rd annual conference of Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientist’s Association (APNSA) “APNEUROCON2016” at Vijayawada during 25th-26th June 2016.
o Dr. V V Ramesh Chandra attended as faculty and presented a paper on “Management of scoliosis surgical principles” at “3rd Annual Asram Neurosurgery Conference” during 29th -31st July 2016, Eluru, India.
o Dr. V V Ramesh Chandra attended as faculty and presented a paper on “Microsurgical tubular discectomy” at 1st ENDOSPINE Annual Andhra medical college Neurosurgery Conference during 5th- 6th November 2016, Visakhapatnam, India.
o Dr. V V Ramesh Chandra attended and presented a paper on “Pediatic spinal deformity an institutional experience” at 65th annual conference of the Neurological society of India, December 15th- 18th, 2016, Chennai, India.
o Dr. V V Ramesh Chandra attended and presented a poster on “Posterior only vertebral column resection institutional experience” at 65th annual conference of the Neurological society of India, December 15th- 18th, 2016, Chennai, India.
o Dr C. Krishna Mohan attended and presented a poster on “spinal cord tumors” at 8th annual conference of Indian Society Of Neuro-Oncology (ISNOCON2016) at Hyderabad during 1st - 3rd April 2016.
o Dr. A. Sidda reddy attended CME on “Spinal Deformity Correction” conducted by Sri Sathya Sai institute of Higher Medical Sciences, on 02nd - 3rd January at Bangalore.
o Dr. A. Sidda reddy attended CME - conducted by NRI Medical College, Guntur during 20th -21st February 2016.
o Dr. A. Sidda reddy attended 65th annual conference of the Neurological society of India, December 15th- 18th, 2016, Chennai, India.
o Dr B.C.M. Prasad attended and deliver a lecture as faculty for APASICON held on 19.08.2017 at Guntur Medical College, Guntur.
o Dr B.C.M. Prasad attended “NSICON2017” held at Nagpur from 30th November to 3rd December 2017.
o Dr B.C.M. Prasad attended as guest faculty for clinical discussion at “Neuroclinics2017” (under the aegis of APNSA) held from 23.12.2017 to 24.12.2017 at Guntur Medical College, Guntur.
o Dr. V.V Ramesh chandra attended and deliver a lecture “Dr. Balaparameswara Rao, symposia on MISS- spondylolisthesis” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr. V.V. Ramesh chandra attended “NSICON2017” held at Nagpur from 30th November to 3rd December 2017.
o Dr V. Bala Balaji presented a paper on “Effect of methylation status of MGMT gene on progressive free survival and overall survival of patients with GBM treated with temozolomide-based chemoradiation” at 104th Indian Science Congress held at Tirupati during 3rd -7th January 2017.
o Dr. B.V. Ravi kumar presented a poster on “posterior single stage vertebral column resection for kyphotic deformities –institutional experience” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr. V. Niranjan presented a poster on “Institutional analysis of patients of spinal dysraphism” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr. K. Venkat attended AIIMS annual complex spine workshop 2017 (AASW2017) on 16th- 18th November, 2017 at New Delhi.
o Dr. BCM Prasad gave Raja reddy Oration in TNSCON, Hyderabad, March 3,4 2018- Controversies, Nuances and Evidences in Vestibular Schwannomas.
o Dr. I. Kaushal - Podium presentation – “Clinicoradiological analysis of cervical disc replacement- our experience” at APNEUROCON 2013, Guntur on 13, 14 July 2013.
o Dr. A. Sanjeev Kumar Podium presentation -“Minimally invasive spinal fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis” at APNEUROCON 2013, Guntur on 13, 14 July 2013.
o Dr. A. Sanjeev Kumar - presented paper on “Functional outcome of Autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with complete spinal cord injury” APNEUROCON 2014” at Tirupati during 20-22 June 2014.
o Dr. M.A. Ameen - presented paper on “Outcome and management of spinal tuberculosis according to severity at a tertiary referral centre” “APNEUROCON 2014” at Tirupati during 20-22 June 2014.
o Dr. K. Pundarikakshaiah - presented paper on “Cases series on OYL, presentation and outcome” “APNEUROCON 2014” at Tirupati during 20-22 June 2014.
o Dr. C. Krishna Mohan - presented paper on “Spinal Deformity correction: Our experience” “APNEUROCON 2014” at Tirupati during 20-22 June 2014.
o Dr. Ch. Siva Subrahmanyam - presented paper on “Series on spinal cord tumors” “APNEUROCON 2014” at Tirupati during 20-22 June 2014.
o Dr. V. Bala Balaji - presented paper on “Open versus Minimally invasive TLIF” “APNEUROCON 2014” at Tirupati during 20-22 June 2014.
o Dr K Pundarikakshiah attended a joint CME program organized by Department of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Radiology on 7th February 2015 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr K Pundarikakshiah presented a paper on “Cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament and its surgical outcome” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad during 27th-28th June 2015.
o Dr C. Krishna Mohan attended a joint CME program organized by Department of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Radiology on 7th February 2015 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr C. Krishna Mohan presented a paper on “Single centre experience in surgical management of intra cranial aneurysms” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad during 27th-28th June 2015.
o Dr C. Siva Subrahmanyam attended a joint CME program organized by Department of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Radiology on 7th February 2015 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr C. Siva Subrahmanyam presented a paper on “Clinical, radiological, functional evaluation of surgical treatment in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad during 27th-28th June 2015.
o Dr C. Siva Subrahmanyam attended 64th annual conference of neurological society of India (NSICON2015) and presented a paper on “Clinical, radiological, functional evaluation of surgical treatment in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis” at Hyderabad during 17th-20th December 2015.
o Dr V. Bala Balaji attended a joint CME program organized by Department of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Radiology on 7th February 2015 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr V. Bala Balaji attended pre conference work shop on “Minimal access neurosurgery” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad on 26.06.2015.
o Dr V. Bala Balaji presented a paper on “Clinicopathalogical correlation and surgical outcome of convexity, parasagital and falcine meningioma in SVIMS” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad during 27th-28th June 2015.
o Dr V. Bala Balaji presented a poster on “Cervical spine injury with locked facets, surgical treatment and outcome” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad during 27th-28th June 2015.
o Dr B.V. Ravi Kumar attended a joint CME program organized by Department of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Radiology on 7th February 2015 at SVIMS, Tirupati.
o Dr B.V. Ravi Kumar attended pre conference work shop on “Minimal access neurosurgery” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad on 26.06.2015.
