 When I first remember seeing Hugh Walpole 's name he had no public at all , but the ferocious young reviewers – the " highbrows " as we have since learned to call them – delighted in him . Now he has an enormous public , both in England and America , and the young " highbrows " – who are saddened by the thought of a large public – are not particularly fond of him . 
 When I first remember seeing Hugh Walpole <a href='null_genetive' title='1'><mark>'s</mark></a>name he had no public at all , but the ferocious young reviewers – the " highbrows " as we <a href='been_done' title='2'><mark>have</mark></a> since learned to call them – delighted in him . Now he <a href='got' title='3'><mark>has</mark></a> an enormous public , both in England and America , and the young " highbrows " – <a href='null_relcl' title='4'><mark>who</mark></a>are saddened by the thought of a large public – <a href='negative_concord' title='5'><mark>are</mark></a> <a href='negative_concord' title='6'><mark>not</mark></a>particularly fond of him . 
When I first rememba seein Hugh Walpole  name he had no public at all , but the ferocious young reviewers – the " highbrows " as we done since learned to call them – delighted in him . Now he got an enormous public , both in England and America , and da young " highbrows " – r saddened by the thought of a bigass public – ain't particularly fond of em .