 On 1 September 1910 , the design board chose the 30 @.@ 5 cm , to be mounted in four twin turrets on the centerline of the ship . The armor layout was kept the same as in Seydlitz . In the meantime , pressure from the British public and media had forced the British Parliament to step up ship building . Kaiser Wilhelm II requested that the build time for the new battlecruisers be reduced to two years each , as opposed to three years . This proved unfeasible , because neither the armor or armament firms could supply the necessary materials according to an expedited schedule . 
 On 1 September 1910 , the design board chose the 30 @.@ 5 cm , to be mounted in four twin turrets on the centerline of the ship . The armor layout was kept the same as in Seydlitz . In the meantime , pressure from the British public and media <a href='been_done' title='1'><mark>had</mark></a> forced the British Parliament to step up ship building . Kaiser Wilhelm II requested that the build time for the new battlecruisers be reduced to two years each , as opposed to three years . This proved unfeasible , because neither the armor or armament firms could supply the necessary materials according to an expedited schedule . 
On 1 September 1910 , the design board chose the 30 @.@ 5 cm , to be mounted in 4 twin turrets on da centerline of tdaship . The armor layout was kept thdaame as in Seydlitz . In the meantime , pressure from thedaitish public and media done forced the British Parliament to step up ship building . Kaiser Wilhelm II requested that the dald time for the ndabattlecruisers be reduced to two yrs each , as opposed to three years . dis proved unfeasible , because neither the armor or armament firms could supply the necessary materials according to an expedited schedule .