Vice-Chancellors' Court, ...
oveu upon the petition of the bankrupt, that the dr~~nzes of the cenmissioners in the commission awarded against m ihould be stayed, and that the execation of a warrant which had 3 ted for his apprebension should be suspended. The affidavit i3. t.rt the pctieiooret having been declared bankcrupt, under a mrm!sinn isued mn the early part of 1821, had applied, in 1M22, have that c0rnmisslon superseded. Upon that occasion hls Ho- -ur the Wsce.UncelJor prynounced an order staying the proceed- under the vewmr s WD, and directing an inquiry. This ~er va never drawn up, the bankrupt conceiig that he a30 .o the person beacirted by it, and that therefore it f fobr hIs opponents to avail ohemselves nf it, which they -2A only do by drawing it up and servinz a copy on him. The of the commission had remained in total suwpension from 'e time of his llonour's pronouncing the order until very recently, h= the commrissioners ordered a meeting, and sunmmoned the pe- :=r to erTender. Ile declined to do so, because the in,niry di. vui by the Vice-Chancellor had not been made, and the order =:ar ntr complied with. The commissioners, in consequence FE-Arefsal to obeytheirsummons. issued awarrant, which was in Lte hands of the officer, and by virtue of which the bankrupt im imminent danger of being apprehended. 'Upon theae grounids p-pied. to the Court for its protection. Te Vrcg.CEFAXcELLoR said, the bankrupt, whatever right be ner=.ts of his case, had been guilty of too flagrant a neglect in not up the order, to entitle himself to the protection he sought. z bad sufered two years to elapse, during which he had taken no z7p to convince the Court of the truth of that case which he had re- ted to them. There was not a shadow of pretence, therefore, ie application. The bankrupt must abide by the consequences . s own sununeness. __ VAlkf-ULIANCELLORS' COURT. T1TnnqnAv Dvv. (- V - =-PAfTE YOuicGaAv, b nAlIDvr