12.5.2017 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 121/39 COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2017/809 of 11 May 2017 in support of the implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) on the non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 26(2) and 31(1) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Whereas: (1) On 12 December 2003 the European Council adopted the EU strategy against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, Chapter III of which contains a list of measures to combat such proliferation which need to be taken both within the Union and in third countries. (2) The Union is actively implementing that strategy and is giving effect to the measures listed in Chapter III thereof, in particular by releasing financial resources to support specific projects conducted by multilateral institutions, providing States in need with technical assistance and expertise with regard to a wide range of non-proliferation measures, and fostering the role of the United Nations (UN) Security Council. (3) On 28 April 2004 the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1540 (2004) (‘UNSCR 1540 (2004)’), which was the first international instrument to deal in an integrated and comprehensive manner with weapons of mass destruction, their means of delivery and related materials. UNSCR 1540 (2004) established binding obligations for all States which aimed to prevent and deter non-State actors from obtaining access to such weapons and weapon-related material. It also called upon States to present the Committee of the Security Council established by UNSCR 1540 (2004) (the ‘1540 Committee’) with a report on steps which they have taken or intend to take to implement UNSCR 1540 (2004). (4) On 27 April 2006 the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1673 (2006) and decided that the 1540 Committee was to intensify its efforts to promote the full implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004) through programmes of work, outreach, assistance, dialogue and cooperation. It also invited the 1540 Committee to explore with States and international, regional and sub-regional organisations the possibility of sharing experience and lessons learned, and the availability of programmes which might facilitate the implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004). (5) On 20 April 2011 the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1977 (2011) and decided to extend the mandate of the 1540 Committee for a period of 10 years until 25 April 2021. It also decided that the 1540 Committee was to continue to intensify its efforts to promote the full implementation by all States of UNSCR 1540 (2004), to engage actively in matching offers and requests for assistance, through such means as visits at the invitation of the State concerned, assistance templates, action plans or other information submitted to the 1540 Committee and to conduct a comprehensive review on the status of implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004) before December 2016. (6) On 15 December 2016 the Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2325 (2016) and thereby endorsed the outcome of the comprehensive review process of UNSCR 1540 (2004) conducted during 2016. It called on all States to strengthen national measures in implementing UNSCR 1540 (2004) and called for greater assistance for building State capability in that regard, including through voluntary contributions, as well as for greater cooperation among stakeholders, civil society and academia. (7) The implementation of Council Joint Action 2006/419/CFSP (1), Council Joint Action 2008/368/CFSP (2) and Council Decision 2013/391/CFSP (3) contributed to diminishing significantly the number of non-reporting States and the number of States which did not submit additional information required by the 1540 Committee following their submission of incomplete reports. (8) The UN Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA), which is responsible for providing the 1540 Committee and its Group of Experts with substantive and logistical support, should be entrusted with the technical implementation of the projects to be carried out under this Decision. (9) This Decision should be implemented in accordance with the Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement concluded by the Commission with the UN concerning the management of financial contributions by the Union to programmes or projects administered by the UN, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 1. In accordance with the EU strategy against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (the ‘EU strategy’), which sets the objective of fostering the role of the UN Security Council and enhancing its expertise in meeting the challenges of proliferation, the Union shall further support the implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1540 (2004) and UNSCR 1977 (2011). 2. The projects in support of UNSCR 1540 (2004), corresponding to measures in line with the EU strategy, shall consist of sub-regional workshops, country visits, meetings, events, training and public relations efforts. 3. The aims of the projects shall consist of: — enhancing the relevant national and regional efforts and capabilities, primarily through training, capacity-building and assistance facilitation in close coordination with other Union programmes and other actors involved in the implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004), to ensure synergies and complementarity; — contributing to the practical implementation of specific recommendations of both the 2009 comprehensive review on the status of implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004) and the outcome of the comprehensive review conducted during 2016, in particular in the areas of technical assistance, international cooperation and raising public awareness; — supporting the development of voluntary UNSCR 1540 (2004) national implementation action plans upon States' request; — promoting the engagement of relevant stakeholders from industry and civil society in the implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004). 4. A detailed description of the projects is set out in the Annex. Article 2 1. The High Representative shall be responsible for the implementation of this Decision. 2. The technical implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2) shall be carried out by UNODA, in cooperation with the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the African Union, the Organization of American States and the League of Arab States, as appropriate. UNODA shall conclude an agreement with the OSCE regarding the transfer of funds required for the implementation of specific OSCE projects. 3. UNODA shall carry out the technical implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2) under the responsibility and the control of the High Representative. For that purpose, the High Representative shall enter into the necessary arrangements with UNODA. Article 3 1. The financial reference amount for the implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2) shall be EUR 2 635 170,77. The total estimated budget of the overall project shall be EUR 2 672 770,77, which shall be provided through co-financing from the general budget of the European Union. 