15 SHARES

Immigration, and how to handle it, continues to be a contentious topic in the United States in 2019. Currently, much of the debate revolves around border security and President Trump’s proposed wall. A partisan disagreement over funding for said wall is a big factor in the partial government shutdown that lasted from the end of 2018 into 2019 – the longest in history. But political differences aside, there’s no question that immigration as a whole affects the economy.

In light of recent developments in U.S. immigration policy, WalletHub compared the economic impact of foreign-born populations on the 50 states and the District of Columbia. We determined which states benefit the most — and least — from immigration using 20 key indicators. Our data set ranges from median household income of foreign-born population to jobs generated by immigrant-owned businesses as a share of total jobs. Read on for our findings, additional commentary from a panel of experts and a full description of our methodology.

Main Findings

State Economic Impact of Immigrants

Overall Rank* State Total Score ‘Workforce’ Rank ‘Socioeconomic Contribution’ Rank ‘Brain Gain & Innovation’ Rank ‘International Students’ Rank 1 California 77.01 2 1 4 8 2 New York 74.62 3 4 2 1 3 New Jersey 70.56 1 3 3 23 4 Massachusetts 61.12 9 9 10 1 5 Maryland 59.08 11 6 7 19 6 District of Columbia 57.41 5 26 12 1 7 Delaware 56.92 12 20 1 5 8 Illinois 55.89 7 14 11 9 9 Florida 55.85 4 7 21 31 10 Washington 55.80 13 13 5 12 11 Connecticut 55.31 10 8 13 10 12 Virginia 52.50 15 11 9 27 13 Nevada 49.87 6 5 22 48 14 Texas 49.09 8 12 20 21 15 Hawaii 46.49 14 2 39 28 16 Michigan 45.83 19 22 6 13 17 Pennsylvania 45.48 20 29 8 6 18 Arizona 43.83 16 10 28 15 19 Georgia 41.87 17 19 15 29 20 Rhode Island 40.17 18 17 32 4 21 North Carolina 35.48 21 25 18 37 22 Minnesota 35.15 28 27 14 25 23 Oregon 34.55 22 16 31 20 24 New Hampshire 33.06 26 18 30 17 25 Missouri 32.51 38 40 16 14 26 Colorado 32.47 23 24 26 30 27 Indiana 31.91 34 41 23 7 28 Ohio 30.65 35 32 24 18 29 Wisconsin 29.51 39 36 19 33 30 Kansas 29.14 32 35 25 24 31 Vermont 28.37 36 23 35 16 32 Iowa 28.06 43 38 29 11 33 Kentucky 26.61 40 50 17 35 34 New Mexico 24.91 24 21 47 46 35 Alaska 24.63 27 15 46 51 36 Nebraska 23.73 42 39 33 22 37 Utah 23.58 29 28 44 36 38 Alabama 22.83 46 47 27 38 39 West Virginia 21.70 49 42 36 26 40 Oklahoma 21.67 41 34 43 32 41 North Dakota 21.17 25 48 42 34 42 Tennessee 21.14 33 45 37 43 43 Arkansas 20.94 37 43 38 42 44 Louisiana 20.27 31 51 34 39 45 South Carolina 20.14 30 44 40 47 46 Maine 19.86 45 31 41 50 47 Idaho 18.03 47 30 50 41 48 Montana 15.93 51 33 45 45 49 South Dakota 15.74 44 49 48 40 50 Wyoming 15.11 48 37 51 44 51 Mississippi 13.19 50 46 49 49

*1=Largest Economic Impact





Ask the Experts

With immigration and border security continuing to hold a prominent place in 2019’s political climate, we asked a panel of experts to share their thoughts on the following key questions:

Do you think the immigration plan proposed by the Trump administration will be effective in reducing undocumented immigration? Recent estimates suggest that net migration from Mexico to the U.S. is below zero in recent years — that is, more Mexicans are leaving the U.S. than entering. Do you think this trend will continue? What is the best way to enforce the immigration law without breaking families apart? Should the U.S. tighten its legal-immigration policies? Are immigrants an economic benefit or an economic drain to states?

Methodology

In order to determine the states in which immigration has the most positive economic impact, WalletHub compared the 50 states and the District of Columbia across four key dimensions: 1) Immigrant Workforce, 2) Socioeconomic Contribution, 3) Brain Gain & Innovators and 4) International Students.

We examined those dimensions using 20 key metrics, which are listed below with their corresponding weights. Each metric was graded on 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing “most positive economic impact.”

