The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as Amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A Primer

Summary: The primary source of federal aid for elementary and secondary education is the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)âparticularly its Title I-A program, which authorizes federal aid for the education of disadvantaged students. The ESEA was initially enacted in 1965 (P.L. 89-10), and was most recently comprehensively amended and reauthorized by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA; P.L. 114-95 ).

Summary: Under Title I-A, the ESEA as amended by the ESSA continues to require states and public schools systems to focus on educational accountability as a condition for the receipt of grant funds. Public school systems and individual public schools are held accountable for monitoring and improving achievement outcomes for students and closing achievement gaps, sustaining a focus that was initiated by amendments to the ESEA made by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB; P.L. 107-110 ) but modified under the ESSA. While states were given more latitude to develop their accountability systems under the ESSA provisions, as a condition of receiving Title I-A funds each state must continue to have content and academic achievement standards and aligned assessments in reading/language arts (RLA), mathematics, and science for specific grade levels. States must now have an accountability system that incorporates (1) long-term and interim performance goals for specified measures; (2) weighted indicators based, in part, on these goals; and (3) an annual system for meaningful differentiation that is used to identify schools that need additional support to improve student achievement.

Summary: Beyond Title I-A, other ESEA programs provide grants and contracts for a variety of educational purposes. ESEA programs and general provisions are included in eight titles, which collectively received appropriations of $25.2 billion in FY2019. The ESEA's titles are as follows:

Summary: Title I: Programs for disadvantaged students, student assessment, migratory students, and neglected and delinquent students. Title II: Programs for teachers, principals, and school leaders; literacy; and American history and civics education. Title III: Programs to support English language acquisition for English learners. Title IV: Programs to support a well-rounded education, safe and healthy students, and technology; after-school instruction and care; charter schools; magnet schools; family engagement in education; and various national activities. Title V: Programs to support rural education. Title VI: Programs for Indian education, Native Hawaiian education, and Alaska Native education. Title VII: Impact Aid programs. Title VIII: General provisions.

Summary: This report provides an overview of major provisions of the ESEA. It also includes a table showing annual appropriations for ESEA programs for FY2017 through FY2019, as well as a table showing the transition in authorized programs and related appropriations from FY2016, when NCLB provisions were still in effect, to FY2017, when ESSA provisions took effect. Finally, a table detailing authorizations of appropriations under current law is also included. The ESSA authorized appropriations for ESEA programs through FY2020.

The primary source of federal aid to elementary and secondary education is the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)âparticularly its Title I-A program, which authorizes federal aid for the education of disadvantaged students. The ESEA was initially enacted in 1965 (P.L. 89-10) "to strengthen and improve educational quality and educational opportunities in the Nation's elementary and secondary schools." It was most recently comprehensively amended and reauthorized by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA; P.L. 114-95 ), which was enacted "to ensure that every child achieves." The ESSA authorized appropriations for ESEA programs through FY2020. FY2019 appropriation for ESEA programs are $25.2 billion.

Under Title I-A, the ESEA as amended by the ESSA continues to require states and public schools systems to focus on educational accountability as a condition for the receipt of grant funds. Public school systems and individual public schools are held accountable for monitoring and improving achievement outcomes for students and closing achievement gaps, sustaining a focus that was initiated by amendments to the ESEA made by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB; P.L. 107-110 ) but modified under the ESSA. While states were given more latitude to develop their educational accountability systems under the ESSA provisions, as a condition for receiving Title I-A funds each state must continue to have content and academic achievement standards and aligned assessments in reading/language arts (RLA), mathematics, and science for specific grade levels. States must now have an accountability system that incorporates (1) long-term and interim performance goals for specified measures; (2) weighted indicators based, in part, on these goals; and (3) an annual system for meaningful differentiation that is used to identify schools that need additional support to improve student achievement.

Beyond Title I-A, other authorized ESEA programs provide, for example, grants to support: the education of migratory students; recruitment and professional development of teachers; language instruction for English learners (ELs); well-rounded education, safe and healthy students, and technology initiatives; after-school instruction and care programs; expansion of charter schools and other forms of public school choice; education services for Native American, Native Hawaiian, and Alaska Native students; Impact Aid to compensate local educational agencies (LEAs) for taxes forgone due to certain federal activities; and innovative educational approaches or instruction to meet particular student needs.

In order to receive funds under Title I-A and several other formula grant programs authorized by the ESEA, each state educational agency (SEA) must submit a state plan to the U.S. Department of Education (ED). These plans can be submitted for individual formula grant programs or, if permitted by the Secretary of Education (hereinafter referred to as the Secretary), the SEA may submit a consolidated state plan based on requirements established by the Secretary. Following the enactment of the ESSA, all SEAs submitted consolidated state plans. The Secretary has approved these plans for all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.

This report provides a brief overview of major provisions of the ESEA. It is organized by title and part of the act. Annual appropriations for ESEA programs are provided through the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies (L-HHS-ED) Appropriations Act, and are shown in this report based on the most recent data available from the U.S. Department of Education, Budget Service for FY2017 through FY2019. Table 2 provides ESEA appropriations for FY2016 and FY2017 to depict the transition from the ESEA as amended by the NCLB to the ESEA as amended by the ESSA. Table 3 provides authorizations of appropriations included in the ESEA as amended by the ESSA. The Appendix provides a list of selected acronyms used in the report.

Title I: Improving the Academic Achievement of theÂ Disadvantaged

The introductory text for ESEA Title I includes the purpose of Title I and authorizations of appropriations for FY2017 through FY2020 for each part of the title. The purpose of Title I is "to provide all children significant opportunity to receive a fair, equitable, and high-quality education, and to close educational achievement gaps." The introductory text prior to Title I-A also requires states to reserve funds provided under Title I-A for school improvement activities and allows them to reserve Title I-A funds for direct students services. As such, while these reservations of funds appear before Title I-A in the ESEA, they are examined following the Title I-A discussion to provide greater context. The introductory text prior to Title I-A also provides authority for states to reserve funds for state administration for Title I-A, Title I-C, and Title I-D.

Section 1004 permits states to reserve funds under Title I-A, Title I-C, and Title I-D for administration. Under this provision, a state may reserve 1% of the amount received under parts A, C, and D, or $400,000 (whichever is greater) for state administration.

Part A: Grants to Local EducationalÂ Agencies6

Title I-A authorizes federal aid to LEAs for the education of disadvantaged children. Title I-A grants provide supplementary educational and related services to low-achieving and other students attending elementary and secondary schools with relatively high concentrations of students from low-income families, as well as eligible students who live in the areas served by these public schools but attend private schools. Title I-A is also a vehicle to which a number of requirements affecting broad aspects of public elementary and secondary education for all students have been attached as conditions for receiving these grants.