2. The expenditure financed by the amount stipulated in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the European Union. 3. The Commission shall supervise the proper management of the expenditure referred to in paragraph 2. For that purpose, the Commission shall conclude a financing agreement with UNODA. The agreement shall stipulate that UNODA is to ensure visibility of the Union contribution, appropriate to its size. It shall also stipulate that the ultimate responsibility regarding the technical implementation of the projects referred to in Article 1(2) vis-à-vis the Commission shall lie with UNODA. 4. The Commission shall endeavour to conclude the financing agreement referred to in paragraph 3 as soon as possible after the entry into force of this Decision. It shall inform the Council of any difficulties in that process and of the date of conclusion of the financing agreement. Article 4 The High Representative shall report to the Council on the implementation of this Decision on the basis of regular reports prepared by UNODA. Those reports shall form the basis for the evaluation carried out by the Council. The Commission shall provide information on the financial aspects of the projects referred to in Article 1(2). Article 5 1. This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. 2. This Decision shall expire 36 months after the conclusion of the financing agreement referred to in Article 3(3), or six months after the date of its adoption if no financing agreement has been concluded within that period. Done at Brussels, 11 May 2017. For the Council The President C. CARDONA (1) Council Joint Action 2006/419/CFSP of 12 June 2006 in support of the implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (OJ L 165, 17.6.2006, p. 30). (2) Council Joint Action 2008/368/CFSP of 14 May 2008 in support of the implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) and in the framework of the implementation of the EU strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (OJ L 127, 15.5.2008, p. 78). (3) Council Decision 2013/391/CFSP of 22 July 2013 in support of the practical implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) on non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery (OJ L 198, 23.7.2013, p. 40). ANNEX 1. OBJECTIVE The overall objective of this Decision is to promote the implementation of UNSCRs 1540 (2004) and 1977 (2011), within the framework of the implementation of the EU strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, through specific measures with the following aims: to enhance the relevant national and regional efforts and capabilities primarily through capacity-building and assistance facilitation; to contribute to the practical implementation of specific recommendations of both the 2009 comprehensive review on the status of implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004) and the outcome of the comprehensive review conducted during 2016, in particular in the areas of technical assistance, international cooperation and raising public awareness. 2. MEASURES 2.1. Objectives of the measures — To support country-specific and regional implementation activities, including the development of voluntary national implementation action plans or roadmaps for the implementation of key requirements of UNSCR 1540 (2004), training for national experts, strengthening regional/sub-regional coordination efforts and other activities designed to promote a sustained national and sub-regional implementation process; — To promote and support universality of reporting as called for by UNSCR 1540 (2004); — To strengthen the role of industry and civil society in implementing UNSCR 1540 (2004); — To raise awareness amongst policy-makers and representatives from industry and civil society regarding the importance of the implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004); — To enhance sub-regional, regional and international cooperation regarding the implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004) with due regard to the role played by the 1540 Committee and its Group of Experts, as well as to the Committee's programme of work; — To contribute to achieving greater synergies in the efforts of international stakeholders in the implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004), in particular in the OSCE region. 2.2. Description of the measures (a) UNODA, acting in close liaison with the 1540 Committee, will respond to up to seven assistance requests from States, giving priority to States from the OSCE region, the African region as well as the Gulf and Middle East region. The assistance provided will be designed to enable States to take additional, practical steps to implement the obligations of UNCSR 1540 (2004) at national level, thereby responding to assistance requests by States to the 1540 Committee. Such assistance will complement the matchmaking function of the 1540 Committee, but not include the provision or procurement of technical equipment. (b) UNODA will support efforts to achieve universality of reporting. While UNSCR 1540 (2004) calls upon States to present a first report no later than six months from the adoption of the Resolution to the 1540 Committee on steps they have taken or intend to take to implement that Resolution, there are still a number of non-reporting States. In that context, UNODA will support through its Regional Centre in Africa (UNREC) and its Regional Centre in Asia and the Pacific (UNRCPD), and in close association with the African Union and relevant regional European Union Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Risk Mitigation Centres of Excellence (the ‘EU CBRN Centres of Excellence’), up to five national or regional activities specifically targeted at non-reporting States. (c) Furthermore, UNODA will support three regional/sub-regional training courses for national points of contact nominated by States with a view to coordinating national implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004) and assisting in the development of a network of points of contact as well as improving their communication with the 1540 Committee. (d) UNODA will subcontract, among other activities, to the OSCE Secretariat a study on how to promote further synergies in the efforts of relevant international stakeholders involved in the implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004) in the OSCE region. (e) UNODA will support up to three UNSCR 1540 (2004) regional industry conferences. Since 2012, the Government of Germany, with the support of the EU outreach programme for dual-use items and UNODA, hosted four conferences in the city of Wiesbaden for stakeholders from industry and civil society in order to encourage industry and private-sector engagement in the implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004). One of the outcomes