Vice-Chancellor's Court, ...
.~~Irzsl . wft~4 rln , iW. W'4;EFIELD moved tor an order caning upon,the dieteff jAant to retur1 a bill of exchange for 226,0001,;wviich be h'd takbn ojitof (out7r undee the Vice_Chbaecell9,8s drder; tpoiean undertak- . .lr. QifLE r7aid, that the defendaht had .'i'ent th'e bill ovet to France -fdr 4ceptance. It was accordingli 'presented, but nbt-o. cepted, and consequently proteste(I for non-ac,cep,tance. By the 2retchlay, ,an ad.; valmr-nt dutv was payable on 'the protest, which *the agbntin Franee being unwifling' to pay on his-own responsibi- thyl be detained the bill, and thereby prevented the defendant from peftotming hj'7 u:ndertahing. the Y.IcZ-heeACELr.on. caid, he- would oblige thedefehdant strictly to fxlfilthe termsof hil undertaking; which he hadit,in his powver to do, by indemnifying the iAent. ViCE-I -ANCE:LLOR S COC; .I* 1 k-MXit tt ,; ;. I ~ I . _ i YROOWLEY Y .OCLE.