Instead of constructing a new chimney for Unit 3's FGD system, AEP retrofitted a cooling tower to release waste heat into the atmosphere.
(meta data) TITLE: Another first: AEP introduces flue gas venting technology in the U.S. | AEP Retirees & Alumni (meta data) PUBLISHER: https://www.facebook.com/WordPresscom Skip to content Follow: AEP Retirees & Alumni # Another first: AEP introduces flue gas venting technology in the U.S. by Dave Waitkus on February 3, 2012 Flue gas from Cardinal Unit 3 is now vented through a 29-foot diameter fiberglass duct to the unit's cooling tower rather than through a conventional stack. Photo by: Keith Burger (Story by Rachel Hammer) BRILLIANT, Ohio — On February 1, 2012, AEP added yet another entry to its list of pioneering technologies. That day, for the first time in the U.S., the company began venting the flue gas from Cardinal Unit 3 through the hyperbolic-shaped natural draft cooling tower rather than through a conventional stack. The technology has been used in numerous new and retrofit installations in Europe for the past 25 years, but this is the first such installation in the U.S. AEP installed this technology as part of the unit's flue gas desulfurization (FGD or scrubber) retrofit project. The new FGD system will remove up to 98 percent of the unit's sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions. ### Technology facts and figures Cooling tower diameter at exit: 180 feet Flue gas discharge pipe diameter: 29 feet Cooling tower to flue gas flow ratio: ~ 15:1 Existing retrofit installations: approx. 43 Existing new installations: approx. 15 AEP's technology partner for this project was Charlotte, N.C., based SPX Cooling Technologies Inc. SPX, formerly Marley Cooling Tower, has been associated with many cooling tower projects across the AEP system. The technology The venting equipment is relatively simple. Keith Burger, project manager – Projects & Controls, explained that during the unit's tie-in outage to connect the new FGD system to the generating unit, the side of the cooling tower concrete shell was reinforced and a hole was cut into it. A 29-foot diameter fiberglass duct was hoisted by crane and set into place to run from the duct leaving the FGD system into the cooling tower. At the center of the cooling tower, the duct makes a 90-degree turn to direct the flue gas upwards to exit through the cooling tower. While the process itself is relatively simple, associated issues, such as air flow impacts, structural design, environmental permitting and associated air modeling, made it significantly more complex to secure acceptance for the project. Deciding factors The unique configuration of the Cardinal Unit 3 site created concerns and challenges that caused AEP to evaluate alternate technologies for venting the flue gas. Typically, AEP has built new stacks as part of the FGD retrofit projects. At Cardinal Unit 3, the only potential location for a new stack was in close proximity to and in direct line with the flow of the water vapor plume as it exits the top of the cooling tower. In cold weather, the water vapor could freeze to the stack and form potentially hazardous ice accumulations. This ice could pose hazards for workers, equipment and reliable operations. Alternatives were limited. According to Tim Riordan, vice president – Engineering Services, there were no real viable alternatives for placement of a new stack. "Applying this technology in this situation is the right thing to do on many levels. First and foremost, it addresses the safety hazard. It's also a good environmental solution. Both the science and the results from existing installations indicate that the increased mass and flow rates from the combined FGD exhaust and cooling tower water vapor plumes will disperse the flue gas in a manner that is protective of the environment," he said. AEP worked closely with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) to understand any potential impacts that application of the new technology might have on ambient air quality. Ohio EPA approved the extensive modeling performed by AEP before modifying the air permit. According to Mark Runyon, senior engineer – Air Quality Services, AEP has installed four ambient sulfur dioxide monitoring stations and three meteorological stations near the plant. In accordance with the Ohio EPA permit, monitoring was performed for one year prior and will continue for a minimum for two years after initial FGD operation. Runyon pointed out that emissions reduction equipment remains the same. So the content of the combined plume is no different from the content of the two plumes vented separately. Also, continuous emissions monitoring equipment (CEMs) placed inside the duct will monitor the plume constituent. Construction Service's Site Manager Dick Aeberli noted that because this was a first time evolution, there was particular emphasis on making sure everyone had a clear understanding of the execution of the critical lift plan. Considerable effort and several months of planning were dedicated to developing this unique rigging scheme for placing the 175-ton fiberglass flue duct, which measured 220 feet in length and 29 feet in diameter, into the cooling tower. Wind speed was a major factor in making this critical lift, therefore, even the time of day was significant. In the early morning hours of October 25, the lift was executed. "Recognizing the magnitude of this undertaking, a collective effort between the building trades, AEP and contractor management, with safety as the number one priority, we were able to complete this monumental feat," Aeberli said. Other cooling tower work, other firsts Removing the cooling tower from service for the FGD project provided an opportunity to perform other cooling tower work. The original precast concrete hot water distribution support structure for Cardinal 3 was in poor condition, requiring numerous repairs through the years and was reaching the end of its useful life. Planning and approval to replace