Law Report.
'I'he question in this case, which was finally argued sonic months ago, was, whether Sir Charles l,ong, Treasurer, and if not, what other representative of the hospital, should be adimitted to proVr a debt agaeirst the bankrupt estate ot' an agent who had received con- siderable prize-money for the Madras army. Alr. IVION'rt AGU said, that this case did not press so very mnch as to require his Lordship's judgment before the vacation should coimmience. Thc L,onD CIrANCELLOR was of a different opinion,and ihought that :he matter pressed, insomucl that lie promised to give jadg- ment oni Tuesday. WARD OP COURT.-BROWN' V. MtARSACKt. Mr. SJADWEL.L reminded his Lordship tlat he had made a mo- tion in this cPse (in which tbe plaintiff' hadi nmarried a ward of (;ourt without obtaining the necessarv consent), for the detendant, Colonel .larsack, to give an account of the ward's (his sister's) fortune, and to make her a suitable allowance until the Master should have miade his report. ligs Lordship had onlv directed that Colonel AlJarsack sholId file an affidavit, istatine the amouat of his sister's fortune, which the Colonel bad neglected to do. The LORD CsIANCELLott said, thiat thte only putnishnment which he could inflict for that neglect was to refuse the defendant his costs.-Motion refu3ied, wvithout costs. LAIV REPORT. COU T F HA CER , ATD- A. A COURT OF CHAN'CERY', SATUR.DAY A-GU.ST 14. CHELSEA HOSP1TAIL V. flnTT4.RQR .)n ---l