 Vargas Llosa also built an image of the regime with the troubled historical events . With regard to the historical accuracy of the book , Vargas Llosa has said " It 's a novel , not a history book , so I took many , many liberties . The only limitation I imposed on myself was that I was not going to invent anything that couldn 't have happened within the framework of life in the Dominican Republic . I have respected the basic facts , but I have changed and deformed many things in order to make the story more persuasive — and I have not exaggerated . " 
 Vargas Llosa also built an image of the regime with the troubled historical events . With regard to the historical accuracy of the book , Vargas Llosa <a href='been_done' title='1'><mark>has</mark></a> said " It 's a novel , not a history book , so I took many , many liberties . The only limitation I imposed on myself was that I was not going to invent anything that couldn 't <a href='been_done' title='2'><mark>have</mark></a> happened within the framework of life in the Dominican Republic . I <a href='been_done' title='3'><mark>have</mark></a> respected the basic facts , but I <a href='been_done' title='4'><mark>have</mark></a> changed and deformed many things in order to make the story more persuasive — and I <a href='been_done' title='5'><mark>have</mark></a> not exaggerated . " 
Vargas Llosa also built an image of the regime w da troubled historical events . With regard to tdahistorical accuracy of the book , Vargas Llosa done said " It 's a novel , not a history book , so I took many , many liberties . The only limitation I imposed on myself was dat I was not going to invent anything that couldn 't done happened within thdaramework of life in the Dominican Republic . I done respected thedasic facts , but I done changed and deformed many things in order to make the story more persuasive — and I done not exaggerated . "