the hot water distribution components with a more efficient design that would improve thermal efficiency already was underway. So when the FGD project came along, AEP was able to integrate the multiple projects to execute them more efficiently. This project then became the first in the world to combine retrofitting discharge of flue gas through the cooling tower concrete shell with conversion from a cross-flow hot water distribution system to a more thermally efficient counter-flow system. Previous similar European natural draft cooling tower installations used concrete hot water distribution supports. Cardinal 3's cooling tower fill system was rebuilt with fiberglass supports. Technology acceptance Plant neighbors in the Brilliant area have an ongoing interest in activities at Cardinal Plant. Throughout the construction program to add environmental controls on all three of the plant's units, plant leaders and the project management team conducted several briefings with community leaders and several public meetings to keep the community informed. Interest in the construction activity at Cardinal Plant was heightened considerably this fall when the hole in the side of the cooling tower was visible from Ohio Route 7. "The timing was right for another update," commented Chuck George, plant manager. While attendance wasn't particularly high, local media covered the meeting. "It was another good opportunity to let our neighbors know about the good things we are doing here at Cardinal, especially since all three units now have state-of-the-art environmental controls," George added. Cardinal Plant is located at Brilliant, Ohio, and has total coal-fired generating capacity of 1,830 megawatts. AEP owns Unit 1 and Buckeye Power owns units 2 and 3. AEP operates the facility on behalf of all owners and managed the FGD retrofit project. All three units now are equipped with selective catalytic reduction systems to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions and FGD systems to address SO2emissions. From → News From AEP Leave a Comment ### Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here... Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Email (Address never made public) You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change ) You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out / Change ) You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change ) You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change ) Connecting to %s Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. « Stan Wilson and Crew Tug Boats » ## Categories Advocacy (9) AEP In The News (31) AEP News Releases (16) Announcements (83) Benefits (47) Community Service (83) Employee Profiles (1) Energy Industry News (28) Events (16) Historical Photographs (139) News From AEP (300) Obituaries (112) Retiree Profiles (23) Retirements (124) Safety (20) Uncategorized (66) Wellness (24) ## Archives August 2019 (6) July 2019 (1) June 2019 (1) May 2019 (4) April 2019 (1) March 2019 (3) February 2019 (3) January 2019 (6) December 2018 (7) November 2018 (8) October 2018 (8) September 2018 (6) August 2018 (7) July 2018 (10) June 2018 (9) May 2018 (12) April 2018 (10) March 2018 (9) February 2018 (7) January 2018 (10) December 2017 (6) November 2017 (10) October 2017 (6) September 2017 (6) August 2017 (9) July 2017 (11) June 2017 (7) May 2017 (8) April 2017 (10) March 2017 (11) February 2017 (8) January 2017 (7) December 2016 (7) November 2016 (10) October 2016 (5) September 2016 (9) August 2016 (12) July 2016 (8) June 2016 (11) May 2016 (7) April 2016 (8) March 2016 (6) February 2016 (6) January 2016 (9) December 2015 (8) November 2015 (7) October 2015 (11) September 2015 (11) August 2015 (6) July 2015 (11) June 2015 (11) May 2015 (10) April 2015 (8) March 2015 (8) February 2015 (9) January 2015 (7) December 2014 (7) November 2014 (10) October 2014 (7) September 2014 (9) August 2014 (7) July 2014 (7) June 2014 (10) May 2014 (10) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (12) February 2014 (8) January 2014 (8) December 2013 (9) November 2013 (8) October 2013 (13) September 2013 (8) August 2013 (13) July 2013 (10) June 2013 (10) May 2013 (13) April 2013 (20) March 2013 (14) February 2013 (11) January 2013 (8) December 2012 (9) November 2012 (15) October 2012 (14) September 2012 (7) August 2012 (13) July 2012 (8) June 2012 (8) May 2012 (12) April 2012 (4) March 2012 (7) February 2012 (13) January 2012 (14) December 2011 (10) November 2011 (10) October 2011 (8) September 2011 (10) August 2011 (12) July 2011 (19) June 2011 (13) May 2011 (12) April 2011 (10) March 2011 (14) February 2011 (14) January 2011 (15) December 2010 (12) November 2010 (15) October 2010 (17) September 2010 (13) August 2010 (27) July 2010 (16) June 2010 (19) May 2010 (10) April 2010 (6) ## Join us on facebook %d bloggers like this:
train19254
Cardinal Power Plant
Environmental mitigation.
To further reduce nitrogen oxide (.mw-parser-output .template-chem2-su{display:inline-block;font-size:80%;line-height:1;vertical-align:-0.35em}.mw-parser-output .template-chem2-su>span{display:block}.mw-parser-output sub.template-chem2-sub{font-size:80%;vertical-align:-0.35em}.mw -parser-output sup.template-chem2-sup{font-size:80%;vertical-align:0.65em}NO"x") emissions , AEP and Buckeye Power announced in 2001 they would install selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems to compliment their LO-NOx burners at Cardinal. The SCRs would decrease NO"x" emissions at the plant from 30% to 90%. Between 2005–2010, flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) equipment were installed to all three units at Cardinal with Units 1 and 2 costing $300 million to construct. The FGD equipment would reduce sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions by 98%. A year after it was installed, inspectors found severe corrosion in its tank vessel. AEP negotiated a settlement with Black & Veatch, the contractor who installed the FGD equipment, to address the corrosion.