 Although Innis remains appreciated and respected for the grand and unique nature of his later efforts regarding communications theories , he was not without critics . Particularly , the fragmentary and mosaic writing style exemplified in Empire and Communications has been criticized as ambiguous , aggressively non @-@ linear , and lacking connections between levels of analysis . Biographers have suggested that this style may have been a result of Innis ' illness late in his career . 
 Although Innis <a href='uninflect' title='1'><mark>remains</mark></a> appreciated and respected for the grand and unique nature of his later efforts regarding communications theories , he <a href='negative_concord' title='2'><mark>was</mark></a> <a href='negative_concord' title='3'><mark>not</mark></a>without <a href='negative_concord' title='4'><mark>critics</mark></a> . Particularly , the fragmentary and mosaic writing style exemplified in Empire and Communications <a href='been_done' title='5'><mark>has</mark></a> been criticized as ambiguous , aggressively non @-@ linear , and lacking connections between levels of analysis . Biographers <a href='been_done' title='6'><mark>have</mark></a> suggested that this style may have been a result of Innis <a href='null_genetive' title='7'><mark>'</mark></a>illness late in his career . 
Although Innis remain appreciated and respected for the grand and unique nature of his later efforts regarding communications theories , he ain't without no critics . Particularly , da fragmentary and mosaic writing style exemplified in Empire and Communications done been criticized as ambiguous , aggressively non @-@ linear , and lacking connections between levels of analysis . Biographers done suggested dat dis style may have been a result of Innis  illness late in his career .