of the fourth such conference, held in November 2015 in cooperation with the 1540 Committee, its Group of Experts and UNODA, was a common understanding to strengthen the regional approach, i.e. to carry out similar conferences in locations including Asia, Latin America and the OSCE region. Future regional conferences for stakeholders from industry should be complementary to the work under the relevant Union programmes, e.g. the EU CBRN Centres of Excellence and/or the EU P2P Export Control Programme for dual-use items. (f) UNODA will organise or support workshops for representatives of civil society, academia and industry aimed at the practical implementation of the 2016 comprehensive review of the status of the implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004). In that context, UNODA will support the participation of national officials of States requesting assistance in training courses and other capacity-building activities. As appropriate, UNODA will seek synergies with the activities of other actors involved in the implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004), the regional EU CBRN Centres of Excellence as well as other Union-sponsored programmes in this field. 2.3. Results of the measures Improved implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004) through additional steps to be undertaken by States towards its full implementation; development of effective and realistic national action plans or road maps for the implementation of the key requirements of that resolution; enhanced regional and sub-regional coordinated approaches to the implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004); and the establishment of effective partnerships between participating States and assistance providers. A higher number of first reports from States that have yet to submit their first national report on the implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004). Greater involvement of representatives of industry and civil society in international, regional and national UNSCR 1540 (2004) implementation efforts. Enhanced public awareness of the importance of full implementation of UNSCR 1540 (2004) and the results of the 2009 and 2016 comprehensive reviews. 3. PARTNERS FOR THE MEASURES UNODA, acting in close liaison with the 1540 Committee, will continue developing effective partnerships with relevant regional organisations, in particular the OSCE, the African Union and the League of Arab States, as well as with the EU CBRN Centres of Excellence, which benefit from financial support from the European Commission and are implemented jointly by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) and the UN Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI). With regard to projects in the OSCE region, UNODA shall conclude an agreement with the OSCE regarding the transfer of funds required for the implementation of such projects, thereby making full use of the Memorandum of Understanding on joint implementation of projects on non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction that UNODA and the OSCE Secretariat concluded in 2011. UNODA will also maintain its cooperation with other international organisations and agencies, including the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), to ensure effective synergies and avoid duplication. 4. INTERACTION WITH UNION EFFORTS Based on the regular feedback from UNODA on its activities, the Union may decide to complement those efforts through targeted diplomatic action aimed at raising awareness regarding the implementation of national action plans and the submission of national reports. 5. BENEFICIARIES OF THE MEASURES — States, government officials; — 1540 Committee and other UN entities; — International, regional and sub-regional organisations; — Governments and organisations providing and receiving technical assistance under UNSCR 1540 (2004); — Civil society and industry. 6. VENUE UNODA will select potential venues for the meetings, workshops and other events. The criteria used for choosing the venues will include the willingness and commitment of a relevant State in a particular region to host the event. Specific locations of country visits or country-specific activities will depend on invitations from interested States and, as appropriate, on decisions of the 1540 Committee in accordance with the Committee's programme of work. 7. DURATION The total estimated duration of the project is 36 months.

Summary: Weapons of mass destruction: combating proliferation Weapons of mass destruction: combating proliferation SUMMARY OF: Decision (CFSP) 2017/809 on the implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) on the non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery WHAT IS THE AIM OF THE DECISION? In accordance with the EU’s 2003 strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the decision supports the implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540. It follows on from similar decisions adopted in 2006, in 2008 and in 2013. The EU strategy is designed to prevent, deter, halt and, if possible, eliminate weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programmes worldwide. Since its inception in 2003, the basic principles of the strategy have included: Strengthening international non-proliferation mechanisms and working to improve systems for verifying violations of rules laid down in multilateral treaties. Promoting a regionally and internationally stable environment, by strengthening programmes to promote disarmament and incorporating the non-proliferation objective in all EU political, diplomatic and economic activities. Working closely with key partners like the USA, Russia or NATO and assisting non-EU countries. KEY POINTS The Council continuously monitors the strategy, receiving progress reports every 6 months. The strategy is implemented through projects and activities such as: support for the Hague Code of Conduct, a set of rules against ballistic missiles (Decision 2014/913/CFSP) support for the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (Decision 2015/259/CFSP) a European network of independent non-proliferation think tanks (Decision 2010/430/CFSP) support for World Health Organisation biosafety/security activities (Decision 2013/668/CFSP). In 2008, the EU adopted new lines for action on WMD proliferation. These were designed to make the 2003 strategy more effective by, for instance, raising awareness in scientific, academic and financial institutions and developing measures to prevent the transfer of knowledge about WMDs to the wrong parties. They reiterate the importance of the 2003 strategy and the principles that determine EU action (effective multilateralism, prevention and international cooperation) and their role in helping implement the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540. UN Security Council Resolution 1540 obliges its signatories to refrain from supporting by any means non-state actors* from: developing, acquiring, manufacturing, possessing, transporting, transferring or using nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and