text:
Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for identifying a user in a multi-user environment. One of the methods includes receiving, by a first user device, an audio signal encoding an utterance, obtaining, by the first user device, a first speaker model for a first user of the first user device, obtaining, by the first user device for a second user of a second user device that is co-located with the first user device, a second speaker model for the second user or a second score that indicates a respective likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the second user, and determining, by the first user device, that the utterance was spoken by the first user using (i) the first speaker model and the second speaker model or (ii) the first speaker model and the second score.
5659665 August 1997 Whelpley, Jr.
7904297 March 2011 Mirkovic et al.
8200488 June 2012 Kemp et al.
8209184 June 2012 Dragosh et al.
8214447 July 2012 Deslippe et al.
8588949 November 2013 Lambourne et al.
8670985 March 2014 Lindahl et al.
8719009 May 2014 Baldwin et al.
8768687 July 2014 Quasthoff et al.
8775191 July 2014 Sharifi et al.
8805890 August 2014 Zhang et al.
8938394 January 2015 Faaborg et al.
2002/0049596 April 2002 Burchard et al.
2002/0193991 December 2002 Bennett et al.
2003/0236099 December 2003 Deisher et al.
2004/0158457 August 2004 Veprek et al.
2005/0135583 June 2005 Kardos et al.
2006/0085188 April 2006 Goodwin et al.
2006/0184370 August 2006 Kwak et al.
2011/0304648 December 2011 Kim et al.
2013/0006634 January 2013 Grokop et al.
2013/0024196 January 2013 Ganong et al.
2013/0060571 March 2013 Soemo et al.
2013/0132086 May 2013 Xu et al.
2013/0262873 October 2013 Read et al.
2016/0104483 April 2016 Foerster et al.
"Speaker Recognition", Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 5 pages, last modified on Jan. 30, 2014; downloaded from the internet on May 15, 2014, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_recognition. cited by applicant .
"Voice Biometrics Evaluation Studio.TM. 8.2 :: Product Description", Customer Care Solutions from Nuance, 2012, 6 pages. cited by applicant .
Germain, Francois G. et al., "Speaker and Noise Independent Voice Activity Detection", Mar. 26, 2013, 9 pages. cited by applicant .
Hurmalainen, Antti et al., "Detection, Separation and Recognition of Speech from Continuous Signals Using Spectral Factorisation", 20.sup.th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2012), Bucharest, Romania, Aug. 27-31, 2012, 5 pages. cited by applicant .
Kim, Youngmoo E. et al., "Comparison of a Joint Iterative Method for Multiple Speaker Identification with Sequential Blind Source Separation and Speaker Identification", Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Odyssey Workshop on Speaker and Language Recognition, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 8 pages. cited by applicant .
Kotti, Margarita et al., "Speaker Segmentation and Clustering", Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint Oct. 31, 2007, 54 pages. cited by applicant .
Kwon, Soonil et al., "Unsupervised Speaker Indexing Using Generic Models", IEEE Transaction on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 13, No. 5, Sep. 2005, 10 pages. cited by applicant .
Maes, Stephanie H. et al., "Conversational Speech Biometrics," J. Liu and Y. Ye (Eds.): E-Commerce Agents, LNAI 2033, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2001, 14 pages. cited by applicant .
Navratil, U.V. et al., "A Speech Biometrics System with Multi-Grained Speaker Modeling", 2000, 5 pages. cited by applicant .
Ramfrez, Javier et al., "Statistical Voice Activity Detection Using a Multiple Observation Likelihood Ratio Test", IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 12, No. 10, Oct. 2005, 4 pages. cited by applicant .
Schabus, Dietmar et al., "Objective and Subjective Feature Evaluation for Speaker-Adaptive visual Speech Synthesis", International Conference on Auditory-Visual Processing, 2013, 6 pages. cited by applicant .
Walsh, John MacLaren et al., Joint Iterative Multi-Speaker Identification and Source Separation Using Expectation Propagation:, Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, New Paltz, NY, 4 pages. cited by applicant .
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,380 dated Sep. 9, 2014, 18 pages. cited by applicant .
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,380 dated Jan. 26, 2015. cited by applicant .
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,380 dated May 27, 2015, 10 pages. cited by applicant .
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2015/030569, dated Jul. 27, 2015, 11 pages. cited by applicant .
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,380 dated Sep. 4, 2015, 16 pages. cited by applicant .
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,380 dated Nov. 13, 2015, 13 pages. cited by applicant .
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/805,687 dated Nov. 18, 2015, 17 pages. cited by applicant .
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2015/052860, dated Dec. 8, 2015, 12 pages. cited by applicant .
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/805,687 dated Apr. 19, 2016, 8 pages. cited by applicant .
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/675,932 dated Jun. 12, 2015, 15 pages. cited by applicant .
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/675,932 dated Oct. 1, 2015, 20 pages. cited by applicant .
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/675,932 dated Jan. 25, 2016, 17 pages. cited by applicant .
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/088,477 dated May 25, 2016, 19 pages. cited by applicant .
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International application No. PCT/US2015/030569, dated Jan. 24, 2017, 8 pages. cited by applicant .
Office Action in Korean Application No. 10-2016-7021778, dated Dec. 13, 2016, 4 pages. cited by applicant .
Extended European Search Report issued in Application No. 16195834.3-1910, dated Nov. 23, 2016, 9 pages. cited by applicant .
Extended European Search Report in European Application No. 16207288.8-1914, dated Apr. 4, 2017, 8 pages. cited by applicant .
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2016-551250, dated Apr. 10, 2017, 6 pages (English Translation). cited by applicant .
Office Action issued in Korean Application No. 10-2016-7027999, dated Apr. 12, 2017, 9 pages (English Translation). cited by applicant .
Jae-Seung, Choi, "Text-dependent Speaker Recognition using Characteristic Vectors in Speech Signal and Normalized Recognition Method," Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, 10(5), May 2012 (English Abstract). cited by applicant .
Auckenthaler et al. "Score Normalization for Text-independent Speaker Verification System," Digital Signal Processing, vol. 10, 2000, 13 pages. cited by applicant .
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2015/052860, dated Apr. 11, 2017, 9 pages. cited by applicant .
Notice of Allowance in Korean Application No. 10-2016-7021778, dated Apr. 25, 2017, (no English translation yet). cited by applicant .
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 15/201,972, dated Jun. 1, 2017, 10 pages. cited by applicant .
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2017/045123, dated Nov. 8, 2017, 15 pages. cited by applicant .
Korean Office Action issued in Application No. 10-2016-7033161, dated Dec. 19, 2017, 10 pages (with English Translation). cited by applicant .
Japanese Office Action issued in Application No. 2016-561322, dated Feb. 5, 2018, 6 pages (with English Translation). cited by applicant .
Shafran et al. "Complex-valued Linear Layers for Deep Neural Network-based Acoustic Models for Speech Recognition," Apr. 8, 2016, [retrieved Feb. 26, 2018] Retrieved from Internet: URL<http://eecs.ucmerced.edu/sites/eecs.ucmerced.edu/files/page/docume- nts/2016-04-08-slides.pdf> 54 pages. cited by applicant .
Variani et al. "Complex Linear Projections (CLP): A Discriminative Approach to Joint Feature Extraction and Acoustic Modeling," Submitted to Proc. ICML, Sep. 2016, 5 pages. cited by applicant .
