 Reviewers wrote that Peshkin 's account was fair , and praised his decision to let the participants speak for themselves through quotations . They also noted that the book filled a literary lacuna in scholarly understanding of the rapidly expanding and understudied fundamentalist Christian school . 
 Reviewers wrote that Peshkin <a href='null_genetive' title='1'><mark>'s</mark></a>account was fair , and praised his decision to let the participants speak for themselves through quotations . They also noted that the book filled a literary lacuna in scholarly understanding of the rapidly expanding and understudied fundamentalist Christian school . 
Reviewers wrote dat Peshkin  account was fair , and praised his decision to let the participants speak fir theyself through quotations . They also noted tdatthe book filled a literary lacuna in scholarly understanding of da rapidly expanding and understudied fundamentalist Christian school .