In Daniel's case, a new trial was ordered because the first one lacked enough proof to reach a sentence. As for Paulino, the court changed his accusation to injuries based on "evident mistakes in the application of the law", therefore his sentence changed from 10 years in prison to 3 years in parole. 
Katika shauri laDaniel, uchunguzi mwingine uliagizwa kufanyika kwa kuwa ule wa kwanza ulikosa ushahidi wa kutosha ili kukamilisha hukumu.a. kama ilivyo kwa Paulino, mahakama ilibadilisha shitaka lake na kulifanya kuwa ni la kujeruhi kwa kuzingatia “makosa ya kiushahidi katika matumizi ya sheria”, hivyo hukumu yake ikabadilishwa kutoka miaka 10 gerezani hadi kifungo cha nje ya gereza kwa miaka 3.