He reaffirms, as stated in his initial claims, that his defence was always conducted in writing, that he never knew who his judges were, and that his lawyer was never permitted to question the prosecution witness. ###>L'auteur maintient ses allégations à ce sujet et réaffirme que sa défense a toujours été présentée par écrit, qu'il a toujours ignoré l'identité des juges et que son avocat n'a jamais pu interroger le témoin à charge.