diff --git "a/data/duo_chat/v1/jsonl/queries/c8e4774d84f8445a8f368926c59e17fa.jsonl" "b/data/duo_chat/v1/jsonl/queries/c8e4774d84f8445a8f368926c59e17fa.jsonl"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/data/duo_chat/v1/jsonl/queries/c8e4774d84f8445a8f368926c59e17fa.jsonl"
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+{"resource_id":"24652824","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 24652824, \"title\": \"Report number of lines per language in repository charts\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-15 17:20:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"### Description\\n\\nAs of now, repository charts report percentage of language in the repo.\\nFirst, it is not obvious how this percentage is computed (number of files? number of lines? bytes? what about comments? libraries?). Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\n### Proposal\\n\\nAs a user I would like to see the number of lines of code per language.\\nIdeally, excluding blank lines and comments, but that is optional.\\n\\n### Documentation blurb\\n\\nAs for use cases:\\n* better understand the repo structure\\n* if this is your repo, being able to report the number of lines of your main language\\n    * this is one of the metric employers would like to know (I personally was surprised by this question on interview and could not clearly respond)\\n* all those use cases for general repo graphs (like pie chart of languages)\\n\\n### Details\\n\\n[A useful comment from ZJ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038):\\n\\n\u003e Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\n\u003e Lines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\n\u003e That all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\\n\\n### Potential Workarounds\\n\\n- Run `scc` in a GitLab CI pipeline: https://github.com/boyter/scc to generate SLOC/etc. reports\\n- If API use is acceptable (instead of UI), parts of its output stats can be stored as custom attributes on the project: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/custom_attributes.html#set-custom-attribute\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 17800, \"updated_by_id\": 5749302, \"weight\": 8, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -14979600, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-07-17 16:10:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 7536567, \"discussion_locked\": false, \"closed_at\": \"2023-01-19 09:38:40 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 579, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11039421, \"title\": \"Category:Code Analytics\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-18 19:25:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:07:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 7161201, \"title\": \"Manage [DEPRECATED]\", \"color\": \"#44AD8E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-19 05:48:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-19 11:52:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Please use the devops::manage label instead of this deprecated label. It is kept for historical issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1890178, \"title\": \"[deprecated] Accepting merge requests\", \"color\": \"#69d100\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 11:34:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-28 08:14:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"[deprecated] Please use \\\"Seeking community contributions\\\" instead. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/developer-relations/contributor-success/team-task/-/issues/77\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1672341, \"title\": \"customer\", \"color\": \"#ad4363\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that were reported by Enterprise Edition subscribers. This label should be accompanied by either the 'bug' or 'feature proposal' label\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 4107658, \"title\": \"graphs\", \"color\": \"#428bca\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the project Graphs pages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15237307, \"title\": \"icebox\", \"color\": \"#d6ecef\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:25:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:35:52 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues on which no work is anticipated in the next several milestones but which may be considered for work shortly thereafter thus not closed.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2936416, \"title\": \"popular proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Feature proposals deemed popular by our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/triage) will have this label applied\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2714266, \"title\": \"potential proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label added by triage tools to mark interesting feature proposals for consideration\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@dbogatov Thanks for the proposal. We'll just have to leave this open and see if it becomes a popular request.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73cf193764726f4ed724d78d4b59d4f81efe83cc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978957, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@wagnerpinheiro, [S]LOC metrics are rather old. They are not actual now (only in 80-90s they were). Your idea is pretty but only for developers ego. For really gentlemen customers GITLAB maybe have to improve their charts with different modern metrics. As example, for analyzing object-oriented languages they can add metric of Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 19:52:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 346483, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978961, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@yachmenov_c_ I have to admit, I had to look up what Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer metrics were. And yes, I would love to see those metrics in GitLab.\\n\\n**However**, I feel like it is quite hard (or say, resource heavy) to implement those. Each language will have to provide a service to get OOP relations. We cannot derive those metrics just by parsing the text.\\n\\n**On the other side**, simple line counter per language (even the one which omits comments and empty lines) is relatively easy to implement.\\n\\nAs for developers' ego, I have to admit it would not mind seeing LOC metrics, but I am sure there are other reasons for these metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:00:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978963, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, I mostly agree with you, really they can implement functionality you mentioned, and it would be great. Nice point!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"ZD ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/80860\\n\\nA Customer requested this feature. :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 695248, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2dba3df39df1cd81040cb0bc86091470aac43ffa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978965, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This would be awesome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 239547, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"604137042a54634c99ba7cda9b19e4db3570b396\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is getting popular\\n\\n@DouweM ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" for this one?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f1bbac293ede2d142630a69c9b499642ce9a40f8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher I think it may not be well defined enough yet for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" . We removed the repository language a while ago because it didn't perform well, so we'll need to figure out way to restore it without reintroducing the performance issue.\\n\\nThis is related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/40236 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23931. \\n\\n/cc @jramsay\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 87854, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23bac7a1ece7d87f5607254715120cb9067506ea\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978986, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If we can provide a foundation in gitlab-ce#23931 that computes the language stats without performance, we could definitely open this up for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1187333, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:16:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:17:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1187333, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"812e8d43c4b74c029c7327a6b783be67b2a0cd78\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978988, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Having the LOC in the table with the language breakdown and percentage would be great.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4a841d10fb4925ca2b102435a39a249fb1f1bb39\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hello,\\n\\nDisplay the LOC in the chart would be a very nice feature :slight_smile: \\n\\nAny update about this ?\\n\\nThank you very much.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2182793, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55170edc6cc50d1a2a20760c0bd5760b0dba68b6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978998, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi,\\u00a0I haven't heard anything back yet.\\nDennis\\nDennis Biringer | Principal Software EngineerPacific Defense Systems, LLC (PDS)Integrity Applications Incorporated535 Lipoa Parkway\\u00a0 Suite 101, Kihei HI, 96753dbiringer@integrity-apps.com(808) 214-0765\\n\\n[smime.p7s](/uploads/e849eea0083b79828f578febe315bdcd/smime.p7s)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55168747dda9172740a2eaa5e847403ed43121de\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979004, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We also would like to see the total number of lines of code, files, etc. Thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a6edf2d747aa859d84a4adfab95b10d53d7774d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979005, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@shellyniz Currently it's presented as a percentage via the API:\\n- https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#languages\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d201f77821e20f12477856580eab2e40804cc2dd\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979019, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Silly me, I was looking for it under the repo API. That's a big help, thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"093b696a8537efb99106d9d0b003220eb6ee8c01\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979020, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\\n\\nIt's a great feature to have especially if you're to brag about how much work has been put into the project in a presentation or something.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 709639, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:05:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:07:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b43271d3058f31f25e92e49015ea9efc4afc7d0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979022, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't see us getting to this anytime soon, but I'm happy to label this with gitlab-ce~1890178 for a community contribution. \\n\\nWe express languages as % of repo, might we also show the absolute LOC? The Charts page might be a sensible place to display this. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/graphs/master/charts for an example. The project overview page could also work, we currently use a multi-colored horizontal line to represent this and show percentages there on mouseover.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:16:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:18:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1f57d0559fe42979c7e6d35e07dbbbb6131d9855\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979029, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @jeremy\\\\_ \\nDo you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'?And so 'Total Lines Number'?\\nWhat's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34d9eb930ce114af06333350c5ff55483637cf7e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979031, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @markglenfletcher \\nIt's very good things that showing percent,but lines number complete it's feature,doesn't?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a92bea136cc9e32d787aa5742ed869a21d2ab49c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979032, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Do you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'? And so 'Total Lines Number'? What's your opinion?\\n\\nI'd love to hear your proposal, but I think the Charts page may be an easy place to add this:\\n\\n![image](/uploads/198f585f7e807ed931757b47a519d135/image.png)\\n\\nWe could include a separate column for LOC on each row, and include a \\\"Total\\\" row at the bottom that displays the sum of the rows. What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 06:32:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-24 12:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-10 12:54:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979035, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"any update about this feature ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2346644, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"075f869895c6f828be69c382f91a4a9b2dba20b5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\nLines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\nThat all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 101578, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"570bda01e243b5cf50fce1ba6adb9cd4605169f4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979038, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Not sure if this helps anyone, but if you use GitBash (or linux terminal) and go into your local repo and type this command:\\n`find . -not -path \\u201c*/.git/*\\u201d | xargs wc -l`\\nYou get the total line counts. No extra things to install - just a bash command.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2223731, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a894203f7adeeb1a1ed60f595000c3d28bf650ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979039, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is another possible way by using the git ls-files command with a file type filter.\\n\\n* Java example: `git ls-files *.java *.xml | xargs wc -l`\\n* Ruby example: `git ls-files *.rb Rakefile Gemfile | xargs wc -l`\\n\\nOr whatever files you want to include in your count. It can also works in subfolders to provide counts of just the contents of that folder.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2814876, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78a3685ac84f3e9f6999bd406e3ee07296be78f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979041, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My developer ego gives +1 for this stats. I think, if you count the lines anyway, it might be no problem to offer different stats as options, because the counting might be the most expensive part anyway. \\n\\n*Yeah* for looking at your developer productivity in numbers. :-)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a8d439996cd80acb0e887e19d4c7a32c3b38f3f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979042, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is not graphical and not included in gitlab, but it serves my interest totally. Also it might be a good starting point for Gitlab's implementation: \\n\\nhttps://github.com/AlDanial/cloc\\n\\nUse `cloc --vcs git` to count only watched files in a git repository.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e05053a4fedccfbd67d6045862d003aaff0c6202\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979043, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@aakriti.gupta, should we just close this one in favor of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104, since it's a prerequisite?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:46:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979061, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, yes, we will take everything from this one in account - it's planned for 12.2. Do you want to comment on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104? What's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3511154, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"45e71e7ac76abec3784d03cbdb2b1cbc301899ff\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979063, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This should not be moved to EE as the initial feature was added by the community.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5ac02291aab2c6a295e4df9adacd278f1278fc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979064, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @max-wittig for pointing out! The EE issue has more content, which will be available on group/instance level. We would like to move all analytics into one space in the top nav bar, so will be thinking through how to combine what is in cc now and the additional functionality we will be adding in ee. Any feedback is welcome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"50ead744b305fa1f532705f92d1dbd1b1ec7a298\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979065, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"As mentioned below, as long as we keep the history through a merge or copying over information, it sounds good to close this with an update @valexieva :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4158075, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979066, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@valexieva I wrote a small script, which reports the languages an instance has by exporting prometheus metrics. Relying just on absolute values would make a lot more sense, than the approach that I'm using now. But I won't use absolute numbers, if `EE` is required for this.\\n\\nhttps://github.com/max-wittig/gitlab-languages\\n\\nI think it would be fine, if the Graph feature stays in EE, but it would be nice, if the API would return absolute numbers.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:35:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:42:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1283330, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7bde2d02397a5cb7ae5b0b940c065224158203f5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979067, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Keeping this open until we complete: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13163. After that will close, the existing functionality will be available in CE, further functionality as per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104 in EE.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"94574f2b40c78694f4096c523c514fcca93041ce\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi, we have scheduled LOC plus language trends for 12.3 - please find here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104#note_194198775. We will also ensure that it's available for CE users in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/65616 before we remove the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/graphs/master/charts\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"16af6bd6af9d839ee0856e4771ce2d012a7dc48e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979073, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Github provides this feature, it would be nice to be able to obtain comparable metrics from Gitlab as we are using both.\\n\\nOur use case to get these numbers is for figuring out the prevalence of code in any given language across our entire codebase to inform us with requirements for code analysis tools etc. \\\"90% of language Y in repository X\\\" without any context to the number is mostly a useless metric. We need to understand how much language Y there is in totality across our multiple SCM systems. Now i can only count how many repos have a given language in general which is not exactly the same thing.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 14:53:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291742295, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@unitysipu \\nI would say for your use case it is better to just create a tool that clones all the repos you want metrics on and runs cloc or a similar tool - https://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\nHaving these metrics across groups/organizations in github and gitlab makes less sense to me than to provide some information about what powers a given project.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291953639, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The amount of code often correlates with things like risk. It's sorta interesting from analysis point of view if you have projects that have 500, 5000, 500k or 5M lines of code. You may want to prioritize or categorize the big projects over the small ones (obviously that's not the full picture, depends on what that code is used for etc.). But just looking at our entire codebase / repositories from the top and knowing there's \\\"90% of PHP\\\" in some project without understanding there's a million lines of it doesn't really help. So while individual teams may have a good grasp of their project, somebody looking over our entire portfolio you need more information to figure out who you should get in touch with. Obviously you can also try to check the file size metrics etc. and try to filter out uninteresting file types or other similar cumbersome workarounds but it's just more work to land on data that could easily be provided by the platform directly.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292157164, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Even if you have 1000 repos, it would still not be that much work to write a tool that accumulates all the information using the method I described, and you're going to get it a lot faster than by asking gitlab to add a feature. \\nAs for expanding the scope of this issue to cover groups and organizations as a whole, I guess gitlab devs might consider that as an enterprise feature at some point.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292558285, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, *obviously* there are workarounds that require you to analyze all the source code yourself. That's not the point of this feature request. I see the conversation revolving around suggestions and local optimizations for individual teams / developers or the importance of the amount of code in context of individuals. I figured it's prudent to provide another point of view that may have an impact on the thinking of why it's important to have this implemented. There are other use cases for the LOC/Language metrics that can be of importance for somebody who is looking at your organization as a whole.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293145108, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Honestly, with that chain of argument: Why have a commit graph? You can do this locally on your git repo. Or why have a bugtracker? You can just install trac separately. Or why have a wiki? Haven't you heard of mediaWiki? And so on. \\n\\nFact is, that this is a standard feature that has many uses for individuals and companies (also for example if I actually will bother to contribute to a code base or if its not worth it because id have to learn X new languages).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4911777, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:42:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4911777, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"044bd214cb760ef42c44b314a3243601c4c2f6a7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:10:44 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299631157, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I disagree. It's absolutely not ridiculous at all to have _code metrics_ available in the source code repository you might use.\\n\\nAny external tool will have to analyse the code outside of the SCM makes the whole process inherently ineffective and slow by design. Gitlab (and github) already has the code inside it and therefore is in the best position to provide metrics and data on it. Furthermore, modern (sophisticated) code analysis tools _integrate directly_ with Github these days through Github applications, but even they cannot provide this data either without analyzing the entire codebase separately.\\n\\nWhile workarounds exist they are all bad in a large organization. I agree that it's clear this is not a priority based on the fact it's been open for two years, but also it's clear that the reasoning and discussion around this feature is very narrow and developer (ego) oriented.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:36:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"005fc553fd9580804c00dd974606b58258f6d149\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299627593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"##### For person\\nPeople expect it, since various metrics implemented in GitHub. At some point everyone just genuinely interested in those metrics even only for self-esteem. And it is frustrating to not find them on GitLab. And since GitHub made everyone think to have them out-of-the-box, people became lazy and don't want to pollute their work environment with some difficult code inspection tools that they will use once just because of curiosity. \\n\\n##### For big team\\nIf you are working in a solid company with big code base, and you professionally perform code analysis and give consulting based on it, then it is ridiculous to do it on the basis of GitHub or GitLab, likely you will need to have more sophisticated special tool for it.\\n\\n##### Conclusion\\nSo this feature is not a mandatory. In first place GitLab need to improve its role system, this is a real bummer:) But GitLab doesn't do it for 2 years, so probably they have more important tasks. I prefer to use GitHub because of role system and metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 635873, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 13:32:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:35:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"96c7f0adc49d8ea2d2f64108bea473166fe3f13c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293348432, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A premium/silver customer has requested for this feature over support ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/220808 (internal link)\\n\\nIn particular they'd like an ability to query statistics about lines of code per detected language type, within each, and across all repositories under a group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7536567, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 13:07:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 7536567, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80839b906be084dee24b6e6d95e01d91af4e6b4a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:56:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 612192220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am proposing in another issue to update an existing open source tool to add MBs of code to the reports.\\n\\nThis is related to helping customers (and prospects) be able to estimate the long term costs of security scanning solutions that charge by lines or MBs of code.\\n\\nIf the tool were a CI stage, but GitLab could receive and parse the report to a UI - then the compute for this would only performed for and paid by customers who want the counts.\\n\\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/233018\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-31 00:05:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 164827, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 388534468, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@DarwinJS the blocker for us on this feature is a line-counting capability in Gitaly.  I noticed that [SCC](https://github.com/boyter/scc) is written in Go, as Gitaly is.  Seems like that could be a very happy coincidence for us.  Did you happen to dive deep enough into SCC to have an opinion about how challenging it might be to integrate into Gitaly?\\n\\nNote for others: SCC is the line-counting software that Darwin recommended in his [blog post](https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 408694264, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bmiller1 the context is helpful.\\n\\nThis is in the %Backlog for awareness\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 586004666, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@djensen - I settled on SCC, rather than the long standing CLOC (Perl) due to it being written in a modern language and, if the author was not able to add features, the hopes that someone at GitLab would.\\n\\nI did dive into the internals, but don't know enough about Go Lang nor Gitaly to comment on whether the two would tango well.\\n\\nIt is lightning fast - which I noticed when processing www-gitlab-com.\\n\\nHave you thought of this as a sidekiq process - not sure how good it would be at doing per-commit differentials in Gitaly and doing the full repo in Gitaly may be a lot of excess compute if it does it every commit?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409124927, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just like source control, you don't need to count all the lines of code in a repo every time.\\n\\nOnce you have a known count of lines at a specific commit, you can just track the diffs after that to increase/decrease line count for specific code and languages.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409309581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes I understand.\\nWhat I'm trying to indicate is that the machinations to isolate net new lines and net removed lines of code may be more processing load than simply scheduling scc weekly?  Especially given the speed of scc.\\n\\nIf that might be true, the question is how timely do line counts need to be?\\n\\nI don't know the answer - just highlighting that if line counts don't need to be up to the minute, there might be a cheaper way to do it.  It would also possibly allow direct dependency on scc, rather than forking it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409329832, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e It is lightning fast\\n\\nYes it is!  It crunches the entire gitlab repo in about 3 seconds on my machine ([results here](https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2013041)).  Not bad.\\n\\n\u003e how timely do line counts need to be?  I don't know the answer\\n\\nMe either, but let's guess it needs to be somewhere between monthly and daily.  (Hourly and commitly seem unnecessarily specific.)  Maybe we could start at monthly and see how it goes?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409366938, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Or, maybe proponents could weigh in on the frequency.\\n\\nI feel a compromise might be:\\n\\n * maintain a _count per branch_ (which could be very helpful anyway)\\n * trigger a count on the _first commit_ of any new branch (or make counting an option?)\\n * update all branch counts _monthly_ (or, only branches that have a flag indicating that they should be counted)\\n\\nThat way, the regular update frequency is down to one count per project branch, per month, and Developers can force a new count by pushing a new branch (perhaps they might have a special case to have up-to-the-commit counts).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:50:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:54:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 5791080, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409381230, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In addition, I would like to understand uses cases for getting as fine as \\\"per branch\\\" code counts - what would someone use this for and how often?  If it is very occasional and/or for a bespoke purpose, they could just run scc themselves on a local copy.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 410590466, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Starter customer requesting this feature in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/172665\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f820fe272fadfd61eb4c19317bb2d45f71f25fa4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 416263002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\nAs the description states, the goal is to understand what the bar means, and see some absolute data. @jeremy Would the MVC here be to simply report the number of bytes, since that's what we're measuring?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 424775, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ccc8a3b61fc8f4f779b6b63486fb31d54c005cc9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 288529601, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[OneDev](https://github.com/theonedev/onedev) calculates SLOC per languages and display the trends over time which is quite interesting. An example trends here:\\n\\nhttps://code.onedev.io/projects/react/stats/lines\\n\\nOne can hover mouse on the trend to show SLOC by day. The initial calculation for a large repo such as Linux takes about 30 min, and the result will be cached. Subsequent updates for new commits will be fairly fast based on cache. Below is the logic for calculation if someone is interested:\\n\\nhttps://github.com/theonedev/onedev/blob/main/server-core/src/main/java/io/onedev/server/infomanager/DefaultCommitInfoManager.java\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7978344, \"created_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"19fa4567d0d0f1d5842c5ba6beae8267aebb0a4e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 483620034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is moving back to the %Backlog for the reasons described in ZJ's [comment above](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038). We're absolutely accepting merge requests on this one, but the Manage stage needs to prioritize other areas at the moment.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd32244cb8a10270e97506088fe7772e17dbcf11\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 242549553, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher please fix this ASAP.\\nI am surprised Gitlab has no protection against this crap.\\nYou will end up with people massively unsubscribing at best.\\n\\nP.S. This idiot keeps recreating accounts.\\nA simple post factum ban will not work.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 12:57:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 920678, \"type\": null, \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d54912a045e3ea6508b3cf9ea3c8d3f2c3f3784\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471910, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is a certain lag.\\nI suggest we do not subscribe back until admins fix it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503473194, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner I actually think this should go to ~\\\"group::source code\\\" , WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4156460, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 579827345, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI - Since Apex code is essentially extended Java with a few accompanying .xml metadata files, my customer was able to run `scc \\u2013count-as cls:java` to interpret Apex .cls files as Java.  scc understands the comment and syntax structure of Java and was able to correctly return the LOC.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 587249173, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I think that makes a lot of sense @ogolowinski\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4447217, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580171017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ogolowinski Yep, I agree. Thanks for changing the group.\\n\\nThis is going to remain in the backlog as it is not our current focus and based on [details](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#details) in the description, LOE will be quite high. Thanks.\\n\\ncc @cupini\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580236144, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@cupini I'm tagging @ljlane who is the PM for ~\\\"group::optimize\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4376883, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562100410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" ~\\\"self-managed\\\" ~customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\n* Link to request:  https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001Eo1h0\\n* Why interested: Want to report on all repos (instance-level) for languages used in repos for tools info\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: Workarounds are nice but would be nice to get an instance-view instantly \\n* PM to mention: @stkerr\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3288671, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-27 23:22:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562089576, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"An Ultimate customer is interested in this feature.\\n* Link to request: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000014HWYo\\n* Why interested: They have a need to report LoC for their Apex repos.\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: We have not found an adequate workaround\\n* PM to mention: @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-20 21:51:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 581438360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another Premium customer is interested in this feature: [#223248](https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/223248)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7272738, \"created_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e8ddc8cdcb1c801921ec5c22320c15c418b8826\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 622513819, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another customer inquiring if this function exists\\nhttps://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/161342\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fe28d2e0f29b158bfc492b79ea8883a16e1d5fb7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364390361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" Customer  interested in this feature [Internal Link](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001kHlpn)\\n\\ncc/ @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5250128, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-18 19:30:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:09:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3f6ffdb391745aec7053e4585f952953cbf32152\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 706872228, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer here: we compile this data periodically for use by the C-suite and even if the absolute numbers are representative of byte counts it is easy enough for me to use an estimate of bytes per line to get what I need.\\n\\nThe key is that I have nothing without absolute numbers.\\n\\nAlso, please consider the non-gitlab.com use case. Perhaps on our hosted instance we would be able to opt-in to a feature like this if it were available and we can decide for ourselves if the performance is acceptable.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78631ce204289b27d0730dbec72b8b9a7f770fec\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364645655, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My company is a Premium customer - we would really like to have this and even more metrics regarding type of language like number of components, files, etc.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5291964, \"created_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3790f9053863d8b679f99d4cc896f3ffb8c450e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 721314226, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"- SF: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000Ut0JyAAJ\\n- ZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/254826\\n\\n~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" customer is interested in this feature.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5537005, \"created_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af4170834a554c4135225876e22c91fadd8c35f2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 791792997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"1900 seat ~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" [Customer](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000002xBZQ) is interested in this feature.\\n\\n- Priority: ~\\\"customer priority::5\\\"  priority::\\n- Why interested: Customer is trying to find a way to report the total line of code across all GitLab projects.\\n- Problem they are trying to solve: Customer has some internal teams who are trying trying to integrate tooling with GitLab to measure and track code coverage. There\\u2019s a cost associated with expanding those other tools and without the ability to report the number of lines it's nearly impossible to estimate said cost.\\n- Current solution for this problem: none\\n- Impact to the customer of not having this: Inability to utilize other tools in conjunction with GitLab and thus slowing adoption of the platform.\\n- Questions: Are they're any other workarounds for this, even at a manual reporting level? \\n- PM to mention: @tlinz\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4748523, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-14 14:49:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-15 13:33:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e76285e7c35cbca1481c16ed2c1ad5b7d232b65e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 990978163, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A Premium customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\nZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/284853\\n\\nThe workaround mentioned [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_332427265) unfortunately is hitting this error at the moment. I wonder if you have thoughts about this @lyle ?\\n\\n```\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n3: from (irb):3\\n2: from lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb:85:in `path'\\n1: from lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/storage_settings.rb:65:in `legacy_disk_path'\\nGitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings::DirectPathAccessError (git disk access denied)\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10051186, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 08:09:53 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 924067966, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Seems related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350080. This was always a bit of a hack, and relied on manually executing `git` commands directly on the repo.\\n\\nYou could take (and modify) the same core:\\n\\n`/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l` and run it directly on the command line given a list of paths generated from `rails`\\n\\nThere's a bunch of caveats there though:\\n- `master` is not necessarily the default branch name (we transitioned in GitLab to `main` some time ago)\\n- It relies on counting the actual number of lines in a file `wc -l` and does it for every file in a repo. This will include licenses, headers, empty space and so on.\\n\\nThere are some additional thoughts in https://gist.github.com/mandiwise/dc53cb9da00856d7cdbb that have iterated on my approach from two years ago :sweat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 925281183, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bgadberry \\n\\nIt seems like with the additional customer problem you need solved that there should be another issue for this...?\\n\\n\u003e Customer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density.\\n\\nThis does not seem directly related. Correct me if I am wrong!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601066055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner You're correct. I was thinking the customer could calculate the metric manually once number of lines of code is made available. On second thought, I think we can calculate vulnerabilities per byte today. I'll report back if that suffices.\\n\\n@tmccaslin Is this vulnerability per byte/line of code metric something we've considered uncovering as part of SAST?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601093808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"It's not per _language_ but the following rails console snippet will give you an estimate of number of lines per `Project` on a self-managed instance where the `git-data` is on a partition or directly attached volume.\\n\\nIt can break a bit if there's no `master` branch or if a repository for some reason doesn't have a `HEAD`, so it's not at all bullet-proof.\\n\\n```ruby\\nheaders = ['path', 'lines','archived?']\\nreport_file = Tempfile.new(['project_lines','.csv'])\\n\\nCSV.open(report_file.path, \\\"wb\\\") do |csv|\\ncsv \u003c\u003c headers\\n   Project.all.each do |p|\\n      output = `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l`\\n      csv \u003c\u003c [p.full_path, Integer(output),p.archived?]\\n   end; nil\\nend\\n\\nreport_file.close\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2930750323d45742084b921bd0f102d58807df7b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 332427265, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, statistics counting total and per lang number of lines (in code files only) would be so nice and basic.  \\nIgnore empty lines for me is optional. \\n\\nGet stats manually / locally for a git repo is not a problem. But this issue asks for the UI of gitlab. And this is what I need as well. \\n\\nhere a link to the current state: (older links above are expired)  \\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts \\n\\nHere a link for more advanced stats ambitions:  \\nhttps://www.openhub.net/p/gitlab\\n\\nedit: btw: If this is not happening since 5 years because of performance issues, then just calculate it once a week and show the calculation date next to it. I guess most people do not need per hour stats about n lines of code. For me even once per month would be enough. (And thus could be used for #12104 as well)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:08:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-03 07:59:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 882141, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3bdba5e20eedfcedc7eb1c6272fa93798b138610\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:13:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951334872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In order to get this request some attention, this issue has been marked as a potentially interesting proposal as it meets the following criteria:\\n\\n* Labelled as a feature proposal\\n* More than 10 upvotes\\n* Unscheduled (not associated with a milestone)\\n\\nThanks for your proposal!\\n\\n\\n\\n/cc @markglenfletcher\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73b69edb26083c702d2514effe76ca7da2d40407\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978971, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 154953, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"63b6ff0026abcb2ee9df9b28041655c7ab9fe563\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979021, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@billclark agreed\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2414870, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1328954e3c5076176230b846b4da51543092429b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If you do, make sure you somehow transfer the popularity and influence as well. \\nThis issue has 2 years of (possible sparse) history and 300+ upvotes. \\nThe newer one is month long. \\n\\nIt may make more sense to either transfer this one to EE, or merge the other one to here.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5db704a8ce0f10d43344ec9d98767153458c3c76\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979062, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"this just counts the raw line number of the files treated as pieces of texts. I guess what people want here is more like a per-language breakdown.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e32505249798e1b3e040ded861516658150259c6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979040, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Is there a way to get this data using the API?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0603dc2249187fa36328ff2f92debfc6c7db79d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"No it is not. That would be something for @matt_wilson to consider with the security dashboard.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5329074, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601097241, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We need more cowbell!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 196721, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616b443b97ad1443c199fb5f0af9780b51ddf379\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts is that what it looks today? seems like a regression.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951315993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I would like a total number of lines not including blank ones.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dcb61a50851d774190fa590cddf3e19f7a753f83\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979036, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer would also like to track lines of code per developer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404096482, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just started to use gitlab, and this is one the first stats i hoped to see in the \\\"Charts\\\", however i was surprised it's missing :(\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3219145, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-22 10:59:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979033, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"how come I can still receive notifications even if I unsubscribed???\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:19:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471203, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001FRuq0\\n\\nCustomer would like to see number of lines of code per language excluding comments. \\n\\n/cc @npost\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-30 01:30:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:47:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 387929331, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer interested in this feature. https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000W2eBo (Internal link)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4587928, \"created_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"35a9711c22330d7480c21b516ab890edccb85fb6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 258382372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"i will join, i want see my ego\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 688008, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8993bd8d42c15974c7f1eee7b8601e71e505626f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979006, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"for a company that has thousands of repositories that's just completely ineffective\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292139470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@bgadberry The customer may be able to pull the necessary vulnerability count information from the existing GraphQL API. I've never heard a request for this functionality before and don't have any plans to include it in the Security Dashboard reports so pulling the data and creating their own reports is the best way forward if this is needed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4708748, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601110834, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Same here!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4122216, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979054, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The developer of scc responded to proposals to update the code as desired. Resultant code is in this blog article: https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story and being worked into this working example for GitLab CI CD: https://gitlab.com/guided-explorations/ci-cd-plugin-extensions/ci-cd-plugin-extension-scc\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404663419, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@mlockhart in the context of an MVC I think we need to stick with measuring the default branch only, because that's what the Repository Analytics page is currently doing ([example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts)).\\n\\nOn the bright side, it seems the existing byte counts are being [updated on push](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/git/branch_push_service.rb#L54).  That makes me hopeful we could match that frequency with line counts.  So let's tentatively say the MVC would be updated pushly (instead of monthly like I proposed above).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409398149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Gold customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/154631 with a slight twist: they'd like to see the number of lines by group/sub-group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-24 18:02:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:37:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3b5c50effe1ea33f7f938b5693032964c2bdc512\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:46:35 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 331168435, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001lc3Cc\\n\\nCustomer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density. \\n\\n/cc @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 19:45:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 600990593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Had a similar request. I was able to get this info by extracting the Gitlab backup repositories from a backup and unbundling everything then running the following utility on the directory.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut it would be nice to see this kind of information on a project / server admin level, just to provide an overview of things currently within GitLab user / admin interfaces.\\r\\n\\r\\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\r\\n\\r\\n![image](/uploads/2e9c9fd05358a6e80411bfb9b323c214/image.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 261290, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:15:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-22 12:20:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 261290, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"186117b5b28df4eca7f2419b17ad900f90e61728\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:42:31 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978968, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Please add a chart with the SLOC metric, it is a metric more useful than the number of commits\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1276118, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 14:50:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 07:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"735fd7ef77d0bd7463126f7436eda8691d678998\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978960, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 695248, \"username\": \"lbot\", \"name\": \"Lee Matos\"}, {\"id\": 239547, \"username\": \"wil.rodriguez\", \"name\": \"William Rodriguez\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 87854, \"username\": \"DouweM\", \"name\": \"Douwe Maan\"}, {\"id\": 1187333, \"username\": \"jramsay-gitlab\", \"name\": \"James Ramsay (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 2182793, \"username\": \"craph1\", \"name\": \"craph\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 709639, \"username\": \"omidontop\", \"name\": \"Omid Manikhi\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 2346644, \"username\": \"ariaieboy\", \"name\": \"AriaieBOY\"}, {\"id\": 101578, \"username\": \"zj-gitlab\", \"name\": \"Zeger-Jan van de Weg\"}, {\"id\": 2223731, \"username\": \"bobbymcgill\", \"name\": \"Bobby McGill\"}, {\"id\": 2814876, \"username\": \"jim.robbins\", \"name\": \"Jim Robbins\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 4158075, \"username\": \"aakriti.gupta\", \"name\": \"Aakriti Gupta\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4911777, \"username\": \"i.hayden\", \"name\": \"Immanuel Hayden\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 635873, \"username\": \"pisarik\", \"name\": \"Vlad Blazhko\"}, {\"id\": 7536567, \"username\": \"hchouraria\", \"name\": \"Harsh Chouraria\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 424775, \"username\": \"markpundsack\", \"name\": \"Mark Pundsack\"}, {\"id\": 7978344, \"username\": \"robinshine\", \"name\": \"Robin Shen\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 4156460, \"username\": \"ogolowinski\", \"name\": \"Orit Golowinski\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 4447217, \"username\": \"ljlane\", \"name\": \"Larissa Lane\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4376883, \"username\": \"stkerr\", \"name\": \"Sam Kerr\"}, {\"id\": 3288671, \"username\": \"cupini\", \"name\": \"Brian Cupini\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 7272738, \"username\": \"kategrechishkina\", \"name\": \"Kate Grechishkina\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 5250128, \"username\": \"ricardoamarilla\", \"name\": \"Ricardo Amarilla\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 5291964, \"username\": \"crispindev\", \"name\": \"crispin velez\"}, {\"id\": 5537005, \"username\": \"cleveland\", \"name\": \"Cleveland Bledsoe Jr\"}, {\"id\": 4748523, \"username\": \"sheininger\", \"name\": \"Steffen Heininger\"}, {\"id\": 10051186, \"username\": \"kballon\", \"name\": \"Kent Japhet Ballon\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 154953, \"username\": \"Zandor300\", \"name\": \"Zandor Smith\"}, {\"id\": 2414870, \"username\": \"mason1920\", \"name\": \"mason1920\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 5329074, \"username\": \"tmccaslin\", \"name\": \"Taylor McCaslin\"}, {\"id\": 196721, \"username\": \"billclark\", \"name\": \"Bill Clark\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 3219145, \"username\": \"spprint\", \"name\": \"Sven Vet\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 4587928, \"username\": \"cbazan1\", \"name\": \"Carlos Bazan\"}, {\"id\": 688008, \"username\": \"friuns\", \"name\": \"friuns\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4708748, \"username\": \"matt_wilson\", \"name\": \"Matt Wilson\"}, {\"id\": 4122216, \"username\": \"saunved\", \"name\": \"Saunved Mutalik\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 261290, \"username\": \"TRPmwiesen\", \"name\": \"Matthew Wiesen\"}, {\"id\": 1276118, \"username\": \"wagnerpinheiro\", \"name\": \"Wagner Pinheiro\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What is this issue about?","query_id":"c6539dc9ba1547e794f8eeb043455ca1","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"24652824","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 24652824, \"title\": \"Report number of lines per language in repository charts\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-15 17:20:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"### Description\\n\\nAs of now, repository charts report percentage of language in the repo.\\nFirst, it is not obvious how this percentage is computed (number of files? number of lines? bytes? what about comments? libraries?). Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\n### Proposal\\n\\nAs a user I would like to see the number of lines of code per language.\\nIdeally, excluding blank lines and comments, but that is optional.\\n\\n### Documentation blurb\\n\\nAs for use cases:\\n* better understand the repo structure\\n* if this is your repo, being able to report the number of lines of your main language\\n    * this is one of the metric employers would like to know (I personally was surprised by this question on interview and could not clearly respond)\\n* all those use cases for general repo graphs (like pie chart of languages)\\n\\n### Details\\n\\n[A useful comment from ZJ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038):\\n\\n\u003e Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\n\u003e Lines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\n\u003e That all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\\n\\n### Potential Workarounds\\n\\n- Run `scc` in a GitLab CI pipeline: https://github.com/boyter/scc to generate SLOC/etc. reports\\n- If API use is acceptable (instead of UI), parts of its output stats can be stored as custom attributes on the project: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/custom_attributes.html#set-custom-attribute\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 17800, \"updated_by_id\": 5749302, \"weight\": 8, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -14979600, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-07-17 16:10:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 7536567, \"discussion_locked\": false, \"closed_at\": \"2023-01-19 09:38:40 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 579, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11039421, \"title\": \"Category:Code Analytics\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-18 19:25:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:07:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 7161201, \"title\": \"Manage [DEPRECATED]\", \"color\": \"#44AD8E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-19 05:48:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-19 11:52:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Please use the devops::manage label instead of this deprecated label. It is kept for historical issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1890178, \"title\": \"[deprecated] Accepting merge requests\", \"color\": \"#69d100\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 11:34:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-28 08:14:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"[deprecated] Please use \\\"Seeking community contributions\\\" instead. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/developer-relations/contributor-success/team-task/-/issues/77\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1672341, \"title\": \"customer\", \"color\": \"#ad4363\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that were reported by Enterprise Edition subscribers. This label should be accompanied by either the 'bug' or 'feature proposal' label\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 4107658, \"title\": \"graphs\", \"color\": \"#428bca\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the project Graphs pages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15237307, \"title\": \"icebox\", \"color\": \"#d6ecef\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:25:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:35:52 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues on which no work is anticipated in the next several milestones but which may be considered for work shortly thereafter thus not closed.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2936416, \"title\": \"popular proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Feature proposals deemed popular by our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/triage) will have this label applied\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2714266, \"title\": \"potential proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label added by triage tools to mark interesting feature proposals for consideration\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@dbogatov Thanks for the proposal. We'll just have to leave this open and see if it becomes a popular request.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73cf193764726f4ed724d78d4b59d4f81efe83cc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978957, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@wagnerpinheiro, [S]LOC metrics are rather old. They are not actual now (only in 80-90s they were). Your idea is pretty but only for developers ego. For really gentlemen customers GITLAB maybe have to improve their charts with different modern metrics. As example, for analyzing object-oriented languages they can add metric of Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 19:52:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 346483, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978961, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@yachmenov_c_ I have to admit, I had to look up what Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer metrics were. And yes, I would love to see those metrics in GitLab.\\n\\n**However**, I feel like it is quite hard (or say, resource heavy) to implement those. Each language will have to provide a service to get OOP relations. We cannot derive those metrics just by parsing the text.\\n\\n**On the other side**, simple line counter per language (even the one which omits comments and empty lines) is relatively easy to implement.\\n\\nAs for developers' ego, I have to admit it would not mind seeing LOC metrics, but I am sure there are other reasons for these metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:00:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978963, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, I mostly agree with you, really they can implement functionality you mentioned, and it would be great. Nice point!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"ZD ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/80860\\n\\nA Customer requested this feature. :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 695248, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2dba3df39df1cd81040cb0bc86091470aac43ffa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978965, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This would be awesome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 239547, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"604137042a54634c99ba7cda9b19e4db3570b396\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is getting popular\\n\\n@DouweM ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" for this one?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f1bbac293ede2d142630a69c9b499642ce9a40f8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher I think it may not be well defined enough yet for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" . We removed the repository language a while ago because it didn't perform well, so we'll need to figure out way to restore it without reintroducing the performance issue.\\n\\nThis is related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/40236 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23931. \\n\\n/cc @jramsay\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 87854, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23bac7a1ece7d87f5607254715120cb9067506ea\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978986, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If we can provide a foundation in gitlab-ce#23931 that computes the language stats without performance, we could definitely open this up for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1187333, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:16:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:17:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1187333, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"812e8d43c4b74c029c7327a6b783be67b2a0cd78\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978988, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Having the LOC in the table with the language breakdown and percentage would be great.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4a841d10fb4925ca2b102435a39a249fb1f1bb39\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hello,\\n\\nDisplay the LOC in the chart would be a very nice feature :slight_smile: \\n\\nAny update about this ?\\n\\nThank you very much.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2182793, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55170edc6cc50d1a2a20760c0bd5760b0dba68b6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978998, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi,\\u00a0I haven't heard anything back yet.\\nDennis\\nDennis Biringer | Principal Software EngineerPacific Defense Systems, LLC (PDS)Integrity Applications Incorporated535 Lipoa Parkway\\u00a0 Suite 101, Kihei HI, 96753dbiringer@integrity-apps.com(808) 214-0765\\n\\n[smime.p7s](/uploads/e849eea0083b79828f578febe315bdcd/smime.p7s)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55168747dda9172740a2eaa5e847403ed43121de\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979004, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We also would like to see the total number of lines of code, files, etc. Thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a6edf2d747aa859d84a4adfab95b10d53d7774d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979005, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@shellyniz Currently it's presented as a percentage via the API:\\n- https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#languages\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d201f77821e20f12477856580eab2e40804cc2dd\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979019, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Silly me, I was looking for it under the repo API. That's a big help, thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"093b696a8537efb99106d9d0b003220eb6ee8c01\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979020, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\\n\\nIt's a great feature to have especially if you're to brag about how much work has been put into the project in a presentation or something.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 709639, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:05:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:07:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b43271d3058f31f25e92e49015ea9efc4afc7d0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979022, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't see us getting to this anytime soon, but I'm happy to label this with gitlab-ce~1890178 for a community contribution. \\n\\nWe express languages as % of repo, might we also show the absolute LOC? The Charts page might be a sensible place to display this. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/graphs/master/charts for an example. The project overview page could also work, we currently use a multi-colored horizontal line to represent this and show percentages there on mouseover.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:16:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:18:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1f57d0559fe42979c7e6d35e07dbbbb6131d9855\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979029, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @jeremy\\\\_ \\nDo you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'?And so 'Total Lines Number'?\\nWhat's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34d9eb930ce114af06333350c5ff55483637cf7e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979031, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @markglenfletcher \\nIt's very good things that showing percent,but lines number complete it's feature,doesn't?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a92bea136cc9e32d787aa5742ed869a21d2ab49c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979032, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Do you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'? And so 'Total Lines Number'? What's your opinion?\\n\\nI'd love to hear your proposal, but I think the Charts page may be an easy place to add this:\\n\\n![image](/uploads/198f585f7e807ed931757b47a519d135/image.png)\\n\\nWe could include a separate column for LOC on each row, and include a \\\"Total\\\" row at the bottom that displays the sum of the rows. What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 06:32:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-24 12:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-10 12:54:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979035, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"any update about this feature ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2346644, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"075f869895c6f828be69c382f91a4a9b2dba20b5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\nLines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\nThat all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 101578, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"570bda01e243b5cf50fce1ba6adb9cd4605169f4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979038, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Not sure if this helps anyone, but if you use GitBash (or linux terminal) and go into your local repo and type this command:\\n`find . -not -path \\u201c*/.git/*\\u201d | xargs wc -l`\\nYou get the total line counts. No extra things to install - just a bash command.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2223731, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a894203f7adeeb1a1ed60f595000c3d28bf650ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979039, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is another possible way by using the git ls-files command with a file type filter.\\n\\n* Java example: `git ls-files *.java *.xml | xargs wc -l`\\n* Ruby example: `git ls-files *.rb Rakefile Gemfile | xargs wc -l`\\n\\nOr whatever files you want to include in your count. It can also works in subfolders to provide counts of just the contents of that folder.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2814876, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78a3685ac84f3e9f6999bd406e3ee07296be78f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979041, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My developer ego gives +1 for this stats. I think, if you count the lines anyway, it might be no problem to offer different stats as options, because the counting might be the most expensive part anyway. \\n\\n*Yeah* for looking at your developer productivity in numbers. :-)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a8d439996cd80acb0e887e19d4c7a32c3b38f3f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979042, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is not graphical and not included in gitlab, but it serves my interest totally. Also it might be a good starting point for Gitlab's implementation: \\n\\nhttps://github.com/AlDanial/cloc\\n\\nUse `cloc --vcs git` to count only watched files in a git repository.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e05053a4fedccfbd67d6045862d003aaff0c6202\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979043, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@aakriti.gupta, should we just close this one in favor of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104, since it's a prerequisite?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:46:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979061, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, yes, we will take everything from this one in account - it's planned for 12.2. Do you want to comment on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104? What's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3511154, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"45e71e7ac76abec3784d03cbdb2b1cbc301899ff\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979063, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This should not be moved to EE as the initial feature was added by the community.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5ac02291aab2c6a295e4df9adacd278f1278fc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979064, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @max-wittig for pointing out! The EE issue has more content, which will be available on group/instance level. We would like to move all analytics into one space in the top nav bar, so will be thinking through how to combine what is in cc now and the additional functionality we will be adding in ee. Any feedback is welcome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"50ead744b305fa1f532705f92d1dbd1b1ec7a298\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979065, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"As mentioned below, as long as we keep the history through a merge or copying over information, it sounds good to close this with an update @valexieva :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4158075, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979066, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@valexieva I wrote a small script, which reports the languages an instance has by exporting prometheus metrics. Relying just on absolute values would make a lot more sense, than the approach that I'm using now. But I won't use absolute numbers, if `EE` is required for this.\\n\\nhttps://github.com/max-wittig/gitlab-languages\\n\\nI think it would be fine, if the Graph feature stays in EE, but it would be nice, if the API would return absolute numbers.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:35:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:42:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1283330, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7bde2d02397a5cb7ae5b0b940c065224158203f5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979067, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Keeping this open until we complete: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13163. After that will close, the existing functionality will be available in CE, further functionality as per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104 in EE.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"94574f2b40c78694f4096c523c514fcca93041ce\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi, we have scheduled LOC plus language trends for 12.3 - please find here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104#note_194198775. We will also ensure that it's available for CE users in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/65616 before we remove the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/graphs/master/charts\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"16af6bd6af9d839ee0856e4771ce2d012a7dc48e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979073, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Github provides this feature, it would be nice to be able to obtain comparable metrics from Gitlab as we are using both.\\n\\nOur use case to get these numbers is for figuring out the prevalence of code in any given language across our entire codebase to inform us with requirements for code analysis tools etc. \\\"90% of language Y in repository X\\\" without any context to the number is mostly a useless metric. We need to understand how much language Y there is in totality across our multiple SCM systems. Now i can only count how many repos have a given language in general which is not exactly the same thing.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 14:53:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291742295, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@unitysipu \\nI would say for your use case it is better to just create a tool that clones all the repos you want metrics on and runs cloc or a similar tool - https://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\nHaving these metrics across groups/organizations in github and gitlab makes less sense to me than to provide some information about what powers a given project.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291953639, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The amount of code often correlates with things like risk. It's sorta interesting from analysis point of view if you have projects that have 500, 5000, 500k or 5M lines of code. You may want to prioritize or categorize the big projects over the small ones (obviously that's not the full picture, depends on what that code is used for etc.). But just looking at our entire codebase / repositories from the top and knowing there's \\\"90% of PHP\\\" in some project without understanding there's a million lines of it doesn't really help. So while individual teams may have a good grasp of their project, somebody looking over our entire portfolio you need more information to figure out who you should get in touch with. Obviously you can also try to check the file size metrics etc. and try to filter out uninteresting file types or other similar cumbersome workarounds but it's just more work to land on data that could easily be provided by the platform directly.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292157164, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Even if you have 1000 repos, it would still not be that much work to write a tool that accumulates all the information using the method I described, and you're going to get it a lot faster than by asking gitlab to add a feature. \\nAs for expanding the scope of this issue to cover groups and organizations as a whole, I guess gitlab devs might consider that as an enterprise feature at some point.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292558285, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, *obviously* there are workarounds that require you to analyze all the source code yourself. That's not the point of this feature request. I see the conversation revolving around suggestions and local optimizations for individual teams / developers or the importance of the amount of code in context of individuals. I figured it's prudent to provide another point of view that may have an impact on the thinking of why it's important to have this implemented. There are other use cases for the LOC/Language metrics that can be of importance for somebody who is looking at your organization as a whole.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293145108, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Honestly, with that chain of argument: Why have a commit graph? You can do this locally on your git repo. Or why have a bugtracker? You can just install trac separately. Or why have a wiki? Haven't you heard of mediaWiki? And so on. \\n\\nFact is, that this is a standard feature that has many uses for individuals and companies (also for example if I actually will bother to contribute to a code base or if its not worth it because id have to learn X new languages).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4911777, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:42:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4911777, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"044bd214cb760ef42c44b314a3243601c4c2f6a7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:10:44 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299631157, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I disagree. It's absolutely not ridiculous at all to have _code metrics_ available in the source code repository you might use.\\n\\nAny external tool will have to analyse the code outside of the SCM makes the whole process inherently ineffective and slow by design. Gitlab (and github) already has the code inside it and therefore is in the best position to provide metrics and data on it. Furthermore, modern (sophisticated) code analysis tools _integrate directly_ with Github these days through Github applications, but even they cannot provide this data either without analyzing the entire codebase separately.\\n\\nWhile workarounds exist they are all bad in a large organization. I agree that it's clear this is not a priority based on the fact it's been open for two years, but also it's clear that the reasoning and discussion around this feature is very narrow and developer (ego) oriented.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:36:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"005fc553fd9580804c00dd974606b58258f6d149\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299627593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"##### For person\\nPeople expect it, since various metrics implemented in GitHub. At some point everyone just genuinely interested in those metrics even only for self-esteem. And it is frustrating to not find them on GitLab. And since GitHub made everyone think to have them out-of-the-box, people became lazy and don't want to pollute their work environment with some difficult code inspection tools that they will use once just because of curiosity. \\n\\n##### For big team\\nIf you are working in a solid company with big code base, and you professionally perform code analysis and give consulting based on it, then it is ridiculous to do it on the basis of GitHub or GitLab, likely you will need to have more sophisticated special tool for it.\\n\\n##### Conclusion\\nSo this feature is not a mandatory. In first place GitLab need to improve its role system, this is a real bummer:) But GitLab doesn't do it for 2 years, so probably they have more important tasks. I prefer to use GitHub because of role system and metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 635873, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 13:32:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:35:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"96c7f0adc49d8ea2d2f64108bea473166fe3f13c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293348432, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A premium/silver customer has requested for this feature over support ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/220808 (internal link)\\n\\nIn particular they'd like an ability to query statistics about lines of code per detected language type, within each, and across all repositories under a group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7536567, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 13:07:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 7536567, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80839b906be084dee24b6e6d95e01d91af4e6b4a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:56:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 612192220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am proposing in another issue to update an existing open source tool to add MBs of code to the reports.\\n\\nThis is related to helping customers (and prospects) be able to estimate the long term costs of security scanning solutions that charge by lines or MBs of code.\\n\\nIf the tool were a CI stage, but GitLab could receive and parse the report to a UI - then the compute for this would only performed for and paid by customers who want the counts.\\n\\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/233018\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-31 00:05:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 164827, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 388534468, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@DarwinJS the blocker for us on this feature is a line-counting capability in Gitaly.  I noticed that [SCC](https://github.com/boyter/scc) is written in Go, as Gitaly is.  Seems like that could be a very happy coincidence for us.  Did you happen to dive deep enough into SCC to have an opinion about how challenging it might be to integrate into Gitaly?\\n\\nNote for others: SCC is the line-counting software that Darwin recommended in his [blog post](https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 408694264, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bmiller1 the context is helpful.\\n\\nThis is in the %Backlog for awareness\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 586004666, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@djensen - I settled on SCC, rather than the long standing CLOC (Perl) due to it being written in a modern language and, if the author was not able to add features, the hopes that someone at GitLab would.\\n\\nI did dive into the internals, but don't know enough about Go Lang nor Gitaly to comment on whether the two would tango well.\\n\\nIt is lightning fast - which I noticed when processing www-gitlab-com.\\n\\nHave you thought of this as a sidekiq process - not sure how good it would be at doing per-commit differentials in Gitaly and doing the full repo in Gitaly may be a lot of excess compute if it does it every commit?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409124927, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just like source control, you don't need to count all the lines of code in a repo every time.\\n\\nOnce you have a known count of lines at a specific commit, you can just track the diffs after that to increase/decrease line count for specific code and languages.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409309581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes I understand.\\nWhat I'm trying to indicate is that the machinations to isolate net new lines and net removed lines of code may be more processing load than simply scheduling scc weekly?  Especially given the speed of scc.\\n\\nIf that might be true, the question is how timely do line counts need to be?\\n\\nI don't know the answer - just highlighting that if line counts don't need to be up to the minute, there might be a cheaper way to do it.  It would also possibly allow direct dependency on scc, rather than forking it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409329832, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e It is lightning fast\\n\\nYes it is!  It crunches the entire gitlab repo in about 3 seconds on my machine ([results here](https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2013041)).  Not bad.\\n\\n\u003e how timely do line counts need to be?  I don't know the answer\\n\\nMe either, but let's guess it needs to be somewhere between monthly and daily.  (Hourly and commitly seem unnecessarily specific.)  Maybe we could start at monthly and see how it goes?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409366938, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Or, maybe proponents could weigh in on the frequency.\\n\\nI feel a compromise might be:\\n\\n * maintain a _count per branch_ (which could be very helpful anyway)\\n * trigger a count on the _first commit_ of any new branch (or make counting an option?)\\n * update all branch counts _monthly_ (or, only branches that have a flag indicating that they should be counted)\\n\\nThat way, the regular update frequency is down to one count per project branch, per month, and Developers can force a new count by pushing a new branch (perhaps they might have a special case to have up-to-the-commit counts).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:50:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:54:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 5791080, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409381230, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In addition, I would like to understand uses cases for getting as fine as \\\"per branch\\\" code counts - what would someone use this for and how often?  If it is very occasional and/or for a bespoke purpose, they could just run scc themselves on a local copy.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 410590466, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Starter customer requesting this feature in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/172665\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f820fe272fadfd61eb4c19317bb2d45f71f25fa4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 416263002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\nAs the description states, the goal is to understand what the bar means, and see some absolute data. @jeremy Would the MVC here be to simply report the number of bytes, since that's what we're measuring?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 424775, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ccc8a3b61fc8f4f779b6b63486fb31d54c005cc9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 288529601, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[OneDev](https://github.com/theonedev/onedev) calculates SLOC per languages and display the trends over time which is quite interesting. An example trends here:\\n\\nhttps://code.onedev.io/projects/react/stats/lines\\n\\nOne can hover mouse on the trend to show SLOC by day. The initial calculation for a large repo such as Linux takes about 30 min, and the result will be cached. Subsequent updates for new commits will be fairly fast based on cache. Below is the logic for calculation if someone is interested:\\n\\nhttps://github.com/theonedev/onedev/blob/main/server-core/src/main/java/io/onedev/server/infomanager/DefaultCommitInfoManager.java\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7978344, \"created_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"19fa4567d0d0f1d5842c5ba6beae8267aebb0a4e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 483620034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is moving back to the %Backlog for the reasons described in ZJ's [comment above](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038). We're absolutely accepting merge requests on this one, but the Manage stage needs to prioritize other areas at the moment.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd32244cb8a10270e97506088fe7772e17dbcf11\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 242549553, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher please fix this ASAP.\\nI am surprised Gitlab has no protection against this crap.\\nYou will end up with people massively unsubscribing at best.\\n\\nP.S. This idiot keeps recreating accounts.\\nA simple post factum ban will not work.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 12:57:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 920678, \"type\": null, \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d54912a045e3ea6508b3cf9ea3c8d3f2c3f3784\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471910, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is a certain lag.\\nI suggest we do not subscribe back until admins fix it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503473194, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner I actually think this should go to ~\\\"group::source code\\\" , WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4156460, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 579827345, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI - Since Apex code is essentially extended Java with a few accompanying .xml metadata files, my customer was able to run `scc \\u2013count-as cls:java` to interpret Apex .cls files as Java.  scc understands the comment and syntax structure of Java and was able to correctly return the LOC.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 587249173, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I think that makes a lot of sense @ogolowinski\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4447217, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580171017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ogolowinski Yep, I agree. Thanks for changing the group.\\n\\nThis is going to remain in the backlog as it is not our current focus and based on [details](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#details) in the description, LOE will be quite high. Thanks.\\n\\ncc @cupini\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580236144, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@cupini I'm tagging @ljlane who is the PM for ~\\\"group::optimize\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4376883, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562100410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" ~\\\"self-managed\\\" ~customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\n* Link to request:  https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001Eo1h0\\n* Why interested: Want to report on all repos (instance-level) for languages used in repos for tools info\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: Workarounds are nice but would be nice to get an instance-view instantly \\n* PM to mention: @stkerr\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3288671, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-27 23:22:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562089576, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"An Ultimate customer is interested in this feature.\\n* Link to request: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000014HWYo\\n* Why interested: They have a need to report LoC for their Apex repos.\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: We have not found an adequate workaround\\n* PM to mention: @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-20 21:51:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 581438360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another Premium customer is interested in this feature: [#223248](https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/223248)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7272738, \"created_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e8ddc8cdcb1c801921ec5c22320c15c418b8826\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 622513819, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another customer inquiring if this function exists\\nhttps://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/161342\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fe28d2e0f29b158bfc492b79ea8883a16e1d5fb7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364390361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" Customer  interested in this feature [Internal Link](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001kHlpn)\\n\\ncc/ @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5250128, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-18 19:30:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:09:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3f6ffdb391745aec7053e4585f952953cbf32152\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 706872228, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer here: we compile this data periodically for use by the C-suite and even if the absolute numbers are representative of byte counts it is easy enough for me to use an estimate of bytes per line to get what I need.\\n\\nThe key is that I have nothing without absolute numbers.\\n\\nAlso, please consider the non-gitlab.com use case. Perhaps on our hosted instance we would be able to opt-in to a feature like this if it were available and we can decide for ourselves if the performance is acceptable.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78631ce204289b27d0730dbec72b8b9a7f770fec\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364645655, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My company is a Premium customer - we would really like to have this and even more metrics regarding type of language like number of components, files, etc.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5291964, \"created_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3790f9053863d8b679f99d4cc896f3ffb8c450e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 721314226, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"- SF: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000Ut0JyAAJ\\n- ZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/254826\\n\\n~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" customer is interested in this feature.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5537005, \"created_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af4170834a554c4135225876e22c91fadd8c35f2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 791792997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"1900 seat ~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" [Customer](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000002xBZQ) is interested in this feature.\\n\\n- Priority: ~\\\"customer priority::5\\\"  priority::\\n- Why interested: Customer is trying to find a way to report the total line of code across all GitLab projects.\\n- Problem they are trying to solve: Customer has some internal teams who are trying trying to integrate tooling with GitLab to measure and track code coverage. There\\u2019s a cost associated with expanding those other tools and without the ability to report the number of lines it's nearly impossible to estimate said cost.\\n- Current solution for this problem: none\\n- Impact to the customer of not having this: Inability to utilize other tools in conjunction with GitLab and thus slowing adoption of the platform.\\n- Questions: Are they're any other workarounds for this, even at a manual reporting level? \\n- PM to mention: @tlinz\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4748523, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-14 14:49:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-15 13:33:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e76285e7c35cbca1481c16ed2c1ad5b7d232b65e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 990978163, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A Premium customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\nZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/284853\\n\\nThe workaround mentioned [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_332427265) unfortunately is hitting this error at the moment. I wonder if you have thoughts about this @lyle ?\\n\\n```\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n3: from (irb):3\\n2: from lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb:85:in `path'\\n1: from lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/storage_settings.rb:65:in `legacy_disk_path'\\nGitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings::DirectPathAccessError (git disk access denied)\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10051186, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 08:09:53 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 924067966, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Seems related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350080. This was always a bit of a hack, and relied on manually executing `git` commands directly on the repo.\\n\\nYou could take (and modify) the same core:\\n\\n`/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l` and run it directly on the command line given a list of paths generated from `rails`\\n\\nThere's a bunch of caveats there though:\\n- `master` is not necessarily the default branch name (we transitioned in GitLab to `main` some time ago)\\n- It relies on counting the actual number of lines in a file `wc -l` and does it for every file in a repo. This will include licenses, headers, empty space and so on.\\n\\nThere are some additional thoughts in https://gist.github.com/mandiwise/dc53cb9da00856d7cdbb that have iterated on my approach from two years ago :sweat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 925281183, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bgadberry \\n\\nIt seems like with the additional customer problem you need solved that there should be another issue for this...?\\n\\n\u003e Customer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density.\\n\\nThis does not seem directly related. Correct me if I am wrong!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601066055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner You're correct. I was thinking the customer could calculate the metric manually once number of lines of code is made available. On second thought, I think we can calculate vulnerabilities per byte today. I'll report back if that suffices.\\n\\n@tmccaslin Is this vulnerability per byte/line of code metric something we've considered uncovering as part of SAST?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601093808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"It's not per _language_ but the following rails console snippet will give you an estimate of number of lines per `Project` on a self-managed instance where the `git-data` is on a partition or directly attached volume.\\n\\nIt can break a bit if there's no `master` branch or if a repository for some reason doesn't have a `HEAD`, so it's not at all bullet-proof.\\n\\n```ruby\\nheaders = ['path', 'lines','archived?']\\nreport_file = Tempfile.new(['project_lines','.csv'])\\n\\nCSV.open(report_file.path, \\\"wb\\\") do |csv|\\ncsv \u003c\u003c headers\\n   Project.all.each do |p|\\n      output = `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l`\\n      csv \u003c\u003c [p.full_path, Integer(output),p.archived?]\\n   end; nil\\nend\\n\\nreport_file.close\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2930750323d45742084b921bd0f102d58807df7b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 332427265, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, statistics counting total and per lang number of lines (in code files only) would be so nice and basic.  \\nIgnore empty lines for me is optional. \\n\\nGet stats manually / locally for a git repo is not a problem. But this issue asks for the UI of gitlab. And this is what I need as well. \\n\\nhere a link to the current state: (older links above are expired)  \\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts \\n\\nHere a link for more advanced stats ambitions:  \\nhttps://www.openhub.net/p/gitlab\\n\\nedit: btw: If this is not happening since 5 years because of performance issues, then just calculate it once a week and show the calculation date next to it. I guess most people do not need per hour stats about n lines of code. For me even once per month would be enough. (And thus could be used for #12104 as well)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:08:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-03 07:59:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 882141, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3bdba5e20eedfcedc7eb1c6272fa93798b138610\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:13:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951334872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In order to get this request some attention, this issue has been marked as a potentially interesting proposal as it meets the following criteria:\\n\\n* Labelled as a feature proposal\\n* More than 10 upvotes\\n* Unscheduled (not associated with a milestone)\\n\\nThanks for your proposal!\\n\\n\\n\\n/cc @markglenfletcher\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73b69edb26083c702d2514effe76ca7da2d40407\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978971, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 154953, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"63b6ff0026abcb2ee9df9b28041655c7ab9fe563\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979021, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@billclark agreed\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2414870, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1328954e3c5076176230b846b4da51543092429b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If you do, make sure you somehow transfer the popularity and influence as well. \\nThis issue has 2 years of (possible sparse) history and 300+ upvotes. \\nThe newer one is month long. \\n\\nIt may make more sense to either transfer this one to EE, or merge the other one to here.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5db704a8ce0f10d43344ec9d98767153458c3c76\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979062, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"this just counts the raw line number of the files treated as pieces of texts. I guess what people want here is more like a per-language breakdown.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e32505249798e1b3e040ded861516658150259c6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979040, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Is there a way to get this data using the API?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0603dc2249187fa36328ff2f92debfc6c7db79d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"No it is not. That would be something for @matt_wilson to consider with the security dashboard.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5329074, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601097241, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We need more cowbell!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 196721, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616b443b97ad1443c199fb5f0af9780b51ddf379\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts is that what it looks today? seems like a regression.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951315993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I would like a total number of lines not including blank ones.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dcb61a50851d774190fa590cddf3e19f7a753f83\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979036, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer would also like to track lines of code per developer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404096482, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just started to use gitlab, and this is one the first stats i hoped to see in the \\\"Charts\\\", however i was surprised it's missing :(\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3219145, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-22 10:59:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979033, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"how come I can still receive notifications even if I unsubscribed???\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:19:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471203, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001FRuq0\\n\\nCustomer would like to see number of lines of code per language excluding comments. \\n\\n/cc @npost\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-30 01:30:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:47:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 387929331, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer interested in this feature. https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000W2eBo (Internal link)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4587928, \"created_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"35a9711c22330d7480c21b516ab890edccb85fb6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 258382372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"i will join, i want see my ego\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 688008, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8993bd8d42c15974c7f1eee7b8601e71e505626f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979006, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"for a company that has thousands of repositories that's just completely ineffective\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292139470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@bgadberry The customer may be able to pull the necessary vulnerability count information from the existing GraphQL API. I've never heard a request for this functionality before and don't have any plans to include it in the Security Dashboard reports so pulling the data and creating their own reports is the best way forward if this is needed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4708748, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601110834, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Same here!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4122216, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979054, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The developer of scc responded to proposals to update the code as desired. Resultant code is in this blog article: https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story and being worked into this working example for GitLab CI CD: https://gitlab.com/guided-explorations/ci-cd-plugin-extensions/ci-cd-plugin-extension-scc\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404663419, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@mlockhart in the context of an MVC I think we need to stick with measuring the default branch only, because that's what the Repository Analytics page is currently doing ([example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts)).\\n\\nOn the bright side, it seems the existing byte counts are being [updated on push](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/git/branch_push_service.rb#L54).  That makes me hopeful we could match that frequency with line counts.  So let's tentatively say the MVC would be updated pushly (instead of monthly like I proposed above).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409398149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Gold customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/154631 with a slight twist: they'd like to see the number of lines by group/sub-group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-24 18:02:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:37:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3b5c50effe1ea33f7f938b5693032964c2bdc512\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:46:35 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 331168435, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001lc3Cc\\n\\nCustomer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density. \\n\\n/cc @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 19:45:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 600990593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Had a similar request. I was able to get this info by extracting the Gitlab backup repositories from a backup and unbundling everything then running the following utility on the directory.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut it would be nice to see this kind of information on a project / server admin level, just to provide an overview of things currently within GitLab user / admin interfaces.\\r\\n\\r\\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\r\\n\\r\\n![image](/uploads/2e9c9fd05358a6e80411bfb9b323c214/image.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 261290, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:15:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-22 12:20:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 261290, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"186117b5b28df4eca7f2419b17ad900f90e61728\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:42:31 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978968, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Please add a chart with the SLOC metric, it is a metric more useful than the number of commits\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1276118, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 14:50:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 07:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"735fd7ef77d0bd7463126f7436eda8691d678998\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978960, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 695248, \"username\": \"lbot\", \"name\": \"Lee Matos\"}, {\"id\": 239547, \"username\": \"wil.rodriguez\", \"name\": \"William Rodriguez\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 87854, \"username\": \"DouweM\", \"name\": \"Douwe Maan\"}, {\"id\": 1187333, \"username\": \"jramsay-gitlab\", \"name\": \"James Ramsay (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 2182793, \"username\": \"craph1\", \"name\": \"craph\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 709639, \"username\": \"omidontop\", \"name\": \"Omid Manikhi\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 2346644, \"username\": \"ariaieboy\", \"name\": \"AriaieBOY\"}, {\"id\": 101578, \"username\": \"zj-gitlab\", \"name\": \"Zeger-Jan van de Weg\"}, {\"id\": 2223731, \"username\": \"bobbymcgill\", \"name\": \"Bobby McGill\"}, {\"id\": 2814876, \"username\": \"jim.robbins\", \"name\": \"Jim Robbins\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 4158075, \"username\": \"aakriti.gupta\", \"name\": \"Aakriti Gupta\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4911777, \"username\": \"i.hayden\", \"name\": \"Immanuel Hayden\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 635873, \"username\": \"pisarik\", \"name\": \"Vlad Blazhko\"}, {\"id\": 7536567, \"username\": \"hchouraria\", \"name\": \"Harsh Chouraria\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 424775, \"username\": \"markpundsack\", \"name\": \"Mark Pundsack\"}, {\"id\": 7978344, \"username\": \"robinshine\", \"name\": \"Robin Shen\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 4156460, \"username\": \"ogolowinski\", \"name\": \"Orit Golowinski\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 4447217, \"username\": \"ljlane\", \"name\": \"Larissa Lane\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4376883, \"username\": \"stkerr\", \"name\": \"Sam Kerr\"}, {\"id\": 3288671, \"username\": \"cupini\", \"name\": \"Brian Cupini\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 7272738, \"username\": \"kategrechishkina\", \"name\": \"Kate Grechishkina\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 5250128, \"username\": \"ricardoamarilla\", \"name\": \"Ricardo Amarilla\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 5291964, \"username\": \"crispindev\", \"name\": \"crispin velez\"}, {\"id\": 5537005, \"username\": \"cleveland\", \"name\": \"Cleveland Bledsoe Jr\"}, {\"id\": 4748523, \"username\": \"sheininger\", \"name\": \"Steffen Heininger\"}, {\"id\": 10051186, \"username\": \"kballon\", \"name\": \"Kent Japhet Ballon\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 154953, \"username\": \"Zandor300\", \"name\": \"Zandor Smith\"}, {\"id\": 2414870, \"username\": \"mason1920\", \"name\": \"mason1920\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 5329074, \"username\": \"tmccaslin\", \"name\": \"Taylor McCaslin\"}, {\"id\": 196721, \"username\": \"billclark\", \"name\": \"Bill Clark\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 3219145, \"username\": \"spprint\", \"name\": \"Sven Vet\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 4587928, \"username\": \"cbazan1\", \"name\": \"Carlos Bazan\"}, {\"id\": 688008, \"username\": \"friuns\", \"name\": \"friuns\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4708748, \"username\": \"matt_wilson\", \"name\": \"Matt Wilson\"}, {\"id\": 4122216, \"username\": \"saunved\", \"name\": \"Saunved Mutalik\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 261290, \"username\": \"TRPmwiesen\", \"name\": \"Matthew Wiesen\"}, {\"id\": 1276118, \"username\": \"wagnerpinheiro\", \"name\": \"Wagner Pinheiro\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize the comments into bullet points?","query_id":"a2d3349b97b341b191168b9bcd924101","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"24652824","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 24652824, \"title\": \"Report number of lines per language in repository charts\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-15 17:20:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"### Description\\n\\nAs of now, repository charts report percentage of language in the repo.\\nFirst, it is not obvious how this percentage is computed (number of files? number of lines? bytes? what about comments? libraries?). Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\n### Proposal\\n\\nAs a user I would like to see the number of lines of code per language.\\nIdeally, excluding blank lines and comments, but that is optional.\\n\\n### Documentation blurb\\n\\nAs for use cases:\\n* better understand the repo structure\\n* if this is your repo, being able to report the number of lines of your main language\\n    * this is one of the metric employers would like to know (I personally was surprised by this question on interview and could not clearly respond)\\n* all those use cases for general repo graphs (like pie chart of languages)\\n\\n### Details\\n\\n[A useful comment from ZJ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038):\\n\\n\u003e Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\n\u003e Lines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\n\u003e That all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\\n\\n### Potential Workarounds\\n\\n- Run `scc` in a GitLab CI pipeline: https://github.com/boyter/scc to generate SLOC/etc. reports\\n- If API use is acceptable (instead of UI), parts of its output stats can be stored as custom attributes on the project: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/custom_attributes.html#set-custom-attribute\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 17800, \"updated_by_id\": 5749302, \"weight\": 8, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -14979600, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-07-17 16:10:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 7536567, \"discussion_locked\": false, \"closed_at\": \"2023-01-19 09:38:40 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 579, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11039421, \"title\": \"Category:Code Analytics\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-18 19:25:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:07:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 7161201, \"title\": \"Manage [DEPRECATED]\", \"color\": \"#44AD8E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-19 05:48:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-19 11:52:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Please use the devops::manage label instead of this deprecated label. It is kept for historical issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1890178, \"title\": \"[deprecated] Accepting merge requests\", \"color\": \"#69d100\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 11:34:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-28 08:14:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"[deprecated] Please use \\\"Seeking community contributions\\\" instead. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/developer-relations/contributor-success/team-task/-/issues/77\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1672341, \"title\": \"customer\", \"color\": \"#ad4363\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that were reported by Enterprise Edition subscribers. This label should be accompanied by either the 'bug' or 'feature proposal' label\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 4107658, \"title\": \"graphs\", \"color\": \"#428bca\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the project Graphs pages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15237307, \"title\": \"icebox\", \"color\": \"#d6ecef\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:25:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:35:52 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues on which no work is anticipated in the next several milestones but which may be considered for work shortly thereafter thus not closed.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2936416, \"title\": \"popular proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Feature proposals deemed popular by our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/triage) will have this label applied\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2714266, \"title\": \"potential proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label added by triage tools to mark interesting feature proposals for consideration\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@dbogatov Thanks for the proposal. We'll just have to leave this open and see if it becomes a popular request.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73cf193764726f4ed724d78d4b59d4f81efe83cc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978957, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@wagnerpinheiro, [S]LOC metrics are rather old. They are not actual now (only in 80-90s they were). Your idea is pretty but only for developers ego. For really gentlemen customers GITLAB maybe have to improve their charts with different modern metrics. As example, for analyzing object-oriented languages they can add metric of Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 19:52:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 346483, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978961, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@yachmenov_c_ I have to admit, I had to look up what Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer metrics were. And yes, I would love to see those metrics in GitLab.\\n\\n**However**, I feel like it is quite hard (or say, resource heavy) to implement those. Each language will have to provide a service to get OOP relations. We cannot derive those metrics just by parsing the text.\\n\\n**On the other side**, simple line counter per language (even the one which omits comments and empty lines) is relatively easy to implement.\\n\\nAs for developers' ego, I have to admit it would not mind seeing LOC metrics, but I am sure there are other reasons for these metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:00:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978963, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, I mostly agree with you, really they can implement functionality you mentioned, and it would be great. Nice point!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"ZD ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/80860\\n\\nA Customer requested this feature. :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 695248, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2dba3df39df1cd81040cb0bc86091470aac43ffa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978965, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This would be awesome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 239547, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"604137042a54634c99ba7cda9b19e4db3570b396\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is getting popular\\n\\n@DouweM ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" for this one?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f1bbac293ede2d142630a69c9b499642ce9a40f8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher I think it may not be well defined enough yet for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" . We removed the repository language a while ago because it didn't perform well, so we'll need to figure out way to restore it without reintroducing the performance issue.\\n\\nThis is related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/40236 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23931. \\n\\n/cc @jramsay\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 87854, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23bac7a1ece7d87f5607254715120cb9067506ea\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978986, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If we can provide a foundation in gitlab-ce#23931 that computes the language stats without performance, we could definitely open this up for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1187333, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:16:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:17:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1187333, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"812e8d43c4b74c029c7327a6b783be67b2a0cd78\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978988, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Having the LOC in the table with the language breakdown and percentage would be great.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4a841d10fb4925ca2b102435a39a249fb1f1bb39\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hello,\\n\\nDisplay the LOC in the chart would be a very nice feature :slight_smile: \\n\\nAny update about this ?\\n\\nThank you very much.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2182793, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55170edc6cc50d1a2a20760c0bd5760b0dba68b6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978998, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi,\\u00a0I haven't heard anything back yet.\\nDennis\\nDennis Biringer | Principal Software EngineerPacific Defense Systems, LLC (PDS)Integrity Applications Incorporated535 Lipoa Parkway\\u00a0 Suite 101, Kihei HI, 96753dbiringer@integrity-apps.com(808) 214-0765\\n\\n[smime.p7s](/uploads/e849eea0083b79828f578febe315bdcd/smime.p7s)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55168747dda9172740a2eaa5e847403ed43121de\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979004, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We also would like to see the total number of lines of code, files, etc. Thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a6edf2d747aa859d84a4adfab95b10d53d7774d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979005, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@shellyniz Currently it's presented as a percentage via the API:\\n- https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#languages\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d201f77821e20f12477856580eab2e40804cc2dd\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979019, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Silly me, I was looking for it under the repo API. That's a big help, thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"093b696a8537efb99106d9d0b003220eb6ee8c01\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979020, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\\n\\nIt's a great feature to have especially if you're to brag about how much work has been put into the project in a presentation or something.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 709639, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:05:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:07:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b43271d3058f31f25e92e49015ea9efc4afc7d0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979022, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't see us getting to this anytime soon, but I'm happy to label this with gitlab-ce~1890178 for a community contribution. \\n\\nWe express languages as % of repo, might we also show the absolute LOC? The Charts page might be a sensible place to display this. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/graphs/master/charts for an example. The project overview page could also work, we currently use a multi-colored horizontal line to represent this and show percentages there on mouseover.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:16:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:18:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1f57d0559fe42979c7e6d35e07dbbbb6131d9855\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979029, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @jeremy\\\\_ \\nDo you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'?And so 'Total Lines Number'?\\nWhat's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34d9eb930ce114af06333350c5ff55483637cf7e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979031, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @markglenfletcher \\nIt's very good things that showing percent,but lines number complete it's feature,doesn't?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a92bea136cc9e32d787aa5742ed869a21d2ab49c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979032, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Do you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'? And so 'Total Lines Number'? What's your opinion?\\n\\nI'd love to hear your proposal, but I think the Charts page may be an easy place to add this:\\n\\n![image](/uploads/198f585f7e807ed931757b47a519d135/image.png)\\n\\nWe could include a separate column for LOC on each row, and include a \\\"Total\\\" row at the bottom that displays the sum of the rows. What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 06:32:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-24 12:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-10 12:54:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979035, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"any update about this feature ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2346644, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"075f869895c6f828be69c382f91a4a9b2dba20b5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\nLines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\nThat all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 101578, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"570bda01e243b5cf50fce1ba6adb9cd4605169f4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979038, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Not sure if this helps anyone, but if you use GitBash (or linux terminal) and go into your local repo and type this command:\\n`find . -not -path \\u201c*/.git/*\\u201d | xargs wc -l`\\nYou get the total line counts. No extra things to install - just a bash command.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2223731, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a894203f7adeeb1a1ed60f595000c3d28bf650ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979039, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is another possible way by using the git ls-files command with a file type filter.\\n\\n* Java example: `git ls-files *.java *.xml | xargs wc -l`\\n* Ruby example: `git ls-files *.rb Rakefile Gemfile | xargs wc -l`\\n\\nOr whatever files you want to include in your count. It can also works in subfolders to provide counts of just the contents of that folder.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2814876, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78a3685ac84f3e9f6999bd406e3ee07296be78f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979041, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My developer ego gives +1 for this stats. I think, if you count the lines anyway, it might be no problem to offer different stats as options, because the counting might be the most expensive part anyway. \\n\\n*Yeah* for looking at your developer productivity in numbers. :-)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a8d439996cd80acb0e887e19d4c7a32c3b38f3f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979042, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is not graphical and not included in gitlab, but it serves my interest totally. Also it might be a good starting point for Gitlab's implementation: \\n\\nhttps://github.com/AlDanial/cloc\\n\\nUse `cloc --vcs git` to count only watched files in a git repository.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e05053a4fedccfbd67d6045862d003aaff0c6202\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979043, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@aakriti.gupta, should we just close this one in favor of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104, since it's a prerequisite?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:46:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979061, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, yes, we will take everything from this one in account - it's planned for 12.2. Do you want to comment on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104? What's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3511154, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"45e71e7ac76abec3784d03cbdb2b1cbc301899ff\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979063, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This should not be moved to EE as the initial feature was added by the community.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5ac02291aab2c6a295e4df9adacd278f1278fc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979064, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @max-wittig for pointing out! The EE issue has more content, which will be available on group/instance level. We would like to move all analytics into one space in the top nav bar, so will be thinking through how to combine what is in cc now and the additional functionality we will be adding in ee. Any feedback is welcome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"50ead744b305fa1f532705f92d1dbd1b1ec7a298\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979065, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"As mentioned below, as long as we keep the history through a merge or copying over information, it sounds good to close this with an update @valexieva :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4158075, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979066, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@valexieva I wrote a small script, which reports the languages an instance has by exporting prometheus metrics. Relying just on absolute values would make a lot more sense, than the approach that I'm using now. But I won't use absolute numbers, if `EE` is required for this.\\n\\nhttps://github.com/max-wittig/gitlab-languages\\n\\nI think it would be fine, if the Graph feature stays in EE, but it would be nice, if the API would return absolute numbers.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:35:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:42:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1283330, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7bde2d02397a5cb7ae5b0b940c065224158203f5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979067, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Keeping this open until we complete: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13163. After that will close, the existing functionality will be available in CE, further functionality as per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104 in EE.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"94574f2b40c78694f4096c523c514fcca93041ce\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi, we have scheduled LOC plus language trends for 12.3 - please find here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104#note_194198775. We will also ensure that it's available for CE users in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/65616 before we remove the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/graphs/master/charts\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"16af6bd6af9d839ee0856e4771ce2d012a7dc48e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979073, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Github provides this feature, it would be nice to be able to obtain comparable metrics from Gitlab as we are using both.\\n\\nOur use case to get these numbers is for figuring out the prevalence of code in any given language across our entire codebase to inform us with requirements for code analysis tools etc. \\\"90% of language Y in repository X\\\" without any context to the number is mostly a useless metric. We need to understand how much language Y there is in totality across our multiple SCM systems. Now i can only count how many repos have a given language in general which is not exactly the same thing.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 14:53:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291742295, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@unitysipu \\nI would say for your use case it is better to just create a tool that clones all the repos you want metrics on and runs cloc or a similar tool - https://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\nHaving these metrics across groups/organizations in github and gitlab makes less sense to me than to provide some information about what powers a given project.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291953639, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The amount of code often correlates with things like risk. It's sorta interesting from analysis point of view if you have projects that have 500, 5000, 500k or 5M lines of code. You may want to prioritize or categorize the big projects over the small ones (obviously that's not the full picture, depends on what that code is used for etc.). But just looking at our entire codebase / repositories from the top and knowing there's \\\"90% of PHP\\\" in some project without understanding there's a million lines of it doesn't really help. So while individual teams may have a good grasp of their project, somebody looking over our entire portfolio you need more information to figure out who you should get in touch with. Obviously you can also try to check the file size metrics etc. and try to filter out uninteresting file types or other similar cumbersome workarounds but it's just more work to land on data that could easily be provided by the platform directly.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292157164, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Even if you have 1000 repos, it would still not be that much work to write a tool that accumulates all the information using the method I described, and you're going to get it a lot faster than by asking gitlab to add a feature. \\nAs for expanding the scope of this issue to cover groups and organizations as a whole, I guess gitlab devs might consider that as an enterprise feature at some point.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292558285, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, *obviously* there are workarounds that require you to analyze all the source code yourself. That's not the point of this feature request. I see the conversation revolving around suggestions and local optimizations for individual teams / developers or the importance of the amount of code in context of individuals. I figured it's prudent to provide another point of view that may have an impact on the thinking of why it's important to have this implemented. There are other use cases for the LOC/Language metrics that can be of importance for somebody who is looking at your organization as a whole.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293145108, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Honestly, with that chain of argument: Why have a commit graph? You can do this locally on your git repo. Or why have a bugtracker? You can just install trac separately. Or why have a wiki? Haven't you heard of mediaWiki? And so on. \\n\\nFact is, that this is a standard feature that has many uses for individuals and companies (also for example if I actually will bother to contribute to a code base or if its not worth it because id have to learn X new languages).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4911777, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:42:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4911777, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"044bd214cb760ef42c44b314a3243601c4c2f6a7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:10:44 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299631157, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I disagree. It's absolutely not ridiculous at all to have _code metrics_ available in the source code repository you might use.\\n\\nAny external tool will have to analyse the code outside of the SCM makes the whole process inherently ineffective and slow by design. Gitlab (and github) already has the code inside it and therefore is in the best position to provide metrics and data on it. Furthermore, modern (sophisticated) code analysis tools _integrate directly_ with Github these days through Github applications, but even they cannot provide this data either without analyzing the entire codebase separately.\\n\\nWhile workarounds exist they are all bad in a large organization. I agree that it's clear this is not a priority based on the fact it's been open for two years, but also it's clear that the reasoning and discussion around this feature is very narrow and developer (ego) oriented.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:36:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"005fc553fd9580804c00dd974606b58258f6d149\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299627593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"##### For person\\nPeople expect it, since various metrics implemented in GitHub. At some point everyone just genuinely interested in those metrics even only for self-esteem. And it is frustrating to not find them on GitLab. And since GitHub made everyone think to have them out-of-the-box, people became lazy and don't want to pollute their work environment with some difficult code inspection tools that they will use once just because of curiosity. \\n\\n##### For big team\\nIf you are working in a solid company with big code base, and you professionally perform code analysis and give consulting based on it, then it is ridiculous to do it on the basis of GitHub or GitLab, likely you will need to have more sophisticated special tool for it.\\n\\n##### Conclusion\\nSo this feature is not a mandatory. In first place GitLab need to improve its role system, this is a real bummer:) But GitLab doesn't do it for 2 years, so probably they have more important tasks. I prefer to use GitHub because of role system and metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 635873, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 13:32:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:35:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"96c7f0adc49d8ea2d2f64108bea473166fe3f13c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293348432, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A premium/silver customer has requested for this feature over support ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/220808 (internal link)\\n\\nIn particular they'd like an ability to query statistics about lines of code per detected language type, within each, and across all repositories under a group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7536567, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 13:07:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 7536567, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80839b906be084dee24b6e6d95e01d91af4e6b4a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:56:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 612192220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am proposing in another issue to update an existing open source tool to add MBs of code to the reports.\\n\\nThis is related to helping customers (and prospects) be able to estimate the long term costs of security scanning solutions that charge by lines or MBs of code.\\n\\nIf the tool were a CI stage, but GitLab could receive and parse the report to a UI - then the compute for this would only performed for and paid by customers who want the counts.\\n\\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/233018\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-31 00:05:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 164827, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 388534468, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@DarwinJS the blocker for us on this feature is a line-counting capability in Gitaly.  I noticed that [SCC](https://github.com/boyter/scc) is written in Go, as Gitaly is.  Seems like that could be a very happy coincidence for us.  Did you happen to dive deep enough into SCC to have an opinion about how challenging it might be to integrate into Gitaly?\\n\\nNote for others: SCC is the line-counting software that Darwin recommended in his [blog post](https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 408694264, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bmiller1 the context is helpful.\\n\\nThis is in the %Backlog for awareness\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 586004666, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@djensen - I settled on SCC, rather than the long standing CLOC (Perl) due to it being written in a modern language and, if the author was not able to add features, the hopes that someone at GitLab would.\\n\\nI did dive into the internals, but don't know enough about Go Lang nor Gitaly to comment on whether the two would tango well.\\n\\nIt is lightning fast - which I noticed when processing www-gitlab-com.\\n\\nHave you thought of this as a sidekiq process - not sure how good it would be at doing per-commit differentials in Gitaly and doing the full repo in Gitaly may be a lot of excess compute if it does it every commit?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409124927, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just like source control, you don't need to count all the lines of code in a repo every time.\\n\\nOnce you have a known count of lines at a specific commit, you can just track the diffs after that to increase/decrease line count for specific code and languages.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409309581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes I understand.\\nWhat I'm trying to indicate is that the machinations to isolate net new lines and net removed lines of code may be more processing load than simply scheduling scc weekly?  Especially given the speed of scc.\\n\\nIf that might be true, the question is how timely do line counts need to be?\\n\\nI don't know the answer - just highlighting that if line counts don't need to be up to the minute, there might be a cheaper way to do it.  It would also possibly allow direct dependency on scc, rather than forking it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409329832, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e It is lightning fast\\n\\nYes it is!  It crunches the entire gitlab repo in about 3 seconds on my machine ([results here](https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2013041)).  Not bad.\\n\\n\u003e how timely do line counts need to be?  I don't know the answer\\n\\nMe either, but let's guess it needs to be somewhere between monthly and daily.  (Hourly and commitly seem unnecessarily specific.)  Maybe we could start at monthly and see how it goes?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409366938, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Or, maybe proponents could weigh in on the frequency.\\n\\nI feel a compromise might be:\\n\\n * maintain a _count per branch_ (which could be very helpful anyway)\\n * trigger a count on the _first commit_ of any new branch (or make counting an option?)\\n * update all branch counts _monthly_ (or, only branches that have a flag indicating that they should be counted)\\n\\nThat way, the regular update frequency is down to one count per project branch, per month, and Developers can force a new count by pushing a new branch (perhaps they might have a special case to have up-to-the-commit counts).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:50:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:54:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 5791080, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409381230, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In addition, I would like to understand uses cases for getting as fine as \\\"per branch\\\" code counts - what would someone use this for and how often?  If it is very occasional and/or for a bespoke purpose, they could just run scc themselves on a local copy.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 410590466, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Starter customer requesting this feature in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/172665\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f820fe272fadfd61eb4c19317bb2d45f71f25fa4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 416263002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\nAs the description states, the goal is to understand what the bar means, and see some absolute data. @jeremy Would the MVC here be to simply report the number of bytes, since that's what we're measuring?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 424775, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ccc8a3b61fc8f4f779b6b63486fb31d54c005cc9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 288529601, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[OneDev](https://github.com/theonedev/onedev) calculates SLOC per languages and display the trends over time which is quite interesting. An example trends here:\\n\\nhttps://code.onedev.io/projects/react/stats/lines\\n\\nOne can hover mouse on the trend to show SLOC by day. The initial calculation for a large repo such as Linux takes about 30 min, and the result will be cached. Subsequent updates for new commits will be fairly fast based on cache. Below is the logic for calculation if someone is interested:\\n\\nhttps://github.com/theonedev/onedev/blob/main/server-core/src/main/java/io/onedev/server/infomanager/DefaultCommitInfoManager.java\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7978344, \"created_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"19fa4567d0d0f1d5842c5ba6beae8267aebb0a4e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 483620034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is moving back to the %Backlog for the reasons described in ZJ's [comment above](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038). We're absolutely accepting merge requests on this one, but the Manage stage needs to prioritize other areas at the moment.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd32244cb8a10270e97506088fe7772e17dbcf11\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 242549553, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher please fix this ASAP.\\nI am surprised Gitlab has no protection against this crap.\\nYou will end up with people massively unsubscribing at best.\\n\\nP.S. This idiot keeps recreating accounts.\\nA simple post factum ban will not work.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 12:57:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 920678, \"type\": null, \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d54912a045e3ea6508b3cf9ea3c8d3f2c3f3784\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471910, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is a certain lag.\\nI suggest we do not subscribe back until admins fix it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503473194, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner I actually think this should go to ~\\\"group::source code\\\" , WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4156460, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 579827345, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI - Since Apex code is essentially extended Java with a few accompanying .xml metadata files, my customer was able to run `scc \\u2013count-as cls:java` to interpret Apex .cls files as Java.  scc understands the comment and syntax structure of Java and was able to correctly return the LOC.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 587249173, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I think that makes a lot of sense @ogolowinski\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4447217, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580171017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ogolowinski Yep, I agree. Thanks for changing the group.\\n\\nThis is going to remain in the backlog as it is not our current focus and based on [details](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#details) in the description, LOE will be quite high. Thanks.\\n\\ncc @cupini\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580236144, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@cupini I'm tagging @ljlane who is the PM for ~\\\"group::optimize\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4376883, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562100410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" ~\\\"self-managed\\\" ~customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\n* Link to request:  https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001Eo1h0\\n* Why interested: Want to report on all repos (instance-level) for languages used in repos for tools info\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: Workarounds are nice but would be nice to get an instance-view instantly \\n* PM to mention: @stkerr\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3288671, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-27 23:22:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562089576, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"An Ultimate customer is interested in this feature.\\n* Link to request: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000014HWYo\\n* Why interested: They have a need to report LoC for their Apex repos.\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: We have not found an adequate workaround\\n* PM to mention: @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-20 21:51:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 581438360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another Premium customer is interested in this feature: [#223248](https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/223248)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7272738, \"created_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e8ddc8cdcb1c801921ec5c22320c15c418b8826\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 622513819, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another customer inquiring if this function exists\\nhttps://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/161342\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fe28d2e0f29b158bfc492b79ea8883a16e1d5fb7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364390361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" Customer  interested in this feature [Internal Link](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001kHlpn)\\n\\ncc/ @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5250128, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-18 19:30:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:09:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3f6ffdb391745aec7053e4585f952953cbf32152\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 706872228, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer here: we compile this data periodically for use by the C-suite and even if the absolute numbers are representative of byte counts it is easy enough for me to use an estimate of bytes per line to get what I need.\\n\\nThe key is that I have nothing without absolute numbers.\\n\\nAlso, please consider the non-gitlab.com use case. Perhaps on our hosted instance we would be able to opt-in to a feature like this if it were available and we can decide for ourselves if the performance is acceptable.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78631ce204289b27d0730dbec72b8b9a7f770fec\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364645655, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My company is a Premium customer - we would really like to have this and even more metrics regarding type of language like number of components, files, etc.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5291964, \"created_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3790f9053863d8b679f99d4cc896f3ffb8c450e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 721314226, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"- SF: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000Ut0JyAAJ\\n- ZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/254826\\n\\n~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" customer is interested in this feature.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5537005, \"created_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af4170834a554c4135225876e22c91fadd8c35f2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 791792997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"1900 seat ~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" [Customer](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000002xBZQ) is interested in this feature.\\n\\n- Priority: ~\\\"customer priority::5\\\"  priority::\\n- Why interested: Customer is trying to find a way to report the total line of code across all GitLab projects.\\n- Problem they are trying to solve: Customer has some internal teams who are trying trying to integrate tooling with GitLab to measure and track code coverage. There\\u2019s a cost associated with expanding those other tools and without the ability to report the number of lines it's nearly impossible to estimate said cost.\\n- Current solution for this problem: none\\n- Impact to the customer of not having this: Inability to utilize other tools in conjunction with GitLab and thus slowing adoption of the platform.\\n- Questions: Are they're any other workarounds for this, even at a manual reporting level? \\n- PM to mention: @tlinz\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4748523, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-14 14:49:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-15 13:33:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e76285e7c35cbca1481c16ed2c1ad5b7d232b65e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 990978163, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A Premium customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\nZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/284853\\n\\nThe workaround mentioned [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_332427265) unfortunately is hitting this error at the moment. I wonder if you have thoughts about this @lyle ?\\n\\n```\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n3: from (irb):3\\n2: from lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb:85:in `path'\\n1: from lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/storage_settings.rb:65:in `legacy_disk_path'\\nGitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings::DirectPathAccessError (git disk access denied)\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10051186, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 08:09:53 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 924067966, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Seems related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350080. This was always a bit of a hack, and relied on manually executing `git` commands directly on the repo.\\n\\nYou could take (and modify) the same core:\\n\\n`/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l` and run it directly on the command line given a list of paths generated from `rails`\\n\\nThere's a bunch of caveats there though:\\n- `master` is not necessarily the default branch name (we transitioned in GitLab to `main` some time ago)\\n- It relies on counting the actual number of lines in a file `wc -l` and does it for every file in a repo. This will include licenses, headers, empty space and so on.\\n\\nThere are some additional thoughts in https://gist.github.com/mandiwise/dc53cb9da00856d7cdbb that have iterated on my approach from two years ago :sweat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 925281183, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bgadberry \\n\\nIt seems like with the additional customer problem you need solved that there should be another issue for this...?\\n\\n\u003e Customer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density.\\n\\nThis does not seem directly related. Correct me if I am wrong!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601066055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner You're correct. I was thinking the customer could calculate the metric manually once number of lines of code is made available. On second thought, I think we can calculate vulnerabilities per byte today. I'll report back if that suffices.\\n\\n@tmccaslin Is this vulnerability per byte/line of code metric something we've considered uncovering as part of SAST?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601093808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"It's not per _language_ but the following rails console snippet will give you an estimate of number of lines per `Project` on a self-managed instance where the `git-data` is on a partition or directly attached volume.\\n\\nIt can break a bit if there's no `master` branch or if a repository for some reason doesn't have a `HEAD`, so it's not at all bullet-proof.\\n\\n```ruby\\nheaders = ['path', 'lines','archived?']\\nreport_file = Tempfile.new(['project_lines','.csv'])\\n\\nCSV.open(report_file.path, \\\"wb\\\") do |csv|\\ncsv \u003c\u003c headers\\n   Project.all.each do |p|\\n      output = `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l`\\n      csv \u003c\u003c [p.full_path, Integer(output),p.archived?]\\n   end; nil\\nend\\n\\nreport_file.close\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2930750323d45742084b921bd0f102d58807df7b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 332427265, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, statistics counting total and per lang number of lines (in code files only) would be so nice and basic.  \\nIgnore empty lines for me is optional. \\n\\nGet stats manually / locally for a git repo is not a problem. But this issue asks for the UI of gitlab. And this is what I need as well. \\n\\nhere a link to the current state: (older links above are expired)  \\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts \\n\\nHere a link for more advanced stats ambitions:  \\nhttps://www.openhub.net/p/gitlab\\n\\nedit: btw: If this is not happening since 5 years because of performance issues, then just calculate it once a week and show the calculation date next to it. I guess most people do not need per hour stats about n lines of code. For me even once per month would be enough. (And thus could be used for #12104 as well)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:08:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-03 07:59:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 882141, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3bdba5e20eedfcedc7eb1c6272fa93798b138610\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:13:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951334872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In order to get this request some attention, this issue has been marked as a potentially interesting proposal as it meets the following criteria:\\n\\n* Labelled as a feature proposal\\n* More than 10 upvotes\\n* Unscheduled (not associated with a milestone)\\n\\nThanks for your proposal!\\n\\n\\n\\n/cc @markglenfletcher\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73b69edb26083c702d2514effe76ca7da2d40407\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978971, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 154953, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"63b6ff0026abcb2ee9df9b28041655c7ab9fe563\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979021, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@billclark agreed\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2414870, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1328954e3c5076176230b846b4da51543092429b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If you do, make sure you somehow transfer the popularity and influence as well. \\nThis issue has 2 years of (possible sparse) history and 300+ upvotes. \\nThe newer one is month long. \\n\\nIt may make more sense to either transfer this one to EE, or merge the other one to here.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5db704a8ce0f10d43344ec9d98767153458c3c76\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979062, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"this just counts the raw line number of the files treated as pieces of texts. I guess what people want here is more like a per-language breakdown.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e32505249798e1b3e040ded861516658150259c6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979040, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Is there a way to get this data using the API?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0603dc2249187fa36328ff2f92debfc6c7db79d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"No it is not. That would be something for @matt_wilson to consider with the security dashboard.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5329074, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601097241, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We need more cowbell!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 196721, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616b443b97ad1443c199fb5f0af9780b51ddf379\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts is that what it looks today? seems like a regression.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951315993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I would like a total number of lines not including blank ones.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dcb61a50851d774190fa590cddf3e19f7a753f83\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979036, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer would also like to track lines of code per developer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404096482, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just started to use gitlab, and this is one the first stats i hoped to see in the \\\"Charts\\\", however i was surprised it's missing :(\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3219145, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-22 10:59:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979033, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"how come I can still receive notifications even if I unsubscribed???\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:19:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471203, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001FRuq0\\n\\nCustomer would like to see number of lines of code per language excluding comments. \\n\\n/cc @npost\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-30 01:30:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:47:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 387929331, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer interested in this feature. https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000W2eBo (Internal link)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4587928, \"created_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"35a9711c22330d7480c21b516ab890edccb85fb6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 258382372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"i will join, i want see my ego\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 688008, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8993bd8d42c15974c7f1eee7b8601e71e505626f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979006, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"for a company that has thousands of repositories that's just completely ineffective\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292139470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@bgadberry The customer may be able to pull the necessary vulnerability count information from the existing GraphQL API. I've never heard a request for this functionality before and don't have any plans to include it in the Security Dashboard reports so pulling the data and creating their own reports is the best way forward if this is needed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4708748, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601110834, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Same here!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4122216, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979054, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The developer of scc responded to proposals to update the code as desired. Resultant code is in this blog article: https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story and being worked into this working example for GitLab CI CD: https://gitlab.com/guided-explorations/ci-cd-plugin-extensions/ci-cd-plugin-extension-scc\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404663419, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@mlockhart in the context of an MVC I think we need to stick with measuring the default branch only, because that's what the Repository Analytics page is currently doing ([example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts)).\\n\\nOn the bright side, it seems the existing byte counts are being [updated on push](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/git/branch_push_service.rb#L54).  That makes me hopeful we could match that frequency with line counts.  So let's tentatively say the MVC would be updated pushly (instead of monthly like I proposed above).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409398149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Gold customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/154631 with a slight twist: they'd like to see the number of lines by group/sub-group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-24 18:02:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:37:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3b5c50effe1ea33f7f938b5693032964c2bdc512\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:46:35 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 331168435, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001lc3Cc\\n\\nCustomer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density. \\n\\n/cc @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 19:45:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 600990593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Had a similar request. I was able to get this info by extracting the Gitlab backup repositories from a backup and unbundling everything then running the following utility on the directory.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut it would be nice to see this kind of information on a project / server admin level, just to provide an overview of things currently within GitLab user / admin interfaces.\\r\\n\\r\\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\r\\n\\r\\n![image](/uploads/2e9c9fd05358a6e80411bfb9b323c214/image.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 261290, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:15:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-22 12:20:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 261290, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"186117b5b28df4eca7f2419b17ad900f90e61728\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:42:31 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978968, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Please add a chart with the SLOC metric, it is a metric more useful than the number of commits\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1276118, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 14:50:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 07:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"735fd7ef77d0bd7463126f7436eda8691d678998\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978960, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 695248, \"username\": \"lbot\", \"name\": \"Lee Matos\"}, {\"id\": 239547, \"username\": \"wil.rodriguez\", \"name\": \"William Rodriguez\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 87854, \"username\": \"DouweM\", \"name\": \"Douwe Maan\"}, {\"id\": 1187333, \"username\": \"jramsay-gitlab\", \"name\": \"James Ramsay (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 2182793, \"username\": \"craph1\", \"name\": \"craph\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 709639, \"username\": \"omidontop\", \"name\": \"Omid Manikhi\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 2346644, \"username\": \"ariaieboy\", \"name\": \"AriaieBOY\"}, {\"id\": 101578, \"username\": \"zj-gitlab\", \"name\": \"Zeger-Jan van de Weg\"}, {\"id\": 2223731, \"username\": \"bobbymcgill\", \"name\": \"Bobby McGill\"}, {\"id\": 2814876, \"username\": \"jim.robbins\", \"name\": \"Jim Robbins\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 4158075, \"username\": \"aakriti.gupta\", \"name\": \"Aakriti Gupta\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4911777, \"username\": \"i.hayden\", \"name\": \"Immanuel Hayden\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 635873, \"username\": \"pisarik\", \"name\": \"Vlad Blazhko\"}, {\"id\": 7536567, \"username\": \"hchouraria\", \"name\": \"Harsh Chouraria\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 424775, \"username\": \"markpundsack\", \"name\": \"Mark Pundsack\"}, {\"id\": 7978344, \"username\": \"robinshine\", \"name\": \"Robin Shen\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 4156460, \"username\": \"ogolowinski\", \"name\": \"Orit Golowinski\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 4447217, \"username\": \"ljlane\", \"name\": \"Larissa Lane\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4376883, \"username\": \"stkerr\", \"name\": \"Sam Kerr\"}, {\"id\": 3288671, \"username\": \"cupini\", \"name\": \"Brian Cupini\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 7272738, \"username\": \"kategrechishkina\", \"name\": \"Kate Grechishkina\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 5250128, \"username\": \"ricardoamarilla\", \"name\": \"Ricardo Amarilla\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 5291964, \"username\": \"crispindev\", \"name\": \"crispin velez\"}, {\"id\": 5537005, \"username\": \"cleveland\", \"name\": \"Cleveland Bledsoe Jr\"}, {\"id\": 4748523, \"username\": \"sheininger\", \"name\": \"Steffen Heininger\"}, {\"id\": 10051186, \"username\": \"kballon\", \"name\": \"Kent Japhet Ballon\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 154953, \"username\": \"Zandor300\", \"name\": \"Zandor Smith\"}, {\"id\": 2414870, \"username\": \"mason1920\", \"name\": \"mason1920\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 5329074, \"username\": \"tmccaslin\", \"name\": \"Taylor McCaslin\"}, {\"id\": 196721, \"username\": \"billclark\", \"name\": \"Bill Clark\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 3219145, \"username\": \"spprint\", \"name\": \"Sven Vet\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 4587928, \"username\": \"cbazan1\", \"name\": \"Carlos Bazan\"}, {\"id\": 688008, \"username\": \"friuns\", \"name\": \"friuns\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4708748, \"username\": \"matt_wilson\", \"name\": \"Matt Wilson\"}, {\"id\": 4122216, \"username\": \"saunved\", \"name\": \"Saunved Mutalik\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 261290, \"username\": \"TRPmwiesen\", \"name\": \"Matthew Wiesen\"}, {\"id\": 1276118, \"username\": \"wagnerpinheiro\", \"name\": \"Wagner Pinheiro\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize with bullet points.","query_id":"02bfaefafa6247b68783fea3d49fb852","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"24652824","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 24652824, \"title\": \"Report number of lines per language in repository charts\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-15 17:20:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"### Description\\n\\nAs of now, repository charts report percentage of language in the repo.\\nFirst, it is not obvious how this percentage is computed (number of files? number of lines? bytes? what about comments? libraries?). Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\n### Proposal\\n\\nAs a user I would like to see the number of lines of code per language.\\nIdeally, excluding blank lines and comments, but that is optional.\\n\\n### Documentation blurb\\n\\nAs for use cases:\\n* better understand the repo structure\\n* if this is your repo, being able to report the number of lines of your main language\\n    * this is one of the metric employers would like to know (I personally was surprised by this question on interview and could not clearly respond)\\n* all those use cases for general repo graphs (like pie chart of languages)\\n\\n### Details\\n\\n[A useful comment from ZJ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038):\\n\\n\u003e Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\n\u003e Lines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\n\u003e That all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\\n\\n### Potential Workarounds\\n\\n- Run `scc` in a GitLab CI pipeline: https://github.com/boyter/scc to generate SLOC/etc. reports\\n- If API use is acceptable (instead of UI), parts of its output stats can be stored as custom attributes on the project: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/custom_attributes.html#set-custom-attribute\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 17800, \"updated_by_id\": 5749302, \"weight\": 8, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -14979600, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-07-17 16:10:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 7536567, \"discussion_locked\": false, \"closed_at\": \"2023-01-19 09:38:40 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 579, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11039421, \"title\": \"Category:Code Analytics\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-18 19:25:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:07:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 7161201, \"title\": \"Manage [DEPRECATED]\", \"color\": \"#44AD8E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-19 05:48:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-19 11:52:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Please use the devops::manage label instead of this deprecated label. It is kept for historical issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1890178, \"title\": \"[deprecated] Accepting merge requests\", \"color\": \"#69d100\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 11:34:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-28 08:14:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"[deprecated] Please use \\\"Seeking community contributions\\\" instead. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/developer-relations/contributor-success/team-task/-/issues/77\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1672341, \"title\": \"customer\", \"color\": \"#ad4363\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that were reported by Enterprise Edition subscribers. This label should be accompanied by either the 'bug' or 'feature proposal' label\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 4107658, \"title\": \"graphs\", \"color\": \"#428bca\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the project Graphs pages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15237307, \"title\": \"icebox\", \"color\": \"#d6ecef\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:25:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:35:52 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues on which no work is anticipated in the next several milestones but which may be considered for work shortly thereafter thus not closed.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2936416, \"title\": \"popular proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Feature proposals deemed popular by our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/triage) will have this label applied\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2714266, \"title\": \"potential proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label added by triage tools to mark interesting feature proposals for consideration\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@dbogatov Thanks for the proposal. We'll just have to leave this open and see if it becomes a popular request.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73cf193764726f4ed724d78d4b59d4f81efe83cc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978957, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@wagnerpinheiro, [S]LOC metrics are rather old. They are not actual now (only in 80-90s they were). Your idea is pretty but only for developers ego. For really gentlemen customers GITLAB maybe have to improve their charts with different modern metrics. As example, for analyzing object-oriented languages they can add metric of Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 19:52:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 346483, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978961, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@yachmenov_c_ I have to admit, I had to look up what Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer metrics were. And yes, I would love to see those metrics in GitLab.\\n\\n**However**, I feel like it is quite hard (or say, resource heavy) to implement those. Each language will have to provide a service to get OOP relations. We cannot derive those metrics just by parsing the text.\\n\\n**On the other side**, simple line counter per language (even the one which omits comments and empty lines) is relatively easy to implement.\\n\\nAs for developers' ego, I have to admit it would not mind seeing LOC metrics, but I am sure there are other reasons for these metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:00:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978963, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, I mostly agree with you, really they can implement functionality you mentioned, and it would be great. Nice point!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"ZD ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/80860\\n\\nA Customer requested this feature. :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 695248, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2dba3df39df1cd81040cb0bc86091470aac43ffa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978965, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This would be awesome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 239547, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"604137042a54634c99ba7cda9b19e4db3570b396\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is getting popular\\n\\n@DouweM ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" for this one?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f1bbac293ede2d142630a69c9b499642ce9a40f8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher I think it may not be well defined enough yet for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" . We removed the repository language a while ago because it didn't perform well, so we'll need to figure out way to restore it without reintroducing the performance issue.\\n\\nThis is related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/40236 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23931. \\n\\n/cc @jramsay\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 87854, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23bac7a1ece7d87f5607254715120cb9067506ea\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978986, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If we can provide a foundation in gitlab-ce#23931 that computes the language stats without performance, we could definitely open this up for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1187333, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:16:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:17:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1187333, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"812e8d43c4b74c029c7327a6b783be67b2a0cd78\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978988, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Having the LOC in the table with the language breakdown and percentage would be great.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4a841d10fb4925ca2b102435a39a249fb1f1bb39\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hello,\\n\\nDisplay the LOC in the chart would be a very nice feature :slight_smile: \\n\\nAny update about this ?\\n\\nThank you very much.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2182793, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55170edc6cc50d1a2a20760c0bd5760b0dba68b6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978998, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi,\\u00a0I haven't heard anything back yet.\\nDennis\\nDennis Biringer | Principal Software EngineerPacific Defense Systems, LLC (PDS)Integrity Applications Incorporated535 Lipoa Parkway\\u00a0 Suite 101, Kihei HI, 96753dbiringer@integrity-apps.com(808) 214-0765\\n\\n[smime.p7s](/uploads/e849eea0083b79828f578febe315bdcd/smime.p7s)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55168747dda9172740a2eaa5e847403ed43121de\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979004, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We also would like to see the total number of lines of code, files, etc. Thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a6edf2d747aa859d84a4adfab95b10d53d7774d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979005, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@shellyniz Currently it's presented as a percentage via the API:\\n- https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#languages\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d201f77821e20f12477856580eab2e40804cc2dd\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979019, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Silly me, I was looking for it under the repo API. That's a big help, thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"093b696a8537efb99106d9d0b003220eb6ee8c01\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979020, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\\n\\nIt's a great feature to have especially if you're to brag about how much work has been put into the project in a presentation or something.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 709639, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:05:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:07:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b43271d3058f31f25e92e49015ea9efc4afc7d0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979022, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't see us getting to this anytime soon, but I'm happy to label this with gitlab-ce~1890178 for a community contribution. \\n\\nWe express languages as % of repo, might we also show the absolute LOC? The Charts page might be a sensible place to display this. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/graphs/master/charts for an example. The project overview page could also work, we currently use a multi-colored horizontal line to represent this and show percentages there on mouseover.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:16:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:18:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1f57d0559fe42979c7e6d35e07dbbbb6131d9855\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979029, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @jeremy\\\\_ \\nDo you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'?And so 'Total Lines Number'?\\nWhat's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34d9eb930ce114af06333350c5ff55483637cf7e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979031, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @markglenfletcher \\nIt's very good things that showing percent,but lines number complete it's feature,doesn't?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a92bea136cc9e32d787aa5742ed869a21d2ab49c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979032, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Do you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'? And so 'Total Lines Number'? What's your opinion?\\n\\nI'd love to hear your proposal, but I think the Charts page may be an easy place to add this:\\n\\n![image](/uploads/198f585f7e807ed931757b47a519d135/image.png)\\n\\nWe could include a separate column for LOC on each row, and include a \\\"Total\\\" row at the bottom that displays the sum of the rows. What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 06:32:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-24 12:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-10 12:54:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979035, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"any update about this feature ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2346644, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"075f869895c6f828be69c382f91a4a9b2dba20b5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\nLines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\nThat all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 101578, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"570bda01e243b5cf50fce1ba6adb9cd4605169f4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979038, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Not sure if this helps anyone, but if you use GitBash (or linux terminal) and go into your local repo and type this command:\\n`find . -not -path \\u201c*/.git/*\\u201d | xargs wc -l`\\nYou get the total line counts. No extra things to install - just a bash command.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2223731, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a894203f7adeeb1a1ed60f595000c3d28bf650ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979039, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is another possible way by using the git ls-files command with a file type filter.\\n\\n* Java example: `git ls-files *.java *.xml | xargs wc -l`\\n* Ruby example: `git ls-files *.rb Rakefile Gemfile | xargs wc -l`\\n\\nOr whatever files you want to include in your count. It can also works in subfolders to provide counts of just the contents of that folder.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2814876, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78a3685ac84f3e9f6999bd406e3ee07296be78f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979041, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My developer ego gives +1 for this stats. I think, if you count the lines anyway, it might be no problem to offer different stats as options, because the counting might be the most expensive part anyway. \\n\\n*Yeah* for looking at your developer productivity in numbers. :-)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a8d439996cd80acb0e887e19d4c7a32c3b38f3f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979042, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is not graphical and not included in gitlab, but it serves my interest totally. Also it might be a good starting point for Gitlab's implementation: \\n\\nhttps://github.com/AlDanial/cloc\\n\\nUse `cloc --vcs git` to count only watched files in a git repository.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e05053a4fedccfbd67d6045862d003aaff0c6202\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979043, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@aakriti.gupta, should we just close this one in favor of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104, since it's a prerequisite?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:46:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979061, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, yes, we will take everything from this one in account - it's planned for 12.2. Do you want to comment on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104? What's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3511154, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"45e71e7ac76abec3784d03cbdb2b1cbc301899ff\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979063, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This should not be moved to EE as the initial feature was added by the community.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5ac02291aab2c6a295e4df9adacd278f1278fc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979064, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @max-wittig for pointing out! The EE issue has more content, which will be available on group/instance level. We would like to move all analytics into one space in the top nav bar, so will be thinking through how to combine what is in cc now and the additional functionality we will be adding in ee. Any feedback is welcome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"50ead744b305fa1f532705f92d1dbd1b1ec7a298\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979065, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"As mentioned below, as long as we keep the history through a merge or copying over information, it sounds good to close this with an update @valexieva :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4158075, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979066, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@valexieva I wrote a small script, which reports the languages an instance has by exporting prometheus metrics. Relying just on absolute values would make a lot more sense, than the approach that I'm using now. But I won't use absolute numbers, if `EE` is required for this.\\n\\nhttps://github.com/max-wittig/gitlab-languages\\n\\nI think it would be fine, if the Graph feature stays in EE, but it would be nice, if the API would return absolute numbers.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:35:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:42:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1283330, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7bde2d02397a5cb7ae5b0b940c065224158203f5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979067, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Keeping this open until we complete: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13163. After that will close, the existing functionality will be available in CE, further functionality as per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104 in EE.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"94574f2b40c78694f4096c523c514fcca93041ce\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi, we have scheduled LOC plus language trends for 12.3 - please find here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104#note_194198775. We will also ensure that it's available for CE users in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/65616 before we remove the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/graphs/master/charts\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"16af6bd6af9d839ee0856e4771ce2d012a7dc48e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979073, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Github provides this feature, it would be nice to be able to obtain comparable metrics from Gitlab as we are using both.\\n\\nOur use case to get these numbers is for figuring out the prevalence of code in any given language across our entire codebase to inform us with requirements for code analysis tools etc. \\\"90% of language Y in repository X\\\" without any context to the number is mostly a useless metric. We need to understand how much language Y there is in totality across our multiple SCM systems. Now i can only count how many repos have a given language in general which is not exactly the same thing.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 14:53:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291742295, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@unitysipu \\nI would say for your use case it is better to just create a tool that clones all the repos you want metrics on and runs cloc or a similar tool - https://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\nHaving these metrics across groups/organizations in github and gitlab makes less sense to me than to provide some information about what powers a given project.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291953639, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The amount of code often correlates with things like risk. It's sorta interesting from analysis point of view if you have projects that have 500, 5000, 500k or 5M lines of code. You may want to prioritize or categorize the big projects over the small ones (obviously that's not the full picture, depends on what that code is used for etc.). But just looking at our entire codebase / repositories from the top and knowing there's \\\"90% of PHP\\\" in some project without understanding there's a million lines of it doesn't really help. So while individual teams may have a good grasp of their project, somebody looking over our entire portfolio you need more information to figure out who you should get in touch with. Obviously you can also try to check the file size metrics etc. and try to filter out uninteresting file types or other similar cumbersome workarounds but it's just more work to land on data that could easily be provided by the platform directly.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292157164, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Even if you have 1000 repos, it would still not be that much work to write a tool that accumulates all the information using the method I described, and you're going to get it a lot faster than by asking gitlab to add a feature. \\nAs for expanding the scope of this issue to cover groups and organizations as a whole, I guess gitlab devs might consider that as an enterprise feature at some point.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292558285, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, *obviously* there are workarounds that require you to analyze all the source code yourself. That's not the point of this feature request. I see the conversation revolving around suggestions and local optimizations for individual teams / developers or the importance of the amount of code in context of individuals. I figured it's prudent to provide another point of view that may have an impact on the thinking of why it's important to have this implemented. There are other use cases for the LOC/Language metrics that can be of importance for somebody who is looking at your organization as a whole.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293145108, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Honestly, with that chain of argument: Why have a commit graph? You can do this locally on your git repo. Or why have a bugtracker? You can just install trac separately. Or why have a wiki? Haven't you heard of mediaWiki? And so on. \\n\\nFact is, that this is a standard feature that has many uses for individuals and companies (also for example if I actually will bother to contribute to a code base or if its not worth it because id have to learn X new languages).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4911777, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:42:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4911777, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"044bd214cb760ef42c44b314a3243601c4c2f6a7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:10:44 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299631157, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I disagree. It's absolutely not ridiculous at all to have _code metrics_ available in the source code repository you might use.\\n\\nAny external tool will have to analyse the code outside of the SCM makes the whole process inherently ineffective and slow by design. Gitlab (and github) already has the code inside it and therefore is in the best position to provide metrics and data on it. Furthermore, modern (sophisticated) code analysis tools _integrate directly_ with Github these days through Github applications, but even they cannot provide this data either without analyzing the entire codebase separately.\\n\\nWhile workarounds exist they are all bad in a large organization. I agree that it's clear this is not a priority based on the fact it's been open for two years, but also it's clear that the reasoning and discussion around this feature is very narrow and developer (ego) oriented.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:36:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"005fc553fd9580804c00dd974606b58258f6d149\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299627593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"##### For person\\nPeople expect it, since various metrics implemented in GitHub. At some point everyone just genuinely interested in those metrics even only for self-esteem. And it is frustrating to not find them on GitLab. And since GitHub made everyone think to have them out-of-the-box, people became lazy and don't want to pollute their work environment with some difficult code inspection tools that they will use once just because of curiosity. \\n\\n##### For big team\\nIf you are working in a solid company with big code base, and you professionally perform code analysis and give consulting based on it, then it is ridiculous to do it on the basis of GitHub or GitLab, likely you will need to have more sophisticated special tool for it.\\n\\n##### Conclusion\\nSo this feature is not a mandatory. In first place GitLab need to improve its role system, this is a real bummer:) But GitLab doesn't do it for 2 years, so probably they have more important tasks. I prefer to use GitHub because of role system and metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 635873, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 13:32:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:35:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"96c7f0adc49d8ea2d2f64108bea473166fe3f13c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293348432, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A premium/silver customer has requested for this feature over support ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/220808 (internal link)\\n\\nIn particular they'd like an ability to query statistics about lines of code per detected language type, within each, and across all repositories under a group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7536567, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 13:07:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 7536567, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80839b906be084dee24b6e6d95e01d91af4e6b4a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:56:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 612192220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am proposing in another issue to update an existing open source tool to add MBs of code to the reports.\\n\\nThis is related to helping customers (and prospects) be able to estimate the long term costs of security scanning solutions that charge by lines or MBs of code.\\n\\nIf the tool were a CI stage, but GitLab could receive and parse the report to a UI - then the compute for this would only performed for and paid by customers who want the counts.\\n\\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/233018\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-31 00:05:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 164827, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 388534468, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@DarwinJS the blocker for us on this feature is a line-counting capability in Gitaly.  I noticed that [SCC](https://github.com/boyter/scc) is written in Go, as Gitaly is.  Seems like that could be a very happy coincidence for us.  Did you happen to dive deep enough into SCC to have an opinion about how challenging it might be to integrate into Gitaly?\\n\\nNote for others: SCC is the line-counting software that Darwin recommended in his [blog post](https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 408694264, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bmiller1 the context is helpful.\\n\\nThis is in the %Backlog for awareness\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 586004666, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@djensen - I settled on SCC, rather than the long standing CLOC (Perl) due to it being written in a modern language and, if the author was not able to add features, the hopes that someone at GitLab would.\\n\\nI did dive into the internals, but don't know enough about Go Lang nor Gitaly to comment on whether the two would tango well.\\n\\nIt is lightning fast - which I noticed when processing www-gitlab-com.\\n\\nHave you thought of this as a sidekiq process - not sure how good it would be at doing per-commit differentials in Gitaly and doing the full repo in Gitaly may be a lot of excess compute if it does it every commit?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409124927, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just like source control, you don't need to count all the lines of code in a repo every time.\\n\\nOnce you have a known count of lines at a specific commit, you can just track the diffs after that to increase/decrease line count for specific code and languages.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409309581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes I understand.\\nWhat I'm trying to indicate is that the machinations to isolate net new lines and net removed lines of code may be more processing load than simply scheduling scc weekly?  Especially given the speed of scc.\\n\\nIf that might be true, the question is how timely do line counts need to be?\\n\\nI don't know the answer - just highlighting that if line counts don't need to be up to the minute, there might be a cheaper way to do it.  It would also possibly allow direct dependency on scc, rather than forking it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409329832, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e It is lightning fast\\n\\nYes it is!  It crunches the entire gitlab repo in about 3 seconds on my machine ([results here](https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2013041)).  Not bad.\\n\\n\u003e how timely do line counts need to be?  I don't know the answer\\n\\nMe either, but let's guess it needs to be somewhere between monthly and daily.  (Hourly and commitly seem unnecessarily specific.)  Maybe we could start at monthly and see how it goes?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409366938, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Or, maybe proponents could weigh in on the frequency.\\n\\nI feel a compromise might be:\\n\\n * maintain a _count per branch_ (which could be very helpful anyway)\\n * trigger a count on the _first commit_ of any new branch (or make counting an option?)\\n * update all branch counts _monthly_ (or, only branches that have a flag indicating that they should be counted)\\n\\nThat way, the regular update frequency is down to one count per project branch, per month, and Developers can force a new count by pushing a new branch (perhaps they might have a special case to have up-to-the-commit counts).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:50:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:54:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 5791080, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409381230, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In addition, I would like to understand uses cases for getting as fine as \\\"per branch\\\" code counts - what would someone use this for and how often?  If it is very occasional and/or for a bespoke purpose, they could just run scc themselves on a local copy.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 410590466, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Starter customer requesting this feature in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/172665\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f820fe272fadfd61eb4c19317bb2d45f71f25fa4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 416263002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\nAs the description states, the goal is to understand what the bar means, and see some absolute data. @jeremy Would the MVC here be to simply report the number of bytes, since that's what we're measuring?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 424775, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ccc8a3b61fc8f4f779b6b63486fb31d54c005cc9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 288529601, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[OneDev](https://github.com/theonedev/onedev) calculates SLOC per languages and display the trends over time which is quite interesting. An example trends here:\\n\\nhttps://code.onedev.io/projects/react/stats/lines\\n\\nOne can hover mouse on the trend to show SLOC by day. The initial calculation for a large repo such as Linux takes about 30 min, and the result will be cached. Subsequent updates for new commits will be fairly fast based on cache. Below is the logic for calculation if someone is interested:\\n\\nhttps://github.com/theonedev/onedev/blob/main/server-core/src/main/java/io/onedev/server/infomanager/DefaultCommitInfoManager.java\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7978344, \"created_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"19fa4567d0d0f1d5842c5ba6beae8267aebb0a4e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 483620034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is moving back to the %Backlog for the reasons described in ZJ's [comment above](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038). We're absolutely accepting merge requests on this one, but the Manage stage needs to prioritize other areas at the moment.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd32244cb8a10270e97506088fe7772e17dbcf11\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 242549553, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher please fix this ASAP.\\nI am surprised Gitlab has no protection against this crap.\\nYou will end up with people massively unsubscribing at best.\\n\\nP.S. This idiot keeps recreating accounts.\\nA simple post factum ban will not work.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 12:57:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 920678, \"type\": null, \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d54912a045e3ea6508b3cf9ea3c8d3f2c3f3784\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471910, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is a certain lag.\\nI suggest we do not subscribe back until admins fix it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503473194, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner I actually think this should go to ~\\\"group::source code\\\" , WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4156460, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 579827345, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI - Since Apex code is essentially extended Java with a few accompanying .xml metadata files, my customer was able to run `scc \\u2013count-as cls:java` to interpret Apex .cls files as Java.  scc understands the comment and syntax structure of Java and was able to correctly return the LOC.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 587249173, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I think that makes a lot of sense @ogolowinski\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4447217, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580171017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ogolowinski Yep, I agree. Thanks for changing the group.\\n\\nThis is going to remain in the backlog as it is not our current focus and based on [details](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#details) in the description, LOE will be quite high. Thanks.\\n\\ncc @cupini\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580236144, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@cupini I'm tagging @ljlane who is the PM for ~\\\"group::optimize\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4376883, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562100410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" ~\\\"self-managed\\\" ~customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\n* Link to request:  https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001Eo1h0\\n* Why interested: Want to report on all repos (instance-level) for languages used in repos for tools info\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: Workarounds are nice but would be nice to get an instance-view instantly \\n* PM to mention: @stkerr\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3288671, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-27 23:22:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562089576, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"An Ultimate customer is interested in this feature.\\n* Link to request: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000014HWYo\\n* Why interested: They have a need to report LoC for their Apex repos.\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: We have not found an adequate workaround\\n* PM to mention: @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-20 21:51:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 581438360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another Premium customer is interested in this feature: [#223248](https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/223248)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7272738, \"created_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e8ddc8cdcb1c801921ec5c22320c15c418b8826\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 622513819, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another customer inquiring if this function exists\\nhttps://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/161342\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fe28d2e0f29b158bfc492b79ea8883a16e1d5fb7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364390361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" Customer  interested in this feature [Internal Link](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001kHlpn)\\n\\ncc/ @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5250128, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-18 19:30:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:09:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3f6ffdb391745aec7053e4585f952953cbf32152\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 706872228, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer here: we compile this data periodically for use by the C-suite and even if the absolute numbers are representative of byte counts it is easy enough for me to use an estimate of bytes per line to get what I need.\\n\\nThe key is that I have nothing without absolute numbers.\\n\\nAlso, please consider the non-gitlab.com use case. Perhaps on our hosted instance we would be able to opt-in to a feature like this if it were available and we can decide for ourselves if the performance is acceptable.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78631ce204289b27d0730dbec72b8b9a7f770fec\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364645655, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My company is a Premium customer - we would really like to have this and even more metrics regarding type of language like number of components, files, etc.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5291964, \"created_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3790f9053863d8b679f99d4cc896f3ffb8c450e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 721314226, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"- SF: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000Ut0JyAAJ\\n- ZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/254826\\n\\n~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" customer is interested in this feature.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5537005, \"created_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af4170834a554c4135225876e22c91fadd8c35f2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 791792997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"1900 seat ~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" [Customer](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000002xBZQ) is interested in this feature.\\n\\n- Priority: ~\\\"customer priority::5\\\"  priority::\\n- Why interested: Customer is trying to find a way to report the total line of code across all GitLab projects.\\n- Problem they are trying to solve: Customer has some internal teams who are trying trying to integrate tooling with GitLab to measure and track code coverage. There\\u2019s a cost associated with expanding those other tools and without the ability to report the number of lines it's nearly impossible to estimate said cost.\\n- Current solution for this problem: none\\n- Impact to the customer of not having this: Inability to utilize other tools in conjunction with GitLab and thus slowing adoption of the platform.\\n- Questions: Are they're any other workarounds for this, even at a manual reporting level? \\n- PM to mention: @tlinz\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4748523, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-14 14:49:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-15 13:33:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e76285e7c35cbca1481c16ed2c1ad5b7d232b65e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 990978163, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A Premium customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\nZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/284853\\n\\nThe workaround mentioned [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_332427265) unfortunately is hitting this error at the moment. I wonder if you have thoughts about this @lyle ?\\n\\n```\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n3: from (irb):3\\n2: from lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb:85:in `path'\\n1: from lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/storage_settings.rb:65:in `legacy_disk_path'\\nGitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings::DirectPathAccessError (git disk access denied)\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10051186, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 08:09:53 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 924067966, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Seems related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350080. This was always a bit of a hack, and relied on manually executing `git` commands directly on the repo.\\n\\nYou could take (and modify) the same core:\\n\\n`/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l` and run it directly on the command line given a list of paths generated from `rails`\\n\\nThere's a bunch of caveats there though:\\n- `master` is not necessarily the default branch name (we transitioned in GitLab to `main` some time ago)\\n- It relies on counting the actual number of lines in a file `wc -l` and does it for every file in a repo. This will include licenses, headers, empty space and so on.\\n\\nThere are some additional thoughts in https://gist.github.com/mandiwise/dc53cb9da00856d7cdbb that have iterated on my approach from two years ago :sweat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 925281183, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bgadberry \\n\\nIt seems like with the additional customer problem you need solved that there should be another issue for this...?\\n\\n\u003e Customer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density.\\n\\nThis does not seem directly related. Correct me if I am wrong!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601066055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner You're correct. I was thinking the customer could calculate the metric manually once number of lines of code is made available. On second thought, I think we can calculate vulnerabilities per byte today. I'll report back if that suffices.\\n\\n@tmccaslin Is this vulnerability per byte/line of code metric something we've considered uncovering as part of SAST?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601093808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"It's not per _language_ but the following rails console snippet will give you an estimate of number of lines per `Project` on a self-managed instance where the `git-data` is on a partition or directly attached volume.\\n\\nIt can break a bit if there's no `master` branch or if a repository for some reason doesn't have a `HEAD`, so it's not at all bullet-proof.\\n\\n```ruby\\nheaders = ['path', 'lines','archived?']\\nreport_file = Tempfile.new(['project_lines','.csv'])\\n\\nCSV.open(report_file.path, \\\"wb\\\") do |csv|\\ncsv \u003c\u003c headers\\n   Project.all.each do |p|\\n      output = `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l`\\n      csv \u003c\u003c [p.full_path, Integer(output),p.archived?]\\n   end; nil\\nend\\n\\nreport_file.close\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2930750323d45742084b921bd0f102d58807df7b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 332427265, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, statistics counting total and per lang number of lines (in code files only) would be so nice and basic.  \\nIgnore empty lines for me is optional. \\n\\nGet stats manually / locally for a git repo is not a problem. But this issue asks for the UI of gitlab. And this is what I need as well. \\n\\nhere a link to the current state: (older links above are expired)  \\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts \\n\\nHere a link for more advanced stats ambitions:  \\nhttps://www.openhub.net/p/gitlab\\n\\nedit: btw: If this is not happening since 5 years because of performance issues, then just calculate it once a week and show the calculation date next to it. I guess most people do not need per hour stats about n lines of code. For me even once per month would be enough. (And thus could be used for #12104 as well)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:08:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-03 07:59:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 882141, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3bdba5e20eedfcedc7eb1c6272fa93798b138610\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:13:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951334872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In order to get this request some attention, this issue has been marked as a potentially interesting proposal as it meets the following criteria:\\n\\n* Labelled as a feature proposal\\n* More than 10 upvotes\\n* Unscheduled (not associated with a milestone)\\n\\nThanks for your proposal!\\n\\n\\n\\n/cc @markglenfletcher\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73b69edb26083c702d2514effe76ca7da2d40407\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978971, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 154953, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"63b6ff0026abcb2ee9df9b28041655c7ab9fe563\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979021, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@billclark agreed\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2414870, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1328954e3c5076176230b846b4da51543092429b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If you do, make sure you somehow transfer the popularity and influence as well. \\nThis issue has 2 years of (possible sparse) history and 300+ upvotes. \\nThe newer one is month long. \\n\\nIt may make more sense to either transfer this one to EE, or merge the other one to here.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5db704a8ce0f10d43344ec9d98767153458c3c76\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979062, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"this just counts the raw line number of the files treated as pieces of texts. I guess what people want here is more like a per-language breakdown.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e32505249798e1b3e040ded861516658150259c6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979040, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Is there a way to get this data using the API?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0603dc2249187fa36328ff2f92debfc6c7db79d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"No it is not. That would be something for @matt_wilson to consider with the security dashboard.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5329074, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601097241, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We need more cowbell!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 196721, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616b443b97ad1443c199fb5f0af9780b51ddf379\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts is that what it looks today? seems like a regression.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951315993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I would like a total number of lines not including blank ones.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dcb61a50851d774190fa590cddf3e19f7a753f83\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979036, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer would also like to track lines of code per developer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404096482, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just started to use gitlab, and this is one the first stats i hoped to see in the \\\"Charts\\\", however i was surprised it's missing :(\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3219145, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-22 10:59:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979033, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"how come I can still receive notifications even if I unsubscribed???\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:19:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471203, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001FRuq0\\n\\nCustomer would like to see number of lines of code per language excluding comments. \\n\\n/cc @npost\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-30 01:30:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:47:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 387929331, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer interested in this feature. https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000W2eBo (Internal link)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4587928, \"created_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"35a9711c22330d7480c21b516ab890edccb85fb6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 258382372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"i will join, i want see my ego\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 688008, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8993bd8d42c15974c7f1eee7b8601e71e505626f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979006, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"for a company that has thousands of repositories that's just completely ineffective\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292139470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@bgadberry The customer may be able to pull the necessary vulnerability count information from the existing GraphQL API. I've never heard a request for this functionality before and don't have any plans to include it in the Security Dashboard reports so pulling the data and creating their own reports is the best way forward if this is needed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4708748, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601110834, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Same here!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4122216, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979054, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The developer of scc responded to proposals to update the code as desired. Resultant code is in this blog article: https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story and being worked into this working example for GitLab CI CD: https://gitlab.com/guided-explorations/ci-cd-plugin-extensions/ci-cd-plugin-extension-scc\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404663419, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@mlockhart in the context of an MVC I think we need to stick with measuring the default branch only, because that's what the Repository Analytics page is currently doing ([example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts)).\\n\\nOn the bright side, it seems the existing byte counts are being [updated on push](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/git/branch_push_service.rb#L54).  That makes me hopeful we could match that frequency with line counts.  So let's tentatively say the MVC would be updated pushly (instead of monthly like I proposed above).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409398149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Gold customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/154631 with a slight twist: they'd like to see the number of lines by group/sub-group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-24 18:02:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:37:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3b5c50effe1ea33f7f938b5693032964c2bdc512\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:46:35 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 331168435, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001lc3Cc\\n\\nCustomer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density. \\n\\n/cc @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 19:45:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 600990593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Had a similar request. I was able to get this info by extracting the Gitlab backup repositories from a backup and unbundling everything then running the following utility on the directory.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut it would be nice to see this kind of information on a project / server admin level, just to provide an overview of things currently within GitLab user / admin interfaces.\\r\\n\\r\\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\r\\n\\r\\n![image](/uploads/2e9c9fd05358a6e80411bfb9b323c214/image.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 261290, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:15:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-22 12:20:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 261290, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"186117b5b28df4eca7f2419b17ad900f90e61728\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:42:31 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978968, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Please add a chart with the SLOC metric, it is a metric more useful than the number of commits\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1276118, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 14:50:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 07:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"735fd7ef77d0bd7463126f7436eda8691d678998\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978960, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 695248, \"username\": \"lbot\", \"name\": \"Lee Matos\"}, {\"id\": 239547, \"username\": \"wil.rodriguez\", \"name\": \"William Rodriguez\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 87854, \"username\": \"DouweM\", \"name\": \"Douwe Maan\"}, {\"id\": 1187333, \"username\": \"jramsay-gitlab\", \"name\": \"James Ramsay (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 2182793, \"username\": \"craph1\", \"name\": \"craph\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 709639, \"username\": \"omidontop\", \"name\": \"Omid Manikhi\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 2346644, \"username\": \"ariaieboy\", \"name\": \"AriaieBOY\"}, {\"id\": 101578, \"username\": \"zj-gitlab\", \"name\": \"Zeger-Jan van de Weg\"}, {\"id\": 2223731, \"username\": \"bobbymcgill\", \"name\": \"Bobby McGill\"}, {\"id\": 2814876, \"username\": \"jim.robbins\", \"name\": \"Jim Robbins\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 4158075, \"username\": \"aakriti.gupta\", \"name\": \"Aakriti Gupta\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4911777, \"username\": \"i.hayden\", \"name\": \"Immanuel Hayden\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 635873, \"username\": \"pisarik\", \"name\": \"Vlad Blazhko\"}, {\"id\": 7536567, \"username\": \"hchouraria\", \"name\": \"Harsh Chouraria\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 424775, \"username\": \"markpundsack\", \"name\": \"Mark Pundsack\"}, {\"id\": 7978344, \"username\": \"robinshine\", \"name\": \"Robin Shen\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 4156460, \"username\": \"ogolowinski\", \"name\": \"Orit Golowinski\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 4447217, \"username\": \"ljlane\", \"name\": \"Larissa Lane\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4376883, \"username\": \"stkerr\", \"name\": \"Sam Kerr\"}, {\"id\": 3288671, \"username\": \"cupini\", \"name\": \"Brian Cupini\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 7272738, \"username\": \"kategrechishkina\", \"name\": \"Kate Grechishkina\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 5250128, \"username\": \"ricardoamarilla\", \"name\": \"Ricardo Amarilla\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 5291964, \"username\": \"crispindev\", \"name\": \"crispin velez\"}, {\"id\": 5537005, \"username\": \"cleveland\", \"name\": \"Cleveland Bledsoe Jr\"}, {\"id\": 4748523, \"username\": \"sheininger\", \"name\": \"Steffen Heininger\"}, {\"id\": 10051186, \"username\": \"kballon\", \"name\": \"Kent Japhet Ballon\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 154953, \"username\": \"Zandor300\", \"name\": \"Zandor Smith\"}, {\"id\": 2414870, \"username\": \"mason1920\", \"name\": \"mason1920\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 5329074, \"username\": \"tmccaslin\", \"name\": \"Taylor McCaslin\"}, {\"id\": 196721, \"username\": \"billclark\", \"name\": \"Bill Clark\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 3219145, \"username\": \"spprint\", \"name\": \"Sven Vet\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 4587928, \"username\": \"cbazan1\", \"name\": \"Carlos Bazan\"}, {\"id\": 688008, \"username\": \"friuns\", \"name\": \"friuns\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4708748, \"username\": \"matt_wilson\", \"name\": \"Matt Wilson\"}, {\"id\": 4122216, \"username\": \"saunved\", \"name\": \"Saunved Mutalik\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 261290, \"username\": \"TRPmwiesen\", \"name\": \"Matthew Wiesen\"}, {\"id\": 1276118, \"username\": \"wagnerpinheiro\", \"name\": \"Wagner Pinheiro\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What are the unique use cases raised by commenters in this issue?","query_id":"eead557005d74823b6db4713ca324254","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"24652824","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 24652824, \"title\": \"Report number of lines per language in repository charts\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-15 17:20:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"### Description\\n\\nAs of now, repository charts report percentage of language in the repo.\\nFirst, it is not obvious how this percentage is computed (number of files? number of lines? bytes? what about comments? libraries?). Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\n### Proposal\\n\\nAs a user I would like to see the number of lines of code per language.\\nIdeally, excluding blank lines and comments, but that is optional.\\n\\n### Documentation blurb\\n\\nAs for use cases:\\n* better understand the repo structure\\n* if this is your repo, being able to report the number of lines of your main language\\n    * this is one of the metric employers would like to know (I personally was surprised by this question on interview and could not clearly respond)\\n* all those use cases for general repo graphs (like pie chart of languages)\\n\\n### Details\\n\\n[A useful comment from ZJ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038):\\n\\n\u003e Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\n\u003e Lines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\n\u003e That all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\\n\\n### Potential Workarounds\\n\\n- Run `scc` in a GitLab CI pipeline: https://github.com/boyter/scc to generate SLOC/etc. reports\\n- If API use is acceptable (instead of UI), parts of its output stats can be stored as custom attributes on the project: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/custom_attributes.html#set-custom-attribute\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 17800, \"updated_by_id\": 5749302, \"weight\": 8, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -14979600, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-07-17 16:10:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 7536567, \"discussion_locked\": false, \"closed_at\": \"2023-01-19 09:38:40 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 579, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11039421, \"title\": \"Category:Code Analytics\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-18 19:25:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:07:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 7161201, \"title\": \"Manage [DEPRECATED]\", \"color\": \"#44AD8E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-19 05:48:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-19 11:52:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Please use the devops::manage label instead of this deprecated label. It is kept for historical issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1890178, \"title\": \"[deprecated] Accepting merge requests\", \"color\": \"#69d100\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 11:34:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-28 08:14:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"[deprecated] Please use \\\"Seeking community contributions\\\" instead. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/developer-relations/contributor-success/team-task/-/issues/77\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1672341, \"title\": \"customer\", \"color\": \"#ad4363\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that were reported by Enterprise Edition subscribers. This label should be accompanied by either the 'bug' or 'feature proposal' label\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 4107658, \"title\": \"graphs\", \"color\": \"#428bca\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the project Graphs pages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15237307, \"title\": \"icebox\", \"color\": \"#d6ecef\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:25:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:35:52 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues on which no work is anticipated in the next several milestones but which may be considered for work shortly thereafter thus not closed.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2936416, \"title\": \"popular proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Feature proposals deemed popular by our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/triage) will have this label applied\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2714266, \"title\": \"potential proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label added by triage tools to mark interesting feature proposals for consideration\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@dbogatov Thanks for the proposal. We'll just have to leave this open and see if it becomes a popular request.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73cf193764726f4ed724d78d4b59d4f81efe83cc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978957, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@wagnerpinheiro, [S]LOC metrics are rather old. They are not actual now (only in 80-90s they were). Your idea is pretty but only for developers ego. For really gentlemen customers GITLAB maybe have to improve their charts with different modern metrics. As example, for analyzing object-oriented languages they can add metric of Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 19:52:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 346483, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978961, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@yachmenov_c_ I have to admit, I had to look up what Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer metrics were. And yes, I would love to see those metrics in GitLab.\\n\\n**However**, I feel like it is quite hard (or say, resource heavy) to implement those. Each language will have to provide a service to get OOP relations. We cannot derive those metrics just by parsing the text.\\n\\n**On the other side**, simple line counter per language (even the one which omits comments and empty lines) is relatively easy to implement.\\n\\nAs for developers' ego, I have to admit it would not mind seeing LOC metrics, but I am sure there are other reasons for these metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:00:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978963, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, I mostly agree with you, really they can implement functionality you mentioned, and it would be great. Nice point!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"ZD ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/80860\\n\\nA Customer requested this feature. :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 695248, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2dba3df39df1cd81040cb0bc86091470aac43ffa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978965, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This would be awesome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 239547, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"604137042a54634c99ba7cda9b19e4db3570b396\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is getting popular\\n\\n@DouweM ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" for this one?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f1bbac293ede2d142630a69c9b499642ce9a40f8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher I think it may not be well defined enough yet for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" . We removed the repository language a while ago because it didn't perform well, so we'll need to figure out way to restore it without reintroducing the performance issue.\\n\\nThis is related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/40236 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23931. \\n\\n/cc @jramsay\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 87854, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23bac7a1ece7d87f5607254715120cb9067506ea\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978986, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If we can provide a foundation in gitlab-ce#23931 that computes the language stats without performance, we could definitely open this up for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1187333, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:16:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:17:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1187333, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"812e8d43c4b74c029c7327a6b783be67b2a0cd78\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978988, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Having the LOC in the table with the language breakdown and percentage would be great.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4a841d10fb4925ca2b102435a39a249fb1f1bb39\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hello,\\n\\nDisplay the LOC in the chart would be a very nice feature :slight_smile: \\n\\nAny update about this ?\\n\\nThank you very much.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2182793, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55170edc6cc50d1a2a20760c0bd5760b0dba68b6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978998, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi,\\u00a0I haven't heard anything back yet.\\nDennis\\nDennis Biringer | Principal Software EngineerPacific Defense Systems, LLC (PDS)Integrity Applications Incorporated535 Lipoa Parkway\\u00a0 Suite 101, Kihei HI, 96753dbiringer@integrity-apps.com(808) 214-0765\\n\\n[smime.p7s](/uploads/e849eea0083b79828f578febe315bdcd/smime.p7s)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55168747dda9172740a2eaa5e847403ed43121de\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979004, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We also would like to see the total number of lines of code, files, etc. Thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a6edf2d747aa859d84a4adfab95b10d53d7774d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979005, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@shellyniz Currently it's presented as a percentage via the API:\\n- https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#languages\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d201f77821e20f12477856580eab2e40804cc2dd\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979019, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Silly me, I was looking for it under the repo API. That's a big help, thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"093b696a8537efb99106d9d0b003220eb6ee8c01\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979020, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\\n\\nIt's a great feature to have especially if you're to brag about how much work has been put into the project in a presentation or something.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 709639, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:05:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:07:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b43271d3058f31f25e92e49015ea9efc4afc7d0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979022, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't see us getting to this anytime soon, but I'm happy to label this with gitlab-ce~1890178 for a community contribution. \\n\\nWe express languages as % of repo, might we also show the absolute LOC? The Charts page might be a sensible place to display this. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/graphs/master/charts for an example. The project overview page could also work, we currently use a multi-colored horizontal line to represent this and show percentages there on mouseover.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:16:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:18:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1f57d0559fe42979c7e6d35e07dbbbb6131d9855\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979029, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @jeremy\\\\_ \\nDo you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'?And so 'Total Lines Number'?\\nWhat's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34d9eb930ce114af06333350c5ff55483637cf7e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979031, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @markglenfletcher \\nIt's very good things that showing percent,but lines number complete it's feature,doesn't?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a92bea136cc9e32d787aa5742ed869a21d2ab49c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979032, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Do you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'? And so 'Total Lines Number'? What's your opinion?\\n\\nI'd love to hear your proposal, but I think the Charts page may be an easy place to add this:\\n\\n![image](/uploads/198f585f7e807ed931757b47a519d135/image.png)\\n\\nWe could include a separate column for LOC on each row, and include a \\\"Total\\\" row at the bottom that displays the sum of the rows. What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 06:32:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-24 12:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-10 12:54:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979035, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"any update about this feature ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2346644, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"075f869895c6f828be69c382f91a4a9b2dba20b5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\nLines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\nThat all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 101578, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"570bda01e243b5cf50fce1ba6adb9cd4605169f4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979038, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Not sure if this helps anyone, but if you use GitBash (or linux terminal) and go into your local repo and type this command:\\n`find . -not -path \\u201c*/.git/*\\u201d | xargs wc -l`\\nYou get the total line counts. No extra things to install - just a bash command.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2223731, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a894203f7adeeb1a1ed60f595000c3d28bf650ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979039, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is another possible way by using the git ls-files command with a file type filter.\\n\\n* Java example: `git ls-files *.java *.xml | xargs wc -l`\\n* Ruby example: `git ls-files *.rb Rakefile Gemfile | xargs wc -l`\\n\\nOr whatever files you want to include in your count. It can also works in subfolders to provide counts of just the contents of that folder.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2814876, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78a3685ac84f3e9f6999bd406e3ee07296be78f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979041, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My developer ego gives +1 for this stats. I think, if you count the lines anyway, it might be no problem to offer different stats as options, because the counting might be the most expensive part anyway. \\n\\n*Yeah* for looking at your developer productivity in numbers. :-)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a8d439996cd80acb0e887e19d4c7a32c3b38f3f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979042, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is not graphical and not included in gitlab, but it serves my interest totally. Also it might be a good starting point for Gitlab's implementation: \\n\\nhttps://github.com/AlDanial/cloc\\n\\nUse `cloc --vcs git` to count only watched files in a git repository.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e05053a4fedccfbd67d6045862d003aaff0c6202\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979043, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@aakriti.gupta, should we just close this one in favor of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104, since it's a prerequisite?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:46:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979061, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, yes, we will take everything from this one in account - it's planned for 12.2. Do you want to comment on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104? What's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3511154, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"45e71e7ac76abec3784d03cbdb2b1cbc301899ff\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979063, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This should not be moved to EE as the initial feature was added by the community.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5ac02291aab2c6a295e4df9adacd278f1278fc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979064, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @max-wittig for pointing out! The EE issue has more content, which will be available on group/instance level. We would like to move all analytics into one space in the top nav bar, so will be thinking through how to combine what is in cc now and the additional functionality we will be adding in ee. Any feedback is welcome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"50ead744b305fa1f532705f92d1dbd1b1ec7a298\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979065, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"As mentioned below, as long as we keep the history through a merge or copying over information, it sounds good to close this with an update @valexieva :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4158075, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979066, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@valexieva I wrote a small script, which reports the languages an instance has by exporting prometheus metrics. Relying just on absolute values would make a lot more sense, than the approach that I'm using now. But I won't use absolute numbers, if `EE` is required for this.\\n\\nhttps://github.com/max-wittig/gitlab-languages\\n\\nI think it would be fine, if the Graph feature stays in EE, but it would be nice, if the API would return absolute numbers.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:35:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:42:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1283330, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7bde2d02397a5cb7ae5b0b940c065224158203f5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979067, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Keeping this open until we complete: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13163. After that will close, the existing functionality will be available in CE, further functionality as per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104 in EE.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"94574f2b40c78694f4096c523c514fcca93041ce\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi, we have scheduled LOC plus language trends for 12.3 - please find here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104#note_194198775. We will also ensure that it's available for CE users in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/65616 before we remove the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/graphs/master/charts\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"16af6bd6af9d839ee0856e4771ce2d012a7dc48e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979073, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Github provides this feature, it would be nice to be able to obtain comparable metrics from Gitlab as we are using both.\\n\\nOur use case to get these numbers is for figuring out the prevalence of code in any given language across our entire codebase to inform us with requirements for code analysis tools etc. \\\"90% of language Y in repository X\\\" without any context to the number is mostly a useless metric. We need to understand how much language Y there is in totality across our multiple SCM systems. Now i can only count how many repos have a given language in general which is not exactly the same thing.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 14:53:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291742295, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@unitysipu \\nI would say for your use case it is better to just create a tool that clones all the repos you want metrics on and runs cloc or a similar tool - https://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\nHaving these metrics across groups/organizations in github and gitlab makes less sense to me than to provide some information about what powers a given project.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291953639, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The amount of code often correlates with things like risk. It's sorta interesting from analysis point of view if you have projects that have 500, 5000, 500k or 5M lines of code. You may want to prioritize or categorize the big projects over the small ones (obviously that's not the full picture, depends on what that code is used for etc.). But just looking at our entire codebase / repositories from the top and knowing there's \\\"90% of PHP\\\" in some project without understanding there's a million lines of it doesn't really help. So while individual teams may have a good grasp of their project, somebody looking over our entire portfolio you need more information to figure out who you should get in touch with. Obviously you can also try to check the file size metrics etc. and try to filter out uninteresting file types or other similar cumbersome workarounds but it's just more work to land on data that could easily be provided by the platform directly.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292157164, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Even if you have 1000 repos, it would still not be that much work to write a tool that accumulates all the information using the method I described, and you're going to get it a lot faster than by asking gitlab to add a feature. \\nAs for expanding the scope of this issue to cover groups and organizations as a whole, I guess gitlab devs might consider that as an enterprise feature at some point.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292558285, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, *obviously* there are workarounds that require you to analyze all the source code yourself. That's not the point of this feature request. I see the conversation revolving around suggestions and local optimizations for individual teams / developers or the importance of the amount of code in context of individuals. I figured it's prudent to provide another point of view that may have an impact on the thinking of why it's important to have this implemented. There are other use cases for the LOC/Language metrics that can be of importance for somebody who is looking at your organization as a whole.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293145108, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Honestly, with that chain of argument: Why have a commit graph? You can do this locally on your git repo. Or why have a bugtracker? You can just install trac separately. Or why have a wiki? Haven't you heard of mediaWiki? And so on. \\n\\nFact is, that this is a standard feature that has many uses for individuals and companies (also for example if I actually will bother to contribute to a code base or if its not worth it because id have to learn X new languages).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4911777, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:42:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4911777, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"044bd214cb760ef42c44b314a3243601c4c2f6a7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:10:44 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299631157, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I disagree. It's absolutely not ridiculous at all to have _code metrics_ available in the source code repository you might use.\\n\\nAny external tool will have to analyse the code outside of the SCM makes the whole process inherently ineffective and slow by design. Gitlab (and github) already has the code inside it and therefore is in the best position to provide metrics and data on it. Furthermore, modern (sophisticated) code analysis tools _integrate directly_ with Github these days through Github applications, but even they cannot provide this data either without analyzing the entire codebase separately.\\n\\nWhile workarounds exist they are all bad in a large organization. I agree that it's clear this is not a priority based on the fact it's been open for two years, but also it's clear that the reasoning and discussion around this feature is very narrow and developer (ego) oriented.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:36:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"005fc553fd9580804c00dd974606b58258f6d149\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299627593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"##### For person\\nPeople expect it, since various metrics implemented in GitHub. At some point everyone just genuinely interested in those metrics even only for self-esteem. And it is frustrating to not find them on GitLab. And since GitHub made everyone think to have them out-of-the-box, people became lazy and don't want to pollute their work environment with some difficult code inspection tools that they will use once just because of curiosity. \\n\\n##### For big team\\nIf you are working in a solid company with big code base, and you professionally perform code analysis and give consulting based on it, then it is ridiculous to do it on the basis of GitHub or GitLab, likely you will need to have more sophisticated special tool for it.\\n\\n##### Conclusion\\nSo this feature is not a mandatory. In first place GitLab need to improve its role system, this is a real bummer:) But GitLab doesn't do it for 2 years, so probably they have more important tasks. I prefer to use GitHub because of role system and metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 635873, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 13:32:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:35:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"96c7f0adc49d8ea2d2f64108bea473166fe3f13c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293348432, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A premium/silver customer has requested for this feature over support ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/220808 (internal link)\\n\\nIn particular they'd like an ability to query statistics about lines of code per detected language type, within each, and across all repositories under a group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7536567, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 13:07:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 7536567, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80839b906be084dee24b6e6d95e01d91af4e6b4a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:56:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 612192220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am proposing in another issue to update an existing open source tool to add MBs of code to the reports.\\n\\nThis is related to helping customers (and prospects) be able to estimate the long term costs of security scanning solutions that charge by lines or MBs of code.\\n\\nIf the tool were a CI stage, but GitLab could receive and parse the report to a UI - then the compute for this would only performed for and paid by customers who want the counts.\\n\\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/233018\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-31 00:05:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 164827, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 388534468, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@DarwinJS the blocker for us on this feature is a line-counting capability in Gitaly.  I noticed that [SCC](https://github.com/boyter/scc) is written in Go, as Gitaly is.  Seems like that could be a very happy coincidence for us.  Did you happen to dive deep enough into SCC to have an opinion about how challenging it might be to integrate into Gitaly?\\n\\nNote for others: SCC is the line-counting software that Darwin recommended in his [blog post](https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 408694264, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bmiller1 the context is helpful.\\n\\nThis is in the %Backlog for awareness\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 586004666, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@djensen - I settled on SCC, rather than the long standing CLOC (Perl) due to it being written in a modern language and, if the author was not able to add features, the hopes that someone at GitLab would.\\n\\nI did dive into the internals, but don't know enough about Go Lang nor Gitaly to comment on whether the two would tango well.\\n\\nIt is lightning fast - which I noticed when processing www-gitlab-com.\\n\\nHave you thought of this as a sidekiq process - not sure how good it would be at doing per-commit differentials in Gitaly and doing the full repo in Gitaly may be a lot of excess compute if it does it every commit?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409124927, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just like source control, you don't need to count all the lines of code in a repo every time.\\n\\nOnce you have a known count of lines at a specific commit, you can just track the diffs after that to increase/decrease line count for specific code and languages.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409309581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes I understand.\\nWhat I'm trying to indicate is that the machinations to isolate net new lines and net removed lines of code may be more processing load than simply scheduling scc weekly?  Especially given the speed of scc.\\n\\nIf that might be true, the question is how timely do line counts need to be?\\n\\nI don't know the answer - just highlighting that if line counts don't need to be up to the minute, there might be a cheaper way to do it.  It would also possibly allow direct dependency on scc, rather than forking it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409329832, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e It is lightning fast\\n\\nYes it is!  It crunches the entire gitlab repo in about 3 seconds on my machine ([results here](https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2013041)).  Not bad.\\n\\n\u003e how timely do line counts need to be?  I don't know the answer\\n\\nMe either, but let's guess it needs to be somewhere between monthly and daily.  (Hourly and commitly seem unnecessarily specific.)  Maybe we could start at monthly and see how it goes?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409366938, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Or, maybe proponents could weigh in on the frequency.\\n\\nI feel a compromise might be:\\n\\n * maintain a _count per branch_ (which could be very helpful anyway)\\n * trigger a count on the _first commit_ of any new branch (or make counting an option?)\\n * update all branch counts _monthly_ (or, only branches that have a flag indicating that they should be counted)\\n\\nThat way, the regular update frequency is down to one count per project branch, per month, and Developers can force a new count by pushing a new branch (perhaps they might have a special case to have up-to-the-commit counts).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:50:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:54:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 5791080, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409381230, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In addition, I would like to understand uses cases for getting as fine as \\\"per branch\\\" code counts - what would someone use this for and how often?  If it is very occasional and/or for a bespoke purpose, they could just run scc themselves on a local copy.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 410590466, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Starter customer requesting this feature in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/172665\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f820fe272fadfd61eb4c19317bb2d45f71f25fa4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 416263002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\nAs the description states, the goal is to understand what the bar means, and see some absolute data. @jeremy Would the MVC here be to simply report the number of bytes, since that's what we're measuring?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 424775, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ccc8a3b61fc8f4f779b6b63486fb31d54c005cc9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 288529601, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[OneDev](https://github.com/theonedev/onedev) calculates SLOC per languages and display the trends over time which is quite interesting. An example trends here:\\n\\nhttps://code.onedev.io/projects/react/stats/lines\\n\\nOne can hover mouse on the trend to show SLOC by day. The initial calculation for a large repo such as Linux takes about 30 min, and the result will be cached. Subsequent updates for new commits will be fairly fast based on cache. Below is the logic for calculation if someone is interested:\\n\\nhttps://github.com/theonedev/onedev/blob/main/server-core/src/main/java/io/onedev/server/infomanager/DefaultCommitInfoManager.java\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7978344, \"created_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"19fa4567d0d0f1d5842c5ba6beae8267aebb0a4e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 483620034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is moving back to the %Backlog for the reasons described in ZJ's [comment above](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038). We're absolutely accepting merge requests on this one, but the Manage stage needs to prioritize other areas at the moment.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd32244cb8a10270e97506088fe7772e17dbcf11\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 242549553, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher please fix this ASAP.\\nI am surprised Gitlab has no protection against this crap.\\nYou will end up with people massively unsubscribing at best.\\n\\nP.S. This idiot keeps recreating accounts.\\nA simple post factum ban will not work.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 12:57:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 920678, \"type\": null, \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d54912a045e3ea6508b3cf9ea3c8d3f2c3f3784\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471910, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is a certain lag.\\nI suggest we do not subscribe back until admins fix it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503473194, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner I actually think this should go to ~\\\"group::source code\\\" , WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4156460, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 579827345, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI - Since Apex code is essentially extended Java with a few accompanying .xml metadata files, my customer was able to run `scc \\u2013count-as cls:java` to interpret Apex .cls files as Java.  scc understands the comment and syntax structure of Java and was able to correctly return the LOC.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 587249173, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I think that makes a lot of sense @ogolowinski\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4447217, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580171017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ogolowinski Yep, I agree. Thanks for changing the group.\\n\\nThis is going to remain in the backlog as it is not our current focus and based on [details](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#details) in the description, LOE will be quite high. Thanks.\\n\\ncc @cupini\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580236144, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@cupini I'm tagging @ljlane who is the PM for ~\\\"group::optimize\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4376883, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562100410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" ~\\\"self-managed\\\" ~customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\n* Link to request:  https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001Eo1h0\\n* Why interested: Want to report on all repos (instance-level) for languages used in repos for tools info\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: Workarounds are nice but would be nice to get an instance-view instantly \\n* PM to mention: @stkerr\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3288671, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-27 23:22:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562089576, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"An Ultimate customer is interested in this feature.\\n* Link to request: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000014HWYo\\n* Why interested: They have a need to report LoC for their Apex repos.\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: We have not found an adequate workaround\\n* PM to mention: @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-20 21:51:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 581438360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another Premium customer is interested in this feature: [#223248](https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/223248)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7272738, \"created_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e8ddc8cdcb1c801921ec5c22320c15c418b8826\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 622513819, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another customer inquiring if this function exists\\nhttps://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/161342\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fe28d2e0f29b158bfc492b79ea8883a16e1d5fb7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364390361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" Customer  interested in this feature [Internal Link](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001kHlpn)\\n\\ncc/ @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5250128, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-18 19:30:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:09:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3f6ffdb391745aec7053e4585f952953cbf32152\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 706872228, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer here: we compile this data periodically for use by the C-suite and even if the absolute numbers are representative of byte counts it is easy enough for me to use an estimate of bytes per line to get what I need.\\n\\nThe key is that I have nothing without absolute numbers.\\n\\nAlso, please consider the non-gitlab.com use case. Perhaps on our hosted instance we would be able to opt-in to a feature like this if it were available and we can decide for ourselves if the performance is acceptable.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78631ce204289b27d0730dbec72b8b9a7f770fec\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364645655, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My company is a Premium customer - we would really like to have this and even more metrics regarding type of language like number of components, files, etc.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5291964, \"created_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3790f9053863d8b679f99d4cc896f3ffb8c450e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 721314226, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"- SF: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000Ut0JyAAJ\\n- ZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/254826\\n\\n~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" customer is interested in this feature.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5537005, \"created_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af4170834a554c4135225876e22c91fadd8c35f2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 791792997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"1900 seat ~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" [Customer](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000002xBZQ) is interested in this feature.\\n\\n- Priority: ~\\\"customer priority::5\\\"  priority::\\n- Why interested: Customer is trying to find a way to report the total line of code across all GitLab projects.\\n- Problem they are trying to solve: Customer has some internal teams who are trying trying to integrate tooling with GitLab to measure and track code coverage. There\\u2019s a cost associated with expanding those other tools and without the ability to report the number of lines it's nearly impossible to estimate said cost.\\n- Current solution for this problem: none\\n- Impact to the customer of not having this: Inability to utilize other tools in conjunction with GitLab and thus slowing adoption of the platform.\\n- Questions: Are they're any other workarounds for this, even at a manual reporting level? \\n- PM to mention: @tlinz\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4748523, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-14 14:49:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-15 13:33:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e76285e7c35cbca1481c16ed2c1ad5b7d232b65e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 990978163, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A Premium customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\nZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/284853\\n\\nThe workaround mentioned [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_332427265) unfortunately is hitting this error at the moment. I wonder if you have thoughts about this @lyle ?\\n\\n```\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n3: from (irb):3\\n2: from lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb:85:in `path'\\n1: from lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/storage_settings.rb:65:in `legacy_disk_path'\\nGitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings::DirectPathAccessError (git disk access denied)\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10051186, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 08:09:53 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 924067966, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Seems related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350080. This was always a bit of a hack, and relied on manually executing `git` commands directly on the repo.\\n\\nYou could take (and modify) the same core:\\n\\n`/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l` and run it directly on the command line given a list of paths generated from `rails`\\n\\nThere's a bunch of caveats there though:\\n- `master` is not necessarily the default branch name (we transitioned in GitLab to `main` some time ago)\\n- It relies on counting the actual number of lines in a file `wc -l` and does it for every file in a repo. This will include licenses, headers, empty space and so on.\\n\\nThere are some additional thoughts in https://gist.github.com/mandiwise/dc53cb9da00856d7cdbb that have iterated on my approach from two years ago :sweat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 925281183, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bgadberry \\n\\nIt seems like with the additional customer problem you need solved that there should be another issue for this...?\\n\\n\u003e Customer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density.\\n\\nThis does not seem directly related. Correct me if I am wrong!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601066055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner You're correct. I was thinking the customer could calculate the metric manually once number of lines of code is made available. On second thought, I think we can calculate vulnerabilities per byte today. I'll report back if that suffices.\\n\\n@tmccaslin Is this vulnerability per byte/line of code metric something we've considered uncovering as part of SAST?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601093808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"It's not per _language_ but the following rails console snippet will give you an estimate of number of lines per `Project` on a self-managed instance where the `git-data` is on a partition or directly attached volume.\\n\\nIt can break a bit if there's no `master` branch or if a repository for some reason doesn't have a `HEAD`, so it's not at all bullet-proof.\\n\\n```ruby\\nheaders = ['path', 'lines','archived?']\\nreport_file = Tempfile.new(['project_lines','.csv'])\\n\\nCSV.open(report_file.path, \\\"wb\\\") do |csv|\\ncsv \u003c\u003c headers\\n   Project.all.each do |p|\\n      output = `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l`\\n      csv \u003c\u003c [p.full_path, Integer(output),p.archived?]\\n   end; nil\\nend\\n\\nreport_file.close\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2930750323d45742084b921bd0f102d58807df7b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 332427265, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, statistics counting total and per lang number of lines (in code files only) would be so nice and basic.  \\nIgnore empty lines for me is optional. \\n\\nGet stats manually / locally for a git repo is not a problem. But this issue asks for the UI of gitlab. And this is what I need as well. \\n\\nhere a link to the current state: (older links above are expired)  \\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts \\n\\nHere a link for more advanced stats ambitions:  \\nhttps://www.openhub.net/p/gitlab\\n\\nedit: btw: If this is not happening since 5 years because of performance issues, then just calculate it once a week and show the calculation date next to it. I guess most people do not need per hour stats about n lines of code. For me even once per month would be enough. (And thus could be used for #12104 as well)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:08:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-03 07:59:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 882141, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3bdba5e20eedfcedc7eb1c6272fa93798b138610\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:13:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951334872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In order to get this request some attention, this issue has been marked as a potentially interesting proposal as it meets the following criteria:\\n\\n* Labelled as a feature proposal\\n* More than 10 upvotes\\n* Unscheduled (not associated with a milestone)\\n\\nThanks for your proposal!\\n\\n\\n\\n/cc @markglenfletcher\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73b69edb26083c702d2514effe76ca7da2d40407\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978971, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 154953, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"63b6ff0026abcb2ee9df9b28041655c7ab9fe563\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979021, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@billclark agreed\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2414870, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1328954e3c5076176230b846b4da51543092429b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If you do, make sure you somehow transfer the popularity and influence as well. \\nThis issue has 2 years of (possible sparse) history and 300+ upvotes. \\nThe newer one is month long. \\n\\nIt may make more sense to either transfer this one to EE, or merge the other one to here.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5db704a8ce0f10d43344ec9d98767153458c3c76\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979062, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"this just counts the raw line number of the files treated as pieces of texts. I guess what people want here is more like a per-language breakdown.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e32505249798e1b3e040ded861516658150259c6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979040, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Is there a way to get this data using the API?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0603dc2249187fa36328ff2f92debfc6c7db79d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"No it is not. That would be something for @matt_wilson to consider with the security dashboard.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5329074, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601097241, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We need more cowbell!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 196721, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616b443b97ad1443c199fb5f0af9780b51ddf379\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts is that what it looks today? seems like a regression.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951315993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I would like a total number of lines not including blank ones.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dcb61a50851d774190fa590cddf3e19f7a753f83\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979036, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer would also like to track lines of code per developer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404096482, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just started to use gitlab, and this is one the first stats i hoped to see in the \\\"Charts\\\", however i was surprised it's missing :(\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3219145, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-22 10:59:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979033, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"how come I can still receive notifications even if I unsubscribed???\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:19:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471203, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001FRuq0\\n\\nCustomer would like to see number of lines of code per language excluding comments. \\n\\n/cc @npost\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-30 01:30:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:47:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 387929331, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer interested in this feature. https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000W2eBo (Internal link)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4587928, \"created_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"35a9711c22330d7480c21b516ab890edccb85fb6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 258382372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"i will join, i want see my ego\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 688008, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8993bd8d42c15974c7f1eee7b8601e71e505626f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979006, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"for a company that has thousands of repositories that's just completely ineffective\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292139470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@bgadberry The customer may be able to pull the necessary vulnerability count information from the existing GraphQL API. I've never heard a request for this functionality before and don't have any plans to include it in the Security Dashboard reports so pulling the data and creating their own reports is the best way forward if this is needed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4708748, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601110834, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Same here!