o Dr B.V. Ravi Kumar presented a paper on “Minimally Invasive TLIF using Cannulated and Fenestrated Augmented Pedicle Screws for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis in Patients with Osteoporosis” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad during 27th-28th June 2015.
o Dr B.V. Ravi Kumar presented a poster on “Middle path regimen in spinal tuberculosis” “APNEUROCON2015”at Hyderabad during 27th-28th June 2015.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan attended pre conference work shop on “Minimal access neurosurgery” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad on 26.06.2015.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan presented a poster on “An algorithmic approach for clinical management of low back ache” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad during 27th-28th June 2015.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan presented a poster on “Analysis of intra cerebral hemorrhage at a tertiary referral centre” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad during 27th-28th June 2015.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan attended 64th annual conference of neurological society of India (NSICON2015) and presented a paper on “Ossified yellow ligament clinic etiological study in a regional institute” at Hyderabad during 17th-20th December 2015.
o Dr. D.M. Sasank attended pre conference work shop on “Minimal access neurosurgery” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad on 26.06.2015.
o Dr. D.M. Sasank presented a paper on “C1-C2 pars interarticularis fixation in C1-C2 vertebra a prospective study on technical analysis and outcome” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad during 27th-28th June 2015.
o Dr. D.M. Sasank presented a poster on “Rare spinal tomours” “APNEUROCON2015” at Hyderabad during 27th-28th June 2015.
o Dr. V. Bala Balaji attended CME - conducted by NRI Medical College, Guntur during 20th -21st February 2016.
o Dr. V. Bala Balaji attended “Shine 2016” held at Chennai on 26-27 February 2016.
o Dr V. Bala Balaji attended 8th annual conference of Indian Society Of Neuro-Oncology (ISNOCON2016) and presented a poster on “Effect of methylation status of MGMT gene on progressive free survival and overall survival of patients with GBM treated with temozolomide-based chemoradiation” at Hyderabad during 1st - 3rd April 2016.
o Dr V. Bala Balaji presented a paper on “Effect of methylation status of MGMT gene on progressive free survival and overall survival of patients with GBM treated with temozolomide-based chemoradiation” “APNEUROCON2016” at Vijayawada during 25th-26th June 2016.
o Dr V. Bala Balaji presented a paper on “Effect of methylation status of MGMT gene on progressive free survival and overall survival of patients with GBM treated with temozolomide-based chemoradiation” at 65th annual conference of the Neurological society of India, December 15th- 18th, 2016, Chennai, India.
o Dr. B. V. Ravi Kumar attended CME - conducted by NRI Medical College, Guntur during 20th -21st February 2016.
o Dr. B. V. Ravi Kumar attended “Shine 2016” held at Chennai on 26-27 February 2016.
o Dr B.V. Ravi Kumar presented a paper on “Comparative study of various minimally invasive lumbar discectomy procedures and open discectomy based on clinical outcome, muscle injury markers and postoperative imaging changes” “APNEUROCON2016” at Vijayawada during 25th-26th June 2016.
o Dr B.V. Ravi Kumar presented a paper on “Comparative study of various minimally invasive lumbar discectomy procedures and open discectomy based on clinical outcome, muscle injury markers and postoperative imaging changes” at 65th annual conference of the Neurological society of India, December 15th- 18th, 2016, Chennai, India.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan attended 8th annual conference of Indian Society Of Neuro-Oncology (ISNOCON2016) and presented a poster on “Correlation between clinical presentation, imaging, pathology and gene mutations in meningiomas” at Hyderabad during 1st - 3rd April 2016.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan attended 8th annual conference of Indian Society Of Neuro-Oncology (ISNOCON2016) and presented a poster on “Study of mutations in the NF-1 gene causing NF -I in 3 successive generations in 3 different Indian families” at Hyderabad during 1st - 3rd April 2016.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan presented a paper on “Correlation between clinical presentation, imaging, pathology and gene mutations in meningiomas” “APNEUROCON2016” at Vijayawada during 25th-26th June 2016.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan presented a poster on “Study of mutations in the NF-1 gene causing NF -I in 3 successive generations in 3 different Indian families” “APNEUROCON2016” at Vijayawada during 25th-26th June 2016.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan attended national conference topic- “basic neurosurgical approaches” “ASRAM NEUROCON-2016” during 29th -31st July, at ASRAM Medical College, ELURU.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan presented a paper on “Correlation between clinical presentation, imaging, pathology and gene mutations in meningiomas” at 65th annual conference of the Neurological society of India, December 15th- 18th, 2016, Chennai, India.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan presented a poster on “Study of mutations in the NF-1 gene causing NF -I in 3 successive generations in 3 different Indian families” at 65th annual conference of the Neurological society of India, December 15th- 18th, 2016, Chennai, India.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan presented a paper on “MIS TLIF vs OPEN TLIF” at 65th annual conference of the Neurological society of India, December 15th- 18th, 2016, Chennai, India.
o Dr. D.M. Sasank attended 8th annual conference of Indian Society Of Neuro-Oncology (ISNOCON2016) and presented a paper/ top scoring abstract on “Giant Spinal Tumours” at Hyderabad during 1st - 3rd April 2016.
o Dr. D.M. Sasank attended 8th annual conference of Indian Society Of Neuro-Oncology (ISNOCON2016) and presented a poster on “Rare Spinal Tumours” at Hyderabad during 1st - 3rd April 2016.
o Dr. D.M. Sasank presented a paper on “Giant Spinal Tumours” “APNEUROCON2016” at Vijayawada during 25th-26th June 2016.
o Dr. D.M. Sasank presented a paper on “Correlation of neuropsychological deficits with findings on MRI/N-PET” at 65th annual conference of the Neurological society of India, December 15th- 18th, 2016, Chennai, India.
o Dr. D.M. Sasank presented a poster on “A prospective study on intraoperative application of vancomycin powder in lumbar spinal fusion surgeries” at 65th annual conference of the Neurological society of India, December 15th- 18th, 2016, Chennai, India.
o Dr. T. Srikanth attended and presented a paper on “MIS TLIF vs OPEN TLIF” “APNEUROCON2016” at Vijayawada during 25th-26th June 2016.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan presented a poster on “Novel mutations observed in three different Indian neurofibromatosis type 1 families” at 104th Indian Science Congess held at Tirupati during 3rd -7th January 2017.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan attended “Shine 2017” held at Chennai on 24-26 February 2017.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan presented a poster on “Factors predicting outcome in OYL done in a tertiary care hospital -10 years analysis” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr. A. Sudarsan presented a paper on “Novel mutations discovered in meningioma patients operated in a tertiary care hospital” at NSICON2017 held at Nagpur from 30th November to 3rd December 2017.
