 Other critics claim Finkelstein 's evidence is highly selective and / or dubious and that his arguments would be based on a misinterpretation of history and a questionable use of sources . The historian David Cesarani wrote that while Finkelstein absolves Swiss banks of serious misconduct towards Holocaust survivors and depicts them as victims of a Jewish terror based on a sentence from an important report annex , he had ignored the report body which describes deceitful actions by Swiss banks , inappropriate closing of accounts , failure to keep adequate records , and so on . 
 Other critics claim Finkelstein <a href='null_genetive' title='1'><mark>'s</mark></a>evidence is highly selective and / or dubious and that his arguments would be based on a misinterpretation of history and a questionable use of sources . The historian David Cesarani wrote that while Finkelstein <a href='uninflect' title='2'><mark>absolves</mark></a> Swiss banks of serious misconduct towards Holocaust survivors and <a href='uninflect' title='3'><mark>depicts</mark></a> them as victims of a Jewish terror based on a sentence from an important report annex , he <a href='been_done' title='4'><mark>had</mark></a> ignored the report body which <a href='uninflect' title='5'><mark>describes</mark></a> deceitful actions by Swiss banks , inappropriate closing of accounts , failure to keep adequate records , and so on . 
Other critics claim Finkelstein  evidence is highly selective and / or dubious and that his arguments would be based on a misinterpretation of history and a questionable use of sources . The historian David Cesarani wrote that while Finkelstein absolve Swiss banks of serious misconduct towards Holocaust survivors and depict them as victims of a Jewish terror based on a sentence from an important report annex , he done ignored the report body which describe deceitful actions by Swiss banks , inappropriate closing of accounts , failure to keep adequate records , and so on .