...... Suppose you are a Bayesian and you must express your "belief" that the killer will We make use of the Smets' claim that "the de re and de dicto interpretations lead to the same results" ( [34], p. 333), that is Bel(A|B) = Bel(¬B ∨ A). Hence being may possess his private view on a subject, it is only after we formalize the feeling of subjectiveness and hence ground it in the **data** that we can rely on any computer's "opinion". We hope we have found one such formalization in this paper. The notion of labeling developed here substitutes one aspect of subjective human behaviour -if one has found one plausible explanation, one is too lazy to look for another one. So the process of labeling may express our personal attitudes, prejudices, sympathies etc. The interpretation drops deliberately the strive for maximal objectiveness aimed at by traditional statistical analysis. Hence we think this may be a promising path for further research going beyond the DS-Theory formalism.