 However , typographic opinions are typically anecdotal with no basis in evidence . " Opinions are not always safe guides to legibility of print " , and when direct studies are conducted , anecdotal opinions — even those of experts — can turn out to be false . Text that seems legible ( visually pleasing at first glance ) may be shown to actually impair reading effectiveness when subjected to scientific study . 
 However , typographic opinions <a href='drop_aux' title='1'><mark>are</mark></a>typically anecdotal with no basis in evidence . " Opinions <a href='negative_concord' title='2'><mark>are</mark></a> <a href='negative_concord' title='3'><mark>not</mark></a>always safe guides to <a href='negative_concord' title='4'><mark>legibility</mark></a> of print " , and when direct studies are conducted , anecdotal opinions — even those of experts — can turn out to be false . Text <a href='null_relcl' title='5'><mark>that</mark></a><a href='uninflect' title='6'><mark>seems</mark></a> legible ( visually pleasing at first glance ) may be shown to actually impair reading effectiveness when subjected to scientific study . 
However , typographic opinions typically anecdotal with no basis in evidence . " Opinions ain't always safe guides to no legibility of print " , and when direct studies are conducted , anecdotal opinions — even those of experts — can turn outt to be false . Text seem legible ( visually pleasing at first glance ) may be shown to actually impair reading effectiveness when subjected to scientific study .