 Hodgson – Arkell , Newcastle 2001 : 1 @.@  c4 c5 2 @.@  g3 g6 3 . Bg2 Bg7 4 . Nc3 Nc6 5 @.@  a3 a6 6 . Rb1 Rb8 7 @.@  b4 cxb4 8 @.@  axb4 b5 9 @.@  cxb5 axb5 Here Rowson remarks , " Both sides want to push their d @-@ pawn and play Bf4 / ... Bf5 , but White has to go first so Black gets to play ... d5 before White can play d4 . This doesn 't matter much , but it already points to the challenge that White faces here ; his most natural continuations allow Black to play the moves he wants to . I would therefore say that White is in ' Zugzwang Lite ' and that he remains in this state for several moves . " 10 . Nf3 d5 10 ... Nf6 11 @.@ 0 @-@ 0 0 @-@ 0 12.d3 d6 13.Bd2 Bd7 would transpose to the Portisch – Tal game below . 11 @.@  d4 Nf6 12 . Bf4 Rb6 13 . 0 @-@ 0 Bf5 14 . Rb3 0 @-@ 0 15 . Ne5 Ne4 16 @.@  h3 h5 ! ? Finally breaking the symmetry . 17 . Kh2 The position is still almost symmetrical , and White can find nothing useful to do with his extra move . Rowson whimsically suggests 17.h4 ! ? , forcing Black to be the one to break the symmetry . 17 ... Re8 ! Rowson notes that this is a useful waiting move , covering e7 , which needs protection in some lines , and possibly supporting an eventual ... e5 ( see Black 's twenty @-@ second move ) . White cannot copy it , since after 18.Re1 ? Nxf2 Black would win a pawn . 18 . Be3 ? ! Nxe5 ! 19 @.@  dxe5 Rc6 ! Rowson notes that with his more active pieces , " It looks like Black has some initiative . " If now 20.Nxd5 , Bxe5 " is at least equal for Black " . 20 . Nxb5 Bxe5 ! 20 ... Nxf2 ? 21.Qxd5 ! wins . 21 . Nd4 Bxd4 22 . Bxd4 e5 Rowson writes , " Now both sides have their trumps , but I think Black has some advantage , due to his extra central control , imposing knight and prospects for a kingside attack . " 23 @.@  b5 Rc8 24 . Bb2 d4 Now White has a difficult game : Rowson analyzes 25.e3 ? ! Nxg3 24.fxg3 Bc2 25.Qf3 Bxb3 26.exd4 Bc4 ! , winning ; 25.g4 hxg4 26.hxg4 Nxf2 ! 27.Rxf2 Bc2 , winning ; 25.Qe1 ! ? Rc2 ! with advantage ; and 25.f4 ( risky @-@ looking , but perhaps best ) Nc3 ! 26.Bxc3 dxc3 27.Qxd8 Rexd8 , and Black is better . 25 @.@  b6 ? Overlooking Black 's threat . 25 ... Nxf2 ! 26 . Qe1 If 26.Rxf2 , Bc2 forks White 's queen and rook . 26 ... Ne4 27 @.@  b7 Rb8 28 @.@  g4 hxg4 29 @.@  hxg4 Be6 30 . Rb5 Nf6 ! 31 . Rxf6 Qxf6 32 . Qg3 Bc4 33 @.@  g5 Qh8 + 0 – 1 
 Hodgson – Arkell , Newcastle 2001 : 1 @.@  c4 c5 2 @.@  g3 g6 3 . Bg2<a href='been_done' title='1'><mark></mark></a> <a href='uninflect' title='2'><mark>Bg7</mark></a> 4 . Nc3 Nc6 5 @.@  a3 a6 6 . Rb1 Rb8 7 @.@  b4 cxb4 8 @.@  axb4 b5 9 @.