Arches' Court, Monday, Ju...
in UIIs case (ttne tacts of which were reported in The Tinues of the 1th inst.,) theargumentof counsel was completed to-day. Dr. .JEyyNEn and Dr. JEgSSE ADDAMS appeared for Alrs. Jolrn; Dr. LUSsnN.TOw and Dr. DODSON for the husbantd. Si JH Nctor.genoi,ththe would deliver his judg- ment on the next ( ourt day. |~ ~~ C ATtr,T\so0y v. ATR;tNSON. Ti was a elts; (whlich was taken bv thet Cort siortly) of divorce and separation, by re.ason orcnteltyania adultery, promotedi by the wifeagainet hierlhusbandl. Asthe eviden-eewa%uot read,andc theqtuestion was only, on the admission of the libel, we are unable to state-any of the partitinlars, except that the la%t act of Prueltv charged was in *844o; that the parties coliabited togethitr up-to 181i; and that be- tween 1814 and 18191 no cruelty whatever w;i charged; antil that tlie acts of adultery which had coine to MIrs. Atk-inson'R knowledge in 1815 hla been bv her forgiven. The COURT, after hearing counsel, directed the libel to be re- formed in fouir articles, pleadling acts of cruelty occurring nine or ten years back; and observed, that if the adulteryof the husband should be proved as laid, there would be enough to entitle the wife to the whole ot tier uraver. ARCIIES' COURT. MoinAv- IITT,- io JOHII AND JOUSV