o Dr. A. Sudarsan presented a paper on “Novel mutations discovered in meningioma patients operated in a tertiary care hospital” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr. D.M. Sasank presented a poster on “A prospective study on use of intraoperative application of vancomycin powder in instrumented spinal fusion surgeries” at 104th Indian Science Congess held at Tirupati during 3rd -7th January 2017.
o Dr. D.M. Sasank presented a poster on “A prospective study on use of intraoperative application of vancomycin powder in instrumented spinal fusion surgeries” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr. D.M. Sasank presented a paper on “Correlation of neuropsychologic al deficits with findings on MRI and NEUROPET in patients with MTBI” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr. D.M. Sasank attend hands on work shop on “Midas rex high speed drill system” conducted by Medtronic at KIMS, Nellore on 09.06.2017.
o Dr. D.M. Sasank attended conference on “Current concepts of cerebral revascularization” conducted by Narayana Medical College at Nellore on 21.10.2017.
o Dr. D.M. Sasank presented a poster on “A prospective study on use of intraoperative application of vancomycin powder in instrumented spinal fusion surgeries” at NSICON2017 held at Nagpur from 30th November to 3rd December 2017.
o Dr. T. Srikanth attended pre conference work shop at 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association)- APNEUROCON2017 at Nellore on 09.06.2017.
o Dr. T. Srikanth presented a poster on “Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm-SVIMS experience” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr T. Srikanth attended “Neuroclinics2017” (under the aegis of APNSA) held from 23.12.2017 to 24.12.2017 at Guntur Medical College, Guntur.
o Dr. P. Rajesh presented a poster on “Varied presentation of schwannoma- a case study series in a tertiary care hospital in south India” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr. P. Rajesh presented a paper on “Outcomes of Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for functional pituitary adenomas treated in a tertiary care hospital in south India” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr. Vivek sharma presented a paper on “A retro spective study on factors affecting good surgical outcomes in patients of ACM with syringomyelia” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr. Vivek sharma presented a poster on “Effect of cranioplasty on cerebral metabolism: A case series of 15 patients” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr Vivek sharma attended “Neuroclinics2017” (under the aegis of APNSA) held from 23.12.2017 to 24.12.2017 at Guntur Medical College, Guntur.
o Dr. Jagtap Rukmaji prakash presented a poster on “Anterior cervical disc arthroplasty (ACDA) anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) done in a tertiary care hospital in south india- 7 years experience” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr. Jagtap Rukmaji prakash presented a poster on “Remote site intracranial hemorrhage: our 10 year experience at tertiary care centre” at APNEUROCON 2017 on 9th-11th June 2017 at Nellore and 24th State conference of APNSA (Andhra Pradesh Neuroscientists Association).
o Dr T. Goutham hanu attended “Neuroclinics2017” (under the aegis of APNSA) held from 23.12.2017 to 24.12.2017 at Guntur Medical College, Guntur.

matches: V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V.


text:
"[T]he Court examined the Article 39(1) time-frame although the notice could not be proven. [The notice was allegedly given by telephone.] In this case, the buyer wished to avoid a contract that concerned fashion wear, and a notice given six weeks after the discovery of an easily discernible non-conformity (discoverable same day as delivery) was not found to be satisfactory." Andersen, Pace Review of the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods 123 and n.214.
Translation (English): Translated text of case presented below.
The transaction involved a sale of knitwear by an Italian seller to a German buyer at a time when the CISG was in effect in both countries.
". . . German law would be applicable in the event that the General Terms of Business of the [buyer] were effectively included in the contract. The [buyer] based its order on its General Terms of Purchasing for Finished Products. The [seller] is stated to have accepted the order based on its own General Terms of Business, a point that the [buyer] has denied.
". . . Assuming that [seller] had sent its General Terms of Business to the [buyer], this would have constituted a counter-offer in the sense of CISG Article 19(1). However, based on the realization of the contract, both parties were in agreement about the essentialia negotii, and it must be assumed that they waived the validity of their conflicting Terms of Business or that they derogated from the application of Article 19, taking advantage of their autonomy pursuant to Article 6. In this case, the contract would have been entered into in accordance with the terms of the CISG . . .
". . . If the [seller] did not send its General Terms of Business to the [buyer], it can still not be assumed that the [buyer's] Terms for Purchasing became part of the contract. On the one hand, the [seller] denies having received the [buyer's] General Terms of Business; on the other hand, the [buyer] did not state that it had included an Italian translation of its Terms for Purchasing. Since the language in this case was not German, the General Terms of Business written in German did not become part of the contract . . ."
The court thus denied the effect of buyer's General Terms reasoning that if they were submitted to the Italian seller, they were, in any event, written in German and not accompanied by an Italian translation. The court held that the law of seller's country (Italy) applied.
". . . In this case of a partial dissensus between the parties, the court . . . disregarded the parties' respective standardized terms and applied the background rules of the Convention. Id. The court also concluded in the alternative that the buyer's standard terms would not have become part of the contract because they were in the German language and the negotiations between the parties had been conducted in Italian. Id." Michael P. Van Alstine, "Consensus, Dissensus, and Contractual Obligation Through the Prism of Uniform International Sales Law", 37 Virginia Journal of International Law (1996) 1 at 92.
Notice of lack of conformity, timeliness of. The knitwear was received by buyer on 18 December 1992 and examined by buyer's quality assurance department on 28 December 1992, which conducted a laundry test. There was an alleged telephone notice of lack of conformity on 5 January 1993 and a written notice on 29 January 1993 which specified the nature of the lack of conformity. The court held that the telephone notice was not proven and that -- under the relevant Italian law which as it applies to notice of lack of conformity, is the CISG -- the notice of 29 January was not timely.
". . . The claim for interest is legitimate pursuant to CISG Article 78. According to it, the party that fails to pay the price of any other sum in arrears shall pay the other party [at maturity] interest for these amounts. Pursuant to CISG Articles 58, 59, the purchase price for the sweaters delivered on 8 December 1992 became due prior to the date applied by the [buyer] (9 January 1993). . . .
". . . Since CISG Article 78 leaves open the amount of the claim for interest, national law is applicable . . .
