 In his survey of cricket laws , Gerald Brodribb suggests that " no dismissal has produced so much argument as lbw ; it has caused trouble from its earliest days " . Among those who do not follow cricket , the law has the reputation of being extremely difficult to understand , of equivalent complexity to association football 's offside rule . Owing to the difficulty of its interpretation , lbw is regarded by critics as the most controversial of the laws but also a yardstick by which an umpire 's abilities are judged . In his book Cricket and the Law : The Man in White Is Always Right , David Fraser writes that umpires ' lbw decisions are frequently criticised and " arguments about bias and incompetence in adjudication inform almost every discussion about lbw decisions . " Problems arise because the umpire has not only to establish what has happened but also to speculate over what might have occurred . Controversial aspects of lbw decisions include the umpire having to determine whether the ball pitched outside leg stump , and in certain circumstances whether the batsman intended to hit the ball or leave it alone . Umpires are frequently criticised for their lbw decisions by players , commentators and spectators . Historically , trouble ranging from protests and arguments to crowd demonstrations occasionally arose from disputed decisions . For example , a prolonged crowd disturbance , in which items were thrown onto the playing field and the match was delayed , took place when Mohammad Azharuddin was adjudged lbw during a 1996 One Day International in India . 
 In his survey of cricket laws , Gerald Brodribb <a href='uninflect' title='1'><mark>suggests</mark></a> that " no dismissal <a href='been_done' title='2'><mark>has</mark></a> produced so much argument as lbw ; it <a href='been_done' title='3'><mark>has</mark></a> caused trouble from its earliest days " . Among those <a href='null_relcl' title='4'><mark>who</mark></a>do not follow <a href='negative_concord' title='5'><mark>cricket</mark></a> , the law <a href='got' title='6'><mark>has</mark></a> the reputation of being extremely difficult to understand , of equivalent complexity to association football <a href='null_genetive' title='7'><mark>'s</mark></a>offside rule . Owing to the difficulty of its interpretation , lbw is regarded by critics as the most controversial of the laws but also a yardstick by which an umpire <a href='null_genetive' title='8'><mark>'s</mark></a>abilities are judged . In his book Cricket and the Law : The Man in White Is Always Right , David Fraser <a href='uninflect' title='9'><mark>writes</mark></a> that umpires <a href='null_genetive' title='10'><mark>'</mark></a>lbw decisions are frequently criticised and " arguments about bias and incompetence in adjudication inform almost every discussion about lbw decisions . " Problems arise because the umpire <a href='uninflect' title='11'><mark>has</mark></a> not only to establish what <a href='been_done' title='12'><mark>has</mark></a> happened but also to speculate over what might <a href='been_done' title='13'><mark>have</mark></a> occurred . Controversial aspects of lbw decisions include the umpire having to determine whether the ball pitched outside leg stump , and in certain circumstances whether the batsman intended to hit the ball or leave it alone . Umpires are frequently criticised for their lbw decisions by players , commentators and spectators . Historically , trouble ranging from protests and arguments to crowd demonstrations occasionally arose from disputed decisions . For example , a prolonged crowd disturbance , in which items <a href='uninflect' title='14'><mark>were</mark></a> thrown onto the playing field and the match was delayed , took place when Mohammad Azharuddin was adjudged lbw during a 1996 One Day International in India . 
In his survey of cricket laws , Gerald Brodribb suggest dat " no dismissal done produced so much argument as lbw ; it done caused trouble from its earliest days " . Among those do not follow no cricket , the law got the reputation of being extremely difficult to understand , of equivalent complexity to association football  offside rule . Owing to da difficulty of its interpretation , lbw is regarded by critics as tdamost controversial of the laws but also a yardstick by which an umpire  abilities r judged . In his book Cricket and thdaaw : The Man in White Is Always rite , David Fraser write that umpires  lbw decisions arrrequently criticised and " arguments abt bias and incompetence in adjudication inform almost every discussion about lbw decisions . " Problems arise because the umpire have not only to establish what done happened but also to speculate ova what might done occurred . Controversial aspects of lbw decisions include the umpire having to determine whether thedall pitched outside leg stump , and in certain circumstances whether the batsman intended to hit the ball or leave it alone . Umpires are rquently criticised for their lbw decisions by players , commentators and spectators . Historically , trouble ranging from protests and arguments to crowd demonstrations occasionally arose from disputed decisions . For example , a prolonged crowd disturbance , in which items was thrown onto the playing field and the match was delayed , took place when Mohammad Azharuddin was adjudged lbw during a 1996 One Day International in India .