 Does it matter whether a white man is charged with killing a black man or a black man is charged with killing a white man ? As for justice when the prosecutor represents the Commonwealth the Judge represents the Commonwealth and the court @-@ appointed lawyer is paid and supported by the Commonwealth , who follows the wishes of the defendant , the man charged with the crime ? If the court @-@ appointed lawyer ignores , or goes against the wishes of the man he is charged with representing , whose wishes does he follow ? Who does he truly represent or work for ? ... I am innocent of these charges that I have been charged of and convicted of and despite the connivance of Sabo , McGill and Jackson to deny me my so @-@ called rights to represent myself , to assistance of my choice , to personally select a jury who is totally of my peers , to cross @-@ examine witnesses , and to make both opening and closing arguments , I am still innocent of these charges . 
 <a href='uninflect' title='1'><mark>Does</mark></a> it matter whether a white man is charged with killing a black man or a black man is charged with killing a white man ? As for justice when the prosecutor <a href='uninflect' title='2'><mark>represents</mark></a> the Commonwealth the Judge <a href='uninflect' title='3'><mark>represents</mark></a> the Commonwealth and the court @-@ appointed lawyer is paid and supported by the Commonwealth , <a href='null_relcl' title='4'><mark>who</mark></a><a href='uninflect' title='5'><mark>follows</mark></a> the wishes of the defendant , the man charged with the crime ? If the court @-@ appointed lawyer ignores , or <a href='uninflect' title='6'><mark>goes</mark></a> against the wishes of the man he is charged with representing , whose wishes <a href='uninflect' title='7'><mark>does</mark></a> he follow ? Who <a href='uninflect' title='8'><mark>does</mark></a> he truly represent or work for ? ... I am innocent of these charges <a href='null_relcl' title='9'><mark>that</mark></a>I <a href='been_done' title='10'><mark>have</mark></a> been charged of and convicted of and despite the connivance of Sabo , McGill and Jackson to deny me my so @-@ called rights to represent myself , to assistance of my choice , to personally select a jury <a href='null_relcl' title='11'><mark>who</mark></a><a href='drop_aux' title='12'><mark>is</mark></a>totally of my peers , to cross @-@ examine witnesses , and to make both opening and closing arguments , I am still innocent of these charges . 
Do it matter whether a white man is charged with killing a black man or a black man is charged wit killin a white man ? As for justice when the prosecutor represent da Commonwealth tdaJudge represent the Commonwealth and the court @-@ appointed lawyer is paid and supported by the Commonwealth , follow the wishes of thdaefendant , thedan charged wwthe crime ? If the court @-@ appointed lawyer ignores , or go against the wishes of the man he is charged with representing , whose wishes do he follow ? Who do he truly represent or work fa ? ... I am innocent of these charges I done been charged of and convicted of and despite the connivance of Sabo , McGill and Jackson to deny me mah so @-@ called rights to represent myself , to assistance of my choice , to personally select a jury totally of my peers , to cross @-@ examine witnesses , and to make both opening and closing arguments , I am still innocent of dese charges .