I can't understand this difference equation step I am working on birth-death processes and I can't understand a step that is taken in a proof.
The mean of a process is defined as
$$\mu(t) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}np_n(t)$$
At certain stage in the proof we go from 
$$\lambda \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(n+1)p_n(t) + \lambda \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}np_n(t)$$
to
$$=\lambda \mu(t) + \lambda\mu(t)$$
I don't see how this is valid. The expansions for the summations aren't the same. For instance, $1 \times p_0 + 2 \times p_1 + ... \ne 1 \times p_1 + 2 \times p_2 + ...$
Am I missing something here, anyone know what's going on?
Here is the proof


It’s a little confusing to have both a constant $\mu$ and a function $\mathbf{\mu}$, so I’m going to replace the former by $\nu$ for this answer. In addition, there appears to be a typo in the first line: the argument makes sense only if the expression on the righthand side of the first equals sign is
$$\lambda\sum_{n\ge 1}np_{n-1}(t)-\lambda\sum_{n\ge 1}np_n(t)-\nu\sum_{n\ge 1}n^2p_n(t)+\nu\sum_{n\ge 1}n(n+1)p_{n+1}(t)\;,\tag{1}$$
with $n^2p_n(t)$ in the third summation.
Shifting the indices on the first term and using the definition of $\mu(t)$ lets us rewrite the first two terms as
$$\lambda\sum_{n\ge 0}(n+1)p_n(t)-\lambda\mu(t)=\lambda\sum_{n\ge 0}np_n(t)+\lambda\sum_{n\ge 0}p_n(t)-\lambda\mu(t)=\lambda\mu(t)+\lambda-\lambda\mu(t)=\lambda\;.$$
Ignoring the factor of $\nu$, the last term can be rewritten as
$$\begin{align*}
\sum_{n\ge 2}(n-1)np_n(t)&=\sum_{n\ge 2}n^2p_n(t)-\sum_{n\ge 2}np_n(t)\\\\
&=\left(\sum_{n\ge 1}n^2p_n(t)-p_1(t)\right)-\left(\sum_{n\ge 1}np_n(t)-p_1(t)\right)\\\\
&=\sum_{n\ge 1}n^2p_n(t)-\sum_{n\ge 1}np_n(t)\\\\
&=\sum_{n\ge 1}n^2p_n(t)-\mu(t)\;.
\end{align*}$$
$(1)$ now reduces to
$$\lambda-\nu\sum_{n\ge 1}n^2p_n(t)+\nu\sum_{n\ge 1}n^2p_n(t)-\nu\mu(t)=\lambda-\nu\mu(t)\;,$$
as desired.