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/346,914, dated Jun. 20, 2017, 25 pages. cited by applicant .
Notice of Allowance in Japanese Application No. 2016-551250, dated Aug. 7, 2017, 3 pages (English Translation). cited by applicant .
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/278,269, dated Aug. 18, 2017, 23 pages. cited by applicant .
Office Action issued in Korean Application No. 10-2016-7022701, dated Aug. 17, 2017, 4 pages (English Translation). cited by applicant .
Korean Office Action issued in Application No. 10-2016-7027999, dated Aug. 28, 2017, 9 pages (with English Translation). cited by applicant .
European Office Action issued in Application No. 15781811.3, dated Aug. 23, 2017, 6 pages. cited by applicant.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/201,972, filed Jul. 5, 2016, now allowed, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/805,687, filed Jul. 22, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,412,376, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/335,380, filed Jul. 18, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,257,120. The contents of the prior applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
1. A system comprising: a first computing device configured to respond to voice commands while in a locked state upon receipt of a particular, predefined hotword and one or more storage devices storing instructions that are operable, when executed by the first computing device, to cause the first computing device to perform operations comprising: receiving, while the first computing device is in the locked state and is co-located with a second computing device configured to respond to voice commands that are preceded by the particular, predefined hotword, audio data that corresponds to an utterance of a voice command that is preceded by the particular, predefined hotword; transmitting, by the first computing device while in the locked state, a first message that includes speaker verification data to a server that receives speaker verification data from multiple co-located devices, including the first computing device and the second computing device, and uses the received speaker verification data to generate a first speaker verification score representing a likelihood a first user of the first computing device spoke the voice command; receiving, by the first computing device while in the locked state, a second message from the server indicating that the first user of the first computing device did not likely speak the voice command based on the first speaker verification score; and in response to receiving the second message, determining to remain in the locked state and not respond to the voice command despite receiving the audio data that corresponds to the utterance of the voice command that is preceded by the particular, predefined hotword.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein: the server further uses the received speaker verification data to generate a second speaker verification score representing a likelihood that a second user of the second computing device spoke the voice command; and receiving the second message indicating that the first user of the first computing device did not likely speak the voice command is further based on the second speaker verification score.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise obtaining a value for a setting that indicates that the first computing device is permitted to provide speaker verification data to other computing devices, wherein transmitting the first message that includes speaker verification data to the server is based on the obtained value for the setting that indicates that the first computing device is permitted to share speaker verification data with other computing devices.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein transmitting the first message that includes the speaker verification data to the server comprises transmitting the first message that includes a first speaker verification model for the first user of the first computing device.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein transmitting the first message that includes the speaker verification data to the server is responsive to receiving the audio data that corresponds to the utterance.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise determining that the second computing device is co-located with the first computing device, wherein transmitting the first message that includes the speaker verification data to the server is responsive to determining that the second computing device is co-located with the first computing device.
7. A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving, by a first computing device configured to respond to voice commands while in a locked state upon receipt of a particular, predefined hotword and while the first computing device is in a locked state and is co-located with a second computing device configured to respond to voice commands that are preceded by the predefined hotword, audio data that corresponds to an utterance of a voice command that is preceded by the particular, predefined hotword; transmitting, by the first computing device while in the locked state, a first message that includes speaker verification data to a server that receives speaker verification data from multiple co-located devices, including the first computing device and the second computing device, and uses the received speaker verification data to generate a first speaker verification score representing a likelihood a first user of the first computing device spoke the voice command; receiving, by the first computing device while in the locked state, a second message from the server indicating that the first user of the first computing device did not likely speak the voice command based on the first speaker verification score; and in response to receiving the second message, determining to remain in the locked state and not respond to the voice command despite receiving the audio data that corresponds to the utterance of the voice command that is preceded by the particular, predefined hotword.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein: the server further uses the received speaker verification data to generate a second speaker verification score representing a likelihood that a second user of the second computing device spoke the voice command; and receiving the second message indicating that the first user of the first computer device did not likely speak the voice command is further based on the second speaker verification score.
9. The method of claim 7, further comprising obtaining a value for a setting that indicates that the first computing device is permitted to provide speaker verification data to other computing devices, wherein transmitting the first message that includes speaker verification data to the server is based on the obtained value for the setting that indicates that the first computing device is permitted to share speaker verification data with other computing devices.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein transmitting the first message that includes the speaker verification data to the server comprises transmitting the first message that includes a first speaker verification model for the first user of the first computing device.
11. The method of claim 7, wherein transmitting the first message that includes the speaker verification data to the server is responsive to receiving the audio data that corresponds to the utterance.
12. The method of claim 7, further comprising determining that the second computing device is co-located with the first computing device, wherein transmitting the first message that includes the speaker verification data to the server is responsive to determining that the second computing device is co-located with the first computing device.
13. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing software comprising instructions executable by one or more computers which, upon such execution, cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising: receiving, by a first computing device configured to respond to voice commands while in a locked state upon receipt of a particular, predefined hotword and while the first computing device is in a locked state and is co-located with a second computing device configured to respond to voice commands that are preceded by the predefined hotword, audio data that corresponds to an utterance of a voice command that is preceded by the particular, predefined hotword; transmitting, by the first computing device while in the locked state, a first message that includes speaker verification data to a server that receives speaker verification data from multiple co-located devices, including the first computing device and the second computing device, and uses the received speaker verification data to generate a first speaker verification score representing a likelihood a first user of the first computing device spoke the voice command; receiving, by the first computing device while in the locked state, a second message from the server indicating that the first user of the first computing device did not likely speak the voice command based on the first speaker verification score; and in response to receiving the second message, determining to remain in the locked state and not respond to the voice command despite receiving the audio data that corresponds to the utterance of the voice command that is preceded by the particular, predefined hotword.
14. The computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein: the server further uses the received speaker verification data to generate a second speaker verification score representing a likelihood that a second user of the second computing device spoke the voice command; and receiving the second message indicating that the first user of the first computer device did not likely speak the voice command is further based on the second speaker verification score.
15. The computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the operations further comprise obtaining a value for a setting that indicates that the first computing device is permitted to provide speaker verification data to other computing devices, wherein transmitting the first message that includes speaker verification data to the server is based on the obtained value for the setting that indicates that the first computing device is permitted to share speaker verification data with other computing devices.
This specification relates to speaker verification.
In a speech-enabled environment, such as a home or automobile, a user may access information or control various functions using voice input. The information and functions may be personalized for a given user. In multiple user environments, it may be advantageous to identify a given speaker from among a group of speakers.
This specification relates to enhancing speaker verification systems by providing speaker verification systems with more information. For example, certain speaker verification systems involve continuously listening for a predefined phrase in order to wake up a computing device, usually to perform further processing and/or receive more user input, such as speech commands and queries. Such speaker verification systems may differentiate an utterance of the predefined phrase from among a set of enrolled users in the device and unknown, non-enrolled users. In typical scenarios, a particular computing device will detect any utterances of the predefined phrase that are spoken by people located in relatively close proximity to the device, e.g., a group of people in a meeting room, or other diners at a table. In some instances, these people may use compatible speaker verification systems with their devices. By taking advantage of co-location information, the speaker verification system associated with each device can detect whether an utterance was spoken by an enrolled user of the respective device or by another user in close proximity, e.g., an imposter, and this information can be used to improve the speaker verification decision.