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4122216, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979054, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The developer of scc responded to proposals to update the code as desired. Resultant code is in this blog article: https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story and being worked into this working example for GitLab CI CD: https://gitlab.com/guided-explorations/ci-cd-plugin-extensions/ci-cd-plugin-extension-scc\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404663419, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@mlockhart in the context of an MVC I think we need to stick with measuring the default branch only, because that's what the Repository Analytics page is currently doing ([example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts)).\\n\\nOn the bright side, it seems the existing byte counts are being [updated on push](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/git/branch_push_service.rb#L54).  That makes me hopeful we could match that frequency with line counts.  So let's tentatively say the MVC would be updated pushly (instead of monthly like I proposed above).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409398149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Gold customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/154631 with a slight twist: they'd like to see the number of lines by group/sub-group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-24 18:02:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:37:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3b5c50effe1ea33f7f938b5693032964c2bdc512\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:46:35 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 331168435, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001lc3Cc\\n\\nCustomer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density. \\n\\n/cc @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 19:45:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 600990593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Had a similar request. I was able to get this info by extracting the Gitlab backup repositories from a backup and unbundling everything then running the following utility on the directory.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut it would be nice to see this kind of information on a project / server admin level, just to provide an overview of things currently within GitLab user / admin interfaces.\\r\\n\\r\\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\r\\n\\r\\n![image](/uploads/2e9c9fd05358a6e80411bfb9b323c214/image.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 261290, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:15:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-22 12:20:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 261290, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"186117b5b28df4eca7f2419b17ad900f90e61728\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:42:31 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978968, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Please add a chart with the SLOC metric, it is a metric more useful than the number of commits\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1276118, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 14:50:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 07:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"735fd7ef77d0bd7463126f7436eda8691d678998\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978960, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 695248, \"username\": \"lbot\", \"name\": \"Lee Matos\"}, {\"id\": 239547, \"username\": \"wil.rodriguez\", \"name\": \"William Rodriguez\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 87854, \"username\": \"DouweM\", \"name\": \"Douwe Maan\"}, {\"id\": 1187333, \"username\": \"jramsay-gitlab\", \"name\": \"James Ramsay (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 2182793, \"username\": \"craph1\", \"name\": \"craph\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 709639, \"username\": \"omidontop\", \"name\": \"Omid Manikhi\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 2346644, \"username\": \"ariaieboy\", \"name\": \"AriaieBOY\"}, {\"id\": 101578, \"username\": \"zj-gitlab\", \"name\": \"Zeger-Jan van de Weg\"}, {\"id\": 2223731, \"username\": \"bobbymcgill\", \"name\": \"Bobby McGill\"}, {\"id\": 2814876, \"username\": \"jim.robbins\", \"name\": \"Jim Robbins\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 4158075, \"username\": \"aakriti.gupta\", \"name\": \"Aakriti Gupta\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4911777, \"username\": \"i.hayden\", \"name\": \"Immanuel Hayden\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 635873, \"username\": \"pisarik\", \"name\": \"Vlad Blazhko\"}, {\"id\": 7536567, \"username\": \"hchouraria\", \"name\": \"Harsh Chouraria\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 424775, \"username\": \"markpundsack\", \"name\": \"Mark Pundsack\"}, {\"id\": 7978344, \"username\": \"robinshine\", \"name\": \"Robin Shen\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 4156460, \"username\": \"ogolowinski\", \"name\": \"Orit Golowinski\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 4447217, \"username\": \"ljlane\", \"name\": \"Larissa Lane\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4376883, \"username\": \"stkerr\", \"name\": \"Sam Kerr\"}, {\"id\": 3288671, \"username\": \"cupini\", \"name\": \"Brian Cupini\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 7272738, \"username\": \"kategrechishkina\", \"name\": \"Kate Grechishkina\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 5250128, \"username\": \"ricardoamarilla\", \"name\": \"Ricardo Amarilla\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 5291964, \"username\": \"crispindev\", \"name\": \"crispin velez\"}, {\"id\": 5537005, \"username\": \"cleveland\", \"name\": \"Cleveland Bledsoe Jr\"}, {\"id\": 4748523, \"username\": \"sheininger\", \"name\": \"Steffen Heininger\"}, {\"id\": 10051186, \"username\": \"kballon\", \"name\": \"Kent Japhet Ballon\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 154953, \"username\": \"Zandor300\", \"name\": \"Zandor Smith\"}, {\"id\": 2414870, \"username\": \"mason1920\", \"name\": \"mason1920\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 5329074, \"username\": \"tmccaslin\", \"name\": \"Taylor McCaslin\"}, {\"id\": 196721, \"username\": \"billclark\", \"name\": \"Bill Clark\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 3219145, \"username\": \"spprint\", \"name\": \"Sven Vet\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 4587928, \"username\": \"cbazan1\", \"name\": \"Carlos Bazan\"}, {\"id\": 688008, \"username\": \"friuns\", \"name\": \"friuns\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4708748, \"username\": \"matt_wilson\", \"name\": \"Matt Wilson\"}, {\"id\": 4122216, \"username\": \"saunved\", \"name\": \"Saunved Mutalik\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 261290, \"username\": \"TRPmwiesen\", \"name\": \"Matthew Wiesen\"}, {\"id\": 1276118, \"username\": \"wagnerpinheiro\", \"name\": \"Wagner Pinheiro\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Could you summarize this issue?","query_id":"ef325647d6734c6180b248ac2cb0cc99","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"24652824","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 24652824, \"title\": \"Report number of lines per language in repository charts\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-15 17:20:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"### Description\\n\\nAs of now, repository charts report percentage of language in the repo.\\nFirst, it is not obvious how this percentage is computed (number of files? number of lines? bytes? what about comments? libraries?). Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\n### Proposal\\n\\nAs a user I would like to see the number of lines of code per language.\\nIdeally, excluding blank lines and comments, but that is optional.\\n\\n### Documentation blurb\\n\\nAs for use cases:\\n* better understand the repo structure\\n* if this is your repo, being able to report the number of lines of your main language\\n    * this is one of the metric employers would like to know (I personally was surprised by this question on interview and could not clearly respond)\\n* all those use cases for general repo graphs (like pie chart of languages)\\n\\n### Details\\n\\n[A useful comment from ZJ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038):\\n\\n\u003e Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\n\u003e Lines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\n\u003e That all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\\n\\n### Potential Workarounds\\n\\n- Run `scc` in a GitLab CI pipeline: https://github.com/boyter/scc to generate SLOC/etc. reports\\n- If API use is acceptable (instead of UI), parts of its output stats can be stored as custom attributes on the project: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/custom_attributes.html#set-custom-attribute\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 17800, \"updated_by_id\": 5749302, \"weight\": 8, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -14979600, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-07-17 16:10:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 7536567, \"discussion_locked\": false, \"closed_at\": \"2023-01-19 09:38:40 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 579, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11039421, \"title\": \"Category:Code Analytics\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-18 19:25:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:07:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 7161201, \"title\": \"Manage [DEPRECATED]\", \"color\": \"#44AD8E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-19 05:48:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-19 11:52:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Please use the devops::manage label instead of this deprecated label. It is kept for historical issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1890178, \"title\": \"[deprecated] Accepting merge requests\", \"color\": \"#69d100\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 11:34:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-28 08:14:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"[deprecated] Please use \\\"Seeking community contributions\\\" instead. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/developer-relations/contributor-success/team-task/-/issues/77\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1672341, \"title\": \"customer\", \"color\": \"#ad4363\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that were reported by Enterprise Edition subscribers. This label should be accompanied by either the 'bug' or 'feature proposal' label\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 4107658, \"title\": \"graphs\", \"color\": \"#428bca\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the project Graphs pages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15237307, \"title\": \"icebox\", \"color\": \"#d6ecef\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:25:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:35:52 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues on which no work is anticipated in the next several milestones but which may be considered for work shortly thereafter thus not closed.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2936416, \"title\": \"popular proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Feature proposals deemed popular by our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/triage) will have this label applied\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2714266, \"title\": \"potential proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label added by triage tools to mark interesting feature proposals for consideration\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@dbogatov Thanks for the proposal. We'll just have to leave this open and see if it becomes a popular request.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73cf193764726f4ed724d78d4b59d4f81efe83cc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978957, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@wagnerpinheiro, [S]LOC metrics are rather old. They are not actual now (only in 80-90s they were). Your idea is pretty but only for developers ego. For really gentlemen customers GITLAB maybe have to improve their charts with different modern metrics. As example, for analyzing object-oriented languages they can add metric of Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 19:52:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 346483, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978961, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@yachmenov_c_ I have to admit, I had to look up what Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer metrics were. And yes, I would love to see those metrics in GitLab.\\n\\n**However**, I feel like it is quite hard (or say, resource heavy) to implement those. Each language will have to provide a service to get OOP relations. We cannot derive those metrics just by parsing the text.\\n\\n**On the other side**, simple line counter per language (even the one which omits comments and empty lines) is relatively easy to implement.\\n\\nAs for developers' ego, I have to admit it would not mind seeing LOC metrics, but I am sure there are other reasons for these metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:00:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978963, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, I mostly agree with you, really they can implement functionality you mentioned, and it would be great. Nice point!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"ZD ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/80860\\n\\nA Customer requested this feature. :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 695248, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2dba3df39df1cd81040cb0bc86091470aac43ffa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978965, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This would be awesome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 239547, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"604137042a54634c99ba7cda9b19e4db3570b396\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is getting popular\\n\\n@DouweM ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" for this one?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f1bbac293ede2d142630a69c9b499642ce9a40f8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher I think it may not be well defined enough yet for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" . We removed the repository language a while ago because it didn't perform well, so we'll need to figure out way to restore it without reintroducing the performance issue.\\n\\nThis is related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/40236 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23931. \\n\\n/cc @jramsay\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 87854, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23bac7a1ece7d87f5607254715120cb9067506ea\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978986, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If we can provide a foundation in gitlab-ce#23931 that computes the language stats without performance, we could definitely open this up for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1187333, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:16:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:17:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1187333, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"812e8d43c4b74c029c7327a6b783be67b2a0cd78\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978988, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Having the LOC in the table with the language breakdown and percentage would be great.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4a841d10fb4925ca2b102435a39a249fb1f1bb39\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hello,\\n\\nDisplay the LOC in the chart would be a very nice feature :slight_smile: \\n\\nAny update about this ?\\n\\nThank you very much.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2182793, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55170edc6cc50d1a2a20760c0bd5760b0dba68b6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978998, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi,\\u00a0I haven't heard anything back yet.\\nDennis\\nDennis Biringer | Principal Software EngineerPacific Defense Systems, LLC (PDS)Integrity Applications Incorporated535 Lipoa Parkway\\u00a0 Suite 101, Kihei HI, 96753dbiringer@integrity-apps.com(808) 214-0765\\n\\n[smime.p7s](/uploads/e849eea0083b79828f578febe315bdcd/smime.p7s)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55168747dda9172740a2eaa5e847403ed43121de\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979004, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We also would like to see the total number of lines of code, files, etc. Thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a6edf2d747aa859d84a4adfab95b10d53d7774d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979005, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@shellyniz Currently it's presented as a percentage via the API:\\n- https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#languages\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d201f77821e20f12477856580eab2e40804cc2dd\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979019, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Silly me, I was looking for it under the repo API. That's a big help, thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"093b696a8537efb99106d9d0b003220eb6ee8c01\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979020, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\\n\\nIt's a great feature to have especially if you're to brag about how much work has been put into the project in a presentation or something.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 709639, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:05:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:07:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b43271d3058f31f25e92e49015ea9efc4afc7d0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979022, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't see us getting to this anytime soon, but I'm happy to label this with gitlab-ce~1890178 for a community contribution. \\n\\nWe express languages as % of repo, might we also show the absolute LOC? The Charts page might be a sensible place to display this. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/graphs/master/charts for an example. The project overview page could also work, we currently use a multi-colored horizontal line to represent this and show percentages there on mouseover.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:16:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:18:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1f57d0559fe42979c7e6d35e07dbbbb6131d9855\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979029, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @jeremy\\\\_ \\nDo you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'?And so 'Total Lines Number'?\\nWhat's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34d9eb930ce114af06333350c5ff55483637cf7e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979031, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @markglenfletcher \\nIt's very good things that showing percent,but lines number complete it's feature,doesn't?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a92bea136cc9e32d787aa5742ed869a21d2ab49c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979032, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Do you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'? And so 'Total Lines Number'? What's your opinion?\\n\\nI'd love to hear your proposal, but I think the Charts page may be an easy place to add this:\\n\\n![image](/uploads/198f585f7e807ed931757b47a519d135/image.png)\\n\\nWe could include a separate column for LOC on each row, and include a \\\"Total\\\" row at the bottom that displays the sum of the rows. What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 06:32:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-24 12:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-10 12:54:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979035, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"any update about this feature ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2346644, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"075f869895c6f828be69c382f91a4a9b2dba20b5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\nLines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\nThat all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 101578, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"570bda01e243b5cf50fce1ba6adb9cd4605169f4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979038, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Not sure if this helps anyone, but if you use GitBash (or linux terminal) and go into your local repo and type this command:\\n`find . -not -path \\u201c*/.git/*\\u201d | xargs wc -l`\\nYou get the total line counts. No extra things to install - just a bash command.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2223731, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a894203f7adeeb1a1ed60f595000c3d28bf650ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979039, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is another possible way by using the git ls-files command with a file type filter.\\n\\n* Java example: `git ls-files *.java *.xml | xargs wc -l`\\n* Ruby example: `git ls-files *.rb Rakefile Gemfile | xargs wc -l`\\n\\nOr whatever files you want to include in your count. It can also works in subfolders to provide counts of just the contents of that folder.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2814876, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78a3685ac84f3e9f6999bd406e3ee07296be78f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979041, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My developer ego gives +1 for this stats. I think, if you count the lines anyway, it might be no problem to offer different stats as options, because the counting might be the most expensive part anyway. \\n\\n*Yeah* for looking at your developer productivity in numbers. :-)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a8d439996cd80acb0e887e19d4c7a32c3b38f3f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979042, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is not graphical and not included in gitlab, but it serves my interest totally. Also it might be a good starting point for Gitlab's implementation: \\n\\nhttps://github.com/AlDanial/cloc\\n\\nUse `cloc --vcs git` to count only watched files in a git repository.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e05053a4fedccfbd67d6045862d003aaff0c6202\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979043, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@aakriti.gupta, should we just close this one in favor of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104, since it's a prerequisite?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:46:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979061, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, yes, we will take everything from this one in account - it's planned for 12.2. Do you want to comment on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104? What's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3511154, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"45e71e7ac76abec3784d03cbdb2b1cbc301899ff\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979063, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This should not be moved to EE as the initial feature was added by the community.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5ac02291aab2c6a295e4df9adacd278f1278fc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979064, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @max-wittig for pointing out! The EE issue has more content, which will be available on group/instance level. We would like to move all analytics into one space in the top nav bar, so will be thinking through how to combine what is in cc now and the additional functionality we will be adding in ee. Any feedback is welcome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"50ead744b305fa1f532705f92d1dbd1b1ec7a298\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979065, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"As mentioned below, as long as we keep the history through a merge or copying over information, it sounds good to close this with an update @valexieva :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4158075, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979066, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@valexieva I wrote a small script, which reports the languages an instance has by exporting prometheus metrics. Relying just on absolute values would make a lot more sense, than the approach that I'm using now. But I won't use absolute numbers, if `EE` is required for this.\\n\\nhttps://github.com/max-wittig/gitlab-languages\\n\\nI think it would be fine, if the Graph feature stays in EE, but it would be nice, if the API would return absolute numbers.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:35:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:42:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1283330, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7bde2d02397a5cb7ae5b0b940c065224158203f5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979067, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Keeping this open until we complete: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13163. After that will close, the existing functionality will be available in CE, further functionality as per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104 in EE.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"94574f2b40c78694f4096c523c514fcca93041ce\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi, we have scheduled LOC plus language trends for 12.3 - please find here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104#note_194198775. We will also ensure that it's available for CE users in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/65616 before we remove the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/graphs/master/charts\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"16af6bd6af9d839ee0856e4771ce2d012a7dc48e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979073, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Github provides this feature, it would be nice to be able to obtain comparable metrics from Gitlab as we are using both.\\n\\nOur use case to get these numbers is for figuring out the prevalence of code in any given language across our entire codebase to inform us with requirements for code analysis tools etc. \\\"90% of language Y in repository X\\\" without any context to the number is mostly a useless metric. We need to understand how much language Y there is in totality across our multiple SCM systems. Now i can only count how many repos have a given language in general which is not exactly the same thing.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 14:53:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291742295, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@unitysipu \\nI would say for your use case it is better to just create a tool that clones all the repos you want metrics on and runs cloc or a similar tool - https://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\nHaving these metrics across groups/organizations in github and gitlab makes less sense to me than to provide some information about what powers a given project.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291953639, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The amount of code often correlates with things like risk. It's sorta interesting from analysis point of view if you have projects that have 500, 5000, 500k or 5M lines of code. You may want to prioritize or categorize the big projects over the small ones (obviously that's not the full picture, depends on what that code is used for etc.). But just looking at our entire codebase / repositories from the top and knowing there's \\\"90% of PHP\\\" in some project without understanding there's a million lines of it doesn't really help. So while individual teams may have a good grasp of their project, somebody looking over our entire portfolio you need more information to figure out who you should get in touch with. Obviously you can also try to check the file size metrics etc. and try to filter out uninteresting file types or other similar cumbersome workarounds but it's just more work to land on data that could easily be provided by the platform directly.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292157164, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Even if you have 1000 repos, it would still not be that much work to write a tool that accumulates all the information using the method I described, and you're going to get it a lot faster than by asking gitlab to add a feature. \\nAs for expanding the scope of this issue to cover groups and organizations as a whole, I guess gitlab devs might consider that as an enterprise feature at some point.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292558285, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, *obviously* there are workarounds that require you to analyze all the source code yourself. That's not the point of this feature request. I see the conversation revolving around suggestions and local optimizations for individual teams / developers or the importance of the amount of code in context of individuals. I figured it's prudent to provide another point of view that may have an impact on the thinking of why it's important to have this implemented. There are other use cases for the LOC/Language metrics that can be of importance for somebody who is looking at your organization as a whole.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293145108, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Honestly, with that chain of argument: Why have a commit graph? You can do this locally on your git repo. Or why have a bugtracker? You can just install trac separately. Or why have a wiki? Haven't you heard of mediaWiki? And so on. \\n\\nFact is, that this is a standard feature that has many uses for individuals and companies (also for example if I actually will bother to contribute to a code base or if its not worth it because id have to learn X new languages).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4911777, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:42:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4911777, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"044bd214cb760ef42c44b314a3243601c4c2f6a7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:10:44 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299631157, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I disagree. It's absolutely not ridiculous at all to have _code metrics_ available in the source code repository you might use.\\n\\nAny external tool will have to analyse the code outside of the SCM makes the whole process inherently ineffective and slow by design. Gitlab (and github) already has the code inside it and therefore is in the best position to provide metrics and data on it. Furthermore, modern (sophisticated) code analysis tools _integrate directly_ with Github these days through Github applications, but even they cannot provide this data either without analyzing the entire codebase separately.\\n\\nWhile workarounds exist they are all bad in a large organization. I agree that it's clear this is not a priority based on the fact it's been open for two years, but also it's clear that the reasoning and discussion around this feature is very narrow and developer (ego) oriented.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:36:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"005fc553fd9580804c00dd974606b58258f6d149\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299627593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"##### For person\\nPeople expect it, since various metrics implemented in GitHub. At some point everyone just genuinely interested in those metrics even only for self-esteem. And it is frustrating to not find them on GitLab. And since GitHub made everyone think to have them out-of-the-box, people became lazy and don't want to pollute their work environment with some difficult code inspection tools that they will use once just because of curiosity. \\n\\n##### For big team\\nIf you are working in a solid company with big code base, and you professionally perform code analysis and give consulting based on it, then it is ridiculous to do it on the basis of GitHub or GitLab, likely you will need to have more sophisticated special tool for it.\\n\\n##### Conclusion\\nSo this feature is not a mandatory. In first place GitLab need to improve its role system, this is a real bummer:) But GitLab doesn't do it for 2 years, so probably they have more important tasks. I prefer to use GitHub because of role system and metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 635873, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 13:32:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:35:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"96c7f0adc49d8ea2d2f64108bea473166fe3f13c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293348432, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A premium/silver customer has requested for this feature over support ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/220808 (internal link)\\n\\nIn particular they'd like an ability to query statistics about lines of code per detected language type, within each, and across all repositories under a group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7536567, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 13:07:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 7536567, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80839b906be084dee24b6e6d95e01d91af4e6b4a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:56:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 612192220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am proposing in another issue to update an existing open source tool to add MBs of code to the reports.\\n\\nThis is related to helping customers (and prospects) be able to estimate the long term costs of security scanning solutions that charge by lines or MBs of code.\\n\\nIf the tool were a CI stage, but GitLab could receive and parse the report to a UI - then the compute for this would only performed for and paid by customers who want the counts.\\n\\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/233018\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-31 00:05:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 164827, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 388534468, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@DarwinJS the blocker for us on this feature is a line-counting capability in Gitaly.  I noticed that [SCC](https://github.com/boyter/scc) is written in Go, as Gitaly is.  Seems like that could be a very happy coincidence for us.  Did you happen to dive deep enough into SCC to have an opinion about how challenging it might be to integrate into Gitaly?\\n\\nNote for others: SCC is the line-counting software that Darwin recommended in his [blog post](https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 408694264, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bmiller1 the context is helpful.\\n\\nThis is in the %Backlog for awareness\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 586004666, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@djensen - I settled on SCC, rather than the long standing CLOC (Perl) due to it being written in a modern language and, if the author was not able to add features, the hopes that someone at GitLab would.\\n\\nI did dive into the internals, but don't know enough about Go Lang nor Gitaly to comment on whether the two would tango well.\\n\\nIt is lightning fast - which I noticed when processing www-gitlab-com.\\n\\nHave you thought of this as a sidekiq process - not sure how good it would be at doing per-commit differentials in Gitaly and doing the full repo in Gitaly may be a lot of excess compute if it does it every commit?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409124927, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just like source control, you don't need to count all the lines of code in a repo every time.\\n\\nOnce you have a known count of lines at a specific commit, you can just track the diffs after that to increase/decrease line count for specific code and languages.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409309581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes I understand.\\nWhat I'm trying to indicate is that the machinations to isolate net new lines and net removed lines of code may be more processing load than simply scheduling scc weekly?  Especially given the speed of scc.\\n\\nIf that might be true, the question is how timely do line counts need to be?\\n\\nI don't know the answer - just highlighting that if line counts don't need to be up to the minute, there might be a cheaper way to do it.  It would also possibly allow direct dependency on scc, rather than forking it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409329832, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e It is lightning fast\\n\\nYes it is!  It crunches the entire gitlab repo in about 3 seconds on my machine ([results here](https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2013041)).  Not bad.\\n\\n\u003e how timely do line counts need to be?  I don't know the answer\\n\\nMe either, but let's guess it needs to be somewhere between monthly and daily.  (Hourly and commitly seem unnecessarily specific.)  Maybe we could start at monthly and see how it goes?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409366938, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Or, maybe proponents could weigh in on the frequency.\\n\\nI feel a compromise might be:\\n\\n * maintain a _count per branch_ (which could be very helpful anyway)\\n * trigger a count on the _first commit_ of any new branch (or make counting an option?)\\n * update all branch counts _monthly_ (or, only branches that have a flag indicating that they should be counted)\\n\\nThat way, the regular update frequency is down to one count per project branch, per month, and Developers can force a new count by pushing a new branch (perhaps they might have a special case to have up-to-the-commit counts).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:50:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:54:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 5791080, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409381230, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In addition, I would like to understand uses cases for getting as fine as \\\"per branch\\\" code counts - what would someone use this for and how often?  If it is very occasional and/or for a bespoke purpose, they could just run scc themselves on a local copy.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 410590466, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Starter customer requesting this feature in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/172665\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f820fe272fadfd61eb4c19317bb2d45f71f25fa4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 416263002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\nAs the description states, the goal is to understand what the bar means, and see some absolute data. @jeremy Would the MVC here be to simply report the number of bytes, since that's what we're measuring?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 424775, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ccc8a3b61fc8f4f779b6b63486fb31d54c005cc9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 288529601, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[OneDev](https://github.com/theonedev/onedev) calculates SLOC per languages and display the trends over time which is quite interesting. An example trends here:\\n\\nhttps://code.onedev.io/projects/react/stats/lines\\n\\nOne can hover mouse on the trend to show SLOC by day. The initial calculation for a large repo such as Linux takes about 30 min, and the result will be cached. Subsequent updates for new commits will be fairly fast based on cache. Below is the logic for calculation if someone is interested:\\n\\nhttps://github.com/theonedev/onedev/blob/main/server-core/src/main/java/io/onedev/server/infomanager/DefaultCommitInfoManager.java\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7978344, \"created_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"19fa4567d0d0f1d5842c5ba6beae8267aebb0a4e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 483620034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is moving back to the %Backlog for the reasons described in ZJ's [comment above](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038). We're absolutely accepting merge requests on this one, but the Manage stage needs to prioritize other areas at the moment.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd32244cb8a10270e97506088fe7772e17dbcf11\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 242549553, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher please fix this ASAP.\\nI am surprised Gitlab has no protection against this crap.\\nYou will end up with people massively unsubscribing at best.\\n\\nP.S. This idiot keeps recreating accounts.\\nA simple post factum ban will not work.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 12:57:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 920678, \"type\": null, \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d54912a045e3ea6508b3cf9ea3c8d3f2c3f3784\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471910, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is a certain lag.\\nI suggest we do not subscribe back until admins fix it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503473194, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner I actually think this should go to ~\\\"group::source code\\\" , WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4156460, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 579827345, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI - Since Apex code is essentially extended Java with a few accompanying .xml metadata files, my customer was able to run `scc \\u2013count-as cls:java` to interpret Apex .cls files as Java.  scc understands the comment and syntax structure of Java and was able to correctly return the LOC.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 587249173, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I think that makes a lot of sense @ogolowinski\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4447217, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580171017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ogolowinski Yep, I agree. Thanks for changing the group.\\n\\nThis is going to remain in the backlog as it is not our current focus and based on [details](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#details) in the description, LOE will be quite high. Thanks.\\n\\ncc @cupini\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580236144, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@cupini I'm tagging @ljlane who is the PM for ~\\\"group::optimize\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4376883, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562100410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" ~\\\"self-managed\\\" ~customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\n* Link to request:  https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001Eo1h0\\n* Why interested: Want to report on all repos (instance-level) for languages used in repos for tools info\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: Workarounds are nice but would be nice to get an instance-view instantly \\n* PM to mention: @stkerr\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3288671, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-27 23:22:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562089576, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"An Ultimate customer is interested in this feature.\\n* Link to request: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000014HWYo\\n* Why interested: They have a need to report LoC for their Apex repos.\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: We have not found an adequate workaround\\n* PM to mention: @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-20 21:51:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 581438360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another Premium customer is interested in this feature: [#223248](https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/223248)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7272738, \"created_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e8ddc8cdcb1c801921ec5c22320c15c418b8826\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 622513819, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another customer inquiring if this function exists\\nhttps://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/161342\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fe28d2e0f29b158bfc492b79ea8883a16e1d5fb7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364390361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" Customer  interested in this feature [Internal Link](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001kHlpn)\\n\\ncc/ @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5250128, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-18 19:30:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:09:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3f6ffdb391745aec7053e4585f952953cbf32152\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 706872228, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer here: we compile this data periodically for use by the C-suite and even if the absolute numbers are representative of byte counts it is easy enough for me to use an estimate of bytes per line to get what I need.\\n\\nThe key is that I have nothing without absolute numbers.\\n\\nAlso, please consider the non-gitlab.com use case. Perhaps on our hosted instance we would be able to opt-in to a feature like this if it were available and we can decide for ourselves if the performance is acceptable.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78631ce204289b27d0730dbec72b8b9a7f770fec\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364645655, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My company is a Premium customer - we would really like to have this and even more metrics regarding type of language like number of components, files, etc.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5291964, \"created_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3790f9053863d8b679f99d4cc896f3ffb8c450e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 721314226, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"- SF: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000Ut0JyAAJ\\n- ZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/254826\\n\\n~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" customer is interested in this feature.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5537005, \"created_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af4170834a554c4135225876e22c91fadd8c35f2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 791792997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"1900 seat ~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" [Customer](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000002xBZQ) is interested in this feature.\\n\\n- Priority: ~\\\"customer priority::5\\\"  priority::\\n- Why interested: Customer is trying to find a way to report the total line of code across all GitLab projects.\\n- Problem they are trying to solve: Customer has some internal teams who are trying trying to integrate tooling with GitLab to measure and track code coverage. There\\u2019s a cost associated with expanding those other tools and without the ability to report the number of lines it's nearly impossible to estimate said cost.\\n- Current solution for this problem: none\\n- Impact to the customer of not having this: Inability to utilize other tools in conjunction with GitLab and thus slowing adoption of the platform.\\n- Questions: Are they're any other workarounds for this, even at a manual reporting level? \\n- PM to mention: @tlinz\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4748523, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-14 14:49:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-15 13:33:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e76285e7c35cbca1481c16ed2c1ad5b7d232b65e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 990978163, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A Premium customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\nZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/284853\\n\\nThe workaround mentioned [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_332427265) unfortunately is hitting this error at the moment. I wonder if you have thoughts about this @lyle ?\\n\\n```\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n3: from (irb):3\\n2: from lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb:85:in `path'\\n1: from lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/storage_settings.rb:65:in `legacy_disk_path'\\nGitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings::DirectPathAccessError (git disk access denied)\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10051186, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 08:09:53 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 924067966, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Seems related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350080. This was always a bit of a hack, and relied on manually executing `git` commands directly on the repo.\\n\\nYou could take (and modify) the same core:\\n\\n`/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l` and run it directly on the command line given a list of paths generated from `rails`\\n\\nThere's a bunch of caveats there though:\\n- `master` is not necessarily the default branch name (we transitioned in GitLab to `main` some time ago)\\n- It relies on counting the actual number of lines in a file `wc -l` and does it for every file in a repo. This will include licenses, headers, empty space and so on.\\n\\nThere are some additional thoughts in https://gist.github.com/mandiwise/dc53cb9da00856d7cdbb that have iterated on my approach from two years ago :sweat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 925281183, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bgadberry \\n\\nIt seems like with the additional customer problem you need solved that there should be another issue for this...?\\n\\n\u003e Customer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density.\\n\\nThis does not seem directly related. Correct me if I am wrong!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601066055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner You're correct. I was thinking the customer could calculate the metric manually once number of lines of code is made available. On second thought, I think we can calculate vulnerabilities per byte today. I'll report back if that suffices.\\n\\n@tmccaslin Is this vulnerability per byte/line of code metric something we've considered uncovering as part of SAST?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601093808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"It's not per _language_ but the following rails console snippet will give you an estimate of number of lines per `Project` on a self-managed instance where the `git-data` is on a partition or directly attached volume.\\n\\nIt can break a bit if there's no `master` branch or if a repository for some reason doesn't have a `HEAD`, so it's not at all bullet-proof.\\n\\n```ruby\\nheaders = ['path', 'lines','archived?']\\nreport_file = Tempfile.new(['project_lines','.csv'])\\n\\nCSV.open(report_file.path, \\\"wb\\\") do |csv|\\ncsv \u003c\u003c headers\\n   Project.all.each do |p|\\n      output = `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l`\\n      csv \u003c\u003c [p.full_path, Integer(output),p.archived?]\\n   end; nil\\nend\\n\\nreport_file.close\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2930750323d45742084b921bd0f102d58807df7b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 332427265, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, statistics counting total and per lang number of lines (in code files only) would be so nice and basic.  \\nIgnore empty lines for me is optional. \\n\\nGet stats manually / locally for a git repo is not a problem. But this issue asks for the UI of gitlab. And this is what I need as well. \\n\\nhere a link to the current state: (older links above are expired)  \\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts \\n\\nHere a link for more advanced stats ambitions:  \\nhttps://www.openhub.net/p/gitlab\\n\\nedit: btw: If this is not happening since 5 years because of performance issues, then just calculate it once a week and show the calculation date next to it. I guess most people do not need per hour stats about n lines of code. For me even once per month would be enough. (And thus could be used for #12104 as well)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:08:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-03 07:59:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 882141, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3bdba5e20eedfcedc7eb1c6272fa93798b138610\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:13:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951334872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In order to get this request some attention, this issue has been marked as a potentially interesting proposal as it meets the following criteria:\\n\\n* Labelled as a feature proposal\\n* More than 10 upvotes\\n* Unscheduled (not associated with a milestone)\\n\\nThanks for your proposal!\\n\\n\\n\\n/cc @markglenfletcher\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73b69edb26083c702d2514effe76ca7da2d40407\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978971, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 154953, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"63b6ff0026abcb2ee9df9b28041655c7ab9fe563\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979021, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@billclark agreed\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2414870, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1328954e3c5076176230b846b4da51543092429b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If you do, make sure you somehow transfer the popularity and influence as well. \\nThis issue has 2 years of (possible sparse) history and 300+ upvotes. \\nThe newer one is month long. \\n\\nIt may make more sense to either transfer this one to EE, or merge the other one to here.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5db704a8ce0f10d43344ec9d98767153458c3c76\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979062, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"this just counts the raw line number of the files treated as pieces of texts. I guess what people want here is more like a per-language breakdown.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e32505249798e1b3e040ded861516658150259c6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979040, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Is there a way to get this data using the API?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0603dc2249187fa36328ff2f92debfc6c7db79d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"No it is not. That would be something for @matt_wilson to consider with the security dashboard.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5329074, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601097241, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We need more cowbell!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 196721, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616b443b97ad1443c199fb5f0af9780b51ddf379\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts is that what it looks today? seems like a regression.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951315993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I would like a total number of lines not including blank ones.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dcb61a50851d774190fa590cddf3e19f7a753f83\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979036, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer would also like to track lines of code per developer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404096482, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just started to use gitlab, and this is one the first stats i hoped to see in the \\\"Charts\\\", however i was surprised it's missing :(\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3219145, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-22 10:59:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979033, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"how come I can still receive notifications even if I unsubscribed???\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:19:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471203, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001FRuq0\\n\\nCustomer would like to see number of lines of code per language excluding comments. \\n\\n/cc @npost\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-30 01:30:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:47:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 387929331, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer interested in this feature. https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000W2eBo (Internal link)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4587928, \"created_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"35a9711c22330d7480c21b516ab890edccb85fb6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 258382372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"i will join, i want see my ego\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 688008, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8993bd8d42c15974c7f1eee7b8601e71e505626f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979006, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"for a company that has thousands of repositories that's just completely ineffective\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292139470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@bgadberry The customer may be able to pull the necessary vulnerability count information from the existing GraphQL API. I've never heard a request for this functionality before and don't have any plans to include it in the Security Dashboard reports so pulling the data and creating their own reports is the best way forward if this is needed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4708748, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601110834, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Same here!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4122216, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979054, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The developer of scc responded to proposals to update the code as desired. Resultant code is in this blog article: https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story and being worked into this working example for GitLab CI CD: https://gitlab.com/guided-explorations/ci-cd-plugin-extensions/ci-cd-plugin-extension-scc\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404663419, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@mlockhart in the context of an MVC I think we need to stick with measuring the default branch only, because that's what the Repository Analytics page is currently doing ([example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts)).\\n\\nOn the bright side, it seems the existing byte counts are being [updated on push](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/git/branch_push_service.rb#L54).  That makes me hopeful we could match that frequency with line counts.  So let's tentatively say the MVC would be updated pushly (instead of monthly like I proposed above).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409398149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Gold customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/154631 with a slight twist: they'd like to see the number of lines by group/sub-group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-24 18:02:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:37:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3b5c50effe1ea33f7f938b5693032964c2bdc512\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:46:35 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 331168435, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001lc3Cc\\n\\nCustomer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density. \\n\\n/cc @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 19:45:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 600990593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Had a similar request. I was able to get this info by extracting the Gitlab backup repositories from a backup and unbundling everything then running the following utility on the directory.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut it would be nice to see this kind of information on a project / server admin level, just to provide an overview of things currently within GitLab user / admin interfaces.\\r\\n\\r\\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\r\\n\\r\\n![image](/uploads/2e9c9fd05358a6e80411bfb9b323c214/image.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 261290, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:15:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-22 12:20:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 261290, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"186117b5b28df4eca7f2419b17ad900f90e61728\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:42:31 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978968, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Please add a chart with the SLOC metric, it is a metric more useful than the number of commits\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1276118, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 14:50:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 07:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"735fd7ef77d0bd7463126f7436eda8691d678998\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978960, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 695248, \"username\": \"lbot\", \"name\": \"Lee Matos\"}, {\"id\": 239547, \"username\": \"wil.rodriguez\", \"name\": \"William Rodriguez\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 87854, \"username\": \"DouweM\", \"name\": \"Douwe Maan\"}, {\"id\": 1187333, \"username\": \"jramsay-gitlab\", \"name\": \"James Ramsay (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 2182793, \"username\": \"craph1\", \"name\": \"craph\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 709639, \"username\": \"omidontop\", \"name\": \"Omid Manikhi\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 2346644, \"username\": \"ariaieboy\", \"name\": \"AriaieBOY\"}, {\"id\": 101578, \"username\": \"zj-gitlab\", \"name\": \"Zeger-Jan van de Weg\"}, {\"id\": 2223731, \"username\": \"bobbymcgill\", \"name\": \"Bobby McGill\"}, {\"id\": 2814876, \"username\": \"jim.robbins\", \"name\": \"Jim Robbins\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 4158075, \"username\": \"aakriti.gupta\", \"name\": \"Aakriti Gupta\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4911777, \"username\": \"i.hayden\", \"name\": \"Immanuel Hayden\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 635873, \"username\": \"pisarik\", \"name\": \"Vlad Blazhko\"}, {\"id\": 7536567, \"username\": \"hchouraria\", \"name\": \"Harsh Chouraria\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 424775, \"username\": \"markpundsack\", \"name\": \"Mark Pundsack\"}, {\"id\": 7978344, \"username\": \"robinshine\", \"name\": \"Robin Shen\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 4156460, \"username\": \"ogolowinski\", \"name\": \"Orit Golowinski\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 4447217, \"username\": \"ljlane\", \"name\": \"Larissa Lane\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4376883, \"username\": \"stkerr\", \"name\": \"Sam Kerr\"}, {\"id\": 3288671, \"username\": \"cupini\", \"name\": \"Brian Cupini\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 7272738, \"username\": \"kategrechishkina\", \"name\": \"Kate Grechishkina\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 5250128, \"username\": \"ricardoamarilla\", \"name\": \"Ricardo Amarilla\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 5291964, \"username\": \"crispindev\", \"name\": \"crispin velez\"}, {\"id\": 5537005, \"username\": \"cleveland\", \"name\": \"Cleveland Bledsoe Jr\"}, {\"id\": 4748523, \"username\": \"sheininger\", \"name\": \"Steffen Heininger\"}, {\"id\": 10051186, \"username\": \"kballon\", \"name\": \"Kent Japhet Ballon\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 154953, \"username\": \"Zandor300\", \"name\": \"Zandor Smith\"}, {\"id\": 2414870, \"username\": \"mason1920\", \"name\": \"mason1920\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 5329074, \"username\": \"tmccaslin\", \"name\": \"Taylor McCaslin\"}, {\"id\": 196721, \"username\": \"billclark\", \"name\": \"Bill Clark\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 3219145, \"username\": \"spprint\", \"name\": \"Sven Vet\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 4587928, \"username\": \"cbazan1\", \"name\": \"Carlos Bazan\"}, {\"id\": 688008, \"username\": \"friuns\", \"name\": \"friuns\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4708748, \"username\": \"matt_wilson\", \"name\": \"Matt Wilson\"}, {\"id\": 4122216, \"username\": \"saunved\", \"name\": \"Saunved Mutalik\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 261290, \"username\": \"TRPmwiesen\", \"name\": \"Matthew Wiesen\"}, {\"id\": 1276118, \"username\": \"wagnerpinheiro\", \"name\": \"Wagner Pinheiro\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize this Issue.","query_id":"4ac8e3f4926145ffa32d33e38bd557be","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"24652824","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 24652824, \"title\": \"Report number of lines per language in repository charts\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-15 17:20:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"### Description\\n\\nAs of now, repository charts report percentage of language in the repo.\\nFirst, it is not obvious how this percentage is computed (number of files? number of lines? bytes? what about comments? libraries?). Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\n### Proposal\\n\\nAs a user I would like to see the number of lines of code per language.\\nIdeally, excluding blank lines and comments, but that is optional.\\n\\n### Documentation blurb\\n\\nAs for use cases:\\n* better understand the repo structure\\n* if this is your repo, being able to report the number of lines of your main language\\n    * this is one of the metric employers would like to know (I personally was surprised by this question on interview and could not clearly respond)\\n* all those use cases for general repo graphs (like pie chart of languages)\\n\\n### Details\\n\\n[A useful comment from ZJ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038):\\n\\n\u003e Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\n\u003e Lines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\n\u003e That all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\\n\\n### Potential Workarounds\\n\\n- Run `scc` in a GitLab CI pipeline: https://github.com/boyter/scc to generate SLOC/etc. reports\\n- If API use is acceptable (instead of UI), parts of its output stats can be stored as custom attributes on the project: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/custom_attributes.html#set-custom-attribute\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 17800, \"updated_by_id\": 5749302, \"weight\": 8, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -14979600, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-07-17 16:10:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 7536567, \"discussion_locked\": false, \"closed_at\": \"2023-01-19 09:38:40 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 579, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11039421, \"title\": \"Category:Code Analytics\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-18 19:25:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:07:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 7161201, \"title\": \"Manage [DEPRECATED]\", \"color\": \"#44AD8E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-19 05:48:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-19 11:52:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Please use the devops::manage label instead of this deprecated label. It is kept for historical issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1890178, \"title\": \"[deprecated] Accepting merge requests\", \"color\": \"#69d100\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 11:34:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-28 08:14:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"[deprecated] Please use \\\"Seeking community contributions\\\" instead. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/developer-relations/contributor-success/team-task/-/issues/77\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1672341, \"title\": \"customer\", \"color\": \"#ad4363\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that were reported by Enterprise Edition subscribers. This label should be accompanied by either the 'bug' or 'feature proposal' label\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 4107658, \"title\": \"graphs\", \"color\": \"#428bca\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the project Graphs pages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15237307, \"title\": \"icebox\", \"color\": \"#d6ecef\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:25:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:35:52 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues on which no work is anticipated in the next several milestones but which may be considered for work shortly thereafter thus not closed.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2936416, \"title\": \"popular proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Feature proposals deemed popular by our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/triage) will have this label applied\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2714266, \"title\": \"potential proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label added by triage tools to mark interesting feature proposals for consideration\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@dbogatov Thanks for the proposal. We'll just have to leave this open and see if it becomes a popular request.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73cf193764726f4ed724d78d4b59d4f81efe83cc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978957, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@wagnerpinheiro, [S]LOC metrics are rather old. They are not actual now (only in 80-90s they were). Your idea is pretty but only for developers ego. For really gentlemen customers GITLAB maybe have to improve their charts with different modern metrics. As example, for analyzing object-oriented languages they can add metric of Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 19:52:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 346483, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978961, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@yachmenov_c_ I have to admit, I had to look up what Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer metrics were. And yes, I would love to see those metrics in GitLab.\\n\\n**However**, I feel like it is quite hard (or say, resource heavy) to implement those. Each language will have to provide a service to get OOP relations. We cannot derive those metrics just by parsing the text.\\n\\n**On the other side**, simple line counter per language (even the one which omits comments and empty lines) is relatively easy to implement.\\n\\nAs for developers' ego, I have to admit it would not mind seeing LOC metrics, but I am sure there are other reasons for these metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:00:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978963, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, I mostly agree with you, really they can implement functionality you mentioned, and it would be great. Nice point!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"ZD ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/80860\\n\\nA Customer requested this feature. :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 695248, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2dba3df39df1cd81040cb0bc86091470aac43ffa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978965, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This would be awesome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 239547, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"604137042a54634c99ba7cda9b19e4db3570b396\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is getting popular\\n\\n@DouweM ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" for this one?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f1bbac293ede2d142630a69c9b499642ce9a40f8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher I think it may not be well defined enough yet for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" . We removed the repository language a while ago because it didn't perform well, so we'll need to figure out way to restore it without reintroducing the performance issue.\\n\\nThis is related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/40236 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23931. \\n\\n/cc @jramsay\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 87854, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23bac7a1ece7d87f5607254715120cb9067506ea\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978986, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If we can provide a foundation in gitlab-ce#23931 that computes the language stats without performance, we could definitely open this up for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1187333, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:16:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:17:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1187333, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"812e8d43c4b74c029c7327a6b783be67b2a0cd78\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978988, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Having the LOC in the table with the language breakdown and percentage would be great.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4a841d10fb4925ca2b102435a39a249fb1f1bb39\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hello,\\n\\nDisplay the LOC in the chart would be a very nice feature :slight_smile: \\n\\nAny update about this ?\\n\\nThank you very much.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2182793, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55170edc6cc50d1a2a20760c0bd5760b0dba68b6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978998, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi,\\u00a0I haven't heard anything back yet.\\nDennis\\nDennis Biringer | Principal Software EngineerPacific Defense Systems, LLC (PDS)Integrity Applications Incorporated535 Lipoa Parkway\\u00a0 Suite 101, Kihei HI, 96753dbiringer@integrity-apps.com(808) 214-0765\\n\\n[smime.p7s](/uploads/e849eea0083b79828f578febe315bdcd/smime.p7s)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55168747dda9172740a2eaa5e847403ed43121de\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979004, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We also would like to see the total number of lines of code, files, etc. Thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a6edf2d747aa859d84a4adfab95b10d53d7774d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979005, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@shellyniz Currently it's presented as a percentage via the API:\\n- https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#languages\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d201f77821e20f12477856580eab2e40804cc2dd\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979019, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Silly me, I was looking for it under the repo API. That's a big help, thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"093b696a8537efb99106d9d0b003220eb6ee8c01\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979020, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\\n\\nIt's a great feature to have especially if you're to brag about how much work has been put into the project in a presentation or something.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 709639, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:05:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:07:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b43271d3058f31f25e92e49015ea9efc4afc7d0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979022, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't see us getting to this anytime soon, but I'm happy to label this with gitlab-ce~1890178 for a community contribution. \\n\\nWe express languages as % of repo, might we also show the absolute LOC? The Charts page might be a sensible place to display this. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/graphs/master/charts for an example. The project overview page could also work, we currently use a multi-colored horizontal line to represent this and show percentages there on mouseover.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:16:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:18:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1f57d0559fe42979c7e6d35e07dbbbb6131d9855\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979029, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @jeremy\\\\_ \\nDo you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'?And so 'Total Lines Number'?\\nWhat's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34d9eb930ce114af06333350c5ff55483637cf7e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979031, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @markglenfletcher \\nIt's very good things that showing percent,but lines number complete it's feature,doesn't?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a92bea136cc9e32d787aa5742ed869a21d2ab49c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979032, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Do you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'? And so 'Total Lines Number'? What's your opinion?\\n\\nI'd love to hear your proposal, but I think the Charts page may be an easy place to add this:\\n\\n![image](/uploads/198f585f7e807ed931757b47a519d135/image.png)\\n\\nWe could include a separate column for LOC on each row, and include a \\\"Total\\\" row at the bottom that displays the sum of the rows. What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 06:32:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-24 12:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-10 12:54:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979035, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"any update about this feature ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2346644, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"075f869895c6f828be69c382f91a4a9b2dba20b5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\nLines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\nThat all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 101578, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"570bda01e243b5cf50fce1ba6adb9cd4605169f4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979038, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Not sure if this helps anyone, but if you use GitBash (or linux terminal) and go into your local repo and type this command:\\n`find . -not -path \\u201c*/.git/*\\u201d | xargs wc -l`\\nYou get the total line counts. No extra things to install - just a bash command.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2223731, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a894203f7adeeb1a1ed60f595000c3d28bf650ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979039, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is another possible way by using the git ls-files command with a file type filter.\\n\\n* Java example: `git ls-files *.java *.xml | xargs wc -l`\\n* Ruby example: `git ls-files *.rb Rakefile Gemfile | xargs wc -l`\\n\\nOr whatever files you want to include in your count. It can also works in subfolders to provide counts of just the contents of that folder.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2814876, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78a3685ac84f3e9f6999bd406e3ee07296be78f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979041, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My developer ego gives +1 for this stats. I think, if you count the lines anyway, it might be no problem to offer different stats as options, because the counting might be the most expensive part anyway. \\n\\n*Yeah* for looking at your developer productivity in numbers. :-)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a8d439996cd80acb0e887e19d4c7a32c3b38f3f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979042, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is not graphical and not included in gitlab, but it serves my interest totally. Also it might be a good starting point for Gitlab's implementation: \\n\\nhttps://github.com/AlDanial/cloc\\n\\nUse `cloc --vcs git` to count only watched files in a git repository.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e05053a4fedccfbd67d6045862d003aaff0c6202\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979043, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@aakriti.gupta, should we just close this one in favor of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104, since it's a prerequisite?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:46:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979061, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, yes, we will take everything from this one in account - it's planned for 12.2. Do you want to comment on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104? What's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3511154, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"45e71e7ac76abec3784d03cbdb2b1cbc301899ff\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979063, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This should not be moved to EE as the initial feature was added by the community.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5ac02291aab2c6a295e4df9adacd278f1278fc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979064, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @max-wittig for pointing out! The EE issue has more content, which will be available on group/instance level. We would like to move all analytics into one space in the top nav bar, so will be thinking through how to combine what is in cc now and the additional functionality we will be adding in ee. Any feedback is welcome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"50ead744b305fa1f532705f92d1dbd1b1ec7a298\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979065, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"As mentioned below, as long as we keep the history through a merge or copying over information, it sounds good to close this with an update @valexieva :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4158075, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979066, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@valexieva I wrote a small script, which reports the languages an instance has by exporting prometheus metrics. Relying just on absolute values would make a lot more sense, than the approach that I'm using now. But I won't use absolute numbers, if `EE` is required for this.\\n\\nhttps://github.com/max-wittig/gitlab-languages\\n\\nI think it would be fine, if the Graph feature stays in EE, but it would be nice, if the API would return absolute numbers.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:35:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:42:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1283330, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7bde2d02397a5cb7ae5b0b940c065224158203f5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979067, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Keeping this open until we complete: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13163. After that will close, the existing functionality will be available in CE, further functionality as per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104 in EE.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"94574f2b40c78694f4096c523c514fcca93041ce\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi, we have scheduled LOC plus language trends for 12.3 - please find here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104#note_194198775. We will also ensure that it's available for CE users in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/65616 before we remove the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/graphs/master/charts\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"16af6bd6af9d839ee0856e4771ce2d012a7dc48e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979073, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Github provides this feature, it would be nice to be able to obtain comparable metrics from Gitlab as we are using both.\\n\\nOur use case to get these numbers is for figuring out the prevalence of code in any given language across our entire codebase to inform us with requirements for code analysis tools etc. \\\"90% of language Y in repository X\\\" without any context to the number is mostly a useless metric. We need to understand how much language Y there is in totality across our multiple SCM systems. Now i can only count how many repos have a given language in general which is not exactly the same thing.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 14:53:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291742295, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@unitysipu \\nI would say for your use case it is better to just create a tool that clones all the repos you want metrics on and runs cloc or a similar tool - https://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\nHaving these metrics across groups/organizations in github and gitlab makes less sense to me than to provide some information about what powers a given project.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291953639, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The amount of code often correlates with things like risk. It's sorta interesting from analysis point of view if you have projects that have 500, 5000, 500k or 5M lines of code. You may want to prioritize or categorize the big projects over the small ones (obviously that's not the full picture, depends on what that code is used for etc.). But just looking at our entire codebase / repositories from the top and knowing there's \\\"90% of PHP\\\" in some project without understanding there's a million lines of it doesn't really help. So while individual teams may have a good grasp of their project, somebody looking over our entire portfolio you need more information to figure out who you should get in touch with. Obviously you can also try to check the file size metrics etc. and try to filter out uninteresting file types or other similar cumbersome workarounds but it's just more work to land on data that could easily be provided by the platform directly.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292157164, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Even if you have 1000 repos, it would still not be that much work to write a tool that accumulates all the information using the method I described, and you're going to get it a lot faster than by asking gitlab to add a feature. \\nAs for expanding the scope of this issue to cover groups and organizations as a whole, I guess gitlab devs might consider that as an enterprise feature at some point.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292558285, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, *obviously* there are workarounds that require you to analyze all the source code yourself. That's not the point of this feature request. I see the conversation revolving around suggestions and local optimizations for individual teams / developers or the importance of the amount of code in context of individuals. I figured it's prudent to provide another point of view that may have an impact on the thinking of why it's important to have this implemented. There are other use cases for the LOC/Language metrics that can be of importance for somebody who is looking at your organization as a whole.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293145108, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Honestly, with that chain of argument: Why have a commit graph? You can do this locally on your git repo. Or why have a bugtracker? You can just install trac separately. Or why have a wiki? Haven't you heard of mediaWiki? And so on. \\n\\nFact is, that this is a standard feature that has many uses for individuals and companies (also for example if I actually will bother to contribute to a code base or if its not worth it because id have to learn X new languages).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4911777, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:42:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4911777, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"044bd214cb760ef42c44b314a3243601c4c2f6a7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:10:44 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299631157, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I disagree. It's absolutely not ridiculous at all to have _code metrics_ available in the source code repository you might use.\\n\\nAny external tool will have to analyse the code outside of the SCM makes the whole process inherently ineffective and slow by design. Gitlab (and github) already has the code inside it and therefore is in the best position to provide metrics and data on it. Furthermore, modern (sophisticated) code analysis tools _integrate directly_ with Github these days through Github applications, but even they cannot provide this data either without analyzing the entire codebase separately.\\n\\nWhile workarounds exist they are all bad in a large organization. I agree that it's clear this is not a priority based on the fact it's been open for two years, but also it's clear that the reasoning and discussion around this feature is very narrow and developer (ego) oriented.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:36:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"005fc553fd9580804c00dd974606b58258f6d149\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299627593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"##### For person\\nPeople expect it, since various metrics implemented in GitHub. At some point everyone just genuinely interested in those metrics even only for self-esteem. And it is frustrating to not find them on GitLab. And since GitHub made everyone think to have them out-of-the-box, people became lazy and don't want to pollute their work environment with some difficult code inspection tools that they will use once just because of curiosity. \\n\\n##### For big team\\nIf you are working in a solid company with big code base, and you professionally perform code analysis and give consulting based on it, then it is ridiculous to do it on the basis of GitHub or GitLab, likely you will need to have more sophisticated special tool for it.\\n\\n##### Conclusion\\nSo this feature is not a mandatory. In first place GitLab need to improve its role system, this is a real bummer:) But GitLab doesn't do it for 2 years, so probably they have more important tasks. I prefer to use GitHub because of role system and metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 635873, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 13:32:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:35:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"96c7f0adc49d8ea2d2f64108bea473166fe3f13c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293348432, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A premium/silver customer has requested for this feature over support ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/220808 (internal link)\\n\\nIn particular they'd like an ability to query statistics about lines of code per detected language type, within each, and across all repositories under a group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7536567, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 13:07:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 7536567, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80839b906be084dee24b6e6d95e01d91af4e6b4a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:56:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 612192220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am proposing in another issue to update an existing open source tool to add MBs of code to the reports.\\n\\nThis is related to helping customers (and prospects) be able to estimate the long term costs of security scanning solutions that charge by lines or MBs of code.\\n\\nIf the tool were a CI stage, but GitLab could receive and parse the report to a UI - then the compute for this would only performed for and paid by customers who want the counts.\\n\\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/233018\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-31 00:05:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 164827, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 388534468, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@DarwinJS the blocker for us on this feature is a line-counting capability in Gitaly.  I noticed that [SCC](https://github.com/boyter/scc) is written in Go, as Gitaly is.  Seems like that could be a very happy coincidence for us.  Did you happen to dive deep enough into SCC to have an opinion about how challenging it might be to integrate into Gitaly?\\n\\nNote for others: SCC is the line-counting software that Darwin recommended in his [blog post](https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 408694264, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bmiller1 the context is helpful.\\n\\nThis is in the %Backlog for awareness\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 586004666, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@djensen - I settled on SCC, rather than the long standing CLOC (Perl) due to it being written in a modern language and, if the author was not able to add features, the hopes that someone at GitLab would.\\n\\nI did dive into the internals, but don't know enough about Go Lang nor Gitaly to comment on whether the two would tango well.\\n\\nIt is lightning fast - which I noticed when processing www-gitlab-com.\\n\\nHave you thought of this as a sidekiq process - not sure how good it would be at doing per-commit differentials in Gitaly and doing the full repo in Gitaly may be a lot of excess compute if it does it every commit?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409124927, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just like source control, you don't need to count all the lines of code in a repo every time.\\n\\nOnce you have a known count of lines at a specific commit, you can just track the diffs after that to increase/decrease line count for specific code and languages.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409309581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes I understand.\\nWhat I'm trying to indicate is that the machinations to isolate net new lines and net removed lines of code may be more processing load than simply scheduling scc weekly?  Especially given the speed of scc.\\n\\nIf that might be true, the question is how timely do line counts need to be?\\n\\nI don't know the answer - just highlighting that if line counts don't need to be up to the minute, there might be a cheaper way to do it.  It would also possibly allow direct dependency on scc, rather than forking it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409329832, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e It is lightning fast\\n\\nYes it is!  It crunches the entire gitlab repo in about 3 seconds on my machine ([results here](https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2013041)).  Not bad.\\n\\n\u003e how timely do line counts need to be?  I don't know the answer\\n\\nMe either, but let's guess it needs to be somewhere between monthly and daily.  (Hourly and commitly seem unnecessarily specific.)  Maybe we could start at monthly and see how it goes?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409366938, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Or, maybe proponents could weigh in on the frequency.\\n\\nI feel a compromise might be:\\n\\n * maintain a _count per branch_ (which could be very helpful anyway)\\n * trigger a count on the _first commit_ of any new branch (or make counting an option?)\\n * update all branch counts _monthly_ (or, only branches that have a flag indicating that they should be counted)\\n\\nThat way, the regular update frequency is down to one count per project branch, per month, and Developers can force a new count by pushing a new branch (perhaps they might have a special case to have up-to-the-commit counts).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:50:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:54:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 5791080, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409381230, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In addition, I would like to understand uses cases for getting as fine as \\\"per branch\\\" code counts - what would someone use this for and how often?  If it is very occasional and/or for a bespoke purpose, they could just run scc themselves on a local copy.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 410590466, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Starter customer requesting this feature in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/172665\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f820fe272fadfd61eb4c19317bb2d45f71f25fa4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 416263002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\nAs the description states, the goal is to understand what the bar means, and see some absolute data. @jeremy Would the MVC here be to simply report the number of bytes, since that's what we're measuring?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 424775, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ccc8a3b61fc8f4f779b6b63486fb31d54c005cc9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 288529601, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[OneDev](https://github.com/theonedev/onedev) calculates SLOC per languages and display the trends over time which is quite interesting. An example trends here:\\n\\nhttps://code.onedev.io/projects/react/stats/lines\\n\\nOne can hover mouse on the trend to show SLOC by day. The initial calculation for a large repo such as Linux takes about 30 min, and the result will be cached. Subsequent updates for new commits will be fairly fast based on cache. Below is the logic for calculation if someone is interested:\\n\\nhttps://github.com/theonedev/onedev/blob/main/server-core/src/main/java/io/onedev/server/infomanager/DefaultCommitInfoManager.java\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7978344, \"created_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"19fa4567d0d0f1d5842c5ba6beae8267aebb0a4e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 483620034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is moving back to the %Backlog for the reasons described in ZJ's [comment above](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038). We're absolutely accepting merge requests on this one, but the Manage stage needs to prioritize other areas at the moment.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd32244cb8a10270e97506088fe7772e17dbcf11\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 242549553, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher please fix this ASAP.\\nI am surprised Gitlab has no protection against this crap.\\nYou will end up with people massively unsubscribing at best.\\n\\nP.S. This idiot keeps recreating accounts.\\nA simple post factum ban will not work.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 12:57:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 920678, \"type\": null, \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d54912a045e3ea6508b3cf9ea3c8d3f2c3f3784\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471910, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is a certain lag.\\nI suggest we do not subscribe back until admins fix it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503473194, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner I actually think this should go to ~\\\"group::source code\\\" , WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4156460, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 579827345, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI - Since Apex code is essentially extended Java with a few accompanying .xml metadata files, my customer was able to run `scc \\u2013count-as cls:java` to interpret Apex .cls files as Java.  scc understands the comment and syntax structure of Java and was able to correctly return the LOC.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 587249173, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I think that makes a lot of sense @ogolowinski\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4447217, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580171017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ogolowinski Yep, I agree. Thanks for changing the group.\\n\\nThis is going to remain in the backlog as it is not our current focus and based on [details](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#details) in the description, LOE will be quite high. Thanks.\\n\\ncc @cupini\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580236144, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@cupini I'm tagging @ljlane who is the PM for ~\\\"group::optimize\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4376883, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562100410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" ~\\\"self-managed\\\" ~customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\n* Link to request:  https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001Eo1h0\\n* Why interested: Want to report on all repos (instance-level) for languages used in repos for tools info\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: Workarounds are nice but would be nice to get an instance-view instantly \\n* PM to mention: @stkerr\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3288671, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-27 23:22:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562089576, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"An Ultimate customer is interested in this feature.\\n* Link to request: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000014HWYo\\n* Why interested: They have a need to report LoC for their Apex repos.\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: We have not found an adequate workaround\\n* PM to mention: @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-20 21:51:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 581438360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another Premium customer is interested in this feature: [#223248](https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/223248)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7272738, \"created_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e8ddc8cdcb1c801921ec5c22320c15c418b8826\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 622513819, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another customer inquiring if this function exists\\nhttps://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/161342\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fe28d2e0f29b158bfc492b79ea8883a16e1d5fb7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364390361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" Customer  interested in this feature [Internal Link](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001kHlpn)\\n\\ncc/ @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5250128, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-18 19:30:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:09:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3f6ffdb391745aec7053e4585f952953cbf32152\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 706872228, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer here: we compile this data periodically for use by the C-suite and even if the absolute numbers are representative of byte counts it is easy enough for me to use an estimate of bytes per line to get what I need.\\n\\nThe key is that I have nothing without absolute numbers.\\n\\nAlso, please consider the non-gitlab.com use case. Perhaps on our hosted instance we would be able to opt-in to a feature like this if it were available and we can decide for ourselves if the performance is acceptable.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78631ce204289b27d0730dbec72b8b9a7f770fec\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364645655, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My company is a Premium customer - we would really like to have this and even more metrics regarding type of language like number of components, files, etc.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5291964, \"created_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3790f9053863d8b679f99d4cc896f3ffb8c450e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 721314226, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"- SF: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000Ut0JyAAJ\\n- ZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/254826\\n\\n~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" customer is interested in this feature.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5537005, \"created_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af4170834a554c4135225876e22c91fadd8c35f2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 791792997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"1900 seat ~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" [Customer](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000002xBZQ) is interested in this feature.\\n\\n- Priority: ~\\\"customer priority::5\\\"  priority::\\n- Why interested: Customer is trying to find a way to report the total line of code across all GitLab projects.\\n- Problem they are trying to solve: Customer has some internal teams who are trying trying to integrate tooling with GitLab to measure and track code coverage. There\\u2019s a cost associated with expanding those other tools and without the ability to report the number of lines it's nearly impossible to estimate said cost.\\n- Current solution for this problem: none\\n- Impact to the customer of not having this: Inability to utilize other tools in conjunction with GitLab and thus slowing adoption of the platform.\\n- Questions: Are they're any other workarounds for this, even at a manual reporting level? \\n- PM to mention: @tlinz\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4748523, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-14 14:49:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-15 13:33:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e76285e7c35cbca1481c16ed2c1ad5b7d232b65e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 990978163, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A Premium customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\nZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/284853\\n\\nThe workaround mentioned [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_332427265) unfortunately is hitting this error at the moment. I wonder if you have thoughts about this @lyle ?\\n\\n```\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n3: from (irb):3\\n2: from lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb:85:in `path'\\n1: from lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/storage_settings.rb:65:in `legacy_disk_path'\\nGitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings::DirectPathAccessError (git disk access denied)\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10051186, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 08:09:53 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 924067966, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Seems related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350080. This was always a bit of a hack, and relied on manually executing `git` commands directly on the repo.\\n\\nYou could take (and modify) the same core:\\n\\n`/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l` and run it directly on the command line given a list of paths generated from `rails`\\n\\nThere's a bunch of caveats there though:\\n- `master` is not necessarily the default branch name (we transitioned in GitLab to `main` some time ago)\\n- It relies on counting the actual number of lines in a file `wc -l` and does it for every file in a repo. This will include licenses, headers, empty space and so on.\\n\\nThere are some additional thoughts in https://gist.github.com/mandiwise/dc53cb9da00856d7cdbb that have iterated on my approach from two years ago :sweat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 925281183, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bgadberry \\n\\nIt seems like with the additional customer problem you need solved that there should be another issue for this...?\\n\\n\u003e Customer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density.\\n\\nThis does not seem directly related. Correct me if I am wrong!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601066055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner You're correct. I was thinking the customer could calculate the metric manually once number of lines of code is made available. On second thought, I think we can calculate vulnerabilities per byte today. I'll report back if that suffices.\\n\\n@tmccaslin Is this vulnerability per byte/line of code metric something we've considered uncovering as part of SAST?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601093808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"It's not per _language_ but the following rails console snippet will give you an estimate of number of lines per `Project` on a self-managed instance where the `git-data` is on a partition or directly attached volume.\\n\\nIt can break a bit if there's no `master` branch or if a repository for some reason doesn't have a `HEAD`, so it's not at all bullet-proof.\\n\\n```ruby\\nheaders = ['path', 'lines','archived?']\\nreport_file = Tempfile.new(['project_lines','.csv'])\\n\\nCSV.open(report_file.path, \\\"wb\\\") do |csv|\\ncsv \u003c\u003c headers\\n   Project.all.each do |p|\\n      output = `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l`\\n      csv \u003c\u003c [p.full_path, Integer(output),p.archived?]\\n   end; nil\\nend\\n\\nreport_file.close\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2930750323d45742084b921bd0f102d58807df7b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 332427265, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, statistics counting total and per lang number of lines (in code files only) would be so nice and basic.  \\nIgnore empty lines for me is optional. \\n\\nGet stats manually / locally for a git repo is not a problem. But this issue asks for the UI of gitlab. And this is what I need as well. \\n\\nhere a link to the current state: (older links above are expired)  \\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts \\n\\nHere a link for more advanced stats ambitions:  \\nhttps://www.openhub.net/p/gitlab\\n\\nedit: btw: If this is not happening since 5 years because of performance issues, then just calculate it once a week and show the calculation date next to it. I guess most people do not need per hour stats about n lines of code. For me even once per month would be enough. (And thus could be used for #12104 as well)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:08:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-03 07:59:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 882141, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3bdba5e20eedfcedc7eb1c6272fa93798b138610\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:13:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951334872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In order to get this request some attention, this issue has been marked as a potentially interesting proposal as it meets the following criteria:\\n\\n* Labelled as a feature proposal\\n* More than 10 upvotes\\n* Unscheduled (not associated with a milestone)\\n\\nThanks for your proposal!\\n\\n\\n\\n/cc @markglenfletcher\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73b69edb26083c702d2514effe76ca7da2d40407\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978971, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 154953, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"63b6ff0026abcb2ee9df9b28041655c7ab9fe563\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979021, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@billclark agreed\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2414870, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1328954e3c5076176230b846b4da51543092429b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If you do, make sure you somehow transfer the popularity and influence as well. \\nThis issue has 2 years of (possible sparse) history and 300+ upvotes. \\nThe newer one is month long. \\n\\nIt may make more sense to either transfer this one to EE, or merge the other one to here.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5db704a8ce0f10d43344ec9d98767153458c3c76\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979062, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"this just counts the raw line number of the files treated as pieces of texts. I guess what people want here is more like a per-language breakdown.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e32505249798e1b3e040ded861516658150259c6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979040, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Is there a way to get this data using the API?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0603dc2249187fa36328ff2f92debfc6c7db79d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"No it is not. That would be something for @matt_wilson to consider with the security dashboard.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5329074, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601097241, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We need more cowbell!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 196721, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616b443b97ad1443c199fb5f0af9780b51ddf379\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts is that what it looks today? seems like a regression.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951315993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I would like a total number of lines not including blank ones.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dcb61a50851d774190fa590cddf3e19f7a753f83\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979036, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer would also like to track lines of code per developer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404096482, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just started to use gitlab, and this is one the first stats i hoped to see in the \\\"Charts\\\", however i was surprised it's missing :(\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3219145, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-22 10:59:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979033, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"how come I can still receive notifications even if I unsubscribed???\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:19:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471203, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001FRuq0\\n\\nCustomer would like to see number of lines of code per language excluding comments. \\n\\n/cc @npost\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-30 01:30:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:47:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 387929331, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer interested in this feature. https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000W2eBo (Internal link)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4587928, \"created_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"35a9711c22330d7480c21b516ab890edccb85fb6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 258382372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"i will join, i want see my ego\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 688008, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8993bd8d42c15974c7f1eee7b8601e71e505626f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979006, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"for a company that has thousands of repositories that's just completely ineffective\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292139470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@bgadberry The customer may be able to pull the necessary vulnerability count information from the existing GraphQL API. I've never heard a request for this functionality before and don't have any plans to include it in the Security Dashboard reports so pulling the data and creating their own reports is the best way forward if this is needed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4708748, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601110834, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Same here!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4122216, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979054, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The developer of scc responded to proposals to update the code as desired. Resultant code is in this blog article: https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story and being worked into this working example for GitLab CI CD: https://gitlab.com/guided-explorations/ci-cd-plugin-extensions/ci-cd-plugin-extension-scc\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404663419, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@mlockhart in the context of an MVC I think we need to stick with measuring the default branch only, because that's what the Repository Analytics page is currently doing ([example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts)).\\n\\nOn the bright side, it seems the existing byte counts are being [updated on push](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/git/branch_push_service.rb#L54).  That makes me hopeful we could match that frequency with line counts.  So let's tentatively say the MVC would be updated pushly (instead of monthly like I proposed above).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409398149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Gold customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/154631 with a slight twist: they'd like to see the number of lines by group/sub-group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-24 18:02:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:37:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3b5c50effe1ea33f7f938b5693032964c2bdc512\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:46:35 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 331168435, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001lc3Cc\\n\\nCustomer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density. \\n\\n/cc @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 19:45:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 600990593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Had a similar request. I was able to get this info by extracting the Gitlab backup repositories from a backup and unbundling everything then running the following utility on the directory.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut it would be nice to see this kind of information on a project / server admin level, just to provide an overview of things currently within GitLab user / admin interfaces.\\r\\n\\r\\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\r\\n\\r\\n![image](/uploads/2e9c9fd05358a6e80411bfb9b323c214/image.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 261290, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:15:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-22 12:20:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 261290, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"186117b5b28df4eca7f2419b17ad900f90e61728\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:42:31 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978968, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Please add a chart with the SLOC metric, it is a metric more useful than the number of commits\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1276118, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 14:50:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 07:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"735fd7ef77d0bd7463126f7436eda8691d678998\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978960, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 695248, \"username\": \"lbot\", \"name\": \"Lee Matos\"}, {\"id\": 239547, \"username\": \"wil.rodriguez\", \"name\": \"William Rodriguez\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 87854, \"username\": \"DouweM\", \"name\": \"Douwe Maan\"}, {\"id\": 1187333, \"username\": \"jramsay-gitlab\", \"name\": \"James Ramsay (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 2182793, \"username\": \"craph1\", \"name\": \"craph\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 709639, \"username\": \"omidontop\", \"name\": \"Omid Manikhi\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 2346644, \"username\": \"ariaieboy\", \"name\": \"AriaieBOY\"}, {\"id\": 101578, \"username\": \"zj-gitlab\", \"name\": \"Zeger-Jan van de Weg\"}, {\"id\": 2223731, \"username\": \"bobbymcgill\", \"name\": \"Bobby McGill\"}, {\"id\": 2814876, \"username\": \"jim.robbins\", \"name\": \"Jim Robbins\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 4158075, \"username\": \"aakriti.gupta\", \"name\": \"Aakriti Gupta\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4911777, \"username\": \"i.hayden\", \"name\": \"Immanuel Hayden\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 635873, \"username\": \"pisarik\", \"name\": \"Vlad Blazhko\"}, {\"id\": 7536567, \"username\": \"hchouraria\", \"name\": \"Harsh Chouraria\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 424775, \"username\": \"markpundsack\", \"name\": \"Mark Pundsack\"}, {\"id\": 7978344, \"username\": \"robinshine\", \"name\": \"Robin Shen\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 4156460, \"username\": \"ogolowinski\", \"name\": \"Orit Golowinski\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 4447217, \"username\": \"ljlane\", \"name\": \"Larissa Lane\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4376883, \"username\": \"stkerr\", \"name\": \"Sam Kerr\"}, {\"id\": 3288671, \"username\": \"cupini\", \"name\": \"Brian Cupini\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 7272738, \"username\": \"kategrechishkina\", \"name\": \"Kate Grechishkina\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 5250128, \"username\": \"ricardoamarilla\", \"name\": \"Ricardo Amarilla\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 5291964, \"username\": \"crispindev\", \"name\": \"crispin velez\"}, {\"id\": 5537005, \"username\": \"cleveland\", \"name\": \"Cleveland Bledsoe Jr\"}, {\"id\": 4748523, \"username\": \"sheininger\", \"name\": \"Steffen Heininger\"}, {\"id\": 10051186, \"username\": \"kballon\", \"name\": \"Kent Japhet Ballon\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 154953, \"username\": \"Zandor300\", \"name\": \"Zandor Smith\"}, {\"id\": 2414870, \"username\": \"mason1920\", \"name\": \"mason1920\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 5329074, \"username\": \"tmccaslin\", \"name\": \"Taylor McCaslin\"}, {\"id\": 196721, \"username\": \"billclark\", \"name\": \"Bill Clark\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 3219145, \"username\": \"spprint\", \"name\": \"Sven Vet\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 4587928, \"username\": \"cbazan1\", \"name\": \"Carlos Bazan\"}, {\"id\": 688008, \"username\": \"friuns\", \"name\": \"friuns\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4708748, \"username\": \"matt_wilson\", \"name\": \"Matt Wilson\"}, {\"id\": 4122216, \"username\": \"saunved\", \"name\": \"Saunved Mutalik\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 261290, \"username\": \"TRPmwiesen\", \"name\": \"Matthew Wiesen\"}, {\"id\": 1276118, \"username\": \"wagnerpinheiro\", \"name\": \"Wagner Pinheiro\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"{url} - Summarize this issue.","query_id":"a35cd5c20af3446c9b211a4214e60d20","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"24652824","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 24652824, \"title\": \"Report number of lines per language in repository charts\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-15 17:20:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"### Description\\n\\nAs of now, repository charts report percentage of language in the repo.\\nFirst, it is not obvious how this percentage is computed (number of files? number of lines? bytes? what about comments? libraries?). Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\n### Proposal\\n\\nAs a user I would like to see the number of lines of code per language.\\nIdeally, excluding blank lines and comments, but that is optional.\\n\\n### Documentation blurb\\n\\nAs for use cases:\\n* better understand the repo structure\\n* if this is your repo, being able to report the number of lines of your main language\\n    * this is one of the metric employers would like to know (I personally was surprised by this question on interview and could not clearly respond)\\n* all those use cases for general repo graphs (like pie chart of languages)\\n\\n### Details\\n\\n[A useful comment from ZJ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038):\\n\\n\u003e Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\n\u003e Lines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\n\u003e That all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\\n\\n### Potential Workarounds\\n\\n- Run `scc` in a GitLab CI pipeline: https://github.com/boyter/scc to generate SLOC/etc. reports\\n- If API use is acceptable (instead of UI), parts of its output stats can be stored as custom attributes on the project: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/custom_attributes.html#set-custom-attribute\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 17800, \"updated_by_id\": 5749302, \"weight\": 8, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -14979600, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-07-17 16:10:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 7536567, \"discussion_locked\": false, \"closed_at\": \"2023-01-19 09:38:40 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 579, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11039421, \"title\": \"Category:Code Analytics\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-18 19:25:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:07:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 7161201, \"title\": \"Manage [DEPRECATED]\", \"color\": \"#44AD8E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-19 05:48:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-19 11:52:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Please use the devops::manage label instead of this deprecated label. It is kept for historical issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1890178, \"title\": \"[deprecated] Accepting merge requests\", \"color\": \"#69d100\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 11:34:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-28 08:14:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"[deprecated] Please use \\\"Seeking community contributions\\\" instead. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/developer-relations/contributor-success/team-task/-/issues/77\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1672341, \"title\": \"customer\", \"color\": \"#ad4363\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that were reported by Enterprise Edition subscribers. This label should be accompanied by either the 'bug' or 'feature proposal' label\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 4107658, \"title\": \"graphs\", \"color\": \"#428bca\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the project Graphs pages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15237307, \"title\": \"icebox\", \"color\": \"#d6ecef\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:25:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:35:52 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues on which no work is anticipated in the next several milestones but which may be considered for work shortly thereafter thus not closed.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2936416, \"title\": \"popular proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Feature proposals deemed popular by our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/triage) will have this label applied\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2714266, \"title\": \"potential proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label added by triage tools to mark interesting feature proposals for consideration\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@dbogatov Thanks for the proposal. We'll just have to leave this open and see if it becomes a popular request.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73cf193764726f4ed724d78d4b59d4f81efe83cc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978957, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@wagnerpinheiro, [S]LOC metrics are rather old. They are not actual now (only in 80-90s they were). Your idea is pretty but only for developers ego. For really gentlemen customers GITLAB maybe have to improve their charts with different modern metrics. As example, for analyzing object-oriented languages they can add metric of Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 19:52:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 346483, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978961, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@yachmenov_c_ I have to admit, I had to look up what Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer metrics were. And yes, I would love to see those metrics in GitLab.\\n\\n**However**, I feel like it is quite hard (or say, resource heavy) to implement those. Each language will have to provide a service to get OOP relations. We cannot derive those metrics just by parsing the text.\\n\\n**On the other side**, simple line counter per language (even the one which omits comments and empty lines) is relatively easy to implement.\\n\\nAs for developers' ego, I have to admit it would not mind seeing LOC metrics, but I am sure there are other reasons for these metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:00:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978963, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, I mostly agree with you, really they can implement functionality you mentioned, and it would be great. Nice point!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"ZD ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/80860\\n\\nA Customer requested this feature. :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 695248, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2dba3df39df1cd81040cb0bc86091470aac43ffa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978965, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This would be awesome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 239547, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"604137042a54634c99ba7cda9b19e4db3570b396\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is getting popular\\n\\n@DouweM ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" for this one?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f1bbac293ede2d142630a69c9b499642ce9a40f8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher I think it may not be well defined enough yet for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" . We removed the repository language a while ago because it didn't perform well, so we'll need to figure out way to restore it without reintroducing the performance issue.\\n\\nThis is related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/40236 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23931. \\n\\n/cc @jramsay\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 87854, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23bac7a1ece7d87f5607254715120cb9067506ea\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978986, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If we can provide a foundation in gitlab-ce#23931 that computes the language stats without performance, we could definitely open this up for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1187333, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:16:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:17:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1187333, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"812e8d43c4b74c029c7327a6b783be67b2a0cd78\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978988, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Having the LOC in the table with the language breakdown and percentage would be great.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4a841d10fb4925ca2b102435a39a249fb1f1bb39\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hello,\\n\\nDisplay the LOC in the chart would be a very nice feature :slight_smile: \\n\\nAny update about this ?\\n\\nThank you very much.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2182793, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55170edc6cc50d1a2a20760c0bd5760b0dba68b6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978998, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi,\\u00a0I haven't heard anything back yet.\\nDennis\\nDennis Biringer | Principal Software EngineerPacific Defense Systems, LLC (PDS)Integrity Applications Incorporated535 Lipoa Parkway\\u00a0 Suite 101, Kihei HI, 96753dbiringer@integrity-apps.com(808) 214-0765\\n\\n[smime.p7s](/uploads/e849eea0083b79828f578febe315bdcd/smime.p7s)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55168747dda9172740a2eaa5e847403ed43121de\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979004, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We also would like to see the total number of lines of code, files, etc. Thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a6edf2d747aa859d84a4adfab95b10d53d7774d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979005, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@shellyniz Currently it's presented as a percentage via the API:\\n- https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#languages\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d201f77821e20f12477856580eab2e40804cc2dd\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979019, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Silly me, I was looking for it under the repo API. That's a big help, thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"093b696a8537efb99106d9d0b003220eb6ee8c01\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979020, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\\n\\nIt's a great feature to have especially if you're to brag about how much work has been put into the project in a presentation or something.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 709639, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:05:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:07:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b43271d3058f31f25e92e49015ea9efc4afc7d0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979022, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't see us getting to this anytime soon, but I'm happy to label this with gitlab-ce~1890178 for a community contribution. \\n\\nWe express languages as % of repo, might we also show the absolute LOC? The Charts page might be a sensible place to display this. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/graphs/master/charts for an example. The project overview page could also work, we currently use a multi-colored horizontal line to represent this and show percentages there on mouseover.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:16:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:18:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1f57d0559fe42979c7e6d35e07dbbbb6131d9855\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979029, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @jeremy\\\\_ \\nDo you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'?And so 'Total Lines Number'?\\nWhat's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34d9eb930ce114af06333350c5ff55483637cf7e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979031, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @markglenfletcher \\nIt's very good things that showing percent,but lines number complete it's feature,doesn't?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a92bea136cc9e32d787aa5742ed869a21d2ab49c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979032, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Do you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'? And so 'Total Lines Number'? What's your opinion?\\n\\nI'd love to hear your proposal, but I think the Charts page may be an easy place to add this:\\n\\n![image](/uploads/198f585f7e807ed931757b47a519d135/image.png)\\n\\nWe could include a separate column for LOC on each row, and include a \\\"Total\\\" row at the bottom that displays the sum of the rows. What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 06:32:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-24 12:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-10 12:54:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979035, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"any update about this feature ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2346644, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"075f869895c6f828be69c382f91a4a9b2dba20b5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\nLines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\nThat all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 101578, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"570bda01e243b5cf50fce1ba6adb9cd4605169f4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979038, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Not sure if this helps anyone, but if you use GitBash (or linux terminal) and go into your local repo and type this command:\\n`find . -not -path \\u201c*/.git/*\\u201d | xargs wc -l`\\nYou get the total line counts. No extra things to install - just a bash command.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2223731, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a894203f7adeeb1a1ed60f595000c3d28bf650ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979039, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is another possible way by using the git ls-files command with a file type filter.\\n\\n* Java example: `git ls-files *.java *.xml | xargs wc -l`\\n* Ruby example: `git ls-files *.rb Rakefile Gemfile | xargs wc -l`\\n\\nOr whatever files you want to include in your count. It can also works in subfolders to provide counts of just the contents of that folder.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2814876, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78a3685ac84f3e9f6999bd406e3ee07296be78f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979041, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My developer ego gives +1 for this stats. I think, if you count the lines anyway, it might be no problem to offer different stats as options, because the counting might be the most expensive part anyway. \\n\\n*Yeah* for looking at your developer productivity in numbers. :-)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a8d439996cd80acb0e887e19d4c7a32c3b38f3f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979042, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is not graphical and not included in gitlab, but it serves my interest totally. Also it might be a good starting point for Gitlab's implementation: \\n\\nhttps://github.com/AlDanial/cloc\\n\\nUse `cloc --vcs git` to count only watched files in a git repository.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e05053a4fedccfbd67d6045862d003aaff0c6202\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979043, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@aakriti.gupta, should we just close this one in favor of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104, since it's a prerequisite?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:46:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979061, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, yes, we will take everything from this one in account - it's planned for 12.2. Do you want to comment on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104? What's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3511154, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"45e71e7ac76abec3784d03cbdb2b1cbc301899ff\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979063, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This should not be moved to EE as the initial feature was added by the community.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5ac02291aab2c6a295e4df9adacd278f1278fc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979064, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @max-wittig for pointing out! The EE issue has more content, which will be available on group/instance level. We would like to move all analytics into one space in the top nav bar, so will be thinking through how to combine what is in cc now and the additional functionality we will be adding in ee. Any feedback is welcome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"50ead744b305fa1f532705f92d1dbd1b1ec7a298\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979065, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"As mentioned below, as long as we keep the history through a merge or copying over information, it sounds good to close this with an update @valexieva :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4158075, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979066, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@valexieva I wrote a small script, which reports the languages an instance has by exporting prometheus metrics. Relying just on absolute values would make a lot more sense, than the approach that I'm using now. But I won't use absolute numbers, if `EE` is required for this.\\n\\nhttps://github.com/max-wittig/gitlab-languages\\n\\nI think it would be fine, if the Graph feature stays in EE, but it would be nice, if the API would return absolute numbers.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:35:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:42:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1283330, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7bde2d02397a5cb7ae5b0b940c065224158203f5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979067, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Keeping this open until we complete: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13163. After that will close, the existing functionality will be available in CE, further functionality as per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104 in EE.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"94574f2b40c78694f4096c523c514fcca93041ce\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi, we have scheduled LOC plus language trends for 12.3 - please find here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104#note_194198775. We will also ensure that it's available for CE users in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/65616 before we remove the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/graphs/master/charts\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"16af6bd6af9d839ee0856e4771ce2d012a7dc48e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979073, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Github provides this feature, it would be nice to be able to obtain comparable metrics from Gitlab as we are using both.\\n\\nOur use case to get these numbers is for figuring out the prevalence of code in any given language across our entire codebase to inform us with requirements for code analysis tools etc. \\\"90% of language Y in repository X\\\" without any context to the number is mostly a useless metric. We need to understand how much language Y there is in totality across our multiple SCM systems. Now i can only count how many repos have a given language in general which is not exactly the same thing.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 14:53:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291742295, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@unitysipu \\nI would say for your use case it is better to just create a tool that clones all the repos you want metrics on and runs cloc or a similar tool - https://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\nHaving these metrics across groups/organizations in github and gitlab makes less sense to me than to provide some information about what powers a given project.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291953639, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The amount of code often correlates with things like risk. It's sorta interesting from analysis point of view if you have projects that have 500, 5000, 500k or 5M lines of code. You may want to prioritize or categorize the big projects over the small ones (obviously that's not the full picture, depends on what that code is used for etc.). But just looking at our entire codebase / repositories from the top and knowing there's \\\"90% of PHP\\\" in some project without understanding there's a million lines of it doesn't really help. So while individual teams may have a good grasp of their project, somebody looking over our entire portfolio you need more information to figure out who you should get in touch with. Obviously you can also try to check the file size metrics etc. and try to filter out uninteresting file types or other similar cumbersome workarounds but it's just more work to land on data that could easily be provided by the platform directly.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292157164, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Even if you have 1000 repos, it would still not be that much work to write a tool that accumulates all the information using the method I described, and you're going to get it a lot faster than by asking gitlab to add a feature. \\nAs for expanding the scope of this issue to cover groups and organizations as a whole, I guess gitlab devs might consider that as an enterprise feature at some point.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292558285, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, *obviously* there are workarounds that require you to analyze all the source code yourself. That's not the point of this feature request. I see the conversation revolving around suggestions and local optimizations for individual teams / developers or the importance of the amount of code in context of individuals. I figured it's prudent to provide another point of view that may have an impact on the thinking of why it's important to have this implemented. There are other use cases for the LOC/Language metrics that can be of importance for somebody who is looking at your organization as a whole.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293145108, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Honestly, with that chain of argument: Why have a commit graph? You can do this locally on your git repo. Or why have a bugtracker? You can just install trac separately. Or why have a wiki? Haven't you heard of mediaWiki? And so on. \\n\\nFact is, that this is a standard feature that has many uses for individuals and companies (also for example if I actually will bother to contribute to a code base or if its not worth it because id have to learn X new languages).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4911777, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:42:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4911777, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"044bd214cb760ef42c44b314a3243601c4c2f6a7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:10:44 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299631157, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I disagree. It's absolutely not ridiculous at all to have _code metrics_ available in the source code repository you might use.\\n\\nAny external tool will have to analyse the code outside of the SCM makes the whole process inherently ineffective and slow by design. Gitlab (and github) already has the code inside it and therefore is in the best position to provide metrics and data on it. Furthermore, modern (sophisticated) code analysis tools _integrate directly_ with Github these days through Github applications, but even they cannot provide this data either without analyzing the entire codebase separately.\\n\\nWhile workarounds exist they are all bad in a large organization. I agree that it's clear this is not a priority based on the fact it's been open for two years, but also it's clear that the reasoning and discussion around this feature is very narrow and developer (ego) oriented.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:36:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"005fc553fd9580804c00dd974606b58258f6d149\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299627593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"##### For person\\nPeople expect it, since various metrics implemented in GitHub. At some point everyone just genuinely interested in those metrics even only for self-esteem. And it is frustrating to not find them on GitLab. And since GitHub made everyone think to have them out-of-the-box, people became lazy and don't want to pollute their work environment with some difficult code inspection tools that they will use once just because of curiosity. \\n\\n##### For big team\\nIf you are working in a solid company with big code base, and you professionally perform code analysis and give consulting based on it, then it is ridiculous to do it on the basis of GitHub or GitLab, likely you will need to have more sophisticated special tool for it.\\n\\n##### Conclusion\\nSo this feature is not a mandatory. In first place GitLab need to improve its role system, this is a real bummer:) But GitLab doesn't do it for 2 years, so probably they have more important tasks. I prefer to use GitHub because of role system and metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 635873, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 13:32:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:35:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"96c7f0adc49d8ea2d2f64108bea473166fe3f13c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293348432, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A premium/silver customer has requested for this feature over support ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/220808 (internal link)\\n\\nIn particular they'd like an ability to query statistics about lines of code per detected language type, within each, and across all repositories under a group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7536567, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 13:07:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 7536567, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80839b906be084dee24b6e6d95e01d91af4e6b4a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:56:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 612192220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am proposing in another issue to update an existing open source tool to add MBs of code to the reports.\\n\\nThis is related to helping customers (and prospects) be able to estimate the long term costs of security scanning solutions that charge by lines or MBs of code.\\n\\nIf the tool were a CI stage, but GitLab could receive and parse the report to a UI - then the compute for this would only performed for and paid by customers who want the counts.\\n\\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/233018\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-31 00:05:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 164827, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 388534468, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@DarwinJS the blocker for us on this feature is a line-counting capability in Gitaly.  I noticed that [SCC](https://github.com/boyter/scc) is written in Go, as Gitaly is.  Seems like that could be a very happy coincidence for us.  Did you happen to dive deep enough into SCC to have an opinion about how challenging it might be to integrate into Gitaly?\\n\\nNote for others: SCC is the line-counting software that Darwin recommended in his [blog post](https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 408694264, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bmiller1 the context is helpful.\\n\\nThis is in the %Backlog for awareness\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 586004666, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@djensen - I settled on SCC, rather than the long standing CLOC (Perl) due to it being written in a modern language and, if the author was not able to add features, the hopes that someone at GitLab would.\\n\\nI did dive into the internals, but don't know enough about Go Lang nor Gitaly to comment on whether the two would tango well.\\n\\nIt is lightning fast - which I noticed when processing www-gitlab-com.\\n\\nHave you thought of this as a sidekiq process - not sure how good it would be at doing per-commit differentials in Gitaly and doing the full repo in Gitaly may be a lot of excess compute if it does it every commit?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409124927, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just like source control, you don't need to count all the lines of code in a repo every time.\\n\\nOnce you have a known count of lines at a specific commit, you can just track the diffs after that to increase/decrease line count for specific code and languages.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409309581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes I understand.\\nWhat I'm trying to indicate is that the machinations to isolate net new lines and net removed lines of code may be more processing load than simply scheduling scc weekly?  Especially given the speed of scc.\\n\\nIf that might be true, the question is how timely do line counts need to be?\\n\\nI don't know the answer - just highlighting that if line counts don't need to be up to the minute, there might be a cheaper way to do it.  It would also possibly allow direct dependency on scc, rather than forking it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409329832, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e It is lightning fast\\n\\nYes it is!  It crunches the entire gitlab repo in about 3 seconds on my machine ([results here](https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2013041)).  Not bad.\\n\\n\u003e how timely do line counts need to be?  I don't know the answer\\n\\nMe either, but let's guess it needs to be somewhere between monthly and daily.  (Hourly and commitly seem unnecessarily specific.)  Maybe we could start at monthly and see how it goes?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409366938, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Or, maybe proponents could weigh in on the frequency.\\n\\nI feel a compromise might be:\\n\\n * maintain a _count per branch_ (which could be very helpful anyway)\\n * trigger a count on the _first commit_ of any new branch (or make counting an option?)\\n * update all branch counts _monthly_ (or, only branches that have a flag indicating that they should be counted)\\n\\nThat way, the regular update frequency is down to one count per project branch, per month, and Developers can force a new count by pushing a new branch (perhaps they might have a special case to have up-to-the-commit counts).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:50:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:54:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 5791080, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409381230, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In addition, I would like to understand uses cases for getting as fine as \\\"per branch\\\" code counts - what would someone use this for and how often?  If it is very occasional and/or for a bespoke purpose, they could just run scc themselves on a local copy.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 410590466, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Starter customer requesting this feature in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/172665\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f820fe272fadfd61eb4c19317bb2d45f71f25fa4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 416263002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\nAs the description states, the goal is to understand what the bar means, and see some absolute data. @jeremy Would the MVC here be to simply report the number of bytes, since that's what we're measuring?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 424775, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ccc8a3b61fc8f4f779b6b63486fb31d54c005cc9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 288529601, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[OneDev](https://github.com/theonedev/onedev) calculates SLOC per languages and display the trends over time which is quite interesting. An example trends here:\\n\\nhttps://code.onedev.io/projects/react/stats/lines\\n\\nOne can hover mouse on the trend to show SLOC by day. The initial calculation for a large repo such as Linux takes about 30 min, and the result will be cached. Subsequent updates for new commits will be fairly fast based on cache. Below is the logic for calculation if someone is interested:\\n\\nhttps://github.com/theonedev/onedev/blob/main/server-core/src/main/java/io/onedev/server/infomanager/DefaultCommitInfoManager.java\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7978344, \"created_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"19fa4567d0d0f1d5842c5ba6beae8267aebb0a4e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 483620034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is moving back to the %Backlog for the reasons described in ZJ's [comment above](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038). We're absolutely accepting merge requests on this one, but the Manage stage needs to prioritize other areas at the moment.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd32244cb8a10270e97506088fe7772e17dbcf11\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 242549553, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher please fix this ASAP.\\nI am surprised Gitlab has no protection against this crap.\\nYou will end up with people massively unsubscribing at best.\\n\\nP.S. This idiot keeps recreating accounts.\\nA simple post factum ban will not work.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 12:57:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 920678, \"type\": null, \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d54912a045e3ea6508b3cf9ea3c8d3f2c3f3784\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471910, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is a certain lag.\\nI suggest we do not subscribe back until admins fix it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503473194, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner I actually think this should go to ~\\\"group::source code\\\" , WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4156460, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 579827345, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI - Since Apex code is essentially extended Java with a few accompanying .xml metadata files, my customer was able to run `scc \\u2013count-as cls:java` to interpret Apex .cls files as Java.  scc understands the comment and syntax structure of Java and was able to correctly return the LOC.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 587249173, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I think that makes a lot of sense @ogolowinski\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4447217, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580171017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ogolowinski Yep, I agree. Thanks for changing the group.\\n\\nThis is going to remain in the backlog as it is not our current focus and based on [details](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#details) in the description, LOE will be quite high. Thanks.\\n\\ncc @cupini\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580236144, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@cupini I'm tagging @ljlane who is the PM for ~\\\"group::optimize\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4376883, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562100410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" ~\\\"self-managed\\\" ~customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\n* Link to request:  https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001Eo1h0\\n* Why interested: Want to report on all repos (instance-level) for languages used in repos for tools info\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: Workarounds are nice but would be nice to get an instance-view instantly \\n* PM to mention: @stkerr\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3288671, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-27 23:22:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562089576, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"An Ultimate customer is interested in this feature.\\n* Link to request: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000014HWYo\\n* Why interested: They have a need to report LoC for their Apex repos.\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: We have not found an adequate workaround\\n* PM to mention: @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-20 21:51:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 581438360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another Premium customer is interested in this feature: [#223248](https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/223248)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7272738, \"created_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e8ddc8cdcb1c801921ec5c22320c15c418b8826\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 622513819, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another customer inquiring if this function exists\\nhttps://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/161342\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fe28d2e0f29b158bfc492b79ea8883a16e1d5fb7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364390361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" Customer  interested in this feature [Internal Link](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001kHlpn)\\n\\ncc/ @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5250128, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-18 19:30:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:09:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3f6ffdb391745aec7053e4585f952953cbf32152\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 706872228, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer here: we compile this data periodically for use by the C-suite and even if the absolute numbers are representative of byte counts it is easy enough for me to use an estimate of bytes per line to get what I need.\\n\\nThe key is that I have nothing without absolute numbers.\\n\\nAlso, please consider the non-gitlab.com use case. Perhaps on our hosted instance we would be able to opt-in to a feature like this if it were available and we can decide for ourselves if the performance is acceptable.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78631ce204289b27d0730dbec72b8b9a7f770fec\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364645655, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My company is a Premium customer - we would really like to have this and even more metrics regarding type of language like number of components, files, etc.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5291964, \"created_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3790f9053863d8b679f99d4cc896f3ffb8c450e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 721314226, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"- SF: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000Ut0JyAAJ\\n- ZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/254826\\n\\n~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" customer is interested in this feature.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5537005, \"created_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af4170834a554c4135225876e22c91fadd8c35f2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 791792997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"1900 seat ~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" [Customer](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000002xBZQ) is interested in this feature.\\n\\n- Priority: ~\\\"customer priority::5\\\"  priority::\\n- Why interested: Customer is trying to find a way to report the total line of code across all GitLab projects.\\n- Problem they are trying to solve: Customer has some internal teams who are trying trying to integrate tooling with GitLab to measure and track code coverage. There\\u2019s a cost associated with expanding those other tools and without the ability to report the number of lines it's nearly impossible to estimate said cost.\\n- Current solution for this problem: none\\n- Impact to the customer of not having this: Inability to utilize other tools in conjunction with GitLab and thus slowing adoption of the platform.\\n- Questions: Are they're any other workarounds for this, even at a manual reporting level? \\n- PM to mention: @tlinz\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4748523, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-14 14:49:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-15 13:33:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e76285e7c35cbca1481c16ed2c1ad5b7d232b65e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 990978163, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A Premium customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\nZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/284853\\n\\nThe workaround mentioned [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_332427265) unfortunately is hitting this error at the moment. I wonder if you have thoughts about this @lyle ?\\n\\n```\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n3: from (irb):3\\n2: from lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb:85:in `path'\\n1: from lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/storage_settings.rb:65:in `legacy_disk_path'\\nGitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings::DirectPathAccessError (git disk access denied)\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10051186, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 08:09:53 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 924067966, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Seems related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350080. This was always a bit of a hack, and relied on manually executing `git` commands directly on the repo.\\n\\nYou could take (and modify) the same core:\\n\\n`/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l` and run it directly on the command line given a list of paths generated from `rails`\\n\\nThere's a bunch of caveats there though:\\n- `master` is not necessarily the default branch name (we transitioned in GitLab to `main` some time ago)\\n- It relies on counting the actual number of lines in a file `wc -l` and does it for every file in a repo. This will include licenses, headers, empty space and so on.\\n\\nThere are some additional thoughts in https://gist.github.com/mandiwise/dc53cb9da00856d7cdbb that have iterated on my approach from two years ago :sweat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 925281183, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bgadberry \\n\\nIt seems like with the additional customer problem you need solved that there should be another issue for this...?\\n\\n\u003e Customer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density.\\n\\nThis does not seem directly related. Correct me if I am wrong!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601066055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner You're correct. I was thinking the customer could calculate the metric manually once number of lines of code is made available. On second thought, I think we can calculate vulnerabilities per byte today. I'll report back if that suffices.\\n\\n@tmccaslin Is this vulnerability per byte/line of code metric something we've considered uncovering as part of SAST?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601093808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"It's not per _language_ but the following rails console snippet will give you an estimate of number of lines per `Project` on a self-managed instance where the `git-data` is on a partition or directly attached volume.\\n\\nIt can break a bit if there's no `master` branch or if a repository for some reason doesn't have a `HEAD`, so it's not at all bullet-proof.\\n\\n```ruby\\nheaders = ['path', 'lines','archived?']\\nreport_file = Tempfile.new(['project_lines','.csv'])\\n\\nCSV.open(report_file.path, \\\"wb\\\") do |csv|\\ncsv \u003c\u003c headers\\n   Project.all.each do |p|\\n      output = `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l`\\n      csv \u003c\u003c [p.full_path, Integer(output),p.archived?]\\n   end; nil\\nend\\n\\nreport_file.close\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2930750323d45742084b921bd0f102d58807df7b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 332427265, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, statistics counting total and per lang number of lines (in code files only) would be so nice and basic.  \\nIgnore empty lines for me is optional. \\n\\nGet stats manually / locally for a git repo is not a problem. But this issue asks for the UI of gitlab. And this is what I need as well. \\n\\nhere a link to the current state: (older links above are expired)  \\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts \\n\\nHere a link for more advanced stats ambitions:  \\nhttps://www.openhub.net/p/gitlab\\n\\nedit: btw: If this is not happening since 5 years because of performance issues, then just calculate it once a week and show the calculation date next to it. I guess most people do not need per hour stats about n lines of code. For me even once per month would be enough. (And thus could be used for #12104 as well)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:08:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-03 07:59:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 882141, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3bdba5e20eedfcedc7eb1c6272fa93798b138610\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:13:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951334872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In order to get this request some attention, this issue has been marked as a potentially interesting proposal as it meets the following criteria:\\n\\n* Labelled as a feature proposal\\n* More than 10 upvotes\\n* Unscheduled (not associated with a milestone)\\n\\nThanks for your proposal!\\n\\n\\n\\n/cc @markglenfletcher\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73b69edb26083c702d2514effe76ca7da2d40407\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978971, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 154953, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"63b6ff0026abcb2ee9df9b28041655c7ab9fe563\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979021, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@billclark agreed\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2414870, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1328954e3c5076176230b846b4da51543092429b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If you do, make sure you somehow transfer the popularity and influence as well. \\nThis issue has 2 years of (possible sparse) history and 300+ upvotes. \\nThe newer one is month long. \\n\\nIt may make more sense to either transfer this one to EE, or merge the other one to here.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5db704a8ce0f10d43344ec9d98767153458c3c76\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979062, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"this just counts the raw line number of the files treated as pieces of texts. I guess what people want here is more like a per-language breakdown.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e32505249798e1b3e040ded861516658150259c6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979040, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Is there a way to get this data using the API?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0603dc2249187fa36328ff2f92debfc6c7db79d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"No it is not. That would be something for @matt_wilson to consider with the security dashboard.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5329074, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601097241, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We need more cowbell!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 196721, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616b443b97ad1443c199fb5f0af9780b51ddf379\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts is that what it looks today? seems like a regression.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951315993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I would like a total number of lines not including blank ones.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dcb61a50851d774190fa590cddf3e19f7a753f83\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979036, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer would also like to track lines of code per developer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404096482, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just started to use gitlab, and this is one the first stats i hoped to see in the \\\"Charts\\\", however i was surprised it's missing :(\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3219145, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-22 10:59:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979033, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"how come I can still receive notifications even if I unsubscribed???\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:19:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471203, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001FRuq0\\n\\nCustomer would like to see number of lines of code per language excluding comments. \\n\\n/cc @npost\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-30 01:30:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:47:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 387929331, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer interested in this feature. https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000W2eBo (Internal link)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4587928, \"created_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"35a9711c22330d7480c21b516ab890edccb85fb6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 258382372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"i will join, i want see my ego\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 688008, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8993bd8d42c15974c7f1eee7b8601e71e505626f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979006, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"for a company that has thousands of repositories that's just completely ineffective\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292139470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@bgadberry The customer may be able to pull the necessary vulnerability count information from the existing GraphQL API. I've never heard a request for this functionality before and don't have any plans to include it in the Security Dashboard reports so pulling the data and creating their own reports is the best way forward if this is needed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4708748, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601110834, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Same here!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4122216, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979054, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The developer of scc responded to proposals to update the code as desired. Resultant code is in this blog article: https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story and being worked into this working example for GitLab CI CD: https://gitlab.com/guided-explorations/ci-cd-plugin-extensions/ci-cd-plugin-extension-scc\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404663419, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@mlockhart in the context of an MVC I think we need to stick with measuring the default branch only, because that's what the Repository Analytics page is currently doing ([example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts)).\\n\\nOn the bright side, it seems the existing byte counts are being [updated on push](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/git/branch_push_service.rb#L54).  That makes me hopeful we could match that frequency with line counts.  So let's tentatively say the MVC would be updated pushly (instead of monthly like I proposed above).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409398149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Gold customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/154631 with a slight twist: they'd like to see the number of lines by group/sub-group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-24 18:02:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:37:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3b5c50effe1ea33f7f938b5693032964c2bdc512\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:46:35 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 331168435, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001lc3Cc\\n\\nCustomer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density. \\n\\n/cc @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 19:45:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 600990593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Had a similar request. I was able to get this info by extracting the Gitlab backup repositories from a backup and unbundling everything then running the following utility on the directory.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut it would be nice to see this kind of information on a project / server admin level, just to provide an overview of things currently within GitLab user / admin interfaces.\\r\\n\\r\\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\r\\n\\r\\n![image](/uploads/2e9c9fd05358a6e80411bfb9b323c214/image.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 261290, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:15:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-22 12:20:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 261290, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"186117b5b28df4eca7f2419b17ad900f90e61728\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:42:31 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978968, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Please add a chart with the SLOC metric, it is a metric more useful than the number of commits\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1276118, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 14:50:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 07:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"735fd7ef77d0bd7463126f7436eda8691d678998\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978960, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 695248, \"username\": \"lbot\", \"name\": \"Lee Matos\"}, {\"id\": 239547, \"username\": \"wil.rodriguez\", \"name\": \"William Rodriguez\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 87854, \"username\": \"DouweM\", \"name\": \"Douwe Maan\"}, {\"id\": 1187333, \"username\": \"jramsay-gitlab\", \"name\": \"James Ramsay (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 2182793, \"username\": \"craph1\", \"name\": \"craph\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 709639, \"username\": \"omidontop\", \"name\": \"Omid Manikhi\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 2346644, \"username\": \"ariaieboy\", \"name\": \"AriaieBOY\"}, {\"id\": 101578, \"username\": \"zj-gitlab\", \"name\": \"Zeger-Jan van de Weg\"}, {\"id\": 2223731, \"username\": \"bobbymcgill\", \"name\": \"Bobby McGill\"}, {\"id\": 2814876, \"username\": \"jim.robbins\", \"name\": \"Jim Robbins\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 4158075, \"username\": \"aakriti.gupta\", \"name\": \"Aakriti Gupta\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4911777, \"username\": \"i.hayden\", \"name\": \"Immanuel Hayden\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 635873, \"username\": \"pisarik\", \"name\": \"Vlad Blazhko\"}, {\"id\": 7536567, \"username\": \"hchouraria\", \"name\": \"Harsh Chouraria\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 424775, \"username\": \"markpundsack\", \"name\": \"Mark Pundsack\"}, {\"id\": 7978344, \"username\": \"robinshine\", \"name\": \"Robin Shen\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 4156460, \"username\": \"ogolowinski\", \"name\": \"Orit Golowinski\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 4447217, \"username\": \"ljlane\", \"name\": \"Larissa Lane\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4376883, \"username\": \"stkerr\", \"name\": \"Sam Kerr\"}, {\"id\": 3288671, \"username\": \"cupini\", \"name\": \"Brian Cupini\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 7272738, \"username\": \"kategrechishkina\", \"name\": \"Kate Grechishkina\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 5250128, \"username\": \"ricardoamarilla\", \"name\": \"Ricardo Amarilla\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 5291964, \"username\": \"crispindev\", \"name\": \"crispin velez\"}, {\"id\": 5537005, \"username\": \"cleveland\", \"name\": \"Cleveland Bledsoe Jr\"}, {\"id\": 4748523, \"username\": \"sheininger\", \"name\": \"Steffen Heininger\"}, {\"id\": 10051186, \"username\": \"kballon\", \"name\": \"Kent Japhet Ballon\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 154953, \"username\": \"Zandor300\", \"name\": \"Zandor Smith\"}, {\"id\": 2414870, \"username\": \"mason1920\", \"name\": \"mason1920\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 5329074, \"username\": \"tmccaslin\", \"name\": \"Taylor McCaslin\"}, {\"id\": 196721, \"username\": \"billclark\", \"name\": \"Bill Clark\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 3219145, \"username\": \"spprint\", \"name\": \"Sven Vet\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 4587928, \"username\": \"cbazan1\", \"name\": \"Carlos Bazan\"}, {\"id\": 688008, \"username\": \"friuns\", \"name\": \"friuns\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4708748, \"username\": \"matt_wilson\", \"name\": \"Matt Wilson\"}, {\"id\": 4122216, \"username\": \"saunved\", \"name\": \"Saunved Mutalik\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 261290, \"username\": \"TRPmwiesen\", \"name\": \"Matthew Wiesen\"}, {\"id\": 1276118, \"username\": \"wagnerpinheiro\", \"name\": \"Wagner Pinheiro\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What is the status of {url}?","query_id":"60a9ac2587cb4dda967bf9e6cd84b81e","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"24652824","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 24652824, \"title\": \"Report number of lines per language in repository charts\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-15 17:20:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"### Description\\n\\nAs of now, repository charts report percentage of language in the repo.\\nFirst, it is not obvious how this percentage is computed (number of files? number of lines? bytes? what about comments? libraries?). Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\n### Proposal\\n\\nAs a user I would like to see the number of lines of code per language.\\nIdeally, excluding blank lines and comments, but that is optional.\\n\\n### Documentation blurb\\n\\nAs for use cases:\\n* better understand the repo structure\\n* if this is your repo, being able to report the number of lines of your main language\\n    * this is one of the metric employers would like to know (I personally was surprised by this question on interview and could not clearly respond)\\n* all those use cases for general repo graphs (like pie chart of languages)\\n\\n### Details\\n\\n[A useful comment from ZJ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038):\\n\\n\u003e Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\n\u003e Lines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\n\u003e That all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\\n\\n### Potential Workarounds\\n\\n- Run `scc` in a GitLab CI pipeline: https://github.com/boyter/scc to generate SLOC/etc. reports\\n- If API use is acceptable (instead of UI), parts of its output stats can be stored as custom attributes on the project: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/custom_attributes.html#set-custom-attribute\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 17800, \"updated_by_id\": 5749302, \"weight\": 8, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -14979600, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-07-17 16:10:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 7536567, \"discussion_locked\": false, \"closed_at\": \"2023-01-19 09:38:40 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 579, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11039421, \"title\": \"Category:Code Analytics\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-18 19:25:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:07:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 7161201, \"title\": \"Manage [DEPRECATED]\", \"color\": \"#44AD8E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-19 05:48:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-19 11:52:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Please use the devops::manage label instead of this deprecated label. It is kept for historical issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1890178, \"title\": \"[deprecated] Accepting merge requests\", \"color\": \"#69d100\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 11:34:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-28 08:14:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"[deprecated] Please use \\\"Seeking community contributions\\\" instead. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/developer-relations/contributor-success/team-task/-/issues/77\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1672341, \"title\": \"customer\", \"color\": \"#ad4363\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that were reported by Enterprise Edition subscribers. This label should be accompanied by either the 'bug' or 'feature proposal' label\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 4107658, \"title\": \"graphs\", \"color\": \"#428bca\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the project Graphs pages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15237307, \"title\": \"icebox\", \"color\": \"#d6ecef\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:25:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:35:52 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues on which no work is anticipated in the next several milestones but which may be considered for work shortly thereafter thus not closed.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2936416, \"title\": \"popular proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Feature proposals deemed popular by our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/triage) will have this label applied\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2714266, \"title\": \"potential proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label added by triage tools to mark interesting feature proposals for consideration\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@dbogatov Thanks for the proposal. We'll just have to leave this open and see if it becomes a popular request.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73cf193764726f4ed724d78d4b59d4f81efe83cc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978957, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@wagnerpinheiro, [S]LOC metrics are rather old. They are not actual now (only in 80-90s they were). Your idea is pretty but only for developers ego. For really gentlemen customers GITLAB maybe have to improve their charts with different modern metrics. As example, for analyzing object-oriented languages they can add metric of Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 19:52:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 346483, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978961, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@yachmenov_c_ I have to admit, I had to look up what Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer metrics were. And yes, I would love to see those metrics in GitLab.\\n\\n**However**, I feel like it is quite hard (or say, resource heavy) to implement those. Each language will have to provide a service to get OOP relations. We cannot derive those metrics just by parsing the text.\\n\\n**On the other side**, simple line counter per language (even the one which omits comments and empty lines) is relatively easy to implement.\\n\\nAs for developers' ego, I have to admit it would not mind seeing LOC metrics, but I am sure there are other reasons for these metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:00:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978963, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, I mostly agree with you, really they can implement functionality you mentioned, and it would be great. Nice point!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"ZD ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/80860\\n\\nA Customer requested this feature. :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 695248, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2dba3df39df1cd81040cb0bc86091470aac43ffa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978965, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This would be awesome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 239547, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"604137042a54634c99ba7cda9b19e4db3570b396\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is getting popular\\n\\n@DouweM ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" for this one?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f1bbac293ede2d142630a69c9b499642ce9a40f8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher I think it may not be well defined enough yet for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" . We removed the repository language a while ago because it didn't perform well, so we'll need to figure out way to restore it without reintroducing the performance issue.\\n\\nThis is related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/40236 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23931. \\n\\n/cc @jramsay\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 87854, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23bac7a1ece7d87f5607254715120cb9067506ea\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978986, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If we can provide a foundation in gitlab-ce#23931 that computes the language stats without performance, we could definitely open this up for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1187333, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:16:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:17:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1187333, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"812e8d43c4b74c029c7327a6b783be67b2a0cd78\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978988, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Having the LOC in the table with the language breakdown and percentage would be great.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4a841d10fb4925ca2b102435a39a249fb1f1bb39\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hello,\\n\\nDisplay the LOC in the chart would be a very nice feature :slight_smile: \\n\\nAny update about this ?\\n\\nThank you very much.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2182793, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55170edc6cc50d1a2a20760c0bd5760b0dba68b6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978998, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi,\\u00a0I haven't heard anything back yet.\\nDennis\\nDennis Biringer | Principal Software EngineerPacific Defense Systems, LLC (PDS)Integrity Applications Incorporated535 Lipoa Parkway\\u00a0 Suite 101, Kihei HI, 96753dbiringer@integrity-apps.com(808) 214-0765\\n\\n[smime.p7s](/uploads/e849eea0083b79828f578febe315bdcd/smime.p7s)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55168747dda9172740a2eaa5e847403ed43121de\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979004, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We also would like to see the total number of lines of code, files, etc. Thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a6edf2d747aa859d84a4adfab95b10d53d7774d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979005, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@shellyniz Currently it's presented as a percentage via the API:\\n- https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#languages\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d201f77821e20f12477856580eab2e40804cc2dd\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979019, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Silly me, I was looking for it under the repo API. That's a big help, thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"093b696a8537efb99106d9d0b003220eb6ee8c01\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979020, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\\n\\nIt's a great feature to have especially if you're to brag about how much work has been put into the project in a presentation or something.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 709639, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:05:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:07:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b43271d3058f31f25e92e49015ea9efc4afc7d0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979022, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't see us getting to this anytime soon, but I'm happy to label this with gitlab-ce~1890178 for a community contribution. \\n\\nWe express languages as % of repo, might we also show the absolute LOC? The Charts page might be a sensible place to display this. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/graphs/master/charts for an example. The project overview page could also work, we currently use a multi-colored horizontal line to represent this and show percentages there on mouseover.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:16:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:18:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1f57d0559fe42979c7e6d35e07dbbbb6131d9855\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979029, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @jeremy\\\\_ \\nDo you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'?And so 'Total Lines Number'?\\nWhat's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34d9eb930ce114af06333350c5ff55483637cf7e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979031, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @markglenfletcher \\nIt's very good things that showing percent,but lines number complete it's feature,doesn't?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a92bea136cc9e32d787aa5742ed869a21d2ab49c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979032, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Do you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'? And so 'Total Lines Number'? What's your opinion?\\n\\nI'd love to hear your proposal, but I think the Charts page may be an easy place to add this:\\n\\n![image](/uploads/198f585f7e807ed931757b47a519d135/image.png)\\n\\nWe could include a separate column for LOC on each row, and include a \\\"Total\\\" row at the bottom that displays the sum of the rows. What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 06:32:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-24 12:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-10 12:54:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979035, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"any update about this feature ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2346644, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"075f869895c6f828be69c382f91a4a9b2dba20b5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\nLines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\nThat all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 101578, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"570bda01e243b5cf50fce1ba6adb9cd4605169f4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979038, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Not sure if this helps anyone, but if you use GitBash (or linux terminal) and go into your local repo and type this command:\\n`find . -not -path \\u201c*/.git/*\\u201d | xargs wc -l`\\nYou get the total line counts. No extra things to install - just a bash command.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2223731, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a894203f7adeeb1a1ed60f595000c3d28bf650ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979039, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is another possible way by using the git ls-files command with a file type filter.\\n\\n* Java example: `git ls-files *.java *.xml | xargs wc -l`\\n* Ruby example: `git ls-files *.rb Rakefile Gemfile | xargs wc -l`\\n\\nOr whatever files you want to include in your count. It can also works in subfolders to provide counts of just the contents of that folder.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2814876, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78a3685ac84f3e9f6999bd406e3ee07296be78f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979041, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My developer ego gives +1 for this stats. I think, if you count the lines anyway, it might be no problem to offer different stats as options, because the counting might be the most expensive part anyway. \\n\\n*Yeah* for looking at your developer productivity in numbers. :-)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a8d439996cd80acb0e887e19d4c7a32c3b38f3f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979042, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is not graphical and not included in gitlab, but it serves my interest totally. Also it might be a good starting point for Gitlab's implementation: \\n\\nhttps://github.com/AlDanial/cloc\\n\\nUse `cloc --vcs git` to count only watched files in a git repository.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e05053a4fedccfbd67d6045862d003aaff0c6202\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979043, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@aakriti.gupta, should we just close this one in favor of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104, since it's a prerequisite?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:46:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979061, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, yes, we will take everything from this one in account - it's planned for 12.2. Do you want to comment on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104? What's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3511154, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"45e71e7ac76abec3784d03cbdb2b1cbc301899ff\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979063, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This should not be moved to EE as the initial feature was added by the community.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5ac02291aab2c6a295e4df9adacd278f1278fc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979064, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @max-wittig for pointing out! The EE issue has more content, which will be available on group/instance level. We would like to move all analytics into one space in the top nav bar, so will be thinking through how to combine what is in cc now and the additional functionality we will be adding in ee. Any feedback is welcome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"50ead744b305fa1f532705f92d1dbd1b1ec7a298\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979065, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"As mentioned below, as long as we keep the history through a merge or copying over information, it sounds good to close this with an update @valexieva :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4158075, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979066, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@valexieva I wrote a small script, which reports the languages an instance has by exporting prometheus metrics. Relying just on absolute values would make a lot more sense, than the approach that I'm using now. But I won't use absolute numbers, if `EE` is required for this.\\n\\nhttps://github.com/max-wittig/gitlab-languages\\n\\nI think it would be fine, if the Graph feature stays in EE, but it would be nice, if the API would return absolute numbers.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:35:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:42:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1283330, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7bde2d02397a5cb7ae5b0b940c065224158203f5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979067, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Keeping this open until we complete: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13163. After that will close, the existing functionality will be available in CE, further functionality as per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104 in EE.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"94574f2b40c78694f4096c523c514fcca93041ce\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi, we have scheduled LOC plus language trends for 12.3 - please find here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104#note_194198775. We will also ensure that it's available for CE users in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/65616 before we remove the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/graphs/master/charts\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"16af6bd6af9d839ee0856e4771ce2d012a7dc48e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979073, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Github provides this feature, it would be nice to be able to obtain comparable metrics from Gitlab as we are using both.\\n\\nOur use case to get these numbers is for figuring out the prevalence of code in any given language across our entire codebase to inform us with requirements for code analysis tools etc. \\\"90% of language Y in repository X\\\" without any context to the number is mostly a useless metric. We need to understand how much language Y there is in totality across our multiple SCM systems. Now i can only count how many repos have a given language in general which is not exactly the same thing.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 14:53:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291742295, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@unitysipu \\nI would say for your use case it is better to just create a tool that clones all the repos you want metrics on and runs cloc or a similar tool - https://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\nHaving these metrics across groups/organizations in github and gitlab makes less sense to me than to provide some information about what powers a given project.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291953639, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The amount of code often correlates with things like risk. It's sorta interesting from analysis point of view if you have projects that have 500, 5000, 500k or 5M lines of code. You may want to prioritize or categorize the big projects over the small ones (obviously that's not the full picture, depends on what that code is used for etc.). But just looking at our entire codebase / repositories from the top and knowing there's \\\"90% of PHP\\\" in some project without understanding there's a million lines of it doesn't really help. So while individual teams may have a good grasp of their project, somebody looking over our entire portfolio you need more information to figure out who you should get in touch with. Obviously you can also try to check the file size metrics etc. and try to filter out uninteresting file types or other similar cumbersome workarounds but it's just more work to land on data that could easily be provided by the platform directly.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292157164, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Even if you have 1000 repos, it would still not be that much work to write a tool that accumulates all the information using the method I described, and you're going to get it a lot faster than by asking gitlab to add a feature. \\nAs for expanding the scope of this issue to cover groups and organizations as a whole, I guess gitlab devs might consider that as an enterprise feature at some point.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292558285, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, *obviously* there are workarounds that require you to analyze all the source code yourself. That's not the point of this feature request. I see the conversation revolving around suggestions and local optimizations for individual teams / developers or the importance of the amount of code in context of individuals. I figured it's prudent to provide another point of view that may have an impact on the thinking of why it's important to have this implemented. There are other use cases for the LOC/Language metrics that can be of importance for somebody who is looking at your organization as a whole.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293145108, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Honestly, with that chain of argument: Why have a commit graph? You can do this locally on your git repo. Or why have a bugtracker? You can just install trac separately. Or why have a wiki? Haven't you heard of mediaWiki? And so on. \\n\\nFact is, that this is a standard feature that has many uses for individuals and companies (also for example if I actually will bother to contribute to a code base or if its not worth it because id have to learn X new languages).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4911777, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:42:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4911777, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"044bd214cb760ef42c44b314a3243601c4c2f6a7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:10:44 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299631157, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I disagree. It's absolutely not ridiculous at all to have _code metrics_ available in the source code repository you might use.\\n\\nAny external tool will have to analyse the code outside of the SCM makes the whole process inherently ineffective and slow by design. Gitlab (and github) already has the code inside it and therefore is in the best position to provide metrics and data on it. Furthermore, modern (sophisticated) code analysis tools _integrate directly_ with Github these days through Github applications, but even they cannot provide this data either without analyzing the entire codebase separately.\\n\\nWhile workarounds exist they are all bad in a large organization. I agree that it's clear this is not a priority based on the fact it's been open for two years, but also it's clear that the reasoning and discussion around this feature is very narrow and developer (ego) oriented.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:36:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"005fc553fd9580804c00dd974606b58258f6d149\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299627593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"##### For person\\nPeople expect it, since various metrics implemented in GitHub. At some point everyone just genuinely interested in those metrics even only for self-esteem. And it is frustrating to not find them on GitLab. And since GitHub made everyone think to have them out-of-the-box, people became lazy and don't want to pollute their work environment with some difficult code inspection tools that they will use once just because of curiosity. \\n\\n##### For big team\\nIf you are working in a solid company with big code base, and you professionally perform code analysis and give consulting based on it, then it is ridiculous to do it on the basis of GitHub or GitLab, likely you will need to have more sophisticated special tool for it.\\n\\n##### Conclusion\\nSo this feature is not a mandatory. In first place GitLab need to improve its role system, this is a real bummer:) But GitLab doesn't do it for 2 years, so probably they have more important tasks. I prefer to use GitHub because of role system and metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 635873, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 13:32:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:35:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"96c7f0adc49d8ea2d2f64108bea473166fe3f13c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293348432, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A premium/silver customer has requested for this feature over support ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/220808 (internal link)\\n\\nIn particular they'd like an ability to query statistics about lines of code per detected language type, within each, and across all repositories under a group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7536567, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 13:07:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 7536567, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80839b906be084dee24b6e6d95e01d91af4e6b4a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:56:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 612192220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am proposing in another issue to update an existing open source tool to add MBs of code to the reports.\\n\\nThis is related to helping customers (and prospects) be able to estimate the long term costs of security scanning solutions that charge by lines or MBs of code.\\n\\nIf the tool were a CI stage, but GitLab could receive and parse the report to a UI - then the compute for this would only performed for and paid by customers who want the counts.\\n\\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/233018\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-31 00:05:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 164827, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 388534468, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@DarwinJS the blocker for us on this feature is a line-counting capability in Gitaly.  I noticed that [SCC](https://github.com/boyter/scc) is written in Go, as Gitaly is.  Seems like that could be a very happy coincidence for us.  Did you happen to dive deep enough into SCC to have an opinion about how challenging it might be to integrate into Gitaly?\\n\\nNote for others: SCC is the line-counting software that Darwin recommended in his [blog post](https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 408694264, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bmiller1 the context is helpful.\\n\\nThis is in the %Backlog for awareness\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 586004666, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@djensen - I settled on SCC, rather than the long standing CLOC (Perl) due to it being written in a modern language and, if the author was not able to add features, the hopes that someone at GitLab would.\\n\\nI did dive into the internals, but don't know enough about Go Lang nor Gitaly to comment on whether the two would tango well.\\n\\nIt is lightning fast - which I noticed when processing www-gitlab-com.\\n\\nHave you thought of this as a sidekiq process - not sure how good it would be at doing per-commit differentials in Gitaly and doing the full repo in Gitaly may be a lot of excess compute if it does it every commit?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409124927, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just like source control, you don't need to count all the lines of code in a repo every time.\\n\\nOnce you have a known count of lines at a specific commit, you can just track the diffs after that to increase/decrease line count for specific code and languages.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409309581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes I understand.\\nWhat I'm trying to indicate is that the machinations to isolate net new lines and net removed lines of code may be more processing load than simply scheduling scc weekly?  Especially given the speed of scc.\\n\\nIf that might be true, the question is how timely do line counts need to be?\\n\\nI don't know the answer - just highlighting that if line counts don't need to be up to the minute, there might be a cheaper way to do it.  It would also possibly allow direct dependency on scc, rather than forking it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409329832, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e It is lightning fast\\n\\nYes it is!  It crunches the entire gitlab repo in about 3 seconds on my machine ([results here](https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2013041)).  Not bad.\\n\\n\u003e how timely do line counts need to be?  I don't know the answer\\n\\nMe either, but let's guess it needs to be somewhere between monthly and daily.  (Hourly and commitly seem unnecessarily specific.)  Maybe we could start at monthly and see how it goes?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409366938, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Or, maybe proponents could weigh in on the frequency.\\n\\nI feel a compromise might be:\\n\\n * maintain a _count per branch_ (which could be very helpful anyway)\\n * trigger a count on the _first commit_ of any new branch (or make counting an option?)\\n * update all branch counts _monthly_ (or, only branches that have a flag indicating that they should be counted)\\n\\nThat way, the regular update frequency is down to one count per project branch, per month, and Developers can force a new count by pushing a new branch (perhaps they might have a special case to have up-to-the-commit counts).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:50:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:54:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 5791080, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409381230, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In addition, I would like to understand uses cases for getting as fine as \\\"per branch\\\" code counts - what would someone use this for and how often?  If it is very occasional and/or for a bespoke purpose, they could just run scc themselves on a local copy.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 410590466, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Starter customer requesting this feature in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/172665\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f820fe272fadfd61eb4c19317bb2d45f71f25fa4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 416263002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\nAs the description states, the goal is to understand what the bar means, and see some absolute data. @jeremy Would the MVC here be to simply report the number of bytes, since that's what we're measuring?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 424775, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ccc8a3b61fc8f4f779b6b63486fb31d54c005cc9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 288529601, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[OneDev](https://github.com/theonedev/onedev) calculates SLOC per languages and display the trends over time which is quite interesting. An example trends here:\\n\\nhttps://code.onedev.io/projects/react/stats/lines\\n\\nOne can hover mouse on the trend to show SLOC by day. The initial calculation for a large repo such as Linux takes about 30 min, and the result will be cached. Subsequent updates for new commits will be fairly fast based on cache. Below is the logic for calculation if someone is interested:\\n\\nhttps://github.com/theonedev/onedev/blob/main/server-core/src/main/java/io/onedev/server/infomanager/DefaultCommitInfoManager.java\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7978344, \"created_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"19fa4567d0d0f1d5842c5ba6beae8267aebb0a4e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 483620034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is moving back to the %Backlog for the reasons described in ZJ's [comment above](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038). We're absolutely accepting merge requests on this one, but the Manage stage needs to prioritize other areas at the moment.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd32244cb8a10270e97506088fe7772e17dbcf11\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 242549553, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher please fix this ASAP.\\nI am surprised Gitlab has no protection against this crap.\\nYou will end up with people massively unsubscribing at best.\\n\\nP.S. This idiot keeps recreating accounts.\\nA simple post factum ban will not work.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 12:57:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 920678, \"type\": null, \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d54912a045e3ea6508b3cf9ea3c8d3f2c3f3784\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471910, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is a certain lag.\\nI suggest we do not subscribe back until admins fix it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503473194, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner I actually think this should go to ~\\\"group::source code\\\" , WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4156460, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 579827345, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI - Since Apex code is essentially extended Java with a few accompanying .xml metadata files, my customer was able to run `scc \\u2013count-as cls:java` to interpret Apex .cls files as Java.  scc understands the comment and syntax structure of Java and was able to correctly return the LOC.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 587249173, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I think that makes a lot of sense @ogolowinski\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4447217, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580171017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ogolowinski Yep, I agree. Thanks for changing the group.\\n\\nThis is going to remain in the backlog as it is not our current focus and based on [details](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#details) in the description, LOE will be quite high. Thanks.\\n\\ncc @cupini\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580236144, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@cupini I'm tagging @ljlane who is the PM for ~\\\"group::optimize\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4376883, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562100410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" ~\\\"self-managed\\\" ~customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\n* Link to request:  https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001Eo1h0\\n* Why interested: Want to report on all repos (instance-level) for languages used in repos for tools info\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: Workarounds are nice but would be nice to get an instance-view instantly \\n* PM to mention: @stkerr\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3288671, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-27 23:22:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562089576, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"An Ultimate customer is interested in this feature.\\n* Link to request: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000014HWYo\\n* Why interested: They have a need to report LoC for their Apex repos.\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: We have not found an adequate workaround\\n* PM to mention: @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-20 21:51:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 581438360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another Premium customer is interested in this feature: [#223248](https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/223248)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7272738, \"created_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e8ddc8cdcb1c801921ec5c22320c15c418b8826\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 622513819, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another customer inquiring if this function exists\\nhttps://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/161342\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fe28d2e0f29b158bfc492b79ea8883a16e1d5fb7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364390361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" Customer  interested in this feature [Internal Link](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001kHlpn)\\n\\ncc/ @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5250128, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-18 19:30:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:09:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3f6ffdb391745aec7053e4585f952953cbf32152\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 706872228, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer here: we compile this data periodically for use by the C-suite and even if the absolute numbers are representative of byte counts it is easy enough for me to use an estimate of bytes per line to get what I need.\\n\\nThe key is that I have nothing without absolute numbers.\\n\\nAlso, please consider the non-gitlab.com use case. Perhaps on our hosted instance we would be able to opt-in to a feature like this if it were available and we can decide for ourselves if the performance is acceptable.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78631ce204289b27d0730dbec72b8b9a7f770fec\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364645655, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My company is a Premium customer - we would really like to have this and even more metrics regarding type of language like number of components, files, etc.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5291964, \"created_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3790f9053863d8b679f99d4cc896f3ffb8c450e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 721314226, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"- SF: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000Ut0JyAAJ\\n- ZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/254826\\n\\n~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" customer is interested in this feature.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5537005, \"created_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af4170834a554c4135225876e22c91fadd8c35f2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 791792997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"1900 seat ~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" [Customer](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000002xBZQ) is interested in this feature.\\n\\n- Priority: ~\\\"customer priority::5\\\"  priority::\\n- Why interested: Customer is trying to find a way to report the total line of code across all GitLab projects.\\n- Problem they are trying to solve: Customer has some internal teams who are trying trying to integrate tooling with GitLab to measure and track code coverage. There\\u2019s a cost associated with expanding those other tools and without the ability to report the number of lines it's nearly impossible to estimate said cost.\\n- Current solution for this problem: none\\n- Impact to the customer of not having this: Inability to utilize other tools in conjunction with GitLab and thus slowing adoption of the platform.\\n- Questions: Are they're any other workarounds for this, even at a manual reporting level? \\n- PM to mention: @tlinz\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4748523, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-14 14:49:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-15 13:33:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e76285e7c35cbca1481c16ed2c1ad5b7d232b65e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 990978163, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A Premium customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\nZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/284853\\n\\nThe workaround mentioned [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_332427265) unfortunately is hitting this error at the moment. I wonder if you have thoughts about this @lyle ?\\n\\n```\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n3: from (irb):3\\n2: from lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb:85:in `path'\\n1: from lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/storage_settings.rb:65:in `legacy_disk_path'\\nGitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings::DirectPathAccessError (git disk access denied)\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10051186, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 08:09:53 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 924067966, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Seems related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350080. This was always a bit of a hack, and relied on manually executing `git` commands directly on the repo.\\n\\nYou could take (and modify) the same core:\\n\\n`/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l` and run it directly on the command line given a list of paths generated from `rails`\\n\\nThere's a bunch of caveats there though:\\n- `master` is not necessarily the default branch name (we transitioned in GitLab to `main` some time ago)\\n- It relies on counting the actual number of lines in a file `wc -l` and does it for every file in a repo. This will include licenses, headers, empty space and so on.\\n\\nThere are some additional thoughts in https://gist.github.com/mandiwise/dc53cb9da00856d7cdbb that have iterated on my approach from two years ago :sweat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 925281183, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bgadberry \\n\\nIt seems like with the additional customer problem you need solved that there should be another issue for this...?\\n\\n\u003e Customer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density.\\n\\nThis does not seem directly related. Correct me if I am wrong!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601066055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner You're correct. I was thinking the customer could calculate the metric manually once number of lines of code is made available. On second thought, I think we can calculate vulnerabilities per byte today. I'll report back if that suffices.\\n\\n@tmccaslin Is this vulnerability per byte/line of code metric something we've considered uncovering as part of SAST?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601093808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"It's not per _language_ but the following rails console snippet will give you an estimate of number of lines per `Project` on a self-managed instance where the `git-data` is on a partition or directly attached volume.\\n\\nIt can break a bit if there's no `master` branch or if a repository for some reason doesn't have a `HEAD`, so it's not at all bullet-proof.\\n\\n```ruby\\nheaders = ['path', 'lines','archived?']\\nreport_file = Tempfile.new(['project_lines','.csv'])\\n\\nCSV.open(report_file.path, \\\"wb\\\") do |csv|\\ncsv \u003c\u003c headers\\n   Project.all.each do |p|\\n      output = `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l`\\n      csv \u003c\u003c [p.full_path, Integer(output),p.archived?]\\n   end; nil\\nend\\n\\nreport_file.close\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2930750323d45742084b921bd0f102d58807df7b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 332427265, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, statistics counting total and per lang number of lines (in code files only) would be so nice and basic.  \\nIgnore empty lines for me is optional. \\n\\nGet stats manually / locally for a git repo is not a problem. But this issue asks for the UI of gitlab. And this is what I need as well. \\n\\nhere a link to the current state: (older links above are expired)  \\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts \\n\\nHere a link for more advanced stats ambitions:  \\nhttps://www.openhub.net/p/gitlab\\n\\nedit: btw: If this is not happening since 5 years because of performance issues, then just calculate it once a week and show the calculation date next to it. I guess most people do not need per hour stats about n lines of code. For me even once per month would be enough. (And thus could be used for #12104 as well)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:08:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-03 07:59:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 882141, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3bdba5e20eedfcedc7eb1c6272fa93798b138610\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:13:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951334872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In order to get this request some attention, this issue has been marked as a potentially interesting proposal as it meets the following criteria:\\n\\n* Labelled as a feature proposal\\n* More than 10 upvotes\\n* Unscheduled (not associated with a milestone)\\n\\nThanks for your proposal!\\n\\n\\n\\n/cc @markglenfletcher\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73b69edb26083c702d2514effe76ca7da2d40407\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978971, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 154953, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"63b6ff0026abcb2ee9df9b28041655c7ab9fe563\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979021, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@billclark agreed\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2414870, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1328954e3c5076176230b846b4da51543092429b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If you do, make sure you somehow transfer the popularity and influence as well. \\nThis issue has 2 years of (possible sparse) history and 300+ upvotes. \\nThe newer one is month long. \\n\\nIt may make more sense to either transfer this one to EE, or merge the other one to here.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5db704a8ce0f10d43344ec9d98767153458c3c76\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979062, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"this just counts the raw line number of the files treated as pieces of texts. I guess what people want here is more like a per-language breakdown.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e32505249798e1b3e040ded861516658150259c6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979040, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Is there a way to get this data using the API?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0603dc2249187fa36328ff2f92debfc6c7db79d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"No it is not. That would be something for @matt_wilson to consider with the security dashboard.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5329074, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601097241, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We need more cowbell!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 196721, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616b443b97ad1443c199fb5f0af9780b51ddf379\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts is that what it looks today? seems like a regression.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951315993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I would like a total number of lines not including blank ones.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dcb61a50851d774190fa590cddf3e19f7a753f83\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979036, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer would also like to track lines of code per developer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404096482, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just started to use gitlab, and this is one the first stats i hoped to see in the \\\"Charts\\\", however i was surprised it's missing :(\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3219145, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-22 10:59:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979033, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"how come I can still receive notifications even if I unsubscribed???\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:19:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471203, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001FRuq0\\n\\nCustomer would like to see number of lines of code per language excluding comments. \\n\\n/cc @npost\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-30 01:30:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:47:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 387929331, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer interested in this feature. https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000W2eBo (Internal link)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4587928, \"created_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"35a9711c22330d7480c21b516ab890edccb85fb6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 258382372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"i will join, i want see my ego\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 688008, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8993bd8d42c15974c7f1eee7b8601e71e505626f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979006, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"for a company that has thousands of repositories that's just completely ineffective\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292139470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@bgadberry The customer may be able to pull the necessary vulnerability count information from the existing GraphQL API. I've never heard a request for this functionality before and don't have any plans to include it in the Security Dashboard reports so pulling the data and creating their own reports is the best way forward if this is needed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4708748, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601110834, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Same here!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4122216, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979054, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The developer of scc responded to proposals to update the code as desired. Resultant code is in this blog article: https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story and being worked into this working example for GitLab CI CD: https://gitlab.com/guided-explorations/ci-cd-plugin-extensions/ci-cd-plugin-extension-scc\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404663419, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@mlockhart in the context of an MVC I think we need to stick with measuring the default branch only, because that's what the Repository Analytics page is currently doing ([example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts)).\\n\\nOn the bright side, it seems the existing byte counts are being [updated on push](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/git/branch_push_service.rb#L54).  That makes me hopeful we could match that frequency with line counts.  So let's tentatively say the MVC would be updated pushly (instead of monthly like I proposed above).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409398149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Gold customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/154631 with a slight twist: they'd like to see the number of lines by group/sub-group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-24 18:02:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:37:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3b5c50effe1ea33f7f938b5693032964c2bdc512\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:46:35 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 331168435, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001lc3Cc\\n\\nCustomer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density. \\n\\n/cc @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 19:45:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 600990593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Had a similar request. I was able to get this info by extracting the Gitlab backup repositories from a backup and unbundling everything then running the following utility on the directory.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut it would be nice to see this kind of information on a project / server admin level, just to provide an overview of things currently within GitLab user / admin interfaces.\\r\\n\\r\\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\r\\n\\r\\n![image](/uploads/2e9c9fd05358a6e80411bfb9b323c214/image.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 261290, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:15:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-22 12:20:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 261290, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"186117b5b28df4eca7f2419b17ad900f90e61728\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:42:31 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978968, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Please add a chart with the SLOC metric, it is a metric more useful than the number of commits\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1276118, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 14:50:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 07:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"735fd7ef77d0bd7463126f7436eda8691d678998\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978960, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 695248, \"username\": \"lbot\", \"name\": \"Lee Matos\"}, {\"id\": 239547, \"username\": \"wil.rodriguez\", \"name\": \"William Rodriguez\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 87854, \"username\": \"DouweM\", \"name\": \"Douwe Maan\"}, {\"id\": 1187333, \"username\": \"jramsay-gitlab\", \"name\": \"James Ramsay (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 2182793, \"username\": \"craph1\", \"name\": \"craph\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 709639, \"username\": \"omidontop\", \"name\": \"Omid Manikhi\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 2346644, \"username\": \"ariaieboy\", \"name\": \"AriaieBOY\"}, {\"id\": 101578, \"username\": \"zj-gitlab\", \"name\": \"Zeger-Jan van de Weg\"}, {\"id\": 2223731, \"username\": \"bobbymcgill\", \"name\": \"Bobby McGill\"}, {\"id\": 2814876, \"username\": \"jim.robbins\", \"name\": \"Jim Robbins\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 4158075, \"username\": \"aakriti.gupta\", \"name\": \"Aakriti Gupta\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4911777, \"username\": \"i.hayden\", \"name\": \"Immanuel Hayden\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 635873, \"username\": \"pisarik\", \"name\": \"Vlad Blazhko\"}, {\"id\": 7536567, \"username\": \"hchouraria\", \"name\": \"Harsh Chouraria\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 424775, \"username\": \"markpundsack\", \"name\": \"Mark Pundsack\"}, {\"id\": 7978344, \"username\": \"robinshine\", \"name\": \"Robin Shen\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 4156460, \"username\": \"ogolowinski\", \"name\": \"Orit Golowinski\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 4447217, \"username\": \"ljlane\", \"name\": \"Larissa Lane\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4376883, \"username\": \"stkerr\", \"name\": \"Sam Kerr\"}, {\"id\": 3288671, \"username\": \"cupini\", \"name\": \"Brian Cupini\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 7272738, \"username\": \"kategrechishkina\", \"name\": \"Kate Grechishkina\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 5250128, \"username\": \"ricardoamarilla\", \"name\": \"Ricardo Amarilla\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 5291964, \"username\": \"crispindev\", \"name\": \"crispin velez\"}, {\"id\": 5537005, \"username\": \"cleveland\", \"name\": \"Cleveland Bledsoe Jr\"}, {\"id\": 4748523, \"username\": \"sheininger\", \"name\": \"Steffen Heininger\"}, {\"id\": 10051186, \"username\": \"kballon\", \"name\": \"Kent Japhet Ballon\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 154953, \"username\": \"Zandor300\", \"name\": \"Zandor Smith\"}, {\"id\": 2414870, \"username\": \"mason1920\", \"name\": \"mason1920\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 5329074, \"username\": \"tmccaslin\", \"name\": \"Taylor McCaslin\"}, {\"id\": 196721, \"username\": \"billclark\", \"name\": \"Bill Clark\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 3219145, \"username\": \"spprint\", \"name\": \"Sven Vet\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 4587928, \"username\": \"cbazan1\", \"name\": \"Carlos Bazan\"}, {\"id\": 688008, \"username\": \"friuns\", \"name\": \"friuns\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4708748, \"username\": \"matt_wilson\", \"name\": \"Matt Wilson\"}, {\"id\": 4122216, \"username\": \"saunved\", \"name\": \"Saunved Mutalik\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 261290, \"username\": \"TRPmwiesen\", \"name\": \"Matthew Wiesen\"}, {\"id\": 1276118, \"username\": \"wagnerpinheiro\", \"name\": \"Wagner Pinheiro\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Please summarize the latest activity and current status of the issue {url}.","query_id":"5e05b9a1e681447bb7da49d3142fd31a","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"24652824","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 24652824, \"title\": \"Report number of lines per language in repository charts\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-15 17:20:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"### Description\\n\\nAs of now, repository charts report percentage of language in the repo.\\nFirst, it is not obvious how this percentage is computed (number of files? number of lines? bytes? what about comments? libraries?). Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\n### Proposal\\n\\nAs a user I would like to see the number of lines of code per language.\\nIdeally, excluding blank lines and comments, but that is optional.\\n\\n### Documentation blurb\\n\\nAs for use cases:\\n* better understand the repo structure\\n* if this is your repo, being able to report the number of lines of your main language\\n    * this is one of the metric employers would like to know (I personally was surprised by this question on interview and could not clearly respond)\\n* all those use cases for general repo graphs (like pie chart of languages)\\n\\n### Details\\n\\n[A useful comment from ZJ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038):\\n\\n\u003e Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\n\u003e Lines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\n\u003e That all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\\n\\n### Potential Workarounds\\n\\n- Run `scc` in a GitLab CI pipeline: https://github.com/boyter/scc to generate SLOC/etc. reports\\n- If API use is acceptable (instead of UI), parts of its output stats can be stored as custom attributes on the project: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/custom_attributes.html#set-custom-attribute\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 17800, \"updated_by_id\": 5749302, \"weight\": 8, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -14979600, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-07-17 16:10:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 7536567, \"discussion_locked\": false, \"closed_at\": \"2023-01-19 09:38:40 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 579, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11039421, \"title\": \"Category:Code Analytics\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-18 19:25:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:07:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 7161201, \"title\": \"Manage [DEPRECATED]\", \"color\": \"#44AD8E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-19 05:48:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-19 11:52:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Please use the devops::manage label instead of this deprecated label. It is kept for historical issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1890178, \"title\": \"[deprecated] Accepting merge requests\", \"color\": \"#69d100\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 11:34:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-28 08:14:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"[deprecated] Please use \\\"Seeking community contributions\\\" instead. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/developer-relations/contributor-success/team-task/-/issues/77\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1672341, \"title\": \"customer\", \"color\": \"#ad4363\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that were reported by Enterprise Edition subscribers. This label should be accompanied by either the 'bug' or 'feature proposal' label\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 4107658, \"title\": \"graphs\", \"color\": \"#428bca\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the project Graphs pages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15237307, \"title\": \"icebox\", \"color\": \"#d6ecef\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:25:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:35:52 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues on which no work is anticipated in the next several milestones but which may be considered for work shortly thereafter thus not closed.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2936416, \"title\": \"popular proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Feature proposals deemed popular by our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/triage) will have this label applied\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2714266, \"title\": \"potential proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label added by triage tools to mark interesting feature proposals for consideration\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@dbogatov Thanks for the proposal. We'll just have to leave this open and see if it becomes a popular request.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73cf193764726f4ed724d78d4b59d4f81efe83cc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978957, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@wagnerpinheiro, [S]LOC metrics are rather old. They are not actual now (only in 80-90s they were). Your idea is pretty but only for developers ego. For really gentlemen customers GITLAB maybe have to improve their charts with different modern metrics. As example, for analyzing object-oriented languages they can add metric of Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 19:52:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 346483, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978961, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@yachmenov_c_ I have to admit, I had to look up what Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer metrics were. And yes, I would love to see those metrics in GitLab.\\n\\n**However**, I feel like it is quite hard (or say, resource heavy) to implement those. Each language will have to provide a service to get OOP relations. We cannot derive those metrics just by parsing the text.\\n\\n**On the other side**, simple line counter per language (even the one which omits comments and empty lines) is relatively easy to implement.\\n\\nAs for developers' ego, I have to admit it would not mind seeing LOC metrics, but I am sure there are other reasons for these metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:00:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978963, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, I mostly agree with you, really they can implement functionality you mentioned, and it would be great. Nice point!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"ZD ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/80860\\n\\nA Customer requested this feature. :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 695248, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2dba3df39df1cd81040cb0bc86091470aac43ffa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978965, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This would be awesome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 239547, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"604137042a54634c99ba7cda9b19e4db3570b396\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is getting popular\\n\\n@DouweM ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" for this one?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f1bbac293ede2d142630a69c9b499642ce9a40f8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher I think it may not be well defined enough yet for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" . We removed the repository language a while ago because it didn't perform well, so we'll need to figure out way to restore it without reintroducing the performance issue.\\n\\nThis is related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/40236 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23931. \\n\\n/cc @jramsay\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 87854, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23bac7a1ece7d87f5607254715120cb9067506ea\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978986, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If we can provide a foundation in gitlab-ce#23931 that computes the language stats without performance, we could definitely open this up for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1187333, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:16:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:17:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1187333, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"812e8d43c4b74c029c7327a6b783be67b2a0cd78\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978988, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Having the LOC in the table with the language breakdown and percentage would be great.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4a841d10fb4925ca2b102435a39a249fb1f1bb39\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hello,\\n\\nDisplay the LOC in the chart would be a very nice feature :slight_smile: \\n\\nAny update about this ?\\n\\nThank you very much.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2182793, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55170edc6cc50d1a2a20760c0bd5760b0dba68b6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978998, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi,\\u00a0I haven't heard anything back yet.\\nDennis\\nDennis Biringer | Principal Software EngineerPacific Defense Systems, LLC (PDS)Integrity Applications Incorporated535 Lipoa Parkway\\u00a0 Suite 101, Kihei HI, 96753dbiringer@integrity-apps.com(808) 214-0765\\n\\n[smime.p7s](/uploads/e849eea0083b79828f578febe315bdcd/smime.p7s)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55168747dda9172740a2eaa5e847403ed43121de\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979004, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We also would like to see the total number of lines of code, files, etc. Thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a6edf2d747aa859d84a4adfab95b10d53d7774d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979005, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@shellyniz Currently it's presented as a percentage via the API:\\n- https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#languages\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d201f77821e20f12477856580eab2e40804cc2dd\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979019, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Silly me, I was looking for it under the repo API. That's a big help, thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"093b696a8537efb99106d9d0b003220eb6ee8c01\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979020, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\\n\\nIt's a great feature to have especially if you're to brag about how much work has been put into the project in a presentation or something.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 709639, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:05:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:07:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b43271d3058f31f25e92e49015ea9efc4afc7d0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979022, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't see us getting to this anytime soon, but I'm happy to label this with gitlab-ce~1890178 for a community contribution. \\n\\nWe express languages as % of repo, might we also show the absolute LOC? The Charts page might be a sensible place to display this. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/graphs/master/charts for an example. The project overview page could also work, we currently use a multi-colored horizontal line to represent this and show percentages there on mouseover.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:16:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:18:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1f57d0559fe42979c7e6d35e07dbbbb6131d9855\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979029, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @jeremy\\\\_ \\nDo you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'?And so 'Total Lines Number'?\\nWhat's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34d9eb930ce114af06333350c5ff55483637cf7e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979031, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @markglenfletcher \\nIt's very good things that showing percent,but lines number complete it's feature,doesn't?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a92bea136cc9e32d787aa5742ed869a21d2ab49c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979032, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Do you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'? And so 'Total Lines Number'? What's your opinion?\\n\\nI'd love to hear your proposal, but I think the Charts page may be an easy place to add this:\\n\\n![image](/uploads/198f585f7e807ed931757b47a519d135/image.png)\\n\\nWe could include a separate column for LOC on each row, and include a \\\"Total\\\" row at the bottom that displays the sum of the rows. What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 06:32:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-24 12:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-10 12:54:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979035, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"any update about this feature ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2346644, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"075f869895c6f828be69c382f91a4a9b2dba20b5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\nLines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\nThat all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 101578, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"570bda01e243b5cf50fce1ba6adb9cd4605169f4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979038, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Not sure if this helps anyone, but if you use GitBash (or linux terminal) and go into your local repo and type this command:\\n`find . -not -path \\u201c*/.git/*\\u201d | xargs wc -l`\\nYou get the total line counts. No extra things to install - just a bash command.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2223731, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a894203f7adeeb1a1ed60f595000c3d28bf650ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979039, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is another possible way by using the git ls-files command with a file type filter.\\n\\n* Java example: `git ls-files *.java *.xml | xargs wc -l`\\n* Ruby example: `git ls-files *.rb Rakefile Gemfile | xargs wc -l`\\n\\nOr whatever files you want to include in your count. It can also works in subfolders to provide counts of just the contents of that folder.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2814876, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78a3685ac84f3e9f6999bd406e3ee07296be78f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979041, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My developer ego gives +1 for this stats. I think, if you count the lines anyway, it might be no problem to offer different stats as options, because the counting might be the most expensive part anyway. \\n\\n*Yeah* for looking at your developer productivity in numbers. :-)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a8d439996cd80acb0e887e19d4c7a32c3b38f3f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979042, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is not graphical and not included in gitlab, but it serves my interest totally. Also it might be a good starting point for Gitlab's implementation: \\n\\nhttps://github.com/AlDanial/cloc\\n\\nUse `cloc --vcs git` to count only watched files in a git repository.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e05053a4fedccfbd67d6045862d003aaff0c6202\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979043, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@aakriti.gupta, should we just close this one in favor of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104, since it's a prerequisite?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:46:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979061, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, yes, we will take everything from this one in account - it's planned for 12.2. Do you want to comment on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104? What's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3511154, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"45e71e7ac76abec3784d03cbdb2b1cbc301899ff\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979063, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This should not be moved to EE as the initial feature was added by the community.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5ac02291aab2c6a295e4df9adacd278f1278fc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979064, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @max-wittig for pointing out! The EE issue has more content, which will be available on group/instance level. We would like to move all analytics into one space in the top nav bar, so will be thinking through how to combine what is in cc now and the additional functionality we will be adding in ee. Any feedback is welcome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"50ead744b305fa1f532705f92d1dbd1b1ec7a298\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979065, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"As mentioned below, as long as we keep the history through a merge or copying over information, it sounds good to close this with an update @valexieva :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4158075, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979066, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@valexieva I wrote a small script, which reports the languages an instance has by exporting prometheus metrics. Relying just on absolute values would make a lot more sense, than the approach that I'm using now. But I won't use absolute numbers, if `EE` is required for this.\\n\\nhttps://github.com/max-wittig/gitlab-languages\\n\\nI think it would be fine, if the Graph feature stays in EE, but it would be nice, if the API would return absolute numbers.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:35:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:42:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1283330, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7bde2d02397a5cb7ae5b0b940c065224158203f5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979067, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Keeping this open until we complete: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13163. After that will close, the existing functionality will be available in CE, further functionality as per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104 in EE.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"94574f2b40c78694f4096c523c514fcca93041ce\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi, we have scheduled LOC plus language trends for 12.3 - please find here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104#note_194198775. We will also ensure that it's available for CE users in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/65616 before we remove the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/graphs/master/charts\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"16af6bd6af9d839ee0856e4771ce2d012a7dc48e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979073, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Github provides this feature, it would be nice to be able to obtain comparable metrics from Gitlab as we are using both.\\n\\nOur use case to get these numbers is for figuring out the prevalence of code in any given language across our entire codebase to inform us with requirements for code analysis tools etc. \\\"90% of language Y in repository X\\\" without any context to the number is mostly a useless metric. We need to understand how much language Y there is in totality across our multiple SCM systems. Now i can only count how many repos have a given language in general which is not exactly the same thing.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 14:53:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291742295, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@unitysipu \\nI would say for your use case it is better to just create a tool that clones all the repos you want metrics on and runs cloc or a similar tool - https://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\nHaving these metrics across groups/organizations in github and gitlab makes less sense to me than to provide some information about what powers a given project.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291953639, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The amount of code often correlates with things like risk. It's sorta interesting from analysis point of view if you have projects that have 500, 5000, 500k or 5M lines of code. You may want to prioritize or categorize the big projects over the small ones (obviously that's not the full picture, depends on what that code is used for etc.). But just looking at our entire codebase / repositories from the top and knowing there's \\\"90% of PHP\\\" in some project without understanding there's a million lines of it doesn't really help. So while individual teams may have a good grasp of their project, somebody looking over our entire portfolio you need more information to figure out who you should get in touch with. Obviously you can also try to check the file size metrics etc. and try to filter out uninteresting file types or other similar cumbersome workarounds but it's just more work to land on data that could easily be provided by the platform directly.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292157164, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Even if you have 1000 repos, it would still not be that much work to write a tool that accumulates all the information using the method I described, and you're going to get it a lot faster than by asking gitlab to add a feature. \\nAs for expanding the scope of this issue to cover groups and organizations as a whole, I guess gitlab devs might consider that as an enterprise feature at some point.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292558285, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, *obviously* there are workarounds that require you to analyze all the source code yourself. That's not the point of this feature request. I see the conversation revolving around suggestions and local optimizations for individual teams / developers or the importance of the amount of code in context of individuals. I figured it's prudent to provide another point of view that may have an impact on the thinking of why it's important to have this implemented. There are other use cases for the LOC/Language metrics that can be of importance for somebody who is looking at your organization as a whole.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293145108, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Honestly, with that chain of argument: Why have a commit graph? You can do this locally on your git repo. Or why have a bugtracker? You can just install trac separately. Or why have a wiki? Haven't you heard of mediaWiki? And so on. \\n\\nFact is, that this is a standard feature that has many uses for individuals and companies (also for example if I actually will bother to contribute to a code base or if its not worth it because id have to learn X new languages).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4911777, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:42:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4911777, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"044bd214cb760ef42c44b314a3243601c4c2f6a7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:10:44 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299631157, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I disagree. It's absolutely not ridiculous at all to have _code metrics_ available in the source code repository you might use.\\n\\nAny external tool will have to analyse the code outside of the SCM makes the whole process inherently ineffective and slow by design. Gitlab (and github) already has the code inside it and therefore is in the best position to provide metrics and data on it. Furthermore, modern (sophisticated) code analysis tools _integrate directly_ with Github these days through Github applications, but even they cannot provide this data either without analyzing the entire codebase separately.\\n\\nWhile workarounds exist they are all bad in a large organization. I agree that it's clear this is not a priority based on the fact it's been open for two years, but also it's clear that the reasoning and discussion around this feature is very narrow and developer (ego) oriented.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:36:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"005fc553fd9580804c00dd974606b58258f6d149\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299627593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"##### For person\\nPeople expect it, since various metrics implemented in GitHub. At some point everyone just genuinely interested in those metrics even only for self-esteem. And it is frustrating to not find them on GitLab. And since GitHub made everyone think to have them out-of-the-box, people became lazy and don't want to pollute their work environment with some difficult code inspection tools that they will use once just because of curiosity. \\n\\n##### For big team\\nIf you are working in a solid company with big code base, and you professionally perform code analysis and give consulting based on it, then it is ridiculous to do it on the basis of GitHub or GitLab, likely you will need to have more sophisticated special tool for it.\\n\\n##### Conclusion\\nSo this feature is not a mandatory. In first place GitLab need to improve its role system, this is a real bummer:) But GitLab doesn't do it for 2 years, so probably they have more important tasks. I prefer to use GitHub because of role system and metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 635873, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 13:32:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:35:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"96c7f0adc49d8ea2d2f64108bea473166fe3f13c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293348432, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A premium/silver customer has requested for this feature over support ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/220808 (internal link)\\n\\nIn particular they'd like an ability to query statistics about lines of code per detected language type, within each, and across all repositories under a group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7536567, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 13:07:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 7536567, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80839b906be084dee24b6e6d95e01d91af4e6b4a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:56:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 612192220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am proposing in another issue to update an existing open source tool to add MBs of code to the reports.\\n\\nThis is related to helping customers (and prospects) be able to estimate the long term costs of security scanning solutions that charge by lines or MBs of code.\\n\\nIf the tool were a CI stage, but GitLab could receive and parse the report to a UI - then the compute for this would only performed for and paid by customers who want the counts.\\n\\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/233018\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-31 00:05:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 164827, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 388534468, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@DarwinJS the blocker for us on this feature is a line-counting capability in Gitaly.  I noticed that [SCC](https://github.com/boyter/scc) is written in Go, as Gitaly is.  Seems like that could be a very happy coincidence for us.  Did you happen to dive deep enough into SCC to have an opinion about how challenging it might be to integrate into Gitaly?\\n\\nNote for others: SCC is the line-counting software that Darwin recommended in his [blog post](https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 408694264, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bmiller1 the context is helpful.\\n\\nThis is in the %Backlog for awareness\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 586004666, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@djensen - I settled on SCC, rather than the long standing CLOC (Perl) due to it being written in a modern language and, if the author was not able to add features, the hopes that someone at GitLab would.\\n\\nI did dive into the internals, but don't know enough about Go Lang nor Gitaly to comment on whether the two would tango well.\\n\\nIt is lightning fast - which I noticed when processing www-gitlab-com.\\n\\nHave you thought of this as a sidekiq process - not sure how good it would be at doing per-commit differentials in Gitaly and doing the full repo in Gitaly may be a lot of excess compute if it does it every commit?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409124927, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just like source control, you don't need to count all the lines of code in a repo every time.\\n\\nOnce you have a known count of lines at a specific commit, you can just track the diffs after that to increase/decrease line count for specific code and languages.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409309581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes I understand.\\nWhat I'm trying to indicate is that the machinations to isolate net new lines and net removed lines of code may be more processing load than simply scheduling scc weekly?  Especially given the speed of scc.\\n\\nIf that might be true, the question is how timely do line counts need to be?\\n\\nI don't know the answer - just highlighting that if line counts don't need to be up to the minute, there might be a cheaper way to do it.  It would also possibly allow direct dependency on scc, rather than forking it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409329832, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e It is lightning fast\\n\\nYes it is!  It crunches the entire gitlab repo in about 3 seconds on my machine ([results here](https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2013041)).  Not bad.\\n\\n\u003e how timely do line counts need to be?  I don't know the answer\\n\\nMe either, but let's guess it needs to be somewhere between monthly and daily.  (Hourly and commitly seem unnecessarily specific.)  Maybe we could start at monthly and see how it goes?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409366938, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Or, maybe proponents could weigh in on the frequency.\\n\\nI feel a compromise might be:\\n\\n * maintain a _count per branch_ (which could be very helpful anyway)\\n * trigger a count on the _first commit_ of any new branch (or make counting an option?)\\n * update all branch counts _monthly_ (or, only branches that have a flag indicating that they should be counted)\\n\\nThat way, the regular update frequency is down to one count per project branch, per month, and Developers can force a new count by pushing a new branch (perhaps they might have a special case to have up-to-the-commit counts).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:50:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:54:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 5791080, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409381230, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In addition, I would like to understand uses cases for getting as fine as \\\"per branch\\\" code counts - what would someone use this for and how often?  If it is very occasional and/or for a bespoke purpose, they could just run scc themselves on a local copy.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 410590466, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Starter customer requesting this feature in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/172665\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f820fe272fadfd61eb4c19317bb2d45f71f25fa4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 416263002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\nAs the description states, the goal is to understand what the bar means, and see some absolute data. @jeremy Would the MVC here be to simply report the number of bytes, since that's what we're measuring?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 424775, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ccc8a3b61fc8f4f779b6b63486fb31d54c005cc9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 288529601, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[OneDev](https://github.com/theonedev/onedev) calculates SLOC per languages and display the trends over time which is quite interesting. An example trends here:\\n\\nhttps://code.onedev.io/projects/react/stats/lines\\n\\nOne can hover mouse on the trend to show SLOC by day. The initial calculation for a large repo such as Linux takes about 30 min, and the result will be cached. Subsequent updates for new commits will be fairly fast based on cache. Below is the logic for calculation if someone is interested:\\n\\nhttps://github.com/theonedev/onedev/blob/main/server-core/src/main/java/io/onedev/server/infomanager/DefaultCommitInfoManager.java\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7978344, \"created_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"19fa4567d0d0f1d5842c5ba6beae8267aebb0a4e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 483620034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is moving back to the %Backlog for the reasons described in ZJ's [comment above](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038). We're absolutely accepting merge requests on this one, but the Manage stage needs to prioritize other areas at the moment.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd32244cb8a10270e97506088fe7772e17dbcf11\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 242549553, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher please fix this ASAP.\\nI am surprised Gitlab has no protection against this crap.\\nYou will end up with people massively unsubscribing at best.\\n\\nP.S. This idiot keeps recreating accounts.\\nA simple post factum ban will not work.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 12:57:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 920678, \"type\": null, \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d54912a045e3ea6508b3cf9ea3c8d3f2c3f3784\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471910, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is a certain lag.\\nI suggest we do not subscribe back until admins fix it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503473194, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner I actually think this should go to ~\\\"group::source code\\\" , WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4156460, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 579827345, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI - Since Apex code is essentially extended Java with a few accompanying .xml metadata files, my customer was able to run `scc \\u2013count-as cls:java` to interpret Apex .cls files as Java.  scc understands the comment and syntax structure of Java and was able to correctly return the LOC.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 587249173, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I think that makes a lot of sense @ogolowinski\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4447217, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580171017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ogolowinski Yep, I agree. Thanks for changing the group.\\n\\nThis is going to remain in the backlog as it is not our current focus and based on [details](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#details) in the description, LOE will be quite high. Thanks.\\n\\ncc @cupini\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580236144, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@cupini I'm tagging @ljlane who is the PM for ~\\\"group::optimize\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4376883, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562100410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" ~\\\"self-managed\\\" ~customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\n* Link to request:  https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001Eo1h0\\n* Why interested: Want to report on all repos (instance-level) for languages used in repos for tools info\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: Workarounds are nice but would be nice to get an instance-view instantly \\n* PM to mention: @stkerr\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3288671, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-27 23:22:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562089576, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"An Ultimate customer is interested in this feature.\\n* Link to request: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000014HWYo\\n* Why interested: They have a need to report LoC for their Apex repos.\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: We have not found an adequate workaround\\n* PM to mention: @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-20 21:51:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 581438360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another Premium customer is interested in this feature: [#223248](https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/223248)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7272738, \"created_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e8ddc8cdcb1c801921ec5c22320c15c418b8826\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 622513819, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another customer inquiring if this function exists\\nhttps://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/161342\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fe28d2e0f29b158bfc492b79ea8883a16e1d5fb7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364390361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" Customer  interested in this feature [Internal Link](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001kHlpn)\\n\\ncc/ @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5250128, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-18 19:30:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:09:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3f6ffdb391745aec7053e4585f952953cbf32152\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 706872228, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer here: we compile this data periodically for use by the C-suite and even if the absolute numbers are representative of byte counts it is easy enough for me to use an estimate of bytes per line to get what I need.\\n\\nThe key is that I have nothing without absolute numbers.\\n\\nAlso, please consider the non-gitlab.com use case. Perhaps on our hosted instance we would be able to opt-in to a feature like this if it were available and we can decide for ourselves if the performance is acceptable.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78631ce204289b27d0730dbec72b8b9a7f770fec\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364645655, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My company is a Premium customer - we would really like to have this and even more metrics regarding type of language like number of components, files, etc.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5291964, \"created_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3790f9053863d8b679f99d4cc896f3ffb8c450e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 721314226, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"- SF: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000Ut0JyAAJ\\n- ZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/254826\\n\\n~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" customer is interested in this feature.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5537005, \"created_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af4170834a554c4135225876e22c91fadd8c35f2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 791792997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"1900 seat ~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" [Customer](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000002xBZQ) is interested in this feature.\\n\\n- Priority: ~\\\"customer priority::5\\\"  priority::\\n- Why interested: Customer is trying to find a way to report the total line of code across all GitLab projects.\\n- Problem they are trying to solve: Customer has some internal teams who are trying trying to integrate tooling with GitLab to measure and track code coverage. There\\u2019s a cost associated with expanding those other tools and without the ability to report the number of lines it's nearly impossible to estimate said cost.\\n- Current solution for this problem: none\\n- Impact to the customer of not having this: Inability to utilize other tools in conjunction with GitLab and thus slowing adoption of the platform.\\n- Questions: Are they're any other workarounds for this, even at a manual reporting level? \\n- PM to mention: @tlinz\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4748523, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-14 14:49:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-15 13:33:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e76285e7c35cbca1481c16ed2c1ad5b7d232b65e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 990978163, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A Premium customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\nZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/284853\\n\\nThe workaround mentioned [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_332427265) unfortunately is hitting this error at the moment. I wonder if you have thoughts about this @lyle ?\\n\\n```\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n3: from (irb):3\\n2: from lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb:85:in `path'\\n1: from lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/storage_settings.rb:65:in `legacy_disk_path'\\nGitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings::DirectPathAccessError (git disk access denied)\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10051186, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 08:09:53 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 924067966, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Seems related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350080. This was always a bit of a hack, and relied on manually executing `git` commands directly on the repo.\\n\\nYou could take (and modify) the same core:\\n\\n`/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l` and run it directly on the command line given a list of paths generated from `rails`\\n\\nThere's a bunch of caveats there though:\\n- `master` is not necessarily the default branch name (we transitioned in GitLab to `main` some time ago)\\n- It relies on counting the actual number of lines in a file `wc -l` and does it for every file in a repo. This will include licenses, headers, empty space and so on.\\n\\nThere are some additional thoughts in https://gist.github.com/mandiwise/dc53cb9da00856d7cdbb that have iterated on my approach from two years ago :sweat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 925281183, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bgadberry \\n\\nIt seems like with the additional customer problem you need solved that there should be another issue for this...?\\n\\n\u003e Customer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density.\\n\\nThis does not seem directly related. Correct me if I am wrong!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601066055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner You're correct. I was thinking the customer could calculate the metric manually once number of lines of code is made available. On second thought, I think we can calculate vulnerabilities per byte today. I'll report back if that suffices.\\n\\n@tmccaslin Is this vulnerability per byte/line of code metric something we've considered uncovering as part of SAST?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601093808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"It's not per _language_ but the following rails console snippet will give you an estimate of number of lines per `Project` on a self-managed instance where the `git-data` is on a partition or directly attached volume.\\n\\nIt can break a bit if there's no `master` branch or if a repository for some reason doesn't have a `HEAD`, so it's not at all bullet-proof.\\n\\n```ruby\\nheaders = ['path', 'lines','archived?']\\nreport_file = Tempfile.new(['project_lines','.csv'])\\n\\nCSV.open(report_file.path, \\\"wb\\\") do |csv|\\ncsv \u003c\u003c headers\\n   Project.all.each do |p|\\n      output = `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l`\\n      csv \u003c\u003c [p.full_path, Integer(output),p.archived?]