@  cxb5 axb5 Here Rowson <a href='uninflect' title='3'><mark>remarks</mark></a> , " Both sides want to push their d @-@ pawn and play Bf4 / ... Bf5 , but White <a href='uninflect' title='4'><mark>has</mark></a> to go first so Black <a href='uninflect' title='5'><mark>gets</mark></a> to play ... d5 before White can play d4 . This doesn 't matter much , but it already <a href='uninflect' title='6'><mark>points</mark></a> to the challenge <a href='null_relcl' title='7'><mark>that</mark></a>White <a href='uninflect' title='8'><mark>faces</mark></a> here ; his most natural continuations allow Black to play the moves he <a href='uninflect' title='9'><mark>wants</mark></a> to . I would therefore say that White is in ' Zugzwang Lite ' and that he <a href='uninflect' title='10'><mark>remains</mark></a> in this state for several moves . " 10 . Nf3 d5 10 ... Nf6 11 @.@ 0 @-@ 0 0 @-@ 0 12.d3 d6 13.Bd2 Bd7 would transpose to the Portisch – Tal game below . 11 @.@  d4 Nf6 12 . Bf4 Rb6 13 . 0 @-@ 0 Bf5 14 . Rb3 0 @-@ 0 15 . Ne5 Ne4 16 @.@  h3 h5 ! ? Finally breaking the symmetry . 17 . Kh2 The position <a href='drop_aux' title='11'><mark>is</mark></a>still almost symmetrical , and White can find nothing useful to do with his extra move . Rowson whimsically <a href='uninflect' title='12'><mark>suggests</mark></a> 17.h4 ! ? , forcing Black to be the one to break the symmetry . 17 ... Re8 ! Rowson <a href='uninflect' title='13'><mark>notes</mark></a> that this is a useful waiting move , covering e7 , which <a href='uninflect' title='14'><mark>needs</mark></a> protection in some lines , and possibly supporting an eventual ... e5 ( see Black <a href='null_genetive' title='15'><mark>'s</mark></a>twenty @-@ second move ) . White cannot copy it , since after 18.Re1 ? Nxf2 Black would win a pawn . 18 . Be3 ? ! Nxe5 ! 19 @.@  dxe5 Rc6 ! Rowson <a href='uninflect' title='16'><mark>notes</mark></a> that with his more active pieces , " It <a href='uninflect' title='17'><mark>looks</mark></a> like Black <a href='got' title='18'><mark>has</mark></a> some initiative . " If now 20.Nxd5 , Bxe5 " <a href='drop_aux' title='19'><mark>is</mark></a>at least equal for Black " . 20 . Nxb5 Bxe5 ! 20 ... Nxf2 ? 21.Qxd5 ! wins . 21 . Nd4 Bxd4 22 . Bxd4 e5 Rowson <a href='uninflect' title='20'><mark>writes</mark></a> , " Now both sides <a href='got' title='21'><mark>have</mark></a> their trumps , but I think Black <a href='got' title='22'><mark>has</mark></a> some advantage , due to his extra central control , imposing knight and prospects for a kingside attack . " 23 @.@  b5 Rc8 24 . Bb2 d4 Now White <a href='got' title='23'><mark>has</mark></a> a difficult game : Rowson <a href='uninflect' title='24'><mark>analyzes</mark></a> 25.e3 ? ! Nxg3 24.fxg3 Bc2 25.Qf3 Bxb3 26.exd4 Bc4 ! , winning ; 25.g4 hxg4 26.hxg4 Nxf2 ! 27.Rxf2 Bc2 , winning ; 25.Qe1 ! ? Rc2 ! with advantage ; and 25.f4 ( risky @-@ looking , but perhaps best ) Nc3 ! 