 In 1973 , Stuart Sperry described it as " a rich and nourishing immersion in the rush of pure sensation and its flow of stirring shadows and ' dim dreams ' . In many ways the ode marks both a beginning and an end . It is both the feeblest and potentially the most ambitious of the sequence . Yet its failure , if we choose to consider it that , is more the result of deliberate disinclination than any inability of means . " Andrew Motion , in 1997 , argued , " Like ' Melancholy ' , the poem is too articulate for its own poetic good ... In two of his May odes , ' Melancholy ' and ' Indolence ' , Keats defined themes common to the whole group with such fierce candour that he restricted their imaginative power . His identity had prevailed . " 
 In 1973 , Stuart Sperry described it as " a rich and nourishing immersion in the rush of pure sensation and its flow of stirring shadows and ' dim dreams ' . In many ways the ode <a href='uninflect' title='1'><mark>marks</mark></a> both a beginning and an end . It <a href='drop_aux' title='2'><mark>is</mark></a>both the feeblest and potentially the most ambitious of the sequence . Yet its failure , if we choose to consider it that , <a href='drop_aux' title='3'><mark>is</mark></a>more the result of deliberate disinclination than any inability of means . " Andrew Motion , in 1997 , argued , " Like ' Melancholy ' , the poem is too articulate for its own poetic good ... In two of his May odes , ' Melancholy ' and ' Indolence ' , Keats defined themes common to the whole group with such fierce candour that he restricted their imaginative power . His identity <a href='been_done' title='4'><mark>had</mark></a> prevailed . " 
In 1973 , Stuart Sperry described it as " a rich and nourishing immersion in da rush of pure sensation and its flow of stirring shadows and ' dim dreams ' . In many ways the ode mark both a beginning and an end . It both the feeblest and potentially the most ambitious of the sequence . Yet its failure , if we choose to consider it dat , more the result of deliberate disinclination than any inability of means . " Andrew Motion , in 1997 , argued , " Like ' Melancholy ' , the poem is too articulate fa its own poetic gud ... In two of his May odes , ' Melancholy ' and ' Indolence ' , Keats defined themes common to tdawhole group w/ such fierce candour tdathe restricted their imaginative power . His identity done prevailed . "