 " the fundamental point is that Google could stop this material appearing but they don 't , or they won 't as a matter of principle . My position is that if the search engines - if somebody were to stop the search engines producing the material , the actual sites don 't really matter because without a search engine , nobody will find it , it would just be a few friends of the person who posts it . The really dangerous things are the search engines . " 
 " the fundamental point is that Google could stop this material appearing but they don 't , or they won 't as a matter of principle . My position is that if the search engines - if somebody <a href='uninflect' title='1'><mark>were</mark></a> to stop the search engines producing the material , the actual sites don 't really matter because without <a href='None' title='2'><mark>a</mark></a>search <a href='negative_concord' title='3'><mark>engine</mark></a> , nobody will find it , it would just be a few friends of the person <a href='null_relcl' title='4'><mark>who</mark></a><a href='uninflect' title='5'><mark>posts</mark></a> it . The really dangerous things <a href='drop_aux' title='6'><mark>are</mark></a>the search engines . " 
 da fundamental point is dat Google could stop dis material appearing but they don 't , or they won 't as a matter of principle . My position is tdatif the search engines - if somebody was to stop tdasearch engines producing thdaaterial , thedatual sites don 't really matter because without search no engine , nobody will find it , it would jus b a few frens of the person post it . The really dangerous things the search engines . 