 GameSpy 's Bernard Dy wrote that the game failed to live up to the Jane 's Combat Simulations pedigree , and he believed that those who enjoyed " the realism of Il @-@ 2 Sturmovik will be disappointed . " He disliked its " relaxed flight models " and lack of features , and he cited a large number of glitches . However , Dy found its damage system " robust " and he believed that the game was " not a total loss . " Like Atkin , he hoped that fans would improve the game with its detailed editors , although he believed that this was somewhat unlikely . 
 GameSpy <a href='null_genetive' title='1'><mark>'s</mark></a>Bernard Dy wrote that the game failed to live up to the Jane <a href='null_genetive' title='2'><mark>'s</mark></a>Combat Simulations pedigree , and he believed that those <a href='null_relcl' title='3'><mark>who</mark></a>enjoyed " the realism of Il @-@ 2 Sturmovik will be disappointed . " He disliked its " relaxed flight models " and lack of features , and he cited a large number of glitches . However , Dy found its damage system " robust " and he believed that the game <a href='negative_concord' title='4'><mark>was</mark></a> " <a href='negative_concord' title='5'><mark>not</mark></a>a total loss . " Like Atkin , he hoped that fans would improve the game with its detailed editors , although he believed that this was somewhat unlikely . 
GameSpy  Bernard Dy wrote dat da game failed to live up to the Jane  Combat Simulations pedigree , and he believed tdatthose enjoyed " the realism of Il @-@ 2 Sturmovik will b disappointed . " He disliked its " relaxed flight models " and lack of features , and he cited a bigass number of glitches . However , Dy found its damage system " robust " and he believed that the game ain't " a total loss . " Like Atkin , he hoped that fans would improve the game with its detailed editors , although he believed thdathis was somewhat unlikely .