Convergence and divergence depending on whether $n$ is odd or even It is part of one problem I am working on: I want to prove the following conjecture ($x\ne q\pi$ where $q\in\Bbb Q$)

$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\sin^{2k-1}(nx)}{n^{\alpha}}\quad\text{converges if}\quad0<\alpha\le1,k\in\Bbb N$$
  $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\sin^{2k}(nx)}{n^{\alpha}}\quad\text{diverges if}\quad0<\alpha\le1,k\in\Bbb N$$

So far I have tested cases for $\sin^{1,2,3,4}$ and the results agree with the conjecture. I believe it holds for all natural numbers. I tried using induction but I failed. Could you help me or improve my method? Best regards.

My failed induction method, for the $\sin^{2k}$ cases, was as follows:

Hypothesis
  $$\sin^{2k}\theta=\xi_k+T_k(\theta)$$
  where $\xi_k\in\Bbb R^+$ (the positivity of $\xi$ is needed in the context of the bigger problem, though it is not necessary in the conjecture), $T_k(\theta)$ is a linear combination of "first-order" trignometric terms: $\sin\theta,\sin 2\theta,\sin 3\theta,\cdots$ or $\cos\theta,\cos2\theta,\cos3\theta\cdots$ but not $\sin^2\theta,\sin^3 2\theta,\cos^45\theta$ etc. If this hypothesis holds, then by Abel-Dirichlet criterion it is easy to prove the second part of the conjecture.
Proof by induction
  Initial case $k=1$ is trivial.
  If for any given $k$ the hypothesis stands, then for $(k+1)$
  $$
\begin{align*}
\sin^{2k+2}\theta=&\xi_k\sin^2\theta+\sin^2\theta T_k(\theta)\\
=&\xi_k\left(\frac{1-\cos 2\theta}{2}\right)+\left(\frac{1-\cos 2\theta}{2}\right)T_k(\theta) \\
=&\frac12\xi_k-\frac12\xi_k\cos2\theta+\frac12T_k(\theta)-\frac12\cos(2\theta)T_k(\theta)
\end{align*}
$$
  Now the hard part lies in the last term of RHS: it definitely contains terms like $\cos2\theta\sin m\theta$ or $\cos2\theta\cos m\theta$, to reduce them to the "first order", it must yield some constant terms, which might threaten the existence of a positive $\xi_{k+1}$.

I don't know how to proceed.

Let's look at the second series. To make things a little easier, suppose $0<x<1$ (The restriction that $x$ is not a rational multiple of $\pi$ is not needed.) Let $N$ be any integer such that $Nx>2\pi.$ Then among $e^{ix}, e^{i2x}, \dots , e^{iNx},$ at least one of those points lands in the arc $A=\{e^{it}: \pi/4 < t <3\pi/4\}.$ Why? Starting at $(1,0)$ we move around the unit circle in steps of arc length $1.$ One of those steps has to land in $A,$ because we traverse the entire circle at least once, and we can't step over $A$ as its arc-length is $\pi/2 > 1.$ The same holds for $(N+1)x, \dots, 2Nx$ etc.
Now the sum in question is at least
$$\tag 1 \sum_{m=1}^{\infty}\sum_{n=mN}^{(m+1)N -1}\frac{\sin^{2k}(nx)}{n}.$$
In each inner sum, we have $\sin (nx) > 2^{-1/2}$ for at least one $n.$ Thus the $m$th inner sum is at least $2^{-k}/(m+1)N.$ Hence $(1)$ is at least
$$\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}\frac{2^{-k}}{(m+1)N} = \infty.$$
So we have divergence for $x\in (0,1).$ You can tweak this argument to get divergence for $x\in (0,\pi).$ And since the series has period $\pi,$ we obtain divergence for all $x\not \in \pi \mathbb {Z}.$
