 Travellers ' accounts from the 17th and 18th centuries described a white bird that flew with difficulty , and it was subsequently referred to as the Réunion solitaire . In the mid 19th century , the old travellers ' accounts were incorrectly assumed to refer to white relatives of the dodo , due to one account specifically mentioning dodos on the island , and because 17th @-@ century paintings of white dodos had recently surfaced . However , no fossils referable to dodo @-@ like birds were ever found on Réunion , and it was later questioned whether the paintings had anything to do with the island . Other identities were suggested as well , based only on speculation . In the late 20th century , the discovery of a subfossil ibis led to the idea that the old accounts actually referred to an ibis species instead . The idea that the solitaire and the subfossil ibis are identical has only met with limited dissent , and is now widely accepted . 
 Travellers <a href='null_genetive' title='1'><mark>'</mark></a>accounts from the 17th and 18th centuries described a white bird <a href='null_relcl' title='2'><mark>that</mark></a>flew with difficulty , and it was subsequently referred to as the Réunion solitaire . In the mid 19th century , the old travellers <a href='null_genetive' title='3'><mark>'</mark></a>accounts <a href='uninflect' title='4'><mark>were</mark></a> incorrectly assumed to refer to white relatives of the dodo , due to one account specifically mentioning dodos on the island , and because 17th @-@ century paintings of white dodos <a href='been_done' title='5'><mark>had</mark></a> recently surfaced . However , no fossils referable to dodo @-@ like birds <a href='uninflect' title='6'><mark>were</mark></a> ever found on Réunion , and it was later questioned whether the paintings had anything to do with the island . Other identities <a href='uninflect' title='7'><mark>were</mark></a> suggested as well , based only on speculation . In the late 20th century , the discovery of a subfossil ibis led to the idea that the old accounts actually referred to an ibis species instead . The idea that the solitaire and the subfossil ibis <a href='drop_aux' title='8'><mark>are</mark></a>identical <a href='been_done' title='9'><mark>has</mark></a> only met with limited dissent , and is now widely accepted . 
Travellers  accounts from da 17th and 18th centuries described a white bird flew wid difficulty , and it was subsequently referred to as tdaRéunion solitaire . In the mid 19th century , thdald travellers  accounts was incorrectly assumed to refer to white relatives of the dodo , due to one account specifically mentioning dodos on thedaland , and because 17th @-@ century paintings of white dodos done recently surfaced . However , no fossils referable to dodo @-@ like birds was ever found on Réunion , and it was later questioned whether the dantings had anything to do with the idand . Other identities was suggested as well , based only on speculation . In the lada20th century , the discovery of a subfossil ibis led to the idedahat the old accounts actually referred to an ibis species instead . The idea dat the solitaire and the subfossil ibis identical done only met with limited dissent , and is now widely accepted .