In general, one innovative aspect of the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods that include the actions of receiving, by a first user device, an audio signal encoding an utterance, obtaining, by the first user device, a first speaker model for a first user of the first user device, obtaining, by the first user device for a second user of a corresponding second user device that is co-located with the first user device, a second speaker model for the second user or a second score that indicates a respective likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the second user, and determining, by the first user device, that the utterance was spoken by the first user using (i) the first speaker model and the second speaker model or (ii) the first speaker model and the second score. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding computer systems, apparatus, and computer programs recorded on one or more computer storage devices, each configured to perform the actions of the methods. A system of one or more computers can be configured to perform particular operations or actions by virtue of having software, firmware, hardware, or a combination of them installed on the system that in operation causes or cause the system to perform the actions. One or more computer programs can be configured to perform particular operations or actions by virtue of including instructions that, when executed by data processing apparatus, cause the apparatus to perform the actions.
In general, one innovative aspect of the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods that include the actions of receiving, by a first user device, an audio signal encoding an utterance, obtaining, by the first user device, a first speaker model for a first user of the first user device, obtaining, by the first user device for each of a plurality of other users of other user devices that are co-located with the first user device, a speaker model for each respective users or a score that indicates a respective likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the respective user, and determining, by the first user device, that the utterance was spoken by the first user using (i) the first speaker model and the plurality of other speaker models or (ii) the first speaker model and the plurality of scores. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding computer systems, apparatus, and computer programs recorded on one or more computer storage devices, each configured to perform the actions of the methods. A system of one or more computers can be configured to perform particular operations or actions by virtue of having software, firmware, hardware, or a combination of them installed on the system that in operation causes or cause the system to perform the actions. One or more computer programs can be configured to perform particular operations or actions by virtue of including instructions that, when executed by data processing apparatus, cause the apparatus to perform the actions.
In general, one innovative aspect of the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods that include the actions of receiving, by a first user device, an audio signal encoding an utterance, determining, by the first user device, a first speaker model for a first user of the first user device, determining, by the first user device, one or more second speaker models, stored on the first user device, for other people who may be co-located with the first user device, and determining, by the first user device, that the utterance was spoken by the first user using the first speaker model and the second speaker models. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding computer systems, apparatus, and computer programs recorded on one or more computer storage devices, each configured to perform the actions of the methods. A system of one or more computers can be configured to perform particular operations or actions by virtue of having software, firmware, hardware, or a combination of them installed on the system that in operation causes or cause the system to perform the actions. One or more computer programs can be configured to perform particular operations or actions by virtue of including instructions that, when executed by data processing apparatus, cause the apparatus to perform the actions.
In general, one innovative aspect of the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods that include the actions of receiving, by at least one of the computers, an audio signal encoding an utterance, obtaining, by at least one of the computers for each of two or more user devices, an identification of a respective speaker models for a respective user of the respective user device, determining, by at least one of the computers, that the utterance was spoken by a particular user of one of the user devices using the identified speaker models. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding computer systems, apparatus, and computer programs recorded on one or more computer storage devices, each configured to perform the actions of the methods. A system of one or more computers can be configured to perform particular operations or actions by virtue of having software, firmware, hardware, or a combination of them installed on the system that in operation causes or cause the system to perform the actions. One or more computer programs can be configured to perform particular operations or actions by virtue of including instructions that, when executed by data processing apparatus, cause the apparatus to perform the actions.
In general, one innovative aspect of the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods that include the actions of receiving, by a first user device, an audio signal encoding an utterance, obtaining, by the first user device, a first score that indicates a likelihood that the utterance was spoken by a first user of the first user device, obtaining, by the first user device for a second user of a corresponding second user device that is co-located with the first user device, a second score that indicates a respective likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the second user, determining, by the first user device, a combination of the first score and the second score, normalizing, by the first user device, the first score and the second score using the combination of the first score and the second score, and determining, by the first user device, that the utterance was spoken by the first user using the normalized first score and the normalized second score.
The foregoing and other embodiments can each optionally include one or more of the following features, alone or in combination. Obtaining, by the first user device for the second user of the corresponding second user device that is co-located with the first user device, the second speaker model for the second user or the second score that indicates a respective likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the second user may include obtaining, by the first user device for the second user of the second user device that is co-located in a physical area near a physical location of the first user device, the second speaker model for the second user or the second score that indicates a respective likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the second user. The method may include performing an action in response to determining that the utterance was spoken by the first user. The method may include analyzing the audio signal to identify a command included in the utterance, and performing an action that corresponds with the command. The method may include generating, by the first user device, a first score that indicates a likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the first user using a portion of the audio signal and the first speaker model. The method may include comparing the first score with the second score to determine a highest score. Determining that the utterance was spoken by the first user may include determining that the first score is the highest score.
In some implementations, obtaining, by the first user device for the second user of the corresponding second user devices that is located in a physical area near a physical location of the first user device, a second speaker model for the second user or a second score that indicates a respective likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the second user may include obtaining, by the first user device, the second speaker model, and generating, by the first user device, the second score using a portion of the audio signal and the second speaker model.
In some implementations, obtaining, by the first user device for the second user of the corresponding second user device that is located in a physical area near a physical location of the first user device, a second speaker model for the second user or a second score that indicates a respective likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the second user may include determining, by the first user device, that the second user device is located in the physical area near the physical location of the first user device, determining, by the first user device, that the first user device has settings that allow the first user device access to the second speaker model, receiving, by the first user device, the second speaker model, and generating, by the first user device, the second score using a portion of the audio signal and the second speaker model. Receiving, by the first user device, the second speaker model may include identifying, by the first user device, one or more third speaker models stored on the first user device, and determining, by the first user device, that a subset of the third speaker models may include the second speaker model. The method may include removing, by the first user device, the third speaker models not included in the subset of the third speaker models from the first user device. Receiving, by the first user device, the second speaker model may include retrieving, by the first user device, the second speaker model from a memory in the first user device. Generating, by the first user device, the second score may include generating, by the first user device, the second score using the second speaker model stored on the first user device and a portion of the audio signal without requesting the second speaker model from another user device. Receiving, by the first user device, the second speaker model may include receiving, by the first user device, the second speaker model from a server. The second user device may include the second speaker model. Receiving, by the first user device, the second speaker model may include receiving, by the first user device, the second speaker model from the second user device.
In some implementations, obtaining, by the first user device the second user of the corresponding second user device that is located in a physical area near a physical location of the first user device, a second speaker model for the second user or a second score that indicates a respective likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the second user may include determining, by the first user device, that the second user device is located in the physical area near the physical location of the first user device, and receiving, by the first user device, the second score. Receiving, by the first user device, the second score may include receiving, by the first user device, the second score from the second user device. Receiving, by the first user device, the second score may include receiving, by the first user device, the second score from a server. The method may include determining, by the first user device, a device identifier for the second user device, and providing, by the first user device, the device identifier to the server, wherein the first user device receives the second score from the server in response to providing the identifier to the server.
