 Triceratops is by far the best @-@ known ceratopsian to the general public . It is traditional for ceratopsian genus names to end in " -ceratops " , although this is not always the case . One of the first named genera was Ceratops itself , which lent its name to the group , although it is considered a nomen dubium today as its fossil remains have no distinguishing characteristics that are not also found in other ceratopsians . 
 Triceratops <a href='drop_aux' title='1'><mark>is</mark></a>by far the best @-@ known ceratopsian to the general public . It <a href='drop_aux' title='2'><mark>is</mark></a>traditional for ceratopsian genus names to end in " -ceratops " , although this <a href='negative_concord' title='3'><mark>is</mark></a> <a href='negative_concord' title='4'><mark>not</mark></a>always <a href='None' title='5'><mark>the</mark></a><a href='negative_concord' title='6'><mark>case</mark></a> . One of the first named genera was Ceratops itself , which lent its name to the group , although it is considered a nomen dubium today as its fossil remains <a href='got' title='7'><mark>have</mark></a> no distinguishing characteristics <a href='null_relcl' title='8'><mark>that</mark></a>are not also found in other ceratopsians . 
Triceratops by far the best @-@ known ceratopsian to da general public . It traditional for ceratopsian genus names to end in " -ceratops " , although dis ain't always no case . One of the first named genera was Ceratops itself , which lent its name to the group , although it is considered a nomen dubium today as its fossil remains got no distinguishing characteristics ain't also found in other ceratopsians .