Error Augmented Robotic Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb - A Review <s> Comparison of Haptic Error Augmented Therapy to other Haptic Therapy <s> This investigation is one in a series of studies that address the possibility of stroke rehabilitation using robotic devices to facilitate “adaptive training.” Healthy subjects, after training in the presence of systematically applied forces, typically exhibit a predictable “after-effect.” A critical question is whether this adaptive characteristic is preserved following stroke so that it might be exploited for restoring function. Another important question is whether subjects benefit more from training forces that enhance their errors than from forces that reduce their errors. We exposed hemiparetic stroke survivors and healthy age-matched controls to a pattern of disturbing forces that have been found by previous studies to induce a dramatic adaptation in healthy individuals. Eighteen stroke survivors made 834 movements in the presence of a robot-generated force field that pushed their hands proportional to its speed and perpendicular to its direction of motion — either clockwise or counterclockwise. We found that subjects could adapt, as evidenced by significant after-effects. After-effects were not correlated with the clinical scores that we used for measuring motor impairment. Further examination revealed that significant improvements occurred only when the training forces magnified the original errors, and not when the training forces reduced the errors or were zero. Within this constrained experimental task we found that error-enhancing therapy (as opposed to guiding the limb closer to the correct path) to be more effective than therapy that assisted the subject. <s> BIB001 </s> Error Augmented Robotic Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb - A Review <s> Comparison of Haptic Error Augmented Therapy to other Haptic Therapy <s> The present study is aimed at developing new rehabilitation protocols to be used in post-stroke robotic-aided therapy. In the recent past, it has been suggested that the use of robotic training forces that enhance error instead of reducing it, could stimulate new learning and feedback strategies at the base of an effective motor recovery. Starting from these findings, in this work two different robotic-aided therapies were compared: the first was based on the constraint induced movement therapy, the second employed an unstable training force field increasing path errors performed by the subjects. The results shows that the use of the unstable divergent force field can increase the recovery, especially in people with mild level of impairment. <s> BIB002 </s> Error Augmented Robotic Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb - A Review <s> Comparison of Haptic Error Augmented Therapy to other Haptic Therapy <s> BackgroundCerebellar symptoms are extremely disabling and are common in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) subjects. In this feasibility study, we developed and tested a robot therapy protocol, aimed at the rehabilitation of incoordination in MS subjects.MethodsEight subjects with clinically defined MS performed planar reaching movements while grasping the handle of a robotic manipulandum, which generated forces that either reduced (error-reducing, ER) or enhanced (error-enhancing, EE) the curvature of their movements, assessed at the beginning of each session. The protocol was designed to adapt to the individual subjects' impairments, as well as to improvements between sessions (if any). Each subject went through a total of eight training sessions. To compare the effect of the two variants of the training protocol (ER and EE), we used a cross-over design consisting of two blocks of sessions (four ER and four EE; 2 sessions/week), separated by a 2-weeks rest period. The order of application of ER and EE exercises was randomized across subjects. The primary outcome measure was the modification of the Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) score. Other clinical scales and movement kinematics were taken as secondary outcomes.ResultsMost subjects revealed a preserved ability to adapt to the robot-generated forces. No significant differences were observed in EE and ER training. However over sessions, subjects exhibited an average 24% decrease in their NHPT score. The other clinical scales showed small improvements for at least some of the subjects. After training, movements became smoother, and their curvature decreased significantly over sessions.ConclusionsThe results point to an improved coordination over sessions and suggest a potential benefit of a short-term, customized, and adaptive robot therapy for MS subjects. <s> BIB003
In the studies where the performance of haptic error augmented therapy was compared with haptic error reducing therapy (Squeri et al., 2007a; BIB002 BIB003 all studies report that there was no clear indication for the prevalence of one approach over the other. An interesting outcome came from the study where viscous force fields were used BIB001 ) as the authors conclude that most of the improvement in function occurred in the directions of the field where errors where amplified.