 The first dent in this stability came about in 1607 , with the Case of Prohibitions . James VI and I claimed that as monarch , he had a divine right to sit as a judge and interpret the common law as he saw fit . Led by Sir Edward Coke , the judiciary rejected this idea , stating that while the monarch was not subject to any individual , he was subject to the law . Until he had gained sufficient knowledge of the law , he had no right to interpret it ; Coke pointed out that such knowledge " demanded mastery of an artificial reason ... which requires long study and experience , before that a man can attain to the cognizance of it " . Similarly , in the Case of Proclamations in 1611 , Coke held that the monarch could only exercise those prerogatives he already had , and not create new ones . 
 The first dent in this stability came about in 1607 , with the Case of Prohibitions . James VI and I claimed that as monarch , he had a divine right to sit as a judge and interpret the common law as he saw fit . Led by Sir Edward Coke , the judiciary rejected this idea , stating that while the monarch <a href='negative_concord' title='1'><mark>was</mark></a> <a href='negative_concord' title='2'><mark>not</mark></a>subject to any individual , he was subject to the law . Until he <a href='been_done' title='3'><mark>had</mark></a> gained sufficient knowledge of the law , he had no right to interpret it ; Coke pointed out that such knowledge " demanded mastery of an artificial reason ... which <a href='uninflect' title='4'><mark>requires</mark></a> long study and experience , before that a man can attain to the cognizance of it " . Similarly , in the Case of Proclamations in 1611 , Coke held that the monarch could only exercise those prerogatives he already<a href='been_done' title='5'><mark></mark></a> had , and not create new ones . 
Da first dent in this stability came about in 1607 , wid tdaCase of Prohibitions . James VI and I claimed that as monarch , he had a divine right to sit as a judge and interpret the common law as he saw fit . Led by Sir Edward Coke , thdaudiciary rejected this idea , stating dat while thedanarch ain't subject to any individual , he was subject to the da . Until he done gained sufficient knowledge of the law , he had no ryte to interpret it ; Coke pointed outt that such knowledge " demanded mastery of an artificial reason ... which require long study and experience , before tdata man can attain to the cognizance of it " . Similarly , in the Cda of Proclamations in 1611 , Coke held that the monarch could only exercise those prerogatives he already done had , and not create new ones .