Have historians responded to Raju's critique? C. K. Raju has made some outrageous criticisms of the traditional take on Euclid in particular and Western history in general. Yet he has a book published on the subject with an apparently respectable publisher in India. Have modern historians of the classical period responded to his critique?
Note. One of the responders mentioned a helpful review by Ferreiros here.

Euclid is no myth.Applonius of Perga directly refers to him in one of his books on conic sections ( In book 3, an original version of which has survived,in Greek).
I have written an article titled'C.K.Rajus mistake' which is on the net exposing all his false arguments.You can read it.I have introduced a lot of new arguments favouring , an Indian origin to Mathematics, and in the course have introduced some Indian philosophical thoughts,which have influenced greek mathematicians starting from Pythogoras.Independent of whether one agrees to my theory,nevertheless, I have busted Raju's false arguments of Euclid being a myth and many of his arguments against Mathematics(which he calls as formal Mathematics).
My paper was published in the 'Mathematics Teacher', the official publication of the society of Mathematics Teachers of India,located in Chennai,India.
The name of the article is 'Stop the Tirade against Euclid.Why Euclid should be more emphasized in Schools than is currently done'I changed its title to'C.K.Rajus mistake' while posting it on the net,to catch the attention of people who may be following him.
Here is the link to the article.
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1504.0198.
Regards.