"[T]he relevant Italian law, which . . . governs the obligation for payment of interest is applicable. . . . The interest rate is 10% . . . pursuant to [the] Italian Civil Code . . ."
The [seller] plaintiff manufactures knitwear; the [buyer] defendant sells knitwear. Initially, the [buyer] ordered two sample sweaters from the [seller]; the [buyer] was charged DM [Deutsche Mark] 103. Based on these samples, the [buyer] then ordered 310 sweaters for a total price of DM 9765. The samples as well as the merchandise at issue were ordered through the [seller]'s sales representative, Mr. M.
The [seller] submits that the [buyer] later asserted that the goods did not conform to the contract. In the [buyer]'s opinion, the material was not sufficiently resistant to washing. The [seller] objects to the [buyer]'s notice of non-conformity as being unspecified and belated. The goods were not defective and were identical to the samples. Regarding the further details of the [seller]'s pleadings, the Court refers to the [seller]'s briefs of 8 September 1993, 24 February 1994, 18 May 1994, 8 September 1994 and 21 November 1994.
The [seller] requests the Court to order the [buyer] to pay it DM 9,374.40 with 10% interest from 9 January 1993.
In addition, the [buyer] expressly declared the contract avoided, insofar as such a declaration had not already been made on 29 January 1993.
With respect to the [buyer]'s further pleadings, the Court refers to the briefs of 20 January 1994, 2 May 1994, 28 July 1994, 7 November 1994, 19 July 1995 and 28 September 1995. The Court took evidence by questioning the witnesses […] and […]. Regarding the findings of the hearing of evidence, the Court refers to the record of the proceedings on 3 August 1995.
I. 1. The sales contract concluded in December of 1992 is governed by the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), following the Convention's Arts. 1(1)(a) and 100(2). Both Italy and the Federal Republic of Germany are Contracting States. The Convention entered into force in Italy on 1 January 1988 and in the Federal Republic of Germany on 1 January 1991. It can be left open whether the parties' general conditions lead to the application of Italian or German law. In either case, the CISG is applicable by virtue of its Art. 1(1)(b).
2. The [buyer] is under obligation to pay the purchase price, since [buyer] lost the right to rely on the lack of conformity pursuant to CISG Article 39(1). [Buyer] failed to give notice to the [seller] specifying the nature of the lack of conformity within a reasonable time after [buyer] discovered the defect. Based on the hearing of evidence, it is not proven that Witness W. gave such a notice of defect for the [buyer] in a telephone conversation dated 5 January 1993.
a) Witness W. testified that she was unable to remember whether she informed the [seller] of the defects in a telephone conversation on 5 January 1993. She solely assumes to have acted accordingly, because there is a receipt regarding the removal of one sweater out of storage.
b) Even if one supposes that Witness W. did make the call, her testimony does not reveal who was her counterpart on the [seller]'s side. In particular, it does not follow that she specified the nature of the lack of conformity.
c) The defects were described more precisely only in a fax dated 29 January 1993 that also contained the measurements of the sweaters after the laundry test. Since the [buyer] had already received the merchandise on 18 December 1992, notice was not given within a reasonable time in the sense of CISG Article 39(1) (see LG Stuttgart [31 August 1989], RIW [*] (1989) 984 = IPRax [*] (1990) 317). It moreover needs to be noted that the delivered sweaters were seasonal fashion goods, which is why a prompt notice of non-conformity was required (cf. v.Caemmerer/Schlechtriem, Kommentar zum Einheitlichen UN-Kaufrecht, Art. 39 n. 16).
II. 1. The claim for interest is legitimate pursuant to Art. 78 CISG. According to this provision, the party that fails to pay the price or any other sum in arrears shall pay the other party [at maturity] interest on these amounts. Pursuant to Arts. 58, 59 CISG, the purchase price for the sweaters delivered on 8 December 1992 became due prior to the date from which the [seller] requests interest (9 January 1993).
2. Since Art. 78 CISG does not provide for an interest rate, the matter is to be settled in conformity with the law applicable by virtue of the rules of German private international law (see OLG Frankfurt a.M. [18 January 1994], NJW [*] (1994) 1013 at 1014).
a) German law would be applicable in the event that the [buyer]'s General Conditions were effectively included in the contract. The [buyer] based its order on its General Terms of Purchasing for Finished Products. The [seller] submits to have accepted the order based on its own General Conditions, a point that the [buyer] contests.
aa) Assuming that [seller] had sent its General Conditions to the [buyer], this would have constituted a counter-offer in the sense of CISG Article 19(1). However, it follows from the performance of the contract that both parties were in agreement about the essentialia negotii. Thus, it must be assumed that they waived the enforcement of their conflicting Standard Terms or that they derogated from the application of Article 19, taking advantage of their party autonomy under Art. 6 CISG. In this case, the contract would have been entered into in accordance with the terms of the CISG (see v. Caemmerer/Schlechtriem, Article 19 n.20).
bb) If the [seller] did not send its General Conditions to the [buyer], it still cannot be assumed that the [buyer]'s Terms for Purchasing became part of the contract. On the one hand, the [seller] denies having received the [buyer]'s General Terms of Business; on the other hand, the [buyer] did not state that it had included an Italian translation of its Terms for Purchasing. Since the language of the contract in the present case was not German, the General Terms of Business written in German did not become part of the contract (v. Caemmerer/Schlechtriem, Article 14 n.16).
b) Therefore, Italian law governs the obligation to pay the purchase price under Art. 28(2) EGBGB [German Code on Private International Law], and it also applies to the accompanying claim for interest. Pursuant to Article 1284 Cc [Italian Civil Code], the interest rate is 10% since 16 December 1990 (see OLG Frankfurt a.M [18 January 1994], NJW [*] (1994) 1013 at 1014).
Translator's note on other abbreviations: IPRax = Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts; NJW = Neue Juristische Wochenschrift; RIW = Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft. All three are German legal periodicals.
** Gerd M. Zimmerman is a practicing attorney in Arizona.
*** Ruth M. Janal, LL.M (UNSW) is a Phd candidate at Albert-Ludwigs-Universit�t Freiburg.

matches:
Art. 1
Art. 39
Art. 78
Art. 78
Art. 6
v.
Art. 28


text:
The possibility to control charge migration in molecules using femtosecond laser pulses is studied, which may have applications in the laser control of fundamental chemical processes. A method is introduced to realize dispersion-free transport of a localized wave packet on a lattice by devising a Hamiltonian so that the wave packet perfectly splits and interferes with itself, providing a new avenue in the field of perfect state transfer.
