On the other hand, Prifti et al. (2018) found that cash transfer gave incentives to Zambians workers to switch the job preference from working at others' farms to working at their own farms. Angeles et al. (2019) found that unconditional cash transfer (UCT) provision would lead to the recovery of the mental health of young people in Malawi. The fundamental mechanisms were improvement in education, the advisors' condition, and social supports. UCT would break the cycle of poverty and depraved mental health. Giang and Nguyen (2017) tried to examine the relationship between cash transfer and education and health using panel **data** in the Vietnamese Household Living Standard Survey in 2010 and 2012. They found that cash transfer could improve the school participation and had a good impact on poverty. In contrast, cash transfer did not have an effect on either the number of inpatients or the number of outpatients. Handa et al. (2018) found that cash transfer programs of Zambians showed strong productive and protective effects. They argued that this program could improve the long-term living standard and had important roles in improving growth. Sabates et al. (2019) found that cash transfer encouraged investment in education. Unfortunately, since school participation in Rwanda had reached 80%, this program could result in more school participation.