their delivery systems. In 2011, the Security Council adopted UN Resolution 1977, which reaffirms that the proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and their means of delivery constitutes a threat to international peace and security. It extends until 2021 the mandate of the 1540 Committee, a committee whose role is to engage actively with states and relevant international, regional and subregional organisations to promote the sharing of experience, lessons learned and effective practices, in the areas covered by UNSCR 1540. The decision cites the EU’s support, in line with its WMD strategy, for the objective of fostering the role of the UN Security Council and enhancing its expertise in addressing the challenges of proliferation. In practical terms, this support consists of sub-regional workshops, country visits, meetings, events, training and public relations efforts. The UN Office for Disarmament Affairs is responsible for the technical implementation of the projects, in cooperation with the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe, the African Union, the Organisation of American States and the League of Arab States, as appropriate. BACKGROUND For more information, see: EU measures to combat WMD proliferation (European External Action Service). KEY TERMS Non-state actors: an individual or organisation with significant political influence but is not allied to any particular country or state. MAIN DOCUMENT Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/809 of 11 May 2017 in support of the implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) on the non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery (OJ L 121, 12.5.2017, pp. 39-44) RELATED DOCUMENTS Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/259 of 17 February 2015 in support of activities of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (OJ L 43, 18.2.2015, pp. 14-28) Council Decision 2014/913/CFSP of 15 December 2014 in support of the Hague Code of Conduct and ballistic missile non-proliferation in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (OJ L 360, 17.12.2014, pp. 44-52) Council Decision 2013/668/CFSP of 18 November 2013 in support of World Health Organisation activities in the area of biosafety and biosecurity in the framework of the European Union Strategy against the proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (OJ L 310, 20.11.2013, pp. 13-19) Council Decision 2013/391/CFSP of 22 July 2013 in support of the practical implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) on non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery (OJ L 198, 23.7.2013, pp. 40-44) Successive amendments to Decision 2013/391/CFSP have been incorporated into the original document. This consolidated version is of documentary value only. Council Decision 2010/430/CFSP of 26 July 2010 establishing a European network of independent non-proliferation think tanks in support of the implementation of the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (OJ L 202, 4.8.2010, pp. 5-9) Council Joint Action 2008/368/CFSP of 14 May 2008 in support of the implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) and in the framework of the implementation of the EU strategy against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (OJ L 127, 15.5.2008, pp. 78-83) Council Joint Action 2006/419/CFSP of 12 June 2006 in support of the implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (OJ L 165, 17.6.2006, pp. 30-34) EU strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction of 10 December 2003 (doc. 15708/03 - not published in the Official Journal) last update 02.03.2018


4.4.2017 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 90/12 COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2017/633 of 3 April 2017 in support of the United Nations Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1) and 31(1) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Whereas: (1) On 20 July 2001 the States participating in the United Nations (UN) Conference on the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects adopted the UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (‘the UN Programme of Action’). On 8 December 2005 the UN General Assembly adopted the International Instrument to Enable States to Identify and Trace, in a Timely and Reliable Manner, Illicit Small Arms and Light Weapons (‘the International Tracing Instrument’). Both of those international instruments declare that States will cooperate, as appropriate, with the UN to support their effective implementation. (2) On 12 July 2002 the Council adopted Joint Action 2002/589/CFSP (1). (3) On 16 December 2005 the European Council adopted the EU Strategy to combat illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition. That Strategy identifies support for the UN Programme of Action as the first priority for action at international level, and calls for the adoption of a legally binding international instrument on the tracing and marking of small arms and light weapons (‘SALW’) and their ammunition. (4) Following the adoption of the International Tracing Instrument, the Union supported its full implementation through the adoption and implementation of Council Joint Action 2008/113/CFSP (2). The implementation of Joint Action 2008/113/CFSP was assessed positively by the Council. (5) On 18 July 2011 the Council adopted Decision 2011/428/CSFP (3). (6) Illicitly obtained small arms have been used for terrorist attacks in Europe. (7) The final report of the 2016 Sixth Biennial Meeting of States (‘BMS6’) to Consider the Implementation of the UN Programme of Action notes: — the need to strengthen the tracing of SALW in conflict and post-conflict situations, including through the provision of capacity-building assistance, for the purposes of identifying and containing the flow of illicit SALW into conflict and post-conflict zones, providing early warning of destabilising flows of such weapons and preventing conflict; — the opportunity for synergies between projects designed to support implementation of the UN Programme of Action and the International Tracing Instrument and projects related to the Sustainable Development Goals; — the need to consider, at the Third Review Conference in 2018, the implications for the UN Programme of Action of recent developments in SALW manufacturing, technology and design; — the need for enhanced dialogue with industry, especially regarding the effective marking of SALW, in light of those recent developments; — the need to increase national capacity to take account of diversion risks when assessing applications for the authorisation of exports of SALW, and to put in place, where they do not exist, adequate laws, regulations and administrative procedures, consistent with the existing responsibilities of States under relevant international law, to ensure effective control over the export, transit and import of SALW, including the use of end-use certification and effective legal and enforcement measures; — that the full and effective implementation of the UN Programme of Action helps to prevent the acquisition of SALW by terrorists, thus reducing the potential impact of their attacks, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 1. With a view to supporting the fight against the illicit trade in SALW by minimising the risk of diversion, including through theft, loss and unauthorised re-export, of SALW to illicit markets, illegal armed groups, terrorists and other unauthorised recipients, the Union shall, by means of this Decision, pursue the following objectives: — supporting the UN Programme of Action and the International Tracing Instrument; — ensuring the relevance of the UN Programme of Action and the International Tracing Instrument and increasing their effectiveness; — supporting actions towards a successful and relevant outcome of the 2018 Third UN Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the UN Programme of Action (‘RevCon3’). 