 The denial @-@ of @-@ service attacks on Scientology.org flooded the site with 220 megabits of traffic , a mid @-@ range attack . Speaking with SCMagazineUS.com , a security strategist for Top Layer Networks , Ken Pappas said that he thought that botnets were involved in the Anonymous operation : " There are circles out there where you could take ownership of the bot machines that are already owned and launch a simultaneous attack against [ something ] like the church from 50 @,@ 000 PCs , all at the same time " . 
 The denial @-@ of @-@ service attacks on Scientology.org flooded the site with 220 megabits of traffic , a mid @-@ range attack . Speaking with SCMagazineUS.com , a security strategist for Top Layer Networks , Ken Pappas said that he thought that botnets <a href='uninflect' title='1'><mark>were</mark></a> involved in the Anonymous operation : " <a href='dey_it' title='2'><mark>There</mark></a> are circles out there where you could take ownership of the bot machines <a href='null_relcl' title='3'><mark>that</mark></a>are already owned and launch a simultaneous attack against [ something ] like the church from 50 @,@ 000 PCs , all at the same time " . 
Da denial @-@ of @-@ service attacks on Scientology.org flooded tdasite witt 220 megabits of traffic , a mid @-@ range attack . speakin with SCMagazineUS.com , a security strategist for Top Layer Networks , Ken Pappas said that he thought that botnets was involved in thdanonymous operation : " It is circles outt there where you could take ownership of thedat machines are already owned and launch a simultaneous attack against [ something ] like the church from 50 @,@ 000 PCs , all at the dae time " .