A possible setup for a quantum-repeater network using satellite links is demonstrated, and it is shown that this approach allows entanglement creation at viable rates over global distances that are inaccessible via direct transmission through optical fibers. In situ fluorescence detection of atoms in a dipole trap using a blue-detuned probe beam in addition to the standard cooling laser beams is demonstrated, and it is shown that atom numbers up to about can be detected with sub-Poissonian precision.
Intensity- and phase-noise correlations in a dual-frequency VECSEL are studied theoretically and experimentally, and it is shown how the results can be interpreted in terms of the linear response of two coupled overdamped oscillators. A proposal is presented for the optomechanical levitation of objects with enhanced isolation from the environment, which is of practical interest for a variety of applications ranging from frequency-tuned high-resolution force sensing to quantum optomechanics experiments.
Volume 91, Issue 5 May Golubev and Alexander I. A 91R — Published 20 Hole in one av 91 aring A 91— Published 22 May Editors' Suggestion Entanglement over global distances via quantum repeaters with satellite links K.
A 91— Published 26 May Editors' Suggestion In-trap fluorescence detection of atoms in a microscopic dipole trap A. A 91— Published 18 May Editors' Suggestion Intensity- and phase-noise correlations in a dual-frequency vertical-external-cavity surface-emitting laser operating at telecom wavelength Syamsundar De, Ghaya Baili, Sophie Bouchoule, Mehdi Alouini, and Fabien Bretenaker Phys.
Rapid Communication Quantum nature of Gaussian discord: Editors' Suggestion Rapid Communication Control of charge migration in molecules by ultrashort laser pulses Nikolay V. Lee, and Sarang Gopalakrishnan Phys. Rapid Communication Generalized Gibbs ensembles for quantum field theories F. Rapid Communication Quantum sound-cone fluctuations in cold Fermi gases: Rapid Communication Image beam from a wire laser E.
Rapid Communication Entanglement dynamics and Mollow nonuplets between two coupled quantum dots in a nanowire photonic-crystal system Gerasimos Angelatos and Stephen Hughes Phys. Mikhailov, and Yanhong Xiao Phys.
Rapid Communication Attonewton force detection using microspheres in a dual-beam optical trap in high vacuum Gambhir Ranjit, David P. Stutz, Mark Cunningham, and Andrew A. Transport of quantum excitations via local and nonlocal fluctuations M. A 91— Published 4 May Show Abstract. Enhancement of coherence in qubits due to interaction with the environment V. A 91— Published 6 May Show Abstract. Dissipative Landau-Zener quantum dynamics with transversal and longitudinal noise S.
A 91— Published 8 May Show Abstract. A 91— Published 11 May Show Abstract. Statistical properties of states in QED with unstable vacuum S. Pseudomodes and the corresponding transformation of the temperature-dependent bath correlation function David W. A 91— Published 14 May Show Abstract.
A 91— Published 18 May Show Abstract. Bell inequalities from group actions: Three parties and non-Abelian groups V. A 91— Published 19 May Show Abstract.
A 91— Published 20 May Show Abstract. Proposal for a motional-state Bell inequality test with ultracold atoms R. Maximally coherent mixed states: A 91— Published 22 May Show Abstract.
Geometric phase for a driven quantum field subject to decoherence Shi-Biao Zheng Phys. A 91— Published 26 May Show Hole in one av 91 aring. Equivalent emergence of time dependence in classical and quantum mechanics John S. A 91— Published 27 May Show Abstract. Pair creation induced by transitions between electronic and positronic bound states Y.
A 91— Published 28 May Show Abstract. Information and entanglement measures applied to the analysis of complexity in doubly excited states of helium J. Restrepo Cuartas and J. A 91— Published 1 May Show Abstract.
A 91— Published 7 May Show Abstract. Faster quantum searching with almost any diffusion operator Avatar Tulsi Phys.
Quantum code for quantum error characterization S. Srikanth, and Subhashish Banerjee Phys. A 91— Published 12 May Show Abstract. Multiplexing scheme for simplified entanglement-based large-alphabet quantum key distribution Adetunmise C.
A 91— Published 15 May Show Abstract. Hole in one av 91 aring control of "Hole in one av 91 aring" and high-fidelity quantum gates with electron and nuclear spins of a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond Yi Chou, Shang-Yu Huang, and Hsi-Sheng Goan Phys.
Quantum state transfer along a ring with time-reversal asymmetry Yang Liu and D. Entanglement control in quantum networks by quantum-coherent time-delayed feedback Sven M. Quantum search algorithm tailored to clause-satisfaction problems Avatar Tulsi Phys. Geometry, robustness, and emerging unitarity in dissipation-projected dynamics Paolo Zanardi and Lorenzo Campos Venuti Phys. Optimal Trotterization in universal quantum simulators under faulty control George C. Knee and William J.
Quantum computation with noisy operations Ying Li Phys. A 91— Published 29 May Show Abstract.
Dorfman, and Shaul Mukamel Phys. Casimir-Polder force for a polarizable molecule near a dielectric substrate out of thermal equilibrium Wenting Zhou and Hongwei Yu Phys. Strategies for reducing the light shift in atomic clocks Hidetoshi Katori, V. Triple excitations in perturbed relativistic coupled-cluster theory and electric dipole polarizability of group-IIB elements S. Strong competition between velocity-changing and phase- or state-changing collisions in H 2 spectra perturbed by Ar P.
Casimir-Polder Hole in one av 91 aring with thermally excited surfaces A. Electron-impact excitation of silver S. Coherent and stochastic contributions of compound resonances in atomic processes: Electron recombination, photoionization, and scattering V.
Dissociation dynamics in the dissociative electron attachment to carbon dioxide Pamir Nag and Dhananjay Nandi Phys. Coherent chemistry with THz pulses: Ultrafast field-driven isomerization of LiNC L. Modified and controllable dispersion interaction in a one-dimensional waveguide geometry Harald R. Haakh and Stefan Scheel Phys. Influence of a surface in the nonretarded interaction between two atoms Reinaldo de Melo e Souza, W.
Kinetic theory of positron-impact ionization in gases G. Multiple ionization of neon atoms in collisions with bare and dressed ions: Dynamics of a two-state system through a real level crossing Benedetto D. Militello and Nikolay V. Real-time tracking of two-electron dynamics in the ionization continuum of Xe M. A Hole in one av 91 aring— Published 5 May Show Abstract. Pulse-shape effects in ionization of atomic hydrogen by short-pulse XUV intense laser radiation: Shortcut to adiabatic passage in a waveguide coupler with a complex-hyperbolic-secant scheme Koushik Paul and Amarendra K.