2. In order to achieve the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, the Union shall, by means of this Decision, support the following: — the preparation of RevCon3 through a series of thematic symposia and regional conferences; — a comprehensive analysis of UN Member States' national reports on the implementation of the UN Programme of Action and the International Tracing Instrument, to be presented at RevCon3; — a sponsorship programme for the participants of third countries; — the provision of technical support for the RevCon3 President; — four thematic symposia producing action-oriented findings on topics related to SALW control. The selected topics were defined as priorities in EU working papers that were submitted to UN Programme of Action meetings (BMS5 in 2014 and BMS6 in 2016) and were reflected in the outcome documents of those meetings: (i) SALW tracing and stockpile management in conflict and post-conflict situations; (ii) SALW and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, including Sustainable Development Goal 16 and the gender aspects of SALW control; (iii) recent developments in SALW manufacturing, technology and design and resulting challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the UN Programme of Action and the International Tracing Instrument; (iv) synergies between the UN Programme of Action, the Arms Trade Treaty and other relevant instruments; — five regional conferences allowing for engagement with government representatives and regional organisations from selected regions on the outcome papers from the thematic symposia; — analysis of national reports on the implementation of the UN Programme of Action and International Tracing Instrument with a focus on implementation challenges that give rise to opportunities for cooperation and assistance; — strengthening the foundations for RevCon3 by means of a sponsorship programme and technical support to the RevCon3 President; and — outreach through press statements and side events. 3. A detailed description of the project referred to in paragraph 2 is set out in the Annex to this Decision. Article 2 1. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (‘the HR’) shall be responsible for the implementation of this Decision. 2. The implementation of the project referred to in Article 1(2) shall be carried out by the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) with the assistance of the Small Arms Survey represented by the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (‘SAS’). 3. UNODA, assisted by SAS, shall perform its task under the responsibility of the HR. For that purpose, the HR shall enter into the necessary arrangements with UNODA. Article 3 1. The financial reference amount for the implementation of the project referred to in Article 1(2) shall be EUR 2 798 381,56. 2. The expenditure financed by the amount set out in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the Union. 3. The Commission shall supervise the proper management of the expenditure referred to in paragraph 1. For that purpose, it shall conclude a financing agreement with UNODA. UNODA and SAS will be invited to reach an agreement on the reimbursement of costs incurred by SAS for its contribution to the implementation of this Decision. The agreement between the Commission and UNODA shall stipulate that UNODA and SAS are to ensure the visibility of the Union's contribution, appropriate to its size. 4. The Commission shall endeavour to conclude the financing agreement referred to in paragraph 3 as soon as possible after the entry into force of this Decision. It shall inform the Council of any difficulties in that process and of the date of conclusion of the financing agreement. Article 4 The HR shall report to the Council on the implementation of this Decision on the basis of regular reports prepared by UNODA. Those reports shall form the basis for the evaluation carried out by the Council. The Commission shall report on the financial aspects of the implementation of the project referred to in Article 1(2). Article 5 1. This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. 2. This Decision shall expire 24 months after the date of conclusion of the financing agreement referred to in Article 3(3). However, it shall expire six months after the date of its entry into force if that financing agreement has not been concluded by that time. Done at Luxembourg, 3 April 2017. For the Council The President F. MOGHERINI (1) Council Joint Action 2002/589/CFSP of 12 July 2002 on the European Union's contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons and repealing Joint Action 1999/34/CFSP (OJ L 191, 19.7.2002, p. 1). (2) Council Joint Action 2008/113/CFSP of 12 February 2008 in support of the International Instrument to Enable States to Identify and Trace, in a Timely and Reliable Manner, Illicit Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) in the framework of the EU Strategy to combat the illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition (OJ L 40, 14.2.2008, p. 16). (3) Council Decision 2011/428/CFSP of 18 July 2011 in support of United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs activities to implement the United Nations Programme of Actions to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (OJ L 188, 19.7.2011, p. 37). ANNEX 1. OBJECTIVES The objective of this Decision is to support the fight against the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons (‘SALW’) by minimising the risk of diversion, including through theft, loss and unauthorised re-export, of SALW to illicit markets, illegal armed groups, terrorists and other unauthorised recipients. Therefore, this Decision will support the United Nations (UN) Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in SALW in All Its Aspects (‘the UN PoA’) and the International Tracing Instrument (‘the ITI’) as well as ensure their relevance and increase their effectiveness. To that end, this Decision will support actions towards a successful outcome of the 2018 Third UN Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the UN PoA (‘RevCon3’). This Decision will support the preparation of RevCon3 through a series of thematic symposia and regional conferences. The thematic symposia will facilitate the elaboration of action-oriented findings on topics related to SALW control. The selected topics were defined as priorities in EU working papers submitted to UN PoA meetings (BMS5 in 2014 and BMS6 in 2016) and were largely taken over in the outcome documents of those meetings. The regional conferences will allow for engagement with government representatives and regional organisations from selected regions on the topics from the thematic symposia. The goal is to consolidate the positive outcome of BMS6 in the outcome of RevCon3. Other actions to support a successful outcome of RevCon3 will be: a comprehensive analysis of UN Member States' national reports on the implementation of the UN PoA and the ITI, to be presented at RevCon3; a sponsorship programme for the participants of third countries; and technical support for the RevCon3 President. 