 Another Buddhist logician Dharmakirti ridiculed anekāntavāda in Pramānavarttikakārika : " With the differentiation removed , all things have dual nature . Then , if somebody is implored to eat curd , then why he does not eat camel ? " The insinuation is obvious ; if curd exists from the nature of curd and does not exist from the nature of a camel , then one is justified in eating camel , as by eating camel , he is merely eating the negation of curd . Ācārya Akalanka , while agreeing that Dharmakirti may be right from one viewpoint , took it upon himself to issue a rejoinder : 
 Another Buddhist logician Dharmakirti ridiculed anekāntavāda in Pramānavarttikakārika : " With the differentiation removed , all things <a href='got' title='1'><mark>have</mark></a> dual nature . Then , if somebody is implored to eat curd , then why he <a href='uninflect' title='2'><mark>does</mark></a> not eat <a href='negative_concord' title='3'><mark>camel</mark></a> ? " The insinuation is obvious ; if curd <a href='uninflect' title='4'><mark>exists</mark></a> from the nature of curd and <a href='uninflect' title='5'><mark>does</mark></a> not exist from <a href='None' title='6'><mark>the</mark></a><a href='negative_concord' title='7'><mark>nature</mark></a> of a camel , then one is justified in eating camel , as by eating camel , he is merely eating the negation of curd . Ācārya Akalanka , while agreeing that Dharmakirti may be right from one viewpoint , took it upon himself to issue a rejoinder : 
Anotha Buddhist logician Dharmakirti ridiculed anekāntavāda in Pramānavarttikakārika : " w the differentiation removed , all things got dual nature . Then , if sumbody is implored to eat curd , then why he do not eat no camel ? " The insinuation is obvious ; if curd exist from the nature of curd and do not exist from no nature of a camel , then one is justified in eating camel , as by eatin camel , he is merely eating the negation of curd . Ācārya Akalanka , while agreeing that Dharmakirti may be ryte from one viewpoint , took it upon himself to issue a rejoinder :