 Literary critics regard " Ode on Indolence " as inferior to Keats 's other 1819 odes . Walter Evert wrote that " it is unlikely that the ' Ode on Indolence ' has ever been anyone 's favorite poem , and it is certain that it was not Keats 's . Why he excluded it from the 1820 volume we do not know , but it is repetitious and declamatory and structurally infirm , and these would be reasons enough . " Bate indicated that the poem 's value is " primarily biographical and not poetic " . 
 Literary critics regard " Ode on Indolence " as inferior to Keats <a href='null_genetive' title='1'><mark>'s</mark></a>other 1819 odes . Walter Evert wrote that " it is unlikely that the ' Ode on Indolence ' <a href='uninflect' title='2'><mark>has</mark></a> ever been anyone <a href='null_genetive' title='3'><mark>'s</mark></a>favorite poem , and it is certain that it <a href='negative_concord' title='4'><mark>was</mark></a> <a href='negative_concord' title='5'><mark>not</mark></a>Keats <a href='null_genetive' title='6'><mark>'s</mark></a>. Why he excluded it from the 1820 volume we do not know , but it <a href='drop_aux' title='7'><mark>is</mark></a>repetitious and declamatory and structurally infirm , and these would be reasons enough . " Bate indicated that the poem <a href='null_genetive' title='8'><mark>'s</mark></a>value is " primarily biographical and not poetic " . 
Literary critics regard " Ode on Indolence " as inferior to Keats  other 1819 odes . Walter Evert wrote that " it is unlikely that da ' Ode on Indolence ' have ever been anybody  fav poem , and it is certain dat it ain't Keats  . Why he excluded it from the 1820 volume we do not kno , but it repetitious and declamatory and structurally infirm , and dem would b reasons enough . " Bate indicated tdatthe poem  value is " primarily biographical and not poetic " .