Is the matrix $A$ symmetric in the quadratic form? Given $x \in \mathbb{R}^n$ and $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ ($A$ is not necessarily symmetric), the quadratic form is written as $x^TAx$, a scaler. We have,
$$x^TAx=(x^TAx)^T=x^TA^Tx$$
that is $x^T(A-A^T)x=0$
Why couldn't conclude $A=A^T$ from $x^T(A-A^T)x=0$, where $x \ne \boldsymbol{0}$? I know it's a false statement and there are counter examples, but it seems to me, mathematically, $A$ should be symmetric. Could someone help explain why I couldn't make such an inference?

If your question is:
Question: Given a matrix $A$ such that 
$$x^TAx=x^TA^Tx \, \forall x$$
does it follow that $A=A^T$?
The answer is no, a counterexample is
$$A=\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1\\-1 &0 \end{bmatrix}$$
In general, any quadratic form corresponds to infinitely many matrices. Among those, exactly one is symmetric.
Note Lets pick $A=\begin{bmatrix} a & b\\c &d \end{bmatrix}$ to be a $2 \times 2$ matrix. 
Then 
$$x^TAx=ax_1^2+dx_2^2+(b+c)x_1x_2$$
This means that the quadratic form only tells you what $a,d$ and $b+c$ are. You don't know what $b$ and $c$ are.
