A sensitivity analysis revealed that the smallest detectable effect size with 90% power and a ¼ 0.05 was r ¼ 0.09 (using G*Power; [55]). Samples 2, 3 and 4 had smaller sample sizes with a minimum N of 207, 202 and 213, respectively, across all comparisons; these sample sizes enabled detection of r 0.22 with 90% power. To account for missing **data** across questionnaires, all correlations use individual mean scores rather than the total scores. Cases were removed from analyses where no **data** were available. All results are reported with unadjusted significance values; corrections for multiple comparisons were calculated for all within-test, within-sample analyses and are only reported where these corrections changed the interpretation of an analysis from statistically significant to not statistically significant. Differences between significant correlations were also analysed using Fisher's Z-tests and Steiger's Z-tests using online resources (http://vassarstats.net/rdiff.html; http://www.psychmike. com/dependent_correlations.php). All other analyses were carried out using SPSS. All study **data** and analysis scripts are available online (https://osf.io/gsfrj/).