Court Of Common Pleas, We...
a.l1tpgs at Lvu.st t-riuts beore Lord Chief Jtustice BEST and a X oMI.Mnl .Z)/-1 ''hi2s was an action for trespass, committed by the defendant in having stopped up a sewer, of which the plaintiff had before en- joyed the use. Mr. STEEUt opcned thie case: Mr. Sergesnt VAUGH5AN stated it to the?jury. In the course of the case (otherwise unintereeting, except to the parties), the plaintiffwanted toaccount for the non-production, as witnesses, of two persons, a bricklayer and carpenter, who had been employed by himi n the construction of a particular work. He called a person to prove that these two men were dead; andl it turned out that they were the two unfortunate individuals (Francis and Honey) who were shot at the Queen's funeral. Tute Jury, after heariog the evidence on both sides, returned ;A verdict for the plaintifl-Damages, Is. This verdict to be subject to the opinion of the Court above,on a particular point to bereserved at the trial. This was the only case tried to-day. It was the last of the comr mon jury causes. The Court rose at two 'clock. COURT OF COMAMlON PLEAS. WVRTMrWTV-r. 7r 2 RADCLIFFE V. 7ATA-rwrr..