Title I-A grants are calculated by ED at the LEA level. The funds are then provided to SEAs, which are required to reserve funds for school improvement activities and may reserve funds for administration and direct student services. SEAs also adjust grant amounts for LEAs for which ED is unable to determine grant amounts, such as newly created LEAs or charter schools that are their own LEAs. In calculating Title I-A grant amounts, ED determines grant amounts under four different formulasâBasic, Concentration, Targeted, and Education Finance Incentive Grants (EFIG)âalthough funds allocated under all of these formulas are combined and used for the same purposes by recipient LEAs. While the allocation formulas have several distinctive elements, the primary factor used in all four is the estimated number of children aged 5-17 in families in poverty. Other factors included in one or more formulas include a state expenditure factor based on average per pupil expenditures for public elementary and secondary education, weighting schemes designed to increase aid to LEAs with the highest concentrations of poverty, and a factor to increase grants to states with high levels of expenditure equity among their LEAs. Each formula also has an LEA hold harmless provision and a state minimum grant provision.

While there are several rules related to school selection, LEAs must generally rank their public schools by their percentages of students from low-income families, and serve them in rank order. This must be done without regard to grade span for any eligible school attendance area in which the concentration of children from low-income families exceeds 75%. An LEA also has the option of serving all high schools in rank order in which the concentration of children from low-income families is 50% or greater. Below these benchmarks, an LEA can choose to serve schools in rank order at specific grade levels (e.g., only serve elementary schools in order of their percentages of children from low-income families) or continue to serve schools at all grade levels in rank order. Once schools are selected, Title I-A funds are allocated among them on the basis of their number of students from low-income families. LEAs are not required to allocate the same amount of Title I-A funds per low-income child to each school. They may provide higher grants per low-income child at schools with high rates of these children than are allocated per low-income child to schools with lower rates of these children.

There are two basic types of Title I-A programs. Schoolwide programs are authorized if the percentage of low-income students served by a school is 40% or higher. In schoolwide programs, Title I-A funds may be used to improve the performance of all students in a school. For example, funds might be used to provide professional development services to all of a school's teachers, upgrade instructional technology, or implement new curricula. The other basic type of Title I-A school service model is the targeted assistance program (TAP). Under TAPs, Title I-A-funded services are generally limited to the lowest-achieving students in the school. For example, students may receive additional instruction in an after-school program, or funds may be used to hire a teacher's aide who provides additional assistance to low-achieving students in their regular classroom. In general, schools have substantial latitude in how they use Title I-A funds, provided the funds are used to improve student academic achievement.

Standards, Assessments, and Accountability Requirements (Section 1111)

As previously mentioned, each SEA must submit a state plan to ED to receive funds under Title I-A and several other state formula grant programs authorized under the ESEA. For Title I-A purposes, the plan requires the SEA to provide information or assurances related to its standards, assessments, and accountability system. Requirements related to each of these areas are discussed below.

In its state plan, each SEA receiving Title I-A funds is required to provide an assurance that it has adopted challenging academic content standards and aligned academic achievement standards (hereinafter collectively referred to as academic standards) in RLA, mathematics, and science (and any other subject selected by the state). The academic standards must include at least three levels of achievement (e.g., basic, proficient, and advanced). In addition, states are required to demonstrate that these academic standards are aligned with entrance requirements for credit-bearing coursework in the state's system of public higher education and relevant state career and technical education standards.

A state is permitted to adopt alternate academic achievement standards for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities provided, among other requirements, that the standards are aligned with the state's challenging academic content standards. The state is also required to demonstrate that it has adopted English language proficiency standards that are derived from the domains of speaking, listening, reading, and writing; address the different proficiency levels of English learners; and align the English language proficiency standards with the challenging state academic standards.

The ESEA explicitly maintains that a state is not required to submit any of the aforementioned standards to the Secretary of Education (the Secretary) for review or approval. Also, the Secretary does not have the authority "to mandate, direct, control, coerce, or exercise any direction or supervision over any of the challenging State academic standards adopted or implemented by a State."

Each state plan must demonstrate that the SEA, in consultation with LEAs, has implemented assessments in RLA, mathematics, and science. The mathematics and RLA assessments must be administered in each of grades 3-8 and once during high school. The science assessment must be administered once in grades 3-5, grades 6-9, and grades 10-12. Thus, each state must administer 17 assessments each school year, but no individual student will take more than 3 of these assessments in a given school year. The assessments must be aligned with the state academic standards.

A state may implement alternate assessments aligned with state academic standards and alternate academic achievement standards for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities. However, for each subject tested no more than 1% of all students tested may take the alternate assessment. Each state plan must also demonstrate that the LEAs in the state will administer an annual assessment of English proficiency for all English learners that is aligned with the state's English language proficiency standards.

In addition to state assessments, each state receiving Title I-A funds must also agree to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) assessments of 4 th and 8 th grade students in reading and math every two years.

In its state plan, each SEA is required to describe its academic accountability system. The system must include state established long-term goals (and measures of interim progress) for all students and separately for each focal subgroup of students for academic achievement as measured by proficiency on the state RLA and mathematics assessments and high school graduation rates. In addition, the goals for subgroups of students who are behind on any of these measures must take into account the improvement needed to close statewide achievement gaps. Also, the system must include long-term goals (and measures of interim progress) for increases in the percentage of English learners making progress in achieving English proficiency, as defined by the state.

The state must then use a set of indicators that are based, in part, on the long-term goals it established to measure annually the performance of all students and each subgroup of students to evaluate public schools. These indicators must include the following:

1. public school student performance on the RLA and mathematics assessments as measured by student proficiency, and for high schools this may also include a measure of student growth on such assessments; 2. for public elementary and secondary schools that are not high schools, a measure of student growth or another indicator that allows for "meaningful differentiation" in school performance; 3. for public high schools, graduation rates; 4. for all public schools in the state, progress in achieving English language proficiency ; and 5. for all public schools in the state, at least one indicator of school quality or student success (e.g., a measure of student engagement, postsecondary readiness, or school climate).

Based on these indicators, the SEA must establish a system for annually "meaningfully differentiating" all public schools that gives substantial weight to each indicator but in the aggregate provides greater weight to the first four than to the school quality and student success indicators. The system must also identify any school in which any subgroup of students is "consistently underperforming," as determined by the state.