We then determined each state and the District’s weighted average across all metrics to calculate its overall score and used the resulting scores to rank-order our sample.

Immigrant Workforce – Total Points: 30

Share of Foreign-Born Workforce: Double Weight (~10.00 Points)

Work Visas per Capita: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)

H-1B, Note: “Work Visas” refer to employment permits granted to immigrants and nonimmigrants and include the following categories: Permanent H-2B and H-2A

Jobs Generated by Immigrant-Owned Businesses as a Share of Total Jobs: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)

Note: This metric was calculated using the following formula: Number of Employees at Immigrant-Owned Firms / Total Number of Employees.

Share of Foreign-Born Business Owners: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)

Share of Active Physicians Who Are International Medical Graduates: Full Weight (~5.00 Points)

Socioeconomic Contribution – Total Points: 30

Share of Foreign-Born Population: Full Weight (~3.75 Points)

Share of Second-Generation Immigrant Households: Full Weight (~3.75 Points)

Share of Income Generated by Immigrant Households: Full Weight (~3.75 Points)

Median Household Income of Foreign-Born Population: Full Weight (~3.75 Points)

Net Difference Between State and Local Revenues and Expenditures per Immigrant: Full Weight (~3.75 Points)

Note: This metric underlines the net difference between the revenues that the state and local governments get from an immigrant and the expenditures that they have with that person. We took into account all emigrant generations (1st, 2nd and 3rd+).

Homeownership Rate for Foreign-Born Population: Full Weight (~3.75 Points)

Immigrant-Owned Businesses Income Generated as a Share of Total Business Revenues: Double Weight (~7.50 Points)

Brain Gain & Innovators – Total Points: 30

Foreign-Born Population Aged 25 & Older with a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)

Foreign-Born STEM Workers as a Share of Total STEM Workers: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)

Note: This metric was calculated using the following formula: Number of Foreign-Born STEM Workers / Total Number of STEM Workers.

H-1B Visas per Capita: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)

Note: “ H-1B Visas ” refer to a visa category that “applies to people who wish to perform services in a specialty occupation, services of exceptional merit and ability relating to a Department of Defense (DOD) cooperative research and development project, or services as a fashion model of distinguished merit or ability.”

Share of Fortune 500 Companies Founded by Immigrants or Their Children: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)

Note: This metric was calculated using the following formula: Number of Fortune 500 Companies Founded by Immigrants or Their Children in the State / Total Number of Fortune 500 Companies in the State.

Share of Foreign-Born Fortune 500 CEOs: Full Weight (~6.00 Points)

Note: This metric was calculated using the following formula: Total Number of Foreign-Born CEOs in the State / Total Number of Fortune 500 Companies in the State.

International Students – Total Points: 10

Number of International Students per Total Students: Full Weight (~3.33 Points)

Economic Contributions of International Students per Capita: Full Weight (~3.33 Points)

Note: “Economic Contributions” refer to the financial contribution of international students through their consumerism, particularly “in the higher education, accommodation, dining, retail, transportation, telecommunications and health insurance sectors,” according to NAFSA: Association of International Educators.

Direct & Indirect Jobs Created by the Economic Contributions of International Students as a Share of Total Jobs: Full Weight (~3.33 Points)

Note: This metric was calculated using the following formula: Number of Direct & Indirect Jobs Created as a Result of the Economic Benefit of International Students / Total Number of Jobs.



Videos for News Use:



Sources: Data used to create this ranking were collected from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor, National Academy of Sciences, Partnership for a New American Economy Research Fund, Association of American Medical Colleges, American Immigration Council, Center for American Entrepreneurship, Boardroom Insiders, Time and NAFSA: Association of International Educators.

Image: Africa Studio / Shutterstock.com

Was this article helpful? Yes No Awesome! Thanks for your feedback. Thank you for your feedback. Sorry! Failed to send the feedback. Please try again later. Submit

Disclaimer: Editorial and user-generated content is not provided or commissioned by financial institutions. Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and have not been approved or otherwise endorsed by any financial institution, including those that are WalletHub advertising partners. Our content is intended for informational purposes only, and we encourage everyone to respect our content guidelines. Please keep in mind that it is not a financial institution’s responsibility to ensure all posts and questions are answered. Ad Disclosure: Certain offers that appear on this site originate from paying advertisers, and this will be noted on an offer’s details page using the designation "Sponsored", where applicable. Advertising may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). At WalletHub we try to present a wide array of offers, but our offers do not represent all financial services companies or products.