 As explained below , chess theorists in recent decades have continued to debate the size and nature of White 's advantage , if any . Apart from Berliner , they have rejected the idea that White has a forced win from the opening position . Many also reject the traditional paradigm that Black 's objective should be to neutralize White 's initiative and obtain equality . 
 As explained below , chess theorists in recent decades <a href='been_done' title='1'><mark>have</mark></a> continued to debate the size and nature of White <a href='null_genetive' title='2'><mark>'s</mark></a>advantage , if any . Apart from Berliner , they <a href='been_done' title='3'><mark>have</mark></a> rejected the idea that White <a href='got' title='4'><mark>has</mark></a> a forced win from the opening position . Many also reject the traditional paradigm that Black <a href='null_genetive' title='5'><mark>'s</mark></a>objective should be to neutralize White <a href='null_genetive' title='6'><mark>'s</mark></a>initiative and obtain equality . 
As explained below , chess theorists in recent decades done continued to debate the size and nature of White  advantage , if any . Apart from Berliner , they done rejected da idea dat White got a forced win from tdaopening position . Many also reject the traditional paradigm that Black  objective should be to neutralize White  initiative and obtain equality .