Court Of Chancery, Wednes...
1 i4wilrionl'. ; 1'he LJOsz CIrANCELLOk has issued an otder requiring the soli. ors tonlotify to: tbe Registrar the numical order in which causes te enteed for hearing, bv which the Court wMil invariablv abide; so tbat UpORi tbenon.anpearance of lic parties or thneir agents at ihe time o^f aflltinthte cauese, sach causes will be immediately placed at 5O0nOUSE V. GRSAHtAM. In this case, which referrd Ato the validity of the sheriff's return npom a writ of scire facaj, time had been giver, to the defend- ant to look for cases In wfich writs had been quashed for want of actual Eersonal service of the writ. Ihe 1JORsD CHAo CELLon aaid, that as no cases had been ad- duced,and as an oficerofthepettyBag.office had before informedtbe Court tbatthe retuzn wars good, accordling to the practice of the lst century, and as the defendant, by entering an appeerance, would hBVe CUred the deFect of personaI service, if any such defect had ex- isted, and m-;ght now show his merits if he had any, the motion for nuashing the writ, on the grsund of insaficientservice and erro- neous returm oFthe writ, tnust be discharged wilth costs. LORlD flYtorr. 1I%r. HEIALD said that lie had an application of a pressing nature to Thake, being for an injunction to restrain parties from proceeding to publish the private lettersofthelate UbrdByron,whichletters,writ- ten ehiefly to his imotheran d his only daughter,bad been placedinthe hainds of a gentleman who had disposed of tbern to a publisher, and thev were, as he (Mr. Heald) understood, advertised for publication. ?the IIOaD CIrAxCEILOu said thattthere could not be a doubt upon the right. It bad bee n ruled over and over again, that a person. holding private letters hadl none but a very qualified pro.perty in them. The application, however, for the sake of regu. arty in the proceedings of the jurisdiction. eouli be made before the Vice-Chancellor. EX-PAItTE GREIAISTnAD, IN I1E IEOWAItD AWD GXBBS8 . B rNJUPTS. MTr. M3OXtAGu obtain'edleave, osbehalf of the petitioner to proceed to the new trial which had been conditionally granted by the Court on paying 6001., tile coets of the former trial, into the hands of the assigneen, but without prejudice to the exceptions taken to ,p!artfrukr itenes in the bill of costs. T he LORD CEArsPcELoR said that he had been told-and so had the hn ) atlnrge, th.at the osts of a trial at comm6n law were next to nothing. By hes costs, it appeared to be nearly as expen- siVe aS a suit in Chancery. I ?ICOVRT.Of CRAIV('V.IZV- IV- Iv.-.- 'r- - -Y