Attosecond structures from the molecular cavity in fullerene photoemission time delay Maia Magrakvelidze, Dylan M. Dipole and nondipole photoionization of molecular hydrogen B. Fast expansions and compressions of trapped-ion chains M. Green-function approach to the theory of tunneling ionization I.
Linear and circular dichroism in photoelectron angular distributions caused by electron correlation Yoshi-Ichi Suzuki and Toshinori Suzuki Phys. Generalized eikonal approximation for strong-field ionization F. Alignment-to-orientation conversion in a magnetic field at nonlinear excitation of the D 2 line of rubidium: Experiment and theory M.
ABSTRACT Protoporphyrin IX substituted myoglobin reveals excellent hole burning properties. We investigated persistent spectral holes under isotropic pressure conditions in a range from 0 to MPa. .
(Av)/Ap is measured as a function of burn frequency . Received for publication 15 July and in final form Phase space density holes are shown to grow in a plasma for any non zero electron-ion drift. holes since, for the same 0., they have a Av, and hence a -y. (91). (90) becomes. _. (x) + 8rnqj 0 dE. ~(E). 9Z2.

matches: V. V. V. V. V. V.


1.1� Transformation of a barter contract into an international sales contract according to the parties� agreement does not affect the validity of an arbitration clause contained in the barter contract.
1.2 Since the parties� contract did not contain a choice of law provision, the Tribunal of International Commercial Arbitration at the Russian Federation Chamber of Commerce and Industry [hereinafter Tribunal], ruled that pursuant to Art. 15(4) of the Russian Federation Constitution [hereinafter RF Constitution] and Art. 7(2) of the Russian Federation Civil Code [hereinafter Civil Code] the parties� relations should be governed both by the Vienna Convention 1980 [hereinafter CISG] (as the parties to the contract are from Contracting States � the Peoples Republic of China and the Russian Federation) and by the General Principles of Deliveries between the Soviet Union and the Peoples� Republic of China [hereinafter Principles of Deliveries]. In this connection, by virtue of Art. 90 CISG, the rules of the Principles of Deliveries prevail over the provisions of the CISG. On the basis of Art. 166 of the Principles of Civil Law 1991, the law of the Russian Federation was applied as the subsidiary law, as the law of the country of the seller.
The Tribunal pointed out that since Art. 166 of the Principles of Civil Law 1991 contains a special rule regarding obligations under international sales contracts, thus the general rule of Art. 165(2) of the Principles of Civil Law 1991 � which provides for a rule of conflict of laws based on the criterion of the place of conclusion of a contract � was not applicable.
1.3� Taking into consideration that the Principles of Deliveries contain provisions on payment of interest for delay of performance of financial obligations, these provisions -- and not Art. 395 Civil Code -- govern the relations of the parties. Accordingly, the amount of interest to be recovered is limited to the ceiling provided for in the Principles of Deliveries.
1.4� Calculation of interest could be made only from the date when the delay of performance of a monetary obligation began under the international sales contract into which the barter contract was transformed. The interest cannot be calculated for the period of performance of obligations under the barter contract since those obligations were not monetary by their nature.
1.5� On the basis of Art. 74 CISG, the Tribunal allowed the [Seller] to recover from the [Buyer] losses suffered by [Seller] due to the breach of contract by [Buyer] in connection with a penalty imposed on the [Seller] by the Russian Federation Customs authorities for non-receipt of hard currency proceeds within the period of time specified in the law.
The action was brought by Claimant [Seller], a Russian company, against Respondent [Buyer], a Chinese company, in connection with non-performance of obligations under a contract concluded between the parties on 18 September 1998. Under this contract, which was a barter contract, the [Seller] delivered to [Buyer] the goods specified in the contract, but the [Buyer] did not ship the goods that should be delivered in exchange within thirty days after delivery by [Seller] of his lots of goods. The [Buyer] referred to difficulties that arose in connection with obtaining a license. On 16 December 1998, the parties therefore signed an Addendum to the contract which provided that [Buyer] would make a monetary payment for the goods delivered to him by [Seller]. The [Buyer] only partially performed his obligation. By the decision of Russian Customs authorities of 29 December 1999, a penalty was imposed upon [Seller] for his violation of the rules governing deposit of hard currency proceeds received for the goods exported. The proceeds were to be deposited to [Seller]'s transit account.
The claims of [Seller] included: recovery of the sum of the principal debt and interest for delay of performance of monetary obligation based on Art. 395 Civil Code; compensation of the sum of the penalty [Seller] paid pursuant to the decision of the Customs authorities; and compensation of arbitration fees and expenses.
Since the contract did not set forth the applicable law, the [Seller] grounded application of rules of Russian law referring to both Art. 166(1)(2) of the Principles of Civil Law 1991 (as the law of country of the seller under a contract transformed into a sales contract) and to Art. 165(2) of the Principles of Civil Law 1991 (considering that the contract was signed in the Russian Federation, i.e., the place of [Seller]).
The [Buyer] did not appear before the Tribunal, nor did he submit his explanations to the action.
The competence of the Tribunal to arbitrate the present dispute follows from Clause 11 of the contract which provides that all disputes and misunderstandings that might arise from or in connection with the contract should be arbitrated by the Tribunal in accordance with the Rules of Tribunal. The Tribunal ascertained that the parties had concluded an arbitration agreement that met the requirements as to form prescribed in Art. 7(2) of the Russian Federation Law on International Commercial Arbitration.
On the basis of Art. 16(1) of the said Law, the Tribunal interprets the arbitration clause, which is a part of the contract, as an agreement independent from the other terms of the contract. Therefore, even if the contract -- which at the beginning commenced as a barter contract and was later transformed into an international sales (delivery) contract signed by the parties on 16 December 1999 Addendum No. 1 -- had been deemed void, the arbitration agreement of the parties would have remained in force. Thus, the arbitration clause is applicable to the parties� contract transformed by their mutual agreement into a contract of another type.
