To The Editor Of The Time...
Sir,_,At beeakf'asf this nioirnhig T wasirn,uch,huttt at reaXh,yoiiF report of eome pro6eedwgs ;t3oai io'uhIt -stretdliciffie,s tuted, it appears, bsy .W Oilb&er; % OldW ndn 6t.-s agent. against a 'female wlio I have had the'misfPrtric to be inntle.t wvibh. and 'from whomn 'it be&rAe ab6lu`ely -hecessaey for ry(e ta se. parate shoitly after my unioro,~n discovenni that iar whole li fe had. been ene continued s,ystem 0f? fraud aid deceptio,n, iriwhikh line of conduct she has, to' my sorrow, bntiTued, bv coitiactieddbtg which she cannot liquidate; and when even at tliepolcXofie y,our, reporter stidcs it to hitve been crodiedd wlih tae.epentot o see her, It is true that a suit Ih^ been. instituted in the Ceneistorlal Court'against me, which I l;ave reason to believe Thas be6n purety speculative onl her part, ima~giniing she should bel sble 'tD c. tort eums of money from various Indies of ieipe6tfaity,; with whom I am Intimate, by ihreatening the inttoduction of tbeir nsmes coupled with miAe, ip, a libel which it hastAen: her proctor seven terms to frame agalnst me,and 'it t's hreat- tned it wvill be filed next lichaelmas term; bUt in juistfed lo~ the proetor against rme, he is in no manner implic&d in hermaiiomimv?ek to extort-money, and I bope he wvill, ere long, di:qcover; the eiror be has been led fito. iadyt Wastel BrlAeo's name appeared- tW Aave been made free withl by mY wife. I beg to state that her ch4rgea were false and unfountdv., "nd the pubIic wAll, i hope, ere long, be able to judge from the merits of the evidence, instead of from ex. naIrte RteterntIM T remain. Sir vour obedient RervhnL J. M. WTNNJNGTON Ffiday morning. To THB EDIOR OF >PHE PJME$. -