TABLE VI .
VIThe average relative uncertainties for each **data** set i resulting from the variance analysis proposed by Badikov et al.[35] (< σi >, < ση,i >, < σ ,i >) are compared with the ones derived from the reported uncertainties (< ui >, < uη,i > , < u ,i >). The total uncertainties are indicated without a sub-index. For the uncertainties due to systematic and random effects the sub-indices η and , respectively, are used. They are derived by taking the average of the relative values for the three energy groups multiplied by 100. The last three columns give the ratio between the values from the variance analysis and the reported ones for each component and for the total uncertainty. Uncertainty ratios that differ significantly from one indicate overestimated (> 1 in red) or underestimated (< 1 in blue) reported uncertainties.Dataset 
Reported values 
Variance analysis 
Ratio 
< σi > < ση,i > < σ ,i > < ui > < uη,i > < u ,i > total η 
Tovesson 
0.91 
0.84 
0.34 
2.38 
2.31 
0.55 
2.63 2.76 1.63 
n TOF (1) 
2.40 
1.73 
1.77 
2.60 
2.08 
1.56 
1.08 1.20 0.94 
n TOF (2) 
3.65 
2.49 
2.67 
2.66 
2.34 
1.27 
0.73 0.94 0.48 
n TOF (3) 
3.65 
3.35 
1.44 
2.43 
2.12 
1.18 
0.67 0.63 0.82 
n TOF (4) 
4.39 
3.74 
2.30 
3.04 
2.29 
2.00 
0.69 0.61 0.87 
Behrens 
1.46 
0.81 
1.21 
2.57 
2.26 
1.22 
1.76 2.79 1.01 
Difilippo 
2.48 
2.39 
0.66 
2.77 
2.20 
1.68 
1.12 0.92 2.54 
Cierjacks 
3.01 
1.09 
2.81 
2.77 
2.36 
1.45 
0.92 2.16 0.52 
Coates 
3.44 
2.92 
1.82 
3.27 
2.31 
2.32 
0.95 0.79 1.27 
Shcherbakov 2.53 
2.45 
0.64 
2.47 
2.31 
0.88 
0.98 0.94 1.37 
Lisowski 
1.54 
0.94 
1.22 
2.59 
2.28 
1.24 
1.68 2.42 1.01 