Spectral measure associated to eigenvector of self-adjoint operator Let $A$ be a self-adjoint operator on .the Hilbertspace $H$ and let $\lambda_0$ be an eigenvalue of $A$ with corresponding eigenvector $\psi$.
The spectral theorem tells us,that there is a projection-valued measure $P_A$ such that
$A = \int \lambda dP_A(\lambda)$.
To each vector $x \in H$ we associate a finite Borel measure $\mu_x$ defined by
$\mu_\psi(\Omega) = \langle \psi, P_A(\Omega) \psi\rangle$.
1) I would like first to understand the very basic example of $A$ an operator on finite-dimensional $\mathbb C^n$ with eigenvalues $\lambda_1,...,\lambda_m$, $P_j$ the projection corresponding to eigenspace of $\lambda_j$. Then $A = \sum_j \lambda_j P_j$. I would like to understand why then we have
$\mu_\psi(\lambda) = \sum \|P_j \psi \|^2 \delta(\lambda-\lambda_j)$.
2) Secondly, for a self-adjoint operator $A$ on $H$, if $\psi$ is an eigenvector to eigenvalue $\lambda_0$, $\|\psi\| = 1$, is it possible to give $\mu_\psi$ explicitely? Maybe someone can give a short explanation what I have to understand to find the expression by myself.
Edit:
I feel stupid, but one last question: why is $\mu_\psi(\{\lambda_0\}) := \langle \psi, P_A(\lambda_0\}) \psi \rangle = \|\psi\|^2$? (in the case 2 that $\psi$ is an eigenvector to the eigenvalue $\lambda_0$)

1) You have, when $A=\sum_j\lambda_jP_j$, that 
$$
P_A(\Omega)=\int1_\Omega(\lambda)\,dP_A(\lambda)=1_\Omega(A)=\sum_j1_\Omega(\lambda_j)P_j.
$$
In particular
$$
\mu_\psi(\{\lambda\})=\langle\psi,P_A(\{\lambda\})\psi\rangle=\sum_j1_{\{\lambda\}}(\lambda_j)\langle\psi,P_j\psi\rangle=\sum_j\delta(\lambda-\lambda_j)\langle P_j\psi,P_j\psi\rangle\\ =\sum_j\delta(\lambda-\lambda_j)\|P_j\psi\|^2
$$
2) It depends on what you mean by "explicitly". In general, writing $A=\int\lambda\,dP_A(\lambda)$ is as much as you can say about an arbitrary normal operator. If your $A$ and $\psi$ are given in some kind of explicit form, it might be possible to say more. Note also that $\mu_\psi$ is a measure on all Borel subsets of the spectrum of $A$, so you cannot have a very explicit expression unless $A$ is very particular. 