In some implementations, the method may include determining, by the first user device, one or more third speaker models, stored on the first user device, for other people who may be located in a physical area near a physical location of the first user device, and determining, by the first user device, that the utterance was spoken by the first user using (i) the first speaker model, the second speaker model, and the third speaker models or (ii) the first speaker model, the second score, and the third speaker models. The method may include generating, by the first user device, a first score that indicates a likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the first user using a portion of the audio signal and the first speaker model, generating, by the first user device for each of the third speaker models, a respective third score using the respective third speaker model and a portion of the audio signal, and comparing, by the first user device, the first score, the second score, and the third scores to determine a highest score. The method may include determining, by the first user device for a third user device, a frequency with which the third user device is located in a physical area near a physical location of the first user device, determining, by the first user device, whether the frequency satisfies a threshold frequency, and storing, by the first user device, a third speaker model for a third user of the third user device in the third speaker models in response to determining that the frequency satisfies the threshold frequency. The method may include receiving, by the first user device, input from the first user identifying a third speaker model, and storing, by the first user device, the third speaker model in the third speaker models in response to receiving the input from the user identifying the third speaker model.
In some implementations, the method may include receiving, by at least one of the computers for each of the user devices, the respective speaker model from the respective user device. The method may include retrieving, by at least one of the computers for each of the user devices, the respective speaker model from a memory included in at least one of the computers using the respective identification.
In some implementations, the method may include determining, by the first user device, that the normalized first score satisfies a threshold value, wherein determining that the utterance was spoken by the first user is in response to determining that the normalized first score satisfies the threshold value. The method may include determining, by the first user device, that an average of the first score and the second score does not satisfy the threshold value, wherein determining the combination of the first score and the second score is in response to determining that the average of the first score and the second score does not satisfy the threshold value. The method may include determining, by the first user device, that both the first score and the second score do not satisfy the threshold value, wherein determining the combination of the first score and the second score is in response to determining that both the first score and the second score do not satisfy the threshold value. The method may include determining, by the first user device, that the first score does not satisfy the threshold value, wherein determining the combination of the first score and the second score is in response to determining that the first score does not satisfy the threshold value.
The subject matter described in this specification can be implemented in particular embodiments so as to realize one or more of the following advantages. In some implementations, the use of imposter speaker models may reduce actions by a user device in response to utterances spoken by a person other than a user of the user device. In some implementations, a system may reduce false positives by sixty to eighty percent when using imposter speaker models. In some implementations, a system may normalize a final utterance score using a combination of the scores for different co-located speakers.
FIGS. 1A-C show an example of an environment in which one or more user devices A-D analyze an audio signal encoding an utterance.
FIG. 2 is an example of a speaker verification system.
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of a process for determining whether an utterance was spoken by a user.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of computing devices that may be used to implement the systems and methods described in this document.
Speaker verification systems may include a process of continuously listening for a predefined phrase in order to wake up a computing device, usually to perform further processing and/or receive more user input, such as speech commands and queries. Such speaker verification systems may differentiate an utterance of the hotword from a set of enrolled users in the device and from unknown, non-enrolled users.
Enrollment refers to whether a user has provided sample utterances to the system to create a model that can be used to discriminate him or her from other users, known or unknown. The speaker verification process may involve comparing a model created for a given utterance against the model created for the speaker (or speakers), and deciding whether to accept or reject the utterance based on a similarity threshold.
Speaker verification systems have applicability in a wide range of areas, and also a wide range of performance requirements--particularly with regards to recognition quality, and impostor prevention effectiveness. For example, a speaker verification system used to unlock a device may have higher requirements to provide low false acceptance of impostors, than when the system is used in an already unlocked device in a trusted environment, where false acceptance can be relaxed in favor of lower false rejections (not recognizing an enrolled user).
When the verification system only has the information provided from the enrolled speaker(s) to perform the decision of acceptance or denial of the given utterance, the verification process may be challenging since the set of unknown possible impostors is practically unbound. This may result in a higher probability that an utterance from an unknown speaker will exceed the similarity threshold for an enrolled speaker, resulting in a false acceptance. This challenge is of particular importance with mobile devices, where the availability of possible impostors around the device increases and changes constantly.
Speaker verification systems may be improved by providing more information to these systems. In particular, by utilizing co-location information provided by generally available APIs, which may already present in mobile devices/platforms, the verification system on each device can detect whether there are possible impostors nearby. Such information can be used to adjust the similarity threshold, and also share their enrolled speaker models to improve the verification decision. In some examples, systems may normalize a score for one or more speakers models using a combination of the scores for co-located speakers. For instance, a user device may use speaker models stored on the user device and speaker models received from other user devices to generate respective scores, determine a combination of the scores, and normalize each of the scores using the combination.
For example, user devices may generate lower scores for utterances because of background noise, e.g., the scores may decrease in proportion to the background noise. In highly noisy conditions, such as a running vehicle or a crowded restaurant, it may be possible that a score for an utterance from a user of the user device does not satisfy a threshold value, e.g., is lower than or equal to an acceptance threshold, and be falsely rejected. The normalization of the scores may reduce the noise penalty. For instance, since the average of multiple scores each generated using a different speaker model does not satisfy the acceptance threshold, e.g., is lower than or equal to the acceptance threshold, normalization would result in improving each of the scores such that the score for the user of the user device should satisfy the acceptance threshold, e.g., be greater than the acceptance threshold.
Because such verification systems may access models of possible impostors, these systems may be able to better reject some utterances (e.g., reduce a false acceptance rate) in those cases where an utterance of an impostor obtains a similarity score against an enrolled user that is higher than the acceptance threshold. For example, if an utterance has an equal or higher score against one of the models in the "impostors" set, e.g., created from the co-located users, then the system can assume the utterance is likely from an impostor and reject it. Such an approach may be compatible with various types of speaker models, e.g., i-vectors, d-vectors, etc.
There may be multiple ways to determine when devices are co-located in a given geographical area. For example, this information may be derived from one or more of global positioning system (GPS), near field communication (NFC), Bluetooth, Subsonic audio, and/or other sensors and technologies. In some examples, co-located devices may be associated virtually, e.g., when the devices participate in the same telephone or video conference. In these examples, the devices, or a server, may determine co-location using calendar entries, email or text messages, or other "soft" concepts.
Multiple users may also be co-located in the same area when not all of the users have a corresponding user device, but some of the user devices include speaker models for those users. For instance, when five friends are in one of their living rooms, and two of the friends have their mobile devices, a first mobile device may include speaker models for the three friends that do not have mobile devices with them and the first and second mobile devices can use those speaker models, and the speaker models for the friends that own the devices, to determine which of the friends spoke a particular utterance.
In exemplary implementations, a speaker verification system receives an audio signal encoding an utterance and determines whether a score generated using a speaker model satisfies a threshold score value. When the speaker verification system uses only a single speaker model for a particular user of a particular user device, the speaker verification system may generate a score that satisfies the threshold score value for an utterance spoken by another user (e.g., the user's brother).
The speaker verification system uses multiple speaker models, for example one for the user and another for the user's brother, to increase the accuracy of the speaker verification system. For instance, the speaker verification system generates two scores for an audio signal encoding the utterance, one for the user and another score for his brother. The speaker verification system compares the scores, both of which may satisfy the threshold score value, to determine which score is highest. The speaker verification system is most likely to generate a highest score using a speaker model for the particular person that spoke the utterance compared to when a different person speaks the utterance, e.g., as the speaker model for that different person will be used to generate the highest score.
