Court Of King's Bench, We...
z;Aiw RKPORZT oa.9 t~ULLe Prodlucerd an afildavitfromn a mcdical gendeman w h a atl t c d g t h b e d e f e nda n t , u e t' i a tw .h ta t i n c o n s eq u e n c e of a n a t t a c k Of tue gout, be was bnable totittend the Court to-day to receive its Thb Hwas an ",CurE Kf 'G V. 'ASco1Eu. st-ceof tse Eaa roeta ginstttegispainst the defendant at the in- staneoftheEastInda Cmpany, under 'he 49th Gow. Ill. c. 120, for taking a prornise of niopley to procure foir Frederick Blennett a cadeshiPLn he CM-Pay?,ervice. He was indict6d jointly with Mr-IZ.rt,a gndean f frtul~'~'eidif tChiselh,irst, in whote sE-rice hehad t-enformaaig.years; bbuttheruryacquittedtheinaster, man found tht servant guilty. 'At the trial it appeared that in'the yea niSSer*neOr l& an a ed Moran w rtn to Bascombe beggbig his intet wt of Taggart,. who wa's av proprietor of 1laat thnia toged With the stars, to pxdue6 a cadetshi fora, ayoung gmitlgaioan n2a=d Pkitehard, nd prnicshh rn li o ? 9 guineas IA tlie event Of tueintigstRov.inen5btt tr Tagtlt ata he hd de 3tl. s Dire T rtgnr at, the eso of 1%scfrnbe, applied te Mr. -13eb, t* Drectr w'&n e 'upp~orted, as for a young frienda in has velf Mh wait interested and would -have succeeded, but t i'trWMt. arlded !A. thhe l.iterval. -MAorgan afterwards re- haer d f setal be to ubsatitute Bennett for his dectased friendx the C be 66npleda4 the appintnient wax obtained, and Morgan Iola 8=6meom' he.s1h'ild do. vwhak he bad promised in Mri. Prit. sen-r4ec tohs hit the dederendantreplied, "Verynwell" tFir. BeTale'tt & afhT Tasos-l1ed to India, and Moorgan igave Baseof0be a Promnissry note for. 100l., which was never paid, on account of the bl*ktMty of the iaker Th Cr. G t rowE. *e piayed the judgment of the Court. Thc Lo UD CMEF JpaTIcn read' his notes of the trial, which itook -lace before hir at G3uildhafl in thesttinpa after Hila-.y Term~. On the part of the defedant, affidtvits were put is, den ed ftloa be intcrilcd tocaommit any breach of the law, and testiyrto the ~general respectability, of his charstcter.. The UGosrxtx SrRGEA_-T and Mr. Cesvr-i irnmitigation, 'urged tlat the Oi-r was rade by Mtorgan;, nh:t tte defendant was not aware of (hi: kaw which he lad brokzon -tti thdat he had de. rivred nothirigbut inconvenienceand en,barrAvilent from his efibuce. Mlr. GMRWUt,inaM&rvation remindeteoutht.efec --as one of avery pernicious tenaency, a(rtn Court itwasetemofence bard effe&iially to -restraiib '3.wihi a xrml Mr. Ju~flce BA'rvey, after StPon1gly expesnthsnewic the COTirt Ci1teztaffied of ihe hp;,reunes ino the sfene ased thich shntencd bhtte pad. efencan t od to e ttKing a fine of 2001., thebMarihal tIl suich fine We believe the ~ ~ ~~ corae of thne day. thathou to~ d tw o' , s te judges were summened for COVR'T O? KING'S 1 r'.T4 T.--ol - r - ^' N V.-JAXES.STA3t ':'r' c