A Survey of Keystroke Dynamics Biometrics <s> Moving Window. <s> Keystroke dynamics based authentication (KDA) verifies a user based on the typing pattern. During enroll, a few typing patterns are provided, which are then used to train a classifier. The typing style of a user is not expected to change. However, sometimes it does change, resulting in a high false reject. In order to achieve a better authentication performance, we propose to continually retrain classifiers with recent login typing patterns by updating the training data set. There are two ways to update it. The moving window uses a fixed number of most recent patterns while the growing window uses all the new patterns as well as the original enroll patterns. We applied the proposed method to the real data set involving 21 users. The experimental results show that both the moving window and the growing window approach outperform the fixed window approach, which does not retrain a classifier. <s> BIB001 </s> A Survey of Keystroke Dynamics Biometrics <s> Moving Window. <s> We present in this paper a study on the ability and the benefits of using a keystroke dynamics authentication method for collaborative systems. Authentication is a challenging issue in order to guarantee the security of use of collaborative systems during the access control step. Many solutions exist in the state of the art such as the use of one time passwords or smart-cards We focus in this paper on biometric based solutions that do not necessitate any additional sensor. Keystroke dynamics is an interesting solution as it uses only the keyboard and is invisible for users. Many methods have been published in this field. We make a comparative study of many of them considering the operational constraints of use for collaborative systems. <s> BIB002 </s> A Survey of Keystroke Dynamics Biometrics <s> Moving Window. <s> A major challenge in anomaly-detection studies lies in identifying the myriad factors that influence error rates. In keystroke dynamics, where detectors distinguish the typing rhythms of genuine users and impostors, influential factors may include the algorithm itself, amount of training, choice of features, use of updating, impostor practice, and typist-to-typist variation. ::: ::: In this work, we consider two problems. (1) Which of these factors influence keystroke-dynamics error rates and how? (2) What methodology should we use to establish the effects of multiple factors on detector error rates? Our approach is simple: experimentation using a benchmark data set, statistical analysis using linear mixed-effects models, and validation of the model's predictions using new data. ::: ::: The algorithm, amount of training, and use of updating were strongly influential while, contrary to intuition, impostor practice and feature set had minor effect. Some typists were substantially easier to distinguish than others. The validation was successful, giving unprecedented confidence in these results, and establishing the methodology as a powerful tool for future anomaly-detection studies. <s> BIB003 </s> A Survey of Keystroke Dynamics Biometrics <s> Moving Window. <s> Keystroke dynamics is a behavioral biometrics showing a degradation of performance when used over time. This is due to the fact that the user improves his/her way of typing while using the system, therefore the test samples may be different from the initial template computed at an earlier stage. One way to bypass this problem is to use template update mechanisms. We propose in this work, new semi-supervised update mechanisms, inspired from known supervised ones. These schemes rely on the choice of two thresholds (an acceptance threshold and an update threshold) which are fixed manually depending on the performance of the system and the level of tolerance in possible inclusion of impostor data in the update template. We also propose a new evaluation scheme for update mechanisms, taking into account performance evolution over several time-sessions. Our results show an improvement of 50% in the supervised scheme and of 45% in the semi-supervised one with a configuration of the parameters chosen so that we do not accept many erroneous data. <s> BIB004
As oppose to growing window, moving window adds the new user sample to template profile and subsequently releasing the earliest sample, thereby retaining a constant template size. It is also known as adaptive mode BIB002 or sliding window BIB003 . A fixed window size is normally used, which is considered to be a disadvantage BIB001 . Despite the shortcoming, it is considered as an improved version of growing window BIB004 . It is interesting to investigate if window size correlates with system accuracy or what is the optimal length of window size to achieve best performance.