 The book caused a great deal of controversy among critics , with some calling it " irresponsible " , and saying it was " determined to give offense " and " appears to endorse violence " . One critic of the book wrote , " The work rapidly becomes an apology for political terrorism and effectively advocates the assassination of the entire American New Right . While the reasons for such a vengeance motif are perhaps evident , can it really be countenanced ? Are we still justified in referring to this as art ? And even if we are , is there a point at which such invective ( and such suggestions ) become simply counterproductive ? " Another critic , however , called it " a masterful creation " and wrote : " In coming years Baker will be seen as having understood the implications of this period in our history while the rest of us were simply living it " . It polarized the reading public as well , with letters to the editor of major newspapers both supporting and opposing Baker 's ideology . Baker himself was aware that the book would be controversial , and deliberately provoked much of the reaction he received . He said : " Tim and Pete tries to convey in print what people really think rather than what they should think or what 's P.C. My fantasy was to leave readers so infuriated they 'd throw down the book and march right out to a gun store because they wanted to see the finale so bad they realize the only way it 'd happen is if they make it happen in real life ! " 
 The book caused a great deal of controversy among critics , with some calling it " irresponsible " , and saying it was " determined to give offense " and " <a href='uninflect' title='1'><mark>appears</mark></a> to endorse violence " . One critic of the book wrote , " The work rapidly <a href='uninflect' title='2'><mark>becomes</mark></a> an apology for political terrorism and effectively <a href='uninflect' title='3'><mark>advocates</mark></a> the assassination of the entire American New Right . While the reasons for such a vengeance motif <a href='drop_aux' title='4'><mark>are</mark></a>perhaps evident , can it really be countenanced ? Are we still justified in referring to this as art ? And even if we <a href='drop_aux' title='5'><mark>are</mark></a>, is <a href='dey_it' title='6'><mark>there</mark></a> a point at which such invective ( and such suggestions ) become simply counterproductive ? " Another critic , however , called it " a masterful creation " and wrote : " In coming years Baker will be seen as <a href='been_done' title='7'><mark>having</mark></a> understood the implications of this period in our history while the rest of us <a href='uninflect' title='8'><mark>were</mark></a> simply living it " . It polarized the reading public as well , with letters to the editor of major newspapers both supporting and opposing Baker <a href='null_genetive' title='9'><mark>'s</mark></a>ideology . Baker himself was aware that the book would be controversial , and deliberately provoked much of the reaction he received . He said : " Tim and Pete <a href='uninflect' title='10'><mark>tries</mark></a> to convey in print what people really think rather than what they should think or what 's P.C. My fantasy was to leave readers so infuriated they 'd throw down the book and march right out to a gun store because they wanted to see the finale so bad they realize the only way it 'd happen is if they make it happen in real life ! " 
The book caused a great deal of controversy among critics , wit sum callin it " irresponsible " , and saying it was " determined to give offense " and " appear to endorse violence " . One critic of the book wrote , " The wrk rapidly become an apology for political terrorism and effectively advocate da assassination of the entire American New rite . While tdareasons for such a vengeance motif perhaps evident , can it really be countenanced ? r we still justified in referring to this as art ? And even if we , is it a point at which such invective ( and such suggestions ) become simply counterproductive ? " Another critic , however , called it " a masterful creation " and wrote : " In commin yrs Baker will be seen as done understood the implications of dis period in our history while the rest of us was simply living it " . It polarized the reading public as well , with letters to thdaditor of major newspapers both supporting and opposing Baker  ideology . Baker himself was aware dat thedaok would be controversial , and deliberately provoked much of the daction he received . He said : " Tim and Pete try to convey in print wat people really think rather den what they should think or what 's P.C. mah fantasy was to leave readers so infuriated they 'd throw down the book and march rryteout to a gun store bc they wanted to see the fdale so badd they kno the ondaway it 'd happen is if they make it happen in real life ! "