Ireland.
(FroM the Freemnn'a JOLrual 0o Tiaur.stay.) Tlhapmoeeutioe of this gentle nneifenbgo tbt attentlonr of-the public almost to the exclusion of every oaishitopic. D1tittle in the wayof additional information can lb eiieinied lip. A fevfaai, towevei, are subjoined, and it mnar,t2 ntlstedIi~ prQoiof the anxitfy i 4the I=ple, that the street Oppo5to the.Cdbmislittet Roomas, in Cu, i 'tl.act, was thronged to suchi excess during the greater port of ' ioterdy, bypercoas vaiting to deea Di-O; on0ellC thott was- ' hth great diffculty a passage could be made for vehicles, or evenl zleatriano. .. .. Zfesso IooneT Ita Pertlni Q'leoghlin, ant Shell, h:ave been retain. vftOD Dte part of Dlr. O'Connell -c; his- Cdunnel, at thbe ftrialto take i^z'ce ont the lid uproximo, SiIr. 'V7ihiam Hall, of 8t. Andrew.stxeet, L2bernyrttaintd as -his agent. - gentTeman ftom the Freevnan's Jourawl attended at the Read iee of Police yesterday, but wan unable to'obtiin admittance into the Board-rtom The followiig we take from the Evenirg Mail: HEAD FoLIlCE-OFFxCEr,.-.Wednesday,at12o'clock, Sir. KildahI attended, on bebalfof ltr. O'Connell, for the puipose of puttink su- verl intarre totrie to the magistrates, rnecting the informations awatn aialast ir. (YConnell. Mr, Kildalilrtqtiired, amongst othier m,atters, to ba f%bnishedl with- a copy of the informationo, and al so with tbe rame or names of tbe persona who swvore thtm. The magistrates decUined complying -with hia-demands, ind ilL.-Kil- dhl retired. The following witnesses were cumraioned to attend at twelve odock, but it ut nearly two before any of them -made thelr ape prarsnce:_lr. John Byrne, No. 5, Cork-bill; B1ess O'Fla.. ierry, VWousten, Warden, and M'Cabe, of The -Morning oE-ost Ir. ElrinFton . of aunders's Nes. Letter; and 3Mr.Joecph Leech, of Thec Freemasn's Jour-ral. The examination of lessrs. Vousden, Elrington, atia O'FIa. 2ierty, occupied a considerable time; but as it was strictly private, w7c are unable to state the precise nature of their e'vidence. We, borever, learned that the answers which they gave were nearly ci- mllar to those which they gave on Friday. Messrs. Leech and Byrne did not attend." [We copy the folloting 'from a paper called the Morning Re-. blr. O'Connell havingretained- Ir. Kildahl, the salicitor, among his otlher professional fried.ds who are engaged in his detence he rir. Hildnbl) attet,ded at the bead: police.office at eleven o'ctock. 1-here were present Alderrman D?arley and Counse'lers Lowe and G mrave. Mr. Kildahi ea.d, as solicitor for' Dlr. O'Connell, I requeat to Laow if there be any infirmation on oath previously made before &nr of the magist rates,-to warrant the Chief Dlaglstratc in calling on lI-r. O'Connell tocen:er into the "- recognizanee ?" The MXagistrate replied, that there was an information on oath. tlr. Kldahtl protested against the right of the m2gistrates to take Czr:her informations, after an arrest upon ar information theretofore E=Ae before them. The- 51agistrates made tio reply; but loo'ed at each otber for csaie time. Llr. Kildahl caid, his next duty was to require from, the mags-. trates a copy, ot such information; and offered to pay any expznse |that might attend the copying thereof. TheIP;agistrates refused to give any uch copy; bat added, that if *they gave a copy there would be no expnense. Mr. Kildahl then distinctly calledt on the magistrates to flurnish iin- with the namne or names of the person or persona who minde -uch informations. This also the magistrates peremp'oriy refuaed& 7,-r. i vell, if, notwithstandirg my protest, you pro. cec to examine anv further witnesses respecting the charge alre4dy made inst Mr. O'Connell, will you permit such examinatiton to bs attended, on the part of Mr. O'Cannelb, hybi2ixlff tmiocounsel ,)r cent ? I The Magisfates.-Cetninly not; but insoniuchi Ift. 0'connell is not subject to the inconvenience-of custody (I 1i7we eoniAderour- I tled to exaitine h other tritnes=es for the pisrpeze of said inquiry as wes?itll consider neesry, vithout all kLDg any at- tendance by or for him. . Ir. Kildahl then retired. A We have reason to believe that on the rcteirn~ of 'Dr. Kildhal to Mdr. O'Connell, the latter directed Alr.N EidAb agairn to erai to tha Office, and to require to know who rvaxconaucting ther pr0e- *cution. iMr. Kildaihl aecordingly made the inquiryv The reply the Zagistraten made was in thero words-" Wedor'wt haow, end refer you to the Crowvn Lawyer = 1)2r.E;lldahl, finding all inquiryvain, thereupon tuldrseaedthe fotilDlowing letter to MXtr. Kematsis, the Crown Solicitor for the pro- j inse of Lelnster: " Sackville-street, 22d Dec. 1824. " Sir,_As the solicitor of Daniel O'Connell, Fgq., ant on his | bhalf, I reouest to be furnished with a copy of the informations, by 'virtue of which he has been held to bail to appr at the next ' commission, which infonnations were not only taken nltogethter cx ',wart', but the matter and particulars thereof have beam hitherto withheld from .r. O'Connell. H aving psoade application for a copy lof them to the magistrates of the Heead Police.office, thevrefased to g;ive it to me, and afterwards referred me to the I Ofilders of tbe :Crdwn: I therefore apply to you for it. You are, of course, aware, diti rt it will be impossible for mnc to take any measure on Mr.O'Con- ;nell's behalf, until I shall have obtained such copy, the expenses of which i am ready forthvwith to pay. In i am, Sir, your most obedient humble servant, lVm. Kemmis, .,sq. Crown Solicitor. " S. KILDAHL." II2-Li2 D. MR, O CQOWUlub;