 Finally , the successor of Djedkare , Unas , is thought to have been his son in spite of the complete lack of evidence bearing on the question . The main argument in favor of this filiation is that the succession from Djedkare Isesi to Unas seems to have been smooth , as suggested indirectly , for example , by the Abusir papyri . Indirect evidence also comes from the reliefs of Unas ' causeway , which show many officials bearing names incorporating " Isesi " , suggesting at the very least that Unas did not perceive Djedkare as an antagonist . 
 Finally , the successor of Djedkare , Unas , is thought to have been his son in spite of the complete lack of evidence bearing on the question . The main argument in favor of this filiation is that the succession from Djedkare Isesi to Unas <a href='uninflect' title='1'><mark>seems</mark></a> to have been smooth , as suggested indirectly , for example , by the Abusir papyri . Indirect evidence also <a href='uninflect' title='2'><mark>comes</mark></a> from the reliefs of Unas <a href='null_genetive' title='3'><mark>'</mark></a>causeway , which show many officials bearing names incorporating " Isesi " , suggesting at the very least that Unas did not perceive Djedkare as <a href='None' title='4'><mark>an</mark></a><a href='negative_concord' title='5'><mark>antagonist</mark></a> . 
Finally , the successor of Djedkare , Unas , is thought to have been his son in spite of the complete lack of evidence bearing on da question . Tdamain argument in favor of this filiation is that the succession from Djedkare Isesi to Unas seem to have been smooth , as suggested indirectly , for example , by thdabusir papyri . Indirect evidence also cum from thedaliefs of Unas  causeway , which show many officials bearing names incorporating " Isesi " , suggesting at the very least dat Unas did not perceive Djedkare as no antagonist .