\\n   end; nil\\nend\\n\\nreport_file.close\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2930750323d45742084b921bd0f102d58807df7b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 332427265, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, statistics counting total and per lang number of lines (in code files only) would be so nice and basic.  \\nIgnore empty lines for me is optional. \\n\\nGet stats manually / locally for a git repo is not a problem. But this issue asks for the UI of gitlab. And this is what I need as well. \\n\\nhere a link to the current state: (older links above are expired)  \\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts \\n\\nHere a link for more advanced stats ambitions:  \\nhttps://www.openhub.net/p/gitlab\\n\\nedit: btw: If this is not happening since 5 years because of performance issues, then just calculate it once a week and show the calculation date next to it. I guess most people do not need per hour stats about n lines of code. For me even once per month would be enough. (And thus could be used for #12104 as well)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:08:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-03 07:59:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 882141, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3bdba5e20eedfcedc7eb1c6272fa93798b138610\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:13:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951334872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In order to get this request some attention, this issue has been marked as a potentially interesting proposal as it meets the following criteria:\\n\\n* Labelled as a feature proposal\\n* More than 10 upvotes\\n* Unscheduled (not associated with a milestone)\\n\\nThanks for your proposal!\\n\\n\\n\\n/cc @markglenfletcher\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73b69edb26083c702d2514effe76ca7da2d40407\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978971, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 154953, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"63b6ff0026abcb2ee9df9b28041655c7ab9fe563\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979021, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@billclark agreed\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2414870, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1328954e3c5076176230b846b4da51543092429b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If you do, make sure you somehow transfer the popularity and influence as well. \\nThis issue has 2 years of (possible sparse) history and 300+ upvotes. \\nThe newer one is month long. \\n\\nIt may make more sense to either transfer this one to EE, or merge the other one to here.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5db704a8ce0f10d43344ec9d98767153458c3c76\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979062, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"this just counts the raw line number of the files treated as pieces of texts. I guess what people want here is more like a per-language breakdown.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e32505249798e1b3e040ded861516658150259c6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979040, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Is there a way to get this data using the API?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0603dc2249187fa36328ff2f92debfc6c7db79d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"No it is not. That would be something for @matt_wilson to consider with the security dashboard.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5329074, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601097241, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We need more cowbell!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 196721, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616b443b97ad1443c199fb5f0af9780b51ddf379\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts is that what it looks today? seems like a regression.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951315993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I would like a total number of lines not including blank ones.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dcb61a50851d774190fa590cddf3e19f7a753f83\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979036, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer would also like to track lines of code per developer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404096482, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just started to use gitlab, and this is one the first stats i hoped to see in the \\\"Charts\\\", however i was surprised it's missing :(\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3219145, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-22 10:59:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979033, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"how come I can still receive notifications even if I unsubscribed???\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:19:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471203, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001FRuq0\\n\\nCustomer would like to see number of lines of code per language excluding comments. \\n\\n/cc @npost\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-30 01:30:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:47:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 387929331, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer interested in this feature. https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000W2eBo (Internal link)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4587928, \"created_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"35a9711c22330d7480c21b516ab890edccb85fb6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 258382372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"i will join, i want see my ego\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 688008, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8993bd8d42c15974c7f1eee7b8601e71e505626f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979006, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"for a company that has thousands of repositories that's just completely ineffective\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292139470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@bgadberry The customer may be able to pull the necessary vulnerability count information from the existing GraphQL API. I've never heard a request for this functionality before and don't have any plans to include it in the Security Dashboard reports so pulling the data and creating their own reports is the best way forward if this is needed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4708748, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601110834, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Same here!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4122216, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979054, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The developer of scc responded to proposals to update the code as desired. Resultant code is in this blog article: https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story and being worked into this working example for GitLab CI CD: https://gitlab.com/guided-explorations/ci-cd-plugin-extensions/ci-cd-plugin-extension-scc\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404663419, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@mlockhart in the context of an MVC I think we need to stick with measuring the default branch only, because that's what the Repository Analytics page is currently doing ([example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts)).\\n\\nOn the bright side, it seems the existing byte counts are being [updated on push](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/git/branch_push_service.rb#L54).  That makes me hopeful we could match that frequency with line counts.  So let's tentatively say the MVC would be updated pushly (instead of monthly like I proposed above).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409398149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Gold customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/154631 with a slight twist: they'd like to see the number of lines by group/sub-group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-24 18:02:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:37:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3b5c50effe1ea33f7f938b5693032964c2bdc512\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:46:35 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 331168435, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001lc3Cc\\n\\nCustomer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density. \\n\\n/cc @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 19:45:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 600990593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Had a similar request. I was able to get this info by extracting the Gitlab backup repositories from a backup and unbundling everything then running the following utility on the directory.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut it would be nice to see this kind of information on a project / server admin level, just to provide an overview of things currently within GitLab user / admin interfaces.\\r\\n\\r\\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\r\\n\\r\\n![image](/uploads/2e9c9fd05358a6e80411bfb9b323c214/image.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 261290, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:15:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-22 12:20:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 261290, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"186117b5b28df4eca7f2419b17ad900f90e61728\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:42:31 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978968, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Please add a chart with the SLOC metric, it is a metric more useful than the number of commits\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1276118, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 14:50:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 07:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"735fd7ef77d0bd7463126f7436eda8691d678998\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978960, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 695248, \"username\": \"lbot\", \"name\": \"Lee Matos\"}, {\"id\": 239547, \"username\": \"wil.rodriguez\", \"name\": \"William Rodriguez\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 87854, \"username\": \"DouweM\", \"name\": \"Douwe Maan\"}, {\"id\": 1187333, \"username\": \"jramsay-gitlab\", \"name\": \"James Ramsay (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 2182793, \"username\": \"craph1\", \"name\": \"craph\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 709639, \"username\": \"omidontop\", \"name\": \"Omid Manikhi\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 2346644, \"username\": \"ariaieboy\", \"name\": \"AriaieBOY\"}, {\"id\": 101578, \"username\": \"zj-gitlab\", \"name\": \"Zeger-Jan van de Weg\"}, {\"id\": 2223731, \"username\": \"bobbymcgill\", \"name\": \"Bobby McGill\"}, {\"id\": 2814876, \"username\": \"jim.robbins\", \"name\": \"Jim Robbins\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 4158075, \"username\": \"aakriti.gupta\", \"name\": \"Aakriti Gupta\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4911777, \"username\": \"i.hayden\", \"name\": \"Immanuel Hayden\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 635873, \"username\": \"pisarik\", \"name\": \"Vlad Blazhko\"}, {\"id\": 7536567, \"username\": \"hchouraria\", \"name\": \"Harsh Chouraria\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 424775, \"username\": \"markpundsack\", \"name\": \"Mark Pundsack\"}, {\"id\": 7978344, \"username\": \"robinshine\", \"name\": \"Robin Shen\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 4156460, \"username\": \"ogolowinski\", \"name\": \"Orit Golowinski\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 4447217, \"username\": \"ljlane\", \"name\": \"Larissa Lane\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4376883, \"username\": \"stkerr\", \"name\": \"Sam Kerr\"}, {\"id\": 3288671, \"username\": \"cupini\", \"name\": \"Brian Cupini\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 7272738, \"username\": \"kategrechishkina\", \"name\": \"Kate Grechishkina\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 5250128, \"username\": \"ricardoamarilla\", \"name\": \"Ricardo Amarilla\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 5291964, \"username\": \"crispindev\", \"name\": \"crispin velez\"}, {\"id\": 5537005, \"username\": \"cleveland\", \"name\": \"Cleveland Bledsoe Jr\"}, {\"id\": 4748523, \"username\": \"sheininger\", \"name\": \"Steffen Heininger\"}, {\"id\": 10051186, \"username\": \"kballon\", \"name\": \"Kent Japhet Ballon\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 154953, \"username\": \"Zandor300\", \"name\": \"Zandor Smith\"}, {\"id\": 2414870, \"username\": \"mason1920\", \"name\": \"mason1920\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 5329074, \"username\": \"tmccaslin\", \"name\": \"Taylor McCaslin\"}, {\"id\": 196721, \"username\": \"billclark\", \"name\": \"Bill Clark\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 3219145, \"username\": \"spprint\", \"name\": \"Sven Vet\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 4587928, \"username\": \"cbazan1\", \"name\": \"Carlos Bazan\"}, {\"id\": 688008, \"username\": \"friuns\", \"name\": \"friuns\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4708748, \"username\": \"matt_wilson\", \"name\": \"Matt Wilson\"}, {\"id\": 4122216, \"username\": \"saunved\", \"name\": \"Saunved Mutalik\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 261290, \"username\": \"TRPmwiesen\", \"name\": \"Matthew Wiesen\"}, {\"id\": 1276118, \"username\": \"wagnerpinheiro\", \"name\": \"Wagner Pinheiro\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"How can I improve the description of {url} so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved?","query_id":"23c8d957a31943cdaa9f4d18ece4f9cf","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"24652824","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 24652824, \"title\": \"Report number of lines per language in repository charts\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-15 17:20:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"### Description\\n\\nAs of now, repository charts report percentage of language in the repo.\\nFirst, it is not obvious how this percentage is computed (number of files? number of lines? bytes? what about comments? libraries?). Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\n### Proposal\\n\\nAs a user I would like to see the number of lines of code per language.\\nIdeally, excluding blank lines and comments, but that is optional.\\n\\n### Documentation blurb\\n\\nAs for use cases:\\n* better understand the repo structure\\n* if this is your repo, being able to report the number of lines of your main language\\n    * this is one of the metric employers would like to know (I personally was surprised by this question on interview and could not clearly respond)\\n* all those use cases for general repo graphs (like pie chart of languages)\\n\\n### Details\\n\\n[A useful comment from ZJ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038):\\n\\n\u003e Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\n\u003e Lines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\n\u003e That all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\\n\\n### Potential Workarounds\\n\\n- Run `scc` in a GitLab CI pipeline: https://github.com/boyter/scc to generate SLOC/etc. reports\\n- If API use is acceptable (instead of UI), parts of its output stats can be stored as custom attributes on the project: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/custom_attributes.html#set-custom-attribute\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 17800, \"updated_by_id\": 5749302, \"weight\": 8, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -14979600, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-07-17 16:10:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 7536567, \"discussion_locked\": false, \"closed_at\": \"2023-01-19 09:38:40 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 579, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11039421, \"title\": \"Category:Code Analytics\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-18 19:25:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:07:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 7161201, \"title\": \"Manage [DEPRECATED]\", \"color\": \"#44AD8E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-19 05:48:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-19 11:52:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Please use the devops::manage label instead of this deprecated label. It is kept for historical issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1890178, \"title\": \"[deprecated] Accepting merge requests\", \"color\": \"#69d100\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 11:34:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-28 08:14:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"[deprecated] Please use \\\"Seeking community contributions\\\" instead. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/developer-relations/contributor-success/team-task/-/issues/77\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1672341, \"title\": \"customer\", \"color\": \"#ad4363\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that were reported by Enterprise Edition subscribers. This label should be accompanied by either the 'bug' or 'feature proposal' label\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 4107658, \"title\": \"graphs\", \"color\": \"#428bca\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the project Graphs pages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15237307, \"title\": \"icebox\", \"color\": \"#d6ecef\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:25:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:35:52 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues on which no work is anticipated in the next several milestones but which may be considered for work shortly thereafter thus not closed.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2936416, \"title\": \"popular proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Feature proposals deemed popular by our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/triage) will have this label applied\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2714266, \"title\": \"potential proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label added by triage tools to mark interesting feature proposals for consideration\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@dbogatov Thanks for the proposal. We'll just have to leave this open and see if it becomes a popular request.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73cf193764726f4ed724d78d4b59d4f81efe83cc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978957, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@wagnerpinheiro, [S]LOC metrics are rather old. They are not actual now (only in 80-90s they were). Your idea is pretty but only for developers ego. For really gentlemen customers GITLAB maybe have to improve their charts with different modern metrics. As example, for analyzing object-oriented languages they can add metric of Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 19:52:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 346483, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978961, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@yachmenov_c_ I have to admit, I had to look up what Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer metrics were. And yes, I would love to see those metrics in GitLab.\\n\\n**However**, I feel like it is quite hard (or say, resource heavy) to implement those. Each language will have to provide a service to get OOP relations. We cannot derive those metrics just by parsing the text.\\n\\n**On the other side**, simple line counter per language (even the one which omits comments and empty lines) is relatively easy to implement.\\n\\nAs for developers' ego, I have to admit it would not mind seeing LOC metrics, but I am sure there are other reasons for these metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:00:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978963, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, I mostly agree with you, really they can implement functionality you mentioned, and it would be great. Nice point!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"ZD ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/80860\\n\\nA Customer requested this feature. :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 695248, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2dba3df39df1cd81040cb0bc86091470aac43ffa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978965, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This would be awesome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 239547, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"604137042a54634c99ba7cda9b19e4db3570b396\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is getting popular\\n\\n@DouweM ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" for this one?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f1bbac293ede2d142630a69c9b499642ce9a40f8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher I think it may not be well defined enough yet for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" . We removed the repository language a while ago because it didn't perform well, so we'll need to figure out way to restore it without reintroducing the performance issue.\\n\\nThis is related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/40236 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23931. \\n\\n/cc @jramsay\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 87854, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23bac7a1ece7d87f5607254715120cb9067506ea\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978986, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If we can provide a foundation in gitlab-ce#23931 that computes the language stats without performance, we could definitely open this up for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1187333, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:16:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:17:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1187333, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"812e8d43c4b74c029c7327a6b783be67b2a0cd78\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978988, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Having the LOC in the table with the language breakdown and percentage would be great.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4a841d10fb4925ca2b102435a39a249fb1f1bb39\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hello,\\n\\nDisplay the LOC in the chart would be a very nice feature :slight_smile: \\n\\nAny update about this ?\\n\\nThank you very much.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2182793, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55170edc6cc50d1a2a20760c0bd5760b0dba68b6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978998, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi,\\u00a0I haven't heard anything back yet.\\nDennis\\nDennis Biringer | Principal Software EngineerPacific Defense Systems, LLC (PDS)Integrity Applications Incorporated535 Lipoa Parkway\\u00a0 Suite 101, Kihei HI, 96753dbiringer@integrity-apps.com(808) 214-0765\\n\\n[smime.p7s](/uploads/e849eea0083b79828f578febe315bdcd/smime.p7s)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55168747dda9172740a2eaa5e847403ed43121de\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979004, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We also would like to see the total number of lines of code, files, etc. Thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a6edf2d747aa859d84a4adfab95b10d53d7774d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979005, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@shellyniz Currently it's presented as a percentage via the API:\\n- https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#languages\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d201f77821e20f12477856580eab2e40804cc2dd\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979019, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Silly me, I was looking for it under the repo API. That's a big help, thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"093b696a8537efb99106d9d0b003220eb6ee8c01\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979020, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\\n\\nIt's a great feature to have especially if you're to brag about how much work has been put into the project in a presentation or something.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 709639, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:05:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:07:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b43271d3058f31f25e92e49015ea9efc4afc7d0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979022, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't see us getting to this anytime soon, but I'm happy to label this with gitlab-ce~1890178 for a community contribution. \\n\\nWe express languages as % of repo, might we also show the absolute LOC? The Charts page might be a sensible place to display this. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/graphs/master/charts for an example. The project overview page could also work, we currently use a multi-colored horizontal line to represent this and show percentages there on mouseover.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:16:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:18:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1f57d0559fe42979c7e6d35e07dbbbb6131d9855\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979029, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @jeremy\\\\_ \\nDo you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'?And so 'Total Lines Number'?\\nWhat's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34d9eb930ce114af06333350c5ff55483637cf7e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979031, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @markglenfletcher \\nIt's very good things that showing percent,but lines number complete it's feature,doesn't?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a92bea136cc9e32d787aa5742ed869a21d2ab49c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979032, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Do you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'? And so 'Total Lines Number'? What's your opinion?\\n\\nI'd love to hear your proposal, but I think the Charts page may be an easy place to add this:\\n\\n![image](/uploads/198f585f7e807ed931757b47a519d135/image.png)\\n\\nWe could include a separate column for LOC on each row, and include a \\\"Total\\\" row at the bottom that displays the sum of the rows. What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 06:32:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-24 12:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-10 12:54:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979035, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"any update about this feature ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2346644, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"075f869895c6f828be69c382f91a4a9b2dba20b5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\nLines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\nThat all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 101578, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"570bda01e243b5cf50fce1ba6adb9cd4605169f4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979038, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Not sure if this helps anyone, but if you use GitBash (or linux terminal) and go into your local repo and type this command:\\n`find . -not -path \\u201c*/.git/*\\u201d | xargs wc -l`\\nYou get the total line counts. No extra things to install - just a bash command.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2223731, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a894203f7adeeb1a1ed60f595000c3d28bf650ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979039, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is another possible way by using the git ls-files command with a file type filter.\\n\\n* Java example: `git ls-files *.java *.xml | xargs wc -l`\\n* Ruby example: `git ls-files *.rb Rakefile Gemfile | xargs wc -l`\\n\\nOr whatever files you want to include in your count. It can also works in subfolders to provide counts of just the contents of that folder.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2814876, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78a3685ac84f3e9f6999bd406e3ee07296be78f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979041, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My developer ego gives +1 for this stats. I think, if you count the lines anyway, it might be no problem to offer different stats as options, because the counting might be the most expensive part anyway. \\n\\n*Yeah* for looking at your developer productivity in numbers. :-)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a8d439996cd80acb0e887e19d4c7a32c3b38f3f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979042, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is not graphical and not included in gitlab, but it serves my interest totally. Also it might be a good starting point for Gitlab's implementation: \\n\\nhttps://github.com/AlDanial/cloc\\n\\nUse `cloc --vcs git` to count only watched files in a git repository.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e05053a4fedccfbd67d6045862d003aaff0c6202\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979043, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@aakriti.gupta, should we just close this one in favor of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104, since it's a prerequisite?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:46:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979061, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, yes, we will take everything from this one in account - it's planned for 12.2. Do you want to comment on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104? What's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3511154, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"45e71e7ac76abec3784d03cbdb2b1cbc301899ff\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979063, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This should not be moved to EE as the initial feature was added by the community.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5ac02291aab2c6a295e4df9adacd278f1278fc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979064, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @max-wittig for pointing out! The EE issue has more content, which will be available on group/instance level. We would like to move all analytics into one space in the top nav bar, so will be thinking through how to combine what is in cc now and the additional functionality we will be adding in ee. Any feedback is welcome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"50ead744b305fa1f532705f92d1dbd1b1ec7a298\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979065, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"As mentioned below, as long as we keep the history through a merge or copying over information, it sounds good to close this with an update @valexieva :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4158075, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979066, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@valexieva I wrote a small script, which reports the languages an instance has by exporting prometheus metrics. Relying just on absolute values would make a lot more sense, than the approach that I'm using now. But I won't use absolute numbers, if `EE` is required for this.\\n\\nhttps://github.com/max-wittig/gitlab-languages\\n\\nI think it would be fine, if the Graph feature stays in EE, but it would be nice, if the API would return absolute numbers.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:35:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:42:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1283330, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7bde2d02397a5cb7ae5b0b940c065224158203f5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979067, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Keeping this open until we complete: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13163. After that will close, the existing functionality will be available in CE, further functionality as per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104 in EE.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"94574f2b40c78694f4096c523c514fcca93041ce\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi, we have scheduled LOC plus language trends for 12.3 - please find here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104#note_194198775. We will also ensure that it's available for CE users in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/65616 before we remove the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/graphs/master/charts\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"16af6bd6af9d839ee0856e4771ce2d012a7dc48e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979073, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Github provides this feature, it would be nice to be able to obtain comparable metrics from Gitlab as we are using both.\\n\\nOur use case to get these numbers is for figuring out the prevalence of code in any given language across our entire codebase to inform us with requirements for code analysis tools etc. \\\"90% of language Y in repository X\\\" without any context to the number is mostly a useless metric. We need to understand how much language Y there is in totality across our multiple SCM systems. Now i can only count how many repos have a given language in general which is not exactly the same thing.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 14:53:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291742295, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@unitysipu \\nI would say for your use case it is better to just create a tool that clones all the repos you want metrics on and runs cloc or a similar tool - https://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\nHaving these metrics across groups/organizations in github and gitlab makes less sense to me than to provide some information about what powers a given project.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291953639, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The amount of code often correlates with things like risk. It's sorta interesting from analysis point of view if you have projects that have 500, 5000, 500k or 5M lines of code. You may want to prioritize or categorize the big projects over the small ones (obviously that's not the full picture, depends on what that code is used for etc.). But just looking at our entire codebase / repositories from the top and knowing there's \\\"90% of PHP\\\" in some project without understanding there's a million lines of it doesn't really help. So while individual teams may have a good grasp of their project, somebody looking over our entire portfolio you need more information to figure out who you should get in touch with. Obviously you can also try to check the file size metrics etc. and try to filter out uninteresting file types or other similar cumbersome workarounds but it's just more work to land on data that could easily be provided by the platform directly.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292157164, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Even if you have 1000 repos, it would still not be that much work to write a tool that accumulates all the information using the method I described, and you're going to get it a lot faster than by asking gitlab to add a feature. \\nAs for expanding the scope of this issue to cover groups and organizations as a whole, I guess gitlab devs might consider that as an enterprise feature at some point.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292558285, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, *obviously* there are workarounds that require you to analyze all the source code yourself. That's not the point of this feature request. I see the conversation revolving around suggestions and local optimizations for individual teams / developers or the importance of the amount of code in context of individuals. I figured it's prudent to provide another point of view that may have an impact on the thinking of why it's important to have this implemented. There are other use cases for the LOC/Language metrics that can be of importance for somebody who is looking at your organization as a whole.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293145108, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Honestly, with that chain of argument: Why have a commit graph? You can do this locally on your git repo. Or why have a bugtracker? You can just install trac separately. Or why have a wiki? Haven't you heard of mediaWiki? And so on. \\n\\nFact is, that this is a standard feature that has many uses for individuals and companies (also for example if I actually will bother to contribute to a code base or if its not worth it because id have to learn X new languages).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4911777, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:42:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4911777, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"044bd214cb760ef42c44b314a3243601c4c2f6a7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:10:44 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299631157, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I disagree. It's absolutely not ridiculous at all to have _code metrics_ available in the source code repository you might use.\\n\\nAny external tool will have to analyse the code outside of the SCM makes the whole process inherently ineffective and slow by design. Gitlab (and github) already has the code inside it and therefore is in the best position to provide metrics and data on it. Furthermore, modern (sophisticated) code analysis tools _integrate directly_ with Github these days through Github applications, but even they cannot provide this data either without analyzing the entire codebase separately.\\n\\nWhile workarounds exist they are all bad in a large organization. I agree that it's clear this is not a priority based on the fact it's been open for two years, but also it's clear that the reasoning and discussion around this feature is very narrow and developer (ego) oriented.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:36:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"005fc553fd9580804c00dd974606b58258f6d149\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299627593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"##### For person\\nPeople expect it, since various metrics implemented in GitHub. At some point everyone just genuinely interested in those metrics even only for self-esteem. And it is frustrating to not find them on GitLab. And since GitHub made everyone think to have them out-of-the-box, people became lazy and don't want to pollute their work environment with some difficult code inspection tools that they will use once just because of curiosity. \\n\\n##### For big team\\nIf you are working in a solid company with big code base, and you professionally perform code analysis and give consulting based on it, then it is ridiculous to do it on the basis of GitHub or GitLab, likely you will need to have more sophisticated special tool for it.\\n\\n##### Conclusion\\nSo this feature is not a mandatory. In first place GitLab need to improve its role system, this is a real bummer:) But GitLab doesn't do it for 2 years, so probably they have more important tasks. I prefer to use GitHub because of role system and metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 635873, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 13:32:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:35:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"96c7f0adc49d8ea2d2f64108bea473166fe3f13c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293348432, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A premium/silver customer has requested for this feature over support ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/220808 (internal link)\\n\\nIn particular they'd like an ability to query statistics about lines of code per detected language type, within each, and across all repositories under a group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7536567, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 13:07:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 7536567, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80839b906be084dee24b6e6d95e01d91af4e6b4a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:56:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 612192220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am proposing in another issue to update an existing open source tool to add MBs of code to the reports.\\n\\nThis is related to helping customers (and prospects) be able to estimate the long term costs of security scanning solutions that charge by lines or MBs of code.\\n\\nIf the tool were a CI stage, but GitLab could receive and parse the report to a UI - then the compute for this would only performed for and paid by customers who want the counts.\\n\\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/233018\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-31 00:05:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 164827, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 388534468, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@DarwinJS the blocker for us on this feature is a line-counting capability in Gitaly.  I noticed that [SCC](https://github.com/boyter/scc) is written in Go, as Gitaly is.  Seems like that could be a very happy coincidence for us.  Did you happen to dive deep enough into SCC to have an opinion about how challenging it might be to integrate into Gitaly?\\n\\nNote for others: SCC is the line-counting software that Darwin recommended in his [blog post](https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 408694264, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bmiller1 the context is helpful.\\n\\nThis is in the %Backlog for awareness\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 586004666, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@djensen - I settled on SCC, rather than the long standing CLOC (Perl) due to it being written in a modern language and, if the author was not able to add features, the hopes that someone at GitLab would.\\n\\nI did dive into the internals, but don't know enough about Go Lang nor Gitaly to comment on whether the two would tango well.\\n\\nIt is lightning fast - which I noticed when processing www-gitlab-com.\\n\\nHave you thought of this as a sidekiq process - not sure how good it would be at doing per-commit differentials in Gitaly and doing the full repo in Gitaly may be a lot of excess compute if it does it every commit?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409124927, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just like source control, you don't need to count all the lines of code in a repo every time.\\n\\nOnce you have a known count of lines at a specific commit, you can just track the diffs after that to increase/decrease line count for specific code and languages.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409309581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes I understand.\\nWhat I'm trying to indicate is that the machinations to isolate net new lines and net removed lines of code may be more processing load than simply scheduling scc weekly?  Especially given the speed of scc.\\n\\nIf that might be true, the question is how timely do line counts need to be?\\n\\nI don't know the answer - just highlighting that if line counts don't need to be up to the minute, there might be a cheaper way to do it.  It would also possibly allow direct dependency on scc, rather than forking it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409329832, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e It is lightning fast\\n\\nYes it is!  It crunches the entire gitlab repo in about 3 seconds on my machine ([results here](https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2013041)).  Not bad.\\n\\n\u003e how timely do line counts need to be?  I don't know the answer\\n\\nMe either, but let's guess it needs to be somewhere between monthly and daily.  (Hourly and commitly seem unnecessarily specific.)  Maybe we could start at monthly and see how it goes?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409366938, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Or, maybe proponents could weigh in on the frequency.\\n\\nI feel a compromise might be:\\n\\n * maintain a _count per branch_ (which could be very helpful anyway)\\n * trigger a count on the _first commit_ of any new branch (or make counting an option?)\\n * update all branch counts _monthly_ (or, only branches that have a flag indicating that they should be counted)\\n\\nThat way, the regular update frequency is down to one count per project branch, per month, and Developers can force a new count by pushing a new branch (perhaps they might have a special case to have up-to-the-commit counts).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:50:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:54:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 5791080, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409381230, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In addition, I would like to understand uses cases for getting as fine as \\\"per branch\\\" code counts - what would someone use this for and how often?  If it is very occasional and/or for a bespoke purpose, they could just run scc themselves on a local copy.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 410590466, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Starter customer requesting this feature in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/172665\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f820fe272fadfd61eb4c19317bb2d45f71f25fa4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 416263002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\nAs the description states, the goal is to understand what the bar means, and see some absolute data. @jeremy Would the MVC here be to simply report the number of bytes, since that's what we're measuring?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 424775, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ccc8a3b61fc8f4f779b6b63486fb31d54c005cc9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 288529601, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[OneDev](https://github.com/theonedev/onedev) calculates SLOC per languages and display the trends over time which is quite interesting. An example trends here:\\n\\nhttps://code.onedev.io/projects/react/stats/lines\\n\\nOne can hover mouse on the trend to show SLOC by day. The initial calculation for a large repo such as Linux takes about 30 min, and the result will be cached. Subsequent updates for new commits will be fairly fast based on cache. Below is the logic for calculation if someone is interested:\\n\\nhttps://github.com/theonedev/onedev/blob/main/server-core/src/main/java/io/onedev/server/infomanager/DefaultCommitInfoManager.java\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7978344, \"created_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"19fa4567d0d0f1d5842c5ba6beae8267aebb0a4e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 483620034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is moving back to the %Backlog for the reasons described in ZJ's [comment above](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038). We're absolutely accepting merge requests on this one, but the Manage stage needs to prioritize other areas at the moment.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd32244cb8a10270e97506088fe7772e17dbcf11\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 242549553, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher please fix this ASAP.\\nI am surprised Gitlab has no protection against this crap.\\nYou will end up with people massively unsubscribing at best.\\n\\nP.S. This idiot keeps recreating accounts.\\nA simple post factum ban will not work.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 12:57:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 920678, \"type\": null, \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d54912a045e3ea6508b3cf9ea3c8d3f2c3f3784\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471910, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is a certain lag.\\nI suggest we do not subscribe back until admins fix it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503473194, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner I actually think this should go to ~\\\"group::source code\\\" , WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4156460, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 579827345, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI - Since Apex code is essentially extended Java with a few accompanying .xml metadata files, my customer was able to run `scc \\u2013count-as cls:java` to interpret Apex .cls files as Java.  scc understands the comment and syntax structure of Java and was able to correctly return the LOC.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 587249173, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I think that makes a lot of sense @ogolowinski\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4447217, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580171017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ogolowinski Yep, I agree. Thanks for changing the group.\\n\\nThis is going to remain in the backlog as it is not our current focus and based on [details](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#details) in the description, LOE will be quite high. Thanks.\\n\\ncc @cupini\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580236144, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@cupini I'm tagging @ljlane who is the PM for ~\\\"group::optimize\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4376883, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562100410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" ~\\\"self-managed\\\" ~customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\n* Link to request:  https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001Eo1h0\\n* Why interested: Want to report on all repos (instance-level) for languages used in repos for tools info\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: Workarounds are nice but would be nice to get an instance-view instantly \\n* PM to mention: @stkerr\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3288671, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-27 23:22:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562089576, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"An Ultimate customer is interested in this feature.\\n* Link to request: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000014HWYo\\n* Why interested: They have a need to report LoC for their Apex repos.\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: We have not found an adequate workaround\\n* PM to mention: @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-20 21:51:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 581438360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another Premium customer is interested in this feature: [#223248](https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/223248)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7272738, \"created_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e8ddc8cdcb1c801921ec5c22320c15c418b8826\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 622513819, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another customer inquiring if this function exists\\nhttps://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/161342\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fe28d2e0f29b158bfc492b79ea8883a16e1d5fb7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364390361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" Customer  interested in this feature [Internal Link](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001kHlpn)\\n\\ncc/ @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5250128, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-18 19:30:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:09:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3f6ffdb391745aec7053e4585f952953cbf32152\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 706872228, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer here: we compile this data periodically for use by the C-suite and even if the absolute numbers are representative of byte counts it is easy enough for me to use an estimate of bytes per line to get what I need.\\n\\nThe key is that I have nothing without absolute numbers.\\n\\nAlso, please consider the non-gitlab.com use case. Perhaps on our hosted instance we would be able to opt-in to a feature like this if it were available and we can decide for ourselves if the performance is acceptable.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78631ce204289b27d0730dbec72b8b9a7f770fec\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364645655, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My company is a Premium customer - we would really like to have this and even more metrics regarding type of language like number of components, files, etc.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5291964, \"created_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3790f9053863d8b679f99d4cc896f3ffb8c450e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 721314226, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"- SF: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000Ut0JyAAJ\\n- ZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/254826\\n\\n~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" customer is interested in this feature.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5537005, \"created_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af4170834a554c4135225876e22c91fadd8c35f2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 791792997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"1900 seat ~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" [Customer](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000002xBZQ) is interested in this feature.\\n\\n- Priority: ~\\\"customer priority::5\\\"  priority::\\n- Why interested: Customer is trying to find a way to report the total line of code across all GitLab projects.\\n- Problem they are trying to solve: Customer has some internal teams who are trying trying to integrate tooling with GitLab to measure and track code coverage. There\\u2019s a cost associated with expanding those other tools and without the ability to report the number of lines it's nearly impossible to estimate said cost.\\n- Current solution for this problem: none\\n- Impact to the customer of not having this: Inability to utilize other tools in conjunction with GitLab and thus slowing adoption of the platform.\\n- Questions: Are they're any other workarounds for this, even at a manual reporting level? \\n- PM to mention: @tlinz\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4748523, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-14 14:49:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-15 13:33:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e76285e7c35cbca1481c16ed2c1ad5b7d232b65e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 990978163, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A Premium customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\nZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/284853\\n\\nThe workaround mentioned [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_332427265) unfortunately is hitting this error at the moment. I wonder if you have thoughts about this @lyle ?\\n\\n```\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n3: from (irb):3\\n2: from lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb:85:in `path'\\n1: from lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/storage_settings.rb:65:in `legacy_disk_path'\\nGitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings::DirectPathAccessError (git disk access denied)\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10051186, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 08:09:53 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 924067966, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Seems related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350080. This was always a bit of a hack, and relied on manually executing `git` commands directly on the repo.\\n\\nYou could take (and modify) the same core:\\n\\n`/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l` and run it directly on the command line given a list of paths generated from `rails`\\n\\nThere's a bunch of caveats there though:\\n- `master` is not necessarily the default branch name (we transitioned in GitLab to `main` some time ago)\\n- It relies on counting the actual number of lines in a file `wc -l` and does it for every file in a repo. This will include licenses, headers, empty space and so on.\\n\\nThere are some additional thoughts in https://gist.github.com/mandiwise/dc53cb9da00856d7cdbb that have iterated on my approach from two years ago :sweat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 925281183, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bgadberry \\n\\nIt seems like with the additional customer problem you need solved that there should be another issue for this...?\\n\\n\u003e Customer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density.\\n\\nThis does not seem directly related. Correct me if I am wrong!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601066055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner You're correct. I was thinking the customer could calculate the metric manually once number of lines of code is made available. On second thought, I think we can calculate vulnerabilities per byte today. I'll report back if that suffices.\\n\\n@tmccaslin Is this vulnerability per byte/line of code metric something we've considered uncovering as part of SAST?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601093808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"It's not per _language_ but the following rails console snippet will give you an estimate of number of lines per `Project` on a self-managed instance where the `git-data` is on a partition or directly attached volume.\\n\\nIt can break a bit if there's no `master` branch or if a repository for some reason doesn't have a `HEAD`, so it's not at all bullet-proof.\\n\\n```ruby\\nheaders = ['path', 'lines','archived?']\\nreport_file = Tempfile.new(['project_lines','.csv'])\\n\\nCSV.open(report_file.path, \\\"wb\\\") do |csv|\\ncsv \u003c\u003c headers\\n   Project.all.each do |p|\\n      output = `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l`\\n      csv \u003c\u003c [p.full_path, Integer(output),p.archived?]\\n   end; nil\\nend\\n\\nreport_file.close\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2930750323d45742084b921bd0f102d58807df7b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 332427265, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, statistics counting total and per lang number of lines (in code files only) would be so nice and basic.  \\nIgnore empty lines for me is optional. \\n\\nGet stats manually / locally for a git repo is not a problem. But this issue asks for the UI of gitlab. And this is what I need as well. \\n\\nhere a link to the current state: (older links above are expired)  \\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts \\n\\nHere a link for more advanced stats ambitions:  \\nhttps://www.openhub.net/p/gitlab\\n\\nedit: btw: If this is not happening since 5 years because of performance issues, then just calculate it once a week and show the calculation date next to it. I guess most people do not need per hour stats about n lines of code. For me even once per month would be enough. (And thus could be used for #12104 as well)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:08:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-03 07:59:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 882141, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3bdba5e20eedfcedc7eb1c6272fa93798b138610\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:13:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951334872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In order to get this request some attention, this issue has been marked as a potentially interesting proposal as it meets the following criteria:\\n\\n* Labelled as a feature proposal\\n* More than 10 upvotes\\n* Unscheduled (not associated with a milestone)\\n\\nThanks for your proposal!\\n\\n\\n\\n/cc @markglenfletcher\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73b69edb26083c702d2514effe76ca7da2d40407\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978971, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 154953, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"63b6ff0026abcb2ee9df9b28041655c7ab9fe563\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979021, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@billclark agreed\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2414870, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1328954e3c5076176230b846b4da51543092429b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If you do, make sure you somehow transfer the popularity and influence as well. \\nThis issue has 2 years of (possible sparse) history and 300+ upvotes. \\nThe newer one is month long. \\n\\nIt may make more sense to either transfer this one to EE, or merge the other one to here.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5db704a8ce0f10d43344ec9d98767153458c3c76\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979062, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"this just counts the raw line number of the files treated as pieces of texts. I guess what people want here is more like a per-language breakdown.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e32505249798e1b3e040ded861516658150259c6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979040, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Is there a way to get this data using the API?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0603dc2249187fa36328ff2f92debfc6c7db79d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"No it is not. That would be something for @matt_wilson to consider with the security dashboard.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5329074, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601097241, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We need more cowbell!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 196721, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616b443b97ad1443c199fb5f0af9780b51ddf379\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts is that what it looks today? seems like a regression.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951315993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I would like a total number of lines not including blank ones.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dcb61a50851d774190fa590cddf3e19f7a753f83\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979036, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer would also like to track lines of code per developer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404096482, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just started to use gitlab, and this is one the first stats i hoped to see in the \\\"Charts\\\", however i was surprised it's missing :(\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3219145, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-22 10:59:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979033, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"how come I can still receive notifications even if I unsubscribed???\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:19:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471203, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001FRuq0\\n\\nCustomer would like to see number of lines of code per language excluding comments. \\n\\n/cc @npost\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-30 01:30:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:47:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 387929331, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer interested in this feature. https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000W2eBo (Internal link)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4587928, \"created_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"35a9711c22330d7480c21b516ab890edccb85fb6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 258382372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"i will join, i want see my ego\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 688008, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8993bd8d42c15974c7f1eee7b8601e71e505626f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979006, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"for a company that has thousands of repositories that's just completely ineffective\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292139470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@bgadberry The customer may be able to pull the necessary vulnerability count information from the existing GraphQL API. I've never heard a request for this functionality before and don't have any plans to include it in the Security Dashboard reports so pulling the data and creating their own reports is the best way forward if this is needed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4708748, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601110834, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Same here!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4122216, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979054, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The developer of scc responded to proposals to update the code as desired. Resultant code is in this blog article: https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story and being worked into this working example for GitLab CI CD: https://gitlab.com/guided-explorations/ci-cd-plugin-extensions/ci-cd-plugin-extension-scc\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404663419, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@mlockhart in the context of an MVC I think we need to stick with measuring the default branch only, because that's what the Repository Analytics page is currently doing ([example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts)).\\n\\nOn the bright side, it seems the existing byte counts are being [updated on push](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/git/branch_push_service.rb#L54).  That makes me hopeful we could match that frequency with line counts.  So let's tentatively say the MVC would be updated pushly (instead of monthly like I proposed above).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409398149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Gold customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/154631 with a slight twist: they'd like to see the number of lines by group/sub-group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-24 18:02:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:37:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3b5c50effe1ea33f7f938b5693032964c2bdc512\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:46:35 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 331168435, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001lc3Cc\\n\\nCustomer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density. \\n\\n/cc @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 19:45:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 600990593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Had a similar request. I was able to get this info by extracting the Gitlab backup repositories from a backup and unbundling everything then running the following utility on the directory.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut it would be nice to see this kind of information on a project / server admin level, just to provide an overview of things currently within GitLab user / admin interfaces.\\r\\n\\r\\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\r\\n\\r\\n![image](/uploads/2e9c9fd05358a6e80411bfb9b323c214/image.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 261290, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:15:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-22 12:20:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 261290, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"186117b5b28df4eca7f2419b17ad900f90e61728\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:42:31 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978968, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Please add a chart with the SLOC metric, it is a metric more useful than the number of commits\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1276118, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 14:50:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 07:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"735fd7ef77d0bd7463126f7436eda8691d678998\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978960, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 695248, \"username\": \"lbot\", \"name\": \"Lee Matos\"}, {\"id\": 239547, \"username\": \"wil.rodriguez\", \"name\": \"William Rodriguez\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 87854, \"username\": \"DouweM\", \"name\": \"Douwe Maan\"}, {\"id\": 1187333, \"username\": \"jramsay-gitlab\", \"name\": \"James Ramsay (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 2182793, \"username\": \"craph1\", \"name\": \"craph\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 709639, \"username\": \"omidontop\", \"name\": \"Omid Manikhi\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 2346644, \"username\": \"ariaieboy\", \"name\": \"AriaieBOY\"}, {\"id\": 101578, \"username\": \"zj-gitlab\", \"name\": \"Zeger-Jan van de Weg\"}, {\"id\": 2223731, \"username\": \"bobbymcgill\", \"name\": \"Bobby McGill\"}, {\"id\": 2814876, \"username\": \"jim.robbins\", \"name\": \"Jim Robbins\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 4158075, \"username\": \"aakriti.gupta\", \"name\": \"Aakriti Gupta\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4911777, \"username\": \"i.hayden\", \"name\": \"Immanuel Hayden\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 635873, \"username\": \"pisarik\", \"name\": \"Vlad Blazhko\"}, {\"id\": 7536567, \"username\": \"hchouraria\", \"name\": \"Harsh Chouraria\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 424775, \"username\": \"markpundsack\", \"name\": \"Mark Pundsack\"}, {\"id\": 7978344, \"username\": \"robinshine\", \"name\": \"Robin Shen\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 4156460, \"username\": \"ogolowinski\", \"name\": \"Orit Golowinski\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 4447217, \"username\": \"ljlane\", \"name\": \"Larissa Lane\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4376883, \"username\": \"stkerr\", \"name\": \"Sam Kerr\"}, {\"id\": 3288671, \"username\": \"cupini\", \"name\": \"Brian Cupini\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 7272738, \"username\": \"kategrechishkina\", \"name\": \"Kate Grechishkina\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 5250128, \"username\": \"ricardoamarilla\", \"name\": \"Ricardo Amarilla\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 5291964, \"username\": \"crispindev\", \"name\": \"crispin velez\"}, {\"id\": 5537005, \"username\": \"cleveland\", \"name\": \"Cleveland Bledsoe Jr\"}, {\"id\": 4748523, \"username\": \"sheininger\", \"name\": \"Steffen Heininger\"}, {\"id\": 10051186, \"username\": \"kballon\", \"name\": \"Kent Japhet Ballon\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 154953, \"username\": \"Zandor300\", \"name\": \"Zandor Smith\"}, {\"id\": 2414870, \"username\": \"mason1920\", \"name\": \"mason1920\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 5329074, \"username\": \"tmccaslin\", \"name\": \"Taylor McCaslin\"}, {\"id\": 196721, \"username\": \"billclark\", \"name\": \"Bill Clark\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 3219145, \"username\": \"spprint\", \"name\": \"Sven Vet\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 4587928, \"username\": \"cbazan1\", \"name\": \"Carlos Bazan\"}, {\"id\": 688008, \"username\": \"friuns\", \"name\": \"friuns\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4708748, \"username\": \"matt_wilson\", \"name\": \"Matt Wilson\"}, {\"id\": 4122216, \"username\": \"saunved\", \"name\": \"Saunved Mutalik\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 261290, \"username\": \"TRPmwiesen\", \"name\": \"Matthew Wiesen\"}, {\"id\": 1276118, \"username\": \"wagnerpinheiro\", \"name\": \"Wagner Pinheiro\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Please rewrite the description of {url} so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved. Also add common \"jobs to be done\" or use cases which should be considered from a usability perspective.","query_id":"b0f2479784ab4ec78ce2b086d560ed39","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"24652824","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 24652824, \"title\": \"Report number of lines per language in repository charts\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-15 17:20:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"### Description\\n\\nAs of now, repository charts report percentage of language in the repo.\\nFirst, it is not obvious how this percentage is computed (number of files? number of lines? bytes? what about comments? libraries?). Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\n### Proposal\\n\\nAs a user I would like to see the number of lines of code per language.\\nIdeally, excluding blank lines and comments, but that is optional.\\n\\n### Documentation blurb\\n\\nAs for use cases:\\n* better understand the repo structure\\n* if this is your repo, being able to report the number of lines of your main language\\n    * this is one of the metric employers would like to know (I personally was surprised by this question on interview and could not clearly respond)\\n* all those use cases for general repo graphs (like pie chart of languages)\\n\\n### Details\\n\\n[A useful comment from ZJ](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038):\\n\\n\u003e Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\n\u003e Lines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\n\u003e That all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\\n\\n### Potential Workarounds\\n\\n- Run `scc` in a GitLab CI pipeline: https://github.com/boyter/scc to generate SLOC/etc. reports\\n- If API use is acceptable (instead of UI), parts of its output stats can be stored as custom attributes on the project: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/custom_attributes.html#set-custom-attribute\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 17800, \"updated_by_id\": 5749302, \"weight\": 8, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -14979600, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-07-17 16:10:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 7536567, \"discussion_locked\": false, \"closed_at\": \"2023-01-19 09:38:40 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 579, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11039421, \"title\": \"Category:Code Analytics\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-18 19:25:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:07:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 7161201, \"title\": \"Manage [DEPRECATED]\", \"color\": \"#44AD8E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-19 05:48:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-19 11:52:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Please use the devops::manage label instead of this deprecated label. It is kept for historical issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1890178, \"title\": \"[deprecated] Accepting merge requests\", \"color\": \"#69d100\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 11:34:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-28 08:14:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"[deprecated] Please use \\\"Seeking community contributions\\\" instead. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/developer-relations/contributor-success/team-task/-/issues/77\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 1672341, \"title\": \"customer\", \"color\": \"#ad4363\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-03-10 22:24:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that were reported by Enterprise Edition subscribers. This label should be accompanied by either the 'bug' or 'feature proposal' label\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 4107658, \"title\": \"graphs\", \"color\": \"#428bca\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-22 15:01:06 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the project Graphs pages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15237307, \"title\": \"icebox\", \"color\": \"#d6ecef\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:25:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-09 02:35:52 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues on which no work is anticipated in the next several milestones but which may be considered for work shortly thereafter thus not closed.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2936416, \"title\": \"popular proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-31 10:32:07 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Feature proposals deemed popular by our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/triage) will have this label applied\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2714266, \"title\": \"potential proposal\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-25 01:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label added by triage tools to mark interesting feature proposals for consideration\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@dbogatov Thanks for the proposal. We'll just have to leave this open and see if it becomes a popular request.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-19 04:14:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73cf193764726f4ed724d78d4b59d4f81efe83cc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978957, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@wagnerpinheiro, [S]LOC metrics are rather old. They are not actual now (only in 80-90s they were). Your idea is pretty but only for developers ego. For really gentlemen customers GITLAB maybe have to improve their charts with different modern metrics. As example, for analyzing object-oriented languages they can add metric of Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 19:52:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 346483, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978961, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@yachmenov_c_ I have to admit, I had to look up what Chidamber \u0026 Kemerer metrics were. And yes, I would love to see those metrics in GitLab.\\n\\n**However**, I feel like it is quite hard (or say, resource heavy) to implement those. Each language will have to provide a service to get OOP relations. We cannot derive those metrics just by parsing the text.\\n\\n**On the other side**, simple line counter per language (even the one which omits comments and empty lines) is relatively easy to implement.\\n\\nAs for developers' ego, I have to admit it would not mind seeing LOC metrics, but I am sure there are other reasons for these metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:00:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-31 12:36:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978963, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, I mostly agree with you, really they can implement functionality you mentioned, and it would be great. Nice point!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 346483, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-04-21 20:11:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8a87fb55f491fc68d6e8910b2bec6e1371d194fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"ZD ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/80860\\n\\nA Customer requested this feature. :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 695248, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:07:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2dba3df39df1cd81040cb0bc86091470aac43ffa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978965, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This would be awesome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 239547, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-09-29 02:34:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"604137042a54634c99ba7cda9b19e4db3570b396\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is getting popular\\n\\n@DouweM ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" for this one?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 10:51:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f1bbac293ede2d142630a69c9b499642ce9a40f8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher I think it may not be well defined enough yet for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\" . We removed the repository language a while ago because it didn't perform well, so we'll need to figure out way to restore it without reintroducing the performance issue.\\n\\nThis is related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/40236 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23931. \\n\\n/cc @jramsay\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 87854, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-20 13:02:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23bac7a1ece7d87f5607254715120cb9067506ea\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978986, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If we can provide a foundation in gitlab-ce#23931 that computes the language stats without performance, we could definitely open this up for ~\\\"Accepting Merge Requests\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1187333, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:16:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-21 15:17:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1187333, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"812e8d43c4b74c029c7327a6b783be67b2a0cd78\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978988, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Having the LOC in the table with the language breakdown and percentage would be great.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 02:26:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4a841d10fb4925ca2b102435a39a249fb1f1bb39\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hello,\\n\\nDisplay the LOC in the chart would be a very nice feature :slight_smile: \\n\\nAny update about this ?\\n\\nThank you very much.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2182793, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-11 07:59:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55170edc6cc50d1a2a20760c0bd5760b0dba68b6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978998, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi,\\u00a0I haven't heard anything back yet.\\nDennis\\nDennis Biringer | Principal Software EngineerPacific Defense Systems, LLC (PDS)Integrity Applications Incorporated535 Lipoa Parkway\\u00a0 Suite 101, Kihei HI, 96753dbiringer@integrity-apps.com(808) 214-0765\\n\\n[smime.p7s](/uploads/e849eea0083b79828f578febe315bdcd/smime.p7s)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1512428, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-04-12 01:49:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55168747dda9172740a2eaa5e847403ed43121de\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979004, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We also would like to see the total number of lines of code, files, etc. Thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-05-31 17:37:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a6edf2d747aa859d84a4adfab95b10d53d7774d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979005, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@shellyniz Currently it's presented as a percentage via the API:\\n- https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#languages\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:08:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d201f77821e20f12477856580eab2e40804cc2dd\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979019, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Silly me, I was looking for it under the repo API. That's a big help, thanks!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:14:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"093b696a8537efb99106d9d0b003220eb6ee8c01\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979020, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\\n\\nIt's a great feature to have especially if you're to brag about how much work has been put into the project in a presentation or something.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 709639, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:05:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:07:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b43271d3058f31f25e92e49015ea9efc4afc7d0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979022, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't see us getting to this anytime soon, but I'm happy to label this with gitlab-ce~1890178 for a community contribution. \\n\\nWe express languages as % of repo, might we also show the absolute LOC? The Charts page might be a sensible place to display this. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/graphs/master/charts for an example. The project overview page could also work, we currently use a multi-colored horizontal line to represent this and show percentages there on mouseover.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:16:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 21:18:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1f57d0559fe42979c7e6d35e07dbbbb6131d9855\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979029, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @jeremy\\\\_ \\nDo you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'?And so 'Total Lines Number'?\\nWhat's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:05:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34d9eb930ce114af06333350c5ff55483637cf7e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979031, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @markglenfletcher \\nIt's very good things that showing percent,but lines number complete it's feature,doesn't?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 37100, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-13 22:12:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a92bea136cc9e32d787aa5742ed869a21d2ab49c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979032, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Do you want to adding this feature with 'Lines Number'? And so 'Total Lines Number'? What's your opinion?\\n\\nI'd love to hear your proposal, but I think the Charts page may be an easy place to add this:\\n\\n![image](/uploads/198f585f7e807ed931757b47a519d135/image.png)\\n\\nWe could include a separate column for LOC on each row, and include a \\\"Total\\\" row at the bottom that displays the sum of the rows. What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 06:32:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-24 12:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1086520, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-10 12:54:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979035, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"any update about this feature ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2346644, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-13 08:43:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"075f869895c6f828be69c382f91a4a9b2dba20b5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just so its stated explicitly, the language bar on the projects overview page is based on bytes. Iteration over each blob to count the number of lines will be quite expensive and to make it performant on gitlab.com scale will be quite the challenge :smile: Bytes are chosen as Git stores the size of each blob with its name. So if a blob has the path `path/to/file.rb` it can take the extension and detect it's Ruby. It already has the number of bytes, so it can move on.\\n\\nLines however is harder, as now you'd have to either iterate each blob each time, or be clever with caching combined with diffing, which in turn might lead to race conditions.\\n\\nThat all being said, this would require a new RPC to Gitaly, and gitaly-proto changes. Happy to review MRs there! :cat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 101578, \"created_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-01-22 11:57:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"570bda01e243b5cf50fce1ba6adb9cd4605169f4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979038, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Not sure if this helps anyone, but if you use GitBash (or linux terminal) and go into your local repo and type this command:\\n`find . -not -path \\u201c*/.git/*\\u201d | xargs wc -l`\\nYou get the total line counts. No extra things to install - just a bash command.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2223731, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 17:41:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a894203f7adeeb1a1ed60f595000c3d28bf650ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979039, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is another possible way by using the git ls-files command with a file type filter.\\n\\n* Java example: `git ls-files *.java *.xml | xargs wc -l`\\n* Ruby example: `git ls-files *.rb Rakefile Gemfile | xargs wc -l`\\n\\nOr whatever files you want to include in your count. It can also works in subfolders to provide counts of just the contents of that folder.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2814876, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:22:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78a3685ac84f3e9f6999bd406e3ee07296be78f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979041, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My developer ego gives +1 for this stats. I think, if you count the lines anyway, it might be no problem to offer different stats as options, because the counting might be the most expensive part anyway. \\n\\n*Yeah* for looking at your developer productivity in numbers. :-)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:10:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a8d439996cd80acb0e887e19d4c7a32c3b38f3f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979042, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is not graphical and not included in gitlab, but it serves my interest totally. Also it might be a good starting point for Gitlab's implementation: \\n\\nhttps://github.com/AlDanial/cloc\\n\\nUse `cloc --vcs git` to count only watched files in a git repository.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 491329, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-09 09:20:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e05053a4fedccfbd67d6045862d003aaff0c6202\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979043, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@aakriti.gupta, should we just close this one in favor of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104, since it's a prerequisite?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:46:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979061, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@dbogatov, yes, we will take everything from this one in account - it's planned for 12.2. Do you want to comment on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104? What's your opinion?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:56:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3511154, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"45e71e7ac76abec3784d03cbdb2b1cbc301899ff\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979063, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This should not be moved to EE as the initial feature was added by the community.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 13:32:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5ac02291aab2c6a295e4df9adacd278f1278fc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979064, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @max-wittig for pointing out! The EE issue has more content, which will be available on group/instance level. We would like to move all analytics into one space in the top nav bar, so will be thinking through how to combine what is in cc now and the additional functionality we will be adding in ee. Any feedback is welcome!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 15:22:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"50ead744b305fa1f532705f92d1dbd1b1ec7a298\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979065, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"As mentioned below, as long as we keep the history through a merge or copying over information, it sounds good to close this with an update @valexieva :)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4158075, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 09:36:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a886f94362ed9c996f0cdc42bf01b0c7181a7f5b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979066, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@valexieva I wrote a small script, which reports the languages an instance has by exporting prometheus metrics. Relying just on absolute values would make a lot more sense, than the approach that I'm using now. But I won't use absolute numbers, if `EE` is required for this.\\n\\nhttps://github.com/max-wittig/gitlab-languages\\n\\nI think it would be fine, if the Graph feature stays in EE, but it would be nice, if the API would return absolute numbers.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1283330, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:35:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-08 14:42:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1283330, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7bde2d02397a5cb7ae5b0b940c065224158203f5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979067, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Keeping this open until we complete: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13163. After that will close, the existing functionality will be available in CE, further functionality as per https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104 in EE.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-01 13:19:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"94574f2b40c78694f4096c523c514fcca93041ce\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi, we have scheduled LOC plus language trends for 12.3 - please find here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12104#note_194198775. We will also ensure that it's available for CE users in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/65616 before we remove the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/graphs/master/charts\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3511154, \"created_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-05 10:11:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"16af6bd6af9d839ee0856e4771ce2d012a7dc48e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979073, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Github provides this feature, it would be nice to be able to obtain comparable metrics from Gitlab as we are using both.\\n\\nOur use case to get these numbers is for figuring out the prevalence of code in any given language across our entire codebase to inform us with requirements for code analysis tools etc. \\\"90% of language Y in repository X\\\" without any context to the number is mostly a useless metric. We need to understand how much language Y there is in totality across our multiple SCM systems. Now i can only count how many repos have a given language in general which is not exactly the same thing.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 14:53:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291742295, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@unitysipu \\nI would say for your use case it is better to just create a tool that clones all the repos you want metrics on and runs cloc or a similar tool - https://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\nHaving these metrics across groups/organizations in github and gitlab makes less sense to me than to provide some information about what powers a given project.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-20 21:49:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 291953639, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The amount of code often correlates with things like risk. It's sorta interesting from analysis point of view if you have projects that have 500, 5000, 500k or 5M lines of code. You may want to prioritize or categorize the big projects over the small ones (obviously that's not the full picture, depends on what that code is used for etc.). But just looking at our entire codebase / repositories from the top and knowing there's \\\"90% of PHP\\\" in some project without understanding there's a million lines of it doesn't really help. So while individual teams may have a good grasp of their project, somebody looking over our entire portfolio you need more information to figure out who you should get in touch with. Obviously you can also try to check the file size metrics etc. and try to filter out uninteresting file types or other similar cumbersome workarounds but it's just more work to land on data that could easily be provided by the platform directly.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:41:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292157164, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Even if you have 1000 repos, it would still not be that much work to write a tool that accumulates all the information using the method I described, and you're going to get it a lot faster than by asking gitlab to add a feature. \\nAs for expanding the scope of this issue to cover groups and organizations as a whole, I guess gitlab devs might consider that as an enterprise feature at some point.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1612315, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 20:38:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292558285, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, *obviously* there are workarounds that require you to analyze all the source code yourself. That's not the point of this feature request. I see the conversation revolving around suggestions and local optimizations for individual teams / developers or the importance of the amount of code in context of individuals. I figured it's prudent to provide another point of view that may have an impact on the thinking of why it's important to have this implemented. There are other use cases for the LOC/Language metrics that can be of importance for somebody who is looking at your organization as a whole.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-24 08:36:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293145108, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Honestly, with that chain of argument: Why have a commit graph? You can do this locally on your git repo. Or why have a bugtracker? You can just install trac separately. Or why have a wiki? Haven't you heard of mediaWiki? And so on. \\n\\nFact is, that this is a standard feature that has many uses for individuals and companies (also for example if I actually will bother to contribute to a code base or if its not worth it because id have to learn X new languages).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4911777, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:42:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4911777, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"044bd214cb760ef42c44b314a3243601c4c2f6a7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-09-17 20:10:44 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299631157, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I disagree. It's absolutely not ridiculous at all to have _code metrics_ available in the source code repository you might use.\\n\\nAny external tool will have to analyse the code outside of the SCM makes the whole process inherently ineffective and slow by design. Gitlab (and github) already has the code inside it and therefore is in the best position to provide metrics and data on it. Furthermore, modern (sophisticated) code analysis tools _integrate directly_ with Github these days through Github applications, but even they cannot provide this data either without analyzing the entire codebase separately.\\n\\nWhile workarounds exist they are all bad in a large organization. I agree that it's clear this is not a priority based on the fact it's been open for two years, but also it's clear that the reasoning and discussion around this feature is very narrow and developer (ego) oriented.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-03-05 12:36:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-26 15:10:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"005fc553fd9580804c00dd974606b58258f6d149\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 299627593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"##### For person\\nPeople expect it, since various metrics implemented in GitHub. At some point everyone just genuinely interested in those metrics even only for self-esteem. And it is frustrating to not find them on GitLab. And since GitHub made everyone think to have them out-of-the-box, people became lazy and don't want to pollute their work environment with some difficult code inspection tools that they will use once just because of curiosity. \\n\\n##### For big team\\nIf you are working in a solid company with big code base, and you professionally perform code analysis and give consulting based on it, then it is ridiculous to do it on the basis of GitHub or GitLab, likely you will need to have more sophisticated special tool for it.\\n\\n##### Conclusion\\nSo this feature is not a mandatory. In first place GitLab need to improve its role system, this is a real bummer:) But GitLab doesn't do it for 2 years, so probably they have more important tasks. I prefer to use GitHub because of role system and metrics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 635873, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-24 13:32:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:35:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"96c7f0adc49d8ea2d2f64108bea473166fe3f13c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 293348432, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A premium/silver customer has requested for this feature over support ticket: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/220808 (internal link)\\n\\nIn particular they'd like an ability to query statistics about lines of code per detected language type, within each, and across all repositories under a group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7536567, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 13:07:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 7536567, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80839b906be084dee24b6e6d95e01d91af4e6b4a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2021-06-26 16:56:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 612192220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am proposing in another issue to update an existing open source tool to add MBs of code to the reports.\\n\\nThis is related to helping customers (and prospects) be able to estimate the long term costs of security scanning solutions that charge by lines or MBs of code.\\n\\nIf the tool were a CI stage, but GitLab could receive and parse the report to a UI - then the compute for this would only performed for and paid by customers who want the counts.\\n\\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/233018\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-31 00:05:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 164827, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 388534468, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@DarwinJS the blocker for us on this feature is a line-counting capability in Gitaly.  I noticed that [SCC](https://github.com/boyter/scc) is written in Go, as Gitaly is.  Seems like that could be a very happy coincidence for us.  Did you happen to dive deep enough into SCC to have an opinion about how challenging it might be to integrate into Gitaly?\\n\\nNote for others: SCC is the line-counting software that Darwin recommended in his [blog post](https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-07 17:27:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 408694264, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bmiller1 the context is helpful.\\n\\nThis is in the %Backlog for awareness\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 586004666, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@djensen - I settled on SCC, rather than the long standing CLOC (Perl) due to it being written in a modern language and, if the author was not able to add features, the hopes that someone at GitLab would.\\n\\nI did dive into the internals, but don't know enough about Go Lang nor Gitaly to comment on whether the two would tango well.\\n\\nIt is lightning fast - which I noticed when processing www-gitlab-com.\\n\\nHave you thought of this as a sidekiq process - not sure how good it would be at doing per-commit differentials in Gitaly and doing the full repo in Gitaly may be a lot of excess compute if it does it every commit?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 13:21:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409124927, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just like source control, you don't need to count all the lines of code in a repo every time.\\n\\nOnce you have a known count of lines at a specific commit, you can just track the diffs after that to increase/decrease line count for specific code and languages.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 17:58:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409309581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes I understand.\\nWhat I'm trying to indicate is that the machinations to isolate net new lines and net removed lines of code may be more processing load than simply scheduling scc weekly?  Especially given the speed of scc.\\n\\nIf that might be true, the question is how timely do line counts need to be?\\n\\nI don't know the answer - just highlighting that if line counts don't need to be up to the minute, there might be a cheaper way to do it.  It would also possibly allow direct dependency on scc, rather than forking it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 18:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409329832, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e It is lightning fast\\n\\nYes it is!  It crunches the entire gitlab repo in about 3 seconds on my machine ([results here](https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2013041)).  Not bad.\\n\\n\u003e how timely do line counts need to be?  I don't know the answer\\n\\nMe either, but let's guess it needs to be somewhere between monthly and daily.  (Hourly and commitly seem unnecessarily specific.)  Maybe we could start at monthly and see how it goes?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:08:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409366938, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Or, maybe proponents could weigh in on the frequency.\\n\\nI feel a compromise might be:\\n\\n * maintain a _count per branch_ (which could be very helpful anyway)\\n * trigger a count on the _first commit_ of any new branch (or make counting an option?)\\n * update all branch counts _monthly_ (or, only branches that have a flag indicating that they should be counted)\\n\\nThat way, the regular update frequency is down to one count per project branch, per month, and Developers can force a new count by pushing a new branch (perhaps they might have a special case to have up-to-the-commit counts).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:50:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 20:54:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 5791080, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409381230, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In addition, I would like to understand uses cases for getting as fine as \\\"per branch\\\" code counts - what would someone use this for and how often?  If it is very occasional and/or for a bespoke purpose, they could just run scc themselves on a local copy.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-10 14:09:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 410590466, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Starter customer requesting this feature in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/172665\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-21 22:56:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f820fe272fadfd61eb4c19317bb2d45f71f25fa4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 416263002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e Second, I would love to see some *absolute* data (number of files, lines, bytes).\\n\\nAs the description states, the goal is to understand what the bar means, and see some absolute data. @jeremy Would the MVC here be to simply report the number of bytes, since that's what we're measuring?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 424775, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-14 16:16:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ccc8a3b61fc8f4f779b6b63486fb31d54c005cc9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 288529601, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[OneDev](https://github.com/theonedev/onedev) calculates SLOC per languages and display the trends over time which is quite interesting. An example trends here:\\n\\nhttps://code.onedev.io/projects/react/stats/lines\\n\\nOne can hover mouse on the trend to show SLOC by day. The initial calculation for a large repo such as Linux takes about 30 min, and the result will be cached. Subsequent updates for new commits will be fairly fast based on cache. Below is the logic for calculation if someone is interested:\\n\\nhttps://github.com/theonedev/onedev/blob/main/server-core/src/main/java/io/onedev/server/infomanager/DefaultCommitInfoManager.java\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7978344, \"created_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-01-12 14:30:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"19fa4567d0d0f1d5842c5ba6beae8267aebb0a4e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 483620034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This is moving back to the %Backlog for the reasons described in ZJ's [comment above](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/17800#note_214979038). We're absolutely accepting merge requests on this one, but the Manage stage needs to prioritize other areas at the moment.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1086520, \"created_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-11-11 01:18:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd32244cb8a10270e97506088fe7772e17dbcf11\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 242549553, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@markglenfletcher please fix this ASAP.\\nI am surprised Gitlab has no protection against this crap.\\nYou will end up with people massively unsubscribing at best.\\n\\nP.S. This idiot keeps recreating accounts.\\nA simple post factum ban will not work.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:22:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 12:57:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 920678, \"type\": null, \"position\": \"{}\", \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d54912a045e3ea6508b3cf9ea3c8d3f2c3f3784\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471910, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"There is a certain lag.\\nI suggest we do not subscribe back until admins fix it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503473194, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner I actually think this should go to ~\\\"group::source code\\\" , WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4156460, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 16:42:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 579827345, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI - Since Apex code is essentially extended Java with a few accompanying .xml metadata files, my customer was able to run `scc \\u2013count-as cls:java` to interpret Apex .cls files as Java.  scc understands the comment and syntax structure of Java and was able to correctly return the LOC.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-27 21:51:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 587249173, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I think that makes a lot of sense @ogolowinski\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4447217, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 19:34:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580171017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ogolowinski Yep, I agree. Thanks for changing the group.\\n\\nThis is going to remain in the backlog as it is not our current focus and based on [details](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#details) in the description, LOE will be quite high. Thanks.\\n\\ncc @cupini\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-19 20:16:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 580236144, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@cupini I'm tagging @ljlane who is the PM for ~\\\"group::optimize\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4376883, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562100410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" ~\\\"self-managed\\\" ~customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\n* Link to request:  https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001Eo1h0\\n* Why interested: Want to report on all repos (instance-level) for languages used in repos for tools info\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: Workarounds are nice but would be nice to get an instance-view instantly \\n* PM to mention: @stkerr\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3288671, \"created_at\": \"2021-04-27 23:22:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-04-28 00:09:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d00c9db46ebdfd5c4e66de6787876ca8748fad60\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 562089576, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"An Ultimate customer is interested in this feature.\\n* Link to request: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000014HWYo\\n* Why interested: They have a need to report LoC for their Apex repos.\\n* Current solution for this problem: Have to scrape every project to get languages used but not per-lines\\n* Impact to the customer of not having this: We have not found an adequate workaround\\n* PM to mention: @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5213201, \"created_at\": \"2021-05-20 21:51:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-05-26 22:16:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7b778642e336114c9305738c7d29c4e4e85d3976\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 581438360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another Premium customer is interested in this feature: [#223248](https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/223248)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7272738, \"created_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-09 11:30:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e8ddc8cdcb1c801921ec5c22320c15c418b8826\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 622513819, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another customer inquiring if this function exists\\nhttps://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/161342\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5791080, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 09:50:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fe28d2e0f29b158bfc492b79ea8883a16e1d5fb7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364390361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Another ~\\\"GitLab Premium\\\" Customer  interested in this feature [Internal Link](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001kHlpn)\\n\\ncc/ @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5250128, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-18 19:30:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:09:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3f6ffdb391745aec7053e4585f952953cbf32152\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 706872228, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer here: we compile this data periodically for use by the C-suite and even if the absolute numbers are representative of byte counts it is easy enough for me to use an estimate of bytes per line to get what I need.\\n\\nThe key is that I have nothing without absolute numbers.\\n\\nAlso, please consider the non-gitlab.com use case. Perhaps on our hosted instance we would be able to opt-in to a feature like this if it were available and we can decide for ourselves if the performance is acceptable.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2973161, \"created_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-06-19 15:58:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78631ce204289b27d0730dbec72b8b9a7f770fec\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 364645655, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"My company is a Premium customer - we would really like to have this and even more metrics regarding type of language like number of components, files, etc.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5291964, \"created_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-11-02 16:11:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3790f9053863d8b679f99d4cc896f3ffb8c450e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 721314226, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"- SF: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000Ut0JyAAJ\\n- ZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/254826\\n\\n~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" customer is interested in this feature.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5537005, \"created_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-12-21 18:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af4170834a554c4135225876e22c91fadd8c35f2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 791792997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"1900 seat ~\\\"GitLab Ultimate\\\" [Customer](https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/00161000002xBZQ) is interested in this feature.\\n\\n- Priority: ~\\\"customer priority::5\\\"  priority::\\n- Why interested: Customer is trying to find a way to report the total line of code across all GitLab projects.\\n- Problem they are trying to solve: Customer has some internal teams who are trying trying to integrate tooling with GitLab to measure and track code coverage. There\\u2019s a cost associated with expanding those other tools and without the ability to report the number of lines it's nearly impossible to estimate said cost.\\n- Current solution for this problem: none\\n- Impact to the customer of not having this: Inability to utilize other tools in conjunction with GitLab and thus slowing adoption of the platform.\\n- Questions: Are they're any other workarounds for this, even at a manual reporting level? \\n- PM to mention: @tlinz\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4748523, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-14 14:49:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-15 13:33:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e76285e7c35cbca1481c16ed2c1ad5b7d232b65e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 990978163, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"A Premium customer is interested in this feature.\\n\\nZD: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/284853\\n\\nThe workaround mentioned [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_332427265) unfortunately is hitting this error at the moment. I wonder if you have thoughts about this @lyle ?\\n\\n```\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n3: from (irb):3\\n2: from lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb:85:in `path'\\n1: from lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/storage_settings.rb:65:in `legacy_disk_path'\\nGitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings::DirectPathAccessError (git disk access denied)\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10051186, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 08:09:53 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 924067966, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Seems related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/350080. This was always a bit of a hack, and relied on manually executing `git` commands directly on the repo.\\n\\nYou could take (and modify) the same core:\\n\\n`/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l` and run it directly on the command line given a list of paths generated from `rails`\\n\\nThere's a bunch of caveats there though:\\n- `master` is not necessarily the default branch name (we transitioned in GitLab to `main` some time ago)\\n- It relies on counting the actual number of lines in a file `wc -l` and does it for every file in a repo. This will include licenses, headers, empty space and so on.\\n\\nThere are some additional thoughts in https://gist.github.com/mandiwise/dc53cb9da00856d7cdbb that have iterated on my approach from two years ago :sweat:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-04-26 22:56:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b8e3e33f1b90b1555829b03d1de3c683ce05edcf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 925281183, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @bgadberry \\n\\nIt seems like with the additional customer problem you need solved that there should be another issue for this...?\\n\\n\u003e Customer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density.\\n\\nThis does not seem directly related. Correct me if I am wrong!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601066055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner You're correct. I was thinking the customer could calculate the metric manually once number of lines of code is made available. On second thought, I think we can calculate vulnerabilities per byte today. I'll report back if that suffices.\\n\\n@tmccaslin Is this vulnerability per byte/line of code metric something we've considered uncovering as part of SAST?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:07:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601093808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"It's not per _language_ but the following rails console snippet will give you an estimate of number of lines per `Project` on a self-managed instance where the `git-data` is on a partition or directly attached volume.\\n\\nIt can break a bit if there's no `master` branch or if a repository for some reason doesn't have a `HEAD`, so it's not at all bullet-proof.\\n\\n```ruby\\nheaders = ['path', 'lines','archived?']\\nreport_file = Tempfile.new(['project_lines','.csv'])\\n\\nCSV.open(report_file.path, \\\"wb\\\") do |csv|\\ncsv \u003c\u003c headers\\n   Project.all.each do |p|\\n      output = `/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} ls-tree --full-tree -r HEAD --name-only | xargs -I '$' /opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/git -C #{p.repository.path} show master:$ | wc -l`\\n      csv \u003c\u003c [p.full_path, Integer(output),p.archived?]\\n   end; nil\\nend\\n\\nreport_file.close\\n```\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 23:51:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2930750323d45742084b921bd0f102d58807df7b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 332427265, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, statistics counting total and per lang number of lines (in code files only) would be so nice and basic.  \\nIgnore empty lines for me is optional. \\n\\nGet stats manually / locally for a git repo is not a problem. But this issue asks for the UI of gitlab. And this is what I need as well. \\n\\nhere a link to the current state: (older links above are expired)  \\nhttps://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts \\n\\nHere a link for more advanced stats ambitions:  \\nhttps://www.openhub.net/p/gitlab\\n\\nedit: btw: If this is not happening since 5 years because of performance issues, then just calculate it once a week and show the calculation date next to it. I guess most people do not need per hour stats about n lines of code. For me even once per month would be enough. (And thus could be used for #12104 as well)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:08:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-03 07:59:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 882141, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3bdba5e20eedfcedc7eb1c6272fa93798b138610\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-05-18 14:13:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951334872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"In order to get this request some attention, this issue has been marked as a potentially interesting proposal as it meets the following criteria:\\n\\n* Labelled as a feature proposal\\n* More than 10 upvotes\\n* Unscheduled (not associated with a milestone)\\n\\nThanks for your proposal!\\n\\n\\n\\n/cc @markglenfletcher\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 419655, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-11-18 04:31:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"73b69edb26083c702d2514effe76ca7da2d40407\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978971, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"+1\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 154953, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-12 09:25:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"63b6ff0026abcb2ee9df9b28041655c7ab9fe563\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979021, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@billclark agreed\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2414870, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-08 02:28:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1328954e3c5076176230b846b4da51543092429b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"If you do, make sure you somehow transfer the popularity and influence as well. \\nThis issue has 2 years of (possible sparse) history and 300+ upvotes. \\nThe newer one is month long. \\n\\nIt may make more sense to either transfer this one to EE, or merge the other one to here.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 920678, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-07-03 11:52:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5db704a8ce0f10d43344ec9d98767153458c3c76\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979062, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"this just counts the raw line number of the files treated as pieces of texts. I guess what people want here is more like a per-language breakdown.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-03-06 18:07:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e32505249798e1b3e040ded861516658150259c6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979040, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Is there a way to get this data using the API?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1861874, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-14 11:06:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0603dc2249187fa36328ff2f92debfc6c7db79d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979017, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"No it is not. That would be something for @matt_wilson to consider with the security dashboard.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5329074, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:16:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601097241, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"We need more cowbell!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 196721, \"created_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-08-07 19:16:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616b443b97ad1443c199fb5f0af9780b51ddf379\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts is that what it looks today? seems like a regression.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 882141, \"created_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-18 13:57:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4b97198d010ed7e95fc262d1f29035f71961eda\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 951315993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I would like a total number of lines not including blank ones.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 102482, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-12-28 07:42:37 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dcb61a50851d774190fa590cddf3e19f7a753f83\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979036, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer would also like to track lines of code per developer.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 21:23:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404096482, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Just started to use gitlab, and this is one the first stats i hoped to see in the \\\"Charts\\\", however i was surprised it's missing :(\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3219145, \"created_at\": \"2018-12-22 10:59:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979033, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"how come I can still receive notifications even if I unsubscribed???\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2438931, \"created_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:19:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-02-07 18:26:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9ac29bf1412056de52f720f228ad964e771a99b0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 503471203, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100001FRuq0\\n\\nCustomer would like to see number of lines of code per language excluding comments. \\n\\n/cc @npost\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-30 01:30:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:47:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"eb54564d4654374ae63e8eb52527601014481efb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 387929331, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Customer interested in this feature. https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0016100000W2eBo (Internal link)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4587928, \"created_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-12-10 19:56:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"35a9711c22330d7480c21b516ab890edccb85fb6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 258382372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"i will join, i want see my ego\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 688008, \"created_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-07-30 22:42:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8993bd8d42c15974c7f1eee7b8601e71e505626f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979006, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"for a company that has thousands of repositories that's just completely ineffective\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5476246, \"created_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-02-21 09:13:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"10fe6a459ec6c87e9ed31c7bbd1a8b595922945b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 292139470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@bgadberry The customer may be able to pull the necessary vulnerability count information from the existing GraphQL API. I've never heard a request for this functionality before and don't have any plans to include it in the Security Dashboard reports so pulling the data and creating their own reports is the best way forward if this is needed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4708748, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 23:42:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 601110834, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Same here!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4122216, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-06-10 15:03:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"71485494f03eb4e76252e3beb5826bac74fa3c15\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214979054, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The developer of scc responded to proposals to update the code as desired. Resultant code is in this blog article: https://acloudguru.com/blog/engineering/how-much-code-do-i-have-a-devsecops-story and being worked into this working example for GitLab CI CD: https://gitlab.com/guided-explorations/ci-cd-plugin-extensions/ci-cd-plugin-extension-scc\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 164827, \"created_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-31 13:21:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 404663419, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@mlockhart in the context of an MVC I think we need to stick with measuring the default branch only, because that's what the Repository Analytics page is currently doing ([example](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/graphs/master/charts)).\\n\\nOn the bright side, it seems the existing byte counts are being [updated on push](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/services/git/branch_push_service.rb#L54).  That makes me hopeful we could match that frequency with line counts.  So let's tentatively say the MVC would be updated pushly (instead of monthly like I proposed above).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4512390, \"created_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-08 21:22:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f22864d4a92ed8bfd0657092f53be6218713536c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 409398149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Gold customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/154631 with a slight twist: they'd like to see the number of lines by group/sub-group.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 786106, \"created_at\": \"2020-04-24 18:02:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-29 19:37:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 786106, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3b5c50effe1ea33f7f938b5693032964c2bdc512\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:46:35 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 331168435, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Ultimate customer requesting this feature: https://gitlab.my.salesforce.com/0014M00001lc3Cc\\n\\nCustomer would like to calculate vulnerabilities per number of lines of code in order to measure issue/vulnerability density. \\n\\n/cc @sarahwaldner\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4788291, \"created_at\": \"2021-06-14 19:45:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-06-14 21:56:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b23826cc32a2ebd6b91f56e4471b7bfef9e87ff6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 600990593, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Had a similar request. I was able to get this info by extracting the Gitlab backup repositories from a backup and unbundling everything then running the following utility on the directory.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut it would be nice to see this kind of information on a project / server admin level, just to provide an overview of things currently within GitLab user / admin interfaces.\\r\\n\\r\\nhttps://www.npmjs.com/package/cloc\\r\\n\\r\\n![image](/uploads/2e9c9fd05358a6e80411bfb9b323c214/image.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 261290, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-03 18:15:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-22 12:20:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 261290, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"186117b5b28df4eca7f2419b17ad900f90e61728\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2022-03-30 20:42:31 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978968, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Please add a chart with the SLOC metric, it is a metric more useful than the number of commits\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1276118, \"created_at\": \"2017-04-21 14:50:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 07:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": \"\", \"noteable_id\": 24652824, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"735fd7ef77d0bd7463126f7436eda8691d678998\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 214978960, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 346483, \"username\": \"yachmenov_c_\", \"name\": \"Yaroslav Yachmenov\"}, {\"id\": 695248, \"username\": \"lbot\", \"name\": \"Lee Matos\"}, {\"id\": 239547, \"username\": \"wil.rodriguez\", \"name\": \"William Rodriguez\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 87854, \"username\": \"DouweM\", \"name\": \"Douwe Maan\"}, {\"id\": 1187333, \"username\": \"jramsay-gitlab\", \"name\": \"James Ramsay (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 2182793, \"username\": \"craph1\", \"name\": \"craph\"}, {\"id\": 1512428, \"username\": \"pds-admins\", \"name\": \"Dennis Biringer\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 709639, \"username\": \"omidontop\", \"name\": \"Omid Manikhi\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 37100, \"username\": \"sampad.abbas1370\", \"name\": \"Abbas Aliakbari\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 2346644, \"username\": \"ariaieboy\", \"name\": \"AriaieBOY\"}, {\"id\": 101578, \"username\": \"zj-gitlab\", \"name\": \"Zeger-Jan van de Weg\"}, {\"id\": 2223731, \"username\": \"bobbymcgill\", \"name\": \"Bobby McGill\"}, {\"id\": 2814876, \"username\": \"jim.robbins\", \"name\": \"Jim Robbins\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 491329, \"username\": \"Valentin_Seehausen\", \"name\": \"Valentin Seehausen\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 4158075, \"username\": \"aakriti.gupta\", \"name\": \"Aakriti Gupta\"}, {\"id\": 1283330, \"username\": \"max-wittig\", \"name\": \"Max Wittig\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 3511154, \"username\": \"valexieva\", \"name\": \"Virjinia Alexieva\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 1612315, \"username\": \"dico.karssiens\", \"name\": \"Dico Karssiens\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4911777, \"username\": \"i.hayden\", \"name\": \"Immanuel Hayden\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 635873, \"username\": \"pisarik\", \"name\": \"Vlad Blazhko\"}, {\"id\": 7536567, \"username\": \"hchouraria\", \"name\": \"Harsh Chouraria\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 424775, \"username\": \"markpundsack\", \"name\": \"Mark Pundsack\"}, {\"id\": 7978344, \"username\": \"robinshine\", \"name\": \"Robin Shen\"}, {\"id\": 1086520, \"username\": \"jeremy-gl\", \"name\": \"Jeremy Watson (ex-GitLab)\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 4156460, \"username\": \"ogolowinski\", \"name\": \"Orit Golowinski\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 4447217, \"username\": \"ljlane\", \"name\": \"Larissa Lane\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4376883, \"username\": \"stkerr\", \"name\": \"Sam Kerr\"}, {\"id\": 3288671, \"username\": \"cupini\", \"name\": \"Brian Cupini\"}, {\"id\": 5213201, \"username\": \"bmiller1\", \"name\": \"Bryan Miller\"}, {\"id\": 7272738, \"username\": \"kategrechishkina\", \"name\": \"Kate Grechishkina\"}, {\"id\": 5791080, \"username\": \"mlockhart\", \"name\": \"Mike Lockhart | GitLab\"}, {\"id\": 5250128, \"username\": \"ricardoamarilla\", \"name\": \"Ricardo Amarilla\"}, {\"id\": 2973161, \"username\": \"robf_at_conversica.com\", \"name\": \"Rob Fulwell\"}, {\"id\": 5291964, \"username\": \"crispindev\", \"name\": \"crispin velez\"}, {\"id\": 5537005, \"username\": \"cleveland\", \"name\": \"Cleveland Bledsoe Jr\"}, {\"id\": 4748523, \"username\": \"sheininger\", \"name\": \"Steffen Heininger\"}, {\"id\": 10051186, \"username\": \"kballon\", \"name\": \"Kent Japhet Ballon\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 419655, \"username\": \"markglenfletcher\", \"name\": \"Mark Fletcher\"}, {\"id\": 154953, \"username\": \"Zandor300\", \"name\": \"Zandor Smith\"}, {\"id\": 2414870, \"username\": \"mason1920\", \"name\": \"mason1920\"}, {\"id\": 920678, \"username\": \"dbogatov\", \"name\": \"Dmytro Bogatov\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 1861874, \"username\": \"shellyniz\", \"name\": \"Shelly Nizri\"}, {\"id\": 5329074, \"username\": \"tmccaslin\", \"name\": \"Taylor McCaslin\"}, {\"id\": 196721, \"username\": \"billclark\", \"name\": \"Bill Clark\"}, {\"id\": 882141, \"username\": \"1u\", \"name\": \"1u\"}, {\"id\": 102482, \"username\": \"faithfulman\", \"name\": \"Kevin Isley\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 3219145, \"username\": \"spprint\", \"name\": \"Sven Vet\"}, {\"id\": 2438931, \"username\": \"JasonHuZS\", \"name\": \"Jason Hu\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 4587928, \"username\": \"cbazan1\", \"name\": \"Carlos Bazan\"}, {\"id\": 688008, \"username\": \"friuns\", \"name\": \"friuns\"}, {\"id\": 5476246, \"username\": \"unitysipu\", \"name\": \"Simo Punnonen\"}, {\"id\": 4708748, \"username\": \"matt_wilson\", \"name\": \"Matt Wilson\"}, {\"id\": 4122216, \"username\": \"saunved\", \"name\": \"Saunved Mutalik\"}, {\"id\": 164827, \"username\": \"DarwinJS\", \"name\": \"DarwinJS\"}, {\"id\": 4512390, \"username\": \"djensen\", \"name\": \"Dan Jensen\"}, {\"id\": 786106, \"username\": \"lyle\", \"name\": \"Lyle Kozloff\"}, {\"id\": 4788291, \"username\": \"bgadberry\", \"name\": \"Brett Gadberry\"}, {\"id\": 261290, \"username\": \"TRPmwiesen\", \"name\": \"Matthew Wiesen\"}, {\"id\": 1276118, \"username\": \"wagnerpinheiro\", \"name\": \"Wagner Pinheiro\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Are there any open questions relating to this issue? {url}","query_id":"9e4fe5abecff4b988c0e197a2130d778","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130125924","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130125924, \"title\": \"Update work item metadata with item type and icon\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:48:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Problem\\n\\nThe current work item detail view includes the work item type in the parent widget, which will be moving elsewhere on the page as part of the updates to the work item detail view. To prepare for this, we are adding the work item type and icon into the header to provide consistency and group similar information together.\\n\\n## Proposal\\n\\n- Add the work item type and icon into the header\\n- Update text styling to match design\\n\\n## Acceptance\\n\\n- UX matches the attached designs. \\n\\n## Design\\n- See design section\\n- [Link to Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/1rrKIfHIvBdY8XrQRJbJdF/%5BSpecs%5D-Planning-objects-%26-work-items-detail-view?type=design\u0026node-id=2%3A139685\u0026mode=design\u0026t=Oz6mkfIUgx8RrBbF-1)\\n\\n## Context\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/plan/-/issues/933#note_1422464575\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 416800, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 231484068, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:53:32 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": 181602, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 22241940, \"title\": \"Category:Team Planning\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Plan, organize, and track team progress using Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2024184, \"title\": \"UX\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-05-17 17:55:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-31 23:10:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues or MRs that introduce user-facing changes or impact the user experience. Applying this label to issues will signal a need for a designer.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15714199, \"title\": \"design-weight::1\", \"color\": \"#ffdbed\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"(Trivial) Mostly small UI changes leading to small incremental UX improvements. No users\\u2019 workflow involved in these changes. Requirements are clear and there are no unanswered questions.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2975007, \"title\": \"feature::enhancement\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-07 21:18:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-14 18:22:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"User-facing improvements that refine the initial MVC to make it more useful and usable. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#data-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690691, \"title\": \"group::project management\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 15:40:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Project Management group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#team-planning-group | PM: @gweaver\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111313, \"title\": \"workflow::planning breakdown\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 22:24:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that need estimation, and possibly breaking down into further chunks to enable effective iteration. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 909555, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": {\"id\": 181602, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-11 00:05:02 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-07-28\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-10\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"iid\": 344, \"title\": null, \"description\": null, \"state_enum\": 3, \"iterations_cadence_id\": 39982, \"sequence\": 3}, \"iterations_cadence\": {\"id\": 39982, \"group_id\": 9970, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 00:05:03 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-06-30\", \"duration_in_weeks\": 2, \"iterations_in_advance\": 4, \"active\": true, \"automatic\": true, \"title\": \"Plan:Project Management\", \"roll_over\": true, \"description\": \"\", \"next_run_date\": \"2023-11-03\"}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Sure thank you :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489952622, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Changed the weight according to the time spent\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34056cd32d6bffdd3d10617e8915d71e485ea27f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493210475, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Haven't weighed this yet, so going to move to %\\\"16.3\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbb4aa80eb958f7d4892c5343671aff89bc90b9a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467543254, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Correct! It also includes adding the work item type icon and updating the styling slightly.\\n\\n\u003e :unicorn: [Workitemtype] created X days ago by Author\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470578981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"hey @esybrant :wave: \\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM](/uploads/13b41114824ffdb8ea6e8d3eddcc1835/Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM.png)\\n\\nhere the scope of the issue to Change the meta data in work items to\\n\\n\\\"Objected created 2 days ago by Deepika Guliani\\\" , right ? Right ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 10:56:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1468267581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@gweaver @donaldcook This one is ready for ~\\\"workflow::planning breakdown\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:58:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-13 17:12:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"248bf7b2791baf7ccb09859ce878cac35493295c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467485139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Hey :wave: Do we want to show the \\\"updated at information\\\" with \\\"created at\\\".\\n\\nIn the designs and in issues , there is no updated at information with metadata\\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM](/uploads/0a35901594c5b1d288d45b5ac45ad2d1/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488185905, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM](/uploads/1e359a6f2addbd695f996f3035bb4892/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM.png)\\n\\nThe above screenshot is what I am envisioning :thinking:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488210755, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Let's work on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079 first, so going to mark this as blocked. @deepika.guliani also going to assign this one to you but no need to start working on it until next iteration.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 20:06:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:41:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9259356f5ef90fea992146400227ede59bb8f6aa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480267245, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani I believe we are moving the \\\"updated at\\\" information out of the metadata for the new work item detail view, but I'm not sure exactly where (I don't see it in the designs at the moment). Let's leave it where it is now and I'll check in with Nick and see where we're planning on moving it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489560154, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing , verified on GitLab Enterprise Edition 16.3.0-pre 61748eb0490\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"21100054581f087d76312ffc1faf9a4a37df1b68\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503776343, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What is this issue about?","query_id":"d88ff50897a449ecaaf45fd5d38e34de","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130125924","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130125924, \"title\": \"Update work item metadata with item type and icon\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:48:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Problem\\n\\nThe current work item detail view includes the work item type in the parent widget, which will be moving elsewhere on the page as part of the updates to the work item detail view. To prepare for this, we are adding the work item type and icon into the header to provide consistency and group similar information together.\\n\\n## Proposal\\n\\n- Add the work item type and icon into the header\\n- Update text styling to match design\\n\\n## Acceptance\\n\\n- UX matches the attached designs. \\n\\n## Design\\n- See design section\\n- [Link to Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/1rrKIfHIvBdY8XrQRJbJdF/%5BSpecs%5D-Planning-objects-%26-work-items-detail-view?type=design\u0026node-id=2%3A139685\u0026mode=design\u0026t=Oz6mkfIUgx8RrBbF-1)\\n\\n## Context\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/plan/-/issues/933#note_1422464575\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 416800, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 231484068, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:53:32 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": 181602, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 22241940, \"title\": \"Category:Team Planning\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Plan, organize, and track team progress using Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2024184, \"title\": \"UX\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-05-17 17:55:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-31 23:10:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues or MRs that introduce user-facing changes or impact the user experience. Applying this label to issues will signal a need for a designer.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15714199, \"title\": \"design-weight::1\", \"color\": \"#ffdbed\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"(Trivial) Mostly small UI changes leading to small incremental UX improvements. No users\\u2019 workflow involved in these changes. Requirements are clear and there are no unanswered questions.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2975007, \"title\": \"feature::enhancement\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-07 21:18:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-14 18:22:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"User-facing improvements that refine the initial MVC to make it more useful and usable. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#data-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690691, \"title\": \"group::project management\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 15:40:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Project Management group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#team-planning-group | PM: @gweaver\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111313, \"title\": \"workflow::planning breakdown\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 22:24:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that need estimation, and possibly breaking down into further chunks to enable effective iteration. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 909555, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": {\"id\": 181602, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-11 00:05:02 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-07-28\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-10\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"iid\": 344, \"title\": null, \"description\": null, \"state_enum\": 3, \"iterations_cadence_id\": 39982, \"sequence\": 3}, \"iterations_cadence\": {\"id\": 39982, \"group_id\": 9970, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 00:05:03 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-06-30\", \"duration_in_weeks\": 2, \"iterations_in_advance\": 4, \"active\": true, \"automatic\": true, \"title\": \"Plan:Project Management\", \"roll_over\": true, \"description\": \"\", \"next_run_date\": \"2023-11-03\"}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Sure thank you :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489952622, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Changed the weight according to the time spent\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34056cd32d6bffdd3d10617e8915d71e485ea27f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493210475, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Haven't weighed this yet, so going to move to %\\\"16.3\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbb4aa80eb958f7d4892c5343671aff89bc90b9a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467543254, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Correct! It also includes adding the work item type icon and updating the styling slightly.\\n\\n\u003e :unicorn: [Workitemtype] created X days ago by Author\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470578981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"hey @esybrant :wave: \\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM](/uploads/13b41114824ffdb8ea6e8d3eddcc1835/Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM.png)\\n\\nhere the scope of the issue to Change the meta data in work items to\\n\\n\\\"Objected created 2 days ago by Deepika Guliani\\\" , right ? Right ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 10:56:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1468267581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@gweaver @donaldcook This one is ready for ~\\\"workflow::planning breakdown\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:58:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-13 17:12:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"248bf7b2791baf7ccb09859ce878cac35493295c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467485139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Hey :wave: Do we want to show the \\\"updated at information\\\" with \\\"created at\\\".\\n\\nIn the designs and in issues , there is no updated at information with metadata\\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM](/uploads/0a35901594c5b1d288d45b5ac45ad2d1/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488185905, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM](/uploads/1e359a6f2addbd695f996f3035bb4892/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM.png)\\n\\nThe above screenshot is what I am envisioning :thinking:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488210755, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Let's work on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079 first, so going to mark this as blocked. @deepika.guliani also going to assign this one to you but no need to start working on it until next iteration.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 20:06:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:41:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9259356f5ef90fea992146400227ede59bb8f6aa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480267245, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani I believe we are moving the \\\"updated at\\\" information out of the metadata for the new work item detail view, but I'm not sure exactly where (I don't see it in the designs at the moment). Let's leave it where it is now and I'll check in with Nick and see where we're planning on moving it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489560154, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing , verified on GitLab Enterprise Edition 16.3.0-pre 61748eb0490\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"21100054581f087d76312ffc1faf9a4a37df1b68\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503776343, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize the comments into bullet points?","query_id":"fafd7f3f67fa41a4b8100065a693c5be","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130125924","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130125924, \"title\": \"Update work item metadata with item type and icon\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:48:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Problem\\n\\nThe current work item detail view includes the work item type in the parent widget, which will be moving elsewhere on the page as part of the updates to the work item detail view. To prepare for this, we are adding the work item type and icon into the header to provide consistency and group similar information together.\\n\\n## Proposal\\n\\n- Add the work item type and icon into the header\\n- Update text styling to match design\\n\\n## Acceptance\\n\\n- UX matches the attached designs. \\n\\n## Design\\n- See design section\\n- [Link to Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/1rrKIfHIvBdY8XrQRJbJdF/%5BSpecs%5D-Planning-objects-%26-work-items-detail-view?type=design\u0026node-id=2%3A139685\u0026mode=design\u0026t=Oz6mkfIUgx8RrBbF-1)\\n\\n## Context\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/plan/-/issues/933#note_1422464575\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 416800, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 231484068, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:53:32 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": 181602, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 22241940, \"title\": \"Category:Team Planning\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Plan, organize, and track team progress using Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2024184, \"title\": \"UX\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-05-17 17:55:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-31 23:10:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues or MRs that introduce user-facing changes or impact the user experience. Applying this label to issues will signal a need for a designer.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15714199, \"title\": \"design-weight::1\", \"color\": \"#ffdbed\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"(Trivial) Mostly small UI changes leading to small incremental UX improvements. No users\\u2019 workflow involved in these changes. Requirements are clear and there are no unanswered questions.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2975007, \"title\": \"feature::enhancement\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-07 21:18:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-14 18:22:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"User-facing improvements that refine the initial MVC to make it more useful and usable. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#data-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690691, \"title\": \"group::project management\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 15:40:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Project Management group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#team-planning-group | PM: @gweaver\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111313, \"title\": \"workflow::planning breakdown\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 22:24:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that need estimation, and possibly breaking down into further chunks to enable effective iteration. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 909555, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": {\"id\": 181602, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-11 00:05:02 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-07-28\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-10\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"iid\": 344, \"title\": null, \"description\": null, \"state_enum\": 3, \"iterations_cadence_id\": 39982, \"sequence\": 3}, \"iterations_cadence\": {\"id\": 39982, \"group_id\": 9970, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 00:05:03 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-06-30\", \"duration_in_weeks\": 2, \"iterations_in_advance\": 4, \"active\": true, \"automatic\": true, \"title\": \"Plan:Project Management\", \"roll_over\": true, \"description\": \"\", \"next_run_date\": \"2023-11-03\"}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Sure thank you :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489952622, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Changed the weight according to the time spent\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34056cd32d6bffdd3d10617e8915d71e485ea27f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493210475, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Haven't weighed this yet, so going to move to %\\\"16.3\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbb4aa80eb958f7d4892c5343671aff89bc90b9a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467543254, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Correct! It also includes adding the work item type icon and updating the styling slightly.\\n\\n\u003e :unicorn: [Workitemtype] created X days ago by Author\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470578981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"hey @esybrant :wave: \\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM](/uploads/13b41114824ffdb8ea6e8d3eddcc1835/Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM.png)\\n\\nhere the scope of the issue to Change the meta data in work items to\\n\\n\\\"Objected created 2 days ago by Deepika Guliani\\\" , right ? Right ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 10:56:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1468267581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@gweaver @donaldcook This one is ready for ~\\\"workflow::planning breakdown\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:58:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-13 17:12:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"248bf7b2791baf7ccb09859ce878cac35493295c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467485139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Hey :wave: Do we want to show the \\\"updated at information\\\" with \\\"created at\\\".\\n\\nIn the designs and in issues , there is no updated at information with metadata\\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM](/uploads/0a35901594c5b1d288d45b5ac45ad2d1/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488185905, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM](/uploads/1e359a6f2addbd695f996f3035bb4892/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM.png)\\n\\nThe above screenshot is what I am envisioning :thinking:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488210755, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Let's work on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079 first, so going to mark this as blocked. @deepika.guliani also going to assign this one to you but no need to start working on it until next iteration.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 20:06:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:41:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9259356f5ef90fea992146400227ede59bb8f6aa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480267245, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani I believe we are moving the \\\"updated at\\\" information out of the metadata for the new work item detail view, but I'm not sure exactly where (I don't see it in the designs at the moment). Let's leave it where it is now and I'll check in with Nick and see where we're planning on moving it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489560154, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing , verified on GitLab Enterprise Edition 16.3.0-pre 61748eb0490\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"21100054581f087d76312ffc1faf9a4a37df1b68\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503776343, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize with bullet points.","query_id":"4de5856c5ef044cc9a9220df711409db","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130125924","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130125924, \"title\": \"Update work item metadata with item type and icon\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:48:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Problem\\n\\nThe current work item detail view includes the work item type in the parent widget, which will be moving elsewhere on the page as part of the updates to the work item detail view. To prepare for this, we are adding the work item type and icon into the header to provide consistency and group similar information together.\\n\\n## Proposal\\n\\n- Add the work item type and icon into the header\\n- Update text styling to match design\\n\\n## Acceptance\\n\\n- UX matches the attached designs. \\n\\n## Design\\n- See design section\\n- [Link to Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/1rrKIfHIvBdY8XrQRJbJdF/%5BSpecs%5D-Planning-objects-%26-work-items-detail-view?type=design\u0026node-id=2%3A139685\u0026mode=design\u0026t=Oz6mkfIUgx8RrBbF-1)\\n\\n## Context\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/plan/-/issues/933#note_1422464575\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 416800, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 231484068, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:53:32 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": 181602, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 22241940, \"title\": \"Category:Team Planning\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Plan, organize, and track team progress using Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2024184, \"title\": \"UX\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-05-17 17:55:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-31 23:10:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues or MRs that introduce user-facing changes or impact the user experience. Applying this label to issues will signal a need for a designer.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15714199, \"title\": \"design-weight::1\", \"color\": \"#ffdbed\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"(Trivial) Mostly small UI changes leading to small incremental UX improvements. No users\\u2019 workflow involved in these changes. Requirements are clear and there are no unanswered questions.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2975007, \"title\": \"feature::enhancement\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-07 21:18:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-14 18:22:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"User-facing improvements that refine the initial MVC to make it more useful and usable. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#data-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690691, \"title\": \"group::project management\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 15:40:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Project Management group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#team-planning-group | PM: @gweaver\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111313, \"title\": \"workflow::planning breakdown\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 22:24:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that need estimation, and possibly breaking down into further chunks to enable effective iteration. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 909555, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": {\"id\": 181602, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-11 00:05:02 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-07-28\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-10\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"iid\": 344, \"title\": null, \"description\": null, \"state_enum\": 3, \"iterations_cadence_id\": 39982, \"sequence\": 3}, \"iterations_cadence\": {\"id\": 39982, \"group_id\": 9970, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 00:05:03 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-06-30\", \"duration_in_weeks\": 2, \"iterations_in_advance\": 4, \"active\": true, \"automatic\": true, \"title\": \"Plan:Project Management\", \"roll_over\": true, \"description\": \"\", \"next_run_date\": \"2023-11-03\"}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Sure thank you :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489952622, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Changed the weight according to the time spent\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34056cd32d6bffdd3d10617e8915d71e485ea27f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493210475, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Haven't weighed this yet, so going to move to %\\\"16.3\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbb4aa80eb958f7d4892c5343671aff89bc90b9a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467543254, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Correct! It also includes adding the work item type icon and updating the styling slightly.\\n\\n\u003e :unicorn: [Workitemtype] created X days ago by Author\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470578981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"hey @esybrant :wave: \\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM](/uploads/13b41114824ffdb8ea6e8d3eddcc1835/Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM.png)\\n\\nhere the scope of the issue to Change the meta data in work items to\\n\\n\\\"Objected created 2 days ago by Deepika Guliani\\\" , right ? Right ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 10:56:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1468267581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@gweaver @donaldcook This one is ready for ~\\\"workflow::planning breakdown\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:58:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-13 17:12:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"248bf7b2791baf7ccb09859ce878cac35493295c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467485139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Hey :wave: Do we want to show the \\\"updated at information\\\" with \\\"created at\\\".\\n\\nIn the designs and in issues , there is no updated at information with metadata\\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM](/uploads/0a35901594c5b1d288d45b5ac45ad2d1/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488185905, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM](/uploads/1e359a6f2addbd695f996f3035bb4892/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM.png)\\n\\nThe above screenshot is what I am envisioning :thinking:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488210755, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Let's work on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079 first, so going to mark this as blocked. @deepika.guliani also going to assign this one to you but no need to start working on it until next iteration.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 20:06:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:41:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9259356f5ef90fea992146400227ede59bb8f6aa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480267245, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani I believe we are moving the \\\"updated at\\\" information out of the metadata for the new work item detail view, but I'm not sure exactly where (I don't see it in the designs at the moment). Let's leave it where it is now and I'll check in with Nick and see where we're planning on moving it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489560154, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing , verified on GitLab Enterprise Edition 16.3.0-pre 61748eb0490\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"21100054581f087d76312ffc1faf9a4a37df1b68\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503776343, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What are the unique use cases raised by commenters in this issue?","query_id":"bf451870b7e0429eb6293e6ab56d4f79","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130125924","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130125924, \"title\": \"Update work item metadata with item type and icon\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:48:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Problem\\n\\nThe current work item detail view includes the work item type in the parent widget, which will be moving elsewhere on the page as part of the updates to the work item detail view. To prepare for this, we are adding the work item type and icon into the header to provide consistency and group similar information together.\\n\\n## Proposal\\n\\n- Add the work item type and icon into the header\\n- Update text styling to match design\\n\\n## Acceptance\\n\\n- UX matches the attached designs. \\n\\n## Design\\n- See design section\\n- [Link to Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/1rrKIfHIvBdY8XrQRJbJdF/%5BSpecs%5D-Planning-objects-%26-work-items-detail-view?type=design\u0026node-id=2%3A139685\u0026mode=design\u0026t=Oz6mkfIUgx8RrBbF-1)\\n\\n## Context\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/plan/-/issues/933#note_1422464575\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 416800, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 231484068, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:53:32 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": 181602, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 22241940, \"title\": \"Category:Team Planning\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Plan, organize, and track team progress using Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2024184, \"title\": \"UX\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-05-17 17:55:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-31 23:10:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues or MRs that introduce user-facing changes or impact the user experience. Applying this label to issues will signal a need for a designer.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15714199, \"title\": \"design-weight::1\", \"color\": \"#ffdbed\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"(Trivial) Mostly small UI changes leading to small incremental UX improvements. No users\\u2019 workflow involved in these changes. Requirements are clear and there are no unanswered questions.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2975007, \"title\": \"feature::enhancement\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-07 21:18:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-14 18:22:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"User-facing improvements that refine the initial MVC to make it more useful and usable. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#data-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690691, \"title\": \"group::project management\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 15:40:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Project Management group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#team-planning-group | PM: @gweaver\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111313, \"title\": \"workflow::planning breakdown\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 22:24:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that need estimation, and possibly breaking down into further chunks to enable effective iteration. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 909555, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": {\"id\": 181602, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-11 00:05:02 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-07-28\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-10\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"iid\": 344, \"title\": null, \"description\": null, \"state_enum\": 3, \"iterations_cadence_id\": 39982, \"sequence\": 3}, \"iterations_cadence\": {\"id\": 39982, \"group_id\": 9970, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 00:05:03 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-06-30\", \"duration_in_weeks\": 2, \"iterations_in_advance\": 4, \"active\": true, \"automatic\": true, \"title\": \"Plan:Project Management\", \"roll_over\": true, \"description\": \"\", \"next_run_date\": \"2023-11-03\"}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Sure thank you :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489952622, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Changed the weight according to the time spent\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34056cd32d6bffdd3d10617e8915d71e485ea27f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493210475, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Haven't weighed this yet, so going to move to %\\\"16.3\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbb4aa80eb958f7d4892c5343671aff89bc90b9a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467543254, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Correct! It also includes adding the work item type icon and updating the styling slightly.\\n\\n\u003e :unicorn: [Workitemtype] created X days ago by Author\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470578981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"hey @esybrant :wave: \\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM](/uploads/13b41114824ffdb8ea6e8d3eddcc1835/Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM.png)\\n\\nhere the scope of the issue to Change the meta data in work items to\\n\\n\\\"Objected created 2 days ago by Deepika Guliani\\\" , right ? Right ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 10:56:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1468267581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@gweaver @donaldcook This one is ready for ~\\\"workflow::planning breakdown\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:58:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-13 17:12:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"248bf7b2791baf7ccb09859ce878cac35493295c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467485139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Hey :wave: Do we want to show the \\\"updated at information\\\" with \\\"created at\\\".\\n\\nIn the designs and in issues , there is no updated at information with metadata\\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM](/uploads/0a35901594c5b1d288d45b5ac45ad2d1/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488185905, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM](/uploads/1e359a6f2addbd695f996f3035bb4892/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM.png)\\n\\nThe above screenshot is what I am envisioning :thinking:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488210755, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Let's work on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079 first, so going to mark this as blocked. @deepika.guliani also going to assign this one to you but no need to start working on it until next iteration.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 20:06:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:41:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9259356f5ef90fea992146400227ede59bb8f6aa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480267245, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani I believe we are moving the \\\"updated at\\\" information out of the metadata for the new work item detail view, but I'm not sure exactly where (I don't see it in the designs at the moment). Let's leave it where it is now and I'll check in with Nick and see where we're planning on moving it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489560154, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing , verified on GitLab Enterprise Edition 16.3.0-pre 61748eb0490\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"21100054581f087d76312ffc1faf9a4a37df1b68\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503776343, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Could you summarize this issue?","query_id":"3e3ac248863b490d92554b42c2ec03cc","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130125924","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130125924, \"title\": \"Update work item metadata with item type and icon\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:48:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Problem\\n\\nThe current work item detail view includes the work item type in the parent widget, which will be moving elsewhere on the page as part of the updates to the work item detail view. To prepare for this, we are adding the work item type and icon into the header to provide consistency and group similar information together.\\n\\n## Proposal\\n\\n- Add the work item type and icon into the header\\n- Update text styling to match design\\n\\n## Acceptance\\n\\n- UX matches the attached designs. \\n\\n## Design\\n- See design section\\n- [Link to Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/1rrKIfHIvBdY8XrQRJbJdF/%5BSpecs%5D-Planning-objects-%26-work-items-detail-view?type=design\u0026node-id=2%3A139685\u0026mode=design\u0026t=Oz6mkfIUgx8RrBbF-1)\\n\\n## Context\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/plan/-/issues/933#note_1422464575\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 416800, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 231484068, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:53:32 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": 181602, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 22241940, \"title\": \"Category:Team Planning\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Plan, organize, and track team progress using Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2024184, \"title\": \"UX\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-05-17 17:55:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-31 23:10:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues or MRs that introduce user-facing changes or impact the user experience. Applying this label to issues will signal a need for a designer.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15714199, \"title\": \"design-weight::1\", \"color\": \"#ffdbed\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"(Trivial) Mostly small UI changes leading to small incremental UX improvements. No users\\u2019 workflow involved in these changes. Requirements are clear and there are no unanswered questions.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2975007, \"title\": \"feature::enhancement\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-07 21:18:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-14 18:22:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"User-facing improvements that refine the initial MVC to make it more useful and usable. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#data-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690691, \"title\": \"group::project management\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 15:40:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Project Management group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#team-planning-group | PM: @gweaver\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111313, \"title\": \"workflow::planning breakdown\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 22:24:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that need estimation, and possibly breaking down into further chunks to enable effective iteration. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 909555, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": {\"id\": 181602, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-11 00:05:02 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-07-28\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-10\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"iid\": 344, \"title\": null, \"description\": null, \"state_enum\": 3, \"iterations_cadence_id\": 39982, \"sequence\": 3}, \"iterations_cadence\": {\"id\": 39982, \"group_id\": 9970, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 00:05:03 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-06-30\", \"duration_in_weeks\": 2, \"iterations_in_advance\": 4, \"active\": true, \"automatic\": true, \"title\": \"Plan:Project Management\", \"roll_over\": true, \"description\": \"\", \"next_run_date\": \"2023-11-03\"}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Sure thank you :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489952622, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Changed the weight according to the time spent\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34056cd32d6bffdd3d10617e8915d71e485ea27f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493210475, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Haven't weighed this yet, so going to move to %\\\"16.3\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbb4aa80eb958f7d4892c5343671aff89bc90b9a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467543254, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Correct! It also includes adding the work item type icon and updating the styling slightly.\\n\\n\u003e :unicorn: [Workitemtype] created X days ago by Author\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470578981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"hey @esybrant :wave: \\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM](/uploads/13b41114824ffdb8ea6e8d3eddcc1835/Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM.png)\\n\\nhere the scope of the issue to Change the meta data in work items to\\n\\n\\\"Objected created 2 days ago by Deepika Guliani\\\" , right ? Right ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 10:56:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1468267581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@gweaver @donaldcook This one is ready for ~\\\"workflow::planning breakdown\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:58:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-13 17:12:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"248bf7b2791baf7ccb09859ce878cac35493295c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467485139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Hey :wave: Do we want to show the \\\"updated at information\\\" with \\\"created at\\\".\\n\\nIn the designs and in issues , there is no updated at information with metadata\\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM](/uploads/0a35901594c5b1d288d45b5ac45ad2d1/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488185905, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM](/uploads/1e359a6f2addbd695f996f3035bb4892/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM.png)\\n\\nThe above screenshot is what I am envisioning :thinking:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488210755, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Let's work on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079 first, so going to mark this as blocked. @deepika.guliani also going to assign this one to you but no need to start working on it until next iteration.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 20:06:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:41:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9259356f5ef90fea992146400227ede59bb8f6aa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480267245, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani I believe we are moving the \\\"updated at\\\" information out of the metadata for the new work item detail view, but I'm not sure exactly where (I don't see it in the designs at the moment). Let's leave it where it is now and I'll check in with Nick and see where we're planning on moving it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489560154, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing , verified on GitLab Enterprise Edition 16.3.0-pre 61748eb0490\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"21100054581f087d76312ffc1faf9a4a37df1b68\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503776343, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize this Issue.","query_id":"1428c254e97349029682fc79272ec440","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130125924","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130125924, \"title\": \"Update work item metadata with item type and icon\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:48:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Problem\\n\\nThe current work item detail view includes the work item type in the parent widget, which will be moving elsewhere on the page as part of the updates to the work item detail view. To prepare for this, we are adding the work item type and icon into the header to provide consistency and group similar information together.\\n\\n## Proposal\\n\\n- Add the work item type and icon into the header\\n- Update text styling to match design\\n\\n## Acceptance\\n\\n- UX matches the attached designs. \\n\\n## Design\\n- See design section\\n- [Link to Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/1rrKIfHIvBdY8XrQRJbJdF/%5BSpecs%5D-Planning-objects-%26-work-items-detail-view?type=design\u0026node-id=2%3A139685\u0026mode=design\u0026t=Oz6mkfIUgx8RrBbF-1)\\n\\n## Context\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/plan/-/issues/933#note_1422464575\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 416800, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 231484068, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:53:32 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": 181602, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 22241940, \"title\": \"Category:Team Planning\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Plan, organize, and track team progress using Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2024184, \"title\": \"UX\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-05-17 17:55:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-31 23:10:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues or MRs that introduce user-facing changes or impact the user experience. Applying this label to issues will signal a need for a designer.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15714199, \"title\": \"design-weight::1\", \"color\": \"#ffdbed\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"(Trivial) Mostly small UI changes leading to small incremental UX improvements. No users\\u2019 workflow involved in these changes. Requirements are clear and there are no unanswered questions.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2975007, \"title\": \"feature::enhancement\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-07 21:18:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-14 18:22:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"User-facing improvements that refine the initial MVC to make it more useful and usable. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#data-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690691, \"title\": \"group::project management\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 15:40:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Project Management group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#team-planning-group | PM: @gweaver\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111313, \"title\": \"workflow::planning breakdown\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 22:24:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that need estimation, and possibly breaking down into further chunks to enable effective iteration. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 909555, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": {\"id\": 181602, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-11 00:05:02 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-07-28\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-10\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"iid\": 344, \"title\": null, \"description\": null, \"state_enum\": 3, \"iterations_cadence_id\": 39982, \"sequence\": 3}, \"iterations_cadence\": {\"id\": 39982, \"group_id\": 9970, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 00:05:03 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-06-30\", \"duration_in_weeks\": 2, \"iterations_in_advance\": 4, \"active\": true, \"automatic\": true, \"title\": \"Plan:Project Management\", \"roll_over\": true, \"description\": \"\", \"next_run_date\": \"2023-11-03\"}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Sure thank you :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489952622, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Changed the weight according to the time spent\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34056cd32d6bffdd3d10617e8915d71e485ea27f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493210475, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Haven't weighed this yet, so going to move to %\\\"16.3\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbb4aa80eb958f7d4892c5343671aff89bc90b9a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467543254, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Correct! It also includes adding the work item type icon and updating the styling slightly.\\n\\n\u003e :unicorn: [Workitemtype] created X days ago by Author\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470578981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"hey @esybrant :wave: \\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM](/uploads/13b41114824ffdb8ea6e8d3eddcc1835/Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM.png)\\n\\nhere the scope of the issue to Change the meta data in work items to\\n\\n\\\"Objected created 2 days ago by Deepika Guliani\\\" , right ? Right ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 10:56:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1468267581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@gweaver @donaldcook This one is ready for ~\\\"workflow::planning breakdown\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:58:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-13 17:12:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"248bf7b2791baf7ccb09859ce878cac35493295c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467485139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Hey :wave: Do we want to show the \\\"updated at information\\\" with \\\"created at\\\".\\n\\nIn the designs and in issues , there is no updated at information with metadata\\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM](/uploads/0a35901594c5b1d288d45b5ac45ad2d1/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488185905, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM](/uploads/1e359a6f2addbd695f996f3035bb4892/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM.png)\\n\\nThe above screenshot is what I am envisioning :thinking:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488210755, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Let's work on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079 first, so going to mark this as blocked. @deepika.guliani also going to assign this one to you but no need to start working on it until next iteration.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 20:06:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:41:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9259356f5ef90fea992146400227ede59bb8f6aa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480267245, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani I believe we are moving the \\\"updated at\\\" information out of the metadata for the new work item detail view, but I'm not sure exactly where (I don't see it in the designs at the moment). Let's leave it where it is now and I'll check in with Nick and see where we're planning on moving it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489560154, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing , verified on GitLab Enterprise Edition 16.3.0-pre 61748eb0490\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"21100054581f087d76312ffc1faf9a4a37df1b68\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503776343, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"{url} - Summarize this issue.","query_id":"fa491b6683444e4a966bd8de76075697","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130125924","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130125924, \"title\": \"Update work item metadata with item type and icon\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:48:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Problem\\n\\nThe current work item detail view includes the work item type in the parent widget, which will be moving elsewhere on the page as part of the updates to the work item detail view. To prepare for this, we are adding the work item type and icon into the header to provide consistency and group similar information together.\\n\\n## Proposal\\n\\n- Add the work item type and icon into the header\\n- Update text styling to match design\\n\\n## Acceptance\\n\\n- UX matches the attached designs. \\n\\n## Design\\n- See design section\\n- [Link to Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/1rrKIfHIvBdY8XrQRJbJdF/%5BSpecs%5D-Planning-objects-%26-work-items-detail-view?type=design\u0026node-id=2%3A139685\u0026mode=design\u0026t=Oz6mkfIUgx8RrBbF-1)\\n\\n## Context\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/plan/-/issues/933#note_1422464575\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 416800, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 231484068, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:53:32 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": 181602, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 22241940, \"title\": \"Category:Team Planning\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Plan, organize, and track team progress using Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2024184, \"title\": \"UX\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-05-17 17:55:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-31 23:10:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues or MRs that introduce user-facing changes or impact the user experience. Applying this label to issues will signal a need for a designer.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15714199, \"title\": \"design-weight::1\", \"color\": \"#ffdbed\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"(Trivial) Mostly small UI changes leading to small incremental UX improvements. No users\\u2019 workflow involved in these changes. Requirements are clear and there are no unanswered questions.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2975007, \"title\": \"feature::enhancement\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-07 21:18:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-14 18:22:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"User-facing improvements that refine the initial MVC to make it more useful and usable. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#data-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690691, \"title\": \"group::project management\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 15:40:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Project Management group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#team-planning-group | PM: @gweaver\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111313, \"title\": \"workflow::planning breakdown\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 22:24:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that need estimation, and possibly breaking down into further chunks to enable effective iteration. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 909555, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": {\"id\": 181602, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-11 00:05:02 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-07-28\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-10\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"iid\": 344, \"title\": null, \"description\": null, \"state_enum\": 3, \"iterations_cadence_id\": 39982, \"sequence\": 3}, \"iterations_cadence\": {\"id\": 39982, \"group_id\": 9970, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 00:05:03 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-06-30\", \"duration_in_weeks\": 2, \"iterations_in_advance\": 4, \"active\": true, \"automatic\": true, \"title\": \"Plan:Project Management\", \"roll_over\": true, \"description\": \"\", \"next_run_date\": \"2023-11-03\"}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Sure thank you :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489952622, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Changed the weight according to the time spent\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34056cd32d6bffdd3d10617e8915d71e485ea27f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493210475, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Haven't weighed this yet, so going to move to %\\\"16.3\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbb4aa80eb958f7d4892c5343671aff89bc90b9a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467543254, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Correct! It also includes adding the work item type icon and updating the styling slightly.\\n\\n\u003e :unicorn: [Workitemtype] created X days ago by Author\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470578981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"hey @esybrant :wave: \\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM](/uploads/13b41114824ffdb8ea6e8d3eddcc1835/Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM.png)\\n\\nhere the scope of the issue to Change the meta data in work items to\\n\\n\\\"Objected created 2 days ago by Deepika Guliani\\\" , right ? Right ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 10:56:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1468267581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@gweaver @donaldcook This one is ready for ~\\\"workflow::planning breakdown\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:58:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-13 17:12:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"248bf7b2791baf7ccb09859ce878cac35493295c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467485139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Hey :wave: Do we want to show the \\\"updated at information\\\" with \\\"created at\\\".\\n\\nIn the designs and in issues , there is no updated at information with metadata\\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM](/uploads/0a35901594c5b1d288d45b5ac45ad2d1/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488185905, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM](/uploads/1e359a6f2addbd695f996f3035bb4892/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM.png)\\n\\nThe above screenshot is what I am envisioning :thinking:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488210755, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Let's work on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079 first, so going to mark this as blocked. @deepika.guliani also going to assign this one to you but no need to start working on it until next iteration.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 20:06:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:41:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9259356f5ef90fea992146400227ede59bb8f6aa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480267245, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani I believe we are moving the \\\"updated at\\\" information out of the metadata for the new work item detail view, but I'm not sure exactly where (I don't see it in the designs at the moment). Let's leave it where it is now and I'll check in with Nick and see where we're planning on moving it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489560154, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing , verified on GitLab Enterprise Edition 16.3.0-pre 61748eb0490\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"21100054581f087d76312ffc1faf9a4a37df1b68\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503776343, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What is the status of {url}?","query_id":"b03aebf33bb94d4c8b9eba58612914e6","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130125924","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130125924, \"title\": \"Update work item metadata with item type and icon\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:48:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Problem\\n\\nThe current work item detail view includes the work item type in the parent widget, which will be moving elsewhere on the page as part of the updates to the work item detail view. To prepare for this, we are adding the work item type and icon into the header to provide consistency and group similar information together.\\n\\n## Proposal\\n\\n- Add the work item type and icon into the header\\n- Update text styling to match design\\n\\n## Acceptance\\n\\n- UX matches the attached designs. \\n\\n## Design\\n- See design section\\n- [Link to Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/1rrKIfHIvBdY8XrQRJbJdF/%5BSpecs%5D-Planning-objects-%26-work-items-detail-view?type=design\u0026node-id=2%3A139685\u0026mode=design\u0026t=Oz6mkfIUgx8RrBbF-1)\\n\\n## Context\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/plan/-/issues/933#note_1422464575\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 416800, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 231484068, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:53:32 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": 181602, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 22241940, \"title\": \"Category:Team Planning\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Plan, organize, and track team progress using Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2024184, \"title\": \"UX\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-05-17 17:55:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-31 23:10:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues or MRs that introduce user-facing changes or impact the user experience. Applying this label to issues will signal a need for a designer.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15714199, \"title\": \"design-weight::1\", \"color\": \"#ffdbed\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"(Trivial) Mostly small UI changes leading to small incremental UX improvements. No users\\u2019 workflow involved in these changes. Requirements are clear and there are no unanswered questions.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2975007, \"title\": \"feature::enhancement\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-07 21:18:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-14 18:22:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"User-facing improvements that refine the initial MVC to make it more useful and usable. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#data-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690691, \"title\": \"group::project management\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 15:40:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Project Management group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#team-planning-group | PM: @gweaver\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111313, \"title\": \"workflow::planning breakdown\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 22:24:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that need estimation, and possibly breaking down into further chunks to enable effective iteration. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 909555, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": {\"id\": 181602, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-11 00:05:02 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-07-28\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-10\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"iid\": 344, \"title\": null, \"description\": null, \"state_enum\": 3, \"iterations_cadence_id\": 39982, \"sequence\": 3}, \"iterations_cadence\": {\"id\": 39982, \"group_id\": 9970, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 00:05:03 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-06-30\", \"duration_in_weeks\": 2, \"iterations_in_advance\": 4, \"active\": true, \"automatic\": true, \"title\": \"Plan:Project Management\", \"roll_over\": true, \"description\": \"\", \"next_run_date\": \"2023-11-03\"}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Sure thank you :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489952622, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Changed the weight according to the time spent\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34056cd32d6bffdd3d10617e8915d71e485ea27f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493210475, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Haven't weighed this yet, so going to move to %\\\"16.3\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbb4aa80eb958f7d4892c5343671aff89bc90b9a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467543254, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Correct! It also includes adding the work item type icon and updating the styling slightly.\\n\\n\u003e :unicorn: [Workitemtype] created X days ago by Author\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470578981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"hey @esybrant :wave: \\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM](/uploads/13b41114824ffdb8ea6e8d3eddcc1835/Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM.png)\\n\\nhere the scope of the issue to Change the meta data in work items to\\n\\n\\\"Objected created 2 days ago by Deepika Guliani\\\" , right ? Right ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 10:56:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1468267581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@gweaver @donaldcook This one is ready for ~\\\"workflow::planning breakdown\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:58:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-13 17:12:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"248bf7b2791baf7ccb09859ce878cac35493295c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467485139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Hey :wave: Do we want to show the \\\"updated at information\\\" with \\\"created at\\\".\\n\\nIn the designs and in issues , there is no updated at information with metadata\\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM](/uploads/0a35901594c5b1d288d45b5ac45ad2d1/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488185905, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM](/uploads/1e359a6f2addbd695f996f3035bb4892/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM.png)\\n\\nThe above screenshot is what I am envisioning :thinking:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488210755, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Let's work on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079 first, so going to mark this as blocked. @deepika.guliani also going to assign this one to you but no need to start working on it until next iteration.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 20:06:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:41:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9259356f5ef90fea992146400227ede59bb8f6aa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480267245, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani I believe we are moving the \\\"updated at\\\" information out of the metadata for the new work item detail view, but I'm not sure exactly where (I don't see it in the designs at the moment). Let's leave it where it is now and I'll check in with Nick and see where we're planning on moving it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489560154, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing , verified on GitLab Enterprise Edition 16.3.0-pre 61748eb0490\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"21100054581f087d76312ffc1faf9a4a37df1b68\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503776343, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Please summarize the latest activity and current status of the issue {url}.","query_id":"3da753064ebf4a60aed937d889d30019","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130125924","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130125924, \"title\": \"Update work item metadata with item type and icon\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:48:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Problem\\n\\nThe current work item detail view includes the work item type in the parent widget, which will be moving elsewhere on the page as part of the updates to the work item detail view. To prepare for this, we are adding the work item type and icon into the header to provide consistency and group similar information together.\\n\\n## Proposal\\n\\n- Add the work item type and icon into the header\\n- Update text styling to match design\\n\\n## Acceptance\\n\\n- UX matches the attached designs. \\n\\n## Design\\n- See design section\\n- [Link to Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/1rrKIfHIvBdY8XrQRJbJdF/%5BSpecs%5D-Planning-objects-%26-work-items-detail-view?type=design\u0026node-id=2%3A139685\u0026mode=design\u0026t=Oz6mkfIUgx8RrBbF-1)\\n\\n## Context\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/plan/-/issues/933#note_1422464575\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 416800, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 231484068, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:53:32 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": 181602, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 22241940, \"title\": \"Category:Team Planning\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Plan, organize, and track team progress using Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2024184, \"title\": \"UX\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-05-17 17:55:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-31 23:10:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues or MRs that introduce user-facing changes or impact the user experience. Applying this label to issues will signal a need for a designer.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15714199, \"title\": \"design-weight::1\", \"color\": \"#ffdbed\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"(Trivial) Mostly small UI changes leading to small incremental UX improvements. No users\\u2019 workflow involved in these changes. Requirements are clear and there are no unanswered questions.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2975007, \"title\": \"feature::enhancement\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-07 21:18:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-14 18:22:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"User-facing improvements that refine the initial MVC to make it more useful and usable. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#data-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690691, \"title\": \"group::project management\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 15:40:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Project Management group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#team-planning-group | PM: @gweaver\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111313, \"title\": \"workflow::planning breakdown\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 22:24:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that need estimation, and possibly breaking down into further chunks to enable effective iteration. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 909555, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": {\"id\": 181602, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-11 00:05:02 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-07-28\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-10\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"iid\": 344, \"title\": null, \"description\": null, \"state_enum\": 3, \"iterations_cadence_id\": 39982, \"sequence\": 3}, \"iterations_cadence\": {\"id\": 39982, \"group_id\": 9970, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 00:05:03 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-06-30\", \"duration_in_weeks\": 2, \"iterations_in_advance\": 4, \"active\": true, \"automatic\": true, \"title\": \"Plan:Project Management\", \"roll_over\": true, \"description\": \"\", \"next_run_date\": \"2023-11-03\"}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Sure thank you :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489952622, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Changed the weight according to the time spent\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34056cd32d6bffdd3d10617e8915d71e485ea27f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493210475, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Haven't weighed this yet, so going to move to %\\\"16.3\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbb4aa80eb958f7d4892c5343671aff89bc90b9a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467543254, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Correct! It also includes adding the work item type icon and updating the styling slightly.\\n\\n\u003e :unicorn: [Workitemtype] created X days ago by Author\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470578981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"hey @esybrant :wave: \\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM](/uploads/13b41114824ffdb8ea6e8d3eddcc1835/Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM.png)\\n\\nhere the scope of the issue to Change the meta data in work items to\\n\\n\\\"Objected created 2 days ago by Deepika Guliani\\\" , right ? Right ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 10:56:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1468267581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@gweaver @donaldcook This one is ready for ~\\\"workflow::planning breakdown\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:58:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-13 17:12:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"248bf7b2791baf7ccb09859ce878cac35493295c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467485139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Hey :wave: Do we want to show the \\\"updated at information\\\" with \\\"created at\\\".\\n\\nIn the designs and in issues , there is no updated at information with metadata\\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM](/uploads/0a35901594c5b1d288d45b5ac45ad2d1/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488185905, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM](/uploads/1e359a6f2addbd695f996f3035bb4892/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM.png)\\n\\nThe above screenshot is what I am envisioning :thinking:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488210755, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Let's work on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079 first, so going to mark this as blocked. @deepika.guliani also going to assign this one to you but no need to start working on it until next iteration.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 20:06:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:41:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9259356f5ef90fea992146400227ede59bb8f6aa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480267245, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani I believe we are moving the \\\"updated at\\\" information out of the metadata for the new work item detail view, but I'm not sure exactly where (I don't see it in the designs at the moment). Let's leave it where it is now and I'll check in with Nick and see where we're planning on moving it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489560154, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing , verified on GitLab Enterprise Edition 16.3.0-pre 61748eb0490\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"21100054581f087d76312ffc1faf9a4a37df1b68\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503776343, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"How can I improve the description of {url} so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved?","query_id":"a9f82e4ab94445f08ce5da9a91b9c2d0","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130125924","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130125924, \"title\": \"Update work item metadata with item type and icon\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:48:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Problem\\n\\nThe current work item detail view includes the work item type in the parent widget, which will be moving elsewhere on the page as part of the updates to the work item detail view. To prepare for this, we are adding the work item type and icon into the header to provide consistency and group similar information together.\\n\\n## Proposal\\n\\n- Add the work item type and icon into the header\\n- Update text styling to match design\\n\\n## Acceptance\\n\\n- UX matches the attached designs. \\n\\n## Design\\n- See design section\\n- [Link to Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/1rrKIfHIvBdY8XrQRJbJdF/%5BSpecs%5D-Planning-objects-%26-work-items-detail-view?type=design\u0026node-id=2%3A139685\u0026mode=design\u0026t=Oz6mkfIUgx8RrBbF-1)\\n\\n## Context\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/plan/-/issues/933#note_1422464575\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 416800, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 231484068, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:53:32 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": 181602, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 22241940, \"title\": \"Category:Team Planning\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Plan, organize, and track team progress using Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2024184, \"title\": \"UX\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-05-17 17:55:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-31 23:10:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues or MRs that introduce user-facing changes or impact the user experience. Applying this label to issues will signal a need for a designer.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15714199, \"title\": \"design-weight::1\", \"color\": \"#ffdbed\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"(Trivial) Mostly small UI changes leading to small incremental UX improvements. No users\\u2019 workflow involved in these changes. Requirements are clear and there are no unanswered questions.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2975007, \"title\": \"feature::enhancement\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-07 21:18:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-14 18:22:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"User-facing improvements that refine the initial MVC to make it more useful and usable. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#data-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690691, \"title\": \"group::project management\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 15:40:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Project Management group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#team-planning-group | PM: @gweaver\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111313, \"title\": \"workflow::planning breakdown\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 22:24:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that need estimation, and possibly breaking down into further chunks to enable effective iteration. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 909555, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": {\"id\": 181602, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-11 00:05:02 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-07-28\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-10\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"iid\": 344, \"title\": null, \"description\": null, \"state_enum\": 3, \"iterations_cadence_id\": 39982, \"sequence\": 3}, \"iterations_cadence\": {\"id\": 39982, \"group_id\": 9970, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 00:05:03 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-06-30\", \"duration_in_weeks\": 2, \"iterations_in_advance\": 4, \"active\": true, \"automatic\": true, \"title\": \"Plan:Project Management\", \"roll_over\": true, \"description\": \"\", \"next_run_date\": \"2023-11-03\"}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Sure thank you :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489952622, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Changed the weight according to the time spent\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34056cd32d6bffdd3d10617e8915d71e485ea27f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493210475, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Haven't weighed this yet, so going to move to %\\\"16.3\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbb4aa80eb958f7d4892c5343671aff89bc90b9a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467543254, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Correct! It also includes adding the work item type icon and updating the styling slightly.\\n\\n\u003e :unicorn: [Workitemtype] created X days ago by Author\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470578981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"hey @esybrant :wave: \\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM](/uploads/13b41114824ffdb8ea6e8d3eddcc1835/Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM.png)\\n\\nhere the scope of the issue to Change the meta data in work items to\\n\\n\\\"Objected created 2 days ago by Deepika Guliani\\\" , right ? Right ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 10:56:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1468267581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@gweaver @donaldcook This one is ready for ~\\\"workflow::planning breakdown\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:58:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-13 17:12:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"248bf7b2791baf7ccb09859ce878cac35493295c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467485139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Hey :wave: Do we want to show the \\\"updated at information\\\" with \\\"created at\\\".\\n\\nIn the designs and in issues , there is no updated at information with metadata\\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM](/uploads/0a35901594c5b1d288d45b5ac45ad2d1/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488185905, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM](/uploads/1e359a6f2addbd695f996f3035bb4892/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM.png)\\n\\nThe above screenshot is what I am envisioning :thinking:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488210755, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Let's work on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079 first, so going to mark this as blocked. @deepika.guliani also going to assign this one to you but no need to start working on it until next iteration.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 20:06:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:41:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9259356f5ef90fea992146400227ede59bb8f6aa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480267245, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani I believe we are moving the \\\"updated at\\\" information out of the metadata for the new work item detail view, but I'm not sure exactly where (I don't see it in the designs at the moment). Let's leave it where it is now and I'll check in with Nick and see where we're planning on moving it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489560154, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing , verified on GitLab Enterprise Edition 16.3.0-pre 61748eb0490\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"21100054581f087d76312ffc1faf9a4a37df1b68\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503776343, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Please rewrite the description of {url} so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved. Also add common \"jobs to be done\" or use cases which should be considered from a usability perspective.","query_id":"3b6b874036ae486587f4aa97eca0cf05","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130125924","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130125924, \"title\": \"Update work item metadata with item type and icon\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:48:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Problem\\n\\nThe current work item detail view includes the work item type in the parent widget, which will be moving elsewhere on the page as part of the updates to the work item detail view. To prepare for this, we are adding the work item type and icon into the header to provide consistency and group similar information together.\\n\\n## Proposal\\n\\n- Add the work item type and icon into the header\\n- Update text styling to match design\\n\\n## Acceptance\\n\\n- UX matches the attached designs. \\n\\n## Design\\n- See design section\\n- [Link to Figma](https://www.figma.com/file/1rrKIfHIvBdY8XrQRJbJdF/%5BSpecs%5D-Planning-objects-%26-work-items-detail-view?type=design\u0026node-id=2%3A139685\u0026mode=design\u0026t=Oz6mkfIUgx8RrBbF-1)\\n\\n## Context\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/plan/-/issues/933#note_1422464575\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 416800, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 231484068, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:53:32 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": 181602, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 22241940, \"title\": \"Category:Team Planning\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-22 13:33:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Plan, organize, and track team progress using Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, and other Agile methodologies.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2024184, \"title\": \"UX\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-05-17 17:55:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-31 23:10:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues or MRs that introduce user-facing changes or impact the user experience. Applying this label to issues will signal a need for a designer.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 15714199, \"title\": \"design-weight::1\", \"color\": \"#ffdbed\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-07-20 17:33:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"(Trivial) Mostly small UI changes leading to small incremental UX improvements. No users\\u2019 workflow involved in these changes. Requirements are clear and there are no unanswered questions.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2975007, \"title\": \"feature::enhancement\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-11-07 21:18:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-07-14 18:22:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"User-facing improvements that refine the initial MVC to make it more useful and usable. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#data-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690691, \"title\": \"group::project management\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-28 15:40:02 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Project Management group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#team-planning-group | PM: @gweaver\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111313, \"title\": \"workflow::planning breakdown\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-04-27 22:24:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that need estimation, and possibly breaking down into further chunks to enable effective iteration. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 909555, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": {\"id\": 181602, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-11 00:05:02 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-07-28\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-10\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"iid\": 344, \"title\": null, \"description\": null, \"state_enum\": 3, \"iterations_cadence_id\": 39982, \"sequence\": 3}, \"iterations_cadence\": {\"id\": 39982, \"group_id\": 9970, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 21:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 00:05:03 UTC\", \"start_date\": \"2023-06-30\", \"duration_in_weeks\": 2, \"iterations_in_advance\": 4, \"active\": true, \"automatic\": true, \"title\": \"Plan:Project Management\", \"roll_over\": true, \"description\": \"\", \"next_run_date\": \"2023-11-03\"}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Sure thank you :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 07:23:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489952622, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Changed the weight according to the time spent\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:09:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"34056cd32d6bffdd3d10617e8915d71e485ea27f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493210475, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Haven't weighed this yet, so going to move to %\\\"16.3\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 19:56:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbb4aa80eb958f7d4892c5343671aff89bc90b9a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467543254, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Correct! It also includes adding the work item type icon and updating the styling slightly.\\n\\n\u003e :unicorn: [Workitemtype] created X days ago by Author\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470578981, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"hey @esybrant :wave: \\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM](/uploads/13b41114824ffdb8ea6e8d3eddcc1835/Screenshot_2023-07-13_at_2.11.30_PM.png)\\n\\nhere the scope of the issue to Change the meta data in work items to\\n\\n\\\"Objected created 2 days ago by Deepika Guliani\\\" , right ? Right ?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 10:56:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 21:40:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1468267581, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@gweaver @donaldcook This one is ready for ~\\\"workflow::planning breakdown\\\"\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 18:58:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-13 17:12:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"248bf7b2791baf7ccb09859ce878cac35493295c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467485139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Hey :wave: Do we want to show the \\\"updated at information\\\" with \\\"created at\\\".\\n\\nIn the designs and in issues , there is no updated at information with metadata\\n\\n![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM](/uploads/0a35901594c5b1d288d45b5ac45ad2d1/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.05.48_AM.png)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:36:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488185905, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"![Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM](/uploads/1e359a6f2addbd695f996f3035bb4892/Screenshot_2023-07-26_at_11.31.13_AM.png)\\n\\nThe above screenshot is what I am envisioning :thinking:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 06:02:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488210755, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Let's work on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079 first, so going to mark this as blocked. @deepika.guliani also going to assign this one to you but no need to start working on it until next iteration.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 20:06:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:41:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9259356f5ef90fea992146400227ede59bb8f6aa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480267245, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani I believe we are moving the \\\"updated at\\\" information out of the metadata for the new work item detail view, but I'm not sure exactly where (I don't see it in the designs at the moment). Let's leave it where it is now and I'll check in with Nick and see where we're planning on moving it.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:08:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aa19390de5e97762e5a6a276a4199c06ddae7c50\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489560154, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing , verified on GitLab Enterprise Edition 16.3.0-pre 61748eb0490\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:21:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130125924, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"21100054581f087d76312ffc1faf9a4a37df1b68\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503776343, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Are there any open questions relating to this issue? {url}","query_id":"a403045ee6dc4f80a30f9ddb12f88246","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"129393876","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 129393876, \"title\": \"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:14:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Summary\\n\\n**Note:** This is part of https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9290, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\\n\\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864.\", \"milestone_id\": 2969687, \"iid\": 415547, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 4, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466963, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:22:38 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 411701, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 1, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 864661, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969687, \"title\": \"16.4\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-09-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 91, \"start_date\": \"2023-08-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Yes, because Issues and Work Items live in the same table, while Epics are in a different table. Also, the work we're doing to allow linking Work Items with each other will cut some effort for us to make Issue - Work Item linking too.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:41:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 16:08:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489084276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda Since Work Items live in same table as Issues, the effort to add support for relating Work Item to a legacy issue isn't as much (we can technically fetch a legacy Issue via Work Items API even today!), so I don't think we need multiple issues to track this effort. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488778366, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya based on the extended scope of the compatibility needs (relating a work item to an issuable), can you please create additional issues or update the specs of the existing issues for this new requirement?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 19:24:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482245564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"To confirm @kushalpandya, the effort is minimal specifically for an `issue - work item` relationship, but an `epic - work item` relationship is what would cost us 3+ milestones, correct?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489060569, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @egrieff! The implementation plan looks ideal. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 08:28:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 10:19:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538970055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya I compiled a list of tasks needed to support this. \\n\\n~frontend \\n\\n- Display hierarchy widget for work items with type `Epic`\\n  \u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003eexample\u003c/summary\u003e\\n\\n  ![Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38](/uploads/1cf3d7a19135056efda506ff3b7ac0b5/Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38.png)\\n\\n  \u003c/details\u003e\\n- Include `add` dropdown to allow creating and linking a new issue\\n  - When creating a new issue, this will be a work item\\n  - For adding an existing issue, the [autocomplete query](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/work_items/graphql/project_work_items.query.graphql) should fetch work items with `Issue` type (which includes legacy issues too). Selecting the issue adds it as a child and displays it in the list\\n- When visiting the legacy issue, we need to be able to see the work item epic in the sidebar. We currently fetch the epic using [project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/queries/project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql) but we'll also have to check if a parent work item is present. We can use the following query:\\n\\n```graphql\\nquery getParent {\\n  workItem(id: \\\"gid://gitlab/WorkItem/\u003cLEGACY_ISSUE_ID\u003e\\\") {\\n    widgets {\\n      ... on WorkItemWidgetHierarchy {\\n        parent {\\n          id\\n          title\\n          webUrl\\n        }\\n      }\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n~backend \\n\\n- ~~Migration to add `WorkItems::HierarchyRestriction` for epic type~~ - Done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127917) \\n- Add validation to prevent setting a parent epic (work item) if the issue already has a legacy epic assigned. Additionally, prevent setting a legacy epic if a parent epic (work item) is already present.\\n\\nI can go ahead and create tasks for these if you agree with the approach.\\n\\nSomething to keep in mind, we can display the epic in the legacy issue's sidebar but no other functionality can be supported without creating a legacy epic for every work item epic that is assigned to a legacy issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 16:27:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 13:33:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1537940828, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing as all tasks are completed. Frontend tasks were promoted to issues so they can be tracked independently with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423981 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423984\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 15:23:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9571499e4d26d0241d9038fab4d3b57c0760d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1553333989, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What is this issue about?","query_id":"94a9cef0c76b4267a4aa1220cbddeae7","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"129393876","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 129393876, \"title\": \"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:14:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Summary\\n\\n**Note:** This is part of https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9290, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\\n\\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864.\", \"milestone_id\": 2969687, \"iid\": 415547, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 4, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466963, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:22:38 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 411701, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 1, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 864661, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969687, \"title\": \"16.4\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-09-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 91, \"start_date\": \"2023-08-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Yes, because Issues and Work Items live in the same table, while Epics are in a different table. Also, the work we're doing to allow linking Work Items with each other will cut some effort for us to make Issue - Work Item linking too.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:41:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 16:08:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489084276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda Since Work Items live in same table as Issues, the effort to add support for relating Work Item to a legacy issue isn't as much (we can technically fetch a legacy Issue via Work Items API even today!), so I don't think we need multiple issues to track this effort. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488778366, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya based on the extended scope of the compatibility needs (relating a work item to an issuable), can you please create additional issues or update the specs of the existing issues for this new requirement?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 19:24:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482245564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"To confirm @kushalpandya, the effort is minimal specifically for an `issue - work item` relationship, but an `epic - work item` relationship is what would cost us 3+ milestones, correct?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489060569, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @egrieff! The implementation plan looks ideal. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 08:28:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 10:19:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538970055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya I compiled a list of tasks needed to support this. \\n\\n~frontend \\n\\n- Display hierarchy widget for work items with type `Epic`\\n  \u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003eexample\u003c/summary\u003e\\n\\n  ![Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38](/uploads/1cf3d7a19135056efda506ff3b7ac0b5/Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38.png)\\n\\n  \u003c/details\u003e\\n- Include `add` dropdown to allow creating and linking a new issue\\n  - When creating a new issue, this will be a work item\\n  - For adding an existing issue, the [autocomplete query](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/work_items/graphql/project_work_items.query.graphql) should fetch work items with `Issue` type (which includes legacy issues too). Selecting the issue adds it as a child and displays it in the list\\n- When visiting the legacy issue, we need to be able to see the work item epic in the sidebar. We currently fetch the epic using [project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/queries/project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql) but we'll also have to check if a parent work item is present. We can use the following query:\\n\\n```graphql\\nquery getParent {\\n  workItem(id: \\\"gid://gitlab/WorkItem/\u003cLEGACY_ISSUE_ID\u003e\\\") {\\n    widgets {\\n      ... on WorkItemWidgetHierarchy {\\n        parent {\\n          id\\n          title\\n          webUrl\\n        }\\n      }\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n~backend \\n\\n- ~~Migration to add `WorkItems::HierarchyRestriction` for epic type~~ - Done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127917) \\n- Add validation to prevent setting a parent epic (work item) if the issue already has a legacy epic assigned. Additionally, prevent setting a legacy epic if a parent epic (work item) is already present.\\n\\nI can go ahead and create tasks for these if you agree with the approach.\\n\\nSomething to keep in mind, we can display the epic in the legacy issue's sidebar but no other functionality can be supported without creating a legacy epic for every work item epic that is assigned to a legacy issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 16:27:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 13:33:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1537940828, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing as all tasks are completed. Frontend tasks were promoted to issues so they can be tracked independently with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423981 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423984\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 15:23:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9571499e4d26d0241d9038fab4d3b57c0760d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1553333989, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize the comments into bullet points?","query_id":"0e143d71f0ab41659a88ea550dddae6c","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"129393876","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 129393876, \"title\": \"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:14:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Summary\\n\\n**Note:** This is part of https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9290, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\\n\\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864.\", \"milestone_id\": 2969687, \"iid\": 415547, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 4, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466963, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:22:38 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 411701, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 1, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 864661, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969687, \"title\": \"16.4\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-09-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 91, \"start_date\": \"2023-08-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Yes, because Issues and Work Items live in the same table, while Epics are in a different table. Also, the work we're doing to allow linking Work Items with each other will cut some effort for us to make Issue - Work Item linking too.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:41:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 16:08:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489084276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda Since Work Items live in same table as Issues, the effort to add support for relating Work Item to a legacy issue isn't as much (we can technically fetch a legacy Issue via Work Items API even today!), so I don't think we need multiple issues to track this effort. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488778366, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya based on the extended scope of the compatibility needs (relating a work item to an issuable), can you please create additional issues or update the specs of the existing issues for this new requirement?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 19:24:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482245564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"To confirm @kushalpandya, the effort is minimal specifically for an `issue - work item` relationship, but an `epic - work item` relationship is what would cost us 3+ milestones, correct?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489060569, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @egrieff! The implementation plan looks ideal. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 08:28:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 10:19:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538970055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya I compiled a list of tasks needed to support this. \\n\\n~frontend \\n\\n- Display hierarchy widget for work items with type `Epic`\\n  \u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003eexample\u003c/summary\u003e\\n\\n  ![Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38](/uploads/1cf3d7a19135056efda506ff3b7ac0b5/Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38.png)\\n\\n  \u003c/details\u003e\\n- Include `add` dropdown to allow creating and linking a new issue\\n  - When creating a new issue, this will be a work item\\n  - For adding an existing issue, the [autocomplete query](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/work_items/graphql/project_work_items.query.graphql) should fetch work items with `Issue` type (which includes legacy issues too). Selecting the issue adds it as a child and displays it in the list\\n- When visiting the legacy issue, we need to be able to see the work item epic in the sidebar. We currently fetch the epic using [project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/queries/project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql) but we'll also have to check if a parent work item is present. We can use the following query:\\n\\n```graphql\\nquery getParent {\\n  workItem(id: \\\"gid://gitlab/WorkItem/\u003cLEGACY_ISSUE_ID\u003e\\\") {\\n    widgets {\\n      ... on WorkItemWidgetHierarchy {\\n        parent {\\n          id\\n          title\\n          webUrl\\n        }\\n      }\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n~backend \\n\\n- ~~Migration to add `WorkItems::HierarchyRestriction` for epic type~~ - Done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127917) \\n- Add validation to prevent setting a parent epic (work item) if the issue already has a legacy epic assigned. Additionally, prevent setting a legacy epic if a parent epic (work item) is already present.\\n\\nI can go ahead and create tasks for these if you agree with the approach.\\n\\nSomething to keep in mind, we can display the epic in the legacy issue's sidebar but no other functionality can be supported without creating a legacy epic for every work item epic that is assigned to a legacy issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 16:27:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 13:33:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1537940828, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing as all tasks are completed. Frontend tasks were promoted to issues so they can be tracked independently with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423981 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423984\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 15:23:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9571499e4d26d0241d9038fab4d3b57c0760d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1553333989, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize with bullet points.","query_id":"31716aecf8434a5eaa4e6e5a597b6d5a","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"129393876","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 129393876, \"title\": \"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:14:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Summary\\n\\n**Note:** This is part of https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9290, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\\n\\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864.\", \"milestone_id\": 2969687, \"iid\": 415547, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 4, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466963, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:22:38 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 411701, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 1, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 864661, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969687, \"title\": \"16.4\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-09-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 91, \"start_date\": \"2023-08-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Yes, because Issues and Work Items live in the same table, while Epics are in a different table. Also, the work we're doing to allow linking Work Items with each other will cut some effort for us to make Issue - Work Item linking too.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:41:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 16:08:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489084276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda Since Work Items live in same table as Issues, the effort to add support for relating Work Item to a legacy issue isn't as much (we can technically fetch a legacy Issue via Work Items API even today!), so I don't think we need multiple issues to track this effort. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488778366, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya based on the extended scope of the compatibility needs (relating a work item to an issuable), can you please create additional issues or update the specs of the existing issues for this new requirement?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 19:24:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482245564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"To confirm @kushalpandya, the effort is minimal specifically for an `issue - work item` relationship, but an `epic - work item` relationship is what would cost us 3+ milestones, correct?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489060569, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @egrieff! The implementation plan looks ideal. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 08:28:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 10:19:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538970055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya I compiled a list of tasks needed to support this. \\n\\n~frontend \\n\\n- Display hierarchy widget for work items with type `Epic`\\n  \u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003eexample\u003c/summary\u003e\\n\\n  ![Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38](/uploads/1cf3d7a19135056efda506ff3b7ac0b5/Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38.png)\\n\\n  \u003c/details\u003e\\n- Include `add` dropdown to allow creating and linking a new issue\\n  - When creating a new issue, this will be a work item\\n  - For adding an existing issue, the [autocomplete query](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/work_items/graphql/project_work_items.query.graphql) should fetch work items with `Issue` type (which includes legacy issues too). Selecting the issue adds it as a child and displays it in the list\\n- When visiting the legacy issue, we need to be able to see the work item epic in the sidebar. We currently fetch the epic using [project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/queries/project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql) but we'll also have to check if a parent work item is present. We can use the following query:\\n\\n```graphql\\nquery getParent {\\n  workItem(id: \\\"gid://gitlab/WorkItem/\u003cLEGACY_ISSUE_ID\u003e\\\") {\\n    widgets {\\n      ... on WorkItemWidgetHierarchy {\\n        parent {\\n          id\\n          title\\n          webUrl\\n        }\\n      }\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n~backend \\n\\n- ~~Migration to add `WorkItems::HierarchyRestriction` for epic type~~ - Done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127917) \\n- Add validation to prevent setting a parent epic (work item) if the issue already has a legacy epic assigned. Additionally, prevent setting a legacy epic if a parent epic (work item) is already present.\\n\\nI can go ahead and create tasks for these if you agree with the approach.\\n\\nSomething to keep in mind, we can display the epic in the legacy issue's sidebar but no other functionality can be supported without creating a legacy epic for every work item epic that is assigned to a legacy issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 16:27:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 13:33:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1537940828, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing as all tasks are completed. Frontend tasks were promoted to issues so they can be tracked independently with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423981 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423984\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 15:23:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9571499e4d26d0241d9038fab4d3b57c0760d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1553333989, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What are the unique use cases raised by commenters in this issue?","query_id":"9ed8b61ebf2f4a8d838a87323d617f72","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"129393876","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 129393876, \"title\": \"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:14:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Summary\\n\\n**Note:** This is part of https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9290, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\\n\\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864.\", \"milestone_id\": 2969687, \"iid\": 415547, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 4, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466963, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:22:38 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 411701, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 1, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 864661, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969687, \"title\": \"16.4\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-09-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 91, \"start_date\": \"2023-08-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Yes, because Issues and Work Items live in the same table, while Epics are in a different table. Also, the work we're doing to allow linking Work Items with each other will cut some effort for us to make Issue - Work Item linking too.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:41:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 16:08:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489084276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda Since Work Items live in same table as Issues, the effort to add support for relating Work Item to a legacy issue isn't as much (we can technically fetch a legacy Issue via Work Items API even today!), so I don't think we need multiple issues to track this effort. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488778366, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya based on the extended scope of the compatibility needs (relating a work item to an issuable), can you please create additional issues or update the specs of the existing issues for this new requirement?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 19:24:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482245564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"To confirm @kushalpandya, the effort is minimal specifically for an `issue - work item` relationship, but an `epic - work item` relationship is what would cost us 3+ milestones, correct?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489060569, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @egrieff! The implementation plan looks ideal. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 08:28:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 10:19:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538970055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya I compiled a list of tasks needed to support this. \\n\\n~frontend \\n\\n- Display hierarchy widget for work items with type `Epic`\\n  \u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003eexample\u003c/summary\u003e\\n\\n  ![Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38](/uploads/1cf3d7a19135056efda506ff3b7ac0b5/Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38.png)\\n\\n  \u003c/details\u003e\\n- Include `add` dropdown to allow creating and linking a new issue\\n  - When creating a new issue, this will be a work item\\n  - For adding an existing issue, the [autocomplete query](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/work_items/graphql/project_work_items.query.graphql) should fetch work items with `Issue` type (which includes legacy issues too). Selecting the issue adds it as a child and displays it in the list\\n- When visiting the legacy issue, we need to be able to see the work item epic in the sidebar. We currently fetch the epic using [project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/queries/project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql) but we'll also have to check if a parent work item is present. We can use the following query:\\n\\n```graphql\\nquery getParent {\\n  workItem(id: \\\"gid://gitlab/WorkItem/\u003cLEGACY_ISSUE_ID\u003e\\\") {\\n    widgets {\\n      ... on WorkItemWidgetHierarchy {\\n        parent {\\n          id\\n          title\\n          webUrl\\n        }\\n      }\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n~backend \\n\\n- ~~Migration to add `WorkItems::HierarchyRestriction` for epic type~~ - Done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127917) \\n- Add validation to prevent setting a parent epic (work item) if the issue already has a legacy epic assigned. Additionally, prevent setting a legacy epic if a parent epic (work item) is already present.\\n\\nI can go ahead and create tasks for these if you agree with the approach.\\n\\nSomething to keep in mind, we can display the epic in the legacy issue's sidebar but no other functionality can be supported without creating a legacy epic for every work item epic that is assigned to a legacy issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 16:27:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 13:33:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1537940828, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing as all tasks are completed. Frontend tasks were promoted to issues so they can be tracked independently with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423981 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423984\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 15:23:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9571499e4d26d0241d9038fab4d3b57c0760d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1553333989, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Could you summarize this issue?","query_id":"e827b55f3f364b549ae7e548d9479999","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"129393876","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 129393876, \"title\": \"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:14:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Summary\\n\\n**Note:** This is part of https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9290, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\\n\\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864.\", \"milestone_id\": 2969687, \"iid\": 415547, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 4, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466963, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:22:38 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 411701, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 1, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 864661, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969687, \"title\": \"16.4\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-09-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 91, \"start_date\": \"2023-08-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Yes, because Issues and Work Items live in the same table, while Epics are in a different table. Also, the work we're doing to allow linking Work Items with each other will cut some effort for us to make Issue - Work Item linking too.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:41:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 16:08:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489084276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda Since Work Items live in same table as Issues, the effort to add support for relating Work Item to a legacy issue isn't as much (we can technically fetch a legacy Issue via Work Items API even today!), so I don't think we need multiple issues to track this effort. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488778366, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya based on the extended scope of the compatibility needs (relating a work item to an issuable), can you please create additional issues or update the specs of the existing issues for this new requirement?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 19:24:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482245564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"To confirm @kushalpandya, the effort is minimal specifically for an `issue - work item` relationship, but an `epic - work item` relationship is what would cost us 3+ milestones, correct?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489060569, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @egrieff! The implementation plan looks ideal. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 08:28:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 10:19:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538970055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya I compiled a list of tasks needed to support this. \\n\\n~frontend \\n\\n- Display hierarchy widget for work items with type `Epic`\\n  \u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003eexample\u003c/summary\u003e\\n\\n  ![Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38](/uploads/1cf3d7a19135056efda506ff3b7ac0b5/Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38.png)\\n\\n  \u003c/details\u003e\\n- Include `add` dropdown to allow creating and linking a new issue\\n  - When creating a new issue, this will be a work item\\n  - For adding an existing issue, the [autocomplete query](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/work_items/graphql/project_work_items.query.graphql) should fetch work items with `Issue` type (which includes legacy issues too). Selecting the issue adds it as a child and displays it in the list\\n- When visiting the legacy issue, we need to be able to see the work item epic in the sidebar. We currently fetch the epic using [project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/queries/project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql) but we'll also have to check if a parent work item is present. We can use the following query:\\n\\n```graphql\\nquery getParent {\\n  workItem(id: \\\"gid://gitlab/WorkItem/\u003cLEGACY_ISSUE_ID\u003e\\\") {\\n    widgets {\\n      ... on WorkItemWidgetHierarchy {\\n        parent {\\n          id\\n          title\\n          webUrl\\n        }\\n      }\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n~backend \\n\\n- ~~Migration to add `WorkItems::HierarchyRestriction` for epic type~~ - Done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127917) \\n- Add validation to prevent setting a parent epic (work item) if the issue already has a legacy epic assigned. Additionally, prevent setting a legacy epic if a parent epic (work item) is already present.\\n\\nI can go ahead and create tasks for these if you agree with the approach.\\n\\nSomething to keep in mind, we can display the epic in the legacy issue's sidebar but no other functionality can be supported without creating a legacy epic for every work item epic that is assigned to a legacy issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 16:27:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 13:33:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1537940828, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing as all tasks are completed. Frontend tasks were promoted to issues so they can be tracked independently with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423981 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423984\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 15:23:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9571499e4d26d0241d9038fab4d3b57c0760d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1553333989, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize this Issue.","query_id":"a430a52579384d198e836cebb25af643","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"129393876","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 129393876, \"title\": \"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:14:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Summary\\n\\n**Note:** This is part of https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9290, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\\n\\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864.\", \"milestone_id\": 2969687, \"iid\": 415547, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 4, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466963, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:22:38 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 411701, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 1, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 864661, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969687, \"title\": \"16.4\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-09-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 91, \"start_date\": \"2023-08-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Yes, because Issues and Work Items live in the same table, while Epics are in a different table. Also, the work we're doing to allow linking Work Items with each other will cut some effort for us to make Issue - Work Item linking too.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:41:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 16:08:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489084276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda Since Work Items live in same table as Issues, the effort to add support for relating Work Item to a legacy issue isn't as much (we can technically fetch a legacy Issue via Work Items API even today!), so I don't think we need multiple issues to track this effort. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488778366, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya based on the extended scope of the compatibility needs (relating a work item to an issuable), can you please create additional issues or update the specs of the existing issues for this new requirement?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 19:24:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482245564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"To confirm @kushalpandya, the effort is minimal specifically for an `issue - work item` relationship, but an `epic - work item` relationship is what would cost us 3+ milestones, correct?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489060569, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @egrieff! The implementation plan looks ideal. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 08:28:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 10:19:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538970055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya I compiled a list of tasks needed to support this. \\n\\n~frontend \\n\\n- Display hierarchy widget for work items with type `Epic`\\n  \u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003eexample\u003c/summary\u003e\\n\\n  ![Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38](/uploads/1cf3d7a19135056efda506ff3b7ac0b5/Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38.png)\\n\\n  \u003c/details\u003e\\n- Include `add` dropdown to allow creating and linking a new issue\\n  - When creating a new issue, this will be a work item\\n  - For adding an existing issue, the [autocomplete query](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/work_items/graphql/project_work_items.query.graphql) should fetch work items with `Issue` type (which includes legacy issues too). Selecting the issue adds it as a child and displays it in the list\\n- When visiting the legacy issue, we need to be able to see the work item epic in the sidebar. We currently fetch the epic using [project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/queries/project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql) but we'll also have to check if a parent work item is present. We can use the following query:\\n\\n```graphql\\nquery getParent {\\n  workItem(id: \\\"gid://gitlab/WorkItem/\u003cLEGACY_ISSUE_ID\u003e\\\") {\\n    widgets {\\n      ... on WorkItemWidgetHierarchy {\\n        parent {\\n          id\\n          title\\n          webUrl\\n        }\\n      }\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n~backend \\n\\n- ~~Migration to add `WorkItems::HierarchyRestriction` for epic type~~ - Done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127917) \\n- Add validation to prevent setting a parent epic (work item) if the issue already has a legacy epic assigned. Additionally, prevent setting a legacy epic if a parent epic (work item) is already present.\\n\\nI can go ahead and create tasks for these if you agree with the approach.\\n\\nSomething to keep in mind, we can display the epic in the legacy issue's sidebar but no other functionality can be supported without creating a legacy epic for every work item epic that is assigned to a legacy issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 16:27:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 13:33:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1537940828, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing as all tasks are completed. Frontend tasks were promoted to issues so they can be tracked independently with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423981 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423984\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 15:23:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9571499e4d26d0241d9038fab4d3b57c0760d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1553333989, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"{url} - Summarize this issue.","query_id":"08493d07ef764b97a8000fbfa5d4f09b","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"129393876","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 129393876, \"title\": \"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:14:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Summary\\n\\n**Note:** This is part of https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9290, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\\n\\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864.\", \"milestone_id\": 2969687, \"iid\": 415547, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 4, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466963, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:22:38 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 411701, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 1, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 864661, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969687, \"title\": \"16.4\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-09-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 91, \"start_date\": \"2023-08-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Yes, because Issues and Work Items live in the same table, while Epics are in a different table. Also, the work we're doing to allow linking Work Items with each other will cut some effort for us to make Issue - Work Item linking too.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:41:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 16:08:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489084276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda Since Work Items live in same table as Issues, the effort to add support for relating Work Item to a legacy issue isn't as much (we can technically fetch a legacy Issue via Work Items API even today!), so I don't think we need multiple issues to track this effort. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488778366, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya based on the extended scope of the compatibility needs (relating a work item to an issuable), can you please create additional issues or update the specs of the existing issues for this new requirement?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 19:24:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482245564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"To confirm @kushalpandya, the effort is minimal specifically for an `issue - work item` relationship, but an `epic - work item` relationship is what would cost us 3+ milestones, correct?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489060569, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @egrieff! The implementation plan looks ideal. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 08:28:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 10:19:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538970055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya I compiled a list of tasks needed to support this. \\n\\n~frontend \\n\\n- Display hierarchy widget for work items with type `Epic`\\n  \u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003eexample\u003c/summary\u003e\\n\\n  ![Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38](/uploads/1cf3d7a19135056efda506ff3b7ac0b5/Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38.png)\\n\\n  \u003c/details\u003e\\n- Include `add` dropdown to allow creating and linking a new issue\\n  - When creating a new issue, this will be a work item\\n  - For adding an existing issue, the [autocomplete query](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/work_items/graphql/project_work_items.query.graphql) should fetch work items with `Issue` type (which includes legacy issues too). Selecting the issue adds it as a child and displays it in the list\\n- When visiting the legacy issue, we need to be able to see the work item epic in the sidebar. We currently fetch the epic using [project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/queries/project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql) but we'll also have to check if a parent work item is present. We can use the following query:\\n\\n```graphql\\nquery getParent {\\n  workItem(id: \\\"gid://gitlab/WorkItem/\u003cLEGACY_ISSUE_ID\u003e\\\") {\\n    widgets {\\n      ... on WorkItemWidgetHierarchy {\\n        parent {\\n          id\\n          title\\n          webUrl\\n        }\\n      }\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n~backend \\n\\n- ~~Migration to add `WorkItems::HierarchyRestriction` for epic type~~ - Done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127917) \\n- Add validation to prevent setting a parent epic (work item) if the issue already has a legacy epic assigned. Additionally, prevent setting a legacy epic if a parent epic (work item) is already present.\\n\\nI can go ahead and create tasks for these if you agree with the approach.\\n\\nSomething to keep in mind, we can display the epic in the legacy issue's sidebar but no other functionality can be supported without creating a legacy epic for every work item epic that is assigned to a legacy issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 16:27:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 13:33:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1537940828, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing as all tasks are completed. Frontend tasks were promoted to issues so they can be tracked independently with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423981 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423984\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 15:23:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9571499e4d26d0241d9038fab4d3b57c0760d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1553333989, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What is the status of {url}?","query_id":"03aa81afb6d74da3b59f3acf46aadd75","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"129393876","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 129393876, \"title\": \"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:14:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Summary\\n\\n**Note:** This is part of https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9290, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\\n\\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864.\", \"milestone_id\": 2969687, \"iid\": 415547, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 4, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466963, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:22:38 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 411701, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 1, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 864661, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969687, \"title\": \"16.4\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-09-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 91, \"start_date\": \"2023-08-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Yes, because Issues and Work Items live in the same table, while Epics are in a different table. Also, the work we're doing to allow linking Work Items with each other will cut some effort for us to make Issue - Work Item linking too.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:41:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 16:08:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489084276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda Since Work Items live in same table as Issues, the effort to add support for relating Work Item to a legacy issue isn't as much (we can technically fetch a legacy Issue via Work Items API even today!), so I don't think we need multiple issues to track this effort. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488778366, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya based on the extended scope of the compatibility needs (relating a work item to an issuable), can you please create additional issues or update the specs of the existing issues for this new requirement?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 19:24:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482245564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"To confirm @kushalpandya, the effort is minimal specifically for an `issue - work item` relationship, but an `epic - work item` relationship is what would cost us 3+ milestones, correct?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489060569, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @egrieff! The implementation plan looks ideal. