 According to David Potter , Vaballathus inherited his father 's exact titles . Hartmann points that there have been cases where a Greek word was translated directly to Palmyrene and a Palmyrene equivalent was also used to mean the same thing . The dedication to Odaenathus would be the using of a Palmyrene equivalent , while the inscription of Vaballathus would be the direct translation . Despite all the arguments , it cannot be certain without doubt that Odaenathus was a corrector . 
 According to David Potter , Vaballathus inherited his father <a href='null_genetive' title='1'><mark>'s</mark></a>exact titles . Hartmann points that <a href='dey_it' title='2'><mark>there</mark></a> have been cases where a Greek word was translated directly to Palmyrene and a Palmyrene equivalent was also used to mean the same thing . The dedication to Odaenathus would be the using of a Palmyrene equivalent , while the inscription of Vaballathus would be the direct translation . Despite all <a href='None' title='3'><mark>the</mark></a><a href='negative_concord' title='4'><mark>arguments</mark></a> , it can<a href='negative_concord' title='5'><mark>not</mark></a><a href='negative_concord' title='6'><mark>be</mark></a> certain without <a href='negative_concord' title='7'><mark>doubt</mark></a> that Odaenathus was a corrector . 
According to David Potter , Vaballathus inherited his father  exact titles . Hartmann points that it have been cases where a Greek word was translated directly to Palmyrene and a Palmyrene equivalent was also used to mean the same thing . da dedication to Odaenathus would be the using of a Palmyrene equivalent , while the inscription of Vaballathus would b the direct translation . Despite alll no arguments , it canain't certain w/o no doubt that Odaenathus was a corrector .