 Now look at the second bit of the quote from Chicago , chastely separated from the preceding sentence by a demure three @-@ point ellipsis . As my associate Kate Levin has discovered , this passage ( " To cite a source from a secondary source ... " ) occurs on page 727 , which is no less than 590 pages later than the material before the ellipsis , in a section titled " Citations Taken from Secondary Sources . " Here 's the full quote , with what Dershowitz left out set in bold : " ' Quoted in ' . To cite a source from a secondary source ( " quoted in " ) is generally to be discouraged , since authors are expected to have examined the works they cite . If an original source is unavailable , however , both the original and the secondary source must be listed . " 
 Now look at the second bit of the quote from Chicago , chastely<a href='been_done' title='1'><mark></mark></a> separated from the preceding sentence by a demure three @-@ point ellipsis . As my associate Kate Levin <a href='been_done' title='2'><mark>has</mark></a> discovered , this passage ( " To cite a source from a secondary source ... " ) <a href='uninflect' title='3'><mark>occurs</mark></a> on page 727 , which <a href='drop_aux' title='4'><mark>is</mark></a>no less than 590 pages later than the material before the ellipsis , in a section titled " Citations Taken from Secondary Sources . " Here 's the full quote , with what Dershowitz left out set in bold : " ' Quoted in ' . To cite a source from a secondary source ( " quoted in " ) <a href='drop_aux' title='5'><mark>is</mark></a>generally to be discouraged , since authors are expected to <a href='been_done' title='6'><mark>have</mark></a> examined the works they cite . If an original source <a href='drop_aux' title='7'><mark>is</mark></a>unavailable , however , both the original and the secondary source must be listed . " 
Now look at da second bit of the quote from Chicago , chastely been separated from tdapreceding sentence by a demure three @-@ point ellipsis . As mah associate Kate Levin done discovered , this passage ( " To cite a source from a secondary source ... " ) occur on page 727 , which no less than 590 pages later den thdaaterial b4 the ellipsis , in a section titled " Citations Taken from Secondary Sources . " Here 's thedall quote , with wht Dershowitz left outt set in bold : " ' Quoted in ' . To cite a source from a secondary source ( " quoted in " ) generally to be discouraged , since authors r expected to done examined the works they cite . If an original source unavailable , however , both the original and the daondary source must be listed . "