Consistory Court, Saturda...
-l ;.-. -, vppiseauou was Irnane to tne Uourt to pronounce Dr. Clarke on the next court day to be in contempt of court, for not hav- ing appe-ed to or otherwise obeyed the monition of this court. Sir CHISTOPHRRoABIrsoN N Said,thatasitwouldhavestillbeen open to Dr. Clarke, had he been present to day, to assert an allegation aB for the next court; and as he (the Judge) was very unwilling that any opportunity whatever should be lost to him of offering, before the ultimate decision of the c"se, any thing like a justification or ex- planation of his conduct, the Court would order the assignation to be made for two' court days from this time, which would carry the matter on to the 2d of November next, and thus afford him an ample opportunity for preparation. The Court was afraid that even this in. dulgence would prove of little benefit to this unfortunate party; but after the period in question, it would be its duty to proceed to s,ch a sentence as might satisfy the exigencies of the law in the matter. CONSISTORY COURT. SATURnAY. JIMVY 10 THE OFFICE OF THE JUDG]'0MOTED BY RUSTA1 ADAMS . - ~~V. CLARKZE. D). D.