Having reviewed the issue of the possibility to arbitrate the case on the merits in the absence of representatives of the parties, the Tribunal stated that the Respondent [Buyer], was duly notified of the time and place of the hearing, which is evidenced by a receipt issued by the post office. Since the [Buyer] submitted neither a written motion to adjourn the hearings for a good cause nor objected to the claims of [Seller], the Tribunal found that according to para. 28(2) of the Rules of Tribunal, non-appearance of the [Buyer] before the Tribunal does not preclude arbitration of the case and rendering of the decision. In addition, the Tribunal -- having stated that [Seller] based on para. 28(3) of the Rules of Tribunal asked the Tribunal to try the case in the absence of his representative -- granted this motion, finding it possible to arbitrate the dispute on the merits in the absence of the Claimant [Seller]�s representative.
As to the law applicable to the relations of parties to this dispute, the Tribunal followed the provisions of Art. 15(4) of the RF Constitution and Art. 7 Civil Code, according to which international treaties of the Russian Federation are a component part of the Russian Federation legal system, and if they provide for different rules than are provided for by civil law, then the rules of the international treaties apply.
The Tribunal ascertained that the parties failed to choose the applicable law in their contract. Since, having signed Addendum No. 1 to their contract, the parties transformed it into an international sales (delivery) contract, and, since as of the date of such transformation of the contract � 16 December 1999 � the CISG had been in force both in the country of [Seller], the Russian Federation, and the country of [Buyer], the Peoples� Republic of China, the provisions of this Convention should be applied. According to Art. 90 CISG, it does not prevail over any already existing international treaties or treaties that might be concluded and which contain provisions concerning the matters governed by the CISG. Since there is such a treaty between the Russian Federation and the Peoples� Republic of China � the Principles of Deliveries � the Principles of Deliveries should be applied to the contractual relations of the parties.
Art. 7(2) CISG provides, inter alia, that questions concerning matters governed by this Convention are to be settled in conformity with the law applicable by virtue of the rules of private international law. According to Art. 166(1)(1) of the Principles of Civil Law 1991, Russian law should be applied to issues not governed by the Principles of Deliveries and the CISG. The Tribunal cannot accept the additional arguments of [Seller] that Russian law should be applied as the law of the place of conclusion of the contract by virtue of Art. 165(2) of the Principles of Civil Law 1991. Art. 166 of the Principles of Civil Law 1991 sets forth a special rule regarding obligations under international sales contracts such as the ones in dispute here; thus the general rule of Art. 165(2) of the Principles of Civil Law 1991 is not applicable to the present dispute.
As to the merits of [Seller]�s claims, the Tribunal ascertained that the case materials evidence the sum of [Buyer]�s principal debt claimed by [Seller]. The amount of debt is not disputed by [Buyer]. In accordance with Arts. 53 and 62 CISG, this sum should be recovered from [Buyer].
As to the [Seller]�s claim to recover from [Buyer] interest for use of money, the Tribunal concluded that the calculation performed according to the provisions of Art. 395 Civil Code could not be taken into consideration in the present case since as it was stated above, by virtue of Art. 15(4) of the RF Constitution and Art. 7(2)(2) Civil Code, international treaty rules prevailed over the rules of national civil law. Para. 55(1) of the Principles of Deliveries provides for a penalty in the amount of 6 percent per annum from the delayed sum in the event of a delay of performance of a monetary obligation. The monetary obligation arose between the parties only at the moment of signing Addendum No. 1 to the contract, i.e., on 16 December 1999. This Addendum obligated [Buyer] to make "payment in hard currency" to the account of [Seller]. Therefore, the [Buyer]�s delay of payment of the full cost of goods delivered by [Seller] is eleven days (from 17 to 28 December 1999, when the [Buyer] made a partial payment to the account of [Seller]), and 269 days of the delay of payment of the rest of the cost of the goods (from 29 December 1999 to 25 October 2000). The Tribunal found reasonable and granted the aggregate sum of interest calculated by [Seller] at the rate of 6 percent per annum as provided for in the Principles of Deliveries.
Non-performance by [Buyer] of his obligation under the barter contract and later under the international sales contract led to the Russian Customs authorities to impose on [Seller] a penalty due to non-receipt of hard currency proceeds, as provided for by the customs law of Russia. The imposition of such penalty is evidenced by the decision of the Customs authorities. Taking into consideration that payments between the parties were to be made in US Dollars, the [Seller] calculated the sum of the penalty in dollars at the [banking] rate of ___ Russian Rubles per US Dollar. The [Buyer] did not dispute the amount of this claim of the [Seller]. The [Seller] is entitled to claim compensation of losses caused him due to actions of the other party based on Art. 74 CISG, which states that damages for breach of contract by one party consist of a sum equal to the loss, suffered by the other party as a consequence of the breach of contract. The sum of the penalty imposed on [Seller] by the Customs authorities of the Russian Federation constitutes such a loss. On this basis, the Tribunal granted the claims of [Seller] to recover from [Buyer] the sum paid by [Seller] as a penalty.
Pursuant to para. 6(2) of the Rules of Tribunal on Arbitration Fees and Expenses, the arbitration fees are placed on [Buyer] pro rata to the amount of granted claims.
* This is a translation of data on Proceeding 225/2000 of 22 March 2002 of the Tribunal of International Commercial Arbitration at the Russian Federation Chamber of Commerce and Industry, reported in: Rozenberg ed., Arb. Praktika (2001-2002), No. 46 [277-282].
All translations should be verified by cross-checking against the original text. For purposes of this translation, Claimant of the Russian Federation is referred to as [Seller]; Respondent of Peoples Republic of China is referred to as [Buyer].


text:
Email has been a part of our business lives for a long time – at least thirty years. While the basic functionality of email hasn’t changed much since the early 1970s, the way we use it has. From the first tentative, “terse and imperfect” messages sent by Internet pioneers like J.C.R. Licklider[i], to email messages used for effectuating real estate transactions,[ii] executing contracts,[iii] firing employees,[iv] filing documents with regulators,[v] and thousands of other business functions, email is an essential part of how do business.
And yet, we still haven’t figured it out.
For most of us, if the email stops, the work stops. However, many of us still treat email messages as the second-class citizen of our information governance program – ignored, tossed, unmanaged. Nowhere is this gap more obvious than in the courts. Here, our email failures become very real and very painful – laid out for the world to see in the harsh black and white of court opinions, media coverage, and the relentless and ruthless blogosphere. The courts are where our Friday afternoon meeting-room discussions and head shaking about the out-of-control email system; about how so-and-so has email messages going back to the 90s; about how we should really do something about all those email backup tapes; take on a new and painful dimension.
In the past few years there have been some blockbuster cases involving email – large enough, one hopes, to gain the attention of senior managers in every industry. These cases, such as Judge Scheindlin’s series of Zubulake decisions[vi] and her recent Pension Committee opinion,[vii] set new standards for the way we manage email and other information. Others, like Coleman Holdings v. Morgan Stanley[viii], attracted attention for their eye-popping monetary sanctions.
