 In contrast , a Time magazine article at the time felt that Steiner 's intention for the Hitler speech was to use it to explore his previously stated belief " that Hitler wielded language as an almost supernatural force " , drawing attention to Nazi hunter Emmanuel Lieber 's warning from the book regarding Hitler : " There shall come a man who ... will know the grammar of hell and teach it to others . He will know the sounds of madness and loathing and make them seem music . " 
 In contrast , a Time magazine article at the time felt that Steiner <a href='null_genetive' title='1'><mark>'s</mark></a>intention for the Hitler speech was to use it to explore his previously stated belief " that Hitler wielded language as an almost supernatural force " , drawing attention to Nazi hunter Emmanuel Lieber <a href='null_genetive' title='2'><mark>'s</mark></a>warning from the book regarding Hitler : " <a href='dey_it' title='3'><mark>There</mark></a> shall come a man <a href='null_relcl' title='4'><mark>who</mark></a>... will know the grammar of hell and teach it to others . He will know the sounds of madness and loathing and make them seem music . " 
In contrast , a Time magazine article at the time felt dat Steiner  intention for the Hitler speech was to use it to explore his previously stated belief " tdatHitler wielded language as an almost supernatural force " , drawing attention to Nazi hunter Emmanuel Lieber  warning from the book regarding Hitler : " It shall come a man ... will knoe the grammar of hell and teach it to others . He will knoe da sounds of madness and loathing and make them seem music . "