Co-Hyp vs Hyper<cite> (Santus et al., 2016)</cite> 97.8 95.7 (Jana and Goyal, 2018b) 99 Table 4 : Percentage F1 scores on a ten-fold cross validation of our models along with the best models described in<cite> (Santus et al., 2016)</cite> and (Jana and Goyal, 2018b) for ROOT9 dataset a set of baseline methodologies, the descriptions of which are presented in Table 1 . Following the same experimental setup, we report the accuracy measure for ten-fold cross validation and compare our models with the baselines in proposed by Weeds et al. (2014) .