 Osbert was no longer archdeacon by 1158 , as his successor is attested by that point . Osbert , however , continued to call himself " archdeacon " even though he held land as a secular lord , including lands in Lacy and Skipton . He also acted as a steward for Hugh de Tilly . Osbert was still alive in 1184 , as he was a witness to a document at York then , and may have been alive as late as 1194 , when Hugh Bardulf was responsible for the farm of Osbert 's lands , as the record of that transaction in the escheat roll is unclear if Osbert was alive at that time or dead . 
 Osbert was no longer archdeacon by 1158 , as his successor is attested by that point . Osbert , however , continued to call himself " archdeacon " even though he held land as a secular lord , including lands in Lacy and Skipton . He also acted as a steward for Hugh de Tilly . Osbert was still alive in 1184 , as he was a witness to a document at York then , and may have been alive as late as 1194 , when Hugh Bardulf was responsible for the farm of Osbert <a href='null_genetive' title='1'><mark>'s</mark></a>lands , as the record of that transaction in the escheat roll <a href='drop_aux' title='2'><mark>is</mark></a>unclear if Osbert was alive at that time or dead . 
Osbert was no longer archdeacon by 1158 , as his successor is attested by that point . Osbert , however , continued to call hisself " archdeacon " even though he held land as a secular lord , including lands in Lacy and Skipton . He also acted as a steward fir Hugh de Tilly . Osbert was still alive in 1184 , as he was a witness to a document at York then , and may have been alive as late as 1194 , when Hugh Bardulf was responsible for the farm of Osbert  lands , as da record of that transaction in the escheat roll unclear if Osbert was alive at that time or dead .