Court Of King's Bench, Tu...
? I ., PMP Altanebitttin-g -of the Clourt? _-"DAy, MFAY ii. hiniself in front oF the bar,.and asked to ha rift Parkins presented ing his motioni fer.axiew tra,s f~~0e~shfur fixed-4brjsar.~ inorriqw, if their b4ord6hips rp1ietcd. . e V. Pukini, tij' slc !one ' llUEmib a^$Esat tkcy mli;htbe pabJtcQ traYC]to i~R.AkxNss said 14tseuud be collteht td.hdave i3 is j'2tic their Lordships.night thiink convbnicnti WThe% Lbf1rflKCH1EJ JuTAOrt said: therm -i -re severa! tiiotio" wbicltiliust first be he;ard . buttt thiey 'ould tot fix it, fbi tolmoi,ro, As iliey might perhaps ge: tit. to.day. - x The ex-ShcriVl1bowd1,fand left theCiourt. TUE'EARL &IF ESSE-m V'. 'ARVE? tais,FQ This was ai action -oft trespass tried btfore the Loret Chief '1aib at thec. last Spring Assizes - at Hertford. Thte declaration set forthi that thodcfendlan, an-the3Uth, of Dcenihn~last., brokeand 6teredi (livcrs woots4and-ciboses, thci,,opc the lintin trampled oni andl.de ov- IC Ie OPrljeYan ~ln~of .Tz theplit defendant i5leaded-ffista the agencrallisvte Latiotnhes, thalieav and licence had been giverl him to go over tll Aint,ff, giron. Thc ad leave and lieticO'dePended- u~tiq~ three letr, grhi~nts_w puatin evdletur in thle cottrscof the trial; anptd read Io wlcj ' t e Lo r cause Chifef Ilarons in Sontuing uip thec case, toldia Ohe jury. Tb~he Lettrd rpliedi on by the defendatit didi not iOnta kin an ry flave and letter, 40d thlcctjbre ithat tlieonlly point whichl ite ha toIconiderwas c,h am'ount Of dlatagett thcY wouild givii to p~reycelt a sepetitioi of a i lidilar t tesrass. The bc ry, notwitIMAnn the directi!' of Rthe' Wiftned Judge, theMt at Verdict fily thle oeneodanh. AlMy. AnaLmsiT,s now came forward for at ri,le toOltow cause wly: tis verdict ral he granted; on the grottiid toat Ahe vcrdict Wr Casontrary toi .cviderice andi the: directionl of -ie Cartic J udge. TuIe letainedi counsel saitd, thiat hi?1 toble cIi,at, thle Earl' of Essex, bad I fivdn public noticce: Us,well'bi atlvrt1setnent as by boards faxed up, toi ffere nt _in - o fhs ]a ettatci,1 that he woutlh iAot per- litg any ot * k.epNas sUpo erfain covte in 'his pvxes.ion Out -of this] plublic poto;1e a orreepondenict arose betwccn Dtr, 1Uarvey eblonb' aM tile Ear l of ~sax, in the coursl of.t hiat dl e ihree wasttcr dr, -weitten by lhei Lrelof Esizcx to aMr. arvy peon ale l which irinedc the latter gene,ician's yu cfeise to to i present adion. T.Ie LQRD C A . r wbetliir-lic: was alriain that-i}e onili'u estion. whih had been left to ting jury. inS'the onrt, udi who tried the case w as the an.owit ot danavTki4. IAtr. -AD. jA'nus said, thist the 5usitimmuf of thec learned Jude was,dietthe ettes reied pon y th deen lant diii not arrbituu,tlb aieai~andlicnce ad tat berfOxheonly question they had to1 The LORDCsei ,JuT~cg, hain consulted with his learnied applied. to tek~~~ the rule for which Ilia had TiHE EAIRL Os'. DARNYLEY AND ROIsERT DrL1011, ESQ.. It will be- in the recolltetion of mnany of' our readers., thai t'snme ttnte ago the Earl oif Dlarrnly ex'hibitedi articles of the-pdacolimthli- courTt .againSt a relationi of hiis own namned Bligh, and Lh-~t Iir., Blighi was in consequence bound( over in recognizances to keep the peace ibr Ibur years towards hiis noble relative. M lr. Dxs'sx,%x th is.day ;poved for a rule dtirectine! the AMarshti of the XCing'; Bench' Lt briiig.'iit the body of'Robert gligh,UEq., in ordter that lai frtigit ajpipear pers9nuly o-Morrow in coutt, in dig-. charge of the recogijizarnce-s ixto whitch b e iierhfadea2ao atid wrhich wdtgd e~tplre at that time. ettedfuyasgo The 61sn(tb'1ssEy, JxJistICg.-Arc you. aware, Mi. Cotninon Sergeat, thit ;I kiriefaciaos has is'sued, alledging a breach of these iecogonizances, thlat a plea has bteen entered denyin'g the' breach' andtha th c~sei~ owat ownfortril?You will therefore see, that unhderihe~ecirconsatsinces we cannot.discharge the recognizancegs. Mlr. Dmj~-Ax said that thiough the Court- could not -dtschbrge- Mr. J3lighi ftrnh.the res~onsibilay, which he had ltWead)rincutred' upnathege rccogntzances,iti night-dischatrgebtim fronmall responsibi- lity upon themi in. ti tuie. r.he LottD CH1i~- JUSTiICE asked whethier MVr. Bligit was riot at resent in custody, uponi sompe-civil process? fr. DiN lipi rjeldiet in the affirmiative.j The LoRtt tuHIEV JUSTlCE."What benefit, then, is he to de- rive fromi litis mleasure? 1Mr. I)h?.LIMT said, that he couxld not exactly tell.-.he was bound, howpyVtr% by, hii recognizansees, to appear personally in 'court Thle.LoSD CslEr~ JJSTtc.E.-Have 3yOu giverl notico to thei othe sie, o yor inenton t isovefor ithe discharge of these re- cognzancs? If yu hae nt, w canot discharge, them.- The LRD CirEy' U5r1e,..Tae a nleto ring Mlr. Bligh ii.nyl,R,p nLl ICTUAIx -- - -