26.Bxc3 dxc3 27.Qxd8 Rexd8 , and Black <a href='drop_aux' title='25'><mark>is</mark></a>better . 25 @.@  b6 ? Overlooking Black <a href='null_genetive' title='26'><mark>'s</mark></a>threat . 25 ... Nxf2 ! 26 . Qe1 If 26.Rxf2 , Bc2 <a href='uninflect' title='27'><mark>forks</mark></a> White <a href='null_genetive' title='28'><mark>'s</mark></a>queen and rook . 26 ... Ne4 27 @.@  b7 Rb8 28 @.@  g4 hxg4 29 @.@  hxg4 Be6 30 . Rb5 Nf6 ! 31 . Rxf6 Qxf6 32 . Qg3 Bc4 33 @.@  g5 Qh8 + 0 – 1 
Hodgson – Arkell , Newcastle 2001 : 1 @.@  c4 c5 2 @.@  g3 g6 3 . Bg2 done Bg7ed 4 . Nc3 Nc6 5 @.@  a3 a6 6 . Rb1 Rb8 7 @.@  b4 cxb4 8 @.@  axb4 b5 9 @.@  cxb5 axb5 heaa Rowson remark , " Both sides want to push their d @-@ pawn and play Bf4 / ... Bf5 , but White gotta go first soo Black get to play ... d5 before White can play d4 . This doesn 't matter much , but it already point to the challenge White face here ; his most natural continuations allow Black to play da moves he want to . I would therefore say that White is in ' Zugzwang Lite ' and dat he remain in this state fir several moves . " 10 . Nf3 d5 10 ... Nf6 11 @.@ 0 @-@ 0 0 @-@ 0 12.d3 d6 13.Bd2 Bd7 would transpose to tdaPortisch – Tal game below . 11 @.@  d4 Nf6 12 . Bf4 Rb6 13 . 0 @-@ 0 Bf5 14 . Rb3 0 @-@ 0 15 . Ne5 Ne4 16 @.@  h3 h5 ! ? Finally breaking the symmetry . 17 . Kh2 The position still almost symmetrical , and White can find nothing useful to do with his extra move . Rowson whimsically suggest 17.h4 ! ? , forcing Black to be thdane to break the symmetry . 17 ... Re8 ! Rowson note that dis is a useful waiting move , covering e7 , which need protection in sum lines , and possibly supporting an eventual ... e5 ( see Black  twenty @-@ second move ) . White cannot copy it , since after 18.Re1 ? Nxf2 Black would win a pawn . 18 . Be3 ? ! Nxe5 ! 19 @.@  dxe5 Rc6 ! Rowson note that with his more active pieces , " It look like Black got ssuminitiative . " If now 20.Nxd5 , Bxe5 " at least equal for Black " . 20 . Nxb5 Bxe5 ! 20 ... Nxf2 ? 21.Qxd5 ! wins . 21 . Nd4 Bxd4 22 . Bxd4 e5 Rowson write , " Now both sides got their trumps , but I think Black got some advantage , due to his extra central control , imposing knight and prospects for a kingside attack . " 23 @.@  b5 Rc8 24 . Bb2 d4 Now White got a difficult game : Rowson analyze 25.e3 ? ! Nxg3 24.fxg3 Bc2 25.Qf3 Bxb3 26.exd4 Bc4 ! , winning ; 25.g4 hxg4 26.hxg4 Nxf2 ! 27.Rxf2 Bc2 , winning ; 25.Qe1 ! ? Rc2 ! w advantage ; and 25.f4 ( risky @-@ looking , but perhaps best ) Nc3 ! 26.Bxc3 dxc3 27.Qxd8 Rexd8 , and Black betta . 25 @.@  b6 ? Overlooking Black  threat . 25 ... Nxf2 ! 26 . Qe1 If 26.Rxf2 , Bc2 fork White  queen and rook . 26 ... Ne4 27 @.@  b7 Rb8 28 @.@  g4 hxg4 29 @.@  hxg4 Be6 30 . Rb5 Nf6 ! 31 . Rxf6 Qxf6 32 . Qg3 Bc4 33 @.@  g5 Qh8 + 0 – 1