How do I prove my Fejer kernel definition is equivalent? In my notes, the definition of the Fejer kernel is 
$$
F_{n} = \sum_{j=-N}^{N} \left(1 - \frac{|j|}{N+1}\right) e^{ijt}.
$$
But in most of the reference material I come across online, it is immediately defined as the average of the Dirichlet kernels
$$
F_{N} = \frac{1}{N+1} \left(D_{0} + \dots + D_{N}\right).
$$
I've tried equating these two definitions by expanding $F_{n}$'s $e^{ijt}$ and using some trigonometry to get something looking like the $\sin$ representation of the Dirichlet kernel but it has not been going well. 
Is there a simple way to prove that these two definitions are equivalent?

It is sufficient to compare the coefficients of $e^{ijx}$ in both expressions.
What is the coefficient of $e^{ijx}$ in the second expression? Since
$$D_n=\sum_{k=-n}^n e^{ikx}$$
the number of Dirichlet Kernels in the average that contain $e^{ijx}$ is clearly
$N-j+1$, (because for $k<j$ the Dirichlet kernel $D_k$ does not contain $e^{ijx}$), and the coefficient is $1$ in each kernel, so all in all we have
$\frac{1}{N+1}(N-j+1)=1-\frac{j}{N+1}$. Here we assumed $j>0$. Similarly, the number of times $e^{-ijx}$ appears in the second expression is also $N-j+1$, hence the expression $1-\frac{|j|}{N+1}$.

When I posted this I wasn't aware of Itay4's answer, which is essentially the same counting argument (although somewhat condensed).

