 The problem as I see it with the BDS movement is not the tactic . Who could not support Boycott , Divestment and Sanctions ? Of course you should . And most of the human rights organizations , church organizations have moved in that direction . The problem is the goal . . . The official BDS movement , they claim to be agnostic , neutral — whatever term you want to use — on the question of Israel . You can ’ t reach a broad public if you are agnostic on the question of Israel . The broad public wants to know , where do you stand ? And if you claim not to have a stand , you lose them . The BDS movement , it always says , and I ’ m using their language , " We are a rights @-@ based organization . We are based in international law . " I agree with that . That ’ s where you have to go : rights @-@ based international law . But the international law is clear . You read the last sentence of the 2004 International Court of Justice opinion on the wall that Israel has been building in the West Bank , and the last sentence says , " We look forward to two states : a Palestinian state alongside Israel and at peace with its neighbors . " That 's the law . 
 The problem as I see it with the BDS movement <a href='negative_concord' title='1'><mark>is</mark></a> <a href='negative_concord' title='2'><mark>not</mark></a><a href='None' title='3'><mark>the</mark></a><a href='negative_concord' title='4'><mark>tactic</mark></a> . Who could not support Boycott , Divestment and Sanctions ? Of course you should . And most of the human rights organizations , church organizations <a href='been_done' title='5'><mark>have</mark></a> moved in that direction . The problem <a href='drop_aux' title='6'><mark>is</mark></a>the goal . . . The official BDS movement , they claim to be agnostic , neutral — whatever term you want to use — on the question of Israel . You can ’ t reach a broad public if you <a href='drop_aux' title='7'><mark>are</mark></a>agnostic on the question of Israel . The broad public <a href='uninflect' title='8'><mark>wants</mark></a> to know , where do you stand ? And if you claim not to have <a href='None' title='9'><mark>a</mark></a><a href='negative_concord' title='10'><mark>stand</mark></a> , you lose them . The BDS movement , it always <a href='uninflect' title='11'><mark>says</mark></a> , and I ’ m using their language , " We <a href='drop_aux' title='12'><mark>are</mark></a>a rights @-@ based organization . We are based in international law . " I agree with that . That ’ s where you have to go : rights @-@ based international law . But the international law <a href='drop_aux' title='13'><mark>is</mark></a>clear . You read the last sentence of the 2004 International Court of Justice opinion on the wall <a href='null_relcl' title='14'><mark>that</mark></a>Israel <a href='uninflect' title='15'><mark>has</mark></a> been building in the West Bank , and the last sentence <a href='uninflect' title='16'><mark>says</mark></a> , " We look forward to two states : a Palestinian state alongside Israel and at peace with its neighbors . " That 's the law . 
Da problem as I see it wit the BDS movement ain't no tactic . Who could not support Boycott , Divestment and Sanctions ? Of course you should . And most of the human rights organizations , church organizations done moved in that direction . The problem the goal . . . The official BDS movement , they claim to be agnostic , neutral — whatever term you want to use — on tdaquestion of Israel . You can ’ t reach a broad public if you agnostic on thdauestion of Israel . The broad public want to know , where do you stand ? And if you claim not to have no stand , yu lose them . The BDS movement , it always say , and I ’ m using their language , " We a rights @-@ based organization . We are based in international law . " I agree with dat . That ’ s where yyugotta go : rights @-@ based international law . But thedaternational law clear . You read the last sentence of the da4 International Court of Justice opinion on the wall Israel have been building in the West Bank , and the lda sentence say , " We look forward to two states : a Palestinian state alongside Israel and at peace with its neighbors . " That 's the law .