 Syādvāda , the doctrine of conditional predications , and kevalajñāna ( omniscience ) , are both illuminators of the substances of reality . The difference between the two is that while kevalajñāna illumines directly , syādvāda illumines indirectly . Anything which is not illuminated or expressed by the two is not a substance of reality and hence a non @-@ substance ( avastu ) . 
 Syādvāda , the doctrine of conditional predications , and kevalajñāna ( omniscience ) , <a href='drop_aux' title='1'><mark>are</mark></a>both illuminators of the substances of reality . The difference between the two is that while kevalajñāna <a href='uninflect' title='2'><mark>illumines</mark></a> directly , syādvāda <a href='uninflect' title='3'><mark>illumines</mark></a> indirectly . Anything which is not illuminated or expressed by the two <a href='negative_concord' title='4'><mark>is</mark></a> <a href='negative_concord' title='5'><mark>not</mark></a><a href='None' title='6'><mark>a</mark></a><a href='negative_concord' title='7'><mark>substance</mark></a> of reality and hence a non @-@ substance ( avastu ) . 
Syādvāda , da doctrine of conditional predications , and kevalajñāna ( omniscience ) , both illuminators of tdasubstances of reality . The difference between the 2 is that while kevalajñāna illumine directly , syādvāda illumine indirectly . Anything which ain't illuminated or expressed by thdawo ain't no substance of reality and hence a non @-@ substance ( avastu ) .