Based on the state's system for annual meaningful differentiation, each SEA must establish a state-determined methodology to identify for comprehensive support and improvement (CSI): (1) at least the lowest-performing 5% of all schools receiving Title I-A funds, (2) all public high schools failing to graduate 67% or more of their students, (3) schools required to implement additional targeted support (see below) that have not improved in a state-determined number of years, and (4) additional statewide categories of schools, at the state's discretion. The LEAs in which schools are identified for CSI are required to work with stakeholders to develop a school improvement plan that, among other requirements, must include evidence-based interventions, be based on a school-level needs assessment, and identify resource inequities. An LEA may also offer students enrolled in a school identified for CSI the option to transfer to another public school in the LEA. If a school does not improve within a state-determined number of years (no more than four years), the school must be subject to more rigorous state-determined actions.

States are required to identify for targeted support and improvement (TSI) any school in which one or more subgroups of students are consistently underperforming as determined by the state. Each of these schools is required to develop and implement a plan to improve student outcomes that includes evidence-based interventions. If a school fails to improve within a number of years determined by the LEA, additional actions must be taken. For a school in which one or more subgroups are performing at a level that if reflective of an entire school's performance would result in its identification for CSI, the school must be identified for additional targeted support and improvement (ATSI) activities, which must include an identification of resource inequities. If a school identified as meeting the criteria for ATSI does not improve within a state-determined number of years, the state is required to identify the school for CSI.

In its state plan, the SEA must also provide an explanation of how the state will factor into its accountability system the requirement that 95% of all students and each subgroup of students participate in the required assessments.

Any teacher or paraprofessional working in a program supported with Title I-A funds must meet applicable state certification and licensure requirements. In addition, states participating in Title I-A must describe in their state plans how low-income and minority children enrolled in Title I-A schools are not served at disproportionate rates by "ineffective, out-of-field, or inexperienced teachers." The state must also describe the measures that will be used to assess and evaluate the state's success in this area.

To serve schools that are identified for comprehensive support and improvement or targeted support and improvement under Title I-A, SEAs are required to reserve the greater of (1) 7% of the total amount the state receives under Title I-A or (2) the sum of the amount that the state reserved for school improvement in FY2016 and received under the School Improvement Grant (SIG) program for FY2016. Beginning in FY2018, an SEA is only permitted to reserve the full amount of funds for school improvement if no LEA receives a smaller Title I-A grant than it did during the prior fiscal year due to the implementation of this provision. Of the funds reserved for school improvement, states are required under ESSA provisions to provide at least 95% to LEAs through formula or competitive grants to serve schools that are implementing comprehensive support and improvement activities or targeted support and improvement activities.

In addition to the required reservation of Title I-A funds for school improvement, SEAs have the option of reserving up to 3% of the Title I-A funds they receive for direct student services. This optional reservation of funds was not included in the law prior to the ESSA. Of the funds reserved, states must distribute 99% to geographically diverse LEAs using a competitive grant process that prioritizes grants to LEAs that serve the highest percentages of schools identified for comprehensive support and improvement or that are implementing targeted support and improvement plans. Funds for direct student services may be reserved without regard to how the reservation of funds may affect LEA grant amounts. Funds may be used by LEAs for a variety of purposes, including to pay the costs associated with the enrollment and participation of students in academic courses not otherwise available at the students' school; credit recovery and academic acceleration courses that lead to a regular high school diploma; activities that lead to the successful completion of postsecondary level instruction and examinations that are accepted for credit at institutions of higher education (IHEs), including reimbursing low-income students for the costs of these examinations; and public school choice if an LEA does not reserve funds for this purpose under Section 1111.

Part B: Grants for State Assessment and Enhanced Assessment Instruments

Title I-B authorizes the State Assessment Grant program to support the development of the state standards and assessments required under Title I-A; the administration of those assessments; and related activities, such as improving assessments for English learners. Two funding mechanisms are authorized: (1) formula grants to states for the development and administration of the state standards and assessments required under Title I-A, and (2) competitive grants to states to carry out related activities beyond the minimum assessment requirements. The allocation of funds depends on a statutorily established "trigger amount" of $369.1 million. For annual appropriations at or below the trigger amount, the entire appropriation is used to award formula grants to states. Under the formula grant program, the Secretary then provides each state with a minimum grant of $3 million. Any remaining funds are subsequently allocated to states in proportion to their number of students ages 5 to 17. For an annual appropriation above the trigger amount, the difference between the appropriation and trigger amount is used to award competitive grants to states.

The ESEA as amended by the ESSA permits the Secretary to reserve up to 20% of the funds appropriated for the State Assessment Grant program to make grants to states to conduct assessment system audits. From the funds reserved for this purpose, the Secretary is required to make an annual grant to the state of not less than $1.5 million to conduct a statewide assessment system audit and provide subgrants to LEAs to conduct assessment audits at the LEA level.

Innovative Assessment and Accountability Demonstration Authority (Section 1204)

The ESEA as amended by the ESSA includes a new demonstration authority for the development and use of an "innovative assessment system." A state, or a consortium of states, may apply for the demonstration authority to develop an innovative assessment system that "may include competency-based assessments, instructionally embedded assessments, interim assessments, cumulative year-end assessments, or performance based assessments that combine into an annual summative determination for each student" and "assessments that validate when students are ready to demonstrate mastery or proficiency and allow for differentiated student support based on individual learning needs." During the first three years in which the Secretary grants demonstration authority, not more than seven SEAs may have their applications for the authority approved. Separate funding is not provided under the demonstration authority; however, states may use a portion of the formula and competitive grant funding provided through the State Assessment Grant program discussed above to carry out this demonstration authority.

Title I-C authorizes grants to SEAs for the education of migratory children and youth. A migratory child or youth is one who made a qualifying move in the preceding 36 months as a migratory agricultural worker or migratory fisher or moved with or to join a parent or spouse who is a migratory agricultural worker or migratory fisher. Among other purposes, the program assists states in supporting high-quality, comprehensive educational programs and services during the school year, summer, and intersession periods that address the unique needs of migratory children. Funds are allocated by formula on the basis of each state's number of migratory children and youth aged 3-21 and Title I-A state expenditure factor (discussed above). ED may also make grants for the coordination of services and transfer of educational records for migratory students.

Part D: Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At Risk

Title I-D authorizes a pair of programs intended to improve education for students who are neglected, delinquent, or at risk of dropping out of school. Subpart 1 authorizes grants for the education of children and youth in state institutions for the neglected or delinquent, including community day programs and adult correctional institutions. Funds are allocated to SEAs on the basis of the number of such children and youth and the Title I-A state expenditure factor. A portion of each SEA's grant is to be used to provide transition services to children and youth transferring to regular public schools.

