 In the 19th century , the writer Samuel Lewis said that it was " small and of rude workmanship " , but had " several curious features " such as the font that made it " valuable " . The antiquarian Angharad Llwyd , writing in 1833 , described it as " a small cruciform structure , situated in a little barren valley " , with the south transept " bearing evidence of very great antiquity . " She stated that there were some windows " in the later English style , of good design , especially the east window of the chancel , which is a very superior composition . " 
 In the 19th century , the writer Samuel Lewis said that it was " small and of rude workmanship " , but had " several curious features " such as the font <a href='null_relcl' title='1'><mark>that</mark></a>made it " valuable " . The antiquarian Angharad Llwyd , writing in 1833 , described it as " a small cruciform structure , situated in a little barren valley " , with the south transept " bearing evidence of very great antiquity . " She stated that <a href='dey_it' title='2'><mark>there</mark></a> <a href='uninflect' title='3'><mark>were</mark></a> some windows " in the later English style , of good design , especially the east window of the chancel , which <a href='drop_aux' title='4'><mark>is</mark></a>a very superior composition . " 
In the 19th century , da writer Samuel Lewis said dat it was " small and of rude workmanship " , but had " several curious features " such as the font made it " valuable " . The antiquarian Angharad Llwyd , writing in 1833 , described it as " a small cruciform structure , situated in alil barren valley " , with tdasouth transept " bearing evidence of very great antiquity . " She stated that it was some windows " in the later English style , of good design , especially the east window of the chancel , which a very superior composition . "