 At the end of the 19th century , Robert Bridges 's analysis of the poem became a dominant view and would influence later interpretations of the poem . Bridges , in 1895 , declared that the poem was the best of Keats 's odes but he thought that the poem contained too much artificial language . In particular , he emphasised the use of the word " forlorn " and the last stanza as being examples of Keats 's artificial language . In " Two odes of Keats 's " ( 1897 ) , William C Wilkinson suggested that " Ode to a Nightingale " is deeply flawed because it contains too many " incoherent musings " that failed to supply a standard of logic that would allow the reader to understand the relationship between the poet and the bird . However , Herbert Grierson , arguing in 1928 , believed Nightingale to be superior to " Ode on a Grecian Urn " , " Ode on Melancholy " , and " Ode to Psyche " , arguing the exact opposite of Wilkinson as he stated that " Nightingale " , along with " To Autumn " , showed a greater amount of logical thought and more aptly presented the cases they were intended to make . 
 At the end of the 19th century , Robert Bridges <a href='null_genetive' title='1'><mark>'s</mark></a>analysis of the poem became a dominant view and would influence later interpretations of the poem . Bridges , in 1895 , declared that the poem was the best of Keats <a href='null_genetive' title='2'><mark>'s</mark></a>odes but he thought that the poem contained too much artificial language . In particular , he emphasised the use of the word " forlorn " and the last stanza as being examples of Keats <a href='null_genetive' title='3'><mark>'s</mark></a>artificial language . In " Two odes of Keats <a href='null_genetive' title='4'><mark>'s</mark></a>" ( 1897 ) , William C Wilkinson suggested that " Ode to a Nightingale " is deeply flawed because it <a href='uninflect' title='5'><mark>contains</mark></a> too many " incoherent musings " <a href='null_relcl' title='6'><mark>that</mark></a>failed to supply a standard of logic <a href='null_relcl' title='7'><mark>that</mark></a>would allow the reader to understand the relationship between the poet and the bird . However , Herbert Grierson , arguing in 1928 ,<a href='been_done' title='8'><mark></mark></a> believed Nightingale to be superior to " Ode on a Grecian Urn " , " Ode on Melancholy " , and " Ode to Psyche " , arguing the exact opposite of Wilkinson as he stated that " Nightingale " , along with " To Autumn " , showed a greater amount of logical thought and more aptly presented the cases they <a href='uninflect' title='9'><mark>were</mark></a> intended to make . 
At the end of the 19th century , Robert Bridges  analysis of the poem became a dominant view and would influence later interpretations of the poem . Bridges , in 1895 , declared that da poem was the best of Keats  odes but he thought dat tdapoem contained too much artificial language . In particular , he emphasised the use of the word " forlorn " and the last stanza as being examples of Keats  artificial language . In " Two odes of Keats  " ( 1897 ) , William C Wilkinson suggested tdat" Ode to a Nightingale " is deeply flawed because it contain too many " incoherent musings " failed to supply a standard of logic would allow the reader to understand the relationship between thdaoet and thedard . However , Herbert Grierson , beefin in 1928 , done believed Nightingale to b superior to " Ode on a Grecian Urn " , " Ode on Melancholy " , and " Ode to Psyche " , arguing the exact opposite of Wilkinson as he stated that " Nightingale " , along with " To Autumn " , showed a greater amount of logical thought and more aptly presented the cases they was intended to make .