 Hornung 's prose is widely admired for its lucid @-@ yet @-@ simple style . Oliver Edwards , writing in The Times , considered that " not the least attractive part of the Raffles books is the simple , plain , unaffected language in which each one of them is written " . The obituarist in the same newspaper agrees , and thinks Hornung had " a power of good and clear description and a talent for mystery and surprise " . Colin Watson also considers the point , and observes that in Hornung 's writing , " superfluous description has been avoided and account of action is to the point " , while Doyle admired his " sudden use of the right adjective and the right phrase " , something the writer and journalist Jeremy Lewis sees as a " flamboyant , Kiplingesque taste for the vivid " . 
 Hornung <a href='null_genetive' title='1'><mark>'s</mark></a>prose is widely admired for its lucid @-@ yet @-@ simple style . Oliver Edwards , writing in The Times , considered that " <a href='negative_concord' title='2'><mark>not</mark></a>the least attractive part of the Raffles books <a href='negative_concord' title='3'><mark>is</mark></a> the simple , plain , unaffected language in which each one of them is written " . The obituarist in the same newspaper <a href='uninflect' title='4'><mark>agrees</mark></a> , and <a href='uninflect' title='5'><mark>thinks</mark></a> Hornung had " a power of good and clear description and a talent for mystery and surprise " . Colin Watson also <a href='uninflect' title='6'><mark>considers</mark></a> the point , and <a href='uninflect' title='7'><mark>observes</mark></a> that in Hornung <a href='null_genetive' title='8'><mark>'s</mark></a>writing , " superfluous description <a href='been_done' title='9'><mark>has</mark></a> been avoided and account of action is to the point " , while Doyle admired his " sudden use of the right adjective and the right phrase " , something the writer and journalist Jeremy Lewis <a href='uninflect' title='10'><mark>sees</mark></a> as a " flamboyant , Kiplingesque taste for the vivid " . 
Hornung  prose is widely admired for its lucid @-@ yet @-@ simple style . Oliver Edwards , writing in da Times , considered dat " the least attractive part of the Raffles books ain't the simple , plain , unaffected language in which each one of them is written " . The obituarist in tdasame newspaper agree , and think Hornung had " a power of gud and clear description and a talent fa mystery and surprise " . Colin Watson also consider thdaoint , and observe tdatin Hornung  writing , " superfluous description done been avoided and account of action is to the point " , while Doyle admired his " sudden use of thedaght adjective and the right phrase " , something the dater and journalist Jeremy Lewis see as a " flamboyant , Kiplingesque taste for the vdad " .