Indeed, research suggests that vignette methodologies are a valid, reliable, inexpensive, and practical method for assessing clinical practice (Bachmann et al., 2008;Veloski et al., 2005). For example, vignette studies assessing quality of care among outpatient physicians found vignettes to provide higher criterion validity, consistency, and variation in comparison to other research methodologies, including the much more expensive use of standardized patients (Peabody et al., 2000(Peabody et al., , 2004. Similar results have been found in multi-national studies, providing some evidence for the cross-cultural applicability and utility of clinical vignettes (Peabody & Liu, 2007;Spreng et al., 2014). Further, by using vignettes, these studies bypass a number of ethical concerns that can arise in studies with actual patients or confidential health **data** (Shah et al., 2007;Taylor, 2006), not to mention cost and feasibility constraints (Peabody et al., 2000;Veloski et al., 2005).