text:
[202 U.S. 60, 61] By leave of court the state of Oregon filed an original bill against Ethan A. Hitchcock, Secretary of the Interior, and William A. Richards, Commissioner of the General Land Office, to restrain the defendants from allotting or patenting to any Indians or other persons certain lands within the limits of the Klamath reservation, which it is alleged were, on March 12, 1860, swamp and overflowed lands, and praying a decree establishing the title of the state of Oregon to such lands, and declaring that the title is subject only to such right of temporary and terminable occupation as may exist in the Indians at present occupying the said reservation, and is not to be defeated by any allotment, patent, agreement, or other arrangement. To this bill the defendants filed a demurrer, partly on jurisdictional grounds and partly on the merits.
For a clear understanding of the questions presented the allegations in the bill must be stated. It is alleged that the defendant Hitchcock is a citizen of the state of Missouri, the defendant Richards of the state of Wyoming; that by an act of Congress approved February 14, 1859 (11 Stat. at L. 383, chap. 33), Oregon was admitted into the Union; that by an act approved September 28, 1850 (9 Stat. at L. 519, chap. 84), Congress granted to the state of Arkansas and other states all lands within their respective limits, which, at the date of the act, were 'swamp and overflowed lands,' and by reason thereof unfit for cultivation; that by an act of March 12, 1860 (12 Stat. at L. 3, chap. 5), the provisions of the last-named act were extended to the state of Oregon; that on February 14, 1859, as well as on March 12, 1860, the United States owned in fee simple a large region and body of land lying within the boundaries of the state of Oregon, which said body of land was neither reserved nor dedicated to any public [202 U.S. 60, 62] use, and was free from any claim of title or possession, saving and excepting a right to temporary use and occupation belonging to certain Indian tribes; that within this large body of lands were three tribes or bands of Indians,-the Klamaths, the Moadocs, and the Yahooskins,-few in number, that number being estimated by the officials of the United States in charge at from 1,200 to 1,500; that they were all in a savage state, uncivilized, without a fixed place of abode, and roaming from place to place within the region; that they had no other kind of tenure or title than that which they and their ancestors held from time immemorial and before the settlement of white men in the territory; that on October 14, 1864 (16 Stat. at L. 707), a treaty was negotiated between the United States and these tribes of Indians, by which they ceded to the United States their right, title, and claim to all these lands except a certain specified and smaller tract within the original outboundaries, which was created a reservation for their use; that said reservation was continued in the occupation of the Indians according to the aboriginal usages and customs of said Indians and of Indians generally, without any claim or pretense of permanent title or individual right to the lands, or any of them, and without any steps taken towards conferring the ultimate title upon them until after the year 1899, when the defendant Hitchcock, Secretary of the Interior, directed and caused a large portion of the lands to be surveyed and divided into numerous definite lots or tracts, for the purpose and with the intention of allotting such tracts to the individual members of the tribes, to be by them held in severalty, and the further purpose of issuing and delivering to each of them a patent declaring that the United States holds the tract allotted in trust for the Indian and his heirs for a period of twenty-five years and that at the expiration of such period it will convey the tract to him or his heirs, discharged of the trust, and free from all encumbrances; that in this the defendant Hitchcock was assuming and professing to act under the authority of the act of Congress of February 8, 1887 (24 Stat. at L. 388, chap. 119); that within the reservation made by the [202 U.S. 60, 63] treaty of 1864 were large tracts, which had been and were on March 12, 1860, swamp and overflowed lands and unfit for cultivation, and hence, under the act of March 12, 1860, had become the property of the state, subject only to the right of occupancy on the part of the Indians; that in the year 1902, before any patents were issued, and while the surveying and allotting were in progress, the state caused an examination to be made for the purpose of ascertaining the tracts which, on March 12, 1860, were swamp and overflowed lands, and a list prepared of them, which list is attached to the bill as an exhibit; that it presented and filed that list with the surveyor general of the United States for the state of Oregon, together with evidence tending to prove that all of the tracts within the list had been and were, on March 12, 1860, swamp and overflowed lands, and rendered thereby unfit for cultivation, which evidence was found and certified by the surveyor general to be sufficient. That thereupon the state selected and claimed said tracts as granted to it by the act of Congress of March 12, 1860, and applied to the proper officers of the United States to inquire into and consider the claims of the state; that this application and the evidence were submitted to the defendant Richards, as Commissioner of the General Land Office, and on November 18, 1903, the Acting Commissioner denied and rejected the claim upon the sole ground that the lands, whether swamp and overflowed or not, were not granted to the state of Oregon by the act of Congress. From this decision an appeal was taken to the Secretary of the Interior, and the decision of the Land Office affirmed.
Charles A. Keigwin, William B. Matthews, and Andrew M. Crawford for complainant.
[202 U.S. 60, 66] Messrs. A. C. Campbell, F. W. Clements, and F. L. Campbell for defendants.
The question of jurisdiction of course precedes any inquiry into the merits. By 2 of art. 3 of the Constitution and Rev. Stat. 687, U. S. Comp. Stat. 1901, p. 565, this court has original jurisdiction of a suit brought by a state against citizens of other states. Pennsylvania v. Quicksilver Min. Co. 10 Wall. 553, 19 L. ed. 998; Wisconsin v. Pelican Ins. Co. 127 U.S. 265, 287 , 32 S. L. ed. 239, 242, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1370, and cases cited in the opinion; California v. Southern P. Co. 157 U.S. 229, 258 , 39 S. L. ed. 683, 693, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 591; Minnesota v. Hitchcock, 185 U.S. 373 , 46 L. ed. 954, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 650. But the contention is that the United States is the real party in interest as defendant, that it cannot be sued without its consent, and that it has given no consent. While the nominal defendants are [202 U.S. 60, 69] citizens of a state other than Oregon, yet they have no interest whatever in the controversy, and, if a decree be rendered against them in favor of the state, it will not affect their interests, but bind and determine the rights of the United States, the real, substantial defendant. It is further said that if there is any other interest adverse to the plaintiff it belongs to the Klamath Indians, who are not made parties, and that the rule in euqity is not to determine a suit without the presence of the parties really to be affected by the decree. California v. Southern P. Co. supra.
'Now, the legal title to these lands is in the United States. The officers named as defendants have no interest in the lands or the proceeds thereof. The United States is proposing to sell them. This suit seeks to restrain the United States from such sale,-to devest the government of its title, and vest it in the state. The United States is, therefore, the real party affected by the judgment, and against which, in fact, it will operate, and the officers have no pecuniary interest in the matter. If whether a suit is one against a state is to be determined, not be the fact of the party named as defendant on the record, but by the result of the judgment of decree which may be entered, the same rule must apply to the United States. The question whether the United States is a party to a controversy is not determined by the merely nominal party on the record, but by the question of the effect of the judgment or decree which can be entered.' [202 U.S. 60, 70] It is true in that case we sustained the jurisdiction of this court, but we did so by virtue of the act of March 2, 1901 (31 Stat. at L. 950, chap. 808, U. S. Comp. Stat. 1901, p. 1384), which was held to be a consent on the part of the United States to be sued in respect to school lands within an Indian reservation, and an acceptance by the government of full responsibility for the result of the decision, so far as the Indians, its wards, were concerned. But neither of the two facts deemed essential to the maintenance of that suit appear in this. There is no act of Congress waiving immunity of the United States, or consenting that it be sued in respect to swamp lands, either within or without an Indian reservation, and there is no act of Congress assuming full responsibility in behalf of its wards, the Indians, for the result of any suit affecting their rights in these lands. It is unnecessary to repeat all that was said in that opinion in reference to these matters. It is sufficient to refer to it for a full discussion of the question.
Again, it must be noticed that the legal title to all these tracts of land is still in the government. No patents or conveyances of any kind have been executed. There has been no finding or adjudication by the Land Department that the lands referred to were swamp or overflowed on March 12, 1860. Under those circumstances it is not a province of the courts to interfere with the Land Department in its administration. So far as a grant of swamp lands is claimed, it must be held that the grant is in process of administration, and, until the legal title passes from the government, inquiry as to equitable rights comes within the cognizance of the Land Department. Courts may not anticipate its action, or take upon themselves the administration of the land grants of the United States. New Orleans v. Paine, 147 U.S. 261, 266 , 37 S. L. ed. 162, 163, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 303; Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. Rust, 168 U.S. 589, 591 , 42 S. L. ed. 591, 592, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 208; United States v. Thomas, 151 U.S. 577 , 38 L. ed. 276, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 426; Brown v. Hitchcock, 173 U.S. 473 , 43 L. ed. 772, 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 485; Humbird v. Avery, 195 U.S. 480, 502 , 503 S., 49 L. ed. 286, 296, 297, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 123.
For these reasons the demurrer is sustained and the bill is dismissed.

matches:
art. 3
v.
v.
v.
v.
v.
v.
v.
v.
v.
v.


1. These rules of admission to a regional state educational institution of secondary vocational education «Astrakhan College of Music. MP Mussorgsky» (hereinafter — Regulations) are designed in accordance with the Procedure of admission to public educational institutions of secondary vocational education, approved by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation» 15 «in January 2009 N 4, and admission rules defined by the Ministry of Culture and the Astrakhan region enshrined in the Charter of the Regional State educational institution of secondary vocational education «Astrakhan College of Music. MP Mussorgsky.
2. These rules govern the reception of citizens of the Russian Federation (hereinafter — the citizens, persons coming), foreign citizens, stateless persons, including the compatriots living abroad (hereinafter — foreign citizens, persons arriving) in the regional state educational institution of secondary vocational education «Astrakhan College of Music them. MP Mussorgsky «(hereinafter — the College of Music) and Znamensky branch of the regional state educational institutions of secondary vocational education» Astrakhan College of Music. MP Mussorgsky «(hereinafter — Znamensky Branch College of Music) for training in basic professional educational programs of secondary vocational education in-depth training from the budget of the Astrakhan region, under contracts with payment of tuition fees with a legal and (or) physical persons (hereinafter — the contract with payment training), and determines the characteristics of the entrance examinations for people with disabilities.
with secondary (complete) general education received in the educational institutions of foreign countries — in accordance with the results of entrance tests conducted by the Music College and Music College Znamensky branch independently, as well as additional entrance examinations.
with secondary vocational education or higher professional education, including training on an abbreviated program — in accordance with the results of entrance tests conducted by the Music College and Music College Znamensky branch independently, as well as additional entrance examinations.