Under Subpart 2, Title I-A funds are provided to each SEA based on the number of children and youth residing in local correctional facilities or attending community day programs for delinquent children and youth. These Title I-A funds are used to make grants to LEAs with high numbers or percentages of children and youth in locally operated correctional facilities for children and youth. These children and youth are then served in accordance with Title I-D provisions. Funds are used, for example, to provide transition programs, dropout prevention programs, special programs to meet the unique academic needs of participating children and youth, and mentoring and peer mediation.

Part E: Flexibility for Equitable Per-Pupil Funding

ESEA Title I-E provides the Secretary with the authority to enter into demonstration agreements that provide flexibility to LEAs to deliver equitable per-pupil funding. The weighted per-pupil funding system must allocate substantially more funding to students from low-income families, English learners, and students with other characteristics associated with educational disadvantage selected by the LEA than is allocated to other students. Prior to the 2019-2020 school year, up to 50 LEAs were permitted to apply for the flexibility to consolidate eligible federal funds and state and local funds to create a single school funding system based on weighted per-pupil allocations (using weights or allocations to provide funding to schools). Beginning with the 2019-2020 school year, the number of LEAs permitted to participate under Title I-E is not capped provided a "substantial majority" of the LEAs participating in previous years have met program requirements.

Title I-F provides for the development of federal regulations for Title I programs and state administration of these programs. Part F also prohibits federal control of the "specific instructional content, academic achievement standards and assessments, curriculum or program of instruction" of states, LEAs, or schools, and clarifies that nothing in Title I is to be "construed to mandate equalized spending per pupil for a State, local educational agency, or school."

Title II: Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High-Quality Teachers, Principals, and Other School Leaders

Title II includes programs centered on teachers, school leaders (e.g., principals), literacy, and American history and civics education. Programs focused on teachers and school leaders support activities and initiatives such as professional development, staff recruitment and retention, performance-based compensation systems, and the establishment of a statewide science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) master teacher corps. Other Title II programs focus on literacy education, providing grants to support literacy efforts from birth through grade 12 and supporting school library programs, early literacy services, and the provision of high-quality books to children and adolescents. Title II also includes American history and civic education programs that provide academies for teachers and students to learn more about these topics and authorizes national activities related to American history and civics education. Title II's introductory text includes the purpose of the title, several definitions, and authorizations of appropriations for FY2017 through FY2020 for the programs authorized in Title II.

Part A: Supporting Effective Instruction

Part A authorizes a program of state grants that may be used for a variety of purposes related to preparation, training, recruitment, retention, and professional development of elementary and secondary education teachers and school leaders. The formula grants are allocated to SEAs based on student population and poverty counts, as well as a base guarantee determined by the amount each state received in FY2001 under antecedent programs. The base guarantee is being phased out through FY2022. SEAs may reserve a share of funds for administration and statewide services, such as teacher or principal support programs; preparation academies; licensing or certification reform; improving equitable access to effective teachers; reforming or improving teacher and principal preparation programs; training teachers in the use of student data; and technical assistance to LEAs.

SEAs are required to suballocate at least 95% of grants to LEAs. Grants to LEAs are made based on student population and poverty counts. However, states are authorized to reserve up to 3% of the amount otherwise reserved for subgrants for LEAs for state-level activities focused on school leaders. Funds received by LEAs may be used for a variety of purposes including recruiting, hiring, and retaining effective teachers; teacher and school leader evaluation and support systems; professional development activities for teachers and principals; and class-size reduction.

Subpart 1 authorizes the Teacher and School Leader Incentive Fund. This program provides competitive grants to LEAs, SEAs or other state agencies, the Bureau of Indian Education, or a partnership of one of these entities with one or more nonprofit or for-profit entities to develop, implement, improve, or expand performance-based teacher and principal compensation systems or human capital management systems for teachers, principals, and other school leaders in high-needs schools.

Subpart 2 authorizes Literacy Education for All, Results for the Nation to improve student academic achievement in reading and writing from early education through grade 12. Under Subpart 2, competitive Comprehensive Literacy State Development Grants (Section 2222) are provided to SEAs. SEAs subsequently provide competitive subgrants to one or more eligible LEAs for the development and implementation of a comprehensive literacy instruction plan, professional development, and other activities. SEAs may also award competitive subgrants for early literacy services to one or more eligible early childhood education programs. In addition, SEAs may use funds to develop or enhance comprehensive literacy instruction plans. SEAs must ensure that at least 15% of funds are used to serve children from birth through age 5, 40% to serve children in kindergarten to grade 5, and 40% to serve children in grades 6 through 12. Funds reserved under Section 2222 for evaluation purposes must be used to conduct a national evaluation of the grant and subgrant programs authorized under Subpart 2 (Section 2225). Under the Innovative Approaches to Literacy program (Section 2226), the Secretary may award grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements to eligible entities to promote literacy programs that support the development of literacy skills in low-income communities through school library programs, early literacy services, and programs to provide high-quality books regularly to children from low-income communities.

Subpart 3 authorizes American History and Civics Education programs. Section 2232 authorizes the Presidential and Congressional Academies for American History and Civics. Presidential Academies offer professional development opportunities for teachers of American history and civics. Congressional Academies provide a seminar or institute for outstanding students of American history and civics. Section 2233 authorizes national activities that provide competitive grants to promote new and existing evidence-based strategies to encourage innovative American history, civics and government, and geography instruction and learning strategies, and professional development for teachers and school leaders.

Subpart 4 authorizes several programs related to educators, school leaders, technical assistance, and evaluation. Section 2242 authorizes the Supporting Effective Educator Development (SEED) program, which provides competitive grants to support nontraditional teacher certification or preparation routes, evidence-based professional development, professional development to support dual or concurrent enrollment, and professional enhancement activities that may lead to an advanced credential. Section 2243 authorizes the School Leader Recruitment and Support program, which provides competitive grants to improve the recruitment, placement, support, and retention of principals and other school leaders in high-need schools. Section 2244 authorizes a comprehensive center focused on students at risk of not attaining full literacy skills due to a disability. Funds may also be used to provide technical assistance or evaluate state and LEA activities under Title II-B. Section 2245 authorizes the STEM Master Teacher Corps program, which provides competitive grants to support the development of a statewide STEM master teacher corps or to support the implementation, replication, or expansion of effective STEM professional development programs.