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 08:28:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 10:19:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538970055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya I compiled a list of tasks needed to support this. \\n\\n~frontend \\n\\n- Display hierarchy widget for work items with type `Epic`\\n  \u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003eexample\u003c/summary\u003e\\n\\n  ![Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38](/uploads/1cf3d7a19135056efda506ff3b7ac0b5/Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38.png)\\n\\n  \u003c/details\u003e\\n- Include `add` dropdown to allow creating and linking a new issue\\n  - When creating a new issue, this will be a work item\\n  - For adding an existing issue, the [autocomplete query](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/work_items/graphql/project_work_items.query.graphql) should fetch work items with `Issue` type (which includes legacy issues too). Selecting the issue adds it as a child and displays it in the list\\n- When visiting the legacy issue, we need to be able to see the work item epic in the sidebar. We currently fetch the epic using [project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/queries/project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql) but we'll also have to check if a parent work item is present. We can use the following query:\\n\\n```graphql\\nquery getParent {\\n  workItem(id: \\\"gid://gitlab/WorkItem/\u003cLEGACY_ISSUE_ID\u003e\\\") {\\n    widgets {\\n      ... on WorkItemWidgetHierarchy {\\n        parent {\\n          id\\n          title\\n          webUrl\\n        }\\n      }\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n~backend \\n\\n- ~~Migration to add `WorkItems::HierarchyRestriction` for epic type~~ - Done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127917) \\n- Add validation to prevent setting a parent epic (work item) if the issue already has a legacy epic assigned. Additionally, prevent setting a legacy epic if a parent epic (work item) is already present.\\n\\nI can go ahead and create tasks for these if you agree with the approach.\\n\\nSomething to keep in mind, we can display the epic in the legacy issue's sidebar but no other functionality can be supported without creating a legacy epic for every work item epic that is assigned to a legacy issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 16:27:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 13:33:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1537940828, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing as all tasks are completed. Frontend tasks were promoted to issues so they can be tracked independently with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423981 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423984\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 15:23:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9571499e4d26d0241d9038fab4d3b57c0760d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1553333989, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Please summarize the latest activity and current status of the issue {url}.","query_id":"6bd03019e4f749a9a66da228673f977a","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"129393876","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 129393876, \"title\": \"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:14:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Summary\\n\\n**Note:** This is part of https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9290, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\\n\\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864.\", \"milestone_id\": 2969687, \"iid\": 415547, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 4, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466963, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:22:38 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 411701, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 1, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 864661, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969687, \"title\": \"16.4\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-09-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 91, \"start_date\": \"2023-08-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Yes, because Issues and Work Items live in the same table, while Epics are in a different table. Also, the work we're doing to allow linking Work Items with each other will cut some effort for us to make Issue - Work Item linking too.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:41:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 16:08:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489084276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda Since Work Items live in same table as Issues, the effort to add support for relating Work Item to a legacy issue isn't as much (we can technically fetch a legacy Issue via Work Items API even today!), so I don't think we need multiple issues to track this effort. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488778366, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya based on the extended scope of the compatibility needs (relating a work item to an issuable), can you please create additional issues or update the specs of the existing issues for this new requirement?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 19:24:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482245564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"To confirm @kushalpandya, the effort is minimal specifically for an `issue - work item` relationship, but an `epic - work item` relationship is what would cost us 3+ milestones, correct?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489060569, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @egrieff! The implementation plan looks ideal. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 08:28:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 10:19:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538970055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya I compiled a list of tasks needed to support this. \\n\\n~frontend \\n\\n- Display hierarchy widget for work items with type `Epic`\\n  \u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003eexample\u003c/summary\u003e\\n\\n  ![Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38](/uploads/1cf3d7a19135056efda506ff3b7ac0b5/Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38.png)\\n\\n  \u003c/details\u003e\\n- Include `add` dropdown to allow creating and linking a new issue\\n  - When creating a new issue, this will be a work item\\n  - For adding an existing issue, the [autocomplete query](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/work_items/graphql/project_work_items.query.graphql) should fetch work items with `Issue` type (which includes legacy issues too). Selecting the issue adds it as a child and displays it in the list\\n- When visiting the legacy issue, we need to be able to see the work item epic in the sidebar. We currently fetch the epic using [project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/queries/project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql) but we'll also have to check if a parent work item is present. We can use the following query:\\n\\n```graphql\\nquery getParent {\\n  workItem(id: \\\"gid://gitlab/WorkItem/\u003cLEGACY_ISSUE_ID\u003e\\\") {\\n    widgets {\\n      ... on WorkItemWidgetHierarchy {\\n        parent {\\n          id\\n          title\\n          webUrl\\n        }\\n      }\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n~backend \\n\\n- ~~Migration to add `WorkItems::HierarchyRestriction` for epic type~~ - Done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127917) \\n- Add validation to prevent setting a parent epic (work item) if the issue already has a legacy epic assigned. Additionally, prevent setting a legacy epic if a parent epic (work item) is already present.\\n\\nI can go ahead and create tasks for these if you agree with the approach.\\n\\nSomething to keep in mind, we can display the epic in the legacy issue's sidebar but no other functionality can be supported without creating a legacy epic for every work item epic that is assigned to a legacy issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 16:27:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 13:33:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1537940828, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing as all tasks are completed. Frontend tasks were promoted to issues so they can be tracked independently with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423981 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423984\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 15:23:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9571499e4d26d0241d9038fab4d3b57c0760d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1553333989, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"How can I improve the description of {url} so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved?","query_id":"c328ab6dc72a41d8868f51ca2dc9235b","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"129393876","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 129393876, \"title\": \"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:14:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Summary\\n\\n**Note:** This is part of https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9290, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\\n\\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864.\", \"milestone_id\": 2969687, \"iid\": 415547, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 4, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466963, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:22:38 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 411701, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 1, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 864661, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969687, \"title\": \"16.4\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-09-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 91, \"start_date\": \"2023-08-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Yes, because Issues and Work Items live in the same table, while Epics are in a different table. Also, the work we're doing to allow linking Work Items with each other will cut some effort for us to make Issue - Work Item linking too.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:41:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 16:08:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489084276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda Since Work Items live in same table as Issues, the effort to add support for relating Work Item to a legacy issue isn't as much (we can technically fetch a legacy Issue via Work Items API even today!), so I don't think we need multiple issues to track this effort. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488778366, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya based on the extended scope of the compatibility needs (relating a work item to an issuable), can you please create additional issues or update the specs of the existing issues for this new requirement?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 19:24:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482245564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"To confirm @kushalpandya, the effort is minimal specifically for an `issue - work item` relationship, but an `epic - work item` relationship is what would cost us 3+ milestones, correct?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489060569, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @egrieff! The implementation plan looks ideal. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 08:28:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 10:19:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538970055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya I compiled a list of tasks needed to support this. \\n\\n~frontend \\n\\n- Display hierarchy widget for work items with type `Epic`\\n  \u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003eexample\u003c/summary\u003e\\n\\n  ![Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38](/uploads/1cf3d7a19135056efda506ff3b7ac0b5/Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38.png)\\n\\n  \u003c/details\u003e\\n- Include `add` dropdown to allow creating and linking a new issue\\n  - When creating a new issue, this will be a work item\\n  - For adding an existing issue, the [autocomplete query](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/work_items/graphql/project_work_items.query.graphql) should fetch work items with `Issue` type (which includes legacy issues too). Selecting the issue adds it as a child and displays it in the list\\n- When visiting the legacy issue, we need to be able to see the work item epic in the sidebar. We currently fetch the epic using [project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/queries/project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql) but we'll also have to check if a parent work item is present. We can use the following query:\\n\\n```graphql\\nquery getParent {\\n  workItem(id: \\\"gid://gitlab/WorkItem/\u003cLEGACY_ISSUE_ID\u003e\\\") {\\n    widgets {\\n      ... on WorkItemWidgetHierarchy {\\n        parent {\\n          id\\n          title\\n          webUrl\\n        }\\n      }\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n~backend \\n\\n- ~~Migration to add `WorkItems::HierarchyRestriction` for epic type~~ - Done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127917) \\n- Add validation to prevent setting a parent epic (work item) if the issue already has a legacy epic assigned. Additionally, prevent setting a legacy epic if a parent epic (work item) is already present.\\n\\nI can go ahead and create tasks for these if you agree with the approach.\\n\\nSomething to keep in mind, we can display the epic in the legacy issue's sidebar but no other functionality can be supported without creating a legacy epic for every work item epic that is assigned to a legacy issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 16:27:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 13:33:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1537940828, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing as all tasks are completed. Frontend tasks were promoted to issues so they can be tracked independently with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423981 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423984\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 15:23:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9571499e4d26d0241d9038fab4d3b57c0760d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1553333989, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Please rewrite the description of {url} so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved. Also add common \"jobs to be done\" or use cases which should be considered from a usability perspective.","query_id":"bdc89252a5524cf3b39d169287df5617","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"129393876","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 129393876, \"title\": \"BE: Add support for setting Work Item as parent to an Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:14:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Summary\\n\\n**Note:** This is part of https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9290, where we are planning to migrate Epics to Work Items.\\n\\nSince Epics to Work Items migration is scheduled to happen _before_ we're able to migrate legacy Issues to Work Items, we need a way to associate a legacy issue as a child to an Epic Work Item, this is only needed until Issues too are Work Items as then, we get parent-child relationships between Work Items for free via Hierarchy Widget that we built for OKRs via https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7864.\", \"milestone_id\": 2969687, \"iid\": 415547, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 4, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466963, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-16 08:22:38 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 411701, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 1, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10230929, \"title\": \"type::feature\", \"color\": \"#009966\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-09 12:29:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-03-28 23:33:53 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Any issue/MR that contains work to support the implementation of a feature and/or results in an improvement in the user experience. Read more at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 864661, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969687, \"title\": \"16.4\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-09-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:04:08 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 91, \"start_date\": \"2023-08-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Yes, because Issues and Work Items live in the same table, while Epics are in a different table. Also, the work we're doing to allow linking Work Items with each other will cut some effort for us to make Issue - Work Item linking too.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:41:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 16:08:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489084276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda Since Work Items live in same table as Issues, the effort to add support for relating Work Item to a legacy issue isn't as much (we can technically fetch a legacy Issue via Work Items API even today!), so I don't think we need multiple issues to track this effort. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488778366, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya based on the extended scope of the compatibility needs (relating a work item to an issuable), can you please create additional issues or update the specs of the existing issues for this new requirement?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 19:24:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 11:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482245564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"To confirm @kushalpandya, the effort is minimal specifically for an `issue - work item` relationship, but an `epic - work item` relationship is what would cost us 3+ milestones, correct?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2890431, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 14:29:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c8f2f81bfb4c4913c0bb4abf415337bc1a6b40f9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489060569, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks @egrieff! The implementation plan looks ideal. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 08:28:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 10:19:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538970055, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@kushalpandya I compiled a list of tasks needed to support this. \\n\\n~frontend \\n\\n- Display hierarchy widget for work items with type `Epic`\\n  \u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003eexample\u003c/summary\u003e\\n\\n  ![Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38](/uploads/1cf3d7a19135056efda506ff3b7ac0b5/Screenshot_2023-08-31_at_16.06.38.png)\\n\\n  \u003c/details\u003e\\n- Include `add` dropdown to allow creating and linking a new issue\\n  - When creating a new issue, this will be a work item\\n  - For adding an existing issue, the [autocomplete query](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/assets/javascripts/work_items/graphql/project_work_items.query.graphql) should fetch work items with `Issue` type (which includes legacy issues too). Selecting the issue adds it as a child and displays it in the list\\n- When visiting the legacy issue, we need to be able to see the work item epic in the sidebar. We currently fetch the epic using [project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/queries/project_issue_epic.mutation.graphql) but we'll also have to check if a parent work item is present. We can use the following query:\\n\\n```graphql\\nquery getParent {\\n  workItem(id: \\\"gid://gitlab/WorkItem/\u003cLEGACY_ISSUE_ID\u003e\\\") {\\n    widgets {\\n      ... on WorkItemWidgetHierarchy {\\n        parent {\\n          id\\n          title\\n          webUrl\\n        }\\n      }\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n~backend \\n\\n- ~~Migration to add `WorkItems::HierarchyRestriction` for epic type~~ - Done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127917) \\n- Add validation to prevent setting a parent epic (work item) if the issue already has a legacy epic assigned. Additionally, prevent setting a legacy epic if a parent epic (work item) is already present.\\n\\nI can go ahead and create tasks for these if you agree with the approach.\\n\\nSomething to keep in mind, we can display the epic in the legacy issue's sidebar but no other functionality can be supported without creating a legacy epic for every work item epic that is assigned to a legacy issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 16:27:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 13:33:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"af7d4722628505e79274ce8357471c1447c484b9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1537940828, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Closing as all tasks are completed. Frontend tasks were promoted to issues so they can be tracked independently with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423981 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423984\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 14:58:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 15:23:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 129393876, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9571499e4d26d0241d9038fab4d3b57c0760d1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1553333989, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 2890431, \"username\": \"amandarueda\", \"name\": \"Amanda Rueda\"}, {\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Are there any open questions relating to this issue? {url}","query_id":"9d6a17984b834d919f5b675598235b11","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130193114","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130193114, \"title\": \"Trainee FE Maintainer (Gitlab) - Deepika Guliani\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-03 05:03:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Basic setup\\n\\n1. [x] Read the [code review page in the handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/) and the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html).\\n1. [x] Understand [how to become a maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#how-to-become-a-project-maintainer) and add yourself as a [trainee maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer) in the [team database](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md). (MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/105456+)\\n\\n## Working towards becoming a maintainer\\n\\nThese are only guidelines. Remember that there is no specific timeline on this.\\n\\nAs part of your journey towards becoming a maintainer, you may find it useful to:\\n\\n1. [ ] Act as a coach in a big deliverable that requires [following the planning step](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/fe_guide/development_process.html#planning-development) as part of the trainee program.\\n1. [x] [Shadow a maintainer](#code-review-pairing) while they review an MR. This will allow you to get insight into the thought processes involved.\\n1. [x] [Have a maintainer shadow *you*](#code-review-pairing) while you review an MR *as if you were a maintainer* . Ideally, this would be with a different maintainer to the above, so you can get different insights.\\n1. [x] *Optional:* [Consider finding a mentor](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer-mentorship-pilot-program) to help you become a maintainer.\\n\\nIt is up to you to ensure that you are getting enough MRs to review, and of varied types. All engineers are reviewers, so you should already be receiving regular reviews from Reviewer Roulette. You could also seek out more reviews from your team, or #frontend Slack channels.\\n\\nYour reviews should aim to cover maintainer responsibilities as well as reviewer responsibilities. Your approval means you think it is ready to merge.\\n\\nAfter each MR is merged or closed, add a discussion to this issue using this template:\\n\\n```markdown\\n### (Merge request title): (Merge request URL)\\n\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I suggested/identified/noted...\\\")\\n\\nPost-review (opportunities to learn):\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I missed...\\\" or \\\"Merged as-is\\\")\\n\\n(Maintainer who reviewed this merge request) Please add feedback, and compare\\nthis review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\nThe purpose of comparing your review to the maintainer's review is to engage in active learning and expand your list of items to consider. Remember, different maintainers are going to identify different issues in the same code. As long as you are not missing large errors or bugs, don't feel like you are doing a bad job if you and a maintainer make different suggestions.\\n\\n**Note:** Do not include reviews of security MRs because review feedback might reveal security issue details.\\n\\n**Tip:** There are [tools](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/tools-and-tips/#trainee-maintainer-issue-upkeep) available to assist with this task.\\n\\n### Code Review Pairing\\n\\nMuch like pair programming, pairing on code review is a great way to knowledge share and collaborate on merge request. This is a great activity for trainee maintainers to participate with maintainers for learning their process of code review.\\n\\nA **private code review session** (unrecorded) involves one primary reviewer, and a shadow. If more than one shadow wishes to observe a private session, please consider obtaining consent from the merge request author.\\n\\nA **public code review session** involves a primary reviewer and one or more shadows in a recorded session that is released publicly, for example to GitLab Unfiltered.\\n\\n* If the merge request author is a GitLab team member, please consider obtaining consent from them.\\n* If the merge request author is a community contributor, you **must** obtain consent from them.\\n* Do **not** release reviews of security merge requests publicly.\\n\\n## When you're ready to make it official\\n\\nWhen reviews have accumulated, and recent reviews consistently fulfill maintainer responsibilities, any maintainer can take the next step. The trainee should also feel free to discuss their progress with their manager or any maintainer at any time.\\n\\n1. [ ] Create a merge request updating [your team member entry](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md) proposing yourself as a maintainer.\\n1. [ ] Keep reviewing, start merging :metal:\", \"milestone_id\": null, \"iid\": 34345, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 244675350, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:15 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 11701495, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 17069039, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 130812, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2015-11-27 21:29:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-04-27 10:56:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 8595532, \"title\": \"trainee maintainer\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": null, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125868 --\u003e\\n### Remove hard coded language: gitlab-org/gitlab!125868\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove hard coded language\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Looked good to me , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536524660, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130137 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder: gitlab-org/gitlab!130137\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-28 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984745, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134349 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!134349\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ad0fef742d45c5008c793f75979365880c402acb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608130962, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127788 --\u003e\\n### Fixing problems with project overview: gitlab-org/gitlab!127788\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixing problems with project overview\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772209, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Dependency updates are often \\\"waived through\\\". You took the time to understand what's going on and tried out the update locally :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563423640, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to update the description of the MR ( not blocking )\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503796209, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127151 --\u003e\\n### Fix image_list_row_spec.js: gitlab-org/gitlab!127151\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix image_list_row_spec.js\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:35:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670465, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure ! Thank you @fguibert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507118687, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125939 --\u003e\\n### Add codeowners validation block: gitlab-org/gitlab!125939\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add codeowners validation block\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b4deb31b91d08bedeb6d231d1b3de07dfa0a30f1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273491, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested a nitpick to put a repeatedly tested component to a variable \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463155402, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125496 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!125496\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656852, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125982 --\u003e\\n### Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency: gitlab-org/gitlab!125982\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jivanvl please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f32b176e44c8c85d053beecdcaa3adda46362829\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547153, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to \\n     - to follow frontend dev guidelines for exported constants\\n     - not duplicate issue list queries right now but move everything to shared in the next iteration , making the cleanup more efficient\\n     - refactor the jest specs to follow the naming conventions, remove unwanted code and add a couple of extra tests - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125877#note_1475901603 \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: The maintainer added a non-blocking suggestion to add more test coverage\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina @tristan.read in please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1479325916, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125255 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope: gitlab-org/gitlab!125255\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 15:12:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393023, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130145 --\u003e\\n### Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!130145\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-25 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4ba705c0455a37a6bdf3b1cea4d9624e5453c39c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1528942055, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - not to use name with component when it is already used in hidden element\\n      - edit the test-id naming convention , was using `js-` naming convention\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489916587, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!121585 --\u003e\\n### Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects: gitlab-org/gitlab!121585\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@terrichu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:53:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445812, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132467 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from discussion_filter_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!132467\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fc3f4f17352251bc002c8612d6b82abd0d053d14\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593896320, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133725 --\u003e\\n### Basic group multiselect support for user token: gitlab-org/gitlab!133725\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Basic group multiselect support for user token\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e7fa81abfa9f541daf659dea19009afbab49a12\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131042, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- It was a small clean change , nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524201744, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for encouraging the MR author to use robust testing assertions. Great review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3540517, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539521470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to use kebab case for `data-testid` selectors\\n   - use `toMatchObect` in tests\\n   - use `toBe` for primitive values testing\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed some non blocking suggestions on comment rephrasing and changing tests description\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524216788, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127240 --\u003e\\n### Improve Value stream dashboard loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!127240\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Improve Value stream dashboard loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nI took it in half review from @jrushford as he was going on PTO\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - some changes to use computed classes on the element in a readable way\\n   - not to use `data-qa-selector` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert was generous to take it up and complete the review :bow: \\n\\nCan you please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review ? Thank you :thank_you:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524230146, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure thank you so much @pburdette :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541007009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: \\n    - to add Sentry logging for error scenarios\\n    - creating a helper function to set the data properties and write specs for it for changes made in haml file \\n    - to use `$emit` instead of `trigger` for testing an emitted event for component \\n- :mag: I identified to prevent failing tests in vue3 compat mode\\n    - an extra use of `nextTick`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463179030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129052 --\u003e\\n### Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure: gitlab-org/gitlab!129052\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dianalogan please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"86bc625b2e896a5c7ae1c21be7483ad6ce374aa8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849365, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Keep an eye out for missing test coverage. Especially when the MR deals with fixing a bug. We want to make sure it has good test coverage so the bug isn't introduced again. \\n\\nOverall good review :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4477803, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539565882, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @leipert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568899677, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @f_caplette :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568898395, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted to use $emit rather than $trigger but since the wrapper was native html element , trigger made more sense \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457667075, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125181 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!125181\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 09:52:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456369541, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124783 --\u003e\\n### Hook up update schedule mutation: gitlab-org/gitlab!124783\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hook up update schedule mutation\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alberts-gitlab please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add tests in `board_card_inner_spec.js`  but they will be added when rspecs are written for the same in future\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed asking why we prefer `eventHub` still\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463161255, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125479 --\u003e\\n### Dismiss modal after increasing access level: gitlab-org/gitlab!125479\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Dismiss modal after increasing access level\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ddavison please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:53 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656907, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125947 --\u003e\\n### Fix wrapping pattern of buttons: gitlab-org/gitlab!125947\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix wrapping pattern of buttons\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good suggestions and questions, not much else to comment on regarding this MR. Keep it up :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1465234546, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125971 --\u003e\\n### Mark vulnerability_details component as deprecated: gitlab-org/gitlab!125971\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"85d4a1316a06e5c11f902081a5bc9507930a634f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @leipert :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- A very small and clean MR to remove an existing FF, no feedback as such\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484705445, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified that the dropdown is closing when we click the copy button which is different from the original behaviour\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473663483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nLooked good to be since a helper method was added. Passed on to the maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to write test for the helper method in both the ee and ce version\\n\\n@mrincon please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473664730, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123522 --\u003e\\n### Implement search for group wikis: gitlab-org/gitlab!123522\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Implement search for group wikis\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@johnmason please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273525, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125980 --\u003e\\n### Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!125980\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123019 --\u003e\\n### Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\": gitlab-org/gitlab!123019\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\"\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470936880, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Did not review this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471435298, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124533 --\u003e\\n### Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!124533\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:50 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445781, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     1. To apply the new eslint rule files where it was used rather than disabling it\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471437751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125196 --\u003e\\n### Add no hard coded url eslint rules: gitlab-org/gitlab!125196\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add no hard coded url eslint rules\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:45 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that it was a small MR with data attribute changes for selection , approved it as is without any feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is \\n\\n@ddavison @justin_ho please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471438997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add a jest test case when the dataset property `cannot-merge` property is not provided\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471440135, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125555 --\u003e\\n### Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar: gitlab-org/gitlab!125555\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-10 10:06:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960557, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125509 --\u003e\\n### Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance: gitlab-org/gitlab!125509\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960568, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add the changes behind a FF just to be sure since this was a change in the head tags and we could not see any potential differences in local gdk and .com\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is **but the maintainer agreed that an FF would be good**\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471441009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested using utility classes at multiple css file changes to reduce the css page bundle size\\n\\nIt was a great improvement to see the final changes made only to the template file\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:48:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471442069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Nothing to suggest , it was a small ~frontend change adding a language attribute to html. Looked good :white_check_mark: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz @psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471443156, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n    - to use computed properties and constants\\n    - to remove redundant code like - `v-if` and `v-show` should never be together\\n    - to remove console logs \\n    - not to use computed property for constants\\n    - move i18n texts to options of the component\\n    - add a finally for isloading to false irrespective of error or not\\n    - remove redundant `v-else-if` which was not needed\\n    - move multiple `findComponent` in test cases as a variable\\n    - [use findComponent as component rather than name](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331672)\\n    - Use emit instead of trigger for gitlab-ui components in [jest test cases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331686)\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - redundant null check in `v-else`\\n     - passing reload as a function instead of emit \\n     - string extrapolation not need\\n\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471448970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125572 --\u003e\\n### Add Tracing List UI: gitlab-org/gitlab!125572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Tracing List UI\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467872137, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126578 --\u003e\\n### [issue-417870] Migrate button component to Pajamas Button: gitlab-org/gitlab!126578\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"da94499aad2ea3f497f66f74e02dec6b36dc850b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471841737, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This isn't one of the largest MRs, but thanks for the promotion of utility classes over custom CSS :thumbsup: and the nice and respectful interaction with a community contributor.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472031566, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This particular MR was a merge as-is MR thus, did not have any requests for change.\\n\\nFor maintainership, the MRs we are looking for are the more thoughtful technical design decisions and engineering considerations.  Regretfully, I cannot fairly grade your maintainership competency based on this MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 272636, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472314143, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127572 --\u003e\\n### Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times: gitlab-org/gitlab!127572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:20 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3473fc8ed41c758a8384a85eb86d04bca942249f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:19 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813801, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Frontend code didn't require changes so the review was :100:, what I'd expect from a frontend maintainer.\\n\\n-------\\n\\nI often read the entire MR to learn more about our codebase. I may ask for changes if I notice something in the backend, documentation, etc...\\n\\nI'd encourage \\\"holistic\\\" reviews and be ready to comment or ask about any part of the MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1607849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:37:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1607849, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1474957631, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127036 --\u003e\\n### Prevent loading state from showing after undo: gitlab-org/gitlab!127036\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9a4cc70bcb0665ed6a9165b00626054c290aaa69\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620562, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to remove the isSingleRequest for emojiQueries since they would not have large requests\\n    - some UI text changes for proper error description\\n    - unnecessary if condition in code\\n    - Show loader when the emojis are being fetched to show an indicator that a query is being run\\n    - remove not need cache.writeQuery in tests, should work fine with proper request handlers\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed checking that the query is called everytime we update any work item attribute\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1475870222, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125121 --\u003e\\n### Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items: gitlab-org/gitlab!125121\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-19 03:41:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464604003, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126709 --\u003e\\n### Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap: gitlab-org/gitlab!126709\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-22 06:31:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547126, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125877 --\u003e\\n### Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list: gitlab-org/gitlab!125877\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-16 06:31:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-20 09:53:43 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471137287, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani My suggestion about the specs came from specific domain knowledge about Incidents, so I wouldn't worry about that.\\n\\nYour review was detailed and what I would expect from a maintainer :thumbsup_tone1:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3146670, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480510293, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127014 --\u003e\\n### Remove import_details_page feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!127014\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove import_details_page feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124322 --\u003e\\n### Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests: gitlab-org/gitlab!124322\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:38:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480581161, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133508 --\u003e\\n### Project overview Edit button fix: gitlab-org/gitlab!133508\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Project overview Edit button fix\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e8dd22043f74a2b659825529463290378e4528c8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726639, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This was a larger MR so it can be easier to miss some things. From this review:\\n\\n- Keep an eye out for code (string and number literals) that can be replaced with existing constants\\n- For reusable/shared components, check that the code is generic and reusable by others\\n- Generally, question every line of code to check whether it is unneeded or can be simplified\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488788165, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @tristan.read :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 02:03:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484696992, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @mrincon :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484697575, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"sure , thank you @ddavison :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484699692, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small ~frontend changes to use `data-testid` instead of qa selector. Had no feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484703670, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n  * to use `fluid-width` instead of `fluid-content`  for `gl-collapsible-listbox` props\\n  * add an extra test for check for other props for the new dropdown\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1569008648, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n       - to change the naming for labelsContainer and labels in jest test cases\\n       - having a test case to make sure that the injected data property `allowScopedLabels` is injected and also having a default value for the injected prop in the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484715899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126425 --\u003e\\n### Work item header and input UI improvements: gitlab-org/gitlab!126425\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Work item header and input UI improvements\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 06:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469343489, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n     - (non-blocking)to use cache update instead of refetching the issue count when deleting the work item\\n     - to remove unused graphql query \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - to point using constants for work item types\\n     - improve the logic when updating fields by updating the persisted_fields and returning early when no work item found\\n     - use isActive is `issuable_item` to highlight selected item\\n     - update the milestone in the FF file\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484781979, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank for you timely review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11004366, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484911410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128081 --\u003e\\n### Fix bold font not being applied on viewed file after further changes. Add viewed file count to diff.: gitlab-org/gitlab!128081\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"be8bab870d9d7406215dcb7751daa1602a6c4d04\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495053415, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127937 --\u003e\\n### [issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states: gitlab-org/gitlab!127937\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:16 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758897, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add screenshots instead of videos in the MR description which gives more clarity  , but it was a non blocking comment hence approved.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495110152, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495112796, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - to use constants for \\\"group\\\" and \\\"project\\\"\\n     - to use scoped strings for translations \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499990702, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125661 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!125661\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-04 03:28:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758939, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - To use `GlDisclosureDropdown` instead of `GlListBox` according to the use case\\n     - To Add accessibility `toggleSrText` prop to dropdown\\n     - to change jest test case string ( nitpick )\\n     - to use `mount` instead of `mountExtended` since no testid was used\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499998030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127996 --\u003e\\n### Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown: gitlab-org/gitlab!127996\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758883, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Minimal changes and looked good to me without any changes, passed on to maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499999096, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126667 --\u003e\\n### Add view cache for PWA manifest.json: gitlab-org/gitlab!126667\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add view cache for PWA manifest.json\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-29 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492740118, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani this was a super large MR, thanks for tackling it and dropping your questions!\\n\\n\u003e I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nIt's interesting to note that the hidden element was actually **needed**. It just wasn't obvious **why**. It took some digging to figure out the reason behind the pattern used there.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2233420, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1497804374, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to\\n    - Add a test to make sure that resolver is called a particular number of times in addition to being called with params\\n    - renaming of some tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n    - rename the variable `mutationLoading` to `isDeleteInprogress` \\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1506027507, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127958 --\u003e\\n### Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination: gitlab-org/gitlab!127958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 08:22:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1496495447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggested changes , small and clean MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558649388, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change all FF's to name the FF's being used in tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out a small test description change\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558673332, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128324 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Various fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab!128324\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Various fixes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-08 03:14:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1500078923, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - To avoid `if-else` for apollo mutate\\n    - delete unnecessary computed props\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503790443, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127900 --\u003e\\n### Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards: gitlab-org/gitlab!127900\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-05 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758913, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to change the wording of some of the tests ( use verbs )\\n    - to move some reuseable components in the tests to the scope of the file and make available to all tests\\n    - remove unwanted assertions in tests\\n    - use `props()` instead of `attributes()` in tests\\n    - use i18n for reuseable constant strings\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507109492, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128088 --\u003e\\n### Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper: gitlab-org/gitlab!128088\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 03:50:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503854140, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't think the variable rename nitpick was a miss, it was just my opinion.\\n\\nThe UX review was skipped due to the team circumstances, but it's still something to keep in mind when reviewing.\\n\\nIt was a good review from you overall :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4846639, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507111595, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove unwanted props\\n   - use conditional chaining for computed props\\n   - remove unwanted hover class from options\\n   - use constants for icon strings from backend\\n   - use `data-testid` selectors instead of `data-qa` selectors\\n   - remove dead code\\n   - use `i18n` for strings\\n   - simplify names of props and prop values as well\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507117825, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126773 --\u003e\\n### Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files: gitlab-org/gitlab!126773\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:27:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493228070, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125260 --\u003e\\n### Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki: gitlab-org/gitlab!125260\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8373453d6ae6f7cb78780555186a249ed82f7a80\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!111116 --\u003e\\n### Display pull command for container registry tag: gitlab-org/gitlab!111116\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616c84e2577641082d10401f5a19fea04ac39323\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1510643149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126836 --\u003e\\n### Fix: group_select has render with older data: gitlab-org/gitlab!126836\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix: group_select has render with older data\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@peterhegman please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b9b2f391cef771e5b41cfa3d74c155b0e464b5f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for your review in that MR Deepika :bow: You made the right call approving it as is while still raising that UX quirk.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3732265, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1521576364, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove some unwanted lines of code\\n   - not to pass an empty object as a param for a util function\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1520453535, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128700 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count: gitlab-org/gitlab!128700\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to rename component event names to make more sense\\n   - to remove `isSingleRequest` from apollo query context after `unbatch_graphql_queries` flag is on on gitlab.com\\n   - conditional chaining for object properties\\n   - use computed props\\n   - use `toEqual` rather than `toStrictEqual`\\n   - instead of manually updating store state in tests , use store action dispatch\\n   - use `toHaveBeenCalledTimes` which will also check if the mock is called rather than just called mock\\n   - not to use `toBeDefined` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - using existing strings for translation\\n      - simplifying the property access by optional chaining\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558758161, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130784 --\u003e\\n### Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!130784\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-09 06:31:34 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541160506, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126649 --\u003e\\n### Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!126649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1498635175, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129775 --\u003e\\n### Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary: gitlab-org/gitlab!129775\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:59 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1522244292, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133476 --\u003e\\n### Remove issuable features moved popover: gitlab-org/gitlab!133476\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove issuable features moved popover\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@djadmin please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c3f7f75559ae30c476f441cc34c2ee37003ddfac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726662, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134178 --\u003e\\n### Migrate work item milestone dropdown to listbox: gitlab-org/gitlab!134178\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ee21d068c9fa91cd92f22ecaca9599cbfcb803e5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481959, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133406 --\u003e\\n### Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid: gitlab-org/gitlab!133406\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@sliaquat please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c497ef797d3e07bcde187480530eb49d015ac9fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726690, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134338 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue: gitlab-org/gitlab!134338\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f27e16c0733dac24965412a9e4f105b22695f1a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481935, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"You provided an excellent review, keep up the good work :rocket: \\n\\nThere wasn't a lot for me to find so no worries. \\n\\nThe only Feedback I can share is to be cautious with suggesting such [\\\"simplifications\\\"](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127240#note_1484661059) in cases where the scope of the problem is too big to be understood very quickly. \\n\\nI've seen too many bugs being introduced by such \\\"simplifications\\\". I would recommend to still address these but with a more open question:\\n\\n\\\"Could you help me understand why we would need this additional check on this value?\\\"\\n\\nThis will lead to the same result but reduce the risk to remove a needed check in a hurry.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7293390, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1526853785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested some minor variable naming changes \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to add test cases/coverage for the new date_timestamp\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538915383, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130013 --\u003e\\n### Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report: gitlab-org/gitlab!130013\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984874, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to use `attributes` function for testing the href of the component\\n    - let go of `exists` since that test will fail anyways\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536523693, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130100 --\u003e\\n### Move job sidebar buttons to header: gitlab-org/gitlab!130100\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move job sidebar buttons to header\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-30 06:31:02 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984776, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to use `default to 0` for prop type `Number`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536528512, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129895 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!129895\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524053220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , small MR with clean changes :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544850303, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130873 --\u003e\\n### Add background color to new MR tabs: gitlab-org/gitlab!130873\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add background color to new MR tabs\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543203980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @ealcantara :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544853007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , minimal ~frontend changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:23:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544852532, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130649 --\u003e\\n### Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License: gitlab-org/gitlab!130649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-02 06:30:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130652 --\u003e\\n### Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!130652\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alexpooley please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811596, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130616 --\u003e\\n### Draft: Add possibility for minimal forks: gitlab-org/gitlab!130616\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ab03e6bb588b8f72ec6195cfa6aa2d31a3b6c6d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811647, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130935 --\u003e\\n### Move Service Desk lists app under Issues: gitlab-org/gitlab!130935\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move Service Desk lists app under Issues\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130810 --\u003e\\n### Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend: gitlab-org/gitlab!130810\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@kushalpandya please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd7a7735f8a732d3a2b13c0079ae047db90b9288\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543204010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130075 --\u003e\\n### Hide search bar if below threshold: gitlab-org/gitlab!130075\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hide search bar if below threshold\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@tristan.read please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ae64b6b7bd2950d31c54abb361e264623276c9dc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984827, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No changes , just fixing failing pipelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546650918, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggestions , it only involved changing `data-testid` changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546653878, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125649 --\u003e\\n### Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming: gitlab-org/gitlab!125649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@huzaifaiftikhar1 please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984893, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested if there is a capability of adding a loading placeholder in the dropdown with the loading indicator ? ( Like `Loading`) \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549132611, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130986 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!130986\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845350, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129958 --\u003e\\n### Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color: gitlab-org/gitlab!129958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-12 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501750, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131028 --\u003e\\n### Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle: gitlab-org/gitlab!131028\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501694, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified \\n     - to remove the background for Progress widget in dark mode as well\\n     - update the border over hover similar in all the widgets\\n     - sync the background color of dropdowns like inputs in milestone and iterations\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:35:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:22:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484788602, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129219 --\u003e\\n### [Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived: gitlab-org/gitlab!129219\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845403, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130678 --\u003e\\n### Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0: gitlab-org/gitlab!130678\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:54 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845382, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked a question regarding the validity of an extra variable which led to fixing a bug :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562749106, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131737 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables: gitlab-org/gitlab!131737\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560771819, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change a test description to depict the true state of the `isCollapsed`. But it was such a pleasure reviewing the MR as it was one of the best I have seen in GitLab\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n   - cleanup `getCssClassDimensions` in mock\\n   - manually add `wrapper.destroy` in the afterEach block\\n   - group `mouse enter` tests into a describe block to prevent repetion\\n   - remove translating strings while testing in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562756509, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131918 --\u003e\\n### How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks: gitlab-org/gitlab!131918\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aqualls please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aecca61bc39672e2a9940fae4a8788cf2daf41fa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772193, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that I could not verify the MR with multiple back and forth resulting in updating the description a couple of times to correct the FF mentioned in the steps to reproduce.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:30:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560773323, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to have feature flag check as well for new entry in dashboard list\\n   - using computed property\\n   - change the test case wordings a little\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing not to use wrapper vm constant property in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:05:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503795483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hey there @deepika.guliani! Most of my points here were about specs readability and predictability. There was nothing here that would have prevented a merge, but sometimes when asking small questions, we find some underlying problems and understand the why.\\n\\nFor example, [when I proposed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/131028#note_1555293432) to move the `toggle?.remove` call to the afterEach block, it was a nitpick and it did not block merge, but by pointing it out, the author and I had a chat and we found out that the wrapper was being mounted twice and that's why there were some issues! This did not impact the tests right now, but it might have in the future as more and more tests were added and then the bug becomes harder to find.\\n\\nThis is not to say that you missed anything really (your reviews are all great!). More that especially in specs, it's easy to miss a lot of underlying problems and it's worth spending a bit of extra time to make sure that everything behave as it should, not just that tests are passing.\\n\\nKeep up the awesome work!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5327378, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563502843, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131951 --\u003e\\n### Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!131951\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:16:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461754, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions, ~frontend light MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is, no ~frontend feedback\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571569999, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129369 --\u003e\\n### Update trial column: gitlab-org/gitlab!129369\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update trial column\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524194801, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132846 --\u003e\\n### Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors: gitlab-org/gitlab!132846\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339261, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-02 12:40:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549256589, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions , clean MR \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587381535, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132832 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!132832\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-30 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339281, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested for a ~UX review since this might have more touching points than mentioned. The code looked good to me.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n  @himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587384960, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587385136, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132613 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix some error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!132613\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix some error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-28 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1581646466, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133275 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand: gitlab-org/gitlab!133275\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 06:31:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4112f7b6c1c062a21e7a8e161d3425dbd7952fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589009889, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add some test cases and `toMatchObject` for testing more props of the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589277355, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131928 --\u003e\\n### Update artifacts page layout: gitlab-org/gitlab!131928\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update artifacts page layout\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461780, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked some clarifying questions, but nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@justin_ho  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589281507, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131143 --\u003e\\n### License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!131143\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@chloeliu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:47 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1556289060, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nBackend heavy , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589285808, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131849 --\u003e\\n### Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids: gitlab-org/gitlab!131849\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mlapierre please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-20 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772203, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: Just to add a before and after video to make the description more clear\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589290037, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"It was a nice initial review! Your suggestion was valuable.\\n\\nGreat attention to detail, important findings, helpful comments. \\n\\nGreat work @deepika.guliani :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10762712, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 14:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:22:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589877102, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133200 --\u003e\\n### Fix devops empty state illustration: gitlab-org/gitlab!133200\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix devops empty state illustration\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pskorupa please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1590705608, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small MR with no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n`@ealcantara` please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1592642788, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good review with good suggestions! A couple of comments:\\n\\n- I believe we don't prefer `||` over `??`, both are perfectly valid\\n- I believe we don't prefer `toEqual` to `toStrictEqual`, in fact `toStrictEqual` is arguably better since it is a more precise check\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 12:36:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-09 05:08:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593026254, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134245 --\u003e\\n### Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!134245\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@acroitor please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23efd83fe1a18f112ebcb8e158b67b5e509014c2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131000, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131825 --\u003e\\n### Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics: gitlab-org/gitlab!131825\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"36b2e435a8457e49253a82a3156bb175daaeabe2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571528474, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134591 --\u003e\\n### Fix epic board children count and weight on card: gitlab-org/gitlab!134591\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix epic board children count and weight on card\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5b708cd017dd2ef2bf249c20c4006a1f13e99031\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1609999412, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134377 --\u003e\\n### Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget: gitlab-org/gitlab!134377\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d4a6612056c26010216970d82e54952419c1c886\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1611728905, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134730 --\u003e\\n### Display abuse report notes (frontend): gitlab-org/gitlab!134730\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2530d3cd51ab399da0ba2945e6d0f64ad38f0d3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1615989743, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Closing this since https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/129537+ is merged\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1fae663519385999828d1931b66d7b7f1e52da66\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1617560916, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3540517, \"username\": \"ealcantara\", \"name\": \"Enrique Alc\\u00e1ntara\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4477803, \"username\": \"pburdette\", \"name\": \"Payton Burdette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 272636, \"username\": \"ddavison\", \"name\": \"Dan Davison\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 1607849, \"username\": \"mrincon\", \"name\": \"Miguel Rincon\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3146670, \"username\": \"tristan.read\", \"name\": \"Tristan Read\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11004366, \"username\": \"eduardosanz\", \"name\": \"Eduardo Sanz Garc\\u00eda\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 2233420, \"username\": \"pslaughter\", \"name\": \"Paul Slaughter\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4846639, \"username\": \"fguibert\", \"name\": \"Florie Guibert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3732265, \"username\": \"pgascouvaillancourt\", \"name\": \"Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 7293390, \"username\": \"jannik_lehmann\", \"name\": \"Jannik Lehmann\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 5327378, \"username\": \"f_caplette\", \"name\": \"Fr\\u00e9d\\u00e9ric Caplette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 10762712, \"username\": \"arfedoro\", \"name\": \"Artur Fedorov\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 6543, \"name\": \"GitLab.com\", \"path\": \"gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 7764, \"name\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"path\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 17069039}]}","query":"What is this issue about?","query_id":"f23701b908cd4fd7a4468e19319d7fbb","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130193114","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130193114, \"title\": \"Trainee FE Maintainer (Gitlab) - Deepika Guliani\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-03 05:03:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Basic setup\\n\\n1. [x] Read the [code review page in the handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/) and the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html).\\n1. [x] Understand [how to become a maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#how-to-become-a-project-maintainer) and add yourself as a [trainee maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer) in the [team database](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md). (MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/105456+)\\n\\n## Working towards becoming a maintainer\\n\\nThese are only guidelines. Remember that there is no specific timeline on this.\\n\\nAs part of your journey towards becoming a maintainer, you may find it useful to:\\n\\n1. [ ] Act as a coach in a big deliverable that requires [following the planning step](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/fe_guide/development_process.html#planning-development) as part of the trainee program.\\n1. [x] [Shadow a maintainer](#code-review-pairing) while they review an MR. This will allow you to get insight into the thought processes involved.\\n1. [x] [Have a maintainer shadow *you*](#code-review-pairing) while you review an MR *as if you were a maintainer* . Ideally, this would be with a different maintainer to the above, so you can get different insights.\\n1. [x] *Optional:* [Consider finding a mentor](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer-mentorship-pilot-program) to help you become a maintainer.\\n\\nIt is up to you to ensure that you are getting enough MRs to review, and of varied types. All engineers are reviewers, so you should already be receiving regular reviews from Reviewer Roulette. You could also seek out more reviews from your team, or #frontend Slack channels.\\n\\nYour reviews should aim to cover maintainer responsibilities as well as reviewer responsibilities. Your approval means you think it is ready to merge.\\n\\nAfter each MR is merged or closed, add a discussion to this issue using this template:\\n\\n```markdown\\n### (Merge request title): (Merge request URL)\\n\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I suggested/identified/noted...\\\")\\n\\nPost-review (opportunities to learn):\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I missed...\\\" or \\\"Merged as-is\\\")\\n\\n(Maintainer who reviewed this merge request) Please add feedback, and compare\\nthis review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\nThe purpose of comparing your review to the maintainer's review is to engage in active learning and expand your list of items to consider. Remember, different maintainers are going to identify different issues in the same code. As long as you are not missing large errors or bugs, don't feel like you are doing a bad job if you and a maintainer make different suggestions.\\n\\n**Note:** Do not include reviews of security MRs because review feedback might reveal security issue details.\\n\\n**Tip:** There are [tools](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/tools-and-tips/#trainee-maintainer-issue-upkeep) available to assist with this task.\\n\\n### Code Review Pairing\\n\\nMuch like pair programming, pairing on code review is a great way to knowledge share and collaborate on merge request. This is a great activity for trainee maintainers to participate with maintainers for learning their process of code review.\\n\\nA **private code review session** (unrecorded) involves one primary reviewer, and a shadow. If more than one shadow wishes to observe a private session, please consider obtaining consent from the merge request author.\\n\\nA **public code review session** involves a primary reviewer and one or more shadows in a recorded session that is released publicly, for example to GitLab Unfiltered.\\n\\n* If the merge request author is a GitLab team member, please consider obtaining consent from them.\\n* If the merge request author is a community contributor, you **must** obtain consent from them.\\n* Do **not** release reviews of security merge requests publicly.\\n\\n## When you're ready to make it official\\n\\nWhen reviews have accumulated, and recent reviews consistently fulfill maintainer responsibilities, any maintainer can take the next step. The trainee should also feel free to discuss their progress with their manager or any maintainer at any time.\\n\\n1. [ ] Create a merge request updating [your team member entry](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md) proposing yourself as a maintainer.\\n1. [ ] Keep reviewing, start merging :metal:\", \"milestone_id\": null, \"iid\": 34345, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 244675350, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:15 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 11701495, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 17069039, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 130812, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2015-11-27 21:29:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-04-27 10:56:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 8595532, \"title\": \"trainee maintainer\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": null, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125868 --\u003e\\n### Remove hard coded language: gitlab-org/gitlab!125868\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove hard coded language\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Looked good to me , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536524660, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130137 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder: gitlab-org/gitlab!130137\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-28 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984745, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134349 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!134349\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ad0fef742d45c5008c793f75979365880c402acb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608130962, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127788 --\u003e\\n### Fixing problems with project overview: gitlab-org/gitlab!127788\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixing problems with project overview\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772209, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Dependency updates are often \\\"waived through\\\". You took the time to understand what's going on and tried out the update locally :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563423640, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to update the description of the MR ( not blocking )\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503796209, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127151 --\u003e\\n### Fix image_list_row_spec.js: gitlab-org/gitlab!127151\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix image_list_row_spec.js\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:35:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670465, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure ! Thank you @fguibert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507118687, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125939 --\u003e\\n### Add codeowners validation block: gitlab-org/gitlab!125939\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add codeowners validation block\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b4deb31b91d08bedeb6d231d1b3de07dfa0a30f1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273491, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested a nitpick to put a repeatedly tested component to a variable \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463155402, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125496 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!125496\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656852, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125982 --\u003e\\n### Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency: gitlab-org/gitlab!125982\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jivanvl please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f32b176e44c8c85d053beecdcaa3adda46362829\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547153, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to \\n     - to follow frontend dev guidelines for exported constants\\n     - not duplicate issue list queries right now but move everything to shared in the next iteration , making the cleanup more efficient\\n     - refactor the jest specs to follow the naming conventions, remove unwanted code and add a couple of extra tests - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125877#note_1475901603 \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: The maintainer added a non-blocking suggestion to add more test coverage\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina @tristan.read in please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1479325916, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125255 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope: gitlab-org/gitlab!125255\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 15:12:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393023, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130145 --\u003e\\n### Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!130145\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-25 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4ba705c0455a37a6bdf3b1cea4d9624e5453c39c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1528942055, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - not to use name with component when it is already used in hidden element\\n      - edit the test-id naming convention , was using `js-` naming convention\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489916587, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!121585 --\u003e\\n### Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects: gitlab-org/gitlab!121585\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@terrichu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:53:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445812, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132467 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from discussion_filter_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!132467\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fc3f4f17352251bc002c8612d6b82abd0d053d14\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593896320, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133725 --\u003e\\n### Basic group multiselect support for user token: gitlab-org/gitlab!133725\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Basic group multiselect support for user token\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e7fa81abfa9f541daf659dea19009afbab49a12\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131042, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- It was a small clean change , nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524201744, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for encouraging the MR author to use robust testing assertions. Great review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3540517, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539521470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to use kebab case for `data-testid` selectors\\n   - use `toMatchObect` in tests\\n   - use `toBe` for primitive values testing\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed some non blocking suggestions on comment rephrasing and changing tests description\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524216788, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127240 --\u003e\\n### Improve Value stream dashboard loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!127240\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Improve Value stream dashboard loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nI took it in half review from @jrushford as he was going on PTO\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - some changes to use computed classes on the element in a readable way\\n   - not to use `data-qa-selector` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert was generous to take it up and complete the review :bow: \\n\\nCan you please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review ? Thank you :thank_you:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524230146, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure thank you so much @pburdette :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541007009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: \\n    - to add Sentry logging for error scenarios\\n    - creating a helper function to set the data properties and write specs for it for changes made in haml file \\n    - to use `$emit` instead of `trigger` for testing an emitted event for component \\n- :mag: I identified to prevent failing tests in vue3 compat mode\\n    - an extra use of `nextTick`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463179030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129052 --\u003e\\n### Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure: gitlab-org/gitlab!129052\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dianalogan please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"86bc625b2e896a5c7ae1c21be7483ad6ce374aa8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849365, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Keep an eye out for missing test coverage. Especially when the MR deals with fixing a bug. We want to make sure it has good test coverage so the bug isn't introduced again. \\n\\nOverall good review :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4477803, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539565882, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @leipert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568899677, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @f_caplette :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568898395, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted to use $emit rather than $trigger but since the wrapper was native html element , trigger made more sense \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457667075, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125181 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!125181\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 09:52:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456369541, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124783 --\u003e\\n### Hook up update schedule mutation: gitlab-org/gitlab!124783\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hook up update schedule mutation\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alberts-gitlab please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add tests in `board_card_inner_spec.js`  but they will be added when rspecs are written for the same in future\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed asking why we prefer `eventHub` still\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463161255, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125479 --\u003e\\n### Dismiss modal after increasing access level: gitlab-org/gitlab!125479\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Dismiss modal after increasing access level\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ddavison please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:53 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656907, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125947 --\u003e\\n### Fix wrapping pattern of buttons: gitlab-org/gitlab!125947\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix wrapping pattern of buttons\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good suggestions and questions, not much else to comment on regarding this MR. Keep it up :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1465234546, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125971 --\u003e\\n### Mark vulnerability_details component as deprecated: gitlab-org/gitlab!125971\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"85d4a1316a06e5c11f902081a5bc9507930a634f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @leipert :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- A very small and clean MR to remove an existing FF, no feedback as such\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484705445, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified that the dropdown is closing when we click the copy button which is different from the original behaviour\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473663483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nLooked good to be since a helper method was added. Passed on to the maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to write test for the helper method in both the ee and ce version\\n\\n@mrincon please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473664730, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123522 --\u003e\\n### Implement search for group wikis: gitlab-org/gitlab!123522\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Implement search for group wikis\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@johnmason please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273525, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125980 --\u003e\\n### Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!125980\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123019 --\u003e\\n### Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\": gitlab-org/gitlab!123019\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\"\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470936880, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Did not review this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471435298, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124533 --\u003e\\n### Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!124533\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:50 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445781, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     1. To apply the new eslint rule files where it was used rather than disabling it\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471437751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125196 --\u003e\\n### Add no hard coded url eslint rules: gitlab-org/gitlab!125196\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add no hard coded url eslint rules\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:45 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that it was a small MR with data attribute changes for selection , approved it as is without any feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is \\n\\n@ddavison @justin_ho please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471438997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add a jest test case when the dataset property `cannot-merge` property is not provided\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471440135, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125555 --\u003e\\n### Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar: gitlab-org/gitlab!125555\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-10 10:06:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960557, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125509 --\u003e\\n### Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance: gitlab-org/gitlab!125509\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960568, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add the changes behind a FF just to be sure since this was a change in the head tags and we could not see any potential differences in local gdk and .com\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is **but the maintainer agreed that an FF would be good**\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471441009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested using utility classes at multiple css file changes to reduce the css page bundle size\\n\\nIt was a great improvement to see the final changes made only to the template file\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:48:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471442069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Nothing to suggest , it was a small ~frontend change adding a language attribute to html. Looked good :white_check_mark: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz @psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471443156, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n    - to use computed properties and constants\\n    - to remove redundant code like - `v-if` and `v-show` should never be together\\n    - to remove console logs \\n    - not to use computed property for constants\\n    - move i18n texts to options of the component\\n    - add a finally for isloading to false irrespective of error or not\\n    - remove redundant `v-else-if` which was not needed\\n    - move multiple `findComponent` in test cases as a variable\\n    - [use findComponent as component rather than name](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331672)\\n    - Use emit instead of trigger for gitlab-ui components in [jest test cases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331686)\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - redundant null check in `v-else`\\n     - passing reload as a function instead of emit \\n     - string extrapolation not need\\n\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471448970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125572 --\u003e\\n### Add Tracing List UI: gitlab-org/gitlab!125572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Tracing List UI\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467872137, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126578 --\u003e\\n### [issue-417870] Migrate button component to Pajamas Button: gitlab-org/gitlab!126578\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"da94499aad2ea3f497f66f74e02dec6b36dc850b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471841737, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This isn't one of the largest MRs, but thanks for the promotion of utility classes over custom CSS :thumbsup: and the nice and respectful interaction with a community contributor.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472031566, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This particular MR was a merge as-is MR thus, did not have any requests for change.\\n\\nFor maintainership, the MRs we are looking for are the more thoughtful technical design decisions and engineering considerations.  Regretfully, I cannot fairly grade your maintainership competency based on this MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 272636, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472314143, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127572 --\u003e\\n### Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times: gitlab-org/gitlab!127572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:20 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3473fc8ed41c758a8384a85eb86d04bca942249f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:19 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813801, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Frontend code didn't require changes so the review was :100:, what I'd expect from a frontend maintainer.\\n\\n-------\\n\\nI often read the entire MR to learn more about our codebase. I may ask for changes if I notice something in the backend, documentation, etc...\\n\\nI'd encourage \\\"holistic\\\" reviews and be ready to comment or ask about any part of the MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1607849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:37:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1607849, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1474957631, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127036 --\u003e\\n### Prevent loading state from showing after undo: gitlab-org/gitlab!127036\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9a4cc70bcb0665ed6a9165b00626054c290aaa69\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620562, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to remove the isSingleRequest for emojiQueries since they would not have large requests\\n    - some UI text changes for proper error description\\n    - unnecessary if condition in code\\n    - Show loader when the emojis are being fetched to show an indicator that a query is being run\\n    - remove not need cache.writeQuery in tests, should work fine with proper request handlers\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed checking that the query is called everytime we update any work item attribute\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1475870222, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125121 --\u003e\\n### Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items: gitlab-org/gitlab!125121\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-19 03:41:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464604003, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126709 --\u003e\\n### Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap: gitlab-org/gitlab!126709\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-22 06:31:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547126, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125877 --\u003e\\n### Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list: gitlab-org/gitlab!125877\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-16 06:31:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-20 09:53:43 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471137287, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani My suggestion about the specs came from specific domain knowledge about Incidents, so I wouldn't worry about that.\\n\\nYour review was detailed and what I would expect from a maintainer :thumbsup_tone1:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3146670, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480510293, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127014 --\u003e\\n### Remove import_details_page feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!127014\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove import_details_page feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124322 --\u003e\\n### Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests: gitlab-org/gitlab!124322\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:38:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480581161, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133508 --\u003e\\n### Project overview Edit button fix: gitlab-org/gitlab!133508\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Project overview Edit button fix\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e8dd22043f74a2b659825529463290378e4528c8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726639, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This was a larger MR so it can be easier to miss some things. From this review:\\n\\n- Keep an eye out for code (string and number literals) that can be replaced with existing constants\\n- For reusable/shared components, check that the code is generic and reusable by others\\n- Generally, question every line of code to check whether it is unneeded or can be simplified\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488788165, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @tristan.read :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 02:03:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484696992, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @mrincon :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484697575, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"sure , thank you @ddavison :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484699692, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small ~frontend changes to use `data-testid` instead of qa selector. Had no feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484703670, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n  * to use `fluid-width` instead of `fluid-content`  for `gl-collapsible-listbox` props\\n  * add an extra test for check for other props for the new dropdown\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1569008648, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n       - to change the naming for labelsContainer and labels in jest test cases\\n       - having a test case to make sure that the injected data property `allowScopedLabels` is injected and also having a default value for the injected prop in the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484715899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126425 --\u003e\\n### Work item header and input UI improvements: gitlab-org/gitlab!126425\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Work item header and input UI improvements\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 06:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469343489, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n     - (non-blocking)to use cache update instead of refetching the issue count when deleting the work item\\n     - to remove unused graphql query \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - to point using constants for work item types\\n     - improve the logic when updating fields by updating the persisted_fields and returning early when no work item found\\n     - use isActive is `issuable_item` to highlight selected item\\n     - update the milestone in the FF file\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484781979, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank for you timely review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11004366, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484911410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128081 --\u003e\\n### Fix bold font not being applied on viewed file after further changes. Add viewed file count to diff.: gitlab-org/gitlab!128081\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"be8bab870d9d7406215dcb7751daa1602a6c4d04\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495053415, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127937 --\u003e\\n### [issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states: gitlab-org/gitlab!127937\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:16 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758897, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add screenshots instead of videos in the MR description which gives more clarity  , but it was a non blocking comment hence approved.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495110152, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495112796, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - to use constants for \\\"group\\\" and \\\"project\\\"\\n     - to use scoped strings for translations \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499990702, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125661 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!125661\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-04 03:28:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758939, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - To use `GlDisclosureDropdown` instead of `GlListBox` according to the use case\\n     - To Add accessibility `toggleSrText` prop to dropdown\\n     - to change jest test case string ( nitpick )\\n     - to use `mount` instead of `mountExtended` since no testid was used\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499998030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127996 --\u003e\\n### Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown: gitlab-org/gitlab!127996\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758883, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Minimal changes and looked good to me without any changes, passed on to maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499999096, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126667 --\u003e\\n### Add view cache for PWA manifest.json: gitlab-org/gitlab!126667\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add view cache for PWA manifest.json\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-29 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492740118, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani this was a super large MR, thanks for tackling it and dropping your questions!\\n\\n\u003e I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nIt's interesting to note that the hidden element was actually **needed**. It just wasn't obvious **why**. It took some digging to figure out the reason behind the pattern used there.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2233420, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1497804374, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to\\n    - Add a test to make sure that resolver is called a particular number of times in addition to being called with params\\n    - renaming of some tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n    - rename the variable `mutationLoading` to `isDeleteInprogress` \\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1506027507, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127958 --\u003e\\n### Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination: gitlab-org/gitlab!127958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 08:22:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1496495447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggested changes , small and clean MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558649388, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change all FF's to name the FF's being used in tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out a small test description change\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558673332, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128324 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Various fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab!128324\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Various fixes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-08 03:14:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1500078923, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - To avoid `if-else` for apollo mutate\\n    - delete unnecessary computed props\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503790443, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127900 --\u003e\\n### Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards: gitlab-org/gitlab!127900\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-05 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758913, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to change the wording of some of the tests ( use verbs )\\n    - to move some reuseable components in the tests to the scope of the file and make available to all tests\\n    - remove unwanted assertions in tests\\n    - use `props()` instead of `attributes()` in tests\\n    - use i18n for reuseable constant strings\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507109492, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128088 --\u003e\\n### Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper: gitlab-org/gitlab!128088\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 03:50:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503854140, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't think the variable rename nitpick was a miss, it was just my opinion.\\n\\nThe UX review was skipped due to the team circumstances, but it's still something to keep in mind when reviewing.\\n\\nIt was a good review from you overall :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4846639, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507111595, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove unwanted props\\n   - use conditional chaining for computed props\\n   - remove unwanted hover class from options\\n   - use constants for icon strings from backend\\n   - use `data-testid` selectors instead of `data-qa` selectors\\n   - remove dead code\\n   - use `i18n` for strings\\n   - simplify names of props and prop values as well\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507117825, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126773 --\u003e\\n### Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files: gitlab-org/gitlab!126773\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:27:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493228070, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125260 --\u003e\\n### Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki: gitlab-org/gitlab!125260\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8373453d6ae6f7cb78780555186a249ed82f7a80\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!111116 --\u003e\\n### Display pull command for container registry tag: gitlab-org/gitlab!111116\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616c84e2577641082d10401f5a19fea04ac39323\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1510643149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126836 --\u003e\\n### Fix: group_select has render with older data: gitlab-org/gitlab!126836\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix: group_select has render with older data\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@peterhegman please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b9b2f391cef771e5b41cfa3d74c155b0e464b5f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for your review in that MR Deepika :bow: You made the right call approving it as is while still raising that UX quirk.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3732265, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1521576364, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove some unwanted lines of code\\n   - not to pass an empty object as a param for a util function\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1520453535, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128700 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count: gitlab-org/gitlab!128700\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to rename component event names to make more sense\\n   - to remove `isSingleRequest` from apollo query context after `unbatch_graphql_queries` flag is on on gitlab.com\\n   - conditional chaining for object properties\\n   - use computed props\\n   - use `toEqual` rather than `toStrictEqual`\\n   - instead of manually updating store state in tests , use store action dispatch\\n   - use `toHaveBeenCalledTimes` which will also check if the mock is called rather than just called mock\\n   - not to use `toBeDefined` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - using existing strings for translation\\n      - simplifying the property access by optional chaining\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558758161, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130784 --\u003e\\n### Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!130784\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-09 06:31:34 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541160506, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126649 --\u003e\\n### Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!126649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1498635175, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129775 --\u003e\\n### Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary: gitlab-org/gitlab!129775\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:59 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1522244292, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133476 --\u003e\\n### Remove issuable features moved popover: gitlab-org/gitlab!133476\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove issuable features moved popover\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@djadmin please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c3f7f75559ae30c476f441cc34c2ee37003ddfac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726662, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134178 --\u003e\\n### Migrate work item milestone dropdown to listbox: gitlab-org/gitlab!134178\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ee21d068c9fa91cd92f22ecaca9599cbfcb803e5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481959, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133406 --\u003e\\n### Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid: gitlab-org/gitlab!133406\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@sliaquat please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c497ef797d3e07bcde187480530eb49d015ac9fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726690, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134338 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue: gitlab-org/gitlab!134338\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f27e16c0733dac24965412a9e4f105b22695f1a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481935, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"You provided an excellent review, keep up the good work :rocket: \\n\\nThere wasn't a lot for me to find so no worries. \\n\\nThe only Feedback I can share is to be cautious with suggesting such [\\\"simplifications\\\"](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127240#note_1484661059) in cases where the scope of the problem is too big to be understood very quickly. \\n\\nI've seen too many bugs being introduced by such \\\"simplifications\\\". I would recommend to still address these but with a more open question:\\n\\n\\\"Could you help me understand why we would need this additional check on this value?\\\"\\n\\nThis will lead to the same result but reduce the risk to remove a needed check in a hurry.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7293390, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1526853785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested some minor variable naming changes \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to add test cases/coverage for the new date_timestamp\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538915383, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130013 --\u003e\\n### Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report: gitlab-org/gitlab!130013\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984874, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to use `attributes` function for testing the href of the component\\n    - let go of `exists` since that test will fail anyways\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536523693, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130100 --\u003e\\n### Move job sidebar buttons to header: gitlab-org/gitlab!130100\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move job sidebar buttons to header\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-30 06:31:02 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984776, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to use `default to 0` for prop type `Number`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536528512, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129895 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!129895\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524053220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , small MR with clean changes :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544850303, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130873 --\u003e\\n### Add background color to new MR tabs: gitlab-org/gitlab!130873\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add background color to new MR tabs\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543203980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @ealcantara :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544853007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , minimal ~frontend changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:23:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544852532, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130649 --\u003e\\n### Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License: gitlab-org/gitlab!130649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-02 06:30:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130652 --\u003e\\n### Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!130652\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alexpooley please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811596, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130616 --\u003e\\n### Draft: Add possibility for minimal forks: gitlab-org/gitlab!130616\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ab03e6bb588b8f72ec6195cfa6aa2d31a3b6c6d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811647, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130935 --\u003e\\n### Move Service Desk lists app under Issues: gitlab-org/gitlab!130935\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move Service Desk lists app under Issues\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130810 --\u003e\\n### Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend: gitlab-org/gitlab!130810\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@kushalpandya please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd7a7735f8a732d3a2b13c0079ae047db90b9288\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543204010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130075 --\u003e\\n### Hide search bar if below threshold: gitlab-org/gitlab!130075\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hide search bar if below threshold\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@tristan.read please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ae64b6b7bd2950d31c54abb361e264623276c9dc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984827, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No changes , just fixing failing pipelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546650918, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggestions , it only involved changing `data-testid` changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546653878, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125649 --\u003e\\n### Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming: gitlab-org/gitlab!125649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@huzaifaiftikhar1 please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984893, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested if there is a capability of adding a loading placeholder in the dropdown with the loading indicator ? ( Like `Loading`) \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549132611, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130986 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!130986\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845350, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129958 --\u003e\\n### Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color: gitlab-org/gitlab!129958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-12 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501750, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131028 --\u003e\\n### Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle: gitlab-org/gitlab!131028\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501694, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified \\n     - to remove the background for Progress widget in dark mode as well\\n     - update the border over hover similar in all the widgets\\n     - sync the background color of dropdowns like inputs in milestone and iterations\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:35:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:22:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484788602, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129219 --\u003e\\n### [Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived: gitlab-org/gitlab!129219\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845403, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130678 --\u003e\\n### Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0: gitlab-org/gitlab!130678\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:54 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845382, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked a question regarding the validity of an extra variable which led to fixing a bug :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562749106, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131737 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables: gitlab-org/gitlab!131737\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560771819, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change a test description to depict the true state of the `isCollapsed`. But it was such a pleasure reviewing the MR as it was one of the best I have seen in GitLab\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n   - cleanup `getCssClassDimensions` in mock\\n   - manually add `wrapper.destroy` in the afterEach block\\n   - group `mouse enter` tests into a describe block to prevent repetion\\n   - remove translating strings while testing in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562756509, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131918 --\u003e\\n### How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks: gitlab-org/gitlab!131918\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aqualls please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aecca61bc39672e2a9940fae4a8788cf2daf41fa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772193, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that I could not verify the MR with multiple back and forth resulting in updating the description a couple of times to correct the FF mentioned in the steps to reproduce.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:30:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560773323, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to have feature flag check as well for new entry in dashboard list\\n   - using computed property\\n   - change the test case wordings a little\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing not to use wrapper vm constant property in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:05:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503795483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hey there @deepika.guliani! Most of my points here were about specs readability and predictability. There was nothing here that would have prevented a merge, but sometimes when asking small questions, we find some underlying problems and understand the why.\\n\\nFor example, [when I proposed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/131028#note_1555293432) to move the `toggle?.remove` call to the afterEach block, it was a nitpick and it did not block merge, but by pointing it out, the author and I had a chat and we found out that the wrapper was being mounted twice and that's why there were some issues! This did not impact the tests right now, but it might have in the future as more and more tests were added and then the bug becomes harder to find.\\n\\nThis is not to say that you missed anything really (your reviews are all great!). More that especially in specs, it's easy to miss a lot of underlying problems and it's worth spending a bit of extra time to make sure that everything behave as it should, not just that tests are passing.\\n\\nKeep up the awesome work!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5327378, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563502843, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131951 --\u003e\\n### Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!131951\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:16:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461754, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions, ~frontend light MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is, no ~frontend feedback\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571569999, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129369 --\u003e\\n### Update trial column: gitlab-org/gitlab!129369\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update trial column\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524194801, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132846 --\u003e\\n### Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors: gitlab-org/gitlab!132846\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339261, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-02 12:40:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549256589, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions , clean MR \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587381535, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132832 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!132832\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-30 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339281, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested for a ~UX review since this might have more touching points than mentioned. The code looked good to me.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n  @himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587384960, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587385136, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132613 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix some error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!132613\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix some error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-28 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1581646466, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133275 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand: gitlab-org/gitlab!133275\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 06:31:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4112f7b6c1c062a21e7a8e161d3425dbd7952fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589009889, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add some test cases and `toMatchObject` for testing more props of the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589277355, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131928 --\u003e\\n### Update artifacts page layout: gitlab-org/gitlab!131928\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update artifacts page layout\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461780, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked some clarifying questions, but nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@justin_ho  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589281507, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131143 --\u003e\\n### License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!131143\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@chloeliu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:47 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1556289060, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nBackend heavy , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589285808, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131849 --\u003e\\n### Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids: gitlab-org/gitlab!131849\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mlapierre please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-20 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772203, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: Just to add a before and after video to make the description more clear\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589290037, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"It was a nice initial review! Your suggestion was valuable.\\n\\nGreat attention to detail, important findings, helpful comments. \\n\\nGreat work @deepika.guliani :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10762712, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 14:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:22:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589877102, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133200 --\u003e\\n### Fix devops empty state illustration: gitlab-org/gitlab!133200\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix devops empty state illustration\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pskorupa please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1590705608, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small MR with no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n`@ealcantara` please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1592642788, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good review with good suggestions! A couple of comments:\\n\\n- I believe we don't prefer `||` over `??`, both are perfectly valid\\n- I believe we don't prefer `toEqual` to `toStrictEqual`, in fact `toStrictEqual` is arguably better since it is a more precise check\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 12:36:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-09 05:08:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593026254, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134245 --\u003e\\n### Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!134245\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@acroitor please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23efd83fe1a18f112ebcb8e158b67b5e509014c2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131000, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131825 --\u003e\\n### Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics: gitlab-org/gitlab!131825\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"36b2e435a8457e49253a82a3156bb175daaeabe2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571528474, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134591 --\u003e\\n### Fix epic board children count and weight on card: gitlab-org/gitlab!134591\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix epic board children count and weight on card\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5b708cd017dd2ef2bf249c20c4006a1f13e99031\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1609999412, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134377 --\u003e\\n### Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget: gitlab-org/gitlab!134377\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d4a6612056c26010216970d82e54952419c1c886\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1611728905, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134730 --\u003e\\n### Display abuse report notes (frontend): gitlab-org/gitlab!134730\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2530d3cd51ab399da0ba2945e6d0f64ad38f0d3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1615989743, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Closing this since https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/129537+ is merged\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1fae663519385999828d1931b66d7b7f1e52da66\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1617560916, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3540517, \"username\": \"ealcantara\", \"name\": \"Enrique Alc\\u00e1ntara\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4477803, \"username\": \"pburdette\", \"name\": \"Payton Burdette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 272636, \"username\": \"ddavison\", \"name\": \"Dan Davison\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 1607849, \"username\": \"mrincon\", \"name\": \"Miguel Rincon\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3146670, \"username\": \"tristan.read\", \"name\": \"Tristan Read\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11004366, \"username\": \"eduardosanz\", \"name\": \"Eduardo Sanz Garc\\u00eda\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 2233420, \"username\": \"pslaughter\", \"name\": \"Paul Slaughter\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4846639, \"username\": \"fguibert\", \"name\": \"Florie Guibert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3732265, \"username\": \"pgascouvaillancourt\", \"name\": \"Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 7293390, \"username\": \"jannik_lehmann\", \"name\": \"Jannik Lehmann\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 5327378, \"username\": \"f_caplette\", \"name\": \"Fr\\u00e9d\\u00e9ric Caplette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 10762712, \"username\": \"arfedoro\", \"name\": \"Artur Fedorov\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 6543, \"name\": \"GitLab.com\", \"path\": \"gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 7764, \"name\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"path\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 17069039}]}","query":"Summarize the comments into bullet points?","query_id":"bde63fbfe15f4af58816d6b5292d735b","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130193114","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130193114, \"title\": \"Trainee FE Maintainer (Gitlab) - Deepika Guliani\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-03 05:03:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Basic setup\\n\\n1. [x] Read the [code review page in the handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/) and the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html).\\n1. [x] Understand [how to become a maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#how-to-become-a-project-maintainer) and add yourself as a [trainee maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer) in the [team database](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md). (MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/105456+)\\n\\n## Working towards becoming a maintainer\\n\\nThese are only guidelines. Remember that there is no specific timeline on this.\\n\\nAs part of your journey towards becoming a maintainer, you may find it useful to:\\n\\n1. [ ] Act as a coach in a big deliverable that requires [following the planning step](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/fe_guide/development_process.html#planning-development) as part of the trainee program.\\n1. [x] [Shadow a maintainer](#code-review-pairing) while they review an MR. This will allow you to get insight into the thought processes involved.\\n1. [x] [Have a maintainer shadow *you*](#code-review-pairing) while you review an MR *as if you were a maintainer* . Ideally, this would be with a different maintainer to the above, so you can get different insights.\\n1. [x] *Optional:* [Consider finding a mentor](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer-mentorship-pilot-program) to help you become a maintainer.\\n\\nIt is up to you to ensure that you are getting enough MRs to review, and of varied types. All engineers are reviewers, so you should already be receiving regular reviews from Reviewer Roulette. You could also seek out more reviews from your team, or #frontend Slack channels.\\n\\nYour reviews should aim to cover maintainer responsibilities as well as reviewer responsibilities. Your approval means you think it is ready to merge.\\n\\nAfter each MR is merged or closed, add a discussion to this issue using this template:\\n\\n```markdown\\n### (Merge request title): (Merge request URL)\\n\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I suggested/identified/noted...\\\")\\n\\nPost-review (opportunities to learn):\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I missed...\\\" or \\\"Merged as-is\\\")\\n\\n(Maintainer who reviewed this merge request) Please add feedback, and compare\\nthis review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\nThe purpose of comparing your review to the maintainer's review is to engage in active learning and expand your list of items to consider. Remember, different maintainers are going to identify different issues in the same code. As long as you are not missing large errors or bugs, don't feel like you are doing a bad job if you and a maintainer make different suggestions.\\n\\n**Note:** Do not include reviews of security MRs because review feedback might reveal security issue details.\\n\\n**Tip:** There are [tools](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/tools-and-tips/#trainee-maintainer-issue-upkeep) available to assist with this task.\\n\\n### Code Review Pairing\\n\\nMuch like pair programming, pairing on code review is a great way to knowledge share and collaborate on merge request. This is a great activity for trainee maintainers to participate with maintainers for learning their process of code review.\\n\\nA **private code review session** (unrecorded) involves one primary reviewer, and a shadow. If more than one shadow wishes to observe a private session, please consider obtaining consent from the merge request author.\\n\\nA **public code review session** involves a primary reviewer and one or more shadows in a recorded session that is released publicly, for example to GitLab Unfiltered.\\n\\n* If the merge request author is a GitLab team member, please consider obtaining consent from them.\\n* If the merge request author is a community contributor, you **must** obtain consent from them.\\n* Do **not** release reviews of security merge requests publicly.\\n\\n## When you're ready to make it official\\n\\nWhen reviews have accumulated, and recent reviews consistently fulfill maintainer responsibilities, any maintainer can take the next step. The trainee should also feel free to discuss their progress with their manager or any maintainer at any time.\\n\\n1. [ ] Create a merge request updating [your team member entry](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md) proposing yourself as a maintainer.\\n1. [ ] Keep reviewing, start merging :metal:\", \"milestone_id\": null, \"iid\": 34345, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 244675350, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:15 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 11701495, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 17069039, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 130812, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2015-11-27 21:29:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-04-27 10:56:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 8595532, \"title\": \"trainee maintainer\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": null, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125868 --\u003e\\n### Remove hard coded language: gitlab-org/gitlab!125868\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove hard coded language\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Looked good to me , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536524660, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130137 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder: gitlab-org/gitlab!130137\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-28 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984745, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134349 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!134349\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ad0fef742d45c5008c793f75979365880c402acb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608130962, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127788 --\u003e\\n### Fixing problems with project overview: gitlab-org/gitlab!127788\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixing problems with project overview\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772209, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Dependency updates are often \\\"waived through\\\". You took the time to understand what's going on and tried out the update locally :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563423640, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to update the description of the MR ( not blocking )\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503796209, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127151 --\u003e\\n### Fix image_list_row_spec.js: gitlab-org/gitlab!127151\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix image_list_row_spec.js\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:35:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670465, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure ! Thank you @fguibert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507118687, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125939 --\u003e\\n### Add codeowners validation block: gitlab-org/gitlab!125939\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add codeowners validation block\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b4deb31b91d08bedeb6d231d1b3de07dfa0a30f1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273491, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested a nitpick to put a repeatedly tested component to a variable \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463155402, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125496 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!125496\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656852, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125982 --\u003e\\n### Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency: gitlab-org/gitlab!125982\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jivanvl please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f32b176e44c8c85d053beecdcaa3adda46362829\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547153, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to \\n     - to follow frontend dev guidelines for exported constants\\n     - not duplicate issue list queries right now but move everything to shared in the next iteration , making the cleanup more efficient\\n     - refactor the jest specs to follow the naming conventions, remove unwanted code and add a couple of extra tests - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125877#note_1475901603 \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: The maintainer added a non-blocking suggestion to add more test coverage\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina @tristan.read in please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1479325916, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125255 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope: gitlab-org/gitlab!125255\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 15:12:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393023, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130145 --\u003e\\n### Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!130145\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-25 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4ba705c0455a37a6bdf3b1cea4d9624e5453c39c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1528942055, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - not to use name with component when it is already used in hidden element\\n      - edit the test-id naming convention , was using `js-` naming convention\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489916587, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!121585 --\u003e\\n### Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects: gitlab-org/gitlab!121585\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@terrichu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:53:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445812, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132467 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from discussion_filter_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!132467\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fc3f4f17352251bc002c8612d6b82abd0d053d14\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593896320, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133725 --\u003e\\n### Basic group multiselect support for user token: gitlab-org/gitlab!133725\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Basic group multiselect support for user token\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e7fa81abfa9f541daf659dea19009afbab49a12\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131042, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- It was a small clean change , nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524201744, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for encouraging the MR author to use robust testing assertions. Great review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3540517, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539521470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to use kebab case for `data-testid` selectors\\n   - use `toMatchObect` in tests\\n   - use `toBe` for primitive values testing\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed some non blocking suggestions on comment rephrasing and changing tests description\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524216788, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127240 --\u003e\\n### Improve Value stream dashboard loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!127240\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Improve Value stream dashboard loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nI took it in half review from @jrushford as he was going on PTO\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - some changes to use computed classes on the element in a readable way\\n   - not to use `data-qa-selector` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert was generous to take it up and complete the review :bow: \\n\\nCan you please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review ? Thank you :thank_you:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524230146, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure thank you so much @pburdette :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541007009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: \\n    - to add Sentry logging for error scenarios\\n    - creating a helper function to set the data properties and write specs for it for changes made in haml file \\n    - to use `$emit` instead of `trigger` for testing an emitted event for component \\n- :mag: I identified to prevent failing tests in vue3 compat mode\\n    - an extra use of `nextTick`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463179030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129052 --\u003e\\n### Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure: gitlab-org/gitlab!129052\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dianalogan please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"86bc625b2e896a5c7ae1c21be7483ad6ce374aa8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849365, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Keep an eye out for missing test coverage. Especially when the MR deals with fixing a bug. We want to make sure it has good test coverage so the bug isn't introduced again. \\n\\nOverall good review :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4477803, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539565882, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @leipert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568899677, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @f_caplette :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568898395, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted to use $emit rather than $trigger but since the wrapper was native html element , trigger made more sense \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457667075, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125181 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!125181\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 09:52:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456369541, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124783 --\u003e\\n### Hook up update schedule mutation: gitlab-org/gitlab!124783\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hook up update schedule mutation\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alberts-gitlab please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add tests in `board_card_inner_spec.js`  but they will be added when rspecs are written for the same in future\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed asking why we prefer `eventHub` still\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463161255, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125479 --\u003e\\n### Dismiss modal after increasing access level: gitlab-org/gitlab!125479\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Dismiss modal after increasing access level\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ddavison please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:53 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656907, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125947 --\u003e\\n### Fix wrapping pattern of buttons: gitlab-org/gitlab!125947\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix wrapping pattern of buttons\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good suggestions and questions, not much else to comment on regarding this MR. Keep it up :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1465234546, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125971 --\u003e\\n### Mark vulnerability_details component as deprecated: gitlab-org/gitlab!125971\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"85d4a1316a06e5c11f902081a5bc9507930a634f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @leipert :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- A very small and clean MR to remove an existing FF, no feedback as such\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484705445, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified that the dropdown is closing when we click the copy button which is different from the original behaviour\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473663483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nLooked good to be since a helper method was added. Passed on to the maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to write test for the helper method in both the ee and ce version\\n\\n@mrincon please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473664730, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123522 --\u003e\\n### Implement search for group wikis: gitlab-org/gitlab!123522\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Implement search for group wikis\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@johnmason please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273525, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125980 --\u003e\\n### Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!125980\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123019 --\u003e\\n### Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\": gitlab-org/gitlab!123019\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\"\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470936880, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Did not review this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471435298, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124533 --\u003e\\n### Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!124533\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:50 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445781, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     1. To apply the new eslint rule files where it was used rather than disabling it\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471437751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125196 --\u003e\\n### Add no hard coded url eslint rules: gitlab-org/gitlab!125196\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add no hard coded url eslint rules\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:45 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that it was a small MR with data attribute changes for selection , approved it as is without any feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is \\n\\n@ddavison @justin_ho please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471438997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add a jest test case when the dataset property `cannot-merge` property is not provided\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471440135, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125555 --\u003e\\n### Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar: gitlab-org/gitlab!125555\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-10 10:06:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960557, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125509 --\u003e\\n### Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance: gitlab-org/gitlab!125509\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960568, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add the changes behind a FF just to be sure since this was a change in the head tags and we could not see any potential differences in local gdk and .com\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is **but the maintainer agreed that an FF would be good**\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471441009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested using utility classes at multiple css file changes to reduce the css page bundle size\\n\\nIt was a great improvement to see the final changes made only to the template file\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:48:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471442069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Nothing to suggest , it was a small ~frontend change adding a language attribute to html. Looked good :white_check_mark: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz @psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471443156, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n    - to use computed properties and constants\\n    - to remove redundant code like - `v-if` and `v-show` should never be together\\n    - to remove console logs \\n    - not to use computed property for constants\\n    - move i18n texts to options of the component\\n    - add a finally for isloading to false irrespective of error or not\\n    - remove redundant `v-else-if` which was not needed\\n    - move multiple `findComponent` in test cases as a variable\\n    - [use findComponent as component rather than name](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331672)\\n    - Use emit instead of trigger for gitlab-ui components in [jest test cases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331686)\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - redundant null check in `v-else`\\n     - passing reload as a function instead of emit \\n     - string extrapolation not need\\n\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471448970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125572 --\u003e\\n### Add Tracing List UI: gitlab-org/gitlab!125572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Tracing List UI\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467872137, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126578 --\u003e\\n### [issue-417870] Migrate button component to Pajamas Button: gitlab-org/gitlab!126578\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"da94499aad2ea3f497f66f74e02dec6b36dc850b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471841737, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This isn't one of the largest MRs, but thanks for the promotion of utility classes over custom CSS :thumbsup: and the nice and respectful interaction with a community contributor.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472031566, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This particular MR was a merge as-is MR thus, did not have any requests for change.\\n\\nFor maintainership, the MRs we are looking for are the more thoughtful technical design decisions and engineering considerations.  Regretfully, I cannot fairly grade your maintainership competency based on this MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 272636, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472314143, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127572 --\u003e\\n### Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times: gitlab-org/gitlab!127572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:20 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3473fc8ed41c758a8384a85eb86d04bca942249f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:19 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813801, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Frontend code didn't require changes so the review was :100:, what I'd expect from a frontend maintainer.\\n\\n-------\\n\\nI often read the entire MR to learn more about our codebase. I may ask for changes if I notice something in the backend, documentation, etc...\\n\\nI'd encourage \\\"holistic\\\" reviews and be ready to comment or ask about any part of the MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1607849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:37:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1607849, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1474957631, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127036 --\u003e\\n### Prevent loading state from showing after undo: gitlab-org/gitlab!127036\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9a4cc70bcb0665ed6a9165b00626054c290aaa69\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620562, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to remove the isSingleRequest for emojiQueries since they would not have large requests\\n    - some UI text changes for proper error description\\n    - unnecessary if condition in code\\n    - Show loader when the emojis are being fetched to show an indicator that a query is being run\\n    - remove not need cache.writeQuery in tests, should work fine with proper request handlers\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed checking that the query is called everytime we update any work item attribute\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1475870222, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125121 --\u003e\\n### Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items: gitlab-org/gitlab!125121\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-19 03:41:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464604003, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126709 --\u003e\\n### Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap: gitlab-org/gitlab!126709\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-22 06:31:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547126, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125877 --\u003e\\n### Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list: gitlab-org/gitlab!125877\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-16 06:31:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-20 09:53:43 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471137287, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani My suggestion about the specs came from specific domain knowledge about Incidents, so I wouldn't worry about that.\\n\\nYour review was detailed and what I would expect from a maintainer :thumbsup_tone1:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3146670, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480510293, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127014 --\u003e\\n### Remove import_details_page feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!127014\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove import_details_page feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124322 --\u003e\\n### Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests: gitlab-org/gitlab!124322\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:38:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480581161, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133508 --\u003e\\n### Project overview Edit button fix: gitlab-org/gitlab!133508\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Project overview Edit button fix\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e8dd22043f74a2b659825529463290378e4528c8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726639, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This was a larger MR so it can be easier to miss some things. From this review:\\n\\n- Keep an eye out for code (string and number literals) that can be replaced with existing constants\\n- For reusable/shared components, check that the code is generic and reusable by others\\n- Generally, question every line of code to check whether it is unneeded or can be simplified\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488788165, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @tristan.read :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 02:03:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484696992, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @mrincon :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484697575, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"sure , thank you @ddavison :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484699692, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small ~frontend changes to use `data-testid` instead of qa selector. Had no feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484703670, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n  * to use `fluid-width` instead of `fluid-content`  for `gl-collapsible-listbox` props\\n  * add an extra test for check for other props for the new dropdown\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1569008648, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n       - to change the naming for labelsContainer and labels in jest test cases\\n       - having a test case to make sure that the injected data property `allowScopedLabels` is injected and also having a default value for the injected prop in the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484715899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126425 --\u003e\\n### Work item header and input UI improvements: gitlab-org/gitlab!126425\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Work item header and input UI improvements\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 06:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469343489, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n     - (non-blocking)to use cache update instead of refetching the issue count when deleting the work item\\n     - to remove unused graphql query \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - to point using constants for work item types\\n     - improve the logic when updating fields by updating the persisted_fields and returning early when no work item found\\n     - use isActive is `issuable_item` to highlight selected item\\n     - update the milestone in the FF file\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484781979, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank for you timely review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11004366, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484911410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128081 --\u003e\\n### Fix bold font not being applied on viewed file after further changes. Add viewed file count to diff.: gitlab-org/gitlab!128081\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"be8bab870d9d7406215dcb7751daa1602a6c4d04\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495053415, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127937 --\u003e\\n### [issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states: gitlab-org/gitlab!127937\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:16 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758897, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add screenshots instead of videos in the MR description which gives more clarity  , but it was a non blocking comment hence approved.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495110152, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495112796, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - to use constants for \\\"group\\\" and \\\"project\\\"\\n     - to use scoped strings for translations \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499990702, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125661 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!125661\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-04 03:28:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758939, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - To use `GlDisclosureDropdown` instead of `GlListBox` according to the use case\\n     - To Add accessibility `toggleSrText` prop to dropdown\\n     - to change jest test case string ( nitpick )\\n     - to use `mount` instead of `mountExtended` since no testid was used\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499998030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127996 --\u003e\\n### Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown: gitlab-org/gitlab!127996\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758883, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Minimal changes and looked good to me without any changes, passed on to maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499999096, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126667 --\u003e\\n### Add view cache for PWA manifest.json: gitlab-org/gitlab!126667\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add view cache for PWA manifest.json\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-29 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492740118, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani this was a super large MR, thanks for tackling it and dropping your questions!\\n\\n\u003e I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nIt's interesting to note that the hidden element was actually **needed**. It just wasn't obvious **why**. It took some digging to figure out the reason behind the pattern used there.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2233420, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1497804374, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to\\n    - Add a test to make sure that resolver is called a particular number of times in addition to being called with params\\n    - renaming of some tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n    - rename the variable `mutationLoading` to `isDeleteInprogress` \\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1506027507, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127958 --\u003e\\n### Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination: gitlab-org/gitlab!127958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 08:22:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1496495447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggested changes , small and clean MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558649388, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change all FF's to name the FF's being used in tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out a small test description change\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558673332, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128324 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Various fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab!128324\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Various fixes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-08 03:14:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1500078923, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - To avoid `if-else` for apollo mutate\\n    - delete unnecessary computed props\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503790443, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127900 --\u003e\\n### Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards: gitlab-org/gitlab!127900\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-05 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758913, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to change the wording of some of the tests ( use verbs )\\n    - to move some reuseable components in the tests to the scope of the file and make available to all tests\\n    - remove unwanted assertions in tests\\n    - use `props()` instead of `attributes()` in tests\\n    - use i18n for reuseable constant strings\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507109492, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128088 --\u003e\\n### Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper: gitlab-org/gitlab!128088\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 03:50:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503854140, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't think the variable rename nitpick was a miss, it was just my opinion.\\n\\nThe UX review was skipped due to the team circumstances, but it's still something to keep in mind when reviewing.\\n\\nIt was a good review from you overall :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4846639, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507111595, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove unwanted props\\n   - use conditional chaining for computed props\\n   - remove unwanted hover class from options\\n   - use constants for icon strings from backend\\n   - use `data-testid` selectors instead of `data-qa` selectors\\n   - remove dead code\\n   - use `i18n` for strings\\n   - simplify names of props and prop values as well\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507117825, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126773 --\u003e\\n### Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files: gitlab-org/gitlab!126773\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:27:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493228070, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125260 --\u003e\\n### Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki: gitlab-org/gitlab!125260\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8373453d6ae6f7cb78780555186a249ed82f7a80\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!111116 --\u003e\\n### Display pull command for container registry tag: gitlab-org/gitlab!111116\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616c84e2577641082d10401f5a19fea04ac39323\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1510643149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126836 --\u003e\\n### Fix: group_select has render with older data: gitlab-org/gitlab!126836\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix: group_select has render with older data\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@peterhegman please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b9b2f391cef771e5b41cfa3d74c155b0e464b5f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for your review in that MR Deepika :bow: You made the right call approving it as is while still raising that UX quirk.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3732265, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1521576364, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove some unwanted lines of code\\n   - not to pass an empty object as a param for a util function\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1520453535, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128700 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count: gitlab-org/gitlab!128700\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to rename component event names to make more sense\\n   - to remove `isSingleRequest` from apollo query context after `unbatch_graphql_queries` flag is on on gitlab.com\\n   - conditional chaining for object properties\\n   - use computed props\\n   - use `toEqual` rather than `toStrictEqual`\\n   - instead of manually updating store state in tests , use store action dispatch\\n   - use `toHaveBeenCalledTimes` which will also check if the mock is called rather than just called mock\\n   - not to use `toBeDefined` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - using existing strings for translation\\n      - simplifying the property access by optional chaining\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558758161, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130784 --\u003e\\n### Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!130784\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-09 06:31:34 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541160506, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126649 --\u003e\\n### Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!126649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1498635175, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129775 --\u003e\\n### Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary: gitlab-org/gitlab!129775\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:59 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1522244292, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133476 --\u003e\\n### Remove issuable features moved popover: gitlab-org/gitlab!133476\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove issuable features moved popover\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@djadmin please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c3f7f75559ae30c476f441cc34c2ee37003ddfac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726662, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134178 --\u003e\\n### Migrate work item milestone dropdown to listbox: gitlab-org/gitlab!134178\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ee21d068c9fa91cd92f22ecaca9599cbfcb803e5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481959, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133406 --\u003e\\n### Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid: gitlab-org/gitlab!133406\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@sliaquat please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c497ef797d3e07bcde187480530eb49d015ac9fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726690, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134338 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue: gitlab-org/gitlab!134338\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f27e16c0733dac24965412a9e4f105b22695f1a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481935, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"You provided an excellent review, keep up the good work :rocket: \\n\\nThere wasn't a lot for me to find so no worries. \\n\\nThe only Feedback I can share is to be cautious with suggesting such [\\\"simplifications\\\"](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127240#note_1484661059) in cases where the scope of the problem is too big to be understood very quickly. \\n\\nI've seen too many bugs being introduced by such \\\"simplifications\\\". I would recommend to still address these but with a more open question:\\n\\n\\\"Could you help me understand why we would need this additional check on this value?\\\"\\n\\nThis will lead to the same result but reduce the risk to remove a needed check in a hurry.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7293390, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1526853785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested some minor variable naming changes \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to add test cases/coverage for the new date_timestamp\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538915383, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130013 --\u003e\\n### Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report: gitlab-org/gitlab!130013\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984874, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to use `attributes` function for testing the href of the component\\n    - let go of `exists` since that test will fail anyways\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536523693, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130100 --\u003e\\n### Move job sidebar buttons to header: gitlab-org/gitlab!130100\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move job sidebar buttons to header\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-30 06:31:02 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984776, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to use `default to 0` for prop type `Number`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536528512, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129895 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!129895\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524053220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , small MR with clean changes :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544850303, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130873 --\u003e\\n### Add background color to new MR tabs: gitlab-org/gitlab!130873\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add background color to new MR tabs\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543203980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @ealcantara :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544853007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , minimal ~frontend changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:23:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544852532, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130649 --\u003e\\n### Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License: gitlab-org/gitlab!130649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-02 06:30:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130652 --\u003e\\n### Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!130652\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alexpooley please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811596, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130616 --\u003e\\n### Draft: Add possibility for minimal forks: gitlab-org/gitlab!130616\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ab03e6bb588b8f72ec6195cfa6aa2d31a3b6c6d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811647, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130935 --\u003e\\n### Move Service Desk lists app under Issues: gitlab-org/gitlab!130935\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move Service Desk lists app under Issues\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130810 --\u003e\\n### Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend: gitlab-org/gitlab!130810\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@kushalpandya please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd7a7735f8a732d3a2b13c0079ae047db90b9288\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543204010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130075 --\u003e\\n### Hide search bar if below threshold: gitlab-org/gitlab!130075\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hide search bar if below threshold\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@tristan.read please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ae64b6b7bd2950d31c54abb361e264623276c9dc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984827, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No changes , just fixing failing pipelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546650918, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggestions , it only involved changing `data-testid` changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546653878, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125649 --\u003e\\n### Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming: gitlab-org/gitlab!125649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@huzaifaiftikhar1 please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984893, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested if there is a capability of adding a loading placeholder in the dropdown with the loading indicator ? ( Like `Loading`) \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549132611, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130986 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!130986\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845350, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129958 --\u003e\\n### Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color: gitlab-org/gitlab!129958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-12 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501750, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131028 --\u003e\\n### Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle: gitlab-org/gitlab!131028\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501694, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified \\n     - to remove the background for Progress widget in dark mode as well\\n     - update the border over hover similar in all the widgets\\n     - sync the background color of dropdowns like inputs in milestone and iterations\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:35:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:22:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484788602, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129219 --\u003e\\n### [Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived: gitlab-org/gitlab!129219\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845403, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130678 --\u003e\\n### Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0: gitlab-org/gitlab!130678\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:54 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845382, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked a question regarding the validity of an extra variable which led to fixing a bug :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562749106, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131737 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables: gitlab-org/gitlab!131737\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560771819, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change a test description to depict the true state of the `isCollapsed`. But it was such a pleasure reviewing the MR as it was one of the best I have seen in GitLab\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n   - cleanup `getCssClassDimensions` in mock\\n   - manually add `wrapper.destroy` in the afterEach block\\n   - group `mouse enter` tests into a describe block to prevent repetion\\n   - remove translating strings while testing in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562756509, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131918 --\u003e\\n### How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks: gitlab-org/gitlab!131918\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aqualls please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aecca61bc39672e2a9940fae4a8788cf2daf41fa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772193, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that I could not verify the MR with multiple back and forth resulting in updating the description a couple of times to correct the FF mentioned in the steps to reproduce.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:30:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560773323, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to have feature flag check as well for new entry in dashboard list\\n   - using computed property\\n   - change the test case wordings a little\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing not to use wrapper vm constant property in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:05:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503795483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hey there @deepika.guliani! Most of my points here were about specs readability and predictability. There was nothing here that would have prevented a merge, but sometimes when asking small questions, we find some underlying problems and understand the why.\\n\\nFor example, [when I proposed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/131028#note_1555293432) to move the `toggle?.remove` call to the afterEach block, it was a nitpick and it did not block merge, but by pointing it out, the author and I had a chat and we found out that the wrapper was being mounted twice and that's why there were some issues! This did not impact the tests right now, but it might have in the future as more and more tests were added and then the bug becomes harder to find.\\n\\nThis is not to say that you missed anything really (your reviews are all great!). More that especially in specs, it's easy to miss a lot of underlying problems and it's worth spending a bit of extra time to make sure that everything behave as it should, not just that tests are passing.\\n\\nKeep up the awesome work!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5327378, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563502843, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131951 --\u003e\\n### Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!131951\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:16:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461754, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions, ~frontend light MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is, no ~frontend feedback\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571569999, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129369 --\u003e\\n### Update trial column: gitlab-org/gitlab!129369\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update trial column\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524194801, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132846 --\u003e\\n### Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors: gitlab-org/gitlab!132846\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339261, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-02 12:40:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549256589, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions , clean MR \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587381535, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132832 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!132832\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-30 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339281, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested for a ~UX review since this might have more touching points than mentioned. The code looked good to me.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n  @himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587384960, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587385136, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132613 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix some error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!132613\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix some error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-28 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1581646466, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133275 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand: gitlab-org/gitlab!133275\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 06:31:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4112f7b6c1c062a21e7a8e161d3425dbd7952fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589009889, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add some test cases and `toMatchObject` for testing more props of the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589277355, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131928 --\u003e\\n### Update artifacts page layout: gitlab-org/gitlab!131928\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update artifacts page layout\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461780, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked some clarifying questions, but nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@justin_ho  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589281507, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131143 --\u003e\\n### License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!131143\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@chloeliu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:47 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1556289060, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nBackend heavy , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589285808, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131849 --\u003e\\n### Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids: gitlab-org/gitlab!131849\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mlapierre please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-20 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772203, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: Just to add a before and after video to make the description more clear\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589290037, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"It was a nice initial review! Your suggestion was valuable.\\n\\nGreat attention to detail, important findings, helpful comments. \\n\\nGreat work @deepika.guliani :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10762712, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 14:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:22:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589877102, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133200 --\u003e\\n### Fix devops empty state illustration: gitlab-org/gitlab!133200\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix devops empty state illustration\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pskorupa please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1590705608, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small MR with no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n`@ealcantara` please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1592642788, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good review with good suggestions! A couple of comments:\\n\\n- I believe we don't prefer `||` over `??`, both are perfectly valid\\n- I believe we don't prefer `toEqual` to `toStrictEqual`, in fact `toStrictEqual` is arguably better since it is a more precise check\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 12:36:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-09 05:08:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593026254, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134245 --\u003e\\n### Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!134245\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@acroitor please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23efd83fe1a18f112ebcb8e158b67b5e509014c2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131000, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131825 --\u003e\\n### Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics: gitlab-org/gitlab!131825\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"36b2e435a8457e49253a82a3156bb175daaeabe2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571528474, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134591 --\u003e\\n### Fix epic board children count and weight on card: gitlab-org/gitlab!134591\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix epic board children count and weight on card\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5b708cd017dd2ef2bf249c20c4006a1f13e99031\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1609999412, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134377 --\u003e\\n### Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget: gitlab-org/gitlab!134377\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d4a6612056c26010216970d82e54952419c1c886\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1611728905, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134730 --\u003e\\n### Display abuse report notes (frontend): gitlab-org/gitlab!134730\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2530d3cd51ab399da0ba2945e6d0f64ad38f0d3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1615989743, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Closing this since https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/129537+ is merged\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1fae663519385999828d1931b66d7b7f1e52da66\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1617560916, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3540517, \"username\": \"ealcantara\", \"name\": \"Enrique Alc\\u00e1ntara\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4477803, \"username\": \"pburdette\", \"name\": \"Payton Burdette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 272636, \"username\": \"ddavison\", \"name\": \"Dan Davison\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 1607849, \"username\": \"mrincon\", \"name\": \"Miguel Rincon\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3146670, \"username\": \"tristan.read\", \"name\": \"Tristan Read\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11004366, \"username\": \"eduardosanz\", \"name\": \"Eduardo Sanz Garc\\u00eda\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 2233420, \"username\": \"pslaughter\", \"name\": \"Paul Slaughter\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4846639, \"username\": \"fguibert\", \"name\": \"Florie Guibert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3732265, \"username\": \"pgascouvaillancourt\", \"name\": \"Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 7293390, \"username\": \"jannik_lehmann\", \"name\": \"Jannik Lehmann\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 5327378, \"username\": \"f_caplette\", \"name\": \"Fr\\u00e9d\\u00e9ric Caplette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 10762712, \"username\": \"arfedoro\", \"name\": \"Artur Fedorov\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 6543, \"name\": \"GitLab.com\", \"path\": \"gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 7764, \"name\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"path\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 17069039}]}","query":"Summarize with bullet points.","query_id":"731a2f82962a49568a9f5cb82b088c99","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130193114","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130193114, \"title\": \"Trainee FE Maintainer (Gitlab) - Deepika Guliani\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-03 05:03:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Basic setup\\n\\n1. [x] Read the [code review page in the handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/) and the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html).\\n1. [x] Understand [how to become a maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#how-to-become-a-project-maintainer) and add yourself as a [trainee maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer) in the [team database](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md). (MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/105456+)\\n\\n## Working towards becoming a maintainer\\n\\nThese are only guidelines. Remember that there is no specific timeline on this.\\n\\nAs part of your journey towards becoming a maintainer, you may find it useful to:\\n\\n1. [ ] Act as a coach in a big deliverable that requires [following the planning step](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/fe_guide/development_process.html#planning-development) as part of the trainee program.\\n1. [x] [Shadow a maintainer](#code-review-pairing) while they review an MR. This will allow you to get insight into the thought processes involved.\\n1. [x] [Have a maintainer shadow *you*](#code-review-pairing) while you review an MR *as if you were a maintainer* . Ideally, this would be with a different maintainer to the above, so you can get different insights.\\n1. [x] *Optional:* [Consider finding a mentor](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer-mentorship-pilot-program) to help you become a maintainer.\\n\\nIt is up to you to ensure that you are getting enough MRs to review, and of varied types. All engineers are reviewers, so you should already be receiving regular reviews from Reviewer Roulette. You could also seek out more reviews from your team, or #frontend Slack channels.\\n\\nYour reviews should aim to cover maintainer responsibilities as well as reviewer responsibilities. Your approval means you think it is ready to merge.\\n\\nAfter each MR is merged or closed, add a discussion to this issue using this template:\\n\\n```markdown\\n### (Merge request title): (Merge request URL)\\n\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I suggested/identified/noted...\\\")\\n\\nPost-review (opportunities to learn):\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I missed...\\\" or \\\"Merged as-is\\\")\\n\\n(Maintainer who reviewed this merge request) Please add feedback, and compare\\nthis review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\nThe purpose of comparing your review to the maintainer's review is to engage in active learning and expand your list of items to consider. Remember, different maintainers are going to identify different issues in the same code. As long as you are not missing large errors or bugs, don't feel like you are doing a bad job if you and a maintainer make different suggestions.\\n\\n**Note:** Do not include reviews of security MRs because review feedback might reveal security issue details.\\n\\n**Tip:** There are [tools](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/tools-and-tips/#trainee-maintainer-issue-upkeep) available to assist with this task.\\n\\n### Code Review Pairing\\n\\nMuch like pair programming, pairing on code review is a great way to knowledge share and collaborate on merge request. This is a great activity for trainee maintainers to participate with maintainers for learning their process of code review.\\n\\nA **private code review session** (unrecorded) involves one primary reviewer, and a shadow. If more than one shadow wishes to observe a private session, please consider obtaining consent from the merge request author.\\n\\nA **public code review session** involves a primary reviewer and one or more shadows in a recorded session that is released publicly, for example to GitLab Unfiltered.\\n\\n* If the merge request author is a GitLab team member, please consider obtaining consent from them.\\n* If the merge request author is a community contributor, you **must** obtain consent from them.\\n* Do **not** release reviews of security merge requests publicly.\\n\\n## When you're ready to make it official\\n\\nWhen reviews have accumulated, and recent reviews consistently fulfill maintainer responsibilities, any maintainer can take the next step. The trainee should also feel free to discuss their progress with their manager or any maintainer at any time.\\n\\n1. [ ] Create a merge request updating [your team member entry](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md) proposing yourself as a maintainer.\\n1. [ ] Keep reviewing, start merging :metal:\", \"milestone_id\": null, \"iid\": 34345, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 244675350, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:15 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 11701495, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 17069039, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 130812, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2015-11-27 21:29:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-04-27 10:56:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 8595532, \"title\": \"trainee maintainer\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": null, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125868 --\u003e\\n### Remove hard coded language: gitlab-org/gitlab!125868\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove hard coded language\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Looked good to me , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536524660, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130137 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder: gitlab-org/gitlab!130137\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-28 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984745, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134349 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!134349\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ad0fef742d45c5008c793f75979365880c402acb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608130962, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127788 --\u003e\\n### Fixing problems with project overview: gitlab-org/gitlab!127788\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixing problems with project overview\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772209, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Dependency updates are often \\\"waived through\\\". You took the time to understand what's going on and tried out the update locally :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563423640, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to update the description of the MR ( not blocking )\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503796209, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127151 --\u003e\\n### Fix image_list_row_spec.js: gitlab-org/gitlab!127151\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix image_list_row_spec.js\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:35:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670465, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure ! Thank you @fguibert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507118687, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125939 --\u003e\\n### Add codeowners validation block: gitlab-org/gitlab!125939\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add codeowners validation block\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b4deb31b91d08bedeb6d231d1b3de07dfa0a30f1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273491, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested a nitpick to put a repeatedly tested component to a variable \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463155402, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125496 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!125496\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656852, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125982 --\u003e\\n### Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency: gitlab-org/gitlab!125982\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jivanvl please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f32b176e44c8c85d053beecdcaa3adda46362829\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547153, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to \\n     - to follow frontend dev guidelines for exported constants\\n     - not duplicate issue list queries right now but move everything to shared in the next iteration , making the cleanup more efficient\\n     - refactor the jest specs to follow the naming conventions, remove unwanted code and add a couple of extra tests - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125877#note_1475901603 \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: The maintainer added a non-blocking suggestion to add more test coverage\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina @tristan.read in please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1479325916, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125255 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope: gitlab-org/gitlab!125255\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 15:12:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393023, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130145 --\u003e\\n### Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!130145\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-25 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4ba705c0455a37a6bdf3b1cea4d9624e5453c39c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1528942055, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - not to use name with component when it is already used in hidden element\\n      - edit the test-id naming convention , was using `js-` naming convention\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489916587, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!121585 --\u003e\\n### Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects: gitlab-org/gitlab!121585\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@terrichu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:53:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445812, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132467 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from discussion_filter_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!132467\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fc3f4f17352251bc002c8612d6b82abd0d053d14\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593896320, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133725 --\u003e\\n### Basic group multiselect support for user token: gitlab-org/gitlab!133725\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Basic group multiselect support for user token\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e7fa81abfa9f541daf659dea19009afbab49a12\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131042, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- It was a small clean change , nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524201744, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for encouraging the MR author to use robust testing assertions. Great review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3540517, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539521470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to use kebab case for `data-testid` selectors\\n   - use `toMatchObect` in tests\\n   - use `toBe` for primitive values testing\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed some non blocking suggestions on comment rephrasing and changing tests description\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524216788, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127240 --\u003e\\n### Improve Value stream dashboard loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!127240\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Improve Value stream dashboard loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nI took it in half review from @jrushford as he was going on PTO\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - some changes to use computed classes on the element in a readable way\\n   - not to use `data-qa-selector` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert was generous to take it up and complete the review :bow: \\n\\nCan you please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review ? Thank you :thank_you:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524230146, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure thank you so much @pburdette :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541007009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: \\n    - to add Sentry logging for error scenarios\\n    - creating a helper function to set the data properties and write specs for it for changes made in haml file \\n    - to use `$emit` instead of `trigger` for testing an emitted event for component \\n- :mag: I identified to prevent failing tests in vue3 compat mode\\n    - an extra use of `nextTick`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463179030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129052 --\u003e\\n### Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure: gitlab-org/gitlab!129052\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dianalogan please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"86bc625b2e896a5c7ae1c21be7483ad6ce374aa8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849365, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Keep an eye out for missing test coverage. Especially when the MR deals with fixing a bug. We want to make sure it has good test coverage so the bug isn't introduced again. \\n\\nOverall good review :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4477803, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539565882, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @leipert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568899677, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @f_caplette :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568898395, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted to use $emit rather than $trigger but since the wrapper was native html element , trigger made more sense \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457667075, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125181 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!125181\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 09:52:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456369541, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124783 --\u003e\\n### Hook up update schedule mutation: gitlab-org/gitlab!124783\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hook up update schedule mutation\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alberts-gitlab please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add tests in `board_card_inner_spec.js`  but they will be added when rspecs are written for the same in future\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed asking why we prefer `eventHub` still\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463161255, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125479 --\u003e\\n### Dismiss modal after increasing access level: gitlab-org/gitlab!125479\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Dismiss modal after increasing access level\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ddavison please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:53 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656907, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125947 --\u003e\\n### Fix wrapping pattern of buttons: gitlab-org/gitlab!125947\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix wrapping pattern of buttons\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good suggestions and questions, not much else to comment on regarding this MR. Keep it up :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1465234546, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125971 --\u003e\\n### Mark vulnerability_details component as deprecated: gitlab-org/gitlab!125971\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"85d4a1316a06e5c11f902081a5bc9507930a634f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @leipert :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- A very small and clean MR to remove an existing FF, no feedback as such\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484705445, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified that the dropdown is closing when we click the copy button which is different from the original behaviour\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473663483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nLooked good to be since a helper method was added. Passed on to the maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to write test for the helper method in both the ee and ce version\\n\\n@mrincon please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473664730, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123522 --\u003e\\n### Implement search for group wikis: gitlab-org/gitlab!123522\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Implement search for group wikis\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@johnmason please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273525, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125980 --\u003e\\n### Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!125980\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123019 --\u003e\\n### Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\": gitlab-org/gitlab!123019\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\"\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470936880, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Did not review this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471435298, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124533 --\u003e\\n### Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!124533\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:50 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445781, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     1. To apply the new eslint rule files where it was used rather than disabling it\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471437751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125196 --\u003e\\n### Add no hard coded url eslint rules: gitlab-org/gitlab!125196\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add no hard coded url eslint rules\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:45 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that it was a small MR with data attribute changes for selection , approved it as is without any feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is \\n\\n@ddavison @justin_ho please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471438997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add a jest test case when the dataset property `cannot-merge` property is not provided\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471440135, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125555 --\u003e\\n### Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar: gitlab-org/gitlab!125555\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-10 10:06:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960557, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125509 --\u003e\\n### Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance: gitlab-org/gitlab!125509\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960568, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add the changes behind a FF just to be sure since this was a change in the head tags and we could not see any potential differences in local gdk and .com\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is **but the maintainer agreed that an FF would be good**\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471441009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested using utility classes at multiple css file changes to reduce the css page bundle size\\n\\nIt was a great improvement to see the final changes made only to the template file\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:48:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471442069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Nothing to suggest , it was a small ~frontend change adding a language attribute to html. Looked good :white_check_mark: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz @psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471443156, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n    - to use computed properties and constants\\n    - to remove redundant code like - `v-if` and `v-show` should never be together\\n    - to remove console logs \\n    - not to use computed property for constants\\n    - move i18n texts to options of the component\\n    - add a finally for isloading to false irrespective of error or not\\n    - remove redundant `v-else-if` which was not needed\\n    - move multiple `findComponent` in test cases as a variable\\n    - [use findComponent as component rather than name](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331672)\\n    - Use emit instead of trigger for gitlab-ui components in [jest test cases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331686)\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - redundant null check in `v-else`\\n     - passing reload as a function instead of emit \\n     - string extrapolation not need\\n\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471448970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125572 --\u003e\\n### Add Tracing List UI: gitlab-org/gitlab!125572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Tracing List UI\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467872137, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126578 --\u003e\\n### [issue-417870] Migrate button component to Pajamas Button: gitlab-org/gitlab!126578\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"da94499aad2ea3f497f66f74e02dec6b36dc850b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471841737, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This isn't one of the largest MRs, but thanks for the promotion of utility classes over custom CSS :thumbsup: and the nice and respectful interaction with a community contributor.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472031566, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This particular MR was a merge as-is MR thus, did not have any requests for change.\\n\\nFor maintainership, the MRs we are looking for are the more thoughtful technical design decisions and engineering considerations.  Regretfully, I cannot fairly grade your maintainership competency based on this MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 272636, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472314143, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127572 --\u003e\\n### Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times: gitlab-org/gitlab!127572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:20 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3473fc8ed41c758a8384a85eb86d04bca942249f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:19 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813801, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Frontend code didn't require changes so the review was :100:, what I'd expect from a frontend maintainer.\\n\\n-------\\n\\nI often read the entire MR to learn more about our codebase. I may ask for changes if I notice something in the backend, documentation, etc...\\n\\nI'd encourage \\\"holistic\\\" reviews and be ready to comment or ask about any part of the MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1607849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:37:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1607849, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1474957631, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127036 --\u003e\\n### Prevent loading state from showing after undo: gitlab-org/gitlab!127036\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9a4cc70bcb0665ed6a9165b00626054c290aaa69\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620562, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to remove the isSingleRequest for emojiQueries since they would not have large requests\\n    - some UI text changes for proper error description\\n    - unnecessary if condition in code\\n    - Show loader when the emojis are being fetched to show an indicator that a query is being run\\n    - remove not need cache.writeQuery in tests, should work fine with proper request handlers\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed checking that the query is called everytime we update any work item attribute\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1475870222, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125121 --\u003e\\n### Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items: gitlab-org/gitlab!125121\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-19 03:41:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464604003, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126709 --\u003e\\n### Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap: gitlab-org/gitlab!126709\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-22 06:31:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547126, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125877 --\u003e\\n### Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list: gitlab-org/gitlab!125877\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-16 06:31:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-20 09:53:43 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471137287, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani My suggestion about the specs came from specific domain knowledge about Incidents, so I wouldn't worry about that.\\n\\nYour review was detailed and what I would expect from a maintainer :thumbsup_tone1:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3146670, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480510293, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127014 --\u003e\\n### Remove import_details_page feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!127014\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove import_details_page feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124322 --\u003e\\n### Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests: gitlab-org/gitlab!124322\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:38:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480581161, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133508 --\u003e\\n### Project overview Edit button fix: gitlab-org/gitlab!133508\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Project overview Edit button fix\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e8dd22043f74a2b659825529463290378e4528c8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726639, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This was a larger MR so it can be easier to miss some things. From this review:\\n\\n- Keep an eye out for code (string and number literals) that can be replaced with existing constants\\n- For reusable/shared components, check that the code is generic and reusable by others\\n- Generally, question every line of code to check whether it is unneeded or can be simplified\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488788165, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @tristan.read :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 02:03:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484696992, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @mrincon :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484697575, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"sure , thank you @ddavison :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484699692, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small ~frontend changes to use `data-testid` instead of qa selector. Had no feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484703670, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n  * to use `fluid-width` instead of `fluid-content`  for `gl-collapsible-listbox` props\\n  * add an extra test for check for other props for the new dropdown\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1569008648, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n       - to change the naming for labelsContainer and labels in jest test cases\\n       - having a test case to make sure that the injected data property `allowScopedLabels` is injected and also having a default value for the injected prop in the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484715899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126425 --\u003e\\n### Work item header and input UI improvements: gitlab-org/gitlab!126425\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Work item header and input UI improvements\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 06:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469343489, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n     - (non-blocking)to use cache update instead of refetching the issue count when deleting the work item\\n     - to remove unused graphql query \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - to point using constants for work item types\\n     - improve the logic when updating fields by updating the persisted_fields and returning early when no work item found\\n     - use isActive is `issuable_item` to highlight selected item\\n     - update the milestone in the FF file\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484781979, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank for you timely review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11004366, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484911410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128081 --\u003e\\n### Fix bold font not being applied on viewed file after further changes. Add viewed file count to diff.: gitlab-org/gitlab!128081\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"be8bab870d9d7406215dcb7751daa1602a6c4d04\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495053415, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127937 --\u003e\\n### [issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states: gitlab-org/gitlab!127937\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:16 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758897, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add screenshots instead of videos in the MR description which gives more clarity  , but it was a non blocking comment hence approved.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495110152, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495112796, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - to use constants for \\\"group\\\" and \\\"project\\\"\\n     - to use scoped strings for translations \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499990702, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125661 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!125661\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-04 03:28:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758939, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - To use `GlDisclosureDropdown` instead of `GlListBox` according to the use case\\n     - To Add accessibility `toggleSrText` prop to dropdown\\n     - to change jest test case string ( nitpick )\\n     - to use `mount` instead of `mountExtended` since no testid was used\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499998030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127996 --\u003e\\n### Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown: gitlab-org/gitlab!127996\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758883, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Minimal changes and looked good to me without any changes, passed on to maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499999096, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126667 --\u003e\\n### Add view cache for PWA manifest.json: gitlab-org/gitlab!126667\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add view cache for PWA manifest.json\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-29 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492740118, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani this was a super large MR, thanks for tackling it and dropping your questions!\\n\\n\u003e I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nIt's interesting to note that the hidden element was actually **needed**. It just wasn't obvious **why**. It took some digging to figure out the reason behind the pattern used there.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2233420, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1497804374, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to\\n    - Add a test to make sure that resolver is called a particular number of times in addition to being called with params\\n    - renaming of some tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n    - rename the variable `mutationLoading` to `isDeleteInprogress` \\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1506027507, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127958 --\u003e\\n### Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination: gitlab-org/gitlab!127958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 08:22:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1496495447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggested changes , small and clean MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558649388, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change all FF's to name the FF's being used in tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out a small test description change\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558673332, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128324 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Various fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab!128324\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Various fixes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-08 03:14:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1500078923, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - To avoid `if-else` for apollo mutate\\n    - delete unnecessary computed props\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503790443, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127900 --\u003e\\n### Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards: gitlab-org/gitlab!127900\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-05 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758913, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to change the wording of some of the tests ( use verbs )\\n    - to move some reuseable components in the tests to the scope of the file and make available to all tests\\n    - remove unwanted assertions in tests\\n    - use `props()` instead of `attributes()` in tests\\n    - use i18n for reuseable constant strings\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507109492, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128088 --\u003e\\n### Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper: gitlab-org/gitlab!128088\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 03:50:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503854140, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't think the variable rename nitpick was a miss, it was just my opinion.\\n\\nThe UX review was skipped due to the team circumstances, but it's still something to keep in mind when reviewing.\\n\\nIt was a good review from you overall :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4846639, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507111595, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove unwanted props\\n   - use conditional chaining for computed props\\n   - remove unwanted hover class from options\\n   - use constants for icon strings from backend\\n   - use `data-testid` selectors instead of `data-qa` selectors\\n   - remove dead code\\n   - use `i18n` for strings\\n   - simplify names of props and prop values as well\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507117825, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126773 --\u003e\\n### Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files: gitlab-org/gitlab!126773\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:27:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493228070, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125260 --\u003e\\n### Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki: gitlab-org/gitlab!125260\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8373453d6ae6f7cb78780555186a249ed82f7a80\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!111116 --\u003e\\n### Display pull command for container registry tag: gitlab-org/gitlab!111116\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616c84e2577641082d10401f5a19fea04ac39323\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1510643149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126836 --\u003e\\n### Fix: group_select has render with older data: gitlab-org/gitlab!126836\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix: group_select has render with older data\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@peterhegman please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b9b2f391cef771e5b41cfa3d74c155b0e464b5f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for your review in that MR Deepika :bow: You made the right call approving it as is while still raising that UX quirk.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3732265, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1521576364, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove some unwanted lines of code\\n   - not to pass an empty object as a param for a util function\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1520453535, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128700 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count: gitlab-org/gitlab!128700\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to rename component event names to make more sense\\n   - to remove `isSingleRequest` from apollo query context after `unbatch_graphql_queries` flag is on on gitlab.com\\n   - conditional chaining for object properties\\n   - use computed props\\n   - use `toEqual` rather than `toStrictEqual`\\n   - instead of manually updating store state in tests , use store action dispatch\\n   - use `toHaveBeenCalledTimes` which will also check if the mock is called rather than just called mock\\n   - not to use `toBeDefined` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - using existing strings for translation\\n      - simplifying the property access by optional chaining\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558758161, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130784 --\u003e\\n### Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!130784\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-09 06:31:34 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541160506, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126649 --\u003e\\n### Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!126649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1498635175, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129775 --\u003e\\n### Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary: gitlab-org/gitlab!129775\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:59 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1522244292, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133476 --\u003e\\n### Remove issuable features moved popover: gitlab-org/gitlab!133476\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove issuable features moved popover\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@djadmin please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c3f7f75559ae30c476f441cc34c2ee37003ddfac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726662, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134178 --\u003e\\n### Migrate work item milestone dropdown to listbox: gitlab-org/gitlab!134178\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ee21d068c9fa91cd92f22ecaca9599cbfcb803e5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481959, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133406 --\u003e\\n### Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid: gitlab-org/gitlab!133406\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@sliaquat please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c497ef797d3e07bcde187480530eb49d015ac9fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726690, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134338 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue: gitlab-org/gitlab!134338\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f27e16c0733dac24965412a9e4f105b22695f1a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481935, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"You provided an excellent review, keep up the good work :rocket: \\n\\nThere wasn't a lot for me to find so no worries. \\n\\nThe only Feedback I can share is to be cautious with suggesting such [\\\"simplifications\\\"](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127240#note_1484661059) in cases where the scope of the problem is too big to be understood very quickly. \\n\\nI've seen too many bugs being introduced by such \\\"simplifications\\\". I would recommend to still address these but with a more open question:\\n\\n\\\"Could you help me understand why we would need this additional check on this value?\\\"\\n\\nThis will lead to the same result but reduce the risk to remove a needed check in a hurry.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7293390, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1526853785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested some minor variable naming changes \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to add test cases/coverage for the new date_timestamp\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538915383, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130013 --\u003e\\n### Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report: gitlab-org/gitlab!130013\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984874, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to use `attributes` function for testing the href of the component\\n    - let go of `exists` since that test will fail anyways\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536523693, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130100 --\u003e\\n### Move job sidebar buttons to header: gitlab-org/gitlab!130100\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move job sidebar buttons to header\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-30 06:31:02 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984776, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to use `default to 0` for prop type `Number`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536528512, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129895 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!129895\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524053220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , small MR with clean changes :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544850303, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130873 --\u003e\\n### Add background color to new MR tabs: gitlab-org/gitlab!130873\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add background color to new MR tabs\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543203980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @ealcantara :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544853007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , minimal ~frontend changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:23:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544852532, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130649 --\u003e\\n### Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License: gitlab-org/gitlab!130649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-02 06:30:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130652 --\u003e\\n### Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!130652\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alexpooley please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811596, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130616 --\u003e\\n### Draft: Add possibility for minimal forks: gitlab-org/gitlab!130616\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ab03e6bb588b8f72ec6195cfa6aa2d31a3b6c6d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811647, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130935 --\u003e\\n### Move Service Desk lists app under Issues: gitlab-org/gitlab!130935\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move Service Desk lists app under Issues\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130810 --\u003e\\n### Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend: gitlab-org/gitlab!130810\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@kushalpandya please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd7a7735f8a732d3a2b13c0079ae047db90b9288\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543204010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130075 --\u003e\\n### Hide search bar if below threshold: gitlab-org/gitlab!130075\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hide search bar if below threshold\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@tristan.read please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ae64b6b7bd2950d31c54abb361e264623276c9dc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984827, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No changes , just fixing failing pipelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546650918, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggestions , it only involved changing `data-testid` changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546653878, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125649 --\u003e\\n### Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming: gitlab-org/gitlab!125649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@huzaifaiftikhar1 please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984893, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested if there is a capability of adding a loading placeholder in the dropdown with the loading indicator ? ( Like `Loading`) \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549132611, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130986 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!130986\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845350, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129958 --\u003e\\n### Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color: gitlab-org/gitlab!129958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-12 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501750, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131028 --\u003e\\n### Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle: gitlab-org/gitlab!131028\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501694, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified \\n     - to remove the background for Progress widget in dark mode as well\\n     - update the border over hover similar in all the widgets\\n     - sync the background color of dropdowns like inputs in milestone and iterations\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:35:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:22:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484788602, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129219 --\u003e\\n### [Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived: gitlab-org/gitlab!129219\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845403, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130678 --\u003e\\n### Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0: gitlab-org/gitlab!130678\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:54 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845382, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked a question regarding the validity of an extra variable which led to fixing a bug :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562749106, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131737 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables: gitlab-org/gitlab!131737\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560771819, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change a test description to depict the true state of the `isCollapsed`. But it was such a pleasure reviewing the MR as it was one of the best I have seen in GitLab\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n   - cleanup `getCssClassDimensions` in mock\\n   - manually add `wrapper.destroy` in the afterEach block\\n   - group `mouse enter` tests into a describe block to prevent repetion\\n   - remove translating strings while testing in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562756509, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131918 --\u003e\\n### How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks: gitlab-org/gitlab!131918\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aqualls please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aecca61bc39672e2a9940fae4a8788cf2daf41fa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772193, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that I could not verify the MR with multiple back and forth resulting in updating the description a couple of times to correct the FF mentioned in the steps to reproduce.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:30:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560773323, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to have feature flag check as well for new entry in dashboard list\\n   - using computed property\\n   - change the test case wordings a little\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing not to use wrapper vm constant property in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:05:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503795483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hey there @deepika.guliani! Most of my points here were about specs readability and predictability. There was nothing here that would have prevented a merge, but sometimes when asking small questions, we find some underlying problems and understand the why.\\n\\nFor example, [when I proposed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/131028#note_1555293432) to move the `toggle?.remove` call to the afterEach block, it was a nitpick and it did not block merge, but by pointing it out, the author and I had a chat and we found out that the wrapper was being mounted twice and that's why there were some issues! This did not impact the tests right now, but it might have in the future as more and more tests were added and then the bug becomes harder to find.\\n\\nThis is not to say that you missed anything really (your reviews are all great!). More that especially in specs, it's easy to miss a lot of underlying problems and it's worth spending a bit of extra time to make sure that everything behave as it should, not just that tests are passing.\\n\\nKeep up the awesome work!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5327378, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563502843, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131951 --\u003e\\n### Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!131951\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:16:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461754, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions, ~frontend light MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is, no ~frontend feedback\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571569999, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129369 --\u003e\\n### Update trial column: gitlab-org/gitlab!129369\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update trial column\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524194801, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132846 --\u003e\\n### Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors: gitlab-org/gitlab!132846\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339261, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-02 12:40:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549256589, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions , clean MR \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587381535, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132832 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!132832\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-30 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339281, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested for a ~UX review since this might have more touching points than mentioned. The code looked good to me.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n  @himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587384960, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587385136, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132613 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix some error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!132613\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix some error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-28 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1581646466, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133275 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand: gitlab-org/gitlab!133275\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 06:31:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4112f7b6c1c062a21e7a8e161d3425dbd7952fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589009889, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add some test cases and `toMatchObject` for testing more props of the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589277355, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131928 --\u003e\\n### Update artifacts page layout: gitlab-org/gitlab!131928\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update artifacts page layout\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461780, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked some clarifying questions, but nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@justin_ho  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589281507, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131143 --\u003e\\n### License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!131143\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@chloeliu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:47 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1556289060, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nBackend heavy , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589285808, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131849 --\u003e\\n### Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids: gitlab-org/gitlab!131849\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mlapierre please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-20 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772203, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: Just to add a before and after video to make the description more clear\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589290037, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"It was a nice initial review! Your suggestion was valuable.\\n\\nGreat attention to detail, important findings, helpful comments. \\n\\nGreat work @deepika.guliani :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10762712, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 14:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:22:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589877102, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133200 --\u003e\\n### Fix devops empty state illustration: gitlab-org/gitlab!133200\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix devops empty state illustration\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pskorupa please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1590705608, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small MR with no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n`@ealcantara` please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1592642788, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good review with good suggestions! A couple of comments:\\n\\n- I believe we don't prefer `||` over `??`, both are perfectly valid\\n- I believe we don't prefer `toEqual` to `toStrictEqual`, in fact `toStrictEqual` is arguably better since it is a more precise check\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 12:36:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-09 05:08:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593026254, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134245 --\u003e\\n### Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!134245\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@acroitor please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23efd83fe1a18f112ebcb8e158b67b5e509014c2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131000, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131825 --\u003e\\n### Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics: gitlab-org/gitlab!131825\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"36b2e435a8457e49253a82a3156bb175daaeabe2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571528474, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134591 --\u003e\\n### Fix epic board children count and weight on card: gitlab-org/gitlab!134591\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix epic board children count and weight on card\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5b708cd017dd2ef2bf249c20c4006a1f13e99031\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1609999412, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134377 --\u003e\\n### Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget: gitlab-org/gitlab!134377\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d4a6612056c26010216970d82e54952419c1c886\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1611728905, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134730 --\u003e\\n### Display abuse report notes (frontend): gitlab-org/gitlab!134730\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2530d3cd51ab399da0ba2945e6d0f64ad38f0d3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1615989743, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Closing this since https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/129537+ is merged\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1fae663519385999828d1931b66d7b7f1e52da66\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1617560916, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3540517, \"username\": \"ealcantara\", \"name\": \"Enrique Alc\\u00e1ntara\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4477803, \"username\": \"pburdette\", \"name\": \"Payton Burdette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 272636, \"username\": \"ddavison\", \"name\": \"Dan Davison\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 1607849, \"username\": \"mrincon\", \"name\": \"Miguel Rincon\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3146670, \"username\": \"tristan.read\", \"name\": \"Tristan Read\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11004366, \"username\": \"eduardosanz\", \"name\": \"Eduardo Sanz Garc\\u00eda\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 2233420, \"username\": \"pslaughter\", \"name\": \"Paul Slaughter\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4846639, \"username\": \"fguibert\", \"name\": \"Florie Guibert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3732265, \"username\": \"pgascouvaillancourt\", \"name\": \"Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 7293390, \"username\": \"jannik_lehmann\", \"name\": \"Jannik Lehmann\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 5327378, \"username\": \"f_caplette\", \"name\": \"Fr\\u00e9d\\u00e9ric Caplette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 10762712, \"username\": \"arfedoro\", \"name\": \"Artur Fedorov\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 6543, \"name\": \"GitLab.com\", \"path\": \"gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 7764, \"name\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"path\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 17069039}]}","query":"What are the unique use cases raised by commenters in this issue?","query_id":"882091f02cc34657873454ed36b1715f","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130193114","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130193114, \"title\": \"Trainee FE Maintainer (Gitlab) - Deepika Guliani\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-03 05:03:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Basic setup\\n\\n1. [x] Read the [code review page in the handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/) and the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html).\\n1. [x] Understand [how to become a maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#how-to-become-a-project-maintainer) and add yourself as a [trainee maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer) in the [team database](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md). (MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/105456+)\\n\\n## Working towards becoming a maintainer\\n\\nThese are only guidelines. Remember that there is no specific timeline on this.\\n\\nAs part of your journey towards becoming a maintainer, you may find it useful to:\\n\\n1. [ ] Act as a coach in a big deliverable that requires [following the planning step](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/fe_guide/development_process.html#planning-development) as part of the trainee program.\\n1. [x] [Shadow a maintainer](#code-review-pairing) while they review an MR. This will allow you to get insight into the thought processes involved.\\n1. [x] [Have a maintainer shadow *you*](#code-review-pairing) while you review an MR *as if you were a maintainer* . Ideally, this would be with a different maintainer to the above, so you can get different insights.\\n1. [x] *Optional:* [Consider finding a mentor](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer-mentorship-pilot-program) to help you become a maintainer.\\n\\nIt is up to you to ensure that you are getting enough MRs to review, and of varied types. All engineers are reviewers, so you should already be receiving regular reviews from Reviewer Roulette. You could also seek out more reviews from your team, or #frontend Slack channels.\\n\\nYour reviews should aim to cover maintainer responsibilities as well as reviewer responsibilities. Your approval means you think it is ready to merge.\\n\\nAfter each MR is merged or closed, add a discussion to this issue using this template:\\n\\n```markdown\\n### (Merge request title): (Merge request URL)\\n\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I suggested/identified/noted...\\\")\\n\\nPost-review (opportunities to learn):\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I missed...\\\" or \\\"Merged as-is\\\")\\n\\n(Maintainer who reviewed this merge request) Please add feedback, and compare\\nthis review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\nThe purpose of comparing your review to the maintainer's review is to engage in active learning and expand your list of items to consider. Remember, different maintainers are going to identify different issues in the same code. As long as you are not missing large errors or bugs, don't feel like you are doing a bad job if you and a maintainer make different suggestions.\\n\\n**Note:** Do not include reviews of security MRs because review feedback might reveal security issue details.\\n\\n**Tip:** There are [tools](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/tools-and-tips/#trainee-maintainer-issue-upkeep) available to assist with this task.\\n\\n### Code Review Pairing\\n\\nMuch like pair programming, pairing on code review is a great way to knowledge share and collaborate on merge request. This is a great activity for trainee maintainers to participate with maintainers for learning their process of code review.\\n\\nA **private code review session** (unrecorded) involves one primary reviewer, and a shadow. If more than one shadow wishes to observe a private session, please consider obtaining consent from the merge request author.\\n\\nA **public code review session** involves a primary reviewer and one or more shadows in a recorded session that is released publicly, for example to GitLab Unfiltered.\\n\\n* If the merge request author is a GitLab team member, please consider obtaining consent from them.\\n* If the merge request author is a community contributor, you **must** obtain consent from them.\\n* Do **not** release reviews of security merge requests publicly.\\n\\n## When you're ready to make it official\\n\\nWhen reviews have accumulated, and recent reviews consistently fulfill maintainer responsibilities, any maintainer can take the next step. The trainee should also feel free to discuss their progress with their manager or any maintainer at any time.\\n\\n1. [ ] Create a merge request updating [your team member entry](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md) proposing yourself as a maintainer.\\n1. [ ] Keep reviewing, start merging :metal:\", \"milestone_id\": null, \"iid\": 34345, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 244675350, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:15 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 11701495, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 17069039, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 130812, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2015-11-27 21:29:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-04-27 10:56:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 8595532, \"title\": \"trainee maintainer\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": null, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125868 --\u003e\\n### Remove hard coded language: gitlab-org/gitlab!125868\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove hard coded language\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Looked good to me , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536524660, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130137 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder: gitlab-org/gitlab!130137\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-28 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984745, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134349 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!134349\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ad0fef742d45c5008c793f75979365880c402acb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608130962, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127788 --\u003e\\n### Fixing problems with project overview: gitlab-org/gitlab!127788\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixing problems with project overview\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772209, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Dependency updates are often \\\"waived through\\\". You took the time to understand what's going on and tried out the update locally :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563423640, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to update the description of the MR ( not blocking )\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503796209, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127151 --\u003e\\n### Fix image_list_row_spec.js: gitlab-org/gitlab!127151\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix image_list_row_spec.js\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:35:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670465, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure ! Thank you @fguibert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507118687, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125939 --\u003e\\n### Add codeowners validation block: gitlab-org/gitlab!125939\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add codeowners validation block\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b4deb31b91d08bedeb6d231d1b3de07dfa0a30f1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273491, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested a nitpick to put a repeatedly tested component to a variable \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463155402, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125496 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!125496\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656852, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125982 --\u003e\\n### Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency: gitlab-org/gitlab!125982\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jivanvl please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f32b176e44c8c85d053beecdcaa3adda46362829\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547153, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to \\n     - to follow frontend dev guidelines for exported constants\\n     - not duplicate issue list queries right now but move everything to shared in the next iteration , making the cleanup more efficient\\n     - refactor the jest specs to follow the naming conventions, remove unwanted code and add a couple of extra tests - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125877#note_1475901603 \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: The maintainer added a non-blocking suggestion to add more test coverage\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina @tristan.read in please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1479325916, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125255 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope: gitlab-org/gitlab!125255\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 15:12:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393023, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130145 --\u003e\\n### Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!130145\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-25 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4ba705c0455a37a6bdf3b1cea4d9624e5453c39c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1528942055, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - not to use name with component when it is already used in hidden element\\n      - edit the test-id naming convention , was using `js-` naming convention\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489916587, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!121585 --\u003e\\n### Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects: gitlab-org/gitlab!121585\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@terrichu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:53:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445812, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132467 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from discussion_filter_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!132467\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fc3f4f17352251bc002c8612d6b82abd0d053d14\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593896320, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133725 --\u003e\\n### Basic group multiselect support for user token: gitlab-org/gitlab!133725\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Basic group multiselect support for user token\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e7fa81abfa9f541daf659dea19009afbab49a12\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131042, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- It was a small clean change , nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524201744, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for encouraging the MR author to use robust testing assertions. Great review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3540517, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539521470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to use kebab case for `data-testid` selectors\\n   - use `toMatchObect` in tests\\n   - use `toBe` for primitive values testing\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed some non blocking suggestions on comment rephrasing and changing tests description\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524216788, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127240 --\u003e\\n### Improve Value stream dashboard loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!127240\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Improve Value stream dashboard loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nI took it in half review from @jrushford as he was going on PTO\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - some changes to use computed classes on the element in a readable way\\n   - not to use `data-qa-selector` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert was generous to take it up and complete the review :bow: \\n\\nCan you please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review ? Thank you :thank_you:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524230146, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure thank you so much @pburdette :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541007009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: \\n    - to add Sentry logging for error scenarios\\n    - creating a helper function to set the data properties and write specs for it for changes made in haml file \\n    - to use `$emit` instead of `trigger` for testing an emitted event for component \\n- :mag: I identified to prevent failing tests in vue3 compat mode\\n    - an extra use of `nextTick`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463179030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129052 --\u003e\\n### Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure: gitlab-org/gitlab!129052\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dianalogan please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"86bc625b2e896a5c7ae1c21be7483ad6ce374aa8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849365, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Keep an eye out for missing test coverage. Especially when the MR deals with fixing a bug. We want to make sure it has good test coverage so the bug isn't introduced again. \\n\\nOverall good review :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4477803, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539565882, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @leipert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568899677, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @f_caplette :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568898395, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted to use $emit rather than $trigger but since the wrapper was native html element , trigger made more sense \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457667075, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125181 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!125181\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 09:52:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456369541, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124783 --\u003e\\n### Hook up update schedule mutation: gitlab-org/gitlab!124783\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hook up update schedule mutation\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alberts-gitlab please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add tests in `board_card_inner_spec.js`  but they will be added when rspecs are written for the same in future\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed asking why we prefer `eventHub` still\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463161255, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125479 --\u003e\\n### Dismiss modal after increasing access level: gitlab-org/gitlab!125479\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Dismiss modal after increasing access level\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ddavison please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:53 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656907, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125947 --\u003e\\n### Fix wrapping pattern of buttons: gitlab-org/gitlab!125947\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix wrapping pattern of buttons\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good suggestions and questions, not much else to comment on regarding this MR. Keep it up :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1465234546, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125971 --\u003e\\n### Mark vulnerability_details component as deprecated: gitlab-org/gitlab!125971\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"85d4a1316a06e5c11f902081a5bc9507930a634f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @leipert :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- A very small and clean MR to remove an existing FF, no feedback as such\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484705445, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified that the dropdown is closing when we click the copy button which is different from the original behaviour\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473663483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nLooked good to be since a helper method was added. Passed on to the maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to write test for the helper method in both the ee and ce version\\n\\n@mrincon please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473664730, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123522 --\u003e\\n### Implement search for group wikis: gitlab-org/gitlab!123522\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Implement search for group wikis\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@johnmason please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273525, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125980 --\u003e\\n### Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!125980\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123019 --\u003e\\n### Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\": gitlab-org/gitlab!123019\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\"\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470936880, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Did not review this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471435298, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124533 --\u003e\\n### Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!124533\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:50 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445781, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     1. To apply the new eslint rule files where it was used rather than disabling it\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471437751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125196 --\u003e\\n### Add no hard coded url eslint rules: gitlab-org/gitlab!125196\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add no hard coded url eslint rules\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:45 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that it was a small MR with data attribute changes for selection , approved it as is without any feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is \\n\\n@ddavison @justin_ho please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471438997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add a jest test case when the dataset property `cannot-merge` property is not provided\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471440135, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125555 --\u003e\\n### Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar: gitlab-org/gitlab!125555\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-10 10:06:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960557, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125509 --\u003e\\n### Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance: gitlab-org/gitlab!125509\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960568, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add the changes behind a FF just to be sure since this was a change in the head tags and we could not see any potential differences in local gdk and .com\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is **but the maintainer agreed that an FF would be good**\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471441009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested using utility classes at multiple css file changes to reduce the css page bundle size\\n\\nIt was a great improvement to see the final changes made only to the template file\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:48:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471442069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Nothing to suggest , it was a small ~frontend change adding a language attribute to html. Looked good :white_check_mark: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz @psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471443156, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n    - to use computed properties and constants\\n    - to remove redundant code like - `v-if` and `v-show` should never be together\\n    - to remove console logs \\n    - not to use computed property for constants\\n    - move i18n texts to options of the component\\n    - add a finally for isloading to false irrespective of error or not\\n    - remove redundant `v-else-if` which was not needed\\n    - move multiple `findComponent` in test cases as a variable\\n    - [use findComponent as component rather than name](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331672)\\n    - Use emit instead of trigger for gitlab-ui components in [jest test cases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331686)\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - redundant null check in `v-else`\\n     - passing reload as a function instead of emit \\n     - string extrapolation not need\\n\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471448970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125572 --\u003e\\n### Add Tracing List UI: gitlab-org/gitlab!125572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Tracing List UI\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467872137, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126578 --\u003e\\n### [issue-417870] Migrate button component to Pajamas Button: gitlab-org/gitlab!126578\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"da94499aad2ea3f497f66f74e02dec6b36dc850b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471841737, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This isn't one of the largest MRs, but thanks for the promotion of utility classes over custom CSS :thumbsup: and the nice and respectful interaction with a community contributor.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472031566, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This particular MR was a merge as-is MR thus, did not have any requests for change.\\n\\nFor maintainership, the MRs we are looking for are the more thoughtful technical design decisions and engineering considerations.  Regretfully, I cannot fairly grade your maintainership competency based on this MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 272636, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472314143, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127572 --\u003e\\n### Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times: gitlab-org/gitlab!127572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:20 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3473fc8ed41c758a8384a85eb86d04bca942249f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:19 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813801, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Frontend code didn't require changes so the review was :100:, what I'd expect from a frontend maintainer.