In the coming weeks, I am going to write about some of these cases, and what they teach us about email management and information governance.
The cases I have chosen to focus on are not important because they are exceptional. Rather, they are important because they are commonplace.
Today, looking for cases that speak to email management issues is like dipping your hand into a river. Every day you can find email management issues being considered by a court, regulator, auditor, or other “finder of fact” in jurisdictions across the globe. The cases I’ve selected are designed to illustrate key points about email management, and to illustrate the intensity and depth to which email issues are considered by the court today. The intention of discussing these cases is not to embarrass or single out a particular institution. In fact, given the plethora of email-related challenges occurring daily before the courts, it would be difficult to make the case that any particular organization’s failings are unique. Instead, the purpose of examining these cases is to glean important lessons for all of us about email management.
Case Number 1: Producing email may be hard, but do the courts care?
Key employees of a global engineering firm accepted employment offers from a competitor. When they left the firm, their employer alleged that they took proprietary software and other intellectual property with them, thereafter using it to help the competitor build a new product, resulting in $8 million in damages. In the ensuing litigation, email messages formed a critical part of the evidence. However, the defendants argued that they should not have to produce their own email messages because it would be too “time consuming” and “expensive.”[x] The court disagreed.
Furthermore, a company lawyer testified that she couldn’t explain why email messages sent to several employees were found in the mailboxes of some employees, but not all.
As a result of all this confusion and difficulty surrounding email, the defendants argued that they should not have to produce responsive email. The judge disagreed, writing that organizations shouldn’t expect special treatment around email discovery simply because information is in email form: “it does not appear to me that searching email archives . . . is inherently more onerous or expensive than conducting manual searches for hard copies of documents. In fact, it could be easier.”[xi] That is, if the email is well-managed, which the court apparently believed was not the case here.
Judging by surveys like AIIM International’s email management “Industry Watch,” which found that a majority of respondents have little confidence in their email program,[xii] most organizations have a long way to go when it comes to email management. Although the business cost of email mismanagement may be hidden, or accrue slowly, email management flaws quickly take center stage in litigation.
Local email archives. Don’t allow employees to create local archives of email (AIIM’s survey found that almost half of organizations have no policy on this topic). Turn off the ability to create .pst and .nsf files., and look for smart technology like content analytics to help you clean up the ones that you already have.
Don’t expect mercy for bad email management. Don’t expect the court to take mercy on you because you have been doing a poor job of managing your information. Email has been around for over three decades. That’s a long time to get it figured out. Courts and regulators in all jurisdictions are demonstrating diminishing patience with organizations that do not take email management seriously.
Is your email system e-discovery-ready? Is your approach to email management and archiving e-discovery ready? In other words, could you easily and quickly conduct searches across the entire system for all email messages generated by specific employees, or containing specific keywords? The AIIM survey found that 45% of organizations allow employees to keep email in personal folders – “unshared, possibly un-findable and at considerable risk of random deletion.”[xiii] Remember, you may need to be able to do this for all email, even the stuff hanging around in decommissioned email systems, file servers, backup systems, and so on.
[i] “One could write tersely and type imperfectly, even to an older person in a superior position . . . and the recipient took no offense. The formality and perfection that most people expect in a typed letter did not become associated with network messages [e-mail], probably because the network was so much faster, so much more like the telephone.” J.C.R. Licklider, Albert Vezza, Applications of Information Networks, Proc of the IEEE, 66(11), Nov 1978.
[ii] For example, in the case of Shattuck v. Klotzbach, 2001 WL 1839720 (Mass. Super., Dec. 11, 2001), where a $2 million real estate sale was negotiated via email. The seller sued the buyer to enforce the contract, and the court found that the email messages satisfied the legal requirement for “a writing” and the typed names at the bottom of the email messages constituted a signature.
[iii] See, for example, Stevens v Publicis S.A., 2008 NY Slip Op 02880 [50 AD3d 253], where a New York appellate court ruled that “emails were signed writings that modify contract.” Coverage at, Kelly O’Connell, “U.S. Court Decides Email Equal a Signature for Contracts,” IBLS, May 2, 2101. Online at, http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?s=latestnews&id=2032 See also, Stevens v. Publicis, S.A. and JSO Assocs. Inc. v. Price.
[vi] The most recent of the five decisions being, Zubulake v. UBS Warburg, 2004 WL 1620866 (S.D.N.Y. July 20, 2004).
[vii] Pension Comm. of Univ. of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of Am. Sec., LLC, (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 15, 2010).
[viii] Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., 2005 Extra LEXIS 94 (Fla. Cir. Ct. Mar. 23, 2005).
[ix] GRI Simulations Inc. v. Oceaneering International Inc., 2010 NLTD 85 (CanLII).

matches: v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v.


concealed, pre-existing defect rather than from the contractor's work. Gen. Elec. Co. v. Moritz, 257 S.W.3d 211, 215 (Tex. 2008).
owner knows or should have known about.” Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. v. Khan, 138 S.W.3d 288, 295 (Tex. 2004)).
The Texas Legislature has waived sovereign immunity for personal injury claims arising from a premise defect. Tex. Civ. Prac.
to a licensee on private property, unless the claimant pays for the use of the premises.
devices as is required by Section 101.060.
Act of May 17, 1985, 69th Leg., R.S., ch. 959, 1985 Tex. Gen. Laws 3242, 3303 (amended 2005) (current version at Tex. Civ.
standard applies. Tex. Civ Prac. & Rem. Code § 101.022(a); see also State Dep’t of Highways & Public Transp. v. Payne, 838 S.
defect.”). Whether a condition is a premise defect or special defect is a question of law, which we review de novo. Payne, 838 S.
“excavations or obstructions.” See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 101.022(b).
blocking the road does. It thus falls outside the TTCA’s narrow special-defect class as a matter of law.
as a broken weld, this argument addresses knowledge of other chairs, not the one that actually broke.
TTCA, premises liability, dangerous condition, ostrich defense) .
summary judgment in Sunblossom's favor pursuant to rule 166a(i).
GROUP REALTY, L.L.C., UNITED AUTO GROUP, INC. AND MOTORS INSURANCE COMPANY v.
00437-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 02‑26‑09)(premises liability, crime, negligence, and gross negligence).
judgment and render judgment that Miguez take nothing from appellant.