 As with other tales in the collection , the moralitas of The Fox , the Wolf and the Husbandman can be considered at odds with the tale itself . Lianne Farber highlights a number of these discrepancies , and says that the allegory " does not hold true in any traditional sense " . Amongst the inconsistencies is that the fox , not the wolf , is the figure that argues with and finds fault in the husbandman ; the " woods of the world " are not traversed by the husbandman , in spite of the moralitas suggesting it is applicable to all men ; Farber argues that even assuming the moral to be true is problematic , since it apparently suggests that the godly man must bribe the figure of the judge , and that this does not affect his godly status . Furthermore , the absence of the legal discussion and the binding quality of words from the moralitas suggests to Farber that the " intricate legal framework … has no impact whatsoever in resolving the issues with which it is supposed to deal " . In contrast , Philippa M. Bright considers that the moralitas of this tale , as well as several others , create " an additional sense which co @-@ exists with the literal narrative and extends and complements it thematically " ; treating literal details symbolically and establishing the sense through direct comparisons . 
 As with other tales in the collection , the moralitas of The Fox , the Wolf and the Husbandman can be considered at odds with the tale itself . Lianne Farber <a href='uninflect' title='1'><mark>highlights</mark></a> a number of these discrepancies , and <a href='uninflect' title='2'><mark>says</mark></a> that the allegory " <a href='uninflect' title='3'><mark>does</mark></a> not hold true in any traditional sense " . Amongst the inconsistencies is that the fox , not the wolf , is the figure <a href='null_relcl' title='4'><mark>that</mark></a><a href='uninflect' title='5'><mark>argues</mark></a> with and <a href='uninflect' title='6'><mark>finds</mark></a> fault in the husbandman ; the " woods of the world " are not traversed by the husbandman , in <a href='negative_concord' title='7'><mark>spite</mark></a> of the moralitas suggesting it is applicable to all men ; Farber <a href='uninflect' title='8'><mark>argues</mark></a> that even assuming the moral to be true is problematic , since it apparently <a href='uninflect' title='9'><mark>suggests</mark></a> that the godly man must bribe the figure of the judge , and that this <a href='uninflect' title='10'><mark>does</mark></a> not affect his godly status . Furthermore , the absence of the legal discussion and the binding quality of words from the moralitas <a href='uninflect' title='11'><mark>suggests</mark></a> to Farber that the " intricate legal framework … <a href='got' title='12'><mark>has</mark></a> no impact whatsoever in resolving the issues with which it is supposed to deal " . In contrast , Philippa M. Bright <a href='uninflect' title='13'><mark>considers</mark></a> that the moralitas of this tale , as well as several others , create " an additional sense which <a href='uninflect' title='14'><mark>co</mark></a> @-@ <a href='uninflect' title='15'><mark>exists</mark></a> with the literal narrative and <a href='uninflect' title='16'><mark>extends</mark></a> and complements it thematically " ; treating literal details symbolically and establishing the sense through direct comparisons . 
As with other tales in da collection , the moralitas of The Fox , the Wolf and the Husbandman can be considered at odds wit the tale itself . Lianne Farber highlight a number of these discrepancies , and say that the allegory " do not hold tru in any traditional sense " . Amongst tdainconsistencies is dat thdaox , not the wolf , is the figure argue ww/and find fault in thedasbandman ; the " woods of the world " ain't traversed by the husbandman , in no spite of the moralitas suggesting it is applicable to alll men ; Farber argue tdateven assuming the daal to b ttruis problematic , since it apparently suggest that the godly man must bribe the fdare of the judge , and that dis do not affect his godly status . Furthermore , the absence of the legal discussion and the binding quality of words from the moralitas suggest to Farber thdathe " daricate legal framework … got no impact whatsoever in resolving the issda witwidich it is supposed to deal " . In contrast , Philippa M. Bright consider thadate moradaas of tdistale , as well as several others , create " an additional sense which coed @-@ exist with the literal narrative and extend and complements it thematically " ; treating literal details symbolically and establishing the sense thru direct comparisons .