Part C includes a supplement, not supplant provision that applies to funds provided under Title II. It also states that nothing in Title II authorizes the Secretary or any federal employee to mandate, direct, or control specific aspects of a state's, LEA's, or school's educational program, including, for example, instructional content, curricula, academic standards, academic assessments, staff evaluation systems, specific definitions of staff effectiveness, professional standards, licensing, or certification. Title II also states that none of the provisions in the title shall be construed to affect collective bargaining or other such agreements between school or district employees and their employers.

Title III: Language Instruction for English Learners and Immigrant Students

Title III authorizes programs that are focused on improving the academic attainment of ELs, including immigrant students. Under the Title III-A state grants program, funds are used at the state level to support activities such as consultation to develop statewide standardized entrance and exit procedures. Funds are used by LEAs for activities such as effective language instructional programs, professional development, and supplemental activities. Title III also authorizes two national programs, a professional development project and a clearinghouse related to the education of ELs. The introductory text to Title III authorizes appropriations for FY2017 through FY2020.

Part A: English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement Act

The English Language Acquisition program was designed to help ensure that ELs, including immigrant students, attain English proficiency, develop high levels of academic attainment in English, and meet the same challenging state academic standards that all students are expected to meet. The program was also designed to assist educators, SEAs, and LEAs in developing and implementing effective language instruction educational programs to assist in teaching ELs and developing and enhancing their capacity to provide effective instructional programs to prepare ELs to enter all-English settings. Title III-A also promotes parental, family, and community participation in language instruction educational programs for the parents, families, and communities of ELs.

Formula grant allocations are made to SEAs based on the proportion of EL students and immigrant students in each state relative to all states. These amounts are weighted by 80% and 20%, respectively. SEAs may reserve not more than 5% of the funds received for working with LEAs to establish standardized statewide entrance and exit procedures, providing effective teacher and principal preparation and professional development activities, and planning evaluation, administration, and interagency coordination. SEAs are required to make subgrants to eligible entities based on the relative number of EL students in schools served by those entities. SEAs are also required to reserve not more than 15% of the state allocation to make grants to eligible entities that have experienced a significant increase in the percentage or number of immigrant students enrolled in schools in the geographic area served by the entity.

Eligible entities receiving subgrants are required to use funds for three activities. First, funds must be used to increase the English language proficiency of ELs by providing effective language instructional programs that demonstrate the program is successfully increasing English language proficiency and student academic achievement. Second, funds must be used to provide effective professional development to school staff or community-based personnel. Third, funds must be used to provide and implement other "effective activities or strategies that enhance or supplement language instruction educational programs for ELs," including parent, family, and community engagement activities. Eligible entities receiving grants from the funds reserved specifically for immigrant students are required to use these funds to support activities that "provide enhanced instructional opportunities" for immigrant students.

While Title III-A focuses on the education of ELs, Title I-A also contains provisions that specifically apply to this student population, as noted previously. For example, Title I-A requires that states establish English language proficiency standards that are derived from the domains of speaking, listening, reading, and writing and are aligned with challenging state academic standards. Under Title I-A, LEAs are required to assess English language proficiency annually using assessments aligned with the state English language proficiency standards.

National Programs (Sections 3131 and 3202)

A portion of Title III-A funds are reserved to support two specific national programs: (1) the National Professional Development Project (Section 3131), and (2) the National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs (Section 3202). Under the National Professional Development Project, grants are awarded on a competitive basis for a period of up to five years to IHEs or public or private entities with relevant experience and capacity working in consortia with SEAs or LEAs to provide for professional development activities that will improve classroom instruction for ELs and help personnel working with these students to meet professional standards. The National Clearinghouse is responsible for collecting, analyzing, synthesizing, and disseminating information about language instruction educational programs for ELs and related programs.

Part B includes definitions relevant to Title III, statutory provisions authorizing the National Clearinghouse (discussed above), and the development of regulations for Title III.

Title IV authorizes a range of programs and activities including a block grant program, a program to support learning opportunities during non-school hours, programs to support charter schools and magnet schools, a family engagement program, an innovation and research program, programs to provide community support for student success, national activities for school safety, and programs focused on arts education, video programming for preschool and elementary school children, and gifted and talented education.

Part A: Student Support and Academic Enrichment (SSAE) Grants

Title IV-A authorizes SSAE grants to improve students' academic achievement by increasing the capacity of states, LEAs, schools, and local communities to (1) provide all students with access to a well-rounded education, (2) improve school conditions for student learning, and (3) improve the use of technology in order to increase the academic achievement and digital learning of all students. Formula grants are made to states based on their Title I-A funding from the prior year. States then make formula subgrants to LEAs. LEAs must use SSAE funds for three broad categories of activities: (1) supporting well-rounded educational opportunities, (2) supporting safe and healthy students, and (3) supporting the effective use of technology. If an LEA receives a grant of $30,000 or more, it must provide assurances that it will use at least 20% for activities to support a well-rounded education, at least 20% for activities to support safe and healthy students, and at least some of its funds to support the effective use of technology. If an LEA receives a grant of less than $30,000, it is only required to provide an assurance regarding the use of funds for at least one of the three categories.

Part B: 21st Century Community Learning Centers

Title IV-B supports activities provided during non-school hours that offer learning opportunities for school-aged children. Formula grants are made to SEAs based on their Title I-A funding from the prior year. States subsequently award grants to local entities (e.g., LEAs, community-based organizations) on a competitive basis for a period of three to five years. In awarding subgrants, SEAs are required to give priority to applicants proposing to target services to students who attend schools implementing CSI or TSI activities or other schools identified by the LEA in need of intervention support to improve student academic achievement and other outcomes; enroll students who may be at risk for academic failure, dropping out, or involvement with criminal or delinquent activities, or who lack "strong positive role models"; or target the families of such students. Local entities may use funds for activities that improve student academic achievement and support student success, such as academic enrichment learning programs, mentoring, tutoring, well-rounded education activities, programs to support a healthy and active lifestyle, technology education, expanded library service hours, parenting skills programs, drug and violence prevention programs, counseling programs, STEM programs, and programs that build career competencies and career readiness.

Part C: Enhancing Opportunity Through Quality Charter Schools

The Charter Schools Program (CSP) supports the startup of new charter schools and the replication and expansion of high-quality charter schools (Section 4303). It also assists charter schools in accessing credit to acquire and renovate facilities and includes a competitive grant program that provides per-pupil facilities aid (Section 4304). The CSP also provides funding for national activities to support the startup, replication, and expansion of charter schools; the dissemination of best practices; program evaluation; and stronger charter authorizing practices (Section 4305). Of the funds appropriated for Title I-C, 65% is provided for the startup, replication, and expansion of charter schools; 22.5% for national activities; and 12.5% for facilities financing.