\\n\\n-------\\n\\nI often read the entire MR to learn more about our codebase. I may ask for changes if I notice something in the backend, documentation, etc...\\n\\nI'd encourage \\\"holistic\\\" reviews and be ready to comment or ask about any part of the MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1607849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:37:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1607849, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1474957631, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127036 --\u003e\\n### Prevent loading state from showing after undo: gitlab-org/gitlab!127036\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9a4cc70bcb0665ed6a9165b00626054c290aaa69\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620562, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to remove the isSingleRequest for emojiQueries since they would not have large requests\\n    - some UI text changes for proper error description\\n    - unnecessary if condition in code\\n    - Show loader when the emojis are being fetched to show an indicator that a query is being run\\n    - remove not need cache.writeQuery in tests, should work fine with proper request handlers\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed checking that the query is called everytime we update any work item attribute\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1475870222, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125121 --\u003e\\n### Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items: gitlab-org/gitlab!125121\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-19 03:41:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464604003, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126709 --\u003e\\n### Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap: gitlab-org/gitlab!126709\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-22 06:31:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547126, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125877 --\u003e\\n### Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list: gitlab-org/gitlab!125877\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-16 06:31:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-20 09:53:43 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471137287, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani My suggestion about the specs came from specific domain knowledge about Incidents, so I wouldn't worry about that.\\n\\nYour review was detailed and what I would expect from a maintainer :thumbsup_tone1:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3146670, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480510293, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127014 --\u003e\\n### Remove import_details_page feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!127014\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove import_details_page feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124322 --\u003e\\n### Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests: gitlab-org/gitlab!124322\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:38:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480581161, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133508 --\u003e\\n### Project overview Edit button fix: gitlab-org/gitlab!133508\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Project overview Edit button fix\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e8dd22043f74a2b659825529463290378e4528c8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726639, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This was a larger MR so it can be easier to miss some things. From this review:\\n\\n- Keep an eye out for code (string and number literals) that can be replaced with existing constants\\n- For reusable/shared components, check that the code is generic and reusable by others\\n- Generally, question every line of code to check whether it is unneeded or can be simplified\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488788165, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @tristan.read :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 02:03:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484696992, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @mrincon :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484697575, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"sure , thank you @ddavison :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484699692, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small ~frontend changes to use `data-testid` instead of qa selector. Had no feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484703670, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n  * to use `fluid-width` instead of `fluid-content`  for `gl-collapsible-listbox` props\\n  * add an extra test for check for other props for the new dropdown\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1569008648, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n       - to change the naming for labelsContainer and labels in jest test cases\\n       - having a test case to make sure that the injected data property `allowScopedLabels` is injected and also having a default value for the injected prop in the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484715899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126425 --\u003e\\n### Work item header and input UI improvements: gitlab-org/gitlab!126425\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Work item header and input UI improvements\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 06:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469343489, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n     - (non-blocking)to use cache update instead of refetching the issue count when deleting the work item\\n     - to remove unused graphql query \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - to point using constants for work item types\\n     - improve the logic when updating fields by updating the persisted_fields and returning early when no work item found\\n     - use isActive is `issuable_item` to highlight selected item\\n     - update the milestone in the FF file\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484781979, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank for you timely review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11004366, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484911410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128081 --\u003e\\n### Fix bold font not being applied on viewed file after further changes. Add viewed file count to diff.: gitlab-org/gitlab!128081\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"be8bab870d9d7406215dcb7751daa1602a6c4d04\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495053415, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127937 --\u003e\\n### [issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states: gitlab-org/gitlab!127937\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:16 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758897, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add screenshots instead of videos in the MR description which gives more clarity  , but it was a non blocking comment hence approved.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495110152, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495112796, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - to use constants for \\\"group\\\" and \\\"project\\\"\\n     - to use scoped strings for translations \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499990702, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125661 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!125661\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-04 03:28:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758939, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - To use `GlDisclosureDropdown` instead of `GlListBox` according to the use case\\n     - To Add accessibility `toggleSrText` prop to dropdown\\n     - to change jest test case string ( nitpick )\\n     - to use `mount` instead of `mountExtended` since no testid was used\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499998030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127996 --\u003e\\n### Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown: gitlab-org/gitlab!127996\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758883, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Minimal changes and looked good to me without any changes, passed on to maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499999096, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126667 --\u003e\\n### Add view cache for PWA manifest.json: gitlab-org/gitlab!126667\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add view cache for PWA manifest.json\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-29 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492740118, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani this was a super large MR, thanks for tackling it and dropping your questions!\\n\\n\u003e I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nIt's interesting to note that the hidden element was actually **needed**. It just wasn't obvious **why**. It took some digging to figure out the reason behind the pattern used there.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2233420, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1497804374, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to\\n    - Add a test to make sure that resolver is called a particular number of times in addition to being called with params\\n    - renaming of some tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n    - rename the variable `mutationLoading` to `isDeleteInprogress` \\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1506027507, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127958 --\u003e\\n### Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination: gitlab-org/gitlab!127958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 08:22:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1496495447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggested changes , small and clean MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558649388, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change all FF's to name the FF's being used in tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out a small test description change\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558673332, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128324 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Various fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab!128324\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Various fixes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-08 03:14:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1500078923, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - To avoid `if-else` for apollo mutate\\n    - delete unnecessary computed props\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503790443, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127900 --\u003e\\n### Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards: gitlab-org/gitlab!127900\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-05 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758913, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to change the wording of some of the tests ( use verbs )\\n    - to move some reuseable components in the tests to the scope of the file and make available to all tests\\n    - remove unwanted assertions in tests\\n    - use `props()` instead of `attributes()` in tests\\n    - use i18n for reuseable constant strings\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507109492, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128088 --\u003e\\n### Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper: gitlab-org/gitlab!128088\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 03:50:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503854140, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't think the variable rename nitpick was a miss, it was just my opinion.\\n\\nThe UX review was skipped due to the team circumstances, but it's still something to keep in mind when reviewing.\\n\\nIt was a good review from you overall :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4846639, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507111595, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove unwanted props\\n   - use conditional chaining for computed props\\n   - remove unwanted hover class from options\\n   - use constants for icon strings from backend\\n   - use `data-testid` selectors instead of `data-qa` selectors\\n   - remove dead code\\n   - use `i18n` for strings\\n   - simplify names of props and prop values as well\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507117825, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126773 --\u003e\\n### Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files: gitlab-org/gitlab!126773\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:27:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493228070, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125260 --\u003e\\n### Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki: gitlab-org/gitlab!125260\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8373453d6ae6f7cb78780555186a249ed82f7a80\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!111116 --\u003e\\n### Display pull command for container registry tag: gitlab-org/gitlab!111116\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616c84e2577641082d10401f5a19fea04ac39323\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1510643149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126836 --\u003e\\n### Fix: group_select has render with older data: gitlab-org/gitlab!126836\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix: group_select has render with older data\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@peterhegman please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b9b2f391cef771e5b41cfa3d74c155b0e464b5f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for your review in that MR Deepika :bow: You made the right call approving it as is while still raising that UX quirk.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3732265, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1521576364, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove some unwanted lines of code\\n   - not to pass an empty object as a param for a util function\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1520453535, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128700 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count: gitlab-org/gitlab!128700\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to rename component event names to make more sense\\n   - to remove `isSingleRequest` from apollo query context after `unbatch_graphql_queries` flag is on on gitlab.com\\n   - conditional chaining for object properties\\n   - use computed props\\n   - use `toEqual` rather than `toStrictEqual`\\n   - instead of manually updating store state in tests , use store action dispatch\\n   - use `toHaveBeenCalledTimes` which will also check if the mock is called rather than just called mock\\n   - not to use `toBeDefined` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - using existing strings for translation\\n      - simplifying the property access by optional chaining\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558758161, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130784 --\u003e\\n### Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!130784\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-09 06:31:34 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541160506, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126649 --\u003e\\n### Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!126649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1498635175, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129775 --\u003e\\n### Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary: gitlab-org/gitlab!129775\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:59 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1522244292, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133476 --\u003e\\n### Remove issuable features moved popover: gitlab-org/gitlab!133476\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove issuable features moved popover\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@djadmin please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c3f7f75559ae30c476f441cc34c2ee37003ddfac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726662, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134178 --\u003e\\n### Migrate work item milestone dropdown to listbox: gitlab-org/gitlab!134178\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ee21d068c9fa91cd92f22ecaca9599cbfcb803e5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481959, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133406 --\u003e\\n### Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid: gitlab-org/gitlab!133406\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@sliaquat please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c497ef797d3e07bcde187480530eb49d015ac9fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726690, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134338 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue: gitlab-org/gitlab!134338\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f27e16c0733dac24965412a9e4f105b22695f1a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481935, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"You provided an excellent review, keep up the good work :rocket: \\n\\nThere wasn't a lot for me to find so no worries. \\n\\nThe only Feedback I can share is to be cautious with suggesting such [\\\"simplifications\\\"](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127240#note_1484661059) in cases where the scope of the problem is too big to be understood very quickly. \\n\\nI've seen too many bugs being introduced by such \\\"simplifications\\\". I would recommend to still address these but with a more open question:\\n\\n\\\"Could you help me understand why we would need this additional check on this value?\\\"\\n\\nThis will lead to the same result but reduce the risk to remove a needed check in a hurry.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7293390, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1526853785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested some minor variable naming changes \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to add test cases/coverage for the new date_timestamp\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538915383, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130013 --\u003e\\n### Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report: gitlab-org/gitlab!130013\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984874, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to use `attributes` function for testing the href of the component\\n    - let go of `exists` since that test will fail anyways\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536523693, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130100 --\u003e\\n### Move job sidebar buttons to header: gitlab-org/gitlab!130100\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move job sidebar buttons to header\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-30 06:31:02 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984776, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to use `default to 0` for prop type `Number`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536528512, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129895 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!129895\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524053220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , small MR with clean changes :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544850303, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130873 --\u003e\\n### Add background color to new MR tabs: gitlab-org/gitlab!130873\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add background color to new MR tabs\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543203980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @ealcantara :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544853007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , minimal ~frontend changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:23:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544852532, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130649 --\u003e\\n### Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License: gitlab-org/gitlab!130649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-02 06:30:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130652 --\u003e\\n### Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!130652\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alexpooley please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811596, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130616 --\u003e\\n### Draft: Add possibility for minimal forks: gitlab-org/gitlab!130616\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ab03e6bb588b8f72ec6195cfa6aa2d31a3b6c6d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811647, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130935 --\u003e\\n### Move Service Desk lists app under Issues: gitlab-org/gitlab!130935\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move Service Desk lists app under Issues\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130810 --\u003e\\n### Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend: gitlab-org/gitlab!130810\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@kushalpandya please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd7a7735f8a732d3a2b13c0079ae047db90b9288\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543204010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130075 --\u003e\\n### Hide search bar if below threshold: gitlab-org/gitlab!130075\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hide search bar if below threshold\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@tristan.read please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ae64b6b7bd2950d31c54abb361e264623276c9dc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984827, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No changes , just fixing failing pipelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546650918, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggestions , it only involved changing `data-testid` changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546653878, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125649 --\u003e\\n### Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming: gitlab-org/gitlab!125649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@huzaifaiftikhar1 please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984893, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested if there is a capability of adding a loading placeholder in the dropdown with the loading indicator ? ( Like `Loading`) \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549132611, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130986 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!130986\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845350, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129958 --\u003e\\n### Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color: gitlab-org/gitlab!129958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-12 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501750, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131028 --\u003e\\n### Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle: gitlab-org/gitlab!131028\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501694, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified \\n     - to remove the background for Progress widget in dark mode as well\\n     - update the border over hover similar in all the widgets\\n     - sync the background color of dropdowns like inputs in milestone and iterations\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:35:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:22:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484788602, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129219 --\u003e\\n### [Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived: gitlab-org/gitlab!129219\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845403, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130678 --\u003e\\n### Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0: gitlab-org/gitlab!130678\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:54 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845382, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked a question regarding the validity of an extra variable which led to fixing a bug :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562749106, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131737 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables: gitlab-org/gitlab!131737\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560771819, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change a test description to depict the true state of the `isCollapsed`. But it was such a pleasure reviewing the MR as it was one of the best I have seen in GitLab\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n   - cleanup `getCssClassDimensions` in mock\\n   - manually add `wrapper.destroy` in the afterEach block\\n   - group `mouse enter` tests into a describe block to prevent repetion\\n   - remove translating strings while testing in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562756509, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131918 --\u003e\\n### How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks: gitlab-org/gitlab!131918\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aqualls please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aecca61bc39672e2a9940fae4a8788cf2daf41fa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772193, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that I could not verify the MR with multiple back and forth resulting in updating the description a couple of times to correct the FF mentioned in the steps to reproduce.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:30:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560773323, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to have feature flag check as well for new entry in dashboard list\\n   - using computed property\\n   - change the test case wordings a little\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing not to use wrapper vm constant property in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:05:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503795483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hey there @deepika.guliani! Most of my points here were about specs readability and predictability. There was nothing here that would have prevented a merge, but sometimes when asking small questions, we find some underlying problems and understand the why.\\n\\nFor example, [when I proposed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/131028#note_1555293432) to move the `toggle?.remove` call to the afterEach block, it was a nitpick and it did not block merge, but by pointing it out, the author and I had a chat and we found out that the wrapper was being mounted twice and that's why there were some issues! This did not impact the tests right now, but it might have in the future as more and more tests were added and then the bug becomes harder to find.\\n\\nThis is not to say that you missed anything really (your reviews are all great!). More that especially in specs, it's easy to miss a lot of underlying problems and it's worth spending a bit of extra time to make sure that everything behave as it should, not just that tests are passing.\\n\\nKeep up the awesome work!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5327378, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563502843, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131951 --\u003e\\n### Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!131951\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:16:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461754, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions, ~frontend light MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is, no ~frontend feedback\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571569999, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129369 --\u003e\\n### Update trial column: gitlab-org/gitlab!129369\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update trial column\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524194801, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132846 --\u003e\\n### Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors: gitlab-org/gitlab!132846\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339261, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-02 12:40:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549256589, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions , clean MR \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587381535, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132832 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!132832\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-30 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339281, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested for a ~UX review since this might have more touching points than mentioned. The code looked good to me.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n  @himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587384960, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587385136, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132613 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix some error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!132613\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix some error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-28 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1581646466, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133275 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand: gitlab-org/gitlab!133275\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 06:31:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4112f7b6c1c062a21e7a8e161d3425dbd7952fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589009889, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add some test cases and `toMatchObject` for testing more props of the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589277355, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131928 --\u003e\\n### Update artifacts page layout: gitlab-org/gitlab!131928\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update artifacts page layout\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461780, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked some clarifying questions, but nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@justin_ho  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589281507, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131143 --\u003e\\n### License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!131143\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@chloeliu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:47 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1556289060, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nBackend heavy , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589285808, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131849 --\u003e\\n### Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids: gitlab-org/gitlab!131849\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mlapierre please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-20 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772203, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: Just to add a before and after video to make the description more clear\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589290037, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"It was a nice initial review! Your suggestion was valuable.\\n\\nGreat attention to detail, important findings, helpful comments. \\n\\nGreat work @deepika.guliani :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10762712, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 14:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:22:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589877102, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133200 --\u003e\\n### Fix devops empty state illustration: gitlab-org/gitlab!133200\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix devops empty state illustration\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pskorupa please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1590705608, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small MR with no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n`@ealcantara` please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1592642788, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good review with good suggestions! A couple of comments:\\n\\n- I believe we don't prefer `||` over `??`, both are perfectly valid\\n- I believe we don't prefer `toEqual` to `toStrictEqual`, in fact `toStrictEqual` is arguably better since it is a more precise check\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 12:36:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-09 05:08:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593026254, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134245 --\u003e\\n### Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!134245\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@acroitor please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23efd83fe1a18f112ebcb8e158b67b5e509014c2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131000, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131825 --\u003e\\n### Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics: gitlab-org/gitlab!131825\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"36b2e435a8457e49253a82a3156bb175daaeabe2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571528474, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134591 --\u003e\\n### Fix epic board children count and weight on card: gitlab-org/gitlab!134591\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix epic board children count and weight on card\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5b708cd017dd2ef2bf249c20c4006a1f13e99031\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1609999412, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134377 --\u003e\\n### Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget: gitlab-org/gitlab!134377\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d4a6612056c26010216970d82e54952419c1c886\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1611728905, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134730 --\u003e\\n### Display abuse report notes (frontend): gitlab-org/gitlab!134730\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2530d3cd51ab399da0ba2945e6d0f64ad38f0d3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1615989743, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Closing this since https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/129537+ is merged\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1fae663519385999828d1931b66d7b7f1e52da66\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1617560916, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3540517, \"username\": \"ealcantara\", \"name\": \"Enrique Alc\\u00e1ntara\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4477803, \"username\": \"pburdette\", \"name\": \"Payton Burdette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 272636, \"username\": \"ddavison\", \"name\": \"Dan Davison\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 1607849, \"username\": \"mrincon\", \"name\": \"Miguel Rincon\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3146670, \"username\": \"tristan.read\", \"name\": \"Tristan Read\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11004366, \"username\": \"eduardosanz\", \"name\": \"Eduardo Sanz Garc\\u00eda\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 2233420, \"username\": \"pslaughter\", \"name\": \"Paul Slaughter\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4846639, \"username\": \"fguibert\", \"name\": \"Florie Guibert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3732265, \"username\": \"pgascouvaillancourt\", \"name\": \"Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 7293390, \"username\": \"jannik_lehmann\", \"name\": \"Jannik Lehmann\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 5327378, \"username\": \"f_caplette\", \"name\": \"Fr\\u00e9d\\u00e9ric Caplette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 10762712, \"username\": \"arfedoro\", \"name\": \"Artur Fedorov\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 6543, \"name\": \"GitLab.com\", \"path\": \"gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 7764, \"name\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"path\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 17069039}]}","query":"Could you summarize this issue?","query_id":"819137565a864ca9892ad65b3c56f92f","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130193114","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130193114, \"title\": \"Trainee FE Maintainer (Gitlab) - Deepika Guliani\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-03 05:03:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Basic setup\\n\\n1. [x] Read the [code review page in the handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/) and the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html).\\n1. [x] Understand [how to become a maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#how-to-become-a-project-maintainer) and add yourself as a [trainee maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer) in the [team database](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md). (MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/105456+)\\n\\n## Working towards becoming a maintainer\\n\\nThese are only guidelines. Remember that there is no specific timeline on this.\\n\\nAs part of your journey towards becoming a maintainer, you may find it useful to:\\n\\n1. [ ] Act as a coach in a big deliverable that requires [following the planning step](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/fe_guide/development_process.html#planning-development) as part of the trainee program.\\n1. [x] [Shadow a maintainer](#code-review-pairing) while they review an MR. This will allow you to get insight into the thought processes involved.\\n1. [x] [Have a maintainer shadow *you*](#code-review-pairing) while you review an MR *as if you were a maintainer* . Ideally, this would be with a different maintainer to the above, so you can get different insights.\\n1. [x] *Optional:* [Consider finding a mentor](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer-mentorship-pilot-program) to help you become a maintainer.\\n\\nIt is up to you to ensure that you are getting enough MRs to review, and of varied types. All engineers are reviewers, so you should already be receiving regular reviews from Reviewer Roulette. You could also seek out more reviews from your team, or #frontend Slack channels.\\n\\nYour reviews should aim to cover maintainer responsibilities as well as reviewer responsibilities. Your approval means you think it is ready to merge.\\n\\nAfter each MR is merged or closed, add a discussion to this issue using this template:\\n\\n```markdown\\n### (Merge request title): (Merge request URL)\\n\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I suggested/identified/noted...\\\")\\n\\nPost-review (opportunities to learn):\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I missed...\\\" or \\\"Merged as-is\\\")\\n\\n(Maintainer who reviewed this merge request) Please add feedback, and compare\\nthis review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\nThe purpose of comparing your review to the maintainer's review is to engage in active learning and expand your list of items to consider. Remember, different maintainers are going to identify different issues in the same code. As long as you are not missing large errors or bugs, don't feel like you are doing a bad job if you and a maintainer make different suggestions.\\n\\n**Note:** Do not include reviews of security MRs because review feedback might reveal security issue details.\\n\\n**Tip:** There are [tools](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/tools-and-tips/#trainee-maintainer-issue-upkeep) available to assist with this task.\\n\\n### Code Review Pairing\\n\\nMuch like pair programming, pairing on code review is a great way to knowledge share and collaborate on merge request. This is a great activity for trainee maintainers to participate with maintainers for learning their process of code review.\\n\\nA **private code review session** (unrecorded) involves one primary reviewer, and a shadow. If more than one shadow wishes to observe a private session, please consider obtaining consent from the merge request author.\\n\\nA **public code review session** involves a primary reviewer and one or more shadows in a recorded session that is released publicly, for example to GitLab Unfiltered.\\n\\n* If the merge request author is a GitLab team member, please consider obtaining consent from them.\\n* If the merge request author is a community contributor, you **must** obtain consent from them.\\n* Do **not** release reviews of security merge requests publicly.\\n\\n## When you're ready to make it official\\n\\nWhen reviews have accumulated, and recent reviews consistently fulfill maintainer responsibilities, any maintainer can take the next step. The trainee should also feel free to discuss their progress with their manager or any maintainer at any time.\\n\\n1. [ ] Create a merge request updating [your team member entry](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md) proposing yourself as a maintainer.\\n1. [ ] Keep reviewing, start merging :metal:\", \"milestone_id\": null, \"iid\": 34345, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 244675350, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:15 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 11701495, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 17069039, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 130812, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2015-11-27 21:29:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-04-27 10:56:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 8595532, \"title\": \"trainee maintainer\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": null, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125868 --\u003e\\n### Remove hard coded language: gitlab-org/gitlab!125868\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove hard coded language\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Looked good to me , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536524660, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130137 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder: gitlab-org/gitlab!130137\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-28 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984745, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134349 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!134349\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ad0fef742d45c5008c793f75979365880c402acb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608130962, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127788 --\u003e\\n### Fixing problems with project overview: gitlab-org/gitlab!127788\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixing problems with project overview\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772209, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Dependency updates are often \\\"waived through\\\". You took the time to understand what's going on and tried out the update locally :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563423640, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to update the description of the MR ( not blocking )\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503796209, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127151 --\u003e\\n### Fix image_list_row_spec.js: gitlab-org/gitlab!127151\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix image_list_row_spec.js\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:35:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670465, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure ! Thank you @fguibert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507118687, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125939 --\u003e\\n### Add codeowners validation block: gitlab-org/gitlab!125939\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add codeowners validation block\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b4deb31b91d08bedeb6d231d1b3de07dfa0a30f1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273491, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested a nitpick to put a repeatedly tested component to a variable \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463155402, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125496 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!125496\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656852, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125982 --\u003e\\n### Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency: gitlab-org/gitlab!125982\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jivanvl please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f32b176e44c8c85d053beecdcaa3adda46362829\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547153, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to \\n     - to follow frontend dev guidelines for exported constants\\n     - not duplicate issue list queries right now but move everything to shared in the next iteration , making the cleanup more efficient\\n     - refactor the jest specs to follow the naming conventions, remove unwanted code and add a couple of extra tests - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125877#note_1475901603 \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: The maintainer added a non-blocking suggestion to add more test coverage\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina @tristan.read in please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1479325916, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125255 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope: gitlab-org/gitlab!125255\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 15:12:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393023, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130145 --\u003e\\n### Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!130145\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-25 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4ba705c0455a37a6bdf3b1cea4d9624e5453c39c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1528942055, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - not to use name with component when it is already used in hidden element\\n      - edit the test-id naming convention , was using `js-` naming convention\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489916587, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!121585 --\u003e\\n### Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects: gitlab-org/gitlab!121585\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@terrichu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:53:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445812, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132467 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from discussion_filter_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!132467\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fc3f4f17352251bc002c8612d6b82abd0d053d14\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593896320, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133725 --\u003e\\n### Basic group multiselect support for user token: gitlab-org/gitlab!133725\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Basic group multiselect support for user token\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e7fa81abfa9f541daf659dea19009afbab49a12\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131042, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- It was a small clean change , nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524201744, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for encouraging the MR author to use robust testing assertions. Great review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3540517, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539521470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to use kebab case for `data-testid` selectors\\n   - use `toMatchObect` in tests\\n   - use `toBe` for primitive values testing\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed some non blocking suggestions on comment rephrasing and changing tests description\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524216788, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127240 --\u003e\\n### Improve Value stream dashboard loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!127240\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Improve Value stream dashboard loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nI took it in half review from @jrushford as he was going on PTO\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - some changes to use computed classes on the element in a readable way\\n   - not to use `data-qa-selector` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert was generous to take it up and complete the review :bow: \\n\\nCan you please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review ? Thank you :thank_you:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524230146, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure thank you so much @pburdette :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541007009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: \\n    - to add Sentry logging for error scenarios\\n    - creating a helper function to set the data properties and write specs for it for changes made in haml file \\n    - to use `$emit` instead of `trigger` for testing an emitted event for component \\n- :mag: I identified to prevent failing tests in vue3 compat mode\\n    - an extra use of `nextTick`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463179030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129052 --\u003e\\n### Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure: gitlab-org/gitlab!129052\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dianalogan please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"86bc625b2e896a5c7ae1c21be7483ad6ce374aa8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849365, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Keep an eye out for missing test coverage. Especially when the MR deals with fixing a bug. We want to make sure it has good test coverage so the bug isn't introduced again. \\n\\nOverall good review :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4477803, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539565882, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @leipert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568899677, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @f_caplette :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568898395, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted to use $emit rather than $trigger but since the wrapper was native html element , trigger made more sense \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457667075, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125181 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!125181\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 09:52:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456369541, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124783 --\u003e\\n### Hook up update schedule mutation: gitlab-org/gitlab!124783\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hook up update schedule mutation\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alberts-gitlab please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add tests in `board_card_inner_spec.js`  but they will be added when rspecs are written for the same in future\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed asking why we prefer `eventHub` still\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463161255, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125479 --\u003e\\n### Dismiss modal after increasing access level: gitlab-org/gitlab!125479\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Dismiss modal after increasing access level\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ddavison please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:53 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656907, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125947 --\u003e\\n### Fix wrapping pattern of buttons: gitlab-org/gitlab!125947\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix wrapping pattern of buttons\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good suggestions and questions, not much else to comment on regarding this MR. Keep it up :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1465234546, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125971 --\u003e\\n### Mark vulnerability_details component as deprecated: gitlab-org/gitlab!125971\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"85d4a1316a06e5c11f902081a5bc9507930a634f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @leipert :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- A very small and clean MR to remove an existing FF, no feedback as such\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484705445, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified that the dropdown is closing when we click the copy button which is different from the original behaviour\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473663483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nLooked good to be since a helper method was added. Passed on to the maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to write test for the helper method in both the ee and ce version\\n\\n@mrincon please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473664730, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123522 --\u003e\\n### Implement search for group wikis: gitlab-org/gitlab!123522\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Implement search for group wikis\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@johnmason please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273525, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125980 --\u003e\\n### Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!125980\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123019 --\u003e\\n### Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\": gitlab-org/gitlab!123019\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\"\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470936880, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Did not review this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471435298, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124533 --\u003e\\n### Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!124533\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:50 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445781, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     1. To apply the new eslint rule files where it was used rather than disabling it\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471437751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125196 --\u003e\\n### Add no hard coded url eslint rules: gitlab-org/gitlab!125196\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add no hard coded url eslint rules\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:45 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that it was a small MR with data attribute changes for selection , approved it as is without any feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is \\n\\n@ddavison @justin_ho please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471438997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add a jest test case when the dataset property `cannot-merge` property is not provided\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471440135, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125555 --\u003e\\n### Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar: gitlab-org/gitlab!125555\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-10 10:06:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960557, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125509 --\u003e\\n### Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance: gitlab-org/gitlab!125509\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960568, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add the changes behind a FF just to be sure since this was a change in the head tags and we could not see any potential differences in local gdk and .com\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is **but the maintainer agreed that an FF would be good**\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471441009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested using utility classes at multiple css file changes to reduce the css page bundle size\\n\\nIt was a great improvement to see the final changes made only to the template file\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:48:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471442069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Nothing to suggest , it was a small ~frontend change adding a language attribute to html. Looked good :white_check_mark: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz @psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471443156, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n    - to use computed properties and constants\\n    - to remove redundant code like - `v-if` and `v-show` should never be together\\n    - to remove console logs \\n    - not to use computed property for constants\\n    - move i18n texts to options of the component\\n    - add a finally for isloading to false irrespective of error or not\\n    - remove redundant `v-else-if` which was not needed\\n    - move multiple `findComponent` in test cases as a variable\\n    - [use findComponent as component rather than name](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331672)\\n    - Use emit instead of trigger for gitlab-ui components in [jest test cases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331686)\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - redundant null check in `v-else`\\n     - passing reload as a function instead of emit \\n     - string extrapolation not need\\n\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471448970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125572 --\u003e\\n### Add Tracing List UI: gitlab-org/gitlab!125572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Tracing List UI\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467872137, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126578 --\u003e\\n### [issue-417870] Migrate button component to Pajamas Button: gitlab-org/gitlab!126578\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"da94499aad2ea3f497f66f74e02dec6b36dc850b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471841737, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This isn't one of the largest MRs, but thanks for the promotion of utility classes over custom CSS :thumbsup: and the nice and respectful interaction with a community contributor.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472031566, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This particular MR was a merge as-is MR thus, did not have any requests for change.\\n\\nFor maintainership, the MRs we are looking for are the more thoughtful technical design decisions and engineering considerations.  Regretfully, I cannot fairly grade your maintainership competency based on this MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 272636, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472314143, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127572 --\u003e\\n### Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times: gitlab-org/gitlab!127572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:20 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3473fc8ed41c758a8384a85eb86d04bca942249f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:19 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813801, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Frontend code didn't require changes so the review was :100:, what I'd expect from a frontend maintainer.\\n\\n-------\\n\\nI often read the entire MR to learn more about our codebase. I may ask for changes if I notice something in the backend, documentation, etc...\\n\\nI'd encourage \\\"holistic\\\" reviews and be ready to comment or ask about any part of the MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1607849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:37:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1607849, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1474957631, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127036 --\u003e\\n### Prevent loading state from showing after undo: gitlab-org/gitlab!127036\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9a4cc70bcb0665ed6a9165b00626054c290aaa69\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620562, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to remove the isSingleRequest for emojiQueries since they would not have large requests\\n    - some UI text changes for proper error description\\n    - unnecessary if condition in code\\n    - Show loader when the emojis are being fetched to show an indicator that a query is being run\\n    - remove not need cache.writeQuery in tests, should work fine with proper request handlers\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed checking that the query is called everytime we update any work item attribute\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1475870222, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125121 --\u003e\\n### Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items: gitlab-org/gitlab!125121\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-19 03:41:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464604003, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126709 --\u003e\\n### Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap: gitlab-org/gitlab!126709\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-22 06:31:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547126, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125877 --\u003e\\n### Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list: gitlab-org/gitlab!125877\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-16 06:31:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-20 09:53:43 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471137287, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani My suggestion about the specs came from specific domain knowledge about Incidents, so I wouldn't worry about that.\\n\\nYour review was detailed and what I would expect from a maintainer :thumbsup_tone1:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3146670, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480510293, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127014 --\u003e\\n### Remove import_details_page feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!127014\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove import_details_page feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124322 --\u003e\\n### Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests: gitlab-org/gitlab!124322\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:38:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480581161, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133508 --\u003e\\n### Project overview Edit button fix: gitlab-org/gitlab!133508\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Project overview Edit button fix\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e8dd22043f74a2b659825529463290378e4528c8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726639, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This was a larger MR so it can be easier to miss some things. From this review:\\n\\n- Keep an eye out for code (string and number literals) that can be replaced with existing constants\\n- For reusable/shared components, check that the code is generic and reusable by others\\n- Generally, question every line of code to check whether it is unneeded or can be simplified\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488788165, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @tristan.read :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 02:03:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484696992, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @mrincon :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484697575, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"sure , thank you @ddavison :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484699692, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small ~frontend changes to use `data-testid` instead of qa selector. Had no feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484703670, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n  * to use `fluid-width` instead of `fluid-content`  for `gl-collapsible-listbox` props\\n  * add an extra test for check for other props for the new dropdown\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1569008648, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n       - to change the naming for labelsContainer and labels in jest test cases\\n       - having a test case to make sure that the injected data property `allowScopedLabels` is injected and also having a default value for the injected prop in the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484715899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126425 --\u003e\\n### Work item header and input UI improvements: gitlab-org/gitlab!126425\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Work item header and input UI improvements\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 06:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469343489, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n     - (non-blocking)to use cache update instead of refetching the issue count when deleting the work item\\n     - to remove unused graphql query \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - to point using constants for work item types\\n     - improve the logic when updating fields by updating the persisted_fields and returning early when no work item found\\n     - use isActive is `issuable_item` to highlight selected item\\n     - update the milestone in the FF file\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484781979, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank for you timely review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11004366, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484911410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128081 --\u003e\\n### Fix bold font not being applied on viewed file after further changes. Add viewed file count to diff.: gitlab-org/gitlab!128081\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"be8bab870d9d7406215dcb7751daa1602a6c4d04\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495053415, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127937 --\u003e\\n### [issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states: gitlab-org/gitlab!127937\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:16 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758897, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add screenshots instead of videos in the MR description which gives more clarity  , but it was a non blocking comment hence approved.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495110152, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495112796, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - to use constants for \\\"group\\\" and \\\"project\\\"\\n     - to use scoped strings for translations \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499990702, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125661 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!125661\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-04 03:28:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758939, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - To use `GlDisclosureDropdown` instead of `GlListBox` according to the use case\\n     - To Add accessibility `toggleSrText` prop to dropdown\\n     - to change jest test case string ( nitpick )\\n     - to use `mount` instead of `mountExtended` since no testid was used\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499998030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127996 --\u003e\\n### Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown: gitlab-org/gitlab!127996\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758883, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Minimal changes and looked good to me without any changes, passed on to maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499999096, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126667 --\u003e\\n### Add view cache for PWA manifest.json: gitlab-org/gitlab!126667\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add view cache for PWA manifest.json\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-29 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492740118, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani this was a super large MR, thanks for tackling it and dropping your questions!\\n\\n\u003e I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nIt's interesting to note that the hidden element was actually **needed**. It just wasn't obvious **why**. It took some digging to figure out the reason behind the pattern used there.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2233420, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1497804374, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to\\n    - Add a test to make sure that resolver is called a particular number of times in addition to being called with params\\n    - renaming of some tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n    - rename the variable `mutationLoading` to `isDeleteInprogress` \\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1506027507, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127958 --\u003e\\n### Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination: gitlab-org/gitlab!127958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 08:22:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1496495447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggested changes , small and clean MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558649388, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change all FF's to name the FF's being used in tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out a small test description change\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558673332, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128324 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Various fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab!128324\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Various fixes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-08 03:14:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1500078923, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - To avoid `if-else` for apollo mutate\\n    - delete unnecessary computed props\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503790443, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127900 --\u003e\\n### Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards: gitlab-org/gitlab!127900\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-05 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758913, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to change the wording of some of the tests ( use verbs )\\n    - to move some reuseable components in the tests to the scope of the file and make available to all tests\\n    - remove unwanted assertions in tests\\n    - use `props()` instead of `attributes()` in tests\\n    - use i18n for reuseable constant strings\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507109492, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128088 --\u003e\\n### Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper: gitlab-org/gitlab!128088\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 03:50:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503854140, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't think the variable rename nitpick was a miss, it was just my opinion.\\n\\nThe UX review was skipped due to the team circumstances, but it's still something to keep in mind when reviewing.\\n\\nIt was a good review from you overall :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4846639, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507111595, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove unwanted props\\n   - use conditional chaining for computed props\\n   - remove unwanted hover class from options\\n   - use constants for icon strings from backend\\n   - use `data-testid` selectors instead of `data-qa` selectors\\n   - remove dead code\\n   - use `i18n` for strings\\n   - simplify names of props and prop values as well\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507117825, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126773 --\u003e\\n### Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files: gitlab-org/gitlab!126773\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:27:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493228070, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125260 --\u003e\\n### Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki: gitlab-org/gitlab!125260\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8373453d6ae6f7cb78780555186a249ed82f7a80\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!111116 --\u003e\\n### Display pull command for container registry tag: gitlab-org/gitlab!111116\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616c84e2577641082d10401f5a19fea04ac39323\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1510643149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126836 --\u003e\\n### Fix: group_select has render with older data: gitlab-org/gitlab!126836\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix: group_select has render with older data\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@peterhegman please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b9b2f391cef771e5b41cfa3d74c155b0e464b5f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for your review in that MR Deepika :bow: You made the right call approving it as is while still raising that UX quirk.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3732265, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1521576364, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove some unwanted lines of code\\n   - not to pass an empty object as a param for a util function\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1520453535, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128700 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count: gitlab-org/gitlab!128700\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to rename component event names to make more sense\\n   - to remove `isSingleRequest` from apollo query context after `unbatch_graphql_queries` flag is on on gitlab.com\\n   - conditional chaining for object properties\\n   - use computed props\\n   - use `toEqual` rather than `toStrictEqual`\\n   - instead of manually updating store state in tests , use store action dispatch\\n   - use `toHaveBeenCalledTimes` which will also check if the mock is called rather than just called mock\\n   - not to use `toBeDefined` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - using existing strings for translation\\n      - simplifying the property access by optional chaining\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558758161, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130784 --\u003e\\n### Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!130784\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-09 06:31:34 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541160506, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126649 --\u003e\\n### Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!126649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1498635175, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129775 --\u003e\\n### Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary: gitlab-org/gitlab!129775\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:59 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1522244292, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133476 --\u003e\\n### Remove issuable features moved popover: gitlab-org/gitlab!133476\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove issuable features moved popover\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@djadmin please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c3f7f75559ae30c476f441cc34c2ee37003ddfac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726662, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134178 --\u003e\\n### Migrate work item milestone dropdown to listbox: gitlab-org/gitlab!134178\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ee21d068c9fa91cd92f22ecaca9599cbfcb803e5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481959, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133406 --\u003e\\n### Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid: gitlab-org/gitlab!133406\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@sliaquat please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c497ef797d3e07bcde187480530eb49d015ac9fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726690, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134338 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue: gitlab-org/gitlab!134338\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f27e16c0733dac24965412a9e4f105b22695f1a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481935, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"You provided an excellent review, keep up the good work :rocket: \\n\\nThere wasn't a lot for me to find so no worries. \\n\\nThe only Feedback I can share is to be cautious with suggesting such [\\\"simplifications\\\"](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127240#note_1484661059) in cases where the scope of the problem is too big to be understood very quickly. \\n\\nI've seen too many bugs being introduced by such \\\"simplifications\\\". I would recommend to still address these but with a more open question:\\n\\n\\\"Could you help me understand why we would need this additional check on this value?\\\"\\n\\nThis will lead to the same result but reduce the risk to remove a needed check in a hurry.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7293390, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1526853785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested some minor variable naming changes \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to add test cases/coverage for the new date_timestamp\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538915383, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130013 --\u003e\\n### Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report: gitlab-org/gitlab!130013\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984874, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to use `attributes` function for testing the href of the component\\n    - let go of `exists` since that test will fail anyways\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536523693, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130100 --\u003e\\n### Move job sidebar buttons to header: gitlab-org/gitlab!130100\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move job sidebar buttons to header\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-30 06:31:02 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984776, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to use `default to 0` for prop type `Number`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536528512, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129895 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!129895\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524053220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , small MR with clean changes :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544850303, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130873 --\u003e\\n### Add background color to new MR tabs: gitlab-org/gitlab!130873\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add background color to new MR tabs\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543203980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @ealcantara :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544853007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , minimal ~frontend changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:23:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544852532, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130649 --\u003e\\n### Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License: gitlab-org/gitlab!130649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-02 06:30:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130652 --\u003e\\n### Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!130652\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alexpooley please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811596, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130616 --\u003e\\n### Draft: Add possibility for minimal forks: gitlab-org/gitlab!130616\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ab03e6bb588b8f72ec6195cfa6aa2d31a3b6c6d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811647, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130935 --\u003e\\n### Move Service Desk lists app under Issues: gitlab-org/gitlab!130935\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move Service Desk lists app under Issues\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130810 --\u003e\\n### Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend: gitlab-org/gitlab!130810\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@kushalpandya please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd7a7735f8a732d3a2b13c0079ae047db90b9288\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543204010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130075 --\u003e\\n### Hide search bar if below threshold: gitlab-org/gitlab!130075\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hide search bar if below threshold\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@tristan.read please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ae64b6b7bd2950d31c54abb361e264623276c9dc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984827, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No changes , just fixing failing pipelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546650918, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggestions , it only involved changing `data-testid` changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546653878, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125649 --\u003e\\n### Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming: gitlab-org/gitlab!125649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@huzaifaiftikhar1 please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984893, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested if there is a capability of adding a loading placeholder in the dropdown with the loading indicator ? ( Like `Loading`) \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549132611, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130986 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!130986\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845350, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129958 --\u003e\\n### Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color: gitlab-org/gitlab!129958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-12 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501750, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131028 --\u003e\\n### Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle: gitlab-org/gitlab!131028\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501694, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified \\n     - to remove the background for Progress widget in dark mode as well\\n     - update the border over hover similar in all the widgets\\n     - sync the background color of dropdowns like inputs in milestone and iterations\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:35:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:22:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484788602, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129219 --\u003e\\n### [Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived: gitlab-org/gitlab!129219\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845403, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130678 --\u003e\\n### Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0: gitlab-org/gitlab!130678\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:54 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845382, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked a question regarding the validity of an extra variable which led to fixing a bug :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562749106, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131737 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables: gitlab-org/gitlab!131737\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560771819, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change a test description to depict the true state of the `isCollapsed`. But it was such a pleasure reviewing the MR as it was one of the best I have seen in GitLab\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n   - cleanup `getCssClassDimensions` in mock\\n   - manually add `wrapper.destroy` in the afterEach block\\n   - group `mouse enter` tests into a describe block to prevent repetion\\n   - remove translating strings while testing in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562756509, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131918 --\u003e\\n### How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks: gitlab-org/gitlab!131918\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aqualls please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aecca61bc39672e2a9940fae4a8788cf2daf41fa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772193, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that I could not verify the MR with multiple back and forth resulting in updating the description a couple of times to correct the FF mentioned in the steps to reproduce.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:30:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560773323, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to have feature flag check as well for new entry in dashboard list\\n   - using computed property\\n   - change the test case wordings a little\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing not to use wrapper vm constant property in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:05:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503795483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hey there @deepika.guliani! Most of my points here were about specs readability and predictability. There was nothing here that would have prevented a merge, but sometimes when asking small questions, we find some underlying problems and understand the why.\\n\\nFor example, [when I proposed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/131028#note_1555293432) to move the `toggle?.remove` call to the afterEach block, it was a nitpick and it did not block merge, but by pointing it out, the author and I had a chat and we found out that the wrapper was being mounted twice and that's why there were some issues! This did not impact the tests right now, but it might have in the future as more and more tests were added and then the bug becomes harder to find.\\n\\nThis is not to say that you missed anything really (your reviews are all great!). More that especially in specs, it's easy to miss a lot of underlying problems and it's worth spending a bit of extra time to make sure that everything behave as it should, not just that tests are passing.\\n\\nKeep up the awesome work!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5327378, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563502843, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131951 --\u003e\\n### Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!131951\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:16:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461754, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions, ~frontend light MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is, no ~frontend feedback\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571569999, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129369 --\u003e\\n### Update trial column: gitlab-org/gitlab!129369\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update trial column\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524194801, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132846 --\u003e\\n### Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors: gitlab-org/gitlab!132846\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339261, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-02 12:40:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549256589, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions , clean MR \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587381535, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132832 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!132832\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-30 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339281, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested for a ~UX review since this might have more touching points than mentioned. The code looked good to me.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n  @himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587384960, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587385136, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132613 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix some error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!132613\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix some error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-28 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1581646466, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133275 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand: gitlab-org/gitlab!133275\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 06:31:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4112f7b6c1c062a21e7a8e161d3425dbd7952fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589009889, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add some test cases and `toMatchObject` for testing more props of the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589277355, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131928 --\u003e\\n### Update artifacts page layout: gitlab-org/gitlab!131928\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update artifacts page layout\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461780, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked some clarifying questions, but nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@justin_ho  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589281507, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131143 --\u003e\\n### License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!131143\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@chloeliu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:47 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1556289060, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nBackend heavy , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589285808, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131849 --\u003e\\n### Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids: gitlab-org/gitlab!131849\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mlapierre please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-20 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772203, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: Just to add a before and after video to make the description more clear\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589290037, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"It was a nice initial review! Your suggestion was valuable.\\n\\nGreat attention to detail, important findings, helpful comments. \\n\\nGreat work @deepika.guliani :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10762712, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 14:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:22:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589877102, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133200 --\u003e\\n### Fix devops empty state illustration: gitlab-org/gitlab!133200\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix devops empty state illustration\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pskorupa please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1590705608, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small MR with no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n`@ealcantara` please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1592642788, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good review with good suggestions! A couple of comments:\\n\\n- I believe we don't prefer `||` over `??`, both are perfectly valid\\n- I believe we don't prefer `toEqual` to `toStrictEqual`, in fact `toStrictEqual` is arguably better since it is a more precise check\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 12:36:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-09 05:08:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593026254, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134245 --\u003e\\n### Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!134245\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@acroitor please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23efd83fe1a18f112ebcb8e158b67b5e509014c2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131000, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131825 --\u003e\\n### Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics: gitlab-org/gitlab!131825\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"36b2e435a8457e49253a82a3156bb175daaeabe2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571528474, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134591 --\u003e\\n### Fix epic board children count and weight on card: gitlab-org/gitlab!134591\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix epic board children count and weight on card\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5b708cd017dd2ef2bf249c20c4006a1f13e99031\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1609999412, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134377 --\u003e\\n### Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget: gitlab-org/gitlab!134377\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d4a6612056c26010216970d82e54952419c1c886\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1611728905, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134730 --\u003e\\n### Display abuse report notes (frontend): gitlab-org/gitlab!134730\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2530d3cd51ab399da0ba2945e6d0f64ad38f0d3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1615989743, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Closing this since https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/129537+ is merged\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1fae663519385999828d1931b66d7b7f1e52da66\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1617560916, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3540517, \"username\": \"ealcantara\", \"name\": \"Enrique Alc\\u00e1ntara\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4477803, \"username\": \"pburdette\", \"name\": \"Payton Burdette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 272636, \"username\": \"ddavison\", \"name\": \"Dan Davison\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 1607849, \"username\": \"mrincon\", \"name\": \"Miguel Rincon\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3146670, \"username\": \"tristan.read\", \"name\": \"Tristan Read\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11004366, \"username\": \"eduardosanz\", \"name\": \"Eduardo Sanz Garc\\u00eda\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 2233420, \"username\": \"pslaughter\", \"name\": \"Paul Slaughter\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4846639, \"username\": \"fguibert\", \"name\": \"Florie Guibert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3732265, \"username\": \"pgascouvaillancourt\", \"name\": \"Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 7293390, \"username\": \"jannik_lehmann\", \"name\": \"Jannik Lehmann\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 5327378, \"username\": \"f_caplette\", \"name\": \"Fr\\u00e9d\\u00e9ric Caplette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 10762712, \"username\": \"arfedoro\", \"name\": \"Artur Fedorov\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 6543, \"name\": \"GitLab.com\", \"path\": \"gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 7764, \"name\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"path\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 17069039}]}","query":"Summarize this Issue.","query_id":"211a38d81aff48f6a928df69cbf1f6d4","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130193114","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130193114, \"title\": \"Trainee FE Maintainer (Gitlab) - Deepika Guliani\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-03 05:03:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Basic setup\\n\\n1. [x] Read the [code review page in the handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/) and the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html).\\n1. [x] Understand [how to become a maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#how-to-become-a-project-maintainer) and add yourself as a [trainee maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer) in the [team database](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md). (MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/105456+)\\n\\n## Working towards becoming a maintainer\\n\\nThese are only guidelines. Remember that there is no specific timeline on this.\\n\\nAs part of your journey towards becoming a maintainer, you may find it useful to:\\n\\n1. [ ] Act as a coach in a big deliverable that requires [following the planning step](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/fe_guide/development_process.html#planning-development) as part of the trainee program.\\n1. [x] [Shadow a maintainer](#code-review-pairing) while they review an MR. This will allow you to get insight into the thought processes involved.\\n1. [x] [Have a maintainer shadow *you*](#code-review-pairing) while you review an MR *as if you were a maintainer* . Ideally, this would be with a different maintainer to the above, so you can get different insights.\\n1. [x] *Optional:* [Consider finding a mentor](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer-mentorship-pilot-program) to help you become a maintainer.\\n\\nIt is up to you to ensure that you are getting enough MRs to review, and of varied types. All engineers are reviewers, so you should already be receiving regular reviews from Reviewer Roulette. You could also seek out more reviews from your team, or #frontend Slack channels.\\n\\nYour reviews should aim to cover maintainer responsibilities as well as reviewer responsibilities. Your approval means you think it is ready to merge.\\n\\nAfter each MR is merged or closed, add a discussion to this issue using this template:\\n\\n```markdown\\n### (Merge request title): (Merge request URL)\\n\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I suggested/identified/noted...\\\")\\n\\nPost-review (opportunities to learn):\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I missed...\\\" or \\\"Merged as-is\\\")\\n\\n(Maintainer who reviewed this merge request) Please add feedback, and compare\\nthis review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\nThe purpose of comparing your review to the maintainer's review is to engage in active learning and expand your list of items to consider. Remember, different maintainers are going to identify different issues in the same code. As long as you are not missing large errors or bugs, don't feel like you are doing a bad job if you and a maintainer make different suggestions.\\n\\n**Note:** Do not include reviews of security MRs because review feedback might reveal security issue details.\\n\\n**Tip:** There are [tools](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/tools-and-tips/#trainee-maintainer-issue-upkeep) available to assist with this task.\\n\\n### Code Review Pairing\\n\\nMuch like pair programming, pairing on code review is a great way to knowledge share and collaborate on merge request. This is a great activity for trainee maintainers to participate with maintainers for learning their process of code review.\\n\\nA **private code review session** (unrecorded) involves one primary reviewer, and a shadow. If more than one shadow wishes to observe a private session, please consider obtaining consent from the merge request author.\\n\\nA **public code review session** involves a primary reviewer and one or more shadows in a recorded session that is released publicly, for example to GitLab Unfiltered.\\n\\n* If the merge request author is a GitLab team member, please consider obtaining consent from them.\\n* If the merge request author is a community contributor, you **must** obtain consent from them.\\n* Do **not** release reviews of security merge requests publicly.\\n\\n## When you're ready to make it official\\n\\nWhen reviews have accumulated, and recent reviews consistently fulfill maintainer responsibilities, any maintainer can take the next step. The trainee should also feel free to discuss their progress with their manager or any maintainer at any time.\\n\\n1. [ ] Create a merge request updating [your team member entry](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md) proposing yourself as a maintainer.\\n1. [ ] Keep reviewing, start merging :metal:\", \"milestone_id\": null, \"iid\": 34345, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 244675350, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:15 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 11701495, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 17069039, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 130812, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2015-11-27 21:29:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-04-27 10:56:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 8595532, \"title\": \"trainee maintainer\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": null, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125868 --\u003e\\n### Remove hard coded language: gitlab-org/gitlab!125868\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove hard coded language\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Looked good to me , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536524660, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130137 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder: gitlab-org/gitlab!130137\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-28 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984745, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134349 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!134349\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ad0fef742d45c5008c793f75979365880c402acb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608130962, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127788 --\u003e\\n### Fixing problems with project overview: gitlab-org/gitlab!127788\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixing problems with project overview\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772209, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Dependency updates are often \\\"waived through\\\". You took the time to understand what's going on and tried out the update locally :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563423640, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to update the description of the MR ( not blocking )\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503796209, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127151 --\u003e\\n### Fix image_list_row_spec.js: gitlab-org/gitlab!127151\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix image_list_row_spec.js\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:35:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670465, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure ! Thank you @fguibert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507118687, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125939 --\u003e\\n### Add codeowners validation block: gitlab-org/gitlab!125939\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add codeowners validation block\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b4deb31b91d08bedeb6d231d1b3de07dfa0a30f1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273491, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested a nitpick to put a repeatedly tested component to a variable \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463155402, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125496 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!125496\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656852, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125982 --\u003e\\n### Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency: gitlab-org/gitlab!125982\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jivanvl please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f32b176e44c8c85d053beecdcaa3adda46362829\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547153, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to \\n     - to follow frontend dev guidelines for exported constants\\n     - not duplicate issue list queries right now but move everything to shared in the next iteration , making the cleanup more efficient\\n     - refactor the jest specs to follow the naming conventions, remove unwanted code and add a couple of extra tests - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125877#note_1475901603 \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: The maintainer added a non-blocking suggestion to add more test coverage\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina @tristan.read in please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1479325916, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125255 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope: gitlab-org/gitlab!125255\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 15:12:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393023, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130145 --\u003e\\n### Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!130145\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-25 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4ba705c0455a37a6bdf3b1cea4d9624e5453c39c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1528942055, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - not to use name with component when it is already used in hidden element\\n      - edit the test-id naming convention , was using `js-` naming convention\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489916587, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!121585 --\u003e\\n### Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects: gitlab-org/gitlab!121585\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@terrichu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:53:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445812, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132467 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from discussion_filter_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!132467\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fc3f4f17352251bc002c8612d6b82abd0d053d14\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593896320, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133725 --\u003e\\n### Basic group multiselect support for user token: gitlab-org/gitlab!133725\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Basic group multiselect support for user token\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e7fa81abfa9f541daf659dea19009afbab49a12\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131042, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- It was a small clean change , nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524201744, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for encouraging the MR author to use robust testing assertions. Great review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3540517, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539521470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to use kebab case for `data-testid` selectors\\n   - use `toMatchObect` in tests\\n   - use `toBe` for primitive values testing\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed some non blocking suggestions on comment rephrasing and changing tests description\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524216788, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127240 --\u003e\\n### Improve Value stream dashboard loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!127240\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Improve Value stream dashboard loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nI took it in half review from @jrushford as he was going on PTO\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - some changes to use computed classes on the element in a readable way\\n   - not to use `data-qa-selector` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert was generous to take it up and complete the review :bow: \\n\\nCan you please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review ? Thank you :thank_you:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524230146, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure thank you so much @pburdette :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541007009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: \\n    - to add Sentry logging for error scenarios\\n    - creating a helper function to set the data properties and write specs for it for changes made in haml file \\n    - to use `$emit` instead of `trigger` for testing an emitted event for component \\n- :mag: I identified to prevent failing tests in vue3 compat mode\\n    - an extra use of `nextTick`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463179030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129052 --\u003e\\n### Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure: gitlab-org/gitlab!129052\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dianalogan please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"86bc625b2e896a5c7ae1c21be7483ad6ce374aa8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849365, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Keep an eye out for missing test coverage. Especially when the MR deals with fixing a bug. We want to make sure it has good test coverage so the bug isn't introduced again. \\n\\nOverall good review :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4477803, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539565882, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @leipert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568899677, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @f_caplette :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568898395, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted to use $emit rather than $trigger but since the wrapper was native html element , trigger made more sense \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457667075, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125181 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!125181\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 09:52:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456369541, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124783 --\u003e\\n### Hook up update schedule mutation: gitlab-org/gitlab!124783\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hook up update schedule mutation\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alberts-gitlab please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add tests in `board_card_inner_spec.js`  but they will be added when rspecs are written for the same in future\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed asking why we prefer `eventHub` still\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463161255, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125479 --\u003e\\n### Dismiss modal after increasing access level: gitlab-org/gitlab!125479\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Dismiss modal after increasing access level\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ddavison please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:53 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656907, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125947 --\u003e\\n### Fix wrapping pattern of buttons: gitlab-org/gitlab!125947\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix wrapping pattern of buttons\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good suggestions and questions, not much else to comment on regarding this MR. Keep it up :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1465234546, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125971 --\u003e\\n### Mark vulnerability_details component as deprecated: gitlab-org/gitlab!125971\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"85d4a1316a06e5c11f902081a5bc9507930a634f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @leipert :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- A very small and clean MR to remove an existing FF, no feedback as such\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484705445, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified that the dropdown is closing when we click the copy button which is different from the original behaviour\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473663483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nLooked good to be since a helper method was added. Passed on to the maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to write test for the helper method in both the ee and ce version\\n\\n@mrincon please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473664730, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123522 --\u003e\\n### Implement search for group wikis: gitlab-org/gitlab!123522\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Implement search for group wikis\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@johnmason please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273525, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125980 --\u003e\\n### Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!125980\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123019 --\u003e\\n### Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\": gitlab-org/gitlab!123019\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\"\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470936880, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Did not review this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471435298, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124533 --\u003e\\n### Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!124533\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:50 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445781, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     1. To apply the new eslint rule files where it was used rather than disabling it\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471437751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125196 --\u003e\\n### Add no hard coded url eslint rules: gitlab-org/gitlab!125196\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add no hard coded url eslint rules\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:45 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that it was a small MR with data attribute changes for selection , approved it as is without any feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is \\n\\n@ddavison @justin_ho please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471438997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add a jest test case when the dataset property `cannot-merge` property is not provided\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471440135, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125555 --\u003e\\n### Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar: gitlab-org/gitlab!125555\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-10 10:06:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960557, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125509 --\u003e\\n### Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance: gitlab-org/gitlab!125509\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960568, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add the changes behind a FF just to be sure since this was a change in the head tags and we could not see any potential differences in local gdk and .com\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is **but the maintainer agreed that an FF would be good**\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471441009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested using utility classes at multiple css file changes to reduce the css page bundle size\\n\\nIt was a great improvement to see the final changes made only to the template file\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:48:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471442069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Nothing to suggest , it was a small ~frontend change adding a language attribute to html. Looked good :white_check_mark: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz @psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471443156, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n    - to use computed properties and constants\\n    - to remove redundant code like - `v-if` and `v-show` should never be together\\n    - to remove console logs \\n    - not to use computed property for constants\\n    - move i18n texts to options of the component\\n    - add a finally for isloading to false irrespective of error or not\\n    - remove redundant `v-else-if` which was not needed\\n    - move multiple `findComponent` in test cases as a variable\\n    - [use findComponent as component rather than name](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331672)\\n    - Use emit instead of trigger for gitlab-ui components in [jest test cases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331686)\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - redundant null check in `v-else`\\n     - passing reload as a function instead of emit \\n     - string extrapolation not need\\n\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471448970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125572 --\u003e\\n### Add Tracing List UI: gitlab-org/gitlab!125572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Tracing List UI\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467872137, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126578 --\u003e\\n### [issue-417870] Migrate button component to Pajamas Button: gitlab-org/gitlab!126578\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"da94499aad2ea3f497f66f74e02dec6b36dc850b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471841737, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This isn't one of the largest MRs, but thanks for the promotion of utility classes over custom CSS :thumbsup: and the nice and respectful interaction with a community contributor.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472031566, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This particular MR was a merge as-is MR thus, did not have any requests for change.\\n\\nFor maintainership, the MRs we are looking for are the more thoughtful technical design decisions and engineering considerations.  Regretfully, I cannot fairly grade your maintainership competency based on this MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 272636, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472314143, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127572 --\u003e\\n### Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times: gitlab-org/gitlab!127572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:20 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3473fc8ed41c758a8384a85eb86d04bca942249f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:19 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813801, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Frontend code didn't require changes so the review was :100:, what I'd expect from a frontend maintainer.\\n\\n-------\\n\\nI often read the entire MR to learn more about our codebase. I may ask for changes if I notice something in the backend, documentation, etc...\\n\\nI'd encourage \\\"holistic\\\" reviews and be ready to comment or ask about any part of the MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1607849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:37:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1607849, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1474957631, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127036 --\u003e\\n### Prevent loading state from showing after undo: gitlab-org/gitlab!127036\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9a4cc70bcb0665ed6a9165b00626054c290aaa69\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620562, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to remove the isSingleRequest for emojiQueries since they would not have large requests\\n    - some UI text changes for proper error description\\n    - unnecessary if condition in code\\n    - Show loader when the emojis are being fetched to show an indicator that a query is being run\\n    - remove not need cache.writeQuery in tests, should work fine with proper request handlers\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed checking that the query is called everytime we update any work item attribute\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1475870222, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125121 --\u003e\\n### Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items: gitlab-org/gitlab!125121\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-19 03:41:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464604003, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126709 --\u003e\\n### Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap: gitlab-org/gitlab!126709\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-22 06:31:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547126, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125877 --\u003e\\n### Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list: gitlab-org/gitlab!125877\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-16 06:31:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-20 09:53:43 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471137287, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani My suggestion about the specs came from specific domain knowledge about Incidents, so I wouldn't worry about that.\\n\\nYour review was detailed and what I would expect from a maintainer :thumbsup_tone1:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3146670, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480510293, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127014 --\u003e\\n### Remove import_details_page feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!127014\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove import_details_page feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124322 --\u003e\\n### Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests: gitlab-org/gitlab!124322\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:38:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480581161, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133508 --\u003e\\n### Project overview Edit button fix: gitlab-org/gitlab!133508\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Project overview Edit button fix\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e8dd22043f74a2b659825529463290378e4528c8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726639, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This was a larger MR so it can be easier to miss some things. From this review:\\n\\n- Keep an eye out for code (string and number literals) that can be replaced with existing constants\\n- For reusable/shared components, check that the code is generic and reusable by others\\n- Generally, question every line of code to check whether it is unneeded or can be simplified\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488788165, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @tristan.read :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 02:03:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484696992, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @mrincon :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484697575, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"sure , thank you @ddavison :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484699692, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small ~frontend changes to use `data-testid` instead of qa selector. Had no feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484703670, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n  * to use `fluid-width` instead of `fluid-content`  for `gl-collapsible-listbox` props\\n  * add an extra test for check for other props for the new dropdown\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1569008648, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n       - to change the naming for labelsContainer and labels in jest test cases\\n       - having a test case to make sure that the injected data property `allowScopedLabels` is injected and also having a default value for the injected prop in the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484715899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126425 --\u003e\\n### Work item header and input UI improvements: gitlab-org/gitlab!126425\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Work item header and input UI improvements\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 06:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469343489, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n     - (non-blocking)to use cache update instead of refetching the issue count when deleting the work item\\n     - to remove unused graphql query \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - to point using constants for work item types\\n     - improve the logic when updating fields by updating the persisted_fields and returning early when no work item found\\n     - use isActive is `issuable_item` to highlight selected item\\n     - update the milestone in the FF file\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484781979, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank for you timely review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11004366, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484911410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128081 --\u003e\\n### Fix bold font not being applied on viewed file after further changes. Add viewed file count to diff.: gitlab-org/gitlab!128081\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"be8bab870d9d7406215dcb7751daa1602a6c4d04\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495053415, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127937 --\u003e\\n### [issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states: gitlab-org/gitlab!127937\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:16 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758897, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add screenshots instead of videos in the MR description which gives more clarity  , but it was a non blocking comment hence approved.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495110152, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495112796, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - to use constants for \\\"group\\\" and \\\"project\\\"\\n     - to use scoped strings for translations \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499990702, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125661 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!125661\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-04 03:28:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758939, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - To use `GlDisclosureDropdown` instead of `GlListBox` according to the use case\\n     - To Add accessibility `toggleSrText` prop to dropdown\\n     - to change jest test case string ( nitpick )\\n     - to use `mount` instead of `mountExtended` since no testid was used\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499998030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127996 --\u003e\\n### Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown: gitlab-org/gitlab!127996\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758883, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Minimal changes and looked good to me without any changes, passed on to maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499999096, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126667 --\u003e\\n### Add view cache for PWA manifest.json: gitlab-org/gitlab!126667\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add view cache for PWA manifest.json\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-29 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492740118, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani this was a super large MR, thanks for tackling it and dropping your questions!\\n\\n\u003e I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nIt's interesting to note that the hidden element was actually **needed**. It just wasn't obvious **why**. It took some digging to figure out the reason behind the pattern used there.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2233420, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1497804374, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to\\n    - Add a test to make sure that resolver is called a particular number of times in addition to being called with params\\n    - renaming of some tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n    - rename the variable `mutationLoading` to `isDeleteInprogress` \\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1506027507, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127958 --\u003e\\n### Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination: gitlab-org/gitlab!127958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 08:22:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1496495447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggested changes , small and clean MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558649388, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change all FF's to name the FF's being used in tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out a small test description change\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558673332, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128324 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Various fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab!128324\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Various fixes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-08 03:14:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1500078923, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - To avoid `if-else` for apollo mutate\\n    - delete unnecessary computed props\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503790443, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127900 --\u003e\\n### Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards: gitlab-org/gitlab!127900\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-05 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758913, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to change the wording of some of the tests ( use verbs )\\n    - to move some reuseable components in the tests to the scope of the file and make available to all tests\\n    - remove unwanted assertions in tests\\n    - use `props()` instead of `attributes()` in tests\\n    - use i18n for reuseable constant strings\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507109492, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128088 --\u003e\\n### Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper: gitlab-org/gitlab!128088\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 03:50:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503854140, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't think the variable rename nitpick was a miss, it was just my opinion.\\n\\nThe UX review was skipped due to the team circumstances, but it's still something to keep in mind when reviewing.\\n\\nIt was a good review from you overall :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4846639, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507111595, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove unwanted props\\n   - use conditional chaining for computed props\\n   - remove unwanted hover class from options\\n   - use constants for icon strings from backend\\n   - use `data-testid` selectors instead of `data-qa` selectors\\n   - remove dead code\\n   - use `i18n` for strings\\n   - simplify names of props and prop values as well\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507117825, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126773 --\u003e\\n### Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files: gitlab-org/gitlab!126773\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:27:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493228070, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125260 --\u003e\\n### Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki: gitlab-org/gitlab!125260\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8373453d6ae6f7cb78780555186a249ed82f7a80\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!111116 --\u003e\\n### Display pull command for container registry tag: gitlab-org/gitlab!111116\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616c84e2577641082d10401f5a19fea04ac39323\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1510643149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126836 --\u003e\\n### Fix: group_select has render with older data: gitlab-org/gitlab!126836\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix: group_select has render with older data\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@peterhegman please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b9b2f391cef771e5b41cfa3d74c155b0e464b5f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for your review in that MR Deepika :bow: You made the right call approving it as is while still raising that UX quirk.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3732265, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1521576364, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove some unwanted lines of code\\n   - not to pass an empty object as a param for a util function\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1520453535, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128700 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count: gitlab-org/gitlab!128700\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to rename component event names to make more sense\\n   - to remove `isSingleRequest` from apollo query context after `unbatch_graphql_queries` flag is on on gitlab.com\\n   - conditional chaining for object properties\\n   - use computed props\\n   - use `toEqual` rather than `toStrictEqual`\\n   - instead of manually updating store state in tests , use store action dispatch\\n   - use `toHaveBeenCalledTimes` which will also check if the mock is called rather than just called mock\\n   - not to use `toBeDefined` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - using existing strings for translation\\n      - simplifying the property access by optional chaining\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558758161, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130784 --\u003e\\n### Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!130784\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-09 06:31:34 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541160506, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126649 --\u003e\\n### Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!126649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1498635175, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129775 --\u003e\\n### Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary: gitlab-org/gitlab!129775\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:59 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1522244292, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133476 --\u003e\\n### Remove issuable features moved popover: gitlab-org/gitlab!133476\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove issuable features moved popover\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@djadmin please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c3f7f75559ae30c476f441cc34c2ee37003ddfac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726662, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134178 --\u003e\\n### Migrate work item milestone dropdown to listbox: gitlab-org/gitlab!134178\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ee21d068c9fa91cd92f22ecaca9599cbfcb803e5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481959, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133406 --\u003e\\n### Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid: gitlab-org/gitlab!133406\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@sliaquat please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c497ef797d3e07bcde187480530eb49d015ac9fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726690, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134338 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue: gitlab-org/gitlab!134338\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f27e16c0733dac24965412a9e4f105b22695f1a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481935, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"You provided an excellent review, keep up the good work :rocket: \\n\\nThere wasn't a lot for me to find so no worries. \\n\\nThe only Feedback I can share is to be cautious with suggesting such [\\\"simplifications\\\"](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127240#note_1484661059) in cases where the scope of the problem is too big to be understood very quickly. \\n\\nI've seen too many bugs being introduced by such \\\"simplifications\\\". I would recommend to still address these but with a more open question:\\n\\n\\\"Could you help me understand why we would need this additional check on this value?\\\"\\n\\nThis will lead to the same result but reduce the risk to remove a needed check in a hurry.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7293390, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1526853785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested some minor variable naming changes \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to add test cases/coverage for the new date_timestamp\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538915383, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130013 --\u003e\\n### Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report: gitlab-org/gitlab!130013\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984874, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to use `attributes` function for testing the href of the component\\n    - let go of `exists` since that test will fail anyways\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536523693, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130100 --\u003e\\n### Move job sidebar buttons to header: gitlab-org/gitlab!130100\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move job sidebar buttons to header\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-30 06:31:02 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984776, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to use `default to 0` for prop type `Number`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536528512, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129895 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!129895\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524053220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , small MR with clean changes :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544850303, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130873 --\u003e\\n### Add background color to new MR tabs: gitlab-org/gitlab!130873\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add background color to new MR tabs\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543203980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @ealcantara :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544853007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , minimal ~frontend changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:23:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544852532, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130649 --\u003e\\n### Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License: gitlab-org/gitlab!130649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-02 06:30:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130652 --\u003e\\n### Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!130652\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alexpooley please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811596, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130616 --\u003e\\n### Draft: Add possibility for minimal forks: gitlab-org/gitlab!130616\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ab03e6bb588b8f72ec6195cfa6aa2d31a3b6c6d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811647, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130935 --\u003e\\n### Move Service Desk lists app under Issues: gitlab-org/gitlab!130935\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move Service Desk lists app under Issues\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130810 --\u003e\\n### Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend: gitlab-org/gitlab!130810\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@kushalpandya please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd7a7735f8a732d3a2b13c0079ae047db90b9288\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543204010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130075 --\u003e\\n### Hide search bar if below threshold: gitlab-org/gitlab!130075\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hide search bar if below threshold\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@tristan.read please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ae64b6b7bd2950d31c54abb361e264623276c9dc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984827, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No changes , just fixing failing pipelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546650918, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggestions , it only involved changing `data-testid` changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546653878, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125649 --\u003e\\n### Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming: gitlab-org/gitlab!125649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@huzaifaiftikhar1 please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984893, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested if there is a capability of adding a loading placeholder in the dropdown with the loading indicator ? ( Like `Loading`) \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549132611, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130986 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!130986\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845350, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129958 --\u003e\\n### Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color: gitlab-org/gitlab!129958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-12 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501750, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131028 --\u003e\\n### Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle: gitlab-org/gitlab!131028\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501694, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified \\n     - to remove the background for Progress widget in dark mode as well\\n     - update the border over hover similar in all the widgets\\n     - sync the background color of dropdowns like inputs in milestone and iterations\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:35:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:22:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484788602, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129219 --\u003e\\n### [Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived: gitlab-org/gitlab!129219\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845403, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130678 --\u003e\\n### Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0: gitlab-org/gitlab!130678\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:54 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845382, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked a question regarding the validity of an extra variable which led to fixing a bug :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562749106, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131737 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables: gitlab-org/gitlab!131737\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560771819, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change a test description to depict the true state of the `isCollapsed`. But it was such a pleasure reviewing the MR as it was one of the best I have seen in GitLab\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n   - cleanup `getCssClassDimensions` in mock\\n   - manually add `wrapper.destroy` in the afterEach block\\n   - group `mouse enter` tests into a describe block to prevent repetion\\n   - remove translating strings while testing in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562756509, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131918 --\u003e\\n### How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks: gitlab-org/gitlab!131918\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aqualls please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aecca61bc39672e2a9940fae4a8788cf2daf41fa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772193, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that I could not verify the MR with multiple back and forth resulting in updating the description a couple of times to correct the FF mentioned in the steps to reproduce.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:30:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560773323, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to have feature flag check as well for new entry in dashboard list\\n   - using computed property\\n   - change the test case wordings a little\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing not to use wrapper vm constant property in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:05:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503795483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hey there @deepika.guliani! Most of my points here were about specs readability and predictability. There was nothing here that would have prevented a merge, but sometimes when asking small questions, we find some underlying problems and understand the why.\\n\\nFor example, [when I proposed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/131028#note_1555293432) to move the `toggle?.remove` call to the afterEach block, it was a nitpick and it did not block merge, but by pointing it out, the author and I had a chat and we found out that the wrapper was being mounted twice and that's why there were some issues! This did not impact the tests right now, but it might have in the future as more and more tests were added and then the bug becomes harder to find.\\n\\nThis is not to say that you missed anything really (your reviews are all great!). More that especially in specs, it's easy to miss a lot of underlying problems and it's worth spending a bit of extra time to make sure that everything behave as it should, not just that tests are passing.\\n\\nKeep up the awesome work!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5327378, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563502843, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131951 --\u003e\\n### Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!131951\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:16:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461754, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions, ~frontend light MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is, no ~frontend feedback\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571569999, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129369 --\u003e\\n### Update trial column: gitlab-org/gitlab!129369\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update trial column\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524194801, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132846 --\u003e\\n### Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors: gitlab-org/gitlab!132846\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339261, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-02 12:40:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549256589, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions , clean MR \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587381535, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132832 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!132832\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-30 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339281, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested for a ~UX review since this might have more touching points than mentioned. The code looked good to me.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n  @himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587384960, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587385136, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132613 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix some error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!132613\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix some error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-28 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1581646466, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133275 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand: gitlab-org/gitlab!133275\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 06:31:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4112f7b6c1c062a21e7a8e161d3425dbd7952fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589009889, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add some test cases and `toMatchObject` for testing more props of the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589277355, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131928 --\u003e\\n### Update artifacts page layout: gitlab-org/gitlab!131928\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update artifacts page layout\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461780, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked some clarifying questions, but nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@justin_ho  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589281507, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131143 --\u003e\\n### License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!131143\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@chloeliu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:47 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1556289060, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nBackend heavy , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589285808, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131849 --\u003e\\n### Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids: gitlab-org/gitlab!131849\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mlapierre please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-20 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772203, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: Just to add a before and after video to make the description more clear\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589290037, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"It was a nice initial review! Your suggestion was valuable.\\n\\nGreat attention to detail, important findings, helpful comments. \\n\\nGreat work @deepika.guliani :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10762712, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 14:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:22:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589877102, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133200 --\u003e\\n### Fix devops empty state illustration: gitlab-org/gitlab!133200\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix devops empty state illustration\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pskorupa please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1590705608, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small MR with no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n`@ealcantara` please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1592642788, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good review with good suggestions! A couple of comments:\\n\\n- I believe we don't prefer `||` over `??`, both are perfectly valid\\n- I believe we don't prefer `toEqual` to `toStrictEqual`, in fact `toStrictEqual` is arguably better since it is a more precise check\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 12:36:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-09 05:08:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593026254, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134245 --\u003e\\n### Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!134245\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@acroitor please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23efd83fe1a18f112ebcb8e158b67b5e509014c2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131000, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131825 --\u003e\\n### Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics: gitlab-org/gitlab!131825\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"36b2e435a8457e49253a82a3156bb175daaeabe2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571528474, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134591 --\u003e\\n### Fix epic board children count and weight on card: gitlab-org/gitlab!134591\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix epic board children count and weight on card\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5b708cd017dd2ef2bf249c20c4006a1f13e99031\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1609999412, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134377 --\u003e\\n### Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget: gitlab-org/gitlab!134377\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d4a6612056c26010216970d82e54952419c1c886\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1611728905, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134730 --\u003e\\n### Display abuse report notes (frontend): gitlab-org/gitlab!134730\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2530d3cd51ab399da0ba2945e6d0f64ad38f0d3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1615989743, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Closing this since https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/129537+ is merged\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1fae663519385999828d1931b66d7b7f1e52da66\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1617560916, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3540517, \"username\": \"ealcantara\", \"name\": \"Enrique Alc\\u00e1ntara\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4477803, \"username\": \"pburdette\", \"name\": \"Payton Burdette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 272636, \"username\": \"ddavison\", \"name\": \"Dan Davison\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 1607849, \"username\": \"mrincon\", \"name\": \"Miguel Rincon\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3146670, \"username\": \"tristan.read\", \"name\": \"Tristan Read\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11004366, \"username\": \"eduardosanz\", \"name\": \"Eduardo Sanz Garc\\u00eda\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 2233420, \"username\": \"pslaughter\", \"name\": \"Paul Slaughter\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4846639, \"username\": \"fguibert\", \"name\": \"Florie Guibert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3732265, \"username\": \"pgascouvaillancourt\", \"name\": \"Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 7293390, \"username\": \"jannik_lehmann\", \"name\": \"Jannik Lehmann\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 5327378, \"username\": \"f_caplette\", \"name\": \"Fr\\u00e9d\\u00e9ric Caplette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 10762712, \"username\": \"arfedoro\", \"name\": \"Artur Fedorov\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 6543, \"name\": \"GitLab.com\", \"path\": \"gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 7764, \"name\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"path\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 17069039}]}","query":"{url} - Summarize this issue.","query_id":"ce24af6915ac45368c364af816d2b310","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130193114","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130193114, \"title\": \"Trainee FE Maintainer (Gitlab) - Deepika Guliani\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-03 05:03:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Basic setup\\n\\n1. [x] Read the [code review page in the handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/) and the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html).\\n1. [x] Understand [how to become a maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#how-to-become-a-project-maintainer) and add yourself as a [trainee maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer) in the [team database](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md). (MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/105456+)\\n\\n## Working towards becoming a maintainer\\n\\nThese are only guidelines. Remember that there is no specific timeline on this.\\n\\nAs part of your journey towards becoming a maintainer, you may find it useful to:\\n\\n1. [ ] Act as a coach in a big deliverable that requires [following the planning step](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/fe_guide/development_process.html#planning-development) as part of the trainee program.\\n1. [x] [Shadow a maintainer](#code-review-pairing) while they review an MR. This will allow you to get insight into the thought processes involved.\\n1. [x] [Have a maintainer shadow *you*](#code-review-pairing) while you review an MR *as if you were a maintainer* . Ideally, this would be with a different maintainer to the above, so you can get different insights.\\n1. [x] *Optional:* [Consider finding a mentor](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer-mentorship-pilot-program) to help you become a maintainer.\\n\\nIt is up to you to ensure that you are getting enough MRs to review, and of varied types. All engineers are reviewers, so you should already be receiving regular reviews from Reviewer Roulette. You could also seek out more reviews from your team, or #frontend Slack channels.\\n\\nYour reviews should aim to cover maintainer responsibilities as well as reviewer responsibilities. Your approval means you think it is ready to merge.\\n\\nAfter each MR is merged or closed, add a discussion to this issue using this template:\\n\\n```markdown\\n### (Merge request title): (Merge request URL)\\n\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I suggested/identified/noted...\\\")\\n\\nPost-review (opportunities to learn):\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I missed...\\\" or \\\"Merged as-is\\\")\\n\\n(Maintainer who reviewed this merge request) Please add feedback, and compare\\nthis review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\nThe purpose of comparing your review to the maintainer's review is to engage in active learning and expand your list of items to consider. Remember, different maintainers are going to identify different issues in the same code. As long as you are not missing large errors or bugs, don't feel like you are doing a bad job if you and a maintainer make different suggestions.\\n\\n**Note:** Do not include reviews of security MRs because review feedback might reveal security issue details.\\n\\n**Tip:** There are [tools](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/tools-and-tips/#trainee-maintainer-issue-upkeep) available to assist with this task.\\n\\n### Code Review Pairing\\n\\nMuch like pair programming, pairing on code review is a great way to knowledge share and collaborate on merge request. This is a great activity for trainee maintainers to participate with maintainers for learning their process of code review.\\n\\nA **private code review session** (unrecorded) involves one primary reviewer, and a shadow. If more than one shadow wishes to observe a private session, please consider obtaining consent from the merge request author.\\n\\nA **public code review session** involves a primary reviewer and one or more shadows in a recorded session that is released publicly, for example to GitLab Unfiltered.\\n\\n* If the merge request author is a GitLab team member, please consider obtaining consent from them.\\n* If the merge request author is a community contributor, you **must** obtain consent from them.\\n* Do **not** release reviews of security merge requests publicly.\\n\\n## When you're ready to make it official\\n\\nWhen reviews have accumulated, and recent reviews consistently fulfill maintainer responsibilities, any maintainer can take the next step. The trainee should also feel free to discuss their progress with their manager or any maintainer at any time.\\n\\n1. [ ] Create a merge request updating [your team member entry](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md) proposing yourself as a maintainer.\\n1. [ ] Keep reviewing, start merging :metal:\", \"milestone_id\": null, \"iid\": 34345, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 244675350, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:15 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 11701495, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 17069039, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 130812, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2015-11-27 21:29:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-04-27 10:56:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 8595532, \"title\": \"trainee maintainer\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": null, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125868 --\u003e\\n### Remove hard coded language: gitlab-org/gitlab!125868\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove hard coded language\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Looked good to me , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536524660, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130137 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder: gitlab-org/gitlab!130137\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-28 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984745, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134349 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!134349\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ad0fef742d45c5008c793f75979365880c402acb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608130962, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127788 --\u003e\\n### Fixing problems with project overview: gitlab-org/gitlab!127788\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixing problems with project overview\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772209, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Dependency updates are often \\\"waived through\\\". You took the time to understand what's going on and tried out the update locally :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563423640, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to update the description of the MR ( not blocking )\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503796209, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127151 --\u003e\\n### Fix image_list_row_spec.js: gitlab-org/gitlab!127151\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix image_list_row_spec.js\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:35:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670465, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure ! Thank you @fguibert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507118687, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125939 --\u003e\\n### Add codeowners validation block: gitlab-org/gitlab!125939\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add codeowners validation block\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b4deb31b91d08bedeb6d231d1b3de07dfa0a30f1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273491, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested a nitpick to put a repeatedly tested component to a variable \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463155402, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125496 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!125496\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656852, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125982 --\u003e\\n### Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency: gitlab-org/gitlab!125982\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jivanvl please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f32b176e44c8c85d053beecdcaa3adda46362829\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547153, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to \\n     - to follow frontend dev guidelines for exported constants\\n     - not duplicate issue list queries right now but move everything to shared in the next iteration , making the cleanup more efficient\\n     - refactor the jest specs to follow the naming conventions, remove unwanted code and add a couple of extra tests - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125877#note_1475901603 \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: The maintainer added a non-blocking suggestion to add more test coverage\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina @tristan.read in please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1479325916, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125255 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope: gitlab-org/gitlab!125255\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 15:12:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393023, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130145 --\u003e\\n### Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!130145\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-25 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4ba705c0455a37a6bdf3b1cea4d9624e5453c39c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1528942055, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - not to use name with component when it is already used in hidden element\\n      - edit the test-id naming convention , was using `js-` naming convention\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489916587, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!121585 --\u003e\\n### Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects: gitlab-org/gitlab!121585\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@terrichu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:53:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445812, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132467 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from discussion_filter_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!132467\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fc3f4f17352251bc002c8612d6b82abd0d053d14\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593896320, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133725 --\u003e\\n### Basic group multiselect support for user token: gitlab-org/gitlab!133725\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Basic group multiselect support for user token\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e7fa81abfa9f541daf659dea19009afbab49a12\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131042, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- It was a small clean change , nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524201744, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for encouraging the MR author to use robust testing assertions. Great review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3540517, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539521470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to use kebab case for `data-testid` selectors\\n   - use `toMatchObect` in tests\\n   - use `toBe` for primitive values testing\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed some non blocking suggestions on comment rephrasing and changing tests description\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524216788, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127240 --\u003e\\n### Improve Value stream dashboard loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!127240\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Improve Value stream dashboard loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nI took it in half review from @jrushford as he was going on PTO\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - some changes to use computed classes on the element in a readable way\\n   - not to use `data-qa-selector` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert was generous to take it up and complete the review :bow: \\n\\nCan you please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review ? Thank you :thank_you:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524230146, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure thank you so much @pburdette :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541007009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: \\n    - to add Sentry logging for error scenarios\\n    - creating a helper function to set the data properties and write specs for it for changes made in haml file \\n    - to use `$emit` instead of `trigger` for testing an emitted event for component \\n- :mag: I identified to prevent failing tests in vue3 compat mode\\n    - an extra use of `nextTick`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463179030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129052 --\u003e\\n### Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure: gitlab-org/gitlab!129052\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dianalogan please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"86bc625b2e896a5c7ae1c21be7483ad6ce374aa8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849365, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Keep an eye out for missing test coverage. Especially when the MR deals with fixing a bug. We want to make sure it has good test coverage so the bug isn't introduced again. \\n\\nOverall good review :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4477803, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539565882, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @leipert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568899677, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @f_caplette :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568898395, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted to use $emit rather than $trigger but since the wrapper was native html element , trigger made more sense \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457667075, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125181 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!125181\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 09:52:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456369541, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124783 --\u003e\\n### Hook up update schedule mutation: gitlab-org/gitlab!124783\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hook up update schedule mutation\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alberts-gitlab please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add tests in `board_card_inner_spec.js`  but they will be added when rspecs are written for the same in future\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed asking why we prefer `eventHub` still\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463161255, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125479 --\u003e\\n### Dismiss modal after increasing access level: gitlab-org/gitlab!125479\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Dismiss modal after increasing access level\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ddavison please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:53 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656907, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125947 --\u003e\\n### Fix wrapping pattern of buttons: gitlab-org/gitlab!125947\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix wrapping pattern of buttons\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good suggestions and questions, not much else to comment on regarding this MR. Keep it up :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1465234546, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125971 --\u003e\\n### Mark vulnerability_details component as deprecated: gitlab-org/gitlab!125971\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"85d4a1316a06e5c11f902081a5bc9507930a634f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @leipert :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- A very small and clean MR to remove an existing FF, no feedback as such\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484705445, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified that the dropdown is closing when we click the copy button which is different from the original behaviour\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473663483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nLooked good to be since a helper method was added. Passed on to the maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to write test for the helper method in both the ee and ce version\\n\\n@mrincon please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473664730, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123522 --\u003e\\n### Implement search for group wikis: gitlab-org/gitlab!123522\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Implement search for group wikis\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@johnmason please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273525, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125980 --\u003e\\n### Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!125980\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123019 --\u003e\\n### Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\": gitlab-org/gitlab!123019\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\"\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470936880, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Did not review this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471435298, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124533 --\u003e\\n### Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!124533\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:50 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445781, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     1. To apply the new eslint rule files where it was used rather than disabling it\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471437751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125196 --\u003e\\n### Add no hard coded url eslint rules: gitlab-org/gitlab!125196\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add no hard coded url eslint rules\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:45 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that it was a small MR with data attribute changes for selection , approved it as is without any feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is \\n\\n@ddavison @justin_ho please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471438997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add a jest test case when the dataset property `cannot-merge` property is not provided\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471440135, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125555 --\u003e\\n### Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar: gitlab-org/gitlab!125555\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-10 10:06:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960557, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125509 --\u003e\\n### Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance: gitlab-org/gitlab!125509\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960568, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add the changes behind a FF just to be sure since this was a change in the head tags and we could not see any potential differences in local gdk and .com\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is **but the maintainer agreed that an FF would be good**\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471441009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested using utility classes at multiple css file changes to reduce the css page bundle size\\n\\nIt was a great improvement to see the final changes made only to the template file\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:48:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471442069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Nothing to suggest , it was a small ~frontend change adding a language attribute to html. Looked good :white_check_mark: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz @psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471443156, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n    - to use computed properties and constants\\n    - to remove redundant code like - `v-if` and `v-show` should never be together\\n    - to remove console logs \\n    - not to use computed property for constants\\n    - move i18n texts to options of the component\\n    - add a finally for isloading to false irrespective of error or not\\n    - remove redundant `v-else-if` which was not needed\\n    - move multiple `findComponent` in test cases as a variable\\n    - [use findComponent as component rather than name](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331672)\\n    - Use emit instead of trigger for gitlab-ui components in [jest test cases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331686)\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - redundant null check in `v-else`\\n     - passing reload as a function instead of emit \\n     - string extrapolation not need\\n\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471448970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125572 --\u003e\\n### Add Tracing List UI: gitlab-org/gitlab!125572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Tracing List UI\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467872137, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126578 --\u003e\\n### [issue-417870] Migrate button component to Pajamas Button: gitlab-org/gitlab!126578\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"da94499aad2ea3f497f66f74e02dec6b36dc850b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471841737, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This isn't one of the largest MRs, but thanks for the promotion of utility classes over custom CSS :thumbsup: and the nice and respectful interaction with a community contributor.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472031566, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This particular MR was a merge as-is MR thus, did not have any requests for change.\\n\\nFor maintainership, the MRs we are looking for are the more thoughtful technical design decisions and engineering considerations.  Regretfully, I cannot fairly grade your maintainership competency based on this MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 272636, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472314143, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127572 --\u003e\\n### Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times: gitlab-org/gitlab!127572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:20 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3473fc8ed41c758a8384a85eb86d04bca942249f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:19 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813801, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Frontend code didn't require changes so the review was :100:, what I'd expect from a frontend maintainer.\\n\\n-------\\n\\nI often read the entire MR to learn more about our codebase. I may ask for changes if I notice something in the backend, documentation, etc...\\n\\nI'd encourage \\\"holistic\\\" reviews and be ready to comment or ask about any part of the MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1607849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:37:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1607849, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1474957631, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127036 --\u003e\\n### Prevent loading state from showing after undo: gitlab-org/gitlab!127036\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9a4cc70bcb0665ed6a9165b00626054c290aaa69\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620562, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to remove the isSingleRequest for emojiQueries since they would not have large requests\\n    - some UI text changes for proper error description\\n    - unnecessary if condition in code\\n    - Show loader when the emojis are being fetched to show an indicator that a query is being run\\n    - remove not need cache.writeQuery in tests, should work fine with proper request handlers\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed checking that the query is called everytime we update any work item attribute\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1475870222, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125121 --\u003e\\n### Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items: gitlab-org/gitlab!125121\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-19 03:41:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464604003, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126709 --\u003e\\n### Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap: gitlab-org/gitlab!126709\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-22 06:31:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547126, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125877 --\u003e\\n### Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list: gitlab-org/gitlab!125877\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-16 06:31:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-20 09:53:43 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471137287, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani My suggestion about the specs came from specific domain knowledge about Incidents, so I wouldn't worry about that.\\n\\nYour review was detailed and what I would expect from a maintainer :thumbsup_tone1:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3146670, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480510293, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127014 --\u003e\\n### Remove import_details_page feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!127014\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove import_details_page feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124322 --\u003e\\n### Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests: gitlab-org/gitlab!124322\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:38:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480581161, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133508 --\u003e\\n### Project overview Edit button fix: gitlab-org/gitlab!133508\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Project overview Edit button fix\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e8dd22043f74a2b659825529463290378e4528c8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726639, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This was a larger MR so it can be easier to miss some things. From this review:\\n\\n- Keep an eye out for code (string and number literals) that can be replaced with existing constants\\n- For reusable/shared components, check that the code is generic and reusable by others\\n- Generally, question every line of code to check whether it is unneeded or can be simplified\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488788165, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @tristan.read :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 02:03:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484696992, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @mrincon :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484697575, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"sure , thank you @ddavison :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484699692, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small ~frontend changes to use `data-testid` instead of qa selector. Had no feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484703670, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n  * to use `fluid-width` instead of `fluid-content`  for `gl-collapsible-listbox` props\\n  * add an extra test for check for other props for the new dropdown\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1569008648, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n       - to change the naming for labelsContainer and labels in jest test cases\\n       - having a test case to make sure that the injected data property `allowScopedLabels` is injected and also having a default value for the injected prop in the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484715899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126425 --\u003e\\n### Work item header and input UI improvements: gitlab-org/gitlab!126425\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Work item header and input UI improvements\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 06:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469343489, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n     - (non-blocking)to use cache update instead of refetching the issue count when deleting the work item\\n     - to remove unused graphql query \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - to point using constants for work item types\\n     - improve the logic when updating fields by updating the persisted_fields and returning early when no work item found\\n     - use isActive is `issuable_item` to highlight selected item\\n     - update the milestone in the FF file\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484781979, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank for you timely review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11004366, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484911410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128081 --\u003e\\n### Fix bold font not being applied on viewed file after further changes. Add viewed file count to diff.: gitlab-org/gitlab!128081\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"be8bab870d9d7406215dcb7751daa1602a6c4d04\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495053415, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127937 --\u003e\\n### [issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states: gitlab-org/gitlab!127937\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:16 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758897, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add screenshots instead of videos in the MR description which gives more clarity  , but it was a non blocking comment hence approved.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495110152, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495112796, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - to use constants for \\\"group\\\" and \\\"project\\\"\\n     - to use scoped strings for translations \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499990702, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125661 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!125661\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-04 03:28:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758939, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - To use `GlDisclosureDropdown` instead of `GlListBox` according to the use case\\n     - To Add accessibility `toggleSrText` prop to dropdown\\n     - to change jest test case string ( nitpick )\\n     - to use `mount` instead of `mountExtended` since no testid was used\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499998030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127996 --\u003e\\n### Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown: gitlab-org/gitlab!127996\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758883, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Minimal changes and looked good to me without any changes, passed on to maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499999096, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126667 --\u003e\\n### Add view cache for PWA manifest.json: gitlab-org/gitlab!126667\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add view cache for PWA manifest.json\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-29 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492740118, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani this was a super large MR, thanks for tackling it and dropping your questions!\\n\\n\u003e I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nIt's interesting to note that the hidden element was actually **needed**. It just wasn't obvious **why**. It took some digging to figure out the reason behind the pattern used there.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2233420, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1497804374, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to\\n    - Add a test to make sure that resolver is called a particular number of times in addition to being called with params\\n    - renaming of some tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n    - rename the variable `mutationLoading` to `isDeleteInprogress` \\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1506027507, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127958 --\u003e\\n### Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination: gitlab-org/gitlab!127958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 08:22:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1496495447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggested changes , small and clean MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558649388, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change all FF's to name the FF's being used in tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out a small test description change\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558673332, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128324 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Various fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab!128324\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Various fixes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-08 03:14:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1500078923, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - To avoid `if-else` for apollo mutate\\n    - delete unnecessary computed props\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503790443, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127900 --\u003e\\n### Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards: gitlab-org/gitlab!127900\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-05 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758913, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to change the wording of some of the tests ( use verbs )\\n    - to move some reuseable components in the tests to the scope of the file and make available to all tests\\n    - remove unwanted assertions in tests\\n    - use `props()` instead of `attributes()` in tests\\n    - use i18n for reuseable constant strings\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507109492, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128088 --\u003e\\n### Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper: gitlab-org/gitlab!128088\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 03:50:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503854140, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't think the variable rename nitpick was a miss, it was just my opinion.\\n\\nThe UX review was skipped due to the team circumstances, but it's still something to keep in mind when reviewing.\\n\\nIt was a good review from you overall :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4846639, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507111595, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove unwanted props\\n   - use conditional chaining for computed props\\n   - remove unwanted hover class from options\\n   - use constants for icon strings from backend\\n   - use `data-testid` selectors instead of `data-qa` selectors\\n   - remove dead code\\n   - use `i18n` for strings\\n   - simplify names of props and prop values as well\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507117825, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126773 --\u003e\\n### Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files: gitlab-org/gitlab!126773\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:27:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493228070, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125260 --\u003e\\n### Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki: gitlab-org/gitlab!125260\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8373453d6ae6f7cb78780555186a249ed82f7a80\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!111116 --\u003e\\n### Display pull command for container registry tag: gitlab-org/gitlab!111116\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616c84e2577641082d10401f5a19fea04ac39323\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1510643149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126836 --\u003e\\n### Fix: group_select has render with older data: gitlab-org/gitlab!126836\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix: group_select has render with older data\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@peterhegman please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b9b2f391cef771e5b41cfa3d74c155b0e464b5f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for your review in that MR Deepika :bow: You made the right call approving it as is while still raising that UX quirk.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3732265, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1521576364, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove some unwanted lines of code\\n   - not to pass an empty object as a param for a util function\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1520453535, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128700 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count: gitlab-org/gitlab!128700\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to rename component event names to make more sense\\n   - to remove `isSingleRequest` from apollo query context after `unbatch_graphql_queries` flag is on on gitlab.com\\n   - conditional chaining for object properties\\n   - use computed props\\n   - use `toEqual` rather than `toStrictEqual`\\n   - instead of manually updating store state in tests , use store action dispatch\\n   - use `toHaveBeenCalledTimes` which will also check if the mock is called rather than just called mock\\n   - not to use `toBeDefined` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - using existing strings for translation\\n      - simplifying the property access by optional chaining\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558758161, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130784 --\u003e\\n### Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!130784\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-09 06:31:34 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541160506, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126649 --\u003e\\n### Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!126649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1498635175, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129775 --\u003e\\n### Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary: gitlab-org/gitlab!129775\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:59 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1522244292, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133476 --\u003e\\n### Remove issuable features moved popover: gitlab-org/gitlab!133476\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove issuable features moved popover\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@djadmin please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c3f7f75559ae30c476f441cc34c2ee37003ddfac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726662, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134178 --\u003e\\n### Migrate work item milestone dropdown to listbox: gitlab-org/gitlab!134178\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ee21d068c9fa91cd92f22ecaca9599cbfcb803e5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481959, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133406 --\u003e\\n### Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid: gitlab-org/gitlab!133406\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@sliaquat please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c497ef797d3e07bcde187480530eb49d015ac9fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726690, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134338 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue: gitlab-org/gitlab!134338\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f27e16c0733dac24965412a9e4f105b22695f1a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481935, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"You provided an excellent review, keep up the good work :rocket: \\n\\nThere wasn't a lot for me to find so no worries. \\n\\nThe only Feedback I can share is to be cautious with suggesting such [\\\"simplifications\\\"](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127240#note_1484661059) in cases where the scope of the problem is too big to be understood very quickly. \\n\\nI've seen too many bugs being introduced by such \\\"simplifications\\\". I would recommend to still address these but with a more open question:\\n\\n\\\"Could you help me understand why we would need this additional check on this value?\\\"\\n\\nThis will lead to the same result but reduce the risk to remove a needed check in a hurry.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7293390, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1526853785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested some minor variable naming changes \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to add test cases/coverage for the new date_timestamp\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538915383, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130013 --\u003e\\n### Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report: gitlab-org/gitlab!130013\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984874, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to use `attributes` function for testing the href of the component\\n    - let go of `exists` since that test will fail anyways\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536523693, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130100 --\u003e\\n### Move job sidebar buttons to header: gitlab-org/gitlab!130100\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move job sidebar buttons to header\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-30 06:31:02 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984776, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to use `default to 0` for prop type `Number`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536528512, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129895 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!129895\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524053220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , small MR with clean changes :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544850303, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130873 --\u003e\\n### Add background color to new MR tabs: gitlab-org/gitlab!130873\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add background color to new MR tabs\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543203980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @ealcantara :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544853007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , minimal ~frontend changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:23:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544852532, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130649 --\u003e\\n### Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License: gitlab-org/gitlab!130649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-02 06:30:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130652 --\u003e\\n### Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!130652\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alexpooley please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811596, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130616 --\u003e\\n### Draft: Add possibility for minimal forks: gitlab-org/gitlab!130616\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ab03e6bb588b8f72ec6195cfa6aa2d31a3b6c6d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811647, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130935 --\u003e\\n### Move Service Desk lists app under Issues: gitlab-org/gitlab!130935\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move Service Desk lists app under Issues\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130810 --\u003e\\n### Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend: gitlab-org/gitlab!130810\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@kushalpandya please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd7a7735f8a732d3a2b13c0079ae047db90b9288\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543204010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130075 --\u003e\\n### Hide search bar if below threshold: gitlab-org/gitlab!130075\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hide search bar if below threshold\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@tristan.read please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ae64b6b7bd2950d31c54abb361e264623276c9dc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984827, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No changes , just fixing failing pipelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546650918, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggestions , it only involved changing `data-testid` changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546653878, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125649 --\u003e\\n### Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming: gitlab-org/gitlab!125649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@huzaifaiftikhar1 please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984893, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested if there is a capability of adding a loading placeholder in the dropdown with the loading indicator ? ( Like `Loading`) \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549132611, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130986 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!130986\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845350, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129958 --\u003e\\n### Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color: gitlab-org/gitlab!129958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-12 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501750, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131028 --\u003e\\n### Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle: gitlab-org/gitlab!131028\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501694, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified \\n     - to remove the background for Progress widget in dark mode as well\\n     - update the border over hover similar in all the widgets\\n     - sync the background color of dropdowns like inputs in milestone and iterations\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:35:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:22:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484788602, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129219 --\u003e\\n### [Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived: gitlab-org/gitlab!129219\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845403, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130678 --\u003e\\n### Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0: gitlab-org/gitlab!130678\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:54 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845382, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked a question regarding the validity of an extra variable which led to fixing a bug :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562749106, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131737 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables: gitlab-org/gitlab!131737\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560771819, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change a test description to depict the true state of the `isCollapsed`. But it was such a pleasure reviewing the MR as it was one of the best I have seen in GitLab\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n   - cleanup `getCssClassDimensions` in mock\\n   - manually add `wrapper.destroy` in the afterEach block\\n   - group `mouse enter` tests into a describe block to prevent repetion\\n   - remove translating strings while testing in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562756509, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131918 --\u003e\\n### How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks: gitlab-org/gitlab!131918\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aqualls please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aecca61bc39672e2a9940fae4a8788cf2daf41fa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772193, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that I could not verify the MR with multiple back and forth resulting in updating the description a couple of times to correct the FF mentioned in the steps to reproduce.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:30:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560773323, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to have feature flag check as well for new entry in dashboard list\\n   - using computed property\\n   - change the test case wordings a little\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing not to use wrapper vm constant property in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:05:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503795483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hey there @deepika.guliani! Most of my points here were about specs readability and predictability. There was nothing here that would have prevented a merge, but sometimes when asking small questions, we find some underlying problems and understand the why.\\n\\nFor example, [when I proposed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/131028#note_1555293432) to move the `toggle?.remove` call to the afterEach block, it was a nitpick and it did not block merge, but by pointing it out, the author and I had a chat and we found out that the wrapper was being mounted twice and that's why there were some issues! This did not impact the tests right now, but it might have in the future as more and more tests were added and then the bug becomes harder to find.\\n\\nThis is not to say that you missed anything really (your reviews are all great!). More that especially in specs, it's easy to miss a lot of underlying problems and it's worth spending a bit of extra time to make sure that everything behave as it should, not just that tests are passing.\\n\\nKeep up the awesome work!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5327378, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563502843, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131951 --\u003e\\n### Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!131951\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:16:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461754, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions, ~frontend light MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is, no ~frontend feedback\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571569999, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129369 --\u003e\\n### Update trial column: gitlab-org/gitlab!129369\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update trial column\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524194801, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132846 --\u003e\\n### Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors: gitlab-org/gitlab!132846\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339261, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-02 12:40:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549256589, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions , clean MR \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587381535, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132832 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!132832\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-30 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339281, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested for a ~UX review since this might have more touching points than mentioned. The code looked good to me.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n  @himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587384960, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587385136, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132613 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix some error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!132613\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix some error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-28 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1581646466, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133275 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand: gitlab-org/gitlab!133275\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 06:31:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4112f7b6c1c062a21e7a8e161d3425dbd7952fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589009889, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add some test cases and `toMatchObject` for testing more props of the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589277355, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131928 --\u003e\\n### Update artifacts page layout: gitlab-org/gitlab!131928\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update artifacts page layout\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461780, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked some clarifying questions, but nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@justin_ho  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589281507, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131143 --\u003e\\n### License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!131143\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@chloeliu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:47 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1556289060, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nBackend heavy , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589285808, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131849 --\u003e\\n### Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids: gitlab-org/gitlab!131849\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mlapierre please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-20 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772203, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: Just to add a before and after video to make the description more clear\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589290037, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"It was a nice initial review! Your suggestion was valuable.\\n\\nGreat attention to detail, important findings, helpful comments. \\n\\nGreat work @deepika.guliani :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10762712, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 14:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:22:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589877102, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133200 --\u003e\\n### Fix devops empty state illustration: gitlab-org/gitlab!133200\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix devops empty state illustration\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pskorupa please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1590705608, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small MR with no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n`@ealcantara` please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1592642788, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good review with good suggestions! A couple of comments:\\n\\n- I believe we don't prefer `||` over `??`, both are perfectly valid\\n- I believe we don't prefer `toEqual` to `toStrictEqual`, in fact `toStrictEqual` is arguably better since it is a more precise check\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 12:36:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-09 05:08:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593026254, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134245 --\u003e\\n### Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!134245\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@acroitor please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23efd83fe1a18f112ebcb8e158b67b5e509014c2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131000, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131825 --\u003e\\n### Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics: gitlab-org/gitlab!131825\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"36b2e435a8457e49253a82a3156bb175daaeabe2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571528474, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134591 --\u003e\\n### Fix epic board children count and weight on card: gitlab-org/gitlab!134591\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix epic board children count and weight on card\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5b708cd017dd2ef2bf249c20c4006a1f13e99031\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1609999412, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134377 --\u003e\\n### Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget: gitlab-org/gitlab!134377\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d4a6612056c26010216970d82e54952419c1c886\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1611728905, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134730 --\u003e\\n### Display abuse report notes (frontend): gitlab-org/gitlab!134730\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2530d3cd51ab399da0ba2945e6d0f64ad38f0d3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1615989743, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Closing this since https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/129537+ is merged\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1fae663519385999828d1931b66d7b7f1e52da66\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1617560916, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3540517, \"username\": \"ealcantara\", \"name\": \"Enrique Alc\\u00e1ntara\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4477803, \"username\": \"pburdette\", \"name\": \"Payton Burdette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 272636, \"username\": \"ddavison\", \"name\": \"Dan Davison\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 1607849, \"username\": \"mrincon\", \"name\": \"Miguel Rincon\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3146670, \"username\": \"tristan.read\", \"name\": \"Tristan Read\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11004366, \"username\": \"eduardosanz\", \"name\": \"Eduardo Sanz Garc\\u00eda\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 2233420, \"username\": \"pslaughter\", \"name\": \"Paul Slaughter\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4846639, \"username\": \"fguibert\", \"name\": \"Florie Guibert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3732265, \"username\": \"pgascouvaillancourt\", \"name\": \"Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 7293390, \"username\": \"jannik_lehmann\", \"name\": \"Jannik Lehmann\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 5327378, \"username\": \"f_caplette\", \"name\": \"Fr\\u00e9d\\u00e9ric Caplette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 10762712, \"username\": \"arfedoro\", \"name\": \"Artur Fedorov\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 6543, \"name\": \"GitLab.com\", \"path\": \"gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 7764, \"name\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"path\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 17069039}]}","query":"What is the status of {url}?","query_id":"67b838dfa62d4e14b61d828c8a0cb032","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130193114","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130193114, \"title\": \"Trainee FE Maintainer (Gitlab) - Deepika Guliani\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-03 05:03:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Basic setup\\n\\n1. [x] Read the [code review page in the handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/) and the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html).\\n1. [x] Understand [how to become a maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#how-to-become-a-project-maintainer) and add yourself as a [trainee maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer) in the [team database](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md). (MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/105456+)\\n\\n## Working towards becoming a maintainer\\n\\nThese are only guidelines. Remember that there is no specific timeline on this.\\n\\nAs part of your journey towards becoming a maintainer, you may find it useful to:\\n\\n1. [ ] Act as a coach in a big deliverable that requires [following the planning step](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/fe_guide/development_process.html#planning-development) as part of the trainee program.\\n1. [x] [Shadow a maintainer](#code-review-pairing) while they review an MR. This will allow you to get insight into the thought processes involved.\\n1. [x] [Have a maintainer shadow *you*](#code-review-pairing) while you review an MR *as if you were a maintainer* . Ideally, this would be with a different maintainer to the above, so you can get different insights.\\n1. [x] *Optional:* [Consider finding a mentor](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer-mentorship-pilot-program) to help you become a maintainer.\\n\\nIt is up to you to ensure that you are getting enough MRs to review, and of varied types. All engineers are reviewers, so you should already be receiving regular reviews from Reviewer Roulette. You could also seek out more reviews from your team, or #frontend Slack channels.\\n\\nYour reviews should aim to cover maintainer responsibilities as well as reviewer responsibilities. Your approval means you think it is ready to merge.\\n\\nAfter each MR is merged or closed, add a discussion to this issue using this template:\\n\\n```markdown\\n### (Merge request title): (Merge request URL)\\n\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I suggested/identified/noted...\\\")\\n\\nPost-review (opportunities to learn):\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I missed...\\\" or \\\"Merged as-is\\\")\\n\\n(Maintainer who reviewed this merge request) Please add feedback, and compare\\nthis review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\nThe purpose of comparing your review to the maintainer's review is to engage in active learning and expand your list of items to consider. Remember, different maintainers are going to identify different issues in the same code. As long as you are not missing large errors or bugs, don't feel like you are doing a bad job if you and a maintainer make different suggestions.\\n\\n**Note:** Do not include reviews of security MRs because review feedback might reveal security issue details.\\n\\n**Tip:** There are [tools](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/tools-and-tips/#trainee-maintainer-issue-upkeep) available to assist with this task.\\n\\n### Code Review Pairing\\n\\nMuch like pair programming, pairing on code review is a great way to knowledge share and collaborate on merge request. This is a great activity for trainee maintainers to participate with maintainers for learning their process of code review.\\n\\nA **private code review session** (unrecorded) involves one primary reviewer, and a shadow. If more than one shadow wishes to observe a private session, please consider obtaining consent from the merge request author.\\n\\nA **public code review session** involves a primary reviewer and one or more shadows in a recorded session that is released publicly, for example to GitLab Unfiltered.\\n\\n* If the merge request author is a GitLab team member, please consider obtaining consent from them.\\n* If the merge request author is a community contributor, you **must** obtain consent from them.\\n* Do **not** release reviews of security merge requests publicly.\\n\\n## When you're ready to make it official\\n\\nWhen reviews have accumulated, and recent reviews consistently fulfill maintainer responsibilities, any maintainer can take the next step. The trainee should also feel free to discuss their progress with their manager or any maintainer at any time.\\n\\n1. [ ] Create a merge request updating [your team member entry](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md) proposing yourself as a maintainer.\\n1. [ ] Keep reviewing, start merging :metal:\", \"milestone_id\": null, \"iid\": 34345, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 244675350, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:15 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 11701495, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 17069039, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 130812, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2015-11-27 21:29:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-04-27 10:56:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 8595532, \"title\": \"trainee maintainer\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": null, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125868 --\u003e\\n### Remove hard coded language: gitlab-org/gitlab!125868\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove hard coded language\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Looked good to me , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536524660, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130137 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder: gitlab-org/gitlab!130137\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-28 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984745, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134349 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!134349\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ad0fef742d45c5008c793f75979365880c402acb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608130962, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127788 --\u003e\\n### Fixing problems with project overview: gitlab-org/gitlab!127788\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixing problems with project overview\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772209, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Dependency updates are often \\\"waived through\\\". You took the time to understand what's going on and tried out the update locally :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563423640, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to update the description of the MR ( not blocking )\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503796209, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127151 --\u003e\\n### Fix image_list_row_spec.js: gitlab-org/gitlab!127151\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix image_list_row_spec.js\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:35:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670465, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure ! Thank you @fguibert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507118687, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125939 --\u003e\\n### Add codeowners validation block: gitlab-org/gitlab!125939\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add codeowners validation block\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b4deb31b91d08bedeb6d231d1b3de07dfa0a30f1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273491, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested a nitpick to put a repeatedly tested component to a variable \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463155402, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125496 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!125496\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656852, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125982 --\u003e\\n### Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency: gitlab-org/gitlab!125982\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jivanvl please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f32b176e44c8c85d053beecdcaa3adda46362829\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547153, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to \\n     - to follow frontend dev guidelines for exported constants\\n     - not duplicate issue list queries right now but move everything to shared in the next iteration , making the cleanup more efficient\\n     - refactor the jest specs to follow the naming conventions, remove unwanted code and add a couple of extra tests - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125877#note_1475901603 \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: The maintainer added a non-blocking suggestion to add more test coverage\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina @tristan.read in please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1479325916, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125255 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope: gitlab-org/gitlab!125255\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 15:12:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393023, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130145 --\u003e\\n### Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!130145\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-25 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4ba705c0455a37a6bdf3b1cea4d9624e5453c39c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1528942055, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - not to use name with component when it is already used in hidden element\\n      - edit the test-id naming convention , was using `js-` naming convention\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489916587, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!121585 --\u003e\\n### Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects: gitlab-org/gitlab!121585\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@terrichu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:53:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445812, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132467 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from discussion_filter_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!132467\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fc3f4f17352251bc002c8612d6b82abd0d053d14\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593896320, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133725 --\u003e\\n### Basic group multiselect support for user token: gitlab-org/gitlab!133725\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Basic group multiselect support for user token\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e7fa81abfa9f541daf659dea19009afbab49a12\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131042, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- It was a small clean change , nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524201744, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for encouraging the MR author to use robust testing assertions. Great review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3540517, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539521470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to use kebab case for `data-testid` selectors\\n   - use `toMatchObect` in tests\\n   - use `toBe` for primitive values testing\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed some non blocking suggestions on comment rephrasing and changing tests description\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524216788, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127240 --\u003e\\n### Improve Value stream dashboard loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!127240\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Improve Value stream dashboard loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nI took it in half review from @jrushford as he was going on PTO\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - some changes to use computed classes on the element in a readable way\\n   - not to use `data-qa-selector` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert was generous to take it up and complete the review :bow: \\n\\nCan you please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review ? Thank you :thank_you:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524230146, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure thank you so much @pburdette :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541007009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: \\n    - to add Sentry logging for error scenarios\\n    - creating a helper function to set the data properties and write specs for it for changes made in haml file \\n    - to use `$emit` instead of `trigger` for testing an emitted event for component \\n- :mag: I identified to prevent failing tests in vue3 compat mode\\n    - an extra use of `nextTick`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463179030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129052 --\u003e\\n### Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure: gitlab-org/gitlab!129052\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dianalogan please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"86bc625b2e896a5c7ae1c21be7483ad6ce374aa8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849365, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Keep an eye out for missing test coverage. Especially when the MR deals with fixing a bug. We want to make sure it has good test coverage so the bug isn't introduced again. \\n\\nOverall good review :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4477803, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539565882, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @leipert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568899677, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @f_caplette :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568898395, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted to use $emit rather than $trigger but since the wrapper was native html element , trigger made more sense \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457667075, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125181 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!125181\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 09:52:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456369541, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124783 --\u003e\\n### Hook up update schedule mutation: gitlab-org/gitlab!124783\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hook up update schedule mutation\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alberts-gitlab please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add tests in `board_card_inner_spec.js`  but they will be added when rspecs are written for the same in future\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed asking why we prefer `eventHub` still\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463161255, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125479 --\u003e\\n### Dismiss modal after increasing access level: gitlab-org/gitlab!125479\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Dismiss modal after increasing access level\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ddavison please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:53 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656907, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125947 --\u003e\\n### Fix wrapping pattern of buttons: gitlab-org/gitlab!125947\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix wrapping pattern of buttons\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good suggestions and questions, not much else to comment on regarding this MR. Keep it up :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1465234546, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125971 --\u003e\\n### Mark vulnerability_details component as deprecated: gitlab-org/gitlab!125971\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"85d4a1316a06e5c11f902081a5bc9507930a634f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @leipert :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- A very small and clean MR to remove an existing FF, no feedback as such\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484705445, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified that the dropdown is closing when we click the copy button which is different from the original behaviour\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473663483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nLooked good to be since a helper method was added. Passed on to the maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to write test for the helper method in both the ee and ce version\\n\\n@mrincon please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473664730, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123522 --\u003e\\n### Implement search for group wikis: gitlab-org/gitlab!123522\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Implement search for group wikis\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@johnmason please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273525, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125980 --\u003e\\n### Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!125980\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123019 --\u003e\\n### Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\": gitlab-org/gitlab!123019\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\"\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470936880, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Did not review this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471435298, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124533 --\u003e\\n### Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!124533\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:50 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445781, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     1. To apply the new eslint rule files where it was used rather than disabling it\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471437751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125196 --\u003e\\n### Add no hard coded url eslint rules: gitlab-org/gitlab!125196\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add no hard coded url eslint rules\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:45 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that it was a small MR with data attribute changes for selection , approved it as is without any feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is \\n\\n@ddavison @justin_ho please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471438997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add a jest test case when the dataset property `cannot-merge` property is not provided\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471440135, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125555 --\u003e\\n### Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar: gitlab-org/gitlab!125555\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-10 10:06:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960557, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125509 --\u003e\\n### Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance: gitlab-org/gitlab!125509\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960568, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add the changes behind a FF just to be sure since this was a change in the head tags and we could not see any potential differences in local gdk and .com\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is **but the maintainer agreed that an FF would be good**\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471441009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested using utility classes at multiple css file changes to reduce the css page bundle size\\n\\nIt was a great improvement to see the final changes made only to the template file\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:48:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471442069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Nothing to suggest , it was a small ~frontend change adding a language attribute to html. Looked good :white_check_mark: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz @psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471443156, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n    - to use computed properties and constants\\n    - to remove redundant code like - `v-if` and `v-show` should never be together\\n    - to remove console logs \\n    - not to use computed property for constants\\n    - move i18n texts to options of the component\\n    - add a finally for isloading to false irrespective of error or not\\n    - remove redundant `v-else-if` which was not needed\\n    - move multiple `findComponent` in test cases as a variable\\n    - [use findComponent as component rather than name](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331672)\\n    - Use emit instead of trigger for gitlab-ui components in [jest test cases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331686)\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - redundant null check in `v-else`\\n     - passing reload as a function instead of emit \\n     - string extrapolation not need\\n\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471448970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125572 --\u003e\\n### Add Tracing List UI: gitlab-org/gitlab!125572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Tracing List UI\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467872137, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126578 --\u003e\\n### [issue-417870] Migrate button component to Pajamas Button: gitlab-org/gitlab!126578\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"da94499aad2ea3f497f66f74e02dec6b36dc850b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471841737, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This isn't one of the largest MRs, but thanks for the promotion of utility classes over custom CSS :thumbsup: and the nice and respectful interaction with a community contributor.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472031566, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This particular MR was a merge as-is MR thus, did not have any requests for change.\\n\\nFor maintainership, the MRs we are looking for are the more thoughtful technical design decisions and engineering considerations.  Regretfully, I cannot fairly grade your maintainership competency based on this MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 272636, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472314143, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127572 --\u003e\\n### Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times: gitlab-org/gitlab!127572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:20 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3473fc8ed41c758a8384a85eb86d04bca942249f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:19 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813801, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Frontend code didn't require changes so the review was :100:, what I'd expect from a frontend maintainer.\\n\\n-------\\n\\nI often read the entire MR to learn more about our codebase. I may ask for changes if I notice something in the backend, documentation, etc...\\n\\nI'd encourage \\\"holistic\\\" reviews and be ready to comment or ask about any part of the MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1607849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:37:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1607849, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1474957631, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127036 --\u003e\\n### Prevent loading state from showing after undo: gitlab-org/gitlab!127036\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9a4cc70bcb0665ed6a9165b00626054c290aaa69\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620562, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to remove the isSingleRequest for emojiQueries since they would not have large requests\\n    - some UI text changes for proper error description\\n    - unnecessary if condition in code\\n    - Show loader when the emojis are being fetched to show an indicator that a query is being run\\n    - remove not need cache.writeQuery in tests, should work fine with proper request handlers\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed checking that the query is called everytime we update any work item attribute\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1475870222, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125121 --\u003e\\n### Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items: gitlab-org/gitlab!125121\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-19 03:41:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464604003, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126709 --\u003e\\n### Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap: gitlab-org/gitlab!126709\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-22 06:31:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547126, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125877 --\u003e\\n### Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list: gitlab-org/gitlab!125877\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-16 06:31:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-20 09:53:43 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471137287, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani My suggestion about the specs came from specific domain knowledge about Incidents, so I wouldn't worry about that.\\n\\nYour review was detailed and what I would expect from a maintainer :thumbsup_tone1:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3146670, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480510293, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127014 --\u003e\\n### Remove import_details_page feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!127014\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove import_details_page feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124322 --\u003e\\n### Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests: gitlab-org/gitlab!124322\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:38:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480581161, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133508 --\u003e\\n### Project overview Edit button fix: gitlab-org/gitlab!133508\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Project overview Edit button fix\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e8dd22043f74a2b659825529463290378e4528c8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726639, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This was a larger MR so it can be easier to miss some things. From this review:\\n\\n- Keep an eye out for code (string and number literals) that can be replaced with existing constants\\n- For reusable/shared components, check that the code is generic and reusable by others\\n- Generally, question every line of code to check whether it is unneeded or can be simplified\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488788165, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @tristan.read :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 02:03:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484696992, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @mrincon :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484697575, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"sure , thank you @ddavison :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484699692, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small ~frontend changes to use `data-testid` instead of qa selector. Had no feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484703670, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n  * to use `fluid-width` instead of `fluid-content`  for `gl-collapsible-listbox` props\\n  * add an extra test for check for other props for the new dropdown\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1569008648, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n       - to change the naming for labelsContainer and labels in jest test cases\\n       - having a test case to make sure that the injected data property `allowScopedLabels` is injected and also having a default value for the injected prop in the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484715899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126425 --\u003e\\n### Work item header and input UI improvements: gitlab-org/gitlab!126425\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Work item header and input UI improvements\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 06:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469343489, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n     - (non-blocking)to use cache update instead of refetching the issue count when deleting the work item\\n     - to remove unused graphql query \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - to point using constants for work item types\\n     - improve the logic when updating fields by updating the persisted_fields and returning early when no work item found\\n     - use isActive is `issuable_item` to highlight selected item\\n     - update the milestone in the FF file\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484781979, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank for you timely review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11004366, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484911410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128081 --\u003e\\n### Fix bold font not being applied on viewed file after further changes. Add viewed file count to diff.: gitlab-org/gitlab!128081\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"be8bab870d9d7406215dcb7751daa1602a6c4d04\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495053415, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127937 --\u003e\\n### [issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states: gitlab-org/gitlab!127937\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:16 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758897, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add screenshots instead of videos in the MR description which gives more clarity  , but it was a non blocking comment hence approved.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495110152, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495112796, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - to use constants for \\\"group\\\" and \\\"project\\\"\\n     - to use scoped strings for translations \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499990702, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125661 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!125661\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-04 03:28:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758939, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - To use `GlDisclosureDropdown` instead of `GlListBox` according to the use case\\n     - To Add accessibility `toggleSrText` prop to dropdown\\n     - to change jest test case string ( nitpick )\\n     - to use `mount` instead of `mountExtended` since no testid was used\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499998030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127996 --\u003e\\n### Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown: gitlab-org/gitlab!127996\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758883, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Minimal changes and looked good to me without any changes, passed on to maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499999096, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126667 --\u003e\\n### Add view cache for PWA manifest.json: gitlab-org/gitlab!126667\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add view cache for PWA manifest.json\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-29 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492740118, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani this was a super large MR, thanks for tackling it and dropping your questions!\\n\\n\u003e I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nIt's interesting to note that the hidden element was actually **needed**. It just wasn't obvious **why**. It took some digging to figure out the reason behind the pattern used there.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2233420, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1497804374, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to\\n    - Add a test to make sure that resolver is called a particular number of times in addition to being called with params\\n    - renaming of some tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n    - rename the variable `mutationLoading` to `isDeleteInprogress` \\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1506027507, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127958 --\u003e\\n### Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination: gitlab-org/gitlab!127958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 08:22:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1496495447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggested changes , small and clean MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558649388, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change all FF's to name the FF's being used in tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out a small test description change\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558673332, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128324 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Various fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab!128324\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Various fixes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-08 03:14:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1500078923, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - To avoid `if-else` for apollo mutate\\n    - delete unnecessary computed props\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503790443, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127900 --\u003e\\n### Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards: gitlab-org/gitlab!127900\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-05 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758913, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to change the wording of some of the tests ( use verbs )\\n    - to move some reuseable components in the tests to the scope of the file and make available to all tests\\n    - remove unwanted assertions in tests\\n    - use `props()` instead of `attributes()` in tests\\n    - use i18n for reuseable constant strings\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507109492, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128088 --\u003e\\n### Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper: gitlab-org/gitlab!128088\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 03:50:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503854140, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't think the variable rename nitpick was a miss, it was just my opinion.\\n\\nThe UX review was skipped due to the team circumstances, but it's still something to keep in mind when reviewing.\\n\\nIt was a good review from you overall :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4846639, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507111595, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove unwanted props\\n   - use conditional chaining for computed props\\n   - remove unwanted hover class from options\\n   - use constants for icon strings from backend\\n   - use `data-testid` selectors instead of `data-qa` selectors\\n   - remove dead code\\n   - use `i18n` for strings\\n   - simplify names of props and prop values as well\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507117825, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126773 --\u003e\\n### Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files: gitlab-org/gitlab!126773\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:27:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493228070, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125260 --\u003e\\n### Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki: gitlab-org/gitlab!125260\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8373453d6ae6f7cb78780555186a249ed82f7a80\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!111116 --\u003e\\n### Display pull command for container registry tag: gitlab-org/gitlab!111116\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616c84e2577641082d10401f5a19fea04ac39323\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1510643149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126836 --\u003e\\n### Fix: group_select has render with older data: gitlab-org/gitlab!126836\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix: group_select has render with older data\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@peterhegman please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b9b2f391cef771e5b41cfa3d74c155b0e464b5f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for your review in that MR Deepika :bow: You made the right call approving it as is while still raising that UX quirk.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3732265, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1521576364, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove some unwanted lines of code\\n   - not to pass an empty object as a param for a util function\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1520453535, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128700 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count: gitlab-org/gitlab!128700\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to rename component event names to make more sense\\n   - to remove `isSingleRequest` from apollo query context after `unbatch_graphql_queries` flag is on on gitlab.com\\n   - conditional chaining for object properties\\n   - use computed props\\n   - use `toEqual` rather than `toStrictEqual`\\n   - instead of manually updating store state in tests , use store action dispatch\\n   - use `toHaveBeenCalledTimes` which will also check if the mock is called rather than just called mock\\n   - not to use `toBeDefined` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - using existing strings for translation\\n      - simplifying the property access by optional chaining\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558758161, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130784 --\u003e\\n### Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!130784\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-09 06:31:34 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541160506, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126649 --\u003e\\n### Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!126649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1498635175, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129775 --\u003e\\n### Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary: gitlab-org/gitlab!129775\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:59 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1522244292, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133476 --\u003e\\n### Remove issuable features moved popover: gitlab-org/gitlab!133476\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove issuable features moved popover\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@djadmin please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c3f7f75559ae30c476f441cc34c2ee37003ddfac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726662, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134178 --\u003e\\n### Migrate work item milestone dropdown to listbox: gitlab-org/gitlab!134178\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ee21d068c9fa91cd92f22ecaca9599cbfcb803e5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481959, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133406 --\u003e\\n### Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid: gitlab-org/gitlab!133406\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@sliaquat please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c497ef797d3e07bcde187480530eb49d015ac9fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726690, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134338 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue: gitlab-org/gitlab!134338\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f27e16c0733dac24965412a9e4f105b22695f1a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481935, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"You provided an excellent review, keep up the good work :rocket: \\n\\nThere wasn't a lot for me to find so no worries. \\n\\nThe only Feedback I can share is to be cautious with suggesting such [\\\"simplifications\\\"](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127240#note_1484661059) in cases where the scope of the problem is too big to be understood very quickly. \\n\\nI've seen too many bugs being introduced by such \\\"simplifications\\\". I would recommend to still address these but with a more open question:\\n\\n\\\"Could you help me understand why we would need this additional check on this value?\\\"\\n\\nThis will lead to the same result but reduce the risk to remove a needed check in a hurry.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7293390, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1526853785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested some minor variable naming changes \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to add test cases/coverage for the new date_timestamp\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538915383, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130013 --\u003e\\n### Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report: gitlab-org/gitlab!130013\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984874, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to use `attributes` function for testing the href of the component\\n    - let go of `exists` since that test will fail anyways\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536523693, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130100 --\u003e\\n### Move job sidebar buttons to header: gitlab-org/gitlab!130100\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move job sidebar buttons to header\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-30 06:31:02 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984776, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to use `default to 0` for prop type `Number`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536528512, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129895 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!129895\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524053220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , small MR with clean changes :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544850303, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130873 --\u003e\\n### Add background color to new MR tabs: gitlab-org/gitlab!130873\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add background color to new MR tabs\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543203980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @ealcantara :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544853007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , minimal ~frontend changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:23:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544852532, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130649 --\u003e\\n### Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License: gitlab-org/gitlab!130649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-02 06:30:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130652 --\u003e\\n### Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!130652\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alexpooley please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811596, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130616 --\u003e\\n### Draft: Add possibility for minimal forks: gitlab-org/gitlab!130616\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ab03e6bb588b8f72ec6195cfa6aa2d31a3b6c6d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811647, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130935 --\u003e\\n### Move Service Desk lists app under Issues: gitlab-org/gitlab!130935\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move Service Desk lists app under Issues\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130810 --\u003e\\n### Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend: gitlab-org/gitlab!130810\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@kushalpandya please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd7a7735f8a732d3a2b13c0079ae047db90b9288\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543204010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130075 --\u003e\\n### Hide search bar if below threshold: gitlab-org/gitlab!130075\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hide search bar if below threshold\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@tristan.read please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ae64b6b7bd2950d31c54abb361e264623276c9dc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984827, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No changes , just fixing failing pipelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546650918, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggestions , it only involved changing `data-testid` changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546653878, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125649 --\u003e\\n### Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming: gitlab-org/gitlab!125649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@huzaifaiftikhar1 please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984893, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested if there is a capability of adding a loading placeholder in the dropdown with the loading indicator ? ( Like `Loading`) \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549132611, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130986 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!130986\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845350, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129958 --\u003e\\n### Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color: gitlab-org/gitlab!129958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-12 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501750, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131028 --\u003e\\n### Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle: gitlab-org/gitlab!131028\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501694, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified \\n     - to remove the background for Progress widget in dark mode as well\\n     - update the border over hover similar in all the widgets\\n     - sync the background color of dropdowns like inputs in milestone and iterations\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:35:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:22:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484788602, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129219 --\u003e\\n### [Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived: gitlab-org/gitlab!129219\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845403, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130678 --\u003e\\n### Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0: gitlab-org/gitlab!130678\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:54 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845382, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked a question regarding the validity of an extra variable which led to fixing a bug :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562749106, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131737 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables: gitlab-org/gitlab!131737\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560771819, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change a test description to depict the true state of the `isCollapsed`. But it was such a pleasure reviewing the MR as it was one of the best I have seen in GitLab\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n   - cleanup `getCssClassDimensions` in mock\\n   - manually add `wrapper.destroy` in the afterEach block\\n   - group `mouse enter` tests into a describe block to prevent repetion\\n   - remove translating strings while testing in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562756509, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131918 --\u003e\\n### How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks: gitlab-org/gitlab!131918\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aqualls please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aecca61bc39672e2a9940fae4a8788cf2daf41fa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772193, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that I could not verify the MR with multiple back and forth resulting in updating the description a couple of times to correct the FF mentioned in the steps to reproduce.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:30:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560773323, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to have feature flag check as well for new entry in dashboard list\\n   - using computed property\\n   - change the test case wordings a little\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing not to use wrapper vm constant property in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:05:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503795483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hey there @deepika.guliani! Most of my points here were about specs readability and predictability. There was nothing here that would have prevented a merge, but sometimes when asking small questions, we find some underlying problems and understand the why.\\n\\nFor example, [when I proposed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/131028#note_1555293432) to move the `toggle?.remove` call to the afterEach block, it was a nitpick and it did not block merge, but by pointing it out, the author and I had a chat and we found out that the wrapper was being mounted twice and that's why there were some issues! This did not impact the tests right now, but it might have in the future as more and more tests were added and then the bug becomes harder to find.\\n\\nThis is not to say that you missed anything really (your reviews are all great!). More that especially in specs, it's easy to miss a lot of underlying problems and it's worth spending a bit of extra time to make sure that everything behave as it should, not just that tests are passing.\\n\\nKeep up the awesome work!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5327378, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563502843, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131951 --\u003e\\n### Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!131951\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:16:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461754, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions, ~frontend light MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is, no ~frontend feedback\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571569999, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129369 --\u003e\\n### Update trial column: gitlab-org/gitlab!129369\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update trial column\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524194801, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132846 --\u003e\\n### Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors: gitlab-org/gitlab!132846\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339261, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-02 12:40:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549256589, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions , clean MR \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587381535, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132832 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!132832\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-30 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339281, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested for a ~UX review since this might have more touching points than mentioned. The code looked good to me.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n  @himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587384960, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587385136, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132613 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix some error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!132613\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix some error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-28 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1581646466, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133275 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand: gitlab-org/gitlab!133275\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 06:31:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4112f7b6c1c062a21e7a8e161d3425dbd7952fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589009889, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add some test cases and `toMatchObject` for testing more props of the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589277355, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131928 --\u003e\\n### Update artifacts page layout: gitlab-org/gitlab!131928\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update artifacts page layout\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461780, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked some clarifying questions, but nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@justin_ho  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589281507, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131143 --\u003e\\n### License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!131143\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@chloeliu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:47 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1556289060, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nBackend heavy , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589285808, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131849 --\u003e\\n### Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids: gitlab-org/gitlab!131849\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mlapierre please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-20 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772203, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: Just to add a before and after video to make the description more clear\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589290037, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"It was a nice initial review! Your suggestion was valuable.\\n\\nGreat attention to detail, important findings, helpful comments. \\n\\nGreat work @deepika.guliani :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10762712, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 14:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:22:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589877102, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133200 --\u003e\\n### Fix devops empty state illustration: gitlab-org/gitlab!133200\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix devops empty state illustration\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pskorupa please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1590705608, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small MR with no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n`@ealcantara` please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1592642788, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good review with good suggestions! A couple of comments:\\n\\n- I believe we don't prefer `||` over `??`, both are perfectly valid\\n- I believe we don't prefer `toEqual` to `toStrictEqual`, in fact `toStrictEqual` is arguably better since it is a more precise check\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 12:36:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-09 05:08:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593026254, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134245 --\u003e\\n### Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!134245\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@acroitor please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23efd83fe1a18f112ebcb8e158b67b5e509014c2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131000, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131825 --\u003e\\n### Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics: gitlab-org/gitlab!131825\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"36b2e435a8457e49253a82a3156bb175daaeabe2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571528474, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134591 --\u003e\\n### Fix epic board children count and weight on card: gitlab-org/gitlab!134591\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix epic board children count and weight on card\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5b708cd017dd2ef2bf249c20c4006a1f13e99031\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1609999412, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134377 --\u003e\\n### Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget: gitlab-org/gitlab!134377\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d4a6612056c26010216970d82e54952419c1c886\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1611728905, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134730 --\u003e\\n### Display abuse report notes (frontend): gitlab-org/gitlab!134730\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2530d3cd51ab399da0ba2945e6d0f64ad38f0d3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1615989743, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Closing this since https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/129537+ is merged\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1fae663519385999828d1931b66d7b7f1e52da66\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1617560916, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3540517, \"username\": \"ealcantara\", \"name\": \"Enrique Alc\\u00e1ntara\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4477803, \"username\": \"pburdette\", \"name\": \"Payton Burdette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 272636, \"username\": \"ddavison\", \"name\": \"Dan Davison\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 1607849, \"username\": \"mrincon\", \"name\": \"Miguel Rincon\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3146670, \"username\": \"tristan.read\", \"name\": \"Tristan Read\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11004366, \"username\": \"eduardosanz\", \"name\": \"Eduardo Sanz Garc\\u00eda\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 2233420, \"username\": \"pslaughter\", \"name\": \"Paul Slaughter\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4846639, \"username\": \"fguibert\", \"name\": \"Florie Guibert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3732265, \"username\": \"pgascouvaillancourt\", \"name\": \"Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 7293390, \"username\": \"jannik_lehmann\", \"name\": \"Jannik Lehmann\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 5327378, \"username\": \"f_caplette\", \"name\": \"Fr\\u00e9d\\u00e9ric Caplette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 10762712, \"username\": \"arfedoro\", \"name\": \"Artur Fedorov\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 6543, \"name\": \"GitLab.com\", \"path\": \"gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 7764, \"name\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"path\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 17069039}]}","query":"Please summarize the latest activity and current status of the issue {url}.","query_id":"a2e2214d23f04cc4b788b16b75224f40","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130193114","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130193114, \"title\": \"Trainee FE Maintainer (Gitlab) - Deepika Guliani\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-03 05:03:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Basic setup\\n\\n1. [x] Read the [code review page in the handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/) and the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html).\\n1. [x] Understand [how to become a maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#how-to-become-a-project-maintainer) and add yourself as a [trainee maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer) in the [team database](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md). (MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/105456+)\\n\\n## Working towards becoming a maintainer\\n\\nThese are only guidelines. Remember that there is no specific timeline on this.\\n\\nAs part of your journey towards becoming a maintainer, you may find it useful to:\\n\\n1. [ ] Act as a coach in a big deliverable that requires [following the planning step](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/fe_guide/development_process.html#planning-development) as part of the trainee program.\\n1. [x] [Shadow a maintainer](#code-review-pairing) while they review an MR. This will allow you to get insight into the thought processes involved.\\n1. [x] [Have a maintainer shadow *you*](#code-review-pairing) while you review an MR *as if you were a maintainer* . Ideally, this would be with a different maintainer to the above, so you can get different insights.\\n1. [x] *Optional:* [Consider finding a mentor](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer-mentorship-pilot-program) to help you become a maintainer.\\n\\nIt is up to you to ensure that you are getting enough MRs to review, and of varied types. All engineers are reviewers, so you should already be receiving regular reviews from Reviewer Roulette. You could also seek out more reviews from your team, or #frontend Slack channels.\\n\\nYour reviews should aim to cover maintainer responsibilities as well as reviewer responsibilities. Your approval means you think it is ready to merge.\\n\\nAfter each MR is merged or closed, add a discussion to this issue using this template:\\n\\n```markdown\\n### (Merge request title): (Merge request URL)\\n\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I suggested/identified/noted...\\\")\\n\\nPost-review (opportunities to learn):\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I missed...\\\" or \\\"Merged as-is\\\")\\n\\n(Maintainer who reviewed this merge request) Please add feedback, and compare\\nthis review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\nThe purpose of comparing your review to the maintainer's review is to engage in active learning and expand your list of items to consider. Remember, different maintainers are going to identify different issues in the same code. As long as you are not missing large errors or bugs, don't feel like you are doing a bad job if you and a maintainer make different suggestions.\\n\\n**Note:** Do not include reviews of security MRs because review feedback might reveal security issue details.\\n\\n**Tip:** There are [tools](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/tools-and-tips/#trainee-maintainer-issue-upkeep) available to assist with this task.\\n\\n### Code Review Pairing\\n\\nMuch like pair programming, pairing on code review is a great way to knowledge share and collaborate on merge request. This is a great activity for trainee maintainers to participate with maintainers for learning their process of code review.\\n\\nA **private code review session** (unrecorded) involves one primary reviewer, and a shadow. If more than one shadow wishes to observe a private session, please consider obtaining consent from the merge request author.\\n\\nA **public code review session** involves a primary reviewer and one or more shadows in a recorded session that is released publicly, for example to GitLab Unfiltered.\\n\\n* If the merge request author is a GitLab team member, please consider obtaining consent from them.\\n* If the merge request author is a community contributor, you **must** obtain consent from them.\\n* Do **not** release reviews of security merge requests publicly.\\n\\n## When you're ready to make it official\\n\\nWhen reviews have accumulated, and recent reviews consistently fulfill maintainer responsibilities, any maintainer can take the next step. The trainee should also feel free to discuss their progress with their manager or any maintainer at any time.\\n\\n1. [ ] Create a merge request updating [your team member entry](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md) proposing yourself as a maintainer.