Admission to the College of Music and Znamensky branch music college for vocational education through the appropriate budget on a competitive basis, unless otherwise stipulated by the legislation of the Russian Federation. Admission requirements are guaranteed the rights of citizens to education and enrollment of those most capable and prepared to master the basic professional educational programs of secondary vocational education in-depth training.
Features of foreign citizens established in Chapter X of these rules.
4. Citizens with disabilities (persons with deficiencies in physical and (or) mental development, including the deaf, hard of hearing, blind, visually impaired, with severe speech disorders, with disorders of the musculoskeletal system and others) are accepted as based on the results unified state examination, and on the basis of entrance tests conducted by the Music College and Music College Znamensky branch independently (in the absence of a unified state exam results), features of which are specified in Chapter VI of these Regulations.
5. The results of the unified state examination, recognized as the results of entrance examinations in general subjects, the relevant specialty, which is sending, and supporting the successful completion of entrance examinations in general subjects should not be installed below the Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science, the minimum number of points on the results of the unified state examination on such general subjects, confirming the development of basic general education curriculum of secondary (complete) general education in accordance with the requirements of the federal state educational standards in the current year.
6. At a reception in the Music College and Music College Znamenskii branch in accordance with the list of specialties of secondary vocational education, which for admission to state and municipal educational establishments of secondary vocational education can be carried further entrance test creative and (or) professional orientation approved by the Ministry of Education and Science Russian Federation, shall be additional entrance tests of creative and professional orientation (hereinafter — the additional entrance tests), which are held on subjects which have not conducted a single state exam.
7. The winners will students be accepted into College of Music and Znamensky branch music college in accordance with the Regulations of the Olympiad, approved by Decree of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated 22 October 2007 N 285 (registered by Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation November 16, 2007, Registration N 10496), as amended by order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation on September 4, 2008 N 255 (registered by Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation October 1, 2008, registration N 12381).
Citizens of other categories of legislation of the Russian Federation.
results of final exams of students of the Experimental Music Center at College of Music.
In this case, the winners of contests of mastery of the relevant additional entrance examinations included in the list of entrance tests, exhibited the maximum score.
11. The volume and structure of admission to College of Music and Music College Znamenskii branch students from the budget of the Astrakhan Region (hereinafter — the low places), are determined in the manner prescribed by the Ministry of Culture of the Astrakhan region.
12. College of Music and Music College Znamenskii branch may exercise within the budget target locations reception of citizens in accordance with agreements with state authorities, local authorities to assist them in training with secondary vocational education and organize these places separate competition.
13. College of Music and Music College Znamenskii branch may exercise in accordance with the laws of the Russian Federation in the field of education receive in excess of the cost of places for training on a contractual basis with payment of tuition fees. The total number of students in the College of Music and the Sign branch music college shall not exceed the maximum number, specified in the license to conduct educational activities.
II. Organization of citizens’ reception in the College of Music and Znamensky branch music college.
14. Organization of reception on the basis of the unified state examination, including the organization of entrance examinations, additional entrance tests for courses on development of basic vocational training programs in secondary vocational education, by the selection committee Musical College and the Sign branch music college (hereinafter — the selection committee).
Chairman of the selection committee was appointed director of the Musical College.
15. To organize and conduct admission tests and additional entrance examinations chairman of the selection committee created a substantive examination and appeals committee.
College of Music and Music College Znamenskii branch can organize the work-site examination commissions to persons entering on the basis of basic general education for the entrance examinations for people with disabilities.
16. Order of formation, composition, powers and activities of the reception of the examination and appeals boards governed by the provisions approved by the Director of the College of Music.
17. Work admissions and records, as well as personal reception of applicants and their parents (legal representatives) are organizing executive secretaries who are appointed by the Director of Music College.
18. At a reception in the Music College and Music College Znamenskii branch director of the Musical College shall safeguard the rights of citizens in education, established by Russian law, transparency and openness of the selection committee, objective assessment of abilities and inclination to do.
19. The Admissions Committee shall monitor the reliability of information on participation in the unified state exam, the results of the unified state examination, and also has the right to inspect other documents submitted by applicants. Control over the reliability of information on the participation of entering the unified state examination is carried through in a federal database of participants in the unified state examination and the results of the unified state examination prompted the participation of entering the unified state exam, to confirm the correctness of the information on the results of the unified state examination.
To confirm the authenticity of other documents submitted by the incoming, the selection committee may apply to the relevant government (municipal) agencies and organizations.
Speciality 070102 «Instrumental Performance (by instruments). Graduate qualification — the orchestra, ensemble, the teacher playing the instrument, a piano accompanist.
Speciality 070104 «Vocal Art». Qualifications Graduate — Artist academic choir, ensemble, folk artist of the choir, ensemble.
Speciality 070106. «Choral conducting. Qualifications Graduate — choir director and creative team, a teacher of choral studies.
Speciality 070109 «Musical variety art (by type). Qualifications Graduate — actor, director vaudeville team, the teacher playing the instrument, artist, leader of pop vocal group, the teacher in a vocal class.
Speciality 070113 «Theory of Music.» Graduate qualification — the teacher of music — theoretical subjects, the teacher of rhythm.
Speciality 070106. «Choral conducting. Qualifications Graduate — choir director and creative team, a teacher of choral studies. In all specialties full term of training — 3 years 10 months. Form of education — full-time.
22. Entrance tests in general subjects in all specialties listed in paragraph 20, composed of entrance examinations in Russian language and literature.
Forms of entrance examinations in general subjects in all specialties listed in paragraph 20, for acting on the basis of general education, as well as on the basis of secondary (complete) general education acquired before 1 January 2009 g.yavlyayutsya: Russian language — dictation , in literature — testing.
Form of entrance examinations in general subjects in all specialties listed in paragraph 20, for applicants with secondary vocational education or higher professional education, including training on the reduced program, as well as for those with secondary (full) general education obtained in the educational institutions of foreign states is an interview.
Features of the entrance examinations for people with disabilities are defined in Chapter VI of these rules for admission. Taking into account the peculiarities of psychophysical development, individual empowerment and health status of incoming entrance examinations in Russian language and literature in all specialties listed in paragraph 20 may take the form of an interview.
23. The list and forms for additional entrance tests, their programs, rules of conduct set forth in the Work Programme of admission tests for entering the College of Music and Znamensky branch music college.
24. All entrance tests are conducted in Russian.
25. Deadlines in 2011, the unified state examination by persons who do not have the results of the unified state examination of the unified state examination set by the Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science.
sample contract for applicants for places on contracts with payment of tuition fees.
— The results of the unified state examination, confirming the successful completion of entrance examinations in general subjects included in the list of entrance tests for each major professional educational programs of secondary vocational education (for persons arriving at the low places, and for those arriving at the site under contract with payment of tuition fees).
The Admissions Committee is obliged to provide Entry personally applied for entry and not having the results of the unified state exam, information about the place of registration on surrender of the unified state examination in the additional terms in the Astrakhan region.
28. Reception of documents for training on the basic professional educational programs of secondary vocational education begins June 20 and ends August 15.
Arriving at the base of secondary (complete) general education, not having the results of the unified state exam, have until July 5 to register for delivery of the unified state examination in accordance with the arrangements for the unified state examination, approved by Decree of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated 24 February 2009 N 57 (registered by Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation March 26, 2009, registration N 13600).
29. Admission to educational institutions for training in basic professional educational programs of secondary vocational education is carried out by personal application received.
Coming entitled to apply for several specialties.
admission on the basis of secondary vocational education, higher education for training in an abbreviated program — documents proving his identity (original or photocopy), at its discretion, the original state documents on education or its copy.
Persons who received military conscripts, and discharged from military service who are eligible for one year after leaving the military to use the results of the unified state exam, handed them a year before conscription, are on admission at an educational institution of military ID.
31. Persons who have special rights to enroll in educational institutions established by the legislation of the Russian Federation, are on your own the original or a photocopy of relevant documents with your application.
help to establish disability, issued by the federal agency medical and social expertise.
Children with disabilities, disabled groups I and II, who in accordance with paragraph 3 of Article 16 of the Law of the Russian Federation «On education» (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 1996, N 3, Art. 150, 2000, N 30, Art. 3120, 2002 , N 26, art. 2517, 2004, N 10, Art. 835; N 35, Art. 3607, 2006, N 1, Article 10, 2007, N 2, Art. 360; N 7, Art. 838; N 27, Art. 3215; N 44, Art. 5280; N 49, Art. 6070, Art. 6074, 2008, N 30, Art. 3616, 2009, N 7, Art. 786, Art. 787) eligible for admission to educational institutions outside of the competition, subject to successful completion of entrance examinations, are at its discretion, the original or a copy of the certificate of disability and establishing the conclusion that there is no contraindication to study at Music College, Music College Znamenskoye branch issued by a federal agency medical and social expertise.
32. When you receive training in basic professional education program, vocational education accepted applications from individuals who have a document of the state sample of secondary (full) general education, basic general education, initial vocational education, secondary vocational education or higher professional education.
tested in the provision of hostels.
The statement also recorded the fact of acquaintance (including through public information systems) with a license to conduct educational activities, state accreditation certificate and applications for them in your chosen profession or lack of such a certificate and certified personal signature coming.
consent to the processing of their personal data in the manner prescribed by federal law from 27 July 2006 N 152-FZ «On Personal Data» (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2006, N 31, art. 3451).
Coming right upon application to use the sample placed on the official website of the educational institution, or a sample placed in the federal public information system «single portal of government and municipal services (functions).
In the case of the provision of applications received, not contain all the information required by subparagraphs 1 — 10 of this paragraph, and (or) the information is not truthful, educational institution returns the documents are received.
34. Charging from entering when they apply, as well as the demand from applicants to provide original documents of state standard of education, evidence of the results of the unified state exam or provide other documents not covered by this Order shall be prohibited.
35. Persons arriving at the target site, along with the documents referred to in paragraph 29 of this Order, submit an original document of the state sample of education.
