Court Of King's Bench, We...
LAT REPORT. f itus, being tle tirst day of Trinity term, the Judges did not sit in nf1 Court till a-ter one o'clock. ARRANGEMEXT OF BUSINESS. The Lonn Cl IEF JUSTICE announced the intention of the Court to ta2ke the Isandon and M liddlesex new triaLs, as they were most in urrear. at a1l convenient times dairing the term. M?5c.AXLETT mentioned the case of "the King v. Hunt," which was appointed for the second day of term. TheLtiOD CtlEr. J.USTICE replied, that cases whichi were spe- c-allr appointed would have precedlenceon their proper days. M1r. TAU%-TO; reminded his Lordsllip, that the case of -the "Kiniv. tooae" stood for llonday. The LRDa CniEFr JUSTICE saidl, that htis observation would( aply to that case also. The Court would be scarcely able to take tLhe sprcial paperclurine this term. ThCe ATTORNEV-GEN'F.RFAL mentioned Mr. Chetwynde's &ase. nt ro time was fixed for the fuirther hearing. CRIMtINAL ISF0R'oluATTION. 31r. CASIrnrLL moved for a rule ralling on the High Consta- Fle of Tunstall, in Stafflrdshire, the Pettv Constable bf the same Flaw, and an Atorney of the couirt resitling in the town, to show crsz wvhv a crinminal information should not be exhibited against then, for an ahuse ofthe process of law. A person named Jones, a ipkeeper in the town, in last March left his house to the care of a feMrnle s-rzran! while he went on a journey. During his ab- seace. his wife named .Martlha Jones, who had separated from hin S~r ma,v years. d.emand- d admiiosn, which! wasrefuised. The high conss3bl, the pettr constable, and the attorney broke open thebouse, tu;rnefd thesevantinto the street, anl gaveIarthaJones possession. The serrant, thus expelled, took r.tfrrge at an inn; but they pursued Frrthither, and forced her into the street during a snow-storm. 3e-cs her macter afterwva. ds executed a power of attorney to enable her rore-zain possesion, under whichlshc entered, and expelled thc wife. The parties tben obtained a warrantagainst this poor woman for breaking open the house of iVfa tha Jones. on *ihich they took Frr hefore a nmazistrate, who imlmiediately disnmissed tlte charge as whollr trmundless. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE asked under what warrant the woman was arrested ? I Ar. CiSrBELL replied. thatshie was taken under the warrant of a -.trrenn-wlio, uo doutbt, wvs informed that the woman had b-eken onen the heuse of Mlartira Jones. No complaint, therefore, was mad-a amainst him. but the attornev and the high constable were clmr=ea with iitfully abusing the process of law for the purposes of rortvssinr-7 he, Court granted a rule to show cause. There were very few motiotis, and scarcely any disnuted cases in !he prrempory pacer in whiclh counsel were ready, so ihat the Court .ose before three o'clock. tOURT OF KING'S BENCH. WVEST3IINSTER, JUNE 18.