\\n1. [ ] Keep reviewing, start merging :metal:\", \"milestone_id\": null, \"iid\": 34345, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 244675350, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:15 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 11701495, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 17069039, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 130812, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2015-11-27 21:29:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-04-27 10:56:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 8595532, \"title\": \"trainee maintainer\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": null, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125868 --\u003e\\n### Remove hard coded language: gitlab-org/gitlab!125868\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove hard coded language\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Looked good to me , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536524660, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130137 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder: gitlab-org/gitlab!130137\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-28 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984745, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134349 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!134349\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ad0fef742d45c5008c793f75979365880c402acb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608130962, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127788 --\u003e\\n### Fixing problems with project overview: gitlab-org/gitlab!127788\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixing problems with project overview\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772209, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Dependency updates are often \\\"waived through\\\". You took the time to understand what's going on and tried out the update locally :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563423640, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to update the description of the MR ( not blocking )\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503796209, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127151 --\u003e\\n### Fix image_list_row_spec.js: gitlab-org/gitlab!127151\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix image_list_row_spec.js\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:35:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670465, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure ! Thank you @fguibert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507118687, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125939 --\u003e\\n### Add codeowners validation block: gitlab-org/gitlab!125939\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add codeowners validation block\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b4deb31b91d08bedeb6d231d1b3de07dfa0a30f1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273491, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested a nitpick to put a repeatedly tested component to a variable \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463155402, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125496 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!125496\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656852, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125982 --\u003e\\n### Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency: gitlab-org/gitlab!125982\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jivanvl please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f32b176e44c8c85d053beecdcaa3adda46362829\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547153, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to \\n     - to follow frontend dev guidelines for exported constants\\n     - not duplicate issue list queries right now but move everything to shared in the next iteration , making the cleanup more efficient\\n     - refactor the jest specs to follow the naming conventions, remove unwanted code and add a couple of extra tests - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125877#note_1475901603 \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: The maintainer added a non-blocking suggestion to add more test coverage\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina @tristan.read in please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1479325916, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125255 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope: gitlab-org/gitlab!125255\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 15:12:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393023, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130145 --\u003e\\n### Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!130145\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-25 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4ba705c0455a37a6bdf3b1cea4d9624e5453c39c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1528942055, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - not to use name with component when it is already used in hidden element\\n      - edit the test-id naming convention , was using `js-` naming convention\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489916587, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!121585 --\u003e\\n### Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects: gitlab-org/gitlab!121585\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@terrichu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:53:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445812, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132467 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from discussion_filter_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!132467\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fc3f4f17352251bc002c8612d6b82abd0d053d14\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593896320, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133725 --\u003e\\n### Basic group multiselect support for user token: gitlab-org/gitlab!133725\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Basic group multiselect support for user token\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e7fa81abfa9f541daf659dea19009afbab49a12\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131042, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- It was a small clean change , nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524201744, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for encouraging the MR author to use robust testing assertions. Great review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3540517, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539521470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to use kebab case for `data-testid` selectors\\n   - use `toMatchObect` in tests\\n   - use `toBe` for primitive values testing\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed some non blocking suggestions on comment rephrasing and changing tests description\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524216788, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127240 --\u003e\\n### Improve Value stream dashboard loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!127240\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Improve Value stream dashboard loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nI took it in half review from @jrushford as he was going on PTO\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - some changes to use computed classes on the element in a readable way\\n   - not to use `data-qa-selector` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert was generous to take it up and complete the review :bow: \\n\\nCan you please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review ? Thank you :thank_you:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524230146, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure thank you so much @pburdette :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541007009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: \\n    - to add Sentry logging for error scenarios\\n    - creating a helper function to set the data properties and write specs for it for changes made in haml file \\n    - to use `$emit` instead of `trigger` for testing an emitted event for component \\n- :mag: I identified to prevent failing tests in vue3 compat mode\\n    - an extra use of `nextTick`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463179030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129052 --\u003e\\n### Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure: gitlab-org/gitlab!129052\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dianalogan please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"86bc625b2e896a5c7ae1c21be7483ad6ce374aa8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849365, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Keep an eye out for missing test coverage. Especially when the MR deals with fixing a bug. We want to make sure it has good test coverage so the bug isn't introduced again. \\n\\nOverall good review :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4477803, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539565882, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @leipert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568899677, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @f_caplette :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568898395, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted to use $emit rather than $trigger but since the wrapper was native html element , trigger made more sense \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457667075, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125181 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!125181\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 09:52:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456369541, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124783 --\u003e\\n### Hook up update schedule mutation: gitlab-org/gitlab!124783\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hook up update schedule mutation\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alberts-gitlab please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add tests in `board_card_inner_spec.js`  but they will be added when rspecs are written for the same in future\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed asking why we prefer `eventHub` still\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463161255, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125479 --\u003e\\n### Dismiss modal after increasing access level: gitlab-org/gitlab!125479\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Dismiss modal after increasing access level\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ddavison please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:53 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656907, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125947 --\u003e\\n### Fix wrapping pattern of buttons: gitlab-org/gitlab!125947\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix wrapping pattern of buttons\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good suggestions and questions, not much else to comment on regarding this MR. Keep it up :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1465234546, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125971 --\u003e\\n### Mark vulnerability_details component as deprecated: gitlab-org/gitlab!125971\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"85d4a1316a06e5c11f902081a5bc9507930a634f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @leipert :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- A very small and clean MR to remove an existing FF, no feedback as such\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484705445, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified that the dropdown is closing when we click the copy button which is different from the original behaviour\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473663483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nLooked good to be since a helper method was added. Passed on to the maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to write test for the helper method in both the ee and ce version\\n\\n@mrincon please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473664730, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123522 --\u003e\\n### Implement search for group wikis: gitlab-org/gitlab!123522\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Implement search for group wikis\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@johnmason please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273525, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125980 --\u003e\\n### Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!125980\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123019 --\u003e\\n### Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\": gitlab-org/gitlab!123019\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\"\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470936880, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Did not review this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471435298, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124533 --\u003e\\n### Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!124533\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:50 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445781, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     1. To apply the new eslint rule files where it was used rather than disabling it\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471437751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125196 --\u003e\\n### Add no hard coded url eslint rules: gitlab-org/gitlab!125196\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add no hard coded url eslint rules\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:45 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that it was a small MR with data attribute changes for selection , approved it as is without any feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is \\n\\n@ddavison @justin_ho please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471438997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add a jest test case when the dataset property `cannot-merge` property is not provided\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471440135, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125555 --\u003e\\n### Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar: gitlab-org/gitlab!125555\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-10 10:06:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960557, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125509 --\u003e\\n### Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance: gitlab-org/gitlab!125509\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960568, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add the changes behind a FF just to be sure since this was a change in the head tags and we could not see any potential differences in local gdk and .com\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is **but the maintainer agreed that an FF would be good**\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471441009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested using utility classes at multiple css file changes to reduce the css page bundle size\\n\\nIt was a great improvement to see the final changes made only to the template file\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:48:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471442069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Nothing to suggest , it was a small ~frontend change adding a language attribute to html. Looked good :white_check_mark: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz @psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471443156, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n    - to use computed properties and constants\\n    - to remove redundant code like - `v-if` and `v-show` should never be together\\n    - to remove console logs \\n    - not to use computed property for constants\\n    - move i18n texts to options of the component\\n    - add a finally for isloading to false irrespective of error or not\\n    - remove redundant `v-else-if` which was not needed\\n    - move multiple `findComponent` in test cases as a variable\\n    - [use findComponent as component rather than name](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331672)\\n    - Use emit instead of trigger for gitlab-ui components in [jest test cases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331686)\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - redundant null check in `v-else`\\n     - passing reload as a function instead of emit \\n     - string extrapolation not need\\n\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471448970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125572 --\u003e\\n### Add Tracing List UI: gitlab-org/gitlab!125572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Tracing List UI\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467872137, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126578 --\u003e\\n### [issue-417870] Migrate button component to Pajamas Button: gitlab-org/gitlab!126578\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"da94499aad2ea3f497f66f74e02dec6b36dc850b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471841737, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This isn't one of the largest MRs, but thanks for the promotion of utility classes over custom CSS :thumbsup: and the nice and respectful interaction with a community contributor.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472031566, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This particular MR was a merge as-is MR thus, did not have any requests for change.\\n\\nFor maintainership, the MRs we are looking for are the more thoughtful technical design decisions and engineering considerations.  Regretfully, I cannot fairly grade your maintainership competency based on this MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 272636, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472314143, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127572 --\u003e\\n### Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times: gitlab-org/gitlab!127572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:20 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3473fc8ed41c758a8384a85eb86d04bca942249f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:19 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813801, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Frontend code didn't require changes so the review was :100:, what I'd expect from a frontend maintainer.\\n\\n-------\\n\\nI often read the entire MR to learn more about our codebase. I may ask for changes if I notice something in the backend, documentation, etc...\\n\\nI'd encourage \\\"holistic\\\" reviews and be ready to comment or ask about any part of the MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1607849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:37:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1607849, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1474957631, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127036 --\u003e\\n### Prevent loading state from showing after undo: gitlab-org/gitlab!127036\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9a4cc70bcb0665ed6a9165b00626054c290aaa69\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620562, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to remove the isSingleRequest for emojiQueries since they would not have large requests\\n    - some UI text changes for proper error description\\n    - unnecessary if condition in code\\n    - Show loader when the emojis are being fetched to show an indicator that a query is being run\\n    - remove not need cache.writeQuery in tests, should work fine with proper request handlers\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed checking that the query is called everytime we update any work item attribute\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1475870222, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125121 --\u003e\\n### Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items: gitlab-org/gitlab!125121\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-19 03:41:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464604003, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126709 --\u003e\\n### Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap: gitlab-org/gitlab!126709\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-22 06:31:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547126, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125877 --\u003e\\n### Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list: gitlab-org/gitlab!125877\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-16 06:31:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-20 09:53:43 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471137287, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani My suggestion about the specs came from specific domain knowledge about Incidents, so I wouldn't worry about that.\\n\\nYour review was detailed and what I would expect from a maintainer :thumbsup_tone1:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3146670, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480510293, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127014 --\u003e\\n### Remove import_details_page feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!127014\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove import_details_page feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124322 --\u003e\\n### Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests: gitlab-org/gitlab!124322\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:38:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480581161, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133508 --\u003e\\n### Project overview Edit button fix: gitlab-org/gitlab!133508\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Project overview Edit button fix\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e8dd22043f74a2b659825529463290378e4528c8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726639, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This was a larger MR so it can be easier to miss some things. From this review:\\n\\n- Keep an eye out for code (string and number literals) that can be replaced with existing constants\\n- For reusable/shared components, check that the code is generic and reusable by others\\n- Generally, question every line of code to check whether it is unneeded or can be simplified\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488788165, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @tristan.read :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 02:03:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484696992, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @mrincon :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484697575, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"sure , thank you @ddavison :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484699692, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small ~frontend changes to use `data-testid` instead of qa selector. Had no feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484703670, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n  * to use `fluid-width` instead of `fluid-content`  for `gl-collapsible-listbox` props\\n  * add an extra test for check for other props for the new dropdown\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1569008648, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n       - to change the naming for labelsContainer and labels in jest test cases\\n       - having a test case to make sure that the injected data property `allowScopedLabels` is injected and also having a default value for the injected prop in the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484715899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126425 --\u003e\\n### Work item header and input UI improvements: gitlab-org/gitlab!126425\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Work item header and input UI improvements\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 06:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469343489, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n     - (non-blocking)to use cache update instead of refetching the issue count when deleting the work item\\n     - to remove unused graphql query \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - to point using constants for work item types\\n     - improve the logic when updating fields by updating the persisted_fields and returning early when no work item found\\n     - use isActive is `issuable_item` to highlight selected item\\n     - update the milestone in the FF file\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484781979, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank for you timely review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11004366, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484911410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128081 --\u003e\\n### Fix bold font not being applied on viewed file after further changes. Add viewed file count to diff.: gitlab-org/gitlab!128081\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"be8bab870d9d7406215dcb7751daa1602a6c4d04\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495053415, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127937 --\u003e\\n### [issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states: gitlab-org/gitlab!127937\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:16 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758897, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add screenshots instead of videos in the MR description which gives more clarity  , but it was a non blocking comment hence approved.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495110152, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495112796, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - to use constants for \\\"group\\\" and \\\"project\\\"\\n     - to use scoped strings for translations \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499990702, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125661 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!125661\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-04 03:28:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758939, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - To use `GlDisclosureDropdown` instead of `GlListBox` according to the use case\\n     - To Add accessibility `toggleSrText` prop to dropdown\\n     - to change jest test case string ( nitpick )\\n     - to use `mount` instead of `mountExtended` since no testid was used\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499998030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127996 --\u003e\\n### Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown: gitlab-org/gitlab!127996\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758883, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Minimal changes and looked good to me without any changes, passed on to maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499999096, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126667 --\u003e\\n### Add view cache for PWA manifest.json: gitlab-org/gitlab!126667\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add view cache for PWA manifest.json\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-29 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492740118, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani this was a super large MR, thanks for tackling it and dropping your questions!\\n\\n\u003e I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nIt's interesting to note that the hidden element was actually **needed**. It just wasn't obvious **why**. It took some digging to figure out the reason behind the pattern used there.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2233420, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1497804374, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to\\n    - Add a test to make sure that resolver is called a particular number of times in addition to being called with params\\n    - renaming of some tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n    - rename the variable `mutationLoading` to `isDeleteInprogress` \\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1506027507, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127958 --\u003e\\n### Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination: gitlab-org/gitlab!127958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 08:22:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1496495447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggested changes , small and clean MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558649388, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change all FF's to name the FF's being used in tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out a small test description change\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558673332, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128324 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Various fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab!128324\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Various fixes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-08 03:14:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1500078923, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - To avoid `if-else` for apollo mutate\\n    - delete unnecessary computed props\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503790443, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127900 --\u003e\\n### Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards: gitlab-org/gitlab!127900\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-05 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758913, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to change the wording of some of the tests ( use verbs )\\n    - to move some reuseable components in the tests to the scope of the file and make available to all tests\\n    - remove unwanted assertions in tests\\n    - use `props()` instead of `attributes()` in tests\\n    - use i18n for reuseable constant strings\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507109492, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128088 --\u003e\\n### Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper: gitlab-org/gitlab!128088\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 03:50:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503854140, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't think the variable rename nitpick was a miss, it was just my opinion.\\n\\nThe UX review was skipped due to the team circumstances, but it's still something to keep in mind when reviewing.\\n\\nIt was a good review from you overall :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4846639, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507111595, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove unwanted props\\n   - use conditional chaining for computed props\\n   - remove unwanted hover class from options\\n   - use constants for icon strings from backend\\n   - use `data-testid` selectors instead of `data-qa` selectors\\n   - remove dead code\\n   - use `i18n` for strings\\n   - simplify names of props and prop values as well\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507117825, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126773 --\u003e\\n### Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files: gitlab-org/gitlab!126773\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:27:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493228070, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125260 --\u003e\\n### Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki: gitlab-org/gitlab!125260\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8373453d6ae6f7cb78780555186a249ed82f7a80\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!111116 --\u003e\\n### Display pull command for container registry tag: gitlab-org/gitlab!111116\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616c84e2577641082d10401f5a19fea04ac39323\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1510643149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126836 --\u003e\\n### Fix: group_select has render with older data: gitlab-org/gitlab!126836\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix: group_select has render with older data\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@peterhegman please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b9b2f391cef771e5b41cfa3d74c155b0e464b5f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for your review in that MR Deepika :bow: You made the right call approving it as is while still raising that UX quirk.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3732265, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1521576364, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove some unwanted lines of code\\n   - not to pass an empty object as a param for a util function\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1520453535, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128700 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count: gitlab-org/gitlab!128700\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to rename component event names to make more sense\\n   - to remove `isSingleRequest` from apollo query context after `unbatch_graphql_queries` flag is on on gitlab.com\\n   - conditional chaining for object properties\\n   - use computed props\\n   - use `toEqual` rather than `toStrictEqual`\\n   - instead of manually updating store state in tests , use store action dispatch\\n   - use `toHaveBeenCalledTimes` which will also check if the mock is called rather than just called mock\\n   - not to use `toBeDefined` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - using existing strings for translation\\n      - simplifying the property access by optional chaining\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558758161, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130784 --\u003e\\n### Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!130784\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-09 06:31:34 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541160506, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126649 --\u003e\\n### Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!126649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1498635175, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129775 --\u003e\\n### Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary: gitlab-org/gitlab!129775\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:59 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1522244292, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133476 --\u003e\\n### Remove issuable features moved popover: gitlab-org/gitlab!133476\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove issuable features moved popover\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@djadmin please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c3f7f75559ae30c476f441cc34c2ee37003ddfac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726662, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134178 --\u003e\\n### Migrate work item milestone dropdown to listbox: gitlab-org/gitlab!134178\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ee21d068c9fa91cd92f22ecaca9599cbfcb803e5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481959, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133406 --\u003e\\n### Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid: gitlab-org/gitlab!133406\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@sliaquat please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c497ef797d3e07bcde187480530eb49d015ac9fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726690, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134338 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue: gitlab-org/gitlab!134338\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f27e16c0733dac24965412a9e4f105b22695f1a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481935, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"You provided an excellent review, keep up the good work :rocket: \\n\\nThere wasn't a lot for me to find so no worries. \\n\\nThe only Feedback I can share is to be cautious with suggesting such [\\\"simplifications\\\"](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127240#note_1484661059) in cases where the scope of the problem is too big to be understood very quickly. \\n\\nI've seen too many bugs being introduced by such \\\"simplifications\\\". I would recommend to still address these but with a more open question:\\n\\n\\\"Could you help me understand why we would need this additional check on this value?\\\"\\n\\nThis will lead to the same result but reduce the risk to remove a needed check in a hurry.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7293390, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1526853785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested some minor variable naming changes \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to add test cases/coverage for the new date_timestamp\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538915383, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130013 --\u003e\\n### Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report: gitlab-org/gitlab!130013\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984874, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to use `attributes` function for testing the href of the component\\n    - let go of `exists` since that test will fail anyways\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536523693, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130100 --\u003e\\n### Move job sidebar buttons to header: gitlab-org/gitlab!130100\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move job sidebar buttons to header\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-30 06:31:02 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984776, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to use `default to 0` for prop type `Number`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536528512, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129895 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!129895\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524053220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , small MR with clean changes :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544850303, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130873 --\u003e\\n### Add background color to new MR tabs: gitlab-org/gitlab!130873\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add background color to new MR tabs\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543203980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @ealcantara :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544853007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , minimal ~frontend changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:23:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544852532, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130649 --\u003e\\n### Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License: gitlab-org/gitlab!130649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-02 06:30:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130652 --\u003e\\n### Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!130652\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alexpooley please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811596, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130616 --\u003e\\n### Draft: Add possibility for minimal forks: gitlab-org/gitlab!130616\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ab03e6bb588b8f72ec6195cfa6aa2d31a3b6c6d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811647, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130935 --\u003e\\n### Move Service Desk lists app under Issues: gitlab-org/gitlab!130935\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move Service Desk lists app under Issues\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130810 --\u003e\\n### Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend: gitlab-org/gitlab!130810\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@kushalpandya please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd7a7735f8a732d3a2b13c0079ae047db90b9288\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543204010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130075 --\u003e\\n### Hide search bar if below threshold: gitlab-org/gitlab!130075\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hide search bar if below threshold\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@tristan.read please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ae64b6b7bd2950d31c54abb361e264623276c9dc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984827, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No changes , just fixing failing pipelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546650918, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggestions , it only involved changing `data-testid` changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546653878, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125649 --\u003e\\n### Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming: gitlab-org/gitlab!125649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@huzaifaiftikhar1 please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984893, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested if there is a capability of adding a loading placeholder in the dropdown with the loading indicator ? ( Like `Loading`) \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549132611, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130986 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!130986\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845350, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129958 --\u003e\\n### Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color: gitlab-org/gitlab!129958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-12 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501750, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131028 --\u003e\\n### Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle: gitlab-org/gitlab!131028\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501694, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified \\n     - to remove the background for Progress widget in dark mode as well\\n     - update the border over hover similar in all the widgets\\n     - sync the background color of dropdowns like inputs in milestone and iterations\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:35:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:22:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484788602, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129219 --\u003e\\n### [Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived: gitlab-org/gitlab!129219\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845403, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130678 --\u003e\\n### Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0: gitlab-org/gitlab!130678\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:54 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845382, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked a question regarding the validity of an extra variable which led to fixing a bug :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562749106, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131737 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables: gitlab-org/gitlab!131737\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560771819, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change a test description to depict the true state of the `isCollapsed`. But it was such a pleasure reviewing the MR as it was one of the best I have seen in GitLab\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n   - cleanup `getCssClassDimensions` in mock\\n   - manually add `wrapper.destroy` in the afterEach block\\n   - group `mouse enter` tests into a describe block to prevent repetion\\n   - remove translating strings while testing in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562756509, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131918 --\u003e\\n### How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks: gitlab-org/gitlab!131918\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aqualls please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aecca61bc39672e2a9940fae4a8788cf2daf41fa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772193, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that I could not verify the MR with multiple back and forth resulting in updating the description a couple of times to correct the FF mentioned in the steps to reproduce.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:30:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560773323, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to have feature flag check as well for new entry in dashboard list\\n   - using computed property\\n   - change the test case wordings a little\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing not to use wrapper vm constant property in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:05:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503795483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hey there @deepika.guliani! Most of my points here were about specs readability and predictability. There was nothing here that would have prevented a merge, but sometimes when asking small questions, we find some underlying problems and understand the why.\\n\\nFor example, [when I proposed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/131028#note_1555293432) to move the `toggle?.remove` call to the afterEach block, it was a nitpick and it did not block merge, but by pointing it out, the author and I had a chat and we found out that the wrapper was being mounted twice and that's why there were some issues! This did not impact the tests right now, but it might have in the future as more and more tests were added and then the bug becomes harder to find.\\n\\nThis is not to say that you missed anything really (your reviews are all great!). More that especially in specs, it's easy to miss a lot of underlying problems and it's worth spending a bit of extra time to make sure that everything behave as it should, not just that tests are passing.\\n\\nKeep up the awesome work!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5327378, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563502843, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131951 --\u003e\\n### Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!131951\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:16:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461754, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions, ~frontend light MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is, no ~frontend feedback\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571569999, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129369 --\u003e\\n### Update trial column: gitlab-org/gitlab!129369\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update trial column\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524194801, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132846 --\u003e\\n### Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors: gitlab-org/gitlab!132846\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339261, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-02 12:40:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549256589, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions , clean MR \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587381535, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132832 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!132832\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-30 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339281, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested for a ~UX review since this might have more touching points than mentioned. The code looked good to me.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n  @himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587384960, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587385136, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132613 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix some error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!132613\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix some error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-28 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1581646466, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133275 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand: gitlab-org/gitlab!133275\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 06:31:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4112f7b6c1c062a21e7a8e161d3425dbd7952fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589009889, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add some test cases and `toMatchObject` for testing more props of the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589277355, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131928 --\u003e\\n### Update artifacts page layout: gitlab-org/gitlab!131928\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update artifacts page layout\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461780, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked some clarifying questions, but nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@justin_ho  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589281507, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131143 --\u003e\\n### License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!131143\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@chloeliu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:47 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1556289060, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nBackend heavy , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589285808, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131849 --\u003e\\n### Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids: gitlab-org/gitlab!131849\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mlapierre please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-20 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772203, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: Just to add a before and after video to make the description more clear\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589290037, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"It was a nice initial review! Your suggestion was valuable.\\n\\nGreat attention to detail, important findings, helpful comments. \\n\\nGreat work @deepika.guliani :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10762712, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 14:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:22:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589877102, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133200 --\u003e\\n### Fix devops empty state illustration: gitlab-org/gitlab!133200\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix devops empty state illustration\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pskorupa please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1590705608, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small MR with no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n`@ealcantara` please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1592642788, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good review with good suggestions! A couple of comments:\\n\\n- I believe we don't prefer `||` over `??`, both are perfectly valid\\n- I believe we don't prefer `toEqual` to `toStrictEqual`, in fact `toStrictEqual` is arguably better since it is a more precise check\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 12:36:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-09 05:08:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593026254, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134245 --\u003e\\n### Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!134245\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@acroitor please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23efd83fe1a18f112ebcb8e158b67b5e509014c2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131000, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131825 --\u003e\\n### Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics: gitlab-org/gitlab!131825\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"36b2e435a8457e49253a82a3156bb175daaeabe2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571528474, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134591 --\u003e\\n### Fix epic board children count and weight on card: gitlab-org/gitlab!134591\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix epic board children count and weight on card\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5b708cd017dd2ef2bf249c20c4006a1f13e99031\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1609999412, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134377 --\u003e\\n### Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget: gitlab-org/gitlab!134377\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d4a6612056c26010216970d82e54952419c1c886\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1611728905, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134730 --\u003e\\n### Display abuse report notes (frontend): gitlab-org/gitlab!134730\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2530d3cd51ab399da0ba2945e6d0f64ad38f0d3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1615989743, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Closing this since https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/129537+ is merged\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1fae663519385999828d1931b66d7b7f1e52da66\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1617560916, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3540517, \"username\": \"ealcantara\", \"name\": \"Enrique Alc\\u00e1ntara\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4477803, \"username\": \"pburdette\", \"name\": \"Payton Burdette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 272636, \"username\": \"ddavison\", \"name\": \"Dan Davison\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 1607849, \"username\": \"mrincon\", \"name\": \"Miguel Rincon\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3146670, \"username\": \"tristan.read\", \"name\": \"Tristan Read\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11004366, \"username\": \"eduardosanz\", \"name\": \"Eduardo Sanz Garc\\u00eda\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 2233420, \"username\": \"pslaughter\", \"name\": \"Paul Slaughter\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4846639, \"username\": \"fguibert\", \"name\": \"Florie Guibert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3732265, \"username\": \"pgascouvaillancourt\", \"name\": \"Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 7293390, \"username\": \"jannik_lehmann\", \"name\": \"Jannik Lehmann\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 5327378, \"username\": \"f_caplette\", \"name\": \"Fr\\u00e9d\\u00e9ric Caplette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 10762712, \"username\": \"arfedoro\", \"name\": \"Artur Fedorov\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 6543, \"name\": \"GitLab.com\", \"path\": \"gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 7764, \"name\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"path\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 17069039}]}","query":"How can I improve the description of {url} so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved?","query_id":"c7cbb0b8bc76438182567419dd56f54e","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130193114","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130193114, \"title\": \"Trainee FE Maintainer (Gitlab) - Deepika Guliani\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-03 05:03:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Basic setup\\n\\n1. [x] Read the [code review page in the handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/) and the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html).\\n1. [x] Understand [how to become a maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#how-to-become-a-project-maintainer) and add yourself as a [trainee maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer) in the [team database](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md). (MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/105456+)\\n\\n## Working towards becoming a maintainer\\n\\nThese are only guidelines. Remember that there is no specific timeline on this.\\n\\nAs part of your journey towards becoming a maintainer, you may find it useful to:\\n\\n1. [ ] Act as a coach in a big deliverable that requires [following the planning step](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/fe_guide/development_process.html#planning-development) as part of the trainee program.\\n1. [x] [Shadow a maintainer](#code-review-pairing) while they review an MR. This will allow you to get insight into the thought processes involved.\\n1. [x] [Have a maintainer shadow *you*](#code-review-pairing) while you review an MR *as if you were a maintainer* . Ideally, this would be with a different maintainer to the above, so you can get different insights.\\n1. [x] *Optional:* [Consider finding a mentor](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer-mentorship-pilot-program) to help you become a maintainer.\\n\\nIt is up to you to ensure that you are getting enough MRs to review, and of varied types. All engineers are reviewers, so you should already be receiving regular reviews from Reviewer Roulette. You could also seek out more reviews from your team, or #frontend Slack channels.\\n\\nYour reviews should aim to cover maintainer responsibilities as well as reviewer responsibilities. Your approval means you think it is ready to merge.\\n\\nAfter each MR is merged or closed, add a discussion to this issue using this template:\\n\\n```markdown\\n### (Merge request title): (Merge request URL)\\n\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I suggested/identified/noted...\\\")\\n\\nPost-review (opportunities to learn):\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I missed...\\\" or \\\"Merged as-is\\\")\\n\\n(Maintainer who reviewed this merge request) Please add feedback, and compare\\nthis review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\nThe purpose of comparing your review to the maintainer's review is to engage in active learning and expand your list of items to consider. Remember, different maintainers are going to identify different issues in the same code. As long as you are not missing large errors or bugs, don't feel like you are doing a bad job if you and a maintainer make different suggestions.\\n\\n**Note:** Do not include reviews of security MRs because review feedback might reveal security issue details.\\n\\n**Tip:** There are [tools](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/tools-and-tips/#trainee-maintainer-issue-upkeep) available to assist with this task.\\n\\n### Code Review Pairing\\n\\nMuch like pair programming, pairing on code review is a great way to knowledge share and collaborate on merge request. This is a great activity for trainee maintainers to participate with maintainers for learning their process of code review.\\n\\nA **private code review session** (unrecorded) involves one primary reviewer, and a shadow. If more than one shadow wishes to observe a private session, please consider obtaining consent from the merge request author.\\n\\nA **public code review session** involves a primary reviewer and one or more shadows in a recorded session that is released publicly, for example to GitLab Unfiltered.\\n\\n* If the merge request author is a GitLab team member, please consider obtaining consent from them.\\n* If the merge request author is a community contributor, you **must** obtain consent from them.\\n* Do **not** release reviews of security merge requests publicly.\\n\\n## When you're ready to make it official\\n\\nWhen reviews have accumulated, and recent reviews consistently fulfill maintainer responsibilities, any maintainer can take the next step. The trainee should also feel free to discuss their progress with their manager or any maintainer at any time.\\n\\n1. [ ] Create a merge request updating [your team member entry](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md) proposing yourself as a maintainer.\\n1. [ ] Keep reviewing, start merging :metal:\", \"milestone_id\": null, \"iid\": 34345, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 244675350, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:15 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 11701495, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 17069039, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 130812, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2015-11-27 21:29:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-04-27 10:56:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 8595532, \"title\": \"trainee maintainer\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": null, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125868 --\u003e\\n### Remove hard coded language: gitlab-org/gitlab!125868\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove hard coded language\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Looked good to me , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536524660, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130137 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder: gitlab-org/gitlab!130137\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-28 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984745, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134349 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!134349\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ad0fef742d45c5008c793f75979365880c402acb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608130962, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127788 --\u003e\\n### Fixing problems with project overview: gitlab-org/gitlab!127788\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixing problems with project overview\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772209, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Dependency updates are often \\\"waived through\\\". You took the time to understand what's going on and tried out the update locally :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563423640, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to update the description of the MR ( not blocking )\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503796209, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127151 --\u003e\\n### Fix image_list_row_spec.js: gitlab-org/gitlab!127151\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix image_list_row_spec.js\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:35:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670465, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure ! Thank you @fguibert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507118687, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125939 --\u003e\\n### Add codeowners validation block: gitlab-org/gitlab!125939\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add codeowners validation block\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b4deb31b91d08bedeb6d231d1b3de07dfa0a30f1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273491, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested a nitpick to put a repeatedly tested component to a variable \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463155402, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125496 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!125496\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656852, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125982 --\u003e\\n### Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency: gitlab-org/gitlab!125982\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jivanvl please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f32b176e44c8c85d053beecdcaa3adda46362829\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547153, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to \\n     - to follow frontend dev guidelines for exported constants\\n     - not duplicate issue list queries right now but move everything to shared in the next iteration , making the cleanup more efficient\\n     - refactor the jest specs to follow the naming conventions, remove unwanted code and add a couple of extra tests - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125877#note_1475901603 \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: The maintainer added a non-blocking suggestion to add more test coverage\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina @tristan.read in please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1479325916, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125255 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope: gitlab-org/gitlab!125255\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 15:12:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393023, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130145 --\u003e\\n### Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!130145\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-25 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4ba705c0455a37a6bdf3b1cea4d9624e5453c39c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1528942055, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - not to use name with component when it is already used in hidden element\\n      - edit the test-id naming convention , was using `js-` naming convention\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489916587, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!121585 --\u003e\\n### Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects: gitlab-org/gitlab!121585\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@terrichu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:53:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445812, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132467 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from discussion_filter_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!132467\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fc3f4f17352251bc002c8612d6b82abd0d053d14\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593896320, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133725 --\u003e\\n### Basic group multiselect support for user token: gitlab-org/gitlab!133725\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Basic group multiselect support for user token\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e7fa81abfa9f541daf659dea19009afbab49a12\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131042, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- It was a small clean change , nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524201744, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for encouraging the MR author to use robust testing assertions. Great review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3540517, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539521470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to use kebab case for `data-testid` selectors\\n   - use `toMatchObect` in tests\\n   - use `toBe` for primitive values testing\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed some non blocking suggestions on comment rephrasing and changing tests description\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524216788, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127240 --\u003e\\n### Improve Value stream dashboard loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!127240\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Improve Value stream dashboard loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nI took it in half review from @jrushford as he was going on PTO\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - some changes to use computed classes on the element in a readable way\\n   - not to use `data-qa-selector` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert was generous to take it up and complete the review :bow: \\n\\nCan you please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review ? Thank you :thank_you:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524230146, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure thank you so much @pburdette :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541007009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: \\n    - to add Sentry logging for error scenarios\\n    - creating a helper function to set the data properties and write specs for it for changes made in haml file \\n    - to use `$emit` instead of `trigger` for testing an emitted event for component \\n- :mag: I identified to prevent failing tests in vue3 compat mode\\n    - an extra use of `nextTick`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463179030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129052 --\u003e\\n### Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure: gitlab-org/gitlab!129052\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dianalogan please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"86bc625b2e896a5c7ae1c21be7483ad6ce374aa8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849365, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Keep an eye out for missing test coverage. Especially when the MR deals with fixing a bug. We want to make sure it has good test coverage so the bug isn't introduced again. \\n\\nOverall good review :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4477803, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539565882, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @leipert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568899677, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @f_caplette :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568898395, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted to use $emit rather than $trigger but since the wrapper was native html element , trigger made more sense \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457667075, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125181 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!125181\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 09:52:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456369541, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124783 --\u003e\\n### Hook up update schedule mutation: gitlab-org/gitlab!124783\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hook up update schedule mutation\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alberts-gitlab please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add tests in `board_card_inner_spec.js`  but they will be added when rspecs are written for the same in future\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed asking why we prefer `eventHub` still\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463161255, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125479 --\u003e\\n### Dismiss modal after increasing access level: gitlab-org/gitlab!125479\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Dismiss modal after increasing access level\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ddavison please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:53 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656907, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125947 --\u003e\\n### Fix wrapping pattern of buttons: gitlab-org/gitlab!125947\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix wrapping pattern of buttons\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good suggestions and questions, not much else to comment on regarding this MR. Keep it up :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1465234546, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125971 --\u003e\\n### Mark vulnerability_details component as deprecated: gitlab-org/gitlab!125971\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"85d4a1316a06e5c11f902081a5bc9507930a634f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @leipert :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- A very small and clean MR to remove an existing FF, no feedback as such\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484705445, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified that the dropdown is closing when we click the copy button which is different from the original behaviour\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473663483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nLooked good to be since a helper method was added. Passed on to the maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to write test for the helper method in both the ee and ce version\\n\\n@mrincon please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473664730, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123522 --\u003e\\n### Implement search for group wikis: gitlab-org/gitlab!123522\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Implement search for group wikis\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@johnmason please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273525, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125980 --\u003e\\n### Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!125980\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123019 --\u003e\\n### Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\": gitlab-org/gitlab!123019\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\"\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470936880, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Did not review this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471435298, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124533 --\u003e\\n### Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!124533\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:50 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445781, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     1. To apply the new eslint rule files where it was used rather than disabling it\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471437751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125196 --\u003e\\n### Add no hard coded url eslint rules: gitlab-org/gitlab!125196\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add no hard coded url eslint rules\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:45 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that it was a small MR with data attribute changes for selection , approved it as is without any feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is \\n\\n@ddavison @justin_ho please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471438997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add a jest test case when the dataset property `cannot-merge` property is not provided\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471440135, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125555 --\u003e\\n### Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar: gitlab-org/gitlab!125555\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-10 10:06:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960557, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125509 --\u003e\\n### Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance: gitlab-org/gitlab!125509\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960568, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add the changes behind a FF just to be sure since this was a change in the head tags and we could not see any potential differences in local gdk and .com\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is **but the maintainer agreed that an FF would be good**\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471441009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested using utility classes at multiple css file changes to reduce the css page bundle size\\n\\nIt was a great improvement to see the final changes made only to the template file\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:48:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471442069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Nothing to suggest , it was a small ~frontend change adding a language attribute to html. Looked good :white_check_mark: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz @psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471443156, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n    - to use computed properties and constants\\n    - to remove redundant code like - `v-if` and `v-show` should never be together\\n    - to remove console logs \\n    - not to use computed property for constants\\n    - move i18n texts to options of the component\\n    - add a finally for isloading to false irrespective of error or not\\n    - remove redundant `v-else-if` which was not needed\\n    - move multiple `findComponent` in test cases as a variable\\n    - [use findComponent as component rather than name](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331672)\\n    - Use emit instead of trigger for gitlab-ui components in [jest test cases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331686)\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - redundant null check in `v-else`\\n     - passing reload as a function instead of emit \\n     - string extrapolation not need\\n\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471448970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125572 --\u003e\\n### Add Tracing List UI: gitlab-org/gitlab!125572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Tracing List UI\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467872137, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126578 --\u003e\\n### [issue-417870] Migrate button component to Pajamas Button: gitlab-org/gitlab!126578\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"da94499aad2ea3f497f66f74e02dec6b36dc850b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471841737, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This isn't one of the largest MRs, but thanks for the promotion of utility classes over custom CSS :thumbsup: and the nice and respectful interaction with a community contributor.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472031566, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This particular MR was a merge as-is MR thus, did not have any requests for change.\\n\\nFor maintainership, the MRs we are looking for are the more thoughtful technical design decisions and engineering considerations.  Regretfully, I cannot fairly grade your maintainership competency based on this MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 272636, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472314143, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127572 --\u003e\\n### Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times: gitlab-org/gitlab!127572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:20 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3473fc8ed41c758a8384a85eb86d04bca942249f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:19 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813801, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Frontend code didn't require changes so the review was :100:, what I'd expect from a frontend maintainer.\\n\\n-------\\n\\nI often read the entire MR to learn more about our codebase. I may ask for changes if I notice something in the backend, documentation, etc...\\n\\nI'd encourage \\\"holistic\\\" reviews and be ready to comment or ask about any part of the MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1607849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:37:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1607849, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1474957631, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127036 --\u003e\\n### Prevent loading state from showing after undo: gitlab-org/gitlab!127036\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9a4cc70bcb0665ed6a9165b00626054c290aaa69\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620562, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to remove the isSingleRequest for emojiQueries since they would not have large requests\\n    - some UI text changes for proper error description\\n    - unnecessary if condition in code\\n    - Show loader when the emojis are being fetched to show an indicator that a query is being run\\n    - remove not need cache.writeQuery in tests, should work fine with proper request handlers\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed checking that the query is called everytime we update any work item attribute\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1475870222, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125121 --\u003e\\n### Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items: gitlab-org/gitlab!125121\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-19 03:41:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464604003, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126709 --\u003e\\n### Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap: gitlab-org/gitlab!126709\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-22 06:31:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547126, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125877 --\u003e\\n### Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list: gitlab-org/gitlab!125877\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-16 06:31:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-20 09:53:43 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471137287, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani My suggestion about the specs came from specific domain knowledge about Incidents, so I wouldn't worry about that.\\n\\nYour review was detailed and what I would expect from a maintainer :thumbsup_tone1:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3146670, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480510293, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127014 --\u003e\\n### Remove import_details_page feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!127014\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove import_details_page feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124322 --\u003e\\n### Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests: gitlab-org/gitlab!124322\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:38:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480581161, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133508 --\u003e\\n### Project overview Edit button fix: gitlab-org/gitlab!133508\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Project overview Edit button fix\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e8dd22043f74a2b659825529463290378e4528c8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726639, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This was a larger MR so it can be easier to miss some things. From this review:\\n\\n- Keep an eye out for code (string and number literals) that can be replaced with existing constants\\n- For reusable/shared components, check that the code is generic and reusable by others\\n- Generally, question every line of code to check whether it is unneeded or can be simplified\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488788165, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @tristan.read :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 02:03:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484696992, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @mrincon :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484697575, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"sure , thank you @ddavison :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484699692, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small ~frontend changes to use `data-testid` instead of qa selector. Had no feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484703670, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n  * to use `fluid-width` instead of `fluid-content`  for `gl-collapsible-listbox` props\\n  * add an extra test for check for other props for the new dropdown\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1569008648, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n       - to change the naming for labelsContainer and labels in jest test cases\\n       - having a test case to make sure that the injected data property `allowScopedLabels` is injected and also having a default value for the injected prop in the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484715899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126425 --\u003e\\n### Work item header and input UI improvements: gitlab-org/gitlab!126425\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Work item header and input UI improvements\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 06:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469343489, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n     - (non-blocking)to use cache update instead of refetching the issue count when deleting the work item\\n     - to remove unused graphql query \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - to point using constants for work item types\\n     - improve the logic when updating fields by updating the persisted_fields and returning early when no work item found\\n     - use isActive is `issuable_item` to highlight selected item\\n     - update the milestone in the FF file\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484781979, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank for you timely review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11004366, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484911410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128081 --\u003e\\n### Fix bold font not being applied on viewed file after further changes. Add viewed file count to diff.: gitlab-org/gitlab!128081\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"be8bab870d9d7406215dcb7751daa1602a6c4d04\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495053415, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127937 --\u003e\\n### [issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states: gitlab-org/gitlab!127937\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:16 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758897, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add screenshots instead of videos in the MR description which gives more clarity  , but it was a non blocking comment hence approved.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495110152, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495112796, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - to use constants for \\\"group\\\" and \\\"project\\\"\\n     - to use scoped strings for translations \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499990702, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125661 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!125661\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-04 03:28:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758939, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - To use `GlDisclosureDropdown` instead of `GlListBox` according to the use case\\n     - To Add accessibility `toggleSrText` prop to dropdown\\n     - to change jest test case string ( nitpick )\\n     - to use `mount` instead of `mountExtended` since no testid was used\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499998030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127996 --\u003e\\n### Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown: gitlab-org/gitlab!127996\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758883, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Minimal changes and looked good to me without any changes, passed on to maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499999096, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126667 --\u003e\\n### Add view cache for PWA manifest.json: gitlab-org/gitlab!126667\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add view cache for PWA manifest.json\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-29 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492740118, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani this was a super large MR, thanks for tackling it and dropping your questions!\\n\\n\u003e I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nIt's interesting to note that the hidden element was actually **needed**. It just wasn't obvious **why**. It took some digging to figure out the reason behind the pattern used there.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2233420, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1497804374, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to\\n    - Add a test to make sure that resolver is called a particular number of times in addition to being called with params\\n    - renaming of some tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n    - rename the variable `mutationLoading` to `isDeleteInprogress` \\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1506027507, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127958 --\u003e\\n### Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination: gitlab-org/gitlab!127958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 08:22:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1496495447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggested changes , small and clean MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558649388, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change all FF's to name the FF's being used in tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out a small test description change\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558673332, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128324 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Various fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab!128324\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Various fixes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-08 03:14:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1500078923, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - To avoid `if-else` for apollo mutate\\n    - delete unnecessary computed props\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503790443, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127900 --\u003e\\n### Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards: gitlab-org/gitlab!127900\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-05 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758913, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to change the wording of some of the tests ( use verbs )\\n    - to move some reuseable components in the tests to the scope of the file and make available to all tests\\n    - remove unwanted assertions in tests\\n    - use `props()` instead of `attributes()` in tests\\n    - use i18n for reuseable constant strings\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507109492, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128088 --\u003e\\n### Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper: gitlab-org/gitlab!128088\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 03:50:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503854140, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't think the variable rename nitpick was a miss, it was just my opinion.\\n\\nThe UX review was skipped due to the team circumstances, but it's still something to keep in mind when reviewing.\\n\\nIt was a good review from you overall :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4846639, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507111595, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove unwanted props\\n   - use conditional chaining for computed props\\n   - remove unwanted hover class from options\\n   - use constants for icon strings from backend\\n   - use `data-testid` selectors instead of `data-qa` selectors\\n   - remove dead code\\n   - use `i18n` for strings\\n   - simplify names of props and prop values as well\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507117825, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126773 --\u003e\\n### Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files: gitlab-org/gitlab!126773\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:27:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493228070, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125260 --\u003e\\n### Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki: gitlab-org/gitlab!125260\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8373453d6ae6f7cb78780555186a249ed82f7a80\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!111116 --\u003e\\n### Display pull command for container registry tag: gitlab-org/gitlab!111116\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616c84e2577641082d10401f5a19fea04ac39323\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1510643149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126836 --\u003e\\n### Fix: group_select has render with older data: gitlab-org/gitlab!126836\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix: group_select has render with older data\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@peterhegman please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b9b2f391cef771e5b41cfa3d74c155b0e464b5f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for your review in that MR Deepika :bow: You made the right call approving it as is while still raising that UX quirk.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3732265, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1521576364, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove some unwanted lines of code\\n   - not to pass an empty object as a param for a util function\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1520453535, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128700 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count: gitlab-org/gitlab!128700\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to rename component event names to make more sense\\n   - to remove `isSingleRequest` from apollo query context after `unbatch_graphql_queries` flag is on on gitlab.com\\n   - conditional chaining for object properties\\n   - use computed props\\n   - use `toEqual` rather than `toStrictEqual`\\n   - instead of manually updating store state in tests , use store action dispatch\\n   - use `toHaveBeenCalledTimes` which will also check if the mock is called rather than just called mock\\n   - not to use `toBeDefined` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - using existing strings for translation\\n      - simplifying the property access by optional chaining\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558758161, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130784 --\u003e\\n### Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!130784\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-09 06:31:34 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541160506, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126649 --\u003e\\n### Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!126649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1498635175, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129775 --\u003e\\n### Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary: gitlab-org/gitlab!129775\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:59 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1522244292, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133476 --\u003e\\n### Remove issuable features moved popover: gitlab-org/gitlab!133476\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove issuable features moved popover\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@djadmin please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c3f7f75559ae30c476f441cc34c2ee37003ddfac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726662, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134178 --\u003e\\n### Migrate work item milestone dropdown to listbox: gitlab-org/gitlab!134178\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ee21d068c9fa91cd92f22ecaca9599cbfcb803e5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481959, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133406 --\u003e\\n### Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid: gitlab-org/gitlab!133406\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@sliaquat please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c497ef797d3e07bcde187480530eb49d015ac9fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726690, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134338 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue: gitlab-org/gitlab!134338\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f27e16c0733dac24965412a9e4f105b22695f1a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481935, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"You provided an excellent review, keep up the good work :rocket: \\n\\nThere wasn't a lot for me to find so no worries. \\n\\nThe only Feedback I can share is to be cautious with suggesting such [\\\"simplifications\\\"](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127240#note_1484661059) in cases where the scope of the problem is too big to be understood very quickly. \\n\\nI've seen too many bugs being introduced by such \\\"simplifications\\\". I would recommend to still address these but with a more open question:\\n\\n\\\"Could you help me understand why we would need this additional check on this value?\\\"\\n\\nThis will lead to the same result but reduce the risk to remove a needed check in a hurry.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7293390, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1526853785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested some minor variable naming changes \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to add test cases/coverage for the new date_timestamp\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538915383, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130013 --\u003e\\n### Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report: gitlab-org/gitlab!130013\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984874, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to use `attributes` function for testing the href of the component\\n    - let go of `exists` since that test will fail anyways\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536523693, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130100 --\u003e\\n### Move job sidebar buttons to header: gitlab-org/gitlab!130100\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move job sidebar buttons to header\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-30 06:31:02 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984776, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to use `default to 0` for prop type `Number`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536528512, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129895 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!129895\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524053220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , small MR with clean changes :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544850303, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130873 --\u003e\\n### Add background color to new MR tabs: gitlab-org/gitlab!130873\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add background color to new MR tabs\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543203980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @ealcantara :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544853007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , minimal ~frontend changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:23:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544852532, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130649 --\u003e\\n### Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License: gitlab-org/gitlab!130649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-02 06:30:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130652 --\u003e\\n### Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!130652\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alexpooley please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811596, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130616 --\u003e\\n### Draft: Add possibility for minimal forks: gitlab-org/gitlab!130616\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ab03e6bb588b8f72ec6195cfa6aa2d31a3b6c6d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811647, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130935 --\u003e\\n### Move Service Desk lists app under Issues: gitlab-org/gitlab!130935\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move Service Desk lists app under Issues\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130810 --\u003e\\n### Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend: gitlab-org/gitlab!130810\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@kushalpandya please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd7a7735f8a732d3a2b13c0079ae047db90b9288\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543204010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130075 --\u003e\\n### Hide search bar if below threshold: gitlab-org/gitlab!130075\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hide search bar if below threshold\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@tristan.read please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ae64b6b7bd2950d31c54abb361e264623276c9dc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984827, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No changes , just fixing failing pipelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546650918, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggestions , it only involved changing `data-testid` changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546653878, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125649 --\u003e\\n### Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming: gitlab-org/gitlab!125649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@huzaifaiftikhar1 please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984893, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested if there is a capability of adding a loading placeholder in the dropdown with the loading indicator ? ( Like `Loading`) \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549132611, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130986 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!130986\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845350, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129958 --\u003e\\n### Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color: gitlab-org/gitlab!129958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-12 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501750, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131028 --\u003e\\n### Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle: gitlab-org/gitlab!131028\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501694, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified \\n     - to remove the background for Progress widget in dark mode as well\\n     - update the border over hover similar in all the widgets\\n     - sync the background color of dropdowns like inputs in milestone and iterations\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:35:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:22:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484788602, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129219 --\u003e\\n### [Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived: gitlab-org/gitlab!129219\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845403, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130678 --\u003e\\n### Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0: gitlab-org/gitlab!130678\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:54 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845382, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked a question regarding the validity of an extra variable which led to fixing a bug :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562749106, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131737 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables: gitlab-org/gitlab!131737\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560771819, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change a test description to depict the true state of the `isCollapsed`. But it was such a pleasure reviewing the MR as it was one of the best I have seen in GitLab\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n   - cleanup `getCssClassDimensions` in mock\\n   - manually add `wrapper.destroy` in the afterEach block\\n   - group `mouse enter` tests into a describe block to prevent repetion\\n   - remove translating strings while testing in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562756509, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131918 --\u003e\\n### How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks: gitlab-org/gitlab!131918\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aqualls please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aecca61bc39672e2a9940fae4a8788cf2daf41fa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772193, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that I could not verify the MR with multiple back and forth resulting in updating the description a couple of times to correct the FF mentioned in the steps to reproduce.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:30:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560773323, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to have feature flag check as well for new entry in dashboard list\\n   - using computed property\\n   - change the test case wordings a little\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing not to use wrapper vm constant property in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:05:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503795483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hey there @deepika.guliani! Most of my points here were about specs readability and predictability. There was nothing here that would have prevented a merge, but sometimes when asking small questions, we find some underlying problems and understand the why.\\n\\nFor example, [when I proposed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/131028#note_1555293432) to move the `toggle?.remove` call to the afterEach block, it was a nitpick and it did not block merge, but by pointing it out, the author and I had a chat and we found out that the wrapper was being mounted twice and that's why there were some issues! This did not impact the tests right now, but it might have in the future as more and more tests were added and then the bug becomes harder to find.\\n\\nThis is not to say that you missed anything really (your reviews are all great!). More that especially in specs, it's easy to miss a lot of underlying problems and it's worth spending a bit of extra time to make sure that everything behave as it should, not just that tests are passing.\\n\\nKeep up the awesome work!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5327378, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563502843, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131951 --\u003e\\n### Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!131951\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:16:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461754, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions, ~frontend light MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is, no ~frontend feedback\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571569999, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129369 --\u003e\\n### Update trial column: gitlab-org/gitlab!129369\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update trial column\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524194801, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132846 --\u003e\\n### Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors: gitlab-org/gitlab!132846\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339261, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-02 12:40:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549256589, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions , clean MR \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587381535, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132832 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!132832\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-30 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339281, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested for a ~UX review since this might have more touching points than mentioned. The code looked good to me.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n  @himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587384960, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587385136, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132613 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix some error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!132613\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix some error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-28 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1581646466, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133275 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand: gitlab-org/gitlab!133275\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 06:31:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4112f7b6c1c062a21e7a8e161d3425dbd7952fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589009889, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add some test cases and `toMatchObject` for testing more props of the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589277355, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131928 --\u003e\\n### Update artifacts page layout: gitlab-org/gitlab!131928\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update artifacts page layout\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461780, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked some clarifying questions, but nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@justin_ho  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589281507, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131143 --\u003e\\n### License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!131143\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@chloeliu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:47 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1556289060, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nBackend heavy , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589285808, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131849 --\u003e\\n### Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids: gitlab-org/gitlab!131849\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mlapierre please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-20 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772203, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: Just to add a before and after video to make the description more clear\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589290037, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"It was a nice initial review! Your suggestion was valuable.\\n\\nGreat attention to detail, important findings, helpful comments. \\n\\nGreat work @deepika.guliani :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10762712, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 14:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:22:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589877102, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133200 --\u003e\\n### Fix devops empty state illustration: gitlab-org/gitlab!133200\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix devops empty state illustration\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pskorupa please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1590705608, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small MR with no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n`@ealcantara` please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1592642788, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good review with good suggestions! A couple of comments:\\n\\n- I believe we don't prefer `||` over `??`, both are perfectly valid\\n- I believe we don't prefer `toEqual` to `toStrictEqual`, in fact `toStrictEqual` is arguably better since it is a more precise check\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 12:36:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-09 05:08:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593026254, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134245 --\u003e\\n### Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!134245\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@acroitor please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23efd83fe1a18f112ebcb8e158b67b5e509014c2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131000, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131825 --\u003e\\n### Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics: gitlab-org/gitlab!131825\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"36b2e435a8457e49253a82a3156bb175daaeabe2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571528474, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134591 --\u003e\\n### Fix epic board children count and weight on card: gitlab-org/gitlab!134591\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix epic board children count and weight on card\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5b708cd017dd2ef2bf249c20c4006a1f13e99031\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1609999412, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134377 --\u003e\\n### Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget: gitlab-org/gitlab!134377\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d4a6612056c26010216970d82e54952419c1c886\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1611728905, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134730 --\u003e\\n### Display abuse report notes (frontend): gitlab-org/gitlab!134730\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2530d3cd51ab399da0ba2945e6d0f64ad38f0d3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1615989743, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Closing this since https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/129537+ is merged\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1fae663519385999828d1931b66d7b7f1e52da66\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1617560916, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3540517, \"username\": \"ealcantara\", \"name\": \"Enrique Alc\\u00e1ntara\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4477803, \"username\": \"pburdette\", \"name\": \"Payton Burdette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 272636, \"username\": \"ddavison\", \"name\": \"Dan Davison\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 1607849, \"username\": \"mrincon\", \"name\": \"Miguel Rincon\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3146670, \"username\": \"tristan.read\", \"name\": \"Tristan Read\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11004366, \"username\": \"eduardosanz\", \"name\": \"Eduardo Sanz Garc\\u00eda\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 2233420, \"username\": \"pslaughter\", \"name\": \"Paul Slaughter\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4846639, \"username\": \"fguibert\", \"name\": \"Florie Guibert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3732265, \"username\": \"pgascouvaillancourt\", \"name\": \"Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 7293390, \"username\": \"jannik_lehmann\", \"name\": \"Jannik Lehmann\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 5327378, \"username\": \"f_caplette\", \"name\": \"Fr\\u00e9d\\u00e9ric Caplette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 10762712, \"username\": \"arfedoro\", \"name\": \"Artur Fedorov\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 6543, \"name\": \"GitLab.com\", \"path\": \"gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 7764, \"name\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"path\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 17069039}]}","query":"Please rewrite the description of {url} so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved. Also add common \"jobs to be done\" or use cases which should be considered from a usability perspective.","query_id":"115357448f2a415584ee6330f7061e72","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"130193114","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 130193114, \"title\": \"Trainee FE Maintainer (Gitlab) - Deepika Guliani\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-03 05:03:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"description\": \"## Basic setup\\n\\n1. [x] Read the [code review page in the handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/) and the [code review guidelines](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/code_review.html).\\n1. [x] Understand [how to become a maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#how-to-become-a-project-maintainer) and add yourself as a [trainee maintainer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer) in the [team database](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md). (MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/105456+)\\n\\n## Working towards becoming a maintainer\\n\\nThese are only guidelines. Remember that there is no specific timeline on this.\\n\\nAs part of your journey towards becoming a maintainer, you may find it useful to:\\n\\n1. [ ] Act as a coach in a big deliverable that requires [following the planning step](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/fe_guide/development_process.html#planning-development) as part of the trainee program.\\n1. [x] [Shadow a maintainer](#code-review-pairing) while they review an MR. This will allow you to get insight into the thought processes involved.\\n1. [x] [Have a maintainer shadow *you*](#code-review-pairing) while you review an MR *as if you were a maintainer* . Ideally, this would be with a different maintainer to the above, so you can get different insights.\\n1. [x] *Optional:* [Consider finding a mentor](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/workflow/code-review/#trainee-maintainer-mentorship-pilot-program) to help you become a maintainer.\\n\\nIt is up to you to ensure that you are getting enough MRs to review, and of varied types. All engineers are reviewers, so you should already be receiving regular reviews from Reviewer Roulette. You could also seek out more reviews from your team, or #frontend Slack channels.\\n\\nYour reviews should aim to cover maintainer responsibilities as well as reviewer responsibilities. Your approval means you think it is ready to merge.\\n\\nAfter each MR is merged or closed, add a discussion to this issue using this template:\\n\\n```markdown\\n### (Merge request title): (Merge request URL)\\n\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I suggested/identified/noted...\\\")\\n\\nPost-review (opportunities to learn):\\n\\n- (List anything of note, or a quick summary. \\\"I missed...\\\" or \\\"Merged as-is\\\")\\n\\n(Maintainer who reviewed this merge request) Please add feedback, and compare\\nthis review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\nThe purpose of comparing your review to the maintainer's review is to engage in active learning and expand your list of items to consider. Remember, different maintainers are going to identify different issues in the same code. As long as you are not missing large errors or bugs, don't feel like you are doing a bad job if you and a maintainer make different suggestions.\\n\\n**Note:** Do not include reviews of security MRs because review feedback might reveal security issue details.\\n\\n**Tip:** There are [tools](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/tools-and-tips/#trainee-maintainer-issue-upkeep) available to assist with this task.\\n\\n### Code Review Pairing\\n\\nMuch like pair programming, pairing on code review is a great way to knowledge share and collaborate on merge request. This is a great activity for trainee maintainers to participate with maintainers for learning their process of code review.\\n\\nA **private code review session** (unrecorded) involves one primary reviewer, and a shadow. If more than one shadow wishes to observe a private session, please consider obtaining consent from the merge request author.\\n\\nA **public code review session** involves a primary reviewer and one or more shadows in a recorded session that is released publicly, for example to GitLab Unfiltered.\\n\\n* If the merge request author is a GitLab team member, please consider obtaining consent from them.\\n* If the merge request author is a community contributor, you **must** obtain consent from them.\\n* Do **not** release reviews of security merge requests publicly.\\n\\n## When you're ready to make it official\\n\\nWhen reviews have accumulated, and recent reviews consistently fulfill maintainer responsibilities, any maintainer can take the next step. The trainee should also feel free to discuss their progress with their manager or any maintainer at any time.\\n\\n1. [ ] Create a merge request updating [your team member entry](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/blob/master/doc/team_database.md) proposing yourself as a maintainer.\\n1. [ ] Keep reviewing, start merging :metal:\", \"milestone_id\": null, \"iid\": 34345, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 3, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": 244675350, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:15 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 11701495, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 11701495, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 17069039, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 130812, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2015-11-27 21:29:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-04-27 10:56:44 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 8595532, \"title\": \"trainee maintainer\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"created_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-11-08 12:29:56 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"ProjectLabel\", \"group_id\": null, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": null, \"milestone\": null, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125868 --\u003e\\n### Remove hard coded language: gitlab-org/gitlab!125868\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove hard coded language\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603993, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Looked good to me , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536524660, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130137 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder: gitlab-org/gitlab!130137\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix epic board count update on add and reorder\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:12:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f0859f422798f0911f1d302381f3b7dc92f2a3e3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-28 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984745, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134349 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!134349\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Migrate card multi select to apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ad0fef742d45c5008c793f75979365880c402acb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608130962, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127788 --\u003e\\n### Fixing problems with project overview: gitlab-org/gitlab!127788\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixing problems with project overview\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772209, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Dependency updates are often \\\"waived through\\\". You took the time to understand what's going on and tried out the update locally :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:31:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563423640, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to update the description of the MR ( not blocking )\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503796209, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127151 --\u003e\\n### Fix image_list_row_spec.js: gitlab-org/gitlab!127151\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix image_list_row_spec.js\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:05:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"80fb9fc2009c78be055fd46286880166c5d8d380\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-26 05:35:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670465, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure ! Thank you @fguibert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:20:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507118687, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125939 --\u003e\\n### Add codeowners validation block: gitlab-org/gitlab!125939\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add codeowners validation block\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b4deb31b91d08bedeb6d231d1b3de07dfa0a30f1\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273491, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested a nitpick to put a repeatedly tested component to a variable \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463155402, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125496 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!125496\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Add issue to Swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:09:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"81c635bd618a931d3728effe87d49d87a6e8846a\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656852, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125982 --\u003e\\n### Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency: gitlab-org/gitlab!125982\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fixes container registry tags list sorting UI inconsistency\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jivanvl please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f32b176e44c8c85d053beecdcaa3adda46362829\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-25 05:05:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547153, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to \\n     - to follow frontend dev guidelines for exported constants\\n     - not duplicate issue list queries right now but move everything to shared in the next iteration , making the cleanup more efficient\\n     - refactor the jest specs to follow the naming conventions, remove unwanted code and add a couple of extra tests - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125877#note_1475901603 \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: The maintainer added a non-blocking suggestion to add more test coverage\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina @tristan.read in please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1479325916, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125255 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope: gitlab-org/gitlab!125255\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and scope\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 15:12:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393023, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130145 --\u003e\\n### Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!130145\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add infinite scroll to source_branch_dropdown.vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-25 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4ba705c0455a37a6bdf3b1cea4d9624e5453c39c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1528942055, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - not to use name with component when it is already used in hidden element\\n      - edit the test-id naming convention , was using `js-` naming convention\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489916587, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!121585 --\u003e\\n### Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects: gitlab-org/gitlab!121585\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove usages of emails_disabled in favor of emails_enabled for Projects\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@terrichu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 06:52:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:53:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445812, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132467 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from discussion_filter_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!132467\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fc3f4f17352251bc002c8612d6b82abd0d053d14\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593896320, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133725 --\u003e\\n### Basic group multiselect support for user token: gitlab-org/gitlab!133725\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Basic group multiselect support for user token\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3e7fa81abfa9f541daf659dea19009afbab49a12\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131042, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- It was a small clean change , nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524201744, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for encouraging the MR author to use robust testing assertions. Great review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3540517, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:24:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539521470, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to use kebab case for `data-testid` selectors\\n   - use `toMatchObect` in tests\\n   - use `toBe` for primitive values testing\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed some non blocking suggestions on comment rephrasing and changing tests description\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524216788, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127240 --\u003e\\n### Improve Value stream dashboard loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!127240\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Improve Value stream dashboard loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jannik_lehmann please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:20:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:29:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484670454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nI took it in half review from @jrushford as he was going on PTO\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - some changes to use computed classes on the element in a readable way\\n   - not to use `data-qa-selector` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert was generous to take it up and complete the review :bow: \\n\\nCan you please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review ? Thank you :thank_you:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524230146, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Sure thank you so much @pburdette :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-04 03:33:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541007009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: \\n    - to add Sentry logging for error scenarios\\n    - creating a helper function to set the data properties and write specs for it for changes made in haml file \\n    - to use `$emit` instead of `trigger` for testing an emitted event for component \\n- :mag: I identified to prevent failing tests in vue3 compat mode\\n    - an extra use of `nextTick`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463179030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129052 --\u003e\\n### Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure: gitlab-org/gitlab!129052\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Make documentation and UI consistent for units of measure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dianalogan please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"86bc625b2e896a5c7ae1c21be7483ad6ce374aa8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 06:31:38 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849365, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Keep an eye out for missing test coverage. Especially when the MR deals with fixing a bug. We want to make sure it has good test coverage so the bug isn't introduced again. \\n\\nOverall good review :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4477803, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 14:53:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1539565882, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @leipert :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:45:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568899677, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @f_caplette :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 08:44:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1568898395, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted to use $emit rather than $trigger but since the wrapper was native html element , trigger made more sense \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457667075, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125181 --\u003e\\n### Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!125181\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Removes direct data manipulation from upload_dropzone_spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 09:52:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-05 08:32:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2b0f83ec1db7bb3d5ef606836cadb99c7d0c31a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456369541, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124783 --\u003e\\n### Hook up update schedule mutation: gitlab-org/gitlab!124783\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hook up update schedule mutation\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alberts-gitlab please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:25:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-07 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add tests in `board_card_inner_spec.js`  but they will be added when rspecs are written for the same in future\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed asking why we prefer `eventHub` still\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-10 08:13:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616479cbc527f2a11ec6896e8c7c7bef049ff499\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1463161255, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125479 --\u003e\\n### Dismiss modal after increasing access level: gitlab-org/gitlab!125479\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Dismiss modal after increasing access level\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ddavison please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-06 07:37:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:53 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1459656907, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125947 --\u003e\\n### Fix wrapping pattern of buttons: gitlab-org/gitlab!125947\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix wrapping pattern of buttons\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464603980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good suggestions and questions, not much else to comment on regarding this MR. Keep it up :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-11 12:15:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1465234546, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125971 --\u003e\\n### Mark vulnerability_details component as deprecated: gitlab-org/gitlab!125971\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"85d4a1316a06e5c11f902081a5bc9507930a634f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273454, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @leipert :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698139, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- A very small and clean MR to remove an existing FF, no feedback as such\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484705445, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified that the dropdown is closing when we click the copy button which is different from the original behaviour\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473663483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nLooked good to be since a helper method was added. Passed on to the maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to write test for the helper method in both the ee and ce version\\n\\n@mrincon please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:58:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1473664730, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123522 --\u003e\\n### Implement search for group wikis: gitlab-org/gitlab!123522\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Implement search for group wikis\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@johnmason please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273525, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125980 --\u003e\\n### Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!125980\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate runner registration dropdown to disclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pgascouvaillancourt please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:14:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 02:55:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1466273408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!123019 --\u003e\\n### Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\": gitlab-org/gitlab!123019\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Resolve \\\"Implement issue preview in a drawer on issue list page\\\"\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:41 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1470936880, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Did not review this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471435298, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124533 --\u003e\\n### Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure: gitlab-org/gitlab!124533\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate \\\"pipelines_artifacts\\\" to GlDisclosure\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-04 10:41:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:42:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5baaee1f1613678faed23c040b80922d59232b3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:50 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1456445781, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     1. To apply the new eslint rule files where it was used rather than disabling it\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471437751, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125196 --\u003e\\n### Add no hard coded url eslint rules: gitlab-org/gitlab!125196\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add no hard coded url eslint rules\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-05 03:56:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:50:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f3d373d2cc95e02e1fb9dc3c1daf4fdb41373be0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-13 05:15:45 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1457393034, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\\nDuring review:\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that it was a small MR with data attribute changes for selection , approved it as is without any feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is \\n\\n@ddavison @justin_ho please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:54:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471438997, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add a jest test case when the dataset property `cannot-merge` property is not provided\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471440135, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125555 --\u003e\\n### Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar: gitlab-org/gitlab!125555\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Show user popover for assignees/reviewers in MR sidebar\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 03:57:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fb87671b5a7260becdc717888495c669b421511c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-10 10:06:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960557, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125509 --\u003e\\n### Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance: gitlab-org/gitlab!125509\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reorder head tags to optimize rendering performance\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-10 05:33:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-12 06:15:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1462960568, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add the changes behind a FF just to be sure since this was a change in the head tags and we could not see any potential differences in local gdk and .com\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is **but the maintainer agreed that an FF would be good**\\n\\n@afontaine please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:00:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"54b8e36b97267c4183f76812cadb115a707003ac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-17 10:06:33 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471441009, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested using utility classes at multiple css file changes to reduce the css page bundle size\\n\\nIt was a great improvement to see the final changes made only to the template file\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:03:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:48:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471442069, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Nothing to suggest , it was a small ~frontend change adding a language attribute to html. Looked good :white_check_mark: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@eduardosanz @psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:05:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471443156, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n    - to use computed properties and constants\\n    - to remove redundant code like - `v-if` and `v-show` should never be together\\n    - to remove console logs \\n    - not to use computed property for constants\\n    - move i18n texts to options of the component\\n    - add a finally for isloading to false irrespective of error or not\\n    - remove redundant `v-else-if` which was not needed\\n    - move multiple `findComponent` in test cases as a variable\\n    - [use findComponent as component rather than name](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331672)\\n    - Use emit instead of trigger for gitlab-ui components in [jest test cases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/125572#note_1469331686)\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - redundant null check in `v-else`\\n     - passing reload as a function instead of emit \\n     - string extrapolation not need\\n\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471448970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125572 --\u003e\\n### Add Tracing List UI: gitlab-org/gitlab!125572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Tracing List UI\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-13 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 04:19:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53cff2a6070a187d131e2645366337d3d687ed1d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-15 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1467872137, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126578 --\u003e\\n### [issue-417870] Migrate button component to Pajamas Button: gitlab-org/gitlab!126578\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 09:57:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"da94499aad2ea3f497f66f74e02dec6b36dc850b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471841737, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This isn't one of the largest MRs, but thanks for the promotion of utility classes over custom CSS :thumbsup: and the nice and respectful interaction with a community contributor.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 181229, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 11:50:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"dfacb5916b8e2c0edf88ff97d41ea9961e5bf49d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472031566, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"This particular MR was a merge as-is MR thus, did not have any requests for change.\\n\\nFor maintainership, the MRs we are looking for are the more thoughtful technical design decisions and engineering considerations.  Regretfully, I cannot fairly grade your maintainership competency based on this MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 272636, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:51:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472314143, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127572 --\u003e\\n### Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times: gitlab-org/gitlab!127572\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display a phased loading indicator to help alleviate long wait times\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:20 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3473fc8ed41c758a8384a85eb86d04bca942249f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:19 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813801, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Frontend code didn't require changes so the review was :100:, what I'd expect from a frontend maintainer.\\n\\n-------\\n\\nI often read the entire MR to learn more about our codebase. I may ask for changes if I notice something in the backend, documentation, etc...\\n\\nI'd encourage \\\"holistic\\\" reviews and be ready to comment or ask about any part of the MR.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 1607849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:37:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 1607849, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-18 15:38:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1474957631, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127036 --\u003e\\n### Prevent loading state from showing after undo: gitlab-org/gitlab!127036\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9a4cc70bcb0665ed6a9165b00626054c290aaa69\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620562, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to remove the isSingleRequest for emojiQueries since they would not have large requests\\n    - some UI text changes for proper error description\\n    - unnecessary if condition in code\\n    - Show loader when the emojis are being fetched to show an indicator that a query is being run\\n    - remove not need cache.writeQuery in tests, should work fine with proper request handlers\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed checking that the query is called everytime we update any work item attribute\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1475870222, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125121 --\u003e\\n### Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items: gitlab-org/gitlab!125121\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Support pagination when loading award emojis in work items\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-11 04:31:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-19 04:16:00 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"98866b264c4f289a615a192d8886d1d457482815\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-19 03:41:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1464604003, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126709 --\u003e\\n### Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap: gitlab-org/gitlab!126709\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Display labels description and scoped labels for epics on roadmap\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-19 11:07:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-22 06:31:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1476547126, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125877 --\u003e\\n### Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list: gitlab-org/gitlab!125877\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Declare search tokens for CE Service Desk list\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-16 06:31:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 10:21:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-20 09:53:43 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1471137287, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani My suggestion about the specs came from specific domain knowledge about Incidents, so I wouldn't worry about that.\\n\\nYour review was detailed and what I would expect from a maintainer :thumbsup_tone1:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3146670, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 01:59:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480510293, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127014 --\u003e\\n### Remove import_details_page feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!127014\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove import_details_page feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mwoolf please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"882188a8cf205ceaf89b5a8ba059b59247d81ef0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!124322 --\u003e\\n### Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests: gitlab-org/gitlab!124322\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Replace qa selector with data-testid for release tests\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 08:38:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480581161, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133508 --\u003e\\n### Project overview Edit button fix: gitlab-org/gitlab!133508\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Project overview Edit button fix\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@dmishunov please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:16 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e8dd22043f74a2b659825529463290378e4528c8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-10 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726639, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani This was a larger MR so it can be easier to miss some things. From this review:\\n\\n- Keep an eye out for code (string and number literals) that can be replaced with existing constants\\n- For reusable/shared components, check that the code is generic and reusable by others\\n- Generally, question every line of code to check whether it is unneeded or can be simplified\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 12:00:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1488788165, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @tristan.read :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 02:03:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0e9d9de9d32a851377c3f68ecebaa49cbf25863f\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484696992, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @mrincon :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:39:52 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"db63c86c5e6ce7ec79dcd29994bb0d24fc5c0681\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484697575, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"sure , thank you @ddavison :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:40:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"78d149a4d1e5565f9e0e0ba3eeb0c58ed67cd793\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484698964, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:41:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"24b37342a9755f9f79952a6a15c7bc3098f0db63\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484699692, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small ~frontend changes to use `data-testid` instead of qa selector. Had no feedback\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:43:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c2301d3f87593c5d28d3ce7b7f41c94efb7c7565\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484703670, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n  * to use `fluid-width` instead of `fluid-content`  for `gl-collapsible-listbox` props\\n  * add an extra test for check for other props for the new dropdown\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1569008648, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n       - to change the naming for labelsContainer and labels in jest test cases\\n       - having a test case to make sure that the injected data property `allowScopedLabels` is injected and also having a default value for the injected prop in the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 06:52:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d5c2baa6160801eeca89c45cea104585b3d2467\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484715899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126425 --\u003e\\n### Work item header and input UI improvements: gitlab-org/gitlab!126425\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Work item header and input UI improvements\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 06:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 04:12:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469343489, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested\\n     - (non-blocking)to use cache update instead of refetching the issue count when deleting the work item\\n     - to remove unused graphql query \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n     - to point using constants for work item types\\n     - improve the logic when updating fields by updating the persisted_fields and returning early when no work item found\\n     - use isActive is `issuable_item` to highlight selected item\\n     - update the milestone in the FF file\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:31:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484781979, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank for you timely review!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11004366, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 08:49:57 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c334ad3278843eed2bf98eb9b7b666091147daf\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484911410, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128081 --\u003e\\n### Fix bold font not being applied on viewed file after further changes. Add viewed file count to diff.: gitlab-org/gitlab!128081\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"be8bab870d9d7406215dcb7751daa1602a6c4d04\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495053415, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127937 --\u003e\\n### [issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states: gitlab-org/gitlab!127937\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[issue-416939] Swap the secondary and primary buttons empty states\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 09:42:16 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758897, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add screenshots instead of videos in the MR description which gives more clarity  , but it was a non blocking comment hence approved.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@jerasmus please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:15:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1e344078acaa45d4e2ad3fbebcc86fbb2ad33a35\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495110152, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you for the feedback @cngo :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-01 10:17:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2a2d677da041cd138384060961fb4ec928774e0e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1495112796, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - to use constants for \\\"group\\\" and \\\"project\\\"\\n     - to use scoped strings for translations \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499990702, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125661 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!125661\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:02:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b2a48f257d9bf53129cc98b78d1b720817b51c40\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-04 03:28:18 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758939, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n     - To use `GlDisclosureDropdown` instead of `GlListBox` according to the use case\\n     - To Add accessibility `toggleSrText` prop to dropdown\\n     - to change jest test case string ( nitpick )\\n     - to use `mount` instead of `mountExtended` since no testid was used\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499998030, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127996 --\u003e\\n### Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown: gitlab-org/gitlab!127996\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate new issue GlDropdown to GlDisclosureDropdown\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:14:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3cc57fc85da84322309a64587c89539990466d48\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758883, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Minimal changes and looked good to me without any changes, passed on to maintainer\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1499999096, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126667 --\u003e\\n### Add view cache for PWA manifest.json: gitlab-org/gitlab!126667\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add view cache for PWA manifest.json\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-29 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-04 04:16:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"58c311dbfe89e6665035357ca8e5957e84d506ee\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492740118, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani this was a super large MR, thanks for tackling it and dropping your questions!\\n\\n\u003e I suggested not to use hidden elements in code but since it was not a scope of the MR , left it as unblocking comment.\\n\\nIt's interesting to note that the hidden element was actually **needed**. It just wasn't obvious **why**. It took some digging to figure out the reason behind the pattern used there.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 2233420, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-02 19:37:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0d33de5ef8a1b478cf3a375b39a6f09a9f8472ba\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1497804374, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to\\n    - Add a test to make sure that resolver is called a particular number of times in addition to being called with params\\n    - renaming of some tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n    - rename the variable `mutationLoading` to `isDeleteInprogress` \\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1506027507, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127958 --\u003e\\n### Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination: gitlab-org/gitlab!127958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Adds page URL params for container image tags list pagination\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-02 06:31:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:26:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 08:22:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1496495447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggested changes , small and clean MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558649388, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change all FF's to name the FF's being used in tests\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out a small test description change\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558673332, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128324 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Various fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab!128324\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Various fixes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-04 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-08 03:14:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1500078923, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - To avoid `if-else` for apollo mutate\\n    - delete unnecessary computed props\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 04:53:36 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f4b11b1a2a06bee2fe587fc7b683472ba73ba0e9\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503790443, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!127900 --\u003e\\n### Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards: gitlab-org/gitlab!127900\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add Value Streams Dashboard link to group analytics dashboards\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-01 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-05 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1494758913, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to change the wording of some of the tests ( use verbs )\\n    - to move some reuseable components in the tests to the scope of the file and make available to all tests\\n    - remove unwanted assertions in tests\\n    - use `props()` instead of `attributes()` in tests\\n    - use i18n for reuseable constant strings\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507109492, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128088 --\u003e\\n### Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper: gitlab-org/gitlab!128088\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Extract Work item contents and create a wrapper\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:02:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7cd5faad465906eb95c5fc7d570f1fe72646c8bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 03:50:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503854140, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I don't think the variable rename nitpick was a miss, it was just my opinion.\\n\\nThe UX review was skipped due to the team circumstances, but it's still something to keep in mind when reviewing.\\n\\nIt was a good review from you overall :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4846639, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:06:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"32833de9945b2a81a47c670ed0baec340de1de06\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507111595, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove unwanted props\\n   - use conditional chaining for computed props\\n   - remove unwanted hover class from options\\n   - use constants for icon strings from backend\\n   - use `data-testid` selectors instead of `data-qa` selectors\\n   - remove dead code\\n   - use `i18n` for strings\\n   - simplify names of props and prop values as well\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1507117825, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126773 --\u003e\\n### Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files: gitlab-org/gitlab!126773\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Rename files in pipeline mini graph, stub out new files\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 04:18:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbbf24dffb2bb5864b288fc26ddd93a863761ed6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-09 11:27:47 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493228070, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125260 --\u003e\\n### Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki: gitlab-org/gitlab!125260\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Feat: Add print to PDF for wiki\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pslaughter please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 04:52:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8373453d6ae6f7cb78780555186a249ed82f7a80\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-10 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1489813808, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!111116 --\u003e\\n### Display pull command for container registry tag: gitlab-org/gitlab!111116\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"616c84e2577641082d10401f5a19fea04ac39323\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1510643149, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126836 --\u003e\\n### Fix: group_select has render with older data: gitlab-org/gitlab!126836\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix: group_select has render with older data\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@peterhegman please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 03:59:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"b9b2f391cef771e5b41cfa3d74c155b0e464b5f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-12 06:31:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1478620628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for your review in that MR Deepika :bow: You made the right call approving it as is while still raising that UX quirk.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3732265, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 17:02:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7d0006beefacc717d0cd5a979a97b7b3e36a69ed\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1521576364, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to remove some unwanted lines of code\\n   - not to pass an empty object as a param for a util function\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-21 06:37:45 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1520453535, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!128700 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count: gitlab-org/gitlab!128700\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix filtering and list count\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-11 06:14:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a15db1741ff71187d3b7f9881798c37dcae54caa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1508849372, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to rename component event names to make more sense\\n   - to remove `isSingleRequest` from apollo query context after `unbatch_graphql_queries` flag is on on gitlab.com\\n   - conditional chaining for object properties\\n   - use computed props\\n   - use `toEqual` rather than `toStrictEqual`\\n   - instead of manually updating store state in tests , use store action dispatch\\n   - use `toHaveBeenCalledTimes` which will also check if the mock is called rather than just called mock\\n   - not to use `toBeDefined` as per guidelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n      - using existing strings for translation\\n      - simplifying the property access by optional chaining\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1558758161, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130784 --\u003e\\n### Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!130784\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add \\\"Closed Issues\\\" to Issue Analytics chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-04 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:47:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-09 06:31:34 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1541160506, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!126649 --\u003e\\n### Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue: gitlab-org/gitlab!126649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate jQuery-based Protected Tag Dropdown to Vue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-03 10:58:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:37:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bbc9db73c97c0b399009e0d7bb840703ab4a4641\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1498635175, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129775 --\u003e\\n### Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary: gitlab-org/gitlab!129775\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Reduce interference between Duo and discussion summary\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:23:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"53c898d1879cdd10cde5f75da8b00081301d2701\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:59 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1522244292, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133476 --\u003e\\n### Remove issuable features moved popover: gitlab-org/gitlab!133476\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove issuable features moved popover\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@djadmin please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c3f7f75559ae30c476f441cc34c2ee37003ddfac\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726662, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134178 --\u003e\\n### Migrate work item milestone dropdown to listbox: gitlab-org/gitlab!134178\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:04 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ee21d068c9fa91cd92f22ecaca9599cbfcb803e5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481959, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133406 --\u003e\\n### Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid: gitlab-org/gitlab!133406\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrate the remaining qa selectors under page/admin to testid\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@sliaquat please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-09 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c497ef797d3e07bcde187480530eb49d015ac9fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1594726690, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134338 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue: gitlab-org/gitlab!134338\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix weight update on move issue\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-17 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f27e16c0733dac24965412a9e4f105b22695f1a0\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1606481935, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"You provided an excellent review, keep up the good work :rocket: \\n\\nThere wasn't a lot for me to find so no worries. \\n\\nThe only Feedback I can share is to be cautious with suggesting such [\\\"simplifications\\\"](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127240#note_1484661059) in cases where the scope of the problem is too big to be understood very quickly. \\n\\nI've seen too many bugs being introduced by such \\\"simplifications\\\". I would recommend to still address these but with a more open question:\\n\\n\\\"Could you help me understand why we would need this additional check on this value?\\\"\\n\\nThis will lead to the same result but reduce the risk to remove a needed check in a hurry.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 7293390, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-24 13:31:54 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fcdd30ff934560dab054c3490c24984cf6aa97c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1526853785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested some minor variable naming changes \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing out to add test cases/coverage for the new date_timestamp\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538915383, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130013 --\u003e\\n### Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report: gitlab-org/gitlab!130013\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix the date filter on the global time tracking report\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pburdette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-01 07:56:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd782183f37f73a8fff9e0ace53ef47ca1473405\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984874, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n    - to use `attributes` function for testing the href of the component\\n    - let go of `exists` since that test will fail anyways\\n\\nPost review:\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536523693, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130100 --\u003e\\n### Move job sidebar buttons to header: gitlab-org/gitlab!130100\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move job sidebar buttons to header\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:11:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-30 06:31:02 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984776, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to use `default to 0` for prop type `Number`\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1536528512, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129895 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes: gitlab-org/gitlab!129895\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix WIP limit background for swimlanes\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-31 05:19:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"e1e222ad1c47f461bf4968e1fbf49bd8bb0c22f6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524053220, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , small MR with clean changes :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544850303, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130873 --\u003e\\n### Add background color to new MR tabs: gitlab-org/gitlab!130873\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add background color to new MR tabs\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@svedova please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:36:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"84f273fb98b0fe0d3ddcd8024d685f4b5320fe42\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543203980, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thank you @ealcantara :bow:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:55 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c5729dd9f06b5c4d7c5bcd920a0572562bfe2083\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544853007, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNothing to suggest , minimal ~frontend changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:23:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544852532, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130649 --\u003e\\n### Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License: gitlab-org/gitlab!130649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove ApplicationSetting dependency on License\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:39:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a7d860ef841371926fd69bc3fa1b772575930606\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-02 06:30:57 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130652 --\u003e\\n### Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!130652\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove `new_graphql_users_autocomplete` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@alexpooley please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:10 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811596, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130616 --\u003e\\n### Draft: Add possibility for minimal forks: gitlab-org/gitlab!130616\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-01 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ab03e6bb588b8f72ec6195cfa6aa2d31a3b6c6d2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:07 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1538811647, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130935 --\u003e\\n### Move Service Desk lists app under Issues: gitlab-org/gitlab!130935\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Move Service Desk lists app under Issues\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:03 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845361, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130810 --\u003e\\n### Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend: gitlab-org/gitlab!130810\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add extra attributes to Internal events tracking on frontend\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@kushalpandya please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"cd7a7735f8a732d3a2b13c0079ae047db90b9288\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1543204010, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130075 --\u003e\\n### Hide search bar if below threshold: gitlab-org/gitlab!130075\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Hide search bar if below threshold\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@tristan.read please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ae64b6b7bd2950d31c54abb361e264623276c9dc\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984827, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No changes , just fixing failing pipelines\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:37:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"c924a01c22da983a146fab4423e3a70d9a6dd3a8\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546650918, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: No suggestions , it only involved changing `data-testid` changes\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1546653878, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!125649 --\u003e\\n### Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming: gitlab-org/gitlab!125649\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Add new E2E test of group audit event streaming\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@huzaifaiftikhar1 please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-24 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:40:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f6e51dc72e2bccc7175901737ded9a3f715811d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 06:31:13 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1525984893, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested if there is a capability of adding a loading placeholder in the dropdown with the loading indicator ? ( Like `Loading`) \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549132611, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130986 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state: gitlab-org/gitlab!130986\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix board selector loading state\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@fguibert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-08 06:55:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"bd930c66b3275f52c24a4e78135f287347ebc98d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-07 06:30:58 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845350, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129958 --\u003e\\n### Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color: gitlab-org/gitlab!129958\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Super sidebar: Lighten theme background color\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:37:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9c0bcd2336346e449103524d06b06f436aaa5277\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-12 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501750, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131028 --\u003e\\n### Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle: gitlab-org/gitlab!131028\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Peek sidebar when mouse is over the toggle\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-11 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:09 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1552501694, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :mag: I identified \\n     - to remove the background for Progress widget in dark mode as well\\n     - update the border over hover similar in all the widgets\\n     - sync the background color of dropdowns like inputs in milestone and iterations\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 07:35:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-11 11:22:51 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"ca025737166556c3e9fe4473d3960af8c75b13e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1484788602, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129219 --\u003e\\n### [Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived: gitlab-org/gitlab!129219\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"[Issues] Add a visual toggle for including archived\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-14 10:39:17 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"480610d69840cf6bf28c182c2a36170cb79cbff7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845403, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!130678 --\u003e\\n### Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0: gitlab-org/gitlab!130678\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Upgrade sentry browser SDK to 7.66.0\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-06 06:31:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:54 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544845382, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked a question regarding the validity of an extra variable which led to fixing a bug :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562749106, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131737 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables: gitlab-org/gitlab!131737\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Remove usage of VueX variables\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:17:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 05:56:32 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"3ebc3e3a2418974a32574c6e5ee346c9e2db1f24\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-16 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560771819, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to change a test description to depict the true state of the `isCollapsed`. But it was such a pleasure reviewing the MR as it was one of the best I have seen in GitLab\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed \\n   - cleanup `getCssClassDimensions` in mock\\n   - manually add `wrapper.destroy` in the afterEach block\\n   - group `mouse enter` tests into a describe block to prevent repetion\\n   - remove translating strings while testing in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:08:43 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562756509, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131918 --\u003e\\n### How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks: gitlab-org/gitlab!131918\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"How to mark feature tests with separate file for accessibility checks\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aqualls please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"aecca61bc39672e2a9940fae4a8788cf2daf41fa\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:17 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772193, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted that I could not verify the MR with multiple back and forth resulting in updating the description a couple of times to correct the FF mentioned in the steps to reproduce.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@leipert please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-15 06:19:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 13:30:40 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6c0ed41092857db945ecad6b1398e1d8d37b41a5\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1560773323, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested \\n   - to have feature flag check as well for new entry in dashboard list\\n   - using computed property\\n   - change the test case wordings a little\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed pointing not to use wrapper vm constant property in specs\\n\\n@f_caplette please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-08 05:03:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:05:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7219aeaeae65aeef46f67a531099de76b708fe4d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1503795483, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hey there @deepika.guliani! Most of my points here were about specs readability and predictability. There was nothing here that would have prevented a merge, but sometimes when asking small questions, we find some underlying problems and understand the why.\\n\\nFor example, [when I proposed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/131028#note_1555293432) to move the `toggle?.remove` call to the afterEach block, it was a nitpick and it did not block merge, but by pointing it out, the author and I had a chat and we found out that the wrapper was being mounted twice and that's why there were some issues! This did not impact the tests right now, but it might have in the future as more and more tests were added and then the bug becomes harder to find.\\n\\nThis is not to say that you missed anything really (your reviews are all great!). More that especially in specs, it's easy to miss a lot of underlying problems and it's worth spending a bit of extra time to make sure that everything behave as it should, not just that tests are passing.\\n\\nKeep up the awesome work!\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 5327378, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-18 14:11:27 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64fb870f7f1010c2d66423b0f396daba6c28308b\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1563502843, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131951 --\u003e\\n### Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart: gitlab-org/gitlab!131951\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Migrates legacy dropdown in metric-chart\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@psimyn please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:25:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6d6b5b1f7264489baab8067b4c0b04dcd715d991\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-21 09:16:27 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461754, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions, ~frontend light MR\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is, no ~frontend feedback\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571569999, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!129369 --\u003e\\n### Update trial column: gitlab-org/gitlab!129369\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update trial column\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-23 08:19:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:51:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"05164f31440336a07a20686869dd2df41a17f90e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1524194801, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132846 --\u003e\\n### Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors: gitlab-org/gitlab!132846\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix auto-scrolling to Markdown anchors\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-01 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339261, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions :slight_smile: \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-08 08:27:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-02 12:40:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8074019dea013a49a10689d0c4ea63fe569d78e7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1549256589, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nNo suggestions , clean MR \\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587381535, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132832 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo: gitlab-org/gitlab!132832\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Move toggle labels from VueX to Apollo\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:24:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"df4cf03d6347fc866de31e03c787ec0581ddf327\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-30 06:31:37 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1583339281, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested for a ~UX review since this might have more touching points than mentioned. The code looked good to me.\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n  @himkp please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fbcbe5eb8a87626398252813bf07aef01e3c6105\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587384960, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- No suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1587385136, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!132613 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Fix some error handling: gitlab-org/gitlab!132613\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Fix some error handling\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-28 06:31:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-03 06:27:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"fde7fadae2c69db53cb111911b40f68b032bb9e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-29 06:31:14 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1581646466, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133275 --\u003e\\n### Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand: gitlab-org/gitlab!133275\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Apollo boards - Refactor epic lane collapse/expand\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 06:31:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a4112f7b6c1c062a21e7a8e161d3425dbd7952fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:08 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589009889, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested to add some test cases and `toMatchObject` for testing more props of the component\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589277355, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131928 --\u003e\\n### Update artifacts page layout: gitlab-org/gitlab!131928\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Update artifacts page layout\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@arfedoro please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:32:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1564461780, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I asked some clarifying questions, but nothing to suggest\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@justin_ho  please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589281507, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131143 --\u003e\\n### License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec: gitlab-org/gitlab!131143\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"License Compliance MR widget test \u0026 simplify E2E spec\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@chloeliu please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-13 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:34:47 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"0f6bdfb690e4ee7878f1e6c7f480fa3c95ac7bc3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-19 06:31:06 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1556289060, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\nBackend heavy , no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@iamphill please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589285808, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131849 --\u003e\\n### Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids: gitlab-org/gitlab!131849\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Test: migrate new MR qa selectors to testids\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@mlapierre please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-18 06:30:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:37:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5ba4748f38d15a105090c7d8ab060973c774ff30\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-20 06:31:05 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1562772203, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: Just to add a before and after video to make the description more clear\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@aturinske please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 09:39:45 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"4448836cdc3cdedd4976a9cd81d8b12ee9cf29bb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589290037, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"It was a nice initial review! Your suggestion was valuable.\\n\\nGreat attention to detail, important findings, helpful comments. \\n\\nGreat work @deepika.guliani :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10762712, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-04 14:54:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:22:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5250484ea95cfa6c621a09dbc0208d55424115b3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1589877102, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!133200 --\u003e\\n### Fix devops empty state illustration: gitlab-org/gitlab!133200\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix devops empty state illustration\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@pskorupa please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-05 06:31:05 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-06 06:31:04 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1590705608, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"During review:\\n\\n- Small MR with no suggestions\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n`@ealcantara` please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-06 08:45:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d3d8a2e49532ca1064de0c1f29d55da6defb85c7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1592642788, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"@deepika.guliani Good review with good suggestions! A couple of comments:\\n\\n- I believe we don't prefer `||` over `??`, both are perfectly valid\\n- I believe we don't prefer `toEqual` to `toStrictEqual`, in fact `toStrictEqual` is arguably better since it is a more precise check\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 4545397, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-06 12:36:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-09 05:08:42 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2f7d4754087117837fefed46536a971b3dfc50e6\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1593026254, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134245 --\u003e\\n### Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag: gitlab-org/gitlab!134245\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Remove`issue_assignees_widget` feature flag\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@acroitor please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-18 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"23efd83fe1a18f112ebcb8e158b67b5e509014c2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-21 06:31:26 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1608131000, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!131825 --\u003e\\n### Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics: gitlab-org/gitlab!131825\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Added dropdown with predefined date ranges to Value Stream Analytics\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@cngo please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-22 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"36b2e435a8457e49253a82a3156bb175daaeabe2\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-12 06:31:12 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1571528474, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134591 --\u003e\\n### Fix epic board children count and weight on card: gitlab-org/gitlab!134591\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix epic board children count and weight on card\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ntepluhina please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-19 06:31:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5b708cd017dd2ef2bf249c20c4006a1f13e99031\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:11 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1609999412, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134377 --\u003e\\n### Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget: gitlab-org/gitlab!134377\\n\\n\\n:heavy_check_mark: @deepika.guliani \\\"Fix work items sidebar glitch incase of parent widget\\\" was merged\\n\\n:left_speech_bubble: convert this into a discussion using the following template\\n\\n```markdown\\nDuring review:\\n\\n- :speech_balloon: I suggested ...\\n- :mag: I identified ...\\n- :notepad_spiral: I noted ...\\n\\nPost review:\\n\\n- :point_up: I missed ...\\n- :white_check_mark: Merged as-is\\n\\n@ealcantara please add feedback, and compare this review to the average maintainer review.\\n```\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-20 06:31:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:25 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 11701495, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"d4a6612056c26010216970d82e54952419c1c886\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:24 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1611728905, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\\n\u003c!-- gitlab-org/gitlab!134730 --\u003e\\n### Display abuse report notes (frontend): gitlab-org/gitlab!134730\\n\\n\\n:hourglass_flowing_sand: not yet merged\\n\\n\\n\u003chr\u003e\\n\\n:robot: This message was generated automatically using [Review\\nTanuki](https://gitlab.com/alberts-gitlab/review-tanuki). **Do not edit manually**\\n\u003c!-- GENERATED BY REVIEW TANUKI DO NOT EDIT --\u003e\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 06:31:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"2530d3cd51ab399da0ba2945e6d0f64ad38f0d3d\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1615989743, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}, {\"note\": \"Closing this since https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/129537+ is merged\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 11701495, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-25 04:46:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": 7764, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 130193114, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"1fae663519385999828d1931b66d7b7f1e52da66\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1617560916, \"namespace_id\": 17069039}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3540517, \"username\": \"ealcantara\", \"name\": \"Enrique Alc\\u00e1ntara\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4477803, \"username\": \"pburdette\", \"name\": \"Payton Burdette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 181229, \"username\": \"leipert\", \"name\": \"Lukas 'Eipi' Eipert\"}, {\"id\": 272636, \"username\": \"ddavison\", \"name\": \"Dan Davison\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 1607849, \"username\": \"mrincon\", \"name\": \"Miguel Rincon\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3146670, \"username\": \"tristan.read\", \"name\": \"Tristan Read\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11004366, \"username\": \"eduardosanz\", \"name\": \"Eduardo Sanz Garc\\u00eda\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 2233420, \"username\": \"pslaughter\", \"name\": \"Paul Slaughter\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4846639, \"username\": \"fguibert\", \"name\": \"Florie Guibert\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 3732265, \"username\": \"pgascouvaillancourt\", \"name\": \"Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 7293390, \"username\": \"jannik_lehmann\", \"name\": \"Jannik Lehmann\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 5327378, \"username\": \"f_caplette\", \"name\": \"Fr\\u00e9d\\u00e9ric Caplette\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 10762712, \"username\": \"arfedoro\", \"name\": \"Artur Fedorov\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 4545397, \"username\": \"cngo\", \"name\": \"Coung Ngo\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}, {\"id\": 11701495, \"username\": \"deepika.guliani\", \"name\": \"Deepika Guliani\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 6543, \"name\": \"GitLab.com\", \"path\": \"gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 7764, \"name\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"path\": \"www-gitlab-com\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 17069039}]}","query":"Are there any open questions relating to this issue? {url}","query_id":"7d092a973aea49ab8262711f0694b21e","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"128440335","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 128440335, \"title\": \"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 09:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\\n\\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets [checks `update_work_item` permission](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13) when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\\n\\n### Steps to replicate\\n\\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\\n\\n![Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13](/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov)\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 412831, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 0, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466693, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10413872, \"title\": \"SLO::Missed\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-28 18:18:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-16 18:38:39 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label to signify that a bug issue has missed its targeted SLO (Service Level Objective). See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/issue_workflow.html#priority-labels. Previously titled as missed-SLO\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26460213, \"title\": \"bug::functional\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Functional defects resulting from feature changes\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3412464, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-01-30 21:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-13 09:23:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Frontend team. Covers everything related to the way GitLab behaves (and, to an extent, looks) inside your browser.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3857523, \"title\": \"priority::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-13 08:01:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:10:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"We will address this soon and will provide capacity from our team for it in the next few releases. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#priority\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3713902, \"title\": \"severity::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-23 14:46:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:13:45 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Critical - applies to bugs and bug categories of availability, performance, security and ux. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#severity\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 835460, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@ramistry Assigning this to you as discussed. :slight_smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"38b30d5809070a434e01d7f712c68bc8716072a3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469295673, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, I have tried the IssueSetSubscription mutation for work items in the !127137 MR and it worked as required. It is also not allowing guest user to subscribe on confidential work item. \\ud83d\\ude42 \\n\\nI just have doubt regarding the naming convention of the mutation. I am not sure if we should go further with current name or have a new mutation like you suggested i.e. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480725131, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"**Proposal**: We can use `IssueSetSubscription` for subscribing and unsubscribing to the work item. If the existing mutation's arguments are not suitable, we can add a new mutation e.g. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:48:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1404104068, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Thanks for confirming, good point about the name and also I noticed that `IssueSetSubscription` requires a project so this won't work when work items are supported at the group level.\\n\\nI've opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 to add a new mutation that requires the work item's global id instead, but this cannot be used until %\\\"16.4\\\". Do you think we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127137 for now in order to fix the permissions problem?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:49:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:50:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481044252, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, yes, I think we can use !127137 as long as we do not have major changes in the mutation input and response in new mutation. :smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 13375904, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481062002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Ok! The changes should not be major, just:\\n\\n- mutation input: `projectPath`, `iid` and `subscribedState` -\u003e `id` and `subscribed`\\n- response: `issue` -\u003e `workItem`\\n\\nWould that be possible?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481081870, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, that will do. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:29:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 13:54:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481101613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The actual issue is fixed and working on gitlab.com. But we are still working on few other concerns mentioned in the [thread](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831#note_1404104068 \\\"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\\\"). \\n\\n@egrieff, I am keeping the issue open till the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 MR is merged. Does that sound right?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 05:23:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1491357196, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Sounds good to me :thumbsup: \\n\\nI've created the ~frontend issue for updating the mutation again next milestone: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420151. Feel free to amend it if needed.\\n\\nI'll validate and close this issue once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 is in production.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 05:23:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492242485, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Verified in production with 16.3.0-pre [49750df77fa](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/49750df77fa)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 16:30:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55966de7fe55806909024fc9c340f366bc131907\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493409135, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What is this issue about?","query_id":"c341661f0a164294866e635ffd393dd6","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"128440335","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 128440335, \"title\": \"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 09:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\\n\\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets [checks `update_work_item` permission](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13) when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\\n\\n### Steps to replicate\\n\\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\\n\\n![Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13](/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov)\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 412831, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 0, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466693, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10413872, \"title\": \"SLO::Missed\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-28 18:18:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-16 18:38:39 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label to signify that a bug issue has missed its targeted SLO (Service Level Objective). See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/issue_workflow.html#priority-labels. Previously titled as missed-SLO\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26460213, \"title\": \"bug::functional\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Functional defects resulting from feature changes\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3412464, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-01-30 21:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-13 09:23:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Frontend team. Covers everything related to the way GitLab behaves (and, to an extent, looks) inside your browser.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3857523, \"title\": \"priority::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-13 08:01:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:10:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"We will address this soon and will provide capacity from our team for it in the next few releases. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#priority\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3713902, \"title\": \"severity::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-23 14:46:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:13:45 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Critical - applies to bugs and bug categories of availability, performance, security and ux. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#severity\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 835460, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@ramistry Assigning this to you as discussed. :slight_smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"38b30d5809070a434e01d7f712c68bc8716072a3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469295673, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, I have tried the IssueSetSubscription mutation for work items in the !127137 MR and it worked as required. It is also not allowing guest user to subscribe on confidential work item. \\ud83d\\ude42 \\n\\nI just have doubt regarding the naming convention of the mutation. I am not sure if we should go further with current name or have a new mutation like you suggested i.e. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480725131, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"**Proposal**: We can use `IssueSetSubscription` for subscribing and unsubscribing to the work item. If the existing mutation's arguments are not suitable, we can add a new mutation e.g. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:48:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1404104068, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Thanks for confirming, good point about the name and also I noticed that `IssueSetSubscription` requires a project so this won't work when work items are supported at the group level.\\n\\nI've opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 to add a new mutation that requires the work item's global id instead, but this cannot be used until %\\\"16.4\\\". Do you think we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127137 for now in order to fix the permissions problem?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:49:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:50:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481044252, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, yes, I think we can use !127137 as long as we do not have major changes in the mutation input and response in new mutation. :smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 13375904, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481062002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Ok! The changes should not be major, just:\\n\\n- mutation input: `projectPath`, `iid` and `subscribedState` -\u003e `id` and `subscribed`\\n- response: `issue` -\u003e `workItem`\\n\\nWould that be possible?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481081870, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, that will do. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:29:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 13:54:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481101613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The actual issue is fixed and working on gitlab.com. But we are still working on few other concerns mentioned in the [thread](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831#note_1404104068 \\\"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\\\"). \\n\\n@egrieff, I am keeping the issue open till the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 MR is merged. Does that sound right?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 05:23:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1491357196, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Sounds good to me :thumbsup: \\n\\nI've created the ~frontend issue for updating the mutation again next milestone: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420151. Feel free to amend it if needed.\\n\\nI'll validate and close this issue once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 is in production.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 05:23:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492242485, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Verified in production with 16.3.0-pre [49750df77fa](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/49750df77fa)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 16:30:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55966de7fe55806909024fc9c340f366bc131907\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493409135, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize the comments into bullet points?","query_id":"d045feed87df439083e5f65b3015b67b","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"128440335","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 128440335, \"title\": \"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 09:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\\n\\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets [checks `update_work_item` permission](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13) when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\\n\\n### Steps to replicate\\n\\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\\n\\n![Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13](/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov)\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 412831, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 0, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466693, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10413872, \"title\": \"SLO::Missed\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-28 18:18:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-16 18:38:39 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label to signify that a bug issue has missed its targeted SLO (Service Level Objective). See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/issue_workflow.html#priority-labels. Previously titled as missed-SLO\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26460213, \"title\": \"bug::functional\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Functional defects resulting from feature changes\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3412464, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-01-30 21:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-13 09:23:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Frontend team. Covers everything related to the way GitLab behaves (and, to an extent, looks) inside your browser.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3857523, \"title\": \"priority::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-13 08:01:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:10:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"We will address this soon and will provide capacity from our team for it in the next few releases. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#priority\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3713902, \"title\": \"severity::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-23 14:46:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:13:45 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Critical - applies to bugs and bug categories of availability, performance, security and ux. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#severity\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 835460, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@ramistry Assigning this to you as discussed. :slight_smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"38b30d5809070a434e01d7f712c68bc8716072a3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469295673, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, I have tried the IssueSetSubscription mutation for work items in the !127137 MR and it worked as required. It is also not allowing guest user to subscribe on confidential work item. \\ud83d\\ude42 \\n\\nI just have doubt regarding the naming convention of the mutation. I am not sure if we should go further with current name or have a new mutation like you suggested i.e. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480725131, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"**Proposal**: We can use `IssueSetSubscription` for subscribing and unsubscribing to the work item. If the existing mutation's arguments are not suitable, we can add a new mutation e.g. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:48:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1404104068, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Thanks for confirming, good point about the name and also I noticed that `IssueSetSubscription` requires a project so this won't work when work items are supported at the group level.\\n\\nI've opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 to add a new mutation that requires the work item's global id instead, but this cannot be used until %\\\"16.4\\\". Do you think we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127137 for now in order to fix the permissions problem?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:49:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:50:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481044252, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, yes, I think we can use !127137 as long as we do not have major changes in the mutation input and response in new mutation. :smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 13375904, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481062002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Ok! The changes should not be major, just:\\n\\n- mutation input: `projectPath`, `iid` and `subscribedState` -\u003e `id` and `subscribed`\\n- response: `issue` -\u003e `workItem`\\n\\nWould that be possible?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481081870, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, that will do. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:29:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 13:54:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481101613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The actual issue is fixed and working on gitlab.com. But we are still working on few other concerns mentioned in the [thread](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831#note_1404104068 \\\"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\\\"). \\n\\n@egrieff, I am keeping the issue open till the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 MR is merged. Does that sound right?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 05:23:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1491357196, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Sounds good to me :thumbsup: \\n\\nI've created the ~frontend issue for updating the mutation again next milestone: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420151. Feel free to amend it if needed.\\n\\nI'll validate and close this issue once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 is in production.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 05:23:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492242485, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Verified in production with 16.3.0-pre [49750df77fa](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/49750df77fa)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 16:30:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55966de7fe55806909024fc9c340f366bc131907\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493409135, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize with bullet points.","query_id":"9b3998dac4104a388279f61f877151fe","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"128440335","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 128440335, \"title\": \"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 09:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\\n\\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets [checks `update_work_item` permission](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13) when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\\n\\n### Steps to replicate\\n\\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\\n\\n![Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13](/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov)\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 412831, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 0, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466693, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10413872, \"title\": \"SLO::Missed\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-28 18:18:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-16 18:38:39 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label to signify that a bug issue has missed its targeted SLO (Service Level Objective). See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/issue_workflow.html#priority-labels. Previously titled as missed-SLO\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26460213, \"title\": \"bug::functional\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Functional defects resulting from feature changes\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3412464, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-01-30 21:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-13 09:23:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Frontend team. Covers everything related to the way GitLab behaves (and, to an extent, looks) inside your browser.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3857523, \"title\": \"priority::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-13 08:01:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:10:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"We will address this soon and will provide capacity from our team for it in the next few releases. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#priority\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3713902, \"title\": \"severity::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-23 14:46:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:13:45 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Critical - applies to bugs and bug categories of availability, performance, security and ux. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#severity\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 835460, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@ramistry Assigning this to you as discussed. :slight_smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"38b30d5809070a434e01d7f712c68bc8716072a3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469295673, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, I have tried the IssueSetSubscription mutation for work items in the !127137 MR and it worked as required. It is also not allowing guest user to subscribe on confidential work item. \\ud83d\\ude42 \\n\\nI just have doubt regarding the naming convention of the mutation. I am not sure if we should go further with current name or have a new mutation like you suggested i.e. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480725131, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"**Proposal**: We can use `IssueSetSubscription` for subscribing and unsubscribing to the work item. If the existing mutation's arguments are not suitable, we can add a new mutation e.g. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:48:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1404104068, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Thanks for confirming, good point about the name and also I noticed that `IssueSetSubscription` requires a project so this won't work when work items are supported at the group level.\\n\\nI've opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 to add a new mutation that requires the work item's global id instead, but this cannot be used until %\\\"16.4\\\". Do you think we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127137 for now in order to fix the permissions problem?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:49:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:50:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481044252, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, yes, I think we can use !127137 as long as we do not have major changes in the mutation input and response in new mutation. :smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 13375904, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481062002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Ok! The changes should not be major, just:\\n\\n- mutation input: `projectPath`, `iid` and `subscribedState` -\u003e `id` and `subscribed`\\n- response: `issue` -\u003e `workItem`\\n\\nWould that be possible?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481081870, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, that will do. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:29:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 13:54:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481101613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The actual issue is fixed and working on gitlab.com. But we are still working on few other concerns mentioned in the [thread](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831#note_1404104068 \\\"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\\\"). \\n\\n@egrieff, I am keeping the issue open till the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 MR is merged. Does that sound right?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 05:23:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1491357196, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Sounds good to me :thumbsup: \\n\\nI've created the ~frontend issue for updating the mutation again next milestone: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420151. Feel free to amend it if needed.\\n\\nI'll validate and close this issue once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 is in production.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 05:23:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492242485, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Verified in production with 16.3.0-pre [49750df77fa](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/49750df77fa)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 16:30:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55966de7fe55806909024fc9c340f366bc131907\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493409135, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What are the unique use cases raised by commenters in this issue?","query_id":"a9ea36902fcd4c3c8620af1dca73f6ad","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"128440335","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 128440335, \"title\": \"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 09:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\\n\\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets [checks `update_work_item` permission](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13) when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\\n\\n### Steps to replicate\\n\\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\\n\\n![Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13](/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov)\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 412831, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 0, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466693, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10413872, \"title\": \"SLO::Missed\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-28 18:18:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-16 18:38:39 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label to signify that a bug issue has missed its targeted SLO (Service Level Objective). See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/issue_workflow.html#priority-labels. Previously titled as missed-SLO\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26460213, \"title\": \"bug::functional\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Functional defects resulting from feature changes\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3412464, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-01-30 21:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-13 09:23:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Frontend team. Covers everything related to the way GitLab behaves (and, to an extent, looks) inside your browser.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3857523, \"title\": \"priority::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-13 08:01:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:10:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"We will address this soon and will provide capacity from our team for it in the next few releases. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#priority\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3713902, \"title\": \"severity::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-23 14:46:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:13:45 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Critical - applies to bugs and bug categories of availability, performance, security and ux. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#severity\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 835460, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@ramistry Assigning this to you as discussed. :slight_smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"38b30d5809070a434e01d7f712c68bc8716072a3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469295673, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, I have tried the IssueSetSubscription mutation for work items in the !127137 MR and it worked as required. It is also not allowing guest user to subscribe on confidential work item. \\ud83d\\ude42 \\n\\nI just have doubt regarding the naming convention of the mutation. I am not sure if we should go further with current name or have a new mutation like you suggested i.e. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480725131, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"**Proposal**: We can use `IssueSetSubscription` for subscribing and unsubscribing to the work item. If the existing mutation's arguments are not suitable, we can add a new mutation e.g. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:48:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1404104068, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Thanks for confirming, good point about the name and also I noticed that `IssueSetSubscription` requires a project so this won't work when work items are supported at the group level.\\n\\nI've opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 to add a new mutation that requires the work item's global id instead, but this cannot be used until %\\\"16.4\\\". Do you think we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127137 for now in order to fix the permissions problem?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:49:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:50:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481044252, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, yes, I think we can use !127137 as long as we do not have major changes in the mutation input and response in new mutation. :smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 13375904, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481062002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Ok! The changes should not be major, just:\\n\\n- mutation input: `projectPath`, `iid` and `subscribedState` -\u003e `id` and `subscribed`\\n- response: `issue` -\u003e `workItem`\\n\\nWould that be possible?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481081870, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, that will do. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:29:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 13:54:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481101613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The actual issue is fixed and working on gitlab.com. But we are still working on few other concerns mentioned in the [thread](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831#note_1404104068 \\\"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\\\"). \\n\\n@egrieff, I am keeping the issue open till the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 MR is merged. Does that sound right?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 05:23:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1491357196, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Sounds good to me :thumbsup: \\n\\nI've created the ~frontend issue for updating the mutation again next milestone: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420151. Feel free to amend it if needed.\\n\\nI'll validate and close this issue once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 is in production.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 05:23:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492242485, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Verified in production with 16.3.0-pre [49750df77fa](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/49750df77fa)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 16:30:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55966de7fe55806909024fc9c340f366bc131907\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493409135, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Could you summarize this issue?","query_id":"d0e91d7b41e64871acb39904144f81ed","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"128440335","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 128440335, \"title\": \"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 09:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\\n\\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets [checks `update_work_item` permission](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13) when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\\n\\n### Steps to replicate\\n\\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\\n\\n![Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13](/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov)\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 412831, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 0, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466693, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10413872, \"title\": \"SLO::Missed\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-28 18:18:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-16 18:38:39 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label to signify that a bug issue has missed its targeted SLO (Service Level Objective). See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/issue_workflow.html#priority-labels. Previously titled as missed-SLO\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26460213, \"title\": \"bug::functional\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Functional defects resulting from feature changes\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3412464, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-01-30 21:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-13 09:23:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Frontend team. Covers everything related to the way GitLab behaves (and, to an extent, looks) inside your browser.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3857523, \"title\": \"priority::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-13 08:01:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:10:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"We will address this soon and will provide capacity from our team for it in the next few releases. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#priority\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3713902, \"title\": \"severity::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-23 14:46:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:13:45 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Critical - applies to bugs and bug categories of availability, performance, security and ux. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#severity\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 835460, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@ramistry Assigning this to you as discussed. :slight_smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"38b30d5809070a434e01d7f712c68bc8716072a3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469295673, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, I have tried the IssueSetSubscription mutation for work items in the !127137 MR and it worked as required. It is also not allowing guest user to subscribe on confidential work item. \\ud83d\\ude42 \\n\\nI just have doubt regarding the naming convention of the mutation. I am not sure if we should go further with current name or have a new mutation like you suggested i.e. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480725131, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"**Proposal**: We can use `IssueSetSubscription` for subscribing and unsubscribing to the work item. If the existing mutation's arguments are not suitable, we can add a new mutation e.g. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:48:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1404104068, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Thanks for confirming, good point about the name and also I noticed that `IssueSetSubscription` requires a project so this won't work when work items are supported at the group level.\\n\\nI've opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 to add a new mutation that requires the work item's global id instead, but this cannot be used until %\\\"16.4\\\". Do you think we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127137 for now in order to fix the permissions problem?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:49:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:50:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481044252, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, yes, I think we can use !127137 as long as we do not have major changes in the mutation input and response in new mutation. :smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 13375904, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481062002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Ok! The changes should not be major, just:\\n\\n- mutation input: `projectPath`, `iid` and `subscribedState` -\u003e `id` and `subscribed`\\n- response: `issue` -\u003e `workItem`\\n\\nWould that be possible?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481081870, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, that will do. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:29:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 13:54:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481101613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The actual issue is fixed and working on gitlab.com. But we are still working on few other concerns mentioned in the [thread](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831#note_1404104068 \\\"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\\\"). \\n\\n@egrieff, I am keeping the issue open till the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 MR is merged. Does that sound right?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 05:23:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1491357196, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Sounds good to me :thumbsup: \\n\\nI've created the ~frontend issue for updating the mutation again next milestone: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420151. Feel free to amend it if needed.\\n\\nI'll validate and close this issue once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 is in production.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 05:23:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492242485, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Verified in production with 16.3.0-pre [49750df77fa](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/49750df77fa)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 16:30:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55966de7fe55806909024fc9c340f366bc131907\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493409135, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize this Issue.","query_id":"cbd1f6899012401484d5124d3cfb26c1","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"128440335","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 128440335, \"title\": \"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 09:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\\n\\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets [checks `update_work_item` permission](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13) when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\\n\\n### Steps to replicate\\n\\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\\n\\n![Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13](/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov)\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 412831, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 0, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466693, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10413872, \"title\": \"SLO::Missed\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-28 18:18:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-16 18:38:39 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label to signify that a bug issue has missed its targeted SLO (Service Level Objective). See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/issue_workflow.html#priority-labels. Previously titled as missed-SLO\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26460213, \"title\": \"bug::functional\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Functional defects resulting from feature changes\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3412464, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-01-30 21:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-13 09:23:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Frontend team. Covers everything related to the way GitLab behaves (and, to an extent, looks) inside your browser.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3857523, \"title\": \"priority::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-13 08:01:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:10:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"We will address this soon and will provide capacity from our team for it in the next few releases. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#priority\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3713902, \"title\": \"severity::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-23 14:46:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:13:45 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Critical - applies to bugs and bug categories of availability, performance, security and ux. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#severity\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 835460, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@ramistry Assigning this to you as discussed. :slight_smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"38b30d5809070a434e01d7f712c68bc8716072a3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469295673, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, I have tried the IssueSetSubscription mutation for work items in the !127137 MR and it worked as required. It is also not allowing guest user to subscribe on confidential work item. \\ud83d\\ude42 \\n\\nI just have doubt regarding the naming convention of the mutation. I am not sure if we should go further with current name or have a new mutation like you suggested i.e. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480725131, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"**Proposal**: We can use `IssueSetSubscription` for subscribing and unsubscribing to the work item. If the existing mutation's arguments are not suitable, we can add a new mutation e.g. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:48:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1404104068, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Thanks for confirming, good point about the name and also I noticed that `IssueSetSubscription` requires a project so this won't work when work items are supported at the group level.\\n\\nI've opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 to add a new mutation that requires the work item's global id instead, but this cannot be used until %\\\"16.4\\\". Do you think we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127137 for now in order to fix the permissions problem?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:49:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:50:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481044252, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, yes, I think we can use !127137 as long as we do not have major changes in the mutation input and response in new mutation. :smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 13375904, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481062002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Ok! The changes should not be major, just:\\n\\n- mutation input: `projectPath`, `iid` and `subscribedState` -\u003e `id` and `subscribed`\\n- response: `issue` -\u003e `workItem`\\n\\nWould that be possible?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481081870, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, that will do. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:29:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 13:54:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481101613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The actual issue is fixed and working on gitlab.com. But we are still working on few other concerns mentioned in the [thread](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831#note_1404104068 \\\"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\\\"). \\n\\n@egrieff, I am keeping the issue open till the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 MR is merged. Does that sound right?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 05:23:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1491357196, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Sounds good to me :thumbsup: \\n\\nI've created the ~frontend issue for updating the mutation again next milestone: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420151. Feel free to amend it if needed.\\n\\nI'll validate and close this issue once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 is in production.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 05:23:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492242485, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Verified in production with 16.3.0-pre [49750df77fa](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/49750df77fa)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 16:30:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55966de7fe55806909024fc9c340f366bc131907\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493409135, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"{url} - Summarize this issue.","query_id":"62f574bea3614eb386eede0a5ac49ba0","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"128440335","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 128440335, \"title\": \"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 09:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\\n\\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets [checks `update_work_item` permission](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13) when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\\n\\n### Steps to replicate\\n\\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\\n\\n![Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13](/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov)\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 412831, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 0, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466693, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10413872, \"title\": \"SLO::Missed\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-28 18:18:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-16 18:38:39 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label to signify that a bug issue has missed its targeted SLO (Service Level Objective). See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/issue_workflow.html#priority-labels. Previously titled as missed-SLO\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26460213, \"title\": \"bug::functional\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Functional defects resulting from feature changes\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3412464, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-01-30 21:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-13 09:23:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Frontend team. Covers everything related to the way GitLab behaves (and, to an extent, looks) inside your browser.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3857523, \"title\": \"priority::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-13 08:01:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:10:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"We will address this soon and will provide capacity from our team for it in the next few releases. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#priority\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3713902, \"title\": \"severity::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-23 14:46:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:13:45 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Critical - applies to bugs and bug categories of availability, performance, security and ux. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#severity\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 835460, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@ramistry Assigning this to you as discussed. :slight_smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"38b30d5809070a434e01d7f712c68bc8716072a3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469295673, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, I have tried the IssueSetSubscription mutation for work items in the !127137 MR and it worked as required. It is also not allowing guest user to subscribe on confidential work item. \\ud83d\\ude42 \\n\\nI just have doubt regarding the naming convention of the mutation. I am not sure if we should go further with current name or have a new mutation like you suggested i.e. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480725131, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"**Proposal**: We can use `IssueSetSubscription` for subscribing and unsubscribing to the work item. If the existing mutation's arguments are not suitable, we can add a new mutation e.g. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:48:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1404104068, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Thanks for confirming, good point about the name and also I noticed that `IssueSetSubscription` requires a project so this won't work when work items are supported at the group level.\\n\\nI've opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 to add a new mutation that requires the work item's global id instead, but this cannot be used until %\\\"16.4\\\". Do you think we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127137 for now in order to fix the permissions problem?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:49:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:50:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481044252, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, yes, I think we can use !127137 as long as we do not have major changes in the mutation input and response in new mutation. :smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 13375904, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481062002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Ok! The changes should not be major, just:\\n\\n- mutation input: `projectPath`, `iid` and `subscribedState` -\u003e `id` and `subscribed`\\n- response: `issue` -\u003e `workItem`\\n\\nWould that be possible?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481081870, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, that will do. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:29:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 13:54:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481101613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The actual issue is fixed and working on gitlab.com. But we are still working on few other concerns mentioned in the [thread](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831#note_1404104068 \\\"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\\\"). \\n\\n@egrieff, I am keeping the issue open till the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 MR is merged. Does that sound right?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 05:23:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1491357196, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Sounds good to me :thumbsup: \\n\\nI've created the ~frontend issue for updating the mutation again next milestone: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420151. Feel free to amend it if needed.\\n\\nI'll validate and close this issue once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 is in production.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 05:23:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492242485, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Verified in production with 16.3.0-pre [49750df77fa](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/49750df77fa)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 16:30:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55966de7fe55806909024fc9c340f366bc131907\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493409135, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What is the status of {url}?","query_id":"451c435990ed498f8b4e2966ed4ecb07","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"128440335","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 128440335, \"title\": \"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 09:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\\n\\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets [checks `update_work_item` permission](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13) when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\\n\\n### Steps to replicate\\n\\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\\n\\n![Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13](/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov)\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 412831, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 0, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466693, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10413872, \"title\": \"SLO::Missed\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-28 18:18:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-16 18:38:39 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label to signify that a bug issue has missed its targeted SLO (Service Level Objective). See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/issue_workflow.html#priority-labels. Previously titled as missed-SLO\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26460213, \"title\": \"bug::functional\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Functional defects resulting from feature changes\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3412464, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-01-30 21:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-13 09:23:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Frontend team. Covers everything related to the way GitLab behaves (and, to an extent, looks) inside your browser.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3857523, \"title\": \"priority::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-13 08:01:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:10:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"We will address this soon and will provide capacity from our team for it in the next few releases. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#priority\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3713902, \"title\": \"severity::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-23 14:46:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:13:45 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Critical - applies to bugs and bug categories of availability, performance, security and ux. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#severity\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 835460, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@ramistry Assigning this to you as discussed. :slight_smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"38b30d5809070a434e01d7f712c68bc8716072a3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469295673, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, I have tried the IssueSetSubscription mutation for work items in the !127137 MR and it worked as required. It is also not allowing guest user to subscribe on confidential work item. \\ud83d\\ude42 \\n\\nI just have doubt regarding the naming convention of the mutation. I am not sure if we should go further with current name or have a new mutation like you suggested i.e. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480725131, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"**Proposal**: We can use `IssueSetSubscription` for subscribing and unsubscribing to the work item. If the existing mutation's arguments are not suitable, we can add a new mutation e.g. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:48:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1404104068, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Thanks for confirming, good point about the name and also I noticed that `IssueSetSubscription` requires a project so this won't work when work items are supported at the group level.\\n\\nI've opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 to add a new mutation that requires the work item's global id instead, but this cannot be used until %\\\"16.4\\\". Do you think we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127137 for now in order to fix the permissions problem?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:49:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:50:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481044252, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, yes, I think we can use !127137 as long as we do not have major changes in the mutation input and response in new mutation. :smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 13375904, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481062002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Ok! The changes should not be major, just:\\n\\n- mutation input: `projectPath`, `iid` and `subscribedState` -\u003e `id` and `subscribed`\\n- response: `issue` -\u003e `workItem`\\n\\nWould that be possible?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481081870, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, that will do. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:29:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 13:54:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481101613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The actual issue is fixed and working on gitlab.com. But we are still working on few other concerns mentioned in the [thread](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831#note_1404104068 \\\"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\\\"). \\n\\n@egrieff, I am keeping the issue open till the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 MR is merged. Does that sound right?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 05:23:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1491357196, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Sounds good to me :thumbsup: \\n\\nI've created the ~frontend issue for updating the mutation again next milestone: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420151. Feel free to amend it if needed.\\n\\nI'll validate and close this issue once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 is in production.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 05:23:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492242485, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Verified in production with 16.3.0-pre [49750df77fa](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/49750df77fa)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 16:30:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55966de7fe55806909024fc9c340f366bc131907\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493409135, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Please summarize the latest activity and current status of the issue {url}.","query_id":"1c5b7a7af0df491d93d478d22e3800f4","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"128440335","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 128440335, \"title\": \"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 09:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\\n\\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets [checks `update_work_item` permission](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13) when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\\n\\n### Steps to replicate\\n\\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\\n\\n![Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13](/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov)\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 412831, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 0, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466693, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10413872, \"title\": \"SLO::Missed\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-28 18:18:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-16 18:38:39 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label to signify that a bug issue has missed its targeted SLO (Service Level Objective). See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/issue_workflow.html#priority-labels. Previously titled as missed-SLO\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26460213, \"title\": \"bug::functional\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Functional defects resulting from feature changes\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3412464, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-01-30 21:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-13 09:23:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Frontend team. Covers everything related to the way GitLab behaves (and, to an extent, looks) inside your browser.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3857523, \"title\": \"priority::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-13 08:01:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:10:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"We will address this soon and will provide capacity from our team for it in the next few releases. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#priority\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3713902, \"title\": \"severity::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-23 14:46:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:13:45 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Critical - applies to bugs and bug categories of availability, performance, security and ux. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#severity\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 835460, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@ramistry Assigning this to you as discussed. :slight_smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"38b30d5809070a434e01d7f712c68bc8716072a3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469295673, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, I have tried the IssueSetSubscription mutation for work items in the !127137 MR and it worked as required. It is also not allowing guest user to subscribe on confidential work item. \\ud83d\\ude42 \\n\\nI just have doubt regarding the naming convention of the mutation. I am not sure if we should go further with current name or have a new mutation like you suggested i.e. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480725131, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"**Proposal**: We can use `IssueSetSubscription` for subscribing and unsubscribing to the work item. If the existing mutation's arguments are not suitable, we can add a new mutation e.g. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:48:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1404104068, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Thanks for confirming, good point about the name and also I noticed that `IssueSetSubscription` requires a project so this won't work when work items are supported at the group level.\\n\\nI've opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 to add a new mutation that requires the work item's global id instead, but this cannot be used until %\\\"16.4\\\". Do you think we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127137 for now in order to fix the permissions problem?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:49:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:50:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481044252, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, yes, I think we can use !127137 as long as we do not have major changes in the mutation input and response in new mutation. :smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 13375904, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481062002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Ok! The changes should not be major, just:\\n\\n- mutation input: `projectPath`, `iid` and `subscribedState` -\u003e `id` and `subscribed`\\n- response: `issue` -\u003e `workItem`\\n\\nWould that be possible?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481081870, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, that will do. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:29:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 13:54:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481101613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The actual issue is fixed and working on gitlab.com. But we are still working on few other concerns mentioned in the [thread](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831#note_1404104068 \\\"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\\\"). \\n\\n@egrieff, I am keeping the issue open till the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 MR is merged. Does that sound right?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 05:23:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1491357196, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Sounds good to me :thumbsup: \\n\\nI've created the ~frontend issue for updating the mutation again next milestone: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420151. Feel free to amend it if needed.\\n\\nI'll validate and close this issue once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 is in production.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 05:23:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492242485, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Verified in production with 16.3.0-pre [49750df77fa](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/49750df77fa)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 16:30:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55966de7fe55806909024fc9c340f366bc131907\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493409135, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"How can I improve the description of {url} so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved?","query_id":"b8f45819cec54d31af387ee5c8702246","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"128440335","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 128440335, \"title\": \"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 09:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\\n\\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets [checks `update_work_item` permission](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13) when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\\n\\n### Steps to replicate\\n\\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\\n\\n![Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13](/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov)\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 412831, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 0, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466693, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10413872, \"title\": \"SLO::Missed\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-28 18:18:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-16 18:38:39 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label to signify that a bug issue has missed its targeted SLO (Service Level Objective). See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/issue_workflow.html#priority-labels. Previously titled as missed-SLO\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26460213, \"title\": \"bug::functional\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Functional defects resulting from feature changes\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3412464, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-01-30 21:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-13 09:23:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Frontend team. Covers everything related to the way GitLab behaves (and, to an extent, looks) inside your browser.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3857523, \"title\": \"priority::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-13 08:01:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:10:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"We will address this soon and will provide capacity from our team for it in the next few releases. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#priority\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3713902, \"title\": \"severity::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-23 14:46:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:13:45 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Critical - applies to bugs and bug categories of availability, performance, security and ux. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#severity\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 835460, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@ramistry Assigning this to you as discussed. :slight_smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"38b30d5809070a434e01d7f712c68bc8716072a3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469295673, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, I have tried the IssueSetSubscription mutation for work items in the !127137 MR and it worked as required. It is also not allowing guest user to subscribe on confidential work item. \\ud83d\\ude42 \\n\\nI just have doubt regarding the naming convention of the mutation. I am not sure if we should go further with current name or have a new mutation like you suggested i.e. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480725131, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"**Proposal**: We can use `IssueSetSubscription` for subscribing and unsubscribing to the work item. If the existing mutation's arguments are not suitable, we can add a new mutation e.g. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:48:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1404104068, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Thanks for confirming, good point about the name and also I noticed that `IssueSetSubscription` requires a project so this won't work when work items are supported at the group level.\\n\\nI've opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 to add a new mutation that requires the work item's global id instead, but this cannot be used until %\\\"16.4\\\". Do you think we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127137 for now in order to fix the permissions problem?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:49:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:50:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481044252, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, yes, I think we can use !127137 as long as we do not have major changes in the mutation input and response in new mutation. :smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 13375904, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481062002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Ok! The changes should not be major, just:\\n\\n- mutation input: `projectPath`, `iid` and `subscribedState` -\u003e `id` and `subscribed`\\n- response: `issue` -\u003e `workItem`\\n\\nWould that be possible?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481081870, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, that will do. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:29:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 13:54:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481101613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The actual issue is fixed and working on gitlab.com. But we are still working on few other concerns mentioned in the [thread](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831#note_1404104068 \\\"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\\\"). \\n\\n@egrieff, I am keeping the issue open till the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 MR is merged. Does that sound right?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 05:23:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1491357196, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Sounds good to me :thumbsup: \\n\\nI've created the ~frontend issue for updating the mutation again next milestone: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420151. Feel free to amend it if needed.\\n\\nI'll validate and close this issue once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 is in production.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 05:23:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492242485, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Verified in production with 16.3.0-pre [49750df77fa](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/49750df77fa)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 16:30:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55966de7fe55806909024fc9c340f366bc131907\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493409135, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Please rewrite the description of {url} so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved. Also add common \"jobs to be done\" or use cases which should be considered from a usability perspective.","query_id":"66d460e92a2d47959a54512423e9d92c","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"128440335","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 128440335, \"title\": \"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 09:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"A user with guest access should be able to subscribe/unsubscribe from work item notifications despite not having permissions to update the work item.\\n\\nWe are observing this bug because the GraphQL mutation that updates all widgets [checks `update_work_item` permission](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/app/graphql/mutations/work_items/update.rb#L13) when this particular widget requires the more lenient `update_subscription` permission.\\n\\n### Steps to replicate\\n\\n- Log in as a `Guest` user and visit an issue in the project, for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/issues/1`\\n- The user should be able to reveal the notifications toggle in the top menu\\n- Visit the same issue using the work item view for example `https://gdk.test:3000/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/work_items/1`\\n- The option to toggle notifications is not displayed\\n\\n![Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13](/uploads/b28defc97c9690f78748f45df4b4a387/Screen_Recording_2023-05-24_at_11.32.13.mov)\", \"milestone_id\": 2969682, \"iid\": 412831, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"weight\": 2, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 0, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -194466693, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 3860200, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": \"on_track\", \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 992791, \"title\": \"Deliverable\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2016-11-18 17:02:50 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-04-17 18:49:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues scheduled for the current milestone.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10413872, \"title\": \"SLO::Missed\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-28 18:18:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-16 18:38:39 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Label to signify that a bug issue has missed its targeted SLO (Service Level Objective). See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/issue_workflow.html#priority-labels. Previously titled as missed-SLO\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2492649, \"title\": \"backend\", \"color\": \"#D10069\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-08-15 14:49:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-06-11 10:34:33 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that require backend work\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26460213, \"title\": \"bug::functional\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-16 19:56:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Functional defects resulting from feature changes\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103451, \"title\": \"devops::plan\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:00:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-11 06:40:37 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Project Management, Agile Portfolio Management, Requirements Management)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3412464, \"title\": \"frontend\", \"color\": \"#3cb371\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-01-30 21:42:37 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-05-13 09:23:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Frontend team. Covers everything related to the way GitLab behaves (and, to an extent, looks) inside your browser.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3857523, \"title\": \"priority::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-04-13 08:01:55 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:10:38 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"We will address this soon and will provide capacity from our team for it in the next few releases. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#priority\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3713902, \"title\": \"severity::2\", \"color\": \"#ff8800\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-23 14:46:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-09-14 22:13:45 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Critical - applies to bugs and bug categories of availability, performance, security and ux. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-triage/#severity\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 28669354, \"title\": \"workflow::complete\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-01-12 00:18:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-01-12 17:27:43 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Applied after all MRs have merged and the issue has been verified if necessary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 835460, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@ramistry Assigning this to you as discussed. :slight_smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 411701, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-14 04:46:11 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"38b30d5809070a434e01d7f712c68bc8716072a3\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1469295673, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, I have tried the IssueSetSubscription mutation for work items in the !127137 MR and it worked as required. It is also not allowing guest user to subscribe on confidential work item. \\ud83d\\ude42 \\n\\nI just have doubt regarding the naming convention of the mutation. I am not sure if we should go further with current name or have a new mutation like you suggested i.e. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480725131, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"**Proposal**: We can use `IssueSetSubscription` for subscribing and unsubscribing to the work item. If the existing mutation's arguments are not suitable, we can add a new mutation e.g. `WorkItemSetSubscription`.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:48:32 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 07:22:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1404104068, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Thanks for confirming, good point about the name and also I noticed that `IssueSetSubscription` requires a project so this won't work when work items are supported at the group level.\\n\\nI've opened https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 to add a new mutation that requires the work item's global id instead, but this cannot be used until %\\\"16.4\\\". Do you think we can use https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127137 for now in order to fix the permissions problem?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:49:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 10:50:42 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481044252, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@egrieff, yes, I think we can use !127137 as long as we do not have major changes in the mutation input and response in new mutation. :smile:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 13375904, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:03:48 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481062002, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Ok! The changes should not be major, just:\\n\\n- mutation input: `projectPath`, `iid` and `subscribedState` -\u003e `id` and `subscribed`\\n- response: `issue` -\u003e `workItem`\\n\\nWould that be possible?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:17:21 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481081870, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Yes, that will do. :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 11:29:31 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 13:54:50 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"60d393f26d1fb1fae1797e2e78d6ab4d2ae4a680\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1481101613, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"The actual issue is fixed and working on gitlab.com. But we are still working on few other concerns mentioned in the [thread](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831#note_1404104068 \\\"Guest users are not able to subscribe to work items\\\"). \\n\\n@egrieff, I am keeping the issue open till the https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 MR is merged. Does that sound right?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 13375904, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 05:23:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1491357196, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@ramistry Sounds good to me :thumbsup: \\n\\nI've created the ~frontend issue for updating the mutation again next milestone: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420151. Feel free to amend it if needed.\\n\\nI'll validate and close this issue once https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/127220 is in production.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:01 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 05:23:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"64f0db074dce6d0dd7c29994a57fdb1e7a51f4ab\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-07-28 14:08:32 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1492242485, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Verified in production with 16.3.0-pre [49750df77fa](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commits/49750df77fa)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 08:59:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 16:30:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 128440335, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"55966de7fe55806909024fc9c340f366bc131907\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493409135, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 411701, \"username\": \"kushalpandya\", \"name\": \"Kushal Pandya\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 13375904, \"username\": \"ramistry\", \"name\": \"Rajan Mistry\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Are there any open questions relating to this issue? {url}","query_id":"adb7faa6d2794ba88e9054d1a9c71d33","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"113414743","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 113414743, \"title\": \"Problem Validation: Report Source Lines of Code (SLoC) per Developer or per Repo/Group\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:09:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Recommendation as a result of the research\\n- Do NOT implement Lines of Code Contributed _per Developer_. There has a potential negative impact.\\n  - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n- Analytics for Lines of Code _per directory, repo, or group_. \\n  - While there are strong hints in this research that suggest this could be of value to users. It seems mostly a nice-to-have feature.\\n     - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n  - The [tentative effort estimation to implement SLoC count on the repo level](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9692#tentative-effort-estimation-base-on-first-technical-approach-above) suggests the amount of work is roughly 1.5 dev months. To then offer this on the group level is probably also not expensive. The effort to implement this on the directory level needs to be investigated. \\n\\n\\n\\n### Links\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Expose Lines of Code (SLoC) per Language in Repository Analytics to improve understanding of repo\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wQ8-WbcE5HmYiwWhZFwASWCqAOp-CcUEeeSIJO1ox3M/edit#). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [research on Source Lines of Code Q3F23](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\n\\n# Details: What we learned researching this space\\n\\n\u003cdiv\u003e\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssumption\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we thought\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we learned\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we think now\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we assumed}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we thought this meant for the solution to this problem}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we learned when we tested this assumption}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{How these learnings relate to our approach/solution}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe assumed that following three issues are about related/partly identical needs and are highly important due to their popularity:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReport number of lines per language in repository charts\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 568 upvotes; 18 individual commenters + 15 customer asks; also third highest \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epriority score\u003c/span\u003e](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-intermediate-dashboard/970771/User-Request-Issue-Prioritization---Product)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e for user requested issues in SCM.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eNew contributors graph (lines of code)\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/14875)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 161 upvotes; 25 individual commenters; no customer asks\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eVisualize Language Trends over Time\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 11 upvotes; 5 customer asks\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDue to the high popularity, we thought the community agrees that GitLab should implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019 and that it would be clear what to implement.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe popularity (both among users and among paying customers) was the reason to pick this topic up.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReviewing all comments and customer asks on all issues I learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g191e02223c5_0_2)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere are **many dimensions** for which SLoC are requested: per **instance**, per **group**, per **project**, per **user**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePaying customers\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e care more about the **group level**, i.e. counting SLoC across all their repos\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn some cases, it seems unclear if there is a need for reporting SLoC **per language** or **just SLoC**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere is **little** **detail** to **why** this is helpful nor **how** **often** such metrics would be consulted\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAdditional insights from other sources\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17f2129743e_1_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome customers do NOT want to see data about individuals\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as their workscouncil would object that and would turn off such a feature.