The notations change as we grow up In school life we were taught that $<$ and $>$ are strict inequalities while $\ge$ and $\le$ aren't. We were also taught that $\subset$ was strict containment but. $\subseteq$ wasn't.
My question: Later on, (from my M.Sc. onwards) I noticed that $\subset$ is used for general containment and $\subsetneq$ for strict. The symbol $\subseteq$ wasn't used any longer! We could have simply carried on with the old notations which were analogous to the symbols for inequalities. Why didn't the earlier notations stick on? There has to be a history behind this, I feel. (I could be wrong)
Notations are notations I agree and I am used to the current ones. But I can't reconcile the fact that the earlier notations for subsets (which were more straightforward) were scrapped while $\le$ and $\ge$ continue to be used with the same meaning. So I ask.

I had a professor explain this as "it is much less common to require a proper subset". So much so, that it became customary to use $\subset$ as a (proper or improper) subset, and $\subsetneq$ as a proper subset, just because the former is easier to write on a blackboard.
The order relations $<$, $\le$ between numbers are supposedly used with approximately the same frequency, so the original notation is kept.
I guess when you're first learning about sets, you use $\subset$ and $\subseteq$ because they're similar to $<$ and $\le$, but this indeed seems to not be the common notation "later". (Fortunately, usually it is clear from context what $\subset$ means.)
Edit to add: $\subsetneq$ is also a more complicated relation than $\subset$ (it is the conjunction of $\subset$ and $\neq$), so maybe it deserves a more complicated symbol.