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIONS The Union project to support RevCon3 will involve the following elements: (i) thematic symposia to develop action-oriented findings on topics related to SALW control; (ii) regional conferences to engage government representatives and regional organisations from selected regions; (iii) an analysis of UN Member States' national reports on the implementation of the UN PoA and the ITI, to be presented at RevCon3; (iv) strengthening the foundations for RevCon3 (sponsorship programme, technical support); (v) effective outreach to generate sustained impact. Those five elements are discussed in more detail below. The project will run in parallel to the preparation of RevCon3 by the President. That will be a key opportunity for the President to participate in thematic and regional preparations for RevCon3. 2.1 Thematic symposia 2.1.1 Aim The aim of each symposium will be to discuss and explore each topic under consideration and agree on actionable steps on the national, regional and global level that may be included in the outcome document of RevCon3. The findings and recommendations of each symposium will be presented to and discussed at all regional conferences. 2.1.2 The project will comprise four symposia with the following topics: (i) SALW tracing and stockpile management in conflict and post-conflict situations; (ii) SALW and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, including Sustainable Development Goal (‘SDG’) 16 and the gender aspects of SALW control; (iii) recent developments in SALW manufacturing, technology and design and resulting challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the UN PoA and the ITI; (iv) synergies between the UN PoA, the Arms Trade Treaty (‘the ATT’) and other relevant instruments. 2.1.3 Format The symposia will have formats tailored to the topics. (i) SALW tracing and stockpile management in conflict and post-conflict situations (see BMS6 outcome document (1)) with the aim of minimising the risk of diversion, including through theft, loss and unauthorised re-export, of SALW to illicit markets, illegal armed groups, terrorists and other unauthorised recipients. Participation by: — technical experts from governments, including affected governments; — UN system (DPKO, DPA, CTED, DSS, UNODC, UNODA); — experts from UN peacekeeping missions; — experts from UNSC monitoring panels; — experts from academia, research institutes; — experts from international organisations (WCO, Interpol, etc); — experts from operational NGOs (MAG, CAR, ARES, etc); — experts from relevant Union institutions (DG Home, Europol). Total approx. 40 participants. Roundtable discussions. All States welcome to observe and participate in Q&A. (ii) SALW and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, including SDG 16 and the gender aspects of SALW control (see BMS6 outcome document (2)) with participation by: — UN system (DESA, PBSO, UNDP, UNICEF, UNODC, UN Women); — experts from academia, research institutes; — experts from governments and regional organisations; — experts from relevant Union institutions (DG DEVCO, DG ECHO). Total approx. 40 participants. Roundtable discussions. All States welcome to observe and participate in Q&A. (iii) Recent developments in SALW manufacturing, technology and design and resulting challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the UN PoA and the ITI (see BMS6 outcome document (3)) with participation by: — experts from SALW industry and relevant industrial-sector federations; — UN system (UNODA); — experts from academia, research institutes; — technical experts from governments; — experts from relevant Union institutions (DG GROW, DG TRADE, DG HOME). Total approx. 40 participants. Day 1: panel discussions, Q&A. Day 2: roundtable discussion on developing a document supplementary to the ITI. All States welcome to observe and participate in Q&A. (iv) Synergies between UN PoA, the ATT and other relevant instruments, including the UN Firearms Protocol and UN counter-terrorism mechanisms (see BMS6 outcome document (4)) with participation by: — experts from governments; — UN system (UNODC, UNODA, etc); — experts from international organisations (WCO, Interpol, ATT Secretariat); — experts from research institutes. Total approx. 40 participants. Roundtable discussions. Focus on synergies, possible positive consequences of one instrument's provisions for the others and avoiding overlaps. All States welcome to observe and participate in Q&A. 2.1.4 Location The symposia on topics (i) and (ii) will be held back to back in New York. The symposia on topics (iii) and (iv) will be held in Brussels and Geneva respectively. 2.1.5 Timing The four symposia will be held in a five-month period between April and September 2017. Their timing and sequencing (i.e. the order of the topics addressed) will be determined by the implementing agencies, in consultation with the Union, taking into account the UN disarmament calendar. Each symposium will run for two days. 2.1.6 Responsibilities of the implementing agencies Conceptualisation and substantive preparation: UNODA and Small Arms Survey will jointly develop the substance of the symposia and will be responsible for the agenda and selection of speakers/experts. Small Arms Survey will prepare a draft background paper on each topic, which will function as the basis for discussion in each symposium. The conceptualisation and substantive preparation of the thematic symposia will take place in dialogue with the Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Division of the European External Action Service (EEAS). Logistics and conference services: UNODA will be responsible for logistical arrangements (booking venues, organising catering, audio-visual equipment, travel arrangements, etc). The EEAS will assist in securing the venue of the symposium on topic (iii), which will be held in Brussels. 