\\u00a0\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt seems that there are two fundamental use cases:\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ea) report LoC per user (i.e per each contributor to a project)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eb) report LoC per \\u2018location\\u2019 (i.e. per repo, per group or per instance)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not very clear how important the topic is to the users/customers.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: we should run a survey to assess importance.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not clear what they are trying to achieve.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: run interviews to understand the why.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe ask is highly popular AND GitHub has offered this for a long time. It should therefore be a good thing to implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eI thought GH addresses all asks vocalized in our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssessing \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2019s offering\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#competition)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e I found:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH does **NOT** show **LoC per repo**. (GL also doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows **languages per repo**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **percent** in the UI (just like GL)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **bytes** in the API (unlike GL which also provides percent)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH also offers the above for the **org-level**, i.e. is across all repos. (GL doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (added/removed) \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eper contributor\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/graphs/contributors?from=2010-03-21\u0026to=2022-11-22\u0026type=a)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (but **NOT language**).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epopular tool lets users post their \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epersonal stats\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on their \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eprofile page\u003c/span\u003e](https://github.com/mrdoob)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub also does not offer everything that users seem to be asking on our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA reason may be that when they implemented this there was no handy library to report SLoC per language per repo/org.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH seems to be considering \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eextensive visualizations of source code\u003c/span\u003e](https://githubnext.com/projects/repo-visualization)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e. The feedback on twitter is positive.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIf we were to offer _LoC per user_, this would be a me-too feature. The \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ecomments\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_293348432)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on the issue suggest that the need is largely driven by the fact that GitHub has had this for a long time and developers consider it as something a source code management platform would normally have.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should survey a broad spectrum of users as the issues suggested that commenters also came from different backgrounds but still all seemed to care about the topic \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe asked a total of \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e118 users: 64 sw dev; 15 dev team leads; 10 DevOps; etc.\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g139bca1b89a_0_1059)\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe thought \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be highly popular, given that the issues are so popular.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003esurvey\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g18dae5a6a9c_0_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eCompared to users of other tools, users of GitLab seem to care less about seeing the number of lines contributed\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitLab users also care less about the breakdown of languages within a project compared to their peers\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn most cases, those newer to their role thought the features were more important\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggests, \\u2018LoC\\u2019 seems to be of medium importance (or medium un-importance) for Source Code management.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe will need to run interviews to understand more.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggested that there do not seem to be significant differences in the views of managers vs. individual contributors.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eTherefore, we interviewed software developers and also asked them about their manager's perspective.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e8 interviews (7 sw devs, 1 of which is also DevOps engineer / evangelist; 1 prj. mngr (former sw dev))\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe would learn in the interviews what the value of \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn the \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003einterviews\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e we learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17117578ef8_2_21)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e **_per user_** is **NOT** seen as a **good measure for contribution**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome have had **negative experiences** with **metrics to assess performance** (incl. SLoC)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e would be **valuable**. Interviewees see this mostly as **nice to have** though.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eComparing\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e growth of SLoC in **_different directories_** that serve different purposes (application vs. test) is **more interesting than** **comparing growth** in SLoC **_per languages_**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePotentially interesting sub-feature: Using SLoC to **filter by language**: commit lists or repo lists.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eOne use case seems to be around SLoC _per user:_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_I want an easy way to know who has contributed how many LoC to a project_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_so that I can compare their contributions_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) to feel proud of my own work or_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) to track my team members work_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should NOT implement this use case: SLoC _per user_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as it is NOT a good metric.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt might be a nice graph to look at for some, but it will have **negative consequences for a few** as their performance would be evaluated based on their contributed SLoC.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDo literature research to find further evidence of this outcome.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eConsider a blog post that reflects our decision. A good timing would be at the same time when we potentially release something else related to SLoC (see below).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Take this result and create an **opportunity canvas on SLoC _per user _**as a contribution metric **with the recommendation NOT to do it**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014--\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_ or _per language per repo_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e seems to be valuable to help users get a quick understanding of a repo or the health of different modules. The use case seems to be:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_For a given repo or a module (i.e. directory) , that I see for the first time, I want to know lines of code per language,_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) so that I can get a quick sense if it will be easy for me to contribute to it given my skill set_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) so that I can understand if the module is bloated_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThis addresses the needs of individual contributors so it would be part of the **free tier**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Understand the effort to implement this.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014---\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per group_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e was not assessed in this series of interviews with developers as this is likely more relevant for administrators, CIO\\u2019s, directors, etc.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e reach out to 2 or 3 customers that requested this in one of the original issues to understand what they are trying to achieve and to understand how this could be tiered.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eliterature research\u003c/span\u003e**](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#literature)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLiterature supports the interviewee\\u2019s perspective that SLoC is NOT a good metric for measuring contribution.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/div\u003e\\n\\n\\n\\n## Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to have an understanding summarized in a RICE score (see [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing)). \\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to decide if they want to move forward with this idea or drop it. \\n  - Recommendation is not to go ahead with Lines of Code _per developer_\\n  - Recommendation is to do follow-up research on Lines of Code _per directory, per repo, and per group_\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for product design to understand the problem\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for engineering to understand the problem\\n\\n## Research Issue\\n\\n_This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc._\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\\n*This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality.\\nIt is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes.\\nJust like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc.*\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 371038, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 24, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -166060152, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-01-19 14:12:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 10822493, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:28 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2771176, \"title\": \"direction\", \"color\": \"#ad8d43\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for important features that are on our roadmap: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26375975, \"title\": \"type::ignore\", \"color\": \"#808080\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-09 18:12:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-09 19:21:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"When using this type, the issue will be excluded from cross functional planning metrics. This is used for meta, planning, issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111311, \"title\": \"workflow::problem validation\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-21 15:43:10 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Workflow label for validating if the problem is customer relevant. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/#workflow-summary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 584663, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, \\n\\nI started this issue for our problem validation. I made it confidential to not influence our survey as the survey takers may be up-voters on the epic this is linked to. Whether this makes sense to ask the very same people in the survey remains to be discussed - you are the expert. The goal however is to make it non-confidential as soon as we have done the survey. \\n\\nI will add further context in the coming days and then reach out to you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:15:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"cc: @mle\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889892, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, have you been able to send out the survey?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1092650147, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz - we are currently recruiting for the survey to ensure we have enough qualified participants, and will begin inviting them to take the survey later today. Should start seeing responses in the next few days.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10060155, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 14:59:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-09 10:48:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1093134713, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am closing this issue as the validation is done. \\n\\ncc: @mle / @leducmills\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"27977437404f1055ab3f1f3bdab3ac76026c88f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472325391, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10060155, \"username\": \"leducmills\", \"name\": \"Ben Leduc-Mills\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What is this issue about?","query_id":"9f10abeaa8904d309ac2ef7a4d156f64","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"113414743","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 113414743, \"title\": \"Problem Validation: Report Source Lines of Code (SLoC) per Developer or per Repo/Group\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:09:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Recommendation as a result of the research\\n- Do NOT implement Lines of Code Contributed _per Developer_. There has a potential negative impact.\\n  - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n- Analytics for Lines of Code _per directory, repo, or group_. \\n  - While there are strong hints in this research that suggest this could be of value to users. It seems mostly a nice-to-have feature.\\n     - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n  - The [tentative effort estimation to implement SLoC count on the repo level](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9692#tentative-effort-estimation-base-on-first-technical-approach-above) suggests the amount of work is roughly 1.5 dev months. To then offer this on the group level is probably also not expensive. The effort to implement this on the directory level needs to be investigated. \\n\\n\\n\\n### Links\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Expose Lines of Code (SLoC) per Language in Repository Analytics to improve understanding of repo\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wQ8-WbcE5HmYiwWhZFwASWCqAOp-CcUEeeSIJO1ox3M/edit#). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [research on Source Lines of Code Q3F23](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\n\\n# Details: What we learned researching this space\\n\\n\u003cdiv\u003e\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssumption\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we thought\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we learned\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we think now\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we assumed}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we thought this meant for the solution to this problem}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we learned when we tested this assumption}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{How these learnings relate to our approach/solution}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe assumed that following three issues are about related/partly identical needs and are highly important due to their popularity:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReport number of lines per language in repository charts\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 568 upvotes; 18 individual commenters + 15 customer asks; also third highest \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epriority score\u003c/span\u003e](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-intermediate-dashboard/970771/User-Request-Issue-Prioritization---Product)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e for user requested issues in SCM.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eNew contributors graph (lines of code)\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/14875)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 161 upvotes; 25 individual commenters; no customer asks\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eVisualize Language Trends over Time\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 11 upvotes; 5 customer asks\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDue to the high popularity, we thought the community agrees that GitLab should implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019 and that it would be clear what to implement.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe popularity (both among users and among paying customers) was the reason to pick this topic up.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReviewing all comments and customer asks on all issues I learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g191e02223c5_0_2)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere are **many dimensions** for which SLoC are requested: per **instance**, per **group**, per **project**, per **user**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePaying customers\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e care more about the **group level**, i.e. counting SLoC across all their repos\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn some cases, it seems unclear if there is a need for reporting SLoC **per language** or **just SLoC**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere is **little** **detail** to **why** this is helpful nor **how** **often** such metrics would be consulted\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAdditional insights from other sources\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17f2129743e_1_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome customers do NOT want to see data about individuals\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as their workscouncil would object that and would turn off such a feature.\\u00a0\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt seems that there are two fundamental use cases:\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ea) report LoC per user (i.e per each contributor to a project)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eb) report LoC per \\u2018location\\u2019 (i.e. per repo, per group or per instance)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not very clear how important the topic is to the users/customers.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: we should run a survey to assess importance.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not clear what they are trying to achieve.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: run interviews to understand the why.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe ask is highly popular AND GitHub has offered this for a long time. It should therefore be a good thing to implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eI thought GH addresses all asks vocalized in our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssessing \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2019s offering\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#competition)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e I found:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH does **NOT** show **LoC per repo**. (GL also doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows **languages per repo**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **percent** in the UI (just like GL)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **bytes** in the API (unlike GL which also provides percent)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH also offers the above for the **org-level**, i.e. is across all repos. (GL doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (added/removed) \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eper contributor\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/graphs/contributors?from=2010-03-21\u0026to=2022-11-22\u0026type=a)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (but **NOT language**).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epopular tool lets users post their \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epersonal stats\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on their \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eprofile page\u003c/span\u003e](https://github.com/mrdoob)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub also does not offer everything that users seem to be asking on our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA reason may be that when they implemented this there was no handy library to report SLoC per language per repo/org.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH seems to be considering \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eextensive visualizations of source code\u003c/span\u003e](https://githubnext.com/projects/repo-visualization)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e. The feedback on twitter is positive.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIf we were to offer _LoC per user_, this would be a me-too feature. The \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ecomments\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_293348432)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on the issue suggest that the need is largely driven by the fact that GitHub has had this for a long time and developers consider it as something a source code management platform would normally have.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should survey a broad spectrum of users as the issues suggested that commenters also came from different backgrounds but still all seemed to care about the topic \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe asked a total of \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e118 users: 64 sw dev; 15 dev team leads; 10 DevOps; etc.\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g139bca1b89a_0_1059)\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe thought \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be highly popular, given that the issues are so popular.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003esurvey\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g18dae5a6a9c_0_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eCompared to users of other tools, users of GitLab seem to care less about seeing the number of lines contributed\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitLab users also care less about the breakdown of languages within a project compared to their peers\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn most cases, those newer to their role thought the features were more important\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggests, \\u2018LoC\\u2019 seems to be of medium importance (or medium un-importance) for Source Code management.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe will need to run interviews to understand more.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggested that there do not seem to be significant differences in the views of managers vs. individual contributors.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eTherefore, we interviewed software developers and also asked them about their manager's perspective.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e8 interviews (7 sw devs, 1 of which is also DevOps engineer / evangelist; 1 prj. mngr (former sw dev))\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe would learn in the interviews what the value of \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn the \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003einterviews\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e we learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17117578ef8_2_21)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e **_per user_** is **NOT** seen as a **good measure for contribution**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome have had **negative experiences** with **metrics to assess performance** (incl. SLoC)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e would be **valuable**. Interviewees see this mostly as **nice to have** though.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eComparing\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e growth of SLoC in **_different directories_** that serve different purposes (application vs. test) is **more interesting than** **comparing growth** in SLoC **_per languages_**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePotentially interesting sub-feature: Using SLoC to **filter by language**: commit lists or repo lists.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eOne use case seems to be around SLoC _per user:_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_I want an easy way to know who has contributed how many LoC to a project_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_so that I can compare their contributions_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) to feel proud of my own work or_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) to track my team members work_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should NOT implement this use case: SLoC _per user_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as it is NOT a good metric.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt might be a nice graph to look at for some, but it will have **negative consequences for a few** as their performance would be evaluated based on their contributed SLoC.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDo literature research to find further evidence of this outcome.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eConsider a blog post that reflects our decision. A good timing would be at the same time when we potentially release something else related to SLoC (see below).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Take this result and create an **opportunity canvas on SLoC _per user _**as a contribution metric **with the recommendation NOT to do it**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014--\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_ or _per language per repo_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e seems to be valuable to help users get a quick understanding of a repo or the health of different modules. The use case seems to be:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_For a given repo or a module (i.e. directory) , that I see for the first time, I want to know lines of code per language,_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) so that I can get a quick sense if it will be easy for me to contribute to it given my skill set_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) so that I can understand if the module is bloated_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThis addresses the needs of individual contributors so it would be part of the **free tier**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Understand the effort to implement this.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014---\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per group_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e was not assessed in this series of interviews with developers as this is likely more relevant for administrators, CIO\\u2019s, directors, etc.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e reach out to 2 or 3 customers that requested this in one of the original issues to understand what they are trying to achieve and to understand how this could be tiered.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eliterature research\u003c/span\u003e**](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#literature)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLiterature supports the interviewee\\u2019s perspective that SLoC is NOT a good metric for measuring contribution.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/div\u003e\\n\\n\\n\\n## Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to have an understanding summarized in a RICE score (see [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing)). \\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to decide if they want to move forward with this idea or drop it. \\n  - Recommendation is not to go ahead with Lines of Code _per developer_\\n  - Recommendation is to do follow-up research on Lines of Code _per directory, per repo, and per group_\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for product design to understand the problem\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for engineering to understand the problem\\n\\n## Research Issue\\n\\n_This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc._\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\\n*This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality.\\nIt is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes.\\nJust like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc.*\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 371038, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 24, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -166060152, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-01-19 14:12:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 10822493, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:28 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2771176, \"title\": \"direction\", \"color\": \"#ad8d43\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for important features that are on our roadmap: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26375975, \"title\": \"type::ignore\", \"color\": \"#808080\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-09 18:12:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-09 19:21:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"When using this type, the issue will be excluded from cross functional planning metrics. This is used for meta, planning, issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111311, \"title\": \"workflow::problem validation\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-21 15:43:10 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Workflow label for validating if the problem is customer relevant. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/#workflow-summary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 584663, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, \\n\\nI started this issue for our problem validation. I made it confidential to not influence our survey as the survey takers may be up-voters on the epic this is linked to. Whether this makes sense to ask the very same people in the survey remains to be discussed - you are the expert. The goal however is to make it non-confidential as soon as we have done the survey. \\n\\nI will add further context in the coming days and then reach out to you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:15:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"cc: @mle\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889892, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, have you been able to send out the survey?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1092650147, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz - we are currently recruiting for the survey to ensure we have enough qualified participants, and will begin inviting them to take the survey later today. Should start seeing responses in the next few days.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10060155, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 14:59:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-09 10:48:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1093134713, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am closing this issue as the validation is done. \\n\\ncc: @mle / @leducmills\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"27977437404f1055ab3f1f3bdab3ac76026c88f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472325391, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10060155, \"username\": \"leducmills\", \"name\": \"Ben Leduc-Mills\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize the comments into bullet points?","query_id":"42023522657347fb8fadb919807c74cf","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"113414743","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 113414743, \"title\": \"Problem Validation: Report Source Lines of Code (SLoC) per Developer or per Repo/Group\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:09:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Recommendation as a result of the research\\n- Do NOT implement Lines of Code Contributed _per Developer_. There has a potential negative impact.\\n  - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n- Analytics for Lines of Code _per directory, repo, or group_. \\n  - While there are strong hints in this research that suggest this could be of value to users. It seems mostly a nice-to-have feature.\\n     - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n  - The [tentative effort estimation to implement SLoC count on the repo level](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9692#tentative-effort-estimation-base-on-first-technical-approach-above) suggests the amount of work is roughly 1.5 dev months. To then offer this on the group level is probably also not expensive. The effort to implement this on the directory level needs to be investigated. \\n\\n\\n\\n### Links\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Expose Lines of Code (SLoC) per Language in Repository Analytics to improve understanding of repo\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wQ8-WbcE5HmYiwWhZFwASWCqAOp-CcUEeeSIJO1ox3M/edit#). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [research on Source Lines of Code Q3F23](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\n\\n# Details: What we learned researching this space\\n\\n\u003cdiv\u003e\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssumption\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we thought\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we learned\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we think now\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we assumed}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we thought this meant for the solution to this problem}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we learned when we tested this assumption}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{How these learnings relate to our approach/solution}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe assumed that following three issues are about related/partly identical needs and are highly important due to their popularity:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReport number of lines per language in repository charts\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 568 upvotes; 18 individual commenters + 15 customer asks; also third highest \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epriority score\u003c/span\u003e](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-intermediate-dashboard/970771/User-Request-Issue-Prioritization---Product)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e for user requested issues in SCM.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eNew contributors graph (lines of code)\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/14875)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 161 upvotes; 25 individual commenters; no customer asks\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eVisualize Language Trends over Time\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 11 upvotes; 5 customer asks\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDue to the high popularity, we thought the community agrees that GitLab should implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019 and that it would be clear what to implement.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe popularity (both among users and among paying customers) was the reason to pick this topic up.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReviewing all comments and customer asks on all issues I learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g191e02223c5_0_2)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere are **many dimensions** for which SLoC are requested: per **instance**, per **group**, per **project**, per **user**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePaying customers\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e care more about the **group level**, i.e. counting SLoC across all their repos\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn some cases, it seems unclear if there is a need for reporting SLoC **per language** or **just SLoC**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere is **little** **detail** to **why** this is helpful nor **how** **often** such metrics would be consulted\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAdditional insights from other sources\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17f2129743e_1_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome customers do NOT want to see data about individuals\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as their workscouncil would object that and would turn off such a feature.\\u00a0\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt seems that there are two fundamental use cases:\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ea) report LoC per user (i.e per each contributor to a project)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eb) report LoC per \\u2018location\\u2019 (i.e. per repo, per group or per instance)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not very clear how important the topic is to the users/customers.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: we should run a survey to assess importance.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not clear what they are trying to achieve.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: run interviews to understand the why.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe ask is highly popular AND GitHub has offered this for a long time. It should therefore be a good thing to implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eI thought GH addresses all asks vocalized in our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssessing \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2019s offering\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#competition)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e I found:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH does **NOT** show **LoC per repo**. (GL also doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows **languages per repo**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **percent** in the UI (just like GL)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **bytes** in the API (unlike GL which also provides percent)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH also offers the above for the **org-level**, i.e. is across all repos. (GL doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (added/removed) \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eper contributor\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/graphs/contributors?from=2010-03-21\u0026to=2022-11-22\u0026type=a)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (but **NOT language**).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epopular tool lets users post their \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epersonal stats\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on their \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eprofile page\u003c/span\u003e](https://github.com/mrdoob)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub also does not offer everything that users seem to be asking on our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA reason may be that when they implemented this there was no handy library to report SLoC per language per repo/org.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH seems to be considering \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eextensive visualizations of source code\u003c/span\u003e](https://githubnext.com/projects/repo-visualization)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e. The feedback on twitter is positive.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIf we were to offer _LoC per user_, this would be a me-too feature. The \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ecomments\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_293348432)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on the issue suggest that the need is largely driven by the fact that GitHub has had this for a long time and developers consider it as something a source code management platform would normally have.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should survey a broad spectrum of users as the issues suggested that commenters also came from different backgrounds but still all seemed to care about the topic \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe asked a total of \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e118 users: 64 sw dev; 15 dev team leads; 10 DevOps; etc.\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g139bca1b89a_0_1059)\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe thought \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be highly popular, given that the issues are so popular.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003esurvey\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g18dae5a6a9c_0_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eCompared to users of other tools, users of GitLab seem to care less about seeing the number of lines contributed\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitLab users also care less about the breakdown of languages within a project compared to their peers\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn most cases, those newer to their role thought the features were more important\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggests, \\u2018LoC\\u2019 seems to be of medium importance (or medium un-importance) for Source Code management.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe will need to run interviews to understand more.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggested that there do not seem to be significant differences in the views of managers vs. individual contributors.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eTherefore, we interviewed software developers and also asked them about their manager's perspective.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e8 interviews (7 sw devs, 1 of which is also DevOps engineer / evangelist; 1 prj. mngr (former sw dev))\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe would learn in the interviews what the value of \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn the \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003einterviews\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e we learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17117578ef8_2_21)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e **_per user_** is **NOT** seen as a **good measure for contribution**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome have had **negative experiences** with **metrics to assess performance** (incl. SLoC)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e would be **valuable**. Interviewees see this mostly as **nice to have** though.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eComparing\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e growth of SLoC in **_different directories_** that serve different purposes (application vs. test) is **more interesting than** **comparing growth** in SLoC **_per languages_**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePotentially interesting sub-feature: Using SLoC to **filter by language**: commit lists or repo lists.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eOne use case seems to be around SLoC _per user:_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_I want an easy way to know who has contributed how many LoC to a project_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_so that I can compare their contributions_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) to feel proud of my own work or_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) to track my team members work_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should NOT implement this use case: SLoC _per user_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as it is NOT a good metric.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt might be a nice graph to look at for some, but it will have **negative consequences for a few** as their performance would be evaluated based on their contributed SLoC.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDo literature research to find further evidence of this outcome.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eConsider a blog post that reflects our decision. A good timing would be at the same time when we potentially release something else related to SLoC (see below).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Take this result and create an **opportunity canvas on SLoC _per user _**as a contribution metric **with the recommendation NOT to do it**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014--\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_ or _per language per repo_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e seems to be valuable to help users get a quick understanding of a repo or the health of different modules. The use case seems to be:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_For a given repo or a module (i.e. directory) , that I see for the first time, I want to know lines of code per language,_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) so that I can get a quick sense if it will be easy for me to contribute to it given my skill set_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) so that I can understand if the module is bloated_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThis addresses the needs of individual contributors so it would be part of the **free tier**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Understand the effort to implement this.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014---\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per group_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e was not assessed in this series of interviews with developers as this is likely more relevant for administrators, CIO\\u2019s, directors, etc.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e reach out to 2 or 3 customers that requested this in one of the original issues to understand what they are trying to achieve and to understand how this could be tiered.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eliterature research\u003c/span\u003e**](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#literature)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLiterature supports the interviewee\\u2019s perspective that SLoC is NOT a good metric for measuring contribution.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/div\u003e\\n\\n\\n\\n## Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to have an understanding summarized in a RICE score (see [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing)). \\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to decide if they want to move forward with this idea or drop it. \\n  - Recommendation is not to go ahead with Lines of Code _per developer_\\n  - Recommendation is to do follow-up research on Lines of Code _per directory, per repo, and per group_\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for product design to understand the problem\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for engineering to understand the problem\\n\\n## Research Issue\\n\\n_This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc._\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\\n*This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality.\\nIt is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes.\\nJust like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc.*\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 371038, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 24, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -166060152, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-01-19 14:12:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 10822493, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:28 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2771176, \"title\": \"direction\", \"color\": \"#ad8d43\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for important features that are on our roadmap: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26375975, \"title\": \"type::ignore\", \"color\": \"#808080\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-09 18:12:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-09 19:21:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"When using this type, the issue will be excluded from cross functional planning metrics. This is used for meta, planning, issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111311, \"title\": \"workflow::problem validation\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-21 15:43:10 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Workflow label for validating if the problem is customer relevant. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/#workflow-summary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 584663, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, \\n\\nI started this issue for our problem validation. I made it confidential to not influence our survey as the survey takers may be up-voters on the epic this is linked to. Whether this makes sense to ask the very same people in the survey remains to be discussed - you are the expert. The goal however is to make it non-confidential as soon as we have done the survey. \\n\\nI will add further context in the coming days and then reach out to you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:15:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"cc: @mle\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889892, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, have you been able to send out the survey?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1092650147, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz - we are currently recruiting for the survey to ensure we have enough qualified participants, and will begin inviting them to take the survey later today. Should start seeing responses in the next few days.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10060155, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 14:59:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-09 10:48:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1093134713, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am closing this issue as the validation is done. \\n\\ncc: @mle / @leducmills\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"27977437404f1055ab3f1f3bdab3ac76026c88f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472325391, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10060155, \"username\": \"leducmills\", \"name\": \"Ben Leduc-Mills\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize with bullet points.","query_id":"c7dd403c6d3d4c61b493f8c389590188","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"113414743","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 113414743, \"title\": \"Problem Validation: Report Source Lines of Code (SLoC) per Developer or per Repo/Group\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:09:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Recommendation as a result of the research\\n- Do NOT implement Lines of Code Contributed _per Developer_. There has a potential negative impact.\\n  - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n- Analytics for Lines of Code _per directory, repo, or group_. \\n  - While there are strong hints in this research that suggest this could be of value to users. It seems mostly a nice-to-have feature.\\n     - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n  - The [tentative effort estimation to implement SLoC count on the repo level](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9692#tentative-effort-estimation-base-on-first-technical-approach-above) suggests the amount of work is roughly 1.5 dev months. To then offer this on the group level is probably also not expensive. The effort to implement this on the directory level needs to be investigated. \\n\\n\\n\\n### Links\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Expose Lines of Code (SLoC) per Language in Repository Analytics to improve understanding of repo\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wQ8-WbcE5HmYiwWhZFwASWCqAOp-CcUEeeSIJO1ox3M/edit#). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [research on Source Lines of Code Q3F23](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\n\\n# Details: What we learned researching this space\\n\\n\u003cdiv\u003e\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssumption\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we thought\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we learned\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we think now\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we assumed}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we thought this meant for the solution to this problem}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we learned when we tested this assumption}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{How these learnings relate to our approach/solution}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe assumed that following three issues are about related/partly identical needs and are highly important due to their popularity:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReport number of lines per language in repository charts\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 568 upvotes; 18 individual commenters + 15 customer asks; also third highest \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epriority score\u003c/span\u003e](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-intermediate-dashboard/970771/User-Request-Issue-Prioritization---Product)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e for user requested issues in SCM.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eNew contributors graph (lines of code)\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/14875)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 161 upvotes; 25 individual commenters; no customer asks\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eVisualize Language Trends over Time\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 11 upvotes; 5 customer asks\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDue to the high popularity, we thought the community agrees that GitLab should implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019 and that it would be clear what to implement.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe popularity (both among users and among paying customers) was the reason to pick this topic up.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReviewing all comments and customer asks on all issues I learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g191e02223c5_0_2)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere are **many dimensions** for which SLoC are requested: per **instance**, per **group**, per **project**, per **user**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePaying customers\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e care more about the **group level**, i.e. counting SLoC across all their repos\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn some cases, it seems unclear if there is a need for reporting SLoC **per language** or **just SLoC**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere is **little** **detail** to **why** this is helpful nor **how** **often** such metrics would be consulted\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAdditional insights from other sources\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17f2129743e_1_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome customers do NOT want to see data about individuals\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as their workscouncil would object that and would turn off such a feature.\\u00a0\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt seems that there are two fundamental use cases:\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ea) report LoC per user (i.e per each contributor to a project)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eb) report LoC per \\u2018location\\u2019 (i.e. per repo, per group or per instance)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not very clear how important the topic is to the users/customers.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: we should run a survey to assess importance.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not clear what they are trying to achieve.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: run interviews to understand the why.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe ask is highly popular AND GitHub has offered this for a long time. It should therefore be a good thing to implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eI thought GH addresses all asks vocalized in our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssessing \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2019s offering\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#competition)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e I found:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH does **NOT** show **LoC per repo**. (GL also doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows **languages per repo**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **percent** in the UI (just like GL)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **bytes** in the API (unlike GL which also provides percent)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH also offers the above for the **org-level**, i.e. is across all repos. (GL doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (added/removed) \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eper contributor\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/graphs/contributors?from=2010-03-21\u0026to=2022-11-22\u0026type=a)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (but **NOT language**).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epopular tool lets users post their \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epersonal stats\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on their \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eprofile page\u003c/span\u003e](https://github.com/mrdoob)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub also does not offer everything that users seem to be asking on our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA reason may be that when they implemented this there was no handy library to report SLoC per language per repo/org.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH seems to be considering \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eextensive visualizations of source code\u003c/span\u003e](https://githubnext.com/projects/repo-visualization)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e. The feedback on twitter is positive.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIf we were to offer _LoC per user_, this would be a me-too feature. The \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ecomments\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_293348432)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on the issue suggest that the need is largely driven by the fact that GitHub has had this for a long time and developers consider it as something a source code management platform would normally have.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should survey a broad spectrum of users as the issues suggested that commenters also came from different backgrounds but still all seemed to care about the topic \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe asked a total of \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e118 users: 64 sw dev; 15 dev team leads; 10 DevOps; etc.\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g139bca1b89a_0_1059)\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe thought \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be highly popular, given that the issues are so popular.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003esurvey\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g18dae5a6a9c_0_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eCompared to users of other tools, users of GitLab seem to care less about seeing the number of lines contributed\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitLab users also care less about the breakdown of languages within a project compared to their peers\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn most cases, those newer to their role thought the features were more important\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggests, \\u2018LoC\\u2019 seems to be of medium importance (or medium un-importance) for Source Code management.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe will need to run interviews to understand more.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggested that there do not seem to be significant differences in the views of managers vs. individual contributors.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eTherefore, we interviewed software developers and also asked them about their manager's perspective.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e8 interviews (7 sw devs, 1 of which is also DevOps engineer / evangelist; 1 prj. mngr (former sw dev))\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe would learn in the interviews what the value of \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn the \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003einterviews\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e we learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17117578ef8_2_21)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e **_per user_** is **NOT** seen as a **good measure for contribution**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome have had **negative experiences** with **metrics to assess performance** (incl. SLoC)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e would be **valuable**. Interviewees see this mostly as **nice to have** though.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eComparing\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e growth of SLoC in **_different directories_** that serve different purposes (application vs. test) is **more interesting than** **comparing growth** in SLoC **_per languages_**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePotentially interesting sub-feature: Using SLoC to **filter by language**: commit lists or repo lists.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eOne use case seems to be around SLoC _per user:_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_I want an easy way to know who has contributed how many LoC to a project_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_so that I can compare their contributions_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) to feel proud of my own work or_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) to track my team members work_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should NOT implement this use case: SLoC _per user_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as it is NOT a good metric.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt might be a nice graph to look at for some, but it will have **negative consequences for a few** as their performance would be evaluated based on their contributed SLoC.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDo literature research to find further evidence of this outcome.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eConsider a blog post that reflects our decision. A good timing would be at the same time when we potentially release something else related to SLoC (see below).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Take this result and create an **opportunity canvas on SLoC _per user _**as a contribution metric **with the recommendation NOT to do it**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014--\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_ or _per language per repo_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e seems to be valuable to help users get a quick understanding of a repo or the health of different modules. The use case seems to be:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_For a given repo or a module (i.e. directory) , that I see for the first time, I want to know lines of code per language,_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) so that I can get a quick sense if it will be easy for me to contribute to it given my skill set_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) so that I can understand if the module is bloated_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThis addresses the needs of individual contributors so it would be part of the **free tier**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Understand the effort to implement this.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014---\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per group_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e was not assessed in this series of interviews with developers as this is likely more relevant for administrators, CIO\\u2019s, directors, etc.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e reach out to 2 or 3 customers that requested this in one of the original issues to understand what they are trying to achieve and to understand how this could be tiered.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eliterature research\u003c/span\u003e**](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#literature)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLiterature supports the interviewee\\u2019s perspective that SLoC is NOT a good metric for measuring contribution.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/div\u003e\\n\\n\\n\\n## Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to have an understanding summarized in a RICE score (see [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing)). \\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to decide if they want to move forward with this idea or drop it. \\n  - Recommendation is not to go ahead with Lines of Code _per developer_\\n  - Recommendation is to do follow-up research on Lines of Code _per directory, per repo, and per group_\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for product design to understand the problem\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for engineering to understand the problem\\n\\n## Research Issue\\n\\n_This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc._\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\\n*This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality.\\nIt is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes.\\nJust like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc.*\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 371038, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 24, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -166060152, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-01-19 14:12:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 10822493, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:28 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2771176, \"title\": \"direction\", \"color\": \"#ad8d43\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for important features that are on our roadmap: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26375975, \"title\": \"type::ignore\", \"color\": \"#808080\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-09 18:12:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-09 19:21:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"When using this type, the issue will be excluded from cross functional planning metrics. This is used for meta, planning, issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111311, \"title\": \"workflow::problem validation\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-21 15:43:10 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Workflow label for validating if the problem is customer relevant. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/#workflow-summary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 584663, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, \\n\\nI started this issue for our problem validation. I made it confidential to not influence our survey as the survey takers may be up-voters on the epic this is linked to. Whether this makes sense to ask the very same people in the survey remains to be discussed - you are the expert. The goal however is to make it non-confidential as soon as we have done the survey. \\n\\nI will add further context in the coming days and then reach out to you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:15:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"cc: @mle\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889892, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, have you been able to send out the survey?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1092650147, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz - we are currently recruiting for the survey to ensure we have enough qualified participants, and will begin inviting them to take the survey later today. Should start seeing responses in the next few days.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10060155, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 14:59:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-09 10:48:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1093134713, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am closing this issue as the validation is done. \\n\\ncc: @mle / @leducmills\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"27977437404f1055ab3f1f3bdab3ac76026c88f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472325391, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10060155, \"username\": \"leducmills\", \"name\": \"Ben Leduc-Mills\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What are the unique use cases raised by commenters in this issue?","query_id":"c0baa9313f9447e2b1433b94a16d925f","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"113414743","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 113414743, \"title\": \"Problem Validation: Report Source Lines of Code (SLoC) per Developer or per Repo/Group\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:09:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Recommendation as a result of the research\\n- Do NOT implement Lines of Code Contributed _per Developer_. There has a potential negative impact.\\n  - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n- Analytics for Lines of Code _per directory, repo, or group_. \\n  - While there are strong hints in this research that suggest this could be of value to users. It seems mostly a nice-to-have feature.\\n     - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n  - The [tentative effort estimation to implement SLoC count on the repo level](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9692#tentative-effort-estimation-base-on-first-technical-approach-above) suggests the amount of work is roughly 1.5 dev months. To then offer this on the group level is probably also not expensive. The effort to implement this on the directory level needs to be investigated. \\n\\n\\n\\n### Links\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Expose Lines of Code (SLoC) per Language in Repository Analytics to improve understanding of repo\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wQ8-WbcE5HmYiwWhZFwASWCqAOp-CcUEeeSIJO1ox3M/edit#). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [research on Source Lines of Code Q3F23](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\n\\n# Details: What we learned researching this space\\n\\n\u003cdiv\u003e\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssumption\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we thought\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we learned\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we think now\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we assumed}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we thought this meant for the solution to this problem}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we learned when we tested this assumption}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{How these learnings relate to our approach/solution}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe assumed that following three issues are about related/partly identical needs and are highly important due to their popularity:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReport number of lines per language in repository charts\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 568 upvotes; 18 individual commenters + 15 customer asks; also third highest \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epriority score\u003c/span\u003e](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-intermediate-dashboard/970771/User-Request-Issue-Prioritization---Product)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e for user requested issues in SCM.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eNew contributors graph (lines of code)\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/14875)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 161 upvotes; 25 individual commenters; no customer asks\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eVisualize Language Trends over Time\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 11 upvotes; 5 customer asks\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDue to the high popularity, we thought the community agrees that GitLab should implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019 and that it would be clear what to implement.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe popularity (both among users and among paying customers) was the reason to pick this topic up.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReviewing all comments and customer asks on all issues I learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g191e02223c5_0_2)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere are **many dimensions** for which SLoC are requested: per **instance**, per **group**, per **project**, per **user**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePaying customers\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e care more about the **group level**, i.e. counting SLoC across all their repos\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn some cases, it seems unclear if there is a need for reporting SLoC **per language** or **just SLoC**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere is **little** **detail** to **why** this is helpful nor **how** **often** such metrics would be consulted\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAdditional insights from other sources\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17f2129743e_1_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome customers do NOT want to see data about individuals\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as their workscouncil would object that and would turn off such a feature.\\u00a0\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt seems that there are two fundamental use cases:\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ea) report LoC per user (i.e per each contributor to a project)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eb) report LoC per \\u2018location\\u2019 (i.e. per repo, per group or per instance)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not very clear how important the topic is to the users/customers.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: we should run a survey to assess importance.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not clear what they are trying to achieve.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: run interviews to understand the why.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe ask is highly popular AND GitHub has offered this for a long time. It should therefore be a good thing to implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eI thought GH addresses all asks vocalized in our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssessing \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2019s offering\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#competition)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e I found:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH does **NOT** show **LoC per repo**. (GL also doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows **languages per repo**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **percent** in the UI (just like GL)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **bytes** in the API (unlike GL which also provides percent)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH also offers the above for the **org-level**, i.e. is across all repos. (GL doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (added/removed) \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eper contributor\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/graphs/contributors?from=2010-03-21\u0026to=2022-11-22\u0026type=a)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (but **NOT language**).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epopular tool lets users post their \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epersonal stats\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on their \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eprofile page\u003c/span\u003e](https://github.com/mrdoob)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub also does not offer everything that users seem to be asking on our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA reason may be that when they implemented this there was no handy library to report SLoC per language per repo/org.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH seems to be considering \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eextensive visualizations of source code\u003c/span\u003e](https://githubnext.com/projects/repo-visualization)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e. The feedback on twitter is positive.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIf we were to offer _LoC per user_, this would be a me-too feature. The \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ecomments\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_293348432)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on the issue suggest that the need is largely driven by the fact that GitHub has had this for a long time and developers consider it as something a source code management platform would normally have.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should survey a broad spectrum of users as the issues suggested that commenters also came from different backgrounds but still all seemed to care about the topic \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe asked a total of \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e118 users: 64 sw dev; 15 dev team leads; 10 DevOps; etc.\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g139bca1b89a_0_1059)\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe thought \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be highly popular, given that the issues are so popular.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003esurvey\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g18dae5a6a9c_0_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eCompared to users of other tools, users of GitLab seem to care less about seeing the number of lines contributed\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitLab users also care less about the breakdown of languages within a project compared to their peers\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn most cases, those newer to their role thought the features were more important\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggests, \\u2018LoC\\u2019 seems to be of medium importance (or medium un-importance) for Source Code management.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe will need to run interviews to understand more.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggested that there do not seem to be significant differences in the views of managers vs. individual contributors.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eTherefore, we interviewed software developers and also asked them about their manager's perspective.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e8 interviews (7 sw devs, 1 of which is also DevOps engineer / evangelist; 1 prj. mngr (former sw dev))\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe would learn in the interviews what the value of \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn the \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003einterviews\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e we learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17117578ef8_2_21)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e **_per user_** is **NOT** seen as a **good measure for contribution**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome have had **negative experiences** with **metrics to assess performance** (incl. SLoC)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e would be **valuable**. Interviewees see this mostly as **nice to have** though.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eComparing\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e growth of SLoC in **_different directories_** that serve different purposes (application vs. test) is **more interesting than** **comparing growth** in SLoC **_per languages_**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePotentially interesting sub-feature: Using SLoC to **filter by language**: commit lists or repo lists.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eOne use case seems to be around SLoC _per user:_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_I want an easy way to know who has contributed how many LoC to a project_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_so that I can compare their contributions_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) to feel proud of my own work or_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) to track my team members work_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should NOT implement this use case: SLoC _per user_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as it is NOT a good metric.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt might be a nice graph to look at for some, but it will have **negative consequences for a few** as their performance would be evaluated based on their contributed SLoC.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDo literature research to find further evidence of this outcome.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eConsider a blog post that reflects our decision. A good timing would be at the same time when we potentially release something else related to SLoC (see below).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Take this result and create an **opportunity canvas on SLoC _per user _**as a contribution metric **with the recommendation NOT to do it**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014--\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_ or _per language per repo_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e seems to be valuable to help users get a quick understanding of a repo or the health of different modules. The use case seems to be:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_For a given repo or a module (i.e. directory) , that I see for the first time, I want to know lines of code per language,_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) so that I can get a quick sense if it will be easy for me to contribute to it given my skill set_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) so that I can understand if the module is bloated_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThis addresses the needs of individual contributors so it would be part of the **free tier**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Understand the effort to implement this.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014---\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per group_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e was not assessed in this series of interviews with developers as this is likely more relevant for administrators, CIO\\u2019s, directors, etc.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e reach out to 2 or 3 customers that requested this in one of the original issues to understand what they are trying to achieve and to understand how this could be tiered.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eliterature research\u003c/span\u003e**](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#literature)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLiterature supports the interviewee\\u2019s perspective that SLoC is NOT a good metric for measuring contribution.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/div\u003e\\n\\n\\n\\n## Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to have an understanding summarized in a RICE score (see [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing)). \\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to decide if they want to move forward with this idea or drop it. \\n  - Recommendation is not to go ahead with Lines of Code _per developer_\\n  - Recommendation is to do follow-up research on Lines of Code _per directory, per repo, and per group_\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for product design to understand the problem\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for engineering to understand the problem\\n\\n## Research Issue\\n\\n_This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc._\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\\n*This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality.\\nIt is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes.\\nJust like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc.*\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 371038, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 24, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -166060152, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-01-19 14:12:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 10822493, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:28 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2771176, \"title\": \"direction\", \"color\": \"#ad8d43\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for important features that are on our roadmap: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26375975, \"title\": \"type::ignore\", \"color\": \"#808080\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-09 18:12:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-09 19:21:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"When using this type, the issue will be excluded from cross functional planning metrics. This is used for meta, planning, issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111311, \"title\": \"workflow::problem validation\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-21 15:43:10 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Workflow label for validating if the problem is customer relevant. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/#workflow-summary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 584663, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, \\n\\nI started this issue for our problem validation. I made it confidential to not influence our survey as the survey takers may be up-voters on the epic this is linked to. Whether this makes sense to ask the very same people in the survey remains to be discussed - you are the expert. The goal however is to make it non-confidential as soon as we have done the survey. \\n\\nI will add further context in the coming days and then reach out to you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:15:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"cc: @mle\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889892, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, have you been able to send out the survey?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1092650147, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz - we are currently recruiting for the survey to ensure we have enough qualified participants, and will begin inviting them to take the survey later today. Should start seeing responses in the next few days.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10060155, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 14:59:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-09 10:48:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1093134713, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am closing this issue as the validation is done. \\n\\ncc: @mle / @leducmills\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"27977437404f1055ab3f1f3bdab3ac76026c88f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472325391, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10060155, \"username\": \"leducmills\", \"name\": \"Ben Leduc-Mills\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Could you summarize this issue?","query_id":"541963eec8564cadb24c5022ba3a620a","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"113414743","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 113414743, \"title\": \"Problem Validation: Report Source Lines of Code (SLoC) per Developer or per Repo/Group\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:09:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Recommendation as a result of the research\\n- Do NOT implement Lines of Code Contributed _per Developer_. There has a potential negative impact.\\n  - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n- Analytics for Lines of Code _per directory, repo, or group_. \\n  - While there are strong hints in this research that suggest this could be of value to users. It seems mostly a nice-to-have feature.\\n     - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n  - The [tentative effort estimation to implement SLoC count on the repo level](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9692#tentative-effort-estimation-base-on-first-technical-approach-above) suggests the amount of work is roughly 1.5 dev months. To then offer this on the group level is probably also not expensive. The effort to implement this on the directory level needs to be investigated. \\n\\n\\n\\n### Links\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Expose Lines of Code (SLoC) per Language in Repository Analytics to improve understanding of repo\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wQ8-WbcE5HmYiwWhZFwASWCqAOp-CcUEeeSIJO1ox3M/edit#). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [research on Source Lines of Code Q3F23](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\n\\n# Details: What we learned researching this space\\n\\n\u003cdiv\u003e\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssumption\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we thought\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we learned\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we think now\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we assumed}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we thought this meant for the solution to this problem}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we learned when we tested this assumption}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{How these learnings relate to our approach/solution}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe assumed that following three issues are about related/partly identical needs and are highly important due to their popularity:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReport number of lines per language in repository charts\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 568 upvotes; 18 individual commenters + 15 customer asks; also third highest \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epriority score\u003c/span\u003e](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-intermediate-dashboard/970771/User-Request-Issue-Prioritization---Product)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e for user requested issues in SCM.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eNew contributors graph (lines of code)\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/14875)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 161 upvotes; 25 individual commenters; no customer asks\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eVisualize Language Trends over Time\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 11 upvotes; 5 customer asks\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDue to the high popularity, we thought the community agrees that GitLab should implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019 and that it would be clear what to implement.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe popularity (both among users and among paying customers) was the reason to pick this topic up.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReviewing all comments and customer asks on all issues I learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g191e02223c5_0_2)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere are **many dimensions** for which SLoC are requested: per **instance**, per **group**, per **project**, per **user**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePaying customers\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e care more about the **group level**, i.e. counting SLoC across all their repos\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn some cases, it seems unclear if there is a need for reporting SLoC **per language** or **just SLoC**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere is **little** **detail** to **why** this is helpful nor **how** **often** such metrics would be consulted\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAdditional insights from other sources\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17f2129743e_1_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome customers do NOT want to see data about individuals\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as their workscouncil would object that and would turn off such a feature.\\u00a0\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt seems that there are two fundamental use cases:\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ea) report LoC per user (i.e per each contributor to a project)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eb) report LoC per \\u2018location\\u2019 (i.e. per repo, per group or per instance)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not very clear how important the topic is to the users/customers.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: we should run a survey to assess importance.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not clear what they are trying to achieve.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: run interviews to understand the why.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe ask is highly popular AND GitHub has offered this for a long time. It should therefore be a good thing to implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eI thought GH addresses all asks vocalized in our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssessing \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2019s offering\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#competition)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e I found:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH does **NOT** show **LoC per repo**. (GL also doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows **languages per repo**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **percent** in the UI (just like GL)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **bytes** in the API (unlike GL which also provides percent)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH also offers the above for the **org-level**, i.e. is across all repos. (GL doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (added/removed) \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eper contributor\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/graphs/contributors?from=2010-03-21\u0026to=2022-11-22\u0026type=a)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (but **NOT language**).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epopular tool lets users post their \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epersonal stats\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on their \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eprofile page\u003c/span\u003e](https://github.com/mrdoob)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub also does not offer everything that users seem to be asking on our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA reason may be that when they implemented this there was no handy library to report SLoC per language per repo/org.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH seems to be considering \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eextensive visualizations of source code\u003c/span\u003e](https://githubnext.com/projects/repo-visualization)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e. The feedback on twitter is positive.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIf we were to offer _LoC per user_, this would be a me-too feature. The \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ecomments\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_293348432)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on the issue suggest that the need is largely driven by the fact that GitHub has had this for a long time and developers consider it as something a source code management platform would normally have.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should survey a broad spectrum of users as the issues suggested that commenters also came from different backgrounds but still all seemed to care about the topic \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe asked a total of \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e118 users: 64 sw dev; 15 dev team leads; 10 DevOps; etc.\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g139bca1b89a_0_1059)\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe thought \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be highly popular, given that the issues are so popular.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003esurvey\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g18dae5a6a9c_0_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eCompared to users of other tools, users of GitLab seem to care less about seeing the number of lines contributed\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitLab users also care less about the breakdown of languages within a project compared to their peers\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn most cases, those newer to their role thought the features were more important\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggests, \\u2018LoC\\u2019 seems to be of medium importance (or medium un-importance) for Source Code management.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe will need to run interviews to understand more.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggested that there do not seem to be significant differences in the views of managers vs. individual contributors.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eTherefore, we interviewed software developers and also asked them about their manager's perspective.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e8 interviews (7 sw devs, 1 of which is also DevOps engineer / evangelist; 1 prj. mngr (former sw dev))\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe would learn in the interviews what the value of \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn the \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003einterviews\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e we learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17117578ef8_2_21)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e **_per user_** is **NOT** seen as a **good measure for contribution**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome have had **negative experiences** with **metrics to assess performance** (incl. SLoC)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e would be **valuable**. Interviewees see this mostly as **nice to have** though.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eComparing\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e growth of SLoC in **_different directories_** that serve different purposes (application vs. test) is **more interesting than** **comparing growth** in SLoC **_per languages_**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePotentially interesting sub-feature: Using SLoC to **filter by language**: commit lists or repo lists.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eOne use case seems to be around SLoC _per user:_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_I want an easy way to know who has contributed how many LoC to a project_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_so that I can compare their contributions_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) to feel proud of my own work or_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) to track my team members work_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should NOT implement this use case: SLoC _per user_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as it is NOT a good metric.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt might be a nice graph to look at for some, but it will have **negative consequences for a few** as their performance would be evaluated based on their contributed SLoC.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDo literature research to find further evidence of this outcome.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eConsider a blog post that reflects our decision. A good timing would be at the same time when we potentially release something else related to SLoC (see below).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Take this result and create an **opportunity canvas on SLoC _per user _**as a contribution metric **with the recommendation NOT to do it**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014--\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_ or _per language per repo_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e seems to be valuable to help users get a quick understanding of a repo or the health of different modules. The use case seems to be:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_For a given repo or a module (i.e. directory) , that I see for the first time, I want to know lines of code per language,_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) so that I can get a quick sense if it will be easy for me to contribute to it given my skill set_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) so that I can understand if the module is bloated_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThis addresses the needs of individual contributors so it would be part of the **free tier**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Understand the effort to implement this.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014---\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per group_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e was not assessed in this series of interviews with developers as this is likely more relevant for administrators, CIO\\u2019s, directors, etc.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e reach out to 2 or 3 customers that requested this in one of the original issues to understand what they are trying to achieve and to understand how this could be tiered.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eliterature research\u003c/span\u003e**](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#literature)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLiterature supports the interviewee\\u2019s perspective that SLoC is NOT a good metric for measuring contribution.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/div\u003e\\n\\n\\n\\n## Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to have an understanding summarized in a RICE score (see [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing)). \\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to decide if they want to move forward with this idea or drop it. \\n  - Recommendation is not to go ahead with Lines of Code _per developer_\\n  - Recommendation is to do follow-up research on Lines of Code _per directory, per repo, and per group_\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for product design to understand the problem\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for engineering to understand the problem\\n\\n## Research Issue\\n\\n_This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc._\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\\n*This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality.\\nIt is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes.\\nJust like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc.*\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 371038, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 24, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -166060152, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-01-19 14:12:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 10822493, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:28 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2771176, \"title\": \"direction\", \"color\": \"#ad8d43\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for important features that are on our roadmap: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26375975, \"title\": \"type::ignore\", \"color\": \"#808080\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-09 18:12:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-09 19:21:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"When using this type, the issue will be excluded from cross functional planning metrics. This is used for meta, planning, issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111311, \"title\": \"workflow::problem validation\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-21 15:43:10 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Workflow label for validating if the problem is customer relevant. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/#workflow-summary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 584663, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, \\n\\nI started this issue for our problem validation. I made it confidential to not influence our survey as the survey takers may be up-voters on the epic this is linked to. Whether this makes sense to ask the very same people in the survey remains to be discussed - you are the expert. The goal however is to make it non-confidential as soon as we have done the survey. \\n\\nI will add further context in the coming days and then reach out to you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:15:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"cc: @mle\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889892, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, have you been able to send out the survey?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1092650147, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz - we are currently recruiting for the survey to ensure we have enough qualified participants, and will begin inviting them to take the survey later today. Should start seeing responses in the next few days.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10060155, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 14:59:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-09 10:48:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1093134713, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am closing this issue as the validation is done. \\n\\ncc: @mle / @leducmills\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"27977437404f1055ab3f1f3bdab3ac76026c88f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472325391, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10060155, \"username\": \"leducmills\", \"name\": \"Ben Leduc-Mills\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Summarize this Issue.","query_id":"ee8012346dfa411590587bd0c37db934","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"113414743","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 113414743, \"title\": \"Problem Validation: Report Source Lines of Code (SLoC) per Developer or per Repo/Group\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:09:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Recommendation as a result of the research\\n- Do NOT implement Lines of Code Contributed _per Developer_. There has a potential negative impact.\\n  - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n- Analytics for Lines of Code _per directory, repo, or group_. \\n  - While there are strong hints in this research that suggest this could be of value to users. It seems mostly a nice-to-have feature.\\n     - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n  - The [tentative effort estimation to implement SLoC count on the repo level](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9692#tentative-effort-estimation-base-on-first-technical-approach-above) suggests the amount of work is roughly 1.5 dev months. To then offer this on the group level is probably also not expensive. The effort to implement this on the directory level needs to be investigated. \\n\\n\\n\\n### Links\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Expose Lines of Code (SLoC) per Language in Repository Analytics to improve understanding of repo\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wQ8-WbcE5HmYiwWhZFwASWCqAOp-CcUEeeSIJO1ox3M/edit#). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [research on Source Lines of Code Q3F23](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\n\\n# Details: What we learned researching this space\\n\\n\u003cdiv\u003e\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssumption\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we thought\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we learned\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we think now\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we assumed}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we thought this meant for the solution to this problem}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we learned when we tested this assumption}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{How these learnings relate to our approach/solution}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe assumed that following three issues are about related/partly identical needs and are highly important due to their popularity:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReport number of lines per language in repository charts\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 568 upvotes; 18 individual commenters + 15 customer asks; also third highest \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epriority score\u003c/span\u003e](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-intermediate-dashboard/970771/User-Request-Issue-Prioritization---Product)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e for user requested issues in SCM.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eNew contributors graph (lines of code)\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/14875)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 161 upvotes; 25 individual commenters; no customer asks\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eVisualize Language Trends over Time\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 11 upvotes; 5 customer asks\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDue to the high popularity, we thought the community agrees that GitLab should implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019 and that it would be clear what to implement.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe popularity (both among users and among paying customers) was the reason to pick this topic up.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReviewing all comments and customer asks on all issues I learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g191e02223c5_0_2)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere are **many dimensions** for which SLoC are requested: per **instance**, per **group**, per **project**, per **user**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePaying customers\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e care more about the **group level**, i.e. counting SLoC across all their repos\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn some cases, it seems unclear if there is a need for reporting SLoC **per language** or **just SLoC**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere is **little** **detail** to **why** this is helpful nor **how** **often** such metrics would be consulted\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAdditional insights from other sources\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17f2129743e_1_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome customers do NOT want to see data about individuals\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as their workscouncil would object that and would turn off such a feature.\\u00a0\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt seems that there are two fundamental use cases:\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ea) report LoC per user (i.e per each contributor to a project)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eb) report LoC per \\u2018location\\u2019 (i.e. per repo, per group or per instance)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not very clear how important the topic is to the users/customers.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: we should run a survey to assess importance.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not clear what they are trying to achieve.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: run interviews to understand the why.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe ask is highly popular AND GitHub has offered this for a long time. It should therefore be a good thing to implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eI thought GH addresses all asks vocalized in our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssessing \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2019s offering\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#competition)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e I found:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH does **NOT** show **LoC per repo**. (GL also doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows **languages per repo**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **percent** in the UI (just like GL)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **bytes** in the API (unlike GL which also provides percent)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH also offers the above for the **org-level**, i.e. is across all repos. (GL doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (added/removed) \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eper contributor\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/graphs/contributors?from=2010-03-21\u0026to=2022-11-22\u0026type=a)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (but **NOT language**).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epopular tool lets users post their \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epersonal stats\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on their \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eprofile page\u003c/span\u003e](https://github.com/mrdoob)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub also does not offer everything that users seem to be asking on our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA reason may be that when they implemented this there was no handy library to report SLoC per language per repo/org.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH seems to be considering \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eextensive visualizations of source code\u003c/span\u003e](https://githubnext.com/projects/repo-visualization)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e. The feedback on twitter is positive.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIf we were to offer _LoC per user_, this would be a me-too feature. The \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ecomments\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_293348432)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on the issue suggest that the need is largely driven by the fact that GitHub has had this for a long time and developers consider it as something a source code management platform would normally have.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should survey a broad spectrum of users as the issues suggested that commenters also came from different backgrounds but still all seemed to care about the topic \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe asked a total of \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e118 users: 64 sw dev; 15 dev team leads; 10 DevOps; etc.\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g139bca1b89a_0_1059)\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe thought \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be highly popular, given that the issues are so popular.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003esurvey\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g18dae5a6a9c_0_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eCompared to users of other tools, users of GitLab seem to care less about seeing the number of lines contributed\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitLab users also care less about the breakdown of languages within a project compared to their peers\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn most cases, those newer to their role thought the features were more important\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggests, \\u2018LoC\\u2019 seems to be of medium importance (or medium un-importance) for Source Code management.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe will need to run interviews to understand more.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggested that there do not seem to be significant differences in the views of managers vs. individual contributors.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eTherefore, we interviewed software developers and also asked them about their manager's perspective.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e8 interviews (7 sw devs, 1 of which is also DevOps engineer / evangelist; 1 prj. mngr (former sw dev))\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe would learn in the interviews what the value of \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn the \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003einterviews\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e we learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17117578ef8_2_21)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e **_per user_** is **NOT** seen as a **good measure for contribution**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome have had **negative experiences** with **metrics to assess performance** (incl. SLoC)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e would be **valuable**. Interviewees see this mostly as **nice to have** though.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eComparing\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e growth of SLoC in **_different directories_** that serve different purposes (application vs. test) is **more interesting than** **comparing growth** in SLoC **_per languages_**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePotentially interesting sub-feature: Using SLoC to **filter by language**: commit lists or repo lists.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eOne use case seems to be around SLoC _per user:_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_I want an easy way to know who has contributed how many LoC to a project_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_so that I can compare their contributions_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) to feel proud of my own work or_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) to track my team members work_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should NOT implement this use case: SLoC _per user_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as it is NOT a good metric.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt might be a nice graph to look at for some, but it will have **negative consequences for a few** as their performance would be evaluated based on their contributed SLoC.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDo literature research to find further evidence of this outcome.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eConsider a blog post that reflects our decision. A good timing would be at the same time when we potentially release something else related to SLoC (see below).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Take this result and create an **opportunity canvas on SLoC _per user _**as a contribution metric **with the recommendation NOT to do it**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014--\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_ or _per language per repo_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e seems to be valuable to help users get a quick understanding of a repo or the health of different modules. The use case seems to be:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_For a given repo or a module (i.e. directory) , that I see for the first time, I want to know lines of code per language,_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) so that I can get a quick sense if it will be easy for me to contribute to it given my skill set_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) so that I can understand if the module is bloated_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThis addresses the needs of individual contributors so it would be part of the **free tier**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Understand the effort to implement this.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014---\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per group_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e was not assessed in this series of interviews with developers as this is likely more relevant for administrators, CIO\\u2019s, directors, etc.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e reach out to 2 or 3 customers that requested this in one of the original issues to understand what they are trying to achieve and to understand how this could be tiered.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eliterature research\u003c/span\u003e**](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#literature)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLiterature supports the interviewee\\u2019s perspective that SLoC is NOT a good metric for measuring contribution.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/div\u003e\\n\\n\\n\\n## Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to have an understanding summarized in a RICE score (see [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing)). \\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to decide if they want to move forward with this idea or drop it. \\n  - Recommendation is not to go ahead with Lines of Code _per developer_\\n  - Recommendation is to do follow-up research on Lines of Code _per directory, per repo, and per group_\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for product design to understand the problem\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for engineering to understand the problem\\n\\n## Research Issue\\n\\n_This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc._\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\\n*This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality.\\nIt is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes.\\nJust like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc.*\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 371038, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 24, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -166060152, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-01-19 14:12:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 10822493, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:28 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2771176, \"title\": \"direction\", \"color\": \"#ad8d43\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for important features that are on our roadmap: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26375975, \"title\": \"type::ignore\", \"color\": \"#808080\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-09 18:12:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-09 19:21:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"When using this type, the issue will be excluded from cross functional planning metrics. This is used for meta, planning, issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111311, \"title\": \"workflow::problem validation\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-21 15:43:10 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Workflow label for validating if the problem is customer relevant. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/#workflow-summary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 584663, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, \\n\\nI started this issue for our problem validation. I made it confidential to not influence our survey as the survey takers may be up-voters on the epic this is linked to. Whether this makes sense to ask the very same people in the survey remains to be discussed - you are the expert. The goal however is to make it non-confidential as soon as we have done the survey. \\n\\nI will add further context in the coming days and then reach out to you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:15:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"cc: @mle\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889892, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, have you been able to send out the survey?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1092650147, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz - we are currently recruiting for the survey to ensure we have enough qualified participants, and will begin inviting them to take the survey later today. Should start seeing responses in the next few days.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10060155, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 14:59:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-09 10:48:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1093134713, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am closing this issue as the validation is done. \\n\\ncc: @mle / @leducmills\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"27977437404f1055ab3f1f3bdab3ac76026c88f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472325391, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10060155, \"username\": \"leducmills\", \"name\": \"Ben Leduc-Mills\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"{url} - Summarize this issue.","query_id":"f5e7f224e9764120bc794e314c2c2729","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"113414743","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 113414743, \"title\": \"Problem Validation: Report Source Lines of Code (SLoC) per Developer or per Repo/Group\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:09:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Recommendation as a result of the research\\n- Do NOT implement Lines of Code Contributed _per Developer_. There has a potential negative impact.\\n  - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n- Analytics for Lines of Code _per directory, repo, or group_. \\n  - While there are strong hints in this research that suggest this could be of value to users. It seems mostly a nice-to-have feature.\\n     - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n  - The [tentative effort estimation to implement SLoC count on the repo level](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9692#tentative-effort-estimation-base-on-first-technical-approach-above) suggests the amount of work is roughly 1.5 dev months. To then offer this on the group level is probably also not expensive. The effort to implement this on the directory level needs to be investigated. \\n\\n\\n\\n### Links\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Expose Lines of Code (SLoC) per Language in Repository Analytics to improve understanding of repo\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wQ8-WbcE5HmYiwWhZFwASWCqAOp-CcUEeeSIJO1ox3M/edit#). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [research on Source Lines of Code Q3F23](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\n\\n# Details: What we learned researching this space\\n\\n\u003cdiv\u003e\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssumption\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we thought\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we learned\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we think now\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we assumed}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we thought this meant for the solution to this problem}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we learned when we tested this assumption}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{How these learnings relate to our approach/solution}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe assumed that following three issues are about related/partly identical needs and are highly important due to their popularity:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReport number of lines per language in repository charts\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 568 upvotes; 18 individual commenters + 15 customer asks; also third highest \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epriority score\u003c/span\u003e](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-intermediate-dashboard/970771/User-Request-Issue-Prioritization---Product)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e for user requested issues in SCM.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eNew contributors graph (lines of code)\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/14875)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 161 upvotes; 25 individual commenters; no customer asks\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eVisualize Language Trends over Time\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 11 upvotes; 5 customer asks\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDue to the high popularity, we thought the community agrees that GitLab should implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019 and that it would be clear what to implement.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe popularity (both among users and among paying customers) was the reason to pick this topic up.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReviewing all comments and customer asks on all issues I learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g191e02223c5_0_2)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere are **many dimensions** for which SLoC are requested: per **instance**, per **group**, per **project**, per **user**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePaying customers\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e care more about the **group level**, i.e. counting SLoC across all their repos\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn some cases, it seems unclear if there is a need for reporting SLoC **per language** or **just SLoC**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere is **little** **detail** to **why** this is helpful nor **how** **often** such metrics would be consulted\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAdditional insights from other sources\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17f2129743e_1_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome customers do NOT want to see data about individuals\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as their workscouncil would object that and would turn off such a feature.\\u00a0\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt seems that there are two fundamental use cases:\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ea) report LoC per user (i.e per each contributor to a project)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eb) report LoC per \\u2018location\\u2019 (i.e. per repo, per group or per instance)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not very clear how important the topic is to the users/customers.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: we should run a survey to assess importance.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not clear what they are trying to achieve.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: run interviews to understand the why.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe ask is highly popular AND GitHub has offered this for a long time. It should therefore be a good thing to implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eI thought GH addresses all asks vocalized in our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssessing \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2019s offering\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#competition)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e I found:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH does **NOT** show **LoC per repo**. (GL also doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows **languages per repo**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **percent** in the UI (just like GL)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **bytes** in the API (unlike GL which also provides percent)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH also offers the above for the **org-level**, i.e. is across all repos. (GL doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (added/removed) \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eper contributor\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/graphs/contributors?from=2010-03-21\u0026to=2022-11-22\u0026type=a)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (but **NOT language**).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epopular tool lets users post their \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epersonal stats\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on their \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eprofile page\u003c/span\u003e](https://github.com/mrdoob)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub also does not offer everything that users seem to be asking on our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA reason may be that when they implemented this there was no handy library to report SLoC per language per repo/org.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH seems to be considering \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eextensive visualizations of source code\u003c/span\u003e](https://githubnext.com/projects/repo-visualization)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e. The feedback on twitter is positive.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIf we were to offer _LoC per user_, this would be a me-too feature. The \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ecomments\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_293348432)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on the issue suggest that the need is largely driven by the fact that GitHub has had this for a long time and developers consider it as something a source code management platform would normally have.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should survey a broad spectrum of users as the issues suggested that commenters also came from different backgrounds but still all seemed to care about the topic \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe asked a total of \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e118 users: 64 sw dev; 15 dev team leads; 10 DevOps; etc.\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g139bca1b89a_0_1059)\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe thought \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be highly popular, given that the issues are so popular.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003esurvey\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g18dae5a6a9c_0_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eCompared to users of other tools, users of GitLab seem to care less about seeing the number of lines contributed\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitLab users also care less about the breakdown of languages within a project compared to their peers\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn most cases, those newer to their role thought the features were more important\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggests, \\u2018LoC\\u2019 seems to be of medium importance (or medium un-importance) for Source Code management.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe will need to run interviews to understand more.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggested that there do not seem to be significant differences in the views of managers vs. individual contributors.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eTherefore, we interviewed software developers and also asked them about their manager's perspective.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e8 interviews (7 sw devs, 1 of which is also DevOps engineer / evangelist; 1 prj. mngr (former sw dev))\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe would learn in the interviews what the value of \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn the \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003einterviews\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e we learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17117578ef8_2_21)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e **_per user_** is **NOT** seen as a **good measure for contribution**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome have had **negative experiences** with **metrics to assess performance** (incl. SLoC)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e would be **valuable**. Interviewees see this mostly as **nice to have** though.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eComparing\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e growth of SLoC in **_different directories_** that serve different purposes (application vs. test) is **more interesting than** **comparing growth** in SLoC **_per languages_**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePotentially interesting sub-feature: Using SLoC to **filter by language**: commit lists or repo lists.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eOne use case seems to be around SLoC _per user:_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_I want an easy way to know who has contributed how many LoC to a project_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_so that I can compare their contributions_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) to feel proud of my own work or_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) to track my team members work_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should NOT implement this use case: SLoC _per user_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as it is NOT a good metric.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt might be a nice graph to look at for some, but it will have **negative consequences for a few** as their performance would be evaluated based on their contributed SLoC.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDo literature research to find further evidence of this outcome.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eConsider a blog post that reflects our decision. A good timing would be at the same time when we potentially release something else related to SLoC (see below).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Take this result and create an **opportunity canvas on SLoC _per user _**as a contribution metric **with the recommendation NOT to do it**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014--\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_ or _per language per repo_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e seems to be valuable to help users get a quick understanding of a repo or the health of different modules. The use case seems to be:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_For a given repo or a module (i.e. directory) , that I see for the first time, I want to know lines of code per language,_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) so that I can get a quick sense if it will be easy for me to contribute to it given my skill set_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) so that I can understand if the module is bloated_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThis addresses the needs of individual contributors so it would be part of the **free tier**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Understand the effort to implement this.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014---\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per group_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e was not assessed in this series of interviews with developers as this is likely more relevant for administrators, CIO\\u2019s, directors, etc.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e reach out to 2 or 3 customers that requested this in one of the original issues to understand what they are trying to achieve and to understand how this could be tiered.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eliterature research\u003c/span\u003e**](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#literature)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLiterature supports the interviewee\\u2019s perspective that SLoC is NOT a good metric for measuring contribution.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/div\u003e\\n\\n\\n\\n## Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to have an understanding summarized in a RICE score (see [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing)). \\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to decide if they want to move forward with this idea or drop it. \\n  - Recommendation is not to go ahead with Lines of Code _per developer_\\n  - Recommendation is to do follow-up research on Lines of Code _per directory, per repo, and per group_\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for product design to understand the problem\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for engineering to understand the problem\\n\\n## Research Issue\\n\\n_This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc._\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\\n*This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality.\\nIt is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes.\\nJust like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc.*\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 371038, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 24, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -166060152, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-01-19 14:12:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 10822493, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:28 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2771176, \"title\": \"direction\", \"color\": \"#ad8d43\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for important features that are on our roadmap: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26375975, \"title\": \"type::ignore\", \"color\": \"#808080\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-09 18:12:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-09 19:21:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"When using this type, the issue will be excluded from cross functional planning metrics. This is used for meta, planning, issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111311, \"title\": \"workflow::problem validation\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-21 15:43:10 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Workflow label for validating if the problem is customer relevant. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/#workflow-summary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 584663, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, \\n\\nI started this issue for our problem validation. I made it confidential to not influence our survey as the survey takers may be up-voters on the epic this is linked to. Whether this makes sense to ask the very same people in the survey remains to be discussed - you are the expert. The goal however is to make it non-confidential as soon as we have done the survey. \\n\\nI will add further context in the coming days and then reach out to you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:15:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"cc: @mle\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889892, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, have you been able to send out the survey?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1092650147, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz - we are currently recruiting for the survey to ensure we have enough qualified participants, and will begin inviting them to take the survey later today. Should start seeing responses in the next few days.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10060155, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 14:59:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-09 10:48:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1093134713, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am closing this issue as the validation is done. \\n\\ncc: @mle / @leducmills\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"27977437404f1055ab3f1f3bdab3ac76026c88f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472325391, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10060155, \"username\": \"leducmills\", \"name\": \"Ben Leduc-Mills\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"What is the status of {url}?","query_id":"7724871bbc2749f7ab97e4d385920796","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"113414743","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 113414743, \"title\": \"Problem Validation: Report Source Lines of Code (SLoC) per Developer or per Repo/Group\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:09:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Recommendation as a result of the research\\n- Do NOT implement Lines of Code Contributed _per Developer_. There has a potential negative impact.\\n  - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n- Analytics for Lines of Code _per directory, repo, or group_. \\n  - While there are strong hints in this research that suggest this could be of value to users. It seems mostly a nice-to-have feature.\\n     - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n  - The [tentative effort estimation to implement SLoC count on the repo level](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9692#tentative-effort-estimation-base-on-first-technical-approach-above) suggests the amount of work is roughly 1.5 dev months. To then offer this on the group level is probably also not expensive. The effort to implement this on the directory level needs to be investigated. \\n\\n\\n\\n### Links\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Expose Lines of Code (SLoC) per Language in Repository Analytics to improve understanding of repo\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wQ8-WbcE5HmYiwWhZFwASWCqAOp-CcUEeeSIJO1ox3M/edit#). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [research on Source Lines of Code Q3F23](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\n\\n# Details: What we learned researching this space\\n\\n\u003cdiv\u003e\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssumption\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we thought\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we learned\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we think now\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we assumed}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we thought this meant for the solution to this problem}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we learned when we tested this assumption}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{How these learnings relate to our approach/solution}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe assumed that following three issues are about related/partly identical needs and are highly important due to their popularity:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReport number of lines per language in repository charts\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 568 upvotes; 18 individual commenters + 15 customer asks; also third highest \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epriority score\u003c/span\u003e](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-intermediate-dashboard/970771/User-Request-Issue-Prioritization---Product)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e for user requested issues in SCM.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eNew contributors graph (lines of code)\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/14875)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 161 upvotes; 25 individual commenters; no customer asks\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eVisualize Language Trends over Time\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 11 upvotes; 5 customer asks\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDue to the high popularity, we thought the community agrees that GitLab should implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019 and that it would be clear what to implement.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe popularity (both among users and among paying customers) was the reason to pick this topic up.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReviewing all comments and customer asks on all issues I learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g191e02223c5_0_2)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere are **many dimensions** for which SLoC are requested: per **instance**, per **group**, per **project**, per **user**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePaying customers\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e care more about the **group level**, i.e. counting SLoC across all their repos\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn some cases, it seems unclear if there is a need for reporting SLoC **per language** or **just SLoC**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere is **little** **detail** to **why** this is helpful nor **how** **often** such metrics would be consulted\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAdditional insights from other sources\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17f2129743e_1_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome customers do NOT want to see data about individuals\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as their workscouncil would object that and would turn off such a feature.\\u00a0\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt seems that there are two fundamental use cases:\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ea) report LoC per user (i.e per each contributor to a project)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eb) report LoC per \\u2018location\\u2019 (i.e. per repo, per group or per instance)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not very clear how important the topic is to the users/customers.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: we should run a survey to assess importance.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not clear what they are trying to achieve.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: run interviews to understand the why.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe ask is highly popular AND GitHub has offered this for a long time. It should therefore be a good thing to implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eI thought GH addresses all asks vocalized in our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssessing \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2019s offering\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#competition)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e I found:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH does **NOT** show **LoC per repo**. (GL also doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows **languages per repo**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **percent** in the UI (just like GL)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **bytes** in the API (unlike GL which also provides percent)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH also offers the above for the **org-level**, i.e. is across all repos. (GL doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (added/removed) \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eper contributor\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/graphs/contributors?from=2010-03-21\u0026to=2022-11-22\u0026type=a)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (but **NOT language**).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epopular tool lets users post their \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epersonal stats\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on their \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eprofile page\u003c/span\u003e](https://github.com/mrdoob)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub also does not offer everything that users seem to be asking on our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA reason may be that when they implemented this there was no handy library to report SLoC per language per repo/org.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH seems to be considering \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eextensive visualizations of source code\u003c/span\u003e](https://githubnext.com/projects/repo-visualization)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e. The feedback on twitter is positive.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIf we were to offer _LoC per user_, this would be a me-too feature. The \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ecomments\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_293348432)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on the issue suggest that the need is largely driven by the fact that GitHub has had this for a long time and developers consider it as something a source code management platform would normally have.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should survey a broad spectrum of users as the issues suggested that commenters also came from different backgrounds but still all seemed to care about the topic \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe asked a total of \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e118 users: 64 sw dev; 15 dev team leads; 10 DevOps; etc.\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g139bca1b89a_0_1059)\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe thought \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be highly popular, given that the issues are so popular.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003esurvey\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g18dae5a6a9c_0_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eCompared to users of other tools, users of GitLab seem to care less about seeing the number of lines contributed\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitLab users also care less about the breakdown of languages within a project compared to their peers\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn most cases, those newer to their role thought the features were more important\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggests, \\u2018LoC\\u2019 seems to be of medium importance (or medium un-importance) for Source Code management.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe will need to run interviews to understand more.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggested that there do not seem to be significant differences in the views of managers vs. individual contributors.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eTherefore, we interviewed software developers and also asked them about their manager's perspective.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e8 interviews (7 sw devs, 1 of which is also DevOps engineer / evangelist; 1 prj. mngr (former sw dev))\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe would learn in the interviews what the value of \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn the \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003einterviews\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e we learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17117578ef8_2_21)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e **_per user_** is **NOT** seen as a **good measure for contribution**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome have had **negative experiences** with **metrics to assess performance** (incl. SLoC)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e would be **valuable**. Interviewees see this mostly as **nice to have** though.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eComparing\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e growth of SLoC in **_different directories_** that serve different purposes (application vs. test) is **more interesting than** **comparing growth** in SLoC **_per languages_**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePotentially interesting sub-feature: Using SLoC to **filter by language**: commit lists or repo lists.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eOne use case seems to be around SLoC _per user:_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_I want an easy way to know who has contributed how many LoC to a project_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_so that I can compare their contributions_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) to feel proud of my own work or_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) to track my team members work_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should NOT implement this use case: SLoC _per user_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as it is NOT a good metric.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt might be a nice graph to look at for some, but it will have **negative consequences for a few** as their performance would be evaluated based on their contributed SLoC.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDo literature research to find further evidence of this outcome.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eConsider a blog post that reflects our decision. A good timing would be at the same time when we potentially release something else related to SLoC (see below).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Take this result and create an **opportunity canvas on SLoC _per user _**as a contribution metric **with the recommendation NOT to do it**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014--\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_ or _per language per repo_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e seems to be valuable to help users get a quick understanding of a repo or the health of different modules. The use case seems to be:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_For a given repo or a module (i.e. directory) , that I see for the first time, I want to know lines of code per language,_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) so that I can get a quick sense if it will be easy for me to contribute to it given my skill set_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) so that I can understand if the module is bloated_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThis addresses the needs of individual contributors so it would be part of the **free tier**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Understand the effort to implement this.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014---\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per group_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e was not assessed in this series of interviews with developers as this is likely more relevant for administrators, CIO\\u2019s, directors, etc.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e reach out to 2 or 3 customers that requested this in one of the original issues to understand what they are trying to achieve and to understand how this could be tiered.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eliterature research\u003c/span\u003e**](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#literature)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLiterature supports the interviewee\\u2019s perspective that SLoC is NOT a good metric for measuring contribution.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/div\u003e\\n\\n\\n\\n## Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to have an understanding summarized in a RICE score (see [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing)). \\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to decide if they want to move forward with this idea or drop it. \\n  - Recommendation is not to go ahead with Lines of Code _per developer_\\n  - Recommendation is to do follow-up research on Lines of Code _per directory, per repo, and per group_\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for product design to understand the problem\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for engineering to understand the problem\\n\\n## Research Issue\\n\\n_This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc._\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\\n*This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality.\\nIt is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes.\\nJust like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc.*\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 371038, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 24, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -166060152, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-01-19 14:12:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 10822493, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:28 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2771176, \"title\": \"direction\", \"color\": \"#ad8d43\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for important features that are on our roadmap: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26375975, \"title\": \"type::ignore\", \"color\": \"#808080\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-09 18:12:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-09 19:21:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"When using this type, the issue will be excluded from cross functional planning metrics. This is used for meta, planning, issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111311, \"title\": \"workflow::problem validation\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-21 15:43:10 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Workflow label for validating if the problem is customer relevant. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/#workflow-summary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 584663, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, \\n\\nI started this issue for our problem validation. I made it confidential to not influence our survey as the survey takers may be up-voters on the epic this is linked to. Whether this makes sense to ask the very same people in the survey remains to be discussed - you are the expert. The goal however is to make it non-confidential as soon as we have done the survey. \\n\\nI will add further context in the coming days and then reach out to you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:15:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"cc: @mle\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889892, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, have you been able to send out the survey?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1092650147, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz - we are currently recruiting for the survey to ensure we have enough qualified participants, and will begin inviting them to take the survey later today. Should start seeing responses in the next few days.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10060155, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 14:59:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-09 10:48:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1093134713, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am closing this issue as the validation is done. \\n\\ncc: @mle / @leducmills\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"27977437404f1055ab3f1f3bdab3ac76026c88f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472325391, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10060155, \"username\": \"leducmills\", \"name\": \"Ben Leduc-Mills\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Please summarize the latest activity and current status of the issue {url}.","query_id":"ba0438418a6e41dcbb69b4ef0f216851","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"113414743","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 113414743, \"title\": \"Problem Validation: Report Source Lines of Code (SLoC) per Developer or per Repo/Group\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:09:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Recommendation as a result of the research\\n- Do NOT implement Lines of Code Contributed _per Developer_. There has a potential negative impact.\\n  - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n- Analytics for Lines of Code _per directory, repo, or group_. \\n  - While there are strong hints in this research that suggest this could be of value to users. It seems mostly a nice-to-have feature.\\n     - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n  - The [tentative effort estimation to implement SLoC count on the repo level](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9692#tentative-effort-estimation-base-on-first-technical-approach-above) suggests the amount of work is roughly 1.5 dev months. To then offer this on the group level is probably also not expensive. The effort to implement this on the directory level needs to be investigated. \\n\\n\\n\\n### Links\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Expose Lines of Code (SLoC) per Language in Repository Analytics to improve understanding of repo\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wQ8-WbcE5HmYiwWhZFwASWCqAOp-CcUEeeSIJO1ox3M/edit#). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [research on Source Lines of Code Q3F23](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\n\\n# Details: What we learned researching this space\\n\\n\u003cdiv\u003e\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssumption\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we thought\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we learned\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we think now\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we assumed}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we thought this meant for the solution to this problem}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we learned when we tested this assumption}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{How these learnings relate to our approach/solution}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe assumed that following three issues are about related/partly identical needs and are highly important due to their popularity:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReport number of lines per language in repository charts\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 568 upvotes; 18 individual commenters + 15 customer asks; also third highest \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epriority score\u003c/span\u003e](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-intermediate-dashboard/970771/User-Request-Issue-Prioritization---Product)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e for user requested issues in SCM.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eNew contributors graph (lines of code)\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/14875)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 161 upvotes; 25 individual commenters; no customer asks\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eVisualize Language Trends over Time\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 11 upvotes; 5 customer asks\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDue to the high popularity, we thought the community agrees that GitLab should implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019 and that it would be clear what to implement.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe popularity (both among users and among paying customers) was the reason to pick this topic up.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReviewing all comments and customer asks on all issues I learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g191e02223c5_0_2)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere are **many dimensions** for which SLoC are requested: per **instance**, per **group**, per **project**, per **user**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePaying customers\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e care more about the **group level**, i.e. counting SLoC across all their repos\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn some cases, it seems unclear if there is a need for reporting SLoC **per language** or **just SLoC**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere is **little** **detail** to **why** this is helpful nor **how** **often** such metrics would be consulted\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAdditional insights from other sources\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17f2129743e_1_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome customers do NOT want to see data about individuals\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as their workscouncil would object that and would turn off such a feature.\\u00a0\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt seems that there are two fundamental use cases:\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ea) report LoC per user (i.e per each contributor to a project)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eb) report LoC per \\u2018location\\u2019 (i.e. per repo, per group or per instance)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not very clear how important the topic is to the users/customers.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: we should run a survey to assess importance.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not clear what they are trying to achieve.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: run interviews to understand the why.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe ask is highly popular AND GitHub has offered this for a long time. It should therefore be a good thing to implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eI thought GH addresses all asks vocalized in our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssessing \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2019s offering\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#competition)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e I found:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH does **NOT** show **LoC per repo**. (GL also doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows **languages per repo**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **percent** in the UI (just like GL)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **bytes** in the API (unlike GL which also provides percent)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH also offers the above for the **org-level**, i.e. is across all repos. (GL doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (added/removed) \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eper contributor\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/graphs/contributors?from=2010-03-21\u0026to=2022-11-22\u0026type=a)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (but **NOT language**).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epopular tool lets users post their \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epersonal stats\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on their \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eprofile page\u003c/span\u003e](https://github.com/mrdoob)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub also does not offer everything that users seem to be asking on our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA reason may be that when they implemented this there was no handy library to report SLoC per language per repo/org.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH seems to be considering \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eextensive visualizations of source code\u003c/span\u003e](https://githubnext.com/projects/repo-visualization)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e. The feedback on twitter is positive.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIf we were to offer _LoC per user_, this would be a me-too feature. The \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ecomments\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_293348432)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on the issue suggest that the need is largely driven by the fact that GitHub has had this for a long time and developers consider it as something a source code management platform would normally have.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should survey a broad spectrum of users as the issues suggested that commenters also came from different backgrounds but still all seemed to care about the topic \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe asked a total of \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e118 users: 64 sw dev; 15 dev team leads; 10 DevOps; etc.\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g139bca1b89a_0_1059)\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe thought \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be highly popular, given that the issues are so popular.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003esurvey\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g18dae5a6a9c_0_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eCompared to users of other tools, users of GitLab seem to care less about seeing the number of lines contributed\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitLab users also care less about the breakdown of languages within a project compared to their peers\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn most cases, those newer to their role thought the features were more important\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggests, \\u2018LoC\\u2019 seems to be of medium importance (or medium un-importance) for Source Code management.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe will need to run interviews to understand more.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggested that there do not seem to be significant differences in the views of managers vs. individual contributors.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eTherefore, we interviewed software developers and also asked them about their manager's perspective.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e8 interviews (7 sw devs, 1 of which is also DevOps engineer / evangelist; 1 prj. mngr (former sw dev))\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe would learn in the interviews what the value of \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn the \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003einterviews\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e we learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17117578ef8_2_21)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e **_per user_** is **NOT** seen as a **good measure for contribution**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome have had **negative experiences** with **metrics to assess performance** (incl. SLoC)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e would be **valuable**. Interviewees see this mostly as **nice to have** though.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eComparing\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e growth of SLoC in **_different directories_** that serve different purposes (application vs. test) is **more interesting than** **comparing growth** in SLoC **_per languages_**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePotentially interesting sub-feature: Using SLoC to **filter by language**: commit lists or repo lists.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eOne use case seems to be around SLoC _per user:_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_I want an easy way to know who has contributed how many LoC to a project_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_so that I can compare their contributions_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) to feel proud of my own work or_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) to track my team members work_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should NOT implement this use case: SLoC _per user_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as it is NOT a good metric.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt might be a nice graph to look at for some, but it will have **negative consequences for a few** as their performance would be evaluated based on their contributed SLoC.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDo literature research to find further evidence of this outcome.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eConsider a blog post that reflects our decision. A good timing would be at the same time when we potentially release something else related to SLoC (see below).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Take this result and create an **opportunity canvas on SLoC _per user _**as a contribution metric **with the recommendation NOT to do it**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014--\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_ or _per language per repo_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e seems to be valuable to help users get a quick understanding of a repo or the health of different modules. The use case seems to be:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_For a given repo or a module (i.e. directory) , that I see for the first time, I want to know lines of code per language,_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) so that I can get a quick sense if it will be easy for me to contribute to it given my skill set_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) so that I can understand if the module is bloated_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThis addresses the needs of individual contributors so it would be part of the **free tier**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Understand the effort to implement this.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014---\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per group_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e was not assessed in this series of interviews with developers as this is likely more relevant for administrators, CIO\\u2019s, directors, etc.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e reach out to 2 or 3 customers that requested this in one of the original issues to understand what they are trying to achieve and to understand how this could be tiered.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eliterature research\u003c/span\u003e**](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#literature)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLiterature supports the interviewee\\u2019s perspective that SLoC is NOT a good metric for measuring contribution.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/div\u003e\\n\\n\\n\\n## Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to have an understanding summarized in a RICE score (see [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing)). \\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to decide if they want to move forward with this idea or drop it. \\n  - Recommendation is not to go ahead with Lines of Code _per developer_\\n  - Recommendation is to do follow-up research on Lines of Code _per directory, per repo, and per group_\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for product design to understand the problem\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for engineering to understand the problem\\n\\n## Research Issue\\n\\n_This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc._\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\\n*This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality.\\nIt is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes.\\nJust like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc.*\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 371038, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 24, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -166060152, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-01-19 14:12:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 10822493, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:28 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2771176, \"title\": \"direction\", \"color\": \"#ad8d43\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for important features that are on our roadmap: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26375975, \"title\": \"type::ignore\", \"color\": \"#808080\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-09 18:12:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-09 19:21:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"When using this type, the issue will be excluded from cross functional planning metrics. This is used for meta, planning, issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111311, \"title\": \"workflow::problem validation\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-21 15:43:10 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Workflow label for validating if the problem is customer relevant. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/#workflow-summary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 584663, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, \\n\\nI started this issue for our problem validation. I made it confidential to not influence our survey as the survey takers may be up-voters on the epic this is linked to. Whether this makes sense to ask the very same people in the survey remains to be discussed - you are the expert. The goal however is to make it non-confidential as soon as we have done the survey. \\n\\nI will add further context in the coming days and then reach out to you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:15:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"cc: @mle\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889892, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, have you been able to send out the survey?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1092650147, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz - we are currently recruiting for the survey to ensure we have enough qualified participants, and will begin inviting them to take the survey later today. Should start seeing responses in the next few days.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10060155, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 14:59:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-09 10:48:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1093134713, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am closing this issue as the validation is done. \\n\\ncc: @mle / @leducmills\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"27977437404f1055ab3f1f3bdab3ac76026c88f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472325391, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10060155, \"username\": \"leducmills\", \"name\": \"Ben Leduc-Mills\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"How can I improve the description of {url} so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved?","query_id":"d2ccd0447ef44bcd8d713f9d891f714c","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"113414743","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 113414743, \"title\": \"Problem Validation: Report Source Lines of Code (SLoC) per Developer or per Repo/Group\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:09:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Recommendation as a result of the research\\n- Do NOT implement Lines of Code Contributed _per Developer_. There has a potential negative impact.\\n  - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n- Analytics for Lines of Code _per directory, repo, or group_. \\n  - While there are strong hints in this research that suggest this could be of value to users. It seems mostly a nice-to-have feature.\\n     - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n  - The [tentative effort estimation to implement SLoC count on the repo level](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9692#tentative-effort-estimation-base-on-first-technical-approach-above) suggests the amount of work is roughly 1.5 dev months. To then offer this on the group level is probably also not expensive. The effort to implement this on the directory level needs to be investigated. \\n\\n\\n\\n### Links\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Expose Lines of Code (SLoC) per Language in Repository Analytics to improve understanding of repo\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wQ8-WbcE5HmYiwWhZFwASWCqAOp-CcUEeeSIJO1ox3M/edit#). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [research on Source Lines of Code Q3F23](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\n\\n# Details: What we learned researching this space\\n\\n\u003cdiv\u003e\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssumption\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we thought\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we learned\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we think now\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we assumed}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we thought this meant for the solution to this problem}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we learned when we tested this assumption}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{How these learnings relate to our approach/solution}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe assumed that following three issues are about related/partly identical needs and are highly important due to their popularity:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReport number of lines per language in repository charts\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 568 upvotes; 18 individual commenters + 15 customer asks; also third highest \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epriority score\u003c/span\u003e](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-intermediate-dashboard/970771/User-Request-Issue-Prioritization---Product)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e for user requested issues in SCM.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eNew contributors graph (lines of code)\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/14875)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 161 upvotes; 25 individual commenters; no customer asks\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eVisualize Language Trends over Time\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 11 upvotes; 5 customer asks\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDue to the high popularity, we thought the community agrees that GitLab should implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019 and that it would be clear what to implement.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe popularity (both among users and among paying customers) was the reason to pick this topic up.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReviewing all comments and customer asks on all issues I learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g191e02223c5_0_2)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere are **many dimensions** for which SLoC are requested: per **instance**, per **group**, per **project**, per **user**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePaying customers\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e care more about the **group level**, i.e. counting SLoC across all their repos\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn some cases, it seems unclear if there is a need for reporting SLoC **per language** or **just SLoC**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere is **little** **detail** to **why** this is helpful nor **how** **often** such metrics would be consulted\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAdditional insights from other sources\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17f2129743e_1_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome customers do NOT want to see data about individuals\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as their workscouncil would object that and would turn off such a feature.\\u00a0\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt seems that there are two fundamental use cases:\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ea) report LoC per user (i.e per each contributor to a project)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eb) report LoC per \\u2018location\\u2019 (i.e. per repo, per group or per instance)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not very clear how important the topic is to the users/customers.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: we should run a survey to assess importance.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not clear what they are trying to achieve.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: run interviews to understand the why.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe ask is highly popular AND GitHub has offered this for a long time. It should therefore be a good thing to implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eI thought GH addresses all asks vocalized in our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssessing \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2019s offering\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#competition)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e I found:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH does **NOT** show **LoC per repo**. (GL also doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows **languages per repo**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **percent** in the UI (just like GL)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **bytes** in the API (unlike GL which also provides percent)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH also offers the above for the **org-level**, i.e. is across all repos. (GL doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (added/removed) \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eper contributor\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/graphs/contributors?from=2010-03-21\u0026to=2022-11-22\u0026type=a)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (but **NOT language**).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epopular tool lets users post their \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epersonal stats\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on their \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eprofile page\u003c/span\u003e](https://github.com/mrdoob)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub also does not offer everything that users seem to be asking on our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA reason may be that when they implemented this there was no handy library to report SLoC per language per repo/org.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH seems to be considering \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eextensive visualizations of source code\u003c/span\u003e](https://githubnext.com/projects/repo-visualization)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e. The feedback on twitter is positive.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIf we were to offer _LoC per user_, this would be a me-too feature. The \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ecomments\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_293348432)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on the issue suggest that the need is largely driven by the fact that GitHub has had this for a long time and developers consider it as something a source code management platform would normally have.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should survey a broad spectrum of users as the issues suggested that commenters also came from different backgrounds but still all seemed to care about the topic \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe asked a total of \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e118 users: 64 sw dev; 15 dev team leads; 10 DevOps; etc.\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g139bca1b89a_0_1059)\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe thought \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be highly popular, given that the issues are so popular.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003esurvey\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g18dae5a6a9c_0_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eCompared to users of other tools, users of GitLab seem to care less about seeing the number of lines contributed\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitLab users also care less about the breakdown of languages within a project compared to their peers\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn most cases, those newer to their role thought the features were more important\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggests, \\u2018LoC\\u2019 seems to be of medium importance (or medium un-importance) for Source Code management.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe will need to run interviews to understand more.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggested that there do not seem to be significant differences in the views of managers vs. individual contributors.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eTherefore, we interviewed software developers and also asked them about their manager's perspective.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e8 interviews (7 sw devs, 1 of which is also DevOps engineer / evangelist; 1 prj. mngr (former sw dev))\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe would learn in the interviews what the value of \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn the \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003einterviews\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e we learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17117578ef8_2_21)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e **_per user_** is **NOT** seen as a **good measure for contribution**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome have had **negative experiences** with **metrics to assess performance** (incl. SLoC)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e would be **valuable**. Interviewees see this mostly as **nice to have** though.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eComparing\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e growth of SLoC in **_different directories_** that serve different purposes (application vs. test) is **more interesting than** **comparing growth** in SLoC **_per languages_**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePotentially interesting sub-feature: Using SLoC to **filter by language**: commit lists or repo lists.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eOne use case seems to be around SLoC _per user:_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_I want an easy way to know who has contributed how many LoC to a project_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_so that I can compare their contributions_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) to feel proud of my own work or_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) to track my team members work_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should NOT implement this use case: SLoC _per user_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as it is NOT a good metric.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt might be a nice graph to look at for some, but it will have **negative consequences for a few** as their performance would be evaluated based on their contributed SLoC.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDo literature research to find further evidence of this outcome.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eConsider a blog post that reflects our decision. A good timing would be at the same time when we potentially release something else related to SLoC (see below).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Take this result and create an **opportunity canvas on SLoC _per user _**as a contribution metric **with the recommendation NOT to do it**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014--\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_ or _per language per repo_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e seems to be valuable to help users get a quick understanding of a repo or the health of different modules. The use case seems to be:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_For a given repo or a module (i.e. directory) , that I see for the first time, I want to know lines of code per language,_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) so that I can get a quick sense if it will be easy for me to contribute to it given my skill set_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) so that I can understand if the module is bloated_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThis addresses the needs of individual contributors so it would be part of the **free tier**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Understand the effort to implement this.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014---\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per group_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e was not assessed in this series of interviews with developers as this is likely more relevant for administrators, CIO\\u2019s, directors, etc.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e reach out to 2 or 3 customers that requested this in one of the original issues to understand what they are trying to achieve and to understand how this could be tiered.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eliterature research\u003c/span\u003e**](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#literature)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLiterature supports the interviewee\\u2019s perspective that SLoC is NOT a good metric for measuring contribution.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/div\u003e\\n\\n\\n\\n## Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to have an understanding summarized in a RICE score (see [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing)). \\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to decide if they want to move forward with this idea or drop it. \\n  - Recommendation is not to go ahead with Lines of Code _per developer_\\n  - Recommendation is to do follow-up research on Lines of Code _per directory, per repo, and per group_\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for product design to understand the problem\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for engineering to understand the problem\\n\\n## Research Issue\\n\\n_This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc._\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\\n*This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality.\\nIt is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes.\\nJust like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc.*\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 371038, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 24, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -166060152, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-01-19 14:12:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 10822493, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:28 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2771176, \"title\": \"direction\", \"color\": \"#ad8d43\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for important features that are on our roadmap: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26375975, \"title\": \"type::ignore\", \"color\": \"#808080\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-09 18:12:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-09 19:21:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"When using this type, the issue will be excluded from cross functional planning metrics. This is used for meta, planning, issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111311, \"title\": \"workflow::problem validation\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-21 15:43:10 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Workflow label for validating if the problem is customer relevant. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/#workflow-summary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 584663, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, \\n\\nI started this issue for our problem validation. I made it confidential to not influence our survey as the survey takers may be up-voters on the epic this is linked to. Whether this makes sense to ask the very same people in the survey remains to be discussed - you are the expert. The goal however is to make it non-confidential as soon as we have done the survey. \\n\\nI will add further context in the coming days and then reach out to you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:15:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"cc: @mle\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889892, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, have you been able to send out the survey?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1092650147, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz - we are currently recruiting for the survey to ensure we have enough qualified participants, and will begin inviting them to take the survey later today. Should start seeing responses in the next few days.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10060155, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 14:59:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-09 10:48:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1093134713, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am closing this issue as the validation is done. \\n\\ncc: @mle / @leducmills\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"27977437404f1055ab3f1f3bdab3ac76026c88f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472325391, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10060155, \"username\": \"leducmills\", \"name\": \"Ben Leduc-Mills\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Please rewrite the description of {url} so that readers understand the value and problems to be solved. Also add common \"jobs to be done\" or use cases which should be considered from a usability perspective.","query_id":"26a00445c58e418c9a3b0109773ead9f","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"113414743","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 113414743, \"title\": \"Problem Validation: Report Source Lines of Code (SLoC) per Developer or per Repo/Group\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"project_id\": 278964, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:09:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"description\": \"# Recommendation as a result of the research\\n- Do NOT implement Lines of Code Contributed _per Developer_. There has a potential negative impact.\\n  - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n- Analytics for Lines of Code _per directory, repo, or group_. \\n  - While there are strong hints in this research that suggest this could be of value to users. It seems mostly a nice-to-have feature.\\n     - For details refer to the opportunity canvas or details section below.  \\n  - The [tentative effort estimation to implement SLoC count on the repo level](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9692#tentative-effort-estimation-base-on-first-technical-approach-above) suggests the amount of work is roughly 1.5 dev months. To then offer this on the group level is probably also not expensive. The effort to implement this on the directory level needs to be investigated. \\n\\n\\n\\n### Links\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Expose Lines of Code (SLoC) per Language in Repository Analytics to improve understanding of repo\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wQ8-WbcE5HmYiwWhZFwASWCqAOp-CcUEeeSIJO1ox3M/edit#). Internal only. \\n\\nThe full [research on Source Lines of Code Q3F23](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit?usp=sharing). Internal only. \\n\\n\\n# Details: What we learned researching this space\\n\\n\u003cdiv\u003e\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssumption\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we thought\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we learned\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWhat we think now\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we assumed}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we thought this meant for the solution to this problem}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{What we learned when we tested this assumption}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e{How these learnings relate to our approach/solution}\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe assumed that following three issues are about related/partly identical needs and are highly important due to their popularity:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReport number of lines per language in repository charts\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 568 upvotes; 18 individual commenters + 15 customer asks; also third highest \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epriority score\u003c/span\u003e](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab:safe-intermediate-dashboard/970771/User-Request-Issue-Prioritization---Product)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e for user requested issues in SCM.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eNew contributors graph (lines of code)\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/14875)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 161 upvotes; 25 individual commenters; no customer asks\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eVisualize Language Trends over Time\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e 11 upvotes; 5 customer asks\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDue to the high popularity, we thought the community agrees that GitLab should implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019 and that it would be clear what to implement.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe popularity (both among users and among paying customers) was the reason to pick this topic up.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eReviewing all comments and customer asks on all issues I learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g191e02223c5_0_2)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere are **many dimensions** for which SLoC are requested: per **instance**, per **group**, per **project**, per **user**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePaying customers\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e care more about the **group level**, i.e. counting SLoC across all their repos\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn some cases, it seems unclear if there is a need for reporting SLoC **per language** or **just SLoC**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThere is **little** **detail** to **why** this is helpful nor **how** **often** such metrics would be consulted\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAdditional insights from other sources\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17f2129743e_1_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome customers do NOT want to see data about individuals\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as their workscouncil would object that and would turn off such a feature.\\u00a0\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt seems that there are two fundamental use cases:\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ea) report LoC per user (i.e per each contributor to a project)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eb) report LoC per \\u2018location\\u2019 (i.e. per repo, per group or per instance)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not very clear how important the topic is to the users/customers.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: we should run a survey to assess importance.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt is not clear what they are trying to achieve.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- Conclusion: run interviews to understand the why.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe ask is highly popular AND GitHub has offered this for a long time. It should therefore be a good thing to implement \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eI thought GH addresses all asks vocalized in our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eAssessing \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2019s offering\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#competition)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e I found:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH does **NOT** show **LoC per repo**. (GL also doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows **languages per repo**\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **percent** in the UI (just like GL)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e- in **bytes** in the API (unlike GL which also provides percent)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH also offers the above for the **org-level**, i.e. is across all repos. (GL doesn\\u2019t.)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH shows \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (added/removed) \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eper contributor\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/graphs/contributors?from=2010-03-21\u0026to=2022-11-22\u0026type=a)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e (but **NOT language**).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epopular tool lets users post their \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003epersonal stats\u003c/span\u003e**](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on their \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eprofile page\u003c/span\u003e](https://github.com/mrdoob)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitHub also does not offer everything that users seem to be asking on our issues.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eA reason may be that when they implemented this there was no handy library to report SLoC per language per repo/org.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGH seems to be considering \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eextensive visualizations of source code\u003c/span\u003e](https://githubnext.com/projects/repo-visualization)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e. The feedback on twitter is positive.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIf we were to offer _LoC per user_, this would be a me-too feature. The \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ecomments\u003c/span\u003e](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800#note_293348432)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e on the issue suggest that the need is largely driven by the fact that GitHub has had this for a long time and developers consider it as something a source code management platform would normally have.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should survey a broad spectrum of users as the issues suggested that commenters also came from different backgrounds but still all seemed to care about the topic \\u2018LoC\\u2019.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe asked a total of \u003c/span\u003e[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e118 users: 64 sw dev; 15 dev team leads; 10 DevOps; etc.\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g139bca1b89a_0_1059)\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe thought \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be highly popular, given that the issues are so popular.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n[\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003esurvey\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g18dae5a6a9c_0_0)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eCompared to users of other tools, users of GitLab seem to care less about seeing the number of lines contributed\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eGitLab users also care less about the breakdown of languages within a project compared to their peers\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn most cases, those newer to their role thought the features were more important\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggests, \\u2018LoC\\u2019 seems to be of medium importance (or medium un-importance) for Source Code management.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe will need to run interviews to understand more.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe survey suggested that there do not seem to be significant differences in the views of managers vs. individual contributors.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eTherefore, we interviewed software developers and also asked them about their manager's perspective.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e8 interviews (7 sw devs, 1 of which is also DevOps engineer / evangelist; 1 prj. mngr (former sw dev))\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe would learn in the interviews what the value of \\u2018LoC\\u2019 would be.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIn the \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003einterviews\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e we learned\u003c/span\u003e](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xm1eVhwHIMEHA851jIqfhQEHRgAA7PFJ4i2LNdkolp0/edit#slide=id.g17117578ef8_2_21)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e **_per user_** is **NOT** seen as a **good measure for contribution**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSome have had **negative experiences** with **metrics to assess performance** (incl. SLoC)\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e would be **valuable**. Interviewees see this mostly as **nice to have** though.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eComparing\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e growth of SLoC in **_different directories_** that serve different purposes (application vs. test) is **more interesting than** **comparing growth** in SLoC **_per languages_**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003ePotentially interesting sub-feature: Using SLoC to **filter by language**: commit lists or repo lists.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eOne use case seems to be around SLoC _per user:_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_I want an easy way to know who has contributed how many LoC to a project_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_so that I can compare their contributions_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) to feel proud of my own work or_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) to track my team members work_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eWe should NOT implement this use case: SLoC _per user_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e as it is NOT a good metric.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eIt might be a nice graph to look at for some, but it will have **negative consequences for a few** as their performance would be evaluated based on their contributed SLoC.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eDo literature research to find further evidence of this outcome.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eConsider a blog post that reflects our decision. A good timing would be at the same time when we potentially release something else related to SLoC (see below).\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Take this result and create an **opportunity canvas on SLoC _per user _**as a contribution metric **with the recommendation NOT to do it**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014--\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per directory_ or _per language per repo_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e seems to be valuable to help users get a quick understanding of a repo or the health of different modules. The use case seems to be:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_For a given repo or a module (i.e. directory) , that I see for the first time, I want to know lines of code per language,_\u003c/span\u003e\\u00a0\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_a) so that I can get a quick sense if it will be easy for me to contribute to it given my skill set_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e_b) so that I can understand if the module is bloated_\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThis addresses the needs of individual contributors so it would be part of the **free tier**.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e Understand the effort to implement this.\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\u2014---\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eSLoC _per group_\u003c/span\u003e**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e was not assessed in this series of interviews with developers as this is likely more relevant for administrators, CIO\\u2019s, directors, etc.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e-\u003e reach out to 2 or 3 customers that requested this in one of the original issues to understand what they are trying to achieve and to understand how this could be tiered.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eThe \u003c/span\u003e[**\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eliterature research\u003c/span\u003e**](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/371465#literature)\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e showed:\u003c/span\u003e\\n\\n\u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003eLiterature supports the interviewee\\u2019s perspective that SLoC is NOT a good metric for measuring contribution.\\u00a0\u003c/span\u003e\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/div\u003e\\n\\n\\n\\n## Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to have an understanding summarized in a RICE score (see [Opportunity Canvas \\\"Contribution Metrics based on Lines of Code (SLoC) Contributed per Developer\\\"](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lV4GB1tE9e52sotyHj61CAjTXwowCq1IyXBUS5P8xS8/edit?usp=sharing)). \\n- [x] The problem is well understood by the PM to decide if they want to move forward with this idea or drop it. \\n  - Recommendation is not to go ahead with Lines of Code _per developer_\\n  - Recommendation is to do follow-up research on Lines of Code _per directory, per repo, and per group_\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for product design to understand the problem\\n- [x] N/A: The problem is well described and detailed with necessary requirements for engineering to understand the problem\\n\\n## Research Issue\\n\\n_This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc._\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\\n*This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and functionality.\\nIt is important to note that the information presented is for informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for purchasing or planning purposes.\\nJust like with all projects, the items mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development, release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the sole discretion of GitLab Inc.*\\n\u003c!-- triage-serverless v3 PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION --\u003e\", \"milestone_id\": 490705, \"iid\": 371038, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"weight\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"moved_to_id\": null, \"due_date\": null, \"lock_version\": 24, \"time_estimate\": 0, \"relative_position\": -166060152, \"service_desk_reply_to\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-01-19 14:12:21 UTC\", \"last_edited_by_id\": 10822493, \"discussion_locked\": null, \"closed_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:28 UTC\", \"closed_by_id\": 10822493, \"state_id\": 2, \"duplicated_to_id\": null, \"promoted_to_epic_id\": null, \"health_status\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"sprint_id\": null, \"blocking_issues_count\": 0, \"upvotes_count\": 0, \"work_item_type_id\": 1, \"namespace_id\": 15846663, \"start_date\": null}, \"author\": {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 11469047, \"title\": \"Category:Source Code Management\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-07-25 19:15:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-08-27 17:08:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Category vision in Create stage: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/687\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2677574, \"title\": \"auto updated\", \"color\": \"#FFECDB\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-09-19 02:09:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-02 11:05:59 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that have been updated in accordance with our issue triage policies (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3103452, \"title\": \"devops::create\", \"color\": \"#E44D2A\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-01 19:01:03 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-07-04 07:09:55 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. Source Code Management, Design Management, Web IDE, Code Review, Gitter)\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2771176, \"title\": \"direction\", \"color\": \"#ad8d43\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2017-10-04 13:38:26 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues for important features that are on our roadmap: https://about.gitlab.com/direction/\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 10309854, \"title\": \"group::source code\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-04-17 13:57:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2019-05-23 09:26:35 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Source Code group of the Create stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/#source-code-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 14918378, \"title\": \"section::dev\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-05-11 22:11:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Dev section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 26375975, \"title\": \"type::ignore\", \"color\": \"#808080\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-09 18:12:49 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-09 19:21:21 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"When using this type, the issue will be excluded from cross functional planning metrics. This is used for meta, planning, issues.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 11111311, \"title\": \"workflow::problem validation\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-06-26 11:39:07 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-08-21 15:43:10 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Workflow label for validating if the problem is customer relevant. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development-flow/#workflow-summary\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"epic_id\": 584663, \"milestone\": {\"id\": 490705, \"title\": \"Backlog\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"Issues that we want to do but are not planned right now. Open for contribution from the community.\", \"due_date\": null, \"created_at\": \"2018-03-22 13:09:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-10-30 14:56:54 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 14, \"start_date\": null, \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"iteration\": null, \"iterations_cadence\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, \\n\\nI started this issue for our problem validation. I made it confidential to not influence our survey as the survey takers may be up-voters on the epic this is linked to. Whether this makes sense to ask the very same people in the survey remains to be discussed - you are the expert. The goal however is to make it non-confidential as soon as we have done the survey. \\n\\nI will add further context in the coming days and then reach out to you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:15:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889592, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"cc: @mle\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-08-17 16:16:14 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1067889892, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @leducmills, have you been able to send out the survey?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-08 10:32:35 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1092650147, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz - we are currently recruiting for the survey to ensure we have enough qualified participants, and will begin inviting them to take the survey later today. Should start seeing responses in the next few days.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10060155, \"created_at\": \"2022-09-08 14:59:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-09 10:48:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"43ad8176d0157577ab804ee9e97aa21c66222620\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1093134713, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I am closing this issue as the validation is done. \\n\\ncc: @mle / @leducmills\", \"noteable_type\": \"Issue\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-17 13:55:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": 278964, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 113414743, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"27977437404f1055ab3f1f3bdab3ac76026c88f7\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1472325391, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10060155, \"username\": \"leducmills\", \"name\": \"Ben Leduc-Mills\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}, {\"id\": 278964, \"name\": \"GitLab\", \"path\": \"gitlab\", \"type\": \"Project\", \"project_namespace_id\": 15846663}]}","query":"Are there any open questions relating to this issue? {url}","query_id":"cf321299d430462487b608aabb14272b","resource_type":"issue"}
+{"resource_id":"822061","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 822061, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3796140, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10550, \"updated_by_id\": 367626, \"last_edited_by_id\": 367626, \"lock_version\": 64, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-07-31\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 22:05:32 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:27:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:17 UTC\", \"title\": \"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\", \"description\": \"This epic tracks the work to bring the [GitLab Duo Chat](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/ai_features.html#gitlab-duo-chat) system to Beta. This includes the backend where the heavy lifting is done and the WebUI frontend.\\n\\n**While this epic does NOT include the **[**Chat in VS Code and Web IDE**](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\")** work, it needs to build the backend in such a way that it can support clients other than the WebUI - specifically IDEs**. It must consider that the IDEs may not have the same context as the WebUI. For instance, an IDE may not know the URL of the code file the user is looking at, as the user might have just created it locally. Also the file may have changed on the client. The maturation of the Chat in VS Code and Web IDE is independent of the chat system maturation.\\n\\n:movie_camera: [Video Walk-through of this epic](https://youtu.be/T645Ppm8oQ0)\\n\\n## Overall Scope\\n\\n### Functional scope\\n\\n* [x] Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding [Web IDE](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\"))\\n* [ ] Chat answers questions relating to\\n  * [x] code the user sees (explain \\\"this\\\")\\n  * [x] code referenced (with URL)\\n  * [x] issue the user sees\\n  * [x] issue referenced\\n  * [x] epic the user sees\\n  * [x] epic referenced\\n  * [ ] ~~MR the user sees~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] ~~MR referenced~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [x] how to use GitLab\\n  * [x] recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n  * [ ] ~~selections (if something is selected e.g. code in the code file, this is added to the context so the chat can answer questions about the selection)~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] dummy tools exist that proof the agent can support many more use cases (pipeline context, global issues/epics/code contexts)\\n* [ ] If context is not available, [chat responds with its supported contexts](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801 \\\"Self-discoverable capabilities of the chat via responses of the chat itself - e.g. I can't answer this questions but I can answer questions that are about the code you are looking at...\\\").\\n* [x] User can give feedback on their satisfaction with the answers and these answers are analyzed to inform potential prompt engineering tweaks.\\n\\n### Non-functional scope\\n\\n* [x] **By design: The tools and the agent(s) must never share context that the user does not have access to.**\\n* [ ] The quality bar for what success means ([see below](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#what-does-success-mean \\\"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\\\")) is defined, tested and passed\\n* [ ] [Perceived speed of answers is at least o.k](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683). from user perspective and there are ideas how to improve it to good.\\n  * [x] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n  * [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n* [ ] Errors are tracked.\\n\\nOne of these two options. Still TBD:\\n\\n* [ ] Works in the main product for Ultimate users that have toggled the right switches in the settings.\\n* [ ] **Access to the Chat is granted if the user has paid the add-on.** The project or the tier of the project's namespace does not matter. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n  * [ ] During the pre-GA phase or pre-addon phase, all SaaS users that are at least in one Ultimate tier, do have access to the chat. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n\\n## What does success mean?\\n\\nGenerally\\n\\n* AI answers should be _mostly_ correct, helpful and friendly.\\n* If the AI does not know it should _mostly_ say that is does not know.\\n\\n#### How to measure it?\\n\\n~~We shall consider the experience Beta-ready once we have achieved the following:~~\\n\\nWe shall consider the experience satisfactory once we have achieved the following:\\n\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003e80% of responses `good` or `excellent`\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003c5% of responses `terrible`\\n\\n(on a 5 point scale: `terrible`, `poor`, `average`, `good`, `excellent`)\\n\\nSee [details why we opted for this quality bar](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gitlab-OKRs/-/work_items/3555#note_1541945461 \\\"KR2: GitLab Duo Chat becomes available in beta, including six \\u201cspecialized tools\\u201d that are also in beta, with a path to general availability in FY24Q4.\\\").\\n\\n[This user satisfaction will be assessed by UXR roughly every two to three weeks](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513 \\\"Repeated analysis of user experience with Duo chat as we continuously improve the chat (also considering the outcome of each round of these user tests.)\\\"). Check the [bottom of our AI Features Dashboard](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/1137231/Ai-Features) for these metrics and how they progress toward the goal.\\n\\n## Work items (remaining as of mid August)\\n\\n#### Understand in more detail the problem space and how well we address user needs (mostly UXR and Product analytics)\\n\\n**Outcomes**: More clear understanding of users expectations and which problems they want to solve interactively with the chat.\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11120+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1325+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415591+\\n\\n#### Addressing functional gaps \u0026 UX issues\\n\\n**Outcomes**: better user experience measurable in better scores in user testing\\n\\n- ~~MR context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430+s~~ (removed from beta scope; see [reason](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430#note_1545114583))\\n- Epic context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422091+s\\n- Support selected text: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422176+s\\n- Streaming: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683+s\\n- Dummy contexts: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422187+s\\n- Self-discoverable capabilities: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801+s\\n- [Collection of UX issues to be addressed](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10673 \\\"Chat Integration iteration 1 FE \u0026 BE\\\"). Such as:\\n  - new conversation\\n  - sync chat across clients\\n  - onboarding\\n  - expiration time for response\\n  - Error messages\\n  - feedback mechanism\\n  - ~~Global entry point for chat should be enabled for beta release but should not be enabled before we reach our quality target.~~ [Global entry point for chat will only be turned on when we reach the quality target defined above independent of the beta release](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2465#note_1577201457). \\n- **Continuously test user satisfaction with UXR and respond to their feedback**\\n\\n#### Developing a testing framework\\n\\n**Outcomes**: enabling efficient development and efficient contribution\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422212+s\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422245+s\\n\\n#### Monitoring quality / stability / speed / cost\\n\\n**Outcomes**: more trust production readiness of the chat\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11234+\\n  - Cost: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415944+s / https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1358+s\\n  - Error rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s tracks the error rate on individual 3rd party AI requests as well as error rate from the user perspective as responding to their request might require combining multiple 3rd party AI requests. @jprovaznik's assumes there are no errors beyond the 3rd party LLM service that would need to be considered (for instance between the backend and the client). The user level error rate calculation will interpret slow responses \\\\\u003e20 sec to be errors. The error rates will be tracked in Grafana.\\n  - Response time: \u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\\\~\\\\~\u003c/span\u003e https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1366+\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~ Will be tracked in Prometheus on the worker level as part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s by @jprovaznik. These measurements will include the time for all AI requests necessary to answer the user question but not the time to receive the user input from the frontend and sending the result back to the frontend. The difference should be marginal.\\n  - \\\"Can't answer\\\" rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422202+s\\n\\n#### Other work items\\n\\n- [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420939+s (switch embeddings provider)\\n- [ ] Mature the chat documentation and bring it to its own page.\\n- [ ] Label the Chat as beta in the product and in the documentation. \\n\\n#### Integrate existing stand-alone AI features ???\\n\\n- Should we integrate existing standalone AI features like _explain this code_ into the chat prior to the Beta release?\\n- We should only do so if they reach the quality bar defined above.\\n- What interdependencies are there with company announcements?\\n\\n# What the user can ask\\n\\n### Questions related to current code\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nCan you explain the code? (Whole file or selected) Explain the selected code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you explain function X? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite me tests for function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWhat is the complexity of the code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would the code look like in Python? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would you refactor the code? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you fix the bug in my code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate an example of how to use function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite documentation for the selected code | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770#note_1597887855) | \\nCreate a function to validate an e-mail address | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a tic tac toe game in Javascript | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a function in Python to call the spotify API to get my playlists | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\n\\n### Questions related to the current issue or current epic\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nPlease summarize the issue | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize with bullet points | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nCan you list all the labels? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nHow old is the epic? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597974580) | \\nFor which milestone is the issue? And how long until then? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize the comments into bullet points? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/31d608f706ac72533502736939cdfe9c077c9975/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L142) | \\nQuestions on the actual content: \\\"What should be the final solution for this issue?\\\" | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1613052031) | \\n\\n### Questions relating to the current MR\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nWhat is this MR about? | | \\nCan you review this MR? | | \\nCan you create a test for the new function in this MR? | | \\nCan you simplify this code? | | \\n\\n### Questions relating how to use GitLab\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nHow do I change my password in GitLab? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I fork a project? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I clone a repository? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I create a template? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nWhat is DevOps? What is DevSecOps? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597971516) | \\n\\n### Follow-up questions\\n\\n#### Basic follow-up question that only require the last answer as context\\n\\n- Can you simplify your answer?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is simplified\\n  - Tool test: [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L167-218)\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you translate your answer to German?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is translated\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you explain your third point in different words?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer contains a bulleted or numbered list (because that was the assignment of the previous question).\\n  - Result: the third point of the last answer is explained with different words.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require the last answer + the context that was pulled for creating the last answer\\n\\n- Iterative in depth analysis of an issue\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Example:\\n    - User is on: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800\\n    - User asks: Can you identify the unique use cases the commenters have raised on this issue?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith bulleted or numbered list of use cases\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n    - User asks: Can you sort this list by the number of users that have requested the use case and include the number for each use case? Can you include a verbatim for the two most requested use cases that reflect the general opinion of commenters for these two use cases?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith sorted list that contains the number of users that asked for each use case and two verbatim\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n- Can you expand on the last paragraph?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n- Can you detail the purpose of the code-owner class?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require multiple recent answers + multiple contexts that were pulled for creating the last answer (NOT PART OF BETA)\\n\\n- Comparison of two issues\\n  - Example\\n    - History: continued from above big example \\\"Iterative in depth analysis of an issue \\\"\\n    - User switched to: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104\\n    - User asks: How are the use cases raised in this issue different or the same?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context for 12104\u003e`\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool to get context for 17800 but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith two list: one with similarities and one with differences\u003e`\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Questions that the user did not formulate clear enough should result in a question from the AI to clarify the question\\n\\n- User: `How do I create a template?`\\n  - Although this question seems to be reasonable, it's not clear what kind of template is meant. I think the only solution for such questions is to have a means for the AI to ask a clarifying question, for example the following\\n- Bot: `The term template is used widely in the context. Could you be more specific which kind of template you would like to create?`\\n- Tool test:\\n- Quality test: \\n\\n## What will not be supported\\n\\n* We will not support other languages than English. That does not mean it won't work, but it will not have been tested at all. We made this decision to prevent a significant increase in complexity.\\n* We will not support comparing and relating different contexts to another. E.g. what is the difference between this issue and issue xyz. This is GA scope.\\n* We will not support global contexts for repos / issues / epics / etc. This may be covered before GA though.\\n\\n## Marketing\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/brand-product-marketing/product-marketing/-/issues/7274+s\\n\\n## Related\\n\\n* [Research work prioritization for the GitLab Chat in Q2 FY24](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2501#note_1421246798 \\\"Research Prioritization for Fulfillment, ModelOps, and Analytics - Q2FY24\\\")\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2604#note_1515310932\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423325+s\\n\\n## Literature\\n\\n(some random links)\\n\\n* Research result: [Questions users want to ask](https://gitlab.dovetailapp.com/projects/6wL9UBVQCbOpaC6WLu22su/v/ukXfzRL2lbYwiKe5Bbdyu/present/1WktHKngt2oO4NpHzBEf9I)\\n* [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools)\\n* https://www.honeycomb.io/blog/hard-stuff-nobody-talks-about-llm\\n* https://newrelic.com/platform/new-relic-grok\\n* https://twitter.com/amanrsanger/status/1660729100137553920\\n* Test framework for code suggestions: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415381+\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": \"2023-07-31\", \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": true, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 785400, \"relative_position\": -12825, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 853405, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 834262, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 17, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 11, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 57, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 80}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 30251403, \"title\": \"AI-Priority\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31167182, \"title\": \"Category:Duo Chat\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 04:14:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-14 17:02:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI Framework category, formerly named Category:GitLab Duo Chat\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 30402137, \"title\": \"Copilot-X-Compete\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": null, \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3207279, \"title\": \"GitLab Ultimate\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-22 09:43:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-01-30 19:53:24 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Features or changes limited or intended as part of GitLab Ultimate.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287867, \"title\": \"devops::ai-powered\", \"color\": \"#e44d2a\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 17:56:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI-powered stage part of the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287876, \"title\": \"group::duo chat\", \"color\": \"#a8d695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 18:01:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:45:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Duo Chat group, part of the AI-powered stage within the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 23545476, \"title\": \"section::data-science\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-01-27 10:11:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-17 00:09:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Data Science section including ModelOps and Anti-Abuse Stages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Thanks @tlinz , just also understanding \\ndoes this impact timelines on the work for Testing and Evaluation cc @oregand as well\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5749302, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6569137e475e099a705317777294fe726092f0ae\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1604836294, \"namespace_id\": 9970}, {\"note\": \"cc @alasch this is interesting external research for the work you're doing on code suggestions\\n\\ncc @NickHertz this is interesting in general for your work on AI features\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437012648, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI UX is working on some guidance about how we move a feature from experiment -\u003e beta -\u003e GA: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/408400\\n\\ncc @jmandell @pedroms\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1390824408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@timzallmann @m_gill @katiemacoy This is the epic where we will add issues and scope the work required to bring the GitLab Chat Bot to beta. I wrote some initial thoughts in the description that can change. \\n\\nThis epic is going to be tracked by leadership so we want the scope of work to be crisp (that is my job) but I need your help with the team to make sure that we have the right sub-epics/issues.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1387614045, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@katiemacoy @sarahwaldner I think:\\n- We must run the UI through solution validation (at least 5 internal participants).\\n- We should track the scoring during the research assuming we'll move forward with that concept.\\n- We should write a clear statement about how confident we are about understanding the problem we're solving for our users.\\n    - It would be really nice to have a sentence or two that explains where this confidence is being derived from.\\n\\n@pedroms what do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5291762, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391203190, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jmandell I think that list is perfectly reasonable and well-scoped to where we are right now!\\n\\nEngineering and I are still trying to figure out technically how we slice and dice this feature. @katiemacoy we will keep you clued in with us in lock step. Previously we had been thinking that we would add each use case one at a time, but it looks like we are actually going to add multiple at a time by enabling different models. This is good news :) Just means I am still a bit unsure how we scope the epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:39:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 22:14:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391220604, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@m_gill This is a great plan. @tlinz What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393133970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I like this proposal. Here are some thoughts. \\n\\n* We should probably add capabilities to collect feedback\\n* In today's demo I got the impression that it may not be easy to create something that can generically catch the context that the user sees. Which is what I had understood the Universal Object access tool would do. I have to discuss this with @timzallmann to understand it better. \\n* We could reduce the scope of VectorQARetrieval tool to documentation only for the beta release and have ask a question about this repo be done by the SCM team if we find that distribution of work could scale well. \\n* Are you saying the WebIDE chat extension is part of Beta or just the API that would enable that, @m_gill. In the spirit of keeping work pieces small I would keep it out of scope and create a separate issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393965447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner from a development perspective, this is what I see as Beta:\\n- [In progress] Ability to switch tooling (IE: A prompt comes in, and we detect where it gets routed)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/121122+ \\n- 2 tools are available to switch to, and respond in a Beta fashion based on the prompts they support:\\n  - [In progress] Universal Object access tool (Explain this block of code, Write tests for this block of code)\\n  - VectorQARetrieval Tool (Answer this question from our documentation, Ask a question about this repository)\\n    - [In progress] Embeddings will be needed https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10616+ \\n- Documentation to reflect how other teams can contribute new tooling\\n  - Teams are unblocked at this point\\n- API for Chat Interface, which will be used for integrations such as IDE extensions (Integrated with toggle support)\\n- System prompt is in place to enforce guardrails on what the Chat can and cannot answer\\n- Moderation is in place to prevent offensive prompts/responses \\n  - Not part of this MVC - \\u201cReport answers as offensive\\u201d functionality\\n- [In progress] Basic UI\\n- [In progress] Memory, across sessions (switching pages or devices)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/410521+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 13:19:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4554599, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1392312276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz just the API that would enable that. I'm aligned with [this larger plan](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10219#note_1393118339), where WebIDE chat should be Phase 2, but still done within the quarter.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:37:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 02:30:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1394009327, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1232+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"04389db4e66ed66a332464009e3f04dfc3c5ecef\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1420511785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, \\n\\n\u003e \u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\n\u003e Does this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nSorry that was not precise. I will change it to: Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding the WebIDE)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422449304, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz :wave_tone1: \\n\\nIn the description under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) the first bullet point is:\\n\\n\u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\nDoes this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nAdditionally, also under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) I see that the first iteration will enable:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nPlease separate this out into it's own section called **Use Cases that will be enabled** and word these statements using the terms that leadership had been referring to them as. The goal is for someone to be able to look at this epic and immediately understand that in the first iteration the following features will be possible:\\n\\n1. Explain this code\\n2. Ask questions about an issue = \u003e _This is new. Please explain what this is since this has not been a feature that we have been broadly discussing for the last couple months_\\n3. Conversational Chat\\n4. Ask questions of docs\\n\\nFinally, marketing needs a 2 week aheads up (to the best of your ability) prior to the release of the first iteration. \\n\\ncc @timzallmann @m_gill\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 15:14:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422263279, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, I think we need to educate the leadership that the scope of what we aim to deliver is much larger than bringing our \\\"legacy\\\" AI experiments together in one place. \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422462628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner and @laurenaalves, I think we are probably less than 2 weeks away from a releasable first iteration. @timzallmann can confirm. In fact, we hope that we can have something demoable today or tomorrow, so we can understand how well it works and what is missing for a releasable functionality. I also have requests from @cherryhan to create something that we can demo to a large prospect on Wednesday as we might not win them if we can't show AI capabilities that go beyond code suggestions. \\n\\n@laurenaalves, once we have that first prototype working we will share it with you. I can work on a blog post. What else do you need from me? Please, check out\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:34:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422486037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz \\n\\n\u003e \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\\n\\nYes I saw that screenshot however in the description of this epic you specifically list these use cases:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nHow should I be interpreting the description? \\n\\nPlease make sure that the start/end dates on the [first iteration epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675) show that this will release in ~2 weeks. Right now the end date is June 9th. Thank you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3796140, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422558431, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675#note_1432658681\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432659564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for sharing! This was an interesting read and can help put our own learnings into perspective.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 7351507, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437568945, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @katiemacoy and others, here is an interesting research that touches on [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools) and also on [Trust in accuracy](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-trust-in-the-accuracy-of-ai-output).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:38:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 15:02:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432665862, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 5749302, \"username\": \"mray2020\", \"name\": \"Mon Ray\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 5291762, \"username\": \"jmandell\", \"name\": \"Justin Mandell\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 7351507, \"username\": \"alasch\", \"name\": \"Anne Lasch\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Summarize the comments into bullet points?","query_id":"c9253de673854dac8c21be3baeed58b2","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"822061","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 822061, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3796140, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10550, \"updated_by_id\": 367626, \"last_edited_by_id\": 367626, \"lock_version\": 64, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-07-31\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 22:05:32 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:27:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:17 UTC\", \"title\": \"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\", \"description\": \"This epic tracks the work to bring the [GitLab Duo Chat](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/ai_features.html#gitlab-duo-chat) system to Beta. This includes the backend where the heavy lifting is done and the WebUI frontend.\\n\\n**While this epic does NOT include the **[**Chat in VS Code and Web IDE**](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\")** work, it needs to build the backend in such a way that it can support clients other than the WebUI - specifically IDEs**. It must consider that the IDEs may not have the same context as the WebUI. For instance, an IDE may not know the URL of the code file the user is looking at, as the user might have just created it locally. Also the file may have changed on the client. The maturation of the Chat in VS Code and Web IDE is independent of the chat system maturation.\\n\\n:movie_camera: [Video Walk-through of this epic](https://youtu.be/T645Ppm8oQ0)\\n\\n## Overall Scope\\n\\n### Functional scope\\n\\n* [x] Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding [Web IDE](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\"))\\n* [ ] Chat answers questions relating to\\n  * [x] code the user sees (explain \\\"this\\\")\\n  * [x] code referenced (with URL)\\n  * [x] issue the user sees\\n  * [x] issue referenced\\n  * [x] epic the user sees\\n  * [x] epic referenced\\n  * [ ] ~~MR the user sees~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] ~~MR referenced~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [x] how to use GitLab\\n  * [x] recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n  * [ ] ~~selections (if something is selected e.g. code in the code file, this is added to the context so the chat can answer questions about the selection)~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] dummy tools exist that proof the agent can support many more use cases (pipeline context, global issues/epics/code contexts)\\n* [ ] If context is not available, [chat responds with its supported contexts](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801 \\\"Self-discoverable capabilities of the chat via responses of the chat itself - e.g. I can't answer this questions but I can answer questions that are about the code you are looking at...\\\").\\n* [x] User can give feedback on their satisfaction with the answers and these answers are analyzed to inform potential prompt engineering tweaks.\\n\\n### Non-functional scope\\n\\n* [x] **By design: The tools and the agent(s) must never share context that the user does not have access to.**\\n* [ ] The quality bar for what success means ([see below](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#what-does-success-mean \\\"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\\\")) is defined, tested and passed\\n* [ ] [Perceived speed of answers is at least o.k](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683). from user perspective and there are ideas how to improve it to good.\\n  * [x] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n  * [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n* [ ] Errors are tracked.\\n\\nOne of these two options. Still TBD:\\n\\n* [ ] Works in the main product for Ultimate users that have toggled the right switches in the settings.\\n* [ ] **Access to the Chat is granted if the user has paid the add-on.** The project or the tier of the project's namespace does not matter. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n  * [ ] During the pre-GA phase or pre-addon phase, all SaaS users that are at least in one Ultimate tier, do have access to the chat. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n\\n## What does success mean?\\n\\nGenerally\\n\\n* AI answers should be _mostly_ correct, helpful and friendly.\\n* If the AI does not know it should _mostly_ say that is does not know.\\n\\n#### How to measure it?\\n\\n~~We shall consider the experience Beta-ready once we have achieved the following:~~\\n\\nWe shall consider the experience satisfactory once we have achieved the following:\\n\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003e80% of responses `good` or `excellent`\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003c5% of responses `terrible`\\n\\n(on a 5 point scale: `terrible`, `poor`, `average`, `good`, `excellent`)\\n\\nSee [details why we opted for this quality bar](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gitlab-OKRs/-/work_items/3555#note_1541945461 \\\"KR2: GitLab Duo Chat becomes available in beta, including six \\u201cspecialized tools\\u201d that are also in beta, with a path to general availability in FY24Q4.\\\").\\n\\n[This user satisfaction will be assessed by UXR roughly every two to three weeks](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513 \\\"Repeated analysis of user experience with Duo chat as we continuously improve the chat (also considering the outcome of each round of these user tests.)\\\"). Check the [bottom of our AI Features Dashboard](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/1137231/Ai-Features) for these metrics and how they progress toward the goal.\\n\\n## Work items (remaining as of mid August)\\n\\n#### Understand in more detail the problem space and how well we address user needs (mostly UXR and Product analytics)\\n\\n**Outcomes**: More clear understanding of users expectations and which problems they want to solve interactively with the chat.\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11120+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1325+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415591+\\n\\n#### Addressing functional gaps \u0026 UX issues\\n\\n**Outcomes**: better user experience measurable in better scores in user testing\\n\\n- ~~MR context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430+s~~ (removed from beta scope; see [reason](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430#note_1545114583))\\n- Epic context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422091+s\\n- Support selected text: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422176+s\\n- Streaming: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683+s\\n- Dummy contexts: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422187+s\\n- Self-discoverable capabilities: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801+s\\n- [Collection of UX issues to be addressed](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10673 \\\"Chat Integration iteration 1 FE \u0026 BE\\\"). Such as:\\n  - new conversation\\n  - sync chat across clients\\n  - onboarding\\n  - expiration time for response\\n  - Error messages\\n  - feedback mechanism\\n  - ~~Global entry point for chat should be enabled for beta release but should not be enabled before we reach our quality target.~~ [Global entry point for chat will only be turned on when we reach the quality target defined above independent of the beta release](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2465#note_1577201457). \\n- **Continuously test user satisfaction with UXR and respond to their feedback**\\n\\n#### Developing a testing framework\\n\\n**Outcomes**: enabling efficient development and efficient contribution\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422212+s\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422245+s\\n\\n#### Monitoring quality / stability / speed / cost\\n\\n**Outcomes**: more trust production readiness of the chat\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11234+\\n  - Cost: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415944+s / https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1358+s\\n  - Error rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s tracks the error rate on individual 3rd party AI requests as well as error rate from the user perspective as responding to their request might require combining multiple 3rd party AI requests. @jprovaznik's assumes there are no errors beyond the 3rd party LLM service that would need to be considered (for instance between the backend and the client). The user level error rate calculation will interpret slow responses \\\\\u003e20 sec to be errors. The error rates will be tracked in Grafana.\\n  - Response time: \u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\\\~\\\\~\u003c/span\u003e https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1366+\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~ Will be tracked in Prometheus on the worker level as part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s by @jprovaznik. These measurements will include the time for all AI requests necessary to answer the user question but not the time to receive the user input from the frontend and sending the result back to the frontend. The difference should be marginal.\\n  - \\\"Can't answer\\\" rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422202+s\\n\\n#### Other work items\\n\\n- [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420939+s (switch embeddings provider)\\n- [ ] Mature the chat documentation and bring it to its own page.\\n- [ ] Label the Chat as beta in the product and in the documentation. \\n\\n#### Integrate existing stand-alone AI features ???\\n\\n- Should we integrate existing standalone AI features like _explain this code_ into the chat prior to the Beta release?\\n- We should only do so if they reach the quality bar defined above.\\n- What interdependencies are there with company announcements?\\n\\n# What the user can ask\\n\\n### Questions related to current code\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nCan you explain the code? (Whole file or selected) Explain the selected code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you explain function X? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite me tests for function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWhat is the complexity of the code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would the code look like in Python? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would you refactor the code? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you fix the bug in my code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate an example of how to use function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite documentation for the selected code | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770#note_1597887855) | \\nCreate a function to validate an e-mail address | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a tic tac toe game in Javascript | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a function in Python to call the spotify API to get my playlists | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\n\\n### Questions related to the current issue or current epic\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nPlease summarize the issue | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize with bullet points | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nCan you list all the labels? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nHow old is the epic? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597974580) | \\nFor which milestone is the issue? And how long until then? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize the comments into bullet points? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/31d608f706ac72533502736939cdfe9c077c9975/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L142) | \\nQuestions on the actual content: \\\"What should be the final solution for this issue?\\\" | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1613052031) | \\n\\n### Questions relating to the current MR\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nWhat is this MR about? | | \\nCan you review this MR? | | \\nCan you create a test for the new function in this MR? | | \\nCan you simplify this code? | | \\n\\n### Questions relating how to use GitLab\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nHow do I change my password in GitLab? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I fork a project? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I clone a repository? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I create a template? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nWhat is DevOps? What is DevSecOps? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597971516) | \\n\\n### Follow-up questions\\n\\n#### Basic follow-up question that only require the last answer as context\\n\\n- Can you simplify your answer?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is simplified\\n  - Tool test: [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L167-218)\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you translate your answer to German?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is translated\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you explain your third point in different words?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer contains a bulleted or numbered list (because that was the assignment of the previous question).\\n  - Result: the third point of the last answer is explained with different words.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require the last answer + the context that was pulled for creating the last answer\\n\\n- Iterative in depth analysis of an issue\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Example:\\n    - User is on: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800\\n    - User asks: Can you identify the unique use cases the commenters have raised on this issue?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith bulleted or numbered list of use cases\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n    - User asks: Can you sort this list by the number of users that have requested the use case and include the number for each use case? Can you include a verbatim for the two most requested use cases that reflect the general opinion of commenters for these two use cases?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith sorted list that contains the number of users that asked for each use case and two verbatim\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n- Can you expand on the last paragraph?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n- Can you detail the purpose of the code-owner class?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require multiple recent answers + multiple contexts that were pulled for creating the last answer (NOT PART OF BETA)\\n\\n- Comparison of two issues\\n  - Example\\n    - History: continued from above big example \\\"Iterative in depth analysis of an issue \\\"\\n    - User switched to: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104\\n    - User asks: How are the use cases raised in this issue different or the same?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context for 12104\u003e`\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool to get context for 17800 but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith two list: one with similarities and one with differences\u003e`\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Questions that the user did not formulate clear enough should result in a question from the AI to clarify the question\\n\\n- User: `How do I create a template?`\\n  - Although this question seems to be reasonable, it's not clear what kind of template is meant. I think the only solution for such questions is to have a means for the AI to ask a clarifying question, for example the following\\n- Bot: `The term template is used widely in the context. Could you be more specific which kind of template you would like to create?`\\n- Tool test:\\n- Quality test: \\n\\n## What will not be supported\\n\\n* We will not support other languages than English. That does not mean it won't work, but it will not have been tested at all. We made this decision to prevent a significant increase in complexity.\\n* We will not support comparing and relating different contexts to another. E.g. what is the difference between this issue and issue xyz. This is GA scope.\\n* We will not support global contexts for repos / issues / epics / etc. This may be covered before GA though.\\n\\n## Marketing\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/brand-product-marketing/product-marketing/-/issues/7274+s\\n\\n## Related\\n\\n* [Research work prioritization for the GitLab Chat in Q2 FY24](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2501#note_1421246798 \\\"Research Prioritization for Fulfillment, ModelOps, and Analytics - Q2FY24\\\")\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2604#note_1515310932\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423325+s\\n\\n## Literature\\n\\n(some random links)\\n\\n* Research result: [Questions users want to ask](https://gitlab.dovetailapp.com/projects/6wL9UBVQCbOpaC6WLu22su/v/ukXfzRL2lbYwiKe5Bbdyu/present/1WktHKngt2oO4NpHzBEf9I)\\n* [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools)\\n* https://www.honeycomb.io/blog/hard-stuff-nobody-talks-about-llm\\n* https://newrelic.com/platform/new-relic-grok\\n* https://twitter.com/amanrsanger/status/1660729100137553920\\n* Test framework for code suggestions: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415381+\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": \"2023-07-31\", \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": true, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 785400, \"relative_position\": -12825, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 853405, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 834262, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 17, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 11, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 57, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 80}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 30251403, \"title\": \"AI-Priority\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31167182, \"title\": \"Category:Duo Chat\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 04:14:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-14 17:02:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI Framework category, formerly named Category:GitLab Duo Chat\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 30402137, \"title\": \"Copilot-X-Compete\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": null, \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3207279, \"title\": \"GitLab Ultimate\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-22 09:43:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-01-30 19:53:24 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Features or changes limited or intended as part of GitLab Ultimate.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287867, \"title\": \"devops::ai-powered\", \"color\": \"#e44d2a\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 17:56:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI-powered stage part of the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287876, \"title\": \"group::duo chat\", \"color\": \"#a8d695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 18:01:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:45:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Duo Chat group, part of the AI-powered stage within the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 23545476, \"title\": \"section::data-science\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-01-27 10:11:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-17 00:09:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Data Science section including ModelOps and Anti-Abuse Stages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Thanks @tlinz , just also understanding \\ndoes this impact timelines on the work for Testing and Evaluation cc @oregand as well\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5749302, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6569137e475e099a705317777294fe726092f0ae\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1604836294, \"namespace_id\": 9970}, {\"note\": \"cc @alasch this is interesting external research for the work you're doing on code suggestions\\n\\ncc @NickHertz this is interesting in general for your work on AI features\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437012648, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI UX is working on some guidance about how we move a feature from experiment -\u003e beta -\u003e GA: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/408400\\n\\ncc @jmandell @pedroms\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1390824408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@timzallmann @m_gill @katiemacoy This is the epic where we will add issues and scope the work required to bring the GitLab Chat Bot to beta. I wrote some initial thoughts in the description that can change. \\n\\nThis epic is going to be tracked by leadership so we want the scope of work to be crisp (that is my job) but I need your help with the team to make sure that we have the right sub-epics/issues.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1387614045, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@katiemacoy @sarahwaldner I think:\\n- We must run the UI through solution validation (at least 5 internal participants).\\n- We should track the scoring during the research assuming we'll move forward with that concept.\\n- We should write a clear statement about how confident we are about understanding the problem we're solving for our users.\\n    - It would be really nice to have a sentence or two that explains where this confidence is being derived from.\\n\\n@pedroms what do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5291762, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391203190, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jmandell I think that list is perfectly reasonable and well-scoped to where we are right now!\\n\\nEngineering and I are still trying to figure out technically how we slice and dice this feature. @katiemacoy we will keep you clued in with us in lock step. Previously we had been thinking that we would add each use case one at a time, but it looks like we are actually going to add multiple at a time by enabling different models. This is good news :) Just means I am still a bit unsure how we scope the epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:39:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 22:14:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391220604, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@m_gill This is a great plan. @tlinz What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393133970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I like this proposal. Here are some thoughts. \\n\\n* We should probably add capabilities to collect feedback\\n* In today's demo I got the impression that it may not be easy to create something that can generically catch the context that the user sees. Which is what I had understood the Universal Object access tool would do. I have to discuss this with @timzallmann to understand it better. \\n* We could reduce the scope of VectorQARetrieval tool to documentation only for the beta release and have ask a question about this repo be done by the SCM team if we find that distribution of work could scale well. \\n* Are you saying the WebIDE chat extension is part of Beta or just the API that would enable that, @m_gill. In the spirit of keeping work pieces small I would keep it out of scope and create a separate issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393965447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner from a development perspective, this is what I see as Beta:\\n- [In progress] Ability to switch tooling (IE: A prompt comes in, and we detect where it gets routed)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/121122+ \\n- 2 tools are available to switch to, and respond in a Beta fashion based on the prompts they support:\\n  - [In progress] Universal Object access tool (Explain this block of code, Write tests for this block of code)\\n  - VectorQARetrieval Tool (Answer this question from our documentation, Ask a question about this repository)\\n    - [In progress] Embeddings will be needed https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10616+ \\n- Documentation to reflect how other teams can contribute new tooling\\n  - Teams are unblocked at this point\\n- API for Chat Interface, which will be used for integrations such as IDE extensions (Integrated with toggle support)\\n- System prompt is in place to enforce guardrails on what the Chat can and cannot answer\\n- Moderation is in place to prevent offensive prompts/responses \\n  - Not part of this MVC - \\u201cReport answers as offensive\\u201d functionality\\n- [In progress] Basic UI\\n- [In progress] Memory, across sessions (switching pages or devices)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/410521+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 13:19:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4554599, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1392312276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz just the API that would enable that. I'm aligned with [this larger plan](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10219#note_1393118339), where WebIDE chat should be Phase 2, but still done within the quarter.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:37:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 02:30:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1394009327, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1232+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"04389db4e66ed66a332464009e3f04dfc3c5ecef\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1420511785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, \\n\\n\u003e \u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\n\u003e Does this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nSorry that was not precise. I will change it to: Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding the WebIDE)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422449304, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz :wave_tone1: \\n\\nIn the description under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) the first bullet point is:\\n\\n\u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\nDoes this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nAdditionally, also under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) I see that the first iteration will enable:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nPlease separate this out into it's own section called **Use Cases that will be enabled** and word these statements using the terms that leadership had been referring to them as. The goal is for someone to be able to look at this epic and immediately understand that in the first iteration the following features will be possible:\\n\\n1. Explain this code\\n2. Ask questions about an issue = \u003e _This is new. Please explain what this is since this has not been a feature that we have been broadly discussing for the last couple months_\\n3. Conversational Chat\\n4. Ask questions of docs\\n\\nFinally, marketing needs a 2 week aheads up (to the best of your ability) prior to the release of the first iteration. \\n\\ncc @timzallmann @m_gill\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 15:14:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422263279, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, I think we need to educate the leadership that the scope of what we aim to deliver is much larger than bringing our \\\"legacy\\\" AI experiments together in one place. \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422462628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner and @laurenaalves, I think we are probably less than 2 weeks away from a releasable first iteration. @timzallmann can confirm. In fact, we hope that we can have something demoable today or tomorrow, so we can understand how well it works and what is missing for a releasable functionality. I also have requests from @cherryhan to create something that we can demo to a large prospect on Wednesday as we might not win them if we can't show AI capabilities that go beyond code suggestions. \\n\\n@laurenaalves, once we have that first prototype working we will share it with you. I can work on a blog post. What else do you need from me? Please, check out\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:34:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422486037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz \\n\\n\u003e \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\\n\\nYes I saw that screenshot however in the description of this epic you specifically list these use cases:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nHow should I be interpreting the description? \\n\\nPlease make sure that the start/end dates on the [first iteration epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675) show that this will release in ~2 weeks. Right now the end date is June 9th. Thank you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3796140, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422558431, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675#note_1432658681\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432659564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for sharing! This was an interesting read and can help put our own learnings into perspective.