Old Bailey New Court, Fri...
LWe have to apologize for the ornlssion-of the following report it tvas entirely accidental.3 iIsr. Tisur.Low. TV. Thtusrlorv was inlicted for stealing in the dwvelling-house of lr;il.Manncl, a watchl, thiree rings, chain, seals, &c., the property of Enmilie St. Ange. Th1'olanss Robinson said he receive(d a lettcr from the prisoner on the 16th July, andI was directed to take it to a house in Taunton^ place; he deliveredlit to a femalc therc,and was directed by the prtsoner to bring back a goldi chain, but he could not obtain it; he rcturned to ihc watclihotise whlere tlhe prisoncr was confined, and having ob- tained another lciter from th e prisoner, he tookit back to the house, anni got the gold chain, whicv lie prodlacel at .larlbnrough-strect. Robert iloward, a constable, said, on the 15th of Julv, the prosecatrix applied at St. Ann's watch-houxe, and through the me- dium of an interpreter said she had lost her watch * on that day, the prisoner ws brought in, accompanied by some Frenel wominz. *rs. St. A.nge saidl, 8be had lost the watch, chains, seals, andi key. Shle said he had been to see lier, and hacl taken them fron lier apart. Inents at 44, Frith.street, St. Ann's. She said she wished to liave them back again l he told her flie had not gotthcm about him, but that if she waited she could have them ; she said lie had taken them out of her room. Mir. PErnLLIPs suggested, that the witness should be asked vhe- ther some pronmise was not held out to the prisoner upon making this disclosure ? COMMrON SEaGEAa'T.-Pray, did the interpreter say, that if the proVerty was priven up, they would not pioceed against him ? The witness said, the interpreter did not mnake such promise something was saul as the interpreter walked up and down, and Mr. Thurlow threw the seal, &c.,on the table. Mr. PHTILLIps._Did Mliss St. Ange talk to the prisoner in French ?-U itness.-Yes. she did ; and they talked together, and I (lid not know what was said. The prosecutrix merely said what r.he had lost. Whern the interpreter addressed him, did he say how he had pos. 8essed ilhmself of the property ? I diit not hear that: it eidied by the charge, and I took it down in the clharge book. CoMrMtoN SERGEANT.-There is a complete failure of evidence as to the owner of the property ; of course suspicions will not do. liet the recognizance of such as do not appear be esrrcated. EmiHie St. Ange vras then called on her recognizance, but not aPprcarnz, it was ordered to be estreated. ap aiJury, as a mnatter of course, acquitted MvIr. Thurlow. OLD BAILEY NEW COURA7, PnZDAY, Sspr. 24.