2.1.7 Results of the action The thematic symposia will result in greater insight and an elaborated position on the selected topics by the Union and other stakeholders involved. Small Arms Survey will prepare a substantive outcome document on the four thematic symposia. That outcome document will contain a study on the four topics and will build on the draft background papers and incorporate the findings of the expert discussions at the four thematic symposia. The outcome document will focus on delivering actionable steps with a view to it being included in the outcome document of RevCon3. The outcome document will inform the subsequent regional meetings under the project. 2.2 Regional conferences 2.2.1 Aim The aim of each regional conference is to prepare RevCon3, by providing a forum for participating States to identify and explore region-specific UN PoA and ITI implementation issues and by discussing the findings and recommendations of the four thematic symposia described in section 2.1. 2.2.2 Topics Each regional conference will address the four topics of the symposia (see section 2.1). In addition, regional conferences need to allow for region-specific discussions in preparation for RevCon3. 2.2.3 Format The regional conferences will rely principally on interactive consultations, based on presentations given by Small Arms Survey and UNODA. At each regional conference, the President will be given the opportunity to present the state of play on preparations for RevCon3. Regional organisations will give presentations on their efforts to implement the relevant paragraphs of the BMS6 outcome document relating to regional organisations. If States are selected for the RevCon3 sponsorship programme, their participants in the regional conference should in principle also be in their RevCon3 delegation. Small Arms Survey will draft a summary procedural report of each regional conference. 2.2.4 Location The regional conferences are designed to support governments and organisations from specific regions in preparing for RevCon3. Some regional organisations are already organising a preparatory meeting for RevCon3: League of Arab States, OSCE and Pacific Islands Forum. The Union project does not need to cover those regions. Therefore, the following five regional meetings are suggested: Countries from sub-regions Regional organisations Regional centre Venue West Africa and Central Africa ECOWAS, ECCAS, AU UNREC Lome East Africa and Southern Africa RECSA, SADC, AU UNREC Lome Caribbean CARICOM UNLIREC Port of Spain Latin America OAS, UNASUR UNLIREC Lima ASEAN and South Asian States ASEAN UNRCPD Bangkok This Decision will support the participation/involvement of the Small Arms Survey and UNODA in the regional conferences mentioned below with a view to presenting the findings of the thematic symposia where they correspond to the interests of the organising entities. Such participation/involvement will be contingent on the timing of the organisation of those conferences. Countries from sub-regions Regional organisations Europe and North-America OSCE Middle-East League of Arab States Pacific PIF 2.2.5 Timing The five regional conferences will be held in an eight-month period between June 2017 and February 2018 (ensuring all regional conferences are held before the Preparatory Committee meeting for RevCon3, likely to be held in February 2018). The exact timing and sequencing (i.e. the order of the regions covered) of the regional conferences will be determined by the implementing agencies, in consultation with the Union, taking into account the UN disarmament calendar. Each regional conference will run for two days. The two regional conferences in Africa will be organised back to back in one location. The two regional conferences in Latin America and the Caribbean will be organised back to back. 2.2.6 Responsibilities of the implementing agencies Substantive preparation: UNODA (including its regional centres) and Small Arms Survey will develop the substance of the regional conferences and will be responsible for the agenda and selection of speakers/experts. UNODA, together with the President, will take the lead in giving presentations on the status of preparations for RevCon3. Small Arms Survey will provide presentations on the outcomes of the symposia. Small Arms Survey will prepare a summary of each regional conference. Logistics and conference services: UNODA and its regional centres will implement the logistical arrangements (booking venues, organising catering, audio-visual equipment, travel arrangements for experts, etc) for the regional conferences, under UNODA HQ oversight. 2.2.7 Result of the action States from the region are encouraged to develop common ground on preparations for RevCon3, in particular on the four topics of the thematic symposia. 2.3 Analysis of UN PoA and ITI national reports with a focus on implementation challenges that give rise to opportunities for cooperation and assistance. 2.3.1 Format The outcome document of the Sixth Biennial Meeting of States on the UN PoA (A/CONF.192/BMS/2016/WP.1/Rev.3) mandated UNODA ‘to examine, within existing resources, implementation trends, challenges and opportunities relating to the UN PoA and ITI, based on available information, including that submitted and/or provided by Member States, for presentation at the RevCon3 for its consideration and appropriate follow up’. An informed, independent assessment of national reports on implementation is an essential source for, and addition to, that mandated report. The assessment of national reports is particularly important as it is expected that those reports will include information on the implementation of SDG 16, on which no other reporting mechanism exists. A comprehensive analysis by Small Arms Survey of national reports will therefore be a key activity under the project, for publication by the Small Arms Survey and feeding into the mandated forward-looking UNODA report. That comprehensive analysis will complement the thematic and regional meetings, and increase the likelihood that RevCon3 will meet the aspirations of the Union for a practical, focused and effective roadmap for the UN PoA in the post-RevCon3 period with a focus on connecting implementation challenges with opportunities for cooperation and assistance. 2.3.2 Timing Analysis completed by the time of the RevCon3 meeting (June 2018). 2.3.3 Responsibilities of the implementing agencies UNODA to set a timely date for receiving biennial national reports (mid-2017). Small Arms Survey to provide written analysis of submitted reports. 2.3.4 Result of the action The analysis will provide information that allows enhanced allocation of assistance activities with regard to UN PoA implementation and SALW control in general. 