When the speaker verification system determines that the score for the user is highest, e.g., generated using a speaker model for the user, the particular user device may perform an action in response to the utterance. When the speaker verification system determines that the score for the user's brother is highest, e.g., generated using the speaker model for the user's brother, the particular user device takes no action.
The speaker verification system may use other speaker models for other users in a physical area near the particular user device, e.g., co-located with the particular user device, or scores received from those other user devices to determine which score is the greatest and whether the particular user device should perform an action in response to the utterance. The speaker verification system may execute on the particular device or another device, e.g., a server.
FIGS. 1A-C show an example of an environment 100 in which one or more user devices A-D 102a-d analyze an audio signal encoding an utterance. The user devices A-D 102a-d may use one of multiple different algorithms to determine whether the utterance was likely spoken by a respective user of the user device, and the user device should perform an action in response to the utterance, or that the utterance was not likely spoken by the respective user and the user device should take no action.
For example, four co-workers may be in a conference room and a first co-worker, e.g., user D, may issue the command "Okay Google, please start the demo." The user device A 102a may analyze the audio signal using multiple speaker models, including a speaker model A 104a for a user A of the user device A 102a and other speaker models for other users, e.g., that are sometimes or often in the same physical area as the user A or the user device A 102a. The other speaker models may be stored in a memory of the user device A 102a for a short period of time, e.g., when the user device A 102a recently requested a particular speaker model from another user device B-D 102b-d, or for a long period of time, e.g., when there is a high probability that the other users are in the same physical area as the user device A 102a.
The user device A 102a determines a score for each of the speaker models and a highest score from the multiple scores. The user device A 102a may determine whether the highest score satisfies the threshold score value, e.g., by comparing the highest score with a threshold score value, and that there is a high likelihood that the highest score is for the user A of the user device A 102a. If the highest score does not satisfy the threshold score value, the user device A 102a may take no further action, e.g., and determine that the utterance was spoken by a user for which the user device A 102a does not have a speaker model.
When the user device A 102a determines that the highest score is for the user A of the user device A 102a, e.g., that the first co-worker who issued the command is the user A, the user device A 102a performs an action in response to the receipt of the audio signal. For instance, the user device A 102a may launch the requested demo.
When the user device A 102a determines that the highest score was not for the user A and that the first co-worker is not the user A, the user device A 102a may take no further action with respect to the audio signal. For example, the user device A 102a may receive another audio signal with another utterance spoken by the first co-worker and take no action in response to the other utterance.
In some examples, when the user devices A-D 102a-d include the same or a compatible speaker verification system, each of the user devices A-D 102a-d may share information about its respective users, e.g., speaker models, or about analysis of an audio signal encoding an utterance, e.g., scores. For instance, as shown in FIG. 1A, a first co-worker, e.g., the user D, may say an utterance 106 "Okay Google, please start the demo" and a microphone on each of the user devices A-D 102a-d may capture a signal representing the utterance and encode the utterance in an audio signal.
Each of the user devices A-D 102a-d analyzes the respective audio signals using the corresponding speaker models A-D 104a-d to generate a score that represents the likelihood that the respective user A-D of the user device spoke the utterance 106, as shown in FIG. 1B. In this example, the user device A 102a generates a score of 0.76 for the user A, the user device B 102b generates a score of 0.23 for the user B, the user device C 102c generates a score of 0.67 for the user C, and the user device D 102d generates a score of 0.85 for the user D.
Each of the user devices A-D 102a-d shares the respective scores with the other user devices. For instance, the user devices A-D 102a-d may use one or more sensors, such as a GPS, NFC, Bluetooth, subsonic audio, or any other appropriate technology, to determine other user devices that are physically located in an area near the respective user device. The user devices A-D 102a-d may determine access settings that indicate whether the user device can share its score with another user device, and may determine whether the other user devices use the same speaker verification system, e.g., and can use the score, or both.
Each of the user devices A-D 102a-d compares all of the scores with each other to determine whether the score generated by the respective user device is the highest score and the respective user device should perform an action in response to the utterance 106. For example, as shown in FIG. 1C, the user device D 102d determines that the score generated using the speaker model D 104d for the user D of the user device D 102d is the highest, and that the likelihood that the utterance 106 was spoken by the user D is greater than likelihoods that the utterance 106 was spoken by the other users for the other user devices A-C 102a-c. The user device D 102d may perform an action that corresponds with the utterance 106, such as launching the requested demo 108. The user device D 102d may compare the highest score with a threshold score value to ensure that there is a high likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the user D and not another user, e.g., for which the user device D 102d did not receive a score.
Similarly, each of the other user devices A-C 102a-c determines that its respective score is not the greatest and that the respective other user device should take no action. Prior to determining that its respective score is not the greatest score, each of the other user devices A-C 102a-c may compare the highest score with a threshold score value, e.g., specific to the respective user device, to ensure that there is at least a minimum similarity between the utterance and one of the speaker models and that the utterance was not spoken by another user for which the other user devices A-C 102a-c do not have a respective speaker model. The other user devices A-C 102a-c may or may not know information about the user, the user device, or both that corresponds with the highest score when the highest score is received from another user device. For instance, each of the user devices A-D 102a-d may send the scores to the other user devices without any identification information, e.g., of the user or the user device. In some examples, a user device may send a score with an identifier for the user for which the score was generated.
FIG. 2 is an example of a speaker verification system 200. One or more user devices A-B 202a-b or a server 204 may analyze an audio signal encoding an utterance, e.g., data representing properties of the utterance, to determine a user that most likely spoke the utterance. The user devices A-B 202a-b, the server 204, or a combination of two or more of these devices may analyze the audio signal using a speaker model, compare the different analysis of the audio signal determined using the speaker models, and determine whether a particular user spoke the utterance.
For example, each of the user devices A-B 202a-b includes a speaker model A-B 206a-b for its respective user. The speaker models A-B 206a-b may be generated for the particular users using any appropriate method, such as having each user speak a registration phrase and then, for example, extracting mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) features from the keyword sample and using these features as a reference for future comparison, and/or training a neural network using representations of utterances spoken by the particular user.
A speaker verification module A 208a uses the speaker model A 206a for the user A of the user device A 202a to determine a likelihood that a particular utterance was spoken by the user A. For instance, the speaker verification module A 208a receives an audio signal encoding the particular utterance, e.g., a representation of the audio signal, and uses the speaker model A 206a to generate a score that represents the likelihood that the particular utterance was spoken by the user A.
The speaker verification module A 208a may use one or more imposter speaker models 210a, stored on the user device A 202a, to generate a score that represents a likelihood, for each of the imposter speaker models 210a, that the particular utterance was spoken by a respective user that corresponds with a particular imposter speaker model. For example, the user device A 202a may receive the audio signal, determine that the user device B 202b is located in a physical area near a physical location of the user device A 202a, e.g., in the same room, and request speaker models for the users of the user device B 202b from the user device B 202b, e.g., the speaker model B 206b, or from the server 204. For instance, the user device A may send a device identifier for the user device B 202b, or an identifier for the user B, as part of a request for the speaker model B 206b, e.g., to the server 204. The user device A 202a stores the speaker model B 206b as one of the imposter speaker models 210a in a memory and the speaker verification module 208a generates a score for each of the imposter speaker models 210a.
