 In her own review of Peshkin 's book , Rose ( Contemporary Sociology ) praised its " clear and detailed " contribution to the field but wished for more overview material on the Christian School Movement 's rise , proponents , philosophical consistency , and " sociohistorical context " . She wrote that few had studied Christian schools , the " fastest growing sector of private education in the United States " . In commending Peshkin 's even @-@ handedness , she wrote that his forthrightness about declaring his own biases and effort to present participant voices through direct quotation were strong elements , though he described more than he analyzed . Rose felt that the " interesting " final chapters of analysis and comparison with public schools " grounded " the overall ethnography , though she wished for more comparison of the adolescent student experience between the academy and other kinds of American schools . She considers Peshkin 's " discussion of the politics of pluralism " , that Christian schools both add to American religious pluralism while advocating against it , possibly his best contribution . 
 In her own review of Peshkin <a href='null_genetive' title='1'><mark>'s</mark></a>book , Rose ( Contemporary Sociology ) praised its " clear and detailed " contribution to the field but wished for more overview material on the Christian School Movement <a href='null_genetive' title='2'><mark>'s</mark></a>rise , proponents , philosophical consistency , and " sociohistorical context " . She wrote that few <a href='been_done' title='3'><mark>had</mark></a> studied Christian schools , the " fastest growing sector of private education in the United States " . In commending Peshkin <a href='null_genetive' title='4'><mark>'s</mark></a>even @-@ handedness , she wrote that his forthrightness about declaring his own biases and effort to present participant voices through direct quotation <a href='uninflect' title='5'><mark>were</mark></a> strong elements , though he described more than he analyzed . Rose felt that the " interesting " final chapters of analysis and comparison with public schools " grounded " the overall ethnography , though she wished for more comparison of the adolescent student experience between the academy and other kinds of American schools . She <a href='uninflect' title='6'><mark>considers</mark></a> Peshkin <a href='null_genetive' title='7'><mark>'s</mark></a>" discussion of the politics of pluralism " , <a href='null_relcl' title='8'><mark>that</mark></a>Christian schools both add to American religious pluralism while advocating against it , possibly his best contribution . 
In her own review of Peshkin  book , Rose ( Contemporary Sociology ) praised its " clear and detailed " contribution to the field but wished for more overview material on the Christian School Movement  rise , proponents , philosophical consistency , and " sociohistorical context " . She wrote dat few done studied Christian schools , the " fastest growin sector of private education in the United States " . In commending Peshkin  even @-@ handedness , she wrote that his forthrightness about declaring his own biases and effort to present participant voices through direct quotation was strong elements , though he described more den he analyzed . Rose felt tdatda " interesting " final chapters of analysis and comparison with public schools " grounded " the overall ethnography , doe she wished for more comparison of tdaadolescent student experience between thdacademy and other kinds of American schools . She consider Peshkin  " discussion of the politics of pluralism " , Christian schools both add to American religious pluralism while advocating against it , possibly his best contribution .