36. Application for admission, as well as the necessary documents may be sent via the incoming postal operators in general use, as well as in digital form (if this is available at an educational institution) in accordance with Federal Law of 10 January 2002 N 1-FZ «On electronic digital signature» (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2002, N 2, Art. 127; 2007, N 46, art. 5554), the Federal Law of 27 July 2006 N 149-FZ «On information, information technologies and data protection (Laws of the Russian Federation, 2006, N31, art. 3448), the Federal Law of 7 July 2003 N 126-FZ «On Communications» (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation in 2003, N 28, Art. 2895; 2004 , N 35, Art. 3607; N 45, Art. 4377, 2005, N 19, Art. 9752, 2006, N 6, Art. 636; N 10, Art. 1069; N 31, art. 3452, 2007, N 1, Art. 8; N 7, Art. 835; 2008, N 18, Art. 294). Departure date documents must be no later than August 5.
Admission documents submitted through the postal operators in general use, ends Aug. 15.
37. When the direction of documents via postal operators of public entering the application for admission is making photocopies of documents proving his identity and citizenship, photocopy of state documents on education, as well as other documents required by this Order. Admission to the College of Music and Znamensky branch music college for training in basic professional educational programs of secondary vocational education is carried out by personal application received.
38. Documents are sent via the incoming postal operators of public registered mail, and list of contents. Notice and a certified inventory investment are the basis confirm receipt of the documents supplied.
39. Is put on each incoming private matter, which stores all documents and materials handed putting additional entrance examinations, admission tests (including an extract from the minutes of the Appeals Committees College of Music and the Sign branch music college).
Personal files are stored in the incoming College of Music and the Sign branch music college for six months since the start of receiving the documents.
40. Sent when personally present documents issued by the receipt of admission documents.
41. Applicants who submitted to the selection committee obviously forged documents, are liable under the legislation of the Russian Federation.
42. At the entrance examinations, additional entrance tests ensures a calm and friendly atmosphere, provided the opportunity to enter more fully demonstrate their knowledge and skills.
43. Schedule of entrance examinations, additional entrance tests (subject, date, time, exam group and place of examination, consultation, date of announcement of results) is approved by the selection committee chairman or his deputies, and brought to the attention received no later than June 20.
44. Applicants take entrance tests in Russian.
45. For those entering the low places (in general competition, for the intended reception entitled to receive out-of-competition), as well as places under contracts with payment of tuition fees for certain specialty held the same entrance test.
46. Entrance tests, additional entrance tests are conducted in writing or orally, shape plays, views, interviews.
The procedure of the interview protocol is made, which records the incoming questions to the examiners and a brief comment (abstract) responses to them.
47. The results of admission tests, including additional entrance examinations, are valued at stoballnoy scale.
d) the ability for analytical thinking.
c) the ability for analytical thinking.
d) knowledge of the musical material in the volume rate music school.
49. All entrance tests for admission on the basis of basic general education (except for the additional entrance examinations) are conducted in accordance with the educational programs of basic education.
50. Entrance test in Russian language — dictation (at reception on the basis of basic general education) is estimated by subtracting from one hundred (100) on a 5 (five) points for each spelling or punctuation errors. Entrance test in literature — tests (for admission on the basis of basic general education) is estimated by assigning to 5 (five) points for each correct answer.
In conducting examinations in Russian language and literature in the form of interviews to identify and assess the general level of knowledge of Russian language and literature.
51. The results of entrance examinations in Russian language and literature, confirming the successful completion of entrance examinations in Russian language and literature should not be installed below the Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science, the minimum number of points on the results of the unified state examination in Russian language and literature. Results of the additional entrance tests, confirming the successful completion of tests of creative professional orientation should not be below 40 points for each of these tests in accordance with the work program admission tests.
52. Entrance tests for persons entering on the basis of general education, as well as additional entrance may be conducted in several stages as the formation of exam groups from among persons who have submitted the necessary documents, and may be held concurrently with the delivery of the unified state examination in the additional terms of the Unified State Examination persons who have no evidence the results of the unified state examination. In organizing the delivery of introductory trials in multiple threads is not allowed re-entering the participation in the delivery entrance tests.
53. For those arriving at the base of general education, the Music College and Music College Znamenskii branch may also be counted as the results of entrance test results of entrance examinations of the calendar year to another educational institution.
54. Forbidden to be counted as an admission test, additional tests entrance exams at the preparatory courses at the College of Music, Znamenskoye branch music college.
55. Person, took away documents after receiving the documents, including those received in the entrance test or admission of additional test results below the minimum number of points, confirming the successful completion of entrance examinations or additional entrance tests are eliminated from the competition.
56. Persons who do not appear on the entrance test, the additional entrance tests for a valid reason (illness or other circumstances, documented by), admitted to them in parallel groups, the next stage of passing entrance, testing, additional entrance examinations or individually prior to their completion.
57. Persons who do not appear on the entrance examination without good cause, as well as the documents were taken away during the admission tests are eliminated from the contest and not enrolled in the College of Music and Znamensky branch music college.
58. Repetition of the opening Test in obtaining satisfactory evaluation and Retake admission test in order to improve the assessment is not allowed.
59. Citizens with Disabilities in the case of lack of evidence on the results of the unified state examination pass the entrance test and an additional entrance tests in accordance with these Rules of Admission and the work program admission tests for entering the College of Music and Music College Znamenskii branch, taking into account peculiarities of psychophysical development, individual empowerment and health status (hereinafter — the individual characteristics) of such applicants.
material and technical conditions must allow unhindered access for entering the auditorium, dressing rooms and other rooms, as well as their stay in these areas (presence of ramps, handrails, widened doorways, lifts, elevators in the absence of an audience must be located on the first floor, the presence of special seating and other devices).
d) for individuals with severe speech disorders, deaf, hard of hearing all the entrance tests at the request of incoming can be done in writing.
to desire to do all the entrance tests may be conducted orally.
61. According to results of entrance examinations, additional entrance examinations coming entitled to lodge an appeal to the Commission a written appeal notice of infringement, in his opinion, the established procedure for testing and (or) does not agree with his (their) results (hereinafter — the appeal).
In the case of entrance examinations in writing, coming to acquaint himself with his work in the presence of a member of the examination committee and executive secretary of the selection committee Musical College and the Sign branch of music college after the results of admission tests.
62. The appeal is not re-take. In considering the appeal will only verify the correctness of evaluation date of admission tests.
63. Appeal is coming personally to the day after the announcement of exam records. In this coming has the right to review their examination paper in the presence of a member of the examination committee and the executive secretaries of admissions College of Music and the Sign branch of the College of Music. The Admissions Committee can receive appeals for the entire working day.
Appeals conducted during the day after familiarization with the examination papers.
64. In the appeals committee when considering the admission tests, additional entrance examinations may be included in the agreement as an independent expert by the representatives of the Ministry of Culture of the Astrakhan region, as well as representatives from other schools.
65. Incoming is entitled to attend the appeal.
An applicant must be in possession of a document proving his identity, and the examination paper.
66. Since coming to minors (under 18) is entitled to attend one of his parents or legal representatives, except minors, recognized in accordance with the laws of the Russian Federation fully operational before reaching adulthood.
67. On appeal, the appeal committee decision is made on the assessment of the exam (as in the case of its increase and decrease).
68. If there is disagreement in the appellate committee balloting, and the decision was adopted by majority vote.
Decorated protocol decision of the appeal committee shall be notified to the incoming (a painting).
69. Trust reception is based on individual competition among the citizens, directed by state authorities and local authorities to target the places specially designated College of Music and Music College Znamensky branch within budget places.
Number of seats for special admission for each specialty determined not later than one month before receiving the documents and should not exceed 30% of the total cost of seats in each specialty, this coming and alerted the public.
If you need to establish a College of Music and Music College affiliated Znamensky higher proportion received by the target receiving it agrees with the Ministry of Culture of the Astrakhan region.
70. Number of target sites can not be increased during the reception of documents, entrance tests and admission.
71. If contracting with the College of Music and Znamensky branch music college parties do not provide a competition aimed at the target site, the selection committee is obliged to reduce the number of allocated target places, put a notice to the Ministry of Culture of the Astrakhan region and arriving at the target location.
72. Persons who have not passed the contest to the target site may, on the basis of available results of entrance tests and the unified state examination taken by the different conditions of admission to any form of education in the College of Music and the Sign branch music college.
73. Target places remaining vacant after the date of entrance tests and admission granted to a person involved in the overall competition.
All procedures for the intended reception of the protocols drawn up a selection committee Musical College and the Sign branch music college.
74. Enrollment is conducted after completion of admission tests, including additional entrance examinations, and ending no later than 10 days before the start of training.
The order of admission of persons eligible for admission without entrance examinations, is published by the end of five days after receiving the documents and posted on the official site of the College of Music and the Sign branch of the College of Music and the information board selection committee. In this case, the persons entitled to admission without entrance examinations, during these five days after receiving the documents must give the original state documents on education.
75. The interval between the date of completion of entrance examinations and the date of the original state documents on education for those entering the low places, is seven calendar days.
76. Upon written request received original documents state-of education and other documents submitted by the incoming, returning College of Music and Music College Znamensky branch within the next working day after application.
77. End date of entrance tests is the announcement of the official website of the Music College and Music College branch of the Sign and stand admissions surnames list of individuals with the number of points, placement of which is considered the selection committee for the various conditions of use (hereinafter — the list of surnames).
for training as an attendee — copies of state documents on education), 6 (six) 3×4 photos and a certificate from an educational institution, where he is a student.
At the same time coming, sent the documents through the postal operators in general use, when presenting the original state documents on education represents the original document proving his identity, copy of which was sent through the postal operators of general use.
79. On admission to the simultaneous parallel development of two major professional educational programs of secondary vocational education (College of Music in either branch of Znamenskoye College of Music or College of Music, or Branch Znamenskoye Music College and other educational institutions) the original state documents on education during the enrollment is coming to him choice to the one major professional educational programs of secondary vocational education, which he will be studying as a student. When enrolling at another major professional educational programs of secondary vocational education as a listener is entering a certified copy of the document state-of education and a certificate from an educational institution, where he is a student.
80. Listeners are transferred to places on contracts with payment of tuition fees.
individuals who have successfully passed the entrance examination, including an additional entrance tests, ranked in descending order of score (with its indication).
For specialty credited those who have a higher number of points on the entrance tests, including additional entrance tests, while an equal number of points — the person having the right to be enrolled, with an equal number of points on the entrance tests in the absence or presence of Equal-emptive rights on transfer — those with a higher score on the additional entrance examinations of professional and (or) the creative direction.
82. By the deadline for submission of original documents state standard of education director of the Musical College issued an order of admission of persons recommended by the selection committee for admission and submit the original of the relevant documents.