The imposter speaker models 210a may include speaker models for other users that may be in a physical area near the physical location of the user device A 202a, such as the same room, hallway, or part of a sidewalk or path, etc. The imposter speaker models may include speaker models for users who are frequently in the same physical area as the user A or the user device A 202a, e.g., as determined using historical data. For example, the user device A 202a may determine that another user device, e.g., a user device C, is in the same physical area as the user device A 202a about four hours each work day, that this daily four hour duration is greater than a daily three hour threshold duration, e.g., specific to work days, an average daily duration, etc., and that a speaker model C for a user C of the user device C should be stored in the imposter speaker models 210a, e.g., until the user A requests the removal of the speaker model C from the imposter speaker models 210a or the daily duration for the user device C no longer satisfies the threshold duration. The frequency may be a specific value, e.g., four hours a day, or a percentage, e.g., five percent of the time the user device A 202 detects a particular other user device or ten percent of a total quantity of other user devices detected by the user device A 202a are a particular other user device, to name a few examples.
In some examples, the user A may identify one or more speaker models that the user device A 202a should include in the imposter speaker models 210a. For example, the user device A 202a may receive input training another speaker model on the user device A 202a for a family member or friend of the user A. The input may indicate that the other speaker model should be an imposter speaker model, e.g., and is a speaker model for a user other than the user A who is not a user of the user device A 202a. The other speaker model may be for another user that is often in a physical area surrounding the user device A 202a, e.g., a child of the user A, to reduce or eliminate actions performed by the user device A 202a in response to an utterance spoken by the other user, unless the user device A 202a is programmed otherwise.
For instance, when the speaker verification module 208a generates a first score using the speaker model A 206a and a respective second score for each of the imposter speaker models 210a, the speaker verification module 208a compares the scores to determine a highest score. When the highest score is generated using the speaker model A 206a, the speaker verification module 208a determines that the user A spoke the particular utterance and that the user device A 202a may take an appropriate action, e.g., a speech recognition module 212a may analyze the particular utterance to identify a command included in the particular utterance.
In one example, one of the imposter speaker models may be for the user A's sibling, e.g., when both of the siblings have similar voices. The speaker verification module 208a generates the first score for the user A and a second score for his brother, by analyzing an utterance spoken by one of the brothers using the respective speaker models. The speaker verification module 208a compares the two scores, each of which may be greater than a threshold score and alone would otherwise trigger an action by the user device A 202a, e.g., because of similarities in the speaker models, to determine which score is greater. When the first score for the user A is greater than the second score, the user device A 202a performs an action based on the utterance, e.g., and the action may be determined in part using the speech recognition module 212a. When the second score for the user A's brother is greater than the first score, the user device A 202a takes no further action, e.g., and does not perform an action in response to the particular utterance.
Some of the imposter speaker models 210a may be used during particular times of the day, particular days, at particular locations, or a combination of two or more of these. For instance, when the user device A 202a is at the house of a family member of the user A, the user device A 202a may use imposter speaker models for the people who live in the family member's house, e.g., and not use those imposter speaker models otherwise unless a co-located user device for one of those people is detected.
In some examples, the user devices A-B 202a-b may use settings 214a-b stored in memory to determine whether the respective speaker model, or a score generated using the respective speaker model, may be provided to other user devices, e.g., using a wireless communication channel 216 such as one created using near field communications. For instance, the user device A 202a may receive the particular utterance, determine that the user device B 202b is in a physical area near the user device A 202a, and request a speaker model from the user device B 202b, e.g., the speaker model B 206b without knowing the particular speaker model that is being requested. The user device B 202b receives the request, analyzes the settings B 214b to determine whether the speaker model B 206b may be shared with another device or with the specific user device A 202a, and, in response to determining that the user device B 202b may share the speaker model B 206b, the user device B 202b sends a copy of the speaker model B 206b to the user device A 202a using the wireless communication channel 216.
The user device A 202a may request a speaker model for a user B of the user device B 202b or for all users of the user device B 202b, e.g., in examples when more than one person may operate a single user device. The speaker model A 206a may include multiple speaker models, in examples when more than one person operates the user device A 202a. In these examples, the speaker verification module 208a may generate a score for each of the users of the user device A 202a, compare these scores with other scores generated using the imposter speaker models 210a, and determine a highest score. When the highest score is for one of the users of the user device A 202a, the user device A 202a may perform an appropriate action, e.g., determined at least in part using the speech recognition module 212a.
A determination of whether to perform the action or not may be made using the particular type of action, the specific user of the user device A 202a, or both. For instance, a first user A may have permissions to launch any application on the user device A 202a while a second user A may have permissions to launch only educational applications on the user device A 202a.
In some implementations, one or more of the speaker models are stored on the server 204 instead of, or in addition to, the user devices A 202a-b. For example, the server 204 may store speaker models 218 for the users A-B of the user devices A-B 202a-b. In these examples, the user device A 202a or the user device B 202b may receive an audio signal encoding an utterance and provide the audio signal, or a portion of the audio signal, e.g., a representation of a portion of the audio signal, to the server 204. The server 204 receives an identifier of the user device, the speaker model, or the user of the user device and determines which one of the speaker models 218 corresponds with the received identifier, e.g., using speaker identifiers 220.
In some examples, the server 204 receives identifiers for other speaker models that will be used in addition to the speaker model of the user device when analyzing the portion of the audio signal. For instance, when the user device A 202a determines that the user device B 202b is physically located in an area near the physical location of the user device A 202a, the server 204 may receive the audio signal and identifiers for the user devices A-B 202a-b from the user device A 202a with a speaker verification request.
The server 204 may receive location information from the user device, e.g., with the audio signal or separately, and use the location information to determine other user devices that are physically located in an area near the physical location of the user device that provided the audio signal to the server 204, e.g., using location information for the other user devices. The server 204 may then identify other speaker models 218 for the determined other devices. The server 204 may use the identified other speaker models when generating the scores on the server 204 or when providing speaker models to the user devices A-B 202a-b.
A speaker verification module 222 on the server 204 uses all of the speaker models, from the user device that provided the server 204 with the audio signal and the determined other user devices, to generate respective scores that each represent a likelihood that the respective person spoke a particular utterance encoded in the audio signal. The speaker verification module 222 may retrieve the speaker models from a memory included in the server 204. The speaker verification module 222 may receive the speaker models from the respective user devices. The server 204, or the speaker verification module 222, determines a highest score and provides a respective user device with a message indicating that the user of that user device is most likely to have spoken the particular utterance. The server 204 may provide the other user devices with messages indicating that the corresponding other users likely did not speak the utterance.
In some examples, a particular user device may provide the server 204 with multiple speaker identifiers, e.g., one for each of the users of the particular user device, one for each of the imposter speaker models that are associated with the particular user device, or both. The particular user device may include data that indicates the type of model for each of the speaker identifiers, e.g., user or imposter. The speaker verification module 222 may analyze an audio signal using all of the speaker models 218 that correspond with the received speaker identifiers and determine which speaker model is used to generate a highest score. When the highest score was generated using a model for one of the users of the particular user device, the server 204 provides the particular user device with a message indicating that a user of the particular device is most likely to have spoken the particular utterance. The message may include the speaker identifier for the particular speaker model used to generate the highest score.
