Consistory Court, Saturda...
Lflne parcnnlars of this cause, which is one of subtraction of tithe, promoted by the incunmbent oe the living against a market- gardener residing in the vicinity of Fulham,havc been already be- fore our readerl s Davis appeared to day, and craved leave to assert an allegation, having, he said, a varietv ofwitncsses to produce in his own behalf. Sir CHRISTOPVEt RoBIN.sow inquired whether the party had anv legal adviserin the case: and being answered in the negative, Tegretted that he had tal-en so injudicious a course. Davis said, that he had hoped this cause would have been set- tled, without mposing on him the necessity of proceedingany further. le had ived minthe patish7 ever since he was a boy, and with all formervicars be had managed to live in perfect peace. rt appeared to him that he must have some unknown enemy, who had prepossessed the present incumbent against him. The COURT observed. that however that mnight be, he had an tin- doubtea right to adopt-whatever appSared to him the most eligible n:oC. of proceeding. COINSISTORY COURT. SATURDAY, JU2NE 19. PllOBY V. DAvIC.