83. If there are seats remaining vacant after admission through a competitive tender, the Ministry of Culture of the Astrakhan region, in exceptional cases may provide College of Music and Music College Znamenskii branch the right to declare an additional method for the specialty of importance for the economic development of the Russian Federation or in the Astrakhan region, from among persons with a certificate of the results of the unified state exam or having a basic general education. In this case, admission to the additional seats must end no later than September 15.
The Ministry of Culture of the Astrakhan region necessarily inform the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation on the Granting College of Music and Music College Znamenskii branch of law to declare an additional method.
X. Features of the admission of foreign nationals.
84. Admission of foreign citizens in the College of Music and Znamensky branch music college for training in basic educational programs of secondary vocational education is carried out in accordance with international treaties of the Russian Federation and intergovernmental agreements of the Russian Federation from the budget of the Astrakhan region (including the limits of the Russian Federation Government quota ), as well as contracts with payment of tuition fees by physical and (or) legal entities.
85.1. Within the quota fixed by the Government of the Russian Federation in accordance with the Government Decree of 25 August 2008 N 638 «On cooperation with foreign countries in the field of education» (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2008, N 35, art. 4034) — in federal government educational institutions of secondary vocational education in the directions of the Federal Agency on Education.
85.2. In accordance with the Agreement on granting equal rights to citizens of States Parties to the Treaty on Deepening Integration in the economic and humanitarian areas from March 29, 1996 for admission to educational institutions approved by Government Resolution of 22 June 1999. N 662 (Laws of the Russian Federation, 1999, N27, art. 3364), and other international treaties of the Russian Federation and intergovernmental agreements of the Russian Federation — in state educational institutions of secondary vocational education.
85.3. Based on the evidence of members of the State program to assist the voluntary resettlement to the Russian Federation of compatriots living abroad, who are members of the State program to assist the voluntary resettlement to the Russian Federation of compatriots living abroad, approved by Presidential Decree of 22 June 2006 N 637 (Laws of the Russian Federation, 2006, N 26, art. 2820) — in state educational institutions of secondary vocational education.
85.4. In accordance with Federal Law of 24 May 1999 N 99-FZ «On State Policy of Russian Federation in respect of compatriots abroad» (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 1999, N 22, Art. 2670, 2002, N 22, Art. 2031; 2004, N 35, Art. 3607, 2006, N 1, art. 10; N 31, art. 3420, 2008, N 30, Art. 3616) — in state educational institutions of secondary vocational education.
86. Admission of foreign citizens mentioned in paragraphs 85.2. — 85.4. paragraph 85 of these Regulations, College of Music and Znamensky branch music college for education from the budget of the Astrakhan region on a competitive basis, unless otherwise stipulated by the legislation of the Russian Federation.
87. Admission of foreign citizens in the College of Music and Znamensky branch music college for training contracts with payment of tuition fees by physical and (or) legal persons is carried out within a number of established license to conduct educational activities, on terms determined annually by the rules of admission.
88. Foreign nationals are entitled to a non-competitive entry and pre-emptive right to enroll in the College of Music and Znamensky branch music college in the cases stipulated by legislation of the Russian Federation.
89.1. For foreign citizens mentioned in paragraph 85.1. paragraph 85 of this Order, within the deadline set by the Federal Agency on Education.
89.2. For foreign nationals referred to in subparagraphs 85.2. — 85.4. paragraph 85 of this Order, within the time prescribed by paragraph 27 of this Order.
Reception of documents for foreign nationals coming for training on contracts with payment of tuition fees by physical and (or) legal persons, shall follow the timetable set out in chapter IV of these rules.
All translations in the Russian language should be made to the name and surname, given an entry visa.
91. Foreign nationals coming to the limits of the Government of the Russian Federation dated August 25, 2008 N 638 «On cooperation with foreign countries in the field of education» (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2008, N 35, art. 4034) quotas, are also the direction of the Federal Education Agency.
94. Entrance examinations for foreign nationals referred to in subparagraphs 85.2. — 85.4. paragraph 85 and paragraph 87 of these Regulations shall be conducted in the form prescribed in Chapter V of these Regulations.
95. If the foreign nationals referred to in paragraphs 85.2. — 85.4. paragraph 85 and paragraph 87 of this Order, the results of CT in general subjects included in the list of entrance tests to the appropriate specialty, the Music College and Music College Znamenskii branch considers the results of CT as a result of admission tests on such general subjects.
96. The results of the winners of the final stage of All-Russian Olympiad recognized state educational institutions as the highest results of entrance examinations (100 points) in the Russian language and literature.
97. Foreign nationals — The winners of schoolchildren are taken to the educational institutions in accordance with the approved order of Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated 22 October 2007 N 285 (registered by Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation November 16, 2007, registration N 10496), as amended thereto, as amended by Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation on September 4, 2008 N 255 (registered by Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation October 1, 2008, registration N 12381) and on March 20, 2009 N 92 (registered by the Ministry of Justice April 27, 2009, registration N 13837).
98. Foreign nationals referred to in subparagraph 85.1. paragraph 85 of this Regulation shall be adopted by the federal government educational institutions without entrance examinations in the directions of the Federal Agency on Education.
99. Enrollment of foreign nationals referred to in subparagraphs 85.2. — 85.4. paragraph 85 of this Regulation, in places funded under the corresponding budget, carried out in order and terms set out in Chapter IX of this Regulation.
100. Enrollment of foreign nationals entering under the directions of the Federal Agency on Education, held in the time limit set by the Federal Agency on Education.
101. Admission of foreign citizens for training contracts with payment of tuition fees by physical and (or) legal persons is carried out in the terms set out in Chapter IX of this Regulation.


text:
3 Denis A. Rychkov, Steven Hunter, Viktor Yu. Kovalskii, Alexander A. Lomzov, Colin R. Pulham, Elena V. Boldyreva. Towards an understanding of crystallization from solution. DFT studies of multi-component serotonin crystals // Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, 2016, vol. 1088, p. 52–61.
9 Losev E.A., Zakharov B.A., Boldyreva E.V. Polymorphic transformations in glycine co-crystals at low temperature and high pressure: Two new examples as a follow-up to a glycine-glutaric acid study// CrystEngComm, 2016, v. 18, iss. 31, p. 5869-5875.
10 Zakharov B., Fisyuk A., Fitch A., Watier Y., Kostyuchenko A., Varshney D., Sztucki M., Boldyreva E., Shalaev E. Ice Recrystallization in a Solution of a Cryoprotector and Its Inhibition by a Protein: Synchrotron X-Ray Diffraction Study // Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2016, v. 105, iss. 7, p. 2129-2138.
11 Boldyreva E.V. Non-ambient Conditions in the Investigation and Manufacturing of Drug Forms. // Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2016, v. 22, p. 4981-5000.
14 A. A. Beloborodova, V. S. Minkov and E. V. Boldyreva. A new solvate of furosemide with dimethylacetamide // Acta Cryst., 2016, v. C72, p. 997-1001.
46 Mikhailenko M.A., Shakhtshneider T.P. Eltsov I.V.,Kozlov A.S., Kuznetsova S.A., Karacharov A.A., Boldyrev V.V. Supramolecular architecture of betulin diacetate complexes with arabinogalactan from Larix sibirica // Carbohydrate Polymers, 2016, Vol. 138, P. 1-7.
47 An’kov S.V., Tolstikova T.G., Onishchuk A.A., Khvostov M.V., Sorokina I.V., Baklanov A.M., Fomin V.M., Boldyrev V.V. Analgesic Effect of Several Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Nanoaerosols // Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal, 2016, Vol.49, Issue 10, Pages 680-682.
48 Shakhtshneider T.P., Kuznetsova S.A., Zamay A.S., Zamay T.N., Spivak E.A., Mikhailenko M.A., Malyar Y.N., Kuznetsov B.N., Chesnokov N.V., Boldyrev V.V. New composites of betulin esters with arabinogalactan as highly potent anti-cancer agents // Natural Product Research, 2016, Vol. 30, Iss. 12, P. 1382-1387.

matches: V. v. v. v. V. V. v.


text:
Hassell, K., French, J. and Boyle, R. (2017), Histological assessment of dusky flathead (Platycephalus fuscus) and sand whiting (Sillago ciliata) from the Hunter River, NSW. CAPIM Technical report No.80, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharley D, Hassell, K., Long, S., Sharp, S., Morris, E., Jeppe, K. and Pettigrove, V. (2016) Assessing ecological impact of the Somerton landfill fire on Merri Creek: Strategies towards recovery. Final report. CAPIM Technical Report No. 76, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Longmore AR. (2016). Port Phillip Bay Environmental Management Plan Nutrient Monitoring Annual Report 2015-16. CAPIM Technical Report No. 74, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Availble on request from capim-info@unimelb.edu.au.
Marshall S and Pettigrove V. (2016). East Werribee Employment Precinct: Stormwater Pollution Risk Assessment. CAPIM Technical Report No. 73, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marshall S, Jeppe K and Pettigrove V. (2016). Sources of synthetic pyrethroids to urban stormwater. Discussion paper. CAPIM Technical Report No. 72, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Myers JH, Sharp S, Keough M, Cinque K, O’Neill C, Coleman R and Pettigrove V. (2016). Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 2: Monitoring and evaluation of the risk of herbicides to key habitats in Western Port. DRAFT. CAPIM Technical Report No. 71, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Townsend K, Kellar C, Amos C, Colombo V, Jeppe K, Long S, Tillett B, Rose G, Allinson M and Pettigrove V. (2016). Lower Broken Creek and Nine Mile Creek macroinvertebrate assessment. Report prepared for Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority. CAPIM Technical Report No. 70, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Townsend K, Kellar C, Amos C, Jeppe K, Long S and Pettigrove V. (2016). Macroinvertebrate monitoring and assessment in the mid-Goulburn River. Report prepared for Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority. CAPIM Technical Report No. 69, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kellar C., MacMahon D, Sharley D, Tillett B, Marshall S, Long S and Pettigrove V (2016). Enhancing Our Dandenong Creek Summary Report for 2015-2016. CAPIM Technical Report No. 68, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marshall S, Sharp S, Amos C and Sharley D. (2016). Evaluation of selected aquatic sampling technologies for EPA Victoria (Phase 3). CAPIM Technical Report No. 67, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Amos C and Sharley D. (2016). Frankston Microbial Sourcing 2015-2016. CAPIM Technical Report No. 66, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bonney P, Kellar C and Pettigrove V. (2016). Weir management in the north Maroondah catchment: continued monitoring of 2015 sediment release operation. CAPIM Technical Report No. 65, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharp S, MacMahon D and Pettigrove V. (2016). Water NSW Pilot Study: Werriberri and Leura Creek Catchments. CAPIM Technical Report No. 64, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hassell K, French J and Boyle R. (2016). Milestone 5 Final Report: Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 3 – Pesticide Sourcing Study and Fish Health Assessment in Western Port Part 2: Assessment of Fish Health in Western Port. CAPIM Technical Report No.63 B, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Myers J, Sharp S, Sharley D, Vu H, Long S and Pettigrove V. (2016). Final Report: Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 3 – Pesticide Sourcing Study and Fish Health Assessment in Western Port Part 1: Pesticide Sourcing Study. CAPIM Technical Report No. 63A, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Donald A*, Katherine Jeppe K**, Elizabeth Morris E**, Pettigrove V**. (2016). Waterway Health Overview Paper: A report to the Yarra River Protection Ministerial Advisory Council, Rigby and Pyx Consulting* and the Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management **, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharp S, Sharley D and Pettigrove V. (2015). Sediment Quality Assessment Program 2015-16. CAPIM Technical Report No. 62, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Reports for the period 2010-2014 will be listed shortly.