In some implementations, a lower numerical value may represent a greater likelihood that a particular user spoke an utterance compared to a higher numerical value. For instance, a lower numerical value may be a higher score than a higher numerical value.
In some examples, when a user device has multiple users, the user device, or the server 204, may determine a particular speaker model for the current user of the user device. For instance, the user device may provide a speaker identifier for the current user to the server 204 and indicate that all of the other speaker identifiers, for other users of the user device, are for imposter speaker models stored on the server 204. In some examples, the user device uses the speaker model for the current user to determine whether or not to perform an action in response to receipt of an audio signal and uses the speaker models for the other users of the user device as imposter speaker models. The user device may use any appropriate method to determine the current user of the user device, such as the use of a password, a username, or both, to unlock the user device and to determine the current user.
In some implementations, when a score is generated using an imposter speaker model, or a model received from another user device, for an audio signal and that score is greater than or equal to the score generated using a speaker model for a user of a particular user device, that particular user device performs no action in response to receipt of the audio signal. In these implementations, when two scores are the same, no user device performs an action in response to receipt of the audio signal. In other implementations, when two scores are the same, for two users of different user devices, and both are the highest score, the two user devices, which correspond to the two scores, may both perform an action. In implementations when two scores for models on a single user device are the same highest score, the user device may or may not perform an action. For instance, when each of the two scores is for a different user of the user device, the user device may perform an action. When one of the scores is for a user speaker model and one of the scores is for an imposter speaker model, the user device may perform no action.
In some implementations, a user device may adjust a threshold value depending on a quantity of detected other user devices. For instance, the threshold value may be less restrictive when no other devices are detected and more restrictive when other user devices are detected, e.g., after receiving an audio signal. The threshold value may become more restrictive based on a quantity of other devices detected, e.g., linearly or exponentially, until a maximum threshold value is reached. In some examples, one or more scores may be normalized, e.g., using a combination of scores for the same utterance generated using different similarity models. The combination may be an average, a sum, or a product.
In some implementations, one or more of the user devices A-B 202a-b may detect other user devices in a physical area near the respective user device periodically. For example, the user device B 202b may determine, every five, ten, or thirty minutes, whether another user device is in the same room as the user device B 202b. In some examples, the user device B 202b may determine whether another user device is within a predetermined distance from the user device B 202b upon determining that the user device B 202b has remained in substantially the same area for a predetermined period of time, e.g., that the user B of the user device B 202b is holding the user device B 202b but is not walking or the user B is remaining in a single room.
The user devices A-B 202a-b may include personal computers, mobile communication devices, e.g., smartphones or tablets, and other devices that can send and receive data over a network 224, e.g., wearable devices such as watches or thermostats, televisions, and network connected appliances. The network 224, such as a local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), the Internet, or a combination thereof, connects the user devices A-B 202a-b and the server 204.
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of a process 300 for determining whether an utterance was spoken by a user. For example, the process 300 can be used by the user device A 202a or the server 204 from the speaker verification system 200.
The process receives an audio signal encoding an utterance (302). For instance, a microphone on a user device receives the audio signal and provides the audio signal to a speaker verification module on a first user device or to a server.
The process obtains a first speaker model for a first user of a first user device (304). For example, the speaker verification module determines that there is a single, first user for the first user device and obtains the first speaker model for that first user. In some examples, the speaker verification module determines a current user for the first user device, who is currently logged in to the first user device or who most recently logged in to the first user device when the first user device is in a locked state, and obtains the first speaker model for that user.
In some examples, the speaker verification module determines that there are multiple users for the first user device and obtains the first speaker model for one of those users. The first user device may then repeat one or more steps in the process 300 for the other users. For instance, the speaker verification module may repeat steps 304 and 306 for each of the users.
The process generates a first score that indicates a likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the first user using a portion of the audio signal and the first speaker model (306). For example, the speaker verification module of the first device uses the entire audio signal and the first speaker model to generate the first score.
The audio signal may include a transformation of the utterance that the speaker verification module can compare against the first speaker model. For instance, the microphone may record the utterance and provide the recording of the utterance to a feature extraction module that generates the audio signal which the speaker verification module uses to generate the first score.
In implementations when there are multiple users of the first user device, the speaker verification module compares the scores for each of the multiple users and selects the greatest score. For example, the first user device may have between one and five speaker models, each for a respective user of the first user device.
The speaker verification module may compare a score, e.g. the greatest score, with a threshold score value to determine whether the score satisfies the threshold score value. For instance, the speaker verification module determines whether the greatest score is higher than the threshold score value when the threshold score value is a minimum required score or whether the greatest score is lower than the threshold score value when the threshold score value is a maximum required score, e.g., and the greatest score has the lowest numerical value of the scores generated for the users of the first user device.
If the greatest score satisfies the threshold score value, the speaker verification module, or another module on the first user device, may generate scores for each of the imposter speaker models identified on the first user device, e.g., stored on the first user device or on a server, and continues with the process 300 to perform step 308. If the greatest score does not satisfy the threshold score value, the user device, or the server, may stop performing the process 300. When the first user device or the server stop performing the process 300, the first user device or the server may stop requesting other speaker models, or other scores, from other user devices.
The speaker verification module on the first user device, or a similar module on the server, may generate a score for each of the imposter speaker models until a score that is the same as or greater than the greatest score for a user of the first user device is generated, at which time the speaker verification module stops performing the process 300. When the speaker verification module determines that there are no more imposter speaker models, or that the greatest score for a user of the first user device has been compared with scores for all of the imposter speaker models, including scores for imposter speaker models for other users of other user devices, e.g., determined using steps 308 and 310, the process proceeds with step 312.
For example, the process determines one or more second user devices located in a physical area near a physical location of the first user device (308). The first user device may determine the second user devices using near field communications. In examples when the speaker verification module has already determined the first score, the first user device may provide the first score to the other user devices, e.g., for use by other speaker verification modules performing a similar process. In some examples, the first user device may provide the first speaker model, other speaker models for other users of the first user device, or a combination of the two, to at least some of the second user devices.
In some implementations, the process may determine second user devices that are co-located with the first user device but in different physical locations. For instance, the first user device may determine that a particular second user device is co-located with the first user device when both devices participate in, or are near devices participating in, the same telephone or video conference. The devices may be located in the same physical room, or in different rooms, that each include with separate video conference equipment. The first device, or a server, may determine that the devices are co-located using calendar entries for the respective users, e.g., when the calendar entry for both users is the same and indicates all of the users attending the event.
The process obtains, for a second user for each of the second user devices, a second speaker model for the respective second user or a second score that indicates a respective likelihood that the utterance was spoken by the respective second user (310). For instance, other speaker verification modules on the second user devices generate respective second scores for each of the users of the second user devices, e.g., using respective second speaker models and other audio signals encoding the same or a portion of the same utterance. The first user device receives each of the second scores from the second user devices, and may receive multiple second scores from a single second user device, in a single message or in multiple messages, when that single second user device has multiple users.
