For example <cite>Wang et al. (2007)</cite> introduced a set of rules to decide if a (DE) construction should be reordered or not before translating to English: • For DNPs (consisting of"XP+DEG"): -Reorder if XP is PP or LCP; -Reorder if XP is a non-pronominal NP • For CPs (typically formed by "IP+DEC"): -Reorder to align with the "that+clause" structure of English. Although this and previous reordering work has led to significant improvements, errors still remain. Indeed, <cite>Wang et al. (2007)</cite> found that the precision of their NP rules is only about 54.6% on a small human-judged set. One possible reason the (DE) construction remains unsolved is that previous work has paid insufficient attention to the many ways the (DE) construction can be translated and the rich structural cues to the translation.