Morris E and Petch D. (2015). Intertidal infauna monitoring program at the Western Treatment Plant 2014-2015. CAPIM Technical Report No. 61, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Barbee N, Longmore A, Townsend K, Pettigrove V and Swearer S. (2015). Technical knowledge synthesis for nutrient cycling, marine pests and pollutants in Port Phillip Bay. Informing the development of the new Port Phillip Bay Environmental Management Plan. CAPIM Technical Report No. 60, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Amos C, MacMahon D, Marshall S and Sharley D. (2015). Review of aquatic sampling technologies for EPA Victoria – Phase 2. Report prepared for EPA Victoria. CAPIM Technical Report No. 59, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Longmore A. (2015). PPB EMP Nutrient Monitoring Program Annual report 2014-2015. CAPIM Technical Report No. 58, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Long S, Sharley D, Macmahon, Hassell K, Jeppe K, Boyle R, Sinclair G, Amos C and Pettigrove V . (2015). Enhancing our Dandenong Creek Pollution Detection Program update 2014-2015. CAPIM Technical Report No. 57, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Long S, Sharley D, Macmahon D and Pettigrove V. (2015). Enhancing our Dandenong Creek Pollution Detection Program update 2014-2015. CAPIM Technical Report No. 56, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Long S, Sharley D, Macmahon D and Pettigrove V. (2015). Enhancing our Dandenong Creek Pollution Detection Program update 2014-2015. CAPIM Technical Report No. 55, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Morris E and Petch D. (2015). Intertidal monitoring program at the Western Treatment Plant, Report Card 2014. A report to GHD for Melbourne Water. CAPIM Technical Report No. 54, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hassell K, Jeppe K, Colombo V, Myers J, Sharp S and Pettigrove V. (2015). Final Report. Screening of agrochemicals in water near an aquaculture facility. CAPIM Technical Report No. 52, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hassell K, Kellar C, Townsend K, Jeppe K, Long S, Myers J, MacMahon D, Allinson M, Marshall S, Arora M, Dey A, Sengupta A and Pettigrove V. (2015). Identifying the factors influencing aquatic ecosystem health in the upper Jacksons Creek catchment. Overview. Final Report. CAPIM Technical Report No. 46, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Allinson G, Allinson M, Kadokami K, Shiraishi S, Nakajima D, Zhang J, Knight A, Gray S and Scales P. (2015). Demonstration of robust water recycling: Monitoring the levels of trace organic chemicals (TrOCs). Australian Water Recycling Centre of Excellence, Brisbane, Australia.
Gray S, Zhang J, Milne N, Duke M, Knight A, Scales P, Allinson M, Allinson G, Packer M, Northcott K, Hillis P, Sheehan D, Allard S, Tan J, JCroué J-P. (2015). Demonstration of robust water recycling: Final summary report. Australian Water Recycling Centre of Excellence, Brisbane, Australia.
Scales P, Knight A, Allinson M, Allinson G, Gray S, Zhang J, Packer M, Northcott K, and Sheehan D. (2015). Demonstration of robust water recycling: Risk assessment of the removal of chemicals of concern in the Davis Station Advanced Water Treatment Plant. Australian Water Recycling Centre of Excellence, Brisbane, Australia.
Arora M, Dey A, Sengupta A and Pettigrove V. (2014). Rainfall Runoff Model of Jacksons Creek Catchment. CAPIM Technical Report No. 53, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Longmore A. (2014). Port Phillip Bay Environmental Management Plan. Monitoring the State of Bay Nutrient Cycling 2013-2014. CAPIM Technical Report No. 49, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Allinson G and Gourley C. (2014). Irrigation of Factory Reuse Water: Environmental Risk Assessment. CAPIM Technical Report No. 48, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. CAPIM Technical Report No. 48, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bonney B, Kellar C and Pettigrove V. (2014).The response of macroinvertebrate communities to multiple sediment releases in the north Maroondah catchment. CAPIM Technical Report No. 47, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kellar C, MacMahon D, Jeppe K, Hassell K, Myers J, Long S, Allinson M, Sharley D and Pettigrove V. (2014). Pollution Prevention Program. CAPIM Technical Report No. 45, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Allinson G. (2014). Dairy Tracers Pilot Project. CAPIM Technical Report No. 43, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Carnell P.E. and Longmore A.R. (2014). VEAC Marine Investigation. Resilience of Victorian reefs to climate change: An investigation utilising the Sub-tidal Reef Monitoring Program. CAPIM Technical Report No. 42, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kellar C, Hassell K, Jeppe K, Myers J, Long S, MacMahon D, Townsend K, Rose G, O’Neill C and Pettigrove V. (2014). Identifying the primary factors influencing aquatic ecosystem health in the Maribyrnong River. Final Report. CAPIM Technical Report No. 41, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marshall S. (2014). Review of pollution trends at Cherry Lake, Altona. CAPIM Technical Report No. 40, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Allinson G, Allinson A, Myers J and Pettigrove V. (2014). Use of novel rapid assessment tools for efficient monitoring of micropollutants in urban storm water (SWF Project 8OS – 8100) Final Report. CAPIM Technical Report No. 37, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hassell K. (2013). Assessment of Gonad Histopathology in Smooth Toadfish (Tetractenos glaber) from Sydney Harbour and surrounding estuaries in New South Wales, Australia. CAPIM Technical Report No. 35, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharley D, Valenzuela I, Sharp S, Amos C, Sá Almeida I and Pettigrove V. Identifying the origin of microbial contamination at Frankston and Mornington beaches. Molecular and Chemical Tracking. CAPIM Technical Report No. 35, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Allinson G. (2013). Passive sampling for 39 priority chemicals identified by Melbourne Water: A review. CAPIM Technical Report No. 35, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Allinson G.(2013). Agricultural non-point source pollution control: A review. CAPIM Technical Report No. 34, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Allinson M, Myers J, Allinson G and Pettigrove V. (2013). Use of novel rapid assessment tools for efficient monitoring of micropollutants in urban storm water (SWF Project 8OS – 8100) Milestone 03 Report. CAPIM Technical Report No. 33, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
O’Brien A and Sharley D. (2013). Impacts of bacteria from Kananook and Mordialloc Creeks on beach water quality: a review of current knowledge. CAPIM Technical Report No. 32, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharley D, Mornane P, Gagliardi B, Almeida MIGS, Kolev S and Pettigrove V. Review of aquatic sampling technologies for EPA Victoria. Monitoring and investigations. CAPIM Technical Report No. 31, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Longmore A. (2013). Port Phillip Bay Environmental Management Plan. Monitoring the State of Bay Nutrient Cycling 2012-2013. CAPIM Technical Report No. 30, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marshall S and Amos C. (2013). Feasibility of establishing and maintaining a mussel colony (Mytilus edulis) in the Docklands precinct for the Mussel Choir project. CAPIM Technical Report No. 29, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Allinson G. (2013). Dairy Effluent Contaminants Review. CAPIM Technical Report No. 28a, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharley D, Hassell K, O’Brien A and Long S. (2013). Assessment of invertebrate communities and fish health in the agriculturally influenced Watson Creek estuary. CAPIM Technical Report No. 28, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharp S, Myers J and Pettigrove V. (2013). An assessment of sediment toxicants in Western Port and major tributaries. CAPIM Technical Report No. 27, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jenkins G, Kenner T, Brown A. (2013). Determining the specificity of fish-habitat relationships in Western Port. CAPIM Technical Report No. 26, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Morris L and May D. (2013). Intertidal Monitoring Program at the Western Treatment Plant. Report Card 2012. CAPIM Technical Report No. 25, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Long Sand Boyle R. (2013) Effects of coal seam gas discharges on freshwater shrimp (Macrobrachium spp) . CAPIM Technical Report No. 24, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Allinson M, Myers J, Allinson G and Pettigrove V. (2013). Use of novel rapid assessment tools for efficient monitoring of micropollutants in urban storm water (SWF Project 8OS – 8100) Milestone 02 Report. CAPIM Technical Report No. 23, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Edge KJ, Chapman JC, Larsson ME, Hassell KL, Roach, AC. (2013) Rapid Assessment of cumulative stressors on fish populations. Final Report to the Environmental Trust, research project 2007/RD/rd017, Environmental Protection Science Branch, New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage. 51pp.
