Prove the lecturer is a liar... I was given this puzzle:

At the end of the seminar, the lecturer waited outside to greet the attendees. The first three seen leaving were all women. The lecturer noted " assuming the attendees are leaving in random order, the probability of that is precisely 1/3." Show the lecturer is lying (or badly mistaken).

I've puzzled it out to proving that there is no ratio of $\binom{a}{3}/\binom{a+b}{3}$ that is 1/3, where $ a,b
\in\mathbb{N}$ and $a\ge3$ and $b\ge0$, $a$ being the number of women and $b$ the number of men.
I'm stuck at this point (but empirically pretty convinced).
Any help/pointers appreciated.
Rasher
PS- as an amusing aside, the first 12 values in the sequence of values for $\binom{3+b}{3}$ are the total number of gifts received for each day of the "12 days of Christmas" song.
I've narrowed it down to proving that in the sequence generated by $n^3+3 n^2+2 n$ with $n
\in\mathbb{N}$ and $n\ge1$ it is impossible for $3(n^3+3 n^2+2 n)$ to exist in the form of $n^3+3 n^2+2 n$ . Still stymied at this point.
I found today a (somewhat) similar question at MathOverflow. Since my question seems to boil down to showing the Diophantine $6 a - 9 a^2 + 3 a^3 - 2 b + 3 b^2 - b^3=0$ has no solutions for $(a,b)
\in\mathbb{N}$ and $(a,b)>= 3$ would it be appropriate to close this here and ask for help at MathOverflow to determine if this can be proved?
An update: I asked a post-doc here at Stanford if he'd have a look (he's done some heavy lifting in the area of bounds on ways $t$ can be represented as a binomial coefficient). To paraphrase his response "That's hard...probably beyond proof in the general case". Since I've tested for explicit solutions to beyond 100M, I'm settling with the lecturer is lying/mistaken at least in spirit unless one admits lecture halls the size of a state.

Simplistic answer:
Let $w=$ number of women, $m=$ number of men, and $n=w+m$.
Assuming the professor has no prior knowledge of the male:female ratio on the course, the solution is quite simple.
The probability that $w:m=1:1$ is $50:50$, so $n=2w$.
Dan's statement can therefore be rewritten:
$$(3w-3)(w-2)=(4w-2)(2w-2)\\ 
3w^2-9w+6=8w^2-12w+4\\
5w^2-3w-2=0\\
w=\frac{3\pm \sqrt {9+40}}{10}\\
w=1, -\frac {2}{5}
$$
which, of course is absurd.
More complete answer:
Without assuming that probabilistically, $n=2w$.
This is basically a rephrasing of your conjecture that there are no rational solutions for $a$ (in the comments section above).
$$3w(w-1)(w-2)=(w+m)(w+m-1)(w+m-2)\\
2m-3m^2+m^3-4w-6mw+3m^2w+6w^2+3mw^2-2w^3=0\\$$
which basically boils down to the (ugly beast of a) statement that 
$$w=\frac{2+m}{2}+
\frac{-12-27m^2}{6\sqrt[3]{3}\sqrt[3]{54m^3\sqrt{3}\sqrt{-64-432m^2-972m^4+243m^6}}}+\\
\frac{\sqrt[3]{-54m^3+\sqrt{3}\sqrt{-64-432m^2-972m^4+243m^6}}}{4\sqrt[3]{9}}\\
$$
has no integer solutions for $m\in \mathbb{Z}$.
Unfortunately, this is where I become a little unstuck!
