The breakdown of self-initiated activities across these three units were 64.2% for patrol, 17.5% for special crime units, and 18.3% for the differential response team. Unfortunately, the HPD CFS **data** do not provide detailed information about the nature of self-initiated activities, such as offense or incident type for patrol officers. Activities performed by specialized crime investigation and DRT officers might be deduced approximately using the division information. But to further breakdown the activity to specific units produces small frequencies of specific offenses, which would have been insufficient to conduct meaningful analysis. For example, there were only 338 self-initiated activities recorded under gang division, and 165 self-initiated activities recorded under robbery division during the study period. The **data** do include some information on dispositional outcomes of police self-initiated activities. The most frequent type of action for self-initiated activities is "collecting information" for each of the three types of police units. The disposition of "collecting information" is used in instances where the incident is resolved without needing to generate an offense report or referral for further investigation. Some examples are if the officer resolves the issue by mediation, the complaint is a civil issue rather than criminal, or if it is to provide further information about an offense report that already exists. Other self-initiated actions include making an offense or supplementary report, making an arrest, issuing tickets, etc.