KM conducted the qualitative **data** analysis, which included a reading of each transcript and the field notes to become familiarised with the data. 25 We used a deductive qualitative content analysis approach to code the **data** in NVivo V.12, with the CFIR as the guiding framework to categorise **data** according to factors (constructs) influencing implementation. 23 27 The CFIR was used with the intention of mapping the identified barriers and facilitators to evidence-based implementation strategies using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change tool following this study. 28 To enhance trustworthiness, 29 three other members of the study team (M-JS, CMS, MO'B) collectively analysed 25% of the transcripts, along with KM, to compare coding and discuss potential discrepancies in the interpretation of the CFIR constructs and codebook. The codes/CFIR constructs were summarised and organised as 'facilitators' or 'barriers' to PC-QI implementation. The study team discussed the codes and grouped them into larger categories, where they could be distilled into broader themes and subthemes of facilitators and barriers until **data** saturation was reached and no new themes were observed in the data. 25 