I would. John and Karen were driving home from a team barbecue one day, and... Cable. Bull: The state assemblyman. Um, a friend of mine is on trial for manslaughter. Because it seems that you stand to benefit greatly from characterizing John's accident as a criminal act. Marissa: Okay. And who to avoid. He's a birdwatcher. Three guiltys. Why? No investigating teammates. Danny: Oh. Man: Hey!
Plan: A: Bull; Q: Who assists a man facing vehicular manslaughter charges? A: a connection; Q: What does Bull uncover between his client's trial and a corrupt state assemblyman? A: a guilty verdict; Q: What would a corrupt state assemblyman benefit from? A: Cable; Q: Who does Danny team up with to investigate why Marissa is suddenly acting and dressing differently? Summary: As Bull assists a man facing vehicular manslaughter charges, he uncovers a connection between his client's trial and a corrupt state assemblyman who would greatly benefit from a guilty verdict. Also, Danny and Cable team up to investigate why Marissa is suddenly acting and dressing differently.