Court Of Chancery, Saturd...
LAW' RPPORT. Bl O argumnenia on mnis case were resau,Xe(i todate Tae .LARD- C5IA3McELLr ox d he *oulJ Io'l Into the pagers, andgtv hisopnioi upon it on Tuesday. GAR-RICK V. CAMDEN. tlir. AILT moved, that Ain. Payne, wrho Yds entitled to an eighth share of the property, should be alIowed t, send in a solicitor to be present at the.proceedings in the Master's dice, upon the sa2e of Mr. Garrick's villa. The motion was opposed bvy the SOLIC IT OR-ENEERAL and lfr. PEPYs, on the ground that there was no necesity ibr a measure which was calculated to cast a reflection en tbe ilaster, and on Mr. Carr, the solicitor, who bad proposed becoming apurchaser. The property it appeared, had been advertised several times, and no person woult bid more thas 4,w0l. for it. The price fixed uipon it by valuation wam 4,8001; and MlIr. Carr was albwed by the Coart to propose himself as tbe purchaser, on conditionthathe first lodged .0001. in the hands of the Accounranst-General; which, however, (it was stated), he had not yet done. The CJ{ANcEFLO5t granted the motion, obsering, that he would never allow a solicitor in a cause to become a ptrchaser of the pro. perty, without directing that another solicitor le ap,pointed to act adversely to him. In saving is, howerer, hedd not mesn to east imputations upon anybody. COURtT OP CHANCERY, SATutRDAY.APRIL 3. _, t , - DELPONT V. DTAStEt ...t..