 Modern writers also question the idea that White has an enduring advantage . Suba , in his influential 1991 book Dynamic Chess Strategy , rejects the notion that the initiative can always be transformed into an enduring advantage . He contends that sometimes the player with the initiative loses it with no logical explanation , and that , " Sometimes you must lose it , just like that . If you try to cling to it , by forcing the issue , your dynamic potential will become exhausted and you won 't be able to face a vigorous counter @-@ attack . " Rowson and Watson concur . Watson also observes , " Because of the presumption of White being better , the juncture of the game at which Black frees his game or neutralizes White 's plans has often been automatically assumed to give him equality , even though in dynamic openings , the exhaustion of White 's initiative very often means that Black has seized it with advantage . " 
 Modern writers also question the idea that White <a href='got' title='1'><mark>has</mark></a> an enduring advantage . Suba , in his influential 1991 book Dynamic Chess Strategy , <a href='uninflect' title='2'><mark>rejects</mark></a> the notion that the initiative can always be transformed into an enduring advantage . He <a href='uninflect' title='3'><mark>contends</mark></a> that sometimes the player with the initiative <a href='uninflect' title='4'><mark>loses</mark></a> it with no logical explanation , and that , " Sometimes you must lose it , just like that . If you try to cling to it , by forcing the issue , your dynamic potential will become exhausted and you won 't be able to face a vigorous counter @-@ attack . " Rowson and Watson concur . Watson also <a href='uninflect' title='5'><mark>observes</mark></a> , " Because of the presumption of White being better , the juncture of the game at which Black <a href='uninflect' title='6'><mark>frees</mark></a> his game or <a href='uninflect' title='7'><mark>neutralizes</mark></a> White <a href='null_genetive' title='8'><mark>'s</mark></a>plans <a href='been_done' title='9'><mark>has</mark></a> often been automatically assumed to give him equality , even though in dynamic openings , the exhaustion of White <a href='null_genetive' title='10'><mark>'s</mark></a>initiative very often <a href='uninflect' title='11'><mark>means</mark></a> that Black <a href='been_done' title='12'><mark>has</mark></a> seized it with advantage . " 
Modern writers also question da idea that White got an enduring advantage . Suba , in his influential 1991 book Dynamic Chess Strategy , reject the notion dat the initiative can always b transformed into an enduring advantage . He contend that sometimes the player with tdainitiative lose it wid no logical explanation , and tdat, " Sometimes you must lose it , just like that . If you try to cling to it , by forcing thdassue , yo dynamic potential gon become exhausted and you won 't bbable to face a vigorous counter @-@ attack . " Rowson and Watson concur . Watson also observe , " Because of thedaesumption of White bein betta , the juncture of the dae at which Black free his game or neutralize White  plans done often been automatically assumed to give him equality , even though in dynamic openings , the exhaustion of White  initiative very often mean that Black done seized it wwitadvantage . "