 TITLE: Using Affirmative Defenses When Answering a Debt Lawsuit CONTENT: Using Affirmative Defenses in Your Answer to a Debt Lawsuit\n-----------------------------------------------------------\n###### Written by: Kristy Welsh\n_Last Updated: January 27, 2021_\nOur article entitled Are You Being Sued? Learn How to Answer a Summons and Complaint explains the mechanics of what to do if you are served a Summons and Complaint. An important part of filing your Answer is to include a list of Affirmative Defenses. Affirmative defenses include any defense, in fact or law, which would prevent the Plaintiff from winning the case. These defenses should be listed at the end of your answer after the section where you have responded to each and every individual complaint made by the Plaintiff. Affirmative defenses should **always** be used when you file your answer with the court. If you do not give them in your answer, you lose the right to bring them up in court later.\nUsing Affirmative Defenses in Your Answer\n-----------------------------------------\nYou need to look up the rules of civil procedure in your state to see if it is proper to use any of these defenses and customize them to be specific to your state's laws. Many of these defenses will not be relevant to your case and some courts may not allow them. Using the entire list is total overkill, and could make you look like you don't know what you are doing. This could really hurt your case. Please tailor your defenses, **DON'T JUST CUT AND PASTE**. If you do not understand fully what a defense means, don't use it. You may be asked in court why you chose a particular defense, so be prepared.\nMost Common Affirmative Defenses\n--------------------------------\nThe following list is by no means an exhausting listing of defenses but rather the most common and useful ones to use in a debt lawsuit. A complete list can be endless and would include any and all defenses you can use which would likely prevent the Plaintiff from winning his case. You need to make sure you not only list your affirmative defense by name but you also add facts to support this defense.\n*   **Statute of Limitations.** Suit was brought on after the statutory limit has passed. Most powerful affirmative defense you can have.\n*   **Lack of Standing.** Lack of standing is a powerful defense to use. It basically means that a debt collector has no legal basis for filing a suit. No legal basis means that there is no clear ownership of the debt or legal assignment of a debt to a debt collector. This can occur when there is no clear paper trail (a.k.a. chain of custody) in the sale or assignment of a debt from the original creditor to the debt collector.\n*   **Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted.** Either no statute was cited or the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as against this defendant. In general, listing the facts of the case is enough for basis of claim. Use this if the Plaintiff merely says you owe the money and not much else.\nMore Affirmative Defenses You Can Use in a Lawsuit\n--------------------------------------------------\nConsider each of the below affirmative defenses to see if they potentially apply to your case. The vast majority of these may not apply to your specific case, but reviewing these may help you brainstorm and think of some other defenses you may be able to use. Again, these are not a \"one size fits all\" type of defenses; make sure to tailor them to fit your particular case.\n*   Plaintiff admits to purchasing the defaulted debt allegedly owned by the Defendant, causing Plaintiff's injury to its own self, therefore **Plaintiff is barred from seeking relief for damages**.\n*   **Unclean Hands.** If the Plaintiff is giving falsified evidence or producing false witnesses, definitely invoke this defense.\n*   Plaintiff's complaint fails to allege whether or not the purported assignment was partial or complete and there is **no evidence that the purported assignment was bona fide**.\n*   **Plaintiff is not authorized or licensed to advertise or solicit**, either in print, by letter, in person or otherwise the right to collect or receive payment of a claim for another, nor to seek to make collection or obtain payment of a claim on behalf of another. The Complaint fails to allege any exception or exemption to these requirements. The Plaintiff is not any of the following: an attorney at law; a person regularly employed on a regular wage or salary in the capacity of credit men or a similar capacity, except as an independent contractor; a bank, including a trust department of a bank, a fiduciary or a financing and lending institution; a common carrier; a title insurer or abstract company while doing an escrow business; a licensed real estate broker; an employee of a licensee; nor a substation payment office employed by or serving as an independent contractor for public utilities.\n*   Defendant invokes the **Doctrine of Laches** as the Plaintiff or the person or entity that assigned the claim to the Plaintiff waited too long to file this lawsuit, making it difficult or impossible for the Defendant to find witnesses or evidence or that evidence necessary to provide for Defendant's defense has been lost or destroyed.\nThere are also a lot of affirmative defenses regarding a debt collection lawsuit that are absolutely useless that have been floating around for years. Here are some of them.\n_Please note: **WE ARE NOT ATTORNEYS**. If you are being sued, it's always a good idea to hire an attorney or get some legal assistance. If you cannot afford an attorney, a lot of people have handled their cases pro per or without a lawyer. Our articles are meant to provide basic information on handling litigation._ END