Part D: Magnet Schools Assistance Program

Title IV-D provides grants to LEAs to plan and operate magnet schoolsâpublic schools of choice designed to encourage voluntary enrollment by students of different racial backgrounds. LEAs that are operating under a court-ordered desegregation plan or have voluntarily adopted a federally approved desegregation plan are eligible to receive grants to establish and operate magnet schools. In awarding grants, the Secretary is required to give priority to LEAs that demonstrate the greatest need for assistance, based on the expense or difficulty of effectively carrying out approved desegregation plans and the magnet school program; propose to implement a new or revise an existing magnet school program based on evidence-based methods and practices or replicate an existing magnet school with a demonstrated track record of success; plan to admit students by methods other than academic examinations, such as a lottery; and propose to increase racial integration by taking into account socioeconomic diversity in the design and implementation of the magnet school program.

Part E: Family Engagement in Education Programs

Title IV-E provides competitive grants to statewide organizations to establish family engagement centers. These centers promote parent education and family engagement in education programs and provide comprehensive training and technical assistance to SEAs, LEAs, and schools identified by SEAs and LEAs; organizations that support family-school partnerships; and other organizations that carry out such programs.

Title IV-F authorizes a range of programs. Each is discussed briefly below.

Subpart F-1 authorizes the Education Innovation and Research (EIR) program, which provides competitive grants to eligible entities to create, develop, implement, replicate, or take-to-scale entrepreneurial, evidence-based, field-initiated innovations to improve achievement and attainment for high-need students. Three types of grants (early phase, mid-phase, and expansion grants) are awarded primarily based on the past demonstrated success of the grantee in meeting these goals.

Subpart F-2 authorizes the Promise Neighborhoods program (Section 4624) and the Full-Service Community Schools (FSCS) program (Section 4625). They were authorized by the ESEA prior to the enactment of the ESSA using authority previously available in Title V-D-1 to create programs of national significance. Both programs are designed to provide pipeline services, which deliver a "continuum of coordinated supports, services, and opportunities," to children in distressed communities. More specifically, the Promise Neighborhoods program provides a comprehensive, effective continuum of coordinated services in neighborhoods with high concentrations of low-income individuals, multiple signs of distress (e.g., high rates of poverty, academic failure, and juvenile delinquency), and schools implementing comprehensive or targeted support and improvement activities under Title I-A. The FSCS program provides grants to public elementary and secondary schools to participate in a community-based effort to coordinate and integrate educational, developmental, family, health, and other comprehensive services through community-based organizations and public and private partnerships. Access to such services is provided in schools to students, families, and the community.

Subpart F-3 authorizes National Activities for School Safety. A portion of funds appropriated for these activities must be used for the Project School Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV). Project SERV provides grants to LEAs, IHEs, and the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) for BIE schools where the learning environment has been disrupted due to a violent or traumatic crisis. Funds for National Activities for School Safety that are not used for Project SERV may be used for other activities to improve student well-being during or after the school day.

Subpart F-4 authorizes three programs focused on academic enrichment. Section 4642 authorizes competitive grants for arts education under the Assistance for Arts Education Program. Section 4643 authorizes grants to support educational and instructional video programming, accompanying support materials, and digital content to promote school readiness for preschool and elementary school children and their families through the Ready to Learn Programming program. Section 4644 authorizes the Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program, which provides grants to enhance the ability of elementary and secondary schools to identify gifted and talented students, including low-income and at-risk students, and meet their special educational needs. The section also supports the National Research Center for the Education of Gifted and Talented Children and Youth.

Title V includes both funding transferability authority and programs to support rural education. Funding transferability authority allows states and LEAs to transfer federal funds from certain ESEA programs to other ESEA programs to enable them to address their particular needs. The Rural Education Assistance Program (REAP) provides additional resources to rural LEAs that might lack the resources to compete effectively for federal grants or might receive formula grant allocations that are too small to meet their intended purposes. The two rural education programs included in Title V provide LEAs with substantial flexibility in how they use their grant funds.

Part A: Funding Transferability for State and Local Educational Agencies

Funding transferability for states and LEAs is included under Title V-A to provide states and LEAs with the "flexibility to target Federal funds to the programs and activities that most effectively address" their "unique needs." In general, states are able to transfer funds from three formula grants programs that focus on teachers and school leaders, provide block grants, and provide after-school programming to formula grant programs focused on special populations (i.e., disadvantaged students, migratory students, neglected and delinquent students, and ELs). More specifically, states are permitted to transfer up to 100% of the funds allotted to them for state-level activities under Title II-A, Title IV-A, or Title IV-B to Title I-A, Title I-C, Title I-D, Title III-A, and one other ESEA program. Similarly, LEAs are also permitted to transfer funds from formula grant programs that focus on teachers and school leaders or provide block grants to formula grant programs focused on special populations. More specifically, LEAs are permitted to transfer 100% of the funds received under Title II-A or Title IV-A to Title I-A, Title I-C, Title I-D, Title III-A, and one other ESEA program. SEAs and LEAs are prohibited from transferring funds from Title I-A, Title I-C, Title I-D, Title III-A, and one other ESEA program to any other program.

Title V-B authorizes the Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP), which is designed to assist rural LEAs that may lack the resources to compete effectively for competitive grants and that may receive grants under other ESEA programs that are too small to be effective in meeting their specified purposes.

Subpart 1 authorizes the Small, Rural School Achievement (SRSA) program, which (1) provides eligible rural LEAs with the flexibility to use funds received under Title II-A and Title IV-A to carry out local activities authorized under certain ESEA programs, and (2) authorizes a formula grant program for rural LEAs under which funds received may be used under several other ESEA programs. Eligibility for both the flexibility authority and the grant program is based on criteria such as average daily attendance or population density and locale codes.

Subpart 2 authorizes the Rural and Low-Income School (RLIS) program, which provides formula grants to states. SEAs then make subgrants to eligible LEAs by formula or competition as determined by the SEA. LEA eligibility criteria include a school-age child poverty rate of 20% or more and meeting certain locale requirements. Similar to the SRSA grants, RLIS grants may be used under several other ESEA programs or for parent involvement activities. LEAs cannot receive both an SRSA grant and a RLIS grant. An LEA that is eligible for grants under both the SRSA and RLIS programs must select the grant program under which it will receive funds.

Part C contains several prohibitions against federal control of educational curricula, academic standards and assessments, or programs of instruction as a condition of receipt of funds under Title V. It also states that nothing in Title V shall be construed to mandate equalized spending per pupil for a state, LEA, or school.

