 However , Nigel Andrews of the Financial Times found it " like a pastoral parable that has been left outside in the damp too long , causing its batteries to go flat " and following a 2008 screening , Sam Jordison of The Guardian suggested " even though this film is ( unusually ) faithful to the book ... it is really little better than inoffensive . Somehow the magic that makes JL Carr 's book so precious is missing . " 
 However , Nigel Andrews of the Financial Times found it " like a pastoral parable <a href='null_relcl' title='1'><mark>that</mark></a><a href='been_done' title='2'><mark>has</mark></a> been left outside in the damp too long , causing its batteries to go flat " and following a 2008 screening , Sam Jordison of The Guardian suggested " even though this film <a href='drop_aux' title='3'><mark>is</mark></a>( unusually ) faithful to the book ... it is really little better than inoffensive . Somehow the magic <a href='null_relcl' title='4'><mark>that</mark></a><a href='uninflect' title='5'><mark>makes</mark></a> JL Carr <a href='null_genetive' title='6'><mark>'s</mark></a>book so precious is missing . " 
However , Nigel Andrews of da Financial Times found it " like a pastoral parable done been left outside in tdadamp too long , causing its batteries to go flat " and following a 2008 screening , Sam Jordison of The Guardian suggested " even tho this film ( unusually ) faithful to thdaook ... it is really little better than inoffensive . Somehow the magic make JL Carr  book so precious is missin . "