Understanding a proof by descent [Fibonacci's Lost Theorem] I am trying to understand the proof in Carmichaels book Diophantine Analysis but I have got stuck at one point in the proof where $w_1$ and $w_2$ are introduced.
The theorem it is proving is that the system of diophantine equations:


*

*$$x^2 + y^2 = z^2$$

*$$y^2 + z^2 = t^2$$


cannot simultaneously be satisfied.

The system is algebraically seen equivalent to


*

*$$t^2 + x^2 = 2z^2$$

*$$t^2 - x^2 = 2y^2$$


and this is what will be worked on. We are just considering the case where the numbers are pairwise relatively prime. That implies that $t,x$ are both odd (they cannot be both even). Furthermore $t > x$ so define $t = x + 2 \alpha$.
Clearly the first equation $(x + 2\alpha)^2 + x^2 = 2 z^2$ is equivalent to $(x + \alpha)^2 + \alpha^2 = z^2$ so by the characterization of primitive Pythagorean triples there exist relatively prime $m,n$ such that $$\{x+\alpha,\alpha\} = \{2mn,m^2-n^2\}.$$
Now the second equation $t^2 - x^2 = 4 \alpha (x + \alpha) = 8 m n (m^2 - n^2) = 2 y^2$ tells us that $y^2 = 2^2 m n (m^2 - n^2)$ by coprimality and unique factorization it follows that each of those terms are squares so define $u^2 = m$, $v^2 = n$ and $w^2 = m^2 - n^2 = (u^2 - v^2)(u^2 + v^2)$.

It is now said that from the previous equation either


*

*$u^2 + v^2 = 2 {w_1}^2$,  $u^2 - v^2 = 2 {w_2}^2$


or


*

*$u^2 + v^2 = w_1^2$,  $u^2 - v^2 = w_2^2$


but $w_1$ and $w_2$ have not been defined and I cannot figure out what they are supposed to be. Any ideas what this last part could mean?
For completeness, if the first case occurs we have our descent and if the second case occurs $w_1^2 + w_2^2 = 2 u^2$, $w_1^2 - w_2^2 = 2 v^2$ gives the descent. Which finishes the proof.

This descent has a very beautiful presentation based upon ideas going back to Fibonacci.
Fibonacci's Lost Theorem $ $ The area of an integral
pythagorean triangle is not a perfect square.
Over $400$ years before Fermat's celebrated proof by infinite descent of the essentially equivalent $\rm\,FLT_4\,$ (Fermat's Last theorem for exponent $4$), Fibonacci claimed
to have a proof of this in his Liber Quadratorum (Book of Squares). But, alas, to this day, his proof has never been found.
Below is my speculative reconstruction of Fibonacci's proof of this theorem, based upon similar ideas that survived in his extensive studies on squares and related topics.
A square arithmetic progression (SAP) is an AP  $\rm\ x^2,\ y^2,\ z^2\ $ with a square stepsize $\rm\, s^2,\, $ viz. $$\rm\ x^2\ \ \xrightarrow{\Large s^2}\ \ y^2\ \ \xrightarrow{\Large s^2}\ \ z^2$$
Naturally associated with every SAP is a "half square triangle",
ie. doubling  $\rm\ z^2 + x^2\ $  produces a triangle of square area $\rm\ s^2,\, $ viz.
$\rm\ (z + x)^2 + (z - x)^2\,  =\  2\ (z^2 + x^2)\  =\  4\ y^2\ $
which indeed has $\  $ area  $\rm\, =\  (z + x)\ (z - x)/2\  = \ (z^2 - x^2)/2\  =\  s^2\ $
With these concepts in mind, the proof is very easy:
If there exists a pythagorean triangle with square area then it
may be primitivized and its area remains square. Let its primitive
parametrization be $\rm\:(a,b)\:$ and let its area be $\rm\:c^2,\:$ namely
$$\rm\ \frac{1}2\ leg_1\ leg_2\, =\ \frac{1}2\ (2\:a\:b)\ (a^2-b^2)\ =\ (a\!-\!b)\ a\ (a\!+\!b)\ b\  =\  c^2 $$
Since $\rm\:a\:$ and $\rm\:b\:$ are coprime of opposite parity,  $\rm\ a\!-\!b,\ a,\ a\!+\!b,\ b\ $ are coprime factors of a square, thus all must be squares.
Hence  $\rm\ a\!-\!b,\ a,\ a\!+\!b\ $  form a SAP; doubling its half square triangle
yields a triangle with smaller square area $\rm\ b < c^2,\ $ hence descent. $\ \ $ QED
Remark $ $ This doubling construction is ancient - already in Euclid. It may be
viewed as a composition of quadratic forms  $\rm\ (z^2 + x^2)\ (1^2 + 1^2)\:. $
