Converse Truth Table I do not understand how the converse ($B \Rightarrow A$) truth table is logical.
For instance, take the statement, "If I am in Paris, then I am in France".
If I am in Paris, then I am in France. Therefore, $A \Rightarrow B$, since if I am in Paris, then I must also be in France. However, ($B \not \Rightarrow A$), since it can be true that I am in France, but that does not necessarily mean I am in Paris specifically. 
I would greatly appreciate it if someone could tell me why my understanding is incorrect.
Thank you.


Let's assume you have a number,for example 5. When you are asked 5 is in which circle you will say it is in B. Then by this statement one can say your number is also in A.
But lets assume you have number 3. And you are asked in which circle number is? You day it is in circle A. So one can't say the number is in B!
This case is same , assume circle B as Paris and fields A as France and see your statement.