Title VI: Indian, Native Hawaiian, and Alaska Native Education

Title VI provides funds specifically for the education of Indian, Native Hawaiian, and Alaska Native children. With respect to Indian education, the ESEA authorizes formula grants to LEAs, Indian tribes and organizations, BIE schools, and other entities to support elementary and secondary school programs that meet the unique cultural, language, and educational needs of Indian children. Funds are also provided for competitive grants to examine the effectiveness of services for Indian children and to provide support and training for Indian individuals to work in various capacities in the education system. Title VI also authorizes competitive grants to organizations with experience in operating Native Hawaiian programs to provide services to improve Native Hawaiian education. A Native Hawaiian Education Council is also authorized under Title VI. In addition, Title VI authorizes competitive grants for activities and services intended to improve education for Alaska Natives, such as the development of curricular materials and professional development.

Subpart 1 authorizes formula grants to eligible LEAs, Indian tribes and organizations, BIE schools, and other entities to support the development of elementary and secondary school programs for Indian students that are designed to meet the unique cultural, language, and educational needs of such students and ensure that all students meet their state's challenging academic standards. Grant allocations are determined based on the number of eligible Indian children served by the eligible entity and state average per pupil expenditures.

Subpart 2, Special Programs and Projects to Improve Educational Opportunities for Indian Children, authorizes two competitive grant programs: (1) Improvement of Educational Opportunities for Indian Children and Youth (Section 6121) and (2) Professional Development for Teachers and Education Professionals (Section 6122). The former supports projects to develop, examine, and demonstrate the effectiveness of services and programs to improve educational opportunities and achievement of Indian children and youth. The latter focuses on efforts such as providing support and training to qualified Indian individuals to become effective teachers, school leaders, and administrators.

Subpart 3, National Activities, authorizes funds for a variety of purposes including research, evaluation, and data collection and analysis. It also authorizes Grants to Tribes for Education Administrative Planning, Development, and Coordination (Section 6132), as well as for Native American and Alaska Native Language Immersion Schools and Programs (Section 6133).

Subpart 4 establishes the National Advisory Council on Indian Education (NACIE; Section 6141) and authorizes a preference for Indian entities under programs authorized by Subparts 2 and 3.

Part B authorizes competitive grants to Native Hawaiian educational or community-based organizations, charter schools, or other public or private nonprofit organizations with experience in operating Native Hawaiian programs, or consortia of these entities, to provide a wide variety of services intended to improve education for Native Hawaiians. In the awarding of grants, priority is to be given to activities that are intended to improve reading skills for Native Hawaiian students in grades K-3, meet the needs of at-risk children and youth, increase participation by Native Hawaiians in fields or disciplines in which they are underemployed, or increase the use of the Hawaiian language in instruction. Specifically authorized activities include early childhood education and care, services for Native Hawaiian students with disabilities, and professional development for educators. Title VI-B also establishes a Native Hawaiian Education Council, which provides coordination activities, technical assistance, and community consultations related to the educational needs of Native Hawaiians.

Part C authorizes competitive grants for a variety of activities and services intended to improve education for Alaska Natives. Eligible grantees include Alaska Native organizations with relevant experience, Alaska Native organizations that lack relevant experience and partner with an SEA, LEA, or Alaska Native organization operating relevant programs; or an entity located in Alaska that is predominantly governed by Alaska Natives and meets other specified criteria. Authorized uses of funds include, for example, the development of curriculum materials that address the special needs of Alaska Native students, training and professional development, early childhood and parenting activities, and career preparation activities.

Title VII compensates LEAs for the "substantial and continuing financial burden" resulting from federal activities. These activities include federal ownership of certain lands, as well as the enrollments in LEAs of children of parents who work and/or live on federal land (e.g., children of parents in the military and children living on Indian lands). The federal government provides compensation via Impact Aid for lost tax revenue because these activities deprive LEAs of the ability to collect property or other taxes from these individuals (e.g., members of the Armed Forces living on military bases) even though the LEAs are obligated to provide free public education to their children.

Title VII authorizes several types of Impact Aid payments. These include payments under Section 7002, Section 7003, Section 7007, and Section 7008, which are discussed briefly below.

Payments Relating to Federal Acquisition of Real Property ( Section 7 002 ) . Section 7002 compensates LEAs for the federal ownership of certain property. To qualify for compensation, the federal government must have acquired the property, in general, after 1938 and the assessed value of the land at the time it was acquired must have represented at least 10% of the assessed value of all real property within an LEA's area of service.

Payments for Eligible Federally Connected Children (Basic Support Payments, Section 7 003 ) . Section 7003 compensates LEAs for enrolling "federally connected" children. These are children who reside with a parent who is a member of the uniformed services living on or off federal property, reside with a parent who is an accredited foreign military officer living on or off federal property, reside on Indian lands, reside in low-rent public housing, or reside with a parent who is a civilian working and/or living on federal land.

Two payments are made under Section 7003. Section 7003(b) authorizes "basic support payments" for federally connected children. Basic support payments are allocated directly to LEAs by ED based on a formula that uses weights assigned to different categories of federally connected children and cost factors to determine maximum payment amounts. Section 7003(d) authorizes additional payments to LEAs based on the number of certain children with disabilities who are eligible to receive services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Payments are limited to IDEA-eligible children whose parents are members of the uniformed services (residing on or off federal property) and those residing on Indian lands.

Construction ( Section 7 007 ) . Section 7007 provides funds for construction and facilities upgrading to certain LEAs with high percentages of children living on Indian lands or children of military parents. These funds are used to make formula and competitive grants.

Facilities Maintenance ( Section 7 008 ) . Section 7008 provides funds for emergency repairs and comprehensive capital improvements at schools that ED currently owns but LEAs use to serve federally connected military dependent children.

Part A (Section 8101) provides definitions of a variety of terms used frequently throughout the ESEA, such as "local educational agency," "state educational agency," "evidence-based," "four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate," "professional development," "state," and "well-rounded education."

Part B: Flexibility in the Use of Administrative and Other Funds

Part B authorizes SEAs and LEAs to consolidate and jointly use funds available for administration under multiple ESEA programs. In order to qualify for this flexibility, SEAs must demonstrate that a majority of their resources are provided from nonfederal sources. LEAs need SEA approval to consolidate their funds. Part B also authorizes the consolidation of funds set aside for the Department of the Interior under various ESEA programs and the McKinney-Vento Homeless Education program.