2.4 Strengthening the foundations for RevCon3 2.4.1 Sponsorship programme Because of a lack of funds, many developing countries struggle to be represented at UN PoA review conferences by their key officials dealing with SALW issues. The Union could fund a sponsorship programme for a selected group of most-affected countries in order to enable the participation of those officials in RevCon3. Activities: UNODA will manage travel to and accommodation at RevCon3 (not the Preparatory Committee earlier in 2018) for up to 20 participants. Participants will be selected by the EEAS upon recommendation by UNODA, including its regional centres. In principle, selected officials should be designated UN PoA national points of contact. Other criteria for selection include gender considerations, timely submission of a national report, active participation in regional conferences or thematic symposia and knowledge of and experience in the topics at hand. During the RevCon3, UNODA will set up a meeting with the sponsored participants and delegations from the Union and its Member States. Results: — RevCon3 deliberations enriched by the expertise of those who deal directly with issues of SALW from affected countries who usually cannot afford to attend the RevCon; — Greater networking opportunities for developing-country officials, including key representatives of civil society organisations who deal with SALW issues; — Possible synergies with side events and training activities related to RevCon3. 2.4.2 Technical support to the RevCon3 President The President and his/her team will benefit from technical expertise provided by the UN Secretariat with the support of a senior expert from Small Arms Survey. Activities: The UN Secretariat, supported by the Small Arms Survey senior expert, will enhance its capacity to advise the President and his/her team on the complex and technical aspects of the work of RevCon3. Results: The President will have access to a full range of expertise in substantive and technical issues related to RevCon3. 2.5 Outreach Outreach through press statements and side events will be a vital part of the project. Moreover, a RevCon3 web platform could draw attention to the key topics for RevCon3 and to assistance/capacity building. Activities: — Joint press statements accompanying symposia and regional conferences. Media coverage; — Side events on the project at relevant meetings including the First Committee of the GA (2017) and the Third Conference of State Parties of the ATT; — UNODA will set up dedicated webpages for RevCon3 one year in advance. That will be the main platform for posting documents and interacting with Member States, regional organisations and institutions. The platform will include thematic areas and particular attention will be given to linking assistance needs with available resources. Results: Effective information management on the project and its outcomes; a dynamic RevCon3 web platform within the formal UN PoA web environment that includes thematic approaches and allows for the matching of assistance needs with available resources. 3. DELIVERABLES The implementing agencies will produce and submit the following deliverables to the Union: — Deliverables 1-5: Summary reports of the four thematic conferences; — Deliverables 6-11: Summary reports of the five regional conferences; — Deliverable 12: A comprehensive assessment of national reports on UN PoA implementation; — Deliverable 13: A final report at the completion of the project. (1) A/CONF.192/BMS/2016/2 §37, §55, §56, §57, §74, §75, §82, §83, §84, §105. (2) A/CONF.192/BMS/2016/2 §15, §23, §24,§25, §40,§41, §52, §59, §60, §101. (3) A/CONF.192/BMS/2016/2 §63, §79, §90. (4) A/CONF.192/BMS/2016/2 §12, §14, §62, §67, §107.

Summary: Small arms and light weapons Small arms and light weapons SUMMARY OF: Decision (CFSP) 2017/633 in support of the United Nations programme of action to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons WHAT IS THE AIM OF THE DECISION? It aims to tackle the illicit trade in small arms* and light weapons* (SALW) and to prevent them falling into the hands of terrorists and illegal armed groups. It confirms the European Union’s commitment to the full global, national and regional implementation of United Nations (UN) action in this area. KEY POINTS The EU supported the work of the 2018 UN conference reviewing the implementation of anti-SALW measures (‘RevCon3’ for short) by organising: 4 thematic SALW conferences between April and November 2017, each with some 40 relevant experts, on: tracing and stockpiling in conflict and post-conflict situationslinks with the UN’s sustainable development goals 16 (peace, justice and strong institutions) and 5 (gender equality)recent developments in manufacture, technology and designsynergies between the UN and other measures; 5 regional conferences on the same 4 themes between June 2017 and February 2018 with experts from national governments and regional organisations; an analysis of national reports implementing the UN measures; a sponsorship programme for participating countries with limited funds and technical support for the RevCon3 presidency; outreach through press statements and various events. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy is responsible for ensuring that the EU decision, which has a budget of €2.8 million, is implemented. FROM WHEN DOES THE DECISION APPLY? It has applied since 3 April 2017. BACKGROUND 20 July 2001: the UN programme of action to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade in SALW in all its aspects (known as the ‘UN programme of action’) is adopted. 8 December 2005: the UN General Assembly adopts the international instrument to enable states to identify and trace, in a timely and reliable manner, illicit SALW (known as the ‘International Tracing Instrument’). For more information, see: Arms trade: EU adopts comprehensive approach to scourge of illicit weapons (European External Action Service). KEY TERMS Small arms: revolvers and self-loading pistols, rifles and carbines, submachine guns, assault rifles, and light machine guns. Light weapons: heavy machine guns, portable anti-aircraft guns, mortars, ammunition, shells, hand grenades, landmines and explosives. MAIN DOCUMENT Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/633 of 3 April 2017 in support of the United Nations programme of action to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons in all its aspects (OJ L 90, 4.4.2017, pp. 12-21) RELATED DOCUMENTS Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1908 of 22 October 2015 in support of a global reporting mechanism on illicit small arms and light weapons and other illicit conventional weapons and ammunition to reduce the risk of their illicit trade (‘iTrace II’) (OJ L 278, 23.10.2015, pp. 15-25) Council Decision 2011/428/CFSP of 18 July 2011 in support of United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs activities to implement the United Nations programme of actions to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons in all its aspects (OJ L 188, 19.7.2011, pp. 37-41) Council Joint Action 2008/113/CFSP of 12 February 2008 in support of the International Instrument to Enable States to Identify and Trace, in a Timely and Reliable Manner, Illicit Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) in the framework of the EU strategy to combat the illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition (OJ L 40, 14.2.2008, pp. 16-19) Council Joint Action 2002/589/CFSP of 12 July 2002 on the European Unions contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons and repealing Joint Action 1999/34/CFSP (OJ L 191, 19.7.2002, pp. 1-4) last update 28.02.2019