as a neo-conservative , I fit quite well within the Weekly Standard 's ideological focus . however , the magazine 's ideological orientation would not be enough to keep I focus on it if the prose and quality of the magazine be below par . not so in this case .  the magazine will present article and viewpoint that be not see elsewhere . while most magazine will try -lrb- and fail -rrb- to give a accurate portrayal of every political opinion , the Weekly Standard will instead go into far more depth of many different conservative issue . some of it have to do with politics -lrb- i.e. , `` be California Golden for Bush ? '' -rrb- , but yet other be far more focus on the ideological reason for certain action -lrb- `` why we go to War '' -rrb- .  those who read the Weekly Standard be probably far more intelligent and educate than a typical reader of a general publication such as Time , which be quite liberal -lrb- and do not admit it ! -rrb- and superficial to boot . you be choose to read a magazine that give you view more credence -- with fact , figure , and the authority of a great man , William Kristol , who found the magazine .  it also have a excellent web site -- http:\/\/www.weeklystandard.com  -- Michael Gordon