This transformation aims at modeling the differences in scope of the argument between the derivation tree for (1) shown in Fig. 2 (a) and the corresponding dependency tree shown in Fig. 2 (b). For instance, in the derivation trees, claims and seems are under the scope of to love while in the dependency tree this order is reversed. According to<cite> (Kallmeyer and Kuhlmann, 2012)</cite> , such edge reversal is due to the fact that an edge between a complement taking adjunction (CTA) and an initial tree has to be reversed, while the other edges remain unchanged.