Court Of Chancery, Wednes...
- LAI1 RkP.Opq< : . i Th'le Ibjeethlte wa ines and'iron-wors bwib1 he lit held of tllc dcef. rewasat uer pwr nf exeted4snst hini (thte plainitiff , while the rightof bringingn ations st lar waa also secured to thie deendant bythecontruct Thg Vice- Chancellor had affirted tde breach of covenant, and had givetm the costs of all the proceedinigs to the detendant The L6stu CHANCELLOR. now confirnied the decreeof4tb Vice- ChaacellUr upon the bredclU of covenatnt* b-it-.his Lordship thought that the dccree wenttoalength which thepracliceof the Court would not ustify in giving the ost of all tbe other proceedings; The pe- on and eppeal prayed in the second instance. to restrain the de- fendianits from proceeainz with their action at law; and 'thougb tl:ere was nt proof thaxt they had commenced. any such. action, his Ljord. ehip thought that hist order must have the effect of restraining shem at lemst tml the UMster shall ha.ve reported the suite of the IN RE ELEPHANT AND CASTLE CHARITY. An originral grantof,5l. a-year copyhold lands, made by the Dean and Chapter of Canterburv to the overseers of Newington parisir in trust, bas reached ztlength the value of 6001. a-year. The Mlaster Of the Rolls had directed the Alaster to report a p,lan foran Improv, ed distn-bution of the funds. .Some difficulty arose upon the words of an act of Parliament which vested this trust in certain parish officers "for the time being." The Loai CHrANCELtOR hadpromised judgment. but felt him- teif oppressedl hy doubtsb 6irst, as to whether theoffieial character of the pasiEtl offierse with whom the trust was to vest bad not changed aegreatlg, as te,be totaUy at variance with the nature of the trtst; and next, if the bill could; with a; proper regard to the acS of Par_ lametun, be entertained at alL. So that the casemustnecessarilY COUTRT OF CtlANCERY-WiY. SWED. A n-- . RFDFEsAni v- *r:rY,o -- ..!