Table 4 shows the final test results of our parser for English. We include in the table results from the pure transition-based parser of Zhang and Clark (2008) (row 'Z&C08 transition'), the dynamic-programming arc-standard parser of<cite> Huang and Sagae (2010)</cite> (row 'H&S10'), and graphbased models including MSTParser (McDonald and Pereira, 2006) , the baseline feature parser of Koo et al. (2008) (row 'K08 baeline') , and the two models of Koo and Collins (2010 ing the highest attachment score reported for a transition-based parser, comparable to those of the best graph-based parsers.