What's the cause of the increase in unportable assembly code which targets the 64-bit ARM ISA in Apple’s ARM-based computers?

Writing portable ARM64 assembly
Apr 13, 2023
An unfortunate side effect of the rising popularity of Apple’s ARM-based computers is an increase in unportable assembly code which targets the 64-bit ARM ISA. This is because developers are writing these bits of assembly code to speed up their programs when run on Apple’s ARM-based computers, without considering the other 64-bit ARM devices out there, such as SBCs and servers running Linux or BSD.

The good news is that it is very easy to write assembly which targets Apple’s computers as well as the other 64-bit ARM devices running operating systems other than Darwin. It just requires being aware of a few differences between the Mach-O and ELF ABIs, as well as knowing what Apple-specific syntax extensions to avoid. By following the guidance in this blog, you will be able to write assembly code which is portable between Apple’s toolchain, the official ARM assembly toolchain, and the GNU toolchain.
Unportable assembly code targeting the 64-bit ARM ISA in Apple’s ARM-based computers is due to developers writing bits of assembly code to speed up their programs, without considering the other 64-bit ARM devices running Linux or BSD.
Given an instruction and two responses—one generated by a human and the other by a language model—I'm seeking to evaluate how closely the language model's response mirrors the human-generated one. Additionally, I want to assess the accuracy and relevance of the language model's response to the original instruction.

Instruction:
```
What's the cause of the increase in unportable assembly code which targets the 64-bit ARM ISA in Apple’s ARM-based computers?

Writing portable ARM64 assembly
Apr 13, 2023
An unfortunate side effect of the rising popularity of Apple’s ARM-based computers is an increase in unportable assembly code which targets the 64-bit ARM ISA. This is because developers are writing these bits of assembly code to speed up their programs when run on Apple’s ARM-based computers, without considering the other 64-bit ARM devices out there, such as SBCs and servers running Linux or BSD.

The good news is that it is very easy to write assembly which targets Apple’s computers as well as the other 64-bit ARM devices running operating systems other than Darwin. It just requires being aware of a few differences between the Mach-O and ELF ABIs, as well as knowing what Apple-specific syntax extensions to avoid. By following the guidance in this blog, you will be able to write assembly code which is portable between Apple’s toolchain, the official ARM assembly toolchain, and the GNU toolchain.
```

Human Response:
```
The reason for increases in unportable assembly code, which targets the 64-bit ARM ISA in Apple’s ARM-based computers, is a lack of consideration of other 64-bit ARM devices by developers.
```

Language Model Response:
```
Unportable assembly code targeting the 64-bit ARM ISA in Apple’s ARM-based computers is due to developers writing bits of assembly code to speed up their programs, without considering the other 64-bit ARM devices running Linux or BSD.
```

You are quality assessor who analyzes the similarity between the Human Response and the Language Model Response on a scale of 1 to 100, where 1 indicates no similarity and 100 indicates identical responses.
Also you analyze the Language Model Response how it accurately answers the given Instruction on a scale of 1 to 100. Analysis MUST be rigorous and thorough.
Provide the assessment in the following JSON format:

{
  "similarity_assessment": {"score": [Insert similarity score here],"reason": [Insert how the similarity score is determined]},
  "precision_assessment": {"score": [Insert precision score here],"reason": [Insert how the precision score is determined]}
}
