Insolvent Debtors' Court,...
sto7h 47z Seene, who had been. befbre the Court oh&a:former da' ;wat; ingl brought uip this.nsornlng. le was oppoksed by fr. ZArlr for essrm t}arratt' and*; Co., ban.l;4r a; Ireccrtcdri and deferded by Sr; CooK.E It appeared upon. the bnier exaltniitoii, that the -insolvent Was- Afarmer in Vrecoishire, and dealt, in cattle in part- nersiunpwitthaperstin named Jones. He stated that he had Made over his propertv,. bvwnrranttof'attorne toeobn Davis, hiafatter.; in-law, btW theCotirt not being safsffed withf is accodnt of thig .ranlsactinni, ordeteed thb'case to stand ovea toihave tSravis prodticedv An affidaivwisrinow putin from Jones,.statr<g that the Insolvent onlr owed DaVis-20l. whien he gave htim thie warrant of atontey. John Davis was then exarained, and stated that he was the fs'. ter-in t-law ofthoinsolvent. He hadbeen a farmer for 58 years, but haviagJlatelykiitired from business, he sold off his stock, and the insolvent narchased part of it. Witness made several advasecs on account of insolvent, and finding-in December last that he was not going on prosperouslyi he insisted on his giving him a warrant of attotey, upon wrhich he entered up.judgment a few months agb. The produice of the sale of the insolvent's gtock was 1771. It did not li. quidate the vwhole sum due to witness, including the sums for which I he had made himself liable on th)e insolvent's account. He was then examined verv minutely as to thie particilars of the transactions of which he had spoken, but his account was both urTsatisfactory of itseIf, and at variance with that of the insolvent. The C0 r U , after henrinr counsel on both sides, observed, that it would he a waste of time to dilate upon a caqe which, take it upon either of the contradictory statements of te insolvent or his father. n.lArw, wasevidentlv-a fraudulent one from first to last. They there- f6ore ordered the insolvent to be remanded within the walls for 18 ca- lendar monthRi .9rtnp.son Betill was opposed by rflr. POLL.OCX for Win. Parker. r. appeared that the insolvent, wwhen sited by illr. Parker. iook defence to the action,-aud afterwards brought a writ of error, for tie purpose of puttinig him to expense. Ile was therefore re- manded fbr seven months within the walls.. The CoURT, when disposing of some unopposed cases, observed, that-they bad received anonymous letters from some of the credi- tors but they wished it tn be understood, that if creditors had any complaint to nmake, thev must conie forward and do it in the regular way. as the Couirt would never p'by any attention to communications of this descriDtion. ISSOLVE~T'DEBTORStCO!gFRs TilutsuAV; JuLT 29;