 Since 1993 , the proportion of lbws in each English season has risen steadily . According to cricket historian Douglas Miller , the percentage of lbw dismissals increased after broadcasters incorporated ball @-@ tracking technology such as Hawk @-@ Eye into their television coverage of matches . Miller writes : " With the passage of time and the adoption of Hawkeye into other sports , together with presentations demonstrating its accuracy , cricket followers seem gradually to have accepted its predictions . Replay analyses have shown that a greater proportion of balls striking an outstretched leg go on to hit the wicket than had once been expected . " He also suggests that umpires have been influenced by such evidence ; their greater understanding of which deliveries are likely to hit the stumps has made them more likely to rule out batsmen who are standing further away from the stumps . This trend is replicated in international cricket , where the increasing use of technology in reviewing decisions has altered the attitude of umpires . Spin bowlers in particular win far more appeals for lbw . However , the use of on @-@ field technology has proved controversial ; some critics regard it as more reliable than human judgement , while others believe that the umpire is better placed to make the decision . 
 Since 1993 , the proportion of lbws in each English season <a href='been_done' title='1'><mark>has</mark></a> risen steadily . According to cricket historian Douglas Miller , the percentage of lbw dismissals increased after broadcasters incorporated ball @-@ tracking technology such as Hawk @-@ Eye into their television coverage of matches . Miller <a href='uninflect' title='2'><mark>writes</mark></a> : " With the passage of time and the adoption of Hawkeye into other sports , together with presentations demonstrating its accuracy , cricket followers seem gradually to <a href='been_done' title='3'><mark>have</mark></a> accepted its predictions . Replay analyses <a href='been_done' title='4'><mark>have</mark></a> shown that a greater proportion of balls striking an outstretched leg go on to hit the wicket than <a href='been_done' title='5'><mark>had</mark></a> once been expected . " He also <a href='uninflect' title='6'><mark>suggests</mark></a> that umpires <a href='been_done' title='7'><mark>have</mark></a> been influenced by such evidence ; their greater understanding of which deliveries <a href='drop_aux' title='8'><mark>are</mark></a>likely to hit the stumps <a href='been_done' title='9'><mark>has</mark></a> made them more likely to rule out batsmen <a href='null_relcl' title='10'><mark>who</mark></a>are standing further away from the stumps . This trend is replicated in international cricket , where the increasing use of technology in reviewing decisions <a href='been_done' title='11'><mark>has</mark></a> altered the attitude of umpires . Spin bowlers in particular win far more appeals for lbw . However , the use of on @-@ field technology <a href='been_done' title='12'><mark>has</mark></a> proved controversial ; some critics regard it as more reliable than human judgement , while others believe that the umpire is better placed to make the decision . 
Since 1993 , da proportion of lbws in each English season done risen steadily . According to cricket historian Douglas Miller , tdapercentage of lbw dismissals increased after broadcasters incorporated ball @-@ tracking technology such as Hawk @-@ Eye into their television coverage of matches . Miller write : " With the passage of time and thdadoption of Hawkeye into other sports , together with presentations demonstrating its accuracy , cricket followers seem gradually to done accepted its predictions . Replay analyses done shown that a greater proportion of balls striking an outstretched leg go on to hit the wicket than done once been expected . " He also suggest that umpires done been influenced by such evidence ; their greater understanding of which deliveries likely to hit thedaumps done made them more likely to rule out batsmen are standing further away from the stumps . dis trend is replicated in international cricket , where the increasing use of technology in reviewing decisions done altered the attitude of umpires . Spin bowlers in particular win far more appeals fir lbw . However , the use of on @-@ field technology done proved controversial ; some critics regard it as more reliable than human judgement , while others believe that the umpire is betta placed to make the decision .