TITLE: A Survey of Historical Document Image Datasets 

ABSTRACT: This paper presents a systematic literature review of image datasets for
document image analysis, focusing on historical documents, such as handwritten
manuscripts and early prints. Finding appropriate datasets for historical
document analysis is a crucial prerequisite to facilitate research using
different machine learning algorithms. However, because of the very large
variety of the actual data (e.g., scripts, tasks, dates, support systems, and
amount of deterioration), the different formats for data and label
representation, and the different evaluation processes and benchmarks, finding
appropriate datasets is a difficult task. This work fills this gap, presenting
a meta-study on existing datasets. After a systematic selection process
(according to PRISMA guidelines), we select 65 studies that are chosen based on
different factors, such as the year of publication, number of methods
implemented in the article, reliability of the chosen algorithms, dataset size,
and journal outlet. We summarize each study by assigning it to one of three
pre-defined tasks: document classification, layout structure, or content
analysis. We present the statistics, document type, language, tasks, input
visual aspects, and ground truth information for every dataset. In addition, we
provide the benchmark tasks and results from these papers or recent
competitions. We further discuss gaps and challenges in this domain. We
advocate for providing conversion tools to common formats (e.g., COCO format
for computer vision tasks) and always providing a set of evaluation metrics,
instead of just one, to make results comparable across studies.
This paper presents a systematic literature review of image datasets for
document image analysis, focusing on historical documents, such as handwritten
manuscripts and early prints. Finding appropriate datasets for historical
document analysis is a crucial prerequisite to facilitate research using
different machine learning algorithms. However, because of the very large
variety of the actual data (e.g., scripts, tasks, dates, support systems, and
amount of deterioration), the different formats for data and label
representation, and the different evaluation processes and benchmarks, finding
appropriate datasets is a difficult task. This work fills this gap, presenting
a meta-study on existing datasets. After a systematic selection process
(according to PRISMA guidelines), we select 65 studies that are chosen based on
different factors, such as the year of publication, number of methods
implemented in the article, reliability of the chosen algorithms, dataset size,
and journal outlet. We summarize each study by assigning it to one of three
pre-defined tasks: document classification, layout structure, or content
analysis. We present the statistics, document type, language, tasks, input
visual aspects, and ground truth information for every dataset. In addition, we
provide the benchmark tasks and results from these papers or recent
competitions. We further discuss gaps and challenges in this domain. We
advocate for providing conversion tools to common formats (e.g., COCO format
for computer vision tasks) and always providing a set of evaluation metrics,
instead of just one, to make results comparable across studies.
A Survey of Historical Document Image Datasets
http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08504v3