Definition of Tangents When we had not learnt Calculus, we met the concept of Tangent in Circle, which was defined as the line touching the circle at ONE point.
Then, after learning Calculus, we knew that a curve could intersect with its tangent at more than one point, and a line intersecting with a curve at only one point is not necessarily a tangent. Hence, we used Limit to define tangent, which involved TWO points and we considered one approached the other to obtain the tangent.
My question is:
The definition of a tangent to a curve should be more general than that to a circle, and hence, we can say that the definition of a tangent to a circle can be derived from the definition of a tangent to a curve.
However, limit uses TWO points, even though they are very close to each other. If they overlap with each other to become ONE point, then no line occurs. So, in theory, how can we proof that the two definitions (a general curve VS a circle) are consistent?

Limit means approaching, not coincidence. So, if you take two points on the circle, line that goes through them is not a tangent, of course. But if you make one point closer to another, that line goes closer to the tangent. If you take it even more close, then line will be also closer. And here comes the limit into the business. Just like derivatives which are based on difference of two values. But to be true derivative one of your values "kind of" approaching another, although you never say that two values are the same, so you cannot take ratio because of denominator being "zero". That's why we define derivative at the point, not two points, and that's how we define tangent as well.
