The Six Clerks.
Itie Six Ulerks in Chancery present their complirents to tite Editor of Tke Times. and request that he wiU insert as early as possiblc the enclo3ed paragraph, in explanatlon of an enroneoug statement which-inadvertently (as they imagine)_found its sray into Thc Tners on Thursdav, the 4th day of November instaOL THE SIX CLERES RV C}IANCEPRY. W e are requested ta correct a statemrent thich appearedl in our paper of Thursdaj,, Nov. 4, purporting to be observations made by the Lord Ciancellor on the conduct of the Six Clerls in Chancery. We find, in fact, that the Lorl Chanceller did not make any such remarkq as we have stated regarding these ofH"ce s nor could he hare done so, as thednties alluded to by his, Lordship, and comn. mented on by hitn, are of a nature totally distitsct from tbose ex- ercised by the Six Clerks in Chanecry. It is not their duty ever to attend the Al-sters in Chancery; they do not act au solicitors- they do not employ an agent to manage their butiness, nor do they have any communication with the suitors of the Court, or the Folci._ tors employed by them. I It was taken frorn a morning Paper. THE SIX CLERKSI