Park and Cardie (2014) extracted clause-specific features using the Stanford syntactic parser and the Penn Treebank. (Merely using clause tags without capturing dependencies for important clauses may not help much in distinguishing objective verifiable claims from unverifiable subjective ones.)<cite> Park and Cardie (2014)</cite> also used tense and person counts for distinguishing verifiable claims from unverifiable claims. We hypothesize that word2vec and dependency context-based embeddings can inherently capture these linguistic characteristics and can replace these features.