The Rev. Alexander Fletch...
This preclo3us teachet of righteousnea, who, it. seatn, is followed to his Grub-street Chapel by.hosts of -ongenial disciples, will, prerhapsj derive fresh credit froth.the disclo.' sure contained in the following letter. We tdare not trust ourselves to speak of this man as he deserves. [From the Edinbiirg1e Evening C0orant, Det.25.1 MIISS DICK'S LETET R TO 51R. FLETCHER. TO THE EDItOlt OF THE COUStANT. Sir,-I3n ope of yonr late numbers you quoted from the Appl to Publc Opinion, lately published-by 5lr. Fletcher. a letter alleged to have been addressed b Aiss Dick to hirii in 1813. AN that letter (if supposed to have been in realitv written by Miss Dick) may hurt her in the estimation of the pablic, I beg, through the mnedium of your paper, on the best authority, and in t e most unqualified man. ner, top tate, thatsucIl a letter waL ne?er writtep by Miss Dick! It is either tbe conmposition of Mlr. Fleteher himself, or of the sister who has the merit of the other parts of that correspondence, and who pretends to be able to quote tho terms of .Miss Dick's letter to her "rohczs at the same time that she very consistently states that it was *not sent to her. neither did she ever read any of her letters. In the Appeal, Mr. Fletcher tells w. thst.the two letters by his sistef were written " by hUs authority." In a letter to Dr. Dick however, dated December 18, 1813, which 1 have seen, he declares, in direct opposition to this statement, that these letters " were-sent wltliout my isstigition or approbation." I might with great. ease convict AMr. Fletcher of falsehaod and prevarication, on almost.everv page of bis prodaction; bat this I conceive to be sunerfluous. the above two instances, with the flcts already before the public, will serve to show the degree of credlit due to his assertioss. I am, &c P. D. Edinburgh, Dec. 24, 1824. ?rm 2irp, Pmomft, -