Court Of Chancery, Monday...
LA7 3 RRBPORT. XtZ LiOUID IkLANCELLOR. asked if there had been any papem put in, in cn"equence of what had been said on Saturday, Air. HonEs caid, none whatever. The Solicitor for the learned plaintiff offered a book to the Ceurt, as the copy from w'"ich the learned plaintiff delivered his lecturea Mlr. HonWrE would not allow the paper to be put in; the Court had only given leave to produce afflidavits, and nothing else could be re- ceived. The Solicitor said that; hio ordship had directed " certain pa- pere" to be put in, ana the7e wan no mention of affidavit. The bnD CtAXOELLoU admitted that he had not specifically named affidavits; blat that must have been understood, for of courae -whatever papers were offered to him in the cause must be verified by oath of the party ofrering it. The usual way was to put In the ori- gnal work, an th}e pitstical copy,which were quoted in the affldavit vhich must accompany and support thcae indfspensable materials of evidence. Mr. Abemethy would have time allowed him to con- sult, with hit leg,Al rdvism, and to put in a proper affidavit, The Solicitor for Mr. Abernethy wished for come Information as to the framing of the affidavit. Mr. Hon2m again objected. litr. Abernethy, like all other plaintifis, must pecribe for himself: the Court could give him no advice. The LonD CUMCEWLLO, thanked Mr. Rome for pteventing him from giving a prewcription. There was hardly an hour In a year in ;whc he wan not naked fior advice by tome party or other; and there wan hardly another hoar In which he had not the trouble of Inforin people thst he could not give them advic He had ed all the cae, and wan perfectly ready to give his judgment on the conclusion of the pleadings. Further proceedings postponed. COURT OF CHANCERY. MONDAY. Dec. S _Ylln LA2ANCET-ASEnlETHY V. ItNIOIIT AND LACEY.