Allinson G. (2012). Pilot Stormwater Project Agrochemicals Report. CAPIM Technical Report No. 15, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Allinson G. (2012). Use of novel rapid assessment tools for efficient monitoring of micropollutants in urban storm water (SWF Project 8OS – 8100) Milestone 01 Report, CAPIM Technical Report No. 16, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Allinson G, Allinson M, Bui A, Zhang P and Rose G (2012). EMP Passive sampler comparison PS comparison project report. CAPIM Technical Report No. 18, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Amos C. (2012). An investigation of contaminants in fish and sediment in Sugarloaf Reservoir. CAPIM Technical Report No. 14, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Gagliardi B (2012). Groundwater quality in the Woori Yallock catchment and its potential impacts on Eucalyptus camphora in the Yellingbo Nature Conservation Reserve, Victoria. CAPIM Technical Report No.17, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
McMahon D. (2012). Stormwater Passive Sampling Survey for the Derwent Estuary Program. CAPIM Technical Report No. 20, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharp S. (2012).Darling Street Stormwater Monitoring: Report 1 - Initial Monitoring. CAPIM Technical Report No. 13, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharp S. (2012). Darling Street Stormwater Harvesting Scheme, 2nd monitoring report. CAPIM Technical Report No. 22, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Barbee N and Swearer S (2011). Validating the use of otoliths from embryos of native fish to detect exposure to copper in estuarine sediments .CAPIM Technical Report No. 11, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Gagliardi B (2011). An Assessment of the Effects of the 2010-2011 Victorian locust control program on Aquatic ecosystems. CAPIM Technical Report No. 9, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Austral.
Kellar C, Hassell K, Long S, Myers J, Golding L, Pettigrove, V. (2011). Identifying the primary factors influencing aquatic ecosystem health in the Upper Dandenong Creek Catchment. CAPIM Technical Report No. 6, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marshall S. (2011). City of Whittlesea Stormwater Quality Monitoring Program - Interim Report. CAPIM Technical Report No. 5, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
O'Brien A and Keough M. (2011) Using mesocosms to detect macroinvertebrate responses to pollutants in estuaries. CAPIM Technical Report No. 10, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hassell K, Marshall A. (2010). Preliminary Assessment of Gonad Histopathology in Smooth Toadfish (Tetractenos glaber) (Freminville 1813) from two estuaries in New South Wales, Australia. CAPIM Technical Report No. 1, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Van Gelderen R and Pettigrove V. (2010) .Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) within the Yarra/Maribyrnong Rivers and Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, Australia. CAPIM Technical Report No. 4, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

matches: V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. V.


text:
Nickeline: Mineral information, data and localities.
Originally named kupfernickel in 1694 by Urban Hjärne from the German nickname for Satan or Nick (in the sense of a mischievous deceiver), because the ore seemed to contain copper but yielded none. Renamed nickeline in 1832 by François Sulpice Beudant in allusion to its nickel contents. Also renamed niccolite by James Dwight Dana in 1868 from the Latin "niccolum".
The most common member of the nickeline group. An important nickel ore mineral.
Whitish yellow-pink to light brownish pink.
Rammelsbergite 36 photos of Nickeline associated with Rammelsbergite on mindat.org.
Silver 30 photos of Nickeline associated with Silver on mindat.org.
Annabergite 29 photos of Nickeline associated with Annabergite on mindat.org.
Gersdorffite 24 photos of Nickeline associated with Gersdorffite on mindat.org.
Skutterudite 23 photos of Nickeline associated with Skutterudite on mindat.org.
Breithauptite 20 photos of Nickeline associated with Breithauptite on mindat.org.
Calcite 20 photos of Nickeline associated with Calcite on mindat.org.
Safflorite 16 photos of Nickeline associated with Safflorite on mindat.org.
Dolomite 16 photos of Nickeline associated with Dolomite on mindat.org.
Bismuth 14 photos of Nickeline associated with Bismuth on mindat.org.
Russell, A. (1927) Notice of an occurrence of niccolite and ullmannite at the Settlingstones mine, Fourstones, Northumberland; and of serpierite at Ross Island mine, Killarney, Co. Kerry, Ireland. Mineralogical Magazine, vol. 21, n° 119, 383-387.
Zeitschrift für Kristallographie (1933) 84: 408.
Palache, C., Berman, H., and Frondel, C. (1944) The System of Mineralogy of James Dwight Dana and Edward Salisbury Dana Yale University 1837-1892, Volume I: Elements, Sulfides, Sulfosalts, Oxides. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 7th edition, revised and enlarged, 834pp.: 236-238.
The following Nickeline specimens are currently listed for sale on minfind.com.
Milka K. de Brodtkorb (1973) 5th Congreso Geologico Argentino 1:63-68, Cordoba.; C. S. Lurgo Mayón (1999). Depósitos polimetálicos ricos en Níquel, Cobalto y Arsénico de la cordillera oriental, Jujuy y Salta.
Stanton, R.L. (1953) The Lloyd copper mine, Burraga. In: Edwards, A.B. (ed.), Geology of Australian Ore Deposits, pp.906-909. Australasian Institute of Mining and Mettalurgy, Melbourne.
ⓘ North Mine (North Broken Hill Mine; NBH Mine) ?
McNeill, A.R. (1973) Mount Bonnie Prospect, Progress Report No.1. Horizon Explorations Limited, Report No. 63. Northern Territory Geological Survey.
A. Strasser: Die Minerale Salzburgs (1989); Kolitsch, U. & Brandstätter, F. (2008); Buttinger-Kreuzhuber, T. (2014): Optische und chemische Analyse einer Nickelerzparagenese der Zinkwand in den Schladminger Tauern. Bachelor-Arbeit, Universität Wien, 30 S.
ⓘ Alte Zeche Mine ?
Coppola, V., Boni, M., Gilg, H.A., Balassone, G., and Dejonghe, L. (2008): Ore Geology Reviews 33, 187-210.
Machlan, L. A., & Barnes, I. L. (1989). The absolute isotopic composition and atomic weight of terrestrial nickel. News Briefs, 94(6), 357.
Econ Geol (1994) 89:1630-1639; Y. Chen, M. E. Fleet and Y. Pan (1993) Platinum-group minerals and gold in Arsenic-rich ore at the Thompson mine, Thompson Nickel Belt, Manitoba, Canada. Mineralogy and Petrology 49:127-146; Chen, Yuan, "Precious-metal Mineralization And Sulfide-silicate Relationships In Some Canadian Nickel-copper Sulfide Deposits: Thompson Mine, Manitoba; Sudbury, Ontario; Dundonald Beach, Ontario" (1993). Digitized Theses. Paper 2231.
Hill, Patrick A. and Ruest, Arthur E., 1981, Heavy Minerals and Metals in Port au Port Bay, Newfoundland, A Reconnaissance, Economic Geology, v. 76, p. 961-970.
Bennett G. (1978) Geology of the Northeast Temagami Area, Ontario Geological Survey, Report 163, p.85.
ⓘ Silver Harbour Mine (Beck Mine; Three A Mine; 3 A) ?
Ann P.Sabina (1991), Rocks and Minerals for the Collector, Sudbury to Winnipeg. GSC Misc. Report 49.
Sergiades, A.O., Silver Cobalt Calcite Vein Deposits of Ontario, 1968; Satterly, J. (1977) A Catalogue of the Ontario Localities Represented by the Mineral Collection of the Royal Ontario Museum; Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper MP70,464p.
Pring, A., Grguric, B.A., Criddle, A.J. (1998) Lindstromite from Cobalt, Ontario. The Canadian Mineralogist, 36, 1139-1148.
ontariominerals.com; Satterly, J. 1977: A Catalogue of the Ontario Localities Represented by the Mineral Collection of the Royal Ontario Museum; Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper MP70,464p.
Knight, Cyril W. (1922). Geology of The Mine Workings of Cobalt and South Lorraine Areas; Thirty - First Annual Report of the Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. 21, Pt.2, P. 118, 120.
Knight, Cyril W. (1922). Geology of The Mine Workings of Cobalt and South Lorraine Areas; Thirty - First Annual Report of the Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. 21, Pt.2, P. 50.
Knight, Cyril W. (1922). Geology of The Mine Workings of Cobalt and South Lorraine Areas; Thirty - First Annual Report of the Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. 21, Pt.2, P. 51, 53.
Can Mineral December 1971 v. 11 no. 1 p. 108-139; Satterly, J. (1977) A Catalogue of the Ontario Localities Represented by the Mineral Collection of the Royal Ontario Museum; Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper MP70,464p.
Dana 7:I:193-194.; Mineralogical Magazine 1940 25 : 557-572.; Satterly, J. (1977) A Catalogue of the Ontario Localities Represented by the Mineral Collection of the Royal Ontario Museum; Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper MP70,464p.
HORVÁTH, L. & PFENNINGER-HORVÁTH, E. (2000) I minerali di Mont-Saint-Hilaire (Québec, Canada) Rivista Mineralogica Italiana, XXIV, 140-202 (in Italian with English summary).
David Quirt (2006) Uranium 101: Geochemistry and Uranium Deposit Metallogenesis. in Uranium Exploration in Western Canada Short Course Notes MEG ed. D. Pana; Maurice, Y.T., G.J. Strnad, and w. Dyck (1983) Interpretation of Secondary Dispersion Patterns at Key Lake, Northern Saskatchewan. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 19(1-3), 643-661.
Barkov, A.Y., Laflamme, J.H.G., Cabri, L.J., and Martin, R.F. (2002) Platinum-group minerals from the Wellgreen Cu-Ni-PGE deposit, Yukon, Canada. Canadian Mineralogist: 40: 651-669.
Dahlkamp, F.J., Ed. (2009): Uranium Deposits of the World. Springer (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 31-156.
Min, M. (1995): Ore Geology Reviews 10, 51-64.
Min, M., Zheng, D., Shen, B., Wen, G., Wang, X., and Gandhi, S.S. (1997): Mineralium Deposita 32(5), 505-519.
Dr Gunther Grundmann collection and ID, via H. Rosinsky (Berlin) (whose label said "Wismut & Rotnickelkies"), mined in 1892.
Billay, A.Y., Kisters, A.F.M., Meyer, F.M., and Schneider, J. (1997): Mineralium Deposita 32, 491-504.
Molnár, F., Oduro, H., Cook, N. D., Pohjolainen, E., Takács, Á., O’Brien, H., ... & Wirth, R. (2016). Association of gold with uraninite and pyrobitumen in the metavolcanic rock hosted hydrothermal Au-U mineralisation at Rompas, Peräpohja Schist Belt, northern Finland. Mineralium Deposita, 51(5), 681-702.
Hänninen, Esko (1978). Enonkosken Laukunkankaan Ni-Cu-esiintymän malmimineralogiasta. Outokumpu OY:n malminetsintä raportit.
Dietrichs, J. (2006): Die Mineralien der Nickelgrube "Großfürstin Alexandra" im Ostharz. Lapis 31 (6), 28-30; 70.
Verein Mansfelder Berg- und Hüttenleute e.V. und Bergbaumuseum Bochum (Hrsg.): Mansfeld - Die Geschichte des Berg- und Hüttenwesens. Lutherstadt Eisleben und Bochum 1999, ISBN 3-921-533-69-4.