In some examples, a server may generate some of the second scores and provide those second scores to the first user device. The server may generate the first score or first scores for the users of the first user device and provide the first scores to the first user device. The server may compare all of the scores and send a message to a device with the greatest score. The server may or may not send messages to other devices that do not correspond with the greatest score.
The process determines that the utterance was spoken by the first user (312). For example, the speaker verification module compares the greatest score for the first user device with the scores for the imposter speaker models stored on the user device, the second scores received from the second user devices, or both. The speaker verification module may stop comparing the greatest score for the first user device with other scores when the speaker verification module determines that one of the other scores is greater than or equal to the greatest score for the first user device, e.g., and stop performing the process 300.
The process performs an action in response to the determination that the utterance was spoken by the first user (314). For instance, a speech recognition module analyzes the audio signal and determines a text representation of the utterance encoded in the audio signal. The first user device uses the text representation to determine a command provided by the first user in the utterance and performs the action in response to the command.
The order of steps in the process 300 described above is illustrative only, and determining whether the utterance was spoken by the user can be performed in different orders. For example, the user device may determine the second user devices located in a physical area near the physical location of the user device, e.g., perform step 308, prior to receiving the audio signal, e.g., performing step 302.
In some implementations, the process 300 can include additional steps, fewer steps, or some of the steps can be divided into multiple steps. For example, the first user device may determine the second user devices, determine whether any speaker models for a second user is stored in memory, e.g., as an imposter speaker model, and only request the second speaker models that are not stored in the memory from the respective second user devices. In these examples, the first user device may remove any imposter speaker models from memory for other users whose respective other user devices are no longer in the physical area near the physical location of the first user device, e.g., and currently are not included in the second user devices.
When removing the imposter speaker models from memory for user devices that are no longer in the physical area near the physical location of the first user device, the first user device may retain any imposter speaker models for other users that are flagged as not for removal. For instance, one of the imposter speaker models may be for a friend of the first user who is often in a physical area near a physical location of the first user device. The first user device may retain the one of the imposter speaker models for the friend even when the first user device does not detect another user device that is operated by the friend.
Embodiments of the subject matter and the functional operations described in this specification can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, in tangibly-embodied computer software or firmware, in computer hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer programs, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a tangible non-transitory program carrier for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. Alternatively or in addition, the program instructions can be encoded on an artificially-generated propagated signal, e.g., a machine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, that is generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus for execution by a data processing apparatus. The computer storage medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a random or serial access memory device, or a combination of one or more of them.
The term "data processing apparatus" refers to data processing hardware and encompasses all kinds of apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers. The apparatus can also be or further include special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit). The apparatus can optionally include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for computer programs, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them.
A computer program, which may also be referred to or described as a program, software, a software application, a module, a software module, a script, or code, can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, or declarative or procedural languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program may, but need not, correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data, e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document, in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files, e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub-programs, or portions of code. A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
Computers suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, general or special purpose microprocessors or both, or any other kind of central processing unit. Generally, a central processing unit will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a central processing unit for performing or executing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Moreover, a computer can be embedded in another device, e.g., a mobile telephone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobile audio or video player, a game console, a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, or a portable storage device, e.g., a universal serial bus (USB) flash drive, to name just a few.
To provide for interaction with a user, embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented on a computer having a display device, e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor, for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, e.g., a mouse or a trackball, by which the user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input. In addition, a computer can interact with a user by sending documents to and receiving documents from a device that is used by the user; for example, by sending web pages to a web browser on a user's device in response to requests received from the web browser.
Embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented in a computing system that includes a back-end component, e.g., as a data server, or that includes a middleware component, e.g., an application server, or that includes a front-end component, e.g., a client computer having a graphical user interface or a Web browser through which a user can interact with an implementation of the subject matter described in this specification, or any combination of one or more such back-end, middleware, or front-end components. The components of the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication, e.g., a communication network. Examples of communication networks include a local area network (LAN) and a wide area network (WAN), e.g., the Internet.
The computing system can include clients and servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other. In some embodiments, a server transmits data, e.g., an HTML page, to a user device, e.g., for purposes of displaying data to and receiving user input from a user interacting with the user device, which acts as a client. Data generated at the user device, e.g., a result of the user interaction, can be received from the user device at the server.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of computing devices 400, 450 that may be used to implement the systems and methods described in this document, as either a client or as a server or plurality of servers. Computing device 400 is intended to represent various forms of digital computers, such as laptops, desktops, workstations, personal digital assistants, servers, blade servers, mainframes, and other appropriate computers. Computing device 450 is intended to represent various forms of mobile devices, such as personal digital assistants, cellular telephones, smartphones, smart-watches, head-worn devices, and other similar computing devices. The components shown here, their connections and relationships, and their functions, are meant to be exemplary only, and are not meant to limit implementations of the inventions described and/or claimed in this document.
Processor 452 may communicate with a user through control interface 458 and display interface 456 coupled to a display 454. The display 454 may be, for example, a TFT LCD display or an OLED display, or other appropriate display technology. The display interface 456 may comprise appropriate circuitry for driving the display 454 to present graphical and other information to a user. The control interface 458 may receive commands from a user and convert them for submission to the processor 452. In addition, an external interface 462 may be provide in communication with processor 452, so as to enable near area communication of device 450 with other devices. External interface 462 may provide, for example, for wired communication (e.g., via a docking procedure) or for wireless communication (e.g., via Bluetooth or other such technologies).
The memory 464 stores information within the computing device 450. In one implementation, the memory 464 is a computer-readable medium. In one implementation, the memory 464 is a volatile memory unit or units. In another implementation, the memory 464 is a non-volatile memory unit or units. Expansion memory 474 may also be provided and connected to device 450 through expansion interface 472, which may include, for example, a SIMM card interface. Such expansion memory 474 may provide extra storage space for device 450, or may also store applications or other information for device 450. Specifically, expansion memory 474 may include instructions to carry out or supplement the processes described above, and may include secure information also. Thus, for example, expansion memory 474 may be provide as a security module for device 450, and may be programmed with instructions that permit secure use of device 450. In addition, secure applications may be provided via the SIMM cards, along with additional information, such as placing identifying information on the SIMM card in a non-hackable manner.
While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
In situations in which the systems discussed here collect personal information about users, or may make use of personal information, the users may be provided with an opportunity to control whether programs or features collect user information, e.g., a speaker model, a user's preferences, or a user's current location, or to control whether and/or how to receive content from the content server. In addition, certain data may be treated in one or more ways before it is stored or used, so that personally identifiable information is removed. For example, a user's identity may be treated so that no personally identifiable information can be determined for the user, or a user's geographic location may be generalized where location information is obtained, such as to a city, ZIP code, or state level, so that a particular location of a user cannot be determined. Thus, the user may have control over how information is collected about the user and used by a content server.
Particular embodiments of the subject matter have been described. Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. For example, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different order and still achieve desirable results. As one example, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In some cases, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. For instance, a module that performs similarity score computation, e.g., part of a speaker verification module, may be implemented in hardware, such as directly on a digital signal processing (DSP) unit.

matches:
Application No. 10
Application No. 16195834
Application No. 16207288
Application No. 2016
Application No. 10
Application No. 10
Application No. 10
Application No. 2016
Application No. 2016
Application No. 10
Application No. 10
Application No. 15781811