French Papers.
The King received in private iudience the Duke de Laval- Montmorency, the Ambassador to the Holv See. AM.de Viliele transacted business with his Alajestv. Neither the King nor the Princes have been out i6-day. PARIS, JULY 4. The Circ6 frigate, commanded by Al. Duplessis-Parseau, arrived at Bresn on the 256h ult., from the Isle of Bourbon, and last from ;Mortinique, which latter island she left on the 1st. IIIANIEIAI, JusE 28. WVe have received here some private information respecting the dismissal of Al. de Chateaubriand; which, if not wholly confor-m- able to truth, is not less worthy of being recorded in the chronicles of the day. 'i It was not," says our correspondent, " either the individual views of the esr-Minister with regard to tde affairs of South America, or his conduct.during the discussion of the project of law on the rentes, whicb was the motive of his disgrace. Nl. de Chateaubriand is accuisedof having favoured the recent conspirations inPortuagal. Mr. CanninghavIiigrceivedtlfemostiauthenticinfor. rrmtidt7 n this pbimt; iminei'iately communicated it to the Prince ae Polignac, the French Apmbassador. The latter forthwith in- formed lsh French Ciabinct, and hence the real motives of the sud- den journev of the Ambassador to Paris. The Monarch could not do otherwise than highly disapprove of the conduct of M. de Cha- timubrimnd wbich was diamnetrically opposed to his private senti. ments, and thus it is easy to account tbr not only the dismissal of ihatMinister, but also the manner in which it was signified to hin. There are, however, important reasons for concealiug the real cauSe of this dismissal, and for leaving the public in incertitude. This iufficiently explains why his dismissal did not take place until after the rejection of theprojet on the rentes although it was already dc- cided at the mnoment when' the proofs trought by the Prince dc Po. lignac had rendered the fault of the Alinister notorious." FRENCH PAPERS. AT. c.TAOrl)- Jn T.v 3.