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 7351507, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437568945, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @katiemacoy and others, here is an interesting research that touches on [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools) and also on [Trust in accuracy](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-trust-in-the-accuracy-of-ai-output).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:38:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 15:02:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432665862, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 5749302, \"username\": \"mray2020\", \"name\": \"Mon Ray\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 5291762, \"username\": \"jmandell\", \"name\": \"Justin Mandell\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 7351507, \"username\": \"alasch\", \"name\": \"Anne Lasch\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Summarize with bullet points.","query_id":"8cdf3c62b3b94688870ff4d843e3def8","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"822061","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 822061, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3796140, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10550, \"updated_by_id\": 367626, \"last_edited_by_id\": 367626, \"lock_version\": 64, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-07-31\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 22:05:32 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:27:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:17 UTC\", \"title\": \"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\", \"description\": \"This epic tracks the work to bring the [GitLab Duo Chat](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/ai_features.html#gitlab-duo-chat) system to Beta. This includes the backend where the heavy lifting is done and the WebUI frontend.\\n\\n**While this epic does NOT include the **[**Chat in VS Code and Web IDE**](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\")** work, it needs to build the backend in such a way that it can support clients other than the WebUI - specifically IDEs**. It must consider that the IDEs may not have the same context as the WebUI. For instance, an IDE may not know the URL of the code file the user is looking at, as the user might have just created it locally. Also the file may have changed on the client. The maturation of the Chat in VS Code and Web IDE is independent of the chat system maturation.\\n\\n:movie_camera: [Video Walk-through of this epic](https://youtu.be/T645Ppm8oQ0)\\n\\n## Overall Scope\\n\\n### Functional scope\\n\\n* [x] Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding [Web IDE](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\"))\\n* [ ] Chat answers questions relating to\\n  * [x] code the user sees (explain \\\"this\\\")\\n  * [x] code referenced (with URL)\\n  * [x] issue the user sees\\n  * [x] issue referenced\\n  * [x] epic the user sees\\n  * [x] epic referenced\\n  * [ ] ~~MR the user sees~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] ~~MR referenced~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [x] how to use GitLab\\n  * [x] recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n  * [ ] ~~selections (if something is selected e.g. code in the code file, this is added to the context so the chat can answer questions about the selection)~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] dummy tools exist that proof the agent can support many more use cases (pipeline context, global issues/epics/code contexts)\\n* [ ] If context is not available, [chat responds with its supported contexts](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801 \\\"Self-discoverable capabilities of the chat via responses of the chat itself - e.g. I can't answer this questions but I can answer questions that are about the code you are looking at...\\\").\\n* [x] User can give feedback on their satisfaction with the answers and these answers are analyzed to inform potential prompt engineering tweaks.\\n\\n### Non-functional scope\\n\\n* [x] **By design: The tools and the agent(s) must never share context that the user does not have access to.**\\n* [ ] The quality bar for what success means ([see below](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#what-does-success-mean \\\"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\\\")) is defined, tested and passed\\n* [ ] [Perceived speed of answers is at least o.k](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683). from user perspective and there are ideas how to improve it to good.\\n  * [x] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n  * [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n* [ ] Errors are tracked.\\n\\nOne of these two options. Still TBD:\\n\\n* [ ] Works in the main product for Ultimate users that have toggled the right switches in the settings.\\n* [ ] **Access to the Chat is granted if the user has paid the add-on.** The project or the tier of the project's namespace does not matter. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n  * [ ] During the pre-GA phase or pre-addon phase, all SaaS users that are at least in one Ultimate tier, do have access to the chat. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n\\n## What does success mean?\\n\\nGenerally\\n\\n* AI answers should be _mostly_ correct, helpful and friendly.\\n* If the AI does not know it should _mostly_ say that is does not know.\\n\\n#### How to measure it?\\n\\n~~We shall consider the experience Beta-ready once we have achieved the following:~~\\n\\nWe shall consider the experience satisfactory once we have achieved the following:\\n\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003e80% of responses `good` or `excellent`\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003c5% of responses `terrible`\\n\\n(on a 5 point scale: `terrible`, `poor`, `average`, `good`, `excellent`)\\n\\nSee [details why we opted for this quality bar](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gitlab-OKRs/-/work_items/3555#note_1541945461 \\\"KR2: GitLab Duo Chat becomes available in beta, including six \\u201cspecialized tools\\u201d that are also in beta, with a path to general availability in FY24Q4.\\\").\\n\\n[This user satisfaction will be assessed by UXR roughly every two to three weeks](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513 \\\"Repeated analysis of user experience with Duo chat as we continuously improve the chat (also considering the outcome of each round of these user tests.)\\\"). Check the [bottom of our AI Features Dashboard](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/1137231/Ai-Features) for these metrics and how they progress toward the goal.\\n\\n## Work items (remaining as of mid August)\\n\\n#### Understand in more detail the problem space and how well we address user needs (mostly UXR and Product analytics)\\n\\n**Outcomes**: More clear understanding of users expectations and which problems they want to solve interactively with the chat.\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11120+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1325+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415591+\\n\\n#### Addressing functional gaps \u0026 UX issues\\n\\n**Outcomes**: better user experience measurable in better scores in user testing\\n\\n- ~~MR context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430+s~~ (removed from beta scope; see [reason](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430#note_1545114583))\\n- Epic context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422091+s\\n- Support selected text: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422176+s\\n- Streaming: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683+s\\n- Dummy contexts: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422187+s\\n- Self-discoverable capabilities: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801+s\\n- [Collection of UX issues to be addressed](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10673 \\\"Chat Integration iteration 1 FE \u0026 BE\\\"). Such as:\\n  - new conversation\\n  - sync chat across clients\\n  - onboarding\\n  - expiration time for response\\n  - Error messages\\n  - feedback mechanism\\n  - ~~Global entry point for chat should be enabled for beta release but should not be enabled before we reach our quality target.~~ [Global entry point for chat will only be turned on when we reach the quality target defined above independent of the beta release](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2465#note_1577201457). \\n- **Continuously test user satisfaction with UXR and respond to their feedback**\\n\\n#### Developing a testing framework\\n\\n**Outcomes**: enabling efficient development and efficient contribution\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422212+s\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422245+s\\n\\n#### Monitoring quality / stability / speed / cost\\n\\n**Outcomes**: more trust production readiness of the chat\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11234+\\n  - Cost: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415944+s / https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1358+s\\n  - Error rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s tracks the error rate on individual 3rd party AI requests as well as error rate from the user perspective as responding to their request might require combining multiple 3rd party AI requests. @jprovaznik's assumes there are no errors beyond the 3rd party LLM service that would need to be considered (for instance between the backend and the client). The user level error rate calculation will interpret slow responses \\\\\u003e20 sec to be errors. The error rates will be tracked in Grafana.\\n  - Response time: \u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\\\~\\\\~\u003c/span\u003e https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1366+\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~ Will be tracked in Prometheus on the worker level as part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s by @jprovaznik. These measurements will include the time for all AI requests necessary to answer the user question but not the time to receive the user input from the frontend and sending the result back to the frontend. The difference should be marginal.\\n  - \\\"Can't answer\\\" rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422202+s\\n\\n#### Other work items\\n\\n- [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420939+s (switch embeddings provider)\\n- [ ] Mature the chat documentation and bring it to its own page.\\n- [ ] Label the Chat as beta in the product and in the documentation. \\n\\n#### Integrate existing stand-alone AI features ???\\n\\n- Should we integrate existing standalone AI features like _explain this code_ into the chat prior to the Beta release?\\n- We should only do so if they reach the quality bar defined above.\\n- What interdependencies are there with company announcements?\\n\\n# What the user can ask\\n\\n### Questions related to current code\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nCan you explain the code? (Whole file or selected) Explain the selected code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you explain function X? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite me tests for function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWhat is the complexity of the code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would the code look like in Python? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would you refactor the code? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you fix the bug in my code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate an example of how to use function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite documentation for the selected code | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770#note_1597887855) | \\nCreate a function to validate an e-mail address | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a tic tac toe game in Javascript | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a function in Python to call the spotify API to get my playlists | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\n\\n### Questions related to the current issue or current epic\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nPlease summarize the issue | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize with bullet points | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nCan you list all the labels? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nHow old is the epic? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597974580) | \\nFor which milestone is the issue? And how long until then? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize the comments into bullet points? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/31d608f706ac72533502736939cdfe9c077c9975/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L142) | \\nQuestions on the actual content: \\\"What should be the final solution for this issue?\\\" | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1613052031) | \\n\\n### Questions relating to the current MR\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nWhat is this MR about? | | \\nCan you review this MR? | | \\nCan you create a test for the new function in this MR? | | \\nCan you simplify this code? | | \\n\\n### Questions relating how to use GitLab\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nHow do I change my password in GitLab? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I fork a project? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I clone a repository? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I create a template? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nWhat is DevOps? What is DevSecOps? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597971516) | \\n\\n### Follow-up questions\\n\\n#### Basic follow-up question that only require the last answer as context\\n\\n- Can you simplify your answer?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is simplified\\n  - Tool test: [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L167-218)\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you translate your answer to German?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is translated\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you explain your third point in different words?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer contains a bulleted or numbered list (because that was the assignment of the previous question).\\n  - Result: the third point of the last answer is explained with different words.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require the last answer + the context that was pulled for creating the last answer\\n\\n- Iterative in depth analysis of an issue\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Example:\\n    - User is on: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800\\n    - User asks: Can you identify the unique use cases the commenters have raised on this issue?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith bulleted or numbered list of use cases\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n    - User asks: Can you sort this list by the number of users that have requested the use case and include the number for each use case? Can you include a verbatim for the two most requested use cases that reflect the general opinion of commenters for these two use cases?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith sorted list that contains the number of users that asked for each use case and two verbatim\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n- Can you expand on the last paragraph?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n- Can you detail the purpose of the code-owner class?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require multiple recent answers + multiple contexts that were pulled for creating the last answer (NOT PART OF BETA)\\n\\n- Comparison of two issues\\n  - Example\\n    - History: continued from above big example \\\"Iterative in depth analysis of an issue \\\"\\n    - User switched to: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104\\n    - User asks: How are the use cases raised in this issue different or the same?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context for 12104\u003e`\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool to get context for 17800 but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith two list: one with similarities and one with differences\u003e`\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Questions that the user did not formulate clear enough should result in a question from the AI to clarify the question\\n\\n- User: `How do I create a template?`\\n  - Although this question seems to be reasonable, it's not clear what kind of template is meant. I think the only solution for such questions is to have a means for the AI to ask a clarifying question, for example the following\\n- Bot: `The term template is used widely in the context. Could you be more specific which kind of template you would like to create?`\\n- Tool test:\\n- Quality test: \\n\\n## What will not be supported\\n\\n* We will not support other languages than English. That does not mean it won't work, but it will not have been tested at all. We made this decision to prevent a significant increase in complexity.\\n* We will not support comparing and relating different contexts to another. E.g. what is the difference between this issue and issue xyz. This is GA scope.\\n* We will not support global contexts for repos / issues / epics / etc. This may be covered before GA though.\\n\\n## Marketing\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/brand-product-marketing/product-marketing/-/issues/7274+s\\n\\n## Related\\n\\n* [Research work prioritization for the GitLab Chat in Q2 FY24](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2501#note_1421246798 \\\"Research Prioritization for Fulfillment, ModelOps, and Analytics - Q2FY24\\\")\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2604#note_1515310932\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423325+s\\n\\n## Literature\\n\\n(some random links)\\n\\n* Research result: [Questions users want to ask](https://gitlab.dovetailapp.com/projects/6wL9UBVQCbOpaC6WLu22su/v/ukXfzRL2lbYwiKe5Bbdyu/present/1WktHKngt2oO4NpHzBEf9I)\\n* [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools)\\n* https://www.honeycomb.io/blog/hard-stuff-nobody-talks-about-llm\\n* https://newrelic.com/platform/new-relic-grok\\n* https://twitter.com/amanrsanger/status/1660729100137553920\\n* Test framework for code suggestions: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415381+\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": \"2023-07-31\", \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": true, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 785400, \"relative_position\": -12825, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 853405, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 834262, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 17, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 11, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 57, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 80}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 30251403, \"title\": \"AI-Priority\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31167182, \"title\": \"Category:Duo Chat\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 04:14:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-14 17:02:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI Framework category, formerly named Category:GitLab Duo Chat\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 30402137, \"title\": \"Copilot-X-Compete\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": null, \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3207279, \"title\": \"GitLab Ultimate\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-22 09:43:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-01-30 19:53:24 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Features or changes limited or intended as part of GitLab Ultimate.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287867, \"title\": \"devops::ai-powered\", \"color\": \"#e44d2a\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 17:56:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI-powered stage part of the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287876, \"title\": \"group::duo chat\", \"color\": \"#a8d695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 18:01:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:45:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Duo Chat group, part of the AI-powered stage within the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 23545476, \"title\": \"section::data-science\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-01-27 10:11:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-17 00:09:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Data Science section including ModelOps and Anti-Abuse Stages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Thanks @tlinz , just also understanding \\ndoes this impact timelines on the work for Testing and Evaluation cc @oregand as well\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5749302, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6569137e475e099a705317777294fe726092f0ae\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1604836294, \"namespace_id\": 9970}, {\"note\": \"cc @alasch this is interesting external research for the work you're doing on code suggestions\\n\\ncc @NickHertz this is interesting in general for your work on AI features\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437012648, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI UX is working on some guidance about how we move a feature from experiment -\u003e beta -\u003e GA: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/408400\\n\\ncc @jmandell @pedroms\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1390824408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@timzallmann @m_gill @katiemacoy This is the epic where we will add issues and scope the work required to bring the GitLab Chat Bot to beta. I wrote some initial thoughts in the description that can change. \\n\\nThis epic is going to be tracked by leadership so we want the scope of work to be crisp (that is my job) but I need your help with the team to make sure that we have the right sub-epics/issues.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1387614045, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@katiemacoy @sarahwaldner I think:\\n- We must run the UI through solution validation (at least 5 internal participants).\\n- We should track the scoring during the research assuming we'll move forward with that concept.\\n- We should write a clear statement about how confident we are about understanding the problem we're solving for our users.\\n    - It would be really nice to have a sentence or two that explains where this confidence is being derived from.\\n\\n@pedroms what do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5291762, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391203190, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jmandell I think that list is perfectly reasonable and well-scoped to where we are right now!\\n\\nEngineering and I are still trying to figure out technically how we slice and dice this feature. @katiemacoy we will keep you clued in with us in lock step. Previously we had been thinking that we would add each use case one at a time, but it looks like we are actually going to add multiple at a time by enabling different models. This is good news :) Just means I am still a bit unsure how we scope the epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:39:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 22:14:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391220604, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@m_gill This is a great plan. @tlinz What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393133970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I like this proposal. Here are some thoughts. \\n\\n* We should probably add capabilities to collect feedback\\n* In today's demo I got the impression that it may not be easy to create something that can generically catch the context that the user sees. Which is what I had understood the Universal Object access tool would do. I have to discuss this with @timzallmann to understand it better. \\n* We could reduce the scope of VectorQARetrieval tool to documentation only for the beta release and have ask a question about this repo be done by the SCM team if we find that distribution of work could scale well. \\n* Are you saying the WebIDE chat extension is part of Beta or just the API that would enable that, @m_gill. In the spirit of keeping work pieces small I would keep it out of scope and create a separate issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393965447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner from a development perspective, this is what I see as Beta:\\n- [In progress] Ability to switch tooling (IE: A prompt comes in, and we detect where it gets routed)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/121122+ \\n- 2 tools are available to switch to, and respond in a Beta fashion based on the prompts they support:\\n  - [In progress] Universal Object access tool (Explain this block of code, Write tests for this block of code)\\n  - VectorQARetrieval Tool (Answer this question from our documentation, Ask a question about this repository)\\n    - [In progress] Embeddings will be needed https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10616+ \\n- Documentation to reflect how other teams can contribute new tooling\\n  - Teams are unblocked at this point\\n- API for Chat Interface, which will be used for integrations such as IDE extensions (Integrated with toggle support)\\n- System prompt is in place to enforce guardrails on what the Chat can and cannot answer\\n- Moderation is in place to prevent offensive prompts/responses \\n  - Not part of this MVC - \\u201cReport answers as offensive\\u201d functionality\\n- [In progress] Basic UI\\n- [In progress] Memory, across sessions (switching pages or devices)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/410521+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 13:19:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4554599, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1392312276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz just the API that would enable that. I'm aligned with [this larger plan](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10219#note_1393118339), where WebIDE chat should be Phase 2, but still done within the quarter.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:37:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 02:30:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1394009327, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1232+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"04389db4e66ed66a332464009e3f04dfc3c5ecef\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1420511785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, \\n\\n\u003e \u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\n\u003e Does this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nSorry that was not precise. I will change it to: Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding the WebIDE)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422449304, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz :wave_tone1: \\n\\nIn the description under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) the first bullet point is:\\n\\n\u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\nDoes this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nAdditionally, also under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) I see that the first iteration will enable:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nPlease separate this out into it's own section called **Use Cases that will be enabled** and word these statements using the terms that leadership had been referring to them as. The goal is for someone to be able to look at this epic and immediately understand that in the first iteration the following features will be possible:\\n\\n1. Explain this code\\n2. Ask questions about an issue = \u003e _This is new. Please explain what this is since this has not been a feature that we have been broadly discussing for the last couple months_\\n3. Conversational Chat\\n4. Ask questions of docs\\n\\nFinally, marketing needs a 2 week aheads up (to the best of your ability) prior to the release of the first iteration. \\n\\ncc @timzallmann @m_gill\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 15:14:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422263279, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, I think we need to educate the leadership that the scope of what we aim to deliver is much larger than bringing our \\\"legacy\\\" AI experiments together in one place. \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422462628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner and @laurenaalves, I think we are probably less than 2 weeks away from a releasable first iteration. @timzallmann can confirm. In fact, we hope that we can have something demoable today or tomorrow, so we can understand how well it works and what is missing for a releasable functionality. I also have requests from @cherryhan to create something that we can demo to a large prospect on Wednesday as we might not win them if we can't show AI capabilities that go beyond code suggestions. \\n\\n@laurenaalves, once we have that first prototype working we will share it with you. I can work on a blog post. What else do you need from me? Please, check out\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:34:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422486037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz \\n\\n\u003e \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\\n\\nYes I saw that screenshot however in the description of this epic you specifically list these use cases:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nHow should I be interpreting the description? \\n\\nPlease make sure that the start/end dates on the [first iteration epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675) show that this will release in ~2 weeks. Right now the end date is June 9th. Thank you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3796140, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422558431, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675#note_1432658681\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432659564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for sharing! This was an interesting read and can help put our own learnings into perspective.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 7351507, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437568945, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @katiemacoy and others, here is an interesting research that touches on [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools) and also on [Trust in accuracy](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-trust-in-the-accuracy-of-ai-output).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:38:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 15:02:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432665862, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 5749302, \"username\": \"mray2020\", \"name\": \"Mon Ray\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 5291762, \"username\": \"jmandell\", \"name\": \"Justin Mandell\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 7351507, \"username\": \"alasch\", \"name\": \"Anne Lasch\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Can you create a simpler list of which questions a user should be able to ask according to this epic.","query_id":"94dda92185d74d8d97e4602c581111d5","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"822061","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 822061, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3796140, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10550, \"updated_by_id\": 367626, \"last_edited_by_id\": 367626, \"lock_version\": 64, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-07-31\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 22:05:32 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:27:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:17 UTC\", \"title\": \"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\", \"description\": \"This epic tracks the work to bring the [GitLab Duo Chat](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/ai_features.html#gitlab-duo-chat) system to Beta. This includes the backend where the heavy lifting is done and the WebUI frontend.\\n\\n**While this epic does NOT include the **[**Chat in VS Code and Web IDE**](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\")** work, it needs to build the backend in such a way that it can support clients other than the WebUI - specifically IDEs**. It must consider that the IDEs may not have the same context as the WebUI. For instance, an IDE may not know the URL of the code file the user is looking at, as the user might have just created it locally. Also the file may have changed on the client. The maturation of the Chat in VS Code and Web IDE is independent of the chat system maturation.\\n\\n:movie_camera: [Video Walk-through of this epic](https://youtu.be/T645Ppm8oQ0)\\n\\n## Overall Scope\\n\\n### Functional scope\\n\\n* [x] Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding [Web IDE](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\"))\\n* [ ] Chat answers questions relating to\\n  * [x] code the user sees (explain \\\"this\\\")\\n  * [x] code referenced (with URL)\\n  * [x] issue the user sees\\n  * [x] issue referenced\\n  * [x] epic the user sees\\n  * [x] epic referenced\\n  * [ ] ~~MR the user sees~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] ~~MR referenced~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [x] how to use GitLab\\n  * [x] recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n  * [ ] ~~selections (if something is selected e.g. code in the code file, this is added to the context so the chat can answer questions about the selection)~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] dummy tools exist that proof the agent can support many more use cases (pipeline context, global issues/epics/code contexts)\\n* [ ] If context is not available, [chat responds with its supported contexts](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801 \\\"Self-discoverable capabilities of the chat via responses of the chat itself - e.g. I can't answer this questions but I can answer questions that are about the code you are looking at...\\\").\\n* [x] User can give feedback on their satisfaction with the answers and these answers are analyzed to inform potential prompt engineering tweaks.\\n\\n### Non-functional scope\\n\\n* [x] **By design: The tools and the agent(s) must never share context that the user does not have access to.**\\n* [ ] The quality bar for what success means ([see below](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#what-does-success-mean \\\"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\\\")) is defined, tested and passed\\n* [ ] [Perceived speed of answers is at least o.k](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683). from user perspective and there are ideas how to improve it to good.\\n  * [x] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n  * [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n* [ ] Errors are tracked.\\n\\nOne of these two options. Still TBD:\\n\\n* [ ] Works in the main product for Ultimate users that have toggled the right switches in the settings.\\n* [ ] **Access to the Chat is granted if the user has paid the add-on.** The project or the tier of the project's namespace does not matter. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n  * [ ] During the pre-GA phase or pre-addon phase, all SaaS users that are at least in one Ultimate tier, do have access to the chat. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n\\n## What does success mean?\\n\\nGenerally\\n\\n* AI answers should be _mostly_ correct, helpful and friendly.\\n* If the AI does not know it should _mostly_ say that is does not know.\\n\\n#### How to measure it?\\n\\n~~We shall consider the experience Beta-ready once we have achieved the following:~~\\n\\nWe shall consider the experience satisfactory once we have achieved the following:\\n\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003e80% of responses `good` or `excellent`\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003c5% of responses `terrible`\\n\\n(on a 5 point scale: `terrible`, `poor`, `average`, `good`, `excellent`)\\n\\nSee [details why we opted for this quality bar](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gitlab-OKRs/-/work_items/3555#note_1541945461 \\\"KR2: GitLab Duo Chat becomes available in beta, including six \\u201cspecialized tools\\u201d that are also in beta, with a path to general availability in FY24Q4.\\\").\\n\\n[This user satisfaction will be assessed by UXR roughly every two to three weeks](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513 \\\"Repeated analysis of user experience with Duo chat as we continuously improve the chat (also considering the outcome of each round of these user tests.)\\\"). Check the [bottom of our AI Features Dashboard](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/1137231/Ai-Features) for these metrics and how they progress toward the goal.\\n\\n## Work items (remaining as of mid August)\\n\\n#### Understand in more detail the problem space and how well we address user needs (mostly UXR and Product analytics)\\n\\n**Outcomes**: More clear understanding of users expectations and which problems they want to solve interactively with the chat.\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11120+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1325+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415591+\\n\\n#### Addressing functional gaps \u0026 UX issues\\n\\n**Outcomes**: better user experience measurable in better scores in user testing\\n\\n- ~~MR context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430+s~~ (removed from beta scope; see [reason](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430#note_1545114583))\\n- Epic context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422091+s\\n- Support selected text: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422176+s\\n- Streaming: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683+s\\n- Dummy contexts: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422187+s\\n- Self-discoverable capabilities: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801+s\\n- [Collection of UX issues to be addressed](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10673 \\\"Chat Integration iteration 1 FE \u0026 BE\\\"). Such as:\\n  - new conversation\\n  - sync chat across clients\\n  - onboarding\\n  - expiration time for response\\n  - Error messages\\n  - feedback mechanism\\n  - ~~Global entry point for chat should be enabled for beta release but should not be enabled before we reach our quality target.~~ [Global entry point for chat will only be turned on when we reach the quality target defined above independent of the beta release](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2465#note_1577201457). \\n- **Continuously test user satisfaction with UXR and respond to their feedback**\\n\\n#### Developing a testing framework\\n\\n**Outcomes**: enabling efficient development and efficient contribution\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422212+s\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422245+s\\n\\n#### Monitoring quality / stability / speed / cost\\n\\n**Outcomes**: more trust production readiness of the chat\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11234+\\n  - Cost: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415944+s / https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1358+s\\n  - Error rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s tracks the error rate on individual 3rd party AI requests as well as error rate from the user perspective as responding to their request might require combining multiple 3rd party AI requests. @jprovaznik's assumes there are no errors beyond the 3rd party LLM service that would need to be considered (for instance between the backend and the client). The user level error rate calculation will interpret slow responses \\\\\u003e20 sec to be errors. The error rates will be tracked in Grafana.\\n  - Response time: \u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\\\~\\\\~\u003c/span\u003e https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1366+\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~ Will be tracked in Prometheus on the worker level as part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s by @jprovaznik. These measurements will include the time for all AI requests necessary to answer the user question but not the time to receive the user input from the frontend and sending the result back to the frontend. The difference should be marginal.\\n  - \\\"Can't answer\\\" rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422202+s\\n\\n#### Other work items\\n\\n- [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420939+s (switch embeddings provider)\\n- [ ] Mature the chat documentation and bring it to its own page.\\n- [ ] Label the Chat as beta in the product and in the documentation. \\n\\n#### Integrate existing stand-alone AI features ???\\n\\n- Should we integrate existing standalone AI features like _explain this code_ into the chat prior to the Beta release?\\n- We should only do so if they reach the quality bar defined above.\\n- What interdependencies are there with company announcements?\\n\\n# What the user can ask\\n\\n### Questions related to current code\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nCan you explain the code? (Whole file or selected) Explain the selected code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you explain function X? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite me tests for function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWhat is the complexity of the code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would the code look like in Python? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would you refactor the code? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you fix the bug in my code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate an example of how to use function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite documentation for the selected code | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770#note_1597887855) | \\nCreate a function to validate an e-mail address | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a tic tac toe game in Javascript | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a function in Python to call the spotify API to get my playlists | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\n\\n### Questions related to the current issue or current epic\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nPlease summarize the issue | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize with bullet points | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nCan you list all the labels? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nHow old is the epic? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597974580) | \\nFor which milestone is the issue? And how long until then? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize the comments into bullet points? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/31d608f706ac72533502736939cdfe9c077c9975/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L142) | \\nQuestions on the actual content: \\\"What should be the final solution for this issue?\\\" | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1613052031) | \\n\\n### Questions relating to the current MR\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nWhat is this MR about? | | \\nCan you review this MR? | | \\nCan you create a test for the new function in this MR? | | \\nCan you simplify this code? | | \\n\\n### Questions relating how to use GitLab\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nHow do I change my password in GitLab? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I fork a project? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I clone a repository? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I create a template? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nWhat is DevOps? What is DevSecOps? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597971516) | \\n\\n### Follow-up questions\\n\\n#### Basic follow-up question that only require the last answer as context\\n\\n- Can you simplify your answer?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is simplified\\n  - Tool test: [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L167-218)\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you translate your answer to German?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is translated\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you explain your third point in different words?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer contains a bulleted or numbered list (because that was the assignment of the previous question).\\n  - Result: the third point of the last answer is explained with different words.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require the last answer + the context that was pulled for creating the last answer\\n\\n- Iterative in depth analysis of an issue\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Example:\\n    - User is on: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800\\n    - User asks: Can you identify the unique use cases the commenters have raised on this issue?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith bulleted or numbered list of use cases\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n    - User asks: Can you sort this list by the number of users that have requested the use case and include the number for each use case? Can you include a verbatim for the two most requested use cases that reflect the general opinion of commenters for these two use cases?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith sorted list that contains the number of users that asked for each use case and two verbatim\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n- Can you expand on the last paragraph?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n- Can you detail the purpose of the code-owner class?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require multiple recent answers + multiple contexts that were pulled for creating the last answer (NOT PART OF BETA)\\n\\n- Comparison of two issues\\n  - Example\\n    - History: continued from above big example \\\"Iterative in depth analysis of an issue \\\"\\n    - User switched to: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104\\n    - User asks: How are the use cases raised in this issue different or the same?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context for 12104\u003e`\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool to get context for 17800 but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith two list: one with similarities and one with differences\u003e`\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Questions that the user did not formulate clear enough should result in a question from the AI to clarify the question\\n\\n- User: `How do I create a template?`\\n  - Although this question seems to be reasonable, it's not clear what kind of template is meant. I think the only solution for such questions is to have a means for the AI to ask a clarifying question, for example the following\\n- Bot: `The term template is used widely in the context. Could you be more specific which kind of template you would like to create?`\\n- Tool test:\\n- Quality test: \\n\\n## What will not be supported\\n\\n* We will not support other languages than English. That does not mean it won't work, but it will not have been tested at all. We made this decision to prevent a significant increase in complexity.\\n* We will not support comparing and relating different contexts to another. E.g. what is the difference between this issue and issue xyz. This is GA scope.\\n* We will not support global contexts for repos / issues / epics / etc. This may be covered before GA though.\\n\\n## Marketing\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/brand-product-marketing/product-marketing/-/issues/7274+s\\n\\n## Related\\n\\n* [Research work prioritization for the GitLab Chat in Q2 FY24](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2501#note_1421246798 \\\"Research Prioritization for Fulfillment, ModelOps, and Analytics - Q2FY24\\\")\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2604#note_1515310932\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423325+s\\n\\n## Literature\\n\\n(some random links)\\n\\n* Research result: [Questions users want to ask](https://gitlab.dovetailapp.com/projects/6wL9UBVQCbOpaC6WLu22su/v/ukXfzRL2lbYwiKe5Bbdyu/present/1WktHKngt2oO4NpHzBEf9I)\\n* [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools)\\n* https://www.honeycomb.io/blog/hard-stuff-nobody-talks-about-llm\\n* https://newrelic.com/platform/new-relic-grok\\n* https://twitter.com/amanrsanger/status/1660729100137553920\\n* Test framework for code suggestions: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415381+\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": \"2023-07-31\", \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": true, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 785400, \"relative_position\": -12825, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 853405, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 834262, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 17, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 11, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 57, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 80}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 30251403, \"title\": \"AI-Priority\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31167182, \"title\": \"Category:Duo Chat\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 04:14:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-14 17:02:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI Framework category, formerly named Category:GitLab Duo Chat\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 30402137, \"title\": \"Copilot-X-Compete\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": null, \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3207279, \"title\": \"GitLab Ultimate\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-22 09:43:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-01-30 19:53:24 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Features or changes limited or intended as part of GitLab Ultimate.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287867, \"title\": \"devops::ai-powered\", \"color\": \"#e44d2a\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 17:56:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI-powered stage part of the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287876, \"title\": \"group::duo chat\", \"color\": \"#a8d695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 18:01:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:45:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Duo Chat group, part of the AI-powered stage within the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 23545476, \"title\": \"section::data-science\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-01-27 10:11:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-17 00:09:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Data Science section including ModelOps and Anti-Abuse Stages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Thanks @tlinz , just also understanding \\ndoes this impact timelines on the work for Testing and Evaluation cc @oregand as well\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5749302, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6569137e475e099a705317777294fe726092f0ae\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1604836294, \"namespace_id\": 9970}, {\"note\": \"cc @alasch this is interesting external research for the work you're doing on code suggestions\\n\\ncc @NickHertz this is interesting in general for your work on AI features\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437012648, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI UX is working on some guidance about how we move a feature from experiment -\u003e beta -\u003e GA: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/408400\\n\\ncc @jmandell @pedroms\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1390824408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@timzallmann @m_gill @katiemacoy This is the epic where we will add issues and scope the work required to bring the GitLab Chat Bot to beta. I wrote some initial thoughts in the description that can change. \\n\\nThis epic is going to be tracked by leadership so we want the scope of work to be crisp (that is my job) but I need your help with the team to make sure that we have the right sub-epics/issues.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1387614045, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@katiemacoy @sarahwaldner I think:\\n- We must run the UI through solution validation (at least 5 internal participants).\\n- We should track the scoring during the research assuming we'll move forward with that concept.\\n- We should write a clear statement about how confident we are about understanding the problem we're solving for our users.\\n    - It would be really nice to have a sentence or two that explains where this confidence is being derived from.\\n\\n@pedroms what do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5291762, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391203190, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jmandell I think that list is perfectly reasonable and well-scoped to where we are right now!\\n\\nEngineering and I are still trying to figure out technically how we slice and dice this feature. @katiemacoy we will keep you clued in with us in lock step. Previously we had been thinking that we would add each use case one at a time, but it looks like we are actually going to add multiple at a time by enabling different models. This is good news :) Just means I am still a bit unsure how we scope the epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:39:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 22:14:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391220604, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@m_gill This is a great plan. @tlinz What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393133970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I like this proposal. Here are some thoughts. \\n\\n* We should probably add capabilities to collect feedback\\n* In today's demo I got the impression that it may not be easy to create something that can generically catch the context that the user sees. Which is what I had understood the Universal Object access tool would do. I have to discuss this with @timzallmann to understand it better. \\n* We could reduce the scope of VectorQARetrieval tool to documentation only for the beta release and have ask a question about this repo be done by the SCM team if we find that distribution of work could scale well. \\n* Are you saying the WebIDE chat extension is part of Beta or just the API that would enable that, @m_gill. In the spirit of keeping work pieces small I would keep it out of scope and create a separate issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393965447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner from a development perspective, this is what I see as Beta:\\n- [In progress] Ability to switch tooling (IE: A prompt comes in, and we detect where it gets routed)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/121122+ \\n- 2 tools are available to switch to, and respond in a Beta fashion based on the prompts they support:\\n  - [In progress] Universal Object access tool (Explain this block of code, Write tests for this block of code)\\n  - VectorQARetrieval Tool (Answer this question from our documentation, Ask a question about this repository)\\n    - [In progress] Embeddings will be needed https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10616+ \\n- Documentation to reflect how other teams can contribute new tooling\\n  - Teams are unblocked at this point\\n- API for Chat Interface, which will be used for integrations such as IDE extensions (Integrated with toggle support)\\n- System prompt is in place to enforce guardrails on what the Chat can and cannot answer\\n- Moderation is in place to prevent offensive prompts/responses \\n  - Not part of this MVC - \\u201cReport answers as offensive\\u201d functionality\\n- [In progress] Basic UI\\n- [In progress] Memory, across sessions (switching pages or devices)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/410521+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 13:19:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4554599, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1392312276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz just the API that would enable that. I'm aligned with [this larger plan](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10219#note_1393118339), where WebIDE chat should be Phase 2, but still done within the quarter.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:37:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 02:30:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1394009327, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1232+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"04389db4e66ed66a332464009e3f04dfc3c5ecef\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1420511785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, \\n\\n\u003e \u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\n\u003e Does this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nSorry that was not precise. I will change it to: Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding the WebIDE)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422449304, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz :wave_tone1: \\n\\nIn the description under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) the first bullet point is:\\n\\n\u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\nDoes this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nAdditionally, also under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) I see that the first iteration will enable:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nPlease separate this out into it's own section called **Use Cases that will be enabled** and word these statements using the terms that leadership had been referring to them as. The goal is for someone to be able to look at this epic and immediately understand that in the first iteration the following features will be possible:\\n\\n1. Explain this code\\n2. Ask questions about an issue = \u003e _This is new. Please explain what this is since this has not been a feature that we have been broadly discussing for the last couple months_\\n3. Conversational Chat\\n4. Ask questions of docs\\n\\nFinally, marketing needs a 2 week aheads up (to the best of your ability) prior to the release of the first iteration. \\n\\ncc @timzallmann @m_gill\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 15:14:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422263279, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, I think we need to educate the leadership that the scope of what we aim to deliver is much larger than bringing our \\\"legacy\\\" AI experiments together in one place. \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422462628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner and @laurenaalves, I think we are probably less than 2 weeks away from a releasable first iteration. @timzallmann can confirm. In fact, we hope that we can have something demoable today or tomorrow, so we can understand how well it works and what is missing for a releasable functionality. I also have requests from @cherryhan to create something that we can demo to a large prospect on Wednesday as we might not win them if we can't show AI capabilities that go beyond code suggestions. \\n\\n@laurenaalves, once we have that first prototype working we will share it with you. I can work on a blog post. What else do you need from me? Please, check out\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:34:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422486037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz \\n\\n\u003e \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\\n\\nYes I saw that screenshot however in the description of this epic you specifically list these use cases:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nHow should I be interpreting the description? \\n\\nPlease make sure that the start/end dates on the [first iteration epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675) show that this will release in ~2 weeks. Right now the end date is June 9th. Thank you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3796140, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422558431, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675#note_1432658681\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432659564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for sharing! This was an interesting read and can help put our own learnings into perspective.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 7351507, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437568945, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @katiemacoy and others, here is an interesting research that touches on [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools) and also on [Trust in accuracy](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-trust-in-the-accuracy-of-ai-output).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:38:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 15:02:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432665862, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 5749302, \"username\": \"mray2020\", \"name\": \"Mon Ray\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 5291762, \"username\": \"jmandell\", \"name\": \"Justin Mandell\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 7351507, \"username\": \"alasch\", \"name\": \"Anne Lasch\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Summarize this Epic.","query_id":"c48c27f8da19417db5a45e32d132fdc9","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"822061","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 822061, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3796140, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10550, \"updated_by_id\": 367626, \"last_edited_by_id\": 367626, \"lock_version\": 64, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-07-31\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 22:05:32 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:27:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:17 UTC\", \"title\": \"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\", \"description\": \"This epic tracks the work to bring the [GitLab Duo Chat](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/ai_features.html#gitlab-duo-chat) system to Beta. This includes the backend where the heavy lifting is done and the WebUI frontend.\\n\\n**While this epic does NOT include the **[**Chat in VS Code and Web IDE**](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\")** work, it needs to build the backend in such a way that it can support clients other than the WebUI - specifically IDEs**. It must consider that the IDEs may not have the same context as the WebUI. For instance, an IDE may not know the URL of the code file the user is looking at, as the user might have just created it locally. Also the file may have changed on the client. The maturation of the Chat in VS Code and Web IDE is independent of the chat system maturation.\\n\\n:movie_camera: [Video Walk-through of this epic](https://youtu.be/T645Ppm8oQ0)\\n\\n## Overall Scope\\n\\n### Functional scope\\n\\n* [x] Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding [Web IDE](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\"))\\n* [ ] Chat answers questions relating to\\n  * [x] code the user sees (explain \\\"this\\\")\\n  * [x] code referenced (with URL)\\n  * [x] issue the user sees\\n  * [x] issue referenced\\n  * [x] epic the user sees\\n  * [x] epic referenced\\n  * [ ] ~~MR the user sees~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] ~~MR referenced~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [x] how to use GitLab\\n  * [x] recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n  * [ ] ~~selections (if something is selected e.g. code in the code file, this is added to the context so the chat can answer questions about the selection)~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] dummy tools exist that proof the agent can support many more use cases (pipeline context, global issues/epics/code contexts)\\n* [ ] If context is not available, [chat responds with its supported contexts](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801 \\\"Self-discoverable capabilities of the chat via responses of the chat itself - e.g. I can't answer this questions but I can answer questions that are about the code you are looking at...\\\").\\n* [x] User can give feedback on their satisfaction with the answers and these answers are analyzed to inform potential prompt engineering tweaks.\\n\\n### Non-functional scope\\n\\n* [x] **By design: The tools and the agent(s) must never share context that the user does not have access to.**\\n* [ ] The quality bar for what success means ([see below](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#what-does-success-mean \\\"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\\\")) is defined, tested and passed\\n* [ ] [Perceived speed of answers is at least o.k](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683). from user perspective and there are ideas how to improve it to good.\\n  * [x] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n  * [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n* [ ] Errors are tracked.\\n\\nOne of these two options. Still TBD:\\n\\n* [ ] Works in the main product for Ultimate users that have toggled the right switches in the settings.\\n* [ ] **Access to the Chat is granted if the user has paid the add-on.** The project or the tier of the project's namespace does not matter. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n  * [ ] During the pre-GA phase or pre-addon phase, all SaaS users that are at least in one Ultimate tier, do have access to the chat. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n\\n## What does success mean?\\n\\nGenerally\\n\\n* AI answers should be _mostly_ correct, helpful and friendly.\\n* If the AI does not know it should _mostly_ say that is does not know.\\n\\n#### How to measure it?\\n\\n~~We shall consider the experience Beta-ready once we have achieved the following:~~\\n\\nWe shall consider the experience satisfactory once we have achieved the following:\\n\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003e80% of responses `good` or `excellent`\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003c5% of responses `terrible`\\n\\n(on a 5 point scale: `terrible`, `poor`, `average`, `good`, `excellent`)\\n\\nSee [details why we opted for this quality bar](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gitlab-OKRs/-/work_items/3555#note_1541945461 \\\"KR2: GitLab Duo Chat becomes available in beta, including six \\u201cspecialized tools\\u201d that are also in beta, with a path to general availability in FY24Q4.\\\").\\n\\n[This user satisfaction will be assessed by UXR roughly every two to three weeks](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513 \\\"Repeated analysis of user experience with Duo chat as we continuously improve the chat (also considering the outcome of each round of these user tests.)\\\"). Check the [bottom of our AI Features Dashboard](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/1137231/Ai-Features) for these metrics and how they progress toward the goal.\\n\\n## Work items (remaining as of mid August)\\n\\n#### Understand in more detail the problem space and how well we address user needs (mostly UXR and Product analytics)\\n\\n**Outcomes**: More clear understanding of users expectations and which problems they want to solve interactively with the chat.\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11120+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1325+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415591+\\n\\n#### Addressing functional gaps \u0026 UX issues\\n\\n**Outcomes**: better user experience measurable in better scores in user testing\\n\\n- ~~MR context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430+s~~ (removed from beta scope; see [reason](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430#note_1545114583))\\n- Epic context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422091+s\\n- Support selected text: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422176+s\\n- Streaming: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683+s\\n- Dummy contexts: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422187+s\\n- Self-discoverable capabilities: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801+s\\n- [Collection of UX issues to be addressed](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10673 \\\"Chat Integration iteration 1 FE \u0026 BE\\\"). Such as:\\n  - new conversation\\n  - sync chat across clients\\n  - onboarding\\n  - expiration time for response\\n  - Error messages\\n  - feedback mechanism\\n  - ~~Global entry point for chat should be enabled for beta release but should not be enabled before we reach our quality target.~~ [Global entry point for chat will only be turned on when we reach the quality target defined above independent of the beta release](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2465#note_1577201457). \\n- **Continuously test user satisfaction with UXR and respond to their feedback**\\n\\n#### Developing a testing framework\\n\\n**Outcomes**: enabling efficient development and efficient contribution\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422212+s\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422245+s\\n\\n#### Monitoring quality / stability / speed / cost\\n\\n**Outcomes**: more trust production readiness of the chat\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11234+\\n  - Cost: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415944+s / https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1358+s\\n  - Error rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s tracks the error rate on individual 3rd party AI requests as well as error rate from the user perspective as responding to their request might require combining multiple 3rd party AI requests. @jprovaznik's assumes there are no errors beyond the 3rd party LLM service that would need to be considered (for instance between the backend and the client). The user level error rate calculation will interpret slow responses \\\\\u003e20 sec to be errors. The error rates will be tracked in Grafana.\\n  - Response time: \u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\\\~\\\\~\u003c/span\u003e https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1366+\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~ Will be tracked in Prometheus on the worker level as part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s by @jprovaznik. These measurements will include the time for all AI requests necessary to answer the user question but not the time to receive the user input from the frontend and sending the result back to the frontend. The difference should be marginal.\\n  - \\\"Can't answer\\\" rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422202+s\\n\\n#### Other work items\\n\\n- [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420939+s (switch embeddings provider)\\n- [ ] Mature the chat documentation and bring it to its own page.\\n- [ ] Label the Chat as beta in the product and in the documentation. \\n\\n#### Integrate existing stand-alone AI features ???\\n\\n- Should we integrate existing standalone AI features like _explain this code_ into the chat prior to the Beta release?\\n- We should only do so if they reach the quality bar defined above.\\n- What interdependencies are there with company announcements?\\n\\n# What the user can ask\\n\\n### Questions related to current code\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nCan you explain the code? (Whole file or selected) Explain the selected code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you explain function X? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite me tests for function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWhat is the complexity of the code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would the code look like in Python? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would you refactor the code? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you fix the bug in my code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate an example of how to use function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite documentation for the selected code | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770#note_1597887855) | \\nCreate a function to validate an e-mail address | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a tic tac toe game in Javascript | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a function in Python to call the spotify API to get my playlists | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\n\\n### Questions related to the current issue or current epic\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nPlease summarize the issue | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize with bullet points | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nCan you list all the labels? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nHow old is the epic? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597974580) | \\nFor which milestone is the issue? And how long until then? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize the comments into bullet points? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/31d608f706ac72533502736939cdfe9c077c9975/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L142) | \\nQuestions on the actual content: \\\"What should be the final solution for this issue?\\\" | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1613052031) | \\n\\n### Questions relating to the current MR\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nWhat is this MR about? | | \\nCan you review this MR? | | \\nCan you create a test for the new function in this MR? | | \\nCan you simplify this code? | | \\n\\n### Questions relating how to use GitLab\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nHow do I change my password in GitLab? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I fork a project? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I clone a repository? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I create a template? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nWhat is DevOps? What is DevSecOps? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597971516) | \\n\\n### Follow-up questions\\n\\n#### Basic follow-up question that only require the last answer as context\\n\\n- Can you simplify your answer?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is simplified\\n  - Tool test: [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L167-218)\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you translate your answer to German?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is translated\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you explain your third point in different words?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer contains a bulleted or numbered list (because that was the assignment of the previous question).\\n  - Result: the third point of the last answer is explained with different words.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require the last answer + the context that was pulled for creating the last answer\\n\\n- Iterative in depth analysis of an issue\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Example:\\n    - User is on: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800\\n    - User asks: Can you identify the unique use cases the commenters have raised on this issue?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith bulleted or numbered list of use cases\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n    - User asks: Can you sort this list by the number of users that have requested the use case and include the number for each use case? Can you include a verbatim for the two most requested use cases that reflect the general opinion of commenters for these two use cases?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith sorted list that contains the number of users that asked for each use case and two verbatim\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n- Can you expand on the last paragraph?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n- Can you detail the purpose of the code-owner class?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require multiple recent answers + multiple contexts that were pulled for creating the last answer (NOT PART OF BETA)\\n\\n- Comparison of two issues\\n  - Example\\n    - History: continued from above big example \\\"Iterative in depth analysis of an issue \\\"\\n    - User switched to: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104\\n    - User asks: How are the use cases raised in this issue different or the same?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context for 12104\u003e`\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool to get context for 17800 but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith two list: one with similarities and one with differences\u003e`\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Questions that the user did not formulate clear enough should result in a question from the AI to clarify the question\\n\\n- User: `How do I create a template?`\\n  - Although this question seems to be reasonable, it's not clear what kind of template is meant. I think the only solution for such questions is to have a means for the AI to ask a clarifying question, for example the following\\n- Bot: `The term template is used widely in the context. Could you be more specific which kind of template you would like to create?`\\n- Tool test:\\n- Quality test: \\n\\n## What will not be supported\\n\\n* We will not support other languages than English. That does not mean it won't work, but it will not have been tested at all. We made this decision to prevent a significant increase in complexity.\\n* We will not support comparing and relating different contexts to another. E.g. what is the difference between this issue and issue xyz. This is GA scope.\\n* We will not support global contexts for repos / issues / epics / etc. This may be covered before GA though.\\n\\n## Marketing\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/brand-product-marketing/product-marketing/-/issues/7274+s\\n\\n## Related\\n\\n* [Research work prioritization for the GitLab Chat in Q2 FY24](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2501#note_1421246798 \\\"Research Prioritization for Fulfillment, ModelOps, and Analytics - Q2FY24\\\")\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2604#note_1515310932\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423325+s\\n\\n## Literature\\n\\n(some random links)\\n\\n* Research result: [Questions users want to ask](https://gitlab.dovetailapp.com/projects/6wL9UBVQCbOpaC6WLu22su/v/ukXfzRL2lbYwiKe5Bbdyu/present/1WktHKngt2oO4NpHzBEf9I)\\n* [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools)\\n* https://www.honeycomb.io/blog/hard-stuff-nobody-talks-about-llm\\n* https://newrelic.com/platform/new-relic-grok\\n* https://twitter.com/amanrsanger/status/1660729100137553920\\n* Test framework for code suggestions: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415381+\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": \"2023-07-31\", \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": true, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 785400, \"relative_position\": -12825, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 853405, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 834262, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 17, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 11, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 57, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 80}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 30251403, \"title\": \"AI-Priority\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31167182, \"title\": \"Category:Duo Chat\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 04:14:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-14 17:02:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI Framework category, formerly named Category:GitLab Duo Chat\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 30402137, \"title\": \"Copilot-X-Compete\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": null, \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3207279, \"title\": \"GitLab Ultimate\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-22 09:43:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-01-30 19:53:24 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Features or changes limited or intended as part of GitLab Ultimate.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287867, \"title\": \"devops::ai-powered\", \"color\": \"#e44d2a\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 17:56:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI-powered stage part of the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287876, \"title\": \"group::duo chat\", \"color\": \"#a8d695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 18:01:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:45:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Duo Chat group, part of the AI-powered stage within the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 23545476, \"title\": \"section::data-science\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-01-27 10:11:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-17 00:09:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Data Science section including ModelOps and Anti-Abuse Stages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Thanks @tlinz , just also understanding \\ndoes this impact timelines on the work for Testing and Evaluation cc @oregand as well\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5749302, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6569137e475e099a705317777294fe726092f0ae\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1604836294, \"namespace_id\": 9970}, {\"note\": \"cc @alasch this is interesting external research for the work you're doing on code suggestions\\n\\ncc @NickHertz this is interesting in general for your work on AI features\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437012648, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI UX is working on some guidance about how we move a feature from experiment -\u003e beta -\u003e GA: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/408400\\n\\ncc @jmandell @pedroms\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1390824408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@timzallmann @m_gill @katiemacoy This is the epic where we will add issues and scope the work required to bring the GitLab Chat Bot to beta. I wrote some initial thoughts in the description that can change. \\n\\nThis epic is going to be tracked by leadership so we want the scope of work to be crisp (that is my job) but I need your help with the team to make sure that we have the right sub-epics/issues.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1387614045, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@katiemacoy @sarahwaldner I think:\\n- We must run the UI through solution validation (at least 5 internal participants).\\n- We should track the scoring during the research assuming we'll move forward with that concept.\\n- We should write a clear statement about how confident we are about understanding the problem we're solving for our users.\\n    - It would be really nice to have a sentence or two that explains where this confidence is being derived from.\\n\\n@pedroms what do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5291762, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391203190, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jmandell I think that list is perfectly reasonable and well-scoped to where we are right now!\\n\\nEngineering and I are still trying to figure out technically how we slice and dice this feature. @katiemacoy we will keep you clued in with us in lock step. Previously we had been thinking that we would add each use case one at a time, but it looks like we are actually going to add multiple at a time by enabling different models. This is good news :) Just means I am still a bit unsure how we scope the epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:39:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 22:14:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391220604, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@m_gill This is a great plan. @tlinz What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393133970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I like this proposal. Here are some thoughts. \\n\\n* We should probably add capabilities to collect feedback\\n* In today's demo I got the impression that it may not be easy to create something that can generically catch the context that the user sees. Which is what I had understood the Universal Object access tool would do. I have to discuss this with @timzallmann to understand it better. \\n* We could reduce the scope of VectorQARetrieval tool to documentation only for the beta release and have ask a question about this repo be done by the SCM team if we find that distribution of work could scale well. \\n* Are you saying the WebIDE chat extension is part of Beta or just the API that would enable that, @m_gill. In the spirit of keeping work pieces small I would keep it out of scope and create a separate issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393965447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner from a development perspective, this is what I see as Beta:\\n- [In progress] Ability to switch tooling (IE: A prompt comes in, and we detect where it gets routed)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/121122+ \\n- 2 tools are available to switch to, and respond in a Beta fashion based on the prompts they support:\\n  - [In progress] Universal Object access tool (Explain this block of code, Write tests for this block of code)\\n  - VectorQARetrieval Tool (Answer this question from our documentation, Ask a question about this repository)\\n    - [In progress] Embeddings will be needed https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10616+ \\n- Documentation to reflect how other teams can contribute new tooling\\n  - Teams are unblocked at this point\\n- API for Chat Interface, which will be used for integrations such as IDE extensions (Integrated with toggle support)\\n- System prompt is in place to enforce guardrails on what the Chat can and cannot answer\\n- Moderation is in place to prevent offensive prompts/responses \\n  - Not part of this MVC - \\u201cReport answers as offensive\\u201d functionality\\n- [In progress] Basic UI\\n- [In progress] Memory, across sessions (switching pages or devices)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/410521+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 13:19:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4554599, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1392312276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz just the API that would enable that. I'm aligned with [this larger plan](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10219#note_1393118339), where WebIDE chat should be Phase 2, but still done within the quarter.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:37:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 02:30:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1394009327, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1232+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"04389db4e66ed66a332464009e3f04dfc3c5ecef\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1420511785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, \\n\\n\u003e \u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\n\u003e Does this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nSorry that was not precise. I will change it to: Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding the WebIDE)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422449304, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz :wave_tone1: \\n\\nIn the description under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) the first bullet point is:\\n\\n\u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\nDoes this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nAdditionally, also under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) I see that the first iteration will enable:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nPlease separate this out into it's own section called **Use Cases that will be enabled** and word these statements using the terms that leadership had been referring to them as. The goal is for someone to be able to look at this epic and immediately understand that in the first iteration the following features will be possible:\\n\\n1. Explain this code\\n2. Ask questions about an issue = \u003e _This is new. Please explain what this is since this has not been a feature that we have been broadly discussing for the last couple months_\\n3. Conversational Chat\\n4. Ask questions of docs\\n\\nFinally, marketing needs a 2 week aheads up (to the best of your ability) prior to the release of the first iteration. \\n\\ncc @timzallmann @m_gill\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 15:14:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422263279, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, I think we need to educate the leadership that the scope of what we aim to deliver is much larger than bringing our \\\"legacy\\\" AI experiments together in one place. \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422462628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner and @laurenaalves, I think we are probably less than 2 weeks away from a releasable first iteration. @timzallmann can confirm. In fact, we hope that we can have something demoable today or tomorrow, so we can understand how well it works and what is missing for a releasable functionality. I also have requests from @cherryhan to create something that we can demo to a large prospect on Wednesday as we might not win them if we can't show AI capabilities that go beyond code suggestions. \\n\\n@laurenaalves, once we have that first prototype working we will share it with you. I can work on a blog post. What else do you need from me? Please, check out\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:34:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422486037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz \\n\\n\u003e \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\\n\\nYes I saw that screenshot however in the description of this epic you specifically list these use cases:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nHow should I be interpreting the description? \\n\\nPlease make sure that the start/end dates on the [first iteration epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675) show that this will release in ~2 weeks. Right now the end date is June 9th. Thank you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3796140, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422558431, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675#note_1432658681\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432659564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for sharing! This was an interesting read and can help put our own learnings into perspective.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 7351507, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437568945, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @katiemacoy and others, here is an interesting research that touches on [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools) and also on [Trust in accuracy](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-trust-in-the-accuracy-of-ai-output).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:38:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 15:02:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432665862, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 5749302, \"username\": \"mray2020\", \"name\": \"Mon Ray\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 5291762, \"username\": \"jmandell\", \"name\": \"Justin Mandell\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 7351507, \"username\": \"alasch\", \"name\": \"Anne Lasch\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"How much work is left to be done {url}?","query_id":"bd52fa87026e4bb9ab4c722daff73eb0","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"822061","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 822061, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3796140, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10550, \"updated_by_id\": 367626, \"last_edited_by_id\": 367626, \"lock_version\": 64, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-07-31\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 22:05:32 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:27:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:17 UTC\", \"title\": \"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\", \"description\": \"This epic tracks the work to bring the [GitLab Duo Chat](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/ai_features.html#gitlab-duo-chat) system to Beta. This includes the backend where the heavy lifting is done and the WebUI frontend.\\n\\n**While this epic does NOT include the **[**Chat in VS Code and Web IDE**](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\")** work, it needs to build the backend in such a way that it can support clients other than the WebUI - specifically IDEs**. It must consider that the IDEs may not have the same context as the WebUI. For instance, an IDE may not know the URL of the code file the user is looking at, as the user might have just created it locally. Also the file may have changed on the client. The maturation of the Chat in VS Code and Web IDE is independent of the chat system maturation.\\n\\n:movie_camera: [Video Walk-through of this epic](https://youtu.be/T645Ppm8oQ0)\\n\\n## Overall Scope\\n\\n### Functional scope\\n\\n* [x] Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding [Web IDE](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\"))\\n* [ ] Chat answers questions relating to\\n  * [x] code the user sees (explain \\\"this\\\")\\n  * [x] code referenced (with URL)\\n  * [x] issue the user sees\\n  * [x] issue referenced\\n  * [x] epic the user sees\\n  * [x] epic referenced\\n  * [ ] ~~MR the user sees~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] ~~MR referenced~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [x] how to use GitLab\\n  * [x] recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n  * [ ] ~~selections (if something is selected e.g. code in the code file, this is added to the context so the chat can answer questions about the selection)~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] dummy tools exist that proof the agent can support many more use cases (pipeline context, global issues/epics/code contexts)\\n* [ ] If context is not available, [chat responds with its supported contexts](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801 \\\"Self-discoverable capabilities of the chat via responses of the chat itself - e.g. I can't answer this questions but I can answer questions that are about the code you are looking at...\\\").\\n* [x] User can give feedback on their satisfaction with the answers and these answers are analyzed to inform potential prompt engineering tweaks.\\n\\n### Non-functional scope\\n\\n* [x] **By design: The tools and the agent(s) must never share context that the user does not have access to.**\\n* [ ] The quality bar for what success means ([see below](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#what-does-success-mean \\\"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\\\")) is defined, tested and passed\\n* [ ] [Perceived speed of answers is at least o.k](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683). from user perspective and there are ideas how to improve it to good.\\n  * [x] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n  * [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n* [ ] Errors are tracked.\\n\\nOne of these two options. Still TBD:\\n\\n* [ ] Works in the main product for Ultimate users that have toggled the right switches in the settings.\\n* [ ] **Access to the Chat is granted if the user has paid the add-on.** The project or the tier of the project's namespace does not matter. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n  * [ ] During the pre-GA phase or pre-addon phase, all SaaS users that are at least in one Ultimate tier, do have access to the chat. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n\\n## What does success mean?\\n\\nGenerally\\n\\n* AI answers should be _mostly_ correct, helpful and friendly.\\n* If the AI does not know it should _mostly_ say that is does not know.\\n\\n#### How to measure it?\\n\\n~~We shall consider the experience Beta-ready once we have achieved the following:~~\\n\\nWe shall consider the experience satisfactory once we have achieved the following:\\n\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003e80% of responses `good` or `excellent`\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003c5% of responses `terrible`\\n\\n(on a 5 point scale: `terrible`, `poor`, `average`, `good`, `excellent`)\\n\\nSee [details why we opted for this quality bar](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gitlab-OKRs/-/work_items/3555#note_1541945461 \\\"KR2: GitLab Duo Chat becomes available in beta, including six \\u201cspecialized tools\\u201d that are also in beta, with a path to general availability in FY24Q4.\\\").\\n\\n[This user satisfaction will be assessed by UXR roughly every two to three weeks](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513 \\\"Repeated analysis of user experience with Duo chat as we continuously improve the chat (also considering the outcome of each round of these user tests.)\\\"). Check the [bottom of our AI Features Dashboard](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/1137231/Ai-Features) for these metrics and how they progress toward the goal.\\n\\n## Work items (remaining as of mid August)\\n\\n#### Understand in more detail the problem space and how well we address user needs (mostly UXR and Product analytics)\\n\\n**Outcomes**: More clear understanding of users expectations and which problems they want to solve interactively with the chat.\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11120+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1325+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415591+\\n\\n#### Addressing functional gaps \u0026 UX issues\\n\\n**Outcomes**: better user experience measurable in better scores in user testing\\n\\n- ~~MR context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430+s~~ (removed from beta scope; see [reason](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430#note_1545114583))\\n- Epic context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422091+s\\n- Support selected text: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422176+s\\n- Streaming: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683+s\\n- Dummy contexts: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422187+s\\n- Self-discoverable capabilities: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801+s\\n- [Collection of UX issues to be addressed](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10673 \\\"Chat Integration iteration 1 FE \u0026 BE\\\"). Such as:\\n  - new conversation\\n  - sync chat across clients\\n  - onboarding\\n  - expiration time for response\\n  - Error messages\\n  - feedback mechanism\\n  - ~~Global entry point for chat should be enabled for beta release but should not be enabled before we reach our quality target.~~ [Global entry point for chat will only be turned on when we reach the quality target defined above independent of the beta release](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2465#note_1577201457). \\n- **Continuously test user satisfaction with UXR and respond to their feedback**\\n\\n#### Developing a testing framework\\n\\n**Outcomes**: enabling efficient development and efficient contribution\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422212+s\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422245+s\\n\\n#### Monitoring quality / stability / speed / cost\\n\\n**Outcomes**: more trust production readiness of the chat\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11234+\\n  - Cost: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415944+s / https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1358+s\\n  - Error rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s tracks the error rate on individual 3rd party AI requests as well as error rate from the user perspective as responding to their request might require combining multiple 3rd party AI requests. @jprovaznik's assumes there are no errors beyond the 3rd party LLM service that would need to be considered (for instance between the backend and the client). The user level error rate calculation will interpret slow responses \\\\\u003e20 sec to be errors. The error rates will be tracked in Grafana.\\n  - Response time: \u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\\\~\\\\~\u003c/span\u003e https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1366+\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~ Will be tracked in Prometheus on the worker level as part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s by @jprovaznik. These measurements will include the time for all AI requests necessary to answer the user question but not the time to receive the user input from the frontend and sending the result back to the frontend. The difference should be marginal.\\n  - \\\"Can't answer\\\" rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422202+s\\n\\n#### Other work items\\n\\n- [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420939+s (switch embeddings provider)\\n- [ ] Mature the chat documentation and bring it to its own page.\\n- [ ] Label the Chat as beta in the product and in the documentation. \\n\\n#### Integrate existing stand-alone AI features ???\\n\\n- Should we integrate existing standalone AI features like _explain this code_ into the chat prior to the Beta release?\\n- We should only do so if they reach the quality bar defined above.\\n- What interdependencies are there with company announcements?\\n\\n# What the user can ask\\n\\n### Questions related to current code\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nCan you explain the code? (Whole file or selected) Explain the selected code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you explain function X? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite me tests for function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWhat is the complexity of the code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would the code look like in Python? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would you refactor the code? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you fix the bug in my code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate an example of how to use function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite documentation for the selected code | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770#note_1597887855) | \\nCreate a function to validate an e-mail address | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a tic tac toe game in Javascript | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a function in Python to call the spotify API to get my playlists | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\n\\n### Questions related to the current issue or current epic\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nPlease summarize the issue | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize with bullet points | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nCan you list all the labels? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nHow old is the epic? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597974580) | \\nFor which milestone is the issue? And how long until then? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize the comments into bullet points? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/31d608f706ac72533502736939cdfe9c077c9975/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L142) | \\nQuestions on the actual content: \\\"What should be the final solution for this issue?\\\" | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1613052031) | \\n\\n### Questions relating to the current MR\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nWhat is this MR about? | | \\nCan you review this MR? | | \\nCan you create a test for the new function in this MR? | | \\nCan you simplify this code? | | \\n\\n### Questions relating how to use GitLab\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nHow do I change my password in GitLab? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I fork a project? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I clone a repository? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I create a template? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nWhat is DevOps? What is DevSecOps? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597971516) | \\n\\n### Follow-up questions\\n\\n#### Basic follow-up question that only require the last answer as context\\n\\n- Can you simplify your answer?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is simplified\\n  - Tool test: [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L167-218)\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you translate your answer to German?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is translated\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you explain your third point in different words?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer contains a bulleted or numbered list (because that was the assignment of the previous question).\\n  - Result: the third point of the last answer is explained with different words.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require the last answer + the context that was pulled for creating the last answer\\n\\n- Iterative in depth analysis of an issue\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Example:\\n    - User is on: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800\\n    - User asks: Can you identify the unique use cases the commenters have raised on this issue?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith bulleted or numbered list of use cases\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n    - User asks: Can you sort this list by the number of users that have requested the use case and include the number for each use case? Can you include a verbatim for the two most requested use cases that reflect the general opinion of commenters for these two use cases?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith sorted list that contains the number of users that asked for each use case and two verbatim\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n- Can you expand on the last paragraph?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n- Can you detail the purpose of the code-owner class?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require multiple recent answers + multiple contexts that were pulled for creating the last answer (NOT PART OF BETA)\\n\\n- Comparison of two issues\\n  - Example\\n    - History: continued from above big example \\\"Iterative in depth analysis of an issue \\\"\\n    - User switched to: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104\\n    - User asks: How are the use cases raised in this issue different or the same?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context for 12104\u003e`\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool to get context for 17800 but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith two list: one with similarities and one with differences\u003e`\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Questions that the user did not formulate clear enough should result in a question from the AI to clarify the question\\n\\n- User: `How do I create a template?`\\n  - Although this question seems to be reasonable, it's not clear what kind of template is meant. I think the only solution for such questions is to have a means for the AI to ask a clarifying question, for example the following\\n- Bot: `The term template is used widely in the context. Could you be more specific which kind of template you would like to create?`\\n- Tool test:\\n- Quality test: \\n\\n## What will not be supported\\n\\n* We will not support other languages than English. That does not mean it won't work, but it will not have been tested at all. We made this decision to prevent a significant increase in complexity.\\n* We will not support comparing and relating different contexts to another. E.g. what is the difference between this issue and issue xyz. This is GA scope.\\n* We will not support global contexts for repos / issues / epics / etc. This may be covered before GA though.\\n\\n## Marketing\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/brand-product-marketing/product-marketing/-/issues/7274+s\\n\\n## Related\\n\\n* [Research work prioritization for the GitLab Chat in Q2 FY24](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2501#note_1421246798 \\\"Research Prioritization for Fulfillment, ModelOps, and Analytics - Q2FY24\\\")\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2604#note_1515310932\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423325+s\\n\\n## Literature\\n\\n(some random links)\\n\\n* Research result: [Questions users want to ask](https://gitlab.dovetailapp.com/projects/6wL9UBVQCbOpaC6WLu22su/v/ukXfzRL2lbYwiKe5Bbdyu/present/1WktHKngt2oO4NpHzBEf9I)\\n* [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools)\\n* https://www.honeycomb.io/blog/hard-stuff-nobody-talks-about-llm\\n* https://newrelic.com/platform/new-relic-grok\\n* https://twitter.com/amanrsanger/status/1660729100137553920\\n* Test framework for code suggestions: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415381+\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": \"2023-07-31\", \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": true, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 785400, \"relative_position\": -12825, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 853405, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 834262, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 17, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 11, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 57, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 80}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 30251403, \"title\": \"AI-Priority\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31167182, \"title\": \"Category:Duo Chat\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 04:14:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-14 17:02:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI Framework category, formerly named Category:GitLab Duo Chat\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 30402137, \"title\": \"Copilot-X-Compete\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": null, \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3207279, \"title\": \"GitLab Ultimate\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-22 09:43:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-01-30 19:53:24 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Features or changes limited or intended as part of GitLab Ultimate.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287867, \"title\": \"devops::ai-powered\", \"color\": \"#e44d2a\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 17:56:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI-powered stage part of the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287876, \"title\": \"group::duo chat\", \"color\": \"#a8d695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 18:01:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:45:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Duo Chat group, part of the AI-powered stage within the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 23545476, \"title\": \"section::data-science\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-01-27 10:11:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-17 00:09:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Data Science section including ModelOps and Anti-Abuse Stages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Thanks @tlinz , just also understanding \\ndoes this impact timelines on the work for Testing and Evaluation cc @oregand as well\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5749302, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6569137e475e099a705317777294fe726092f0ae\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1604836294, \"namespace_id\": 9970}, {\"note\": \"cc @alasch this is interesting external research for the work you're doing on code suggestions\\n\\ncc @NickHertz this is interesting in general for your work on AI features\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437012648, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI UX is working on some guidance about how we move a feature from experiment -\u003e beta -\u003e GA: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/408400\\n\\ncc @jmandell @pedroms\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1390824408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@timzallmann @m_gill @katiemacoy This is the epic where we will add issues and scope the work required to bring the GitLab Chat Bot to beta. I wrote some initial thoughts in the description that can change. \\n\\nThis epic is going to be tracked by leadership so we want the scope of work to be crisp (that is my job) but I need your help with the team to make sure that we have the right sub-epics/issues.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1387614045, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@katiemacoy @sarahwaldner I think:\\n- We must run the UI through solution validation (at least 5 internal participants).\\n- We should track the scoring during the research assuming we'll move forward with that concept.\\n- We should write a clear statement about how confident we are about understanding the problem we're solving for our users.\\n    - It would be really nice to have a sentence or two that explains where this confidence is being derived from.\\n\\n@pedroms what do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5291762, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391203190, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jmandell I think that list is perfectly reasonable and well-scoped to where we are right now!\\n\\nEngineering and I are still trying to figure out technically how we slice and dice this feature. @katiemacoy we will keep you clued in with us in lock step. Previously we had been thinking that we would add each use case one at a time, but it looks like we are actually going to add multiple at a time by enabling different models. This is good news :) Just means I am still a bit unsure how we scope the epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:39:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 22:14:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391220604, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@m_gill This is a great plan. @tlinz What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393133970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I like this proposal. Here are some thoughts. \\n\\n* We should probably add capabilities to collect feedback\\n* In today's demo I got the impression that it may not be easy to create something that can generically catch the context that the user sees. Which is what I had understood the Universal Object access tool would do. I have to discuss this with @timzallmann to understand it better. \\n* We could reduce the scope of VectorQARetrieval tool to documentation only for the beta release and have ask a question about this repo be done by the SCM team if we find that distribution of work could scale well. \\n* Are you saying the WebIDE chat extension is part of Beta or just the API that would enable that, @m_gill. In the spirit of keeping work pieces small I would keep it out of scope and create a separate issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393965447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner from a development perspective, this is what I see as Beta:\\n- [In progress] Ability to switch tooling (IE: A prompt comes in, and we detect where it gets routed)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/121122+ \\n- 2 tools are available to switch to, and respond in a Beta fashion based on the prompts they support:\\n  - [In progress] Universal Object access tool (Explain this block of code, Write tests for this block of code)\\n  - VectorQARetrieval Tool (Answer this question from our documentation, Ask a question about this repository)\\n    - [In progress] Embeddings will be needed https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10616+ \\n- Documentation to reflect how other teams can contribute new tooling\\n  - Teams are unblocked at this point\\n- API for Chat Interface, which will be used for integrations such as IDE extensions (Integrated with toggle support)\\n- System prompt is in place to enforce guardrails on what the Chat can and cannot answer\\n- Moderation is in place to prevent offensive prompts/responses \\n  - Not part of this MVC - \\u201cReport answers as offensive\\u201d functionality\\n- [In progress] Basic UI\\n- [In progress] Memory, across sessions (switching pages or devices)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/410521+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 13:19:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4554599, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1392312276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz just the API that would enable that. I'm aligned with [this larger plan](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10219#note_1393118339), where WebIDE chat should be Phase 2, but still done within the quarter.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:37:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 02:30:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1394009327, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1232+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"04389db4e66ed66a332464009e3f04dfc3c5ecef\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1420511785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, \\n\\n\u003e \u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\n\u003e Does this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nSorry that was not precise. I will change it to: Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding the WebIDE)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422449304, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz :wave_tone1: \\n\\nIn the description under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) the first bullet point is:\\n\\n\u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\nDoes this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nAdditionally, also under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) I see that the first iteration will enable:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nPlease separate this out into it's own section called **Use Cases that will be enabled** and word these statements using the terms that leadership had been referring to them as. The goal is for someone to be able to look at this epic and immediately understand that in the first iteration the following features will be possible:\\n\\n1. Explain this code\\n2. Ask questions about an issue = \u003e _This is new. Please explain what this is since this has not been a feature that we have been broadly discussing for the last couple months_\\n3. Conversational Chat\\n4. Ask questions of docs\\n\\nFinally, marketing needs a 2 week aheads up (to the best of your ability) prior to the release of the first iteration. \\n\\ncc @timzallmann @m_gill\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 15:14:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422263279, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, I think we need to educate the leadership that the scope of what we aim to deliver is much larger than bringing our \\\"legacy\\\" AI experiments together in one place. \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422462628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner and @laurenaalves, I think we are probably less than 2 weeks away from a releasable first iteration. @timzallmann can confirm. In fact, we hope that we can have something demoable today or tomorrow, so we can understand how well it works and what is missing for a releasable functionality. I also have requests from @cherryhan to create something that we can demo to a large prospect on Wednesday as we might not win them if we can't show AI capabilities that go beyond code suggestions. \\n\\n@laurenaalves, once we have that first prototype working we will share it with you. I can work on a blog post. What else do you need from me? Please, check out\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:34:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422486037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz \\n\\n\u003e \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\\n\\nYes I saw that screenshot however in the description of this epic you specifically list these use cases:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nHow should I be interpreting the description? \\n\\nPlease make sure that the start/end dates on the [first iteration epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675) show that this will release in ~2 weeks. Right now the end date is June 9th. Thank you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3796140, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422558431, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675#note_1432658681\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432659564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for sharing! This was an interesting read and can help put our own learnings into perspective.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 7351507, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437568945, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @katiemacoy and others, here is an interesting research that touches on [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools) and also on [Trust in accuracy](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-trust-in-the-accuracy-of-ai-output).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:38:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 15:02:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432665862, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 5749302, \"username\": \"mray2020\", \"name\": \"Mon Ray\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 5291762, \"username\": \"jmandell\", \"name\": \"Justin Mandell\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 7351507, \"username\": \"alasch\", \"name\": \"Anne Lasch\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"How much work is left to be done in this epic?","query_id":"bb76a9350e224240aba07164028c5128","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"822061","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 822061, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3796140, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10550, \"updated_by_id\": 367626, \"last_edited_by_id\": 367626, \"lock_version\": 64, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-07-31\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-10-20 22:05:32 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:27:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:17 UTC\", \"title\": \"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\", \"description\": \"This epic tracks the work to bring the [GitLab Duo Chat](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/ai_features.html#gitlab-duo-chat) system to Beta. This includes the backend where the heavy lifting is done and the WebUI frontend.\\n\\n**While this epic does NOT include the **[**Chat in VS Code and Web IDE**](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\")** work, it needs to build the backend in such a way that it can support clients other than the WebUI - specifically IDEs**. It must consider that the IDEs may not have the same context as the WebUI. For instance, an IDE may not know the URL of the code file the user is looking at, as the user might have just created it locally. Also the file may have changed on the client. The maturation of the Chat in VS Code and Web IDE is independent of the chat system maturation.\\n\\n:movie_camera: [Video Walk-through of this epic](https://youtu.be/T645Ppm8oQ0)\\n\\n## Overall Scope\\n\\n### Functional scope\\n\\n* [x] Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding [Web IDE](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10522 \\\"Bringing GitLab Chat to WebIDE \u0026 VSCode via Gitlab Workflow Extension\\\"))\\n* [ ] Chat answers questions relating to\\n  * [x] code the user sees (explain \\\"this\\\")\\n  * [x] code referenced (with URL)\\n  * [x] issue the user sees\\n  * [x] issue referenced\\n  * [x] epic the user sees\\n  * [x] epic referenced\\n  * [ ] ~~MR the user sees~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] ~~MR referenced~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [x] how to use GitLab\\n  * [x] recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n  * [ ] ~~selections (if something is selected e.g. code in the code file, this is added to the context so the chat can answer questions about the selection)~~ (removed from beta scope)\\n  * [ ] dummy tools exist that proof the agent can support many more use cases (pipeline context, global issues/epics/code contexts)\\n* [ ] If context is not available, [chat responds with its supported contexts](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801 \\\"Self-discoverable capabilities of the chat via responses of the chat itself - e.g. I can't answer this questions but I can answer questions that are about the code you are looking at...\\\").\\n* [x] User can give feedback on their satisfaction with the answers and these answers are analyzed to inform potential prompt engineering tweaks.\\n\\n### Non-functional scope\\n\\n* [x] **By design: The tools and the agent(s) must never share context that the user does not have access to.**\\n* [ ] The quality bar for what success means ([see below](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#what-does-success-mean \\\"GitLab Duo Chat [Beta]\\\")) is defined, tested and passed\\n* [ ] [Perceived speed of answers is at least o.k](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683). from user perspective and there are ideas how to improve it to good.\\n  * [x] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n  * [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419531+s\\n* [ ] Errors are tracked.\\n\\nOne of these two options. Still TBD:\\n\\n* [ ] Works in the main product for Ultimate users that have toggled the right switches in the settings.\\n* [ ] **Access to the Chat is granted if the user has paid the add-on.** The project or the tier of the project's namespace does not matter. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n  * [ ] During the pre-GA phase or pre-addon phase, all SaaS users that are at least in one Ultimate tier, do have access to the chat. [This still needs to be confirmed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421295#note_1515265994 \\\"Discuss: Allow the user to use the chat while not being in a GitLab repo\\\").\\n\\n## What does success mean?\\n\\nGenerally\\n\\n* AI answers should be _mostly_ correct, helpful and friendly.\\n* If the AI does not know it should _mostly_ say that is does not know.\\n\\n#### How to measure it?\\n\\n~~We shall consider the experience Beta-ready once we have achieved the following:~~\\n\\nWe shall consider the experience satisfactory once we have achieved the following:\\n\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003e80% of responses `good` or `excellent`\\n* Users consider \\\\\u003c5% of responses `terrible`\\n\\n(on a 5 point scale: `terrible`, `poor`, `average`, `good`, `excellent`)\\n\\nSee [details why we opted for this quality bar](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gitlab-OKRs/-/work_items/3555#note_1541945461 \\\"KR2: GitLab Duo Chat becomes available in beta, including six \\u201cspecialized tools\\u201d that are also in beta, with a path to general availability in FY24Q4.\\\").\\n\\n[This user satisfaction will be assessed by UXR roughly every two to three weeks](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513 \\\"Repeated analysis of user experience with Duo chat as we continuously improve the chat (also considering the outcome of each round of these user tests.)\\\"). Check the [bottom of our AI Features Dashboard](https://app.periscopedata.com/app/gitlab/1137231/Ai-Features) for these metrics and how they progress toward the goal.\\n\\n## Work items (remaining as of mid August)\\n\\n#### Understand in more detail the problem space and how well we address user needs (mostly UXR and Product analytics)\\n\\n**Outcomes**: More clear understanding of users expectations and which problems they want to solve interactively with the chat.\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11120+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1325+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2513+\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415591+\\n\\n#### Addressing functional gaps \u0026 UX issues\\n\\n**Outcomes**: better user experience measurable in better scores in user testing\\n\\n- ~~MR context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430+s~~ (removed from beta scope; see [reason](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412430#note_1545114583))\\n- Epic context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422091+s\\n- Support selected text: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422176+s\\n- Streaming: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10683+s\\n- Dummy contexts: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422187+s\\n- Self-discoverable capabilities: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415801+s\\n- [Collection of UX issues to be addressed](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10673 \\\"Chat Integration iteration 1 FE \u0026 BE\\\"). Such as:\\n  - new conversation\\n  - sync chat across clients\\n  - onboarding\\n  - expiration time for response\\n  - Error messages\\n  - feedback mechanism\\n  - ~~Global entry point for chat should be enabled for beta release but should not be enabled before we reach our quality target.~~ [Global entry point for chat will only be turned on when we reach the quality target defined above independent of the beta release](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2465#note_1577201457). \\n- **Continuously test user satisfaction with UXR and respond to their feedback**\\n\\n#### Developing a testing framework\\n\\n**Outcomes**: enabling efficient development and efficient contribution\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422212+s\\n- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422245+s\\n\\n#### Monitoring quality / stability / speed / cost\\n\\n**Outcomes**: more trust production readiness of the chat\\n\\n- https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11234+\\n  - Cost: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415944+s / https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1358+s\\n  - Error rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s tracks the error rate on individual 3rd party AI requests as well as error rate from the user perspective as responding to their request might require combining multiple 3rd party AI requests. @jprovaznik's assumes there are no errors beyond the 3rd party LLM service that would need to be considered (for instance between the backend and the client). The user level error rate calculation will interpret slow responses \\\\\u003e20 sec to be errors. The error rates will be tracked in Grafana.\\n  - Response time: \u003cspan dir=\\\"\\\"\u003e\\\\~\\\\~\u003c/span\u003e https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1366+\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~ Will be tracked in Prometheus on the worker level as part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/421546+s by @jprovaznik. These measurements will include the time for all AI requests necessary to answer the user question but not the time to receive the user input from the frontend and sending the result back to the frontend. The difference should be marginal.\\n  - \\\"Can't answer\\\" rate: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/422202+s\\n\\n#### Other work items\\n\\n- [ ] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/420939+s (switch embeddings provider)\\n- [ ] Mature the chat documentation and bring it to its own page.\\n- [ ] Label the Chat as beta in the product and in the documentation. \\n\\n#### Integrate existing stand-alone AI features ???\\n\\n- Should we integrate existing standalone AI features like _explain this code_ into the chat prior to the Beta release?\\n- We should only do so if they reach the quality bar defined above.\\n- What interdependencies are there with company announcements?\\n\\n# What the user can ask\\n\\n### Questions related to current code\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nCan you explain the code? (Whole file or selected) Explain the selected code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you explain function X? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite me tests for function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWhat is the complexity of the code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would the code look like in Python? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nHow would you refactor the code? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCan you fix the bug in my code | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate an example of how to use function X | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nWrite documentation for the selected code | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770#note_1597887855) | \\nCreate a function to validate an e-mail address | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a tic tac toe game in Javascript | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\nCreate a function in Python to call the spotify API to get my playlists | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L222-246) | \\n\\n### Questions related to the current issue or current epic\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nPlease summarize the issue | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize with bullet points | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nCan you list all the labels? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nHow old is the epic? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597974580) | \\nFor which milestone is the issue? And how long until then? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L126-144) | \\nSummarize the comments into bullet points? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/31d608f706ac72533502736939cdfe9c077c9975/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L142) | \\nQuestions on the actual content: \\\"What should be the final solution for this issue?\\\" | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1613052031) | \\n\\n### Questions relating to the current MR\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nWhat is this MR about? | | \\nCan you review this MR? | | \\nCan you create a test for the new function in this MR? | | \\nCan you simplify this code? | | \\n\\n### Questions relating how to use GitLab\\n\\nQuestion | Tool test | Quality test \\n---|---|---\\nHow do I change my password in GitLab? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I fork a project? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I clone a repository? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nHow do I create a template? | [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L248-261) | \\nWhat is DevOps? What is DevSecOps? | [:x:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/133770/diffs#note_1597971516) | \\n\\n### Follow-up questions\\n\\n#### Basic follow-up question that only require the last answer as context\\n\\n- Can you simplify your answer?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is simplified\\n  - Tool test: [:white_check_mark:](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/b220eb42587282203362b59eafc3560b5578c9d6/ee/spec/lib/gitlab/llm/chain/agents/zero_shot/executor_real_requests_spec.rb#L167-218)\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you translate your answer to German?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history.\\n  - Result: the last answer is translated\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n- Can you explain your third point in different words?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer contains a bulleted or numbered list (because that was the assignment of the previous question).\\n  - Result: the third point of the last answer is explained with different words.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require the last answer + the context that was pulled for creating the last answer\\n\\n- Iterative in depth analysis of an issue\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Example:\\n    - User is on: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/17800\\n    - User asks: Can you identify the unique use cases the commenters have raised on this issue?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith bulleted or numbered list of use cases\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n    - User asks: Can you sort this list by the number of users that have requested the use case and include the number for each use case? Can you include a verbatim for the two most requested use cases that reflect the general opinion of commenters for these two use cases?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith sorted list that contains the number of users that asked for each use case and two verbatim\u003e`\\n      - Tool test:\\n      - Quality test:\\n- Can you expand on the last paragraph?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n- Can you detail the purpose of the code-owner class?\\n  - Context: there is at least one bot-answer in history and the last answer required the usage of a Tool to generate it.\\n  - Result: The answer contains information that was available in the result of the previously used Tool but not contained in any of the answers.\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Advanced follow-up questions that require multiple recent answers + multiple contexts that were pulled for creating the last answer (NOT PART OF BETA)\\n\\n- Comparison of two issues\\n  - Example\\n    - History: continued from above big example \\\"Iterative in depth analysis of an issue \\\"\\n    - User switched to: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/12104\\n    - User asks: How are the use cases raised in this issue different or the same?\\n    - Bot:\\n      - uses `\u003cissue tool to collet the issue context for 12104\u003e`\\n      - uses `\u003chistory that includes the result of previously used tool to get context for 17800 but does not call the tool again\u003e`\\n      - answers `\u003cwith two list: one with similarities and one with differences\u003e`\\n  - Tool test:\\n  - Quality test:\\n\\n#### Questions that the user did not formulate clear enough should result in a question from the AI to clarify the question\\n\\n- User: `How do I create a template?`\\n  - Although this question seems to be reasonable, it's not clear what kind of template is meant. I think the only solution for such questions is to have a means for the AI to ask a clarifying question, for example the following\\n- Bot: `The term template is used widely in the context. Could you be more specific which kind of template you would like to create?`\\n- Tool test:\\n- Quality test: \\n\\n## What will not be supported\\n\\n* We will not support other languages than English. That does not mean it won't work, but it will not have been tested at all. We made this decision to prevent a significant increase in complexity.\\n* We will not support comparing and relating different contexts to another. E.g. what is the difference between this issue and issue xyz. This is GA scope.\\n* We will not support global contexts for repos / issues / epics / etc. This may be covered before GA though.\\n\\n## Marketing\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/marketing/brand-product-marketing/product-marketing/-/issues/7274+s\\n\\n## Related\\n\\n* [Research work prioritization for the GitLab Chat in Q2 FY24](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2501#note_1421246798 \\\"Research Prioritization for Fulfillment, ModelOps, and Analytics - Q2FY24\\\")\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2604#note_1515310932\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/423325+s\\n\\n## Literature\\n\\n(some random links)\\n\\n* Research result: [Questions users want to ask](https://gitlab.dovetailapp.com/projects/6wL9UBVQCbOpaC6WLu22su/v/ukXfzRL2lbYwiKe5Bbdyu/present/1WktHKngt2oO4NpHzBEf9I)\\n* [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools)\\n* https://www.honeycomb.io/blog/hard-stuff-nobody-talks-about-llm\\n* https://newrelic.com/platform/new-relic-grok\\n* https://twitter.com/amanrsanger/status/1660729100137553920\\n* Test framework for code suggestions: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415381+\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": \"2023-07-31\", \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": true, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 785400, \"relative_position\": -12825, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 853405, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 834262, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 17, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 11, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 57, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 80}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 30251403, \"title\": \"AI-Priority\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-11 19:53:00 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31167182, \"title\": \"Category:Duo Chat\", \"color\": \"#6699cc\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 04:14:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-14 17:02:16 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI Framework category, formerly named Category:GitLab Duo Chat\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 30402137, \"title\": \"Copilot-X-Compete\", \"color\": \"#9400d3\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 18:43:40 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": null, \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 3207279, \"title\": \"GitLab Ultimate\", \"color\": \"#8E44AD\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-12-22 09:43:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2018-01-30 19:53:24 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Features or changes limited or intended as part of GitLab Ultimate.\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287867, \"title\": \"devops::ai-powered\", \"color\": \"#e44d2a\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 17:56:54 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:24:57 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"AI-powered stage part of the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 31287876, \"title\": \"group::duo chat\", \"color\": \"#a8d695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-08-10 18:01:08 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-08-16 05:45:05 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Duo Chat group, part of the AI-powered stage within the Data Science section\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 23545476, \"title\": \"section::data-science\", \"color\": \"#F0AD4E\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-01-27 10:11:43 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-09-17 00:09:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues related to the Data Science section including ModelOps and Anti-Abuse Stages\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"Thanks @tlinz , just also understanding \\ndoes this impact timelines on the work for Testing and Evaluation cc @oregand as well\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5749302, \"created_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-16 08:21:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6569137e475e099a705317777294fe726092f0ae\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1604836294, \"namespace_id\": 9970}, {\"note\": \"cc @alasch this is interesting external research for the work you're doing on code suggestions\\n\\ncc @NickHertz this is interesting in general for your work on AI features\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 03:57:18 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437012648, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner FYI UX is working on some guidance about how we move a feature from experiment -\u003e beta -\u003e GA: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/408400\\n\\ncc @jmandell @pedroms\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 9608331, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1390824408, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@timzallmann @m_gill @katiemacoy This is the epic where we will add issues and scope the work required to bring the GitLab Chat Bot to beta. I wrote some initial thoughts in the description that can change. \\n\\nThis epic is going to be tracked by leadership so we want the scope of work to be crisp (that is my job) but I need your help with the team to make sure that we have the right sub-epics/issues.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-11 21:30:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 16:16:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1387614045, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@katiemacoy @sarahwaldner I think:\\n- We must run the UI through solution validation (at least 5 internal participants).\\n- We should track the scoring during the research assuming we'll move forward with that concept.\\n- We should write a clear statement about how confident we are about understanding the problem we're solving for our users.\\n    - It would be really nice to have a sentence or two that explains where this confidence is being derived from.\\n\\n@pedroms what do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5291762, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:15:22 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391203190, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jmandell I think that list is perfectly reasonable and well-scoped to where we are right now!\\n\\nEngineering and I are still trying to figure out technically how we slice and dice this feature. @katiemacoy we will keep you clued in with us in lock step. Previously we had been thinking that we would add each use case one at a time, but it looks like we are actually going to add multiple at a time by enabling different models. This is good news :) Just means I am still a bit unsure how we scope the epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-15 21:39:16 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-15 22:14:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"a030f2b7ee29d953ed341c5b25cf1788acc07e90\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1391220604, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@m_gill This is a great plan. @tlinz What do you think?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-16 23:23:23 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393133970, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I like this proposal. Here are some thoughts. \\n\\n* We should probably add capabilities to collect feedback\\n* In today's demo I got the impression that it may not be easy to create something that can generically catch the context that the user sees. Which is what I had understood the Universal Object access tool would do. I have to discuss this with @timzallmann to understand it better. \\n* We could reduce the scope of VectorQARetrieval tool to documentation only for the beta release and have ask a question about this repo be done by the SCM team if we find that distribution of work could scale well. \\n* Are you saying the WebIDE chat extension is part of Beta or just the API that would enable that, @m_gill. In the spirit of keeping work pieces small I would keep it out of scope and create a separate issue.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:23:58 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1393965447, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner from a development perspective, this is what I see as Beta:\\n- [In progress] Ability to switch tooling (IE: A prompt comes in, and we detect where it gets routed)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/121122+ \\n- 2 tools are available to switch to, and respond in a Beta fashion based on the prompts they support:\\n  - [In progress] Universal Object access tool (Explain this block of code, Write tests for this block of code)\\n  - VectorQARetrieval Tool (Answer this question from our documentation, Ask a question about this repository)\\n    - [In progress] Embeddings will be needed https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10616+ \\n- Documentation to reflect how other teams can contribute new tooling\\n  - Teams are unblocked at this point\\n- API for Chat Interface, which will be used for integrations such as IDE extensions (Integrated with toggle support)\\n- System prompt is in place to enforce guardrails on what the Chat can and cannot answer\\n- Moderation is in place to prevent offensive prompts/responses \\n  - Not part of this MVC - \\u201cReport answers as offensive\\u201d functionality\\n- [In progress] Basic UI\\n- [In progress] Memory, across sessions (switching pages or devices)\\n  - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/410521+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-16 13:19:11 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 4554599, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-18 11:41:28 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1392312276, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz just the API that would enable that. I'm aligned with [this larger plan](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10219#note_1393118339), where WebIDE chat should be Phase 2, but still done within the quarter.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4554599, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-17 11:37:46 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-18 02:30:19 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6560fc17d284f7b876bf2343c55477162950153e\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1394009327, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/gitlab-data/product-analytics/-/issues/1232+\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-06 17:01:33 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"04389db4e66ed66a332464009e3f04dfc3c5ecef\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1420511785, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, \\n\\n\u003e \u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\n\u003e Does this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nSorry that was not precise. I will change it to: Chat can be opened anywhere on the GitLab Web page. (Excluding the WebIDE)\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422449304, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @tlinz :wave_tone1: \\n\\nIn the description under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) the first bullet point is:\\n\\n\u003e Chat is available everywhere in the product\\n\\nDoes this include the Web IDE? I do not think that it does. Please clarify this.\\n\\nAdditionally, also under [Overall Scope](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10550#overall-scope) I see that the first iteration will enable:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nPlease separate this out into it's own section called **Use Cases that will be enabled** and word these statements using the terms that leadership had been referring to them as. The goal is for someone to be able to look at this epic and immediately understand that in the first iteration the following features will be possible:\\n\\n1. Explain this code\\n2. Ask questions about an issue = \u003e _This is new. Please explain what this is since this has not been a feature that we have been broadly discussing for the last couple months_\\n3. Conversational Chat\\n4. Ask questions of docs\\n\\nFinally, marketing needs a 2 week aheads up (to the best of your ability) prior to the release of the first iteration. \\n\\ncc @timzallmann @m_gill\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 15:14:28 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:05:06 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422263279, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner, I think we need to educate the leadership that the scope of what we aim to deliver is much larger than bringing our \\\"legacy\\\" AI experiments together in one place. \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:13:38 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422462628, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@sarahwaldner and @laurenaalves, I think we are probably less than 2 weeks away from a releasable first iteration. @timzallmann can confirm. In fact, we hope that we can have something demoable today or tomorrow, so we can understand how well it works and what is missing for a releasable functionality. I also have requests from @cherryhan to create something that we can demo to a large prospect on Wednesday as we might not win them if we can't show AI capabilities that go beyond code suggestions. \\n\\n@laurenaalves, once we have that first prototype working we will share it with you. I can work on a blog post. What else do you need from me? Please, check out\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:34:27 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 10822493, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 17:37:15 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422486037, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@tlinz \\n\\n\u003e \\\"Explain code\\\" is only one of many questions you can ask in the context of code the user sees. I added a screenshot from the slide deck to address this.\\n\\nYes I saw that screenshot however in the description of this epic you specifically list these use cases:\\n\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\nChat answers questions relating to\\n\\n* code the user sees\\n* issue the user sees\\n* how to use GitLab\\n* recent context from chat history (i.e. Conversational Chat enabled)\\n\u003e\u003e\u003e\\n\\nHow should I be interpreting the description? \\n\\nPlease make sure that the start/end dates on the [first iteration epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675) show that this will release in ~2 weeks. Right now the end date is June 9th. Thank you.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3796140, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:19 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3796140, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-06-07 18:46:29 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1422558431, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/10675#note_1432658681\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:35:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"f75d5a41b11fd5d816943c6c83d74e3e6915144c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432659564, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for sharing! This was an interesting read and can help put our own learnings into perspective.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 7351507, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 10:34:41 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1437568945, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Hi @katiemacoy and others, here is an interesting research that touches on [What parts of development workflow make sense for AI tools](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-what-parts-of-development-workflow-make-sense-for-ai-tools) and also on [Trust in accuracy](https://stackoverflow.co/labs/developer-sentiment-ai-ml/#h2-trust-in-the-accuracy-of-ai-output).\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 10822493, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 14:38:20 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-20 15:02:30 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 822061, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"8c25c694069b586e4328971e9aca6803a1adcc3c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1432665862, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 5749302, \"username\": \"mray2020\", \"name\": \"Mon Ray\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 9608331, \"username\": \"katiemacoy\", \"name\": \"Katie Macoy\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 5291762, \"username\": \"jmandell\", \"name\": \"Justin Mandell\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 4554599, \"username\": \"m_gill\", \"name\": \"Michelle Gill\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 3796140, \"username\": \"sarahwaldner\", \"name\": \"Sarah Waldner\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}, {\"id\": 7351507, \"username\": \"alasch\", \"name\": \"Anne Lasch\"}, {\"id\": 10822493, \"username\": \"tlinz\", \"name\": \"Torsten Linz\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Please summarize what the objective and next steps are for {url}.","query_id":"b7e69abe215d4621b391ab5deabdd480","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"854759","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 854759, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 4089849, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10814, \"updated_by_id\": 4377833, \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"lock_version\": 16, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-11-10\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:07:28 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-06-09 19:34:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 14:14:38 UTC\", \"title\": \"[UX] Detail pages for Plan related Work Items\", \"description\": \"## Iteration 1: Building a foundation for work item detail views\\n\\nThe goal of Iteration 1 is to create a consistent and flexible foundation for work items that will accommodate a variety of different planning objects.\\n\\n### Iteration 1A: Header area and breadcrumbs changes\\n\\nThese changes to the header area are meant to group similar work item information together and make work items more consistent with other planning objects.\\n\\nBecause these changes are small and increase consistency with other areas of the product, they do not need to be behind a feature flag.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eHeader area and breadcrumbs changes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416800+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416799+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n### Iteration 1B: Two-column layout, sidebar attributes, and edit experience\\n\\nWhen updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users. These changes should be made behind a feature flag and released to users together.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eTwo-column layout (including two-column layout for small screens)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415077+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417915+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:two:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSidebar attributes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nWhether we need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" depends on which design direction we pursue. TBD.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416801+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:three:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eEdit experience (for work item title and description)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nWill likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" .\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\\u2022 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419952+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:four:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSticky header (includes making utility actions sticky)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Confidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Iteration 2: Create flow for work items\\n\\nImprove the creation of work items (does not impact legacy issues/epics).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n| Reference | Description | UX status | Issue links |\\n|-----------|-------------|-----------|-------------|\\n| :one: | Create experience | Currently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Will likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" . | https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11012+s |\\n\\n## Iteration 3: Adding a contextual work item view\\n\\nOnce we have a foundation for work items in place, we'll continue to build upon that by adding and improving widgets and introducing a contextual work item view for users to be able to view work items without losing their current context.\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-08-03\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eWork item contextual view (modal? drawer?)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome of this is being explored with the overall detail page design, but the majority of design requirements will be handled in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\\nThere will be a separate ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" effort conducted alongside https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Non-dependent improvements that can be released in any order\\n\\nImprovements in this area are not dependent on Iterations 1-3. They can be made at any time (before or after Iterations 1-3).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eParent / ancestry information\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\n~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" will be done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2486+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": null, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 677568, \"relative_position\": -35781, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909555, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909556, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 6, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 26, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 9}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, \"labels\": [], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@mushakov agreed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 14:56:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-16 15:46:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1434241869, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@donaldcook Yes, each iteration is a point we can release to customers. 1A can be released without 1B. \\n\\nI grouped them together because I see them as the two parts to the whole vision of `Building a foundation for work item detail views`. I see 1A and 1B as strongly related, but I don't think Iteration 1, 2, and 3 are as strongly related, if that makes sense.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 20:43:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487907450, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Update on the work item utility actions: Utility actions will be [staying within the page header and not moving to the breadcrumbs](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417206#note_1506867173 \\\"Re-structure work items header area layout to accommodate new ancestry widget\\\"), so I have removed that from the epic description. Utility actions will be part of the [sticky header for work items](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953) so that they can be accessed anywhere on the page.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7e53e624db5ba371f4a9065e52ee401e5d7ec6fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544538650, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[some slack discussion](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/CLW71KM96/p1690404850184969) on actions in breadcrumbs. And https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419962+ \\n\\n/cc @annabeldunstone\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 832471, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9e1673ddf12c87cf7ea59afa5831910e9ae90b5c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493245122, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda @gweaver I think that most of these items will need to be addressed before the rollout Epics or Issues. Can you please take a quick look and confirm? If so, we can set it to block both of your epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 22:32:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:05:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1433195793, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the feedback! Will try to address it point by point below.\\n\\n### General\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n\\n@jackib Are you asking about what I mean by `When updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users.`? I just mean that 1B.1 (Two-column layout), for example, shouldn't be released without the other items in 1B.\\n\\nWhen it comes to work item types, I believe that any change we make to the work item will automatically apply to all work item types (currently tasks, objectives, and key results).\\n\\n\u003e * What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n \\n:thumbsup: Will do, but I think I'll add it to the top of the table instead of a separate column (which will make all the columns narrower).\\n\\n\u003e * Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\n@jackib Do you mean add screenshots of the current state to this Epic? Or screenshots of the current state to each issue as they move to implementation?\\n\\n### Parent / ancestry widget\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving.\\n\\nMy thinking here is that moving the parent / ancestry information into the sidebar is fairly big change from how the work item currently is and that it makes sense to introduce that change when we introduce the sidebar. But that's a pretty loosely held opinion, I'm happy to split that out into a separate iteration if that's what others feel strongly about. @nickbrandt would appreciate your input since you're working on that widget!\\n\\n### Create / edit experience\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail.\\n\\n\u003e I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\nI actually don't have a strong reason for create/edit being part of iteration 1B, I put it there because I thought it was one of the areas we'd discussed in our sync meeting (but I may have gotten my wires crossed there). I'm happy to move it to a later iteration independent of the two-column layout. \\n\\n@gweaver it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n### Additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc)\\n\\n\u003e These aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate \\\\[insert object\\\\] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\\n\\nMakes sense to me! :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482585360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Are we saying that each iteration is a point that we can release to customers? If that is the case, do we need 1a and 1b or can they just be 1 and 2?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487571719, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Closing the loop here -- I created 4 subepics for this epic that we can use to contain the issues for each of the phases you outlined. We can work together as a team to further refine and estimate the work involved for each MVC where the goal is we can release each of phase when it's completed.\\n\\ncc @donaldcook\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 16:01:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 17:21:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1490780614, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @nickbrandt @gweaver @donaldcook I just took a stab at documenting the dependencies and rollout plan for the updates to the work items detail view (see the epic description). Would love your feedback!\\n\\n**Here are some prompts to solicit feedback (but please feel free to give feedback in any area!):**\\n\\n* Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n* Are the dependencies clear?\\n* I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 17:32:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480097393, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant This is so organized, thank you!\\n\\n**Feedback on the plan**\\n\\n\u003e * Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n\\nLooking at [this inventory](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9972 \\\"\\ud83c\\udf1f Align Work Item design patterns with the Pajamas Design System\\\"), everything seems to be addressed from the UX concerns. \\n\\n\u003e * Are the dependencies clear?\\n\\n* For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n* For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n**Few suggestions on documentation**\\n\\n* What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n* Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\ncc @amandarueda @mushakov\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4089849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:12:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480398899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for putting this together, @esybrant ! I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\ncc: @amandarueda @gweaver @jackib\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482003013, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant I agree all of these things should be done prior to migrating epics and issues to the work item architecture. Here's my initial feedback and questions:\\n\\n- For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving. \\n- For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail. \\n\\n\u003e I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\\n\\nThese aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate [insert object] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482056872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n@esybrant I'm suggesting the edit and create workflows be split into different iterations. The update pattern needs to be consistent and clear (ex: we are proposing introducing a new `Edit` button in the breadcrumbs area), which is scoped to the detail view. The create workflows do include the detail view, but also encompass areas of the product outside of the detail view, so I think that workflow can be improved after we release improvements to the detail view.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 13:28:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:27:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1485391729, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I agree with @gweaver suggestion above.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486103338, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Also, thanks for the explanation of the why behind your recommendations, @esybrant . It's super clear to follow why you went in a specific direction :star2: .\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486108724, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the great feedback! I updated the description based on your suggestions if you want to give it another look.\\n\\nNotable changes:\\n\\n* Moved the create flow to its own iteration (but left the edit experience in iteration 1B).\\n* Moved the parent/ancestry widget out to a new section `Non-dependent improvements`\\n* Moved sticky header from 1A to 1B _(In my mind, this one is more connected to the two-column layout than the header changes.)_\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 22:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 22:03:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486169421, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 832471, \"username\": \"psimyn\", \"name\": \"Simon Knox\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Summarize the comments into bullet points?","query_id":"f7804c49211745d6bdcd6b4dc606187d","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"854759","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 854759, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 4089849, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10814, \"updated_by_id\": 4377833, \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"lock_version\": 16, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-11-10\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:07:28 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-06-09 19:34:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 14:14:38 UTC\", \"title\": \"[UX] Detail pages for Plan related Work Items\", \"description\": \"## Iteration 1: Building a foundation for work item detail views\\n\\nThe goal of Iteration 1 is to create a consistent and flexible foundation for work items that will accommodate a variety of different planning objects.\\n\\n### Iteration 1A: Header area and breadcrumbs changes\\n\\nThese changes to the header area are meant to group similar work item information together and make work items more consistent with other planning objects.\\n\\nBecause these changes are small and increase consistency with other areas of the product, they do not need to be behind a feature flag.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eHeader area and breadcrumbs changes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416800+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416799+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n### Iteration 1B: Two-column layout, sidebar attributes, and edit experience\\n\\nWhen updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users. These changes should be made behind a feature flag and released to users together.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eTwo-column layout (including two-column layout for small screens)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415077+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417915+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:two:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSidebar attributes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nWhether we need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" depends on which design direction we pursue. TBD.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416801+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:three:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eEdit experience (for work item title and description)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nWill likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" .\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\\u2022 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419952+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:four:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSticky header (includes making utility actions sticky)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Confidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Iteration 2: Create flow for work items\\n\\nImprove the creation of work items (does not impact legacy issues/epics).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n| Reference | Description | UX status | Issue links |\\n|-----------|-------------|-----------|-------------|\\n| :one: | Create experience | Currently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Will likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" . | https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11012+s |\\n\\n## Iteration 3: Adding a contextual work item view\\n\\nOnce we have a foundation for work items in place, we'll continue to build upon that by adding and improving widgets and introducing a contextual work item view for users to be able to view work items without losing their current context.\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-08-03\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eWork item contextual view (modal? drawer?)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome of this is being explored with the overall detail page design, but the majority of design requirements will be handled in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\\nThere will be a separate ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" effort conducted alongside https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Non-dependent improvements that can be released in any order\\n\\nImprovements in this area are not dependent on Iterations 1-3. They can be made at any time (before or after Iterations 1-3).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eParent / ancestry information\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\n~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" will be done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2486+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": null, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 677568, \"relative_position\": -35781, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909555, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909556, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 6, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 26, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 9}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, \"labels\": [], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@mushakov agreed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 14:56:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-16 15:46:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1434241869, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@donaldcook Yes, each iteration is a point we can release to customers. 1A can be released without 1B. \\n\\nI grouped them together because I see them as the two parts to the whole vision of `Building a foundation for work item detail views`. I see 1A and 1B as strongly related, but I don't think Iteration 1, 2, and 3 are as strongly related, if that makes sense.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 20:43:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487907450, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Update on the work item utility actions: Utility actions will be [staying within the page header and not moving to the breadcrumbs](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417206#note_1506867173 \\\"Re-structure work items header area layout to accommodate new ancestry widget\\\"), so I have removed that from the epic description. Utility actions will be part of the [sticky header for work items](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953) so that they can be accessed anywhere on the page.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7e53e624db5ba371f4a9065e52ee401e5d7ec6fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544538650, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[some slack discussion](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/CLW71KM96/p1690404850184969) on actions in breadcrumbs. And https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419962+ \\n\\n/cc @annabeldunstone\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 832471, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9e1673ddf12c87cf7ea59afa5831910e9ae90b5c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493245122, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda @gweaver I think that most of these items will need to be addressed before the rollout Epics or Issues. Can you please take a quick look and confirm? If so, we can set it to block both of your epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 22:32:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:05:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1433195793, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the feedback! Will try to address it point by point below.\\n\\n### General\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n\\n@jackib Are you asking about what I mean by `When updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users.`? I just mean that 1B.1 (Two-column layout), for example, shouldn't be released without the other items in 1B.\\n\\nWhen it comes to work item types, I believe that any change we make to the work item will automatically apply to all work item types (currently tasks, objectives, and key results).\\n\\n\u003e * What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n \\n:thumbsup: Will do, but I think I'll add it to the top of the table instead of a separate column (which will make all the columns narrower).\\n\\n\u003e * Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\n@jackib Do you mean add screenshots of the current state to this Epic? Or screenshots of the current state to each issue as they move to implementation?\\n\\n### Parent / ancestry widget\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving.\\n\\nMy thinking here is that moving the parent / ancestry information into the sidebar is fairly big change from how the work item currently is and that it makes sense to introduce that change when we introduce the sidebar. But that's a pretty loosely held opinion, I'm happy to split that out into a separate iteration if that's what others feel strongly about. @nickbrandt would appreciate your input since you're working on that widget!\\n\\n### Create / edit experience\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail.\\n\\n\u003e I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\nI actually don't have a strong reason for create/edit being part of iteration 1B, I put it there because I thought it was one of the areas we'd discussed in our sync meeting (but I may have gotten my wires crossed there). I'm happy to move it to a later iteration independent of the two-column layout. \\n\\n@gweaver it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n### Additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc)\\n\\n\u003e These aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate \\\\[insert object\\\\] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\\n\\nMakes sense to me! :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482585360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Are we saying that each iteration is a point that we can release to customers? If that is the case, do we need 1a and 1b or can they just be 1 and 2?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487571719, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Closing the loop here -- I created 4 subepics for this epic that we can use to contain the issues for each of the phases you outlined. We can work together as a team to further refine and estimate the work involved for each MVC where the goal is we can release each of phase when it's completed.\\n\\ncc @donaldcook\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 16:01:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 17:21:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1490780614, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @nickbrandt @gweaver @donaldcook I just took a stab at documenting the dependencies and rollout plan for the updates to the work items detail view (see the epic description). Would love your feedback!\\n\\n**Here are some prompts to solicit feedback (but please feel free to give feedback in any area!):**\\n\\n* Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n* Are the dependencies clear?\\n* I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 17:32:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480097393, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant This is so organized, thank you!\\n\\n**Feedback on the plan**\\n\\n\u003e * Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n\\nLooking at [this inventory](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9972 \\\"\\ud83c\\udf1f Align Work Item design patterns with the Pajamas Design System\\\"), everything seems to be addressed from the UX concerns. \\n\\n\u003e * Are the dependencies clear?\\n\\n* For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n* For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n**Few suggestions on documentation**\\n\\n* What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n* Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\ncc @amandarueda @mushakov\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4089849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:12:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480398899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for putting this together, @esybrant ! I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\ncc: @amandarueda @gweaver @jackib\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482003013, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant I agree all of these things should be done prior to migrating epics and issues to the work item architecture. Here's my initial feedback and questions:\\n\\n- For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving. \\n- For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail. \\n\\n\u003e I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\\n\\nThese aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate [insert object] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482056872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n@esybrant I'm suggesting the edit and create workflows be split into different iterations. The update pattern needs to be consistent and clear (ex: we are proposing introducing a new `Edit` button in the breadcrumbs area), which is scoped to the detail view. The create workflows do include the detail view, but also encompass areas of the product outside of the detail view, so I think that workflow can be improved after we release improvements to the detail view.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 13:28:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:27:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1485391729, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I agree with @gweaver suggestion above.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486103338, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Also, thanks for the explanation of the why behind your recommendations, @esybrant . It's super clear to follow why you went in a specific direction :star2: .\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486108724, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the great feedback! I updated the description based on your suggestions if you want to give it another look.\\n\\nNotable changes:\\n\\n* Moved the create flow to its own iteration (but left the edit experience in iteration 1B).\\n* Moved the parent/ancestry widget out to a new section `Non-dependent improvements`\\n* Moved sticky header from 1A to 1B _(In my mind, this one is more connected to the two-column layout than the header changes.)_\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 22:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 22:03:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486169421, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 832471, \"username\": \"psimyn\", \"name\": \"Simon Knox\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Summarize with bullet points.","query_id":"af30b325747041b684123cf7f3952c83","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"854759","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 854759, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 4089849, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10814, \"updated_by_id\": 4377833, \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"lock_version\": 16, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-11-10\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:07:28 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-06-09 19:34:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 14:14:38 UTC\", \"title\": \"[UX] Detail pages for Plan related Work Items\", \"description\": \"## Iteration 1: Building a foundation for work item detail views\\n\\nThe goal of Iteration 1 is to create a consistent and flexible foundation for work items that will accommodate a variety of different planning objects.\\n\\n### Iteration 1A: Header area and breadcrumbs changes\\n\\nThese changes to the header area are meant to group similar work item information together and make work items more consistent with other planning objects.\\n\\nBecause these changes are small and increase consistency with other areas of the product, they do not need to be behind a feature flag.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eHeader area and breadcrumbs changes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416800+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416799+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n### Iteration 1B: Two-column layout, sidebar attributes, and edit experience\\n\\nWhen updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users. These changes should be made behind a feature flag and released to users together.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eTwo-column layout (including two-column layout for small screens)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415077+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417915+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:two:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSidebar attributes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nWhether we need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" depends on which design direction we pursue. TBD.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416801+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:three:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eEdit experience (for work item title and description)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nWill likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" .\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\\u2022 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419952+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:four:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSticky header (includes making utility actions sticky)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Confidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Iteration 2: Create flow for work items\\n\\nImprove the creation of work items (does not impact legacy issues/epics).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n| Reference | Description | UX status | Issue links |\\n|-----------|-------------|-----------|-------------|\\n| :one: | Create experience | Currently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Will likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" . | https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11012+s |\\n\\n## Iteration 3: Adding a contextual work item view\\n\\nOnce we have a foundation for work items in place, we'll continue to build upon that by adding and improving widgets and introducing a contextual work item view for users to be able to view work items without losing their current context.\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-08-03\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eWork item contextual view (modal? drawer?)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome of this is being explored with the overall detail page design, but the majority of design requirements will be handled in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\\nThere will be a separate ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" effort conducted alongside https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Non-dependent improvements that can be released in any order\\n\\nImprovements in this area are not dependent on Iterations 1-3. They can be made at any time (before or after Iterations 1-3).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eParent / ancestry information\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\n~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" will be done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2486+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": null, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 677568, \"relative_position\": -35781, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909555, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909556, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 6, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 26, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 9}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, \"labels\": [], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@mushakov agreed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 14:56:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-16 15:46:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1434241869, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@donaldcook Yes, each iteration is a point we can release to customers. 1A can be released without 1B. \\n\\nI grouped them together because I see them as the two parts to the whole vision of `Building a foundation for work item detail views`. I see 1A and 1B as strongly related, but I don't think Iteration 1, 2, and 3 are as strongly related, if that makes sense.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 20:43:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487907450, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Update on the work item utility actions: Utility actions will be [staying within the page header and not moving to the breadcrumbs](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417206#note_1506867173 \\\"Re-structure work items header area layout to accommodate new ancestry widget\\\"), so I have removed that from the epic description. Utility actions will be part of the [sticky header for work items](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953) so that they can be accessed anywhere on the page.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7e53e624db5ba371f4a9065e52ee401e5d7ec6fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544538650, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[some slack discussion](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/CLW71KM96/p1690404850184969) on actions in breadcrumbs. And https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419962+ \\n\\n/cc @annabeldunstone\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 832471, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9e1673ddf12c87cf7ea59afa5831910e9ae90b5c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493245122, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda @gweaver I think that most of these items will need to be addressed before the rollout Epics or Issues. Can you please take a quick look and confirm? If so, we can set it to block both of your epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 22:32:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:05:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1433195793, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the feedback! Will try to address it point by point below.\\n\\n### General\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n\\n@jackib Are you asking about what I mean by `When updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users.`? I just mean that 1B.1 (Two-column layout), for example, shouldn't be released without the other items in 1B.\\n\\nWhen it comes to work item types, I believe that any change we make to the work item will automatically apply to all work item types (currently tasks, objectives, and key results).\\n\\n\u003e * What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n \\n:thumbsup: Will do, but I think I'll add it to the top of the table instead of a separate column (which will make all the columns narrower).\\n\\n\u003e * Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\n@jackib Do you mean add screenshots of the current state to this Epic? Or screenshots of the current state to each issue as they move to implementation?\\n\\n### Parent / ancestry widget\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving.\\n\\nMy thinking here is that moving the parent / ancestry information into the sidebar is fairly big change from how the work item currently is and that it makes sense to introduce that change when we introduce the sidebar. But that's a pretty loosely held opinion, I'm happy to split that out into a separate iteration if that's what others feel strongly about. @nickbrandt would appreciate your input since you're working on that widget!\\n\\n### Create / edit experience\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail.\\n\\n\u003e I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\nI actually don't have a strong reason for create/edit being part of iteration 1B, I put it there because I thought it was one of the areas we'd discussed in our sync meeting (but I may have gotten my wires crossed there). I'm happy to move it to a later iteration independent of the two-column layout. \\n\\n@gweaver it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n### Additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc)\\n\\n\u003e These aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate \\\\[insert object\\\\] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\\n\\nMakes sense to me! :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482585360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Are we saying that each iteration is a point that we can release to customers? If that is the case, do we need 1a and 1b or can they just be 1 and 2?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487571719, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Closing the loop here -- I created 4 subepics for this epic that we can use to contain the issues for each of the phases you outlined. We can work together as a team to further refine and estimate the work involved for each MVC where the goal is we can release each of phase when it's completed.\\n\\ncc @donaldcook\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 16:01:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 17:21:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1490780614, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @nickbrandt @gweaver @donaldcook I just took a stab at documenting the dependencies and rollout plan for the updates to the work items detail view (see the epic description). Would love your feedback!\\n\\n**Here are some prompts to solicit feedback (but please feel free to give feedback in any area!):**\\n\\n* Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n* Are the dependencies clear?\\n* I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 17:32:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480097393, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant This is so organized, thank you!\\n\\n**Feedback on the plan**\\n\\n\u003e * Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n\\nLooking at [this inventory](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9972 \\\"\\ud83c\\udf1f Align Work Item design patterns with the Pajamas Design System\\\"), everything seems to be addressed from the UX concerns. \\n\\n\u003e * Are the dependencies clear?\\n\\n* For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n* For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n**Few suggestions on documentation**\\n\\n* What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n* Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\ncc @amandarueda @mushakov\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4089849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:12:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480398899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for putting this together, @esybrant ! I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\ncc: @amandarueda @gweaver @jackib\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482003013, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant I agree all of these things should be done prior to migrating epics and issues to the work item architecture. Here's my initial feedback and questions:\\n\\n- For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving. \\n- For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail. \\n\\n\u003e I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\\n\\nThese aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate [insert object] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482056872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n@esybrant I'm suggesting the edit and create workflows be split into different iterations. The update pattern needs to be consistent and clear (ex: we are proposing introducing a new `Edit` button in the breadcrumbs area), which is scoped to the detail view. The create workflows do include the detail view, but also encompass areas of the product outside of the detail view, so I think that workflow can be improved after we release improvements to the detail view.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 13:28:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:27:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1485391729, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I agree with @gweaver suggestion above.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486103338, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Also, thanks for the explanation of the why behind your recommendations, @esybrant . It's super clear to follow why you went in a specific direction :star2: .\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486108724, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the great feedback! I updated the description based on your suggestions if you want to give it another look.\\n\\nNotable changes:\\n\\n* Moved the create flow to its own iteration (but left the edit experience in iteration 1B).\\n* Moved the parent/ancestry widget out to a new section `Non-dependent improvements`\\n* Moved sticky header from 1A to 1B _(In my mind, this one is more connected to the two-column layout than the header changes.)_\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 22:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 22:03:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486169421, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 832471, \"username\": \"psimyn\", \"name\": \"Simon Knox\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Can you create a simpler list of which questions a user should be able to ask according to this epic.","query_id":"3af11e10e5514642b21a7d6e7c86d1c6","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"854759","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 854759, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 4089849, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10814, \"updated_by_id\": 4377833, \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"lock_version\": 16, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-11-10\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:07:28 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-06-09 19:34:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 14:14:38 UTC\", \"title\": \"[UX] Detail pages for Plan related Work Items\", \"description\": \"## Iteration 1: Building a foundation for work item detail views\\n\\nThe goal of Iteration 1 is to create a consistent and flexible foundation for work items that will accommodate a variety of different planning objects.\\n\\n### Iteration 1A: Header area and breadcrumbs changes\\n\\nThese changes to the header area are meant to group similar work item information together and make work items more consistent with other planning objects.\\n\\nBecause these changes are small and increase consistency with other areas of the product, they do not need to be behind a feature flag.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eHeader area and breadcrumbs changes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416800+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416799+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n### Iteration 1B: Two-column layout, sidebar attributes, and edit experience\\n\\nWhen updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users. These changes should be made behind a feature flag and released to users together.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eTwo-column layout (including two-column layout for small screens)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415077+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417915+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:two:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSidebar attributes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nWhether we need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" depends on which design direction we pursue. TBD.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416801+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:three:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eEdit experience (for work item title and description)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nWill likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" .\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\\u2022 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419952+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:four:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSticky header (includes making utility actions sticky)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Confidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Iteration 2: Create flow for work items\\n\\nImprove the creation of work items (does not impact legacy issues/epics).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n| Reference | Description | UX status | Issue links |\\n|-----------|-------------|-----------|-------------|\\n| :one: | Create experience | Currently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Will likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" . | https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11012+s |\\n\\n## Iteration 3: Adding a contextual work item view\\n\\nOnce we have a foundation for work items in place, we'll continue to build upon that by adding and improving widgets and introducing a contextual work item view for users to be able to view work items without losing their current context.\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-08-03\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eWork item contextual view (modal? drawer?)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome of this is being explored with the overall detail page design, but the majority of design requirements will be handled in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\\nThere will be a separate ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" effort conducted alongside https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Non-dependent improvements that can be released in any order\\n\\nImprovements in this area are not dependent on Iterations 1-3. They can be made at any time (before or after Iterations 1-3).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eParent / ancestry information\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\n~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" will be done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2486+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": null, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 677568, \"relative_position\": -35781, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909555, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909556, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 6, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 26, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 9}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, \"labels\": [], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@mushakov agreed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 14:56:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-16 15:46:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1434241869, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@donaldcook Yes, each iteration is a point we can release to customers. 1A can be released without 1B. \\n\\nI grouped them together because I see them as the two parts to the whole vision of `Building a foundation for work item detail views`. I see 1A and 1B as strongly related, but I don't think Iteration 1, 2, and 3 are as strongly related, if that makes sense.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 20:43:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487907450, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Update on the work item utility actions: Utility actions will be [staying within the page header and not moving to the breadcrumbs](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417206#note_1506867173 \\\"Re-structure work items header area layout to accommodate new ancestry widget\\\"), so I have removed that from the epic description. Utility actions will be part of the [sticky header for work items](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953) so that they can be accessed anywhere on the page.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7e53e624db5ba371f4a9065e52ee401e5d7ec6fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544538650, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[some slack discussion](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/CLW71KM96/p1690404850184969) on actions in breadcrumbs. And https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419962+ \\n\\n/cc @annabeldunstone\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 832471, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9e1673ddf12c87cf7ea59afa5831910e9ae90b5c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493245122, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda @gweaver I think that most of these items will need to be addressed before the rollout Epics or Issues. Can you please take a quick look and confirm? If so, we can set it to block both of your epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 22:32:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:05:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1433195793, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the feedback! Will try to address it point by point below.\\n\\n### General\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n\\n@jackib Are you asking about what I mean by `When updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users.`? I just mean that 1B.1 (Two-column layout), for example, shouldn't be released without the other items in 1B.\\n\\nWhen it comes to work item types, I believe that any change we make to the work item will automatically apply to all work item types (currently tasks, objectives, and key results).\\n\\n\u003e * What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n \\n:thumbsup: Will do, but I think I'll add it to the top of the table instead of a separate column (which will make all the columns narrower).\\n\\n\u003e * Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\n@jackib Do you mean add screenshots of the current state to this Epic? Or screenshots of the current state to each issue as they move to implementation?\\n\\n### Parent / ancestry widget\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving.\\n\\nMy thinking here is that moving the parent / ancestry information into the sidebar is fairly big change from how the work item currently is and that it makes sense to introduce that change when we introduce the sidebar. But that's a pretty loosely held opinion, I'm happy to split that out into a separate iteration if that's what others feel strongly about. @nickbrandt would appreciate your input since you're working on that widget!\\n\\n### Create / edit experience\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail.\\n\\n\u003e I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\nI actually don't have a strong reason for create/edit being part of iteration 1B, I put it there because I thought it was one of the areas we'd discussed in our sync meeting (but I may have gotten my wires crossed there). I'm happy to move it to a later iteration independent of the two-column layout. \\n\\n@gweaver it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n### Additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc)\\n\\n\u003e These aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate \\\\[insert object\\\\] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\\n\\nMakes sense to me! :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482585360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Are we saying that each iteration is a point that we can release to customers? If that is the case, do we need 1a and 1b or can they just be 1 and 2?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487571719, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Closing the loop here -- I created 4 subepics for this epic that we can use to contain the issues for each of the phases you outlined. We can work together as a team to further refine and estimate the work involved for each MVC where the goal is we can release each of phase when it's completed.\\n\\ncc @donaldcook\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 16:01:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 17:21:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1490780614, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @nickbrandt @gweaver @donaldcook I just took a stab at documenting the dependencies and rollout plan for the updates to the work items detail view (see the epic description). Would love your feedback!\\n\\n**Here are some prompts to solicit feedback (but please feel free to give feedback in any area!):**\\n\\n* Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n* Are the dependencies clear?\\n* I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 17:32:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480097393, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant This is so organized, thank you!\\n\\n**Feedback on the plan**\\n\\n\u003e * Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n\\nLooking at [this inventory](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9972 \\\"\\ud83c\\udf1f Align Work Item design patterns with the Pajamas Design System\\\"), everything seems to be addressed from the UX concerns. \\n\\n\u003e * Are the dependencies clear?\\n\\n* For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n* For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n**Few suggestions on documentation**\\n\\n* What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n* Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\ncc @amandarueda @mushakov\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4089849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:12:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480398899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for putting this together, @esybrant ! I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\ncc: @amandarueda @gweaver @jackib\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482003013, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant I agree all of these things should be done prior to migrating epics and issues to the work item architecture. Here's my initial feedback and questions:\\n\\n- For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving. \\n- For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail. \\n\\n\u003e I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\\n\\nThese aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate [insert object] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482056872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n@esybrant I'm suggesting the edit and create workflows be split into different iterations. The update pattern needs to be consistent and clear (ex: we are proposing introducing a new `Edit` button in the breadcrumbs area), which is scoped to the detail view. The create workflows do include the detail view, but also encompass areas of the product outside of the detail view, so I think that workflow can be improved after we release improvements to the detail view.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 13:28:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:27:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1485391729, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I agree with @gweaver suggestion above.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486103338, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Also, thanks for the explanation of the why behind your recommendations, @esybrant . It's super clear to follow why you went in a specific direction :star2: .\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486108724, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the great feedback! I updated the description based on your suggestions if you want to give it another look.\\n\\nNotable changes:\\n\\n* Moved the create flow to its own iteration (but left the edit experience in iteration 1B).\\n* Moved the parent/ancestry widget out to a new section `Non-dependent improvements`\\n* Moved sticky header from 1A to 1B _(In my mind, this one is more connected to the two-column layout than the header changes.)_\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 22:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 22:03:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486169421, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 832471, \"username\": \"psimyn\", \"name\": \"Simon Knox\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Summarize this Epic.","query_id":"85a5011b466745febd758206aad828bb","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"854759","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 854759, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 4089849, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10814, \"updated_by_id\": 4377833, \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"lock_version\": 16, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-11-10\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:07:28 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-06-09 19:34:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 14:14:38 UTC\", \"title\": \"[UX] Detail pages for Plan related Work Items\", \"description\": \"## Iteration 1: Building a foundation for work item detail views\\n\\nThe goal of Iteration 1 is to create a consistent and flexible foundation for work items that will accommodate a variety of different planning objects.\\n\\n### Iteration 1A: Header area and breadcrumbs changes\\n\\nThese changes to the header area are meant to group similar work item information together and make work items more consistent with other planning objects.\\n\\nBecause these changes are small and increase consistency with other areas of the product, they do not need to be behind a feature flag.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eHeader area and breadcrumbs changes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416800+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416799+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n### Iteration 1B: Two-column layout, sidebar attributes, and edit experience\\n\\nWhen updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users. These changes should be made behind a feature flag and released to users together.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eTwo-column layout (including two-column layout for small screens)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415077+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417915+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:two:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSidebar attributes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nWhether we need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" depends on which design direction we pursue. TBD.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416801+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:three:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eEdit experience (for work item title and description)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nWill likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" .\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\\u2022 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419952+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:four:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSticky header (includes making utility actions sticky)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Confidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Iteration 2: Create flow for work items\\n\\nImprove the creation of work items (does not impact legacy issues/epics).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n| Reference | Description | UX status | Issue links |\\n|-----------|-------------|-----------|-------------|\\n| :one: | Create experience | Currently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Will likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" . | https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11012+s |\\n\\n## Iteration 3: Adding a contextual work item view\\n\\nOnce we have a foundation for work items in place, we'll continue to build upon that by adding and improving widgets and introducing a contextual work item view for users to be able to view work items without losing their current context.\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-08-03\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eWork item contextual view (modal? drawer?)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome of this is being explored with the overall detail page design, but the majority of design requirements will be handled in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\\nThere will be a separate ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" effort conducted alongside https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Non-dependent improvements that can be released in any order\\n\\nImprovements in this area are not dependent on Iterations 1-3. They can be made at any time (before or after Iterations 1-3).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eParent / ancestry information\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\n~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" will be done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2486+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": null, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 677568, \"relative_position\": -35781, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909555, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909556, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 6, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 26, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 9}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, \"labels\": [], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@mushakov agreed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 14:56:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-16 15:46:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1434241869, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@donaldcook Yes, each iteration is a point we can release to customers. 1A can be released without 1B. \\n\\nI grouped them together because I see them as the two parts to the whole vision of `Building a foundation for work item detail views`. I see 1A and 1B as strongly related, but I don't think Iteration 1, 2, and 3 are as strongly related, if that makes sense.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 20:43:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487907450, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Update on the work item utility actions: Utility actions will be [staying within the page header and not moving to the breadcrumbs](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417206#note_1506867173 \\\"Re-structure work items header area layout to accommodate new ancestry widget\\\"), so I have removed that from the epic description. Utility actions will be part of the [sticky header for work items](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953) so that they can be accessed anywhere on the page.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7e53e624db5ba371f4a9065e52ee401e5d7ec6fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544538650, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[some slack discussion](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/CLW71KM96/p1690404850184969) on actions in breadcrumbs. And https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419962+ \\n\\n/cc @annabeldunstone\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 832471, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9e1673ddf12c87cf7ea59afa5831910e9ae90b5c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493245122, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda @gweaver I think that most of these items will need to be addressed before the rollout Epics or Issues. Can you please take a quick look and confirm? If so, we can set it to block both of your epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 22:32:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:05:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1433195793, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the feedback! Will try to address it point by point below.\\n\\n### General\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n\\n@jackib Are you asking about what I mean by `When updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users.`? I just mean that 1B.1 (Two-column layout), for example, shouldn't be released without the other items in 1B.\\n\\nWhen it comes to work item types, I believe that any change we make to the work item will automatically apply to all work item types (currently tasks, objectives, and key results).\\n\\n\u003e * What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n \\n:thumbsup: Will do, but I think I'll add it to the top of the table instead of a separate column (which will make all the columns narrower).\\n\\n\u003e * Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\n@jackib Do you mean add screenshots of the current state to this Epic? Or screenshots of the current state to each issue as they move to implementation?\\n\\n### Parent / ancestry widget\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving.\\n\\nMy thinking here is that moving the parent / ancestry information into the sidebar is fairly big change from how the work item currently is and that it makes sense to introduce that change when we introduce the sidebar. But that's a pretty loosely held opinion, I'm happy to split that out into a separate iteration if that's what others feel strongly about. @nickbrandt would appreciate your input since you're working on that widget!\\n\\n### Create / edit experience\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail.\\n\\n\u003e I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\nI actually don't have a strong reason for create/edit being part of iteration 1B, I put it there because I thought it was one of the areas we'd discussed in our sync meeting (but I may have gotten my wires crossed there). I'm happy to move it to a later iteration independent of the two-column layout. \\n\\n@gweaver it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n### Additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc)\\n\\n\u003e These aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate \\\\[insert object\\\\] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\\n\\nMakes sense to me! :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482585360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Are we saying that each iteration is a point that we can release to customers? If that is the case, do we need 1a and 1b or can they just be 1 and 2?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487571719, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Closing the loop here -- I created 4 subepics for this epic that we can use to contain the issues for each of the phases you outlined. We can work together as a team to further refine and estimate the work involved for each MVC where the goal is we can release each of phase when it's completed.\\n\\ncc @donaldcook\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 16:01:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 17:21:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1490780614, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @nickbrandt @gweaver @donaldcook I just took a stab at documenting the dependencies and rollout plan for the updates to the work items detail view (see the epic description). Would love your feedback!\\n\\n**Here are some prompts to solicit feedback (but please feel free to give feedback in any area!):**\\n\\n* Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n* Are the dependencies clear?\\n* I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 17:32:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480097393, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant This is so organized, thank you!\\n\\n**Feedback on the plan**\\n\\n\u003e * Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n\\nLooking at [this inventory](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9972 \\\"\\ud83c\\udf1f Align Work Item design patterns with the Pajamas Design System\\\"), everything seems to be addressed from the UX concerns. \\n\\n\u003e * Are the dependencies clear?\\n\\n* For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n* For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n**Few suggestions on documentation**\\n\\n* What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n* Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\ncc @amandarueda @mushakov\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4089849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:12:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480398899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for putting this together, @esybrant ! I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\ncc: @amandarueda @gweaver @jackib\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482003013, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant I agree all of these things should be done prior to migrating epics and issues to the work item architecture. Here's my initial feedback and questions:\\n\\n- For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving. \\n- For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail. \\n\\n\u003e I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\\n\\nThese aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate [insert object] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482056872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n@esybrant I'm suggesting the edit and create workflows be split into different iterations. The update pattern needs to be consistent and clear (ex: we are proposing introducing a new `Edit` button in the breadcrumbs area), which is scoped to the detail view. The create workflows do include the detail view, but also encompass areas of the product outside of the detail view, so I think that workflow can be improved after we release improvements to the detail view.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 13:28:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:27:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1485391729, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I agree with @gweaver suggestion above.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486103338, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Also, thanks for the explanation of the why behind your recommendations, @esybrant . It's super clear to follow why you went in a specific direction :star2: .\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486108724, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the great feedback! I updated the description based on your suggestions if you want to give it another look.\\n\\nNotable changes:\\n\\n* Moved the create flow to its own iteration (but left the edit experience in iteration 1B).\\n* Moved the parent/ancestry widget out to a new section `Non-dependent improvements`\\n* Moved sticky header from 1A to 1B _(In my mind, this one is more connected to the two-column layout than the header changes.)_\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 22:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 22:03:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486169421, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 832471, \"username\": \"psimyn\", \"name\": \"Simon Knox\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"How much work is left to be done {url}?","query_id":"d5a494b88280474ab5e0efce17a79b24","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"854759","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 854759, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 4089849, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10814, \"updated_by_id\": 4377833, \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"lock_version\": 16, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-11-10\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:07:28 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-06-09 19:34:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 14:14:38 UTC\", \"title\": \"[UX] Detail pages for Plan related Work Items\", \"description\": \"## Iteration 1: Building a foundation for work item detail views\\n\\nThe goal of Iteration 1 is to create a consistent and flexible foundation for work items that will accommodate a variety of different planning objects.\\n\\n### Iteration 1A: Header area and breadcrumbs changes\\n\\nThese changes to the header area are meant to group similar work item information together and make work items more consistent with other planning objects.\\n\\nBecause these changes are small and increase consistency with other areas of the product, they do not need to be behind a feature flag.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eHeader area and breadcrumbs changes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416800+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416799+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n### Iteration 1B: Two-column layout, sidebar attributes, and edit experience\\n\\nWhen updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users. These changes should be made behind a feature flag and released to users together.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eTwo-column layout (including two-column layout for small screens)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415077+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417915+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:two:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSidebar attributes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nWhether we need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" depends on which design direction we pursue. TBD.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416801+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:three:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eEdit experience (for work item title and description)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nWill likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" .\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\\u2022 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419952+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:four:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSticky header (includes making utility actions sticky)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Confidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Iteration 2: Create flow for work items\\n\\nImprove the creation of work items (does not impact legacy issues/epics).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n| Reference | Description | UX status | Issue links |\\n|-----------|-------------|-----------|-------------|\\n| :one: | Create experience | Currently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Will likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" . | https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11012+s |\\n\\n## Iteration 3: Adding a contextual work item view\\n\\nOnce we have a foundation for work items in place, we'll continue to build upon that by adding and improving widgets and introducing a contextual work item view for users to be able to view work items without losing their current context.\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-08-03\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eWork item contextual view (modal? drawer?)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome of this is being explored with the overall detail page design, but the majority of design requirements will be handled in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\\nThere will be a separate ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" effort conducted alongside https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Non-dependent improvements that can be released in any order\\n\\nImprovements in this area are not dependent on Iterations 1-3. They can be made at any time (before or after Iterations 1-3).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eParent / ancestry information\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\n~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" will be done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2486+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": null, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 677568, \"relative_position\": -35781, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909555, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909556, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 6, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 26, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 9}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, \"labels\": [], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@mushakov agreed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 14:56:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-16 15:46:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1434241869, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@donaldcook Yes, each iteration is a point we can release to customers. 1A can be released without 1B. \\n\\nI grouped them together because I see them as the two parts to the whole vision of `Building a foundation for work item detail views`. I see 1A and 1B as strongly related, but I don't think Iteration 1, 2, and 3 are as strongly related, if that makes sense.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 20:43:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487907450, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Update on the work item utility actions: Utility actions will be [staying within the page header and not moving to the breadcrumbs](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417206#note_1506867173 \\\"Re-structure work items header area layout to accommodate new ancestry widget\\\"), so I have removed that from the epic description. Utility actions will be part of the [sticky header for work items](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953) so that they can be accessed anywhere on the page.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7e53e624db5ba371f4a9065e52ee401e5d7ec6fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544538650, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[some slack discussion](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/CLW71KM96/p1690404850184969) on actions in breadcrumbs. And https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419962+ \\n\\n/cc @annabeldunstone\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 832471, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9e1673ddf12c87cf7ea59afa5831910e9ae90b5c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493245122, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda @gweaver I think that most of these items will need to be addressed before the rollout Epics or Issues. Can you please take a quick look and confirm? If so, we can set it to block both of your epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 22:32:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:05:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1433195793, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the feedback! Will try to address it point by point below.\\n\\n### General\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n\\n@jackib Are you asking about what I mean by `When updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users.`? I just mean that 1B.1 (Two-column layout), for example, shouldn't be released without the other items in 1B.\\n\\nWhen it comes to work item types, I believe that any change we make to the work item will automatically apply to all work item types (currently tasks, objectives, and key results).\\n\\n\u003e * What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n \\n:thumbsup: Will do, but I think I'll add it to the top of the table instead of a separate column (which will make all the columns narrower).\\n\\n\u003e * Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\n@jackib Do you mean add screenshots of the current state to this Epic? Or screenshots of the current state to each issue as they move to implementation?\\n\\n### Parent / ancestry widget\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving.\\n\\nMy thinking here is that moving the parent / ancestry information into the sidebar is fairly big change from how the work item currently is and that it makes sense to introduce that change when we introduce the sidebar. But that's a pretty loosely held opinion, I'm happy to split that out into a separate iteration if that's what others feel strongly about. @nickbrandt would appreciate your input since you're working on that widget!\\n\\n### Create / edit experience\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail.\\n\\n\u003e I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\nI actually don't have a strong reason for create/edit being part of iteration 1B, I put it there because I thought it was one of the areas we'd discussed in our sync meeting (but I may have gotten my wires crossed there). I'm happy to move it to a later iteration independent of the two-column layout. \\n\\n@gweaver it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n### Additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc)\\n\\n\u003e These aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate \\\\[insert object\\\\] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\\n\\nMakes sense to me! :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482585360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Are we saying that each iteration is a point that we can release to customers? If that is the case, do we need 1a and 1b or can they just be 1 and 2?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487571719, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Closing the loop here -- I created 4 subepics for this epic that we can use to contain the issues for each of the phases you outlined. We can work together as a team to further refine and estimate the work involved for each MVC where the goal is we can release each of phase when it's completed.\\n\\ncc @donaldcook\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 16:01:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 17:21:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1490780614, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @nickbrandt @gweaver @donaldcook I just took a stab at documenting the dependencies and rollout plan for the updates to the work items detail view (see the epic description). Would love your feedback!\\n\\n**Here are some prompts to solicit feedback (but please feel free to give feedback in any area!):**\\n\\n* Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n* Are the dependencies clear?\\n* I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 17:32:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480097393, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant This is so organized, thank you!\\n\\n**Feedback on the plan**\\n\\n\u003e * Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n\\nLooking at [this inventory](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9972 \\\"\\ud83c\\udf1f Align Work Item design patterns with the Pajamas Design System\\\"), everything seems to be addressed from the UX concerns. \\n\\n\u003e * Are the dependencies clear?\\n\\n* For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n* For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n**Few suggestions on documentation**\\n\\n* What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n* Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\ncc @amandarueda @mushakov\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4089849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:12:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480398899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for putting this together, @esybrant ! I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\ncc: @amandarueda @gweaver @jackib\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482003013, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant I agree all of these things should be done prior to migrating epics and issues to the work item architecture. Here's my initial feedback and questions:\\n\\n- For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving. \\n- For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail. \\n\\n\u003e I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\\n\\nThese aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate [insert object] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482056872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n@esybrant I'm suggesting the edit and create workflows be split into different iterations. The update pattern needs to be consistent and clear (ex: we are proposing introducing a new `Edit` button in the breadcrumbs area), which is scoped to the detail view. The create workflows do include the detail view, but also encompass areas of the product outside of the detail view, so I think that workflow can be improved after we release improvements to the detail view.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 13:28:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:27:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1485391729, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I agree with @gweaver suggestion above.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486103338, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Also, thanks for the explanation of the why behind your recommendations, @esybrant . It's super clear to follow why you went in a specific direction :star2: .\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486108724, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the great feedback! I updated the description based on your suggestions if you want to give it another look.\\n\\nNotable changes:\\n\\n* Moved the create flow to its own iteration (but left the edit experience in iteration 1B).\\n* Moved the parent/ancestry widget out to a new section `Non-dependent improvements`\\n* Moved sticky header from 1A to 1B _(In my mind, this one is more connected to the two-column layout than the header changes.)_\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 22:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 22:03:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486169421, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 832471, \"username\": \"psimyn\", \"name\": \"Simon Knox\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"How much work is left to be done in this epic?","query_id":"d3e889ed83974e1492c0f42b06de52b6","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"854759","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 854759, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 4089849, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10814, \"updated_by_id\": 4377833, \"last_edited_by_id\": 4377833, \"lock_version\": 16, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-11-10\", \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:07:28 UTC\", \"created_at\": \"2023-06-09 19:34:47 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 14:14:38 UTC\", \"title\": \"[UX] Detail pages for Plan related Work Items\", \"description\": \"## Iteration 1: Building a foundation for work item detail views\\n\\nThe goal of Iteration 1 is to create a consistent and flexible foundation for work items that will accommodate a variety of different planning objects.\\n\\n### Iteration 1A: Header area and breadcrumbs changes\\n\\nThese changes to the header area are meant to group similar work item information together and make work items more consistent with other planning objects.\\n\\nBecause these changes are small and increase consistency with other areas of the product, they do not need to be behind a feature flag.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eHeader area and breadcrumbs changes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416800+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416799+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415079+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n### Iteration 1B: Two-column layout, sidebar attributes, and edit experience\\n\\nWhen updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users. These changes should be made behind a feature flag and released to users together.\\n\\n_Iteration 1A is a blocker for the release of Iteration 1B._\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-09-05\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eTwo-column layout (including two-column layout for small screens)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome aspects are ~\\\"workflow::ready for development\\\" , some aspects are still in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nConfidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415077+s\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417915+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:two:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSidebar attributes\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\"\\n\\nWhether we need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" depends on which design direction we pursue. TBD.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/416801+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:three:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eEdit experience (for work item title and description)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\nWill likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" .\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\\u2022 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419952+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:four:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eSticky header (includes making utility actions sticky)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Confidence level is high, ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" is not needed.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n* https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Iteration 2: Create flow for work items\\n\\nImprove the creation of work items (does not impact legacy issues/epics).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n| Reference | Description | UX status | Issue links |\\n|-----------|-------------|-----------|-------------|\\n| :one: | Create experience | Currently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" . Will likely need ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" . | https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11012+s |\\n\\n## Iteration 3: Adding a contextual work item view\\n\\nOnce we have a foundation for work items in place, we'll continue to build upon that by adding and improving widgets and introducing a contextual work item view for users to be able to view work items without losing their current context.\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-08-03\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eWork item contextual view (modal? drawer?)\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nSome of this is being explored with the overall detail page design, but the majority of design requirements will be handled in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\\nThere will be a separate ~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" effort conducted alongside https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409886.\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\\n\\n## Non-dependent improvements that can be released in any order\\n\\nImprovements in this area are not dependent on Iterations 1-3. They can be made at any time (before or after Iterations 1-3).\\n\\n_\u003csub\u003eTable updated 2023-07-24\u003c/sub\u003e_\\n\\n\u003ctable\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eReference\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eDescription\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eUX status\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003cth\u003eIssue links\u003c/th\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003ctr\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n:one:\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003eParent / ancestry information\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\nCurrently in ~\\\"workflow::design\\\" .\\n\\n~\\\"workflow::solution validation\\\" will be done in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ux-research/-/issues/2486+s\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003ctd\u003e\\n\\n\u003c/td\u003e\\n\u003c/tr\u003e\\n\u003c/table\u003e\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": null, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": null, \"due_date_is_fixed\": null, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": 677568, \"relative_position\": -35781, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909555, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": 909556, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 6, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 26, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 9}, \"author\": {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, \"labels\": [], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": null, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@mushakov agreed.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-16 14:56:04 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-16 15:46:49 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1434241869, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@donaldcook Yes, each iteration is a point we can release to customers. 1A can be released without 1B. \\n\\nI grouped them together because I see them as the two parts to the whole vision of `Building a foundation for work item detail views`. I see 1A and 1B as strongly related, but I don't think Iteration 1, 2, and 3 are as strongly related, if that makes sense.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 20:43:38 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-26 20:00:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487907450, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Update on the work item utility actions: Utility actions will be [staying within the page header and not moving to the breadcrumbs](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/417206#note_1506867173 \\\"Re-structure work items header area layout to accommodate new ancestry widget\\\"), so I have removed that from the epic description. Utility actions will be part of the [sticky header for work items](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419953) so that they can be accessed anywhere on the page.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-09-05 21:09:10 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"7e53e624db5ba371f4a9065e52ee401e5d7ec6fb\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1544538650, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"[some slack discussion](https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/CLW71KM96/p1690404850184969) on actions in breadcrumbs. And https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/419962+ \\n\\n/cc @annabeldunstone\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 832471, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-31 06:51:39 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"9e1673ddf12c87cf7ea59afa5831910e9ae90b5c\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1493245122, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@amandarueda @gweaver I think that most of these items will need to be addressed before the rollout Epics or Issues. Can you please take a quick look and confirm? If so, we can set it to block both of your epics.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-06-15 22:32:33 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-06-30 20:05:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"5eda4ecd2496f733079025a5cd7461a1c8cb9850\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1433195793, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the feedback! Will try to address it point by point below.\\n\\n### General\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n\\n@jackib Are you asking about what I mean by `When updating the work item detail view, there are a number of changes that need to happen all at once to provide value and a consistent, usable experience for our users.`? I just mean that 1B.1 (Two-column layout), for example, shouldn't be released without the other items in 1B.\\n\\nWhen it comes to work item types, I believe that any change we make to the work item will automatically apply to all work item types (currently tasks, objectives, and key results).\\n\\n\u003e * What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n \\n:thumbsup: Will do, but I think I'll add it to the top of the table instead of a separate column (which will make all the columns narrower).\\n\\n\u003e * Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\n@jackib Do you mean add screenshots of the current state to this Epic? Or screenshots of the current state to each issue as they move to implementation?\\n\\n### Parent / ancestry widget\\n\\n\u003e * For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving.\\n\\nMy thinking here is that moving the parent / ancestry information into the sidebar is fairly big change from how the work item currently is and that it makes sense to introduce that change when we introduce the sidebar. But that's a pretty loosely held opinion, I'm happy to split that out into a separate iteration if that's what others feel strongly about. @nickbrandt would appreciate your input since you're working on that widget!\\n\\n### Create / edit experience\\n\\n\u003e * For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail.\\n\\n\u003e I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\nI actually don't have a strong reason for create/edit being part of iteration 1B, I put it there because I thought it was one of the areas we'd discussed in our sync meeting (but I may have gotten my wires crossed there). I'm happy to move it to a later iteration independent of the two-column layout. \\n\\n@gweaver it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n### Additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc)\\n\\n\u003e These aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate \\\\[insert object\\\\] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\\n\\nMakes sense to me! :thumbsup:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 21:53:09 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482585360, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Are we saying that each iteration is a point that we can release to customers? If that is the case, do we need 1a and 1b or can they just be 1 and 2?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3507264, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 16:48:21 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1487571719, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant Closing the loop here -- I created 4 subepics for this epic that we can use to contain the issues for each of the phases you outlined. We can work together as a team to further refine and estimate the work involved for each MVC where the goal is we can release each of phase when it's completed.\\n\\ncc @donaldcook\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-27 16:01:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-27 17:21:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1490780614, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @nickbrandt @gweaver @donaldcook I just took a stab at documenting the dependencies and rollout plan for the updates to the work items detail view (see the epic description). Would love your feedback!\\n\\n**Here are some prompts to solicit feedback (but please feel free to give feedback in any area!):**\\n\\n* Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n* Are the dependencies clear?\\n* I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 17:32:18 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480097393, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant This is so organized, thank you!\\n\\n**Feedback on the plan**\\n\\n\u003e * Is there anything I'm missing as part of the iteration plans?\\n\\nLooking at [this inventory](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/9972 \\\"\\ud83c\\udf1f Align Work Item design patterns with the Pajamas Design System\\\"), everything seems to be addressed from the UX concerns. \\n\\n\u003e * Are the dependencies clear?\\n\\n* For Iteration 1B, do you mean all four areas should be applied to Tasks, Objectives and Key Results at the same time? Confirming this, as I think this epic is a blocker for migration of Epics and Issues.\\n* For Iteration 1B, I wonder if the Parent/Ancestry and Create improvements have to be part of it, or can be a 1C, or as part of Iteration 2?\\n\\n**Few suggestions on documentation**\\n\\n* What do you think of adding an updated date column to your tables, that way we can keep this from getting stale?\\n* Since the detail page design directions are so different from the current Task view, can we add current screenshots to issues, in addition to the proposal? For the current, just a screenshot of the affected parted of the Tasks view would be fine.\\n\\ncc @amandarueda @mushakov\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4089849, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-20 22:45:02 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:12:31 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1480398899, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Thanks for putting this together, @esybrant ! I think of `Create / edit experience` as a separate iteration after we have arrived at the desired modal layout. Can you expand on why you recommend coupling this with the rest of the changes?\\n\\ncc: @amandarueda @gweaver @jackib\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:19:13 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482003013, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@esybrant I agree all of these things should be done prior to migrating epics and issues to the work item architecture. Here's my initial feedback and questions:\\n\\n- For 1B.3 (`Parent / ancestry information`) - Do we need to make this a dependency of 1B given the parent information is already present in the secondary breadcrumbs above the title? Rationale: It already exists in the experience today for Tasks, Objectives, and Key Results. The impact/change is limited to only these three work item types. Moving it to a widget in the sidebar seems like more of a consistency thing rather than a usability problem we're solving. \\n- For 1B.4 (`Create / edit experience`) - The create experience and related workflows feels like a separate problem and set of MVCs from the two-column layout. Maybe the creation should block releasing Objectives and Key Results instead of defaulting the two-column layout to \\\"on\\\"? Editing the detail view, specifically the Title and Description, via the new `Edit` button proposed for the breadcrumb row, feels more like a dependency for enabling the two-column layout given the outcome I think UX is looking for is fully removing the \\\"click to edit\\\" pattern from the work item detail. \\n\\n\u003e I originally had adding additional widgets (dev widget, child items, linked items, etc) as part of Iteration 2, but it seems like many of those things are already captured in the epics for migrating epics/issues to work items. How do we want to structure that?\\n\\nThese aren't present on work items now, so we can treat each of them as separate dependencies for the top-level \\\"migrate [insert object] to work items\\\" epics. WDYT?\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-21 17:47:48 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1482056872, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"\u003e it sounds like you're suggesting the edit/create is a dependency for the two-column layout, am I reading that right?\\n\\n@esybrant I'm suggesting the edit and create workflows be split into different iterations. The update pattern needs to be consistent and clear (ex: we are proposing introducing a new `Edit` button in the breadcrumbs area), which is scoped to the detail view. The create workflows do include the detail view, but also encompass areas of the product outside of the detail view, so I think that workflow can be improved after we release improvements to the detail view.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4303289, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 13:28:39 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:27:24 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1485391729, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"I agree with @gweaver suggestion above.\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:29:59 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486103338, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"Also, thanks for the explanation of the why behind your recommendations, @esybrant . It's super clear to follow why you went in a specific direction :star2: .\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 5709669, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-24 21:36:44 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486108724, \"namespace_id\": null}, {\"note\": \"@jackib @gweaver @mushakov Thanks for the great feedback! I updated the description based on your suggestions if you want to give it another look.\\n\\nNotable changes:\\n\\n* Moved the create flow to its own iteration (but left the edit experience in iteration 1B).\\n* Moved the parent/ancestry widget out to a new section `Non-dependent improvements`\\n* Moved sticky header from 1A to 1B _(In my mind, this one is more connected to the two-column layout than the header changes.)_\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 4377833, \"created_at\": \"2023-07-24 22:33:40 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-07-25 22:03:46 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 854759, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": null, \"type\": \"DiscussionNote\", \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"6f79d0d9dff3add7b3d8dd2275cc1eaf0c130ed4\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"last_edited_at\": null, \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1486169421, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 832471, \"username\": \"psimyn\", \"name\": \"Simon Knox\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 3507264, \"username\": \"donaldcook\", \"name\": \"Donald Cook\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}, {\"id\": 4089849, \"username\": \"jackib\", \"name\": \"Jacki Bauer\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 4303289, \"username\": \"gweaver\", \"name\": \"Gabe Weaver\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 5709669, \"username\": \"mushakov\", \"name\": \"Melissa Ushakov\"}, {\"id\": 4377833, \"username\": \"esybrant\", \"name\": \"Emily Sybrant\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Please summarize what the objective and next steps are for {url}.","query_id":"95b9e9298a50487aa3a306650265427f","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"835460","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 835460, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3860200, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10694, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"lock_version\": 1, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"last_edited_at\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"title\": \"Work items permission adjustments\", \"description\": \"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969659, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969682, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": false, \"due_date_is_fixed\": false, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": null, \"relative_position\": null, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 5}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969659, \"title\": \"16.1\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-06-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 88, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@amandarueda FYI I've created this epic to group issues related to WI bugs involving permissions for guest users. \\n\\nThe last 3 are related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174, so I'm holding assigning a weight until we agree on a resolution. Let me know if anything else is missing :pray:\\n\\n---\\nETA: After https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174 was resolved I updated labels and proposals.\\n\\n@ramistry Do you mind assigning a weight for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412830 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412829, please?\\n\\nAlso, I'm not sure if https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831 requires a new mutation so I left the ~backend label for now, but maybe you can check if the proposal is applicable. :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:11:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 16:29:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 835460, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"37b8672383a3328f9a96a077149e8b793af45464\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:58:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1403219449, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Summarize the comments into bullet points?","query_id":"bba92de29c85493ab4233634d3430244","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"835460","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 835460, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3860200, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10694, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"lock_version\": 1, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"last_edited_at\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"title\": \"Work items permission adjustments\", \"description\": \"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969659, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969682, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": false, \"due_date_is_fixed\": false, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": null, \"relative_position\": null, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 5}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969659, \"title\": \"16.1\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-06-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 88, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@amandarueda FYI I've created this epic to group issues related to WI bugs involving permissions for guest users. \\n\\nThe last 3 are related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174, so I'm holding assigning a weight until we agree on a resolution. Let me know if anything else is missing :pray:\\n\\n---\\nETA: After https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174 was resolved I updated labels and proposals.\\n\\n@ramistry Do you mind assigning a weight for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412830 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412829, please?\\n\\nAlso, I'm not sure if https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831 requires a new mutation so I left the ~backend label for now, but maybe you can check if the proposal is applicable. :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:11:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 16:29:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 835460, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"37b8672383a3328f9a96a077149e8b793af45464\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:58:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1403219449, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Summarize with bullet points.","query_id":"257a464f0f0146f389399c8d2c1720f0","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"835460","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 835460, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3860200, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10694, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"lock_version\": 1, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"last_edited_at\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"title\": \"Work items permission adjustments\", \"description\": \"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969659, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969682, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": false, \"due_date_is_fixed\": false, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": null, \"relative_position\": null, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 5}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969659, \"title\": \"16.1\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-06-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 88, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@amandarueda FYI I've created this epic to group issues related to WI bugs involving permissions for guest users. \\n\\nThe last 3 are related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174, so I'm holding assigning a weight until we agree on a resolution. Let me know if anything else is missing :pray:\\n\\n---\\nETA: After https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174 was resolved I updated labels and proposals.\\n\\n@ramistry Do you mind assigning a weight for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412830 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412829, please?\\n\\nAlso, I'm not sure if https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831 requires a new mutation so I left the ~backend label for now, but maybe you can check if the proposal is applicable. :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:11:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 16:29:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 835460, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"37b8672383a3328f9a96a077149e8b793af45464\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:58:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1403219449, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Can you create a simpler list of which questions a user should be able to ask according to this epic.","query_id":"962d680d2e394a90857f1290a6462dc4","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"835460","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 835460, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3860200, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10694, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"lock_version\": 1, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"last_edited_at\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"title\": \"Work items permission adjustments\", \"description\": \"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969659, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969682, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": false, \"due_date_is_fixed\": false, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": null, \"relative_position\": null, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 5}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969659, \"title\": \"16.1\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-06-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 88, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@amandarueda FYI I've created this epic to group issues related to WI bugs involving permissions for guest users. \\n\\nThe last 3 are related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174, so I'm holding assigning a weight until we agree on a resolution. Let me know if anything else is missing :pray:\\n\\n---\\nETA: After https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174 was resolved I updated labels and proposals.\\n\\n@ramistry Do you mind assigning a weight for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412830 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412829, please?\\n\\nAlso, I'm not sure if https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831 requires a new mutation so I left the ~backend label for now, but maybe you can check if the proposal is applicable. :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:11:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 16:29:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 835460, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"37b8672383a3328f9a96a077149e8b793af45464\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:58:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1403219449, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Summarize this Epic.","query_id":"8d6ee7a9894b49889885d99ca2ad3bcd","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"835460","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 835460, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3860200, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10694, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"lock_version\": 1, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"last_edited_at\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"title\": \"Work items permission adjustments\", \"description\": \"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969659, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969682, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": false, \"due_date_is_fixed\": false, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": null, \"relative_position\": null, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 5}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969659, \"title\": \"16.1\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-06-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 88, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@amandarueda FYI I've created this epic to group issues related to WI bugs involving permissions for guest users. \\n\\nThe last 3 are related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174, so I'm holding assigning a weight until we agree on a resolution. Let me know if anything else is missing :pray:\\n\\n---\\nETA: After https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174 was resolved I updated labels and proposals.\\n\\n@ramistry Do you mind assigning a weight for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412830 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412829, please?\\n\\nAlso, I'm not sure if https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831 requires a new mutation so I left the ~backend label for now, but maybe you can check if the proposal is applicable. :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:11:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 16:29:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 835460, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"37b8672383a3328f9a96a077149e8b793af45464\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:58:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1403219449, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"How much work is left to be done {url}?","query_id":"b61ab18b34e5476cbf144fccde31294d","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"835460","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 835460, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3860200, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10694, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"lock_version\": 1, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"last_edited_at\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"title\": \"Work items permission adjustments\", \"description\": \"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969659, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969682, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": false, \"due_date_is_fixed\": false, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": null, \"relative_position\": null, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 5}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969659, \"title\": \"16.1\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-06-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 88, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@amandarueda FYI I've created this epic to group issues related to WI bugs involving permissions for guest users. \\n\\nThe last 3 are related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174, so I'm holding assigning a weight until we agree on a resolution. Let me know if anything else is missing :pray:\\n\\n---\\nETA: After https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174 was resolved I updated labels and proposals.\\n\\n@ramistry Do you mind assigning a weight for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412830 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412829, please?\\n\\nAlso, I'm not sure if https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831 requires a new mutation so I left the ~backend label for now, but maybe you can check if the proposal is applicable. :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:11:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 16:29:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 835460, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"37b8672383a3328f9a96a077149e8b793af45464\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:58:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1403219449, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"How much work is left to be done in this epic?","query_id":"d80aaab45ca84cf580b8f16d9260058f","resource_type":"epic"}
+{"resource_id":"835460","context":"{\"data\": {\"id\": 835460, \"group_id\": 9970, \"author_id\": 3860200, \"assignee_id\": null, \"iid\": 10694, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"last_edited_by_id\": null, \"lock_version\": 1, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"end_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"last_edited_at\": null, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-10-24 13:56:16 UTC\", \"title\": \"Work items permission adjustments\", \"description\": \"We have observed differences between permission checks for users with guest access to issues vs work items. This epic will track the issues to solve them.\", \"start_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969659, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone_id\": 2969682, \"start_date_fixed\": null, \"due_date_fixed\": null, \"start_date_is_fixed\": false, \"due_date_is_fixed\": false, \"closed_by_id\": null, \"closed_at\": null, \"parent_id\": null, \"relative_position\": null, \"state_id\": \"opened\", \"start_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"due_date_sourcing_epic_id\": null, \"external_key\": null, \"confidential\": false, \"color\": \"#1068bf\", \"total_opened_issue_weight\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_weight\": 8, \"total_opened_issue_count\": 0, \"total_closed_issue_count\": 5}, \"author\": {\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}, \"labels\": [{\"id\": 10690700, \"title\": \"group::product planning\", \"color\": \"#A8D695\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2019-05-22 19:55:52 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2020-10-16 19:33:41 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues belonging to the Product Planning group of the Plan stage of the DevOps lifecycle. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-categories/#product-planning-group\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 2278648, \"title\": \"type::bug\", \"color\": \"#CC0000\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2017-07-07 20:20:34 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2021-10-27 09:36:49 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Issues that report undesirable or incorrect behavior. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}, {\"id\": 25541419, \"title\": \"work items\", \"color\": \"#428BCA\", \"project_id\": null, \"created_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2022-06-13 14:41:30 UTC\", \"template\": false, \"description\": \"Related to the Work Items feature\", \"type\": \"GroupLabel\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_on_merge\": false}], \"start_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969659, \"title\": \"16.1\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-06-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:02:12 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 88, \"start_date\": \"2023-05-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"due_date_sourcing_milestone\": {\"id\": 2969682, \"title\": \"16.3\", \"project_id\": null, \"description\": \"\", \"due_date\": \"2023-08-17\", \"created_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-02-01 16:03:42 UTC\", \"state\": \"active\", \"iid\": 90, \"start_date\": \"2023-07-18\", \"group_id\": 9970, \"lock_version\": 0}, \"notes\": [{\"note\": \"@amandarueda FYI I've created this epic to group issues related to WI bugs involving permissions for guest users. \\n\\nThe last 3 are related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174, so I'm holding assigning a weight until we agree on a resolution. Let me know if anything else is missing :pray:\\n\\n---\\nETA: After https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/407174 was resolved I updated labels and proposals.\\n\\n@ramistry Do you mind assigning a weight for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412830 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412829, please?\\n\\nAlso, I'm not sure if https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/412831 requires a new mutation so I left the ~backend label for now, but maybe you can check if the proposal is applicable. :pray:\", \"noteable_type\": \"Epic\", \"author_id\": 3860200, \"created_at\": \"2023-05-24 10:11:29 UTC\", \"updated_at\": \"2023-05-24 16:29:56 UTC\", \"project_id\": null, \"attachment\": null, \"line_code\": null, \"commit_id\": null, \"noteable_id\": 835460, \"st_diff\": null, \"system\": false, \"updated_by_id\": 3860200, \"type\": null, \"position\": null, \"original_position\": null, \"resolved_at\": null, \"resolved_by_id\": null, \"discussion_id\": \"37b8672383a3328f9a96a077149e8b793af45464\", \"change_position\": null, \"resolved_by_push\": null, \"review_id\": null, \"confidential\": null, \"last_edited_at\": \"2023-05-24 15:58:36 UTC\", \"internal\": false, \"id\": 1403219449, \"namespace_id\": null}], \"note_authors\": [{\"id\": 3860200, \"username\": \"egrieff\", \"name\": \"Eugenia Grieff\"}], \"namespace_hierarchy\": [{\"id\": 9970, \"name\": \"GitLab.org\", \"path\": \"gitlab-org\", \"type\": \"Group\"}]}","query":"Please summarize what the objective and next steps are for {url}.","query_id":"5879c5a612174057b683e51163514723","resource_type":"epic"}