Direct products in the category Rel Please describe direct products in the category Rel.

As Dylan has already mentioned, the category-theoretic product in $\textbf{Rel}$ is the disjoint union of sets. We can verify this by hand:
\begin{align}
\textbf{Rel}(X, Y \amalg Z) 
& = \mathscr{P}(X \times (Y \amalg Z)) \\
& \cong \mathscr{P}((X \times Y) \amalg (X \times Z)) \\
& \cong \mathscr{P}(X \times Y) \times \mathscr{P}(X \times Z)
 = \textbf{Rel}(X, Y) \times \textbf{Rel}(X, Z)
\end{align}
This isn't too surprising, since $\textbf{Rel}$ is isomorphic to $\textbf{Rel}^\textrm{op}$ and behaves a bit like what one expects for the category of (free) vector spaces over the field of one element.

There is a categorical description of the cartesian product of sets within $\textbf{Rel}$, however. To avoid confusion, let us now write $X \otimes Y$ for the cartesian product of $X$ and $Y$. It's not hard to check that this makes $\textbf{Rel}$ into a symmetric monoidal category. Moreover, $\textbf{Rel}(X, Y) = \mathscr{P}(X \otimes Y)$, hence,
$$\textbf{Rel}(X \otimes Y, Z) \cong \textbf{Rel}(X, Y \otimes Z)$$
so $\textbf{Rel}$ is even a monoidal closed category! Of course, this means $\textbf{Rel}$ is enriched over itself, with the internal hom being given, confusingly, by the cartesian product. (Note that the representable functor $\textbf{Rel}(1, -)$ is not the forgetful functor!) Thus, we may characterise the cartesian product as follows: it is the unique monoidal product on $\textbf{Rel}$ that has unit $1$ and admits an internal hom. (This is because every set is a coproduct of copies of $1$.)
[But how does one characterise $1$...? It's not the terminal object anymore!]
