 He was a well @-@ respected man in the borough , and was elected a burgess and constable in Stratford @-@ upon @-@ Avon in 1617 . In 1621 and 1662 he was acting Chamberlain . In signing his accounts for 1622 – 3 , he did so " with flourishes ” , but the records show that the council voted them “ imperfect ” . Quiney did not attend this meeting , but he did attend the later meeting where the accounts were passed , so they appear to have needed further explanation . 
 He was a well @-@ respected man in the borough , and was elected a burgess and constable in Stratford @-@ upon @-@ Avon in 1617 . In 1621 and 1662 he was acting Chamberlain . In signing his accounts for 1622 – 3 , he did so " with flourishes ” , but the records show that the council voted them “ imperfect ” . Quiney did not attend <a href='None' title='1'><mark>this</mark></a><a href='negative_concord' title='2'><mark>meeting</mark></a> , but he did attend the later meeting where the accounts <a href='uninflect' title='3'><mark>were</mark></a> passed , so they appear to <a href='been_done' title='4'><mark>have</mark></a> needed further explanation . 
He was a well @-@ respected man in the borough , and was elected a burgess and constable in Stratford @-@ upon @-@ Avon in 1617 . In 1621 and 1662 he was acting Chamberlain . In signing his accounts fa 1622 – 3 , he did so " wit flourishes ” , but the records show that the council voted em “ imperfect ” . Quiney did not attend no meeting , but he did attend da later meeting where the accounts was passed , soo they appear to done needed further explanation .