The realities of the legislation's potential impact is no laughing matter. The Washington Post reports that a doctor could be charged with wrongful death if he or she grants an abortion to a woman with a pregnancy complication, for instance.“[House Bill 1337] will require a woman, during one of the most devastating times in her life after learning of a fetal anomaly, to prolong her pregnancy even if against her wishes, and to potentially assume the greater health risks associated with doing so,” Indianapolis Ob/Gyn Brownsyne Tucker-Edmonds told The Washington Post.Those requirements might also compel women to hide information from their physicians in order to avoid having to make such difficult decisions, Hal Lawrence, chief executive of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, told The Post in explaining the group's opposition to the bill.So far, Indiana and North Dakota are the only two states that have enacted the controversial ban. Planned Parenthood in Indiana and the American Civil Liberties Union plan to take the contentious bill to court, the Associated Press reports.In the meantime, Periods for Pence will keep on dialing. In an interview with WRTV, Indianapolis' ABC News affiliate , the anonymous campaign founder said, "The more I read this bill, the more vague language I found and the more loopholes, and it just seemed incredibly intrusive. So I wanted to give a voice for women who really didn’t feel like they were given any kind of input into a bill that would affect our life so much."Judging by the media attention the collective voices and mounting social media presence are receiving, it might prove harder for the Indiana government to hang up on women's reproductive rights and long-term health.