 David Bushnell , writing in The Hispanic American Historical Review , points out that the work is less a pure historical account than others suggest . García Márquez 's Bolívar is a man " who wanders naked through the house , suffers constipation , uses foul language , and much more besides . " He argues that documentation does not support many of these details . Bushnell suggests , however , that the fact that the novel is not entirely historically accurate does not necessarily distinguish it from the work of professional historians . The main difference , Bushnell believes , is that García Márquez 's work " is far more readable " than a pure history . 
 David Bushnell , writing in The Hispanic American Historical Review , <a href='uninflect' title='1'><mark>points</mark></a> out that the work is less a pure historical account than others suggest . García Márquez <a href='null_genetive' title='2'><mark>'s</mark></a>Bolívar <a href='drop_aux' title='3'><mark>is</mark></a>a man " who <a href='uninflect' title='4'><mark>wanders</mark></a> naked through the house , <a href='uninflect' title='5'><mark>suffers</mark></a> constipation , <a href='uninflect' title='6'><mark>uses</mark></a> foul language , and much more besides . " He <a href='uninflect' title='7'><mark>argues</mark></a> that documentation <a href='uninflect' title='8'><mark>does</mark></a> not support many of these details . Bushnell <a href='uninflect' title='9'><mark>suggests</mark></a> , however , that the fact that the novel <a href='negative_concord' title='10'><mark>is</mark></a> <a href='negative_concord' title='11'><mark>not</mark></a>entirely historically accurate <a href='uninflect' title='12'><mark>does</mark></a> not necessarily distinguish it from <a href='None' title='13'><mark>the</mark></a><a href='negative_concord' title='14'><mark>work</mark></a> of professional historians . The main difference , Bushnell <a href='uninflect' title='15'><mark>believes</mark></a> , is that García Márquez <a href='null_genetive' title='16'><mark>'s</mark></a>work " is far more readable " than a pure history . 
David Bushnell , writing in The Hispanic American Historical Review , point out dat da wrk is less a pure historical account den others suggest . García Márquez  Bolívar a man " who wander naked through the house , suffer constipation , use foul language , and much more besides . " He argue that documentation do not support many of these details . Bushnell suggest , however , that tdafact that the novel ain't entirely historically accurate do not necessarily distinguish it from no work of professional historians . Thdaain difference , Bushnell believe , is that García Márquez  wwrk" is far more readable " than a pure history .