 I am an Advaitist and yet I can support Dvaitism ( dualism ) . The world is changing every moment , and is therefore unreal , it has no permanent existence . But though it is constantly changing , it has a something about it which persists and it is therefore to that extent real . I have therefore no objection to calling it real and unreal , and thus being called an Anekāntavadi or a Syādvadi . But my Syādvāda is not the Syādvāda of the learned , it is peculiarly my own . I cannot engage in a debate with them . It has been my experience that I am always true from my point of view , and am often wrong from the point of view of my honest critics . I know that we are both right from our respective points of view . And this knowledge saves me from attributing motives to my opponents or critics . The seven blind men who gave seven different descriptions of the elephant were all right from their respective points of view , and wrong from the point of view of one another , and right and wrong from the point of view of the man who knew the elephant . I very much like this doctrine of the manyness of reality . It is this doctrine that has taught me to judge a Musulman from his standpoint and a Christian from his . Formerly I used to resent the ignorance of my opponents . Today I can love them because I am gifted with the eye to see myself as others see me and vice versa . I want to take the whole world in the embrace of my love . My Anekāntavāda is the result of the twin doctrine of Satyagraha and ahiṃsā . 
 I am an Advaitist and yet I can support Dvaitism ( dualism ) . The world is changing every moment , and <a href='drop_aux' title='1'><mark>is</mark></a>therefore unreal , it <a href='got' title='2'><mark>has</mark></a> no permanent existence . But though it is constantly changing , it <a href='got' title='3'><mark>has</mark></a> a something about it which <a href='uninflect' title='4'><mark>persists</mark></a> and it <a href='drop_aux' title='5'><mark>is</mark></a>therefore to that extent real . I <a href='got' title='6'><mark>have</mark></a> therefore no objection to calling it real and unreal , and thus being called an Anekāntavadi or a Syādvadi . But my Syādvāda <a href='negative_concord' title='7'><mark>is</mark></a> <a href='negative_concord' title='8'><mark>not</mark></a>the Syādvāda of the learned , it is peculiarly my own . I cannot engage in <a href='None' title='9'><mark>a</mark></a><a href='negative_concord' title='10'><mark>debate</mark></a> with them . It <a href='uninflect' title='11'><mark>has</mark></a> been my experience that I am always true from my point of view , and am often wrong from the point of view of my honest critics . I know that we are both right from our respective points of view . And this knowledge <a href='uninflect' title='12'><mark>saves</mark></a> me from attributing motives to my opponents or critics . The seven blind men <a href='null_relcl' title='13'><mark>who</mark></a>gave seven different descriptions of the elephant <a href='uninflect' title='14'><mark>were</mark></a> all right from their respective points of view , and wrong from the point of view of one another , and right and wrong from the point of view of the man <a href='null_relcl' title='15'><mark>who</mark></a>knew the elephant . I very much like this doctrine of the manyness of reality . It <a href='drop_aux' title='16'><mark>is</mark></a>this doctrine <a href='null_relcl' title='17'><mark>that</mark></a><a href='been_done' title='18'><mark>has</mark></a> taught me to judge a Musulman from his standpoint and a Christian from his . Formerly I used to resent the ignorance of my opponents . Today I can love them because I am gifted with the eye to see myself as others see me and vice versa . I want to take the whole world in the embrace of my love . My Anekāntavāda <a href='drop_aux' title='19'><mark>is</mark></a>the result of the twin doctrine of Satyagraha and ahiṃsā . 
I am an Advaitist and yet I can support Dvaitism ( dualism ) . The world is changing every moment , and therefore unreal , it got no permanent existence . But though it is constantly changing , it got a something bou it which persist and it therefore to dat extent real . I got therefore no objection to calling it real and unreal , and thus bein called an Anekāntavadi or a Syādvadi . But mah Syādvāda ain't da Syādvāda of tdalearned , it is peculiarly my own . I cannot engage in no debate with them . It have been my experience that I am always true from my point of view , and am often wrong from the point of view of my honest critics . I know that we r both ryte from our respective points of view . And this knowledge save me from attributing motives to my opponents or critics . The seven blind men gave seven different descriptions of thdalephant was alll rritefrom their respective points of view , and wrong from the point of view of one anotha , and right and wrong from thedaint of view of the man knew the elephant . I very much like dis doctrine of the manyness of reality . It this doctrine done taught me to judge a Musulman from his standpoint and a Christian from his . Formerly I used to resent the ignorance ofmahy opponents . Today I can luvv them b/c I am gifted w the eye to see myself as others see me and vice versa . I want to take the dale world in the edaace of my luv . My Anekāntavāda the result of the twin doctrine of Satyagraha and ahiṃsā .