Co-Hyp vs Hyper (Santus et al., 2016) 97.8 95.7 <cite>(Jana and Goyal, 2018b)</cite> 99 Table 4 : Percentage F1 scores on a ten-fold cross validation of our models along with the best models described in (Santus et al., 2016) and <cite>(Jana and Goyal, 2018b)</cite> for ROOT9 dataset a set of baseline methodologies, the descriptions of which are presented in Table 1 .