Court Of Common Pleas, Gu...
The Court sat this morning at ten o'clock; but rose in a few minutes, there being only two causes entered tbr trial, of which one was withdrawn, and the other undefrnded. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, WEDNESDAY, DEc. 1. (bittings after Term.) THE KING V. PRltCZ. This was an infarmation filed aainst the defendant by the At. torney-Uenreal, to recover penalties for having rooms and utesisils for carrying on the procesg of aieaLing, which were Hot entered at the Excise. It appearel from thc evidence, tbat the lefendant carrie6ion the business of a maltster, in an old farm-house, at a place called Sliel- zich-court, near the citv of Hereford. He had entered at the Ex- cise-ofEce as the places in which he caTried use his business, one malt-house, two steeping tubs, one working floor, two kilns, and one store-room. 'rhe Excise officers having obserfUd about thepre- miscs n muach greater quantity of grain than the defendant with his apparently limited mesas of msianupacture bad any occasioa for, en- tcrtatned a? SUspiCiOnI that he was engaged in some fraudulent trans- actions. They accordingly' searched the premises, and in addition to the entered or licensed reomus, they discovered a Izncealed sCt of rooms, furnished& vwith aU the necessary apparatus for malting, and a large quantity of grain, in the diffcrent stages of the manufacture. This evidence having bccn given, rnr. JERvIs said he was in- structed on the part of the defendant to submit to a conviction. T'he jury accordingly returned a veedit ofguilty.-Penalty 1,00. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. (AWILDHAL-L. Drr. 1.