Part C: Coordination of Programs, Consolidated State and Local Plans and Applications

Part C authorizes SEAs and LEAs to prepare single, consolidated plans and reports for all "covered" ESEA programs. In general, the covered programs are the ESEA formula grant programs administered via SEAs.

Under this provision, the Secretary is authorized to waive most statutory and regulatory requirements associated with any program authorized by the ESEA, if specifically requested by an SEA or Indian tribe. LEAs may submit waiver requests through their SEA. The SEA may then submit the request to the Secretary if it approves the waiver. Schools must submit their waiver requests to their LEAs, which in turn submit those requests to the SEA.

Part E: Approval and Disapproval of State Plans and Local Applications

Part E includes provisions related to secretarial approval of state ESEA plans and SEA approval of LEA plans. In both cases, the Secretary and the SEA, respectively, have 120 days from the day the plan was submitted to make a written determination that the submitted plan does not comply with relevant requirements. If such a determination is made, among other actions, the state or LEA must be notified immediately of the determination, provided with a detailed description of the specific plan provisions that failed to meet the requirements, offered an opportunity to revise and resubmit the plan within 45 days of the determination being made, provided technical assistance upon request (from the Secretary or SEA, respectively), and provided with a hearing within 30 days of the plans resubmission.

Subpart 1 contains provisions for the participation of private school students and staff in those ESEA programs where such participation is authorized. Under the relevant ESEA programs, services provided to private school students or staff are to be equitable in relation to the number of such students or staff eligible for each program; secular, neutral, and non-ideological, with no funds to be used for religious worship or instruction; and developed through consultation between public and private school officials. Provision is made for bypassing SEAs and LEAs that cannot or have not provided equitable services to private school students or staff, and serving private school students and staff in these areas through neutral, third-party organizations. Provision is also made for the submission of complaints regarding implementation of these requirements. Subpart 1 also prohibits federal control of private or homeschools, or the application of any ESEA requirement to any private school that does not receive funds or services under any ESEA program. It also states that no ESEA provisions apply to homeschools.

Subpart 2 contains a wide range of provisions, including the following:

a general definition of "maintenance of effort," as applied in several ESEA programs (Section 8521); a requirement that ED publish guidance on prayer in public schools, and a requirement that LEAs receiving ESEA funds certify to their SEAs that they do not limit the exercise of "constitutionally protected prayer" in public schools (Section 8524); a requirement that recipient SEAs, LEAs, and public schools have a "designated open forum" to provide equal access to the Boy Scouts (Section 8525); a prohibition on the use of ESEA funds to "promote or encourage sexual activity (Section 8526)"; a prohibition on federal control of educational curricula, content or achievement standards, building standards, or allocation of resources (Section 8526A and Section 8527); a requirement that LEAs receiving funds under any ED program provide to the armed services access to directory information on secondary school students, unless students or their parents request that such information not be released (Section 8528); a prohibition on federally sponsored testing of students or teachers, with some exceptions (Section 8529); an "Unsafe School Choice Option" under which students in states receiving ESEA funds who attend a "persistently dangerous" public school, or who are victims of violent crime at school, are to be offered the opportunity to transfer to a "safe" public school (Section 8532); a requirement related to the transfer of school disciplinary records (Section 8537); a requirement related to consultation between LEAs and Indian tribes and tribal organizations (Section 8538); a requirement that ED provide outreach and technical assistance to rural LEAs (Section 8539); and a prohibition related to the aiding and abetting of sex abuse (Section 8546).

Subpart 3 includes teacher liability protection. This subpart provides limitations on liability for teachers in school for harm caused by an act or omission of the teacher on behalf of the school if certain conditions (e.g., the teacher was acting within the scope of his or her employment) are met.

Subpart 4 contains gun-free requirements. Each state receiving funds under the ESEA must have a state law that requires LEAs to expel for at least one year any student who is determined to have brought a firearm to a school or possessed a firearm at a school under the jurisdiction of an LEA in the state. The chief administering officer of the LEA may modify this requirement on a case-by-case basis. In addition, no LEA may receive funds unless it has a policy requiring that any student who brings a firearm or weapon to a school served by the LEA is referred to the criminal justice or juvenile delinquency system.

Subpart 5 prohibits smoking within indoor facilities providing kindergarten, elementary, or secondary education or library services to children, if the services are funded directly or indirectly by the federal government, or the facility is constructed, operated, or maintained using federal funds.

Part G authorizes ED to reserve 0.5% of the funds appropriated for ESEA programs, other than Titles I, for program evaluations if funds for this purpose are not separately authorized.

Appropriations and Authorizations of Appropriations for Programs Authorized by theÂ ESEA

Appropriations included in Table 1 are based on the most recent data available from ED's Budget Service Office. The amounts shown reflect any reprogramming or transfers of funds done by ED as of the time this table was prepared to provide the actual level of funding allocated to each program/activity. This list of "programs/activities" does not take into account the number of programs, projects, or activities that may be funded under a single line-item appropriation, so the actual number of ESEA programs, projects, or activities being supported through appropriations is not shown. It should be noted that ED considers all of the funds provided in an appropriations act for a given fiscal year, including advance appropriations provided for the following fiscal year, to be appropriations for the given fiscal year. For example, for the purposes of appropriations, ED considers all of the funds provided in the FY2019 appropriations act, including advance appropriations provided in FY2020, to be FY2019 appropriations.

Table 2 provides ESEA appropriations for FY2016 and FY2017 to depict the transition from the ESEA as amended by the NCLB to the ESEA as amended by the ESSA. Programs authorized under the ESEA as amended by either the NCLB or the ESSA are included. Programs and activities are referred to by their names in the ESEA as amended by the ESSA if a program was in both the ESEA as amended by the ESSA and by the NCLB. If the program had a different name in the ESEA as amended by the NCLB, the name is included in parentheses. Programs are listed in the order in which they appear in the ESEA as amended by the ESSA if they also appeared in the ESEA as amended by the NCLB. For programs that appear in only the ESEA as amended by either the ESSA or the NCLB, programs are listed in the order they appear or appeared in law. For some programs that were funded in FY2016 but not in FY2017, it is possible that another program authorized in FY2017 provided funding for similar purposes. For example, the Elementary and Secondary School Counseling program was funded in FY2016 but not in FY2017. School counseling activities are an allowable use of funds under the SSAE program created under the ESSA. The same methodology as discussed above was used in determining appropriations amounts for each program.

Table 3 provides the authorized level of appropriations for each program included in the ESEA that has a specified authorization of appropriations. The ESEA includes authorizations of appropriations for FY2017 through FY2020.