Court Of Chancery, Thursd...
tAnW 1IPORT. - %a in S -o actiOn.~~ 'lU uattcOver teevitence before-mnentioned fe~t' tole two acto. edfen-lat agaiij demurred. 4r, 9UlGDth applied to the Court to stay the trial of the first I fltil the demurrer should be argued in this caurt. .ateLoRD CoANCE LLOSraid that he hado never heard before 'fa demnurrer to a bill for a commission to discover evidence in JUStIiCeation of a libel.IThe case being so far new, he would not issue 'ixiy order- but Idr. Sugden miglht acquaint the Court'of KiNg'3 r-ench, tht It wshis wish that the trial rhould be whst ic saturday to tohe day in next week and h would hear the argu- inentaon the dapiinrrer on Saturday. r.ion SATIELL tshortly after entered the Court, to which he cim 'vediately aphlied on behalf ofmr. Aacaula ho in that his lord- ilP wo12ld1not peraist in directing'an ortler -which, hnaving been 'granlted in the absence of one of thie parties., would giv'e the plaintiff a't Onlbe all the bencfit of a prohibition obtained aller full argument. Th L. (IiANCELS.OA sid that it was not his Intention to igOeany order except for hearing the demurrer argueld. Hie was axt 'aloss to-know what objection coulid be taken to the discovery of evi- 'ece to juetly in acase oflBbel alfecting private character. He was sWr h.,according to tlhe dDctrines of the Court of King's Bench, te tyhtll was no justification of an injuirious libel. But starely it WA tWell known that the truth mnight inflxence a verdict so far as the l'fO1unt0f datmages was concerned,and he could not tuppose that MVr. 'Shadwell's client was anxious merely for a verdict in thie avowedI ab- Sence Of evklent~e WELSaid, that the course taken, or about to be taken, woud pc te painIff anunfair advantage, and one ~ wi~ebe as arui?arl dien itld,because his bills had not The Lan CHNCELLOR said, that if 3Mr. Shadwell pleased, he 'woud oderthedemrrer to be argued to-morrow - and unidoubted ly, 'li cmpelig te efendant to allow delay, he folly intended that theplantff'sholdindemnify him for the t3xpenses occasione4 'oy' that ela T forard the business, however, if they woul', hand him up tle bills and demurrer, he vwould read them over tlb,jt evening. AMr. SRAD WELL thlought that there would be rin, becessity for troubling his Lordship to read over the papersc, Qtle contents of which Would come best before him in the course of 1,n argument. The LoiD CHIANCELLOR thlOUght t'f1at it might be best in all tases for the Judge to know nothing Of thea matter until it came be- fore himi in argument. EUJRTtS V. CLARtE, E The ~on~CHANg~ 'ns~CASE Of' RYE HARB~OURt. found te nuisa c .c., wa f opinion that the Yerdlict which signfy o th ~1t,rtheircase musttstand. but if the parties woulcd etitriner, hi agreeent sato the appointmeiat of an able ~IOIS ~ ordsip toogh tha hecould give him such direc- ~ ~ us to be made in the dikes and sluics as WUURT oP CHANCRRV- - * SIT A rrVy T . vT ; . .A . . _ X .