Nickerl, F., and Röthig, H. (2000): Verzeichnis der Berggebäude von Annaberg 1500-1900. Streifzüge durch die Geschichte des oberen Erzgebirges, Bergbaunachrichten. Arbeitskreis Annaberg-Buchholzer Heimatforscher, 60 pp.
Economic Geology 102 (2007) 1269-1294.; Bonev, I. K., Petrunov, R., Cook, N. J., & Ciobanu, C. L. (2005). Kostovite and its argentian varieties: Deposits and mineral associations. Geochem. Mineral. Petrol.(Bulg. Acad. Sci.), 42, 1-22.
Yassin, S.Z., Goff, J.C. (Eds.) (2006): Geology of Iraq. Dolin, Prague and Moravian Museum, Brno, 337 pp.
Bombicci, L. (1877) Contribuzioni di mineralogia italiana. Parte III. Millerite di Nieddoris ecc. (Sardegna). Memorie della R. Accademia delle Scienze dell'Istituto di Bologna, serie 3a, 8, 343-344; AA. VV., 1996. Collezionare minerali. Hobby & Work.
Jervis, G. (1881) I tesori sotterranei dell'Italia. Vol. 3: Regioni delle Isole. Sardegna e Sicilia. Addenda ai precedenti volumi. Ermanno Loescher, Torino, XXII+539 pp.; Billows, E. (1941) I minerali della Sardegna e i loro giacimenti. Tipografia V. Musanti, Cagliari, 167 pp.; Stara, P., Rizzo, R., and Tanca, G.A. [with contributions of Vinci, A., and Astolfi, M.] (1996) Iglesiente e Arburese. Miniere e Minerali. Associazione Mineralogica Sarda, Associazione Mineralogica Domusnovas, Gruppo Mineralogico Arburese, Gruppo Mineralogico Paleontologico Piacentino, Gruppo Mineralogico Lombardo et al. Ed., Siena, Vol. 2, 192 pp.
Dessau, G. (1936) I minerali dei filoni a nichelio e cobalto dell’ Arburese (Sardegna). Periodico di Mineralogia, 7 ,21–39; Billows, E. (1941) I minerali della Sardegna e i loro giacimenti. Tipografia V. Musanti, Cagliari, 167 pp.; Stara, P., Rizzo, R., and Tanca, G.A. [with contributions of Vinci, A., and Astolfi, M.] (1996) Iglesiente e Arburese. Miniere e Minerali. Associazione Mineralogica Sarda, Associazione Mineralogica Domusnovas, Gruppo Mineralogico Arburese, Gruppo Mineralogico Paleontologico Piacentino, Gruppo Mineralogico Lombardo et al. Ed., Siena, Vol. 2, 192 pp.
Billows, E. (1941) I minerali della Sardegna e i loro giacimenti. Tipografia V. Musanti, Cagliari, 167 pp.; Stara, P., Rizzo, R., Tanca, G.A. (1996): Iglesiente e Arburese. Miniere e Minerali. Edito a cura dell'EMSA e "varie associazioni mineralogiche", Volume 2°, 192 pp.
Piepoli, P. (1933) Étude microscopique de quelques minerais des filons argentifères du Sarrabus (Sardaigne). Bulletin de la Société française de minéralogie, 56, 6-7-8, 277-302; Stara, P., Rizzo, R., Brizzi, G. (1993) Sarrabus. Miniere e Minerali. Associazione Mineralogica Sarda, Gruppo Mineralogico Lombardo, Associazione Piemontese Mineralogia Paleontologia e Mostra Torinese Minerali, Centro Mineralogico Varesino, Amici Mineralogisti Fiorentini, Gruppo Mineralogico Paleontologico Piacentino, et al., Stige Milano Srl, Milano, 208 pp.
Bombicci, L. (1877) Contribuzioni di mineralogia italiana. Parte III. Minerali delle Miniere del Sarrabus, esercitate dalla Società anonima di Lanusei in Sardegna. Memorie della R. Accademia delle Scienze dell'Istituto di Bologna, serie 3a, 8, 326-344; Traverso, G.B (1881) Giacimenti a minerali d'argento del Sarrabus e di alcune specie di minerali provenienti dai filoni che lo costituiscono, facenti parte della collezione mineralogica del Museo Civico di Genova. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova, 16, 493-522; De Castro, C. (1890) Descrizione geologico-mineraria della zona argentifera del Sarrabus (Sardegna). Memorie descrittive della Carta geologica d'Italia, 5, 68 pp. + 6 plates + 1 folded geological map; Traverso, G.B. (1898) Sarrabus e suoi minerali. Note descrittive sui minerali del Sarrabus facenti parte della collezione di minerali italiani presso il Museo civico di Genova. Tipografia e Libreria Sansoldi, Alba, 73 pp.; Piepoli, P. (1933) Étude microscopique de quelques minerais des filons argentifères du Sarrabus (Sardaigne). Bulletin de la Société française de minéralogie, 56, 6-7-8, 277-302; Stara, P., Rizzo, R., Brizzi, G. (1993) Sarrabus. Miniere e Minerali. Associazione Mineralogica Sarda, Gruppo Mineralogico Lombardo, Associazione Piemontese Mineralogia Paleontologia e Mostra Torinese Minerali, Centro Mineralogico Varesino, Amici Mineralogisti Fiorentini, Gruppo Mineralogico Paleontologico Piacentino, et al., Stige Milano Srl, Milano, 208 pp.
De Castro, C. (1890) Descrizione geologico-mineraria della zona argentifera del Sarrabus (Sardegna). Memorie descrittive della Carta geologica d'Italia, 5, 68 pp. + 6 plates + 1 folded geological map; Piepoli, P. (1933) Étude microscopique de quelques minerais des filons argentifères du Sarrabus (Sardaigne). Bulletin de la Société française de minéralogie, 56, 6-7-8, 277-302; Stara, P., Rizzo, R., Brizzi, G. (1993) Sarrabus. Miniere e Minerali. Associazione Mineralogica Sarda, Gruppo Mineralogico Lombardo, Associazione Piemontese Mineralogia Paleontologia e Mostra Torinese Minerali, Centro Mineralogico Varesino, Amici Mineralogisti Fiorentini, Gruppo Mineralogico Paleontologico Piacentino, et al., Stige Milano Srl, Milano, 208 pp.; Manca, A., Manca, R., Manca, L. (1995) La miniera di Masaloni (Sarrabus, Sardegna). Rivista Mineralogica Italiana, 18, 3 (3-1995), 291-297.
Traverso, G.B (1881) Giacimenti a minerali d'argento del Sarrabus e di alcune specie di minerali provenienti dai filoni che lo costituiscono, facenti parte della collezione mineralogica del Museo Civico di Genova. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova, 16, 493-522; De Castro, C. (1890) Descrizione geologico-mineraria della zona argentifera del Sarrabus (Sardegna). Memorie descrittive della Carta geologica d'Italia, 5, 68 pp. + 6 plates + 1 folded geological map; Piepoli, P. (1933) Étude microscopique de quelques minerais des filons argentifères du Sarrabus (Sardaigne). Bulletin de la Société française de minéralogie, 56, 6-7-8, 277-302; Stara, P., Rizzo, R., Brizzi, G. (1993) Sarrabus. Miniere e Minerali. Associazione Mineralogica Sarda, Gruppo Mineralogico Lombardo, Associazione Piemontese Mineralogia Paleontologia e Mostra Torinese Minerali, Centro Mineralogico Varesino, Amici Mineralogisti Fiorentini, Gruppo Mineralogico Paleontologico Piacentino, et al., Stige Milano Srl, Milano, 208 pp.
Kjerulf and Dahll (1861b, p. 329); Neumann (1985, p. 28).
Hoehne K. 1936: Über einige Arsen-, Nickel-, Kobalt-, Silber-, Wismut- und Uranerzführende Kalkspatgänge dre Grube Bergfreiheit zu Oberschmiedeberg im Riesengebirge. Chem d. Erde Bd 10; Econ Geol (1997) 92:468-484; Mochnacka, K., Oberc-Dziedzic, T., Mayer, W., & Pieczka, A. (2015). Ore mineralization related to geological evolution of the Karkonosze–Izera Massif (the Sudetes, Poland)—Towards a model. Ore Geology Reviews, 64, 215-238.
Dan Weinrich; Ilinca, G. (1998) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bucharest, Romania, 356 p. (in Romanian).; Ilinca, G. (2012) Upper Cretaceous contact metamorphism and related mineralization in Romania. Acta Mineralogica-Petrographica, Abstract Series, Szeged, Vol. 7.
Ilinca, G. (1998) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bucharest, Romania, 356 p. (in Romanian).; Ilinca, G. (2012) Upper Cretaceous contact metamorphism and related mineralization in Romania. Acta Mineralogica-Petrographica, Abstract Series, Szeged, Vol. 7.
Pavel M. Kartashov data; Pekov, I.V., Levitskiy, V.V., Krivovichev, S.V., Zolotarev, A.A., Bryzgalov, I.A., Zadov, A.E. & Chukanov, N.V. (2012): New nickel-uranium-arsenic mineral species from the oxidation zone of the Belorechenskoye deposit, Northern Caucasus, Russia: I. Rauchite, Ni(UO2)2(AsO4)2.10H2O, a member of the autunite group. European Journal of Mineralogy, 24, 913-922.
Števko M., Sejkora J., Litochleb J., Macek I., Bačík P., 2013: Krutovit a sprievodné minerály z lokality Dobšiná-Teliatko (Slovenská republika). Bull. mineral.-petrolog. Odd. Nár. Muz. (Praha), 21, 1, 1-14 (in Slovak with English abstract).
Henning, A., van der Westhuizen, W.A., de Bruiyn, H., and Beukes, G.J. (1997): Mineralium Deposita 32, 410-418.
Tolman, C. F., & Rogers, A. F. (1916). A Study of the Magmatic Sulphide Ores. Leland Stanford Junior Univ. Pub., Univ. Service.
Canadian Mineralogist 38:567-584 (2000); CHOI, S. G., & IMAI, N. (1985). Ni-Fe-Co Arsenides and Sulpharsenides from the Ulsan Mine, Republic of Korea. Mining Geology, 35(189), 1-16.
Calvo, M. (2008) Minerales de Aragón. Prames. 463 pages; Fanlo, I., Subías, I., Gervilla, F. and Manuel, J. (2006). Textures and compositional variability in gersdorffite from the Crescencia Ni-(Co-U) showing, Central Pyrenees, Spain: Primary deposition or re-equilibration?. Canadian Mineralogist: 44: 1513-1528.
Moralev, G.V., and Shatagin, K.N. (1999): Mineralium Deposita 34, 405-413.
Gregor, W. (1818): Transactions of the Royal Geological Society of Cornwall 1, 224-225; Phillips, W. (1823): An Elementary Introduction to the Knowledge of Mineralogy, 3rd ed. William Phillips (London), 535 pp.; Hogg, T. (1825): A Manual of Mineralogy. Polyblank Publishers (London), pp. 50-51; Hall, T.M. (1868): The Mineralogist's Directory. Edward Stanford (London), 168 pp.
Phillips, W. (1823): An Elementary Introduction to the Knowledge of Mineralogy, 3rd ed. William Phillips (London), 535 pp.; Hall, T.M. (1868): The Mineralogist's Directory. Edward Stanford (London), 168 pp.; Collins, J.H. (1871): A Handbook to the Mineralogy of Cornwall and Devon. D. Bradford Barton Ltd. (Truro, UK), 108 pp.
Dines, H.G. (1956): The metalliferous mining region of south-west England. HMSO Publications (London), Vol. 2, pp. 545-546; Merry, M. & Weiß, S. (2017): Nickel- und Kobaltmineralien aus der St. Austell Consols Mine, Cornwall (GB). Lapis, 42 (1), 24-26; 39-40; 62 (in German).
Dunham, Sir K. C. Geology of the North Pennine Orefield, Volume 1 Tyne to Stainmore (2nd Edition), pp 11. Fisher, J. (2009) The Hilton Mine: Scordale, Cumbria England. Rocks and Minerals, 84:2, 114-121.
Dana 7: I: 302.; Russell, A. (1927) Notice of an occurrence of niccolite and ullmannite at the Settlingstones mine, Fourstones, Northumberland; and of serpierite at Ross Island mine, Killarney, Co. Kerry, Ireland. Mineralogical Magazine, vol. 21, n° 119, 383-387.; Ixer, R.A. and Duller, P.R. (1998) Virtual atlas of opaque and ore minerals in their associations.; Young, B. (2011) Millerite from Coldberry Gutter and Great Eggleshope, Teesdale, County Durham. NHSN-Transactions, vol. 71, part 2, 111-114.
Temple, A.K. (1954) Rammelsbergite from the Southern Uplands of Scotland. Mineralogical Magazine, vol. 30, n° 227, p. 541-543.; Livingstone, A. and Macpherson, H.G. (1983) Fifth supplementary list of British minerals (Scottish). Mineralogical Magazine, vol. 47, n° 342, p. 99-105.; Livingstone, A. (2002) The Minerals of Scotland - past and present, NMS Publications Ltd.
Livingstone, A. (2002) : Minerals of Scotland - past and present, NMS Publications Ltd.
Mineralogical Magazine 1954 30 : 541-543.
Anthony, J.W., et al (1995), Mineralogy of Arizona, 3rd.ed.: 313; Wenrich, K.J. & H.B. Sutphin (1988), Recognition of breccia pipes in northern Arizona, AZ Bur. Geol. Min. Tech. Fieldnotes: 18: 1-5, II.
Anthony, J.W., et al (1995), Mineralogy of Arizona, 3rd.ed.: 335, 390, 393; Bastin, E.S. (1922), Primary native-silver ores near Wickenburg, AZ, and their bearing on the genesis of the silver ores of Cobalt, Ontario, USGS Bull. 735: 131-155; Galbraith, F.W. (1947), Minerals of AZ, AZ Bur. Mines Bull. 153: 9, 15, 20, 27, 28.
Küstel, Guido (1865): Tellurite of gold and silver: Mining and Scientific Press: 10: 306; Murdoch, Joseph & Robert W. Webb (1966), Minerals of California, Centennial Volume (1866-1966): California Division Mines & Geology Bulletin 189: 279.
Bowen, O.E., Jr. & C.H. Gray, Jr. (1957), Mines and mineral deposits of Mariposa County, California: California Journal of Mines and Geology: 53(1&2): 154; Pemberton, H. Earl (1983), Minerals of California; Van Nostrand Reinholt Press: 66.
Cooney, R.L. (1956), The mineralogy of the Jensen and Henshaw quarries near Riverside, California: Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of California at Los Angeles: 30; Pemberton, H. Earl (1983), Minerals of California; Van Nostrand Reinholt Press: 65, 66.
USGS (2005), Mineral Resources Data System (MRDS): U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, loc. file ID #10261998.
Chomiak, B. A. (1989): An integrated study of the structure and mineralization at Great Hill, Cobalt, Connecticut [M.S. thesis]: University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, 288 p.
King, V. and Foord, 1994, Mineralogy of Maine, volume 1.
Rainville, G. D. and Park, W. C. (1976) Nickeliferous Pyrrhotite Deposits, Knox County, Southeastern Maine in Lyons, P. C. and Brownlow, A. H. (editors) Studies in New England Geology, Memoir 146, Geological Society of America, p. 319-347.; King & Foord, 1994. Mineralogy of Maine, V.1.
ⓘ Seneca No. 1 Shaft ?
ⓘ Willow Springs prospect (Willow Spring) ?
Palache(1935):29; Oen, et al: Neues Jahrbuch für Min. Abhandlungen:150:259-272; Dunn(1995):Pt4:547-549.
Robert C. Smith, II Ph.D.
ⓘ Josephine Creek placers ?
ⓘ Oxford Serpentine Quarry (Collins prospect) ?

matches: v. v. V. V. V. V.


text:
The “first principle” of labor and commercial arbitration law is that “arbitration is a matter of consent, not coercion” —put differently, arbitration “is a way to resolve those disputes—but only those disputes—that the parties have agreed to submit to arbitration.” Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U.S. 662, 678-80 (2010) (citation and quotations omitted); First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938, 943 (1995) (citations omitted); Granite Rock Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 561 U.S. 287, 295 & n.7, 294 n.6 (2010); AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers, 475 U. S. 643, 648 (1986). That first principle is integrally intertwined with “the central or primary purpose of the [Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”)][,]” which is “to ensure that private agreements to arbitrate are enforced according to their terms.”Stolt-Nielsen, 559 U.S. at 679 (citations and quotations omitted).
What happens if the parties agree to submit one category of disputes to a two-person arbitration panel and to submit another category of disputes to a three-person panel?
If you read Part I you know the arbitration program in PoolRe case was, to put it mildly, inadequate to meet the needs of the multi-party, multi-contract dispute that arose out of the parties’ legal relationships. Perhaps the saving grace is that the both the district court and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the award, which is what Sections 5 and 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act require.
The Fifth Circuit addressed whether the district court erred by: (a) vacating the arbitration award on the ground the arbitrator exceeded his powers; (b) vacating the entire award; and (c) denying the motion to compel arbitration of the Phase II Claims. Finding no error, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment in its entirety.
The Fifth Circuit held that the arbitrator exceeded his powers because the Arbitrator: (a) was not properly appointed under the terms of the Reinsurance Agreement’s arbitrator selection provisions, which required him to be “selected by the Anguilla, B.W.I. Director of Insurance;” and (b) decided the dispute under the American Arbitration Association’s rules when the Reinsurance Agreement required arbitration under International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) Rules.
The district court held vacatur was required because the Arbitrator “was not ‘the actual decisionmaker that [PoolRe and the Captives] selected as an integral part of their agreement.'” Slip op. at 9 (quoting district court). The Fifth Circuit held that “the district court properly vacated the arbitrator’s award with regard to the claims against PoolRe[,]” because the Arbitrator “was appointed in the manner provided in the [Engagement Agreement’s] Billing Guidelines — to which PoolRe was not a party — but was appointed in a manner contrary to that provided in the Reinsurance Agreements between PoolRe and the Captives, which required ‘select[ion] by the Anguilla, B.W.I. Director of Insurance.'” Slip op. at 10-11. The Capstone Entities “submitted [their] original arbitration demand to [the Arbitrator][,]” but “PoolRe,” said the Court, “only intervened in that arbitration after [the Anguilla Financial Services Commission] notified Pool Re that no Director of Insurance existed.” Slip op. at 10-11. The Arbitrator thus “had not been ‘selected according to the contract specified method’. . . when he decided the dispute between Pool Re and the Captives.” Slip op. at 11 (quoting Bulko v. Morgan Stanley DW Inc., 450 F.3d 622, 625 ((5th Cir. 2006)).
The Fifth Circuit’s decision is fully consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act, under which “arbitration is a matter of consent, not coercion.” Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U.S. 662, 678-80 (2010) (citation and quotations omitted). Courts are supposed to enforce arbitration agreements according to their terms, and among the most important terms of an arbitration agreement are those concerning arbitrator selection. See Lefkovitz v. Wagner, 395 F.3d 773, 780 (2005) (Posner, J.) (“Selection of the decision maker by or with the consent of the parties is the cornerstone of the arbitral process.”); see, e.g., 9 U.S.C. § 5 (“If in the agreement provision be made for a method of naming or appointing an arbitrator or arbitrators or an umpire, such method shall be followed. . . .”); Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Art. V(1)(d), June 10, 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2519, T.I.A.S. No. 6997 (a/k/a the “New York Convention”) (implemented by 9 U.S.C. §§ 201, et. seq.) (award subject to challenge where “[t]he composition of the arbitral authority or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties”); Stolt-Nielsen, 559 U.S. at 668, 670 (one of the FAA’s “rules of fundamental importance” is parties “may choose who will resolve specific disputes”) (emphasis added; citations omitted); Encyclopaedia Universalis S.A. v. Encyclopaedia Brittanica, Inc., 403 F.3d 85, 91-92 (2d Cir. 2005) (vacating award by panel not convened in accordance with parties’ agreement); Cargill Rice, Inc. v. Empresa Nicaraguense Dealimentos Basicos, 25 F.3d 223, 226 (4th Cir. 1994) (same); Avis Rent A Car Sys., Inc. v. Garage Employees Union, 791 F.2d 22, 25 (2d Cir. 1986) (same).

matches:
v.
v.
v.
v.
v.
v.
v.
§ 5
v.
v.
v.